Bulls blown out by Sixers
Sixers beat writer Marc Narducci on tonight's game:
The Sixers motor never stops and the Bulls don't appear to be playing with much conviction these days.
That sure was the appearance after the Sixers ran over Chicago, 121-99 on Wednesday, outscoring the Bulls, 30-2 in fastbreak points.
The Sixers most impressive trait is that they go hard virtually every night. Chicago meanwhile, which was coming off a big win on Tuesday over Atlanta, appeared lifeless.
For all the impressive traits of the Sixers, playing hard may be No. 1. Usually the first thing opposing scouts and players mention is how hard the Sixers go at it. And while it's difficult to look into an opponent's collective heart, the Bulls didn't look ready to compete.
Of course much of the blame goes to the Sixers, who came out with an aggressive style and never let up. The Sixers beat the Bulls three games to one this season and in the previous game they overcame an 18-point fourth quarter deficit to win in Chicago. This may be too simplistic, but it seems a case of the Sixers seemingly wanting it more than Chicago these last two games.
The Bulls are an example that talent doesn't always win in the NBA. The Bulls have some talented players, but the pieces seem oddly out of place. The Sixers on the other hand have been a selfless team, never caring about who scores. Against Chicago, the Sixers had 36 assists (including 18 by Andre Miller) and 12 turnovers.
The fact that the Sixers players aren't worried about who lights up the stat sheet is why their scoring is often balanced. Against the Bulls, eight players had eight or more points and five were in double figures, including three off the bench - Lou Williams, Rodney Carney and Thaddeus Young.
The Sixers have beaten a lot of teams lately with more talent (although Chicago doesn't fall in that category).
The key is playing together and right now, it's hard to find a more cohesive bunch than the Sixers and a more dispirited group than the Bulls.
This echoes the article I linked in the game thread, saying that the Sixers are the try-hardy non-stars that the Bulls once were.
But going over that comparison (look at their respective draft places, for one) isn't the point: merely that in these fading days of the season, merely trying can get you some cheap wins. It was usually the time where the Bulls surged towards the playoffs. Now they're the ones playing out the string, not really trying unless it's their turn to chuck up a shot.
One more loss to Atlanta on Friday and even the mouthpieces of the organization can say it's over. By this point, I can't wait.
0 recs |
220
comments
Comments
Ok so I'll bring it back to TT
by bullshooter on Mar 26, 2008 11:37 PM CDT 0 recs
has there been a reason recently?
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 12:07 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Drew Gooden
by rusty longley on
Mar 27, 2008 12:31 AM CDT
up
0 recs
always back to TT
by tyrus4prez on
Mar 27, 2008 8:36 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Did you forget an extra "negative"...
by tyger1147 on
Mar 27, 2008 9:15 AM CDT
up
0 recs
ironic, huh
by bullshooter on
Mar 27, 2008 11:37 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Sixers have been impressive recently ...
What pisses me off the most is that I still don't think the three teams ahead of us for the 8th spot (Atlanta, New Jersey, Indy freaking Ana) are better than us. They all suck.
If we actually fixed our pathetic attitudes and had just an average coach, we could've EASILY slid into that last playoff spot. Just being around .500 gets you a shot at home-court advantage this year in the East.
Unacceptable. We're tanking, but we're really not. We're trying to make the playoffs, but we're really not. How is this not the worst season ever in the history of the Bulls franchise?
by Orange Juice on Mar 26, 2008 11:43 PM CDT 0 recs
Something about the Sixers
Well, it's hard to look at that as an excuse when you see Andre Iguodala, who turned down a similar deal to what our guys were offered, kicking ass and taking names.
For that matter, they've got Louis Williams who's going to be an RFA too. And lets be honest about it, where do we rate Gordon vs. Louis Williams and Monta Ellis?
If you're going to take a look at an RFA undersized scorer, wouldn't you check out both of those guys before you'd look at Gordon?
by Sports2 on Mar 27, 2008 12:13 AM CDT 0 recs
Talk to me baby
Igoudala, Williams, and Miller just carved up the Bulls with dribble penetration until they drew a second defender. That help usually came from in and around the baseline and the now wide open Sixer players knew exactly where to go, THE RIM. I thought I was watching a college team defend against a pro team.
I'll give the Sixers most of the credit. They are the hottest team in the NBA right now. Since they fired Billy King and hired Ed Stefanski the team is like a whole new operation. More players see the court, Mo Cheeks has job security, Igoudala attacks the rim almost every time he touches the ball, previously hardly playing Rodney Carney comes in and knocks down his wide open shots, nobody seems to know Thaddeus Young is left handed, and I'm burying my face in my hands watching this.
Is Louis Williams better than Gordon? It appears so, but correct for the fact that Gordon is guarding Williams which means Lou is getting to any spot he wants to do further damage. I need to call my uncle, a Sixers fan, and ask him what he thinks. It has to be a helluva lot of fun to watch the Sixers right now.
When Deng and Igoudala both turned down extensions one of the things I thought might be good was if the teams traded for the other. AI to Chicago and Luol to Philly. You have to wonder if Billy King would have done that to maybe save his job.
I think Monta will look a lot worse in any other city other than San Francisco. His defense is worse than Gordon's, but he can do whatever he wants on offense inside Nellieball.
by NBA Observer on
Mar 27, 2008 3:31 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I'd also give some credit to the Bulls sucking
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 3:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Williams and Gordon
Ben shot a little better, rebounded a bit better, and is a slightly better defender (if you can believe that...but if you think about it Williams is even smaller).
Williams with the edge in assist and turnover numbers, as well as getting to the line.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 3:53 PM CDT
up
0 recs
of course, right now?
It's all relative though, I'm not sure Williams turns down $50m.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 3:57 PM CDT
up
0 recs
have you seen draft measurements on Williams
by NBA Observer on
Mar 27, 2008 4:38 PM CDT
up
0 recs
don't know
I'd guess Gordon has pretty long arms too.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 5:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
wait a minute
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 3:46 PM CDT
up
0 recs
For the two guys involved, yes.
Personally, my theory is just that the talent in the rest of the league just exceeded the Bulls' ability to play harder. I always thought the Bulls tradiontially got off to slow starts because their intensity could be more easily matched in the first half when opponents are fresher, healthier, and still motivated because the talent level was generally equal or in favor of the opponent. In the second half, the Bulls would maintain that same level of intensity, but opponents were now tired, injured, or out of the playoff picture and talent would succumb to harder play. This year the first half has become the whole season.
by messwiththebull on
Mar 28, 2008 8:29 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I wasn't really passing on the excuses validity
by Sports2 on
Mar 28, 2008 8:32 AM CDT
up
0 recs
It's like using a time machine
Thank God the rest of the NBA has been amazing this year, I would have gone clinically insane by now.
by rusty longley on Mar 27, 2008 12:29 AM CDT 0 recs
Get ready for your '12 Sixers!
Be more reasonable, the Bulls are way ahead of the Sixers at this point.
by YaoPau on
Mar 27, 2008 11:10 AM CDT
up
0 recs
One thing i dont get is
by eross226 on Mar 27, 2008 12:36 AM CDT 0 recs
they don't go to the hot hand
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 9:57 AM CDT
up
0 recs
if you watched the game
by danger mouse on
Mar 27, 2008 2:38 PM CDT
up
0 recs
more screaming at the TV
by NBA Observer on
Mar 27, 2008 3:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I didn't get
They have only won the 2nd part of a back-to-back 3 times this season, so last night's loss was expected. But I didn't think they would completely lay an egg. How do you go from 31 points one night to 0 points the next?? Dang, I don't think anyone was expecting 31 again, but at least give me 12-15. Not to pick on Gooden, but his last two games have been a microcosm of the Bulls play all season long.
In case anyone hasn't realized it yet, this team has mentally checked out. Inconsistency has been the M.O. all season long. Everyone has zoned out (players and coaches) and they're ready for the season to end. NOW they finally know how us fans feel...just get it over with!
by NormVanBeer on Mar 27, 2008 8:45 AM CDT 0 recs
Was i seeing it right last night
They seem to be a team with a few players who thrive on taking you off the dribble--Iggy and Louis Williams get to the basket at will against Deng and Gordon/Hinrich.
I can see the comparison to last year's Bulls in terms of energetic team play, but they look to me like a completely differently constructed team--good, quick ball handlers vs. stand-around jump-shooters.
by alec on Mar 27, 2008 8:48 AM CDT 0 recs
completely agree
If the sixers are smart about keeping lou williams and having him learn the finer points of handling the team from andre miller, and they keep iggy, their upside is way higher than the bulls' ever was. They really are just time and a decent post scorer away from being eastern contenders.
by kig on
Mar 27, 2008 9:03 AM CDT
up
0 recs
let's not get ahead of ourselves
by bullshooter on
Mar 27, 2008 11:42 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Ben Gordon
by Yibs on Mar 27, 2008 9:00 AM CDT 0 recs
I forgot to mention
by Yibs on
Mar 27, 2008 9:02 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Spot on.
Noah +7,7
Thomas +4,8
Thabo +3,9
Kirk +2,2
Noc +1,2
Hughes +1,1
Duh -0,7
Gooden -1,6
Deng -2,9
BG -8,7!!
KC Johnson thought Kirk had been the worst player on the Bulls this year. What an idiot. Can't take him seriously after that. It's clearly BG.
Wonder if somebody is regretting not signing some contracts... Neither should make that amount for their entire careers anyway.
I would keep Duhon over both BG and Hughes, but due to the contract that's not gonna happen. no way does Cheapo Jerry buy him out. Hell, he doesn't even bother paying for a proper GM or coach. Imagine if he had resigned Phil in `98! He SHOULD have a Jerry Sloan thing going in Chicago if Cheapo wasn't all about the green.
Enough with the rambling... Im thru
by Bass on
Mar 27, 2008 9:16 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I forgot Gray
Making our RFA's the worst on the team in this category. Thank you for not signing, guys! ;)
by Bass on
Mar 27, 2008 9:24 AM CDT
up
0 recs
those aren't even correct
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 9:36 AM CDT
up
0 recs
bah I was looking at a different page
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 9:37 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I understand you find it hard to take in
I said specifically in THIS statistical category but of course you conveniently choose to ignore that.
To further clarify (since that obviously is needed with you) I do not think that Deng is the second worst player on the team. I do however believe (and the stats vehemently support this) that BG has had the most profound negative influence on Bulls play this year. Although that may just be because Boylan doesn't show up in the statsheet... ;)
by Bass on
Mar 27, 2008 9:52 AM CDT
up
0 recs
It might also be fair to say that, if anything,
by alec on
Mar 27, 2008 9:56 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Good point :)
But it's not like Matt is the only one being suckered by BG's "Sweet-shooting" "high production". The announcers at the Philly game introduced BG as "sixth man extraordinaire"... (Barf!)
by Bass on
Mar 27, 2008 10:32 AM CDT
up
0 recs
true to the point
by Yibs on
Mar 27, 2008 11:08 AM CDT
up
0 recs
that makes Gordon look even worse on defense
by Parrotman on
Mar 27, 2008 10:37 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Did you see BG
by sue369 on
Mar 27, 2008 11:06 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Deng and Gordon
by Parrotman on
Mar 27, 2008 10:09 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Unfortunately game-streaming for me has
by Bass on
Mar 27, 2008 10:56 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Phil didn't leave due to money........
Krause was really pushing for Floyd to come in before the 97-98 season, but JR knew if that happened, Michael would retire (again) in a heartbeat. He didn't want to pass on a chance for at least one more title. (Hell, I still think the Bulls could have won in '99. Remember, Pippen missed 35 games at the start of the year and the Bulls still finished 62-20, tied for the best record in the league)
Remember, after Jackson was signed at the start of the season, Krause made the comment "Phil Jackson has been signed on as coach for the upcoming season, it will BE HIS LAST as head coach of the Chicago Bulls!"
by BullsAttitude on
Mar 27, 2008 12:30 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Don't forget Hughes is also eating Thabo's minutes
by shoryuken on
Mar 27, 2008 9:18 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I throw up
by sue369 on
Mar 27, 2008 9:44 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I just get that feeling when i see hughes
I liked thabo starting, and i liked ben gordon coming off the bench for instant offense. I actually wouldnt mind gordon starting and thabo coming off the bench to relieve gordons short comings (no pun intended), i dont like hughes as nothing more then a reserve. If i were coaching i would tell hughes straight up, drive, slash, and dont take a shot that is not within 10 feet of the basket, because he seems to be able to get the line alot better then anyone else.
by piccolomair on
Mar 27, 2008 12:28 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Great article
If every one sees that, why Boylan doesn't? What a stupid coach!!!
I HATE BOYLAN... AND HUGHES
by bull83 on Mar 27, 2008 9:03 AM CDT 0 recs
Regarding "I hate ... Hughes"
I'm ready to go back to starting Thabo & Kirk - make Hughes the 3rd or 4th guard on the team.
by mdmnd9294 on Mar 27, 2008 9:32 AM CDT 0 recs
It was wishful thinking that he'd go back
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 9:39 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Plus, I don't think I've ever seen
by alec on
Mar 27, 2008 9:53 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I resemble that comment
by bullshooter on
Mar 27, 2008 11:48 AM CDT
up
0 recs
look no
by leeac on
Mar 27, 2008 5:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
We're spoiled with Pippen and Jordan
I sure hope so.
by NBA Observer on
Mar 27, 2008 5:50 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Excellent point
by California Al on
Mar 27, 2008 12:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Not to mention with Hughes,
by wjb1492 on
Mar 27, 2008 1:19 PM CDT
up
0 recs
In my mind
by sue369 on
Mar 27, 2008 9:47 AM CDT
up
0 recs
the one positive part of the Boylan era
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Mar 27, 2008 9:55 AM CDT
up
0 recs
That, and he's awakened
by alec on
Mar 27, 2008 10:01 AM CDT
up
0 recs
And don't forget how he
by wjb1492 on
Mar 27, 2008 10:17 AM CDT
up
0 recs
"Unearthed"
by Bass on
Mar 27, 2008 10:05 AM CDT
up
0 recs
he only unearthed him
by Jaina on
Mar 27, 2008 10:10 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Actually he started
by sue369 on
Mar 27, 2008 11:15 AM CDT
up
0 recs
not really
he only really had that one 26 minute game, and given tt's jerking around, it could easily have been a one time thing if kirk hadn't been injured in that game immediately following it.
by Jaina on
Mar 27, 2008 12:06 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Considering he
by sue369 on
Mar 27, 2008 1:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
again, not true
he did have 1 game where it says 0 min, but other than that, boylan did match his season low in minutes (2) on one of the occasions. skiles played him only 2 minutes twice. most nights he played at LEAST 5 minutes, hitting 14+ minutes 10 times, 20+ minutes 4 times.
by Jaina on
Mar 27, 2008 1:34 PM CDT
up
0 recs
to add
by Jaina on
Mar 27, 2008 1:35 PM CDT
up
0 recs
and
but now i was just refuting the point that boylan was really playing him any more than skiles was.
by Jaina on
Mar 27, 2008 1:40 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I was mostly going by
In Dec. there were 12 games in which all four guards played in the same game. Thabo had 81 minutes in those 12 games for 6.75 min. average for those games.
In Jan. under Boylan there were 7 games in which all four guards played in the same game. Thabo had 97 minutes in those 7 games for 13.8 min. average for those games.
I guess we disagree on when he gained his confidence.
by sue369 on
Mar 27, 2008 3:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
he didn't
and he still had quite a few 0 pters in there (4, 5 if you count the Myers interim game) in his first games after skiles. 4/5 if you don't count the spurs game, 5/6 if you do. even the game where he played 26 minutes he only scored 2 pts. next game 9, next 17. that 9 had matched his season high back in november. his other stats (assists, rebounds) weren't better than anything he had done all season, either. no confidence until his 17 pt/6 reb game in his 2nd start. followed that up with 9/8, and then a double double with 12 pts 13 rebounds.
his minutes may have increased slightly in his dec vs initial boylan games, but his stats didn't until he got into the starting lineup. confidence? he hadn't taken more than 5 shots since november before, when? his 2nd start, the 17 point game. seems like that's when he gained his confidence, to me.
by Jaina on
Mar 27, 2008 3:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs

