Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dogfishhead's avatar

It says a lot about collective expectations that a 3-2 start is so jarring. I would like to be wrong about the long-term prospects of this team and would be happily wrong if I thought the individual defensive parts of this team did not amount to a mesh sieve.

But, as it stands the Bulls are currently 7th in defensive rating and, as the article cites, opponents are shooting 29% from 3 against them. If you think that's a consequence of pace (e.g. other teams' legs are weak, and our legs are Forrest Gump legs metaphorically breaking through material limitations), well, that's certainly a take. And it sounds like something Jim Boylen might mutter to himself in a spiritual trance after too much blended whiskey and shrimp cocktail that someone else paid for.

But, also: fuck it: "We don't run, we're done." - Billy D.

Expand full comment
d-noah's avatar

I'd agree there will be regression to the norm for this team in a few ways - they will shoot themselves out of more games and should have shot themselves out of this game if Orlando didn't give it away; their defense will suffer as teams get better targeting Giddey and Lavine; the Bulls pace will actually be counter productive and injury a bunch of guys who aren't sturdy enough to play this pace long term(Ball, Lavine, Williams).

In good news, let's please give Ayp the game ball. The stat sheet might not show it but he basically single handedly brought the Bulls back to life, and guarded Orlando well during those brutal no offense bench lineups when Orlando should have ate the Bulls for dinner.

Expand full comment
35 more comments...

No posts