What percentage of your shots should 3pt shots
I had a discussion with a few friends, and we talked about, what percentage of a teams' shots should be 3pt shots. A friend of mine said 50%, I thought that was the dumbest statement I ever heard. He said that equals champoinship. The consensus of the group was between 15-20%, what does everybody else think?
over 1 year ago
QUINTEN DALEY
23 comments
1 recs |
Comments
15-20%?
I don’t think we can determine this figure yet, until we see the Bulls in action showing off their player roles. Just because Korver, Brewer, and Boozer played this way with the Jazz doesn’t mean they’ll be mirror images with the Bulls.
We definitely don’t have a 3pt minded offense. We have Korver, but he’s an off the bench player and Rose shouldn’t be taking so many 3s since he should be more of a playmaker. Deng has definitely improved his 3, but I think a SF should be more of a slasher. I’ve only watched Watson a couple times, but I’m pretty sure he’s good at 3’s.
I think we are a slashing/paint minded offense. We have Bogans?, Brewer, Deng, Johnson, and Rose to slash. We have Boozer and Noah in the post.
We have a mid-range game with Boozer, Deng, Gibson, Korver, Rose, and Thomas.
I think our biggest offensive weakness is 3-pt shooting. It’s obvious. We are missing the Ray Allen or Ben Gordon to have a complete offense. From my observation of the Bulls pre-season, I think our 3pt shot selection % will be 15-20% However, I know this will change.
Remember last season? It took millions of games for the Bulls to have a set in stone lineup. However, we had a rookie coach, Del Negro, but now we have an experienced assistant coach that’ll hopefully also be good as a head coach. I think he’ll be fine with this transition because I’m sure he’s taken over as the head coach many times when the head coach was ejected and he’s pretty much the head coaches’ bitch.
we need another 3pt shooting threat
Korver is our only true 3pt shooter. Opponents will able to have plenty of time to think and counter anything Korver does when he comes off the bench for his use of 3’s.
Again, I see this as the only weakness of our offense.
by benny the bull on Aug 30, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Bogans can shoot the 3...
And I think Lu will be shooting more this season…
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
Gibson is another post threat.
Boozer has stolen all the PF attention that i keep forgetting Gibson even exists!
by benny the bull on Aug 30, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Shouldn't this be a fanpost?
And I think that’s kind of an absurd question. It depends on the makeup of the team.
Unless you were talking about the Bulls specifically?
by tuff-gong on Aug 30, 2010 1:14 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I say 0%.
100% of your shots should be dunks.
by arjoseph on Aug 30, 2010 1:25 PM CDT reply actions 6 recs
Unless Luol Deng's on the other team.
Pat Riley is the devil.
by Poloplaya14 on Aug 30, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Given the dearth of 3 Pt shooters on the team and what pct teams shot at last year, 15-20% sounds right
Team ▴ 3PA/FGA Off Rank ORL 35.05% 4 NYK 31.20% 16 IND 27.79% 26 HOU 26.55% 17 PHO 26.08% 1 MIL 25.91% 23 CLE 24.75% 6 GSW 23.78% 14 SAS 23.23% 9 NOH 22.98% 18 BOS 22.77% 15 LAL 22.72% 11 DEN 22.72% 3 AVE 22.19% DAL 22.16% 10 LAC 22.07% 28 MIA 21.88% 19 POR 21.51% 7 ATL 21.39% 2 CHA 21.11% 24 TOR 21.07% 5 PHI 20.59% 20 SAC 20.06% 22 OKC 18.54% 13 UTA 18.36% 8 WAS 18.28% 25 NJN 18.08% 30 DET 18.02% 21 MIN 17.06% 29 CHI 15.62% 27 MEM 14.84% 12
Doesn’t appear, though, that there’s any relation between % of shots taken from behind the arc and offensive efficiency
Well, isn't what LeBron did last night the living embodiment of The Secret, leaving millions on the table and turning himself into a hometown villain, all for the sake of winning?
Neil Paine, basketball-reference.com
by snley on Aug 30, 2010 1:45 PM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Good stats...
The two best teams (LAL/BOS) shot just a little over the league average of 22.19%…and only a couple of good teams (OKC, UTA) shot less than 20% of their shots from there…
I would say at least 20% of a team’s shots should be from 3 point range.
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
youre friends with don nelson??
from now on instead of saying "go fuck yourself" im gunna just say "go join the heat"
by sin on Aug 30, 2010 3:10 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Heyoooo
eat. sleep. hoop. repeat. become legendary.
by Sir Buckets on Aug 30, 2010 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
HE SAID THAT = CHAMPIOMCHIP?!?!?!
SWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Uncle Stanley McGoober on Aug 30, 2010 3:29 PM CDT reply actions
shouldnt it depend on your personnel? 15% seems low though.
"If I was to answer that question honestly, I would have to lie to you."
- Isiah Thomas, when asked if any teams were interested in trading for Shandon Anderson
Actually
Now that I think of it, I think our offense is VERY solid. Nowadays, the most successful teams are full of slashing to attract fouls and for And 1’s. Players are much more aggressive than before and it’s the easy way to get a 3pts rather than the low % 3pt shot.
Sure, if we got a sharpshooter SG, the Bulls would be championship contendors, but it’s not a must.
The Magic couldn’t win a championship because their only slashing/paint threats were Turkgolu and Howard. Last season, they had Nelson, Carter, and Howard. They relied more on lower % jumpshots to finish games rather than high % slashing. I believe this was their biggest weakness.
Even though they have one of the best Centers in the NBA, a Center shouldn’t be the go to guy to finish games. They signed Carter, but he’s much out of his prime to be like Kobe.
Here's a thought
Think about this. The league eFG% average from specific floor spots are:
Rim Close Mid Long 3pt 61.0 44.1 39.8 39.6 53.2
So this means that 100 shots from at the rim would net 122 pts or 100 shots from 3pt would net 106.4 pts. Hoopdata has a stat called XeFG%. Basically, this gives the expected eFG% if you shot exactly the league average from all spots on the floor. It is basically a measure of shot selection since it will reward teams that shoot a ton of threes and shots at the rim. Teams that force up a ton of threes or contested shots at the rim will shoot a worse eFG% in reality, but this is a good measure of shot selection. Here are teams ordered by XeFG% (good shot selection) and then their overall team offensive rank.
Team/ORank CHA 24 ORL 2 HOU 18 NYK 15 UTH 8 DEN 5 CLE 4 LAC 27 MEM 17 BOS 13 PHO 1 SAS 9 NOR 16 NJN 20 SAC 22 IND 26 LAL 11 OKC 12 PHI 20 ATL 3 TOR 6 DET 21 GSW 14 MIL 23 MIN 29 CHI 28 DAL 10 POR 7 MIA 19 WAS 25
Again, there seems to be very little correlation. Charlotte sure plays the right way, but they simply don’t have the offensive players to back up their play. That said, aside from ATL, TOR, and POR, most good offensive teams are playing the right way. But overall, you still need personnel to back up play.
"Mental toughness is to physical as four is to one." - Bob Knight
by DRose01 on Aug 30, 2010 5:03 PM CDT reply actions 4 recs
I was just curious if you knew if people kept track of such things...
but do you know if there is an opp eFG% stat based on shot type. Essentially, I am wondering if a certain type of shot may make your defense less efficient due to the situation you find yourself in after they rebound the ball…
Hmmm
That’s a trickier one! You could just check that on your own a bit. Go to hoopdata and see which teams take the most threes or most shots at the rim and compare it to how many fast break buckets they give up. That would be a tough thing to do, but it is possible. Not sure how well fast break stats are tracked.
"Mental toughness is to physical as four is to one." - Bob Knight
right now this site doesn have anything (which is confusing because they did during last offseason), but during the last 2 seasons they have tracked
fastbreak points: http://www.teamrankings.com/nba/stats/?cat=team&pan=2052
"If I was to answer that question honestly, I would have to lie to you."
- Isiah Thomas, when asked if any teams were interested in trading for Shandon Anderson












