Noc and Thabo for Nets Garbage?
[From the diaries. This scenario isn't very plausible since it's such a bad deal from the Bulls standpoint, but it's better than hearing that Nocioni's untouchable. -Matt]
Can you say "Salary dump"?
According to league sources, the Bulls have discussed sending rugged forward Andres Nocioni and second-year guard Thabo Sefolosha to the Nets for Bostjan Nachbar, Marcus Williams, Antoine Wright and Jamaal Magloire. There might be other parts in the proposed deal.The Bulls have been talking to several teams. Their first choice would be to use Nocioni in a package for Memphis big man Pau Gasol, but they're keeping their options open. The Nets, who lost in Sacramento Tuesday night, 128-94, were rebuffed in their advances for Gasol.
If the Bulls-Nets trade goes through, it will clear money for Chicago and put the Nets over the luxury-tax threshold. The Nets have tried to avoid that, but Nocioni, who signed a five-year $37.5 million deal over the summer, would give them a needed dimension.
I'm not at all averse to moving Noc and in the grand scheme of things he's overpaid, but I'm not seeing much purpose to this deal when it comes to any sort of long range plan, short of a complete blow up of the team.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
0 recs |
112 comments
Comments
This doesn't sound like a deal
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 8:31 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This has to be internet rumors
Second, if MANAGEMENT does think Noce is overpaid then a salary dump make sense if they don't see him in there long term plans, but don't give away two tradeable assets for another small gaurd and trash.
Finally, if for some reason this trade goes down. It would have to be part of a bigger deal because standing alone this trade would confuse the crap out of me.
by Jesse07 on Jan 23, 2008 8:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
eh?
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 8:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Bulls would be giving up the two best players
by BNeL21 on Jan 23, 2008 8:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Can't see the Nets doing this either.
by upther on Jan 23, 2008 8:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Marcus Williams makes is the heir apparent?
by Sports2 on Jan 23, 2008 9:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Body Fat was already a red flag
Trying to squeeze in a little playing time between injuries on the one hand and playing behind Kidd on the other (Hall of Fame lock Kidd is averaging 37 minutes, exactly his career average), it's pretty hard to judge his progress, if any.
What gives this idea credence is that the Bulls really have two ways they can go in the trade market. One is to go for an established guy (Gasol, in this example), who is unhappy, and costs his small market team too much money while simultaneously having somehow alienated the home fans.
Going for a guy like Williams is the other trade avenue open to the Bulls. Williams is a supposed high talent (which the Bulls desperately need) who has been buried behind a superstar, which might lead to his being available at somewhat below his true value.
The biggest question about this trade is whether Williams is a better "pure" point guard than Duhon. It's a big risk. We just don't have enough data to make an absolute assessment. Is his shooting really as bad as Duhon's?
If he's not a huge upgrade over what we have, it makes no sense to give up our best bargaining chip to get him...and make no mistake, in this era of "energy," Nocioni is the one player on our roster that every GM salivates for.
He's the one player other GM's believe might be the catalyst to turn their underperforming club into the upper echelon team they believe their collective talent implies.
So what if he hasn't done it for the Bulls. I'm pretty sure around the league the Bulls are considered too dysfunctional for any one, two or even three players to significantly impact.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 9:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He didn't measure well
Add to that a fairly woeful display of shooting so far, and I'm really not seeing the attraction.
As a prospect, he's right around Frank Williams or Mateen Cleeves in my book. He's a heck of a lot closer to them than a guy he was strangely compared to- Deron Williams, who's a heck of an athlete with a chisled body and a great head on top of it. I can't think of ANY successful (in the NBA) guys with his build, skillset and mindset. Add poor shooting, questionable desire and conditioning, and felony charges, and he's got major issues. He's the sort of guy who merits a second round pick, if that, a year and a half in the league.
I don't disagree with the idea that getting a sleeper that's not being used on another team (at the expense of one of our "ready to contribute" guys is something the Bulls should look at.
But this dude is absolute garbage as a prospect, and at the end of the day, the "can the guy play" issue trumps the "is this the right kind of trade" issue.
For a trade that might make some pretty good sense, I heard last night that Ric Bucher was saying the Bulls and Blazers might be talking trade. One guy I'd love to get my hands on would be Rudy Fernandez, who the Blazers picked 24th last year I think, and who's scoring 20ppg in the ACB Spanish league. He's 6'5"/6'6", can fill it up, and has a heck of a handle. Think Jamal Crawford or Larry Hughes, but with a very good basketball IQ instead of a crummy one.
He's not going to do the Blazers anything with Brandon Roy there, and the Blazers might be the sort of team who would take a guy we don't want to pay (Gordon?) and/or we regret paying (Wallace).
Sorry for the tangent, but the point is, above all the Bulls need a hit. Marcus Williams and those other clowns aren't.
by Sports2 on Jan 23, 2008 10:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe this report from Jonathan Givony
But I think we agree that the Bulls need to take a significant risk if they want to escape thier current doldrums. Maybe taht risk is for a guy like Fernandez. I know the euro-press has loved him for a cuople of years.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 10:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, we agree, just not on M Will
In short, he got a great review because he was playing against poor competition.
by Sports2 on Jan 23, 2008 11:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea of Gordon for Rudy Fernandez.
With Fernandez on board, it would make sense to go after his Spanish national team mate Pau Gasol. This would give the Bulls a revised, and I believe, much-upgraded core.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 11:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
gah
Besides, Gordon is an upcoming restricted FA, Portland would rather have the guy who's yet to start his rookie contract, considering all the young guys they have to pay.
And I don't get why having Fernandez/Thabo is great shakes, while Portland can't fit Fernandez/Roy together.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 11:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What's the deal that Bucher
I wouldn't mind getting Fernandez and Gasol. I'm sure you've read plenty about Rudy. I remember reading comments out of europe where they were laughing at us for how low we kept putting him in our mock drafts.
Also, if he's the gateway to Gasol, I'd say it warrents a little extra risk to get him.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 11:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Garbage
by BNeL21 on Jan 23, 2008 8:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
only if it was all at once
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 9:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right
by BNeL21 on Jan 23, 2008 9:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
by BNeL21 on Jan 23, 2008 9:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's a follow-up blog post
http://njmg.typepad.com/zzone/2008/01/bull-market.html
Not much additional info, though.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 9:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't mind giving up on Sefolosha
by hscs on Jan 23, 2008 9:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Noc is my favorite Bull....
by SlickRick76 on Jan 23, 2008 9:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ha
by tyrus4prez on Jan 23, 2008 9:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
in theory, sure
If this was done to get out of Wallace's contract, I'd be more receptive.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 9:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno
by hscs on Jan 23, 2008 10:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That surprises me, but Sam
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 10:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Funny
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
right
I think teams still can believe in 'tough guy' acquisitions though, hopefully. If not now then in the offseason when Noc's BYC status goes away.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 10:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
here we go again
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it's relevant
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 11:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Joe Smith is the actual block
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 11:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well one problem
and while Noc may be happy with reduced minutes, they're paying him the same whether he plays 20 or 35. I'd rather have the shorter/cheaper obligation to Smith. Smith's also better at basketball.
Smith could (should) be dealt soon though, and it's a similar solution. I wouldn't say he's more of a block.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 11:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
...and Noc's other role,
At least one of them, and probably two, have got to go.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 11:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wow
Hinrich's not going to the bench if he hasn't already. He's a $10m/year point guard, which means starter.
I don't like pigeonholing guys as bench players as some marketable skill anyway (if nobody's figured that out given my stance on Gordon), it's a place for players who just aren't that good, especially on a team this bad.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 11:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure you're right about the actuality.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 11:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ideally
by hscs on Jan 23, 2008 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He's either an above-average back-up
However, if what you're suggesting is that the team has more pressing needs, I agree with you.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 11:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
actually
by hscs on Jan 23, 2008 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he's in-between
06-07 = above-average
+
07-08 = belove-average
=
average player
news of the day right there!
by ScottieCartwright on Jan 23, 2008 12:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you're kidding, right?
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 10:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
nope
I really don't mind giving up on Sefolosha. He was supposed to be ready to contribute as a defender, and efficient-but-not-prolific offensive player. I don't take it as much of a loss, and the 5 year mistake gets fixed.
by hscs on Jan 23, 2008 10:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with ya on Sefolosha
Maybe I'm like Pax and over-value these guys, but I do think other teams would be interested. Just keep reminding them that Phoenix likes him and they never ever make a personnel mistake.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 10:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do I always see the opposite from you guys?
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 10:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe because I have no idea what
See the forest for the trees, man: Thabo's 23 and has produced two sub-10 PERs. Tyrus is 21 and had PERs of 14.9 and 13.4(not that such a number is great). Yes, Thabo's PER doesn't show that he is a better defender (although I'll always take the shotblocker over the 'stopper') but he has to get a lot better offensively to be a rotation player.
If you just want to talk ppg, right now per-40 he's at 11/8/3, so 16/5/5 seems a ways away.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 11:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As the guy who advocates
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 11:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You know what's ridiculous?
Wow. I just "crunched the numbers," and they're very, very similar. You won't believe it because you don't want to, but you won't look for yourself. Stay in your hole of ignorance.
by tyger1147 on Jan 23, 2008 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Per 36 minute comparisons
FG% 45.8 46
Pts 11.2 11.3
Reb 7.1 8.5
Ast 3.3 1.8
TO 2.1 1.8
Stl 2.1 1.2
Fou l 3.4 4.5
Blk 0 1.7
A actually got 29.5 mpg and B got 26.8 mpg. Quick, which won has proven himself and which one has blown his chance?
by tyger1147 on Jan 23, 2008 12:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice grammatical error there.
by tyger1147 on Jan 23, 2008 12:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are those the numbers as starters?
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 2:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is one I actually don't get either.
by Scotter on Jan 23, 2008 11:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't want Thabo given away
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This seems to be somewhat remedied.
by tyger1147 on Jan 23, 2008 11:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This also
I could see us dumping Cap'n Kirk, but not Noc....I think Pax and co want to light a fire in Memphis to make the Gasol for Noc and parts trade.....and with Memphis taking it easy despite losing, Chicago wants to force the issue before our season is completely over.
I'd hate to see Noc go, but I do think Gasol is a vital piece of what we're missing. Having him with Wallace/Smith/Noah/Tyrus will give us a formiddable frontcourt, and I think at least Gordon's coming back into form of late, so our guards aren't awful (come back to play Kirk, remember that at one point for 4 years in the league you were pretty good)....
by majoyenrac on Jan 23, 2008 10:05 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
LOL
By and large, I think Noc is slightly overpaid, but he's certainly not grossly unproductive salary (a la Wallace). Given that the Bulls appear to have really soured on Tyrus and Deng is a continual injury, I'm not sure he's a player we just want to dump. Again, I might for a guy that I thought was a really nice prospect might get it done, but I don't see a "vision for the future" when I see things like including talk of salary dumps and very marginal prospects.
by Sports2 on Jan 23, 2008 10:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a message that...
by majoyenrac on Jan 23, 2008 10:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Memphis doesn't believe the Bulls would
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 10:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
don't like it
I'm all for trading Noce to get something back in return, but this one is a stinker.
Someone else who can't believe that the Gasol deal hangs on Paxson's unwillingness (stupidity) to not include Noce
by ScottieCartwright on Jan 23, 2008 10:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Has to be part of a bigger trade
by RogersPark Kris on Jan 23, 2008 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I literally can't believe it
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 10:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather see
by sue369 on Jan 23, 2008 10:46 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Paxson better not make this trade
by armstrong2389 on Jan 23, 2008 11:02 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Two things...
(2) How does the proposed NJ trade help the Bulls? The players we are getting in return are dregs. I don't get it.
by 1958ChiTown on Jan 23, 2008 11:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I was shocked by this proposal
by chgobr on Jan 23, 2008 12:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If that's your present state of mind,
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 12:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well then I'd want Pax and Co to admit
This trade would help them win zero games. In fact, they would be worse.
by RogersPark Kris on Jan 23, 2008 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I appreciate the preventive medicine suggestion
by chgobr on Jan 23, 2008 12:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
P.S. I hope the Bulls' players
It would ensure a loss tonight. :)
by 1958ChiTown on Jan 23, 2008 12:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ha!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 12:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So you heard him
http://stations.espn.go.com/stations/espnradio1000/sectional?id=showpodcasts
by KT on Jan 23, 2008 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't get
by Rusty LaRue on Jan 23, 2008 1:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
New Jersey sucks this year.
I keep reading that they want to move Vince Carter in the worst way. Thabo might be the player they really are looking at in this deal. A defense-first off-guard/small forward would allow them to look for a big in any Carter deal.
I'm not saying there's actually anything to this so-called report, but there are ways to make it make sense.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 1:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Jersey keeps Kidd
Noc is small, but with a guard who's a fabulous passer (which will give Noc open looks) and a great rebounding guard, solid defender, Noc could thrive....maybe not Lebron thrive, but you get my gist.
Plus his gritty play might rub off on Mr. Lax himself (Vince Carter).
I think Noc would be a great fit for the Nets, or Suns for that matter.....
by majoyenrac on Jan 23, 2008 1:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
crossing my fingers that this is just a rumor
by Conor on Jan 23, 2008 12:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I definitely would take Nachbar and M Williams for
by chgobr on Jan 23, 2008 12:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it's not a trade
by hscs on Jan 23, 2008 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't speak ill of the dead.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 12:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Pax might want to look into this
by Big D on Jan 23, 2008 1:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics:
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 1:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's obviously bullshit
by Big D on Jan 23, 2008 12:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
only cans with strings
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 1:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
heh
or mongererers, the intertube goblins that keep Pax from making trades.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 1:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Matt, just lookin' out for you.
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 1:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tne Nets aren't going to make this deal either.
And let's not distort the balance in this rumored trade any further: our guys aren't that marketable for a reason. That's what happens when you hold onto "assets" too long and allow their production to betray their promise. Antoine Wright would probably be the second best guard on the Bulls team, and most likely a starter. Marcus Williams would become the best pure point guard on the Bulls. He's chubby and hasn't played much, but he has shown good court vision, play-making instincts, and the ability to make his teammates better/get them easy buckets. To my knowledge, no current Bulls guard can do these things. Noce is a slow three who is most effective playing the four. Thabo has played the basketball of his NBA career over the past two weeks. The deal isn't what I'd consider to be attractive, but I doubt NJ fans are screaming for this to go through, either.
by messwiththebull on Jan 23, 2008 1:03 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
by Rusty LaRue on Jan 23, 2008 1:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gee, what a surprise.
He might also have agreed with the following posts:
"Bulls Can't Win! Ever!"
"No Answer on This Roster!"
"Noah Can't Play: Fact!"
"PER = Pathetic Excuse of a Roster!"
"A Big Fat Dose of Unfounded Fatalism: Fact!"
"Bulls Doo-Doo Bad Bad"
by 1958ChiTown on Jan 23, 2008 1:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As usual
by Rusty LaRue on Jan 23, 2008 7:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wright has an 8.6 PER
by hscs on Jan 23, 2008 1:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And he wouldn't get to play against the Bulls
by Big D on Jan 23, 2008 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This Deal
by Name4Sale on Jan 23, 2008 1:15 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
well really
But I understand your point....
I'd love to cap the players, coaches, mgmt salaries at some level and use the rest of the money that the cities provide to go back to help the schools/city themselves.....this goes for all sports....
But that said, I still love and support the NBA.
by majoyenrac on Jan 23, 2008 1:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If you give up Noc and Sefo
by hhi on Jan 23, 2008 1:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
A-Drain, Thomas, Veektor, Nichols
by hscs on Jan 23, 2008 1:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you have the deets on Deng?
by alec on Jan 23, 2008 1:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
This trade makes no sense for either team
Somebody big must be on the move. Please be Kirk and fillers for Kidd. fingers crossed
I'd rather trade Deng than Nocioni. Nocioni is 8.5 mil per we know. Deng turned down 10+ mil per. Is Deng really going to give you that much more 38 minute production over Nocioni?
by NBA Observer on Jan 23, 2008 1:36 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Deng
YES
by ScottieCartwright on Jan 23, 2008 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
HUH???
by Name4Sale on Jan 23, 2008 2:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Who said I wanted Kidd to score?
by NBA Observer on Jan 23, 2008 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Horsesh*t idea of a trade
Thabo looks very good to me. Not sure how many posters here go back to the pre-title days, but Pip was definitely a diamond in the rough. Not much of a shot, very poor mental lapses, not to mention the migraines, contract issues, etc. But when a guy has that length and handles like a guard, and plays great D with flashes of offence, you don't give him away. Pippen became twice the player he was his first two years. Noc would be a sensational asset for a good team, just the kind of guy you want coming off the bench. There's a good trade out there for Noc. Unless this is part of a grand scheme that unbfolds later, I don't like it.
Let's cut Pax a little slack; this is the first time he's been in this spot. The program was right on track and looked like it only needed tweaking. The personnel moves were consistent with what he and Skiles were doing; turned out that what they were doing had run its course. All of a sudden, the coach failed, the core failed, Kirk and Lu have lingering injuries, and our only hope is if the rookies and sophs reach their potential immediately. Who foresaw all of this happening right out of the gate? Nobody! Otherwise, the posts here would be discussing the progress of a team that everyone knew was crap instead of reflecting everyone's anger and disappointment at underachieving.
Re the Kwame deal, you obviously didn't see the Phoenix game; the stiff turned the ball over on 6 straight plays. I mean, think of the worst 6 plays you ever saw Chandler and Wallace combined make, and condense them into a 3 minute highlight film. Now wrap that kind of play with the intangibles that make a 7' tall multi-million dollar athlete take a fans birthday cake and hit him in the face with it, and you have a very accurate picture of Kwame. Careful what you wish for.
by California Al on Jan 23, 2008 2:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Kwame doesn't have to play a minute
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2008 2:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hear you on that
by California Al on Jan 23, 2008 3:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In fact
I like it, he and Radmo for Big Ben.....never thought I'd say that, but this year it's true.
Wallace will and could be a vital piece to get the Lakers a very solid shot at a title, he can still turn it on if he needs to, he just ain't inspired by our group and can't turn it on for 82 games....
I don't want someone coasting by on our team, much as I've liked Big Ben in the past, why keep him 2 more years if his effort ain't there when we may have a chance to deal him for at least $9M of cap room next year, and an overpaid, older Khryapa who at least at some point in his career showed he could be ok (that 2004-2005 Sonics club)....maybe the triangle offense ain't for him, or maybe he just looked good on a bad SOnics team that played out of their minds for 1 season (a la, but to a lessser degree than the 2005 White Sox--this ought to get me some messages, I know, but it's true...).
by majoyenrac on Jan 23, 2008 3:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
khryapa played for Portland
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 3:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh I know he did, he started 50 some games
by majoyenrac on Jan 23, 2008 9:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe i read that wrong.
by bullshooter on Jan 23, 2008 10:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And we haven't run the triangle in about 10 years.
by CrashDavis on Jan 23, 2008 4:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe
by fundamentallysound on Jan 23, 2008 5:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 












