Slightly different story, but same ending: Defense, physical play, and another close Bulls victory
| Pace | Eff | eFG | FT/FG | OREB% | TOr | |
| Chicago | 88.0 | 100.0 | 45.1% | 31.9 | 27.0 | 17.0 |
| Indiana | 95.5 | 38.5% | 19.5 | 31.9 | 12.5 |
Another slow-paced mostly-ugly game. There was a lot of the same: high turnover number from the Bulls, getting to the free-throw line a ton (though they barely did at all in the first half), outstanding defense and poor Pacers offense keeping the game close. Then relying on Derrick Rose dominating the final possessions (converted the game-winning basket, naturally), and getting to that point with some more clutch Kyle Korver 3s.
There were some differences though. While Rose once again was reliable as the closer, he did not have the caliber of standout game like he did in the first two meetings. Just 23 points on 18 shots, 5 turnovers, and some poor shot selection. The Pacers kept using larger defenders on him (even using Dahntay Jones tonight), and emphasized trapping him earlier in possessions. It worked, relatively, but he still managed to get to the line a ton, and oftentimes the Bulls were able to space and pass their way out of early trouble. They still will usually lack a 2nd ballhandler though (CJ Watson only sorta counts, and they do not play together that often), so this will likely be something we'll see more and more as the playoffs roll along.
If Rose was merely less-than-spectacular, Boozer was pretty much awful. Though he did have a nice steal and converted a dunk (I swear, I saw it!) in the 4th quarter, he was mostly ineffective around the rim though the Bulls seemingly tried to make an effort to work the ball to him more. And while the Pacers frontcourt didn't do as much damage (McRoberts did have a shamefully good move on Booz), that's mostly because it turns out that Hansbrough and Hibbert just aren't very good.
So without a fully-capable Rose and with an abysmal Boozer, where was the help? It starts with Luol Deng, who had a fantastic first half on his way to 21 points. The first half production from he and Taj Gibson (who had to come in early after Boozer picked up a dumb second foul) was especially big as that was when Rose and Boozer really struggled. And I don't remember seeing Deng ever coming out of the game, though the box score has him at under 46 minutes. He was key in making the Pacers pay for trapping Rose, with 2 three-pointers. Keith Bogans one-upped him with 3-3 shooting from beyond the arc in what was by far his best game of the series. When the guy hits shots, he can play (yes, I decide).
And I thought this was the first time in a while that Joakim Noah looked like his old self again. The rebounding has been there all-along, but tonight Joakim was a real threat in the half-court set, willing to drive and launch the tornado. And while the Bulls won't get another true ballhandler to help Rose, an active Noah can fill that role admirably for a big man.
It was mentioned in the comments this week, and makes more sense to me after tonight: Getting Noah back to full strength, rest for Ronnie Brewer (hasn't looked the same with that bum hand), and keeping Derrick Rose away from more hard fouls is of paramount importance. This hasn't been the Bulls looking their best, but that's the Pacers goal: to rough up (and in Jeff Foster's case, more than just rough, pretty much blatantly flagrant) and try and compensate for their lack of talent. The Bulls don't have to play that game, they just have to win the game and never see these guys again. One more.
329 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
:::::claps:::
“No! Don’t let Booz in this winners circle. If we keep doing this he’ll never learn!”
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
by SoulEater7 on Apr 22, 2011 12:33 AM CDT reply actions 4 recs
I still can't come down after that game!
Probably because of the meth
by Meth Chef Jeff on Apr 22, 2011 12:39 AM CDT reply actions
I get it...
it’s a terrible bit!
You must have me confused with someone else, I have never been to Chicago.
[whispers] I sexually assaulted Scottie Pippen in 1997.
by DocPepper on Apr 22, 2011 4:02 AM CDT up reply actions 6 recs
Props to Kyle Korver for steppin up 3 straight games. Love that dude. (no homo)
Never Fear cause D-Rose is here.
by Juan dela Cruz on Apr 22, 2011 12:41 AM CDT reply actions
Aaaand time for sweepin this Sat., good luck to the Bulls
and as Matt said the other thread, lets just win that one and get it over with. Lastly, when will they announce err give D-Rose the MVP?
Never Fear cause D-Rose is here.
by Juan dela Cruz on Apr 22, 2011 12:44 AM CDT reply actions
Rose, Watson, and Korver
I felt like Rose looked tired all game. He wasn’t attacking the rim as much (partly because Indiana wanted to take away his drives, and partly because of the officiating), but even when he settled for jumpers he didn’t appear to have the usual lift in his legs. Hopefully, the Bulls can sweep, and he can get some recuperation time.
Watson was a tale of two halves. The first half he looked pretty good, he had an easy lay-up, tried to run the offense, and took what the defense gave him. In the second half he looked dreadful. He turned the ball over, and picked up stupid fouls. If I’m not mistaken Thibs opened the fourth with both Rose and Watson in, with Watson being the primary ball-handler. I was extremely excited, but Watson blew two out of the three possessions with stupid turnovers. Thus, we never got to see Derrick attack without the responsibility of taking care of the ball. I had high hopes for this combination, as I felt it would give Derrick a chance to rest while on the court, providing the threat needed to allow the other teammates to get good looks, without having to bust his tail on every possession organizing everything.
Korver was great, I especially liked running plays for him late in the game (I rememeber one for sure, but there might have been two) because it: (A) allowed Derrick to sit at the top of the key for a possession, (B) punished Indiana for putting Darren Collison on him. Korver has a quick trigger, and a solid height advantage on Collison. Combined with Collison’s slight build (meaning picks are more effective against him), and Collison simply was unable to recover in time to challenge Korver’s shot.
Yeah I'm off the "Watson at the 2" bandwagon
It’s a nice idea in theory to get another ballhandler out there, but Watson’s just not that good in that capacity.
Pat Riley is the devil.
by Poloplaya14 on Apr 22, 2011 12:59 AM CDT up reply actions
The problem with Watson and Derrick sharing the court tonight was that they had CJ run the point for some reason.
by fundamentallysound on Apr 22, 2011 1:05 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't mind that so much
but Derrick wasn’t running off screens. That was the whole reason for CJ to run point: the Pacers wouldn’t be able to trap Derrick at half court and pack the lane. Frustrating.
Boozer, playful and sarcastic after the game, said: “Didn’t get any free throws. Guess I didn’t get fouled out there.”
This guy is something ese.. he lives in like two worlds sometimes I believe.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
In fairness
He got hacked a few times going up.
I don't know what you mean...
I can think of several times he was fouled and I shouted “And one!”,but the refs didnt blow the whistle.
13 for 7.
pretty sure he does that every play. Even when kyle shoots the 3 uncontested.
Thibs got his team a chemistry set for Christmas
by livesinnoahsbasement on Apr 22, 2011 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
I just mean he can have a bad game and be just as happy as if he was great.
Nothing fazes the guy.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
except losing maybe?
But we’re not good at that.
It’s just that people are scared of the unknown. What I have seen of him is exactly what we need and I can’t believe he isn’t being at least gotten some burn after all we’ve seen. -SoulEater7
That happens to a lot of guys. I didn't hear Rose whining after every game for the first 2 1/2 years of his career.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
derrick was resting tonight.
bench mob #
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
by Orlando Woolridge on Apr 22, 2011 1:10 AM CDT reply actions
Still don't get the Boozer hate
I know he gets paid a lot of money, but this is not even close to a Ben Wallace type of thing. We’re winning games this year because we play D, rebound the fuck out of the ball, and let Rose handle the rest. Booze is a GREAT rebounder. He’s probably the main reason we’re such a good rebounding team. Not only does he get a lot of rebounds, he gets the tough defensive rebounds at the end of games. For some reason, people don’t want to give him credit for this. Also, if we’re gonna bitch him out when Hansbrough is going off, shouldn’t we credit him when he’s basically turned him into a ghost offensively, and kept him off the offensive glass (one of his specialties) in the last two games?
The bottom line is, he’s always scored a majority of his points on the pick and roll. That’s his fucking specialty. In Utah, him and D Will would run that shit the whole game. We barely EVER do it here. The blame needs to go on Thibs or Derrick, not Boozer. The fact that he’s still doing all the dirty work, and not complaining about the way he’s being used is something he should be admired for, not criticized. He’s not fucking Al Jefferson where you just throw the ball to him and he gets you 20 points. He never was. So people need to stop acting like that’s what he’s supposed to be doing.
Instead of all the negatives with Boozer, why don’t we focus on the positives for once:
- As far as I can tell, he’s been a GREAT teammate. he hasn’t complained about a damn thing despite the fact that he’s not being used nearly as much as he has been. And he’s always quick to talk up his teammates
- We won 62 games (!!!!!!!!!!!!) with him starting at the 4 for a majority of the season
- Awesome rebounder, on (and this is key) an awesome rebounding team. Any asshole can put put up huge rebounding numbers while their team is getting stomped every night (Hi Kevin Love!), but when you’re a great rebounder, and your team is a great rebounding team, that says something.
- He takes tons of shit for his D, but we’re still the best defensive team in the league, and he’s usually on the floor when we straight shut people down in the third and fourth quarters. He’s not a shot blocker by any stretch, but he’s a good positional defender, and (here we go again) he gets the board after we make the stop (all of you people that love Taj so much (as do I) need to remember that this might be, and has been, a problem with him)
Anyway, I’m sure there’s more, but I doubt any of you have even read this far. I guess I just think Boozer is taking way too much shit. It’s really not fair imo.
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 1:44 AM CDT reply actions 23 recs
Totally forgot to mention passing, which is one of the most important things he does
This whole team is built around moving the ball, and playing as a team, and no one has a bigger role in that than him with his passing out of the post
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 1:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Boozer also draws a lot of attention
If he is trying to post up, or simply moving around Indiana is shading towards him a lot of the time. Boozer’s missed shots also have not been of the wide-open variety. My only complaint is the rate at which he picks up offensive fouls.
Still remember his first touch this season when he drew a double team
I had no idea what that looked like until that moment. It was surreal. A bull double-teamed IMMEDIATELY in the post.
it is so frustrating that the best place to chat about the bulls is dominated by a whiny drama queen moderator with a man crush on an average SG......6 recs
by BigforkBullsFan on Apr 22, 2011 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions
yeah that was awesome
first time he touched the ball all season… immediately drew two guys
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
Agreed jbj
Must…stop…heat…of…the moment BS…
People proably hate Booz for not having an impact on offense consistently like Amare and Bosh and being Rose’s #2. But like you said when Noah was struggling Booz picked us up with his rebounds, gets steals when you late in the 2nd half lately, good passing big man (still can’t believe he saw KK in that one game can’t remember the team we played). Now while guys complain about his D people seem to forget, our Defense was already top 5 with an idiot as a coach we had no offense Booz is here for our offense we know he is bad on D, GarPaxDorf knows of his bad D, but he’s known for his rebounds and post scoring (while he’s struggling there) but I think he will play better as long he plays in attack mode like he did the last few games at the regular season.
Rose: Who in the blue hell are you?
Rondo: Well
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO YOU ARE!
Well , the people that want Stoudemire so badly right now
would also be the ones that would be complaining about the lack of rebounding, and yelling for him to get D Rose the ball, if he was here. It’s funny, I was reading the Knicks board after one of our games against them (I think the last one) and they were talking about how they’d kill to have a guy that could board like Boozer. I know he hasn’t been quite as good as we expected, but this is definitely a “Grass is greener…” situation
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 2:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Counting tonight, Boozer is 4/20 on shots 5 feet or closer.
Rose has a long ways to go in terms of becoming a better passer, but holy shit man. He’s getting massacred at the rim and this is against some weak defensive players. The frontcourt defenses only get quicker and more athletic in the next two rounds. This was supposed to be a team that Boozer could bully inside and he’s failing miserably. Carlos is way too talented to simply rely on perfect execution out of the pick and roll to get 20 points a game. He can score in a variety of ways, we saw it for parts of this season and it’s just not showing up right now.
by Ozzie Montana on Apr 22, 2011 2:00 AM CDT up reply actions 9 recs
Yeah, I mean, rebounding is nice and all and that's PART of what Boozer was brought here to do, but
he’s in there primarily to be the second scoring option behind Rose (especially since his defensive rotations and defensive effort are absolutely terrible). He’s not getting it done and the criticism is very valid.
by fundamentallysound on Apr 22, 2011 2:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Well, if they brought him in to be the second scoring option
and thought he would flourish in that role just by posting up, then they’re idiots. Plain and simple. He’ll never be a great scoring option when used in that manner, so people need to just forget about it. Now, if Rose really works on his pnr game for next year, then maybe we’ll start to see a bit more of the scoring Boozer we thought we were getting. To be honest, I’m pretty impressed that he’s played so well considering how rarely we run the plays that he’s good at.
I kinda compare it to the way Vinny used Lu the last two years. He tried to make him an iso type player, but that’s not what Lu does. Now that he’s playing in a system that works for him, he’s flourishing. Same shit with Boozer. You can’t expect him to be something he’s not. We didn’t pay him to be a back to the basket scorer
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 2:23 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect your big, burly, expensive power forward to be able to finish around the rim.
by fundamentallysound on Apr 22, 2011 2:27 AM CDT up reply actions 7 recs
He's not good at getting points from the low post
He’s 6’7", and it’s never been his game, as far as I know.
he has to go up stronger
way too much finesse. Having said that, with the amount of offensive rebounds, interior shots and put backs he and Noah have attempted, its amazing they haven’t been going to the free throw line more.
by Basketball Smurf on Apr 22, 2011 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions
You'll like this link
Boozer’s synergy stats past two seasons.
Pretty spot on all around. Definitely needs more mention that Boozer isn’t an efficient post scorer (he’s actually fine when he attempts a shot, but he turns the ball over at a high rate and rarely draws fouls), and he’s not a good isolation option.
I think it’s interesting that he’s attempting more shots off pick and rolls compared to last year (15% of his shots compared to 13.5%), but his efficiency is waaay down. His 63 FG% in PnR attempts last year compared to 46 FG% in PnR this year support your point that it’s Rose, not Boozer. Boozer’s only getting 63 FG% if he’s getting passes to give him layup opportunities.
What Deron was doing that Rose isn’t, it’s hard to say. I’m gonna try to give it a look.
by YaoPau on Apr 22, 2011 3:09 AM CDT up reply actions 6 recs
Good stuff
i think the difference between Rose and Deron is just that D Will would lead Boozer with his passes. He’d give him the ball with an opportunity to do something. What I’ve noticed from Rose is that he doesn’t anticipate plays well. He passes where guys are, not where they’re gonna be. If that makes sense. So most of the time Boozer gets the ball in a spot where he really doesn’t have much room to do something. There’s just no rhythm whatsoever to the boozer Rose pnr.
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 3:22 AM CDT up reply actions 7 recs
Ok it's really noticeable
I want to post a video soon showing the difference. Deron/Boozer PnR’s are clearly set plays, and they’re beautiful. Deron’s job on these set plays is to pass, so he’s not even looking for dribbling space. He gets around the pick, and without looking or thinking, boom, immediate pass between the defenders.
Rose/Boozer PnR’s look like attempts to give Rose space. Rose gets around the screen, determines if there is space to drive, and if not, Boozer is the second option. After looking at the Deron/Boozer plays, I kept watching the Rose/Boozer plays and thinking “Rose!! Boozer is wide open!! You’re always a half second late!!”
Pretty cool insight, and rec’d all the way. I had no clue Boozer was that efficient in Utah’s PnR. That changes a lot, and it gives me hope for Boozer to keep up his efficiency in future years. I’m hoping their poor PnR is a result of Boozer being hurt early on.
by YaoPau on Apr 22, 2011 3:36 AM CDT up reply actions 10 recs
And Rose is 22.
He still has a few things to learn, and is young enough to learn them.
by Tim S. on Apr 22, 2011 7:11 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
Deron is a much better passer than Derrick
Hopefully Derrick gets better, but that’s it in a nutshell. Deron is a different type of PG who is looking less to score and more to distribute. If Derrick did that a little more he would see less of these traps and have more freedom to do his thing.
this is where rose loses the pg debate
Cp3 and deron are still ahead of rose in the passing department. Rose is the better player but he’s definitely not the best point guard in the league
The quest for seven is on.
Not the best passing point guard.
When he is on his game like the first two in this series, it’s hard to complain about his passing.
by Tim S. on Apr 22, 2011 7:12 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
im not complaining
hes a better player by far.
hes just not a prototypical point guard.
hes a top 5 player the way hes playing.
The quest for seven is on.
not in regards to passing
which is where the comparison is being made. Rose is superior in a lot of ways to Deron, but passing isn’t one of them.
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Well Granger is better than Lebron at hitting jumpers
It’s just that people are scared of the unknown. What I have seen of him is exactly what we need and I can’t believe he isn’t being at least gotten some burn after all we’ve seen. -SoulEater7
yeah, its acceptable to compare individual skills
to someone else’s individual skills. Granger has a better jumper than LeBron…. so does Korver (so does half the league).
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions
watching utah run PnR last season was a thing of beauty
DWill is even making humphreys and lopez look good. Most of Derrick’s assists appear to be from kick outs while Deron’s/CP3’s assists appear to give more easy looks to their big dudes. Who would of thought that aaron gray could actually look somewhat competent.
It also helps when Jerry Sloan is your coach
Maybe one of the best coaches of the PnR of all time.
Derrick Rose will be suspended by the NBA because he has broken too many ankles.
by jrobulls on Apr 22, 2011 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
This.
That shouldn’t be forgotten. Deron didn’t quite learn to do that on his own.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe he'll come to the Bulls in a consulting capacity this summer!
Actually, that would be kind of cool.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Well, there's no defense for some of the misses he's had lately
They were definitely shots that a guy like him should make, but I don’t think it’s the disaster it’s being made out to be. Could just be a situation where he’s a little rusty due to the lack of touches lately. Just like any other basketball play, you get better through repetition, Boozer hasn’t had that many opportunities. Rose should do a better job of looking for him for easy ones so he can see the ball going in the hole. He’s just lacking some confidence and offensive rhythm
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 2:18 AM CDT up reply actions
Right...those gimmes are gonna have to start falling though if the Bulls are gonna win in the rounds to come.
I’m confident Booz will turn it around though. If the Bulls sweep…he will have a good week to work on some of these things as well.
I agree, the guy gets plenty of shots at the basket
not just from Rose, but from other guys finding him. He needs to finish better and draw more fouls. He’s going up weak too often.
by Basketball Smurf on Apr 22, 2011 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions
I don'tknow why people would think he could bully Hansbrough and Hibbert.
Hibbert seems like the perfect type of a defender for Boozer. He won’t get backed down, and he won’t get pump-faked because he’s so tall. Boozer can’t elevate over him.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Totally agree with this
especially about his attitude and not being used right.
I have to agree as well
Boozer actually played pretty good Defense tonight, and made some bigs plays on both ends down the stretch.
BUT BOOZER YELLS SO MUCH I JUST WANT TO YELL BACK AT HIM FOR NO REASON SOMETIMES
The quest for seven is on.
I can't agree with everything you've said
But I’m glad to read some support in Booze’s favor and this did give me some food for thought. I haven’t been reading in-game threads lately due to work asploding, but I can only imagine the onslaught that brought on this spirited defense.
For what it’s worth:
I get the defensive limitations, I get the need to have a pick and roll partner that he’s used to and who delivers the ball better, I get the rebounding that he provides. I think what I, and many others are responding to is that Boozer had played so much better this year, on this team. Booze was an automatic 20/10 guy until sometime shortly after the all-star break. Tonight he scored four points, had three turnovers, was blocked twice and while he did have 11 boards, I can’t remember more than one that was heavily contested. I’m sorry but that’s a crapfest, if not a shitshow.
Add to that the expectation (and current fulfillment?) of Booze’s crappy playoff rep, a massive contract in a city that already employs Alfonso Soriano on one of its sports teams, and Booze’s constant hope/prayer/dependance on bail out calls and failure to go up strong (just creates a perception of softness) and you can see how some might have arrived at vitriol.
To his credit, Booze has been by far the most entertaining Bull so far this postseason. It it’s a Bulls game anymore without at least two HEEEYYYs, and his yelling “GIMME THAT S***!” at a rebound is in the top five funniest pieces of nat sound I’ve ever heard at a game.
I think anyone rational realizes that the Bulls need Boozer to be good if they are to challenge for a championship. He filled a massive void at the 4 for Chicago, and even when he missed a week with that ugly ankle sprain it reminded just how important he is to this team.
He doesn’t need to do anything more than be who he’s always been, but so far against the Pacers (and TYLER HANSBROUGH for god’s sake), he has been far less than that.
Check out Bulls coverage at SB Nation - Chicago or on twitter @rightfieldsucks
by Right_Field_Sucks on Apr 22, 2011 3:02 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I sort of agree
One nice thing about Boozer is he rarely complains about his role. He doesn’t demand touches or need to be given the ball late in games. There are a lot of players who get paid big bucks who will demand that. He’s perfectly fine with taking a backseat to Derrick and the others.
However, 4 points is unacceptable for a guy being paid like he is. Sure I don’t expect him to be 20/10 every night, but I do expect him to be competent most nights. I also expect him to be able to carry the offense for stretches if they need him to.
From the game threads, this was ridiculous--
“Boozer is a terrible rebounder”
Me- “He has 11? Leading the game so far?”
“Uhhh not the IMPORTANT rebounds!”
“Rebound stats can be overrated.”
WTF?
You must have me confused with someone else, I have never been to Chicago.
[whispers] I sexually assaulted Scottie Pippen in 1997.
See this a lot
If somebody is doing bad at one thing, then they must be bad at everything. Once some people decide to dislike a player, the blinders go on. It was other players like Deng in the past where his defense, rebounding and scoring were useless simply because he wasn’t an effective isolation player.
now that I can understand, but as we know
the gamethreads are to be burned and never discussed* once they’re closed. Bad things all around happen in there.
*unless you all flag like you should
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 22, 2011 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions
if there is a tough rebound to be gotten,
i would trust taj more than booz to get it. no matter the stats.
(and i don’t boozer-hate in the game threads. that would be foolish.)
pride is the last to go before the foul.
Boozer makes a lot of easy rebounds
because he gets great position. He uses that wide body.
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions
No way
In addition to the above comments about Boozer’s boxing-out and positioning, he has way better hands than Taj.
Pat Riley is the devil.
Boozer rebounds are like Gordon turnovers.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
there's a difference between having a shitty game and being a shitty player
he’s had 2 shitty games out of 3, though.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 22, 2011 8:22 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Wow. Let me ask you a question Juice...
Why is the standard for Boozer’s play so much lower than the standard you have for Rose? Boozer can score 4 points in a playoff game, not jump, not play smart on either end on the court, and turn the ball over but that’s OK, he rebounds! But God forbid Rose takes one too many 3s.
First off rebounds are only as valuable as your teams ability to get them and considering that we have the deepest frontcourt in the league, with guys capable of grabbing boards, excuse me if I expect more out of Boozer than that. Boozer just is not only not scoring, he’s playing dumb basketball. When Rose is getting trapped at halfcourt, why is both Boozer and Noah standing in the same space at the top of the key? Why isn’t boozer down below helping with spacing so that when Noah (Our second best ballhandler) gets the ball, the lanes aren’t clogged. Also, how many times has this guy gotten the ball taken from him at the top of the key? Whether that’s Collinson or even Hansborough. Also, if we gave a guy 80 million bucks that could only be effective in the PnR then he is as bad of a signing as Ben Wallace. Because if he can’t finish around the rim and go up strong in the playoffs, he never will and he’s pretty much done.
The dude was brought here for 20 and 10, to a force in the paint and a 2nd option. Nothing more, nothing less. Boozer going out and getting 11 rebounds with 4 points is damn inexcusable. Why? 1.) Because he sucks at everything else he’s doing on the court and 2.) Because we have other guys that can go on the court and rebound. I can’t believe the slack some want to give this guy. We’re literally winning in spite of Carlos Boozer and if Thibs had subbed for defense sooner in the 4th that game would not have come down to a last shot. 10 recs…wow
Hey Rose. I don't see the appeal!
My rec was for the insight
Not for excusing Booze of his many sins. I was ready to live with bad defense, since that has been as advertised. It’s the inability to finish and the turnovers that have been driving me nuts. But not having watched him all that much until this year, I didn’t appreciate how much of his success depends on a strong PnR game, as persuasively demonstrated by JBL and YaoPau. I thought he was a “dump it in the post and everything will work out” kind of player, but it turns out that’s not him.
Since Derrick is awesome, I have hope he’ll improve that part of his game over the off-season and we’ll make the best use of Booze possible, since we’re likely stuck with him. For now, I’m just hoping he can get his shit together and be Game 2 Boozer more often than Game 1 and 3 Boozer.
by Brooklyn Bulls on Apr 22, 2011 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions
I think I'm more surprised than you by the number of recs. I thought a lot more people were in Boozer hate mode right now
Anyway , I explained why I thought he had value in that rant, so I’m not gonna restate the whole thing over again. I’ll just say that I disagree. The one thing I will respond to:
Boozer can score 4 points in a playoff game, not jump, not play smart on either end on the court, and turn the ball over but that’s OK, he rebounds! But God forbid Rose takes one too many 3s.
I would compare Boozer’s game last night to if Rose had like 6-10 points and around 12-13 assists. If he did that, I wouldn’t complain about his performance. But let’s not pretend like Boozer is on Rose’s level, or if he should ever even be expected to perform on that level. Maybe that sucks considering the money they spent on him, but sometimes you have to overpay a little to get a free agent to sign.
Also, if he continues to have games like this (scoring wise), I’ll probably start hating him too, but I think it’s a little premature at this point for people to pile on. There is value in what he is giving the team right now. He has a track record of playoff success, and I don’t think this is all his fault.
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions
I understand your point but
Why isn’t it his fault? Look I get that his strength is the PnR game but he hasn’t exactly done anything as of the last 3 months to show he deserves that type of attention. He’s not jumping or going up strong at all so what’s the point of turning Rose into Dwill? I think they focus on getting Boozer involved too much as it is. This isn’t the Deng situation where VDN let Deng shoot bad shots all game and used him incorrectly. Boozer is just not getting it done right now at all.
I’m hard on Boozer because I’m looking at the long view. We didn’t give up Asik or Taj to get a SG because Bulls management felt that we needed the depth in the front court partly because of Boozer’s lack of defense. Ok fine. But that strategy is contingent on Boozer being the 2nd option. If he isn’t that than we aren’t winning a ring. Hell we’re not even getting out of the East this year. And to me that’s inexcusable to think that we signed a guy to just be a force.. just be a guy that needs to be payed attention to for Rose’s sake. But what we’re getting are traps on Rose and a PF that doesn’t even know what to do with the ball once Rose gives it to him.
I wasn’t a Brad Miller fan at all but at least he was a threat if Rose got trapped to shoot, pass, or take it to the hole. He’s played terrible so far in these playoffs and I can count on one hand the number of productive games he’s had lately. Playing bad here and there is one thing, not jumping or finishing for a PF is downright scary.
Hey Rose. I don't see the appeal!
Well, they had to spend that money once they couldn't get the real game changers
and I’d say they did alright, all things considered. Who would you prefer they went after? Would you rather have David Lee? I sure as hell wouldn’t. But that’s the type of guy we’d be looking at. It’s not perfect, but it could be a lot worse. We’re winning BECAUSE of him, not in spite of him.
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Winning because of Boozer?
The Bulls haven’t missed a beat with Carlos out of the lineup.
"The advanced metrics guys do not like Derrick Rose very much." - Bills Simmons podcast 2/4
by RogersPark Kris on Apr 22, 2011 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions
We are not winning because of Carlos Boozer
That’s just disingenuous. The best I can give is winning WITH Boozer. That’s about it. I didn’t disagree with the signing of Boozer either and was happy when we signed him. I was also upset when Thibs benched him early in the season against NJ. But I was wrong. Thibs knew Boozer was so bad defensively that he was costing us. Honestly the best PF for the Bulls is early season Taj. That guy was playing better ball than Chris Bosh. He was defending, hitting the open jumper and finishing.
Hey Rose. I don't see the appeal!
That’s just disingenuous. The best I can give is winning WITH Boozer.
What I mean is, he is a main reason why we are winning. He’s obviously not the biggest reason, but he’s one of em.
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm sorry Juice but he's not
and quite honestly hasn’t been most of the season.
Hey Rose. I don't see the appeal!
by Dils on Apr 22, 2011 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rose has 6-10 pts in a game and you're not going to complain?
Come on Jerry. You’d have to sit on your fingers.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions
Well, like I said, he'd need some big assist numbers
And actually, that’s usually what I criticize him most for. I don’t mind when he has low scoring games, it’s the games where he completely forgets how to pass that bother me. Which is yet another reason why it was probably good for me that I’ve stayed out of game threads lately.
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Well it's a problem sometimes and yeah it can be frustrating.
Specially when you see him angry at himself for making an errant pass then do it again the next trip up the court. He’s no Jason Kidd yet obviously. Yet he got better this year and hopefully this hard series will be good to teach him and learn from it. He’s our big option. The other teams after this that we play (hopefully, not over quite yet) are going to do the same thing. So yeah we have to get physical with the other teams and hope Derrick learns to deal with the physical play and still keep his head. Which is why I wish Thibs would stick up for Deng and other teammates keeping Rose’s back. I wouldn’t bet against Rose with anything and I think he will do better passing.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions
NO NO NO NO
if you see how he gets lazy on the defensive rebounds…a fuk it i give up
i love boozer..and i love lazy people
Fuck Boozer. What!?!
by Belize on Apr 22, 2011 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Ben Wallace's first year with the Bulls was so friggin underrated, it sucks no one remembers how great he was
Then he completely turned to doo doo.
I’m quite worried that Boozer’s career heads in the same direction.
I’d hate Booz a whole lot less if he didn’t have an un-tradeable contract, which is currently seems like at the moment
There is pretty much no such thing as an untradeable contract
Wiz got rid of Arenas, and were even able t trade him to what was considered a contender at the time
by TruEChiFaN... on Apr 22, 2011 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Here is the thought behind it.
All the positives you just outlined describe a role player and not a guy we are paying max salary for to be our second scoring option. Taj can also rebound and not bitch about doing the dirty work. If this is all we expect out of Carlos Boozer its a damning indictment on the contract we just handed him.
I lived in Utah for the last 5 years and what are you seeing is what pissed Utah fans off so much. Every year he would disappear in the playoffs particularly against the Lakers. That’s with DWill running that PnR you talked about. He still would log a no show come play off time. Go ask Utah fans about Carlos Boozer. The track record is there.
Add that to the hysterics, stupid offense fouls, turn overs, and the silly cheap shots and thats where the hate comes from.
"If you're not going to compete, then I'll dominate you." MJ
your points would resonate more if boozer was putting up a 16 PER and .53 TS%
and people were wondering why he doesnt put up a 20 PER and .58 TS%. as it stands hes got a 7 PER and .42 TS% for this series and that his production has been pathetic is largely his fault. his finishing has been vile, and its not like he hasnt had good looks.
"if Jonny [Flynn] loved playin competeant basketball az much az he loves de movie Salt
he might be ok."
- MAYNHOLUP
Korver
I know this subject has been beaten to death, but after tonight’s game it’s become even more glaring to me: why isn’t Thibs playing Korver more? As I’ve watched these three games, one of the running themes that the announcers have constantly brought up is that Bulls have pulled away in the fourth in every game. Well, no shit, cuz Korver’s on the floor in the 4th quarters.
On a related note, Rose really had a bad game today all the way around. But I thought his most egregious error was ceasing to pass to red-hot Korver after that 10-0 run. For some reason, Korver hardly touched the ball after he had knocked down several shots in a row, and instead it was ice-cold Rose taking all those long jumpers that were nowhere near going in. Yes, Rose hit that incredible game-winning lay-up. But the Bulls really shouldn’t have been in that position in the first place.
I’m not really complaining about Rose per se (god forbid), but just hoping that Rose and the staff see that this happened and not let it happen again. And perhaps give Korver some more playing time (he sat on the bench the entire 3rd when the Bulls shot 3 for 89 and yet kept Bogans in there the whole time when the problem was clearly the offense, not the defense).
Derrick reminded me of Kobe with some of the bad perimeter shots he took tonight where he was forcing the issue.
And like Kobe, he hit the shot at the end and made everyone forget about the bad shots and misses that made such a heroic shot necessary in the first place.
by fundamentallysound on Apr 22, 2011 2:22 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah
I was thinking the same exact thing. I’m wishing as hell that Rose leans towards learning to be more like CP3 than Kobe. I know Rose and Paul are different kinds of players, but I would think learning to distribute the way Paul does would make Rose even more lethal as a scoring option when the game dictates that he takes over.
yeah, it's hard to be mad at Rose since he's amazing and all
but you really have to wonder about some of his decision making at times. When teams take away his athleticism with traps and things, and force him to use his brain to exploit defenses, he can make some pretty poor decisions. I’m sure that will change the longer he’s in the league (and big playoff games), but you really wonder how this will affect the team as we get deeper in the Playoffs. If we’re playing Miami and it’s the fourth quarter in a close game, what’s he gonna do when Wade and Chalmers blitz the shit out of him with Lebron waiting for him to carelessly fling the ball? That’s the scary thing
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 2:28 AM CDT up reply actions
Derrick can be frustrating at times
There are times when it clicks and he realizes “everyone is coming at me, I might just hit the open guy”. And then there are other times where he has it in his head that he is scoring and it doesn’t matter what is out there. Hopefully this is something he gets better at in time, but he needs to learn that he is so good at getting to the hoop that it creates a ton of open looks for people. CP3 and Lebron are masters at this.
Yeah, the turnovers have me concerned more than anything.
Should the Bulls meet the Heat in the ECF…the high turn over numbers right now will not win that series. LeBron and company would fast break all over us. Gonna have to clean this shit up for sure.
He's young, learning and growing.
The intensity has just been turned up and he’s been nervous and compulsive at times in responding. He’s the leader now so some people saying “oh he’s been there before he should know” are not realizing the pressure he is under at age 22. I expect he’s going to get over it, even this year. As painful as it is to watch sometimes, you don’t learn how to pass in the NBA without doing it. You don’t learn to minimize turnovers at the same time scoring and passing until you do it during a hotly contested series. He still closes games out. He’s playing decent defense. He was able to handle Wade and LeBron pretty damn well earlier in the season. I think he can rise to the occasion.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions
I was so annoyed by that too. That 10-0 run was a mix of Korver's shooting and Rose drawing fouls.
After that, not only did he stop calling Korver’s number but he compounded it by settling for awful jumpers. We definitely won’t see this game in Rose’s playoff highlight reel.
by Ozzie Montana on Apr 22, 2011 2:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe the fact that Korver sat the whole third quarter
had something to do with him being ready to dominate in the 4th quarter. When Korver comes in the game, he expends a lot of energy running around screens for the entire offensive possession as well as working hard to guard an offensive player who’s usually a lot more athletic than him. I don’t know how many minutes he can play like that and still be effective.
And I talked about the same thing during the Indiana loss in the regular season in the context of why Boozer didn’t score at the end of the game. Rose gets locked in at the end of games when he decides to take over. I love that he wants the ball and he’s so effective, but there are plays where he literally doesn’t even glance at his teammates. I don’t want Rose to become Kobe Bryant, predictably taking every shot no matter if there are 4 people on him.
Maybe
If he played Korver more coaches would figure out ways to constantly defend Korver out of the game.
It’s throwing Korver in different situations that I think keeps Korver and the team fresh perhaps.
But yes Korver’s one of the best signings of the summer.
I always knew he was more than a Kapono pure shooter, but damn get that guy more confidence….and his defense isn’t nearly as bad as his rep.
The kid's out of this world. He's got Allen Iverson speed, Jason Kidd's vision, Chauncey Billups' shooting ability and Michael Jordan's athleticism. How do you guard that? - Pacers coach Frank Vogel.
Ha, I knew the Bulls would win.
The close games are just a fluke, I would expect low scoring games in Indiana with wins in favor of the Bulls.
Let us cavort like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean.
the way we win is becoming so predictable
im betting matt wrote this preview after the last game and just waited a few hours after the game ended today to post it.
cant fool me!
The quest for seven is on.
missed most of the second half
but seriously for the boozer supporters up there. taj totally changed the game defensively when he came in.
there were multiple times when he would drift off his man to help out on someone else and as soon as the ball was swung he would immediately rotate back to his man. it was simply amazing defense by taj and i really think we need to consider starting taj if we arent going to run the offense through boozer to start the game.
theres really no point in having boozer out there over taj if youre not going to post him up and run the offense through him. taj is a superior defender and a good enough rebounder. what you lose in rebounding when you go from booz to taj, noah will make up. lets not forget noah was a rebounding machine before boozer came along and took some of those.
The quest for seven is on.
Nothing personal, bur you're Boozer hate is really annoying
“boozer supporters”? Really? I think we’re all Bulls supporters, so naturally yes, I think we all support one of the best players on our team. You just said you’d rather start Gibson over our multiple-time all-star pf because of defense.
When we signed Boozer, did you think he was defensive player of the year? Because if you did, youre a moron. If not, did you want Taj to start over him? That’s what I thought.
by Scala-three-ne on Apr 22, 2011 4:03 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
and youre an idiot
Yes really. We’re all bulls fans but that doesn’t mean you have to like every single fucking player. Some of you guys support boozer. I’m going to call his ass out if he’s playing below exppectations. We paid $80 million for a 20/10 a night guy. I have rarely seen it. And omg multiple allstar must mean he has to start!! Its not like manu ever came off the bench. Sometimees shit works better that way. Use your fucking brain before you criticize.
Our second unit lacks scoring. You start taj and bring in boozer off the bench so that his minutes run into the time the second unit plays and you get offensive punch. Our starting lineup has enough punch.
Like I said there’s no point in starting boozer over taj if you don’t play through him.
And no I didn’t think he was great defensively in fact I didn’t want him the most out of the big 3 pf this summer because his d was so shitty. And yes I do want taj starting. That was my whole fucking point moron.
The quest for seven is on.
by sin on Apr 22, 2011 4:44 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah baby.
Bogans and Taj start the game and boozer and korver come in to wipe away the 20-point defecit. I kid I kid. I just find this idea funny after how many people think the bulls need more offense in the starting five.
it is so frustrating that the best place to chat about the bulls is dominated by a whiny drama queen moderator with a man crush on an average SG......6 recs
by BigforkBullsFan on Apr 22, 2011 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions
id also like to see korver start
hes improved alot defensively as the year has gone on
The quest for seven is on.
I'm wondering how the Bulls are going to handle the traps in the later rounds
I mean they know it’s coming yet it seems like they struggle to get a good shot going each time. Then I see some of the other teams, and they make it seem a lot smoother. Every one knows where they’re supposed to be, they swing the ball around, get good looks at the rim. It seems like the Bulls turn it over a good amount when the traps come. I didn’t see this game so I can’t comment on how many times the Bulls turned it over on a trap, but from games 1 and 2 it seems like it was a decent amount. I just hope they keep working on it, and make teams pay for trapping so early, and they don’t turn over the ball as much. One more win to go.
I'm wondering
How did LeBron deal with traps in last season’s playoffs? How did Wade? How did Iverson when the Sixers made the Finals?
Maybe it’s that none of those three were point guards. Not sure, but I can’t remember an instance where teams were double-teaming a score first PG when he crosses half court. I love how creative Vogel’s been.
LeBron at least had Mo Williams who could dribble. Iverson had other ball handlers (Eric Snow, Aaron McKie).
Wade last year was more like what Derrick will have to deal with, but even he had Mario Chalmers and Beasley who can put the ball on the floor and create.
by fundamentallysound on Apr 22, 2011 3:19 AM CDT up reply actions
LeBron also had Delonte West, who was and is a pretty underrated creator / ball-handler type.
by fundamentallysound on Apr 22, 2011 3:20 AM CDT up reply actions
LeBron's mom can vouch for that ability.
by CowBearsFan on Apr 22, 2011 7:10 AM CDT up reply actions 9 recs
It was the force of a Delonte West slam.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions
Then it's time for a few drinks
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions
And a smoke
(it clouds the face herpes)
"Word of advice, don’t join, Bears fans are crazy."--- D-Jackfan10
I was just wondering that same thing about how Lebron handled traps
It really is frustrating to watch how horrible we look in some of these situations. Like you said though, Indiana deserves some credit, because it can’t be easy to put that kinda pressure on a guy like Rose who has the ball in his hands so often
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 3:19 AM CDT up reply actions
I wonder if Lebron is just too big to trap well
With Rose, you can put a couple bodies around him and limit what he can see. But Lebron is tall enough that he is going to be able to see over/around guys easier, and has more area he can throw passes.
Also, if you tie him up, who wants to go after a jump ball against Lebon?
by tuluse on Apr 22, 2011 5:22 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Lebron is tall enough to pass over the trap
Rose isn’t, so two tall long defenders can give him trouble. It doesn’t help that no one gives him a passing lane.
That's a good point
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions
The Rose trap has been demonstrated so much
over the course of the season that all opposing coaches are going to have confidence in this ploy. I’ve never seen a LeBron trap so the next coach that does it will be the first, I don’t think they have had confidence in that type of play.
Its more about trying to wall LeBron off from the paint and have him settle for jumpers.
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Has anyone tried trapping Dwayne Wade?
He’s better comparison for Rose since he isn’t a giant.
i read this and just think fuck westbrook
People think they can compare him to rose but he will never see this kind of trap so long as durant is there
The quest for seven is on.
He needs to pass out of it faster
When he sees the trap, he needs to unload it to the open guy and let the rest of the team finish a 4-3 trip. Scottie was actually pointing out some great stuff during the game about this. Noah should be at the top of the key to get the pass from Derrick. Boozer should be under the basket and Deng/Korver should be on the wings. Someone will have to be open.
If you guys watch game 6 of the Boston - Bulls series
Ben Gordon gets trapped multiple times and handles it expertly by backing up quickly to draw the defenders backwards and then hitting Noah in the middle of the floor who then made the right play (to Tyrus, naturally). The Celtics only tried this a couple of times in the first quarter.
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions
i think he was creating those situations a lot early on
but the Bulls players weren’t being very efficient converting in the 4 on 3 situations.
by Basketball Smurf on Apr 22, 2011 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions
i predicted a bulls loss after halftime at game 2, then another for game 3
i predict another bad loss at game 4!
On the Booz front
I know he makes a ton of money, but he’s playing hard out there. There’s been a ton of b.s., he gets some in this series ticky tack foul calls, only to have them hack away at a ton of our guys and Boozer and often not get the calls.
Boozer was hacked on every single one of his shot attempts, but they called none as fouls.
And yet, he got into foul trouble when Hibbert ran into him and flailed back as if Boozer hit him. THat was the biggest bunch of B.S. That and Hansborough’s flopping.
It’s b.s. I don’t like complaining about the refs, but the Bulls aren’t hacking, and getting all kinds of ticky tack fouls called against them, whereas the Pacers all series but most especially yesterday were hacking away, and just blatant hacking, and yet it was one of every 3 being called.
That’s a bunch of B.S..
Ref’s are taking boozer out of his game. It’s not Boozer, and it’s total bullshit.
Yesterday’s game is not one of those games that makes you want to watch the NBA. It was an ugly foul filled game, where the Pacers did nothing but play dirty. Not quite 80’s Pistons dirty, but pretty damn close to Miami or New York of the 90s (but with less talent).
Just ugly. THe league was supposed to stop that play.
i know Pipp and King kept saying the Bulls should hard foult hem back, but the fact that even a ticky tack call or a flop was being called on the Bulls, you’d bet they’d retailiate and then get ejected….
Total B.S.
I wanted to like this Pacers team for playing hard, but there’s a difference between playing hard and playing the right way, and just playing dirty. THis team plays dirty, and they’re a bunch of bitches.
bulls proving to be the tougher and better team.
Let’s bring the broom. Move on.
Also, I’ve been a Foster fan for years, he plays hard, gritty defense and is a solid rebounder. But man Vogel has him playing dirty hacker, it sucks. He should be out next game.
I’d love to see Boozer attack Hansborogh….
I’m pissed over yesterday’s game. Refs can’t let one team hack away and call flops and ticky tack calls against he other, it just makes the game more ugly.
The kid's out of this world. He's got Allen Iverson speed, Jason Kidd's vision, Chauncey Billups' shooting ability and Michael Jordan's athleticism. How do you guard that? - Pacers coach Frank Vogel.
yeah it makes it hard to watch, that's for sure
I can’t remember the last time I was this angry about a basketball game. It’s infuriating.
Guilty Simpson should be our starting SG
by Rose Colored Goggles on Apr 22, 2011 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions
Why did Thibs wait until the final minute of the game to get Noah on the high screen?
When Noah is in the game and the offense is not trying to force it into Boozer, Rose should be getting high screens from Noah. The whole Pacers defense is to trap Rose on the perimeter or clog the paint with Hibbert or Foster to force him to shoot a jumper, pass, or hopefully force a turnover. Noah is the best player we have to set the high screen beyond the three point line forcing a switch or a trap for Rose.
Since Thibs is running Deng on the high screen so often it makes me think the play is trying to correct for mistakes that have yet to happen. Basically, Rose turning it over so Deng is the last Bull to try and stop a fast break.
It’s nauseating watching the Pacers put George on Rose and Granger on Deng and watch the Bulls create perhaps the worst chance for Rose to do what he does best against big, slow defenders like Foster and Hibbert.
I can predict the future using Norm Van Lier's crystal balls.
"Sam has a tendency to denigrate reports coming from any reporter who didn’t also cover the day Naismith first put up the peach baskets." - snley
Maybe I’m in the minority here, but I think these close ugly games are good for the bulls. This gives them a taste in the first series of what real playoff basketball is. I’d almost prefer they get these tough games in now to better prepare them. If they had gotten a cake walk they might have come up against a good team like a deer in a headlights. I think these close, ugly wins will only give them confidence. The Pacers are giving them everything they can handle physically and mentally. This is only going to make them stronger down the line I believe. After yesterday’s game the team the was so emotional once the buzzer sounded. I hadn’t seen that kind of emotion from them this series.
recap/analysis link dump
John Krolik http://bit.ly/f8r8sM
Kelly Dwyer http://yhoo.it/fKlVNz
Sam Smith http://bit.ly/dWbzPK
Bulls By the Horns http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2912
Dan Bernstein http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2011/04/22/bernstein-bulls-above-the-thugs/
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 22, 2011 10:09 AM CDT reply actions
BTW, that Danny Bernstein column makes me love Thibodeau even more
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 22, 2011 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions
I disagree with Bernstein
And I disagree that the Pacers are just thugging it for no apparent reason. There’s a method to the madness. They’re trying to get in Rose’s head, and it appears to be working. He had a pretty dreadful game yesterday. The game before he had 6 turnovers. What Vogel’s doing IS a strategy. It’s not just a bunch of “flailing weirdos”. And just because I think the Bulls should respond in a similar manner, does not make me some retarded meatball who wants revenge.
Why not foul Collison so that he has that same fear when he approaches the paint? And what’s the worst thing that cold happen if say, Kurt Thomas, leveled him? The refs get pissed and warn both benches, which in turn makes things a lot less physical and helps Derrick get to the paint easier? I’ll take that.
I can see where Thibs is coming from if he doesn’t want to play in the mud. And I’m not all that upset about it. But for Bernstein to act like it’s ridiculous , or serves no purpose, is just wrong.
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Another problem with Bernsteins' opinion
is that it’s based around the idea that we’ll eventually win the series, and get retribution that way. Well, what happens if we face a good team like the Heat or Celtics, and they employ the same strategy? A series win will not be nearly as certain. Do we just let those guys intimidate the fuck out of Rose and mess him up, while Wade and Lebron spin and dunk on us?
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions
Caught off guard
I think the Pacers just present a pretty bizarre set of matchups.
What other teams learn from what the Pacers are attempting versus the Bulls won’t help them as much IMO. The Pacers played pretty well against the Bulls in the regular season, I’m sure that gave them some confidence going into this series where if they played over their heads, the Bulls might play down to their level and give the Pacers a chance.
Also, if the regular season taught us anything about this team, when the stakes are higher and the spotlight brighter, this team hones in their focus better and beats the living crap out of supposedly better teams. Rose dropping 42 on San Antonio? Beating the Heat every single time? I believe the Bulls – once they are done with Indiana – will be back to their old selves. I am not so worried about etiher Atlanta or Orlando, and if it’s the Heat after that…I think all the media attention Miami will have received by then will be enough fuel for the Bulls, and especially Rose, to again rise to the challenge and snuff them out as well. I’m hopeful of all this anyway. Not really worried about anyone in the West. If they can win the East, they’ll win the rings.
If anything, this tuneup with the Pacers will only do more to benefit the long-term success of this team, as it will allow Thibs to continue beating the drum about them needing to “continue to learn”…that we’re “not there yet”…etc.
by POSEYHATER on Apr 22, 2011 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Maybe Rose had a bad game because he had an off game ?
I don’t see teams getting into his head, its the reverse. They’re fouling him automatically when he gets into the lane and instead of shooting 4 for 18 and getting 8 points he gets 23. The Pacers are the mental ones who bailed him out of a bad game.
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Read the whole article
Frank Vogel has instructed his team to clutch, shove, bump, and rake at the ball. That’s what an underdog can do to even things out – deny layups, take away drives, make them hit their free-throws. Test their focus.
Pacers are "thugging it up"
because they suck and they know they suck. You can’t beat em foul the hell outta them and get away with it
Rose: Who in the blue hell are you?
Rondo: Well
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO YOU ARE!
Whatever! Everything sounds smarter when you have Derrick Rose bailing your ass out.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Lol!
Right. It’s all good to have Bogans and Boozer because we’re winning. Amazing what a MVP on your team can cover up.
Hey Rose. I don't see the appeal!
it's like the Rex Grossman argument.. well he got the Bears to a Super bowl! Nooo
The Bears # 1 defense and special teams got them there. Not bashing Thibs but he hasn’t had a great series and Rose has covered it up.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Well the Defense has been pretty darn spectacular
So that’s on THibs.
The kid's out of this world. He's got Allen Iverson speed, Jason Kidd's vision, Chauncey Billups' shooting ability and Michael Jordan's athleticism. How do you guard that? - Pacers coach Frank Vogel.
He's kept the Bulls calm and in control
Which is worth something.
I would like to see a bit more out of him on the tactical side.
Yeah. Glad Thibs doesn't listen to the mouthbreathers on here.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
My cousin was at the game last night
He said Pacers fans were chanting SAT at Rose the whole time
"Word of advice, don’t join, Bears fans are crazy."--- D-Jackfan10
People from Indiana have no fucking business making ' you're not intelligent' jokes.
I’ve spent plenty of time there, and sure there’s some great people, but it doesn’t take much more than a breakfast at a Cracker Barrel off I-65 to realize there’s a whole bunch of extra chromosomes in play.
by Bin Bin on Apr 22, 2011 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
carlos boozer blows
how many times per game does a turnover result from him being involved with a play? he plays so damn small despite being very strong and has those fucking butter fingers. that contract is an albatross on the order of an alfonso soriano/bary zito. it’s not quite an eddy curry as the bulls will continue to get some measure of production (however deceptive), but damn, it’s a huge problem moving forward.
Yeah, it's really killed us this year
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions
no but it will kill us
if carlos boozer were a better player, we’d have a chance to win a championship this year.
by John T. Unger on Apr 22, 2011 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
yeah, and if Luol Deng was Scottie Pippen we'd have a better chance to win a Championship this year too. What's your point?
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions
my point is
the bulls front office should’ve spent their money more wisely. then we’d be a better team. i’m really not sure what scottie pippen has to do with this.
by John T. Unger on Apr 22, 2011 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions
Boozer was the bargain in that draft class.
You can’t argue with 8 months hindsight that the Bulls didn’t make good decisions with Free Agents.
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions
I would still take Amar'e
1) Because he helps us where we need it most, scoring. He might suck at rebounding, but we have 4 other big men who are good rebounders and Deng.
2) He’s more fun to watch
and
3) My friend is a Suns fan and I could make fun of him endlessly.
Amare got max right ?
Signing Boozer allowed the Bulls to sign the other important players, Korver, Brewer, Watson and (ahem) Bogans.
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions
He did
But the Bulls have the cap room to trade them straight up right now
On who exactly? The Great David Lee?
You always were second best! And in this business, Bub, second best don't *cut* it!
they actually did a good job in the offseason.
if not boozer, who would you have signed actually?
Spent more wisely on whom?
You’ve been talking out of your ass since January when you said there was no way the Bulls could win the number 1 seed because they struggled against a bad team. GTFO.
the thing is
boozer blows. you know it. i know it. his teammates know it. his coach definitely knows it but is stuck having to play him. this team would be better if gibson played the majority of the minutes at PF. with carlos boozer as an “important” cog on this team, they can’t win a championship. period. end of story.
by John T. Unger on Apr 22, 2011 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions
I just started laughing thinking about McRoberts' haircut from last year
The Playoffs: That magical time of year when I become a fan of every team that Lebron James isn't playing for.
by Juiceboxjerry on Apr 22, 2011 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
What haircut?
"Well you're giving me the opportunity to agree with Bill Plaschke and Marriotti, I'm gonna pass" - Tim Cowlishaw
This one

I can predict the future using Norm Van Lier's crystal balls.
"Sam has a tendency to denigrate reports coming from any reporter who didn’t also cover the day Naismith first put up the peach baskets." - snley
by NBA Observer on Apr 22, 2011 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
rofl
"The advanced metrics guys do not like Derrick Rose very much." - Bills Simmons podcast 2/4
by RogersPark Kris on Apr 22, 2011 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions
What sad is he's going to be the MVP of the NBA and... he's still getting some rookie calls.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Hey, we can't complain too much. He went to the line 21 times in game one, 13 times in game two, 15 in game three.
"Smith stripped. Smith stopped! Smith stopped again by Pippen!"
by ColonelFatheart on Apr 22, 2011 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Well stop fouling then.
Why should we get screwed because the Pacers can’t play defense without fouling him?
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
by SoulEater7 on Apr 22, 2011 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah I sure got tired of the Pacer fans and the media to an extent
Talking about how many foul calls he was getting when their obvious intent has been to foul him and Derrick keeps driving the lane because it works. He’s driving tons and getting a lot of fouls. How hard is that to understand or justify? They see a big number and assume he’s getting an advantage I would say. Or they’re Indy fans and blinded with homer hate.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm not saying they're bullshit calls he's getting. He obviously deserves them, and probably deserves more.
But remember when he wasn’t getting a lot of these calls?
"Smith stripped. Smith stopped! Smith stopped again by Pippen!"
by ColonelFatheart on Apr 22, 2011 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah and if he was Wade, James or Kobe he's at the line.
yet he’s the MVP? I don’t get the logic.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
He probably should have gone
25 times in game 1, 22 times in game 2, and 27 times in game 3….yesterday’s fouling was atrociously bad. We get the ticky tack barely fouls, or the Hansborough flop foul calls against Boozer as Offensive fouls, or the even worse Hibbert running into Boozer and them flailing away with a grin as the refs took Boozer out of the game.
And yet they can hack hack hack and one of 3 hacks is a foul.
I don’t care if the refs are going to have teams play physical, but it has to be for both sides. You can’t call one side all these flops, and really non fouls and the other be inconsistent with the physical fouls.
The kid's out of this world. He's got Allen Iverson speed, Jason Kidd's vision, Chauncey Billups' shooting ability and Michael Jordan's athleticism. How do you guard that? - Pacers coach Frank Vogel.
by majoyenrac on Apr 22, 2011 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
goes to the line 21 times
yet it STILL seems that he should get more calls lol
Rose: Who in the blue hell are you?
Rondo: Well
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO YOU ARE!
He could have went to the line 30 times if they called all the hacks
On to bigger and better things next year!
by tfrabotta on Apr 22, 2011 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
It was crazy switching to the HEAT - Sixers game
and seeing the touch fouls Wade was getting. It was like a game with completely different rules. Like EuroBall or something.
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Kobe sez he doesn't know what you are talking about.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions
I thought the defeintion of rookie calls changed with Blake Griffin...
You always were second best! And in this business, Bub, second best don't *cut* it!
yes.
Guilty Simpson should be our starting SG
by Rose Colored Goggles on Apr 22, 2011 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Can we make this a play?

Derrick Rose will be suspended by the NBA because he has broken too many ankles.
by jrobulls on Apr 22, 2011 11:21 AM CDT reply actions 8 recs
nonononnononono stop don't do it!

and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
by SoulEater7 on Apr 22, 2011 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Why is it when I look at this picture
I hear the commercial voice “Did somebody order Jimmy Johns?”
ASIK AND DESTROY
I miss Jimmy Johns.. Could've used his MMA skills aganist Foster
You always were second best! And in this business, Bub, second best don't *cut* it!
Agreed.
And as much as Thibs is complaining about retaliation being bad in the media, I don’t believe it. He says the playoffs always have hard fouls and physical play, indeed they do. He said nothing wrong with that (though elbows and muggings aren’t exactly meaning that). So I don’t see how bringing the fight back to Foster or the others should be a problem. I saw him put KT and Taj in the game right after the hard Derrick foul. I think at the least he wants us to be just as physical as Indy. I doubt he would mind retaliation for more probs Sat. but he isn’t gonna say so in the media. Indy is going to come out swinging Saturday and we have to match being that physical. Not necessarily retaliate…but at least be damn physical and not mind throwing a few Thomas bows around.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions
If they were playing a better team like say Orlando this wouldn't be acceptable.
However the pacers suck so whatever. The problem is the refs were letting them get away with it and they could play that way the whole game. If they would have retailed the refs would be forced to take control of the game and those kinda plays wouldn’t go down.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
The Pacers
Have no other option but to goon it up and hope it stops us.
If you’re getting smacked and it hurts your performance, you have to fight back sometime or they just keep doing it. Sending in KT right after Rose got mugged was to me exactly the kind of thing we need and for Kurt and the rest of the team to be just as physical when needed. I think you can do both…ignore some hard fouls and give something back when needed.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions
if the refs aren't calling it why not give a few shots back?
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
oh yeah they don't wanna be fined.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
I'm with you believe me.
Don’t think I’d go into full goon mode but you have to fire back or you’ll get punked all night.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions
I mean, don't we kind of think the Bulls will handle this w the League?
They can say ‘look, we said all the right stuff publicly, but you guys need to take a look at this goonery and do something about it.’. This approach would seem to yield more positive results than retaliating or whining in a press conference.
I hope so
that foster elbow needs to be reviewed AND PUNISHED
by JockstrapNoah on Apr 22, 2011 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Freeze it
Now roll it!
"Nothing can happen till you swing the bat." -Haruko Haruhara
by windycitywarrior on Apr 22, 2011 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Clutch elbows to the rescue
He can’t foul Rose if he has a broken jaw!
Let us cavort like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean.
by hedonism bot on Apr 23, 2011 3:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Rose has attempted 49 free throws through 3 games.
Rajon Rondo made 75 free throws during the regular season.
(This is completely irrelevant but we need more Fuck Rondo).
by Ozzie Montana on Apr 22, 2011 12:02 PM CDT reply actions 6 recs
Ah, the Fuck Rondo-ness is in the air!
"Smith stripped. Smith stopped! Smith stopped again by Pippen!"
by ColonelFatheart on Apr 22, 2011 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Ball movement on offense
I think too much blame is being placed on individual players for the Bulls problems, whether it’s Rose, Boozer, or Bogans (scratch that, we can still blame him for everything).
One of the things I’ve noticed during this series is the lack of ball movement on offense. There seem to be so many possessions where the Bulls waste half of the shot clock while most of the players are just standing around, either waiting for Rose to do something or watching Noah figure out what to do with the ball in the high post. What ends up happening is that they have to force shots/passes with time running out on the shot clock, which leads to silly turnovers and bad shots in general.
This lack of ball movement is a problem given that the Bulls offense this season has been driven primarily by motion off the ball and great passing, particularly to guys cutting to the basket. To test whether my eyes are deceiving me, I looked into some characteristics of a motion offense.
One of the (admittedly crude) indicators of a drop in ball movement is the number of assists per game. So, I looked up team splits on AST/game in wins and losses during the regular season, as well as the last three games against the Pacers:
Bulls 2010-2011 AST/game:
Wins: 23.2 assists per game
Losses: 19.5 assists per game
Pacers series: 17.6 assists per game
In other words, the major area of improvement for the Bulls as the playoffs progress is to return to the type of offense that performed so well during the regular season. Getting movement off the ball and sharing the basketball (as cheesy as it sounds) early in the shot clock will go a long way toward (1) minimizing turnovers, (2) reducing Rose’s offensive load, (3) getting Boozer easier baskets, and (4) forcing opposing defenses to work harder. Everyone wins, including the Bulls.
"If the Bulls are healthy it could get ugly." - Joakim Noah
by bryield on Apr 22, 2011 12:26 PM CDT reply actions 5 recs
The offense has been horrid.
It would be nice if they could move the ball without turning it over.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Yep that's one thing they need to work on even more and learn from.
Opponents will keep playing physical and swarming Rose, you can bank on it.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions
too many turnovers from Boozer and Rose
In the series so far Boozer has 12 field goals, 10 turnovers and 3 assists. I don’t care what people say, that is on him and he needs to improve.
by Basketball Smurf on Apr 22, 2011 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions
The Bulls collectively moving the ball a lot better
Would probably cut down on Boozer’s turnovers and increase his assists. I absolutely agree that Boozer needs to play better both offensively and defensively, but the all-too-common occurrence of the other Bulls simply standing around while Boozer goes 1-on-1 (at best) or gets doubled in the post doesn’t help. Despite his height disadvantage in the post, Boozer typically has great vision passing to cutters or shooters, but this is nearly impossible if no one is moving off the ball.
In my opinion, one of the more frustrating non-defense related things about Boozer is his minimal use of post moves, which is surprising given his occasional flashes of effective spin moves and ball fakes (e.g., spin move and dunk on Hansbrough last night in the 4th quarter). I know JBJ mentioned above that Boozer was primarily a PnR player in Utah, but he has demonstrated that he can be an effective scorer in the post. The Bulls are going to need that if they want a deep run in the playoffs.
"If the Bulls are healthy it could get ugly." - Joakim Noah
heard kyle on waddle/silvy this morning
He said pip went into the lockerroom last night after the game to have a talk with the team about getting physical and fighting back. Pretty cool stuff
The quest for seven is on.
That's awesome.
Guilty Simpson should be our starting SG
by Rose Colored Goggles on Apr 22, 2011 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions
See I agree with Pippen.
Bulls were lucky they played a team that is so bad at closing games. The Bulls have been getting bullied all series. If this was Boston the elbows would be flying. You can get away with it now.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Another thing about Pippen is he complete honest on the broadcast. Almost to a fault.
He made some good points and some meh points but he can almost get away with saying Boozer doesn’t run back hard enough. I like it.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Agreed, Pip's been pretty great.
besides the fact that he sounds like he’s constantly using his “sexy” voice
Guilty Simpson should be our starting SG
by Rose Colored Goggles on Apr 22, 2011 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah he does need to speak louder and clearer.
his voice is so deep it can get lost in the noise. He just needs some more time.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
bet he's using his "sexy" voice as many times
as he’s using his sexy wife.
I get the non-pip commentary
I wish my announcers had played the game at his level.
I did see Boozer run back lightly a couple times. He also closes out slowly.
Pippen
wasn’t advocated retaliating. He was saying during the telecast that if the Pacers are going to foul the Bulls hard, then on the other end, when the Pacers are going for layups/dunks etc you can’t let them make the basket and get an and1. The Bulls allowed a couple of those because they committed “soft” fouls instead of making sure they Pacers guys couldn’t get the shot off. He wasn’t saying that the Bulls should commit dirty and/or borderline flagrant fouls. At least that was how I interpreted his words during the broadcast. Stacey was the one, imo, that was advocating the Bulls should fight dirty with dirty.
The Chicago Bulls....have a young star, Derrick Rose, who must learn to live with the tearing down of his MVP candidacy as rapidly as he constructed it. - Woj
no no listen to the waddle and silvy thing
korver definitely sounds like pip had told them to get even by elbowing them back on the other end or setting really hard screens etc.
The quest for seven is on.
Pippen has taken on the Norm Van lier void.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
gross, go away
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 22, 2011 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I still say this maybe the toughest series as far as physical play the bulls may have.
What other team has these Thugs that can muck up the game?
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Every team?
I don’t associate the Pacers with tough thugs. Plenty of scarier teams.
Foster, McRobberts, Jones, Hansbrough who has more thugs like that on the better teams?
Zaza Pachulia on the Hawks? Nobody on the Magic scare me. Nobody on Boston is tough. Miami is weak. LA has Derrick Fisher.. but thats about it. Nobody else seems that physical.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
um, Dwight Howard?
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 22, 2011 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd encourage Howard to play thuggish.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Have you watched their recent games?
Dwight has gotten better and better and going straight up and not committing fouls while still keeping high block / steal #s. In the game he played all 48 minutes, he played hard defense and didn’t wind up with his 5th foul until late in the 4th.
ASIK AND DESTROY
Ok so why would he all of the sudden wanna play like Jeff Foster?
I’m confused.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
I think the point was more...
That Dwight Howard can be just as menacing as the entire Pacer’s lineup.
Not specific to the thug part.
ASIK AND DESTROY
Hmm yeah maybe he can block shots and be menacing like that but not thuggish style.
If he starts elbowing people like Foster he’ll just end up in foul trouble.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Yeah, depends on his composure.
I haven’t seen DH get many foul calls for elbows trying to stop a drive, but what I HAVE seen is him get foul calls for flailing his elbows trying to clear space after a rebound. Something he’s been prone to do in the past when he’s frustrated.
ASIK AND DESTROY
Hansbrough's a thug?
He’s got 8 fouls in 106 minutes. He’s not thuggish, he’s just awkward and possibly uncoordinated. Jones/McRoberts are physical defenders, I wouldn’t say thugs. The only multiple offender has been Foster, and the series overall hasn’t been that physical.
I’m going to be worried every time Rose drives into Bass+Howard, even Garnett/Shaq. Dwight was freight-training Omer last time they faced off, and Dwight’s injured Rose before. As for having bigs with 6 fouls to give, Miami has Magloire, Juwon Howard, Joel Anthony. Atlanta has Zaza, Jason Collins, Josh Powell. Boston has Troy Murphy, Jermaine O’Neal, Krstic I guess.
He's got thuggish qualities
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Tyler Hansbrough, Indiana's flailing weirdo.

ASIK AND DESTROY
by JStymie on Apr 22, 2011 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions 9 recs
Potential Matchups
LA: Andrew Bynum, Matt Barnes, Ron Artest, and Kobe Bryant.
Boston: KG, Jermaine O’neal, Shaq (if healthy), Rajon Rondo (do we forget the head shot to Miller and the throwing of Hinrich)
Miami: No one
Atlanta: No one
Orlando: Howard, Bass (maybe)
Also, it was only a few weeks ago that the Bulls played Boston and KG responded by saying they got their asses kicked with respect to physical play
Miami has thugs! that's practically all they have up front
Z, Dampier, Howard, Maggloire, Haslem (if he’s back). Come on.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 22, 2011 7:42 PM CDT up reply actions
atlanta has a thug: kurt
wait no thats kirk. fuck is kurt the one on our team or the one on atl?!!
The quest for seven is on.
I think his point is that the Pacers have a lot of players they don't care about using all 6 fouls with
does Miami, Boston, Orlando etc. have rotation players they’re just willing to put into early foul trouble?
Guilty Simpson should be our starting SG
by Rose Colored Goggles on Apr 22, 2011 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions
exactly and that why i think the offense will look better in the later rounds.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
Noah has 9 blocks in this series
that is encouraging as hell. Taj with 5.
Having both of them healthy is going to make the defense even tougher.
Yup.
It sure is. Double digit rebounds in every game as well, even tho in the 1st two he only played 30 minutes. It was nice to see him get a few more [minutes] last night (35). Taj has been playing well, wouldn’t mind seeing him get a few more minutes.
The Chicago Bulls....have a young star, Derrick Rose, who must learn to live with the tearing down of his MVP candidacy as rapidly as he constructed it. - Woj
It's frustrating that people (not on this site) are comparing Rose's fts to Wade 2006
Especially after the most recent game. Here are some stats from last night:
Fouls drawn:
Rose – 7
Dirk – 7
LeBron – 7
Wade – 7
Offensive fouls against:
Rose – 2
Dirk – 0
LeBron – 0
Wade – 0
Rose dominated the ball more than any of those other guys, and he was being guarded the most aggressively. However, he didn’t draw more fouls than a single one of the other superstars in action last night. Rose had the most free throw attempts per foul because the refs swallowed their whistles on handchecks, reach-ins, traps, hedges, and screens — ie the fouls that wouldn’t result in a free throw. On Rose’s game-winning drive, he was smacked in the face by Dahntay Jones without a whistle. When a player has the ball as much as he does, drives the lane as much as he does, and is defended as aggressively as the Pacers have defended him in this series, Rose drawing 7-10 foul calls per game is not compelling evidence that the officials are favoring him.
Rose also was the only superstar last night to be called for any offensive fouls, and both calls were questionable. I think Foster did a good job selling a foul on Rose on Foster’s active hedge, but the charge Hansbrough drew on Rose was objectively the wrong call. Hansbrough was sliding hard to the right, and that call turned an And-1 into a turnover. Furthermore, Rose has taken more forceful, purposeful fouls than anyone else in these playoffs. Vogel has even admitted to that being a strategy, yet the Bulls have been called for more fouls than the Pacers in each of the past two games prior to Indiana’s intentional, extend-the game fouls in the final seconds. Contrast that with the Heat being whistled for several fewer fouls than the Sixers in every game even with extend-the-game fouls taken into account.
If the officials were constantly bailing out Rose, they wouldn’t have called more offensive fouls on him than defensive fouls on his opponent in the first half (2 to 1). The trio of Foster, Hansbrough, and McRoberts had just 5 fouls in 73 total minutes played last night. Foster’s only fouls were of the elbow-to-the-head, borderline-flagrant variety. In addition, he set a few blatantly illegal screens (including one that was a blatantly double-moving screen, following Rose for a couple steps in one direction and then back in the other direction, something I had never seen before). The Pacers weren’t called for a single illegal screen last night. Even apart from that, something tells me that Foster deserved more than just two standard fouls in 25 minutes. I believe Coach Vogel said post-game that Foster hits someone on every play. Whether it’s dirty or good playoff basketball, it should indeed be called a foul from time to time.
The Pacers are a scrappy, physical team that doesn’t give up easy baskets. Some of the national media may say that the Bulls look wholly unimpressive this series and are getting bailed out by whistles and poor execution from the Pacers, but this type of series doesn’t lend itself to style points. If the Bulls can escape with a quick series win and get some time to rest for the second round, we should all be satisfied with the team’s performance.
by from the window to luol on Apr 22, 2011 12:46 PM CDT reply actions 10 recs
I also thought they're cutting under Rose, not letting him land
But he’s up there so long, it looks like a charge.
This is why we are wining the Championship.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
It is encouraging to see Deng and Korver play the way they have,
confirming the general sentiment that Rose makes three point shooters better, and that they are our real 2/3 options in this context. Moreover, it was awesome to see Noah look amped and in control; if he isn’t playing well then Orlando will be more of a problem. As for the Boozer problem, I think its definitely a combination of his own diminishing athleticism and Rose’s inability to get the ball to him in good positions (in general and more specifically in this series, through the trap). Rose is awesome, but he has not yet learned how to play with a power forward.
"Derrick Rose is an unstoppable force of getting to the rim."
-Jon Barry
by Morphic Resident on Apr 22, 2011 12:52 PM CDT reply actions
NBA reviewing Jeff Foster hits
http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nba/news/story?id=6409539
The Chicago Bulls....have a young star, Derrick Rose, who must learn to live with the tearing down of his MVP candidacy as rapidly as he constructed it. - Woj
Thx .
Nice to see the NBA is looking at it with the refs just blowing us off as a young team needing to prove ourselves to them.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not really worried about the Bulls turnovers.. because
I just think the combination of the refs not calling fouls and the Pacers just straight hacking on defense is what has really made this series ugly and turnover prone for the Bulls.
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
The score is killing Stacy haha
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
What are they saying?
The Chicago Bulls....have a young star, Derrick Rose, who must learn to live with the tearing down of his MVP candidacy as rapidly as he constructed it. - Woj
Just mocking his overzealousness. Whoaaaaaaaaa!
and Hansbrough was eating... he was eating chocolate chip cookies with a fork.
That's their shtick.
Gotta love/hate talk radio looking for something to mock or get ratings from. Stacey is an easy target lately with how he’s been cheering us.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions
There is no set date.
They typically announce MVP late in Round 1, or right before Round 2. They try to do the announcement a day or so before a home game for the winning player (same with the other awards) so they can have an immediate celebration @ the home stadium.
If the Bulls sweep in Indiana, they might wait until the start of Round 2, can’t say for sure.
ASIK AND DESTROY
Thanks!
Thanks for the info…if they dont sweep maybe they’ll do it UC on Tuesday (even better for me since I have tickets!)..hopefully Rose is practicing his speech!
Um hopefully not.
But I like the enthusiasm lol.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions
On the off chance that the league suspends Foster, based on their review...
Saturday’s game would potentially be really, really lopsided. With just McRoberts and Hibbert in the foul rotation, I can’t see both of them managing to stay in the game.
ASIK AND DESTROY
Did you see the video on nba.com where Granger compared Noah to the predator
because of his looks lol
They showed the segment on TNT
The Chicago Bulls....have a young star, Derrick Rose, who must learn to live with the tearing down of his MVP candidacy as rapidly as he constructed it. - Woj
Big guys come up big
Huge play from Boozer and Noah, limiting Hibbert and Hansbrough to 6-24 shooting and taking away the Pacers’ biggest strength: size. The game wasn’t pretty, but it’s a road win in the playoffs, and the Bulls gotta take that. If nothing else, they’ve been showing they can win close games and gut it out down the stretch. Check out the breakdown from last night:
http://sportstatistics.blogspot.com/2011/04/nba-playoffs-night-six.html
I realize this has been hashed out considerably
since the last game, but i haven’t seen this point stressed enough. I get that Rose and Deng are ok, the Bulls won, and that Foster’s a thug who will hopefully be dismissed after next game…but the larger issue is how payback is a necessary component to the Bulls approach here. sending a message is not imperative to the pacers series. the bulls will leave conseco with a sweep. it’s imperative to the hawks/magic, the heat/celtics, and the lakers/thunder. Physical play, when unpunished (not by the league) will hurt the Bulls for 2 reasons: 1) the obvious and literal interpretation, although I believe Rose’s body can handle it—Deng’s cannot, so it’s a serious concern 2) Constant crowding and restriction that is unrewarded by fouls will hurt his game, as we saw yesterday, and the opposition will take note. Sure he’ll get to the line, but %wise his shots will be altered far more than he can get to the line. He’ll lose the space he needs and his fg % will decrease, denying the Bulls possessions at crucial times. The answer is not coming from the league office. It needs to come from our bigs. Hard fouls on key members of the opposition is the only way to get our scoring threats some breathing room. and some safety.
I'll post this here to avoid another fanshot
This was linked via Henry Abbott and ESPN’s TrueHoop site Hoopspeak.com:
Mama there goes that meme: Is Rose hurting the Bulls’ offense?
"If the Bulls are healthy it could get ugly." - Joakim Noah
This is bullshit
He should’ve been suspended or fined heavily. Thibs needs to be put KT in for payback. I hope the bulls listen to Pippen and payback a little tomorrow.
That link won't work for me.
This one does
http://www.indystar.com/article/20110422/SPORTS04/110422022/2-hard-fouls-by-Pacers-Foster-upgraded-flagrant?odyssey=mod|newswell|img|IndyStar.com|p
This seems utterly meaningless. They upgraded them and now Foster can be suspended if he accumulates enough flagrant points? with two flagrants in the game? wimpy and stupid. It’s just throwing a bone to acknowledge how they screwed up to the Bulls and doing nothing at the same time. To me this is like when the league admitted the goaltending missed call on OKC.
They just want to placate fans and saying we screwed up but aren’t gonna do anything about it just makes it worse to me.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
The only possitive I can see here is
maybe if he does something close to that foul, refs will finally call flagrant instead of getting a free pass and just raise his hand and look at rose
Not when Bird is still blowing Stern
And Vogel is preaching his pedophile tactics.
I just hope we get out of this round unhurt
Rose is as tough as it gets and Deng will get up every time he goes down. But I just hope the Pacers don’t take it too far over the line by sidelining a Bull for the rest of the season.
An overview of a few things:
I think it might be beneficial if you all heard the opinion of a rational Pacer fan (that’s how I classify myself anyway). First of all, the refs have been BAD this series. It’s the NBA, they’re always bad. But they haven’t been overly biased. More often than not in the first two games calls that could have gone either way went the Bulls way. You were at home, Rose is a superstar, and you’re Chicago so that’s to be expected. Also, getting more calls at home is statistically proven. To his credit I think Rose deserved probably 90% of the foul shots he got. The man is good at drawing contact. You won’t find me complaining about how he gets nonstop star calls. He gets a few, but much less than the likes of Dwayne Wade.
Then last night the Pacers got TONS of calls in the first half. Like damn near every one. The second half was called much more evenly in my opinion. So overall I can’t imagine a neutral observer saying that the officials were trying to ‘gift’ anything to the Pacers especially if you compare whatever edge we got last night to the edges you got in games 1 and 2. You’re going to have Rose for years and you’ll always be a big market team. You’ll likely have an edge in officiating over teams like the Pacers for forever. Also, any time fans from any team complain about officiating it makes them look like whiny bitches. I get embarrassed when any fans of teams I follow do it. Just my 2 cents.
When it comes to claiming that the Pacers are acting like thugs you should probably get used to it. The only way to slow Rose down is to be physical with him so you’re going to see a lot more of that in future rounds. It’s simply a good game plan. Additionally, I find it hypocritical to get upset with Foster and Tyler when Boozer and Noah play such a similar style. Boozer throws elbows more than any player I’ve seen this year while Noah blantantly pushes people so often I can’t believe he doesn’t get into foul trouble more. And I don’t dislike either of those guys whatsoever. You want an enforcer quality in your big men. It’s how the game is played and half of why I’m not too high on Roy Hibbert (the other half is that he can’t make fucking shots).
So yeah. That’s pretty much it. If you’re interested I think the Bulls win tomorrow comfortably which might remove some of that ‘Why are the Bulls struggling to beat the Pacers?’ crap from the media. And after tomorrow you won’t be done with the Pacers for forever. We’ll likely be seeing you in the playoffs next year. That’s if there’s basketball next year and if we can put any of the money coming off our books to good use. We shall see.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Apr 22, 2011 5:40 PM CDT reply actions
You show some reason here.
But I would say comparing Foster to Boozer or Noah is homerish. If you want to compare something it would be Thomas not them. Of course you like Foster playing the enforcer role. It helps slow down Rose and that’s indeed what you need. I have to admit I like KT filling that role for us when needed.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Well 'style' wasn't the best word.
I simply think they’re all equally as dirty. Boozer is just better at hiding it or at least making it look like it’s accidental. Foster can’t help but be blatant. I just like physical plays; I think it’s made this series entertaining. Reminds me of NBA playoff basketball in the 90s where if you drove the lane you were sure to get destroyed. Those were better days. Even though my team didn’t even sniff a championship.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Apr 22, 2011 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions
And that's where you're wrong.
Boozer and Noah aren’t equally dirty. Reminisce all you want. Style has nothing to do with it.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions
We must have a different definition of dirty.
Sneaky underhanded shit like poking guys in the eyes, stepping on their feet, taking their legs out while they’re jumping, holding jerseys, quick elbows when you’re underneath the rim and fighting for rebounds and the refs can’t see, and pushing players into cameramen and fans after plays are over (which Noah does constantly)… that’s dirty. Hard fouls are part of playoff basketball. Driving the middle of the lane leaves you open to them. Dirty or not you’re going to be seeing a lot more of it next round.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Apr 22, 2011 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions
he wound up and hit deng purposely in the head with his elbow.
that’s not dirty? then i don’t know what is.
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
I'd say undercutting guys while they jump
causing them to land on their faces is worse. Not that any of the Bulls have done that, I’n just saying. Deng was fine anyway. I’m not implying that was an entirely clean play I just think the Bulls fans I’ve talked to are blowing it out of proportion. One would think you’d mostly be looking ahead to the next round or talking about how Noah had a better than normal game or how Korver is lights-freaking out, but instead everyone keeps going on about how the Pacers are thugs and how the refs were trying to steal the game for the Pacers. You’re 3 and 0 and you have Rose. Be happy.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Apr 22, 2011 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions
under cutting people while they jump?
like this?
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
I dont think the boozer push is that strong
its more of a combination of a push and some acting job
Keep trolling.
If you don’t know the difference between Noah and Boozer and Foster and Thomas you can’t be helped. Split hairs if you want. Thankfully it won’t be long until your team will be playing golf and we won’t have Pacer fans nipping at our heels.
"Fast Don't Lie"
by Sandberg's evil twin on Apr 22, 2011 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions
You claim to be rational Pacer fan
But all I hear is you being a whiny bitch about how your team is justified being goons because they don’t have the talent to compete. I, for one, don’t blame the players. It starts with the coach. Vogel is a thug even thought he doesn’t look like one. He does look like a pedophile though. The players are simply doing what their coach is telling them. Granger is class act but is being reduced to thug-level. Pacers will be a small market team and you guys will be irrelevant once we complete the sweep tomorrow.
Classy
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Apr 22, 2011 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Bulls are a 1 seed.
You’re supposed to win. And even though I’m apparently a ‘whiny bitch’ I’m still rooting for the Bulls to win the East because I hate Boston and Miami and the Bulls are generally a likeable team. I just wouldn’t get too cocky. If Rose can get rattled by the likes Paul George and D. Jones he’s going to have a hard time getting the Bulls to the finals. At some point you’re going to run into a team who knows how to finish a game. Not everyone sucks ass in the final 5 minutes like the Ps do.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Apr 22, 2011 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Its all about matchups
This is the NBA. No one is “supposed” to win.
The reason the Bulls did’t sweep the division is because they have match up problems with the Pacers. It even showed in the final game of the season series. The Bulls also tend to play down to their opponent. So I don’t think the Bulls to have to struggle so much against Orlando in the second round. And we’ve swept Miami and hence already know how to beat them. I’m not being cocky about the Bulls. I’m just being positive. I’m so bought into what the Bulls are doing this season that I’m not looking past tomorrow’s game.
I wouldn’t exactly call Rose rattled when he put up 39, 36 and 23 points in three games. The 23 points was because of the thug tactics used by the Ps. No one can score when you throw elbow to their heads. And hibbert McRoberts were literally draped all over Rose whenever he drove to the hole.
The Bulls will face different challenges against different teams. But they will up for it. You cannot win 62 games by fluke.
Rose rattled? Can we get this poor guy a stat sheet please, I don't have the energy to type further.
seriously
rose still fearless, makes the tiebreaking shot no problem no matter how poor he was shooting.
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
Also a fair weather fan
I cant see how you can root for a division rival no matter how much you hate Boston or Miami.
Good post
The only problem I have with foster is the elbow to the face. The rest of the pacers make good hard playoff fouls. If I were the coach of the pacers, I would ask Foster to be my enforcer too but not to that extent. I disagree though on Noah and Booz being dirty. Yes they stick out their elbows from time to time to protect the ball, but I dont remember them targeting someone especially in the face
The only problem I have with the calls is the inconsistency w/c is your typical nba lately so whatever. As a player, its hard to play if the refs call touch fouls this quarter then wwe the next. I’m sure both teams are having a hard time adjusting in game
imo Rose gets 1-2 touch fouls and its usually after a really hard foul and rose standing up for himself. Maybe its the refs way of protecting the players. Good thing is he doesn’t get phantom calls mainly because he doesnt flop like cp3, manu etc
Yeahhh that was a little harsh.
I was surprised he didn’t get the flagrant for that one. It’s somewhat of a compliment, though. Rose is so good that throughout the playoffs teams are going to keep trying to knock his ass out. Jordan had to deal with the same thing.
The refs are just overall terrible. There were two plays pretty close together yesterday where I’m almost positive Rose stepped out of bounds with the ball and then Hansbrough did the same thing with officials looking directly at both of them. Seriously? Calling it when players are out of bounds has to be the easiest thing to do.
I’m scared of playing the Bulls once Rose really does start getting star calls. He already goes to the line 20 plus times a game on his own merit. It’ll just be insane once the refs help him out. If Reggie Miller taught him how to flop appropriately he’d be impossible to guard.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Apr 22, 2011 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions
flopping
I want my team to win, but hopefully not in that way. I dont want drose to resort to flopping. I dont want to see him act like he was hit by a bus or something. Yeah it works in this softy era, but just not my cup of tea.
I don't mind it when a guy is trying to get a charge called
because that’s the only way you’re going to get a whistle. It sucks, but that’s the way Stern has made it. The rest of the time I agree with you. Paul Pierce makes me want to murder his dog every time he flops on a jump shot after barely being touched.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Apr 22, 2011 6:18 PM CDT up reply actions
lol the signature head snap
they should add that in 2k12 and also the cp3 roll over move
We're gonna win the championship guys
Drose wont let us lose

by 















