Ol' slowhand rears his calm head
Oh, right, the two best players on the team aren't signed to extensions yet. With a month to go:
Paxson's stance is that the team should get a salary discount on any extension agreed to now, given that the Bulls are offering long-term security for the players a year earlier than necessary.
''If we sign these guys to an extension, and this season they go out and have some catastrophic injury, they're still getting the money,'' Paxson said. ''I try to make it sound logical, but I don't know if it comes across that way. It's an extension; we feel like it's the one time in a contract negotiation that, for the security that they're going to get, we should get something in return. That doesn't mean that we're not going to talk about a great contract, because we are. But what I've found and learned through Kirk's deal last year is that we still have a month, which is a long time. When that deadline starts approaching, maybe something gets done. It's very easy for fans to sit back, even players, and say, 'Well, they should just do this.' I was a player. But I have great appreciation for this now being in this chair that it's a business.''
Hey, that's what I've been saying: they should just do this. Pax has rightfully labeled me as an impatient amateur, curse his handsome self.
If extensions aren't signed, I'm not as much concerned over the effect it'd have on each player, since I honestly don't think the players care that much who pays them. Any talk of being slighted or underappreciated will mean nothing if they just get the money from somebody, Pax or not. Their feelings won't be irreparably hurt if they don't get 'shown love' this season to where they wouldn't take an extension later.
But, dramatically more important, it'll have an effect on me, reading all season about Gordon and Deng's 'contract year' and each doing the Chauncey Billups "Gee it'd be nice to play in [insert opponent's team's city here]" bullshit. I don't think I can take it.
I said last month it seems like Deng's assured his place, while Gordon's is still iffy. But then you see a quote from Skiles' today singling out how great a summer Gordon had. I have to guess that all parties involved believe that the Bulls are committed to both players long-term, and thus will get extensions.
(Unless he's really not sure this core is enough, and wouldn't mind holding out on either and banking on a spectacular sign/trade deal next offseason. But that's far riskier proposition than a Chris Kaman scenario with these two. Even if Gordon and Deng get signed now and don't perform quite to the level they promise, they're both young enough to still be attractive trade assets.)
Pax downplays the problem of waiting, but why not save that future money? There's been preemptive hemming and/or hawing over the luxury tax already this offseason, and getting these deals done now (and therefore cheaper than next offseason) is the best way to manage your tax.
So I'll just take this Paxtalk as part of the wonderful world of contract negotiations. He's not going to say 'we can't lose these guys, no way'. Hurts the leverage. And apparently that means more to him than hurting my sanity. So here's to a month of back-and-forth through the media: crud.
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
I think a deal will get done
by KT on
Oct 1, 2007 6:30 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
But the good news is...
I'm hoping this month isn't as bad as waiting on Kirk last year, just because we know how Pax intends to go about the process. I'd rather have things done now, too, but I don't think I'll freak out as bad this year when the "don't expect anything to get done" line starts creeping out.
by wjb1492 on
Oct 1, 2007 9:50 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ben has said
Only 8 more days til a preseason game. :)
by sue369 on
Oct 1, 2007 10:06 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Players seem
by Option27 on
Oct 1, 2007 11:23 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
One thing to remember...
Speaking of which, I hope $110 million for 6 years for Rashard Lewis doesn't play a big role in negotiations, especially with Deng. That contract was just stupid. The Bulls overpaid for Tyson a couple of years ago because the 76ers gave a bonehead contract to Samuel Dalembert. I like the neighborhood of Chauncey Billups contract, 5 years, $60 million for each of these guys. I would think Deng would be a little higher.
by MMP on
Oct 1, 2007 10:45 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
big offers
Charlotte, Atlanta, Philly, maybe Seattle...and all those teams have their own FAs to worry about.
Maybe M-Jeff will make a big offer to his protege Gordon, heh.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Oct 1, 2007 10:51 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Regarding this post
Most interesting part of the article is the trade proposal Mike Mcgraw thinks up, which to me makes perfect sense . . . .
From the article . .
If Bryant trade talks ever become legitimate, here are a few things the Bulls aren't likely to do: Include Deng with Gordon in any trade, pay a hefty amount of luxury tax or even give up Thomas or Noah, since they'd have no means to replace the young big men.
There are combinations that meet the criteria and work under salary-cap rules if Bryant waived his trade kicker. The Bulls would need to add another large contract (like Andres Nocioni's) to avoid the luxury tax, since Ben Wallace is unlikely to leave.
Gordon, Nocioni, Thabo Sefolosha, Joe Smith, plus first-round picks galore, for example, could be done after Dec. 15. Not great for the Lakers, sure, but an argument could be made that it's better than what Minnesota received for Garnett.
by Option27 on
Oct 1, 2007 11:36 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
that is a crap package for L.A.
Paxson may be holding out on Gordon for that very long longshot.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Oct 1, 2007 11:41 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nocioni's a BYC contract this year as well
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Oct 1, 2007 12:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It is crappy for LA
by Option27 on
Oct 1, 2007 12:31 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
All this talk about Deng and Gordon
by bullshooter on
Oct 1, 2007 11:48 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good point
by cubbybear on
Oct 1, 2007 5:08 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Anyone else
by sue369 on
Oct 1, 2007 6:41 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll see it later
I read that it was on men's health. I wondered why they wanted BG.
by KT on
Oct 1, 2007 7:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It is
by sue369 on
Oct 1, 2007 8:09 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that's it?
by KT on
Oct 1, 2007 8:41 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep,
by sue369 on
Oct 1, 2007 8:47 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
thank Skiles
by KT on
Oct 1, 2007 10:32 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Critical
As for the other, secondary, points being made here. I would believe that Deng and Gordon almost have to be signed. Paxson went out of his way to sign a lesser player in Nocioni. If one or, dear god, both of The Two were not resigned, I would have to assume that Paxson is confident about making a better deal next summer. Given his trading acumen, that would still allow me to hold out hope.
By the way, thanks Matt for the title. That sent me all the way back to the old site when my nom de plume was the lame "Tom" and not the bitchin' hijacking of a ZuangZian character study.
by CookDing on
Oct 2, 2007 9:39 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
yup. both of them have to be signed
by brianmita on
Oct 2, 2007 8:12 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














