Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Breaking: Hornets, Rockets, Pacers & Nets working on 4 team deal. Ariza to NO. C. Lee to HOU. Collison & Posey to IND. Murphy to NJ.

almost 2 years ago Marlo2_tiny Illini15 176 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

New Orleans could look pretty good next year if this happens

Well, their starting five at least:

Paul
Thornton
Ariza
West
Okafor

Deng/Boozer/Noah: All your rebound are belong to us.

by Illini15 on Aug 11, 2010 12:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Really?

I think they could have gotten more for Collison than Ariza and his mediocre contract.

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

well, apparently not

not that the proof is always in the pudding, but I wouldn’t be surprised if interest in Collison was that lukewarm. Think of all the young PGs in the league.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

If it happens, great move

for the Pacers, they finally get the PG they needed

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah.. kinda sucks for us.

I mean we still have a better PG, but never fun to see a rival get better w/o really giving anything up.

Murphy was going to be long gone before they improved anyways.

by Grinder in Training on Aug 11, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Using the raw +/- tool from YaoPau

It at least looks like Troy Murphy kind of sucks.

by Basketball on Aug 11, 2010 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you look only at +/-, yes Murphy looks shitty. But he's solid by PER and he's one of the best

defensive rebounding players in the whole league. His one on one defense sucks ass, but he’s still one of the Pacers best players, which is partially a reflection of how bad the Pacers are, honestly.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I suppose I won't argue that he is one of the more talented ones...

but a big hole at pg, vs a hole at pf, I don’t see how they come out worse this year.

Not only that but they have foster who is also an extremely good rebounder and probably doesn’t get enough credit for the job he does.

I understand Murphy can space the floor… but he really does suck a whole lot on defense. I guess overall I think the pacers made a good move.

by Basketball on Aug 11, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

A big hole...

Ready to be filled by Psycho-T!!!

Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 11, 2010 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Every time he dunks next year

I want him to glare into the nearest camera and scream “I AM PSYCHOTIC”

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.. but his contract is up after this year..

So it doesn’t matter. They weren’t going to be good this year. Hence my saying he was going to be gone before they improved. Who cares if they are slightly better or worse this year?

The short term is irrelevant to the Pacers. They are bad either way in the near future. And if anything, being worse this year is a plus, might give them a better draft pick.

I don’t see how adding a piece to their core going forward, while only losing a guy who has an expiring contract, doesn’t make them better. If the Pacers really want Murphy back, they can just sign him again next summer.

by Grinder in Training on Aug 11, 2010 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

So why do you care what the Pacers did? They aren't competing with the Bulls for years

it does not “suck for us.” The Bulls are still a lot better than the Pacers at every position besides small forward.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

They are still playing us 4 times a year

It doesn’t help us in any way to have our direct competitors improved. For one year they may be worse, but every year after that, they are now much better. That can only hurt the Bulls.

by Grinder in Training on Aug 11, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Perhaps, but they still are an inferior team

Posey does not play hard unless he is on a title contender and Collison is a turnover machine. As long as Rose has upped his defense I do not foresee much trouble from Indiana.

I did already pick them to make the 8th seed so I think this helps that prediction at least. :-P

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 11, 2010 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Certainly no trouble this year, that's a given.

But with Murphy, they weren’t going to be a concern either. But say you add a solid draft pick, to a core that now includes Collison, and they have a ton of cap space going forward, maybe they have something.

by Grinder in Training on Aug 11, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

True. I also like the pieces they have right now

I am actually a pretty big Hansbrough fan and of course Granger can play. Hibbert is looking to take a big step this year too. One more piece and they could be something.

I still think the Bulls are going to be the team to beat in the Central for years though. I just think the core is too solid right now and can only get better.

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 11, 2010 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're way overrating Collison if you think they are now "much better."

He helps, but he’s pretty average all things considered (good offense, below average defense) and he got to run an offense where he absolutely dominated the ball down in NO, which inflated his stats.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think it helps Indiana long-term

and good for them. But in terms of playoff spots this season it’s probably not an issue.

I’m of course granting the assumption that any East team being better is inherently bad for the Bulls.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think it helps long term as much as others do. They locked up an average player

on a rookie deal which is a win, but he’s not going to change their overall prospects all that much, especially with the glut of talented point guards coming through the league in the last few years.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Basically, I view Darren Collison as equivalent to Damon Stoudamire

who was a fine player, but was essentially average for his whole career.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Adding an average player on a rookie contract

While only giving up an expiring contract is a good deal when you are not playing to win this season.

Teams in the Bulls division making good deals not help the Bulls.

by Grinder in Training on Aug 11, 2010 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

It doesn't help, but it doesn't really matter. The Pacers have a LOT of

work still to do to remake their roster to be anywhere close to the Bulls level and I don’t even think as much of the current Bulls as many here do.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Of course they do

But now now they have one less position to worry about.

by Grinder in Training on Aug 11, 2010 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Collison perhaps could be Ariza in a few years

But I would guess a somewhat still unknown kid who had a very nice rookie year could get more than they got for him that’s all. I would have waited until the deadline to deal Collison (Though maybe they know he won’t get the burn with CP3 back—I think CP3 will be hurt again :)).

Posey’s contract was 2 yrs left which while its a bad contract could set ’em up for changes……..crazy thing is it has a 10% kicker…..

I just don’t think Ariza is a big upgrade for the cap money he’ll take up, esp when they lose a bargaining chip in a future trade.

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Ariza has one of the best contracts in the game

4 years, $28 mil for a decent 25 year old who plays 36mpg? Hard to imagine he’s worth anything less than that.

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I don't know

He’s been traded an awful lot…..

Plus he’s merely average….reeks of a Kirk thing for the Hornets down teh line….especially when I think they could be players for better players once Peja expires this year.

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

since when do humans play 48 mpg though?

I think that slightly offsets everything. I still am on Yao’s side of it… but that seemed a little off.

A true friend stabs you in the front - Oscar Wilde

by dantheman3k on Aug 11, 2010 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good argument

But I’d like to think via the draft they can find a better 3 for cheaper down the line…..

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

But in the new cap if it falls, etc world with the neg.

His salary could look even worse right?

He is average….I’ll agree it’s a “fair” deal, but typically with young somewhat unknown players like Collison—who was a pleasant surprise, there is a bit of an “unfair” deal at present as you weigh that upside.

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was traded twice...

While on a cheap rookie contract…once as salary fodder in a Steve Francis deal, then to LA for Brian Cook and Mo Evans…

Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 11, 2010 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Teams don't generally trade

Young upside guys for “salary fodder” and then again for * the great Mo Evans and Brian Cook *….

Then trade again for journeyman in the making Courtney Lee, especially when Lee’s a backup with Kevin Martin on board.

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

His contract is up after this year

They have Peja expiring, sounded to me like a S&T chip for salaries next year should they want to go that route….now that’s gone.

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

damn, you're fast :)

I’m so happy for trade news.

Interest abounds, mostly on how collectively we (whatever that means) thought that Collison’s trade value would be higher, and/or how much Houston must’ve not liked that Ariza signing to bail after one year.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 12:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Ariza was paid based off

his hot shooting in the finals, therefore Houston Jerome James him, Ariza can defend but he is a horrible shooter, that doesn’t take advantage of his strengths on offense, which is using his athletecism to get to the rim, instead of launching 3pt shots.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's much better than Jerome James

He’s very athletic, and a solid defender, and wasn’t just a 1 series playoff wonder.

But he’s not great either, and I think seems to have some attitude issues esp on him leaving Orlando and then leaving New York after it seemed both teams had a coup for a young player with upside to deal him for nothing….

Granted Isiah was one of ’em.

I know why he left the Lakers…..that was about chasing the $$ which anyone would do perhaps not named Shaq these days (I am still a bit surprised Shaq didn’t go to Atlanta for $5M/per).

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

right

but didn’t he end up taking from houston what the lakers were offering too? i thought the lakers offered him the MLE, he said no, so they signed artest, leaving him in the dust. then he went to houston for the MLE.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Aug 11, 2010 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Really like it for Indiana

not that it gets them to the playoffs or anything, but before this they were literally bringing everyone back, and that was just sad. And obviously they needed a new young PG and were looking at one all offseason.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 12:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Me too

If Indiana’s not careful, they could actually sneak into the playoffs.

And what’s the over/under on how long until Noah lays out Posey?

by kthrapp on Aug 11, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

More like NJ

Courtney Lee for Troy Murphy? I don’t understand why NJ would make that move.

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Probably

because they just signed Morrow and Outlaw this offseason, and they can start T-Will at SG if they want. Those three at the 2/3 is decent enough, and Lee isn’t really that great anyways. Their only PF is Favors, and he’s super raw.

Deng/Boozer/Noah: All your rebound are belong to us.

by Illini15 on Aug 11, 2010 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can see Prokorov wanting to make the playoffs this year

and maybe he does that with Lee being just a backup and Murphy as a 30mpg starter. The possibility of a playoff run isn’t worth the 10 mil of added salary. Besides, Lee had two more years left on a supercheap rookie deal, and had a pretty decent year last year (12.8 PER, good defense).

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why would NJ want an expiring deal?

Lee makes like 1.5 mil per year, and NJ is under the cap.

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Based on?

Pacers DRatings with Murphy on/off court…

2010: 110.0 on, 106.0 off
2009: 112.4 on, 107.3 off
2008: 109.8 on, 107.4 off
2007: 111.1 on, 105.3 off

My guess is Murphy is one of the worst defenders in the NBA. Also, he’s never been on a team that’s won more than 38 games. I know there’s a lot of love for him here because of his style, but he seems like a crappier version of the Maggette types that put up big numbers and don’t help their teams. I think Lee could realistically be better now, and comparing salaries (Lee: 2 years, $3.5 mil, Murphy: 1 year, $12 mil) I don’t think it’s close.

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Courtney Lee is pretty lousy on offense, not as bad as Murphy is on defense, but Lee's not

as good a defender as Murphy is an offensive player. And I didn’t factor in the salaries, because clearly NJ doesn’t care and Murphy is gone after this year, whereas Lee’s deal continues on.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't get that line of thinking. Players develop by seeing the floor and playing.

They aren’t winning a title or really pursuing the playoffs this year. Develop and play the guy that could be the next Amare / Howard, don’t worry about the short term losses.

If there’s one part of this that I hate for NJ, it’s that. But they made the decision not to start Favors at PF this year a while ago, so given that that’s what they wanted to do, this is a pretty good deal for them.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

he's supposedly really raw

and they had pretty much nobody there in the frontcourt besides Lopez and Favors. (Johan Petro and Kris Humphries) so he should still see minutes.

and it’s one season. Not starting for one year…well, as someone who had a shit fit when Paxson was mulling not starting Rose, I see your point.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bit different situation though, no?

Derrick Rose was clearly the best option.

I’d imagine if Favors proves to be the same, the Nets will actually give him the job and have Murphy come off the bench unlike the Bulls.

by Grinder in Training on Aug 11, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hinrich was the better option in Rose's rookie year

Bulls with Hinrich on the court: +7.3
Bulls with Rose on the court: -1.9

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

blech, a one year APM hammer?

Anyway, I was going to mention that it wasn’t THAT clear, but we have to remember the reason the Bulls got that #1 pick in the first place was in part because of Hinrich’s abysmal ‘07-’08 season

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

It's not APM, that's raw with one player as the other guy's backup

I think that makes for a pretty clear conclusion when deciding who was the better option.

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Awesome...

that makes him better than both Rose and Gordon!

by poster on Aug 11, 2010 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I don't think those are APM numbers, I think they are raw APM numbers

which I think are relatively fair to use when comparing two players on the same team who play the same position.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

raw PM numbers*

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Which makes it pretty much exactly the same situation.

An even more apt comparison is when the Bulls failed to develop Tyrus Thomas by burying him and not getting him proper development minutes.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dwight Howard averaged 13 and 11 his rookie year

and didn’t go to college. If Favors is as good a prospect as people are saying, he should at least be able to start and not force his team to trade a young, longterm piece for a $12 mil stopgap. The Nets could’ve had Lee backup Williams next year, then extend him for the next 5 seasons cheap.

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

He doesn't have to be

He just has to be close to Troy Murphy to make this a dumb deal.

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

meh

first of all, you’re forgetting Anthony Morrow in the Nets 2-guard rotation.

And I think it also helps a player not to be thrown into the deep end on an awful team. They needed some help, I can’t see Favors not getting minutes. But Avery Johnson seems pretty veteran-y, so we’ll see.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seems everyone had forgotten...

That they signed Sean May…

Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 11, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't, he'll

be a valuable contributor for the Nets.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, he won't.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know, I

was just being sarcastic, lol

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

expiring deals would be good at the trade deadline

An expiring deal of an okay player with a future first or something could be quite valuable. They could take on someone’s “bad deal” like a Nocioni as long as they included a good young player that’s out of favor (like an Anthony Randolph on Golden State). I like this deal. I think it gives them a good player and gives them a lot of options at the deadline.

I like this deal for New Jersey and Houston. I know it was just a salary dump for the Rockets, but they now have Martin – Lee – Lowry
Battier – Budinger – Patterson

In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).

Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.

by tyger1147 on Aug 11, 2010 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, he can't.

He’s a pure 4, and nothing more. He doesn’t have the quickness or lateral movement ability to play the 3 in the NBA. Not even close. He never even played it in college. For the Rockets, it’s more like this:

Brooks/Lowry
Martin/Lee
Battier/Budinger
Scola/Hill/Patterson
Yao/Miller/Hayes

Pretty deep team, they’ll be fun to watch.

Deng/Boozer/Noah: All your rebound are belong to us.

by Illini15 on Aug 11, 2010 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he'll be able to.

His lane agility is amongst the SG’s like Henry and Turner, better than Warren and Armon Johnson, for example. I know that’s a crude way to measure things, but I think he’ll be fine as a 3/4 combo. He’s huge and has pretty good athleticism. Might not be a great defender, but he can’t be any worse at D on SF’s than Korver D’ing up SG’s. And I think his offense would more than make up for it.

In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).

Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.

by tyger1147 on Aug 11, 2010 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

How much did they have before this?

In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).

Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.

by tyger1147 on Aug 11, 2010 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Enough to absorb a $12 mil salary

Not sure of the exact, though they had enough to almost sign two maxes I think and signed Morrow and…

by YaoPau on Aug 11, 2010 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

lowry is in cleveland

"If I was to answer that question honestly, I would have to lie to you."

- Isiah Thomas, when asked if any teams were interested in trading for Shandon Anderson

by TheMoon on Aug 11, 2010 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, he's not. HOU matched.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Murphy is decent though

Lee is overrated….

But I’ve been on that one before.

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

All I'm saying is that

the Pacers got Darren Collison and Player B for (huge contract) Troy Murphy. This gives them the PG they need (NO better hope CP3 stays healthy and doesn’t walk in 2 years) and dump the salary that was choking their finances.

GREAT move by Larry Bird.

by kozzer on Aug 11, 2010 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Its a one year rental for NJ...

Which could theoretically then have cap space again next Summer, while temporarily improving their team this year…

Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 11, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Time

for the Mello sweepstakes.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

But Kirk's gone

2010-2011: I put the Scottie-Barkley Rockets feud curse on the Wade-James-Bosh trio.....

by majoyenrac on Aug 11, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Not really sure how I feel about any of this

One thing I do know is that this must kill all the trading Chris Paul talk since they traded away his would-be successor.
I continue to be amazed about how high everyone is on Ariza who posted a woeful 13.40 per and 49% TS. I just don’t get it.

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 11, 2010 12:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't think he's great or anything

but he can hit a three and is an athletic wing defender. He’s a great fit next to Paul, and he’s still pretty young.

Deng/Boozer/Noah: All your rebound are belong to us.

by Illini15 on Aug 11, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'll give him the D

But he is a career 32% 3 point shooter and is going into his 7th season. He will benefit from Paul, true, but I can’t imagine any of his percentages going up much more.

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 11, 2010 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Trevor Ariza

is a rich man’s Jamario Moon and a poor man’s James Posey. He is an overall 44% from the field, not a very good shooter, people are still thinking about that ’09 Finals.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

To be fair, Ariza's TS% went down drastically because he was asked to be the focal point of the offense and he's simply

not skilled enough to fill that role. As a shooter-defender next to a ball dominant player like Kobe or Paul, he fits just fine.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Quite true

But if Paul goes down with injury again, who is filling his role? I would have at least insisted on a competent back-up PG in any deal involving moving Collison. In terms of 3pt shooting Ariza has never been good. Hopefully he can act as a true slasher and defensive stalwart and cut back on the perimeter game. That would be best.

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 11, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed, slashing is

better for his game, and he does need to CUT BACK on the 3pt attempts, people think chucking up the 3 is better than playing to your overall strength.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think they are banking on Paul being healthy. If he goes down, they are screwed anyway. Might as well tank

for a draft pick if CP3 gets hurt. A high draft pick will help them much more than having a good backup for CP3 that can buoy them for a crap draft pick if he goes down.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

None of these

moves = Heat beating. This is just more of reshuffling the deck, middle of the pack to garbage teams finding ways to improve there teams.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

If Yao is healthy...

Houston with KMart, Brooks and a returning Scola…with Battier and Lee playing the roles or perimeter defenders, could be a very good well rounded team.

Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 11, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

They won 42 last year without Yao...

And KMart has never had a quality big like Yao to play with…easily 50 wins next season…

Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 11, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Isn't Yao months away from even practicing?

DANIEL HUDSON SUCKS. HOWS THAT GUN BAN WORKING FOR YOU MAYOR DALLY

by Ozzie Montana on Aug 11, 2010 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

HOLY CRAP

according to espn trade machine, the winning percentage of all teams stays the same!!! thats pretty hard to do with 2 teams, let alone four.
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/976/thron.png

Practice beats talent when talent doesn't practice.

by iamsasquatch on Aug 11, 2010 1:03 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

also, from woj twitter:
The Pacers are negotiating a buyout with T.J. Ford’s agent on the $8.5 million owed the point guard this season, league sources tell Y!.

Practice beats talent when talent doesn't practice.

by iamsasquatch on Aug 11, 2010 1:05 PM CDT reply actions  

we could use a 3rd PG!

I don’t even think he’s that bad of a guy, just that the coach didn’t like playing him. I could be wrong though.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know if Teej would be interested in coming off the bench as the third PG emergency guy. I have to think

that there’s more of a market for him out there than that. Maybe he can go to the Knicks and back up Felton?

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is what I call "shit hit the fan"

There is random crap scattered all around the league after trade

by JustAnotherFan on Aug 11, 2010 1:15 PM CDT reply actions  

I like this move

Assuming Bellinelli can earn more PT than he did on two bad teams. He can certainly shoot the 3.
Kind of makes me wonder if we couldn’t have moved JJ for Bellinelli. Julian Wright cannot possibly have that much more value than Jimmy Johns.
Hindsight is 20/20 though.

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 11, 2010 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

hmm, that is interesting

Wright effectively has an expiring deal, but it’s not like JJ makes that much.

Plus while it’s nice to have another shooter I’m not sure about just giving up on JJ that early.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also true. And I am one who still thinks JJ has value

At the same time, Marco is only 1 year older so it is not like he won’t/can’t get better either. I guess it depends on what the Bulls would want at that roster spot; a big stronger defender with potential ball-handling and slashing skills or a perimeter oriented shooter with a sweet stroke but, from what I have researched, not much else.

I cannot pretend to be a Marco expert though.

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 11, 2010 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

How the fuck did we not get in on this

Ariza for Deng would be awesome. Regardless, sweet trade.

All I want in life is for UC fans to chant: Deeeeeloooonte during Heat games

by Belize on Aug 11, 2010 2:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Count the ringzzzzz

DANIEL HUDSON SUCKS. HOWS THAT GUN BAN WORKING FOR YOU MAYOR DALLY

by Ozzie Montana on Aug 11, 2010 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

What?

Why would that be awesome?

by tuff-gong on Aug 11, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's inherently a bad idea

but that’s not ‘getting into’ this trade, since nobody like Deng (and his deal) was moved.

BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 11, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

That trade

is horrible, these guys are both the same age, Deng is the much better player buy a land slide.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 11, 2010 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hell I'm a huge Deng hater

and I don’t think I agree with this one. Let the slamming begin. lol

by Dils on Aug 11, 2010 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

airza for deng wouldve been great

at least ariza knows to chuck from behind the 3pt line

from now on instead of saying "go fuck yourself" im gunna just say "go join the heat"

by sin on Aug 11, 2010 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Now we just need someone to crunch the numbers.

Deng’s long two at a significantly higher percentage versus Ariza’s 5-6 3s a game at 33% shooting.

by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Aug 11, 2010 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Key word: Chuck, and

he is not very good at it, I’ll take Deng’s consistent 17 & 7 over Ariza garbage 3pt shot and 14 points.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Aug 12, 2010 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

WTF?

Deng/Boozer/Noah: All your rebound are belong to us.

by Illini15 on Aug 11, 2010 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think if CP3 can turn Ariza

into a quality offensive player, like Nash does for his teammates, than this could be a pretty good trade for New Orleans. You get a defensive stopper on the wing who can play the 2 or the 3 and looking at their roster, they needed that. I wonder about his attitude though.

As far as Collison, I think he has the ability to be a good point guard and Indiana did a good job of getting him. If those guys gel they could be exciting to watch. Not very good, but exciting.

Murphy is way overrated and he and Brook Lopez should form one of the worst defensive front courts in the NBA. Houston takes another minor step to 8th in the conference. They must have really disliked Ariza, b/c Lee is just like a worse version

by Basketball Smurf on Aug 11, 2010 7:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Lee can't play the 3 like Ariza but he's a whole lot cheaper. I also think they really like Budinger (rightfully so)

and decided it made more sense to give him minutes behind Battier than trying to fit Ariza in, in a role where he was struggling.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 11, 2010 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lee isn’t going to replace Ariza. Budinger is Ariza’s long term replacement. Lee is just going to backup Martin. Ariza didn’t know his role. He tried to be a go-to scorer and forgot that he was lucky he had Kobe to help him get a bunch of wide open looks. His handles are terrible and his jumper is still rough. Very overrated even defensively. He can get steals but he’s not a stopper by any stretch of the imagination.

by C Smoove on Aug 11, 2010 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Ariza was asked to be the go-to scorer. The Rockets bet that he could handle an increased role. It turned out they were wrong.

Morey realized this and went out and made a smart deal to lose Ariza and get a player they liked. Plus Budinger proved to be quite solid as a rookie and plenty capable of taking over for Ariza longterm.

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 12, 2010 1:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Plus, they saved $8 million counting lux tax payments.

When the basketball value is “meh”, that $8 mil is great.

In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).

Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.

by tyger1147 on Aug 12, 2010 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Correct, the Rockets did encourage Ariza to chuck. However Ariza didn’t make the necessary adjustments when his shot wasn’t falling(i.e slash more and stop shooting so many 3s that one is having trouble making). In a perfect world, Ariza should be coming off the bench.

by C Smoove on Aug 12, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, Rockets are over the Luxury tax and don't look like obvious contenders to me

I would have really liked to take Ariza off the Rockets hands. He’s super athletic, very good defensively, and has a much better chance than Brewer does of making an open shot.

BullsTwo > Back up and running!

by Sports2 on Aug 11, 2010 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

If Morey is to be believed, this deal was about acquiring Lee and not just dumping Ariza.

So it’s not clear that the Bulls had the pieces to get Ariza. They likely wouldn’t have done a cap space for Ariza dump.

Q: Was this more a deal to move Ariza’s contract or to get Courtney?

DM: This was an opportunity to get Courtney. I mentioned the Kyle Lowry deal and I hesitate a little bit because Kyle is a very good player and I don’t necessarily want to put expectations on Courtney to be similar to Kyle – they’re very different players. But in terms of our aggressiveness and trying to acquire players who we think fit our winning culture and style of play, fit our overall focus on what we value on the floor, when those players become available we aggressively go for it.

Link

The Chicago Bulls hate shooting ability.

by fundamentallysound on Aug 12, 2010 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

And if you ask anyone in the government, the economy is on the rebound!

Seriously, answer is teeming with bullshit

BullsTwo > Back up and running!

by Sports2 on Aug 12, 2010 6:39 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree

that was just a good spin on having to trade your big free agent acquisition from the prior year.

by Basketball Smurf on Aug 12, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

3 teams improve their selves

Bad trade for Houston, Lee isn’t an improvement over Ariza………..Lee is a below average player

by Jermal on Aug 11, 2010 9:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Fewer years, less money

and they “coveted” Lee all along. lol

I can predict the future using Norm Van Lier's crystal balls.

"Sam has a tendency to denigrate reports coming from any reporter who didn’t also cover the day Naismith first put up the peach baskets." - snley

by NBA Observer on Aug 12, 2010 7:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Lee isn’t replacing Ariza. Lee is a 2 not a 3. Ariza isn’t very good and had a long contract that paid 7 mill a year. Does Ariza leaving really hurt Houston? The answer is no. The key is Yao, so if Yao isn’t healthy, having Ariza around means jack.

by C Smoove on Aug 12, 2010 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seems like a good trade all the way around

NJ had a glut of 2s and probably got rid of the one with the lowest upside. IND gets a promising young player. NO dumps a bad contract (Posey) and sells high on a young player that they wouldn’t be able to fully utilize. HOU dumps some salary and gets a piece that seems to fit well with their core (defense and decent shooting).

by JSB on Aug 11, 2010 9:35 PM CDT reply actions  

Who are the glut of 2 guards in NJ?

I don’t really understand the Nets desire to put a player in front of Derrick Favors and take away their obvious SG starter.

BullsTwo > Back up and running!

by Sports2 on Aug 11, 2010 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Morrow, Terrence Williams, Farmar (who said he expects to play alongside Devin Harris a fair amount)

It’s obviously questionable that there’s a single starting-quality SG in that group, but it’s not like Courtney Lee’s that good either.

Pat Riley is the devil.

by Poloplaya14 on Aug 12, 2010 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Also

They have Damion James and Bobby Simmons on the roster who while not close to starting quality are swingmen types. I like Lee as a player, but if they didn’t see PT for him, I think Murphy is decent value for 1 year.

by JSB on Aug 12, 2010 1:06 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Cut your losses

Trade CP3 before Maverick Carter is driving that train wreck.

I can predict the future using Norm Van Lier's crystal balls.

"Sam has a tendency to denigrate reports coming from any reporter who didn’t also cover the day Naismith first put up the peach baskets." - snley

by NBA Observer on Aug 12, 2010 7:02 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.

Links

"Best NBA Blogroll"
-- Dan Shanoff

The Essentials:
Bulls.com
NBA.com
HoopsHype
BallHype
ESPN.com NBA

Workin' the Beat:
KC Johnson - Tribune (blog)
John Jackson - Sun-Times (blog)
Mike McGraw - Daily Herald (blog)
Nick Friedell -  ESPNChicago.com
Sam Smith - Bulls.com
Aggrey Sam - CSNChicago.com


More Bulls Blogs/Forums:
Thank You Isiah
Chicago Bulls Podcasters
Bulls Confidential
By the Horns
Bullish Thoughts
Chicago Bulls KY
Pippen Ain't Easy
RealGM Bulls Forum
SportsTwo Bulls Forum

Blogging the Association:
(League Wide)
True Hoop
HoopsAnalyst
Give Me the Rock
The Basketball Jones
NBA Fanhouse
Hoops Addict
SBNation.com - NBA
ProBasketballTalk
ShamSports
Ball Don't Lie
The Painted Area


(Team-Centric)
Queen City Hoops

Bobcats Baseline
Knickerblogger.net    
Sixers' Shots
Forum Blue and Gold
SuperSonicSoul
Hornets247.com 
SonicsCentral.com 
ClipperBlog.com  
The Nugg Doctor
Loy's Place
Reds Army
Need4Sheed
THE WIZZNUTZZ
RaptorsForum.com
TWolvesBlog.com
Spurs Dynasty
David's Memphis Grizzlies Blog
The Bratwurst
Sixers Journal
Sixers 4 Guidos 
3 Shades of Blue  
CavsNews.com
RaptorTalk
Deceptively Quick
TheLakersNation.com
Utah Jazzer Blog
KnicksDefense.com
T. Jose Caldeford
Hoopinion
RaptorBlog.com
Suns @NBAWeblog.com
The Cowhide Globe
Stepien Rules
Project Spurs
Raptors Republic
Dino Nation Blog
Lake Show Life
Valley of the Suns
The KnicksBlog.com
Big Lakers Fan
Roundball Mining Company
Cavs: The Blog
48 Minutes of Hell
Daily Thunder
Piston Powered
The Two Man Game
PistonsNationBlog.com
Cowbell Kingdom.com
Hot Hot Hoops
NetsAreScorching
Celtics Hub
Orlando Magic Daily
Philadunkia
Truth About It
Always Miller Time
Slippery When Nets
Eight Points Nine Seconds
Howlin' T-Wolf
Red 94

MSM NBA blogs:

Ira Winderman (Heat)
Jason Quick (Blazers)
IndyStar.com (Pacers)
Michael Cunningham (Hawks) 
Full-Court Press (Pistons)
Jonathan Feigen (Rockets)
Rick Bonnell (Bobcats)
Jazz Notes
Chris Herrington (Grizzlies)
Orlando Sentinel
Michael Lee (Wizards)
Alan Hahn (Knicks)   
Doug Smith (Raptors)
Marc Berman (Knicks)
Al Iannazzone (Nets)

For the Statheads:
Basketball-Reference.com
APBR Discussion
Knickerblogger's Stat Page
82Games.com
Doug's Stats
Popcorn Machine
HoopData


Other Resources:

HoopsHype Salaries
SportsTwo Salaries
ESPN.com Trade Machine
RealGM: NBA Draftpicks Owed
ShamSports.com Salaries
DraftExpress

 


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger