"At most, three to six teams will take advantage of the amnesty clause this year, the executive said"
Story: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/28/sports/basketball/each-nba-team-can-waive-one-bad-contract.html
We've all been going crazy wondering about possible amnesty targets that the Bulls can try to get, but the article above outlines why that may just be a fantasy. No GM or owner wants to pay a guy more than $20 million to help somebody else's team, and for most teams, using amnesty will not do much to improve their situation. Plus, the ability to waive in future years makes it more likely a GM will try to trade a player or see if he improves, before cutting him in a future year when there is less dead money at stake. If there are truly only 6 players that are waived this season, it stands to reason that those will be the absolute worst situations such as Arenas, Luke Walton, and Rashard Lewis. Anyone useful that is actually released, like Brandon Roy, will be snapped up by a team that is under the cap like Washington or Sacramento.
If you rule out waiver cuts, the only other ways to acquire a shooting guard are trades, restricted free agents, and unrestricted free agents.
Trades: I do not believe that the Bulls are any more willing to give up Taj Gibson or Omer Asik this offseason than they were at the trade deadline last year. It's also doubtful that Memphis or Houston will be willing to give up OJ or Courtney Lee without getting one of those two. Houston currently has no centers on their roster other than Hasheem Thabeet and possibly Jordan Hill. Once Memphis resigns Marc Gasol to big money, they'll have no significant big man depth behind him and Randolph. One thing I find interesting about the new CBA is that a player can be "amnestied" at any point as long as it's by his original team, and the contract is already in existence. That means that the Bulls now have a way to sign both Taj and Asik to market contracts, that doesn't send them deep into the luxury tax. In 2 or 3 years, they can waive Boozer while bringing Mirotic over.
Restricted free agents: By "restricted free agents", I mean "Arron Afflalo". He's a pipe dream. Not only is he the Nuggets' best shooting guard, he's their only one right now after JR Smith and Wilson Chandler went to China. The Nuggets will match the Bulls best offer of the midlevel exception, if only to stay above the minimum payroll requirements. There's Marcus Thornton too, I suppose, but Sacramento will also match and are far under the minimum payroll right now.
Unrestricted free agents: Now we're back to where we've been since the end of last year. Choosing from a bunch of past-their-prime free agents who are willing to take a small short-term salary in order to chase a ring. They all have much-discussed weaknesses, in contrast to the dubious achievement of being better than Keith Bogans. The analysis that i've done so far is pretty straightforward stuff. Assuming that nothing's changed in their priorities, we should expect that the Bulls front office has been mostly concentrating on free agents since the season ended.
Steven A Smith might be correct about the Bulls already locking in on Tracy McGrady. Seeing how he predicted this 6 days ago, at the same time he said the lockout would end soon, you have to take him seriously. We already know he wants to come here and will play for the minimum. I had near-courtside seats to the Detroit game last year, and I will say that rumors of Tracy's inability to play have been greatly exaggerated (youtube video of detroit days). I was actually most surprised by his defensive effort, as he stayed in front of Rose on switches. Here's a bonus clip of him in the 4th quarter against the Bulls, where the Bulls couldn't stop him as he scored 15 in the 4th to erase a double digit lead. Tracy probably creates his own shot, dribbles, and passes better than anyone on this list. He fits the number one need of being able to take advantage of the situation when teams double Rose hard on the perimeter. Detroit started him at PG last year against San Antonio, and he had 15 points on 11 shots, 9 assists, and 7 rebounds with only 2 turnovers. His previous game he had 12 assists and 3 turnovers.
I'm probably just talking myself into him, but when the other possible free agents are Vince Carter, Jason Richardson, Jamal Crawford, Von Wafer, Delonte West, Anthony Parker, Caron Butler, DeShawn Stevenson, Mike Dunleavy, Shannon Brown, Michael Redd, Roger Mason, Marquis Daniels, and Josh Howard, that's not hard to do.
What does everyone think the Bulls will actually do? I've approached this as far as what's likely. Does anyone see a trade target that the Bulls will feel is so much better than the free agents, that they're willing to give up big man depth? Is there a free agent that that's a better fit when you include role, money, and skills?
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
20 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
(sry, spending too much time on SCH)
Crawford (for whatever reason, there’s a Crawford on the Hawks, and they’ve been calling him Crow for as long as I can remember)
don't all big macs have cheese?
You raise an interesting point though, What number is TMac gonna wear? Is he gonna try and buy the number from Rose? Would a lifetime supply of hot sauce and skittles do the trick?
I tend to believe Stephen A.
That TMac will likely find his way to Chicago on the cheap this season. The Bulls had some interest in him last offseason…and runningman has sold me on his ability to play.
I would be interested in either of Marcus Thornton or Arron Afflalo, but as noted their teams would likely match any MLE offer the Bulls could put out there…For UFE, I would like Delonte, JRich or Crawford…
I am not a fan of trading either of the Bulls’ young big men for small guards. If we could move any of the non-guaranteed contracts for someone like Tony Allen or Stephen Jackson, I could get on board.
New signature coming...but its a process.
I would probably like D west a little over Tmac.
Both have sensitive issues that could prohibit them from playing (Tmac’s knees, Dwest’s head, mental issues).
I like West’s game a lot. To me, he’s like a more athletic, more versatile Hinrich(not as good of a shooter tho). West would be a perfect 3rd guard who can play next to Derrick at times and be another ballhandler. I dont like him as a starting 2 guard….he’s only 6’3".
i've been wanting this
ever since the season ended. west is solid.
by grabmesomeBOOZ on Nov 28, 2011 9:55 PM CST up reply actions
i wanted west at the beginning of last season
i just really wasn’t sure about his mental health. but for fit, i have def been preaching that for awhile..
Look
I didn’t want to offend anyone by saying the "f" word or generalizing my statement to any particular sex by saying "gays" or lesbians" or "bi’s" so "homos" is the most "politically correct" term. I’m just trying to be more tact in a tactless blog.
by Hindut Patrol on Feb 15, 2011 2:51 PM EST
I'd take McGrady while throwing most if not all of our mid level exception
at Marcus Thornton. Move Brewer to the starting lineup, move Bogans to the 11th man roll and make Watson compete for his job with McGrady and Thornton (I envision McGrady playing a PG role with the 2nd unit). Of all the options out there this seems to be the most realistic. I don’t believe Afflalo will be available and I’m not into Carter, Richardson (too old and one dimensional), West (too unreliable), Crawford (too pricey) Howard (not a good fit) and rest who aren’t impact players (Wafer, really?).
Another intriguing possibility for at least part of the mid level is Dunleavy (smart, efficient 2 guard who can handle a bit and shoot 3s). And I guess if Miami really cuts Miller, he would potentially be a good fit.
by Basketball Smurf on Nov 28, 2011 10:11 PM CST reply actions
agreed
I think TMac solves a lot of problems come playoff time, and he’s probably our cheapest option considering the rumors that he wants to play here so bad. For as gimpy as his knees are, he is the best on the list at creating his own shots. With our rebounding, I’ll live with his 35% from three. Also, I’m okay with Bogans being on the roster. He can spell T-mac and simply play the role of defender which is what he should have been brought here for in the first place. Brewer and Korver still will get their minutes since TMac probably won’t play more than 20 min a game. I think Tmac should play the first few minutes, a few minutes at the start of the 2nd half, then on the court to close the game out. Brewer, Korver, and bogans can fill in the rest.
T Mac can still play, but not all the time.
His knees are about fifty years old. That sounds like an exaggeration, but its really not. I tracked him pretty closely last season as I’ve long been a fan of his, and while he proved he can still play well, he also proved that he can’t do it on back to back nights, or in every game of long road trips. Meaning, he’s not the answer at shooting guard or in any role requiring big, consistent minutes. He’s also an incredibly streaky outside shooter whose averages from distance haven’t been what you would call efficient.
I’m all for signing him, as the op is correct that we’re not going to find anyone else with his talent for shot creation. He could also produce some great playoff moments, I think. Buy he can’t be our only signing. We also need a Richardson or Crawford type who can play more consistent minutes at the 2 and spread the floor.
With that said: hell yeah. Bring on the Mac.
by arjoseph on Nov 28, 2011 11:34 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I want shannon brown, jsut cuz he has bounce.
"We got to win. Win no matter what. Trip, kick somebody, fight, bite. Whatever. Win." - Derrick Rose
just*
"We got to win. Win no matter what. Trip, kick somebody, fight, bite. Whatever. Win." - Derrick Rose
by OdwallaJuicish on Nov 29, 2011 7:58 AM CST up reply actions
I'm not in love with the idea of Mcgrady
but he could be really useful in the playoffs. He can make some really amazing plays when he’s on and if he wants to be a Bull as badly as he does, i think we owe him a shot.
we could start him and sub him out halfway through the first quarter for Brewer. (i think brewer has proved in the playoffs that he deserves more minutes) and then bring T-Mac back to help run the bench mob.
Come playoff time he’ll still be fresh if we don’t overplay him. Just imagine a team tries to double Rose in the 4th and McGrady MAKES A PLAY! unlike any of the other bulls, to win the game!
I love this idea
If we can bring over thorton without a trade of omer/taj and sign mcgrady we’d be complete by having what we needed last season, which is surround derrick with shooters. If we can let bogans go, which I doubt since thibs likes him, we can sign a vet big man, because it is unlikely kurt thomas will be back. We need that insurance big man even if noah and boozer say they’re “100%” healthy, their injury concerns still scare me. No scal and no kurt leaves only omer and taj. Honestly I have no idea who is available to pickup for cheap.
by zubba5 on Nov 29, 2011 3:14 PM CST via mobile reply actions
that would be perfect
Leon Powe should be our insurance big. He was a really good player in that 08 Boston championship run but he got injured.
Still for a 5th big off the bench he’d be great.
by MartyMondays on Nov 29, 2011 5:58 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Just in
A New York blog just posted that Kurt Thomas would rather come back to Chicago to play for a contender, rather than the Knicks. I don’t know how our money situation is but if we had Kurt, T-Mac, and Thornton, that’s a scary team honestly.

by 











