Lebron, Derrick Rose and Jordan - Reflections and Illusions of NBA Destiny
Finally, It seems as if Miami's LeBron James is on the path to attaining Jordan-like status. But there is already one thing he cannot accomplish. And that's the near perfection of MJ's achievements.
(Photo: You would be smug too!)
He never really had his ups and downs, the way LeBron has had to start his career. It was really just an upward trajectory that plateaued and never returned to Earth. Lebron has exceeded expectations at times and disappointed at times. But that sort of progression is natural for most star athletes.
Jordan had a lot of help in his journey. And frankly, just a little bit of luck in order for the narrative to come out so complete. That's why it's nearly impossible to compare anyone with him.
Others may eclipse him in championships, but never in the crystallized perfection department. He made the NBA seem like pro-wrestling, with the certainty by which he earned his rings. And once he got started, no one would stand in the way.
This is not a blog from a bitter Bulls fan to tear down LeBron with comparisons to His Airness. In fact, I think it has actually become a close call as to who is, or will be better when it's all over.
This is really just a way to remember the good times as a dejected Bulls fan. I won't be down and out forever. But the new season is a LONG, long way in the future. But clearly the overdone debate over who rules is back at the forefront, due in large part to Scottie Pippen's recent comments.
Here's a little insight into the legacy of Jordan, the nature of grading an athlete, overboard expectations and how stars like King James and Derrick Rose fit into a league that still remembers those six championships.
Let's revisit the squad that changed expectations for everyone.
How predictable it all became. The Chicago Bulls. The Jordan years and the man's uncanny ability to succeed. He was mentally strong, extremely self-motivated and possessed outstanding athletic abilities. It all translated into glory. He could do nothing but win. Beating the odds became automatic. And each new challenge he encountered would read like a chapter in a bedtime story—ending happily ever after.
Other teams—other players—they all had their disqualifying flaws. Patrick Ewing was labeled a loser from his Georgetown years—ironically losing the NCAA Title to Jordan on a game-winning shot during his freshman year. The mighty Hoyas taken down by a freshman.
Ewing's heavily favored teams never did win that title he desperately needed. We all know what happens to the teams that should win, and don't. Labels can very easily become self-fulfilling prophecies.
Karl Malone and John Stockton represented boring basketball, at least in an Xs and Os sense. They may have mastered the pick-and-roll, along with a million other life-affirming team traits. In their league, however, superstar heroics are what brings home the hardware. And the fundamentally sound Jazz were not worthy of providing those moments.
How dare these pretenders try and take the trophy from its rightful throne. If they were "winners," then why hadn't they won. Must be destiny. Even Scottie Pippen was aware that "the Mailman didn't deliver on Sunday." And he didn't.
Real stars would never miss free throws in a close game, right?
It was just that simple.
That brings us to His Airness, Michael Jordan. The man, the myth, the legend. The action figure with the million-dollar smile. The phenom who could transcend the basketball court, wall street, pop culture and even other dimensions, at least in Space Jam.
He was a winner. And if someone was a winner, they never lost.
At least when it came to him.
That's how it was for a generation raised on the NBA in the 90s.
We were drinking the spiked Gatorade.
This won't be the first time that MJ's legacy will be mentioned in terms of its lasting effects on the league. It's pretty obvious that it will take many, many years until he is remembered more as a Bill Russell type. A hero from the past, whose achievements are no longer comparable due to the gradual evolution of the league.
I would venture to guess that Bill Russell's 11 championships are held in less esteem, to recent generations, than the six championships of those 90s-era Bulls.
We only remember what we are actually around to see.
Championships from eras long gone can never be remembered in their proper context. There is always the question of whether the competition was as consistent. Or whether in the early years, the big men simply dominated because no one else was as tall.
No one would argue that it was due to an unfair break in genetics that made MJ unstoppable. He was 6'6" and blessed with talent, but not physically overwhelming.
What a disservice it then becomes, since Jordan's teams were virtually PERFECT in their quest for multiple titles. Not only to the other contenders in the sport of basketball, but for every popular athlete in any sport.
There suddenly emerged a set of Jordan rules. Or at least subconscious guidelines that we created to judge the cream of the crop in the athletic world. They were never carved into stone, but I guarantee we have all used them as a barometer for judging the legacies of athletes.
(Photo: IM NOT IN CLEVELAND ANYMORE!!!!!)
1. Champions never lose to underdogs.
If that does occur, they risk losing way more than that season's title ring. In every series that the Bulls were deemed "Goliath" to some other team's David, the giant prevailed. Every single one. No longshots. No odds-beaters. Only trampled foes.
2. Great players must always take the last shots.
Jordan not only hit more game-winning shots than almost anyone in history, but in doing so, probably missed more game-winning shots in history as well. But that is inconsequential. If the greatest champion of all time (at least to some) made it a habit of taking nearly every clutch shot, then everyone else afterwards had to follow suit. That is, if they wanted to continue to possess their alpha-dog street cred.
3. One Championship will never be enough.
In order to be truly great, two-peats, three-peats and double three-peats were the key to notoriety. I think we all remember LeBron's halfway-kidding introductory speech to the Miami fans, where he counted all the way up to seven championships as his stated goal. It's no accident that he stopped at one more than Jordan. But once again, he was more than likely joking. Seven championships seem like a tall order at this point in his career. He may someday regret even mentioning that in jest.
Take a look at Jordan's body of work. It reads like a movie script that would be too syrupy to be released.
Remember how little Michael was left off the high school basketball team?
And remember how he used that negative event to inspire himself to practice harder and used all of his willpower to show his coach that he made a terrible mistake?
Yes, exactly.
Who writes this swill?
No one. This really happened. These inspirational anecdotes would define his career.
He accomplished EVERYTHING. It was virtually athletic perfection.
But many, many things had to come together for this triumph of a career.
He had to be drafted by a good organization, willing to put the parts around him to succeed. Maybe the Bulls didn't have to be spectacular in that regard, but he would not have been set up properly on the majority of the other teams in the league.
This executive support was on full display when he began his quest for a second three-peat. Significant contributors such as Toni Kukoc, Ron Harper and, of course, Dennis Rodman were all brought together to help win. It was a success. They played their roles seamlessly.
And let's not forgot that the team was headed up by one of the most highly regarded coaches ever to man the sidelines in Phil Jackson. Some would argue that his titles were somehow diminished because of his All-Star personnel. But it would be foolish to dismiss his accomplishments completely. You don't win as many championships as he has by happenstance.
No way.
By that logic, Kobe and Shaq should have ensured that Del Harris was wearing championship rings on his fingers and toes.
But there was more to be merry about. The Bulls drafted Scottie Pippen out of Central Arkansas. That worked out just fine. A Top-50 player of all time and closer to one than 50. A solid-gold find that was certainly not an inevitability.
What if that never happened?
For the most part, Jordan did not suffer with constant injuries. He did lose virtually an entire season early on. Afterwards he was able to avoid similar mishaps almost entirely. In professional sports, remaining healthy can not be taken for granted. Ask Bill Walton, Greg Oden, Shaquille O'neal, Penny Hardaway, Grant Hill and plenty of others.
Even the mighty Tiger Woods may have to bow down to the reality of advanced wear and tear. It will most likely cost him his historic shot at breaking Jack Nicklaus' majors record. It's a shame. It truly does take a stroke of luck just to be healthy over the course of a career.
I'm certainly not saying that Michael was just the recipient of good fortune. He made his own luck. I have never seen an athlete dominate the game the way he did. Almost on command. It was a sight to see.
However, it's not realistic to expect that sort of dominance again in the modern era. Even if MJ was drafted tomorrow, too many question marks would have to become exclamation points for him to go on a similar run.
It took a lot of outside factors all coming together beautifully.
Maybe in a parallel universe he only wins four titles. Maybe he loses a couple of them as well.
Maybe he slips in Kerry Wood's hot tub.
Just ask Kobe, who has been a part of more finals than Michael.
You can't win them all.
But you shouldn't have to, either. Not if you're attending them in economy-sized Sam's club numbers like Jordan and Bryant.
After that team finally broke apart, it slowly became obvious that no athlete of any skill set in any sport could be held to such ridiculous standards.
Let's take the grid iron for instance.
League mascot and golden boy, Tom Brady, not too long ago, took a team riding the momentum of an undefeated season all the way to the Superbowl.
But then promptly lost.
That's right. After three NFL titles, his team was perfect throughout the regular season and all the way up to the big game. And the only thing standing between the Patriots and perfection was a win against a team they had already beaten that year. A team that was one of the lowlier underdogs of the decade, in the form of the New York Giants. He was set up to be Jordan-esque.
Right there for the taking with a another strong performance.
But guess what? They lost.
Didn't you wonder what the deeper meaning of a mind-boggling loss like this would carry?
Perhaps there is no answer.
It didn't signal the end of the Patriots dominance. It didn't mean that Brady was no longer a superstar quarterback or that he wasn't clutch. Gisele didn't decide to leave him for Tony Romo.
It also didn't mean that Bill Belichek won't be remembered as a historically great coach. Of course he will. That's, at least, one more Superbowl appearance to put on the resume.
The Giants just won the game.
The Pats most likely would have won big if there was a rematch.
But there won't be. Stuff happens.
Except to His Airness it seemed.
He always came out on top. His record-breaking 72-10 team sure didn't wilt when it came down to crunch time.
The Jordan years created this false sense of destiny in the world of sports, to a generation that grew up with the certainty of the Un-Forgetta-Bulls.
Wayne Gretzky's presence was felt as well. The first part of his career was spent, much like Mike's, gaining individual accolades, while his team grew stronger and more successful. Enough time passed, and the Edmonton Oilers finally brought home the cup. And it wouldn't be the first time. Once he became the champ, he was crowned three more times.
But looking closely, even the great one suffered a bout of disappointing failure. And in the midst of a colossal string of success.
The Oilers weren't quite able to win five in row. They had to settle for merely a double two-peat. Edmonton was shown the exit by a hungry Calgary Flames team right in the middle of all that success.
Jordan would not have stood for that? Right?
See where I'm going. Gretzky is on Jordan's level. Maybe pound-for-pound in his sport, even better. He certainly demolished the record books faster and by larger margins than Jordan did, in comparison with his peers.
But he lost, and it didn't mean a thing.
The Cup was returned to its previous owners the next year.
But I will also admit that when I first heard of this failure at the apex of Gretzky's powers, I was a bit disappointed.
Jordan never lost in his prime.
Nope.
But he could have. Great athletes lose all the time.
90 percent of his success was due to his incredible will to win and inspirational athleticism. But 10 percent was from factors beyond his control.
But he did have me going for a while. I grew up thinking that every great athlete should experience similar levels of unobstructed success. They should all make sensational plays in every pressure situation, year after year in order to beat the "unworthy" stars from the other teams.
The Ewings or the Barkleys who, in my estimation, must not have wanted it enough or didn't try hard enough or weren't as heroic or clutch. That had to be the source of their failure. At least it was sold to the public that way.
(Photo: Why Couldn't Pat Riley Make Me a Damn Superteam?!?!)
Michael Jordan's reign made a generation of fans buy into sports as a fairy tale. Something reliable and expected. Not scripted, but without much doubt involved in regards to the outcome.
It created that little voice in the back of your head before a Superbowl that says, "Ok, I know the teams look relatively equal, but Peyton Manning will definitely play above his means today, because he is a superstar."
Mythology doesn't grind out wins, though, or recover on-side kicks.
And when Drew Brees led his team to victory over the shell-shocked Colts, I can at least speak for myself in, once again, feeling puzzled over where this event fits.
The best quarterback in the league, one of those guys that even your mother could pick out of a lineup due to his global stardom, had lost. And not even in a particularly memorable way. It's not as if he fell on his own sword.
It's too confusing.
What do you make of a player who is arguably the best in the league, who has won a Superbowl and also lost one?
In reality, those types of conundrums have always existed in sports. It's life, and it never has been black and white. But those Bulls teams made it feel like it could have been.
That's the Jordan effect. It took a combination of factors, hinging upon his otherworldly talents, to finish his NBA novella. Don't expect that sort of certainty ever again.
The stars may not have been aligned, but they were pretty close in the night sky when Michael Jordan arrived on the planet.
And even now, in a league made up of players, who mostly remember those days from highlight reels, those sort of off-the-chart expectations have not completely subsided.
And at least for some, there may be a dark side to living in the shadows of the impossible.
LeBron James took maybe the worst supporting cast of players to ever play for a title into the finals against San Antonio early in his career. Go back and look at the roster. It's much worse than you think. Not only that, but he absolutely willed his team to that perch by scoring damn near every single clutch point in defeating the heavily favored Detroit Pistons.
Most people have already forgotten about that. The Spurs were a monster and The Cavs didn't win.
Instead of remembering that season fondly, it has been cast aside as a season that "LeBron failed." He didn't ask to be the next Jordan, and no one should expect it. He's still a young man. These years should be the exciting prime years. He could be leading the downtrodden city of Cleveland to the promised land.
What a story that would be, right?
No chance anymore. People apparently told him one too many times that if he didn't want to be a failure, he would have to start piling up rings.
Look how easy it was for Jordan.
Can't LeBron even get one (I would say it's looking great, right now)?
People forget the difficulty of a championship. It's a grueling journey. A journey that, for most, will end before reaching the hollowed grounds of victory.
And as we all know, nothing is ever guaranteed.
Too many times those Bulls teams made us forget that.
Now in the eyes of the average NBA fan, LeBron has signed a deal with the devil. His team is now ridiculously loaded with superstar talent. Many lesser players could win with the help of Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh, least of all, King James.
It all seemed a bit desperate and over the top. But it did shed light into the dynamics of the pressure that was being exerted on him to win. He would rather take on the role of a hated villain than to gamble with the uncertainty of possibly never winning a title.
He will be booed at every visitor's arena until his last dunk as a player. And at times, it seems that he is becoming, and understandably, a bit unhinged—with angry, mildly threatening tweets early on and somewhat emotional press conferences and out-of-character overcelebrations on the court just recently.
It's not psychotic behavior, but it's not consistent with his mannerisms in the past. This was once the NBA's version of the "Say Hey Kid" before The Decision loomed on the horizon. A care-free, fun-loving basketball prodigy with an infectious smile. It's easy to tell that all the negativity has taken its toll.
It's only natural.
And can you really say that the otherworldly Jordan-esque expectations thrust upon him since middle school did not play at least some role in his dramatic decision?
Recently, the newly anointed MJ-like player, Derrick Rose, took a speedboat full of young and talented Bulls up the river toward the island of oppressive expectations that is the Miami Heat's season. The newly anointed savior may someday finish the job.
But not this year. Not quite.
LBJ is still playing the role of Colonel Kurtz on his island of stars.
And maybe he will find himself in the unbelievable position of winning a title, but still being generally maligned.
"Jordan didn't have to team up with Magic for his titles."
There is some validity to that statement.
And give Derrick Rose a few unfulfilling seasons and see if he starts feeling the strain.
Maybe he will flee to his own island of misfit superstars to cope.
Of course it's only basketball. But the ante has been cranked up for the time being. It may be our entertainment, but it's also one man from Akron's entire legacy on the line.
But that's what happens when you win six championships. And furthermore, when you do it with nary a misstep along the way.
It's certainly not for everyone. Though the bar isn't being lowered anytime soon.
We will continue to watch and see how the pressure manifests itself on the younger generations.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
27 comments
|
15 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In today's league?
MJ would have scored 40ppg at least once.
i voted more success myself
but cautiously, jordans greatest fear, as noted by sam smith, was the idea of looking bad in front of the media…and honestly…how bad is it not to look bad in the media these days with twitter and bloggers running amock….
I also wonder if jordans evolution of his game came through because of the lack of hand check rules. He had to adapt his game to shoot longer jumpers, get in the post and avoid some of that contact. Or perhaps he wouldve done so regardless (looking at rose, and all the no calls he gets, u can see he is on that path to evolve his game for that very reason)…
fuck it….hed be better and we all know it…a kobe bryant with a kevin garnett mentality….absolutely frightening.
I dont care what the D.N.A. Says, the Guy wearing number 12 Cannot be Kirk Hinrich, he is definetly Kurt. Kirk can actually play basketball!
Impossible to be Perfect Now
Jordan would have been crucified for affairs, gambling, and whatever else that most nba players engage in…. I don’t think the media would allow for a perfect image nowadays.. there are exceptions though.. such as Tom Brady. Don’t know how he has managed to keep such an amazing image while his coach cheated, they lost their last superbowl, and also while having a baby with Gisele (who brings even MORE attention to his every move.)
Good point..
by bdmillhouser on Jun 12, 2011 1:23 AM CDT up reply actions
not to mention his split with bridget moynahan
although, i have no idea whether he knew he got her pregnant before he dumped her, or really what the circumstances were regarding that.
… but this isn’t about tom brady lol.
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
Holy hell
this was a great read…thanks
I dont care what the D.N.A. Says, the Guy wearing number 12 Cannot be Kirk Hinrich, he is definetly Kurt. Kirk can actually play basketball!
agreed.. very well written piece..
At $300 million, I don't want Albert Pujols anywhere near the Cubs.
by DisCUBbobulated on Jun 1, 2011 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Fantastic work
I'm a New Yorker born and bred. I support my Jets, Mets, Red Storm and Islanders. I also love my out-of-state Bulls, Clippers, Cowboys & Fighting Irish.
Thanks for Kind Words
I can honestly say I have no Idea how MJ would fare in the new nba. But just like in my article, I think for him to have the insane uninhibited success, he would have to have a decent amount of luck.
Follow me on Twitter @ChiBDM and also Tumblr at www.chibdm.tumblr.com.
You can honestly say you don't know how he would fare in today's NBA?
In relation to what, winning another 6 titles? Leading the league in scoring? Please clarify.
"After Game 1, they made me and Joe’s life a living hell." - Jamal Crawford
MJ
I think he would be just as good, I just feel that odds are always against winning 6 championships.. So even if he was a little improved, he most likely would not be able to pull anything better than 6 championships off..
So about the same…
Follow me on Twitter @ChiBDM and also Tumblr at www.chibdm.tumblr.com.
More success, easily.
Handcheck rules aside, he would eat up the hero ballers of this generation. MJ would make Lebron mentally crumble the way he did to everyone in his generation. If the Heat were crying after a regular season loss, what would MJ’s Bulls do to them? You think he would stand for Wade’s flopping bullshit? He would DESTROY those fuckers. Argument over!
by rinconen on Jun 3, 2011 2:08 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
exactly this
after I finished reading and voted I was ready to post..well…pretty much exactly this
I started off thinking 'Boy, yfbb is gonna hate this one'
but by the time I finished reading, I was almost moved by how profoundly revealing this was. Excellent post.
i thought the exact same thing...
hate to knitpick but i dont think cross-sport comparisons are fair. brady and gretzky don’t have as large of an impact on the game as a basketball player can. jordan ended up playing around 38-45 out of 48 minutes per night. brady only played on one side of the ball and gretzky probably didnt log more than 28 minutes out of a possible 60… jordan had more influence on outcomes because he was playing a higher percentage of the game. not jordan’s fault, just the nature of how the games are played.
overall, a very good read
Doesn’t seem very moral to me. Might as well take Satan’s autograph while you’re at it. - N.C.
I enjoyed that
Taking Pippen’s choice of words… I kinda think that MJ was the greatest at playing The Basketball Game, as in getting the most from basketball that a human being possibly can. It’s kinda like how Seinfeld was the greatest at playing The Comedian Game for awhile, even though he may or may not be the greatest comic, but he’s worked the game in a way where it’s benefitted his life above anyone else. People bow to that guy. He’s still probably the A list of A list among comedians. Then factor in that MJ was likely also the greatest player of all time, and that’s tough to beat.
And I think the first part is what’s lost in this LeBron debate. Nobody cares that Jabbar’s resume kicks probably everybody’s ass all-time, or that Dan Marino crushed every passing record, or that Pedro Martinez dominated hitters like nobody else before him. They played their sport, they dominated, and that was it.
LeBron is the story of the day, but so was Wilt Chamberlain at one time, and Oscar Robertson, and looking back people just say “yeah those guys were awesome”, and that’s it. It’s the guys like Jordan, Ruth, Ali who not only dominated, not only won championships, but also were huge ambassadors of the game that got people not interested in their sport to suddenly become interested in them that are remembered as the elite. Nobody gives a crap about LeBron.
yea
go to pakistan, say Lebron James, and people will think you sneezed, are talking about some clothing line, or are cursin in english…say Michael Jordan and they will nod accordingly and say “Basketball” with a smile….
I dont care what the D.N.A. Says, the Guy wearing number 12 Cannot be Kirk Hinrich, he is definetly Kurt. Kirk can actually play basketball!
If Jordan were drafted today, what are the odds that he would end up playing with
players as good as Pippen and Grant and Rodman under a coach as good as Jackson? Maybe not as good as you think. After all, there are 30 teams in the NBA. Many of them are badly run. Few of them have ever won a championship. And if he did play with other elites, is it possible that he would do so by leaving the team that drafted him?
Jordan would be as good or better, but it is a team game.
by Tim S. on Jun 6, 2011 11:11 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Exactly
Thats exactly what I wanted to get across with this article.. I agree… The odds of him being set up so well would be relatively low if he somehow started his career today..
by bdmillhouser on Jun 6, 2011 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions
Even Garnett won a championship eventually.
Chances are that a player as great as him would not play his whole career without winning one or more championships. Heck, if the Lakers had drafted him he might have won more than six. But to win six with the team that drafted him he had to be both great and lucky, not just great.
set up so well?
He was drafted before the Bulls acquired any of those things Tim S listed. Lebron eventually got to play with Wade, Melo with Amare. You don’t think Jordan could have engineered something like that? And its not Jordan is the first gut to have good teammates. Dirk used to play with Nash. Would we view Pippen the same if he didn’t play with Jordan? Eventually Jordan would have hoisted multiple championships. Maybe not 6, but he would have won championships. Because he was the best player to play the game AND he had an unbelievable drive to win. In today’s NBA he would have pulled a Decision, but instead of losing to the Mavs – he would have won.
by Basketball Smurf on Jun 14, 2011 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions
interesting read
what i was thinking about was: if MJ started his career today, what effect would today’s media hype have on his development? in his first years in the league, there was already so much hype surrounding him. would he have a twitter account? (definately) would he surround himself with fake-friends, a possee, girls? (maybe) what about his passion for gambling? would he spend his off-season doing movies, promo-ads, hanging out with his possee? or would he spend the time working to get better and better and better instead? i’m not so sure. there are so much more tempting things surrounding hyped players nowadays, i’m not 100% sure he could keep his ultra-competitive spirit.
if he would, there’s no doubt for me that he would become the dominant player within his first two to three years. there are much more possibilities today to become a better player than in the mid-eighties. more effective conditioning, better coaching, better training facilities, and so on. i say, he would become even better. the fact that this is league loaded with superstars would even add to his competitiveness. he would work his ass off becoming better than James, Wade, Kobe, and all the other superstars.
and you have to remember: he made his teammates better. switch Drexler and MJ in the mid eighties, and i tell you, the Blazers would have won multiple championships. and any other team would have too.
Steve Kerr put it pretty well in a recent interview.
He (LeBron) doesn’t have an offensive game that he can rely on: no low-post game, no mid-range jump shot so when the game really gets tough he has a hard time finding easy baskets and getting himself going. That’s what Michael did in his sleep, so that’s why the comparison is wrong."
IMO, LeBron is a great player, bit he is not on Michael’s level.
LBJs numbers may often be similar or appear to be on the same level, but they were achieved under very different circumstances.
Simply put, if you replaced LeBron James with Michael Jordan, the Heat would have won the NBA championship this year. Period.
Am I wrong?
Lu-Deng Clan Aint Nuttin ta Fuck Wit !
I don't know, MJ is kind of old...
How does one practice consistency? Take lots of Benefiber?
by WearShades on May 31, 2011 6:37 AM PDT
by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Jun 13, 2011 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs

by 

















