Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Learning Experience

Saying 'it's almost better this way' that the Bulls are playing the Heat rings hollow, I admit. It would've been nicer to get the 'easy' route to the Eastern Conference finals. If the Bulls need to prove themselves, they could've proved themselves then.

But proving themselves now isn't the worst thing in the world, and in terms of a first-round matchup, a meeting with the Heat will tell us more about the team than one against the Wizards or Magic.

Over the course of the season I've tried to throw cold water on any special significance that a regular season game brought. There were 82 of them, guys were in and out for both teams at the time, and as we know not every team is geared up for every game. So while it's impressive that the Bulls have won season series against the Pistons and Heat, and tied against the Mavs and Suns, it doesn't mean that the Bulls belong with those teams. What will determine that is the upcoming 7-game series, where there's no lies and no upsets. The better team will win. Are the Bulls better than the Heat?

I really think this series could tell us a lot about the Bulls: Hinrich, Deng and Gordon in particular. As much as I worry about Skiles burying Tyrus on the bench (and a series-long exile of Tyrus will be enough to have me worry about Skiles himself), if the 'core' doesn't play well it likely won't matter anyway. That means Hinrich being a consistently efficient point guard, exploiting the Heat's weak perimeter defense and initiating their drive-and-kick attack,  Luol Deng doing more than hitting open jumpers, slashing to the basket both with and without the ball against a team with no real answer for him,  Ben Gordon show the league that he's not merely a diminutive streaky jump-shooter, a rich man's Juan Dixon or Willie Green, and become the upper-echelon all-around scorer that the Bulls need. Even better, can any of the three get to the line in merely a fraction of the frequency that Dwyane Wade can?

The best part about bringing in a veteran frontcourt in the offseason is that there's no longer that additional variable concerning how the bigs will play. Wallace and Brown should do fine. It'll be the 'core' that will elevate the Bulls to the 2nd round, if they play well.

If they don't, it brings up so many questions: Is it the type of team that tries hard enough during the regular season to rack up wins but truly aren't that good? Is their point differential inflated by blowouts over inferior opponents? Are they rightfully more annoyed-by instead of feared-by in the East, a team that can be put away whenever necessary?

I wouldn't have said this a year ago, but after a year of perceived progress plus the addition of Wallace, I think these are valid questions if they lose to a banged-up, older, slower Heat team. Judging by their respective seasons, the Bulls are the better team. But in playoff games it always comes down to talent, and the Bulls need to show that they're not just some gritty band of overachievers, there's some true star power amongst them. This season made me want to believe it, but I can't be convinced if they can't make a good showing of this series. 

0 recs  |  Comment 80 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

promise
grandiose, long-sweeping proclomations tonight...actual analysis of these two teams later.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 19, 2007 9:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Sad Matt didn't make up
some shit about how the Bulls feel? I know I am.

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 19, 2007 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Warning, PaxJax:
You're getting bitter.

Just because 1958 likes getting out his smoking jacket and playing Freud occasionally doesn't mean you have to get your panties up in a bunch.

Although for the record, I agree with you: sports psycology is way overplayed by a sports media who have exhausted every other possible article topic.

by Chalkwhite on Apr 19, 2007 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eh
I really don't care, but my heart is an emotionless calculator, so that shouldn't surprise anyone. Off to rely on math!

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 19, 2007 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

psychology*
God, I wish I could spell.

by Chalkwhite on Apr 19, 2007 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

theres always
a yankees redsox / TO story...or rachel nichols could interview barry bonds

by milesgmsu on Apr 23, 2007 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like my dad said
I think this is the series where Wallace earns that fat paycheck. We brought him in to stop Shaq, and if  we don't have to double-team the old bastard, Kapono and Walker won't get their open threes. The Core is important, but I think Wallace's play on Shaq will define the series.

by Chalkwhite on Apr 19, 2007 10:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree mostly with what you said,
but I don't think Wallace's play on Shaq will "define" the series. I leave that play up for the man from Sudan.
PLAYOFF TIME. LETS GO CHICAGO!

by NittanyBull on Apr 19, 2007 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we didnt bring in big ben to stop shaq
or if we did i take back every kind word ive ever said about paxson

by milesgmsu on Apr 23, 2007 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Creaky old Heat
Matt is so right to point out that the Heat have no answer to Deng on defense. Posey-Wright-Kapono need to be exploited as much as possible.

Let's look at the other positions.

Jason Williams/Gary Payton: nothing to be affraid of there.

DWade: will have a harder time on offense this year if Heinrich is spelled by Thabo. All we need is for him to be inefficient.

Haslem/Walker: no worries having these two being watched by Noc and Tyrus T, especially with Wallace taking Shaq 1-on-1. Walker's low release = juicy blocks for TT.

Shaq: don't mind him scoring 18-26 points against Wallace, as long as he's working hard and shoots below 45%. Mourning is a beast on defense, but what can you do?

The Heat are beatable. This team isn't "built for the playoffs." Well, maybe for the 2001-2002 playoffs, but not this year's.

by jai on Apr 19, 2007 10:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

posey
posey isn't that old.  can't he still play some d?

by smegmatic on Apr 19, 2007 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Posey
yes, Posey can play D and will likely be a good test for Deng. Don't forget they also have Eddie Jones, who is old but is also still a good defender.

One key is to attack Williams and Wade, force their better wing defenders to help and leave Deng open.

So maybe 'no answer' for Deng is a stretch, but he should be able to take apart Posey if he's playing well, right?

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2007 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Based on my memory,
Deng hasn't played particularly well against Posey.  Posey is just as big, and in his pre-miami days was credited with being a strong defender.

by Scotter on Apr 20, 2007 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

cut deng some slack
he was porbably afraid posey was gonna shiv him or pull a pacman jones

by milesgmsu on Apr 23, 2007 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i still am pissed about yesterday
and i wish we won. but after hearing wade, kidney, and shaq diesel talk like once again they are the 2 seed and the bulls are the 7th, about how they are coming for the bulls, well SHAQ CAN SHOVE IT! The guy is extremley dominant and is basically the perfect offensive player but im sorry this time the Bulls are not the lower seeded team. i am almost glad to play them, just because we might win. how sweet to send shaq and his team of 90's all stars home. gosh i hope we can do it.
2007 Playoffs: Heat vs Bulls

by hongydraw on Apr 19, 2007 11:19 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Did you just call Mourning, "Kidney"?
That's pretty funny.
PLAYOFF TIME. LETS GO CHICAGO!

by NittanyBull on Apr 19, 2007 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That sort of came out wrong
just because of my violent reaction to that statement. Just to let you know:

Shaq's scoring titles: 2
AI's scoring titles: 4
Wilt: 7
MJ: 10

Please, I have a deep-rooted hatred of Shaq. Don't disrespect the memory of Michael by calling that sack of lard the "perfect offensive player."

by Chalkwhite on Apr 19, 2007 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

dont get me wrong
i cant stand shaq or the heat either. i shouldnt have said perfect offensive player, i didnt know another way to describe his back to the basket ness. but yeah with a lack of free throws or threes or anything else he isnt perfect. i was trying to describe the way he gets a lob pass under the hoop, double pumps, shakes his shoulders, then goes up and dunks. its just so hard to gaurd.
SHAQ-DADDY, PREPARE FOR THE STAMPEDE! IT'S THE BULLS, BEWARE OF THE NEW BREED!!!

by hongydraw on Apr 20, 2007 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's true
Although at this point, I think he's lost a step to the point where he's only as dominant because the refs remember how kick-ass he used to be, and so change the way they call the game when he's in it.

Anyways, that's Wallace's job now.

by Chalkwhite on Apr 20, 2007 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

all things being equal
he is the most dominant paint player ever

by milesgmsu on Apr 23, 2007 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bulls-my view
In my opinion should be the favorite if it was not for all this nostalgic memories of shaq/wade domination.  Shaq is older and wade is injured.  The rest of the heat are older.  The only thing they have going for them this year is Kapono...everything else is worse. Yes Shaq and WAde are great but both have limited use this time around.

The bulls have homecourt advantage and have the better team.  Unfortunately, I am worried that the bulls are shaky.  I do not know what it is about them but I don;t trust them night in and night out to finish games and prove they are better than opposing teams which they should beat (including the heat in my opinion).  Hopefully, the bulls prove everyone, including them espn experts, wrong.  And then go on to beat everyone only to lose to the Mavericks in 5 games.

by Sambossanova on Apr 19, 2007 11:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

it can happen
the bears did it
SHAQ-DADDY, PREPARE FOR THE STAMPEDE! IT'S THE BULLS, BEWARE OF THE NEW BREED!!!

by hongydraw on Apr 20, 2007 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and yeah
why does espn show the bulls no respect against this 90's all star team
SHAQ-DADDY, PREPARE FOR THE STAMPEDE! IT'S THE BULLS, BEWARE OF THE NEW BREED!!!

by hongydraw on Apr 20, 2007 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I always wonder
which Bulls team will show up each game. Maybe this would be a good time for PJ and Ben W. to step up and show that veteran leadership. Keep this team focused on what they need to do.
Tyrus Thomas is a human highlight reel.

by sue369 on Apr 20, 2007 6:51 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That would be the team
that arrives at the U.C., and enters the Bulls' locker room. Scott Skiles is the coach. They wear red, white, and sometimes black. The guys in the Stags uniforms are completely different, except Duhon.

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 20, 2007 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ack
the smartass comment should have been here.
Tyrus Thomas is a human highlight reel.

by sue369 on Apr 20, 2007 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol
Smartass!
Tyrus Thomas is a human highlight reel.

by sue369 on Apr 20, 2007 10:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Tonight on CSN
at 10:30 they are doing a Bulls/Heat playoff preview. (I know you are boycotting CSN Pax)
Tyrus Thomas is a human highlight reel.

by sue369 on Apr 20, 2007 10:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Anyone here know
when they're doing the random ping pong balls to break ties today on NBA TV?
AIM screen name : Option27

by Option27 on Apr 20, 2007 10:59 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

don't know the exact time
I'm going to start a new diary on this...

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2007 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just read this in today's chat
here

Nathanael (KC): When will we hear the results from the tie breaking for the lottery?

SportsNation Chris Sheridan: (12:18 PM ET ) The ornery yet delightful young lady from the NBA communications office who is sitting nearby tells me it'll be sometime this afternoon, maybe between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m. EDT, and they're doing it live on NBA-TV. Stu Jackson actually plucks ping-pong balls out of a hopper. Live TV at its finest.

AIM screen name : Option27

by Option27 on Apr 20, 2007 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

also from the chat
found this very interesting

jon (nyc): chris, id just like to point out, with great glee, how badly the bulls got screwed wednesday night. do you think roy hibbert will be a good fit next to ben wallace? lets go heat!!

SportsNation Chris Sheridan: (12:29 PM ET ) Jon, they didn;t get screwed Wednesday night. They failed to show up. I was at the game, and they were flat. I heard afterward that they got stuck in the Lincoln Tunnel for an hour Wednesday morning on their way to shootaround, which might have had an effect. Can't uderstand why they would stay in NYC when playing in New Jersey, but they weren;t the first team to do it, and they weren;t the first to lose their spirit in the tunnel due to traffic.

AIM screen name : Option27

by Option27 on Apr 20, 2007 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Sun-Times echoes some of your thoughts...
Though this writer feels that it is unwise to rely on rookies in the playoffs. (I don't know about that.)

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/basketball/bulls/350863,CST-SPT-greg20.article

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 12:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Sam Smith's Playoff Predictions...
The old dunce has the Bulls out in the first round (no surprise) ...and the Warriors in the Western Conference finals? Huh?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/basketball/bulls/cs-070420samspicks,1,2222753.htmlstory?coll=ch i-sportstop-hed

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 12:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

it is a surprise
Sam had the Bulls in the Eastern Conference Finals last year I think.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2007 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 20, 2007 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He did.
Perhaps he is the inverse baromoter of truth.

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My dad
gets all of his Bulls news from Sam, because he thinks that the bloggers are "too profane" and don't know enough about basketball.

shakes head

by Chalkwhite on Apr 20, 2007 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why does it feel like
The Bulls already lost? What the hell? They haven't even played the first game.

by vlad001 on Apr 20, 2007 12:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

There's a blogabull
counseling department that can answer your question. I would be more concerned about a Cleveland, Detroit, or New Jersey series though.

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 20, 2007 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kudos Matt
Blogabull is really expanding.  Counseling, and the new SuperBullsFans erotic fiction submission section.  I am excited to see what comes next.

by bullshooter on Apr 20, 2007 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In light of Matt's commentary, I would like to
hear from some of our more esteemed posters (err, commentators) concerning what they would do as GM if the Bulls lost this series to the Heat.

Would you break up the team? How?

Would you trade? For whom?

Would you let the core develop another year?

Add a piece? Who and how?

I guarantee you this: If the Bulls lose this series, there is going to be some extreme dissatisfation in the season ticket holder ranks. Another year of playoff futility in 07-08 would precipitate mutiny.

So what would you do?  

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 12:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

futility's relative
If they play extremely well and get beat, I won't be as hasty to change course. Although I don't see how that scenario happens to be honest. If they play well they're going to win.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2007 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm certainly
not "esteemed," but I feel like it would be foolish to break up the team. If we bow out in the first round, we'd need to wait until we see where our draft pick falls before we know what our options are. If it's one of the top two (obviously a slim chance, but still), then it we seem that we are golden. If it's one of the later ones, I would recommend packaging it looking for our low post scorer.

An intruiging possibility: Shawm Marion. There cheap-ass owner doesn't want to pay the luxury tax: if we sent some of our rookie-scale players plus the pick, we might be able to nab him.

Sign and trade for Noc, the pick, and TT (as much as I hate to give him up)for Marion?
With a line-up of:
Kirk
Gordon
Deng
Marion
Wallace

We'd be formiddable.

Just at thought.

by Chalkwhite on Apr 20, 2007 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really can't spell
intriguing*
Shawn*
Just a* thought

by Chalkwhite on Apr 20, 2007 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think you break up the team
until you plug the gaping hole at 4 (or 5 depending on how you look at it).  Everything depends on the draft at that point.  At the same time, nobody is safe in the right trade.  And I certainly don't give out any exorbitant long term deals this summer.

by bullshooter on Apr 20, 2007 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the bulls won't lose until the Nets in the
EC finals or the Spurs or Suns in the Finals.  And after that they will stand pat and only add someone like Melvin Ely, Joe Smith, or Chris Mihm in addition to the draft pick.  I think Nocioni is the wild card as to whether they resign him at the right price or package him in a deal for a PF.

by GWKD on Apr 20, 2007 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes
And while I believe in statistics very much, Hollinger's stuff seems to be lacking a few crucial elements that might make it more reliable and useful.  None of his algorithms take into account the whole, "David Stern likes stars to win" factor.  I view his stuff more as evidence that we knew what was going to happen was obvious, not as a basis for picking against the grain.  All that aside, Go Bulls.

by bullshooter on Apr 20, 2007 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mannix had the Bulls winning to start the season
so it's more like 'I'm sticking with my pick' type of deal. I don't really accept that as analysis, personally.

"uber-aggressive forward Andres Nocioni, a player built for the postseason."

I hope that doesn't sound as silly in a couple weeks.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2007 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be fair, Noce is essentially tied for
second highest playoff scoring average of any Bull (tied with BG behind Hinrich).

And he averages fewer turnovers in playoff games than both BG and Hinrich (to be expected, since Hinrich and BG are guards).

And, and, get this, he is also second on the team in playoff rebounding, behing Ben Wallace, of course.

So it really isn't that zany to say that Noce is "built for the postseason."

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

god.dammit.
You called me stupid, and now you're going on another Nocioni in the postseason slurpfest again. Small. Sample. Size.

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 20, 2007 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't hold that against Noce, though.
I understand your point about statistical validity. However, in 12 games (the same amount played by BenG and Kirk and Duhon, etc.), Noc has played consistently well.

Now, the fact that Noce has great playoff numbers certainly doesn't support the notion that he should SIT in the playoffs, does it?

The guy has gone to the playoffs in both of his seasons in the league, and he has played well. You can't take that away from him. It certainly has to be factor in determining Skiles rotation, right?

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW, Noce is also the third leading scorer
against the Heat in this year's regular season series. I think he is averaging about 14.5 PPG.

Now Tyrus also has pretty good splits against the Heat, given that he only played about 18 MPG.

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really
Tyrus Thomas is a clear upgrade at power forward, and P.J. Brown can defend Shaq and Mourning much better than Floppin' Nocioni can. Nocioni should get some minutes and chuck some threes, but Skiles would be mistaken to rely on him for long stretches, or play him with Gordon, Deng, and Hinrich all on the floor. It doesn't matter that it's the playoffs. He plays well against Walker, and that's how he should be used.

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 20, 2007 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm with PaxJax
I'd rather Skiles uses the past few months of evidence instead of the past 2 playoff series. I just don't buy into Nocioni swallowing magic playoff juice before every series.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2007 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As you well know, Noce was out the last few months
and it is very difficult for Skiles (or anyone else) to know whether the improvement in the team's play was a result of Noce's absence or whether it was a result of improved execution elsewhere on the team.

And keep in mind, the one time we played Miami without Noce this season, we were destroyed. A thousand things might explain that, but it remains the fact of the matter.

I am predicting that Skiles will try to play Noce as much as possible in this series. You know Skiles thinks that Noce's presence improves our spacing on offense. That's huge in a drive and kick game like that of the Bulls. He'll be out there to free up the jump shooters and clear the lane.  

If he has another great series, will you admit you were wrong?

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In six games playoff games against the Heat last
year he averaged 22 points and 9 rebounds. He almost averaged a double double...against the team that went on to be the world champions.

Are you tellimg me that's a fluke?

You can explain away those statistics with vague pronouncements like "Tyrus Thomas is a clear upgrade at power forward."

You're not impartial because you have a personal agenda. You've staked out a contrarian position on Noce and now you are going to absurd lengths to defend it.

We lost that series last year because we had no one to guard Shaq. That wasn't Noce's fault, by any stretch of the imagination. Now we have Ben Wallace. That should be the difference this year. If it's not, we overpaid for Wallace.

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Outside of "The Core",
Noce has the highest PER on the team.

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 6:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So?
PER isn't perfect, no pun intended. The Roland Rating negates some of Nocioni's offensive efficiency, and I hope I don't have to see the Heat taking turns dunking on him.

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 20, 2007 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

right
This why Noc is a mismatch: He helps the offense but hurts the defense. So even if he puts up some points against the Heat they give up a substantial amount of defense and rebounding by playing him at the 4.

That seems the type of situation that's good to try in spurts but not for the 38 minutes a game he got last year's playoffs. Remember the Bulls lost the series. Sure it wasn't Noc's fault, but you also can't know if it really helped that much.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2007 6:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And "The Core"
should be taking more shots, instead of giving the ball to a guy who can't pass.

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 20, 2007 6:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

while im asolidly in the defewnse of noch camp
that still means noch has a lower PER than 4 guys on the team.....

by milesgmsu on Apr 23, 2007 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think anyone has an agenda
But some of us believe the Bulls are better with Tyrus than Noc. Nobody here cares if Noc gets paid more or less this offseason, or have a special reason to not want him to do well.

I guess we each have our cases, and you could say that maybe the Heat allowed Noc to shoot like crazy and it hurt the team overall. I'm concerned about the team, and I think the Bulls give the Heat more problems when an explosive shotblocker and rebounder than they do with another jump-shooter.

There are times where they'll need Noc's scoring, but saying just because he decimated Antoine Walker in 6 games that earns him the majority of minutes this series even though he's hurt and Tyrus has proven to help the team, I just can't agree with it.

And who gives a shit who is right or wrong amongst us? If Noc plays well and the Bulls win I won't care that I was 'wrong', I'm telling you what I think they should do this series, and that's play him less.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2007 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course he'll play less than last year's series.
Not in small part due to the fact that he is just coming off of an injury.

by 1958ChiTown on Apr 20, 2007 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

restricted free agent
don't forget that Noc is also playing for a contract.

by GWKD on Apr 20, 2007 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure why you're
worried about what the ESPN dot commers say, when this guy is more your speed anyway.

by Paxson Jackson on Apr 20, 2007 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know what's more annoying
PaxJax's comments or his affinity to find stupid websites.
PLAYOFF TIME. LETS GO CHICAGO!

by NittanyBull on Apr 20, 2007 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This series is the key.....
I agree that this series will tell a lot about this team.  This is the time to step it up and show the basketball world that the Bulls HAVE arrived.  Not to just make the playoffs, but to COMPETE and WIN.  If we can beat this Heat team (older, banged up, probably with a lack of hunger after already winning), we will build momentum going into the series vs. Detroit.  Cleveland, on the other hand?  They will have such an (extremely) easy route that it will also be easy for them to lose their focus.  I think in the long-run, this definitely will make us a stronger team if we can put it together and win.  This first-round, however, is key.  If we win this series, we will have tons of momentum against the Cavs./Pistons, as they play teams that don't pose as great a threat as the Heat.  Thoughts???

by KM24 on Apr 20, 2007 4:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Series keys to hope for
Can Gordon overcome Eddie Jones's defense?
Can Deng overcome Posey's defense ?

Will Noc have a great series? Similiar to last year. Will TT and Thabo add a little something something extra?

by exult463 on Apr 20, 2007 5:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Time is Now to Trade Deng

Recent FanPosts

Small
What the Bulls are missing
Jayhawk_small
Game Preview # 12 - Bulls @ Nuggets
Blackstar_small
Plan B: if the Bulls fail to sign a FA superstar at the 2 or the 4 spots...
Small
How About A Whole New Plan?
Small
Game Preview #10: Chicago Bulls vs. Los Angeles Lakers
Small
Rose Problem: Trying too hard to please Vinny and "teammates"
Small
Your thought on a GS-Chi Ellis A-R for Kirk TT trade dreams
Jjohnson
What's going on in Derrick Rose's head?
Drose2_small
what i'd do as GM right now...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger