Standing Pax
TYI correctly jabs back at TrueHoop's one-liner regarding the 'wasting everyone's time' nature of a lesser offer for Kobe (specifically, John Jackson's take):
Meanwhile, the Lakers are facing a star with a no-trade clause who will only allow himself to be traded to a handful of teams, none of which can offer a player in return who's the caliber of Ben Gordon. It's an uncomfortable situation, one that seems to be trending toward intolerable. Patience is a virtue that we can definitely afford.
It's a whole different subject as far as the timeline the Bulls should be looking at, (I think the Bulls should be a little more pro-active and make a run with Wallace, not worry already about 'replacing' him) but I think the important reason for patience is that this team is just one player away as is. Taking a shot at Kobe or KG or Gasol while gutting the team isn't worth it because then the team is still one move away. Perhaps closer in the big picture (it's easier to replace a Hinrich than a Bryant, for instance) but not by that much.
The Bulls only make these trades if it's the last addition for a title run. Disgruntled 'stars' are made available for a reason, and usually traded for lesser talent for that very same reason. A lot of time it's that 'time-wasting' offer that gets accepted, simply because they're better than the rest.
I'd trade Gordon pretty much only if it was in a deal for Kobe, Tyrus only if for Gasol. I don't trade two of Hinrich/Deng/Gordon/Tyrus for anyone. Add either star player while keeping nearly all of the rest, don't take apart too much of this very good team for another version of a very good team. If there's one big move (I don't mean some other sign/trade with Noc or Duh) to be made, make sure it puts the team ready to win the title this year.
It may be too much to ask, but that's what Pax should want. Have your cake and eat it too, because what the hell else would you do with the cake?
0 recs |
95 comments
Comments
Listen to it, of course!
by cubbybear on Jun 19, 2007 11:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
good answer
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 19, 2007 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i tend to agree
tier 1
Gordon
Hinrich
Deng
We only trade 1 from tier one per superstar. Furthermore, we can only trade to improve position...i.e. deng for t-mac; gordon for kobe; hinrich for nash.....position value can be debated, but no trading hinrich for kobe
tier 2
wallace
Wallace can;t be traded. His contract will be too valuable in a few years, anyone we trade him for will onyl highlihgt a new gap (bad low post defense / rebounding) unless its a J o'neal type, and i want my bobbleheads to appreciate in value
tier 3
Noch
Tyrus
Thabo
#9 Pick
You can trade up to two of these....if you want all 4, that's ok but no tier 1 player
tier 4
Duhon
Piece in any trade if only for salary
Tier 5
Krappy
Individual 2nd round pick
big marty
resigned FAs
MLE
you can take 2 of these in any trade....anything beyond levles out at an exchange rate of 2 per tier 3 & 4, and 4 per tier 1
I'm way too logical and analytical for my own good, but i think this conveys logically what trade scennarios we would except
by milesgmsu on Jun 19, 2007 11:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if only you didn't type with mittens on
But anyway, this is a fine list, my only difference would be putting Noc in 4 and Duhon in 5.
Also I'm pretty sure Marty is not under contract.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 19, 2007 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean Duhon doesn't have a special
by cubbybear on Jun 19, 2007 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i thought typing wasn't that bad that time
and you way undervalue duhon....teams that duhon would be serious value to off the top of my head
most teams in the league could use a legit backup PG...is it a luxury piece, yes, but backup PG's the quality of duh aren't a dime a dozen....
duhon would even be an improvmenet in PG play for cleveland, lakers, and hawks.....
so to say duhon is valued the same as crappy or a 2nd round pick is being quite unfair. Plus, duhon has an attractive salary not only because it expires, but its one of the bulls larger contracts
by milesgmsu on Jun 20, 2007 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kobe is helping the Bulls out
by Big D on Jun 20, 2007 12:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe the Bulls can help Kobe out
by wjb1492 on Jun 20, 2007 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Advice
by cubbybear on Jun 20, 2007 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kobe
by LD9 on Jun 20, 2007 12:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Would I do that trade?
by cubbybear on Jun 20, 2007 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cleveland is not
by LD9 on Jun 20, 2007 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant in three years
by cubbybear on Jun 20, 2007 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
kupchek would be stoned and put in the tar pits
by milesgmsu on Jun 20, 2007 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ld9 and big d?
by milesgmsu on Jun 20, 2007 12:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Kobe discussions have begun
http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/46587/20070619/lakers_begin_trade_talks_with_chicago/
by babybulls on Jun 20, 2007 12:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just watched on Sportscenter
by babybulls on Jun 20, 2007 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ray Allen
P.S. Kirk, Tyrus, and Thabo= PJ or Noc in a sign and trade and the Sonics also get 2008 Bulls 1st rounder.
by LD9 on Jun 20, 2007 1:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
PG
by Sambossanova on Jun 20, 2007 1:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like I said in the post
by LD9 on Jun 20, 2007 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Pax says he hasn't talked to the Lakers
Bulls general manager John Paxson denied an ESPN report that the Lakers have contacted the Bulls regarding a possible trade for Kobe Bryant.
While discussing Bryant's situation on ESPNews, NBA analyst Ric Bucher said the Lakers "have talked to the Chicago Bulls." Reached by e-mail late Tuesday, Paxson wrote that the report was not true.
http://www.dailyherald.com/sports/bulls.asp
Who do you believe - Bucher or Pax? I'll go with Pax.
by KT on Jun 20, 2007 6:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pax
by LD9 on Jun 20, 2007 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
but that could mean that the Bulls have contacted the Lakers...mwahahahahaha
by ScottieCartwright on Jun 20, 2007 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Paxson should open a college for media relations
by cubbybear on Jun 20, 2007 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Logic 101
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on Jun 20, 2007 12:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
joejoe
by bullshooter on Jun 20, 2007 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The LA reaction is mixed
by Rick S on Jun 20, 2007 1:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't buy that crap that they need to have a
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on Jun 20, 2007 1:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bring Kobe
More importantly, I do think everyone here is in love with the currrent bulls roster a bit too much. Sure its team basketball, motion offense, tough defense, but this underdog situation of a growing team is getting old. Kobe isnt as bad as everyone here makes him out to be. The offense isn't necessarily compeltely butchered. Part of the reason kobe is considered a hog around here is because the Lakers suck...He has no one to pass it to? He's actually a good passer. And it would be nice to know that there will be someone to take the last shot. Plus, I think it's a lot more exciting to see Kobe create his own shot with 2 seconds left on the shot clock than ben gordon. And remember how everyone loved it when ben gordon took over in that game against the bucks. Well that would happen 10-15 times a year, at least, with kobe on the roster. Watching your own team in those type of games is exciting as you may recall from the Jordan era.
In my opinion, everyone here is too conservative about mantaining the status quo, but I guess this whole comment I made is not very significant since almost everyone has a very strong opinion about kobe.
by Sambossanova on Jun 20, 2007 1:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
"in love with the current roster"
by Paxson Jackson on Jun 20, 2007 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, I always wondered what it would be like
by wjb1492 on Jun 20, 2007 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
IMHO
by bullshooter on Jun 20, 2007 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that would be great,
by Paxson Jackson on Jun 20, 2007 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I concur
by bullshooter on Jun 20, 2007 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does this help compensate?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobe_Bryant
That's pretty hilarious, actually. I like him more now, only because I was named after my grandfather, which is infinitely superior to beef, despite its unparalleled marbling.
by cubbybear on Jun 20, 2007 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What signs
by Sambossanova on Jun 20, 2007 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you can say it's an irrational fear
On the other hand, he could dominate the ball but the Bulls lose more often, he could throw teammates under the bus as early as the infamous circus trip, he could get into a hugely destructive power struggle with Skiles, or even just the possibility of him opting out after two years and leaving the Bulls in worse condition than with the team now having two more years to develop.
by wjb1492 on Jun 20, 2007 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For once,
by marionette on Jun 20, 2007 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
There is plenty of history in the NBA of stars being traded for parts that ends up helping one team - Shaq to Miami, Barkley to Pheonix
Someone mentioned 3rd team and Ray Allen, I think Seattle is more likely to want to get rid of Lewis.
by NY Chicago Fan on Jun 20, 2007 6:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lewis is a Free Agent
by LD9 on Jun 20, 2007 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade is sometimes evaluated by the movement
by cubbybear on Jun 20, 2007 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
of course
I am actually beginning to think a deal can happen. That being said, let's remember Paxson's penchant for playing deals very slow. I have seen only one deal in his years as GM that moved quickly and that was Ben. Every other deal (the crawford and curry trades, Tyson's K, Kirk's K) have all involved massive amounts of patience. It's why I pushed for a nickname of 'Slowhand'. At this point, why wouldn't he take his sweet time? Really, Kobe's value goes down by the minute, we're getting closer to adding three contracts that will allow us to ship less players and match and kobe is continues to make it more difficult for the Lakers to keep him. His ripped his teammates and management, how do you reconcile that? We're actually at the point where the Lakers are planting discussion rumors on ESPN.
by CookDing on Jun 20, 2007 7:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Can we send Bill Simmons a group letter
For the record: I'm not sold on Kobe for the Bulls, but I like the fact that we're in the driver's seat on this one.
by Old Skool Sloan on Jun 20, 2007 8:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
meh
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 20, 2007 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Simmons
by TT 4 Prez on Jun 20, 2007 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if Bill Simmons was still relevant
by Paxson Jackson on Jun 20, 2007 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can just imagine
by cubbybear on Jun 20, 2007 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bill Simmons is retarded
by SRQman on Jun 20, 2007 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who's a better fit at guard with Kobe?
I think it would be Gordon. Kobe is going to dominate the ball and draw double teams. He needs someone who can spot up and hit the open three, and Kirk has struggled at that. Also, dominant shooting guards do not need a classic PG. And Kobe or Thabo in a three-guard rotation can help out with Ben's defensive deficiencies.
I know Pax will never do it, but I think it makes more sense to trade Hinrich than Gordon.
by nateroth on Jun 20, 2007 10:22 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Kobe's going to do everything.
by wjb1492 on Jun 20, 2007 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't have a true PG
I guess the real question is how would Kobe and Kirk going to coexist? I think they'd be fine together but would they each be at their best?
by nateroth on Jun 20, 2007 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
except for one thing
by bullshooter on Jun 20, 2007 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pax and BJ
by nateroth on Jun 20, 2007 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pax ran the offense
by bullshooter on Jun 21, 2007 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say Hinrich.
Moreover, think of the great defensive backcourt we would have with Hinrich and Kobe. Hinrich could defend the opposing team's best guard, freeing up Kobe to drop fitty. Then, when it came to crunch time, both guards could lock down.
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 20, 2007 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Garnett and Kobe
by Kantut on Jun 20, 2007 11:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think we have the assets to do that.
What if we traded Gordon for Garnett?
I recently read that the Bulls were stillin interested in Garnett and would be willing to part with Gordon (but not Deng).
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 20, 2007 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
P.S. I guess that
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 20, 2007 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bulls have a better offer
by Kantut on Jun 20, 2007 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I appreciate your creativity, but
I don't think Pax is willing to trade Deng for KG. Additionally, PJ probably won't agree to a sign and trade with a rebuilding T-Wolves franchise.
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 20, 2007 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed, lets settle on one at a time
There's no salary (like boston has with Ratliff) to match up with KG's monster deal so things likely couldn't come together. It won't stop me from wistfully thinking of a Garnett/Wallace frontcourt absolutely terrorizing people.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 20, 2007 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
by CookDing on Jun 21, 2007 7:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for echoing my thoughts on Jefferson
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 20, 2007 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sebastian Telfair?
by marionette on Jun 20, 2007 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't mind delving into the question...
This is partly why I'm in favor of Noah. (I've also been a Gator fan since age 4.) It's true that he doesn't give us anything we don't already have, but to me, it's an open question as to how much longer we will have what we had this season. I've written this before, but a starting lineup 2 years down the line of Kirk, Ben, Luol, Ty and Noah should be able to run just about every team in the league off of the court, if Skiles is willing to accomodate a Suns-type, wide-open style of play.
by BenGo07 on Jun 20, 2007 1:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather not consider it a mistake
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 20, 2007 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
flawed analysis
by milesgmsu on Jun 20, 2007 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The last point is a great one
by cubbybear on Jun 20, 2007 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, man, what a horrible offseason that was
by preverbal on Jun 20, 2007 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of these assertions...
I'm willing to admit that it's too soon to fully judge the Wallace signing, but I think we can agree that there was semi-drop off in his play this year from years previous. Seeing as he's always made up for his lack of size with energy (along with his muscle), his getting older should be a concern.
by BenGo07 on Jun 20, 2007 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was shocked at the
BTW, I've heard that last year MN turned down Deng, Chandler, & '06 1st(became TT) for Garnett. Any members care to comment on that statement's accuracy?
by marionette on Jun 20, 2007 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wha?
I'm 100% positive the only thing holding the Bulls back from "a Suns-type, wide-open style of play" is Steve Nash. He's just being selfish playing the point only for Phoenix.
(82games also has fastbreak points thingy up too.)
by Paxson Jackson on Jun 20, 2007 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I appreciate the fact...
All of that granted, we do have Wallace on the books for another 3 years at $45 mil. It seems to me very possible we might be regretting those last two years---much like the Heat, though certainly happy with last year's championship, might also be regretting the 3 years at $60 mil. that Shaq is saddling them with.
Meanwhile, I'm not projecting that Hinrich will ever reach Nash-like greatness, but it's interesting to note that Hinrich's first four years compare favorably to Nash's first four years (and indeed his first five).
Thanks for the 82games link. That's really intersting.
by BenGo07 on Jun 20, 2007 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
1 year of regret
by CookDing on Jun 21, 2007 7:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I take it...
If not, than I'm not sure we were watching the same Piston series.
Having said that, I am also not ready to call the Wallace signing a mistake.
by Scott 9 on Jun 21, 2007 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marty Burns' new article on a potential
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/marty_burns/06/20/bulls.kobe/index.html
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 20, 2007 3:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That was a waste of time.
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on Jun 20, 2007 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Back court of migets.
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on Jun 20, 2007 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please do not ever link that
I will become violent if you do.
Terrible memories of that game.
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 20, 2007 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marty makes
by sue369 on Jun 20, 2007 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We
by eross226 on Jun 20, 2007 5:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












