Discussion about this post

User's avatar
your friendly BullsBlogger's avatar

AK is Shrugs MacKenzie

Expand full comment
Rich Karpinski's avatar

I have zero understanding how any of this is the Reinsdorfs' problem? Outside of a few teams like the Clippers, most teams operate within their cap constraints. This is not baseball where the Yankees payroll is $300 million and the Pirates $40 million. So that means for the Bulls -- just like every other NBA team -- franchise success is a function of front-office and coaching staff decisions, followed by player success or failure. Rinse and repeat, with urgency, until you get it right.

Billy has not shown he can coach this roster, as constructed. AKME have shown that outside of an interesting first year, they have zero urgency -- and at this point one would say ability -- to make moves in a transaction-heavy league to improve this team.

This concept of 'continuity' is atrocious in many ways -- most of all is that as supposedly knowledgeable basketball experts with all the inside, day-to-day knowledge and access we fans lack, you don't wait for things to play out in the standings year after year. You should KNOW what is working, what is not, what moves are available, and the associated risk/reward. And then you should ACT, proactively. I honestly can't think of another NBA front-office that operates as the Bulls do. It's gross malpractice.

Even if this team outplays expectations early this year, which I think they might, AKME have shown only that this will make them content, not itching to aggressively work to get to the next level. Which is just infuriating and discouraging.

Expand full comment
54 more comments...

No posts