Official BaB 2011-12 Bulls Season Preview (for serious!)
The NBA Blogosphere wasn't going to let something trivial, like 'the season possibly not happening', to keep from the yearly blogger tradition of season previews. This is my entry for the Bulls, look for posted links of other teams and divisions as this extended offseason rolls along.
Team Name: Chicago Bulls
Last Year's Record: 62-20
Key Free Agents: Kurt Thomas, Brian Scalabrine, Keith Bogans (unguaranteed), so...N/A
Team Needs: shooting guard
1. What are your team's biggest needs this offseason?
There's a large, gaping hole in the Bulls starting lineup. Every night it was always initially bandaged by Keith Bogans, then supplemented by a combination of Kyle Korver, Ronnie Brewer, and CJ Watson, but the shooting guard position was never completely filled all season. It remains the most obvious and potentially easily-improved position in what is a fairly-stacked roster.
What the Bulls need from that position is a single player of increased quality, as opposed to the sheer quantity they threw at the problem last season. While over the course of a season the differing skills of their various SGs often were useful enough, a single player with a combination if ballhandling, outside shooting, and defensive ability could work wonders.
2. What are the team's biggest strengths & weaknesses? (so far)
The Bulls were the most hard-working, dedicted team in the league, and it paid off in them posessing its best defense. The Bulls owned two elite-level defenders in Joakim Noah and Luol Deng, impressive depth (especially in the front court), and a naturally coachable roster overall, but it was the arrival of rookie head coach Tom Thibodeau that set the tone early and often that defense was going to be the key in Chicago. Coach Thibs employed an active and swarming scheme that forced opponents into a struggle for not only every game, but every single posession.
But beyond reigning MVP Derrick Rose, the Bulls were merely an average offensive team. Credit goes to Thibodeau for encouraging his players to be more of 3-point threats, but while Rose and Deng showed improvement (especially when it came to volume), there is still not enough shooting outside of Kyle Korver to adequately punish defenses for collapsing on Rose. Another flaw with the team's offense was the lack of other playmakers on the floor. With Derrick always serving as the intial option, there was rarely much else seen when that was taken away. Some of that was a lack of originality in the offensive scheme, and Thibodeau still has room to improve as a coach on that side of the court. But there was also nobody else on the floor who could improvise their way out of a bad posession.
Getting Rose help is not only about increasing productivity overall, but also alleviating some stress from the MVP's shoulders. Not only rarely receiving breaks in a game, Rose's team required so much of him he couldn't ever take single plays off. Perhaps some of his diminished shooting as the season wore on was due to fatigue and injury brought on by that constant workload.
3. If there is no season in 2011-12, how is your team set up for 2012?
Fairly outstandingly, though one could consider any wasted season of a prime Derrick Rose unforgiveable. For a title contender, the Bulls are a fairly young team and under contract through that 2012-13 season, so they'd have much less of an issue with a cancelled season than most teams. Oh man, maybe I figured out what was owner Jerry Reinsdorf's plan all along!
4. If you could make one change the NBA's new CBA, what would it be?
And since I've fired my first salvo at management, might as well continue: the old CBA was actually perfect for a big-market team like Bulls. But for all the good work they've done in assembling this 62-win team, they rarely, if ever, used their inherent financial advantage over the teams that weren't bursting with profits. So any competition-balancing change won't affect them much more than the previous constraints they shackled to themselves.
So speaking then as a fan of the league in general, I'll go with finding some way to allow teams to more easily escape bad contracts. That could be lowering guaranteed years, different ways of handling cap hits, or some other mechanism to where it's not less spending to the players as a collective, but moreso that it goes to the players that are earning it. A player eating his way out of the league after getting a huge guaranteed deal doesn't help either the league or the players as a whole.
5. How far are the Bulls from their 7th championship, and how can they get there?
When it comes the Bulls championship aspirations for the next several years, it's all about Derrick Rose. It's certainly debateable whether Rose was the league's best player last season (and furthermore, whether MVP should reflect that), but there's no question that Rose elevated himself into the conversation of the handful of true franchise players that could potentially lead a championship squad. So many teams in the league are desperate for that one asset (including the Bulls themselves in any era post-Jordan) that it can't be emphasized enough. With Rose leading them, the Bulls will never be truly that far from contention, which is a luxury that shouldn't be taken lightly.
But the Miami Heat have two of those guys. The Bulls gave them a battle, but Miami did win 4 of the 5 games in their Eastern Conference Finals matchup, oftentimes looking like they only had to 'turn it up' to completely throttle the Bulls offense. But Bulls fans can be optimistic for improvement even beyond their teams lofty achievements last season. Again, it starts with Rose: it's downright likely that he'll have better seasons than his MVP one, even if he never wins that award again. For all his greatness there are improveable aspects of his defense, shooting, and decisionmaking that could make him even better. Then, consolidating some of their team depth into more higher-level talent could also do wonders. While it's nice to be able to run ten players deep over the 82-game grind, a lot of those guys are on the bench when it gets to the playoffs anyway and that advantage lessens against elite opponents.
The Bulls also have some hope for a healthier campaign this year, as both Carlos Boozer and Joakim Noah were not 100% for that Miami series and had missed large chunks of the season. However the history of those two suggests that perfect health is unlikely, and it may actually be hard to repeat the remarkable health of the other players on the roster.
With four starters locked into multi-year 8-figure yearly contracts (Boozer, Noah, Deng, and soon Rose), the Bulls may not have many options for a dramatic improvement, but they should be really good for a long time, and therefore may only need a small boost anyway. Miami should only be improved themselves, but for the Bulls it can be as easy as nailing their shooting guard acquisition to get them over that star-studded hurdle and raising another banner.
19 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This depresses me.
Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Cha-pu
by chapuforyou on Oct 14, 2011 3:35 PM CDT reply actions 11 recs
no witty comments in the pics?
uve changed yfbb, youve changed
"Psycho: I'm liable to go Michael/take your pick: Jackson, Tyson, Jordan - Game 6."
by Belize on Oct 14, 2011 3:39 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Rose has played 115 games over a one year stretch.
81 (regular) + 8 (preseason) + 17 (post) + 12 (worlds and pre-worlds) = over a one year stretch.
Deng played 82 + 8 + 17 + 12(probably more? euros) = 116 games and played the second most minutes in the the league last season (1st: Monta Ellis)
I don’t mind these guys having extended breaks, especially in Deng’s case. If they played a regular season of games this year, are they more likely to break down in the playoffs after such a heavy work load?
thats soo crazy I was just going to look up these numbers too...
and boooo for not having luol in that picture.
You always were second best! And in this business, Bub, second best don't *cut* it!
by Yibs on Oct 15, 2011 8:07 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Gives Thibs a good reason to play Lu 47.3 minutes a game.
Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Cha-pu
by chapuforyou on Oct 15, 2011 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
If only the owners could have found a way to not sign players to awful contracts without stopping play.
Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.
by MarketMaker on Oct 15, 2011 2:33 PM CDT reply actions 6 recs
No. 4 ...one change you would make to the CBA...
Divide ALL TV and apparel revenue among the 30 teams. After that WHY does there need to be ANY constraints on the owners. Someone please explane
He took his what to where?!
yeah that would've made more sense as an answer, and I have advocated that in the past.
damnit.
Maybe I was just of the mindset that there weren’t going to be any major revenue sharing initiatives, or that the Owners had the discipline not to sign themselves into these messes.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 16, 2011 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Isn't the CBA separate than any revenue sharing between the teams?
I thought I heard that the owners are discussing the issue separately. Thus, any revenue-sharing answer wouldn’t have been responsive to the CBA question, anyway.
oh yeah!
good point.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 17, 2011 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Except that
There are two ways the small market teams can get more money: revenue sharing and/or reducing the players share. If/until all the teams agree on a revenue sharing plan the only way the small market teams can get more money is by reducing the players’ share.
Is revenue sharing connected to the CBA? Of course it is.
He took his what to where?!
"Connected," sure.
I was just trying to assuage yfBB’s seeming guilt over not mentioning it. And it’s the league’s (i.e., owners’) postion that the issues are separate (i.e., that the CBA guarantees the league will be healthy, revenue sharing will then redistribute wealth within that now healthy system).
Your last thought
That is a nuance that I really haven’t concidered. In that case if I were the NBPA, I would not budge until the owner’s revealed how they were going to make all 30 teams whole and what the financial conditions were for each team. Well, that’s not the NBPA’s business. Except that it’s the owners that are crying for relief.
He took his what to where?!
Good point.
It’s certainly debateable whether Rose was the league’s best player last season (and furthermore, whether MVP should reflect that)
I’m tired of debating this question every season. The MVP means different things to everybody.
by James Broschat on Oct 17, 2011 11:43 PM CDT reply actions
Thank god we don't have to debate it this season.
What with there being no season and all.
If there was a season though it’d be debated. “If the MVP adds a post game, you have to give him the MVP again!”
by JockstrapNoah on Oct 18, 2011 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions

by 
















