Game 2 aftermath thread
I needed to break up the game thread, so let the wailing and (Steve) nashing of teeth commence.
That's not meant to belittle any 'sky is falling' comments, I'm sincerely discouraged as well.
Everything was bad tonight, yet again. At least we don't have to read that the team wasn't properly prepared or didn't play with energy. Nope, they're just not as good. Especially worrisome that the 'core' is getting destroyed by their counterparts. Hinrich, Gordon, and Deng have to outperform Billups/Hamilton/Prince, or at least come close.
It almost makes the rest of the team's problems moot, but continuing to give up offensive boards doesn't even allow the offense to get started. Wallace may have gotten a few easy baskets in the half but he was nowhere to be found when the Bulls needed someone guarding the basket. It's a problem that the jump-shooting Detroit bigs present, but Wallace also has to be conscious of running around trying to get steals and as a result leaving the paint open.
And the bench play and deployment almost is beyond the point of criticism. Continuing to run out Duhon and Noc didn't kill the team, but it buried them after the early death, yet again.
0 recs |
112
comments
Comments
So JoJo doesn't have to write a diary
by Paxson Jackson on May 7, 2007 10:06 PM CDT 0 recs
(Repost)
From a purely fan perspective, these two games
have been really depressing.
I am somewhat disheartened.
The team I just watched on TV did not even resemble the team I saw all year long.
Are we just an irksome regular season team, as one blogger suggested? Are we simply outmatched when good teams turn up the playoff intensity? Are the Bulls the little engine that could, a team which tries hard but gets knocked off of its rails far before it ever reaches the summit?
What, if anything, do these games suggest about the long term potential of our team? Can this team win a championship with its current core (however you may define that)? Or are the guards too short, the team too unathletic?
I am not shocked by losing, but I am absolutely shocked by the failure to make the games competitive.
I really don't know the answer to the questions I posed. I guess the next two games will tell the tale, in some ways.
Come on Bulls, get back in this series.
by 1958ChiTown on May 7, 2007 10:10 PM CDT 0 recs
these are legit questions
If they make it a series maybe the braintrust can convince themselves that even if they just gave the core guys another year and moved up Tyrus/Thabo and punted Noc/Duhon (blammo, you're more athletic now) they can take on the Pistons in a series.
of course all the while they'll still search for a low-post threat.
I doubt even two more destructions will cause them to deal Gordon or Hinrich but the doubt will creep in, for sure.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 7, 2007 10:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Yup
Last series, I couldn't believe they were putting it all together like they did. So in control, so smooth.
This series, they look like confused kids. They don't seem to know what they want to do, their sets look awkward, no one can hit a shot.
Its nice to think that they can rally and win their home games and make a series out of it, but what positives can you even take home to build on? The Bulls just got EMBARRASSED twice in a row. Embarrassed. Schooled. Humiliated.
I'll keep rooting for Bulls in six. But it sure feels like Pistons in four.
by preverbal on
May 7, 2007 10:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Bulls shooting
by SRQman on
May 7, 2007 10:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The Bulls need to shoot better
compared to the Dali version
Sad thing is someone wants to buy mine
by SRQman on May 7, 2007 10:20 PM CDT 0 recs
What the hell?
by Chalkwhite on
May 8, 2007 10:39 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Noc
I see Noc having real value in another system. He's just not what the bulls need at that 4 spot. I'd say trade him as part of whatever Pax does in the offseason.
Also, the Bulls can make this a long, exciting series. So there's no need to start Google and YouTube-scouting Spencer Hawes and Roy Hibbert just yet.
by jai on May 7, 2007 10:21 PM CDT 0 recs
Pax
by LD9 on May 7, 2007 10:38 PM CDT 0 recs
Positives?
Bench play was better. (Of course, it couldn't have been worse.)
Kirk obviously had a horrid shooting night (not just the 0-for, but missing 2 free throws as well), but at least he had 6 rebounds, 7 assists and only 1 TO to do something positive. He was hot last game, so it's not like this is an extended shooting slump.
Lu also had a bad shooting night, but did hit 8 of 8 free throws.
Ben Wallace had 13 points and 3 blocks.
TOs weren't quite as bad as I thought. Only 13 total, and BG and Noc had 7 of those. No one else had more than a one TO tonight.
Bulls shot more than twice as many free throws as Detroit, and actually shot a higher FT% as well. (Since I'm looking for positives, I'm ignoring the 15 missed free throws.)
by wjb1492 on May 7, 2007 10:42 PM CDT 0 recs
getting to the line so much
It's difficult to look at the box score though knowing they were playing catch-up the whole game.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 7, 2007 10:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Wallace
Pistons are smart and good defensive team. They know if Prince doesn't let Deng get easy jump shots and they hound Gordon on both ends that Bulls offense bogs down.
On offensive end I think many people had greatly underestimated Webber and Wallace. Having 2 bigs who can post, shoot and pass is killing the Bulls. Bulls are needing to "help" on D against too many Pistons which is sign for disaster when Pistons have so many scorers.
by NY Chicago Fan on
May 8, 2007 9:47 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, but I didn't have much to work with.
by wjb1492 on
May 8, 2007 10:01 AM CDT
up
0 recs
unfortunately
by bullshooter on May 7, 2007 10:52 PM CDT 0 recs
the Bulls didnt care, and wont in games 3 or 4
by hongydraw on
May 7, 2007 10:56 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Was PJ Brown stoned on the bench?
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on May 7, 2007 10:56 PM CDT 0 recs
its pistons vs ben wallace
by hongydraw on
May 7, 2007 11:00 PM CDT
up
0 recs
sorry
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 7, 2007 11:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Hmmmmm
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on
May 7, 2007 11:15 PM CDT
up
0 recs
after sweep of the heat
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 8, 2007 9:27 AM CDT
up
0 recs
ok its
By normal I mean moving the ball around the wings and getting to the basket. I don't care how good the Pistons are, the Bulls are doing things that lead me to believe they relaxed and have no prepared for the second round. Maybe sheed was right maybe the Bulls were just happy to be there.
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on
May 8, 2007 9:46 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I agree
by NY Chicago Fan on
May 8, 2007 9:50 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I agree
The Pistons make almost all of their shots and they execute, while the bulls arent doing so well in that department. The Match up dillemma is another problem and they might have to play zone, espescially early on. What pisses me off the most is how they are killing us on the boards with webber and crap getting all these offensive boards.
Nocioni has been injured and it is hard for him to be full speed on defense. Nocioni isnt an excellent defernder but he is a solid feisty defender. But the pistons are making him look like antoine walker.
Ahh what will become of these bulls...
by Sambossanova on
May 7, 2007 11:31 PM CDT
up
0 recs
they need to draft well...
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on
May 7, 2007 11:56 PM CDT
up
0 recs
JoeJoe
by cubbybear on
May 8, 2007 2:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Next season home court or bust!
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on May 7, 2007 11:29 PM CDT 0 recs
Deron Williams vs Baron Davis
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on May 7, 2007 11:58 PM CDT 0 recs
bulls will turn it around
by tomcat on May 8, 2007 2:12 AM CDT 0 recs
it is my great hope
by KT on May 8, 2007 5:13 AM CDT 0 recs
Just a few things
The bench played better. I was so happy to see TT have a good game. Thabo did well too. Noch, well I don't have much to say about him. Du is such a non factor in this series so far.
I think the Pistons just have Kirk, BG and Luol's number for this series so far. They have totally taken them out of their games. One suggestion I heard last night was put BG on the bench and start Thabo. Let BG see what is going on in the game and then send him in. They also said maybe TT should start since he brings excitement to the game when he is in. What could it hurt? What they are doing now isn't working.
I hope being home helps them Thurs. night. They need a win and they will have the home crowd to help get that win. I'm not giving up on this team.
by sue369 on May 8, 2007 7:32 AM CDT 0 recs
Gordon started fine last night
by Paxson Jackson on
May 8, 2007 7:43 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Gordon's fouls
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 8, 2007 10:13 AM CDT
up
0 recs
It's too bad the best players at drawing fouls
by Paxson Jackson on
May 8, 2007 10:27 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Hard to pick up fouls guarding your man...
by Big D on
May 8, 2007 10:41 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Lineup changes
I'm bummed about all of this too. Getting blown out twice after sweeping the defending champs will always be a slap in the face. But now the Bulls get to come home where they have played well all season. Let's see what these guys are made of.
by paxson43 on
May 8, 2007 11:22 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Don't lose hope yet....
Hold serve at home, then steal one in Detroit....
The Cavs should have beat the Pistons last year, having a chance to close it out at home...
Keep the faith!!!
by FearTheSword on May 8, 2007 8:09 AM CDT 0 recs
Thanks for the support!
by SouthSideIrish on
May 8, 2007 9:30 AM CDT
up
0 recs
It's over
After this season comes to a pathetic ending..I think some serious trading is on the horizon for this team. Gordon, gone. Nocioni, bye-bye. PJ Brown, good-riddance. Duhon, ughhhh. Disintegrate the core. It was a bad idea to think you could build a team around 4 smalls. Trading Curry: BAD IDEA and we can see that coming to fruition in this series. We needed his low post presence. Next year this guy will be a 20/8 to 25/10 type. Trading Chandler for ONLY PJ Brown: Very Bad Idea. Wallace and PJ are done. Beaten. Defeated. Exhausted. Used Up. Chandler at least brought some fire, some passion, some turnovers too but at least he's a better rebounder, blocker and younger with something to prove. Wallace looks like he doesn't care.
I'm out.. bring on Da Cubs
by BullShitzer on May 8, 2007 9:27 AM CDT 0 recs
awwww
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 8, 2007 9:29 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Curry will be a 25/10 guy next year?
by Big D on
May 8, 2007 9:29 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Ha!
Curry might be a 20-25/5 guy. Who scores 15 of those 20-25 in the 1st quarter.
by preverbal on
May 8, 2007 9:33 AM CDT
up
0 recs
and then turns the ball over
by KT on
May 8, 2007 9:39 AM CDT
up
0 recs
you confuse bens emotions
by DannyRange on
May 8, 2007 10:45 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Deep breath . . .
I will not give up on the team I love.
I have seen them play great.
I have seen them play poorly.
This team is capable of playing both ways.
Regardless, I am a fan.
As a fan, I choose to believe.
I believe that the Bulls will go home,
gather themselves, find whatever it is they have been missing -- pride, moxie, vertical lift, whatever.
And I believe they will show up and win two at home.
Whether they win the series or not, I choose to believe they will send me to the off-season happy. And all they have to do for that to happen is compete.
Say it with me now . . .
by preverbal on May 8, 2007 9:38 AM CDT 0 recs
I'm with you
by wjb1492 on
May 8, 2007 10:06 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Agree
by SRQman on
May 8, 2007 10:09 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm here
GO BULLS!!!
by sue369 on
May 8, 2007 11:39 AM CDT
up
0 recs
hahahah @
If they don't respond to these losses then I think the Bulls will just be the joke of the NBA as they already are.
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on May 8, 2007 9:51 AM CDT 0 recs
I don't see how
by SRQman on
May 8, 2007 9:59 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Let's get Physical, Physical.
The Body needs to pound on Webber's body. Make him feel old again. And the Bulls need to get their perimeter guys in foul trouble, not the guys that barely play.
Oh yeah, hitting some open shots would help.
by Option27 on May 8, 2007 10:14 AM CDT 0 recs
Conspiracy theory anyone?
by SouthSideIrish on May 8, 2007 10:24 AM CDT 0 recs
I could comment on
-
I'm proposing a trade idea. Doosh and Duh for a pair of used Jordans.
by Goostafer on May 8, 2007 10:29 AM CDT 0 recs
We need a henchman
The only chance the bulls have of winning this series is to get a key injury on the Pistons. Like Norm Van Lier says, "we may lose the game, but we wont lose the fight" Send these guys into the next round banged up.
by DannyRange on May 8, 2007 10:35 AM CDT 0 recs
Is it too early to start talkin draft??????
Bulls get 1st pick, do we go with Oden or Durant?
This a no brainer right????
by DannyRange on
May 8, 2007 10:37 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Here is my take...
by Squirrley on May 8, 2007 10:48 AM CDT 0 recs
Note to Bulls
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 8, 2007 10:56 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Shocking
They haven't shot well, they haven't played good defense yet, and they are getting schooled on the boards.
In a twisted way, these almost seem like positives. You expect them to play to their season averages, or at least their averages against Detroit. They can't play this poorly for the whole series, can they?
The area I'm most concerned about is the defense. Detroit is getting way too many open looks. Wide open. IMHO, that's why the Bulls shot more FTs then the Pistons in game 2...
They aren't even close enough to the Pistons to foul them!
by mdmnd9294 on May 8, 2007 10:54 AM CDT 0 recs
I buy
by Paxson Jackson on
May 8, 2007 11:01 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Detroit's defense
by Boney on
May 8, 2007 11:18 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Boner, seriously
by Paxson Jackson on
May 8, 2007 11:22 AM CDT
up
0 recs
make sense?
by Boney on
May 8, 2007 1:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
oh please
That's how your comment reads. Miscue isn't a 'big' word, champ. I'm not googling it for my benefit.
by Paxson Jackson on
May 8, 2007 1:31 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I didn't put it as a big word
jesus, put down the thesaurus bro.
by Boney on
May 8, 2007 1:39 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Because you're typing
by Paxson Jackson on
May 8, 2007 1:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
6 in one hand, half a dozen in the other.
by Madmax on
May 8, 2007 1:54 PM CDT
up
0 recs
jeepers creepers
by Paxson Jackson on
May 8, 2007 2:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
nice
I'm sorry, I only care about whether or not my team actually wins and how they match up physically with another team. I don't care about someone else's magical stats or where they rate on a daily power rankings board on espn.com. Seems to me the team I follow always ends up not being near the top of any efficiency ratings, but they have put up 6 straight years of 50+ wins. It may have only resulted in 1 title, but that's more than I can say the Bulls have done in the last 6 years besides cross their fingers for good lottery picks.
by Boney on
May 8, 2007 1:55 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Don't forget
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 8, 2007 1:59 PM CDT
up
0 recs
statistics schmatistics
If Jordan averages 30 points a night, you know he's going to get his points it's up to you to physically stop it, if you're on the court.
Some of the toolbags on here have is the "Well, Hollinger says our efficiency ratings are higher than the Pistons so that means we're better"... oh ok, that's why you're the #5 seed and Detroit's #1. I know Detroit sloshes through games at a slow pace, but I don't care as long as they get the W. If Detroit is on a winning streak, their chances of winning are a lot higher than "well, Tayshaun Prince hasn't been playing up to his 90% efficiency rating so their chances of winning are 9:1"..
by Boney on
May 8, 2007 2:13 PM CDT
up
0 recs
are you dim?
The nice thing about stat-friendly people as they admit they don't know all the answers. A sense of humility you can't seem to grasp.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
May 8, 2007 2:19 PM CDT
up
0 recs
then why bother with them
your team wins 3 out of 4 games during the regular season against my team. there's obviously a stat that proves to 1958ChiTown that leads him to 2+ posts about how "Detroit's not that good"... come on man, lay it on me. Detroit is a team that's been the most consistent team in the Eastern conference lately, why should I (as a Pistons' fan, not a member of the team) worry about beating the Bulls? They're obviously better, based on Ben Wallace's per 40 minute rebounding totals.
Also, I emailed you (Matt) when you raved about signing Big Ben and how the media was wrong about how his stats have been in decline. You emailed back with a "well his per40 rebounding stats have gotten better"...
um, but what if those 40 minutes come in a span of 10 games? shit, I could snag a rebound or 2 in 4 minutes a night. My per40 rebound totals would be off the chart!
by Boney on
May 8, 2007 2:27 PM CDT
up
0 recs


