Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

This team is a mess

It was all scripted so well. The veterans band together and single out a young insubordinate for further punishment. Everybody on the same page, showing leadership, salvaging the season. Sit back and wait for glowing remarks on your behalf.

But see, if you're going to play this "galvanizing the team" game, it shouldn't be initiated by Griffin and Wallace: someone who doesn't play, and someone who can no longer play (and is known for clashing with coaches himself!). And then have it endorsed by a lame-duck coach.

Oh, and you can't then walk on the floor with this welling of team spirit...and then give up 38 in the first quarter. Lose to the Hawks by 21.

This kind of story can perhaps be told about a great team with a track record of success. But these players have done nothing to earn minutes or power, and not only have they gotten a coach fired but they're now handing out disciplinary measures.

What a joke.

Comment 238 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I owe Skiles an apology
I was as critical of his failure to play the young players as anyone, but at least he had the balls to limit Wallace's minutes.  From what we've seen from Boylan, that might have been the REAL reason Skiles was canned, not because of his unwillingness to play Thomas and Noah.  If the Bulls want to let a rapidly declining player like Ben Wallace practically run the organization, then they deserve to go into the toilet alongside Wallace's game.

by Big D on Jan 13, 2008 4:08 PM CST reply actions  

agreed
especially if Skiles' other real sin in Pax's eyes was not benching Ben Gordon.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 13, 2008 4:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I can picture Skiles
sitting at home watching this mess and laughing hysterically that he no longer has to deal with it.  Regardless of how "happy" the team may be without him, he's certainly looking better and better the longer this season goes on.

I've never seriously wished an injury on any player, especially never one on my own team, and it makes me sad that Wallace is bringing me rapidly toward that point.

"I believe. I believe. It's silly, but I believe." (Miracle on 34th Street)

by wjb1492 on Jan 13, 2008 4:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Have I heard this once before?Hmm...
''Obviously, losing to New York is something everybody has jumped on as kind of a barometer of our team,'' Boylan said after practice Thursday. ''So maybe getting away is a good thing for us at this time.
"YES,WE CAN!"-B.OBAMA.

by Azabullsfan on Jan 13, 2008 4:13 PM CST reply actions  

i find it hilarious that on this very page
a promo for that nationally televised bulls-heat slugfest wednesday night can be found.  come see a team apparently run by two pathetic veterans take on the worst team in the league!  the nba, where amazing happens.

by Mike C on Jan 13, 2008 4:14 PM CST reply actions  

What about Larry Brown?
Noah's extra game suspension is a symptom of lack of leadership.  What about having the coach talk to Noah and better understand what is going on with him than not have him play?  Noah seemed very contrite and further punishing him makes no sense - except the players feel there is no leadership.  

I do not like Larry Brown abandoning every team he has been with.  He did size up the Knicks in a month trying to make changes that Isiah now realizes but cannot make because they are his players.  He did pull Detroit together t win a championship and put Philly in the Finals.  What do you guys think?

by chgobr on Jan 13, 2008 4:21 PM CST reply actions  

Brown hates the youngins
This team would have to be drastically made over in his image and probably would not be better off for it in the long run.  What this team needs is a coach who will be willing to develop the likes of Noah and Thomas while pushing Hinrich, Gordon, and Deng to the next level.  Please, don't mention Rick Carlisle as another possibility.

by snley on Jan 13, 2008 4:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I completely forgot there was a game today
Boy did I get lucky.  Taking a quick look at the box score, it's a good thing Thomas only got 10 min and Noah was benched by his teammates.  This game could have been much, much worse if you had a rookie and a second year guy out there.  I'm assuming that Noce got a number of minutes at the 4, which probably led to the large rebound disparity, but all that he contributes that doesn't show up in the boxscore probably kept this from being a blowout of the worst magnitude.  At least Griffin and Wallace are earning their salaries that they were both supposed to get for their "veteran presence."  I really hope that Paxson learns a lot about this team during the rest of the season.  Maybe he will finally grow a pair and make a trade.  Hopefully, his veteran leaders will be the first ones out the door.

by snley on Jan 13, 2008 4:26 PM CST reply actions  

right
we're still in a playoff push, so playing the better younger players will only symbolize giving up :)

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 13, 2008 4:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Hysterical
Blowout of the worse magnitude...I'm waiting for the posts "correcting" you that it was a blowout.

As far as Wallace, I don't think I've ever done a bigger 180 in my entire sports fanatic life.  To think I was once happy with the signing.

"I believe. I believe. It's silly, but I believe." (Miracle on 34th Street)

by wjb1492 on Jan 13, 2008 4:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Should we be talking about re-builing?
Ahhh yes the good old days... Kevin Garnett was in Minn and we were pegged to be Eastern Champs... Well those days have passed. Now were left with a doubt that we can make the playoffs. Whats going to make us better...? Re-signing Deng and Gordon to blown up contracts at seasons end? Will that really do it? No... Our core is garbage whether its our in-consistent play from everyone but Joe Smith. We have no star and that often means we have no killer instinct. We need to start over free up our salary cap space. Get some good draft picks and pull in a prime player. No combo-guards no 6 foot 3 shooting guards and please im begging no more 6-9 centers.
Fire Sale!! Please Pax!! I cant look at these people for 5-6 more years!! Start Over!!

by TRiCioNeRo on Jan 13, 2008 4:29 PM CST reply actions  

Fire sale would be too drastic
When you run a fire sale, it's usually b/c you don't expect the good players on your team to be around when the team is ready to be good again.  That, or you're an owner pissed off that the city/state your team plays in won't give you a billion dollars for a new stadium.  There are several quality pieces to build around that could make this team good again in a hurry.  Moves need to be made, but to scrap it all would be folly.

by snley on Jan 13, 2008 4:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Plural?
Pieces? Right now what pices can we build around with our cap situation? Jerry wouldnt go over the cap in the 23 era. Remember the re-signing of Pippen? Deng is a piece but a 3rd option second at best. Be honest with yourself now, we did great in this draft Noah, Tyrus, and Gray will be good but still. One poss left who are we going to Gordon? Deng? Kirk? its all gonna fail we want a championship not a second round knock out every year if were lucky... Fire sale wasnt the right word youre right.

by TRiCioNeRo on Jan 13, 2008 7:32 PM CST up reply actions  

You named pieces
Deng, Noah, Thomas, and as unpopular as this is, I stand by Hinrich.  Capt. Kirk does enough right to warrant keeping him.  While I don't think he'll ever win back to back MVP's, I think he still has a chance to continually improve through his career ala Steve Nash.  Hinrich does seem to fit the historical class of big PG's who can pass or shoot who, as John Hollinger pointed out last year, may not see their peaks until their 30's.  His stats compare well to Nash at this point in their careers.

Gray came into the NBA 10-15 years too late.  He's a nice option for some minutes off the bench, but nothing to really build around.  He's too damn slow to want as anything more than a very limited role player.

Obviously, some of that core that I identified above, will probably have to be used in attempts to improve the team via trade.  Put with a good SG, I think they can make for a hell of a starting 5.  That's why I'd be very much in favor of a McGrady trade.

by snley on Jan 13, 2008 8:36 PM CST up reply actions  

McGrady?
Thats a funny subject... When it comes to T-Mac the only trade id do would be for Wallace and Duhon.. But still the question remains what has McGrady done and what is he going to do... Hes on the decline and Houston should trade him for youthful pieces to put around Yao. It'll never happen. The only person logically to go after is Pau hes young enough to fit in with our core and he fits our biggest need. But theres still flaws all over our team. Were playing 4 on 5 on both ends with Wallaces off. and Gordons def.

by TRiCioNeRo on Jan 13, 2008 9:03 PM CST up reply actions  

McGrady trade probably wouldn't happen
The reason I'd be most in favor of it, though, is simply to get rid of Wallace.  I think Houston would be much more likely to take on that contract than Memphis.  Gordon's D I'm not too worried about when you consider that the team ranked first in Defensive Efficiency last year.  I just worry about Wallace's seeming ability to hold this team hostage.  It'd be great to get Pau, but it seems that Memphis still isn't quite serious about getting rid of him.  If they're not in a rush, then the Bulls deal would have to probably start with Deng and Noah/Thomas.  To me, once you add in the extra bodies for salary matching, the team still looks like it will be bound for a second round playoff exit.  Not to mention, Paxson probably won't do an in season trade.  What I'd love to see happen is that Thomas, Noah, and Sefolosha finally get their minutes so the Bulls know what they have heading into the offseason.

by snley on Jan 14, 2008 8:14 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree
Kirk started off horribly this year (unexplicably bad) but he's starting to play solid D and be consistent again. We also won't get enough value for him in the marketplace anyway and he's not worthy of a fire sale.

Deng's timid (which is why he's an at best second fiddle).

I would try to keep the following from our team (Hinrich, Deng, Noah, Thomas).

I'd love to keep Nocioni (I know I'm on the rare side for this blog, but he's the only guy who plays his butt off every minute--and he's probably the best energy guy in the league, but if we can use him and Smith and maybe one of our potential guys (Thomas, Noah, Thabo) and a draft pick, then I'm for it.

I know everyone hates my minor tweak trade thoughts, but why not try to pry Mike Miller out of Memphis?  Miller's a big SF/SG who while he doesn't maybe have the huge games of Gordon, he's always more consistent and his size makes him less guardable under pressure because he can at least make a pass when double teamed.  I say trade Gordon, Khryapa, Griffin for Mike Miller.  It sounds like a lot (3 for 1), but isn't that much when you consider that Griffin and Khryapa are fluff on our team anyway.

Miller's the guy I'd always compare GOrdon to going into this season (except Miller's got height, and Gordon has the ability for more ridiculous scoring games), but Miller can score (16.4 pts a game, and can rebound (7 pts/game).

Memphis will pick up $8.5M of cap relief next year that they could use for Gordon (but likely would not).

SUre I'd love a superstar, but since it's unlikely we'll get one (and I don't really want Gimpy McGrady these days) I think we should make a tweak and get another piece in the draft.

We'll have to wait out Big Ben's contract anyway before we can really be competitive again (or at least we'll have to wait until after next season when Big Ben's salary is a valuable commodity again), so let's at least try to make some waves playing the young guys and lookign competitive:

Hinrich
Mike Miller
Deng
Thomas
Wallace

Bench: Noah, Nocioni, Smith, Duhon, Thabo, Gray

This would be a minor tweak, but we still would have the assets for a more major tweak, and if that never happened, we'll at least have a more consistent starting lineup....Miller will help to really keep the defenses honest and with the size he has, he can at least keep a hand in the face of the bigger guys, which will slow them down a bit more than BG.

I still like Gordon, but we ain't keeping him anyway, so let's just end the BG experience while we can.

I also don't think (As all the analysts are saying on espn and si that the Bulls ahve the pieces for a blockbuster right now--salaries of Deng and Gordon are too low, and Hinrich/Noc with the BYC are too high), and nobody wants Wallace's mammoth cap killer contract.

by majoyenrac on Jan 14, 2008 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Plus
I do think between Noah and Thomas we'll have a star PF/C in the works.

I know Thomas's attitude has cost him playing time, but from what I see (Even yesterdays 2 minutes at the end of the game) I see a big guy who can pass (that was an awesome pass at the end of the game that the announcers of course didn't watch) and a guy who can leap over everyone for rebounds/points.

He needs discipline and so does apparently Noah, and since that's the case, let's get a big man coach in there NOW.  

I think both of these guys can be better than the current Chandler, and I do think Noah might be the only leader in this bunch (but he's a rookie and a very loud rookie who needs a bit of maturing).

I'd love to see some development of players (something outside of Deng we haven't seen--I think Noce, Hinrich, Gordon developed naturally, Deng's the only guy who had a big jump).

Let's get a big man coach and see what they can do.....it's just a shame the Bulls haven't really had many stellar big men.  Last Thing I want to see is Stacey King in that role--although I might not mind it because the games would be easier to watch even when we're getting killed with Stacey not talking talking talking talking as much....

by majoyenrac on Jan 14, 2008 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Gordon and parts for Mike Miller?
So what you're saying is you want the Bulls to score  70 points a game? Mike Miller is a nice player but you can get him for a lot less (ie Hinrich)

by alee7805 on Jan 14, 2008 6:59 PM CST up reply actions  

No we can't
THe BYC and salaries wouldn't allow that trade to happen (Hinrich for Miller).  I like BG (I think he's got a ton of talent for a taller team--one with say a taller PG and strong seven foot Center who could play 30+ minutes a game and control the paint to hide BG's defensive lapses a bit more).....

I do think especially given this year and the fact that in the last 2 years we've drafted 2 taller SG's, that it's a sign that we want to give up on the BG experience...

Plus I think a lineup of Hinrich-Miller-Deng-Thomas/Smith-Wallace/Noah would add a boost to our hot and cold team by virtue that Miller is pretty much consistent (when he's given the opps, he'll get his scores) where Gordon can have games where he's open and misses everything.  Plus Miller can grab rebounds, passes as well as Gordon, can handle the ball better, and actually might be a better defender by virtue of his height....

Teams like Detroit wouldn't be able to completely outmuscle us with a big guard, and Mike Miller is a lot better than his league rep (since he's been lost on mostly mediocre Memphis teams and Memphis ain't really a hotbed for NBA talk either).

Memphis is sure to pull the plug on this one....and I think in this scenario we're trying something while giving us another trade piece (if Miller doesn't work, he's at least an $8.5M trade chip for a bigger trade later).

by majoyenrac on Jan 15, 2008 7:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Was it as bad as the score looked?
I missed the game. I think this season is close to lost. We need to find a coach get rid of Wallace and develop some of the young players that would be one the floor if Wallace was not.
TMD- http://playahatersblog.blogspot.com

by TMD on Jan 13, 2008 4:48 PM CST reply actions  

It may have actually been worse.
I still have hope for the season, or at least I really want to keep having hope even though it gets harder and harder to maintain my delusions.

What I really want is for the players I still like on this team to somehow get rescued from this misery, which I think playing the young guys would accomplish.  They'd make mistakes, sure, but the whole attitude on the floor is different with the kids out there.

"I believe. I believe. It's silly, but I believe." (Miracle on 34th Street)

by wjb1492 on Jan 13, 2008 4:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Worse
First quarter:
Bulls 22
Joe Johnson 19

So, yeah.

Can this season be saved by jumping?

by cubbybear on Jan 13, 2008 6:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I believe that vote
has already been cast to no avail.
Insert sarcasm here.

by MarketMaker on Jan 13, 2008 5:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I would find a way
to vote early and often,
TMD- http://playahatersblog.blogspot.com

by TMD on Jan 13, 2008 5:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I think
Playing Thomas and Noah would be better than seeing Wallace out there. I really hope we can dump hi for Gasol or T-Mac. I would rather see Gasol, Gordon, Thabo,Deng and Thomas than what is on the court now.
TMD- http://playahatersblog.blogspot.com

by TMD on Jan 13, 2008 5:02 PM CST reply actions  

Oops!
I didn't even know they were playing today... missed it?  or maybe not!

by exult463 on Jan 13, 2008 5:08 PM CST reply actions  

comment to the K.C.'s article
hits the bulls-eye to one of this team's major problems..
"Maybe one of the Bulls' problems is that they have a guy who can't even play calling team meetings. When will Deng, Gordon, and Hinrich step up and be leaders?"

by exult463 on Jan 13, 2008 5:26 PM CST reply actions  

Does anybody here
think that there is a team in the NBA who would take Ben Wallace?  He has 2 and 1/2 years of making a lot of money and being terrible.  Who would benefit in any way from getting him on their roster? He might offer the least production per dollar of any non-injured player in the league.  I would love to get rid of him more than anyone, but I can't even imagine the Knicks would make this stupid of a mistake.  The writing is on the wall: His signing is the one move above all others that will eventually end the John Paxson era.
Insert sarcasm here.

by MarketMaker on Jan 13, 2008 5:31 PM CST reply actions  

Wasn't it
Reinsdorf who wanted BW in the first place?
Win, just win.

by sue369 on Jan 13, 2008 5:39 PM CST up reply actions  

trading of Wallace
I have mentioned sending him to Houston as part of a McGrady trade. His $15 million per year and Duhon would match to McGrady's $18 million per year. He would help bolster their defense, okay maybe help. I just don't see getting out from under that without taking another terrible contract in return. No one is going to trade with us out of kindness in retrospect Tyson Chandler would look good right now
TMD- http://playahatersblog.blogspot.com

by TMD on Jan 13, 2008 5:42 PM CST up reply actions  

don't give ike too much credit...
wallace is supposed to provide a team some toughness and defense, something the knicks lack.  if the rumors are true about knicks wanting to unload randolph, i'd take his fat jump shooting *ss straight up for wallace in a heartbeat.  he makes 13m vs wallace's 15m, and randolph has 3.5 years left on the deal. randolph can probably offset wallace's crappy rebounding numbers but probably not wallace's crappy roaming help defense. by subtraction, this trade would make us a little less crappy.

by leeac on Jan 13, 2008 10:53 PM CST up reply actions  

An incremental improvement might be
all that we can hope for, so probably the best trade available is the one Matt mentioned a while back for in Maggette from the Clippers..

by exult463 on Jan 13, 2008 5:43 PM CST reply actions  

What a load of BS
Even though I like A-Drain and can understand his veteran opinion being of some value, I can't believe how an interim coach can respond to an overpaid player who is loafing through the season. Noah has enough reason for an outburst, considering this team's gross underachieving and head-shaking decision-making. This is a depleted Bulls team with ZERO passion, direly in need of the young energy that can be produced with minutes from players like Noah, Thomas, and Thabo. In them is potential that can be realized if they're actually given a respectable chance. Joe Smith and Ben Wallace are not the future, Chris Duhon isn't leading this team anywhere, and the thought of Noc as a go-to-guy with his wild three-point shooting and erratic offense makes me want to take a few years off from the Bulls. Noah should not have been benched; he should've been awarded Wallace's contract for actually caring. You're right Matt; what a f**king joke.

by ForWhomTheBullTolls on Jan 13, 2008 5:44 PM CST reply actions  

I agree with what you said
but Reinsdorf was reportedly pushing for the Wallace signing since he's buddies with his agent.  It would be interesting to know to what extent he was involved in that mess.  

by No bull on Jan 13, 2008 5:45 PM CST reply actions  

E-Rob, Tim Thomas or Wallace
out of the three, who is the bigger poison to the team...

It seems as if the competition is between Thomas and Wallace?

Kinda miss Big Sweetney and Othella now?  Wow, I believe the character building selections went out of the door with the high price purchase of Wallace.  

Maybe Ben Wallace is a serious problem....

by exult463 on Jan 13, 2008 5:53 PM CST reply actions  

Wallace by far
Because of his big contract, he actually has power in the organization.

by Big D on Jan 13, 2008 6:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I have felt
That Wallace is a cancer for a while now. We paid too much for overpriced role player. In Detroit his shortcomings were overshawdowed by the four all stars in the starting line up with him. And letting him have so much say so in firing a coach and calling team meetings is crazy. He is in no position to call anything! If he were playing his ass off maybe but he is not no one on this team is. Griffin should shut up as well he should never see the floor play Thabo, Thomas, Noah and let Wallace and Griffin go have coffee with other retirees somewhere
TMD- http://playahatersblog.blogspot.com

by TMD on Jan 13, 2008 6:36 PM CST up reply actions  

YTD: Reinsdorf made more on his crap
then all members of this blog together. Any problem?

by runio on Jan 13, 2008 6:20 PM CST reply actions  

Big Ben
Most of my posts on here recently have been about how bad Big Ben is, and I see no reason to stop now.  We all saw the Atlanta game, but think about these numbers:

Wallace shot 1-5 from the floor (20%).  Of the 4 misses, 2 were blocked.  He only took one shot from more than 5 feet (a 14 foot miss).  Wallace also shot 25% from the FT line.

I cannot understand how these numbers are acceptable under any standard.

by Stay Chisel on Jan 13, 2008 6:32 PM CST reply actions  

There's no statistic for grit...
Like the crap that sticks to your grille, not what Reggie Miller had oodles of.  Come to think of it, that's not a good thing.  Carry on piling on.
Can this season be saved by jumping?

by cubbybear on Jan 13, 2008 6:44 PM CST up reply actions  

If its not Noce with you guys its Wallace
Scapegoat much guys???

You're  missing the boat.  The vote on the Noah thing was
unanimous.  So you're going to bitch and moan over who called the meeting or took the vote to Boylan??  Makes no sense at all.
Forest and trees are different things.

Its taking some of you awhile to come to grips with the fact that
there are much much bigger issues on this team than Wallace
or how many minutes Thomas gets or any other single issue.
You need to let some of this piddling stuff go and look at the
broader issues.

They don't need to take it back to square one but the answer to this team's issues are not on the roster right now and its hard to see how Pax is going to trade his way out of this.   There isn't going to be a +/- hero trotting up on a white horse to save the
season.   Pax needs new guards and a new coach, at a minimum.
He's drafted poorly the last two years and failed to be proactive  in trades.   He's put poorly matched players together and its catching up with him.  

Look. Atlanta sucks but they're the team with the brighter near term.  This could get much much worse even if Wallace never plays another minute and Thomas averages 35mpg from here on in

by Rusty LaRue on Jan 13, 2008 6:45 PM CST reply actions  

Right on...
though Atlanta has some decent players.  I would take Joe Johnson over Gordon or Josh Smith over Deng or Horford over Tyrus or Noah.

by Kemp @ Blog a Bull on Jan 13, 2008 7:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Worse?
If we lose more we get a good pick next year, if we stay the same were going to get the tenth pick. Playoffs? Were having problems with the Knicks, Sixers and Hawks. Nothing is worse than mediocracy in this leauge. Except a 28-12 4th quater at home against the Knicks.  

by TRiCioNeRo on Jan 13, 2008 7:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah worse
There's a lot worse than being mediocre, just ask Tim Floyd.

We'll be getting more games like NY and Atl.  Get ready for this Feb road trip.

by Rusty LaRue on Jan 13, 2008 7:45 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree
The Bulls guard(s) situation is bad, very bad.  But, I'm a bit loss since Paxson missed out on Brandon Roy.  I don't see how this situation can be fixed easily or quickly.  Hinrich, has some limitations, but he's a decent player.  But, Hinrich needs a special player along side of him to help compliment his strengths and mask his weaknesses.  This type of complimentary player (a SG with leadership and decent PG skills) don't come easily and don't come in the draft frequently.  

Therefore this then leaves Kirk somewhat abandoned trying to progress (playing with the likes of Duhon and Thabo) while his weaknesses are being exposed to the point of destroying his confidence.

He's like a wounded promised champion race horse (analogy to not having a complimentary backcourt mate). I question whether he'll ever achieve consistency (Bulls mgmt will ever be able to acquired a suitable backcourt mate).  Or should he be pawned and sacificed (given up by the Bulls and traded to the Heat or the Blazers to become all that he can be playing along side one of his b-ball leather soul-mates in his generation) for a first round draft pick and other considerations. Or else he'll waste and pine away playing for the non-complimentary player case assembled for him by the Bulls.

Gordon will be ok as a 6th man, period.  Nothing more.

Therefore, the Bulls guard situation consists of a shell of what he could be PG, a scoring 3rd guard off the bench, Duhon, Thabo and Griffin.  All 5 aren't starters in the NBA, with the exception of Kirk only matched with the appropriate SG.  Yes, this is a bigger problem for Paxson.

by exult463 on Jan 13, 2008 9:31 PM CST up reply actions  

You nailed it.
The problem isn't Nocioni's "chucking" and it isn't Tyrus' or Noah's "burn", just as it wasn't Skiles' rotations.  Those are minor issues as to why the team is such a mess.

I think it is obvious right now that the Tyrus/Wallace/Thabo offseason was utterly devastating.  Additionally, Noah seems to be a wasted pick, although it is hard to say it was a mistake because of what else was available at that spot.  

It is now easy to defend Gordon (especially when Wallace is on the floor) so the only scorer on the team is neutralized and he doesn't have any other top-level skills.  

Hinrich started off the year playing horribly but when he plays to his averages, he makes the Bulls a middle-of-the-road team.  I think that's the ceiling right now.

Obviously there are no easy answers but I don't see any way this team can remain intact over the next five weeks.  That will have to be the start of 08-09.

by nateroth on Jan 13, 2008 10:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I never thought I'd say this
But out of the contracts that the Bulls have done, this offseason has been the best by far.

Noce was overpriced, but saved the season with his overconfident chucker mentality, and Joe Smith has the highest PER on the team.  If Noah and Gray count, they have made significant contributions and their selections should be noted(Gray might be the steal of the draft, if he can become more consistent).  Also, refusing to give Gordon and Deng more money may have not only saved money, but may have just saved the Bulls' future for the next few years, as they have not been worth big-time money all year, and the leap forward has not happened, for the team or the players.

The big-money signings of BW and Hinrich(the former far more than the latter) were good at the time, but now appear foolish.  When we look back, Paxson's decision making seems to be getting slightly better, IMHO.  Ben Wallace is an outlier, and I think that Reinsdorf is at fault there.

I think a big-time coach can save this team.  Only a coach that really draws some water(LB, for one), will sit Wallace and be able to take the heat.  Noah, Smith, Gray, Thomas and Thabo are now the most important assets to evaluate, as Deng seems to be stable rather than improving at this moment in time, and Gordon enjoys his new role, but doesn't seem to be earning a starting spot just yet.

Better decisions up to the trade deadline and this offseason are something I think have the potential to give us back the hope that the Bulls regression has taken from us.

Can this season be saved by jumping?

by cubbybear on Jan 13, 2008 6:52 PM CST reply actions  

You're right
There are a lot of problems on this team and the blame falls on Paxson.
TMD- http://playahatersblog.blogspot.com

by TMD on Jan 13, 2008 6:53 PM CST reply actions  

paxsons created a monster
and its out of his control now.

paxson needs to be fired and they need someone who doesnt have a mancrush on each of his draft picks. fire sale would be better than watching this team. it makes me sick.

by Jbasic89 on Jan 13, 2008 6:59 PM CST reply actions  

Well
I do not care one way or the other about the Noah sit-down.  I do, however, think that Wallace is responsible for a lot of the problems with this team.

Wallace's defense does not make up for his lack of offense.  The Bulls do not have the kind of offensive firepower necessary to play 4 on 5 on that end of the court.  Many of Big Ben's misses are basically turnovers.

Other problems on this team include the midget backcourt, which includes the related problem of starting Chris Duhon.  Chew on these stats:  Duhon took 5 shots and missed them all.  Of those, 3 were blocked.  Duhon is shooting 37% from the floor on the year.

Between Wallace and Duhon, we have two starters who combined for 3 points on 10% shooting in over 51 minutes tonight.  Does anyone know of a team with a winning record who can make the same claim?

by Stay Chisel on Jan 13, 2008 7:12 PM CST reply actions  

What a freaking joke...
..that the one guy on the team who has shown some enthusiasm, fight and talent gets benched by overpaid and undertalented losers like Griffin and Big Ben. So punishment can be handed out arbitrarily by Big Ben and other sundry losers? What the hell is Boylan getting paid for? It would be such a shame to see Noah lose his heart like TT & Thabo did.

by bullsfaninbigapple on Jan 13, 2008 7:31 PM CST reply actions  

Your right
These young guys need confidence and someone needs to take the horns. Noah will be our Stephen Jackson once Bens gone. Also im glad to see another bulls fan in the area.

by TRiCioNeRo on Jan 13, 2008 7:43 PM CST up reply actions  

What more needs to be seen?
At what point does Pax pull the plug on this "core", send down a mandate to Boylan to play the young guys more, and deal rapidly depreciating assets like Hinrich and Gordon?  You don't make a deal for a Gasol now, because this team is on par with the Memphis Grizzlies, not a player away from legitimate contention.  The only keeper out of this core is Deng.  See if a contender can be built around him, Ty, Noah, and Thabo.  At least the model will be based on size, length, and athleticism, rather than one that generates unfavorable mismatches at every position.  Pax put his eggs in a basket being carried by two miniature combo guards.  Note:  not miniature point guards, mini combo guards.  I demand that the third rebuilding effort to begin sooner than later because it's obvious that this team is 2nd round material at best and lottery bound in its current state.  Then we can see if Paxson learned anything from his first attempt and can come to a quick decision on whether Paxson can be the architect of a contender or if he can only be successful via making safe draft picks and pilfering Isiah Thomas.  

by messwiththebull on Jan 13, 2008 8:48 PM CST reply actions  

Wow, first Skiles, then Big Ben
Not to say that those two aren't blameless, but it seems whenever this team sucks most of the griping centers around one main guy. Wallace doesn't seem that much worse than he was last year, when the team was doing fine. Guess we all need someone to vent at, and few seem to want it to be part of the Deng/Gordon/Hinrich core.

by T Maple on Jan 13, 2008 8:50 PM CST reply actions  

He's declined in two really important areas
He's shooting 32.9% from the field down from a bad 45.3%.  That's almost 2 points lost per game.  And his defensive rebounding has dropped almost 1.5 boards/game.  Given the deline in team defensive rebounding, those boards are turned into points for the other team through offensive rebounds.  So Wallace is giving up another 1-2 points on the defensive end this year as well.  So Wallace is clearly responsible for 3-4 points of the team's 10 point change in point differential.  Being personally responsible for 30-40% of the negative change at a minimum is significant.  That's before considering his often lazy ass defense, drag on other players' offense, and his impact on keeping Tyrus and Noah on the bench.  Wallace deserves more crap than anyone else.  Although Kirk and Ben come the closest in terms of negative impact.

by Scotter on Jan 13, 2008 9:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Just got back from the game
I scalped 5th row center court seats and I got a great look at the debacle.  The guy practically gave me the tickets, I think he knew I was a bulls fan and felt sorry for me.

Boy did the game get away from them quick.  The biggest difference was the aggressiveness.  Joe Johnson looked unbelievable out there.  Childress was trying to dunk everything, when he wasn't travelling.  And the officiating was awful, both ways.  Noc got pulled down on that spin move by Anthony Johnson, Johnson grabbed him on the shoulder.  Couple of the Hawks were mugged on dunks and no calls.  Kirk was hit on those jumpshots he bricked and there was no call.  For all the travels and palms they did call, there were more they should have called.  It was a very inconsistent job by the refs.  Not that it made much difference when the bulls came out with no aggression.  They were up 6-2 I think, turned it over a couple of times and all of a sudden I looked up and it was 25-8.  My wife asked me if they were always this bad...

The most interesting thing about the game were the size of the players.  There is no way BG is more than 6 feet, and Noc is a lot bigger than I thought, still just as slow as on TV though.   And Aaron Gray deserves the nickname "Sasquatch."   Joe Smith is really big, too.  I was imnpressed with how professional he seemed compared to some of the other guys.  During warmups, he spent at least 20 minutes going around, taking passes from the coaches after setting a pick and practicing jumpshots.  At the same time Wallace was jacking up fadeaway 20 footers and taking the occasional free throw.  Noah was running laps.  Thabo was working hard and took a lot of shots, too.

The strangest looking guy was Marvin Williams.  If you've ever seen Ben Wallace in person, the first thing you notice about him is his huge arms.  Well, don't take this the wrong way, but Marvin Williams has the ass of a 300lb woman.  He can't even stand up straight, it's like some kind of birth defect.  I feel bad for the guy.

I got a picture with Red an Wayne after the game.  I think this season has taken a decade of Red's life, and he might not have had 10 years left, he is looking old and tired.  You can see how frustrated he is.  

Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 13, 2008 9:11 PM CST reply actions  

Prior to every game at the UC...
Ben Wallace warms up by shooting various three pointers. He always ends by taking a fadeaway three from the corner nearest the tunnel leading to the Bulls locker room.

And yes, Gordon looks even smaller in person. I stood next to him earlier this season and towered over him at a modest 6'3".

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Jan 13, 2008 9:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh and I forgot the highlight of the game
at least for bulls fans, maybe.  In the beginning of the fourth they did the kiss came, which is always fun.  They ended it with Duhon and Joe Smith on the bench which broke the whole place up.  Joe wasn't too excited about it.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 13, 2008 9:36 PM CST up reply actions  

The problems
Have been well documented here. We are too small in the backcourt, Thabo was drafted to address that issue. Thomas was take for his upside and Noah for his energy. Gordon is too small and probably not a number one option on a good team. We are probably going to lose Gordon because he believes he is better than he really is and he or Kirk have no trade value because of contract issues and diminished trade value. Although there are many teams looking for point guard help so he maybe tradable however I doubt it. So we need to prepare ourselves for the next rebuilding effort to get underway.
TMD- http://playahatersblog.blogspot.com

by TMD on Jan 13, 2008 9:15 PM CST reply actions  

I think trades and a two year rebuilding plan are
necessary to truly put the Bulls in contention for a title.

I don't know what else to say. The problems seem to go far beyond confidence, rotations, minutes, and coaching.

Does anyone here think that the team, as constituted, can win a championship? If so, why? I am genuinely curious.

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Jan 13, 2008 9:28 PM CST reply actions  

I still believe
Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, Thomas, Noah, hopefully Thabo as the solution to the small backcourt, maybe Gray, and I guess Noc given the contract could get there in 2-3 years.  I don't think they'd ever be the favorites, but they'd have a chance.  I still think those 6 six lottery picks are the team's best chance to win.

But in order for it to work alot of changes need to happen.  The only way this works is if Paxson moves Wallace or eats the contract.  He finds a coach with a different offensive system that's willing to committ to Paxson's lottery picks.  The emphasis has to shift from the backcourt to the frontcourt.  Paxson has to find a way to get through to Thomas and Noah because they have to be the guys the offense runs through.  The Bulls should be a fast paced, defensive orientated team, that runs it's halfcourt offense through it's frontcourt.  Who knows if this would work, but it'd be a lot more interesting that the current product.

by Scotter on Jan 13, 2008 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow...six lottery picks.
I knew Pax had acquired a lot of young talent, but to just read it like that...six lottery picks over the last few years...it's a shame. This really should be a better team at this point.

by T Maple on Jan 13, 2008 11:17 PM CST up reply actions  

the bulls are still really young
and you know what they can do if they play together like they did last year.  Hopefully, that's the lesson they learn this year if nothing else.  I don't think you need to rebuild, just refocus and grow and learn.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 13, 2008 10:13 PM CST up reply actions  

refocus and grow and learn
Agreed.
But the key here is doing those things with the right coach...
And Boylan is NOT the right coach.

It amazes me that Pax could just put a guy in place that is basically a Skiles, part deux and really expect things to get better.

I'm more inclined to return to the assumption that Pax didn't really have a plan in place...and that he just fired Skiles because he had to do SOMETHING....

Unfortunately, because Boylan is NOT the right coach (not saying he isn't a good coach - just not the RIGHT coach)...
In the end it all comes down to the Bulls going nowhere this year, and the this ugly winter of Chicago sports will continue (painfully).

Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Jan 14, 2008 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Defense to Offense
I think this team has to play stellar defense for any respectable offense to get any attention.  This roster almost begs for a Rick Pitino style of covering your weaknesses with stamina, press, and tenacious defense.

Kirk's offense isn't that great.  With Duhon and Wallace on the floor they have to pass magnificently to get things popping.

You have to play lock down defense, get in passing lanes, force players to dribble drive into charges, and REBOUND the basketball.  I just don't see this effort this season that was evident in the previous three seasons.

Looking around the league, I can see a dozen NBA teams that could be 45-37 for the season with Skiles coaching them into overachieving pressing defense that is converted into offense.

by NBA Observer on Jan 14, 2008 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

stuff your energy in a sack
The Bulls would rebound better if the better rebounders actually played. Skiles refused to do that too.
Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Jan 14, 2008 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Who are these better rebounders?
Watching off the ball as I normally do, it's difficult to find one Bull that consistently boxes out any opposing color shirt when a shot is lifted.

When you see a shot go up, you don't watch the shot.  You find an opponents jersey and you box him out.  When the ball carems(karems?), go get it.

I may just watch the whole game from yesterday again just to count the number of missed boxouts.

by NBA Observer on Jan 14, 2008 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

have fun
it's easier to look at REB-r. It's a bit more accurate than one game of box out counting too. Thomas, Noah, and Gray are all better rebounders than Nocioni and Smith. It would be nice to find out exactly how much better they are with more minutes, and Wallace has been awful at everything but rebounding.
Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Jan 14, 2008 11:40 AM CST up reply actions  

awful at everything but rebounding
He hasn't exactly been lights out at rebounding either.    :-)
Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Jan 14, 2008 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Rebound Rate
http://www.knickerblogger.net/stats/2008/jh_ALL_REB.htm

Basically it shows the percentage of rebounds available. One sticky wicket is that 'available' rebounds for an individual is just taking the percentage of total minutes he was on the floor, but it does a pretty good job.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

edit
it *adjusts for the percentage of rebounds available.

http://www.nba.com/sonics/news/stats101.html

Also, since the young Bulls bigs don't seem to be showing up on the leaderboard, here's the team stats:

http://www.knickerblogger.net/stats/2008/Bulls.htm

Some other things to consider with individual rebound rate is teammates matter. Kurt Thomas has his career high in rebound rate, and I can only guess that he doesn't have much help in the Sonics' frontcourt (outside of Nick Collison)

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 1:43 PM CST up reply actions  

And as for how they played
The hawks did a great job scouting the bulls sets.  They doubled BG every chance they got and he disappeared.  Even with Thabo bringing the ball up, he either wasn't interested or couldn't get open.  The Hawks were also cheating off of Du and Wallace and after Kirk got that first easy layup, there was nothing he could do.  He also had one really bad pass in the first quarter, but I didn't feel like he gave up like some of the other guys.  Tyrus came in and floated around the perimeter again.  The coaches need to make sure he doesn't ever get in that position because he is useless out there at that spot.

And Wallace was a real mystery.  I don't think there is any hope for that guy anymore.  He had one nasty dunk right in somebody's face to remind everybody that he could do it, and then he went back to his bread-and-butter pass out or hook-airball.  It's frustrating to see on TV, but it is digusting to see in person, especially when he starts out with the dunk.  

BG also had a play in the fourth where he did his drive-tumble-not-going-to-get-the-call and just stayed on the ground glaring at the ref while the rest of the guys played 4-on-5 at the other end.  He got up and jogged back just in time to see his guy get the open jumper.

And I know you guys love to bash him, but Noc is one guy you can't count on to give it his all.  He was fired up from the beginning and shot the ball like I'd expect BG to shoot it.  He was fearless and wasn't going to give up any easy layups or dunks.  He did get posterized in the first, but you have to respect the guy for getting back and challenging the dunk, even as you snicker at him.

Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 13, 2008 9:33 PM CST reply actions  

good stuff
thanks for the courtside analysis.  Can't beat being at the game to see everything that's going on at the personal level.  I've got no issues with Noc.  Just don't know if BW is a mystery; can't think of a non-profane word for him, but not a mystery.

by California Al on Jan 14, 2008 3:27 AM CST up reply actions  

Does the fact
that the Knicks beat the Pistons by 24 make anyone else feel slightly better?

I hate the Knicks, but at least someone else had a more pathetic loss than us today.

by Jaina on Jan 13, 2008 9:49 PM CST reply actions  

the real shame
is that the Pistons are going to repeat their midseason swoon and come back to the pack.  If the bulls could get their shit together and play with some discipline and continuity, they could be right in the middle of things, even now.  But I am beginning to suspect that won't happen.  Even worse, the bulls will have just as much competition to see who can sink the fastest, and miami already has a six game lead.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 13, 2008 9:56 PM CST up reply actions  

just wait until they beat the Bulls
I can see it happening, second of a back-to-back. Miami has to win some games this year, and they probably have the Bulls circled as winnable.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 13, 2008 10:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Shaq supposedly will be back on Wednesday
Just watch him have one of his four or five good games this year.

by Big D on Jan 13, 2008 10:16 PM CST up reply actions  

If you're not rooting for the bulls to win
you should be rooting for them to lose.  Late lottery picks is what got them into this problem in the first place.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 14, 2008 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed.
There's no worse place to be than mid-pack with no outstanding talent to develop.  

However, I'm still not convinced the Bulls lack talent.  Their young guys keep showing flashes--which is exactly what talented young guys do.  They lack consistency, but that can only come with playing time...which is why this franchise is such a mess right now.  The young guys are getting blocked by Wallace's on-court and off-court games.  

I'm not ready to blow the whole thing up (of course, that means I don't consider dumping Wallace any way possible as "blowing up" the team), not until we can confirm what we do or don't have in the 1st and 2nd year guys.  

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

It seriously did make me feel better!
Not only the horendous loss, but Prince was 0-10.  His whole line for the night was 3 rebounds, 1 TO.  And the team shot something barely over 30%.
"I believe. I believe. It's silly, but I believe." (Miracle on 34th Street)

by wjb1492 on Jan 13, 2008 10:03 PM CST up reply actions  

game was in NY
think they went out in NY City last night?
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 13, 2008 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

lol that and
Rip only had 3 pts, and Sheed only had 6 pts and 3 rebounds.  Just straight up awful.

by Jaina on Jan 13, 2008 10:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Just straight up awful
Maybe that was their idea of a "tribute" to an old, die hard ex-piston, and Isiah's (mis)handling of what used to be NY's pride and joy...
Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Jan 14, 2008 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Better trade proposal than getting McGrady:
Let's trade Ben Wallace for a bag of air, eh? Right now I'm pretty sure I'd rather have that on our team.
He could sit on a bench ... at a park somewhere, and not on the Bulls' bench. That would be great. And then we could play our bigs who don't suck, and then not lose horribly, or if we did lose horribly at least develop talent or SOMETHING.
Yeeeeeah, 13-20.

by Prevenge on Jan 13, 2008 11:34 PM CST reply actions  

Wallace, Griffin, Joe Smith
0 minutes for each one and the bulls will start winning.

1-Hinrich/Duhon
2-Gorodn/Sefolosha
3-Deng/Noc
4-Thomas
5-Noah/Gray

That shit looks great on paper, let them run and play stifling D, they could become then the second coming of the 2004 Pistons

by Chilai on Jan 14, 2008 1:12 AM CST reply actions  

Smith
Despite his rap, has the best PER on the team.  Not sure about +/-, but he seems to be the only guy on the team whose shots I expect to rarely go in.
Can this season be saved by jumping?

by cubbybear on Jan 14, 2008 1:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed.
Smith has been playing good, there's no reason to limit him to 20 minutes a game, though we probably do want to cut him back a little so that he's not completely dead by the end of the season and is well-rested for the playoffs. Err, if we make the playoffs.

by Prevenge on Jan 14, 2008 3:16 AM CST up reply actions  

The Hawks look like title contenders
when they dribble the basketball as little as possible.  They passed the ball very well yesterday.

The game sucked from the get go.  The best play of the game for Chicago was right after the jump ball.  Chris Duhon not saving the ball from going out of bounds since he would be saving a ball blind right underneath his own basket.

Yes.  That was the high point.

by NBA Observer on Jan 14, 2008 8:16 AM CST reply actions  

the low point for me
was seeing Khryapa come in at the end and just immediately fire away from the outside, lol...you could tell his mindframe was something like "I never get to play, I'm at least getting up ONE shot!"

I've honestly forgotten that he was still on the team

by ScottieCartwright on Jan 14, 2008 8:19 AM CST reply actions  

still on the team
Bet he wishes he was still in Portland...   :-)
Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Jan 14, 2008 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

He probably
wouldn't be playing much there, either.

by Jaina on Jan 14, 2008 1:35 PM CST up reply actions  

bwahaha
Hanley's in rare form on the radio this morning. His partner is giving the 'who cares what Adrian Griffin thinks' argument, and Hanley's flipping out. ha!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 10:30 AM CST reply actions  

It kills me
that people blame Paxson for not trading for KG.  There are issues that one can blame Paxson for, but the lack of a KG trade has to do with McHale.  He should have taken that 2nd round pick, and Deng and Chandler.  

by KT on Jan 14, 2008 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

just sweetening the deal for you
I know it's easy to confuse a 2nd rounder like Aaron Gray with a lottery pick.
Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Jan 14, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions  

oh man
now Mulligan's intentionally taking random pot-shots at Adrian Griffin just to get Hanley's goat (or whatever that expression is).

Mully is chairman of the 'pure point guard' committee, which I don't enjoy listening to, but the Griffin bashing was funny stuff.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 10:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Normally, I don't endorse nastiness,
but in this case I hope Steve Rosenbloom keeps the heat on.  http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/rosenblog/2008/01/players-play-co.html  ...referring to Wallace:  "Talk of "respect" from one of the many spineless co-conspirators who quit on Scott Skiles?"

The Bulls, Heat and Knicks are in a pitched battle for most screwed up franchise on the league, and I can't honestly say who's currently the front runner.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 10:38 AM CST reply actions  

Rosenbloom can keep the heat on all he wants
he'll still be the most irrelevant columnless columnist in Chicago.
Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Jan 14, 2008 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

he's purely a blogger now
which means I actually read his stuff more nowadays.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 10:46 AM CST up reply actions  

listening to his blog
was bad enough. You really read it? I followed it for like a week and he just linked to Trib stories and Doodspin. Between the bad one-liners.
Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Jan 14, 2008 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

To use your term: I skim
For some reason I have fond memories from when I was an impressionable youngster and reading Rosenbloom on the 2nd page of the Trib sports section every morning. Or maybe it's just the incredibly low standard for Trib sports columnists since then that make me nostalgic.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Personally, I don't care
where the pressure comes from.  I want an every-pronged attack right now.  Rosenbloom must have some readers or his column/blog would have been dumped long ago.

There was one brief period where he shared a Saturday moring show, on the Score(?), where his partner somewhat kept his negativity in check, which made him listentoable.

He actually did one show solo about whiffle ball that was one of the best sports radio segments I've ever heard.    

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 11:06 AM CST up reply actions  

he had a daily midday show
that was on AM1000, and he was with Sean Salisbury (yuck).

But now that I think of it, he was on Saturdays at  the Score before that, hosted with 'radio legend' Dave Baum.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

most screwed up franchise on the league
Umm....don't forget the Sonics in that mix.
:-)
Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Jan 14, 2008 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

By design
The Sonics have taken the rebuilding route.  They opted for that over resigning Lewis and holding onto Ray Allen.  The three consecutive years of drafting centers not ready or able to compete in the NBA ended this past summer.

by NBA Observer on Jan 14, 2008 1:32 PM CST up reply actions  

As much as I hate him
Marriotti seemed to say it perfectly " This is a season that can't end soon enough. But this I know is true: You can't let players make policy when they can't make jumpshots. "
I vote for Thomas to play, play more and play regularly.-Sam Smith

by tyrus4prez on Jan 14, 2008 10:46 AM CST reply actions  

For some reason
that statement feels so true, especially when you think of Ben Wallace being on the Bulls

by exult463 on Jan 14, 2008 11:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Now that it seems Boylan has clearly lost control
Wouldn't it make sense to Pax for him to make a coaching change now more than ever?

At least with another coach, he'll have this team under his belt for a half season before next year begins.  They would have more experience under this new coach instead of just learning brand new stuff once training camp begins.

Also, this allows the new coach to see what the youngsters have in them before they start trading them all away.

by Option27 on Jan 14, 2008 11:10 AM CST reply actions  

historically
interim coaches have little success.  changing to another coach now is pointless.

I don't think Pax wanted to fire Skiles, but I think Skiles wanted to be fired.  Skiles had input into every roster move Pax made, so getting fired is one way for him to escape being responsible for the roster.  Because he was responsible, too.

by KT on Jan 14, 2008 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Input?
I don't think I'd buy that Skiles wanted to be fired to escape responsibility.  

Sure, Skiles had input, but unless you have a good sense of exactly what that input was and how much it was heeded, I think it's pretty unfair to draw that conclusion.

I mean, Skiles' input could have been "Hey, Thomas is an assclown, draft Aldridge.  And oh yeah, go out and trade Ben Gordon to the TWolves so we can snag Brandan Roy too.  He kicks ass."

Or he could have begged Pax to draft Adam Morrison.  I dunno, but it all really comes back to the fact that it's ultimately only Pax's call to make.  He's the only guy who's responsible and if he wasn't fully on-board with the moves Skiles requested, he ought not to have made them.

by Sports2 on Jan 14, 2008 11:56 AM CST up reply actions  

all reports
indicate Paxson and Skiles worked closely together on the roster.  Pax looked for players to fit Skiles.  Maybe that's the problem.

by KT on Jan 14, 2008 12:11 PM CST up reply actions  

You're probably right,
but if that happened (dumping Boylan now), you just know that Boylan would never get another opportunity.  It would effectively kill all his head coaching dreams forever.  I'm willing to give the guy a little more time.  

My impression was that part of the agreement was that if the Bulls weren't to start contending soon, Boylan would be given the green light to go with the young guys.  If it comes to that (non-contention--which all indications are it already has) then at least he's got a chance to show what he might or might not be capable of.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

But we we're never really rooting for Boylan
It's the Bulls who we're rooting for. I mean he may be the nicest guy in the world but it's come to the point where we should cut our losses.

I don't really care how happy the Bulls players are either. They may have smiles all over their faces now because Boylan is there but I think the Bulls could really use someone right now who understands their weaknesses and strengths more to their advantage.

The point is to win games, not to keep players happy.

Winning eventually makes players happy.

by Option27 on Jan 14, 2008 11:28 AM CST up reply actions  

It's been argued back and forth here
whether winning now and developing the kids are mutually exclusive.  Most of the  more astute basketball minds clearly are of the opinion that the Bulls can do both.  Others of us (me, and I don't think I'm alone) are more inclined to think it's either/or.

I also root for good karma to come to the good people involved.  I always feel better when the institutions (the Bulls, in this case) `do right' by their people.  

However, I do appreciate your point.  In the competitive world of pro sports, the `greater good' is winning, so winning should always be the top priority.  But I'm also a little soft-hearted, and I believe there's such a thing as winning the right way, and that that represents an even greater good.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 11:59 AM CST up reply actions  

I appreciate yours as well BUT
As long as cheating is not involved, the ultimate goal is winning the championship.

There is no greater good beyond that

by Option27 on Jan 14, 2008 12:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I agreee, but
for the Bulls to win a championship or even compete for one they need one or more of the young guys to develop into something special.  If that doesn't happen we cannot do it with the decent "core" we have.

by chgobr on Jan 14, 2008 12:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah
I never said the Bulls could win a championship with this team.

My only point is to bring in a new coach ASAP so he sees what he can work with next year and then go to Paxson and tell him what he thinks of the team and what he can and can not work with.

If Pax got players that were Skiles kind of guys, wouldn't he want to do the same for the next coach?

It's better to do it now before he pulls a major trade.

All I'm saying is forget who the fuck is happy and what's a feel good story. Get the right formula going as soon as possible cause this one is dying fast

by Option27 on Jan 14, 2008 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

A point on which I would definitely agree
with you would be that if we do bring in a new coach, and gave him the security of a long-term deal, he wouldn't be afraid to stand up to Wallace and play the young guys.  

Any way that we can get some player development is fine by me.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 12:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly
This is supposed to be run by a coach not the other way around.

by Option27 on Jan 14, 2008 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

A vision of how we want this team to
perform on the court would be helpful before we decide on the coach.  The coach should fit the vision.  I guess you can choose a very strong coach that has a vision, a la Phil Jackson or Larry Brown and let him go with it.  Who are you thinking about for a coach?

This team is also making me miserable.

by chgobr on Jan 14, 2008 12:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Honestly
We need someone that gets respected by his players and also isn't afraid to play youngsters. Look at Phil Jackson. The guys got the respect of his team and stuck with Bynum and guys like Farmar, Turiaf and Walton.

The only guy out there that I can even think of that is even considered is Carlisle.

I know Wallace and him didn't get along too famously but I'm starting to think the only coach Wallace would get along with is one that lets him do whatever the fuck he wants.

At least Carlisle helped develop guys in Indiana whilst still winning. I think O'neal had his best years when Carlisle was there. Stephen Jackson even raised his game a bit more

by Option27 on Jan 14, 2008 1:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Stats back it up
If you look here, you'll notice he played most of their youngsters a lot

That was with his first season with Indiana.

That was also the team that won 61 games and 10 in the postseason.

Not bad for a first stint with a relatively young team

by Option27 on Jan 14, 2008 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

In Pax we now question...
Aug. 5, 2004 -- Re-signed Jamal Crawford and traded him and Jerome Williams to New York for Dikembe Mutombo, Othella Harrington, Frank Williams and Cezary Trybankski.

Sept. 8, 2004 -- Traded Dikembe Mutombo to the Houston Rockets for Eric Piatkowski, Adrian Griffin and Mike Wilks.

Oct. 4, 2005 -- Traded Eddy Curry and Antonio Davis to New York in exchange for Mike Sweetney, Tim Thomas, Jermaine Jackson, a conditional first round draft pick and two second round draft picks.

June 28, 2006 -- Acquired the draft rights to No. 4 pick Tyrus Thomas and Viktor Khryapa from Portland in exchange for the draft rights to No. 2 pick LaMarcus Aldridge (Texas) and a future second-round pick.

June 28, 2006 -- Acquired the draft rights to No. 13 pick Thabo Sefolosha (Switzerland) from Philadelphia for the draft rights to No. 16 pick Rodney Carney (Memphis), New York's 2007 second-round pick and cash.

July 13, 2006 -- Signed free agent Ben Wallace to a contract.

July 14, 2006 -- Acquired P.J. Brown and J.R. Smith from the New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets in exchange for Tyson Chandler.

July 20, 2006 -- Traded J.R. Smith to the Denver Nuggets in exchange for Howard Eisley and two 2007 second-round draft picks from the Nuggets.

July 31, 2006 -- Signed free agent Adrian Griffin to a contract.

October 31, 2006 -- Re-signed Kirk Hinrich to a multi-year extension.

July 18, 2007 -- Re-signed free agent Andrés Nocioni.

if anyone he trades or acquires going forward will still be on the team beyond 1 year (a host), pine away on the bench (Viktor) or become a poison (Ben Wallace)?  History tells us he wasn't the type of GM to pull a trade on the likes of a Garnett or Kobe because they're still in playing in the NBA as starters. Yet, Paxson seems very liberal with the cash to those on his good side

by exult463 on Jan 14, 2008 11:47 AM CST reply actions  

Hscs, close your eyes.
Since we're talking about Paxson the trader in this post, there are a number of us on this site who I believe are actually traders...and would, I'm pretty sure, agree with me that trading is trading, no matter the arena.  

And there are different types of traders.  Some like to take big, all-or-nothing plunges.  These are often guys who trade on gut instinct.  Others would rather make regular, repeated, incremental gains, looking for small perceived edges in a deal.  

This is Paxson.  When he made the trade with Portland, for example, he probably felt there wasn't enough information available on Aldridge and TT to determine which was the better prospect...but if he could get a slight mathematical edge he'd feel the deal was worth doing.  He then took the edge he so `cleverly' squeezed out of Portland and turned it into another micro deal with Philadelphia.

Both deals should have been relatively risk-free, particularly the Partland deal  in which Paxson was `taking advantage' of Portland's strong (but in Paxson's analysis, unwarranted) preference for Aldridge.

Paxson is not a `big deal' guy, and doesn't know how to gauge his risk on a big deal.  The Wallace trade is a perfect example.  Detroit was only too happy to let Wallace go, and Paxson's radical overpayment gave them an `honorable' out.

But the problem with taking the plunge on a big deal is that, if it goes south, you are left with a lot of bailing to do to get back above water.  

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm desperately trying not to be a Negative Nancy
The bright side of the Bulls:

1- We may end up with an unexpected good draft pick
2- Yes Paxson made a huge error with the essential Chandler - the Corpse switch but all GMs make mistakes.  He did get us out from under the Jalen Rose mess.  I still believe he is capable of righting the ship.
3- We know this team has the potential to play good basketball (see last year).
4- We have good young players
5- TT, Noah, Thabo and Gray could improve and be important pieces for us to be a top team.
6- The right coach/chemistry could change this around relatively quickly.

The above camouflages my depression, desperation and anger I have regarding this team.  

by chgobr on Jan 14, 2008 11:57 AM CST reply actions  

Hey! chgbor
This is a
"This team is a mess"  thread.

You'll need to save this for the next thread/blog entry titled something like
"What we need to do to improve going forward" or
"We're not that far away from being a elite team"  or
"We have all of the pieces except a vocal SG leader/all-star and a new coach"  or
something similiar.

by exult463 on Jan 14, 2008 12:29 PM CST up reply actions  

You are right exult463
I thought if I posted something positive I would feel better.  It didn't work

by chgobr on Jan 14, 2008 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Reinsdorf's playoffs expectations can't die
Seeing that we're only a handful of games from making the playoffs, I don't see this .500 basketball situation changing anytime soon unless we deal.

by NBA Observer on Jan 14, 2008 1:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Boylan wants us to believe
that this was a unanimous decision.  But you notice, even though nobody has come out and specifically said it was unanimous, that word has already crept into our thread at least once.

Personally, I'd be very surprised if the vote was unanimous.

Saying, as Boylan does, that "the entire team came to him" is like saying the entire country voted George Bush into office.  Yes, the entire country voted, but no, we did not vote him in unanimously.  (In fact, he received less than a majority vote, but I don't think we need to get into the arcane intricacies of the electoral college to see through Boylan's bullshit on this one.)

So the truth, more than likely, is that this was just another act ripping the team apart, pitting play against player...rather than the `team unifier' we're being led down the rosy path to believe.

I smell the rat of deception--on top of all the other BS going on--in this thing.  

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed
To a lesser extent, i could probably figure that most players when asked what to do about noah would say something along the lines of "Idunno" and then when told they were gonna give him another day to sit out the majority would probably say "Whatever, i guess if thats what needs to be done" sounding completely unsure. Since this isnt it a no, it is immediately turned into a Unanimous Yes with Big Ben and A drain pushing for it
im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Jan 14, 2008 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

So now Boylan is lying
and Noah is still not to blame.  Noah is the guy who caused this and yet no one seems to think he is culpable.  
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 14, 2008 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

don't confuse the issue
Noah 'caused' the first suspension.

This extra suspension is caused by a sorta-mutiny, and the reason it's now being a big deal. For what it's worth, anonymous Bulls players told KC that the vote was unanimous as well.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 1:35 PM CST up reply actions  

KC is such a team apologist
I just never feel I can trust him.  Of our local media, at least Sam Smith isn't afraid to ruffle some feathers.  (I don't include Mariotti because he's really op ed, not coverage.)

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Think
those "anonymous player" were Griffin and Wallace?  And do you think by "anonymous" they meant "us two?"

by JeffD on Jan 14, 2008 2:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd rather read about
the fiery Joakim Noah yelling in practice and motivating the team to win than the A-Drain/Wallace Tribunal tacking on extra punishment and getting blown out in Atlanta.

As long as I'm getting into how I'd like to see things show up in the beat articles, how about the coaching staff grows a brain (just one, I'm not asking too much) and takes the attention off of the players for once? Boylan should be taking the blame for fighting and yelling in his practices, and Ron Adams should be saying something other than "no comment."

Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Jan 14, 2008 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe Ron Adams
is taking the high road by not commenting. Doesn't sound like his yelling at practice motivated the team at all. You have no idea what Noah is like. Maybe he makes life hell for the rest of the team by not showing up on time, not learning the plays and blowing assignments in practice.
Win, just win.

by sue369 on Jan 14, 2008 1:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I love your hypocricy at every turn.
"YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HE'S LIKE!!!

But I'll go ahead tell you what he's like because I know. We hang out. No one knows what goes on other than me."

--sue369

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Jan 14, 2008 2:03 PM CST up reply actions  

All of what
I said about Noah has been in print. That came from his coaches and teammates. I never claimed to know what he's like.

You just want to argue so I'm not going to respond to you any more.

Win, just win.

by sue369 on Jan 14, 2008 2:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Promise.
I think this is the third time you've said this. Get over me already!!! We're through. I don't love you anymore.
Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Jan 14, 2008 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually
after the game yesterday they interviewed Kirk and he said it was a team decision and they couldn't let it go on. Only the players no how bad it is.
Win, just win.

by sue369 on Jan 14, 2008 1:49 PM CST up reply actions  

No, not "actually."
More like "apparently."

I saw Kirk's interview where he said that.  He's looking down, away, anywhere but straight at the camera.  Did he look like someone who believed what he was saying?  Not to me.  It's the same as Boylan's "entire team."  By implication, we're supposed to believe it was unanimous.  That's the way propaganda works, not truth.

And I'm not a person who enjoys a good conspiracy theory either.  It just seems to me these guys are lying.  

Yes, Bullshooter, I'd rather believe a straight shooter like Noah than a guy who slowly and painstakingly measures every word for its print impact...like Boylan.  (So what if I defended him two hours ago?)

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 2:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes actually,
If you have ever seen an interview with Kirk he never looks at the camera or the reporter in the eye. That's just the way he is.
Win, just win.

by sue369 on Jan 14, 2008 2:21 PM CST up reply actions  

No, again, a "team decision"
does not translate directly to a "unanimous decision."

...and as an aside, a team captain that can't look at you when he's talking to you is pathetic.    

and..."never" is a big word.  He never looks at the camera?  

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 3:20 PM CST up reply actions  

No he doesn't.
He is pretty shy and has said he is uncomfortable being in the spotlight. I'm sure he isn't that way in the locker room or they wouldn't have voted him captain again. Try to catch him in an interview again sometime and you'll see the same thing again.
Win, just win.

by sue369 on Jan 14, 2008 3:31 PM CST up reply actions  

captain..
do standards,qualifications,etc exists anymore..Paxson

by exult463 on Jan 14, 2008 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

I named him
after you.

You should love him.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

be careful
I have multiple self images so you don't really want to peg him like that.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Jan 14, 2008 2:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I wish the group of us here could get together
and meet with Paxson.  We are probably the most knowlegeable Bulls fans and it would be good for Pax to hear us and for us to hear what he is thinking.

by chgobr on Jan 14, 2008 1:17 PM CST reply actions  

Thats intresting
Say only 3 us were allowed the privilage, who would we have a "unanimous" vote on to go to such a meeting.

I think for sure it would have to be Matt Hscs, and Sue (for female bulls fans and hinrich fans alike). ehh just bored and thinking about stuff....

im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Jan 14, 2008 2:08 PM CST up reply actions  

He might go for it if we could convince him
we just want to hear what his is thinking and provide our ideas to help improve this mess.  It is a win - win.  We learn and hopefully feel better and he maybe gets some new ideas.  I'd invite the whole BlogaBull group.

by chgobr on Jan 14, 2008 2:16 PM CST up reply actions  

IT would be great Publicity
GM Paxson does what every gm has been afraid to do. He listens to his fans....that could be teh national headline, hearalding Paxson of being a guy wanting to look so outside the box and satisfy his demographic that he took the most faithful bulls fans and had a nice discussion on what they think the organization should do to get back to becoming a dynasty.

"The fans here are really great, they watch the games and they consider everything that somtimes my staff and I ever overlook. At the same time they understand that there are things that they cannot understand and only those of us inside the oganization can see. This encounter gave both sides a chance to look outside the box and see the organization from all aspects. We got alot of good ideas across" ...thats just the type of quote i can see pax giving.

I wouldnt mind if everyone could go, but im thinking theres alot of bloggers here, that we really dont see, only matt probably has the real number of how many people are joined here. I guess if you only wanted to take teh regulars, or maybe have a diary contest.... getting too ahead of myself?? i can dream.

im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Jan 14, 2008 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh, please!!
I'd be forced to disagree with you on principle alone.  

But to take this fantasy seriously...I'd say, if anything, it should be the people who have put the time and effort into creating and maintaining their own blogs.  So that would be...I'm not even sure...Matt, hscs, Sports2, and a few more, I'm pretty sure.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 2:23 PM CST up reply actions  

uh
like i actually gave it more than 10 seconds of thought. Like i said im bored and daydreaming, i couldnt think of a long list of bloggers (i know very litle about anyone here to be quite honest) and i dont know who has what blogs or does what, there were maybe 5 names that popped into my head and i limited it to three. I used my own personal oppinion which really is crap (i already said i know very little about anyone here) and my belief is that matt and hscs seem to have the most well thought out points or statistics on this website. Sue just seemed like a fun idea cuz usually u want to diversify such groups, but its not like i actually thought about who TRULY is worthy, and i dont mean to insult anyone or anything. Just bored and thinking thats all...
im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Jan 14, 2008 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

hey, I'm criticizing.
I'm only saying that for Pax to take it seriously, he'd have to see how he could get some real public relations mileage out of it...the same thing you're thinking.  I just think he'd be more likely to entertain an audience of blog owners than a crowded room of...us.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Aww, thanks
for thinking of me any way.
Win, just win.

by sue369 on Jan 14, 2008 2:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Bulls fans...
... Would be the last people he would want (or need) to meet with. He needs people that understand the NBA, not just one struggling franchise.

by Khalid El-Amin on Jan 14, 2008 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

That is true but..
Sometimes i feel that the beat writers are actually slower than some of the people here. Seriously there are ideas thoughts that i read here a few days in advance, and then during a game i often hear stacey king or tom dore repeat the ideas ive already discussed (or read a discussion of) here. The nba franchises duty is to A) Entertain the fans and B)Win Championships. OF course b usually leads to a. One way of entertaining the fans, might be to actually listen to them...the bulls website does have some fans voice option, ive never checked it out because i figure its one of those false devices that makes one think he actually is having a say but no one important really looks at it.
im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Jan 14, 2008 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

that would be nice
a blogabullers dream!!  
I vote for Thomas to play, play more and play regularly.-Sam Smith

by tyrus4prez on Jan 14, 2008 1:24 PM CST reply actions  

I had an e-mail dialogue with Paxson 4 years ago.
He was great about replying and was very responsive and nice.  Then we started to win and he changed his e-mail address.  Does anyone know how to reach him?  I've sent letters to the Berto center w/o replies.

by chgobr on Jan 14, 2008 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

insinuation theater
Boers/Bernstein have their 'sources' and claimed the following already:

1)Adams told Noah to learn the plays as it'll help them be a winning team, and Noah responded (roughly): "who are you to tell me about winning" (with 'MFers' peppered in there)

  1. Saturday night in Atlanta was part-ay time. (not sure why that's news for an NBA team, it must've been a hell of a romp)
  2. Ben Wallace is poisoning the locker room and should never be counted on for leadership.
  3. The Bulls can't wait to get rid of Tyrus Thomas, soon, and for anything.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 2:24 PM CST reply actions  

Are these the same sources
who said a Kobe trade was imminent?

by KT on Jan 14, 2008 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

there never was a trade on the table
kupchak had no intention of trading Kobe, all the crap was coming from Kobe's agent.

by KT on Jan 14, 2008 3:57 PM CST up reply actions  

So the "Kobe voided trade x"
Which was sending Deng and change to the Lakers was just crap from Kobe's agent?

I thought I read quotes from Kobe that he voided a trade and this was it.

by NBA Observer on Jan 14, 2008 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Paxson has said many times that
never at any time were the two sides "close" to making a deal, as there were many "outside factors at work."

I'm sure Mitch was entertaining the trade talks simlpy to appease Kobe until Phil could try to convince him to stay.

by RogersPark Kris on Jan 14, 2008 4:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes
The LA beat writers and Chicago beat writers never reported on any trade stuff, because they knew it wasn't happening.  

Hanley talked about the ESPN guys telling Deng at the New Jersey game that he'd been traded, and  Hanley told everyone they were all wrong.  An LA beat writer told TrueHoop that the stuff was coming from Kobe's agent and Kupchak wasn't looking to move Kobe at all.

Despite what was reported, Kupchak held all the cards.  There's no way Kobe wasn't going to show up and play, no matter what he threatened.

by KT on Jan 14, 2008 4:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I hope Tyrus is traded.
Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Jan 14, 2008 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

So...
... Are you a Bulls fan or a Tyrus Thomas fan?

by Khalid El-Amin on Jan 14, 2008 3:55 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm a Thomas fan because I'm a Bulls fan.
But the Bulls are losing me quick. I like the Bears, Bulls and Cubs, but all lose my interest when they're losing. However, MLB, NFL and NBA, in general, do not. I'm a sports junkie. If one of "my teams" is doing poorly, I'll find other teams or other players to root for.

I think Thomas can be a great player, and he just needs 25-30 minutes a night. He being traded, probably in a package like this, would signal to me this team has no clue what's going on. Then I could give up until their's a regime change. For now, I'm still holding out hope for Paxson.

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Jan 14, 2008 4:07 PM CST up reply actions  

That's all fine and good but...
What you are really saying is that you are a fair weather fan. Dictionary definition in fact.

I admire the fact that you are up front about it, but don't be surprised when real Bulls fan no longer give a damn what you think about anything Bulls related.

by Khalid El-Amin on Jan 15, 2008 12:30 AM CST up reply actions  

i love that quote
by Noah....  Good shit NOAH!!!
I vote for Thomas to play, play more and play regularly.-Sam Smith

by tyrus4prez on Jan 14, 2008 3:05 PM CST up reply actions  

OK. Let's look at #1.
Who would you rather have tell you about winning?  

I pick Noah.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 2:30 PM CST reply actions  

Noah says talent...
...beats out schemes and play-books.
Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Jan 14, 2008 2:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't have to look up Adams' accomplishments
to know that Noah's won nothing in this league. So Adams wins by default.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 2:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Now you force me to look up
Adams' accomplishments.

OK. Let's see, on Philly he was on board for a couple of last place finishes...a couple of pre-Popo years with the Spurs...scouting for a mixed bag of Portland teams...let's see, served as a consultant for Japanese baskeball (now there's something to put on your NBA resume)....

Hmm.  I think we might be able to bring in Adams' record for review after all, and fairly ask, what does he know about winning, compared to one of the winningest handful of college players in a generation?  (One who also comes from a championship family heritage.)

I still vote for Noah.  

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 2:58 PM CST reply actions  

I won the school spelling bee in 2nd grade
That means about as much in the NBA as Noah's college accomplishments.

by Big D on Jan 14, 2008 3:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Except...
...no one's citing your spelling bee for giving you $2.5 mil and drafting you 9th. The sole reason? Hardly. I feel confident, though, that I don't need to look it up to say Noah's "winningness" in college was one of the reasons the Bulls really liked him.

I'm actually not on Noah's side in this part of the debate, but I do think he has half an argument.

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Jan 14, 2008 3:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I could name a ton of players
who were great "winners" and high draft picks who never did jackshit in the NBA.  Noah has proven nothing so far, so I can understand why some of the vets would be a little peeved at that comment.  What I don't understand is why in the world those vets should have any say in whether he plays or not.  Hell, I'm sure most teams have one or two guys who aren't that popular with their teammates.  That doesn't mean those teammates have any right to go to the coach and say "hey, we don't like this guy, so don't play him."  That's high school bullshit.

by Big D on Jan 14, 2008 4:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Cogratulations. Did you really?
I think your reasons are even more ridiculous than mine.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 3:13 PM CST up reply actions  

worked with George Karl
on some highly successful Bucks teams.

Adams is considered one of the best assistant coaches in the league -  they vote on those things, and he's always up there.

by KT on Jan 14, 2008 3:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I left that out
because it didn't help make my case.

I still pick Noah.

It's pretty much that I'm picking him by default, because I'm so pissed off at anything that smacks of the team's management.  Maybe tomorrow I'll side with management, but today this fiasco just has me too emotionally against them.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 3:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Trade for Gasol
Hinrich, Deng, Thomas, and Griffin for Conley and Gasol.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2429~285~1981~3032~3195~996&teams=29~2 9~29~29~4~4&te=&cash=

You're not going to get Gasol without giving Memphis a lot.  And while Hinrich's name hasn't come up yet, his name should be included for Memphis.

Memphis gets what they need: a solid PG who can run their offense.  They don't have that, although they will get it from Conley in a year or two.  Memphis can play Deng at the 4 alongside Miller at 3 and Milicic at 5.  Off the bench they have Thomas and Warrick.  Solid front-court.

Griffin is just trade-fodder, he can be exchanged for cash.

Chicago can start Duhon at PG while Conley takes the rest of the season to get used to Chicago's playbook (or lack thereof until a new coach is signed).  Chicago gets its low post player.  They get 4 years of Pau and 2 of Conley, a tandem they can build around.

Chicago lineup:
duhon/conley
gordon/sefalosha
nocioni/khryapa (or Griffin if exchanged for cash)
Gasol/Smith
Wallace/Noah/Gray

next season (question marks, will other players fill these roles? also, assuming gordon is gone):
conley/duhon?
duhon?/sefalosha
nocioni/khryapa?
Gasol/Smith
Noah/Wallace/Gray

You can't expect to give up your junk and get Gasol.  Giving up Deng and Hinrich is not a loss if you get Gasol and Conley, who will become a solid starting point guard.  Yes, you'll end up losing for much of the rest of the season, but from the looks of it-- you're going to lose anyway.  Get a lottery pick, spend the season calibrating your new players and signing a coach.

should be noted, I am a Pistons fan, but a supporter (and now a sympathizer) of the Chicago Bulls.  Yes, we do exist... ;)

by number32 on Jan 14, 2008 3:25 PM CST reply actions  

updated:
or try Aaron Gray and cash instead of Griffin.  Then Chicago won't be anemic at the 3 spot and Memphis has a backup for the foul-loving Milicic.  Under this trade, they're a little weak (see also: stromile swift).

by number32 on Jan 14, 2008 3:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Normally I'd scoff at this proposal Piston-lover!
But it's actually not that far-fetched considering how it's easier to find a dominant 4 then 5 and in the east Gasol would most likely be able to feast.

by RogersPark Kris on Jan 14, 2008 3:34 PM CST up reply actions  

ambassador
I agree Matt, its likely they won't ever trade for Conley.  But with names like Hinrich, Deng, and Thomas, I'm hoping they'll consider.  Especially considering they'll get 5 years of Hinrich, how is a sure thing.  Conley is riskier than Hinrich.

And RogersPark Kris, I appreciate the "non scoff" :)

While I am a Pistons fan, I've always respected the Bulls' blue collar play that reminds me of how my team played in '03.  Besides, I like the Bulls/Pistons rivalry.  Bulls fans are, as a whole, much smarter and more sportsmanlike that other team's fans-- say Boston, specifically.  You should see the BS we get from Celtics fans over at DetroitBadBoys.com (where I post as Mike Payne)...  Sure, we Bulls/Pistons fans have shared our spats on the web, but I think at the end of the day we're all decent people.

Whatever trade you make, if you do, I wish you and yours plenty of luck and good fortune.

by number32 on Jan 14, 2008 3:49 PM CST up reply actions  

What a piece of sh*t franchise the
Bulls are turning into.

The management, the coaches, and the "Core" (laugh) are so concerned with making self-righteous, sanctimonious proclamations about proper character that they forgot that their job is to win games. This isn't a seminary, it's a basketball team. Sometimes, the best players aren't the nicest guys. Jordan and Pippen weren't upstanding citizens. Nor was Rodman a paragon of humility and virtue. Neither is Kobe or LeBron or Rasheed Wallace or a bunch of other elite talents. Who fucking cares?

The lesson within the Bulls' culture is clear: if you aren't a meek, overachieving, undersized conformist, you will be punished and ostracized. Tyrus learned that lesson last season during the All-Star game controversy. Noah is now being baptized into the Church of Paxson, where the cardinal sin is a failure to sprint from the pew to the altar.

You want to know the truth? I don't care if Noah lambasted Ron Adams. I don't care if Noah took a steaming dump on Ron Adams' desk. I don't care if the remainder of the team became frightened when they saw someone exhibiting competitive hubris.

However, as a season ticket holder, I do care that suspending Noah for two games decreased our chances of victory. I do care that consistently playing the mediocre but diligent, decent hacks has resulted in a 14-21 record. And, more than anything, I do care that the Bulls staff seems incapable of developing athletic young talent, in part because they repeatedly implement the same imperious, abrasive teaching techniques that invariably fail. (Honestly, what did Noah learn from this suspension? That Ron Adams is a pussy, that Boylan is a powerless puppet, that certain of his teammates feel threatened by his presence on the roster, that autonomy will be punished, that he can be publicly humiliated by the very people who are supposed to be his mentors? There is no evidence this suspension will cause Noah to suddenly become a docile team player who assidously studies his playbook. If anything, he'll simply become more withdrawn, apathetic, and recalcitrant.) Maybe the Bulls should try some different modes of communication.

Paxson,, stop trying to mold young men. Stop trying to run a professional franchise like it's the high school basketball team from Hoosiers. Win games. Win. Win. Win. That is your mandate. That is the only thing that matters. If winning means having to compromise your precious, old fashioned, quaint principles, then do it. Put the best players on the floor, even if you wouldn't want them to date your daughter or raise your son or babysit your senile grandmother.  

The alternative is to trade away Tyrus, trade away Noah, and surround yourself with decent, family oriented veterans who have verticals lower than the mean January temperature in Chicago and who will finish in the sixth seed every season before being humiliated in the playoffs. Maybe that is your aim.  

 

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Jan 14, 2008 3:35 PM CST reply actions  

I think that's twice in as many days you
called someone a 'pussy'. I don't recommend making it a habit.

Beyond that though, Pax has not only failed in valuing character over talent, but the character guys he acquired have proven to not be so.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 14, 2008 3:39 PM CST up reply actions  

I second that.
All in favor? Aye.  Motion carried.  It's unanimous.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 3:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Another Unanimous Vote
I wonder if this is exactly how the A-Drain/Corpse meeting went down.
im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Jan 14, 2008 4:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Am I the only one who is somewhat suspicious of
the term "unanimous" as applied to the team vote.

Don't get me wrong, I have no doubt every team member voted to have Noah suspended, I just wonder how meaningful many of those votes were.

If AG, Wallace, and the Core (giggle) all voted to suspend Noah, I can't imagine Tyrus or Viktor (for example) standing up to defend Noah, especially in a culture of paranoia where it has been demonstrated that dissenters are singled out and censured by the team.

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Jan 14, 2008 4:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Read upwards from here
and I think you'll find you're not alone.

In fact, it's...I won't say it.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 4:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I was waiting for you two to come together.
We now have the United Philosophizing Verbose Conspiracy Mind-Reading Duo. Or something more clever.
Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Jan 14, 2008 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes, it might help to watch
how you phrase things...even your titles.

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 4:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I doubt there is any conspiracy.
Just standard group dynamics.

What incentive does someone have for voting against the majority in the matter of Noah's punishment?

In other words, I don't really think you can make much of the "unanimous" team decision, one way or another.

The bigger issue is that the team was making the decision, not the coaches.

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Jan 14, 2008 4:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Yup
Hell, guys like Tyrus Thomas and Aaron Gray had to be thinking in the back of their minds "Great, we'll get some more playing time with Noah out" (too bad they were wrong).  Not to mention that Noah is Ben Wallace's backup.  That's why NBA teams aren't run as democracies.

by Big D on Jan 14, 2008 5:00 PM CST up reply actions  

They are probably thinking
"Wouldn't it have been great to be drafted to a team of winners and not a bunch of losers with drama issues and team votes?"  Heck, Noah probably has never had to deal with being on a losing team.  After you are with the Bulls for a while you get used to it though and fall right in line.  

by cranscape on Jan 14, 2008 5:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Amen
1958ChiTown... you really nailed it!  Halleluiah.
you really did.  This is the most refreshing insight I've read in a while. I love the religous analogy.

by exult463 on Jan 14, 2008 4:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Enough is Enough
I'm not going to take it anymore.. This is too much descention going on this team.  

This has got to stop.  I like a little controversy, but this is out of control or getting there.  Losing is never good.

I underestimated Skiles authority to keep things under control...  
My apology, I hope he smooths out around the edges and takes his coaching to the next level.

by exult463 on Jan 14, 2008 4:07 PM CST reply actions  

Billy Donovan, in today's SunTimes,
on Noah:

"Donovan said. "He just wants to win and [if] there's one thing I've always respected and admired about Jo it's that [he dislikes] losing more than anyone I've ever coached.""

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/basketball/bulls/740293,donovan011408.article

by alec on Jan 14, 2008 4:54 PM CST reply actions  

like I said before, pax should fire himself
He is who put this team together...
He, whose best move was the curry trade...
He, who fired a good coach when didnt have anyone else
He, who had better not trade Ty2 before given a chance to grow (see Ty1 for current reference)
He should can his own arse
"We are who you thought we were"

by Thirdrock on Jan 14, 2008 5:19 PM CST reply actions  

It's no fun anymore
to watch the Bulls. How can you lose to Atlanta! The Bulls are not who we thought they were.
Bulls fan till death

by saalikjazz on Jan 14, 2008 6:19 PM CST reply actions  

The problem is not
Ben Wallace as some people have right fully so ripped him on this site, its the fact that the coaching staff or Pax is too dumb to realize that an aging center cant play 35 min a night. Wallace can still be very effective if he were to play 25 minutes a night. And if he doesnt like it then he deserves to be benched for not realizing that hes hurting the team playing thees heavy minutes.

by eross226 on Jan 14, 2008 9:02 PM CST reply actions  

If he doesn't like it
he will call another vote.  Didn't they vote in his head band and vote out Skiles and vote out Noah.

by cranscape on Jan 15, 2008 12:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.

Links

"Best NBA Blogroll"
-- Dan Shanoff

The Essentials:
Bulls.com
NBA.com
HoopsHype
BallHype
ESPN.com NBA

Workin' the Beat:
KC Johnson - Tribune (blog)
John Jackson - Sun-Times (blog)
Mike McGraw - Daily Herald (blog)
Nick Friedell -  ESPNChicago.com
Sam Smith - Bulls.com
Aggrey Sam - CSNChicago.com


More Bulls Blogs/Forums:
Thank You Isiah
Chicago Bulls Podcasters
Bulls Confidential
By the Horns
Bullish Thoughts
Chicago Bulls KY
Pippen Ain't Easy
RealGM Bulls Forum
SportsTwo Bulls Forum

Blogging the Association:
(League Wide)
True Hoop
HoopsAnalyst
Give Me the Rock
The Basketball Jones
NBA Fanhouse
Hoops Addict
SBNation.com - NBA
ProBasketballTalk
ShamSports
Ball Don't Lie
The Painted Area


(Team-Centric)
Queen City Hoops

Bobcats Baseline
Knickerblogger.net    
Sixers' Shots
Forum Blue and Gold
SuperSonicSoul
Hornets247.com 
SonicsCentral.com 
ClipperBlog.com  
The Nugg Doctor
Loy's Place
Reds Army
Need4Sheed
THE WIZZNUTZZ
RaptorsForum.com
TWolvesBlog.com
Spurs Dynasty
David's Memphis Grizzlies Blog
The Bratwurst
Sixers Journal
Sixers 4 Guidos 
3 Shades of Blue  
CavsNews.com
RaptorTalk
Deceptively Quick
TheLakersNation.com
Utah Jazzer Blog
KnicksDefense.com
T. Jose Caldeford
Hoopinion
RaptorBlog.com
Suns @NBAWeblog.com
The Cowhide Globe
Stepien Rules
Project Spurs
Raptors Republic
Dino Nation Blog
Lake Show Life
Valley of the Suns
The KnicksBlog.com
Big Lakers Fan
Roundball Mining Company
Cavs: The Blog
48 Minutes of Hell
Daily Thunder
Piston Powered
The Two Man Game
PistonsNationBlog.com
Cowbell Kingdom.com
Hot Hot Hoops
NetsAreScorching
Celtics Hub
Orlando Magic Daily
Philadunkia
Truth About It
Always Miller Time
Slippery When Nets
Eight Points Nine Seconds
Howlin' T-Wolf
Red 94

MSM NBA blogs:

Ira Winderman (Heat)
Jason Quick (Blazers)
IndyStar.com (Pacers)
Michael Cunningham (Hawks) 
Full-Court Press (Pistons)
Jonathan Feigen (Rockets)
Rick Bonnell (Bobcats)
Jazz Notes
Chris Herrington (Grizzlies)
Orlando Sentinel
Michael Lee (Wizards)
Alan Hahn (Knicks)   
Doug Smith (Raptors)
Marc Berman (Knicks)
Al Iannazzone (Nets)

For the Statheads:
Basketball-Reference.com
APBR Discussion
Knickerblogger's Stat Page
82Games.com
Doug's Stats
Popcorn Machine
HoopData


Other Resources:

HoopsHype Salaries
SportsTwo Salaries
ESPN.com Trade Machine
RealGM: NBA Draftpicks Owed
ShamSports.com Salaries
DraftExpress

 


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger