Numbers/Notes on the Second Tier PF FAs
[From the FanPosts. Not sure how I missed this yesterday. Great analysis of the 3 non-Bosh PFs -ed.]
OK. Lets change things up and add Dirk and Bosh just for the hell of it.
This post is not meant to be particularly original; most of this stuff has been said already in other threads. It wishes to be a central place where one can look at some relevant numbers on FA PFs for comparison. The only guys I will be considering here are Amare Stoudemire, Carlos Boozer, Chris Bosh, Dirk Nowitzki and David Lee. Unless stated otherwise I will only be using their numbers from this year.
Offense
Jumpers
Boozer: .448 eFG%
Amare: ..452 eFG%
Lee: ..430 eFG%
Bosh: .444 eFG%
Nowitzki: .474 eFG%
Notes: Amare and Boozer are very good shooters and have shot like this in previous seasons. Conversely, this represents a career high in shooting accuracy for Lee. If this is not an aberration for Lee but sign of sustainable improvement, then all of these PFs would be good options for pick and pop plays.
Inside
Boozer: .673 eFG%
Amare: .669 eFG%
Lee: .656 eFG%
Bosh: .612 eFG%
Dirk: .617 eFG%
Notes: Its amazing how well Amare finishes given the amount of contact he draws. Any of these guys would make a fantastic pick and roll target. But something occurs to me now, though it might be very wrong. Thinking back, it seems to me that Rose likes a majority of picks to be set on the left side of the court. Rose goes across the pick from left to right and tries to attack the right side. This leaves the big guy rolling down the left side. If all of this is true (not a given at all) then wouldnt it be useful to have a left handed big guy (like Bosh), or a guy who finishes really well with his left hand (like Boozer, or like Lee, who is naturally left handed though he plays right-handed)? I dont know. Frankly I dont know how effective Amare is going left. I'm thinking out loud here.... I wonder if Dirk and Bosh's numbers are like this because they dont run the pick and roll as much as these other guys, or because they are more slimly built.
Passing
Boozer: 15.8 AST%
Amare: 4.8 AST%
Lee: 17.5 AST%
Bosh: 11.5%
Dirk: 13.0%
Notes: Boozer, like everyone else in Sloan's offense, is a very willing passer. From watching Utah, Boozer appears to me to be very skilled especially as an interior passer. He moves the ball along to open players, but does not seem to "create for others" per se, in the sense that a lead guard creates for others. Lee, however, has done just that this year, and his number here represents a career high. For PF/C it is the third highest AST% in the league. Only Duncan and Josh Smith had higher assist rates. This seems like an awfully impressive feat for Lee considering Tim and Josh had much better teammates.... Only 5 starting bigs recorded assists less often than Amare.... Dirk is just a really smart player. He doesnt force anything and, as you'll see in a minute, he doesnt make mistakes.
Turnover Rate
Boozer: 14.3%
Amare: 12.1%
Lee: 11.9%
Bosh: 10.7%
Dirk: 7.8%
Notes: Lee kept his TO rate the same as last year despite large increases in usage and assist rate.... Amare commits a lot of offensive fouls.... If you have watched Dirk over the years this number should not be surprising.
Offensive Rebounding Rate
Boozer: 8.2%
Amare: 9.7%
Lee: 8.4%
Bosh: 9.9%
Dirk: 3.1%
Notes: Since the Bulls have not been much for putting the ball in the hoop since about 1997, I think ORB% is a pretty important skill for the Bulls PF to have. I guess Amare wins this, but its probably not by enough to be too relevant.... This was a career high for Bosh.... Dirk has always been bad at this.
Overall Offensive Picture
To make this comparison as fair as possible the number I want to give here will be Player Ortg minus Team Ortg. This should help contextualize how powerful an offensive player a guy is. But, since each of these guys had different usage rates, I have adjusted Boozer and Lee's USG% to match Amare's 27 USG%. Since I did this, I also had to penalize Lee and Boozer's ORTG, which should take a corresponding hit. According to a recent article on B-R.com, a player with >23% usage has his Ortg fall .833 points for every 1 point usage increase. Using this I can create an Adjusted Ortg for both Boozer and Lee that will be suitable for comparison to Amare's. The numbers I give here will be: Adjusted Player Ortg- Team Ortg.
Boozer: -.7
Amare: + 2.0
Lee: +5.5
Bosh: +7.7
Dirk: +8.5
Clutch Numbers per48 (Points/Rebs/Ast/Stl/Blk/TOs/FTAs/FG%)
Boozer: 29.1/14.1/2.5/1.2/.8/4.6/10.4/58.1%
Amare: 28.1/9.9/2.9/.4/1.5/2.9/9.9/62.2%
Lee: 22.4/15.9/3.8/0.0/.9/2.1/2.4/64.8%
Bosh: 30.9/14.3/5.1/1.4/2.4/2.0/16.6/38.1%
Dirk: 47.2/9.0/5.3/.8/2.0/2.5/14.9/44.9%
Notes: These guys are terrifically accurate in crunch time. Not many defensive plays between them though. Oh well. Noah will have to make up for that, which he currently does anyways.... Lee by far has the best Ast/TO ratio. He will NOT be shooting FTs in crunch time however (2.4 per48!).
Defense
Defensive Rebounding Rate
Boozer: 29.9%
Amare: 18.9%
Lee: 27.6%
Bosh: 25.2%
Dirk: 20.1%
Notes: While I realize the Bulls are already a good defensive rebounding team, and there are only so many defensive rebounds to grab, since these three guys are all fairly weak defenders I would think snagging defensive caroms would be a good way for them to pull their weight defensively.
Block Rate
Boozer: 1.1%
Amare: 2.1%
Lee: 1.0%
Bosh 2.1%
Dirk: 2.0%
Notes: If Deng were in this comparison he would have the second highest block rate, only .3% behind Amare.
Steal Rate
Boozer: 1.6%
Amare: .9%
Lee: 1.4%
Bosh: .9%
Dirk: 1.2%
Personal Fouls/36
Boozer: 3.6
Amare: 3.6
Lee: 3.1
Bosh: 2.4
Dirk: 2.5
Notes: Boozer's numbers here might be a little high because Sloan instructs his guys to foul the crap out of opponents.... The Bulls did a very good job defending yet not fouling this year; Bosh or might fit in to this scheme adequately.
Defensive PPP
Boozer: .85
Amare: .84
Lee: .98
Bosh: .89
Notes: Wow. Terrible showing by Lee. However, it should be noted that Lee will not be forced to be the Bulls center, and thus will be matched up against players his own size. Apparently this is a big deal. As YaoPau pointed out in one post, Lee gives up 15 points 11 rebounds to centers, and only 13 points 8 rebounds to PFs. Lee turns centers into Andrew Bogut and PFs into Udonis Haslem. Big difference. So there is reason to believe Lee might be a better man defender in a Bulls uniform.... Heres a link to Amare and Bosh's numbers as provided by fundamental. Bosh is a good defender in iso and post situations (interesting because of his skinny frame), but he seems to lose his man a lot, which kills him. His spot up jumper D is really bad. And his defense on guys rolling to the basket is bad. This tells me he is either a ball watcher, or hes trying to be the KG-like man who gets everyones back and corrects his teammates mistakes on D. He shouldnt have to do that on his next team.
PER
Boozer: 21.3
Amare: 22.6
Lee: 22.2
Bosh: 25.2
Dirk: 22.9
Notes: By itself I am not sure PER means anything substantial, especially when you are given three PERs this close to each other.
WP/48-- The Dave Berri-thing
Boozer: .291
Amare: .170
Lee: .247
Bosh: .223
Dirk: .135
Notes: If I understand Berri correctly, Lee suffers just a little in this because he is listed as the Knicks center.... Bosh too... Like with PER, by itself, and with players this close in productivity, it doesnt really mean much to me. I just thought I'd throw it out there.
Age
Boozer: 28
Amare: 27
Lee: 26
Bosh: 26
Dirk: 31
Notes: The magic number here is 21, Rose's age. The closer the FA is to that the better.... Bosh turned 26 two days ago.... Dirk turns 32 in 3 weeks.
Character
Boozer: People seem to say Boozer is a bad guy because of the Cleveland baggage. Two things. One, he appears to be a very vocal and supportive teammate during games. Two, how bad could he be if Colangelo picked him for his Team USA Renaissance "Its an honor to be chosen to represent your country" thing?
Amare: I always feel like people think of Amare as a bad guy or a headcase or unreliable or something. I would like to counter with a couple of things I took from the book 7 Seconds or Less. One, I thought Amare came off as a very likable, if terribly self-involved, man. Two, Amare has had a successful, lucrative and stable career so far in spite of the fact that his upbringing, by any standard, was pretty awful. A lot of other guys in Amare's position have done a lot worse, and that to me points to some admirable strength in Amare's character.
Lee: Hes gotten better almost every year of his career. Other than that I know nothing about him, from which I can deduce that he is either a good guy, or a discreet villain.
Bosh: He appears to be a thoughtful and charming person who donates quite a bit of money to charitable organizations. On the other hand, he does have this strange issue with his former girlfriend/mother of his child. Heres one article on this issue. Heres another. I cant really find anything thats less than a year old though.
Dirk: Hes likes reading and plays the sax. His former girlfriend is a weirdo.
Injury History
Boozer: I can not find a comprehensive list, but his injuries seem to be numerous and nagging. I think his hamstrings are actually made out of strings of cured pork.
Amare: Mainly Amare has had the microfracture surgery in 2006 and the detached retina last year.
Lee: The only injury I can find on Lee is a badly sprained ankle in 2007.
Bosh: I have no idea where Yaopau found it, but I remember him presenting a list of Bosh's injuries. They are many and petty. He reminds me of Boozer in that regard. Sounds a little dangerous to me.
Dirk: An iron man of sorts. He misses 3-5 games a year, but thats it.
Notes: I don't worry about Amare: hes a total freak of nature. And obviously Lee has shown himself to be a healthy player. Boozer I worry about a little.
Entertainment Value
Not a totally unimportant criterion. I am sure most fans have a picture of their ideal team, or at least of the ideal player for each position. For me Amare has the look and style of a true PF; I can't ever see myself getting tired of him dunking on peoples heads and then roaring at the basket stanchion like a perturbed grizzly bear.
Boozer and Lee do not have the same nuclear capabilities as STAT. For me, they provide entertainment with their passing ability. Especially Lee. Basketball is the sport I most like to watch, but hockey and soccer are the sports I most love to play. These sports ask you constantly to move the ball/puck and also yourself, so I have always been fond of clever passing (as opposed to the typical Bulls' obvious, futile passing around the 3 pt arc).
YouTube
Carlos Boozer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfTAog-mie4&feature=related
Amare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtprtyyntxA
David Lee: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPN8G9cBIco&feature=related
Dirk: Nothing. His videos are all grainy and at least 3 years old.
Bosh: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHBw0cyKQaU
Notes: Boozer looks way cooler in YouTube land than he does in real life. That move he did on matt barnes was ridiculous.... In spite of his microfracture surgery, Im pretty sure Amare could dunk from the 3pt line.... YouTube: Not flattering for David Lee!
Conclusion
My own personal wish list for PFs is as follows:
1. Bosh
2. Lee
3. Amare
4. Dirk
5. Boozer.
I like Lee's fit with the Bulls. He basically does what the other guys do, but he also creates shots for others. This seems like it would be a pretty useful skill to have not just in itself, but also because it covers up the playmaking deficiencies of Deng. I also like the idea of a noah-lee-deng frontline, since going into every game I will know that the rebound battle has already been won. And he might come cheaper. That being said, I love Amare's style and his ability to get to the free throw line, so I will not be the least bit upset if he comes here. With Boozer, I probably will be a little crestfallen.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
189 comments
|
17 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i only read half of it
just because thats all my attention span allowed me,
but i agree with your rankings, and never did realize that amare might not be as effective going left off the pick and roll
Extremely well done.
I had no idea how well Lee stacked up to the other two.
Frankly, I thought Amare’s numbers would be head and shoulders above the others in offense.
"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris
The way I see it
From the stats point of view there is little difference between them. No surprise there. I don’t worry about the left pick roll because that would just be an issue with he’s turning for the hook which in most cases is a bad shot unless you are Kareem. About Boozer, I don’t think the Cleveland episode should be downplayed character-wise. That was f…d-up. That means he’s the kind of guy who could swear he’s signing with us and then just don’t and we end up with no FA at all. And it really seems this is about intangibles (and I’m not talking about glueness). I think all of them have flaws: I worry about Lee’s energy (specially on D), Boozer’s character and injury history and Amare’s focus. On the other hand Amare in unstoppable when focused, Lee has a demeanor that fits the Bulls and is constantly improving (although this will be his 1st big contract) and Boozer is a very hard worker when healthy (if he remains after getting a 2nd big contract we will see).
I think the 3 would make the Bulls a lot better but Boozer is a gamble because of his health problems. Other than that I would go with Amare for entertainment purposes.
I would not want Boozer.
He choked big-time in the playoffs this year and he’s good at having injuries and backstabbing teams.
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
I wouldn't say that he choked insofar as he had a horrible matchup in Gasol
And still managed to be somewhat effective on offense while being destroyed on defense.
To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.
Well done sir...A rec for you...
Your ranking is in line with my opinion of the whom the Bulls should target in the offseason (well, I am actually way more down on Boozer, I almost consider him to be the poison of Johnson) and its nice to see some additional statistics to support this position…
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
Great read
I would even go further and put Lee on number 1. He’s the one of these guys who’s most likely not getting overpaid, so that leaves us with enough money to keep our pick and add another valuable asset to our team, maybe a backup guard.
He probably will,
the Lakers would have to match salary in a S&T, so lets SHUT DOWN THE CARTER on gift wrapping teams FA before free agency happens, the second tier I would take Amare, he is good in the PNR, his post game is good, and his ability to command double teams and dominate a game the way he did against the Lakers the other night.
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions
In all honesty, if the "consolation prize is just David Lee and a good draft pick...
…I will not be heartbroken. I will take it over Joe Johnson any day of the week. It’s not splashy, but I think Rose + SG + Deng + Lee + Noah is akin to the 2006-2007 Bulls (in that they are considered scrappy and severely underrated), but on the next step up. They will be possible second round winners next year, and if the SG becomes something and everyone progresses on typical age-improvement arcs, they’ll be a 55 to 60-win team and make it to the Conference Finals year-in, year-out with a legitimate chance to get to the NBA Finals and win it.
It’s not ideal, but it would be super entertaining.
Rose – Hinrich (blech, eventual replacement)
SG – Hinrich (blech, eventual replacement)
Deng – Johnson
Lee – Gibson
Noah – Asik
I would hope that Reinsdorf would extend Noah and Rose their proper due and shed Hinrich as salary if they were refusing to go to the luxury tax. I would hate to see Deng go instead of Hinrich. That’d be pathetic.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
by tyger1147 on May 25, 2010 9:37 AM CDT reply actions 2 recs
Nope. Won't happen.
You need to SHUT DOWN THE CARTER on not having a clue what you’re talking about.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
by tyger1147 on May 25, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I know
what I’m talking about, this is still a good team, but not a championship team, 2nd round at best, Rose will have to become a top 5 player for this team to be a championship contender.
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions
no, you don't.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
David Lee
improves them but not by that much, the onus would be more on Rose to develop into a top 5 player, David Lee isn’t the pure scorer Amare is, the Bulls needs a scorer, I think he fits more of a need.
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions
I hope Rose does develop
into that top 5 player, but I think Amare helps us better.
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions
He'll take even
more pressure off a Rose, especially in the 4th, you have another guy you can give the ball to and get a basket.
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions
OTOH, you have another guy to just let the other team run right by him.
Or someone who will ball hog and not create for others. Or someone who won’t rebound. You know, alll those other aspects of basketball.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
by tyger1147 on May 25, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
To be fair, David Lee won't exactly beast on the defensive end.
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
this team looks a lot like the current atlanta hawks.
It has 4th seed and 2nd round loss written all over it.
by Uncle Stanley McGoober on May 25, 2010 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions
The Hawks don't have anyone as good as I hope Rose will be.
Deng, Lee and Noah are all severely underrated. If Chris Bosh or Amare Stoudemire make the Bulls title contenders and David Lee makes them 2nd rounders, you mean to say that Stoudemire or Bosh are really worth 2 rounds of playoffs greater than Lee? Please. That’s ludicrous.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Yes, Bosh and Amare are
its what they can do offensively, they are both more talented players than Lee.
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe Bosh
Amare isn’t a great rebounder like lee, so i say the both are about the same…….lee can rebound and score and amare is just a little bit better on offense……neither one of them can play defense like bosh
amare is a very flashy player and that flashiness is confusing you.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
Amare
also has to be double teamed, which helps the offense, Amare can post up and face up, he’s not be a good rebounder, but we have Noah to beast the boards along w/ Deng.
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm not
as enamored w/ David Lee as everybody else is, he is good a player, but he is the last guy on my list interms of getting a team to that next level, his ideal role would be at best as a 3rd or 4th option on a contending team.
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions
i watch a bit of phoenix and i rarely see amare doubled, if for no other reason
than nash has the ball so much and no team commits double teams to guys working off the ball. but if he were doubled im not sure it would help the offense anyways. you see that Passing category? sub-5% AST rate for amare, and on a team that is built for spacing and scoring.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
by TheMoon on May 25, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
But you did see
how he BEASTED the Lakers, Bulls need a legit scoring option if they strike out on the big 3, he is number 4 on my board, and he fits, he can be a #1 or #2 scorer, he’ll take the pressure off Rose to score
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Did you see how he got torched in games 1 and 2?
by YaoPau on May 25, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
"Ability to be occasionally amazing"
is a good trait for scouting 18 year old prospects, not 27 year old established players. I keep seeing it pop up with Amare discussions and it’s garbage.
by YaoPau on May 25, 2010 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
David Lee gets
destroyed like that on D too
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep
and if everything else was equal then Amare vs. Lee would be a tough call. But Lee is younger, healthier, costs less, and over the course of the season put up the same PER as Amare. Nobody’s arguing that Amare sucks, just that Lee is also good and is a lot safer.
by YaoPau on May 25, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
Amare gives you
more of what you need in a scoring 4, more versitle that Lee, he can drive, post, PNR, and face up
by QUINTEN DALEY on May 25, 2010 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't know how much safer he is
The problem with lee in my mind is that he’s only been this good for one year. I’m concerned he may be a one-year wonder and regress to being just a solid player. On the other hand, Amare and boozer have consistently been good for a number of years. If lee is significantly cheaper I’ll take him but if they all end up getting about the same amount of $ he’s 3rd on my list.
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 25, 2010 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
I basically disagree.
The problem with lee in my mind is that he’s only been this good for one year.
He’s the same player as always, save for passing and usage.
What’s different in the advanced stats?
TS% has actually gone down but has been pretty steady.
DRB% has stayed identical.
TRB% has been pretty damned steady.
STL% hasn’t changed one bit.
BLK% has been pretty frickin’ steady.
TOV% has stayed the same the past 3 years (pre-D"Antoni)
ORtg has gone slightly down.
DRtg has stayed identical.
AST% increased by about 70%. (~10 to ~17)
USG% has increased by about 24%. (~19 to ~22)
If you expect him to come in and be a second option on offense, his usage should stay up. I guess you only hope he can pass as well as he has. But otherwise, he’s been “this good” his entire career. I mean, he put up a 20 PER as a 23 year old 2nd-year player getting 1700 minutes. He’s put a up a > .15 WS/48 every year since his second. This isn’t out of nowhere.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
by tyger1147 on May 25, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
On the other hand...
…if you look at Stoudemire’s numbers, there’s so much variance there as to drive one crazy. And it’s not just his “injury” years either.
I think Stoudemire and Boozer are better, but A) not by a lot and B) come with tons more risk.
In fact, after what I just researched, I’d argue that David Lee is one of the safest possible, most consistent players in the NBA. Not at all a one-year wonder.
*Correction to above USG went from ~19 to ~24.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
But the USG% jump is a big deal and can't be overlooked
Generally speaking, players don’t just jump from a 19 USG% to a 24 and maintain their scoring efficiency. The fact that Lee did it is pretty astounding, and I don’t think its being overly skeptical to say that there’s a decent chance that he doesn’t repeat those results, particularly when he’s no longer far and away the most talented player on his team. Take him off of the Knicks where D’Antoni probably draws up more plays for him than anybody else because the rest of the Knicks suck and I think there’s a good chance he reverts back to being a 16 and 11 player. Still good, but not as impactful as Amare/Boozer would be.
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 25, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
There was a TS% drop
He was a career .608 TS% player before this season, and his TS% dropped to .584 with the higher usage. There have been other players recently whose usage increased with a similarly limited TS% drop. Chris Kaman, Andrew Bogut, Carl Landry, Luis Scola all did it last year. Joakim’s TS% held up rather nicely with increased usage, especially considering the Bulls team TS% plummeted overall last season.
The rest of your logic makes no sense to me. If I’m reading it correctly, you’re saying “Lee scored efficiently with terrible teammates and with D’Antoni having to draw up play after play for him. Imagine when he goes to a good team, with good teammates. He won’t be as effective.” Because to me, if I see a guy putting up huge, efficient numbers without any help, I’d consider that more impressive than if he put up those same numbers in a loaded system.
by YaoPau on May 25, 2010 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
First off, those other guys you mentioned haven't had as dramatic an increase in USG% as Lee has
His USG% has jumped from 15.6 to 23.8 over the past 2 years. That’s huge. For his TS% to only drop from .606 to .584 over that span is a relatively modest drop for such a big uptick in USG%
I’m not saying he won’t be able to score as efficiently. But he’s going to have a hard time maintaining his increased USG% on a team where he’s the 2nd or 3rd option, so his PER is gonna drop. I don’t think that’s the case for Boozer/Amare because those guys are more like 1-on-1 scorers who are gonna get their points no matter what to a large extent. Lee on the other hand is more of a product-of-the-system guy who’ll score on putbacks, cuts to the basket, etc, sort of like what Luol Deng does. I’m not saying that those types of players aren’t valuable, just that they rarely maintain such a high USG% on good teams, which is what’s made Lee a 22 PER player instead of a 19 PER player.
Brad Miller is god.
lee was assisted on 64% of his baskets; amare,
61%; boozer, 74%. so why are amare and boozer 1 on 1 guys while lee is supposedly just running around off the ball? and look at the ORB% of these three? lee has the second highest. so why does this make him a “garbage points” guy while boozer and amare arent?
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
by TheMoon on May 25, 2010 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Not sure what you define as "garbage points"
But assisted doesn’t tell the full story. For instance, Luol Deng was assisted on only 60.9 of buckets this year, but you know as well as I do that he’s hardly a guy who you’d call a 1-on-1 scorer.
There’s a difference between signing a guy who’s good at scoring in the post and a guy who’s good at cutting to the basket off-the-ball and scoring. I’m not saying one’s better than the other, but they mean different things as far as fit goes. I guess what I’m trying to say is that even though, statistically Boozer, Amare, and Lee are pretty similar, they are all very different players and help a team in different ways. You can’t say that just because they’re PERs are about the same they’re interchangeable. If we were to sign one of those guys this summer, and only one of those guys, I’d lean towards Amare and Boozer because I feel like they’re better at creating scoring inside 1 on 1, which is what we need right now. On the other hand, if we got Lebron in a S + T for Deng and we were gonna sign another guy, I’d lean towards Lee because he’s more of a complimentary guy who can do things without the ball.
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 25, 2010 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions
im not even sure what your point is
in your first paragraph unless its to say that none of these players are really 1 on 1 players which is exactly my point and in contradiction to your point.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
My point in the first paragraph is that %assisted is a pretty meaningless statistic if you look at it without taking context into account.
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 25, 2010 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions
no its not. you just dont like what the
numbers indicate because it conflicts with what you have chosen to believe. players like bosh, duncan, dirk, randolph, even landry are 1 on 1 players. these guys are creating offense by themselves all the time. thats why their %assisted is around 50 and not >60. boozer, amare, lee, garnett at this stage of the game, are all guys with great PGs who have a lot of their offense created for them. does that mean they cant create offense? no. but it does mean that this distinction you are trying to make is goofy and contradicted by the available facts.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
by TheMoon on May 25, 2010 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Brandon Bass was assisted on 51.3% of his shots this year
Does that make him a better 1-on-1 scorer than Boozer, Amare and Lee? What about Al Harrington and his 55.6%? I think it just means he likes to jack up shots with a guy’s hand in his face, not that he’s a 1-on-1 scorer. Amare/Boozer play with 2 of the best PGs in the league (probably the 2 best last year), so it makes perfect sense that they’d have higher &assisted numbers. It also makes perfect sense that Lee would have a relatively lower number playing next to Duhon and Toney Douglas. assisted is a statistic that’s affected by a ton of factors that have nothing to do with the player himself, which is why you can’t simply say player x was assisted y of the time, therefore he’s this type of player.
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 25, 2010 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions
your terminology is confusing me now.
bass’ %assisted doesnt say anything about him being better than anyone. it says nothing about value at all. it does say that hes an iso 1 on 1 player, and i think if you have watched him play you will agree with that. between amare, boozer and lee i dont know who the best iso player is. maybe fundamentallysound can tell us since he has synergysports now. all i am saying is that neither of these guys are 1 on 1 players at all. maybe they all could be, or maybe none of them could be. but 1 on 1 plays are not where these guys have gotten the bulk of their offense.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
That may be so
But if you have 2 players (we’ll call them A and B) and you told be that 20% of A’s points come from 1-on-1 play and 10% of B’s points come from 1-on-1 play
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 25, 2010 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions
*
But if you have 2 players (we’ll call them A and B) and you told be that 20% of A’s points come from 1-on-1 play and 10% of B’s points come from 1-on-1 play and your team needed a scorer who could go 1-on-1, all else being equal, wouldn’t you want A? On the other hand, if you had already had 2 all-stars on your team and wanted a guy who could do more without the ball (cutting, PnR stuff, etc.) wouldn’t you want B?
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 25, 2010 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes.
However, look at the stats TheMoon posted. Assuming that the converse of the assisted stats are true [i.e. unassisted=1 on 1 play], Lee got points by himself in 36% of situations. Boozer got points in 39% of situations.
If player A had 36% of his plays from 1 on 1 play, and player B had 39% of his plays from 1-on-1 play, who cares about that relative to the players’ other differences? And Lee’s 2 years younger and less injury-prone.
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
I get that
But part of the reason for that is that Nash and Deron Williams are so much better at creating for Boozer/Amare than anybody on the Knicks is at creating for Lee.
This is one of those times where the numbers alone don’t tell the full story.
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 26, 2010 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions
The isolation numbers:
Player, % of plays that are isos, total # of iso plays, and points per play.
Amare, 14.7%, 301, .94 ppp
Lee, 14%, 219, .9 ppp
Boozer, 5.6%, 92, .68 ppp
Post up numbers (same format):
Amare, 19.2%, 392, .99 ppp
Lee, 12.5%, 125, .8 ppp
Boozer, 21.6%, 355, .87 ppp
Pick and roll numbers (as the roll man):
Amare, 17.8%, 364, 1.2 ppp
Lee, 22.6%, 353, 1.31 ppp
Boozer, 13.5%, 222, 1.27 ppp
Amare is far and away the best 1 on 1 guy (isolation and post-ups). Lee’s the best PnR guy and Boozer, while good in the post, is a disaster when he isolates (which is probably why he stays within 15 feet of the hoop and almost always on the block).
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 26, 2010 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions 7 recs
you are so all over the place right now.
why can a bad overall player not be better one on one than a great overall player?
brandon bass might be very good at creating for himself one on one but suck horribly everywhere else
i also can’t believe that you’re saying lee gets more of his shots created for him because of D’Antoni and Chris Duhon than Stoudemire does because of Gentry and Nash. Yes, Amare can create his own shot, but he rarely does in the traditional sense. I’d say he probably does about a 1/3 of the time. That’s probably what Lee does, too.
I mean, c’mon, you’re disparaging Lee by saying that he mostly runs off screens and all this, completely ignoring that Amare runs pick-and-rolls to death. My God man.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Alright, let's settle this
According to Synergy, here is their breakdown:
Isolation scoring:
Amare: 15% of possessions, 0.94 PPP
Lee: 14% of possessions, 0.90 PPP
Boozer: 6% of possessions, 0.68 PPP
Post-Up Scoring:
Amare: 19% of possessions, 0.99 PPP
Lee: 13% of possessions, 0.80 PPP
Boozer: 22% of possessions, 0.87 PPP
Pick and Roll, as Pick-Setter:
Amare: 18% of possessions, 1.20 PPP
Lee: 23% of possessions, 1.31 PPP
Boozer: 14% of possessions, 1.27 PPP
Spot-Up:
Amare: 9% of possessions, 0.95 PPP
Lee: 16% of possessions, 0.88 PPP
Boozer: 11% of possessions, 0.85 PPP
Off Cuts:
Amare: 14% of possessions, 1.44 PPP
Lee: 10% of possessions, 1.32 PPP
Boozer: 22% of possessions, 1.29 PPP
After Offensive Rebounds:
Amare: 9% of possessions, 1.16 PPP
Lee: 9% of possessions, 1.15 PPP
Boozer: 9% of possessions, 1.16 PPP
In Transition:
Amare: 6% of possessions, 1.29 PPP
Lee: 6% of possessions, 1.30 PPP
Boozer: 7% of possessions, 1.43 PPP
Some other play types (off screens, off handoffs, P&R as ball handler) occur so rarely I didn’t post them, and they account for the rest. None of the players score efficiently on those plays.
Couple things I took from this:
(1) You called Lee the guy who’s “good at cutting to the basket off-the-ball and scoring”. He actually does that the least of the three players.
(2) Some people have claimed that Lee gets garbage points off offensive rebounds. All three players are basically identical at scoring off rebounds.
(3) None of the three are effective in the post. Crazy, eh? I’m surprised by that. While their FG% on those shots is decent (Amare makes 51%, Boozer 48%), their turnover rate in the post is really high (14% for Amare, 16% for Boozer). That completely makes me re-think the value of post scoring, especially if the player doesn’t pass well out of the post.
(4) Amare and Lee are very similar at creating offense in isolation, and both were much better than Boozer in that category.
(5) Lee’s bread and butter is the pick and roll. He’s ridiculously good at it, using a higher portion of his possessions than Amare and Boozer and scoring at a more efficient rate.
It’s hard to look at this data and say that Amare and Lee are wildly different players. Sure, Amare scores from the post a bit more, and Lee takes a few more jumpers, but they are much more similar than they are different, especially compared to Boozer. The idea that Amare/Boozer create more offense is a myth, as is the idea that Lee scores more off garbage points. Please let this anti-Lee craziness stop.
by YaoPau on May 25, 2010 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions 8 recs
Oh, you beat me to it. Curses!
(Kidding. Well done.)
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 26, 2010 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions
do these PPP numbers only record the players' scoring
or do they also record the points created off passing in these situations?
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
I *think* the formula is
Pts/(FGA + .44 * FTA + TOV). I tried it for a few players and it estimated almost exact. Basically it’s TS% with turnovers included.
by YaoPau on May 26, 2010 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think its anti-Lee craziness
Amare appears to be the more well rounded scorer. He is far more accomplished in his career, both as an individual player and as far as team success. And at times in his career, Amare has been capable of dominating in ways Lee
The only argument for Lee appears to be that he is cheaper and younger. And on that basis I can see preferring Lee. But I haven’t heard an argument that he is better.
by Basketball Smurf on May 26, 2010 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions
I think the argument isn't about him being better, it's that
they are providing more or less the same production and Lee is going to be quite a bit cheaper (or at least, that’s the general assumption) and he’s younger and less injured.
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 26, 2010 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions
Nah, it's nothing against Amare
I’ve just seen a lot of posts saying Lee is a role player who gets scrap points and isn’t an impact player, and on and on, and I don’t see much to support that. Obviously Amare has little to prove.
by YaoPau on May 26, 2010 1:29 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Those numbers are a tad surprising to me, especially for Boozer
But Amare is clearly the best 1-on-1 scorer out of the 3. Boozer’s standing falls quite a bit in my book, so all else equal, I’d say I’d rank them Amare, Lee, Boozer now.
I’ve always said that I’d rather have Lee if he’s significantly cheaper than the other two, but we’ll see how the market plays out. If it’s a choice between Lee at 5 years $80 mil and Amare/Boozer at the max, I think you take Lee. If it’s 5 years $90 mil for Lee, I think you lean towards Amare. But let’s say Boozer’s stock falls and the market price for him falls to 4 years $65 million, I’d go for him.
Brad Miller is god.
Bogut went from 17.8 to 23.3 in *one* year
He’s gone from 15.9 to 23.3 over his career. Kaman went from 20.9 to 27.1 in one year, and 15.7 to 27.1 over his career. I wonder if you’re looking anything up at this point or just rattling off arguments because you don’t like Lee.
As for Lee having to deal with being a 2nd option, he was the second option most of this season in New York, as Al Harrington had a USG% near 27. You’re acting like Lee was a go-to scorer, when in reality his USG% equaled Andre Miller’s this season. He excelled in the kind of role he’ll be in with most teams.
As for PER dropping, it shouldn’t. Look at Garnett when he joined the Knicks, or Gasol when he joined the Lakers. A drop in USG% should be offset by an increase in TS%. One thing I don’t understand is why you think Lee is a one hit wonder. He put up a 20.2 PER in his second season, and has a career 19.5 PER. It’s understandable that he’d improve a bit as he plays into his prime, since most good PFs do.
Just a total load of bs arguments imo, none of which are supported by numbers.
by YaoPau on May 25, 2010 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
You're cherry-picking numbers
Bogut did go from 17.8 to 23.3, but the year before that he was at 20.2. And yes he did jump from 15.9 to 23.3 in his career, but that’s over a 5-year span. Gradual improvement is normal, while sudden, dramatic improvement is more likely to be an aberration. Kaman’s massive jump followed a year in which he was hobbled with injuries, and 20.9 to 27.1 isn’t as dramatic as 15.6 to 23.8. A USG% as low as 15.6 implies that, 2 years ago, Lee was barely involved in the offense. And now he’s a volume scorer? Maybe that’ll hold up, and maybe it won’t.
And my whole point is Lee is not a go-to scorer, which is why you can’t just say “his TS% and USG% are about the same as Boozer/Amare, so he’s about the same player.” Lee, Amare, and Boozer all get their points in very different ways, and, consequently, would fit in effectively to varying degrees. Yes, this argument isn’t supported by numbers, because statistics fail to account for differences in playing style. If you have two guys with a .550 TS% and a 25 USG%, but tell me that one’s a post scorer, and one’s a face-up player, they’re going to have different effects on a team that signs one of them. I’m not saying that one is universally better than the other, just that they’re different.
Lee’s a slasher. He’s great at moving without the ball and scoring. Right now, we already have a guy like that, and his name is Luol Deng. Amare/Boozer are more “give me the ball and I’ll go 1-on-1” players, and right now we lack a big man who has the ability to do that. On the other hand, if we get Lebron in a S + T for Deng, now I’d prefer Lee, because he’s more effective without the ball in his hands.
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 25, 2010 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually, Lee is NOT a slasher. He had the ball in his hands a ton this year.
You’ve pretty clearly not been watching him this year.
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 26, 2010 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions
You're right I'm wrong about that
And no I haven’t made it a point to watch the Knicks very much recently , so a lot of my opinion on Lee was based on highlight clips and reputation, but your and YaoPau’s numbers have shown me the light.
Brad Miller is god.
Being able to admit when you're wrong is a trait that
is often in short supply around here and elsewhere (I do it as much as anyone). So kudos for admitting it.
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 26, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions
Should say "I'm as guilty of it as anyone."
Misphrased that.
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 26, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah this'll seem odd (seeing as I'm pretty much just jumping into the convo here)
but at least you’re open minded.
by Stacey_Is_King on May 26, 2010 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Along the same lines as YaoPau...
He didn’t continue to score as efficiently. His increase in PER was solely from two areas: increased USG and increased AST. These outweighed his slight decrease in shooting, as I pointed out above.
Second, as I mentioned, if you’re bringing in David Lee to the Bulls as your lone free agent acquisition, he’s going to be the 2nd scoring option behind Derrick Rose. Actually, just like he was to Al Harrington this year. You might want to believe he was the primary option based on zero research, but in my opinion, he was probably really just the only who stayed on the team for the entire year.
Having Rose around 26-28% and Lee between 22-24% seems pretty normal for around the league. I see no reason why it would be different for the Bulls, and I don’t see why that small variation would affect Lee.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
IF we did get Lebron...i can see it might make a difference
Rose/Lebron/Lee/Noah etc….How would lee fit in with Rose and lebron
He has only shot well this year
This year in contrast to last, Per 40 minutes:
From 16-23’ his attempts have rose from 2.1 to 5.2
His FG% from 16-23’ rose from 34 to 43%
From 10-15’ his attempts rose slightly 1.2 to 1.6
but his FG% rose to 49.6% from 37% the previous year.
He’s been an absolute marksman this year. He’s been so good that it’s clear to me that this isn’t a total fluke, he has become a good shooter. I just don’t know if he could repeat this shooting performance.
"I skim a LOT of what gets said here
in a race to put in a smirky retort."
-your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 16, 2009 4:52 PM EDT
by Jamaicanpi on May 25, 2010 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sorry
"I skim a LOT of what gets said here
in a race to put in a smirky retort."
-your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 16, 2009 4:52 PM EDT
agreed. though with a lane agility much better than roses
i think lee will be able to beat PFs off the dribble as easily as he did centers.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
you're right. on offense, they are better. on defense they are not
the difference is not near as vast as you think.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
That look
like a 2nd round exit. Unless Rose becomes a top 10-5 player. He’s not that far off but still doesn’t look like a championship team.
Well there you have it.
With these three replies, I’m convinced I have a good idea on my hands.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
by tyger1147 on May 25, 2010 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
hahahahaha
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
Great read and well done!
I agree with the assessment. Bosh has to be number one, but Lee is definitely solid and could probably be signed for less. If Bulls could find a way to get Lee and Gay by shedding Hinrich, that would be an excellent team.
PG – Rose
SG – Gay/Draft Pick
SF – Deng/Gay
PF – Lee/Taj
C – Noah/Lee
This is a tight 7 man rotation. Lot’s of athleticism and youth. The right coach could make this into a championship team.
LeBron would be awesome too :)
Curious what people high on David Lee think he's worth..
If he’s going to come cheaper (and a bidding war doesn’t occur) is that 5 years/$65 million/$13per? Would anyone venture north of that?
He'll definitely get way more than that
5 years $80 mil would be an appropriate ceiling I think.
Brad Miller is god.
Lee only has 5 years of experience
So, depending on the cap number for next year, he’ll probably only be able to make $13.5-$14M a year.
Not quite
He’ll only be able to get about $14 mil in year one, but his salary can still increase by 10% each year after that. So his max would be about $5 years 90 mil.
Brad Miller is god.
If we get a second tier PF talent
the hope is we also get another FA. Whether its someone like LBJ or someone like gay, through a S&T, it is essential to make another upgrade to become a legit contender.
by Scottie's Nose on May 25, 2010 10:15 AM CDT reply actions
Good article
About Amare’s knee though. I’ve seen other posts here saying “he’s been healthy, he’s retained his athleticism, this is a risk worth taking” and while that could be 100% absolutely right, I’m not ready to trust that yet. Here’s an article on microfractures from basketball prospectus. The short version: instead of having a meniscus in his knee, Amare has a layer of dried blood. There are no conclusive studies on how the knee holds up long-term or evidence of an explosive NBA player who has played with the injury past 5 years.
And it’s not like Amare has a fallback option if his athleticism goes. Other big men have lost athleticism after major surgery and still retained value because of their defense (McDyess, Kenyon Martin). If Amare has to play below the basket, he sucks. Considering the extremeness of the surgery, the way Amare plays and how little we know about the longterm results, I think at the very least you factor in a percentage chance that Amare fizzles out in a few years and see if the overall numbers still make him worth signing. As for Boozer, the track record on big men who missed as many games as he has the past five years is awful. Not that that’s a remarkable conclusion :)
My opinion now is that Amare and Boozer aren’t worth the risk. Like with Joe Johnson, I can’t see a situation where the Bulls sign Amare and win a title right away (I’m willing to overlook Wade’s age and injury history for this reason), and there’s massive cost if something goes wrong. If we want a PF, get Lee or even Luis Scola, who is 29, has the type of game to hold up for 4-5 more years, and has never missed a game in his NBA career. And then you can sign another guy.
by YaoPau on May 25, 2010 11:01 AM CDT reply actions 5 recs
I hate Will Carroll.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
why?
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 25, 2010 9:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Pitcher Abuse Points
It’s one thing to be wrong. It’s another to be wrong and totally arrogant about how right you are. PAP is just so wrong. It’s fine for a jumping off point, or a first foray into pitcher stress, but it should have been left 12-14 years ago. That it’s last this long, let alone 5 years or so, is ridiculous.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Ah, you're talking baseball sabermetric nonsense. Might as well be Greek to me.
I understand baseball for the most part, but I know very little about the sabermetric stats besides that on base percentage is more important than batting average.
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 26, 2010 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions
Amar'e can shoot
That should help, but year Amar’e with limited athleticism is a scary thought.
And not the good kind of scary.
Great read
I still put Bosh and Amare as 1 and 2, mainly because they get to the free throw line a lot. That is the biggest difference to me between them and Boozer or Lee as far as what the Bulls need. When the outside shots aren’t going in, the Bulls really need a guy who can get to the line to get easy points. I would take any one of these guys over Joe Johnson though!
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
by bigballa10 on May 25, 2010 1:09 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
Full list for me is
1. Bosh
2. Amare
3. Lee
4. Boozer
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
Lets not forget Amare plays with STEVE NASH
I personally think the biggest letdown of the 3 of the guys is going to be Amare. I believe his offensive numbers are as good as they are ever going to be, playing in Phoenix with one of the best playmakers of all time. I won’t be giddy over Boozer either with his litany of injuries, but I think given the steep discount Lee would be available for compared to Amare/Boozer and he’s younger, Lee should become the clear target assuming we strike out on Bosh and Lebron.
Get to the Choppa!
by Fred Hoiberg on May 25, 2010 1:57 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Let's not forget that Amare was an all-star before Nash got there
And Deron Williams is also one of the best playmakers of all time so boozer will drop off too. And lee plays with Chris Duhon, another elite point guard (I kid, but playing for d’antoni probably leads to some statistical increase).
Brad Miller is god.
Amare was not an all-star before nash. and his TS% spiked from .53 w/out Nash to .61 with.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
and that d'antoni comment is stupid.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
I was off on the year when Nash got there, but Amare was still pretty good before Nash got there
But I don’t think the D’Antoni comment is stupid. Players’ tend to score more efficiently when playing in fast-paced offensive systems, and any D’Antoni team is going to have a fast-paced offensive system. The Knicks were 8th in pace this year and 2nd the year before that.
In fact, all 3 of these guys have been on teams that were top 10 in pace over the last couple years, so its not unreasonable to expect all of them to have a bit of statistical dropoff if they go to a slower paced team.
Brad Miller is god.
Do you have any statistical evidence, or even anecdotal...
…to suggest that players score more efficiently in faster-paced systems?
Indiana, Minnesota, Portland, Atlanta… they’d like words with you.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
I haven't done a ton of analysis or anything, but it seems to be true
The Phoenix Suns’ entire decade is a pretty good anecdotal example. There are plenty of players that put up career highs in TS% for Phoenix. Now if you want to say that’s just Nash, fine. But in GS, Maggette just put up a career high in TS% at the age of 30. Morrow, an undrafted free agent put up a .597 TS%, which is ridiculously high for a guard. In NY, Chris freaking Duhon had a TS% of .569 (he came back to earth this year, but still. Perhaps Indiana and Minnesota would score even less efficiently if they went slower, and Portland and Atlanta would score even more efficiently at a higher pace.
And logically, it makes sense that if you push the ball, you’ll get more easy buckets. If you were to graph eFG% with pace for every team in the league over the past 10 years, I’m sure you’d get some correlation. There’s obviously a million other factors, so they probably wouldn’t correlate too strong, though.
Brad Miller is god.
It also makes logical sense that if you wait for a very good shot...
…instead of rushing them and taking the first decent shot, you’ll also score more efficiently.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
billups put up a career high in TS% at 31 on the slowest team in the league in 07-08.
Nic batum put up a TS% of .646, which is insane for a perimeter player, on the slowest team in the league this year.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
The Bulls were top 10 in pace under Skiles and Vinny.
One season of average offensive efficiency to show for it. You know better than to suggest teams that score more points are more efficient.
"Boozer's dumb ass jumped. So I dunked on his ass."-Joakim Noah
by Ozzie Montana on May 25, 2010 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions
i think a fast pace can help, but its not a given that it does when your only
playmaker on the perimeter is chris duhon.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
A fast pace helps when it suits your personnel. If your personnel is filled with knockdown spot-up shooters?
Yeah, a fast pace is going to help. If you’re filled with guys that do more dribbling before they shoot? Then a half court set is probably better.
This isn’t rocket science, I don’t know why Polo is being so obtuse about it.
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 25, 2010 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
It really hasn't.
You are off your game today.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Deron Williams has had a fantastic year
But he isn’t in Nash’s class in terms of career yet; Nash is a two time MVP. Amare is better than Shawn Marion, but I really did not expect Marion to have such a steep decline once he left the Suns.Stoudamire should have to pay Nash royalties for the pay days he has gotten and will get this year.
Get to the Choppa!
by Fred Hoiberg on May 26, 2010 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Gread Post! Thanks for the insight
My Own List:
1. Bosh
2. Lee
3. Amare
4. Boozer
My list of free agents overall:
1. Lebron
2. Bosh
3. Wade
4. Lee
Great job
I’m kind of coming around on Lee too, I guess at this point the only move that would make me wanna bomb the United Center would be signing Joe Johnson. And even that depends on the years and money he’s given and who else would be joining him
If you're reading this signature, there's a good chance you don't like Vinny Del Negro.
I want no part of Joe Johnson at anything over $11 or 12 million a year (Luol Deng money).
He’s really not that much better than Deng, on the whole, and he’s older and is almost entirely an isolation player (which takes the ball out of Derrick’s hands).
He’s going to get offered more than $11 or 12 million, and therefore, I hope we don’t sign him at all. DO NOT WANT.
2010 Offseason Motto: Get Greedy, Bulls. Grab LeBron and Bosh and Phil.
by fundamentallysound on May 26, 2010 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions
can you help me out with dirks defensive PPP numbers? im trying to add dirk and bosh to this post.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
Yea, I guess you're right, he's destined to be overpaid
The thing is, if we get Bosh or someone like that, I’d still take an overpaid Joe Johnson. We’re gonna be capped out for years to come anyway, so why not try to maximize talent while you’ve got the chance? My dream scenario is still Redick though, really think that guy would fit well with this team. Plus we’d have two of the most hated college basketball players of all time on our team, sounds like fun.
If you're reading this signature, there's a good chance you don't like Vinny Del Negro.
by Juiceboxjerry on May 26, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Since these three are all relatively equal
At least to the point that you can have such long winded debates over who is better that I stopped reading what you all had to say, I think all that matters is how much better Chris Bosh is than them.
What I mean is, is Chris Bosh so much better than these three guys that you would do whatever it takes (Noah, I assume) in a sign and trade to get him? Or, because we have 3 options that are all relatively equal a step below, are they close enough, that if the Raptors demand Noah, we tell them to go to hell?
For the stat guys, where would Dirk have fallen in this group if he becomes an option? Does Dirk being potentially available also lower what we’d pay for Bosh, or is he too old to make it a factor for our very young team?
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 26, 2010 8:05 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Yes, I'd like to see where Bosh and Nowitzki (why not?) land on the above 3-man list.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Well I think Bosh is definitely number one
I just wonder if it’s a big enough leap between talent, to make it worth losing Noah in a S&T. Or basically how big the talent gap is so you would know what makes sense in a S&T. I mean is it close enough it doesn’t even make sense to give up Taj? Or is it so large that giving up anyone other then Rose is perfectly reasonable?
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 26, 2010 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions
i will do that.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
I'm not rating him at all.
And if anything I’m suggesting he’s our second best player and very good. That was my whole point.
I must have worded it poorly.
“Is Bosh so much better than these 3 guys that are apparently close in talent, that it’s worth giving up our very good, young center?” is what I was trying to ask. I’m not sure what you gathered from my post, but I surely wasn’t underrating him in any way.
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 26, 2010 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions
I missed that it was a question
I thought you were saying you want to trade Noah to get Bosh. Sorry.
To get this on point. I think any of these guys with Noah is better than Bosh + Taj.
Somebody went over Dirk I seem to recall
But I don’t know where. It was probably YaoPau, but the gist of the post was Dirk’s numbers should take a steep dive in about 2 or 3 years, and be particularly brutal by the end of a 5 year contract. I think Dirk would be awesome if the Bulls were already a 2nd round or ECF team and he could push us over the top as a 2nd option, but if Dirk is all we get, I believe it would only make the bulls faux contenders (like ATL) and leave a solid string of 2nd round exits.
Get to the Choppa!
by Fred Hoiberg on May 26, 2010 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions
That was an admittedly iffy post
I tried finding comparables for Dirk, but he has no comparable. But he turns 32 in a month, he’s 7’ tall, he’s played 38mpg since 2001 and made the playoffs every year. There’s gotta be wear and tear building up, and 2010 marked the 4th straight year Dirk’s PER dropped.
My shot in the dark guess is Dirk has two more good years left before he falls off. The reason being he’s played 34000 regular season minutes in his career, putting him 8th among active players. Duncan at 35000 is showing signs of dramatically slowing down. Ray Allen and Michael Finley at 38000 are role players. Shaq at 41000 is a giant blob. Garnett at 42000 is Dirk’s best case for holding up, but even Garnett has clearly lost a step.
Basically, Dirk’s entering really unknown territory in a couple years, and while he has the game to extend his career, he could easily be a couple years away from being a 19 PER, bad defender, and that’s not worth much at all.
you know when you gave those 3 year APMs for amare, boozer and lee?
could you help me out with those for bosh and dirk? Id like to add them to this post and i am not sure where to find APM info.
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
They are 2006-2009 4 year
and they’re a tad more dated now than when I posted them. But Dirk was +6.65, -0.13 and Bosh was +5.80, +1.36
by YaoPau on May 26, 2010 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nice piece
kind of sold me on Lee. Fawk Bosh (unless we get NOBODY)..but Lee + wade/bron would be sweeeet
"The Bulls Are Back" - D. Stern (2010)
Bosh's crunch time fg% is ridiculously bad
I wonder if it’s because he starts pressing and forcing bad shots to be “the guy”. He does make up for it somewhat by getting to the line at a ridiculous rate.
Brad Miller is god.
Not sure his game translates to crunch times shots to be honest
Which is fine, we have Derrick Rose. Add Bosh, and a sg who can hit 3’s and Bosh won’t be the first option in crunch time anyways.
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 27, 2010 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions
i dont like any of em as compliments to lbj if we were to get him
I kust find them too offensively minded which we don’t need if we have lebron and rose. Id rather have a traditional big man that can grab boards an defend other bigs and score only when the offense allows them much like noah works.
Without lbj in the equation though id prefer amare or bosh. They have the most to offer offensively which is what we need. Was high on boozer but damn did he get beasted by the laker bigs
As a previous example of offensive-minded stars playing together
look at the 2008 Celtics:
PPG in 2007:
Ray Allen – 26.4
Paul Pierce – 25.0
Kevin Garnett – 22.4
PPG in 2008:
Ray Allen – 17.4
Paul Pierce – 19.6
Kevin Garnett – 18.8
Shots per game in 2007:
Ray Allen – 21.0
Paul Pierce – 18.1
Kevin Garnett – 16.1
Shots per game in 2008:
Ray Allen – 13.5
Paul Pierce – 13.7
Kevin Garnett – 15.3
Point being that if these players are buying in to team success, rather than individual success, it will work. And given that both Rose and LeBron are both unselfish, I really don’t think it will be a problem no matter which of these PF’s might join also (assuming, of course, that we get LeBron).
yes but buying into team success is always a big if
i think the reason kg pierce and allen were able to mesh is because no one player was head and shoulders above the others. when you have a lebron or a bosh who thinks hes the whole world. its going to be hard to get them to buy into a team system where everyone has an equal role. boston worked out great in my opinion because they have the three of them to keep each other in check
Bosh isn't likely to come here following LeBron without realizing he's giving up some shots
It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.
George Washington
You're making a lot of assumptions
on the mental states of stangers
Why didn't anyone go after Lee last season?
Wasn’t he a Restricted FA? I felt like any team coulda offered a slightly better deal with years tacked on, and saved a LOT more money than waiting for this year.
1. Because he was restricted and NY could match any offer
and
2. Saving money and cap space for 2010…
someone should've played chicken with the Knicks
would they have really matched and fudged their 2010 cap plan?
BaB on Twitter | BaB on Facebook
"Don't nag, flag!"
by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 27, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions
yea, thats what i was getting at
like NO other team didnt want to do anything, and yea detroit really messed up, hes SO much better than charlie V and they coulda gotten him for much cheaper IMO
Doubt it...
Considering David Lee made more money last season in New York than Charlie V. got in Detroit…given that they had Stuckey and Hamilton already, while they had no one of value in the frontcourt, a case could be made that they should have targeted Lee first with Ben Gordon’s money…
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
by Dionysus2.0 on May 27, 2010 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Main reason was that nobody had cap room
Nobody was clearing cap room for 2009 when 2010 was on the horizon. Except Detroit. Man did they screw up.
Brad Miller is god.
He didn't have the same efficient jump shot either
He developed that this year
"I skim a LOT of what gets said here
in a race to put in a smirky retort."
-your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 16, 2009 4:52 PM EDT
This makes me a lot warmer to Lee.
Is Lee going to command a max deal? I’d be fine based on this even if he did, but he seems so off-the-radar and under-appreciated now that I feel like you could get a player who’s better than his high-priced deal with lee. I’m far warmer with lee after reading this.
A true friend stabs you in the front - Oscar Wilde
Lee will command a max
But his max contract is less than everyone else’s. Since he only has 4 years experience, his max deal will fall somewhere between $12-14mil, depending on what the cap ends up being.
Lee WILL NOT get as much as the others, simply because the salary structure dictates he cannot. And to me, he’d be worth every penny of $12-14mil. Agree with the OP; If it’s not Bosh, I’d rather have Lee than Amare (considering the salary difference).
by Thrustacular on May 26, 2010 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions
i dont mind amare. but i do worry about how he'll translate into a non-suns system.
he would be going from a team with a 115 Ortg to a team with a 104 Ortg. I am not aware of any other significant player making such a movement. Marion did and it wrecked him offensively, but he wasnt as good at offense as amare. shawn kemp sort of did this in 97 when he went from a 111 Ortg team to a 104.5 Ortg team. It hurt him pretty badly too— though he might have been a substance abuser at the time, which would skew the results. the problem is that if he doesnt make a pretty smooth transition offensively from the suns to the bulls then what does amare have? what does he do but score and score efficiently?
"carrying a lot of weight that can be converted into more strength."
Hmm. can i get a t-shirt large enough to have that written across the chest?
-- feral
I wouldn't mind signing Lee as long as we get Lebron.
Bosh 2010!!!!!
by illwill on May 26, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
the more i think about the idea of adding LeBron
the more i’m getting unsure if this is the best option we have. the way he reacted after the Celtics kicked their asses in game 3 (was it game 3 or game 4? i dunno, i bet you know better), saying he’s not concerned, behaving the complete opposite than his coach, makes me question his maturity and leadershi skills.
i’m not saying adding LeBron would be a fault or that we shouldn’t do it if we could. but i think it’s his personality that separates him from guys like Jordan, Bird or Magic. they were all about winning and when they got defeated, they responded. LeBron’s a showman, he’s all about himself, his legacy and stuff. as long as he doens’t change his mind and behaviour as an expected leader, i dunno if he will win a ring.
plus, i think we have a very good leader in d-rose, who i believe will be a top 5, if not top 3 PG in the coming years. nowadays it’s all about team chemistry, and i think we can develop one without LeBron.
Way overthinking it
If you don’t think LeBron James is your best option. People said the same things about Magic, being all about the spotlight, Jordan, being all about himself. Then they got on great teams and all of a sudden they were “winners.”
You need to do some research if you think Magic Johnson didn’t get dogged in the press for a long time, same as MJ.
It takes more than a top 3 PG to win an NBA championship.
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 27, 2010 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions
Uhhh, what?
Magic won the title in his rookie season, and had titles peppered through his career, and was always on great teams with other great players. When was he “dogged” for being all about the spotlight?
Definitely correct
He was still dogged consistently early on his career for being more about the Hollywood life style than about the games though. He grew up as his career went on.
His first year was great, but the next few years the bad press came out about him. The Westhead situation, booed by his own fans, demanded a trade, etc.. He matured later on. The first year his talent alone wowed people (although Jordan’s did too). Just like LeBron, the criticism came after people got to know them.
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 27, 2010 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
The surrounded by talent
Relates more to Jordan’s situation obviously, but the bad press was given to both of them.
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 27, 2010 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions
Um, when he was labeled "Tragic Johnson" for choking in the 1984 Finals?
Or, when Kareem hated the guy because he was hogging all the attention as a fist-pumping smile factory?
"Boozer's dumb ass jumped. So I dunked on his ass."-Joakim Noah
by Ozzie Montana on May 27, 2010 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions
That's fine
Lebron can dazzle, while Noah leads, and Rose can get mad.
You’re acting like Lebron will be the only player on the team.
by tuluse on May 27, 2010 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
i agree
yes, you’re right. but i don’t think it was all about the players they were surrounded with, but a change in mindset. yes, Jordan was in the same situation when he didn’t win a title the first seasons. i’m just saying, everyone is thinking that adding LeBron will make us champions. and i’m not 100% sure whether this dream will come true.
look, the question is, does adding LeBron make this team that championship-worthy? maybe, potential-wise it’s even more likely when another top free agent is added to the mix, let’s say Bosh. does it ruin the team chemistry? maybe. who’s your second banana on that team, Bosh or D-Rose?
i’m saying again, if you can get LeBron, take him. but don’t expect him to win us a championship immidiately.
I assume this was supposed to be a reply to me
If guys who were dogged worse than LeBron changed, why the hell couldn’t LeBron make the same mind-set change at the same age they did?
If LeBron doesn’t make this a championship team, no one would, so you might as well close the doors b/c it’s over. And why not immediately? He’s in his prime? Our young guys are not rookies, we won’t have cap room going forward, this is as good as it’s gonna get. If we’re winning a championship with LeBron, we’re just as likely to do it in year 1 as we are in year 3 or 5.
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 27, 2010 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions
yeah, it was supposed to be a reply, my bad
no i kinda screwed up this reply order, dammit…
anyways, back to our discussion: i don’t agree on the sentence "If LeBron doesn’t make this a championship team, no one would, so you might as well close the doors b/c it’s over. "
our team isn’t that far away from succeedeing in the playoffs. we gave the Cavs, who were in no doubt superior, a hard to win series. last year, we fought the Celtics and made it a 7-game-series. we are still a very young an unexperienced team, but we’re growing. D-Rose is growing in his leadership role, and Noah, Hinrich and Deng are a great supporting cast.
i say this: add to this team
a) a coach with playoff experience, a coach that the players trust in
b) a PF that hustles and fights for possessions (be it Lee, who i prefer, Boozer, or even Bosh or Stoudemire, even if they are not your typical hustlers)
c) a few bench players with playoff experience
but please, please let D-Rose be this team’s leader. he’s shown that he’s capable of doing it. and the other guys trust him. i’m not saying they won’t trust LeBron, but he surely demands the alpha dog role at any team, and i’m just basically saying, that it’s a risk to screw up the chemistry of a team that’s not so far away from succeeding.
it might work, but in my opinion, championship teams are grown, and not made via sign & trade.
Not that far?
This isn’t the NFL. Players are what they are. We’ve been at this level before.
Adding Chris Bosh makes us potentially very competitive. But adding LeBron James makes us an elite team w/o a doubt. Championship teams are not grown. It’s been discussed repeatedly here.
Lakers added Gasol, Artest, Celtics added Garnett and Allen, Magic added Lewis, Carter, etc.., Suns added Steve Nash, Grant Hill, etc..
None of these teams are winning with home grown talent. Sure it could happen, but the teams that add a super star win far more often.
"A common mistake made by baseball fans is to call a pitcher unhittable when that pitcher is not Matt Thornton." - Hardball Times
by Grinder in Training on May 27, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
then tell me,
when was the last time a team won a championship in the same season it brought it an alpha dog player that demanded the leading role ?
when Gasol was added, Kobe remained the leader. when Celtics added Allen and Garnett, Pierce remained the leader, because none of them demanded this role (well, Garnett was sort of a co-leader, but he wasn’t above Pierce). Lewis and Carter are no leaders, that role remained to Dwight. Nash was brought in as a leader, okay, but have they won a championship with him? no. had they had a legit leader before? no, they HAD to bring in a leader.
anyways, we can argue on that for hours. i see your point, and i don’t say it’s wrong adding LeBron. but it’s a risk we don’t have to take.
That's a terrible question to use to prove your point as there's only 1 title winner per season
Every champion has been constructed in different ways. Some with a core that battled their way up together for a few years (‘91 Bulls), others with a roster that was quickly thrown together (’08 Celtics, which is the answer to your question), and still others that added 1 final piece to put them over the top (‘83 Sixers, another counterpoint for you, who added MVP Moses Malone). The thing that all championship teams, though, have in common is a collection of great talent in varying stages of their primes. When you have a chance to acquire the greatest talent in the league, especially in a star dominated game like the NBA, you take it. And, if for some reason the pieces you already have don’t fit, they’re the ones who need to go.
It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.
George Washington
by snley on May 27, 2010 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
see, my point is i don't think the only way to win a championship
is to bring in LeBron. there are many ways to achieve this goal, and one might be to add LeBron and another top FA to the mix and trust in the rest of the team to perform as supporting cast. another way might be to trust in the existing team and just tweak a few things, the most important one being bringing in a coach with playoff experience. both ways bear a risk, in my view.
and yes, i stick to it, it may be a risk to bring in the best and most dominant player in the NBA. expectations are already pretty high here, they go through the roof when LeBron enters. assuming we get him and a second top guy like Bosh, anything else than a championship would be a huge disappointment for everyone. what happens if they fail? too many egos can destroy a team.
if we get LeBron, i’ll be excited and happy with that. D-Rose will be able to become second banana, i’m sure. but then, don’t bring in ANOTHER top guy. spend the money that’s left (assuming that if we get LeBron, it’s via sign & trade anbd there is money left) for experienced role players.
I see your point but believe it's product of misevaluating risk levels
Your fear is they don’t get along. That’s legitimate. However, the greater risk is the team doesn’t have enough talent. Acquire the best talent in the best combination possible. If that means bringing in LeBron and Bosh, you can’t pass that up. If your scenario, though, comes to fruition and conflict arises, well, you’re talking about having to trade Bosh or Rose or Noah. A trade might not bring equal value but it’s still likely to bring you something better than just settling for role players this off season. Your worst case scenario (leaving out LeBron and Bosh being debilitated by injuries the rest of their careers) is likely to leave the team in the same position as the best case scenario for just going for LeBron and role players. When evaluating the 2 risks together, it’s apparent there’s little to lose bringing in both LeBron and Bosh.
It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.
George Washington
you know what?
i bet that if we asked the players, all would say they would LOVE to have LeBron and Bosh in the mix.
yea i know, my opinion is quite unpopular here. nevermind, i stick to it.
I don't see how you can classify adding the best player in the NBA as a risk
Brad Miller is god.
by Poloplaya14 on May 28, 2010 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
Especally with the players we have
Rose is a very humble guy who I feel pretty certain does not NEED to be the #1 option. Noah is a guy who just wants to win. I don’t see bringing in Bosh and LeBron creating any bad chemistry on this team whatsoever. And I’m FINE taking that risk.
Or even historically...
The old school Bulls added Pippen (through trade)…the Rockets added Clyde…the Lakers added Shaq…Detroit added pretty much everyone…
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
by Dionysus2.0 on May 27, 2010 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Then your opinion is wrong.
but in my opinion, championship teams are grown, and not made via sign & trade.
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
by Dionysus2.0 on May 27, 2010 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I still don't think Lebron is as good for us as Bosh
There is something to be said for Rose already having the killer instinct. For all the chatter about Magic, how many rings did he have at year 7? How many finals ? The fact is Bosh can shoot, and has a post up game. if we can sign him, and get a shooter, we would be in pretty good shape. If we get Bron-bron too, great, but he worries me. His long 3 thing doesn’t help anybody else score- on the other hand going down low to Bosh would. That gets back to the Coach thing- we need a coach to bring in an offense, and get bron-bron to adhere to it. The other thing the Celtics taught us, is if you pack the lane bron-bron doesn’t know what to do. Bosh has a nice touch on his shots too. I don’t buy the Lee thing. I know he has some stats, but jeez there are plenty of stat monsters on crappy teams that never amount to much when put in the bigger situations. He has no quickness or length advantage, and his touch isnt that great. There is a huge difference scoring when u r getting consistently blown out, so the other team isn’t playing D. Nope. stay away. Bosh, Lebron, Amare,
I forgot that LeBron was playing for a team that had made the playoffs the season before he was drafted and had a still in his prime
top 5 all time player. LeBron’s already been better than Magic in his best seasons and he creates more opportunities for his teammates than Bosh. If it was just a matter of packing the lane against James, the entire NBA would have been doing it his entire career. Also, it seems silly to bash LeBron for never winning and then back Bosh who’s only made it to the second round of the playoffs. Not that I’d condone evaluating a player largely by team success.
It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.
George Washington
I just get the idea Bosh would fit better-
Bron-bron thinks he’s Jesus. Thats why he tosses up those 3’s. And then when things don’t go his way, he gets embarrassed and turns it off. Jeez, think of what the sports writers would have written about bron-bron if he had just gone to the hole repeatedly in the last games when his team was discombobulated. They would have said, look at his try to take the team home, get it done. But he didn’t. He blinked. Its 7 years now. I’m guessing he will continue to blink.
I would rather have a classic big who has great touch than someone who thinks he’s Jesus- thats all. I think its fair to say Cleveland has made a much bigger effort to surround bron-bron with lots of pieces and he still hasn’t panned out. Look we have our cutter guy in Rose, and we need a big. Bosh is the best big available, and he’s got great touch. You know its about getting high percentage shots and playing D, in the end. We need a big for that. If we grab bron-bron first where are we? We are incomplete – thats what. Sure, so hes mr “I look good on tv dont i”, but I want to win.
Even if he's not a "big", LeBron creates more high percentage shots for both himself and his teammates than Bosh
LeBron has a similar if not greater impact on the defensive end than Bosh. LeBron’s been a key contributor to top 10 defenses while Bosh’s teams have routinely struggled. That’s obviously not all on Bosh, but hard to make a case that he’s a game changing defensive presence. Bosh is not a “classic big”, he’s a face up shooter/slasher. LeBron has an ego, but, then so does every other athlete who has ever reached the highest levels of their sport. You don’t get that good without supreme self confidence. The Bulls sign LeBron first, they have the best player in the game. Everything’s a hell of a lot easier when you have that. If things don’t work out with him and Rose, they trade Rose. Just because he was here first doesn’t mean he has to stay. If you want to say “I think LeBron’s a douche”, just say “I think LeBron’s a douche.” There’s no sense in trying to validate it with basketball reasons that just don’t add up.
It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.
George Washington
Its easy to hype him like everyone else
I’m taking the contrary position because I think its being honest. I’ve watched alot of games where he does amazing things that aren’t high percentage, and then I see him try the same things repeatedly trying to be a hero instead of being part of an offense, and figuring out how to break a team down and win. He’s 7 years in, and he still seems mostly just in love with taking long threes and barreling to the hole. Totally agree great specimen, would be great to have, just don’t buy the hype that he will take us home- you know there are plenty of other vince carter types out there – great athletes that can do amazing things- but don’t have the kller instinct to win it all- Jordan, Duncan, KG, Shaq, Kobe, Olajuwon, they have all the titles since Magic and Bird, – because they are all killers. Because they know how to crack a defense and exploit it- because they usually were the teams D leader, not just with help D, but schooling guys HOW to play D. Bron-bron isn’t that guy. Also, after 7 years, he still has “go to the hole” or “launch the 3” – no mid range, no back to the basket- so sure, maybe the standard is set to high- im just trying to figure out if he has it in him to take the next step- and not sure about it. Im not saying Bosh is the answer, but he fits with the rest of our pieces better, so at least we have that.
Each of those guys you listed as "killers" all were questioned the exact same way you question LeBron
before they won their first championship. Jordan was too selfish. Duncan won early enough to not get overly dogged, but there were grumblings about him being “too nice” like Robinson. KG only got out of the first round once and was accused of shying away from taking over in the fourth. Shaq’s teams were swept out of the playoffs every time they lost in the playoffs and it was assumed he was too caught up in being a star to take basketball seriously not to mention the free throw shooting. After Shaq left, Kobe was assumed to be too selfish and condescending to his teammates to ever win a title on his own. Olajuwon was considered to be obsessed with his individual success over team success and even received a lot of crap for fasting for religious reasons during the season. Everyone is assumed to not have “it” until they actually win a championship. Funny thing is, most of them change very little from what they were before other than how the press covers them.
I agree with you, LeBron has a tendency to get caught up in taking 3s and long 2s. It’s not is best way to serve his team. But, he’s not alone in that. MJ was ball dominant and had plenty of nights when he was accused of shooting his team out of a game. A lot of those shots Kobe hit in Game 6 against Phoenix were terrible, low percentage shots that Kobe was lucky to have go in. Because they went in, everyone assumes it was because Kobe was a “killer”. In the end, though, he’s going to give you so much good it’s silly to get so caught up in the bad.
It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.
George Washington
by snley on May 31, 2010 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I guess if LeBron failed once, he'll fail every time,
even when he’s never failed like this before.
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
Bosh isn't a classic big.
So there goes that.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Rose and Lebron
sign and trade
Amare and Barbosa for Kirk, Deng + a 1st round pick
Rose
Barbosa
Lebron
Amare
Noah.
Bench: Taj, Asik, JJ, Flip, Pargo
SO we win a lot of games, 118 to 109. That line-up destroys teams. Championship!
"Michael Redd's owed 18.3 million next year. He can either opt out like an idiot or opt in like a douche bag." - NittanyCub
by Trey23 on May 31, 2010 2:53 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
You lost all crediblity
When you still mentioned Pargo on the team. I dont care if LBJ gets here. PARGO CAN NEVER COME BACK HERE! EVER! Not even as a damn towel boy.
by T.Moore on Jun 1, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
All I know
is that Lee’s agent better be showing these numbers to every team in contract negotiations. He matches up very well against some of the best PFs in the game on paper.
Also, I want Isiah Thomas to be my college scout if i’m a pro team.
Lee should get a max deal
But his max is lower than the other guys because he hasn’t been in the league as long.
thanks for bringing up bad memories
Illinois should have had that championship
by tuluse on Jun 2, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
The Goofiest Front Court in NBA History
Talk about entertainment value—-Bosh and Noah would make every post game show an adventure. They are both goofballs in an endearing and entertaining fashion. It would be a blast.
And kidding aside, Bosh’s gregarious nature would be very helpful for Rose who does not seem to relish the media responsibilities that come with being the face of the franchise. Bosh seems ready and willing to help with that burden…its a seemingly minor point, but anything that comforts Rose has real value.

by 





















