Bulls 121, Kings 115: Great rebounding keeps Bulls in games, but bad rebounding gives lesser teams chances
No matter how you slice it, the Bulls' win over the Kings on Tuesday night was a fun game to watch. There was plenty of comedy to go with hustle. And where the score implies more drama than there actually was, it's reflective of two teams battling to push the ball down each other's throats.
The Bulls offense was about as aggressive as you would want. There was no Derrick Rose (back spasms), but the last thing lacking was speed and explosion. Joakim Noah (22 points on 7-for-11, 6-for-9 at the rim, 8-for-9 at the line, 11 rebounds, four blocks) consistent held the Kings back from getting rewarded for some very strong defense by punishing them for over-committing to the ball. Luol Deng (23 points on 6-for-17, 4-for-5 at the rim, 9-for-9 at the line, 11 assists, seven rebounds) moved the ball and nailed open shots creating off the ball, exploiting those same aspects like, well, an All-Star capable of point forward elements.
Best for the Bulls is that they started this six-game homestand with a bang, not having to stretch too many minutes, in a game without their superstar reigning MVP. Deng played 42 minutes, but that's just how things go -- especially with Richard Hamilton still out, stretching Ronnie Brewer's playing time. Noah played 36 minutes, but Taj Gibson's (15 points on 7-for-8) ultra-aggressiveness and Omer Asik (seven rebounds, +16) prevented him from playing stretches too long in the second half.
Carlos Boozer (16 points on 7-for-14, 4-for-5 within ten feet in 24 minutes) was another highly bright spot, slaying some good on-ball defense. Him an Noah being aggressive off the ball completely changes the Bulls offense into a big boy bunch with reserves to not wear them out. It's difficult to ignore wishing this could be seen every night; and the ways they were using their size, fighting for position, and making moves were ways to play the game that give your the desired results, no matter who's the opponent.
Home sweet home, indeed.
Team
SAC
CHI
- Awful rebounding kept the Kings in the game. No offense to the Kings, as the Bulls man- and help-defense really wasn't so bad. In isolation, highly skilled Kings players made great moves and hit some crazy shots. Moreover, they fought in a commendable way for loose balls in ways that should accumulate 15-20 more wins for this team over the last months of the season, IMO. That said, rebounding is supposed to be the Bulls' Old Reliable. They're way too big, athletic, and skilled to piss away great before-the-ball-is-in-the-air defense by allowing 25 second chance points to anyone -- let alone the Kings -- on 17 offensive rebounds [.pdf].
- Going into Thursday's matchup with the Celtics, there's an offensive formula to beat the crap out of them. The Cs aren't a strong rebounding team, but it's tough to move the ball well against. If the bigs and Deng just stay as active as they were on Tuesday, the Cs aren't going to slow them down with physicality. Moving through space, finding open men, and aggressively cutting to the basket without the ball will get the ball where the Bulls should never get beat: above the rim. The injury bug has hurt, though. After winning six of their first seven against teams on pace to make the playoffs, they've lost five of six.
- Limited amounts of long-2s made this game a blast as a fan. The 3-pointer is a more efficient shot and gets a rise, as does watching the best basketball players in the world aggressively pushing the ball toward the basket. The Bulls and Kings provided great entertainment with 36 and 47 shots at the rim, going 9-for-19 and 9-for-17 on 3s, and only taking 17 and 15 shots on long-2s, respectively. The Kings are more talented than their record and they're playing well since replacing Paul Westphal with Keith Smart at the head coaching position -- and it showed through both teams playing a well-coached game.
- More Deng-Big pick n' roll please. Deng's a strong man. He makes up for ugly-looking ball-handling by keeping his strong bdy between defenders and the ball. We saw his slow down and not charge full force as the handler in the PNR game -- and it looked great. He isn't the next point forward of the NBA, but with the Bulls' bigs and 3-point shooters using space, this could be a great weapon to allow Rose to rest here and there on offense. It only works when teams are over-committing their help, though. The Heat and Cs and Sixers may help too well, but all help Ds over-commit from time-to-time and if he can switch gears with his pace to make interior passes like Tuesday night more often, the Bulls offense gets a bit more dangerous, as the height is just further utilized.
- Noah talked Noah stuff and Lin-sanity on Wednesday's PTI.
- Neither C.J. Watson (.456 3P%), nor Kyle Korver (.424 3P%) were chosen for All-Star Weekend's 3-Point Shootout. And that really shouldn't be surprising.
- The Bulls starting lineup with Brewer instead of Hamilton has been the most efficient in the NBA this season (min. 100 MP). That's right: Basketball-Reference.com just made me lose my shit.
Advanced Box Score via Hoopdata.
51 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What does that stat mean at the end, most efficent lineup in basketball?
Could someone explain this to me please, thanks!
Bulls Season
Jarring dissonance
This game is perfect example of how deeply misleading the +/– metric can be when applied narrowly. Omer “Stone Hands” Asik was +16, while Noah, who undoubtedly played one of his best games of the season, was a –10.
I wouldn't really call it a metric & it's largely useless for one player without a huge sample....
But in a game where the Bulls struggled to rebound, his 6 defensive rebounds in those 12 minutes were meaningful to kill Kings possessions.
Follow me on Twitter.
by Alex Sonty on Feb 15, 2012 9:26 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Call it what you like
it’s largely useless for one player without a huge sample
Precisely my point.
by Paul Warfield on Feb 15, 2012 10:43 PM CST up reply actions
thanks 2007.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 16, 2012 8:08 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
on the other hand, boozer's -12 was the worst on the team and-- contra alex-- i think that
is a very accurate description of his contribution last night.
"A household is a business given over to caring for small, temporarily insane people, a business subject to cash-flow problems, endless legal harassments, run by people who expect to have sex with each other, who occupy the same space, and who go nuts when either party has sex with anyone else. Once in marriage, a lot of people try to get out as fast as religious tradition, poverty, or devotion to children permits.""
although maybe im wrong. heres alex:
Carlos Boozer (16 points on 7-for-14, 4-for-5 within ten feet in 24 minutes) was another highly bright spot, slaying some good on-ball defense
i suppose i agree with that if its a reference to his effect on his own team.
"A household is a business given over to caring for small, temporarily insane people, a business subject to cash-flow problems, endless legal harassments, run by people who expect to have sex with each other, who occupy the same space, and who go nuts when either party has sex with anyone else. Once in marriage, a lot of people try to get out as fast as religious tradition, poverty, or devotion to children permits.""
DeMarcus had his way with everyone
Follow me on Twitter.
by Alex Sonty on Feb 16, 2012 7:33 AM CST up reply actions 5 recs
How the hell is James Jones AND Chalmers in it
But no CJ, hell or Ray Allen? Jones is barely shooting 40%.
jones only made it cause he's the defending champ
doubt they would have invited him otherwise
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
by Jaina on Feb 15, 2012 11:26 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
The new Play Index is a thing of unparalleled beauty.
I now know Kobe is 2/6 in shots attempted in the final minute to either tie or take the lead, Durant is 5/11, Rose is 3/5 and LaMarcus Aldridge is 4/4.
by Ozzie Montana on Feb 15, 2012 11:12 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
LaMarcus Aldridge.
/sighs dreamily
light em up
by docks on Feb 15, 2012 11:56 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
he was a Bull for about 20 minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEuC676Mxts
Obviously it’s good he didn’t end up staying (we wouldn’t have Rose). But I do wonder how far that team could have gone that year with a starting 5 of Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, Aldridge, and Wallace (with Duhon, Nocioni, and PJ Brown coming off the bench). All for the better though.
futur considerations...
conceder trading him back to us?
What exactly are you using for that?
by Stacey_Is_King on Feb 16, 2012 12:17 AM CST up reply actions
Play index tool. It's new
by BigforkBullsFan on Feb 16, 2012 6:25 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
This tool really is fantastic
First finding, most supposedly “clutch” players are really just very good players that take a ton of game tying/winning shots and miss most of them. Trailing by 2 or less in the final minute (last year), shots to tie or take the lead: Rose 3/8, Durant 5/17 (yikes), LeBron 2/7, Wade 1/4 and yet David West 8/12. What??!?!
by DRoseO1 on Feb 16, 2012 7:08 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
The Chris Paul Effect
Follow me on Twitter.
by Alex Sonty on Feb 16, 2012 7:32 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
The shot chart tool is awesome
It makes it easier to find the number of crazy buzzer beaters Rose takes. I just checked it out for last year. It’s a bit annoying because only half of the court is shown, but you can still manage. Take a look at this. I just looked at 3 point shots taken with under 3 minutes left in the quarter. It was easier to do this opponent by opponent. Against Boston, Rose was 2/8, but we only see 4 misses. That means the other 2 were on the other side of half court. 2 others on that chart could be eliminated since they were from 30+ feet and with less than a second remaining.
I did this for all opponents for Rose (just cause I’m a nerd and like to know stuff). All in all, Rose missed 25 buzzer beaters from beyond 30 feet last year. This would have jumped Rose’s 3pt percentage from 33.2% to 35.5%. That is truly a significant difference! I love this play index+!
I did it for this year too. Doesn’t make as much of a difference this year. He’s taken 7 30+ foot buzzer beaters. His 3pt percentage is raised from 31.0% to 32.0%. Basketball-reference should be commended for this work.
by DRoseO1 on Feb 16, 2012 7:59 AM CST reply actions 5 recs
this is helpful, the Sam Smith index
raised Rose’s 3pt% 10 percentage points.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 16, 2012 8:09 AM CST up reply actions 3 recs
Excellent work.
It would be cool to isolate to 0:07 remaining or less to make a shot chart easier. Here’s a list of 3Ps missed in the final 7 seconds of a quarter that paints a picture of others’ buzzer-beaters, but for now, you have to go to each players’ shot chart, as you did, to fnd the hail marys.
Hopefully the player shot finders are modified to allow you to search by time on the second and within more precise ranges.
Follow me on Twitter.
Ya, I feel like they should be able to make this a custom search
Rather than selecting from a custom list of options. It would be even more awesome to look at time left on shot clock, but sadly that data doesn’t even exist I don’t believe.
Also, that is interesting because I only got 7 buzzer beaters for Rose,
But this has him at 15. And that’s because I counted ones that were within a reasonable range.
Here is an awesome one
by DRoseO1 on Feb 16, 2012 9:31 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
We are going to need to start a new thread just for the awesome stuff we find
Cause this thing is freakin sweet.

Boozer and Taj combined for 7 rebs in 48 minutes
Taj was especially pathetic with 2 rebs in 24 minutes. Noah has started to get it going and I’m excited about that. Still, I’m waiting for one of Taj or Boozer to step up and become completely players. We need Taj to get some consistency on the offensive end, and Boozer to bring consistent effort on the defensive end. And the rebounding has to be there every game. Cousins and Thompson had more offensive rebounds (13 combined) than Taj and Boozer had total rebounds.
I don’t want to rip Boozer, but he was not a bright spot Tuesday. He had 5 fouls in 24 minutes, mostly from reaching. When he was the court, Evans and Thornton had a field day on the pick and roll. I don’t know if its effort or ability but he doesn’t move his feet. I believe in 3 of the last 5 broadcasts I’ve seen, the color guy (definitely Stacey and JVG, and I think an opposing team brodcast as well) showed Boozer unwillingness to take a charge. Considering that he is almost a complete non-threat to block shots, I think he should be at least attempting to take charges.
Don’t get me wrong, it was a total team breakdown defensively against the Kings – who knew the Bulls would struggle to contain penetration so much w/o Rose. JLIII can at times hold his own offensively, but he is a terrible defender, despite the effort. I thought Thibs kind of made the game more competitive than need be by playing JLIII and CJ together (the Bulls couldn’t get any stops), especially since Korver was playing well on both ends.
All in all, teams are going to have games like this. The buy-in defensively wasn’t there but the Bulls still got the win. And I thought Korver-Deng-Noah looked truly fantastic Tues night, which was great to see.
by Basketball Smurf on Feb 16, 2012 12:06 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Taj
We need Taj to get some consistency on the offensive end
I agree, but part of the blame lies with Thibs, in my view. Sadly, Taj is the only Bulls player who finishes strong around the rim. He has also been developing some post moves. Yet despite this, and that his mid-range jumper has sucked badly this season, Thibs rarely uses him to post up.
I believe that whatever potential he has will only be fully realized if he is given regular chances to post up. Otherwise, it is likely to remain mostly frustrating for all involved.
by Paul Warfield on Feb 16, 2012 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
so...
you really dont like thibs do you….
Waiting for the Prodigal Son to Return KH12 BITCHES!!!!
In the Chemi-meter we trust!
by piccolomair on Feb 16, 2012 12:54 PM CST up reply actions
actually I do...
but I believe that he could – and should – be more creative offensively.
by Paul Warfield on Feb 16, 2012 12:56 PM CST up reply actions
wow, this again, you really need to give up on thinking "thibs being Jesus" thing and Taj does not even have a good post up move...
Your are strongly overrating Taj scoring ability. I have been saying this since last year playoffs…Tajs offense is equal to Boozer defense.
i wouldnt go that far
boozer defense is more of a myth than reality, thibs tells us it exists, just never have seen it. Ive seen flashes of efficient offense from taj….
Waiting for the Prodigal Son to Return KH12 BITCHES!!!!
In the Chemi-meter we trust!
I'd suggest...
that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Taj is shooting 69% at the rim, close to 62% within nine feet of the basket, and 33% from beyond that distance.
No one suggested that he was an outstanding scorer – or anything close. What I have suggested repeatedly is that he would be much better used around the basket, than shooting mid-range jumpers.
by Paul Warfield on Feb 16, 2012 5:57 PM CST up reply actions
that is a fair point...
I agree that he would need to be used only under certain matchup conditions.
by Paul Warfield on Feb 16, 2012 6:42 PM CST up reply actions
Taj has never been a particularly good rebounder, but this season he's been even worse.
by Ozzie Montana on Feb 16, 2012 12:14 PM CST up reply actions
I guess all those reports about Boozer's elite defense before he got to the Bulls were all wrong.
This space is available.

by 















