Thoughts on game won
(oh, what a title)
I get what what Chris Sheridan is trying to say, but if I were a Heat fan it wouldn't make me feel better about game 1:
"All in all, the Heat didn't have a whole lot to feel all that unhappy about after they were outplayed and out-executed for a vast majority of the game."
Um, that should make them unhappy, you'd think.
It wasn't a perfect game by the Bulls but I was extremely pleased with how they attacked offensively. Getting the ball early to Deng and exploiting the mismatch of having him guarded by Wade got them off to a good start, which may not have been that important but certainly made me feel better. Wade's not even a good defender when he's healthy, and with the bum shoulder he can't roam for steals as recklessly as he usually does. Deng was able to post him up some (considering his size advantage though, the lack of post play means that part of his game isn't ready for prime time) but also was able to lose Wade when cutting away from the ball, and as the league now knows thanks to Wade himself, Deng is one of the best finishers in the game.
Ben Gordon was also attacking the rim and finished the game with 11 free throw attempts. The Heat certainly geared their defense at Gordon, even trapping him beyond the 3-point line, and while Gordon wasn't perfect in those situations he did finish with a career-high 11 assists. The fact that he attacked the rim allowed himself to have a good game while not hitting a single 3-pointer. It used to be nearly impossible for him to be effective when his shot wasn't falling, but Saturday's effort was nearly Wade-esque in the versatility.
And this is why the Bulls got Ben Wallace. I was surprised that Wallace was guarding O'Neal single-handedly (I thought they'd use PJ and have Wallace help) but the trust paid off. Whether Wallace didn't deserve some of those calls (I forgot to tape the game (unforgivable)) or not doesn't matter, he received those calls because he's Ben freaking Wallace. 'Star' treatment is unfortunate, but at least with Wallace the Bulls now have one of their own (and we can rehash that debate over what makes a star, an all-star, a superstar, or a superduperstar, but first let me put a pistol in my mouth) who can match up with O'Neal in terms of respect from the officials. Wallace didn't even play particularly well (especially offensively, the ball movement derailed even quicker than usual when he had the ball) but at least he was there. When he's playing that means Malik Allen and Mike Sweetney aren't, and Wallace having an average game is better than going deep in the bench.
While I think Skiles stuck with Noc a bit too long (hey, it wound up working out, but I still would rather see more of this in game two), he deserves credit for realizing how well Thabo defended Wade and made sure he (and not Duhon) was the first guard off the bench after Hinrich got in foul trouble yet again (thankfully Griffin is still hurt, heh). This is stating the obvious, but Thabo was able to use his long arms and poke at Wade's dribble, disrupting him in a way that Duhon can't. As an added bonus he even hit some shots. But unlike people who are watching the Bulls for the first time, one bad game isn't reason to give up on Kirk. The Bulls turned out not needing him on Saturday but they will. I don't get whey it's so easy to throw a major contributor like Kirk under the bus but the bad players get a free pass. That could just be high expectations, I suppose, but Kirk isn't the problem, and giving Thabo minutes from a worse player (like Duhon) will help the team with no needed effect on Hinrich's place in the rotation. The beauty of a series opponent is (hopefully) Skiles sees no reason to change: Duhon should no longer get assigned to Wade the rest of the way.
Along with Kirk's struggles, the Bulls have other reasons to laugh at the idea that they can't play this well again. They shot 3-17 from three, and I don't remember them being especially hard looks either. For reference, Antoine Walker himself went 4-7 from distance. He was able to be the third option for Miami, but that was likely by design as Walker is awful and anything that gets him more shots should be encouraged. And I thought in terms of shot making that both O'Neal and Wade made a lot of difficult shots. Even single-covered, O'Neal was forced to work, and Wade was pretty much kept away from the rim, both by injury and the Bulls defense.
The finish was uncomfortably close. But, hey, in a season where the Bulls close-game execution has been questioned, they managed to hold on. Those are the types of finishes where the Heat should have the advantage, trading possessions with Wade (granted, Shaq had fouled out by then) leading the free-throw parade. But he was held in check, and the fact that it was a close loss should be more discouraging than encouraging for the Heat. They got the type of game they wanted at the end, and lost. If the Bulls continue to play this well there may not be many more close games at all.
0 recs |
96 comments
Comments
nice summary
- Deng continuing to be agresive vs Wade on offensive end. Even if Deng doesn't have classic post game he should be able to attack rim with his long arms and height.
- Thabo, Thabo, Thabo. Its what Bulls drafted him for and what us fans have been waiting for. His long arms, height and atheletic ability absolutely bothered Wade on D. Wade will always score but Bulls threw him and Miami O off. I can't wait until someone works with Thabo in attacking rim on offense to dunk, he might be real good next year.
- Wallace out of foul trouble. Shaq scored early but BigBen remained on floor (45mins) and less double teaming means other Miami guys don't get easy baskets. Its the classic story of slow down star a little and just don't let role players beat you.
- I think Hinrich will be fine. Value of Bulls depth is they don't always need all players to score
- I do like Thomas energy and speed on the court to make big plays but you can't knock what Noc did or hold it against Noc that he isn't Thomas. I think Thomas will get more run and can be a factor too. Deng isn't going to play 46 mins every night and with Kirk out Skiles probably went to more Noc for some outside shooting
by NY Chicago Fan on
Apr 22, 2007 7:50 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
NY, I think I found
Unless you're a Bulls fan during the afternoon and Warriors fan by night, then nevermind.
by NittanyBull on
Apr 22, 2007 11:19 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
nope
there is probably room for both of us in NY, although Bulls all the way
by NY Chicago Fan on
Apr 23, 2007 12:01 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
game won?
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on
Apr 22, 2007 8:04 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
word play
by NittanyBull on
Apr 22, 2007 8:24 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Be careful what you wish for
by Paxson Jackson on
Apr 22, 2007 8:06 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Spurs update:
by NittanyBull on
Apr 22, 2007 8:29 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Game over. Spurs lose.
I am very interested to see how the next game goes. Was Golden State's domination of Dallas a regular season illusion, or is it truly a favorable match-up for the Warriors?
by 1958ChiTown on
Apr 22, 2007 8:38 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This Golden State-Dallas game
Baron Davis has gone insane.
I don't know if the Warriors can keep this up.
by 1958ChiTown on
Apr 22, 2007 10:38 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not to detract from the argument or anything
There was a negative article about Kirk by Jay Mariotti, too, but I've come to kind of expect it from him.
by wjb1492 on
Apr 22, 2007 9:51 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Anybody else watching DAL/GSW?
by NittanyBull on
Apr 22, 2007 10:37 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'va watched them all season
by Goostafer on
Apr 22, 2007 10:44 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on
Apr 22, 2007 10:46 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
They're really living/dying on the 3 right now
by NittanyBull on
Apr 22, 2007 10:56 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This game is insane
by SRQman on
Apr 22, 2007 10:57 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ROFL i love a mad Mark Cuban
by SRQman on
Apr 22, 2007 11:04 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
also
by SRQman on
Apr 22, 2007 11:02 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I really liked the full-court press that Nelson
WOW, Barnes with the 3!
by NittanyBull on
Apr 22, 2007 11:10 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This game is crazy
by SRQman on
Apr 22, 2007 11:11 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't believe GS is going to win this.
by NittanyBull on
Apr 22, 2007 11:12 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ya they must be going crazy
by SRQman on
Apr 22, 2007 11:13 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Baron Davis is playing like one of
Damn. This just might, might, turn into a series after all.
Warriors really seem to have the Maverick's number.
by 1958ChiTown on
Apr 22, 2007 11:14 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What a great
Only games that really sucked was Cavs vs. Wiz and Pistons vs Magic even though the Magic were still in it for a while.
GS/Dallas and SAN/Den were great games to end this weekend.
Lets go Bulls we gotta take Game 2,3 and 4
by SRQman on
Apr 22, 2007 11:16 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
cavs game was great
by brianmita on
Apr 22, 2007 11:27 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
whoops
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 2:37 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Suns have got to be smiling right now
by Big D on
Apr 22, 2007 11:19 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Davis
With current hand checking and zone rules Golden St may have chance with small ball, Dallas needs to find way to make them pay on boards / inside
by NY Chicago Fan on
Apr 22, 2007 11:58 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Moved (demoted) Diary
Game two is so big because it can make home court or break home court. Bulls need to hold home court. I thought the Bulls got some lucky calls down the stretch but they should have won by 25 had they made open shots. They seemed to go flat at the end, unless your Andres Nocioni I mean. Now I remember why I love him. They say Hinrich is the rock of the team but Nocioni is the heart. Cause the rock wasn't doing shit. Gent Kirk killed us. His defense was discusting letting GP beat him on the dribble? Ok if it's just once but all day he was letting guys get by him. Im worried about game 2. I just hope they stay foucused and play team ball.
Dallas has a handfull by the way. I love seeing Mark ''Ceaser'' Cuben cry! Dallas looks old as does SA.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 22, 2007 11:26 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
speaking of diaries
Just for commenting flow purposes, if anything.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 22, 2007 11:27 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Commenting flow is
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on
Apr 22, 2007 11:48 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Very well said Matt
Kapono got zero open looks; the Bulls are staying at home on him (good idea, that). Posey didn't do much of anything in the first game, nor did Haslem. The question is, are these guys ready to step up and make plays? I don't think the Bulls are letting them because of the improved defense. Posey got open looks last year. He did not on Saturday. The same goes for Haslem.
Couch's article was totally hacky. I was moved to send him a somewhat aggressive e-mail (I blame the four beers at the Lifetime/Draft show tonight). You summed it up well, Matt. Clearly he has not been watching this team...
by corey williams corey benjamin on
Apr 22, 2007 11:53 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Posey has a good game in him
According to Miamians, apparently Eddie Jones is a long-time playoff choker. I had not known that.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 22, 2007 11:56 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rosenbloom is on the anti-Kirk bandwagon, too
Ben Gordon moved to the point and had 24 points and 11 assists in the win. The so-called "poison pill" part of Hinrich's contract ends this summer. Kirk Hinrich, your plane is boarding."
http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/rosenblog/2007/04/bulls_win_but_h.html
I expect that Kirk will have a nice game in at least one of the next two, someone else will have a lousy one, and the media bandwagon guys will move on to their next target. Funny how the detractors for the various players always come out after a bad game, but you so rarely hear from them after the good.
by wjb1492 on
Apr 23, 2007 11:30 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think it would be interesting
Hinrich
Sefo
Deng
Thomas
Wallace
With everyone else, I really liked how Sefolosha played against Wade: he really seemed to put him off any kind of rhythm. I think him and Hinrich can cause some real trouble if they double-team him from time to time. Thomas, to me, seems like a dunk/lay up scorer right now( with not much length with his shot) which I think could get 8-10 easy points for the Bulls. Just a thought, anyhoo.
by NittanyBull on
Apr 22, 2007 11:54 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Miami shows more respect (i guess)
http://www.nba.com/nba_news/Heat_down.html
by hongydraw on
Apr 23, 2007 12:24 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
There is a virtual smorgasbord of
It would not surprise me one bit if Mariotti watched his first full game on Saturday.
He acts like his take on the Deng story is brand new.
Meanwhile, it looks like Riley will attempt to implement a new, more physical defensive style (read: thuggery) on Tuesday night. Posey may guard Deng.
by 1958ChiTown on
Apr 23, 2007 9:40 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Posey should guard Deng if they're smart
If only Don Nelson was coaching them they would put Wade on Wallace.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 10:04 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
True.
Put Jones on Gordon, Posey on Deng, Wade on Nocioni.
That's really not a bad defensive set of match-ups for Miami. Not perfect, but not terrible. Offensively, they would still have Wade and Shaq out there, with Posey to hit open threes on double teams.
Adopting your position for a moment, the Bulls would almost be compelled to take Nocioni out in that situation, putting PJ or Thomas back in. Wade presumably couldn't guard either of those guys in the post. At the very least, we would have a huge edge on the boards. Miami would have to bring back Haslem and rotate Wade to Deng or Gordon.
by 1958ChiTown on
Apr 23, 2007 10:18 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll say this about Noc
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 10:31 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yup
by NY Chicago Fan on
Apr 23, 2007 5:58 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Positive stuff from cbssportsline.com
"5. The officiating in the Bulls-Heat game was bad. It wasn't atrocious, given the amount of contact and flopping going on, but the video evidence won't be used to train young officials any time soon. That being said, Chicago overcame the absence of Kirk Hinrich for practically the entire game, and Miami actually rallied to go on a run when O'Neal and Wade sat side-by-side for a large chunk of the fourth quarter. Don't blame Game 1's outcome on the refs. Chicago deserved the win.
...
9. Tyrus Thomas and Thabo Sefolosha used their first playoff games to make me look like a complete moron. I believe I gave the Bulls something like a D-minus for their 2006 draft, because I really felt their man should've been LaMarcus Aldridge, and I underestimated Sefolosha. So this is me saying I was wrong. In fact, I'm deeming it one of the most regrettable things I've done this year, and I have a lot of repenting to do. Thomas brought great energy and caught the Heat with a solid right to the stomach with his block-and-dunk flurry in the second half. Sefolosha bothered Wade. He was right in his pocket, and he showed no fear. Both Chicago rookies were impressive, proving to be unexpected X-factors."
by wjb1492 on
Apr 23, 2007 11:24 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
re: #9
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 12:58 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
or better yet
how well did charlotte do....exactly
by milesgmsu on
Apr 23, 2007 2:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Ben Wallace part
by Option27 on
Apr 23, 2007 11:46 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I will take close wins
Who cares what Greg Couch thinks of Kirk? Christ it was one game. Kirk's coaches, team mates and fans know what he brings to the game.
I am really nervous about the game tomorrow night. I don't expect it to be anything like Saturdays game.
by sue369 on
Apr 23, 2007 12:01 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
im only nervous
i like what skiles said to kirk, who was purposelsy hanging around away from the reporters "kirk, you gotta face the music, man"
by milesgmsu on
Apr 23, 2007 2:25 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Skiles said it
by sue369 on
Apr 23, 2007 3:14 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just for Matt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3OtKHGNotY
Gotta love Tyrus in the black shoes and socks.
I want to see him drop another 27 like that Cleveland game.
Actually, a double double like the one he had againsts the Pistons would be fantastic.
by 1958ChiTown on
Apr 23, 2007 12:03 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
From Hollinger today
1. The whining must stop: It's playoff season, and that means it's whining season. If you lost a close game, rest assured that it's because of the refs and not your own failures.
The Pistons have the worst reputation for this, but of late perhaps nobody has become more insufferable than Shaquille O'Neal.
Look, I'm a Shaq fan. I think he's been unfairly jobbed out of multiple MVPs because writers always are looking for a David to beat Goliath, and on his good days he's one of the game's most entertaining spokesmen.
But just once, could he lose a playoff game without complaining about the refs or opponents flopping? Shaq's completely predictable whine after Chicago's Game 1 victory was notable as the postseason's first (though unfortunately not it's last) postgame pity-fest.
"My intention was to come out and be myself, until Eddie Rush derailed me," O'Neal said. "It's just unfortunate that people fall for that."
If you're keeping score, the Eddie Rush he referred too is the same veteran official who looked at Eddie Jones and motioned for him to get up after the Miami player's failed flop attempt in the third quarter. Sounds like a real sucker.
And while we're checking facts, here's another interesting one for you, Shaq: Two of your fouls came when you tried to flop. Remember those?
And just so we're on the same page: If you turn your elbow into Ben Wallace's face, he's going to fall down. That's not flopping, that's physics.
"He says that about every team, so I wouldn't put too much into that," Bulls coach Scott Skiles said about Shaq's complaints, and he's absolutely right. Remember, O'Neal was spouting the same excuses last year when the Bulls won Games 3 and 4.
The fact is, O'Neal's declining conditioning is what's causing the foul trouble. He averaged a foul every eight minutes this season; if he keeps that up in the playoffs, foul trouble at some point in a game will be the rule, not the exception. Which means we should get ready for more whining.
by Option27 on
Apr 23, 2007 12:21 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
More MSM reaction:
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 1:03 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Didn't take him long
by bullshooter on
Apr 23, 2007 2:55 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
eh
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 3:39 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is it just impossible to front the post against
Is he so big that everyone fears he would just catch a lob and finish?
So far as I can tell from watching the replay, Wallace only tried it once or twice in the first half.
Man, I do not want Shaq to have a huge game two.
by 1958ChiTown on
Apr 23, 2007 2:54 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
IIRC
As a rule the Bulls like to front, and Ben doesn't like it. Who knows if it was Ben's will or the team strategy.
I don't think Shaq is capable of having many 'huge' games anymore based on his age and conditioning. We'll see.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 3:46 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hinrich's 4th foul
by bullshooter on
Apr 23, 2007 3:49 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Bulls Must Win: game 2
All of the temporary glorying will then be replaced with a sense of urgency. Bulls, now must take the next step in championship mentality and "will a victory" on their home court in Gm 2 or else this team will temporarily be stuck on stagnant (little progress from last year) if they lose.
Bulls must match Riley's tough D, and refs calling the game differently with a welcome challenge and overcome whatever Miami or Refs throws at them.
Deng will need to grow up now, and understand that the Bulls have not accomplished anything, more, yet (in regards to reaching the next level in playoffs) from last year!
by exult463 on
Apr 23, 2007 6:13 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Jesus Christ
This is one of the worst comments on the Internet I've ever read. (offense intended)
by tyger1147 on
Apr 23, 2007 7:45 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cut the brother some slack
by preverbal on
Apr 23, 2007 8:06 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
alternatively,
by bullshooter on
Apr 23, 2007 8:24 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not just the punctuation...
Read it again. Try to understand the points, if you can. It's complete garbage. It sounds like a mixture of pep-talk and shit-talk.
If Miami wins tomorrow, they get exactly they want. Really? I thought they would have wanted two wins in Chicago.
Bulls need to be ready for whatever Miami (a) and the refs (b) throws at them. (a) I would hope so. (b) How does one prepare for that?
Match Riley's tough D? Didn't know he was playing.
The refs calling the game differently is a welcome challenge. Doubt it!
Championship mentality and stagnant with one loss?!?! Say what? I don't get it.
Deng needs to grow up and know the Bulls haven't yet accomplished "anything"... Gotta be honest here, guys: I've never read anything that he thought differently.
by tyger1147 on
Apr 23, 2007 9:04 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
haha, somebody finally snapped
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 10:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I dunno...
There's a lot of commas, periods and parentheses... that's true. But they all seem to be placed in the oddest of spots.
by tyger1147 on
Apr 23, 2007 10:33 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well I'm used to
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 10:36 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I will interpret: Bulls Must Win Game 2
In that event, all of our current satisfaction and excitement will be replaced by concern and an undercurrent of urgency.
The Bulls have the opportunity now to take the next step in their pursuit of a championship by putting forth a determined effort and securing a victory on their home court in Game 2.
Otherwise, the Bulls will put themselves at risk of another first round exit and a sense that their progress as a team has stagnated.
The Bulls must be prepared for a more intense defensive effort from the Heat, and must also be flexible enough to adjust if the game is called differently by the officials in light of the Heat's griping. Hopefully, the Bulls will accept this as a welcome challenge and rise to the occasion.
Deng, after having a breakout playoff game in a breakout season, now has the chance to cement himself as an elite player by maintaining his offensive aggressiveness and production. I hope both Deng, and the Bulls as a whole, perform as though they understand that they have not yet accomplished anything greater than last year, when they gave the Heat a scare but ultimately succumbed in the first round."
by preverbal on
Apr 23, 2007 11:12 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or in Haiku
If they do, glory awaits
If not, stagnation
by preverbal on
Apr 23, 2007 11:14 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
For the remainder of this series
by preverbal on
Apr 23, 2007 11:17 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Taking it to the next level
by bullshooter on
Apr 24, 2007 9:36 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Incredible...
I like the Haiku as well. Another way would have been, "It's only one game; the Bulls, especially Deng, need to come out aggressive in Game 2."
Just about anything could have worked. Anything other than what was written.
by tyger1147 on
Apr 23, 2007 11:21 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What's up your ass?
by NittanyBull on
Apr 23, 2007 8:16 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
quality control
by Paxson Jackson on
Apr 23, 2007 8:22 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm growing tired of you
by NittanyBull on
Apr 23, 2007 8:25 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you should stop now
by bullshooter on
Apr 23, 2007 8:29 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is that a threat?
by NittanyBull on
Apr 23, 2007 8:29 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No threats
by bullshooter on
Apr 23, 2007 8:43 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, if you were me,
by NittanyBull on
Apr 23, 2007 8:45 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't agree with Bullshooter often
by Paxson Jackson on
Apr 23, 2007 8:51 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
eh, mostly
So I'd actually prefer ignoring them, but making fun of them works too. So yea, Nittany, I don't see the point in defending such comments unless you actually agree with the points made. Standing up for the cause of rambling just hurts things overall, methinks.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Apr 23, 2007 10:28 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And I'll gladly read over most of the stuff...
But that one, I just couldn't ignore. I think I get mad when I don't understand something. And not just because someone is smarter than me or a concept is difficult to grasp, but when it's a combination of bad thought and poor punctuation.
I guess I just see it as insult to the general public (of which I belong) to not at least quickly proofread comments. So I choose to insult back. My (in)sincerest apologies.
by tyger1147 on
Apr 23, 2007 10:41 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not like I don't value the points you make
As for bullshooter: don't confuse with being the "butt" of a joke with not wanting to talk about anything other than a post on here, or basketball. I'm more than glad to offer a quick jab on the chin once a while, especially when it's you. Honestly, do you look over my posts? Hey Robin, how many times have I commented on here?
by NittanyBull on
Apr 23, 2007 10:44 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Again
by bullshooter on
Apr 24, 2007 9:33 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You can do better NinnyBull
by bullshooter on
Apr 23, 2007 9:01 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I remain unimpressed by Detroit.
If we get past the damn Heat.
Fear the stripes.
by 1958ChiTown on
Apr 23, 2007 9:40 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
it seems the Heat give a little more respect...
http://www.nba.com/nba_news/deng_heat_070423.html
by hongydraw on
Apr 23, 2007 9:51 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs











