Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

Bulls add Bogans, still looking towards Rudy Fernandez

Well it was known a couple weeks ago that the Bulls were looking to sign either Eddie House, Roger Mason, or Keith Bogans as a backup guard, and with the former two off the board the Bulls snatched up Bogans Friday for his vet minimum deal.

I like the signing in that Bogans is a pure 3-and-D guy, taking nearly two-thirds of his shots from 3 last season (and a lot of those from the corners). He shot over 35% from there and has been at that level throughout his career. From what I've read his stout defense may be a bit more reputation than reality, but he's a big guard and has played a lot of minutes for defensive-minded coaches over his career, including starting 49 games for Greg Popovich and the Spurs last season, so I'm assuming he's at least slightly above-average.

Now, granted, he does pretty much nothing else but defend, and stand and shoot 3s. But that's what the Bulls are looking for in their remaining roster spots (and Thibodeau mentioned it just that morning), and while they also could use another ball-handler, that's not going to be found all in one package, those guys just aren't left.

Except...Rudy Fernandez is indeed still available. Marc Stein reported last last night that the Bogans signing was moreso a death-knell for any T-Mac possibility, but not Fernandez. Stein's report has also been the first one indicating that the Bulls have offered a first-round pick, which is reassuring. Apparently the Blazers have balked at merely accepting a pick, and want Taj Gibson, but the Bulls offered only James Johnson (not sure if that's in addition to a pick or not, plus the Blazers would have to send out another player to take in Johnson's salary) and the Blazers aren't interested in him.

This thing could drag out as the Blazers try to drum up interest elsewhere, since it looks like of the three teams initially interested in Fernandez, two (Celtics and Knicks) have moved on, and the Bulls have put out a pretty solid offer. Maybe the Blazers would rather not have a late 1st and instead receive a player on a rookie deal who can actually play (sorry Jimmy Johns), and there are those types all over the league. You can include Taj Gibson in that category, of course, but I'm fine with the Bulls holding on to Taj, and waiting for the Blazers to come back around to their offer.

Comment 237 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What I like about the Bulls in this deal is that they're not desperate to do the deal.

While it would be nice to add a wing player like Rudy Fernandez I like that the Bulls have leverage in this.You don’t reward Portland by giving them Taj Gibson. Thats just bad business because Portland has been notoriously difficult to deal with. You can’t reward that. It’s a take it or leave it kinda deal.

by SoulEater7 on Aug 7, 2010 1:57 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Iggy & Rudy

I’m tired of Portland dragging this Rudy deal out. Check out this 4 team trade and tell me what you think… CLICK:
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2f4kape

Portland gets: Brandan Wright(PF)+ Bulls 2nd rd pick & a open roster spot to sign PG Patrick Mills

Chicago gets: Andre Iguodala(SG)+Rudy Fernandez(SG). Iggy & D-Rose= Best NBA backcourt) Both will be in MVP discussion this year (Move Ronnie Brewer to SF)

Philly gets: Monta Ellis(PG that will score 25pts/game)Cap Space over next 4yrsBulls 1st rd pick+James Johnson(6’9" Shooter/Shot Blocker for free with trade exception)

GSW gets: Luol Deng (Star 6’9" SF they need badly) 17ppg 7rpg & great defense+ Jerryd Bayless (SG/PG Solid high flying scorer to replace Ellis)

by Jay Everett on Aug 11, 2010 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

why?

it’s front in center?

by SoulEater7 on Aug 7, 2010 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Replying to comments in a completely nonsequitor fashion is very difficult

especially to Blazers fans who might not bother checking this one. Since this is front and center Id expect commentary to gravitate here regardless.

by reprisal on Aug 7, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Blazers fans are all over this site.

Hard to imagine them missing the front page story

by Option27 on Aug 7, 2010 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I only glanced at this thread

because Im badly procrasinating. But I had type a paragraph reply to something specific to that conversation and not mentioned by yfBB.

by reprisal on Aug 7, 2010 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Do the Knicks own a 2011 first

or did they just not want to trade it? There doesn’t seem to be a big market for Rudy right now, the Blazers should suck it up and make the trade.

by jubaby on Aug 7, 2010 2:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Did they give up the pick?

Or the right to swap picks?

Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 7, 2010 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Swap
the right to switch 2011 draft picks with New York, the Knicks’ 2012 first-rounder and New York’s lottery selection from 2009.


link

by Option27 on Aug 7, 2010 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

the fact that they gave up the 2012 first rounder

means they can’t trade the 2011 first rounder, swap contingency or not. have to own a pick in the next two years

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 7, 2010 6:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

So is that innacurate?

The way that quote is written, it sounds like they essentially traded away 3 firsts in a row for a grandpa on prosthetic legs.

by jubaby on Aug 8, 2010 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

well the 'lottery selection from 2009' was Jordan Hill

you can trade picks every year if it’s after you actually drafted a player

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 8, 2010 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

despite pritch's departure, the blazers are not reasonable

taj and rudy are both 25, have 13.8 – 14.4 PERs that drop off in the playoffs, made their all-rookie teams (taj a 1st) and have similar rookie salaries as the 24th and 26th picks.

i think rudy has a potentially higher ceiling, but he’s a running wing that bombs threes. young 4s that can play are usually valued more highly in the nba.

portland has three layers of depth, they could actually have rudy fly back to spain this year and not even miss him. the bulls would miss taj as their first big off the bench.

at the risk of sounding like the blazers’ gm in 1984 (geoff petrie?) when discussing mj, doesn’t dante cunningham (drexler) give them most of what taj would anyway?

(wow, a taj/mj parallel!)

The name of the team is ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS - "I tried to convince them that what they were doing was an aberration, an imbecility, a stupidity without name"

by marionette on Aug 7, 2010 2:14 PM CDT reply actions  

and this notion that rudy's gonna be super attractive after killing in the world championships

doesn’t make sense either. he’s already looked his best in the olympics, he could actually be less attractive if he doesn’t meet expectations for some reason. or gets hurt.

they must want the “golden ticket” chance that the bobcats’ pick is.

The name of the team is ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS - "I tried to convince them that what they were doing was an aberration, an imbecility, a stupidity without name"

by marionette on Aug 7, 2010 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Bulls are the most unreasonable team in the league to deal with. I really can’t stand them and their “our owner buys first round picks” fans are equally as obnoxious as their FO.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 2:18 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

lol

i think you mean their fans’ sense of lebron/bosh entitlement!

The name of the team is ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS - "I tried to convince them that what they were doing was an aberration, an imbecility, a stupidity without name"

by marionette on Aug 7, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I meant the Blazers. Gah.

FAIL.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Equally obnoxious?

Reinsdorf seems like he could be pretty obnoxious at times. Don’t be so hard on the Bulls fans.

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 7, 2010 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

If it was up to me you guys would already have Rudy.

I think 95% of the fanbase would be happy with the Bobcat’s pick and 60% would be happy with future first rounder from the Bulls.

Mostly I think people just want to see Rudy go somewhere he can be successful.

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 7, 2010 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Totally.

The bulls are really dumb, ’fo real.

In Bayless I trust.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>

by staylost on Aug 9, 2010 2:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

From the Blazers perspective,

if they are asking for Taj, they will be asking for a starter-calibur young big for a starter-calibur young perimeter player in Rudy. This doesn’t seem that unreasonable.

On the other hand, Taj has actually played quality starters’ minutes while Rudy has not. Not only that, but quality bigs seem much harder to find than quality perimeter players.

I don’t think the Bulls need to give up Taj just yet, but I also think that Rudy can be a star in this league. I hope the Bulls get him eventually!

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on Aug 7, 2010 3:02 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

It's not unreasonable for the Blazers to ask

but I think it’s very reasonable for the Bulls to say no.

BullsTwo > Back up and running!

by Sports2 on Aug 7, 2010 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

A blazers fan made this comment in the other thread.

A first round pick from the Bulls (unless it’s the Bobcat’s pick) is likely to be very low. Portland buys one of those almost every draft. They paid cash to get the Hornets pick two seasons ago and then again paid cash to move up ten spots last draft.
Basically the Bulls pick (probably in the 20’s) is worth about 3 million in cash, which is approximately what the Blazers would save just by GIVING Rudy to the Bulls. To some cash conscious teams that might be worth something, but Paul Allen just paid a couple million for an extra second round pick. He doesn’t care about saving 3 million.
Trading Rudy for a low first round pick is almost the same as giving him away. His value can’t possibly drop below free.
Also, the market can’t get any smaller. The Mavs just lost Rodrigue Beaubois to a foot injury. There’s a great possibility that more teams will be in need of a starting caliber SG by the trade deadline.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 3:47 PM CDT reply actions  

My response to that is that it doesn't make any sense

Even if the blazers buy a late 1st every year, they can either buy the pick, which costs them $3 mil or trade Rudy for the pick, which saves them $3 mil in salary. In that sense, the bulls would be paying $6 mil for Rudy. Basically the blazer’s fan’s logic is completely backwards.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think that makes sense from a financial perspective, not a basketball perspective.

If the Blazers cared about the cap or having an extra 6 million sitting around, then it would be a pretty good deal. I just don’t think Paul Allen cares about saving six million dollars, which might be crazy, but that’s his deal.

Maybe if your team wasn’t so great we would want your first round pick. That’s what you get for being so awesome.

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 7, 2010 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

On the flipside though

you probably aren’t gonna find a bad team, one that will be picking in the top 15 or so, that will be willing to give up their pick without some serious protection.

Superteams suck.

by Juiceboxjerry on Aug 7, 2010 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

That's probably true.

Isn’t that how the Bobcat’s pick works though? Top 15 protected the first season and then it goes down from there?

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 7, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Charlotte’s own 2012 1st round draft pick to Chicago (top-14 protected in the 2012 Draft, top-12 protected in 2013, top-10 protected in 2014, top-8 protected in 2015 and unprotected in the 2016 Draft.) [Charlotte – Chicago, 2/18/2010]

Read more: http://www.realgm.com/src_future_draftpicks.php#chicago#ixzz0vyV2GylI

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Some websites have started doing that, I think SI does it too

Not a bad idea considering the frequency of people copying and pasting material without linking to the source

Well, isn't what LeBron did last night the living embodiment of The Secret, leaving millions on the table and turning himself into a hometown villain, all for the sake of winning?
Neil Paine, basketball-reference.com

by snley on Aug 7, 2010 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe Paul Allen doesn't care about $6 million

But trading Rudy for a 1st round pick would be trading Rudy for the equivalent of $6 million. It’s not the same as giving him away, and it is very possible that his value decreases even further than that.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I doubt it, but I guess we'll find out.

Plus, the odds of him being benched for a month are really slim.

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 7, 2010 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its not being benched for a month

but limited playing time…he only attempts like 7 shots in 25 minutes of play…with wes on the team, will he only get 20 minutes of playtime? Less? will he only then take 5 shots a game? its hard to have great value when statistically u are not doing much. Plus the more rudy pouts, the more the blazers will get desperate to move him, and other teams will know this.

I dont care what the D.N.A. Says, the Guy wearing number 12 Cannot be Kirk Hinrich, he is definetly Kurt. Kirk can actually play basketball!

by piccolomair on Aug 8, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Theres not much risk in waiting

until the season starts. Rudy may get hurt during the FIBA games, but so might any other shooting guard which may spark interest. After that it would be a calculated risk.

by reprisal on Aug 7, 2010 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also its not just the financial value

the draft pick is a more flexible asset(but with a more fixed value). Getting the pick now instead of draft time gives them a more universal asset to potentially use in a trade with say Pryz’s expiring contract to exceed the cap in a way they wont be able to do at draft time. While its certainly true that more interest may open up in Rudy, a number of teams wont ever be interested in him because they either dont have minutes at SG or because they dont believe Rudy is willing to stick in their market or system. Not to mention, nothing stops the Blazers from using that money to buy even more picks if they wanted. But only a couple would be available for cash each year.

Also mentioned in the other was that they may not want to even get low picks because they have draft picks waiting in the wings in Europe. But to me that just seems like extra incentive to free up a roster spot. Especially to do it over the summer when you could still bring one of those guys over if you wanted.

by reprisal on Aug 7, 2010 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

We are over the cap so how does saving $3mil in salary help us?

In Bayless I trust.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>

by staylost on Aug 9, 2010 2:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

It helps Paul Allen's pocket

And don’t tell me he doesn’t care about $3 million. Maybe he doesn’t care that much, but I have a hard time believing that Paul Allen’s going to throw away $6 million worth of value for a player that isn’t bringing anything to the table in Portland.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 9, 2010 2:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

I understand that

But it’s one thing to overpay for players who you believe will help your team or splurge on draft picks to build a team. It’s another to waste money to keep a player on the team who isn’t really helping and doesn’t want to be there.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 10, 2010 3:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

unless it’s somehow illegal to marry a basketball.

"I want to be that guy. I want to be the reason the Bulls are back."- Derrick Rose.
"I'm never leaving Chicago."- Derrick Rose

by Cosmis on Aug 7, 2010 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

There's hope for you after all.

DANIEL HUDSON SUCKS. HOWS THAT GUN BAN WORKING FOR YOU MAYOR DALLY

by Ozzie Montana on Aug 7, 2010 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

There will be more available talent at the trade deadline for

less. Rundy decient, but like I said earlier he aint worth that Bobcat pick,…….let alone Taj.

by Pepp23 on Aug 7, 2010 4:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't want anyone else

I want Rudy.

He’s a perfect fit for this team and could push this team over the top.

Simple

by Option27 on Aug 7, 2010 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Epic?

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on Aug 7, 2010 8:17 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

The Bobcats are going to be titty this year, and Portland knows

it….Lets not do the dummy by trading them that pick for this dude. He’s a sketchy defender and he whines like a mule off the court. I wouldn’t mine having him but he aint worth all that……period.

by Pepp23 on Aug 7, 2010 4:26 PM CDT reply actions  

TS% is the most accurate measure of simple scoring efficiency and includes free throws.

Derrick has been below average in that measure in both of his years. And I made the point in another thread that Derrick was astonishingly good from January on. His TS% was 55+ and he scored 22.5 ppg. The only other players that passed as much as Derrick and scored that much with that level of efficiency were Wade and LeBron.

Derrick was efficient for 48 games last year. The first half of the year, he was pretty crummy, but he was also hurt and he had Kirk Hinrich playing some of the worst offense I’ve ever seen playing next to him during that time. Kirk improved some in the second half of the year which made life easier for Derrick and Derrick just got better and healthier over that time.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

So in the end of the day,

Derrick isn’t an inefficient scorer, he just was while he was injured. So we’re both saying the same thing.

Originally, I thought you may have been referencing the Doug Collins equation, which I think is simply retarded.

BTW, is there a way to look up monthly PER, USG, TS%, etc?

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Basketball-reference.com is always a good start

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/r/rosede01.html

There may be other sites that make it easier to search/filter/etc. but b-r covers the basics.

by paxson43 on Aug 7, 2010 6:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was inefficient as a rookie, too and when you look at last year in the aggregate because of his poor start, he was

inefficient.

I calculated his TS from January on, on my own. It’s a pretty easy calculation. TS%= (Points/2*(FGA+.44*FTA))*100.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think his performance from January onwards is a good indicator as to where he is now,

don’t you? So with the game he showed for the second half of the season, I think it’s fair to say he’s already an outstanding player and well on his way to being top ten. Like you said, for ~ a four month stretch he was up there with Lebron and D-Wade.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Offensively anyway.

He still has a ways to go to be on Wade and LeBron’s level on defense.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

If we only counted Tyrus stats for January on each year

he would have looked like a much better player. Derrick was clearly hurt and did improve, but expecting a 55% TS% next season is probably unlikely.

Offense league wide also improves as the season progresses.

by Scotter on Aug 7, 2010 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's what I said, January on.

It’s something to be excited about, but it still doesn’t mean he’s going to do it for 82 games next season. Another slow start is very possible considering all of the changes and the typically more difficult first half schedule that the Bulls almost always play.

by Scotter on Aug 7, 2010 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Huh?

I don’t think Tyrus was one of those guys where he improves as the season goes on. He’s one of those guys who wanders aimlessly through games and the season, with brilliant play peppered throughout.

I don’t understand why you think Rose having a 55 TS% next year is unlikely. He’ll still convert his shots close or at the rim at the same rate, he’s been working on extending his (already fantastic) mid-range shooting out to the 3pt line, and hopefully with his excellent play with team USA he’ll get more love from the refs next year. He doesn’t take bad shots, or force things too much, so I think your opinion isn’t correct and if anything his TS% goes up next year because

Same at the rim % + same or better mid-range % + better & higher volume 3pt shooting + more FTA’s = better TS%

by kozzer on Aug 8, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

About Thomas: You may not think it, but it's been true 3 of his 4 seasons.

In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).

Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.

by tyger1147 on Aug 8, 2010 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

OK well that's interesting

I still wanna see some stats on that. But even so, stats only tell part of the story, they don’t explain the reason for the improvement. In Derrick’s case, he was clearly injured, and in with Tyrus, he is injured in the brain.

by jubaby on Aug 8, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, technically that might be true about his stats

however, that’s misleading because 2 of those 3 seasons had extenuating circumstances. The 1st one was his rookie year, so I’m sure that increased playing time and familiarity with the NBA game contributed to that. And I’d bet that this is true of the vast majority of lottery picks.

Then last year, he had the forearm injury where he missed much of December (and had a couple of nice games before that injury) and that set him back a couple months where he finally starting getting back to ‘normal’ around the time he was traded to the Bobcats.

For those reasons, I think that either you can’t say he’s “a player that improves as the season goes on” as a characterization, or at the very least, because of his still only going in to his 5th year there isn’t enough of a track record to legitimately justify that position.

by kozzer on Aug 8, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Do you have any proof of that?

Please show some stats because I think that’s totally false. And there is no way the entire league improves the way Derrick did from the start to January on.

by jubaby on Aug 8, 2010 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know why he's disregarding the circumstances.

I was an idiot and didn’t think he was really injured early on, but it’s clear that he was, and it was easy to see that as he returned to full health his game got much, much better. Derrick improved in a big way over time, and that culminated in a fucking amazing April: 25.4 ppg, 7 Ass, 4.1 reb on 54% shooting. Rose is gonna be shitting on everyone next year, whether the stats say so or not.

by dakoose on Aug 8, 2010 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

What if they really want him but the Blazers insist on Taj?

That’s a sticking point.

Getting Rudy would be really, really nice, but I think we’re OK without him, especially if we lose Taj for him.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

With Rudy, we're great

Even if I’m the only one convinced, it’s good enough for me

by Option27 on Aug 7, 2010 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think greatness lives or dies with the elevation of Rose

Noah too, to an extent. I don’t really like the sentiment, but it is true that a team is as great as its star player.
Even so, I like where we are right now and I agree that I will like things even better if we can get Rudy without losing Taj.

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 7, 2010 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rudy's going to put us over the top?

He’s not even that good of a 3pt shooter. He’s a really fun player, but I don’t get why people here are infatuated with him. He’s a decent 25 year old player. He’s not even that young. I highly doubt we’re looking at the next Ginobli.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 6:19 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

yep. but for a team that isnt a contender, making a more exhilarating product is pretty important.

"If I was to answer that question honestly, I would have to lie to you."

- Isiah Thomas, when asked if any teams were interested in trading for Shandon Anderson

by TheMoon on Aug 7, 2010 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think we are a contender,

especially in the East. I think that for now, our upside is good enough to reach the two seed and possibly beat Miami. That’s if everything goes perfectly. But at the very least we should be right there with Orlando and Boston.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

wow. ORL won 59 games last year. i have to imagine they win at least 55-57, maybe more.

you honestly think the bulls are in that league? i was thinking more like 47 wins for this season for the bulls and a 6th seed.

"If I was to answer that question honestly, I would have to lie to you."

- Isiah Thomas, when asked if any teams were interested in trading for Shandon Anderson

by TheMoon on Aug 7, 2010 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

If the Bulls get Rudy

I firmly believe 55 is easy. It’s the 60 I want.

They won 41 with an insane amount of injuries, VDN and a bad roster.

Pretty much from Rose and Noah.

With all the pieces we have added and could possibly add, yeah . . .we’re really really good

by Option27 on Aug 7, 2010 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

They played like a 36 win team last year. It was a fluke that they won 41 games, so that

partially covers for the injuries / VDN problems. They significantly improved the roster, but it still has similar holes. Lack of three point shooting being the main one. Adding 14-19 wins is not going to be easy, even with Boozer and company. Rudy’s an average player and he’s not going to make THAT big of a difference. I want him because he’s a good fit for the Bulls needs, but he’s becoming wildly overrated.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't consider Rudy to be a great player

I think the Bulls already have all the right parts to get them somewhere good.

I just think Rudy is the perfect compliment to this team.

He’s like the missing piece of the Puzzle.

I’m not looking for a Melo (even though it would be nice).

I think Rudy would be like our own Manu.

by Option27 on Aug 7, 2010 7:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rudy belongs nowhere near Manu in any conversation.

Manu is a great player. Rudy’s an average one.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think so.

I disagree with FS in calling Manu great. He’s pretty good, but great should be reserved for the actual greats, not the complimentary pieces.

I like Rudy, and he’s fun to watch, but Manu was/is a night-in/night-out game changer. Rudy is a three point shooter who can dunk a little bit.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's that good?

Kobe, Wade, and Brandon Roy are all definitely better than Manu, IMO. Kevin Martin, OJ Mayo, Iguodala and a few others are all possibly better, too. Manu’s damn good, but I think PER overrates Manu in a big way.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Adjusted plus minus loves Manu, too.

He’s at least in the top 4. It’s close between he and Roy. The only SGs definitively better than him are Kobe and Wade. He’s better than Martin, Mayo, Iggy’s a SF and Manu’s better than him anyway.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Top 10 Shooting Gaurds, IMO

1. Kobe Bryant
2. D. Wade
3. Brandon Roy
4. Manu Ginobli
5. Joe Johnson
6. Ray Allen
7. Andre Igoudala
8. Caron Butler
9. Jason Richardson
10. Monta Ellis

by MCREW on Aug 7, 2010 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd have J-Rich above Caron and Iggy, especially since those two are SFs

and Monta Ellis sucks. Your top 5 is pretty good, though. But I think Wade’s better than Kobe.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I looked at Yahoo's leaderboard

for SG and they had Iggy, so I just listed him. Per 82games, he does play a bunch of minutes at SG, but you’re correct in that he’s a SF.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just giving Kobe some respect but

I also think D. Wade is as good as Kobe and certainly more efficient than Kobe.

by MCREW on Aug 7, 2010 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

You guys didn't understand me at all

When I wrote Manu-like, I meant he could have a similar impact to our team like Manu has with SA.

I’m not saying Rudy is as good as Manu but I think he can do a lot of those little things at SG that Manu does for SA.

The “dirty work” for a wing.

I also think Manu has benefitted his whole career playing alongside Duncan and Parker which opens up his game a bit more. Just like how Rudy’s game can open up with Rose and Boozer.

by Option27 on Aug 7, 2010 9:01 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

He has shown no ability to do

either the little things or the big things that Manu does. And Rudy definitely doesn’t do dirty work.

An average player can’t have a Manu like impact. And Manu didn’t need Duncan and Parker to put an Olympic gold medal around his neck. He’s that good.

by Scotter on Aug 7, 2010 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Manu Ginobli has benefited from being awesome,

something that Rudy Fernandez still needs to work on.

Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!

by Prevenge on Aug 8, 2010 4:39 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

haha. agreed prevenge. manu basically

has no flaws as a player. he does everything at a high level, literally. hes one guy i wish were ageless. i will be so sad to see him retire.

"If I was to answer that question honestly, I would have to lie to you."

- Isiah Thomas, when asked if any teams were interested in trading for Shandon Anderson

by TheMoon on Aug 8, 2010 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Me too.

I love watching Ginobli play. He’s just so infuriating, you know? So much guile and confidence.

Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!

by Prevenge on Aug 8, 2010 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dude

NOTHING is easy.

"Boozer's dumbass dunked, so i dunked on his dumbass"- Joakim Noah

by T.Moore on Aug 9, 2010 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like Option27 said,

we won 41 last year even with all those injuries. If we were healthy down the stretch, I think we were a 45-48 win team last year. Now add in Boozer, Brewer, Korver, Asik, Bogans and Thibs, we should be, at the very least, good enough to win 50 games. I like our chances to get to the mid-high 50’s in wins. It’s no sure thing, but I think we can get there.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Again, they played like a 36 win team last year. They might have been a 43 win team

if healthy if they didn’t overachieve. That’s the baseline. They didn’t get 12-15 wins better this offseason.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 7:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think they played like a 36 win team last year.

They had a very good record towards the end of the season; I think they were a fifth seed. If you look at it, the Bulls upgraded at PG(Derrick will be better), SG(Brewer>Kirk), PF(Booz>Taj), C(Noah will be better), the bench and at coach. Outside of SF, where they were already very solid at, the Bulls got better everywhere, whether it be via free agency or player growth.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

At times they did play like the shit,

but I guess what I’m saying is that the players on that team were good enough to be a 45-48 win team. If Thibs were here, I firmly believe last year’s cast would have done much, much better than they did. Throw in all the other improvements I mentioned above and I think 55-60 wins is very possible.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I love pt differentioal as an indicator for how good a team really is

But ….. the Bulls had some atrocious losses that really skewed the entire season. 2nd half pt differential, when Derrick got healthy and we put behind the horrendous start of Salmons and Kirk and the roster was full was +6-7 pts, which is damn good.

And didn’t we kick ass on the road winning 5 games in a row against winning teams? Never happened before in NBA history!

You’re overly pessimistic.

"Michael Redd's owed 18.3 million next year. He can either opt out like an idiot or opt in like a douche bag." - NittanyCub

by Trey23 on Aug 7, 2010 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

They won 41 games bro

It makes no sense to pick around in point differential like that. All it tells me is that they were inconsistent. They become more consistent with Boozer, but they are still going to be a team that must “overachieve” to succeed. And again, that is so subjective to say a team overachieves if that’s the way it is pieced together.

by jubaby on Aug 8, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

No they played like a 41 win team

because they won 41 games. Hell weren’t they something like 0-10 without Noah? I won’t even bring up the 35 pt GS game or the last second Brad Miller shot. That’s 43 right there. It isn’t impossible to believe that this team could get into the mid 50 win range if they gel together and stay injury free.

by Dils on Aug 7, 2010 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

every team has stuff like that, every season. you cant just abstract

away things that mess up the elegance of your off season fantasy. shit happens.

"If I was to answer that question honestly, I would have to lie to you."

- Isiah Thomas, when asked if any teams were interested in trading for Shandon Anderson

by TheMoon on Aug 7, 2010 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well that's no different then

saying that the team really is a 36 win team because of point differential. I accept that they were a 41 win team.

by Dils on Aug 8, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

Please, continue…..

"Michael Redd's owed 18.3 million next year. He can either opt out like an idiot or opt in like a douche bag." - NittanyCub

by Trey23 on Aug 7, 2010 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm imagine Rudy as

like the two-face girlfriend of Jerry’s in the episode of Seinfeld. Sometimes extremely beautiful, sometimes the exact opposite.

"Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team." -Scottie Pippen

by owenjs on Aug 8, 2010 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

at first I was like WHAT?

but then I reread it and saw you typed Rudy, not Rose

something tells me even the mafia wouldn't call on greg walker if a hit was needed.

-MarketMaker

by blackoutsox on Aug 7, 2010 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

He set the rookie record for the most 3-pointers made in a season

Volume counts as much as efficiency does. I guy who shoots 38% on 8 3-pt attempts/36 minutes is more valuable than a guy who shoots 41% on 4 3-pt attempts/36 minutes.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't consider him a typical rookie.

He was very old for a rookie and played professionally overseas. He is a solid three point shooter, but not much better than that.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

23 isn't that old for a rookie

It’s the same age as a player who played 4 years of college and came out, which used to be pretty standard.

Over his very short career, Rudy’s averaged 2.7 made 3-pointers/36 min, shooting 38.7%. Over Reggie Miller’s career, he averaged 1.9 made 3-pointers/36 min, shooting 39.5%. Over Ray Allen’s career, he averaged 2.4 made 3-pointers/36 min, shooting 39.6%.

So, when compared to the two greatest 3-pt shooters ever, Rudy’s 3-pt% is less than 1% lower while launching at a higher volume. i don’t see how you can look at that and say Rudy’s anything but a great 3-pt shooter.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Watch him fucking play.

He’s not great at anything. Allen and Miller were focal points of their respective offenses for most of their careers, shooting tons of contested, late game/shot-clock threes on a consistent basis. If you’re telling me that Rudy’s on Miller’s and Allen’s offense, you’re wrong. Sometimes fans look at just the numbers and ignore every bit of common sense out there.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are many facets of the game where statistical analysis falls short of painting an accurate portrait of what's going on

3-pt shooting is not one of them. It’s pretty easy to tell who’s a good 3-pt shooter and who isn’t. You simply count up the makes and misses.

There are many things that Rudy is nowhere near as good at as Miller and Allen were. But in one area of the game, 3-pt shooting, Rudy matches up with anyone. Period.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, period

At the rate he was going his rookie year (2.9 made 3-pointers/36 min), if he’d averaged 36 mpg and played all 82 games, he would’ve made 238 3-pointers, which would’ve been the 6th highest single season mark ever. If he’d averaged 41 mpg and played all 82 games (lofty expectations, but not something that’s never been done), he would’ve broken Ray Allen’s single season record for the most 3-pointers made. There is no question that Rudy Fernandez is really, really good at shooting 3-pointers.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

In fairness, I don't think Rudy is or will ever be anything like Reggie or Ray-Ray

but you also have to consider Rudy’s only played 2 years in the league and never been given a chance to shine.

I think Rudy is better than given credit for – perhaps not as much as he given credit for here – but is no Reggie or Ray. I do think he’s an above average starting SG in the league who can’t get his minutes in and is the total wrong system.

A true friend stabs you in the front - Oscar Wilde

by dantheman3k on Aug 7, 2010 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure

But if he did have the midrange game of those players, he’d be a future hall-of-famer and we wouldn’t have a chance of acquiring him.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 8, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

really?

the thing that’s stopping Rudy fro the Hall of Fame is a mid range jumper?

uhhh… wow.

A true friend stabs you in the front - Oscar Wilde

by dantheman3k on Aug 8, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Uh, yes?

I don’t know why that seems so ridiculous to you. You’d consider Reggie Miller to be a hall-of-famer, right? Well name one thing that Miller, in his prime, did better than Rudy, besides score from midrange.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 8, 2010 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

his defense?

admittedly I haven’t seen a whole lot of Rudy, but I find it a hard pill to swallow that the difference between a good bench player and a hall of famer is a mid-range jumpshot.

A true friend stabs you in the front - Oscar Wilde

by dantheman3k on Aug 8, 2010 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Miller wasn't a lockdown defender by any means

And it’s not just “a mid-range jumpshot.” There’s obviously a lot more that goes into having a good midrange game than just being able to hit an open jumper. Kobe Bryant’s considered one of the best players of all time, and the only facet of his game that was ever truly special was his midrange game.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 8, 2010 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I started typing a reply

Then I realized it would be easier to name things Reggie Miller did worse than Fernadez. Which is rebound and that’s about it. Reggie Miller was better at everything else.

by tuluse on Aug 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

is that really the case?

what if by taking 4 less shots/36 player 2 allowed a better player to take 4 more shots?

by SidM on Aug 7, 2010 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

A 38% 3-pt% equates to a 57% eFG%

So for what you say to be true, the better player taking 4 more shots needs to have an eFG% higher than 57% for his shot to be a better one. For reference, Lebron’s eFG% was 54.5 last year.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 8, 2010 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

so suppose those 4 shots go to korver

who had a 59.8% eFG last year. wouldn’t that be more valuable than 4 more shots by someone less accurate?

by SidM on Aug 8, 2010 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

If that was the case then yes

But realistically that scenario’s pretty unlikely.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 8, 2010 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well,

if getting Rudy means having Asik and Kurt Thomas play major minutes, we’re probably better off without Rudy.

by dakoose on Aug 7, 2010 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

if rudy is the difference between ok and great then we have major problems

from now on instead of saying "go fuck yourself" im gunna just say "go join the heat"

by sin on Aug 7, 2010 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, man

we have to keep this alive as long as possible, hehe

"Michael Redd's owed 18.3 million next year. He can either opt out like an idiot or opt in like a douche bag." - NittanyCub

by Trey23 on Aug 7, 2010 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I still like T-Mac as well….I think its very important to have a player that can give 3-4 explosions off the bench in the post season. He doesn’t need 6-10 shots he can do some play making and the stage isn’t too big for him. (at least in that role)

"Well you're giving me the opportunity to agree with Bill Plaschke and Marriotti, I'm gonna pass" - Tim Cowlishaw

by Camry on Aug 7, 2010 5:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Opining for Greatness

Whether the Bulls get Rudy or not doesn’t really matter. He would become a piece of a four or five man wing rotation. There is only one way the Bulls become a great team and that is with Derrick Rose jumping into the top 5 player in the league conversation. All of my confidence this entire offseason has relied on my belief that Derrick Rose is a once in a generation type player. A freak point guard that this league has never seen. If he can jump into that upper echelon the Bulls will be able to compete for the East. If not they will have a nice season and compete for a 3 or 4 seed and win a playoff series or two. If Rose truly has added a three point shot he becomes UNDEFENDABLE. And adding Boozer who can play the pick and roll and Korver for spacing with Deng is going to make the Bulls offense look very good. Rose is the key, who cares about Rudy Fernandez?

by CreamoftheClass on Aug 7, 2010 6:35 PM CDT reply actions  

Who cares about Rudy Fernandez?

All of us Bulls fans that are bored and have nothing else to talk about during a loooong offseason.

by paxson43 on Aug 7, 2010 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

isnt rudy up for an extension the same time as rose?

from now on instead of saying "go fuck yourself" im gunna just say "go join the heat"

by sin on Aug 7, 2010 7:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Samardo Samuels for Rudy Fernandez

Had the Bulls actually signed Samuels they could’ve used him as leverage to trade for Fernandez. But they let him go to Cleveland. This organization just doesn’t have the foresight to do these kind of things.

by Kevin34 on Aug 7, 2010 7:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Samuels? What?

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 7, 2010 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

how could they have traded him?

his rights didn’t belong to the bulls or anything. so you can’t just sign a random free agent and then trade them immediately.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Aug 8, 2010 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

or are you saying to have replaced taj

in which case wtf?

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Aug 8, 2010 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Summer league

What was Samuels doing on the BULLS summer league roster if they didn’t have his rights?

by Kevin34 on Aug 8, 2010 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

i think they can invite anyone they want to a summer league roster

that’s why there are so many undrafted guys in the summer league. it’s like an extended tryout.

by SidM on Aug 8, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rudy is still a work in progress

Rudy has talent, but the only thing he’s proven he can do well in the NBA is hit the 3. Rudy needs to take better percentage shots, improve his defense, improve his ball handling, and not be afraid to go to the rim in the NBA. Rudy can improve his game, especially given he’s 6’6 and athleticaly talented. But, is Rudy motivated to improve his game or does he want to just give up and go back to Spain? I don’t know. That is why I would not trade Taj for Rudy. Taj is a proven NBA Starting Power Forward willing to improve his game and will be in the NBA for a very long time. Rudy is a risk for any team that gets him and is a work in progress shooting gaurd. Rudy is not part of Portland’s regular rotation anymore and if Portland does not want the Bulls generous offer of a first round pick for Rudy, then Bulls should just move on. Bulls will be fine with D. Rose and Boozer.

by MCREW on Aug 7, 2010 8:24 PM CDT reply actions  

If he is getting 30 per game, what is the breakdown?

PG: Rose 34, Watson 14
SG: Rudy 22, Brewer 24, Korver 2
SF: Deng 32, Rudy 8, Korver 8

I saw T2 at Walgreens in Deerfield he’s tall. if you’re wondering what his grocery list included: magnums, french vanilla ice cream and a 20 oz sprite

by Super-Structure on Aug 7, 2010 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really don't like having Korver and Rudy playing so many minutes,

because of their defensive deficiencies. Also, Brewer could turn out to be really in Thibs defense and the ultimate alley-oop partner for Derrick.

I saw T2 at Walgreens in Deerfield he’s tall. if you’re wondering what his grocery list included: magnums, french vanilla ice cream and a 20 oz sprite

by Super-Structure on Aug 7, 2010 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

You can minimize that though

By playing Rudy alongside Deng as much as possible and Brewer alongside Korver as much as possible, you make it so you always have at least one really good wing defender out there, allowing Korver/Rudy to take the easier matchup.

Also, as soon as one guy gets hurt (cough Deng cough), a lot of minutes open up.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Brewer alley-oop?

Have seen Brewer play quit a bit with Utah in the regular season and playoffs and have NEVER seen Brewer do an alley-oop with D-Will. Brewer gets points in transition and will hit a mid-range shot or two during the course of a game. Brewer isn’t someone that can carry the scoring load in stretches, but you can count on him getting like 10+ pts or so for the 30 minutes of time he gets on the court. He will NEVER be much more than that, IMHO.

by MCREW on Aug 7, 2010 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

It literally took me 5 minutes to find a youtube clip proving you ronge

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYWtzg1IhXM&feature=related

Only a couple alley-oops but lots of other examples of D-Will feeding Brewer for a dunk.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 11:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

There were plenty of half-court dunks in that clip though

And I’m not the one who said “Brewer alley-oop?” as if the idea of Brewer catching an alley-oop was silly.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 8, 2010 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry I don't make evaluations from Youtube clips

I make them by watching real games and how a person performs in those games. From youtube, Rudy is also a great finisher/dunker/ally-oop and does that alot during games too then, huh.

by MCREW on Aug 8, 2010 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nobody's asking for evaluations.

You said you’ve never seen Brewer do an alley-oop despite watching plenty of games. Clearly, you haven’t watched enough, and that’s all PoloPlaya was saying. He wasn’t asking for your scouting report on Brewer.

by dakoose on Aug 8, 2010 2:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey, um, dakoose, poloplaya,

can I hear your comments? I’d love to hear them.

hey, MCREW, can you not make this a personal argument and just stick to talking about basketball like a mature human being? That’d be swell. No one was attacking. Someone was attacking an argument you made that, as it turns out, was inaccurate and poor. Here’s the drill on what happens next: you let it go and then if in the season you’re right and he/they’re wrong, then you mention it. You don’t become a dick. Becoming a dick is the wrong response for anyone who isn’t yfBB.

A true friend stabs you in the front - Oscar Wilde

by dantheman3k on Aug 8, 2010 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I typed this up once but Mozilla crashed, so I'll do it again.

I like Brewer for this team, though I do wish he was better from outside. Then again, if he could shoot three’s he’d be awesome and we wouldn’t be able to afford him.

He’s a good compliment to a ball dominant guard like Rose, just like he was good alongside DWill. He’s (apparently) content with getting his points off of back-cuts, fast breaks, steals, alley-oops, etc. He’s a big bodied, athletic G/F who can defend, something we haven’t had in a long time, and something absolutely necessary given Derrick’s defensive issues. A lot of people talk about needing a three-point shooter alongside Derrick that he can drive and kick to well, having a guy that knows how to cut to the open spots when Derrick penetrates can be just as good. He’s played under Sloan and knows very well how to take advantage of his point guard’s penetration, and Derrick’s better in that department than any other PG in the league. Plus, Thibs coached Ray Allen and knows how to use guys that move well without the ball. Brewer should be very solid as a Bull.

by dakoose on Aug 8, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Completely agree

I love the Brewer pick up, and I’m surprised everybody thinks we need an assassin SG to contend. He is a good finisher, and that is an underrated skill- imagine how many layups Kurt missed last year, and add those to Derrick’s assist total. We are not a perfect team, but stop admitting defeat without seeing what we have. That’s not directed at anyone, but just a general statement of my confidence in the Bulls.

by jubaby on Aug 8, 2010 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Man, you're acting like an idiot.

dantheman explained it perfectly.

1)You said Brewer hadn’t caught lobs from D-Williams, a conclusion you reached because you claim you’ve never seen it while watching games.
2) Polo pointed out that bot only were you wrong, you were lazy, as you could have found lobs between D Will and RB in just 5 minutes.
3) You “rebutted,” and I use that term loosely, by insinuating that youtube clips don’t come from real games and that you don’t make evaluations from youtube videos, even though poloplaya didn’t make an evaluation. He just stated a fact: Brewer did catch plenty of alley-oops from DWill. So you defended yourself from a non-existent attack. Good work.

by dakoose on Aug 8, 2010 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

In 2008-2009 Brewer had 128 dunks.

That was the 8th highest in the NBA. (Tied with Lebron)

Since he was assisted on 69% of his inside shots a reasonable person would have to assume he was getting a decent portion of his dunks from lob passes.

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 8, 2010 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

You started no one was asking stuff

this is a blog. whether you like it or not people are free to make statements.

by MCREW on Aug 8, 2010 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd go

Rose 36 Watson 12
Rudy 28 Brewer 16 Watson 4
Deng 32 Brewer 4 Korver 12

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 7, 2010 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really would prefer to avoid Watson at two.

One, the small ball lineups rarely work; two you would have to line Watson up net to Rose which could minimize both their talents and leave a huge defensive hole.

I saw T2 at Walgreens in Deerfield he’s tall. if you’re wondering what his grocery list included: magnums, french vanilla ice cream and a 20 oz sprite

by Super-Structure on Aug 8, 2010 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Watson will not be getting double teamed

and Gordon and Rose were pretty bad defensively.

I saw T2 at Walgreens in Deerfield he’s tall. if you’re wondering what his grocery list included: magnums, french vanilla ice cream and a 20 oz sprite

by Super-Structure on Aug 8, 2010 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Watson’s better than Gordon defensively though. He’s short but he’s got a good wingspan (6’6"). It’s not ideal, but in limited stretches, it can work.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 8, 2010 1:42 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I feel like this doesn't use Brewer enough.

20 minutes a game for someone who, although is nowhere near a great player, fits nearly perfectly into our defensive-minded coach’s defensive-system. Maybe it’ll depend on the night, but I think Brewer will find his way into more than 20 mpg.

Although, maybe an all-defense lineup would feature Deng at PF? It’s weird to think about the possibilities. He’s a good outside defender but not exactly someone you’d want on some PFs, but I actually think on your outside non-post PFs (ie the mighty Bosh) he’d be good to defend them. We have a lot of quality depth and we have a lot of versatile players. Weird to think about lineups. Anxious for the season.

A true friend stabs you in the front - Oscar Wilde

by dantheman3k on Aug 8, 2010 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe it'll depend on the night...

I think that’s the key. Against Kobe and Wade, Brewer will play as many minutes as they do. On other nights, not so much.

by hlac on Aug 8, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have a hard time imagining...

The second guy signed in the offseason only getting 12 minutes a night…especially with what they paid Korver.

Brewer is a better player right now than Rudy, and a better fit in the starting lineup next to Rose, so he will be starting, probably getting closer to that 28 number you assigned to Rudy…who would be lucky to get the remaining 20.

Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 8, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Also wanna add.

If Bulls get Rudy, they’ll become a basketball junkie’s wet dream.

Right now, that team is OKC with Chicago being a close second.

Rudy puts them ahead

by Option27 on Aug 7, 2010 9:06 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Portland and Orlando are always in it as well...

and if Griffin turns out to be good and B. Diddy pulls his shit together the Clippers could be sleepers. The new baby team is Sacramento.

I saw T2 at Walgreens in Deerfield he’s tall. if you’re wondering what his grocery list included: magnums, french vanilla ice cream and a 20 oz sprite

by Super-Structure on Aug 7, 2010 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

How does everyone think about Marco Bellineli?

He avg .388 3 pt % in his career and can be a playmaker. He gets 2.3 mil next year and would be 3rd SG on roster behind Derozen/Barbosa and possibly Weems.

May still have enough money to trade just a 2nd round draft pick for him?

by K_yle33 on Aug 7, 2010 9:35 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I think this would be a good pickup...

he is an insane spot up shooter, and could end up as a pretty good trade chip if someone becomes available; plus no complaints about minutes. On the bad side, he is a pretty terrible defender and not nearly the athlete or playmaker that Rudy is.

I saw T2 at Walgreens in Deerfield he’s tall. if you’re wondering what his grocery list included: magnums, french vanilla ice cream and a 20 oz sprite

by Super-Structure on Aug 7, 2010 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Taj is really too good of a defender to give up for Rudy.

Clearly we have a deficiency at three point shooting that will take marked improvements from Rose, Deng, Watson (at least from last season) plus a strong year from Korver to even get us to ‘not the worst’ but we look to be one of the better defenses in the league next year and Taj will be a big reason why. If Rose steps it up (which he clearly is capable of doing) and Thibs lives up to his pedigree, we could be a top three defense; shooting can always be bought.

But anyway yfBB, I’m i near complete agreement, as per usual.

I saw T2 at Walgreens in Deerfield he’s tall. if you’re wondering what his grocery list included: magnums, french vanilla ice cream and a 20 oz sprite

by Super-Structure on Aug 7, 2010 10:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Watson shot 40% 2 years ago.

I’m expecting/hoping for him to be near that again.

"Michael Redd's owed 18.3 million next year. He can either opt out like an idiot or opt in like a douche bag." - NittanyCub

by Trey23 on Aug 7, 2010 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pistons interested in signing T-Mac

Sources say T-Mac might end up with Pistons

by MCREW on Aug 7, 2010 11:29 PM CDT reply actions  

Can we start the season please?

This offseason is so long that people are hyperventilating about adding bench players.

Ball 4!

by californiachicagoan on Aug 8, 2010 12:02 AM CDT reply actions  

My thing with Taj is that he becomes more valuable with the signing of Boozer.

Boozer has his injury history and it might not show up this season but down the line it’s just going to happen and Taj is going to have to fill in.

by SoulEater7 on Aug 8, 2010 2:26 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Honestly, I would just try and play this season out and hand Jamal Crawford part of the MLE next offseason

Rehabilitated? It's just a bullshit word. So go ahead and stamp your forms, sonny, and stop wasting my time. Because to tell you the truth, I don't give a shit.

by Teh Immortal Batman on Aug 8, 2010 3:44 AM CDT reply actions  

the guy is really bad

many coaches , like Pop, who overvalue veterans take him on a one year contract and then don’t resign him because he is bad. The worst signing of the summer for the Bulls.

by biolb on Aug 8, 2010 3:51 AM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Settle down, man

Yeah, signing a 35% 3pt career shooter who’s above average on defense to the 5th guard role at 1yr guaranted vet min, that still allows the Bulls to go out and sign another player at the vet min.

And he was SOOO BADDD and Popovich hated him so much that he started him for 50 games.

by kozzer on Aug 8, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

rec

"Michael Redd's owed 18.3 million next year. He can either opt out like an idiot or opt in like a douche bag." - NittanyCub

by Trey23 on Aug 9, 2010 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Has anyone asked Tom Thibodeau?

I’m not sure if Rudy fits into Tom’s plans. He is an offense and steals oriented two guard who does not defend one-on-one all that well. Maybe he could be integrated into a team defensive scheme under Tibs, but that remains to be seen. On the other hand, Rudy playing next to Rose could be dynamic offensively, so I hope the Bulls don’t give up on the idea without considering the possible positive contributions that Rudy could make to the team.

"It's a team game." Please, feel free to factor that into your statistical analysis!

by KINGofMACct on Aug 8, 2010 4:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Rudy as xfib is a want.

I totally agree with xFIB. we need taj cause if boozer goes down for any time we need a pf who has had some success. This bulls team honestly reminds me of the pistons team just that they are not those retarded pistons, If we can get rudy i would be happy. the thing i am worried about is if he does not get the minutes he demands then what happens. We had tyrus, gray(the scrub), tim thomas, hughes, etc all complain of no minutes. i just think that johnson who was drafted higher than taj did not mess with chemistry by complaining. It took noah two whole years before he became my favorite player on this team. rudy is not going to be in our future plans so why mess with it now. Brewer is our starting 2 and that was already promised him. why mess with it. lets see what happens. we are worried about miami but lets these guys gel and play team ball. as is we can beat boston, atlanta, and orlando. in the east. I see us in the finals against orlando or miami.

Bulls NBA Contenders By 2010

by glycen on Aug 8, 2010 1:03 PM CDT reply actions  

id argue rudy is just as much as a want as taj

I think our offense isnt balanced at all, off the bench our best offensive player may be korver. At the sg spot we are gonna be forced to choose offense or defense. We have a nice bench, but nothing that fits well with anything else. Taj is good, but i dont like this idea or notion that he is irreplaceable. Louis Amundson isnt a bad backup pf, we can sign him still. He can rebound, he can defend. Asik, Noah, Kurt Thomas, non of those guys are exclusively one big man position, they can move from c to pf and vice versa.

depth chart-depth grade

Rose/watson-B (watson is too much of an unknown still to me)
Brewer/Korver/Bogans-C minus (korver cant play defense, and while bogan has the complete skills, his efficiency may be worse than hinrich on both ends of the court)
Deng/JJ/Korver-C (saved mainly cuz of deng, and jj i have hope for..for some reason)
Boozer/Taj/Thomas-A (taj is a great backup)
Noah/Asik/Thomas-B (noah is awesome, hard to say how good asik will be)

Add rudy to this roster, and trade taj and sign Louis, and suddenly the depth grade for all positions turns into B (since rudy can play some 3, and you are then able to move brewer to 3 while rudy plays two.)

I dont care what the D.N.A. Says, the Guy wearing number 12 Cannot be Kirk Hinrich, he is definetly Kurt. Kirk can actually play basketball!

by piccolomair on Aug 8, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Free agents left

Just went through the agents left for the start of the season. Bogans looks pretty good from the lot left. The big men left boone,kwame and amundsen are pretty much it. But if rudy comes through good if not then i would go for amundsen. alot of energy goes a long way especially when we have a noah on our team. man the bulls are going to be good this year.

Bulls NBA Contenders By 2010

by glycen on Aug 8, 2010 6:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Bulls Can't Shoot, especially 3s. - Hinrich shoots as well as Rudy. - Anthony Morrow was the guy!

Bulls are a team that struggled to score last year:

24th in scoring at 97.5 pts per game.
23rd in overall FG percentage at 45.1%.
28th in 3pt percentage at 33%.
29th in 3s made at 4.3 per game.
30th in 3pt differential. – Bulls made -2.8 fewer 3s per game than their opponents and shot -7.5 fewer 3s than their opponents.

The 3 pt shot has become a more important part of the NBA game in the last 5-7 years – more are taken and more are made than in the past. With that in mind – forget about Rudy Fernandez. Anthony Morrow was the ‘shooter’ Bulls missed out on.

Among players attempting at least 4 treys per game, Anthony Morrow led the NBA at 45.6%. He is one of the PUREST SHOOTERS in the entire NBA. While Bulls were waiting for Orlando to match the J.J. Redick offer sheet, New Jersey signed Morrow to a 3-year/$12 million contract. Korver shoots a higher percentage, but took only 2 treys per game – and more importantly you need 2 or 3 good shooters to really pressure the defense and space the court.

Morrow is a gunslinger who also shoots a very high percentage – THAT IS RARE. His 2pt percentage is also very high, and he’s an 88% FT shooter. Did I mention he’s a great shooter?!? Look at his stats:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/m/morroan01.html

Morrow is so much better than Rudy Fernandez it’s a joke. Rudy is WAY OVERRATED. Bulls should have signed Morrow and then both Bogans and Rudy are not necessary. Morrow is not returning to Spain and would willingly come off the bench. Morrow sharing the SG role with Ronnie Brewer would have been a good fit. Much like Thabo and James Harden on Oklahoma City, one defensive SG, one offensive SG.

Last year on 3s: Hinrich 37.1%, Rudy 36.8%, Bogans 35.7%. Yeah, that’s right. Rudy is no better a 3pt shooter than Hinrich! – "But Rudy shot 40% the year before?" Well so did Hinrich!

Now here are the REAL SHOOTERS: Anthony Morrow 45.6% (taking 4.5 per game), Kyle Korver 53.6% and 48.7% in the playoffs (taking 2.1 per game). Bulls should have signed them both!!! Then they’re no longer the worst 3pt shooting team in the NBA.

by Edward- on Aug 9, 2010 11:54 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree

I said that last season, before and during freeagency that the bulls should go after Morrow, but the bulls let the nets get him at a bargain price………..i’m not mad at the bulls for going after Redick but they should have offer Morrow a contract too…………instead the bulls have bogans as a backup, he may be a better defender but he not a better outside shooter like Morrow and the bulls already had sign Brewer to start and play defense

by Jermal on Aug 9, 2010 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Overall, Bulls did not improve their 3pt shooting, which was/is one of their biggest weaknesses.

Yes, this is not Monday morning quarterbacking by me. I was saying to my buddies before the Redick offer that Morrow was the man! Then when Bulls made the Redick offer I said, “Bulls should make an offer to Morrow now before they get an answer from Orlando because they have plenty of cap space and Morrow could be easily traded later if they get Redick.”

But Bulls didn’t make an offer to Morrow, Orlando matched, and it is their BIG BLUNDER of this free agency, in my opinion. Because even though they signed Korver, they didn’t improve their 3pt shooting – strange as that sounds its true! We lost Salmons and Hinrich (not to mention Gordon from the year before) and we sign a defensive starting SG in Brewer. Bogans is an average shooter and little Watson is no SG. So Korver just keeps us even with last year – especially given he’s a low volume shooter and coming off the bench.

Remember we need 2 or 3 shooters who are BETTER THAN HINRICH – 42% and up, not equal or worse. Bogans and Rudy are not better than Hinrich!!! The percentages don’t lie!

Signing both Morrow and Korver would have been a major upgrade in 3pt shooting. Along with the improvement at PF with Boozer that would have been a successful off-season.
As it stands now Bulls didn’t really improve at SG (trading away Salmons, Hinrich and James Anderson 17th pick; and signing Brewer and Bogans), and didn’t improve on their "worst in the NBA" 3pt shooting.

No one in the media talks about this. They just talk about Rudy. LOL

by Edward- on Aug 9, 2010 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Bogans and Rudy are not better than Hinrich!!! The percentages don’t lie!

Except when they do. Efficiency almost always goes down as usage goes up.

3 point attempts per 36 minutes
Rudy: 7
Morrow: 5.5
Boguns: 4.5
Hinrich: 4.1

Rudy is taking much more difficult shots. (including a ton of half court attempts at the buzzer) He has an incredibly fast release and has a somewhat unique talent of being able to get his three point attempts off basically whenever he wants. That’s a different skill than just shooting open threes and no one should expect his outside shooting to be equally efficient as someone (Hinrich) who takes 40% less shots.

Morrow is obviously a fantastic shooter, although I would argue he’s a defensive liability while Rudy is somewhat of an asset.

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 9, 2010 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Where are your studies that say efficiently almost always goes down as usage goes up?

In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).

Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.

by tyger1147 on Aug 10, 2010 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think the idea

is that as you take a larger share of the offense, you get a larger share of the defense’s attention.

by SidM on Aug 10, 2010 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

bah, my fault

i was thinking of increased minutes, not usage. sorry

In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).

Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.

by tyger1147 on Aug 10, 2010 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Accurate Numbers Analysis

So you’re arguing that Rudy Fernandez is a defensive asset? LOL The Trailblazers are rolling on the floor laughing! Both Rudy and Morrow are regarded as poor defenders. To call either one a defensive asset results in a loss of credibility.

If Rudy is taking much more difficult shots then that’s a liability and he needs to be more selective. 3pt shooters in the mid 30s% are a dime-a-dozen. It’s the shooters who are consistently over 40% that are elite and valuable. There are only about 15 such shooters in the entire NBA. Bulls could have added two of these elite shooters and missed an excellent opportunity.

Regarding 3pt shots per 36 minutes here are the actual numbers and percentages:

Morrow 5.5 shots/36 min at 45.6%.
Korver 4.1 shots/36 min at 53.6%
Rudy 6.7 shots/36 min at 36.8%
Hinrich 4.1 shots/36 min at 37.1%
Bogans 4.6 shots/36 min at 35.7%

These are two different classes of shooters.

Additionally, neither Korver nor Morrow will complain about coming off the bench playing 20 some minutes per game. Rudy has threatened to leave for Spain.

by Edward- on Aug 10, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Did I really make you laugh out loud?
LOL The Trailblazers are rolling on the floor laughing! Both Rudy and Morrow are regarded as poor defenders. To call either one a defensive asset results in a loss of credibility.

While I’m not any more qualified than the next guy, I have watched every single minute Rudy has played in the NBA. I specifically called him “somewhat of an asset” on defense. Which is exactly what he is when he’s paired up against prototypical shooting guards and not small forwards or point guards. What exactly has your scouting assessment of Rudy been these past two years? Have you been taking some copious notes on Rudy’s defensive strengths and weaknesses? What specifically have you observed? I’m dying to know.

Secondly, Rudy never “threatened to leave for Spain”. He can’t leave for two more season because Spain honors NBA contracts. He’s basically said he wouldn’t mind returning to Europe at some point and he wishes he could play more minutes. Big fucking deal. Plus the Spanish papers he interviewed with are notorious for sensationalizing stories, and misquoting people. No one is exactly sure what Rudy said.

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 10, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't say Rudy is good at defense

But Morrow is horrible.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 10, 2010 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

That sounds about right.

Rudy is at least passable on defense and does some good things from time to time. No one is calling him a stopper, but I don’t think he’s at Morrow’s level either.

by Nick Van Excellent on Aug 10, 2010 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Once again you guys are underestimating the fact that Fernandez

played in a very slow McMillan system. Rudy is at his best in a faster offense. His rookie year was really good because he played on the second unit which had more emphasis on running the ball ahead with S. Rodriguez at the PG position. I am not sure about how your system is but if Rose likes to push the ball ahead a lot then Rudy is a great asset, especially since Rose can catch defences off guard during transition and catch Rudy for open 3s all day, plus Rudy can make plays in transition himself. During half court offense, Rudy is still really good at running off screens, so he isnt completely depended on one style of play

Rookie year 40% 3s. 160 3s playing 25 mins a game. and 10.5pts a game is pretty good for a bench rookie.

WITH ODEN ON OUR SIDE

by bowdown on Aug 11, 2010 7:09 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

any movement on the Fernandez acquistion yet?

I’ve been checking back here almost everyday to see somthing new emerge.

by Da Bears2333333 on Aug 11, 2010 4:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Iggy & Rudy

I’m tired of Portland dragging this Rudy deal out. Check out this 4 team trade and tell me what you think… CLICK:
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2f4kape

Portland gets: Brandan Wright(PF)+ Bulls 2nd rd pick & a open roster spot to sign PG Patrick Mills

Chicago gets: Andre Iguodala(SG)+Rudy Fernandez(SG). Iggy & D-Rose= Best NBA backcourt) Both will be in MVP discussion this year (Move Ronnie Brewer to SF)

Philly gets: Monta Ellis(PG that will score 25pts/game)Cap Space over next 4yrsBulls 1st rd pick+James Johnson(6’9" Shooter/Shot Blocker for free with trade exception)

GSW gets: Luol Deng (Star 6’9" SF they need badly) 17ppg 7rpg & great defense+ Jerryd Bayless (SG/PG Solid high flying scorer to replace Ellis)

by Jay Everett on Aug 11, 2010 6:20 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

112_small
Bulls at Boston Celtics: Game Preview #30
Small
Making a Play for Pau

Recent FanPosts

Blogabull_s_small
Around the NBA 2/11: Lin vs. Rubio
Drose2_small
Bulls at Charlotte Bobcats: Game Preview #29
Monkey_small
Bulls at New Orleans Hornets: Game Preview #28
Nba-media-day-2011-12_small
Sad Bogans
Hinrich_rose_small
Throwing Shit At the Wall or Its Trade Machine Season
Zack_ryder_small
Around the NBA Thread 2/5; I Don't Care About The Super Bowl.
Small
Kyle Korver: The Importance of Warming Up the Hot Sauce
Small
Bulls at Milwaukee Bucks: Game Preview #26

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Links

"Best NBA Blogroll"
-- Dan Shanoff

The Essentials:
Bulls.com
NBA.com
HoopsHype
BallHype
ESPN.com NBA

Workin' the Beat:
KC Johnson - Tribune (blog)
John Jackson - Sun-Times (blog)
Mike McGraw - Daily Herald (blog)
Nick Friedell -  ESPNChicago.com
Sam Smith - Bulls.com
Aggrey Sam - CSNChicago.com


More Bulls Blogs/Forums:
Thank You Isiah
Chicago Bulls Podcasters
Bulls Confidential
By the Horns
Bullish Thoughts
Chicago Bulls KY
Pippen Ain't Easy
RealGM Bulls Forum
SportsTwo Bulls Forum

Blogging the Association:
(League Wide)
True Hoop
HoopsAnalyst
Give Me the Rock
The Basketball Jones
NBA Fanhouse
Hoops Addict
SBNation.com - NBA
ProBasketballTalk
ShamSports
Ball Don't Lie
The Painted Area


(Team-Centric)
Queen City Hoops

Bobcats Baseline
Knickerblogger.net    
Sixers' Shots
Forum Blue and Gold
SuperSonicSoul
Hornets247.com 
SonicsCentral.com 
ClipperBlog.com  
The Nugg Doctor
Loy's Place
Reds Army
Need4Sheed
THE WIZZNUTZZ
RaptorsForum.com
TWolvesBlog.com
Spurs Dynasty
David's Memphis Grizzlies Blog
The Bratwurst
Sixers Journal
Sixers 4 Guidos 
3 Shades of Blue  
CavsNews.com
RaptorTalk
Deceptively Quick
TheLakersNation.com
Utah Jazzer Blog
KnicksDefense.com
T. Jose Caldeford
Hoopinion
RaptorBlog.com
Suns @NBAWeblog.com
The Cowhide Globe
Stepien Rules
Project Spurs
Raptors Republic
Dino Nation Blog
Lake Show Life
Valley of the Suns
The KnicksBlog.com
Big Lakers Fan
Roundball Mining Company
Cavs: The Blog
48 Minutes of Hell
Daily Thunder
Piston Powered
The Two Man Game
PistonsNationBlog.com
Cowbell Kingdom.com
Hot Hot Hoops
NetsAreScorching
Celtics Hub
Orlando Magic Daily
Philadunkia
Truth About It
Always Miller Time
Slippery When Nets
Eight Points Nine Seconds
Howlin' T-Wolf
Red 94

MSM NBA blogs:

Ira Winderman (Heat)
Jason Quick (Blazers)
IndyStar.com (Pacers)
Michael Cunningham (Hawks) 
Full-Court Press (Pistons)
Jonathan Feigen (Rockets)
Rick Bonnell (Bobcats)
Jazz Notes
Chris Herrington (Grizzlies)
Orlando Sentinel
Michael Lee (Wizards)
Alan Hahn (Knicks)   
Doug Smith (Raptors)
Marc Berman (Knicks)
Al Iannazzone (Nets)

For the Statheads:
Basketball-Reference.com
APBR Discussion
Knickerblogger's Stat Page
82Games.com
Doug's Stats
Popcorn Machine
HoopData


Other Resources:

HoopsHype Salaries
SportsTwo Salaries
ESPN.com Trade Machine
RealGM: NBA Draftpicks Owed
ShamSports.com Salaries
DraftExpress

 


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger