Let's Look At What Really Happened Here.
Two years ago, the team was one starting power forward short of being very good. A genuine starter could have gotten this team through perhaps two playoff rounds. That was a very good three-guard rotation and Salmons was a real asset. Thomas was a backup but could be effective in spurts.
Instead, the Bulls gave away Gordon, Hinrich, Tyrus and Salmons for NOTHING in order to save money, I mean clear cap space. Did anybody really think any of those top free agents was going to sign with these bad actors?
So now we have replaced those four with Boozer and two second team guards leaving no depth at small forward. We now have a starting power forward and unaddressed needs elsewhere.
It makes monetary sense but it's really pathetic.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
59 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I disagree.
We got our starting power forward, and gave up nothing of any consequence.
Gordon’s gone because he stupidly turned down two very good offers from the Bulls. Hinrich was overpaid, and is gone because the Org went all in on free agency – something that no one would have admonished if it had landed us Bron and Bosh. Tyrus needed a change of scenery, and frankly hasn’t played much better since heading to Charlotte. Salmons was a bad fit for a number of reasons.
Our new team fits together ten times better, and – maybe with the exception of Deng – players are earning salaries requisite with their talent level, potential, age, and position. True, we’re still a bit weak in terms of guards, but I’d take this team any day over the teams the Bulls have fielded during the past three seasons.
by Diz on Jul 16, 2010 4:15 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
yeah, everyone sucked
Gordon got a real good offer from the Pistons too. SO YOU’RE STUPID
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 16, 2010 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Wow! Venomous!!
Didn’t realize I said anything all that controversial?!
Do you really think we were better off two seasons ago with BG, Hinrich, Tyrus, and Salmons than we are now???
And for the record, BG’s making slightly more now than he would have had he accepted the Bulls’ offer(s), but playing for a far worse team where he had his worst year since entering the NBA. My guess is if he could do it over again, he’d choose differently…
The Pistons made out real well
… burning their cap space on Ben Gordon. Where did they finish again?
"If you're not going to compete, then I'll dominate you." MJ
what happens if someone flags you?
just wondering
by masputo on Jul 18, 2010 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
If you're saying that the free agency chase was all a ruse to drum up season ticket interest
even I’m not that cynical.
I think it’s more likely they did think they had a chance in free agency (and just failed at capitalizing), but figured even if they failed they at least got rid of a lot of long-term money. It was a win-win.
But yeah, we’re sort of back where we started, it could’ve wound up a lot worse and we only wasted a season or so of Rose’s rookie deal. I’m looking forward this year more than the last one, anyway.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 16, 2010 4:24 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
ABSOLUTELY!!
I’ve been a Chicago fan for too many years.
They’ll trot out anything and the fans will keep buying tickets.
The history is there!
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
The problem with your whole conspiracy theory
The team as presently constructed is better than your bloated mess. There is no point in spending money unwisely. Then you are left with the Chicago Cubs, New York Mets or New York Knicks.
I’m looking forward this year
WAAAHHHHHHH?
::::::::Checks hell::::::::::::
Yup..frozen
All I want in life is for UC fans to chant: Deeeeeloooonte during Heat games
by Belize on Jul 16, 2010 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions 5 recs
This team is way better
Yes, we were a power forward away for about eight years
If you don’t have STARTERS you can’t compete.
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
Let me get this straight?
You think keeping together a team with Hinrich ($9M), Gordon ($11m), Salmons ($8m)/Tyrus Thomas ($8m) would have been a good idea? That looks to me like a whole of expensive ill-fitting parts and still no low-post scorer, and no cap space to get one either. As much as people bash Reinsdorf for his “intelligent expenditure” comment, I don’t see how paying the luxury tax for that bunch would have been a good idea.
I vastly prefer the team we have now with parts that fit and a true low-post scorer.
Salmons with his 5 mil player option
would be perfect right now, but other than that those players weren’t getting unless anywhere relevant.
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 16, 2010 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions
He probably wouldn't have exercised it
What with so many teams under the cap and the lockout looming. Just ask RJeff about that.
can't be sure
if he didn’t go to milaukee, I doubt anyone gives him 7-8mil a year playing the season out with the Bulls. Even the Bulls might have been able to resign him for brewer/Korver money.
He would be nice second team wing tandem with Korver
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 16, 2010 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions
They arent "ill-fitting parts"
Hinrich, Gordon, and Thomas are exactly what the bulls currently need. They need shooting and scoring (Gordon), they need defense and a back up guard (hinrich) and defensive and athleticism (Thomas). Boozer is great need as he provides low post scoring, but he is a 28yr old pf, who is injury prone by the way most pf numbers decrease after 28/29yrs. of age. The biggest problem is that the bulls signed Deng to a terrible contract. That was a bad decision from the start, paying a mid-range shooter, who is not very athletic and cannot create a 70+ million contract. The bulls would have also been much better keeping sefolosha for 3million a yr. and keeping JR Smith (in the chandler trade) for around 5million.
While the current bulls team is solid, they arent going to be a championship contender with an aging and expensive pf, and a team that still cannot shoot (besides korver).
It would have been a good idea with a starting power forward.
Let’s see how long Boozer and Deng hold up.
And that cap space can really help in overtime…
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
Huh?
You know in your scenario there is no hope of landing a starting power forward. We would be way over the cap after keeping Hinrich, Gordon, Salmons and Thomas.
Maybe we could have gotten something for any one of them
It’s all about profits.
One lucky ping pong ball away from a total waste of 12 years.
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
agreed
landing derrick rose saved the bulls. saved paxson. in the past five yrs. paxson has signed unathletic overachievers to large contracts: hinrich and deng, and let scorers and athletes walk without getting anything in return: sefolosha, jr smith, gordon, thomas. Without rose the bulls would have been a 30 win team the last two yrs. and would have remained a team getting the 8-12th pick in the nba draft.
The players of 2 years ago would have never competed for a title
We gave them up for a legit chance at the best free agent class ever. Unfortunately we got 2nd place in that race.
The concession is 3ish players who can contribute to a Chip team: Rose, Boozer, Noah.
If JJ(ohnson) had signed as 2 guard, we’d be right there. If Deng was a couple notches better, we’d also be right there. If there was 1 other top-notch FA SG available, we’d again be right there. But no such luck.
So we didn’t quite hit a home run. We’re still in position for something to happen over the next couple years for something good to happen (trade, draft pick, somebody gets way better, chaos from lockout) that could put us over the top.
All in all, I’ll enjoy watching the Bulls a lot more than in recent years. Sure the Celtics series was fun, but the expectations and long-term potential of that team was pretty low. We can actually throw around scenarios to get to a championship without completely insane rationalizations.
by Bill Cartwright's Elbow on Jul 16, 2010 5:13 PM CDT reply actions
:::::::::yawn:::::::::::
All I want in life is for UC fans to chant: Deeeeeloooonte during Heat games
by Belize on Jul 16, 2010 5:34 PM CDT reply actions 4 recs
Of course the Bulls are better
On the surface I can see where you are coming form, I too was hoping for James or Wade but the truth is the Bulls had the second best off season of any NBA team. But lets address your comments. First, Ben Gordon was not worth the money, he clearly was going to the highest bidder and a 6 foot tall SG that plays ZERO D with bad handles and worse passing skills isn’t someone you can win a title with. Second, Tyrus Thomas was the same 6 pt. 6 rebound guy for the Bobcats as he was for the Bulls and he got paid 35 million, no way his upside is very limited considering his lack of basketball IQ. Third, John Salmonds was and IS a SF not a SG ! His numbers went up for the Bucks because slow SF where guarding him. I also thought he was a bad fit with Rose because he needed the ball in his hands to much and wasn’t a stand still shooter. Forth, Kirk Hinrick. I was never a fan, he is a bad shooter that just isn’t athletic, can’t jump and stops the ball too much. I know what people will say Kirk is a good defender and but really thats it. Decent ball handling shills and at that salary we where lucky to dump him.
I too was disappointed we didn’t land Wade or James but a bigger disappointment would have been not going for them. This off season some of the best teams and players put all their chips in the someone was going to walk away with the big prize, thats wasn’t the Bulls but at least they where in the game. After Bosh and Wade signed with Miami the Bulls grabbed the next best guy Boozer and after James signed they did the best they cold. This new Bulls team should win the central and have home court advantage in the first round, I like our chances.
Playing Monday Morning QB works better
When the present team is not as good as the team 2 years ago.
in the Skiles/Hinrich era, the team maxed out at 47 wins. Now anything less than a 50+ win season would be a disappointment.
The team 2 years ago had 0 all-stars. This year we enter with 2 with the potential for a 3rd with Noah. I definitely think the Bulls are better off even if it took time for them to get here.
by Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. on Jul 16, 2010 10:20 PM CDT reply actions
This year, if Rose, Brewer, Boozer, Noah and Deng stay healthy for 75 games each
Bulls will play some sick basketball. I pity the teams that will plays healthy Bulls.
I say healthy, no major injuries to the starting 5 + Korver, Taj, Asik we could be getting awfully close to 60 wins.
Last season, healthy Bulls (despite VDN) started playing good away games and competed out West.
What do the oddsmakers thing about this team?
Heat: 7:4 to win the championship
Lakers: 11:4
Magic: 11:1
Celtics: 12:1
Bulls: 15:1
Mavericks: 18:1
Nuggets: 18:1
Thunder 18:1
Hawks: 28:1
Jazz: 30:1
Suns: 35:1
Have the Bulls ever had the 5th best odds to win the championship since Jordan retired? I am pretty confident that answer is no. That team you wanted would have a higher salary, less flexibility and be a worse team.
Blazers have a better shot than the Suns, Jazz, Hawks, Nuggets or Mavs if you ask me
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on Jul 16, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Only if Oden can stay healthy...
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
Marcus Camby
Roy’s the one that needs to stay healthy. If he’d been healthy all of last year, I’m convinced they’d have been the 2 seed.
Brad Miller is god.
The best FA signing of the post-MJ era
Might turn out to be Coach Thib. It’s obvious the player’s respect him and are anxious to play for him. He will probably be worth 10 wins compared to VDN. This team will win 50+ games.
by Duck99 on Jul 17, 2010 11:38 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
i'm really anxious to see how he does
it’s obv the guy is really smart. can’t wait to see it in action.
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
Our team is much better now. We can win 47-52 games with this team. I love Ben but he’s not here so let it go. Salmons was terrible during the 1st half but turned it around later. Hinrich should have been off the team years ago. Tyrus stayed at the same 10pt/6 reb level and I doubt that will improve that much..
We now have a shooter and a low post scorer and a strong perimeter defender. Also our bench is bolstered with Taj now on the bench.
:(
I thought this was supposed to be a look a what really happened.
Instead, the Bulls gave away Gordon, Hinrich, Tyrus and Salmons for NOTHING in order to save money, I mean clear cap space.
lol.
Prrretttyy sure it was for clearing cap space, champ.
Did anybody really think any of those top free agents was going to sign with these bad actors?
Yeah….
We absolutely had a good shot at getting one or two of the big 3 (James, Wade, Bosh). The Bulls put themselves in the absolute best position to succeed in 2010 free agency. We had the cap space, the young talent, the great city, the loyal fans, etc. It’s not the front office’s fault some players made the wrong decision.
So now we have replaced those four with Boozer and two second team guards
So you’re upset that we replaced
- BG, an undersized SG, defensive liability, and a player who apparently didn’t have the greatest chemistry with Rose
- Hinrich, who was reduced to the role of overpaid backup with the arrival of Rose
- Salmons, who is a solid player, but nothing to lose sleep over
- and Tyrus, the classic underachieving/big potential guy
with
- Boozer, the All-Star low-post threat we have been needing for years (and not to mention a great fit with Rose)
- Korver, who had one of the highest 3pt shooting % in league history last year
- and Brewer, the perimiter defender we’ll need to guard Wade (and Kobe, if we get that far :P) in the playoffs
?
…leaving no depth at small forward.
Uhhh…
Deng/Korver/JJ is just fine….
We now have a starting power forward and unaddressed needs elsewhere
Last time I checked, we still had some cap space. And those unaddressed needs aren’t the gaping holes you’re making them out to be.
It makes monetary sense but it’s really pathetic.
Yeah, being a legitimate ECF contender sucks!
eat. sleep. hoop. repeat. become legendary.
by Sir Buckets on Jul 17, 2010 3:26 PM CDT reply actions 6 recs
You mean legitimate ECF #2 contender.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Miami, Orlando, Boston are ahead of us. Maybe more.
Going nowhere. Again.
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
The top 3 seeds in the East are up for grabs.
You’re underestimating this Bulls team.
eat. sleep. hoop. repeat. become legendary.
by Sir Buckets on Jul 18, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think that's a correct estimate
they’re on the level of the Hawks, on the edge of home court. Hey, I thought just being ‘better’ was enough, lets not push it.
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 18, 2010 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions
And that's how it works!
Chicago fans will setlle for ANYTHING!!
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
Miami, Bulls, Orlando, Boston
Chi-Town sports fan
by Cap10_Kirk on Jul 18, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
How's the cool aid?
Now we’re looking for a backup center over at Fenwick. Works cheap. Perfect!
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
You're embarrassing yourself
Brad Miller at 3/$15 million isn’t a good idea either.
by JSB on Jul 18, 2010 9:52 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Tyrus Thomas and Ben Gordon will show everyone this year!!!
You’ll see!!!!!!
(not Hinrich, though)
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Ty Thomas would be great on this team
If he would not take a shot further than 6 feet from the basket and be a defensive/rebounding demon for 20 minutes a game. If he’s smart (doubtful) he’ll do that or be out of the league in 2 years.
by Duck99 on Jul 17, 2010 9:59 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Yeah, it was obvious that some team was going to pay Ty too much money in this market.
I don’t really have a problem letting him go. Or Kirk. You can argue that had J-Fish not gone to Milwaukee, he would’ve opted in at $6M, which would be nice right now. But the fact is, he got $40 million, something no one here would’ve liked if it came from the Bulls. And it’s possible he could’ve stayed here and play just as well to close out last season, leading to the bloated deal he got this offseason.
If they made no moves and played it safe leading up the most momentus free agency period ever, this city would’ve burned the Org. to the ground, everyone knows that. They tried, and while they weren’t able to executve plan A or B, they got better.
No kidding
If they had not had enough cap space to go after LeBron, because they hung onto a guy like Salmons or Tyrus, people would have been rightfully pissed. Last year was the perfect year to dump salary and go for LBJ or some other big free agent. Rose and Noah were still developing and it was unlikely they would be able to make a serious run anyways.
What the hell is wrong with you? You’re upset we got boozer because he can get injured?? What all-star level PF was out there that we could have gotten outside of boozer and bosh?? (We got one of them). You claim all we needed with that team two years ago was a starting power forward but if we still had all that garbage on our team we would have already been at the cap and couldn’t sign anyone. Secondly, if somehow miraculously you can have rose, gordon, salmons, deng, hinrich, tyrus,taj,boozer,noah, all under the cap, how is that team better than where we are right now.
Let me explain something to you. The following players will never get meaningful minutes on a championship team, not because they can’t SCORE, but because their style of play is not conducive to WINNING in the playoffs : Ben Gordon, Tyrus Thomas.
Don’t bash the FO because it’s normally the cool thing to do cuz for once they did everything right with Plan A, B, and C.
Uh, Gordon scored 40+ in the playoffs...
How’s the cool aid?
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
bulls
This post is funny given that he was true in that the bulls just needed a scoring power forward, as they had defense, depth, a backup point guard, athleticism and shooting. However, now the bulls have inside scoring but lost their backup point guard/defender in hinrich (who was overpaid) and shooter in Ben Gordon (who is now overpaid) and athleticism/rebounder/defender in Thomas (who is also now overpaid). Yet a lineup of rose, and gordon, deng, thomas, and noah, i feel is just as capable if not more capable of competing with the Heat in the east. While boozer is a great scorer, he is also much older, injury prone and costs the bulls 80million. He is also a defensive liability. I like brewer on defense but he cannot shoot, which is what the bulls need. I have no complaints about korver as a backup sf. But think hinrich is great against wade, gordon spreads the floor for rose more so than any player currently on the bulls, and thomas has played great defense on both bosh and james. Given that these three players are all relatively young the bulls would have the possibility of competing for yrs. to come. Also the bulls had the potential to trade thomas for boozer at the beginning of last yr. which would have been a great trade. they also were in talks with ray allen for hinrich, which also would have been better than the current situation.
Delwonka: Thank you for seeing this!
I actually played the previous team in the Real GM Kobe 24 league last year and just added Paul Milshap who wasn’t even a starter but more of a competent pro than Thomas at PF.
We only made it to the Eastern Conference Finals!
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
and that's just like real life!
except for the whole “not at all” thing.
A true friend stabs you in the front - Oscar Wilde
You would be surprised how close to the real thing it is!
Point is, you need a complete team with good players and backups.
Try it.
always a great contribution.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST

by 













