Bulls 90, Hawks 79: Huge first quarter run and enough defense keep Bulls from another stinker
The Bulls' 90-79 win over the Hawks on Monday was a bit of dominance mixed with a bit of a stinker. Leading by as much as 21, pulling the starters from a game where Atlanta never really had a chance was nixed by the Bulls being brick-tastic and flat to recover on defense in the third quarter, seeing their lead shorten to five.
The Bulls responded to an ugly start to the game, where they found themselves down 11-6, with a 29-6 run over the final eight minutes of the first quarter. They cruised through to halftime and stayed level early in the third, looking like the starters would get a fourth quarter to rest. But the Bulls bricked 13-of-19 shots and turned the ball over four times, while Jannero Pargo knocked down three 3s and the Bulls failed to recover in transition.
In the halfcourt, though, the Bulls prevented the Hawks from getting just about anything going. On the other end, the Bulls didn't shoot well, but the ol' reliable mulligan game was there. The Bulls scored 18 second chance points on 15 offensive boards and nailed 8-of-20 3s (40%) to make up for an awful day of shooting from the field (38.6%).
Derrick Rose (23 points on 8-for-18, 2-for-4 on 3s, six assists, four rebounds, four turnovers in 34:54) was explosive in his first game in about a week-and-a-half; and he wasn't strapped to a gurney. The first step beat Jeff Teague without a problem and the lift made Zaza Pachulia hack away.
The story was overall great defense. The Hawks never really were able to penetrate well. Josh Smith (17 points on 7-for-21) made great move on the handful of occasions he was able to establish position inside, but never got established as an easy button for rough possessions, even with Carlos Boozer checking him while Joakim Noah was anchoring the paint. As the Bulls easily got to the paint, Smith was a strong attacker with three blocks, making it difficult to convert (36 points in the paint on 18-for-44, 40.9%). Unfortunately for Atlanta, only Smith and Pachulia were grabbing rebounds (19 of the team's 41) and the perimeter defenders couldn't recover after collapsing to close out on shooters.
- Bulls had five double-figure scorers. Rose, Boozer (16 on 7-for-13), Luol Deng (10 on 4-for-15, 2-for-6 on 3s), Ronnie Brewer (13 on 4-for-9), and John Lucas III (10 on 3-for-8, 2-for-3 on 3s) all did it in different ways. Rose was Rose, dominating for 16 in the first half, being superagressive most of the game. Boozer found space in the mid-range, hit those jumpers, and made a couple of moves in the post. Deng had seven in the first quarter, but was other wise a bit of a brick-tastic mess. Brewer was bailing out the Bulls' sloppy possessions late in shot clocks and Lucas found ways to create off the ball, moving through space largely as a secondary ball handler.
- Deng and Brewer's defense killed the Hawks' hope. They combined for three steals, swattedballs out of bounds to cut Atlanta's shot clocks, consistently shut down passing lanes for Joe Johnson (12 points on 5-for-11) to get the ball, let alone score. This made Boozer's job a lot easier, as Smith was forced out to the perimeter to help add a passing lane.
- Noah's hustle was a progressive push. His game-high 16 rebounds (five offensive) were mostly out-jumping lazy positioning by Hawks bigs. But his outlet and inside-out passing made scoring a bit easier for the Bulls.
- Taj Gibson and Mike James scored run-killing buckets off the bench. When the Hawks surged back into the game, Gibson's offensive rebounding (three offensive, six total) and battling through space gave him six hard-fought points and James knocked down a crucial three to create distance from Atlanta's comeback as part of his seven. More important, James at the helm of the pick n' roll in C.J. Watson 's absence kept the offense flowing when Rose rested.
- Rose still didn't have to play too much. There were long shifts, but also long rests. He didn't look any more uncomfortable than any other NBA player about seven weeks into this condensed season looks. At times, he simply looked like his typical Slinky self. There wasn't a slower step to compensate for pain. So, if there were 'too soon' worries, they ought to be somewhat relieved.
- The Hawks bricked 11-of-21 free throws. Wait, what?!?
- "The Bulls have not lost two regular season games in a row since Feb. 5-7 of last season," Kent McDill noted after the game. "They have won after each of their last 12 regular season losses."
- The Heat's (25-7) six-game win streak still keeps them a half-game over the Bulls (26-8) in the East. Though, the Bulls are one-up in the win column, they're also one down in the loss column. Miami hosts the Kings (10-21) on Tuesday and Knicks (16-16) on Thursday before All-Star Weekend. The Bulls only host the Bucks (13-18) on Wednesday before the break.
Stats via NBA.com [.pdf].
86 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Boozers efficiency?
I know there is plenty I complaining about Los, an that long 2’s are one of those complaints, but his scoring efficiency seems good. Anyone know how his scoring efficiency this year compares with last year and his Utah years? With other PFs?
by BigforkBullsFan on Feb 20, 2012 7:43 PM CST via mobile reply actions
His efficiency is slightly less than his career averages, but some of his advanced stats suggest he's having a career year.
His WS/48 is the highest it’s ever been.
Supporter of Carlos Austin Boozer, and I don't want to see Dwight Howard in a Bulls uniform. Call me crazy.
by wrigleyrocker12 on Feb 20, 2012 8:45 PM CST up reply actions
Well that says a lot for "Advanced" stats.
Hey Rose. I don't see the appeal!
You just need to understand what they're saying
In the case of WS/48 Boozer is getting credit for being on a very good defensive team
by tuluse on Feb 21, 2012 10:29 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
this
Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.
by MarketMaker on Feb 21, 2012 11:54 AM CST up reply actions
Funny because he didn't get that last year while having a better offensive season.
Supporter of Carlos Austin Boozer, and I don't want to see Dwight Howard in a Bulls uniform. Call me crazy.
by wrigleyrocker12 on Feb 21, 2012 3:38 PM CST up reply actions
rose had 5 rebounds.
and he should have had 7. thats his fault.
"A household is a business given over to caring for small, temporarily insane people, a business subject to cash-flow problems, endless legal harassments, run by people who expect to have sex with each other, who occupy the same space, and who go nuts when either party has sex with anyone else. Once in marriage, a lot of people try to get out as fast as religious tradition, poverty, or devotion to children permits.""
wow a recap on the same day as the game?!
How I know I'm still a Bulls fan during Linsanity:
When Lin drives into a crowd and gets mauled: "GOOD SHIT KEEP DOING THAT!!!"
When Rose drives into a crowd and gets mauled: "OH SHIT I HOPE HE'S NOT HURT"
by sin on Feb 20, 2012 8:30 PM CST reply actions 11 recs
it's takes a lot of time to delete all your comments.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2012 11:06 PM CST up reply actions 7 recs
To the gallows!
Supporter of Carlos Austin Boozer, and I don't want to see Dwight Howard in a Bulls uniform. Call me crazy.
by wrigleyrocker12 on Feb 20, 2012 11:07 PM CST up reply actions
and everyone should just do what I do, and thank Alex for the fine work so far this season
(and then check who recs all the me-slamming comments)
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2012 11:07 PM CST up reply actions
yeah
I don’t always agree with Alex but he is doing a great job indeed.
My thanks, Alex
by JustAnotherFan on Feb 21, 2012 10:37 AM CST up reply actions
Spite recs are the best.
This space is available.
by MrBungle on Feb 21, 2012 10:49 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
I like the spiteful anti-spite recs
I suspect that the pro-yfbb comments get a lot of rec’s from yfbb1, yfbb2, etc.
On an unrelated note, thanks Alex. Love your recaps like Larry Hughes likes difficult off-balance jumpers.
MY comments??
I can’t control the responses i generate
How I know I'm still a Bulls fan during Linsanity:
When Lin drives into a crowd and gets mauled: "GOOD SHIT KEEP DOING THAT!!!"
When Rose drives into a crowd and gets mauled: "OH SHIT I HOPE HE'S NOT HURT"
make your life easier and hire me to do that for you
Ill work for free :D
How I know I'm still a Bulls fan during Linsanity:
When Lin drives into a crowd and gets mauled: "GOOD SHIT KEEP DOING THAT!!!"
When Rose drives into a crowd and gets mauled: "OH SHIT I HOPE HE'S NOT HURT"
by sin on Feb 20, 2012 11:31 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
more james
Less jl3hree please
Proud Boozer hater...umm ya, fu** that guy
by Belize on Feb 20, 2012 9:42 PM CST via mobile reply actions 5 recs
hope neither plays in the playoffs, but between the two the vet who runs the pnr is about 1000x better than the gunslinging short dude
If you meet the Buddha in the lane, feed him the ball
by paddyfairview on Feb 21, 2012 4:17 AM CST up reply actions 3 recs
only if Thibs can help his perimeter defense a bit
he was leaving Pargo way too much room for a while there.
by NerdVernacular on Feb 21, 2012 9:41 AM CST up reply actions
Not that I'm a fan
But Carlton hit the 2 or 3 key buckets to end our second half slides, without those who knows what would have happened yesterday.
I was frustrated with how little boozer was playing in 2nd half….
The kid's out of this world. He's got Allen Iverson speed, Jason Kidd's vision, Chauncey Billups' shooting ability and Michael Jordan's athleticism. How do you guard that? - Pacers coach Frank Vogel.
by majoyenrac on Feb 21, 2012 10:32 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
You hate 42% 3 pt shooters?
Don’t sleep on Carlton.
"We got to win. Win no matter what. Trip, kick somebody, fight, bite. Whatever. Win." - Derrick Rose
YOU WILL RESPECT HIM
DUNK HIS ASS
by obnoxious american on Feb 21, 2012 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
he can hit the 3, ill give him that
but that’s kinda hit..he’s like BG but way way way way worse
Proud Boozer hater...umm ya, fu** that guy
He's a 3rd string point guard who has had to play more minutes because of injury the venom he gets doesn't make sense.
They can save the world if they don't kill each other first.
by squadron supreme on Feb 21, 2012 3:52 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
venom? you want to see venom my friend?
Proud Boozer hater...umm ya, fu** that guy
by Belize on Feb 21, 2012 4:07 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
I don't hate John Lucas III
I hate watching him play basketball
by tuluse on Feb 21, 2012 4:53 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
The Hawks never really were able to penetrate well.
And they weren’t even drunk
"And thank you to God for making me an Atheist." - Ricky Gervais
by MichaelClutchtree on Feb 20, 2012 9:50 PM CST reply actions
Warning ...
If you’re able to penetrate well for more than four hours, seek immediate medical help to avoid long-term injury.
IF IT TAKES FOREVER!!
by Cubfansince1957 on Feb 20, 2012 11:08 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
asik is in thibs dog house
the thunder god has been cursed by the elder gods!
And no backup was necessary for Noah today, he got his hands on every ball.
Supporter of Carlos Austin Boozer, and I don't want to see Dwight Howard in a Bulls uniform. Call me crazy.
by wrigleyrocker12 on Feb 20, 2012 10:48 PM CST up reply actions
Is that official?
Or speculative? Did he actually do something?
TL;DR
If Raiden was a basketball player
And teleported with the ball, would that be traveling?
depends on when he picks up his dribble
I’d say when he comes out of the dribble he gets two steps, but not before.
Let us cavort like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean.
by hedonism bot on Feb 21, 2012 12:26 PM CST up reply actions
I'm guessing for matchups. I couldn't watch the game so I cannot be sure.
"Sleep is the brother of broke."
- Chris Douglas-Roberts
How many games in the last several have the bulls not had at least 2 key guards injured?
by DisCUBbobulated on Feb 20, 2012 11:17 PM CST reply actions
Rip and Derrick, so, zero
it don't mean a theng if you ain't got that deng
by Osaka on Feb 20, 2012 11:40 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Heat are not a half-game up.
They just have a better winning percentage.
it don't mean a theng if you ain't got that deng
by Osaka on Feb 20, 2012 11:39 PM CST via mobile reply actions
That's sports-speak for behind a certain team and less than a game back.
Like “flied out” in baseball.
Follow me on Twitter.
Or, oddly enough
Like “a half game back” in baseball.
I love seasons too. That's why I live in a place that skips the shitty ones.
by thatshortkid on Feb 21, 2012 9:50 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
*up
curse you, via mobile.
I love seasons too. That's why I live in a place that skips the shitty ones.
by thatshortkid on Feb 21, 2012 9:58 AM CST up reply actions
Is this the wrong place for a "reply fial?"
This space is available.
it seems bad form to reply fial anyone but yourself
DUNK HIS ASS
by obnoxious american on Feb 21, 2012 11:33 AM CST up reply actions
I thought reply fials were usally meant in jest.
I didn;t realize anyone actually took them seriously.
This space is available.
no i know.
shit’s insular. i wouldn’t do it to anyone but myself though cause i’ve only been around like 2 years.
DUNK HIS ASS
by obnoxious american on Feb 21, 2012 1:22 PM CST up reply actions
i wouldn't think so
wait, which blog’s memes are we going with?
I love seasons too. That's why I live in a place that skips the shitty ones.
by thatshortkid on Feb 21, 2012 2:07 PM CST up reply actions
but they're not a half game up
bulls are up 1 in the win column and down 1 in the loss column, so they are essentially even.
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
Yeah but because the Heat are good, they're more likely to win than lose those extra 2 games.
Pat Riley is the devil.
by Poloplaya14 on Feb 21, 2012 12:56 PM CST up reply actions
i was talking technical terminology
they aren’t a half game ahead.
but anyway, they still have 3 games against us. we split the series, and we’ve evened out. plus, they lost to the bucks. twice. anything can happen.
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
No, they're not.
A Heat loss without a Bulls game would put them in 2nd with a .757 WL% to the Bulls’ current .765, meaning they’re less than a game ahead. If they were a full game ahead, a Heat loss would still have them slightly ahead.
A Bulls win without a Heat game puts the Bulls at a .771 to the Heat’s current .781, therefore the Heat have the advantage, and are technically between a half- and full-game ahead. Technically a half-game means a win by the team in second would have them tied or better.
It’s definitely not a full game and definitely not tied. When the most at stake for the top team with a loss for them and win for the #2 team is being tied, that’s a full game. Because the Heat: (a) have a higher WL%; and (b) a Heat loss and a Bulls win puts the Bulls over them, not tied, the commonly accepted simplification in the sports lexicon is to call it “a half-game”.
Follow me on Twitter.
Sorry, Alex you are wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Games_back
Common sports lexicon dictates that the Heat and the Bulls are currently tied. The half game situation only applies when the difference in totals games played by the two teams is not a factor of two. The absolute difference in wins and losses between the Bulls and the Heat is zero so for all intents and purposes they are tied.
This space is available.
I trust Alex over Wikipedia on this point.
"I actually think he's kind of cute."
-My fiance on Joakim Noah
*headdesk*
Well you had better let all the other major sports publications know they are wrong
because they seem to agree with Wikipedia, unless of course “common” means something other than occurring or appearing frequently.
This space is available.
o'rly?
Also, in some rare situations, also caused in the early season when teams play an odd number of games, a team with fewer wins could potentially be ahead of a team with more wins. For example, if a team is 26–15, but another team is 25–13, the team with a record of 25–13 is technically one-half game ahead of the 26–15 team, despite having fewer wins on the season.
Follow me on Twitter.
Um, did you read what you highlighted?
26+15 =41 games. 25+13 =38 games. 41-38 = 3 = not a factor of 2 hence the half game situation is applicable. Besides, 25-13 is 12 ‘games over .500’ and 26-15 is 11 ‘games over .500’ so in that example no one would ever consider those two teams as being tied. The Heat and the Bulls were both 18 games over .500 hence they were considered tied even though they had different winning percentages as explained in the article.
This space is available.
A tie would mean a win gives a slight edge, but that didn't exist...
Therefore not a tie. A Bulls win with an idle Heat team still has them in 2nd. The example relates for that reason. It’s why, mathematically, when there’s a prima facie “tie”, the loss column objectively decides the edge, regardless of the more subjective tie breakers created by the league.
Follow me on Twitter.
Yes, technically you are right. Unfortunately, the naming convention used in sports is a bit deceiving.
This space is available.
I see what you're saying, but why I said "lexicon"
Because “a half-game” is a simplified version of saying “not tied, but less than a full game”, which is a simplified version of “x = >y and <y+1 with x being the differential between two teams and y being zero”. You’re not wrong qua wrong, but “a half-game” is a readable version of the idea in the sports wordstock expressing that message, though not completely true to the flawed formula; just as “flied out” is grammatically incorrect, but within the wordstock of baseball culture.
I quoted what I did to express that the games behind formula doesn’t express whether or not two teams are tied. It’s consistent with the conclusion maybe 99% of the time and 100% of the time when all games are played by all teams, but not a proof of the claim.
Follow me on Twitter.
When you say lexicon I assume you mean "the vocabulary of a particular language, field, social class, person, etc. "
In others words it may be true for one particular field, in this case sports, but false in another context, possibly statistics or reality. In sports, two teams who both are x games above or even below .500 are considered to be tied.
‘Half game’ is the mathematical result of the games behind formula in the Wikipedia article I referenced earlier. It is not used simply to convey the idea that two teams are not tied. The Heat and the Bulls were both 18 games over .500. The Bulls could have been 18-0 and the Heat 38-18. Even though, the Bulls would have been perfect and the Heat not so much, sports media outlets would have still considered the two teams to be tied. In this situation, would you still consider the Bulls to be half a game up?
This space is available.
Assuming you meant 36-18, the Bulls would have the better record, yes.
The team with the better record is higher in the standings. “Best record” and “most wins” are two different concepts. The standings are determined by W-L%, not as a tiebreaker when equal in games above .500.
Example: MLB teams in the shortened 1994 season didn’t all play the same amount of games — they were scattered between 112-and-117 games. Unfortunately for this example, the win quantities and games above .500 coincided with W-L%, but had the White Sox finished the season 65-46 to the Indians’ 66-47, the Sox would’ve still been the official winners of the division with a higher W-L%.
Translated: the Heat weren’t the #1 seed going into Tuesday’s game because of a tiebreaker in the head-to-head. Had they both had the same records but the Bulls 1-0 in the season series — making some other win a loss for the Bulls an vice versa for the Heat — the Heat would still be in the top spot in the East with a higher W-L%. W-L% is not a tiebreaker, but the decider of the standings itself, listed as “Tie breaker not needed (better overall winning percentage)” per the NBA.
Follow me on Twitter.
MrBungle's right
Being a half-game back is when you’re 1-1 and the other team is 2-1 or when you’re 1-2 when the other team is 1-1. When you’re 1-1 and the other team is 2-2, you’re technically tied.
Pat Riley is the devil.
The 1-1 team has a magic number to clinch because of the loss column
Hence why going into yesterday’s games, the Heat were projected at around 48.2 wins and the Bulls around 47.3, according to Basketball-Reference.
It’s the rare subtlely that exists where the second place team is still in second by winning their next game on a day when the 1st place team is idle.
Follow me on Twitter.
Projected record has nothing to do with whether two teams are considered to be tied or not.
Assuming a 20 game season, two teams could both be 5-5 but one team could be projected to win 10 games but the other projected to win 13 games simply because one of the teams has played all of their games at home. This projected record does not change the fact that the two teams are currently tied.
If you had not added the “commonly accepted simplification in the sports lexicon” blurb then yes you would have been correct as anyone can see that the Bulls and the Heat had different winning percentages so technically they were not tied. Sports vernacular, however, says that two teams who have the same difference between wins and losses are considered to be tied as confirmed by Wikipedia. This does not diminish your otherwise excellent work here but you are wrong on this matter.
This space is available.
Decent game
That great first quarter saved the Bulls’ asses, because the last part of the third and the beginning of the fourth were pretty terrible. A twenty point lead turned into five within a few minutes. If there’s anything I’ve noticed, it’s that the Bulls can get a bit lazy towards the end of the game…
UMD Bulldogs: 2011 NCAA DI Men's Hockey Nat'l Champions; 2008 & 2010 NCAA DII Football Nat'l Champions
Did you guys see.......
That Rose publicly and privately told the front office that he would like to play with Pau Gasol? Im pretty excited about that. To make the news better, we would trade boozer and another player to make the deal. Its said that the Lakers are unlikely to make a deal be4 the deadline that includes Gasol, but if it did happen, MY GOD WOULD WE ALL BE HAPPY……………….. I personally was one of those guys that wanted to keep Asik, I thought he was an extremely valuable back up center, especially in last years playoffs. Im ready to use him and Cj watson as trade bait now thou…..For a guy who can score off the bench like OJ Mayo. Although if we pulled that trade off for Gasol, keep the team the way it is and we will win it all this year.
DROSE>any1 you think is better
by Chi's DaSecretMan on Feb 21, 2012 11:00 AM CST reply actions
I was thinking about how strange it was that Omer only played for 38 seconds...
I know that Thibs does not like him much right now (although I think he’s great).
However, what if this is the prelude to some sort of trade? Are they keeping his minutes short a la Kaman? Could this be part of a package for Gasol? Perhaps a trade with GS? 38 seconds is pretty absurd given the amount of trust that Thibs has had in him in the past.
Schindler's List is, at the most basic level, a remake of Jurassic Park... ~Zizek
i just figured it's because he's been kinda bad lately.
DUNK HIS ASS
by obnoxious american on Feb 21, 2012 1:45 PM CST up reply actions
plus, atl is not really a good matchup for him
even without horford, they don’t really use a guy he matches up very well against. he’s not really that useful against a guy like pachulia. if damp had gotten more minutes (he and omer were both in there at the same time heh), i could see it more.
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
If Pachulia was more a threat to score he'd probably use him
But with Asik out there matched up against Pachulia, Drew would probably switch a lot and get Josh Smith to exploit Omer with his crazy athleticism…..
So I think that’s why no Asik, but we shall see. I know Adrian Griffin was on JHood the other day saying that the org is very very hgih on Asik both O and D (that was maybe on Sunday).
The kid's out of this world. He's got Allen Iverson speed, Jason Kidd's vision, Chauncey Billups' shooting ability and Michael Jordan's athleticism. How do you guard that? - Pacers coach Frank Vogel.
I think it's a mix of both?
He is playing kind of bad lately, but not enough to warrant this much limited playing time.
Possibly Thibs wants his players to get used to the rotation without him…?
"I actually think he's kind of cute."
-My fiance on Joakim Noah
*headdesk*

by 
















