Kirk Hinrich is Killing the Bulls Softly With His Offense
Kirk Hinrich is one of the worse offensive guards in the NBA. He isn't just bad. He isn't just streaky. Of the guards playing major rotation minutes in the NBA, Hinrich is one of the worst offensive players. On par with guys like Duhon, Earl Watson, Q Rich, Mario Chalmers, and Steve Blake.
By popular request, I am posting some facts about Hinrich. In truth, since I first posted these numbers, Kirk has improved. Unfortunately, he is still terrible. Some of you might not like this. Some of you may want to attack the messenger. I don't care. The guy sucks, and his offensive play is indefensible. On to the horror -
Of the 74 guards playing more than 25 MPG this season, Hinrich ranks 63rd in fg%. 65th in TS%, and 65th in PER. Which is why, I guess, that despite the Bulls being devoid of offensive options, Hinrich ranks 60th in USG%.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&per_minute_base=36&type=advanced&is_playoffs=N&year_min=2010&year_max=2010&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=99&lg_id=&franch_id=&is_active=&is_hof=&pos=G&qual=&c1stat=mp_per_g&c1comp=gt&c1val=25&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&order_by=fg_pct
Of the 166 players in the NBA playing more than 25 MPG, Kirk Hinrich and his $9.5 a year rank 154 in PER, 152 in TS% and 151 in FG%. Let this sink in. Of all the regular rotation players in the NBA, Hinrich is one of the worst shooters AND contributes the least in other offensive categories. So never let it be confused again. Hinrich is one of the worst offensive players in the league in all the categories that matter. He is the 98th ranked 3pt shooter in the league. Despite being a "true point" his assist percentage is lower than Joe Johnson, Monta Ellis, Beno Udrih and Allen Iverson. So he isn't creating opportunities for others either... What exactly is he doing out there?
I know we get all excited when he has one of his nice games and scores 15 points. The Hinrich fans come out and say - "see, look at our boy." Of course, Hinrich scoring over 15 points is rare, so why not brag. Our starting shooting guard has scored over 15 pts a grand total of 6 times this season. Hinrich has not scored over 20 pts in a single game all year! Not one time.
Hinrich is a terrible offensive player. The END.....
P.S. -
But Hinrich plays great D! He plays awesome D! Sure, I don’t buy it, but sure. Truly, Hinrich’s D is his only value to the Bulls. Because Rose and Salmons struggle defensively, and Pargo/Hunter have no place on basketball court, Hinrich’s D stands out.
Kirk Hinrich is overpaid relative to other high level perimeter defenders. Hinrich makes more than Ariza, Battier, Artest, Shaw Marion and Sefolosha (a player with similar shooting numbers to Hinrich). He makes more than Anthony Parker, West, Mo Williams or Boobie Gibson.
Hinrich is overpaid relative to other starting guards and wings on teams comparable to the Bulls. He makes more than Crawford, Bibby, or Stephen Jackson. Kirk Hinrich makes more than Devin Harris, Jameer Nelson or David West.
The list of perimeter players who make more than Kirk Hinrich, but produce less includes only Tracy McGrady, Michael Redd and Larry Hughes. Two guys with catastrophic injuries and a former Bull.
And one more point, over the last 5 games the Bulls D has been terrible. I'm not blaming Hinrich. But please, do not call this guy the backbone of any great D. That was Noah, Tyrus and Taj.
The End... for now.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
335 comments
|
15 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I know he has trouble scoring
but the ast % being worse than Monta Ellis and Allen Iverson is shocking. I mean Ellis shoots almost every time I see him with the ball. That’s pretty bad.
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
Yep. He's not a good passer, he's a terrible scorer, he's a below average rebounder and his defense (his only valuable skill)
is quickly becoming obsolete as more and more quick guards enter the league, because he can’t stay in front of them.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 10:09 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
when Hinrich was inserted into the starting lineup
his biggest value on offense, as far as I can tell, was his willingness to move the ball. Unlike Salmons, he wasn’t looking for his shot, so the ball ended up in Rose and Deng’s hands more. But that is not “real” value. That is simply not messing up. Imagine if the Bulls had a really dangerous shooter to pair with the improved Rose
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 10:13 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
A really dangerous shooter like, oh I don't know, say Ben Gordon?
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 10:15 PM CST up reply actions
I still can't get over the fact that they picked Hinrich over Gordon. Because make no mistake, that's what they did.
They could have moved Hinrich for expirings and re-signed Gordon. They could have done it. They should have done it. Then they would have had a legitimate starting SG, one of the most talented offensive backcourts in the league and they still would have had max cap space. Rose, Gordon, Deng, Bosh, and Noah with Taj and miscellaneous bench guys is pretty close to a contender (depending on how well they did with the depth-filling issue).
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 10:18 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
If BG had been more white and gritty...
We miss you, Tyrus Thomas and Ben Gordon!
by Granny Waiters on Mar 2, 2010 2:30 AM CST up reply actions
He wasn't?
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
LOL
Move hinrich? U make it sound so easy …. im sure everyteam in the NBA are drewling at the prospect at getting the worst offensive guard in the league!
They had a deal to get expirings from Boston at the deadline,
and before the season started, and a chance to get Blake and Outlaw from Portland.
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 12:06 PM CST up reply actions
hinrich was having career year offensively last year though.
41% from 3s…. 55.1% TS%. Like posted a lot of contenders without concern for cap wanted him
I will probably never get over it. Honestly. I thought seriously about abandoning this team after that idiotic move.
I only really stayed because of Rose, Thomas, and Noah. Then they screwed up Tyrus and shipped him out for nothing. Now I just stick with it because Rose is so fun to watch and Noah is awesome. But with Noah out and Deng out, this team becomes really un-fun to watch. Even with Rose. He can only do so much, and if I just want to watch Rose make plays I can just watch a few highlights from the evening’s games, because really, there’s not much else to see without Noah.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 10:22 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
What will it take for you to abandon the team?
I got JR on the phone
The mania is still runnin' wild and the madness still flows through the veins.
by The Mega Powers on Mar 1, 2010 11:27 PM CST up reply actions
Failure to get a good FA and Rose having a career ending injury.
Also, die in a fire.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:27 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Hmm not signing Bosh or not having to read your comments
That’s a toughy
The mania is still runnin' wild and the madness still flows through the veins.
by The Mega Powers on Mar 1, 2010 11:31 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
You have contributed nothing to this discussion, troll.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:53 PM CST up reply actions
There is no discussion
It’s the neverending debate of Kirk Hinrich vs Ben Gordon. Where all basketball knowledge is left at the door
The mania is still runnin' wild and the madness still flows through the veins.
by The Mega Powers on Mar 2, 2010 12:45 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
thanks confuscious
now please shut the fuck up
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 12:46 AM CST up reply actions 7 recs
If that's how you feel, then don't enter the discussion.
No one’s forcing your hand.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:46 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Like I said
There is no discussion. A hand cannot be placed.
The mania is still runnin' wild and the madness still flows through the veins.
by The Mega Powers on Mar 2, 2010 12:55 AM CST up reply actions
No,
it’s the neverending debate of “Kirk Hinrich is bad, here’s stats to prove it” vs. “Kirk Hinrich isn’t bad”.
As much as Gordon is better than Hinrich [when healthy? Seriously, wtf happened this year], that does’t really relate to the point of this post, which is that Hinrich isn’t a good basketball player.
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
Everyone knows he's not a good player
I just don’t understand why there is so much complaining. The rest of the season means nothing. Ben Gordon is in Detroit. Everyone needs to chillout until the summer.
The mania is still runnin' wild and the madness still flows through the veins.
by The Mega Powers on Mar 2, 2010 12:53 AM CST up reply actions
Because the clueless fans and The Organization
still love Kurt and hate Ben.
We miss you, Tyrus Thomas and Ben Gordon!
by Granny Waiters on Mar 2, 2010 2:32 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
The "Over" Hinrich love
is just baffling
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
Because we have to be called basketball dumb
by media and radio talk show host and blind fans when we point out for over 3 years now that this guy is mediocre at best.
Then when they decide to move the more productive player for nothing, we have to hear how Hinrich is “glue” and how he’s more valuable because he defends 3 spots and this and that. Total BS. and fans with eyes are tired and frustrated with this organization and their stupid decisions.
Don’t worry, you’ll now start to get tired of fans with the “I told you sos” about Tyrus being let go. He wasn’t good enough for Vinnie but good enough for Larry Brown. Open your eyes!
by Dils on Mar 2, 2010 6:46 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
true, you go first?
see ya in July.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 10:32 AM CST up reply actions
if it doesn't mean anything, why didn't they trade him?
And don’t give me, “But the 165th best rotation player in the league will have value in a sign-and-trade” argument, either.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Um...
Ben Gordon from 3 this season…30.5%
Kirk Hinrich from 3 this season…36.8%
A dangerous shooter indeed.
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
Because over 5 years of consistent excellence can be totally tossed aside by one injury plagued year.
Jesus, you stink.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:23 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Using the stats of this season...
The same ones being used to disparage Hinrich, the debunk your idea is totally not called for…Dick!
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
You could point to other years of similar Hinrich suckage. He's had three seasons in a row of pretty
crappy play.
Gordon has had one injury plagued off year. Gordon is much more likely to bounce back to being the player he’s been in the past than Hinrich is to ever be a good player.
The funny thing is even with Gordon shooting 10% below his career average from 3P land he’s still got a higher TS% this year than Hinrich’s career average!
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:47 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
Hinrich has not been injury plagued this year and he's never been excellent at anything.
He’s especially never been as excellent at anything as Ben Gordon is at shooting and making 3 pointers.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:44 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
Not talking about injuries
Referring to the notion that one bad year can negate 5 good ones, which is similar to what’s gone on with people’s perceptions of Kirk
Not true. Kirk has been bad for three straight years.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:54 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Poloplaya14 = Sue
Thrusting toward the playoffs, one game at a time.
by Illini15 on Mar 1, 2010 11:58 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Probably.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:02 AM CST up reply actions
I disagree
sue is realistic! Don’t slander her name like that. lol
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
by Prevenge on Mar 2, 2010 12:41 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
That's true
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
Point blank
Hinrich was a maxed out player when they drafted him, he was able to over acheive imo and reaching the mountain top in 06-07, now he is on decline, his decline will continue to be horrible.
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 12:14 PM CST up reply actions
I'm just mad at Pat Riley more than anyone.
Maybe Jay Williams too.
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
Especially Jay Williams...
Idiot!
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
Sometimes I remember the 2005 playoffs against Washington and remember Hinrich torching Arenas and Hughes.
Or, guarding Wade in 2006 and doing a great job. What the fuck happened to that guy?
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
He was playing above his head for short periods of time?
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 10:28 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
He was turning into a top 10 PG, then just came crashing down.
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 1, 2010 10:42 PM CST up reply actions
What you're talking about is a deficiency of perception. A lot of people assumed he was turning into a top 10 PG
but there was plenty of evidence that he wasn’t, like the fact that even at his absolute peak his PER was only 17.0. Hardly top 10 PG stuff.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:04 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Point guards usually make plays for others.
Or they are just Derrick Rose.
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
Assists get counted towards PER too. And lots of other PGs that set guys up, get really high PERs. See e.g. Steve Nash, Chris Paul, Deron Williams, etc. etc. etc.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:08 PM CST up reply actions
Rose actually has the 16th highest assist percentage in the league
among guards. Not great, but about what you’d expect for his style. Just below Tony Parker and Andre Miller, a hair above Chauncey Billups. Imagine if he had someone who could knock down a shot or finish around the basket.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 11:14 PM CST up reply actions
I agree.
I’m saying Kirk Hinrich isn’t a good point guard.
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
What happened?
60 million too much dollars happened.
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
My dad and my
pet theory is that he should have to live in a cage in between games. His best season, 06-07, was followed by his marriage, after which he got way worse. And then he had a kid the next season, and dropped off a cliff. It’s his family’s fault!
Will everyone stop hating on Deng, please?
My rebuttal
Kirk Hinrich’s career 3pt% s 37.9. This year, he’s a shade below at 36.8. Last year, he was a shade above at 40.8. 37.8 is a good 3-pt , which makes Kirk Hinrich a good shooter. If you don’t buy that, either you don’t value logic or you don’t believe 37.8 is a good 3-pt.
Here are the career 3-pt% numbers of some other players who have reputations as good shooters:
JJ Redick 38.5
Rashard Lewis 39.1
Vince Carter 37.4
Jason Kidd 34.5
Kobe Bryant 34.0
Chauncey Billups 39.1
Ray Allen 39.5
Paul Pierce 36.9
And a few notable former Bulls:
John Paxson 35.5
Michael Jordan 32.7
Scottie Pippen 32.6
Now, Kirk is not very good at getting to the rim. For that reason, his TS% and FG% suffer. However, that’s simply not his role. His offensive role is primarily to be a spot-up jump shooter and occasionally handle the ball and distribute. The latter occurs mainly when Rose is not in the game.
And as far as his passing goes, his career AST% is 28.9. Not great, but very respectable. However, if you look at his year-by-year numbers, his ast% nosedove after Rose joined the team. Why? Is it because a player still in prime condition suddenly experience a dramatic decline? I find that theory highly unlikely. Could it be that his role changed from being a distributing PG to being a spot-up shooter? Hmmmm, that almost makes sense.
And as far as his defense is concerned, he was named to the All-defensive second team in ‘07, along with Jason Kidd, Tayshaun Prince, Kevin Garnett, and Ben Wallace (he was still good then). And he’s essentially the same player now as he was then. He’s universally considered a great (not good, great) defender by just about every reputable basketball analyst.
by Poloplaya14 on Mar 1, 2010 10:31 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Except the "basketball analysts" that actually watch the games and see him giving up loads of blow-bys.
And he’s essentially the same player now as he was then. He’s universally considered a great (not good, great) defender by just about every reputable basketball analyst.
He’s NOT a great defender. Is he above average? Yes. Great? Hardly. And when you consider how shit he is at everything else, it means he’s terrible.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 10:34 PM CST up reply actions
Then how are the Bulls so good at defense?
Luol’s very good, but Rose is below average, Taj/Noah have looked just okay as a combination inside. Tyrus can be great, but he’s played just 25% of the team’s minutes, and I can’t imagine Salmons/Miller/Pargo/Johnson are pushing us into the elite category.
Yet take out that awful 10 game stretch earlier on, and I think we have the league’s best defense. And several of Kirk’s lineups have been dominant defensively.
And before pointing to Kirk for being crappy on offense, point to Vinny first. With Noah out, we don’t have a single player with a TS% above .530!! Kirk’s been decently efficient for a long time (.529 TS% since ‘05-’06). It’s easy to say he’s been crappy this year. But when everyone’s crappy, check the system.
by YaoPau on Mar 1, 2010 10:56 PM CST up reply actions 7 recs
Taj, Noah, Tyrus, and Deng are all above average defenders. Interior defense can erase a lot of blow-bys.
The Bulls, when they had Tyrus, had probably the best shot-blocking front court in the league. Taj blocks a lot of shots, Noah does, and Tyrus blocked more than anyone.
I will never understand how people give ALL the credit to Kirk for the defense when he’s merely good at defense. He’s on a team with nothing but good defensive players (save Rose).
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 10:59 PM CST up reply actions
Except Tyrus missed a month due to injury and even when he was healthy was on the bench half the time
And the Bulls were still a very good defensive team.
Because Taj, Noah, and Deng are all either good or great defenders.
And Hinrich is pretty good himself. He’s just not the defensive panacea that his supporters think he is and considering how much he harms the offense, he’s a net negative for the team.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:19 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Fair points
First off, I don’t consider Taj a good defender, rather he’s a decent one. However, because of Rose, Kirk routinely guards the other team’s top perimeter player. If Hinrich wasn’t great at defense, the Bulls wouldn’t be, regardless of how good the interior players are.
That's simply not true. Interior defense is the most important part of any defense. With great
interior defense and good wing defense (which is what the Bulls have with Lu being a great defender and Kirk being a pretty good defender), you’re bound to have a great defense. Kirk is a cog in a good defense, he’s not the sole reason for it. Really Derrick is the only bad defender on the team that gets regular minutes (well he was until Hakim Warrick got here) and he does so much on the other end that it doesn’t matter how bad he stinks on D (he’s better than last year), because without him on offense the Bulls would be the worst offense in the history of the NBA, no exaggeration.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:26 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm aware of the value of interior defense
However, you still need the guys at the perimeter to do their jobs. You’re right that Kirk is a cog in a good defense, just as Joakim and Gibson and Deng are. But it’s clear you’ve made up your mind, so I’m not going to argue this point further.
My point is that the notion that Kirk is this GREAT defender is by and large false.
He’s a good defender with other good (and some great — Luol) defenders around him, but for some reason he gets all the credit for the defense, so much so that no one blames him when he sucks a dick on offense (which is most of the time).
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:34 PM CST up reply actions
Hinrich doesn't always guard the teams best perimeter player
a lot of times that task falls to Deng. Tonight, it fell to JJ.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 11:27 PM CST up reply actions
Right, this line from Hinrich-fellators always makes me laugh.
So I guess when Deng guards LeBron regularly (and very well) that must mean that Mo Williams is the Cavs best perimeter player because that’s who Kirk gets matched up on.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:29 PM CST up reply actions
I rarely see the converse argument
that the opponent’s best defender can now concentrate on Derrick Rose since the 2-guard doesn’t need much attention.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 10:40 AM CST up reply actions
(or is that the inverse argument)
(or neither)
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 10:40 AM CST up reply actions
I made it below
Hinrich is being guarded by the least capable defender the opposing team has every night. And still we get these results. If an opposing team thinks their 2 guard can give Rose problems, they switch him on to Rose. if they like the point guard match-up, they stick with that. Opposing defenses don’t even think about Hinrich.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 11:20 AM CST up reply actions
If they were such a good defensive team, please explain this fact.
In games Tyrus competed in the Bulls were 18-11, a .621 winning percentage.
In games Tyrus did not play in the Bulls are 13-18, a percentage of .419.
If I’m not mistaken, good defensive teams usually win more than 41.9% of their games. I wonder if Tyrus could have kept the score closer tonight since he scored 16 off the bench against the hottest team in the league (guarded by Nowitski) and pulled down 12 rebounds to go along with 2 blocks. For the 6th straight game he played the entire 4th quarter. I guess his new knickname might become The Closer since he’s always in there at the end in order to provide defense according to Larry Brown..
Poloplaya14, can you at least one time, try to back up your assertions with some valid statistics. All I’m asking it to do it just once, for a change of pace. Then we can agree to disagree on actual facts rather than emotional judgements.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Mar 1, 2010 11:58 PM CST up reply actions
Are you fucking serious?
I need to back up by assertions with statistics. I’m not one of the morons who claims that Hinrich is a bad shooter despite the fact that I posted statistics proving the contrary.
I’m not gonna dig up statistics to prove this point, because I happen to agree with your main point that the Bulls were a better defensive team with Tyrus. However, the Bulls were still a pretty good defensive team without Tyrus. They lost because they couldn’t score points, but anybody who’s been paying attention knows that. Now did Tyrus fix the Bulls’ offense? No, his return just happened to coincide with the beginning of Rose’s torrid streak.
For some reason, this statement was funny to me.
Then we can agree to disagree on actual facts rather than emotional judgements.
Like haha funny.
i don't understand
he is also on some of the worst defensive 5 man units. The Taj/Noah/Miller/Tyrus group didn’t get enough credit for how good they were defensively. We are talking about a team that leads the league in block shots and you are acting as if we have a bunch of weak defenders down low. Our big guys are mobile, defend the pick and roll well, block shots and when Deng and Noah are healthy – they also rebound. Yet you are willing to throw aside their effectiveness as just okay and attribute all the effectiveness to Hinrich? I don’t get it.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 11:01 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, when you block a lot of shots and have good defensive rebounding (Lu's specialty)
then you’re going to have a pretty stout interior defense. Add to that, that we have nimble PnR defending big men and it’s not hard to see why the defense is very, very good. Plus, calling Lu merely “very good” is an insult to his defense. He’s one of the best perimeter defenders in the league and it’s mind-boggling to me how much credit that should be Lu’s goes to Kirk instead. You saw a good demonstration of how valuable Lu is tonight. Without him (and Noah) this team totally falls apart, especially on the glass.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:07 PM CST up reply actions
I agree.
I’m pretty perturbed at how underrated Deng is defensively. I’ve piped up a few times, but most of the time I’ve kept quiet.
In all honesty, my guess is that they use Deng in a sign-and-trade this summer (keeping Hinrich, because he’s worthless to other teams) and get an athletic SF, citing the need to be quicker and more active on defense.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
They'll trade for Trevor Ariza and his championship pedigree.
Then SoulEater won’t complain about his worthless offensive game, because he proved he had balls in the playoffs.
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 2, 2010 1:58 PM CST up reply actions
I also think you're WAY underselling Taj and Noah. Taj and Noah hedge very well on the pick and roll
and they both play good help defense. If anything the Bulls could be EVEN better on D if Noah and Taj were slightly better man to man defenders, but most of their value comes from helping after Derrick or Kirk gets torched.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:02 PM CST up reply actions
I see your point
I could have Tyrus-type bias with Taj/Noah, where I see the occasional times when they get destroyed by thick post players and assume that overall they’re worse than they are. They are really good at defending the perimeter. I guess my answer is I don’t know.
Fair point
However, I think you’d have a hard time calling the likes of Eddy Curry, Antonio Davis, Othella Harrington, and Malik Allen great interior defenders. Yet the Bulls were still a great defensive team back then. The main reason for that was Tyson Chandler. The second reason was Kirk.
Kirk Hinrich today is not the same player that he used to be. Also, Deng was the second biggest reason
for their good defense behind Tyson Chandler. Oh and Scott Skiles, whose scheme was very, very good. Antonio Davis was also a good defender. Kirk was part of it, but he was hardly the number two reason.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:20 PM CST up reply actions
In 04-05, the bulls were #2 in opponent's eFG%
Deng missed a large chunk of that season and only got 27mpg that year. He was also a 19-year-old rookie that wasn’t nearly as good as he is now. Davis was a plodding 36-year-old who was average at best. Skiles played a large role, but that team was still trotting out Eddy Curry, Othella Harrington, and Eric Piatkowski for significant lengths of time.
And why is Kirk Hinrich not the same player he used to be? He hasn’t experienced any major injuries and he’s only 29.
Watch him play. He's not nearly as good at keeping people in front of him as he once was.
And Deng has always good at defense. Really. Also, Nocioni was still pretty good at defense at that point. His feet hadn’t betrayed him, yet. People forget that Noce WAS a good defender. He just lost a step or 8 and couldn’t stop chasing the ball.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:32 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I watch him play, and I'm not seeing what you're seeing
And if you don’t think Deng is a much better defender now than he was 6 years ago, you’re kidding yourself.
He's much better, but he was still very very good and Tyson Chandler was the best interior
defending big man in the league that year. Honestly. He was the anchor of that defense. That’s why the Ben Wallace signing and dumping of Chandler made no sense.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:36 PM CST up reply actions
That's a good question
And why is Kirk Hinrich not the same player he used to be? He hasn’t experienced any major injuries and he’s only 29.
I’ve been trying to figure that out since 2007.
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
by bigballa10 on Mar 2, 2010 11:59 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Sports2 makes a good point
Skiles seemed to bring the most out of Hinrich, especially on the offensive end of the floor.
Skiles does
that for a lot of teams, PHX and the Bucks as well
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
And one more thing, Tyrus is awesome.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:02 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
One question:
How is that Hinrich led Bulls defense looking now?
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 7, 2010 5:06 PM CST up reply actions
you say "that's simply not his role"
as if the Bulls are telling Hinrich not to penetrate and score. They would love for Hinrich to penetrate and score. They would love for his role to increase. He just can’t do it. Its strange how Gordon, Salmons and Deng never got the memo to be just a spot up shooter, but Hinrich got it – that is all they want from him. Deng and Salmons can jab step to their feet fall off. Gordon was able to routinely call his own number when hear. Rose obviously does the same. But not Hinrich, to dedicated to the game plan. That must be it. He has vast reserves un-utilized talents… that for some reason the bulls aren’t asking him to use.
In regards to his ast%, i deliberately listed other shooting guards to demonstrate that other guys, even guys with selfish reputations, are able to hand off a higher percentage of assist than Hinrich. Hinrich ALWAYS faces the weakest perimeter defender the opposing team has to offer. He can never break his man down and create plays for others. He is playing with a scoring point guard. Part of his job is to facilitate the offense. This has nothing to do with a position change, it is him not being able to beat his man and get into the lane, even off the pick and roll.
Besides, he is never going to be the starting point guard for the Bulls again. So who cares what he would do if he was the starting point guard? We are talking about what he can do for this Bulls team with Rose.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 10:45 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
It's not like the Bulls are telling him not to score
However, only one guy can hold onto the ball at once, and Rose happens to be one of the very best in the league at penetrating and scoring. So why would you ask Hinrich to do instead? Instead, Hinrich is primarily a spot-up jump-shooter these days, which is a role he’s pretty good at. However, spot-up jump shooters rarely get to the rim and therefore the line, so they tend to have less-than-stellar FG% and TS% numbers.
Your comparisons to Gordon, Salmons, and Deng are bad ones. Gordon was fantastic at creating his own shot and getting to the line, meaning it made sense to let him take the ball out of Rose’s hands. Salmons was also fantastic at creating his own shot… last year. This year, he wasted precious time jab-stepping and settling for ineffective jumpers, which is the main reason many Bulls fans soured on him. Is that what you want Hinrich to do? And as for Deng, he’s a completely different player than Hinrich and actually doesn’t demand the ball nearly as much as you’d expect, given how effective a scorer he is.
And regarding his ast%, I explained why his ast% is low these days. Regardless, the players you were comparing him to are clearly cherry-picked. Udrih is a PG, and Iverson, Johnson, and Ellis are all combo-type guards who bring the ball up a lot and distribute a lot more than most SGs. I don’t really think any of them have that much of a selfish reputation.
And again, I never said he would be the starting PG. His offensive role alongside Rose is that of a spot-up jump shooter who can occasionally take over the point and be a decent-enough distributor. He’s fairly good at that, despite what you say.
hmmmm
So teams can only have one guy penetrate and score? Don’t tell the other NBA teams, they may think they are breaking some type of rule.
I compared Hinrich to other Bulls players to demonstrate that their nothing in the offense preventing him from penetrating except his own ineptness, which you readily acknowledge. So, thank you. I notice you do this a lot. Jump in to argue a point and really have no point of your own.
If his value is mainly as a spot up shooter, than recognize that he has the worst TS% and FG% of any spot up shooter receiving significant minutes in the NBA. So he is still the worst at it, no matter how you try to spin it. By comparison, Raja Bell has a TS% of .570. Being able to hit 3s at a high rate HELPS YOUR TS%.
Basically, you are going to ignore tons of facts to reach the conclusion that Hinrich is a fine spot up shooter and decent distributor. That is your right. That is what makes Hinrich fans a special breed.
And finally, Iverson and Ellis don’t have a reputation for selfishness? Now you are just making shit up.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 11:25 PM CST up reply actions
Well only one guy can penetrate and score at once
And when you have one of the best in the league at that, why would you have someone else do that? Who on Miami penetrates besides Wade? Who on Cleveland penetrates besides LeBron? Who on Phoenix penetrates besides Nash?
Because you can't have Rose be the only offensive option on every single possession. You need more than
one creator. Come on man, stop playing dumb (or being dumb).
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:37 PM CST up reply actions
You need more than one creator?
Who does Cleveland have that creates other than LeBron? And they have the best record in the league. It’d be nice to have another player who can create like Rose (we will if we sign D-Wade) but we don’t.
Mo Williams creates. Delonte West creates. Shaq creates out of double teams.
Also, using Cleveland as a template is not a good idea because they have the best fucking player on the planet and they still haven’t been able to win it all.
Look at the Celtics. Rondo creates. Pierce creates. Allen can create. They are falling off this year because of age, but they had a lot of creators.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:41 PM CST up reply actions
Well, there you have it
If we want to become as good as Cleveland, Rose has to transform into Lebron. Simple. Instead of Hinrich being competent on offense, we can have Rose transform into the top player of his generation.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 11:42 PM CST up reply actions 4 recs
For Cleveland:
Mo Williams penetrates quite a bit. Delonte West does it a bit.
For the Suns: Jason Richardson can penetrate. Barbosa is great at it.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:38 PM CST up reply actions
Mo Williams and West only penetrate when they're given open lanes created by the double teams drawn by LeBron
Ditto for Richardson and Barbosa.
So Rose is among the best at penetrating but not creating open lanes?
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
I never said that
However, he is not good at dishing the ball to guys with open lanes. Well, he’s not as good at that as LeBron or Nash, anyways.
You implied it.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
No matter what you think I implied, what I meant is this:
Rose is great at penetrating and certainly creates open lanes. However because of his deficiencies as a passer and, more importantly, because of VDN’s deficiencies as a coach, the Bulls as a team don’t take advantage of those lanes.
plus both Cleveland and Phoenix have interior threats they
throw the ball too. I think its odd to use Cleveland and Miami for this as well, because both teams offenses receive a ton of criticism. Miami’s offense is terrible and Cleveland’s offense is far too Lebron centric. The best teams have multiple guys who can penetrate and score. Poloplaya is just looking for excuses why Hinrich never does it. As if that is some prize.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 11:41 PM CST up reply actions
He's willing to bend and twist any piece of evidence for the proposition that Hinrich is still good, despite all evidence
pointing to the contrary.
He’s a bad basketball player with an even worse contract. Them’s the facts.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:43 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
No I'm just stating facts and sharing my opinion that Kirk is a good basketball player
You’re the one who refuses to listen to reason.
You're the one that is not looking at any objective facts. You just totally dismissed all stats
and any understanding of what makes for a successful basketball offense in making your argument.
If you think that’s reasonable, then well, there’s no need to continue having a fruitless discussion.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:51 PM CST up reply actions
Are you fucking kidding?
You’re the one that claims Hinrich is a poor shooter despite that fact that his career 3-pt % is very good. I didn’t dismiss any stats. In fact, I brought up stats to back my argument up. You obviously didn’t read what I wrote so I’m not going to repeat up. If you want my stat-based argument, scroll up. But don’t tell me I’m the one ignoring the numbers.
36.8% from 3 is not very good, especially if you don't
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:29 AM CST up reply actions
No it's not
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:30 AM CST up reply actions
Very good for a guard?
38% and above.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:36 AM CST up reply actions
You can get away with 36.8% as a guard
but you have to be good at other things. If you’re strictly a spot up shooter, you need to be hitting 38-39% at least.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:38 AM CST up reply actions
I'm done arguing with you.
He’s bad. He’s very, very bad. But you want to see value where it isn’t, which makes you have lots in common with the Bulls front office, so congratulations for that.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:40 AM CST up reply actions
And Hinrich's at 37.9% for his career
So if he raises his % by .1%, you’ll consider him very good for a guard. But right now he sucks. Is that right?
He doesn't do anything else.
TS% is the best for figuring a guy’s scoring efficiency and Kirk has a mediocre to bad one for his whole career.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:39 AM CST up reply actions
You can't look at that statistic in a vacuum
The biggest factor in TS% is how often you get to the line. Spot-up jump-shooters seldom get to the line, and that’s Hinrich’s main role.
No, the biggest factor in TS%
is how efficiently you score. Getting to the line helps because it’s the most efficient way to score. Followed by making 3s. Kirk’s problem is that he doesn’t get to the line because he doesn’t ever penetrate. His other problem is that even on the rare occasions when he does penetrate, he’s one of the absolute worst finishers at the rim in the league. He’s also atrocious at mid-range shooting. From 10-15 feet, he shoots 33%.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:44 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I thought you were done
I preferred it that way.
You’re right, Kirk doesn’t get to the line and is terrible at finishing at the rim, which is why his TS% is low. I agree with that completely.
What I don’t agree with is your perception of 10-15 feet as mid-range. 16-23 feet is what I consider mid-range.
Browsing through Hoopdata, Kirk’s been shooting 40.0 % this year from 16-23, above the league average of 39.5%. While we’re at it, his eFG% is 55.2 above the league average of 52.7.
Those eFG% numbers you're referencing
are only for 3 pointers. So Kirk is an above average 3 point shooter. We knew that already. He’s an average mid-range shooter and terrible anywhere inside of 15 feet. This means he’s not good at scoring. He’s not good at rebounding. And he’s not good at passing or penetrating. So again, I’m failing to see what he does well besides camping outside the 3 point line and being a little bit above average at it. It’s simply not enough.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 1:00 AM CST up reply actions
That's what I meant to say
His eFG% is above league-average on 3-pointers. I made a mistake in omitting that key phrase.
And I’m glad you finally agree that Kirk is an above-average 3-point shooter. A lot of your comments seem to indicate the opposite.
And to respond to your other points, he is not good at scoring, but he is good at passing. His career AST% is very respectable. He’s a good ball-handler who doesn’t turn the ball over a lot. And then there’s his defense (you think he’s just good, I think he’s excellent, let’s not quibble further). All in all, he’s obviously no all-star, but I think he could be the 5th-best starter on a championship team, which is all he’d have to be assuming we sign an all-star PF.
Um...
Where did you get your stats? 82 games seems to differ.
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
Hoopdata.com
learn it, love it, use it.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 1:33 PM CST up reply actions
I thought he only became a spot up...
…guy recently?
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
ugh.
especially if you don’t get to the line or are as bad at converting at the rim as Kirk is.
He also provides mediocre to bad rebounding for a 2 guard and is not a creator for his teammates.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 12:30 AM CST up reply actions
yeah, dude
Hinrich has a better career 3pt shooting % than John Paxson, Michael Jordan or Scottie Pippen. Case Closed. Face
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 12:26 AM CST up reply actions
That's different.
Giving the ball to a post player to establish an interior presence forces a team to double, which opens things up for perimeter players. That has nothing to do with the discussion on Kirk, unless you want to criticize him for not being a low-post threat.
what i'm saying, for the 100th time
is that the Bulls have a need and an opportunity for Hinrich to take on a greater offensive role and he has not proven capable of doing it. There is no other creator on the team besides Rose. No low post threat demanding the ball. Just a bunch of players who are asked to beat their guys off the bounce. The fact that it isn’t Hinrich’s game to create high percentage shots for himself or his teammates is a problem. The fact that he can’t do it at a rate equal to that of his NBA peers is a problem. Hinrich’s offensive game is a problem, especially when his defensive contributions don’t outpace Taj, Noah or Deng.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 11:48 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Spurs have multiple creators. Tony Parker, Manu, etc.
Celtics do, too.
Orlando has Jameer Nelson, Shard Lewis, Vince Carter.
I could go on.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:48 PM CST up reply actions
Not a single player you mentioned is at Rose's caliber right now
My point is, why take the ball out of Rose’s hands when he’s clearly the Bulls’ best option?
because if he is the only option teams can
load up on him and stop him from being effective. Do you watch basketball?
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 1, 2010 11:51 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
Allow me to rephrase
You’re right, every team needs alternative options. However, every player has a specific skill set which leaves him suited to playing a specific role. On the Bulls, Derrick Rose is by far the best at penetrating. So there’s no real reason to ask anybody else to fill that same role.
However, you’re right, we do need other options, which is why we have Kirk, who’s a good spot-up jump-shooter, Deng, who’s excellent at cutting without the ball, etc.
Oh sweet Jesus. So because Manu is the best creator the Spurs have, Tony Parker
should never ever handle the ball? You sir are a moron.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:51 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Because basketball is a team sport?
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 2, 2010 12:07 AM CST up reply actions
This not about Hinie or anything. I'm not defending that
But some people forget that sometimes. But I agree with you.
I just love this notion that Rose should be the only one attacking all the time.
Then, when Rose has nights where he goes 11/25 and missing layups people will lay into him. I’d rather see Rose average 18 ppg and leading a real offense rather than relying on him to score above 25 so they can beat good teams.
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 2, 2010 2:01 PM CST up reply actions
He's not the only one who should be attacking
Other guys should be penetrating through the open lanes created when the defense shifts to limit Rose.
However, we’re not capable of doing that because A) Rose still has a ways to go in developing court vision and B) VDN’s a terrible offensive coach and hasn’t shown that he has any idea of how to effectively capitalize off of the holes that Rose creates.
it's one thing to acknowledge that Kirk has limits offensively yet it doesn't matter as much
because of who he plays with.
But don’t say Kirk has limits offensively because he’s requested by the team to be less useful out of design.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 10:45 AM CST up reply actions
I think it's quite clear that when he was the starting PG, he was much more concerned with attacking the rim
This is evidenced by the fact that he averaged more than twice as many FTAs/min back then. Now, he plays a different role which involves him handling the ball a lot less and shooting jumpers a lot more.
Note: I never said he was ever good at attacking the rim
I merely said he tried to do it more when he was the starting PG.
I agree, the 3pt% matters more than his overall offensive deficiencies
playing next to Rose.
But he’s now sub-36% for this season. He had a nice comeback last season but that looks like the outlier.
Plus this would be fine if he wasn’t paid (and praised) in accordance with a player of who you’d expect more than competent 3pt shooting (plus he takes under 1.5 a game, which matters) and above-average defense.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, his taking under 1.5 a game negates a lot of this argument that he's a good shooter
because he makes 36% of his threes. Because he turns down a lot of open looks because he’s timid and because he stinks.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 1:35 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
"he turns down a lot of open looks because he’s timid and because he stinks."
one man’s timid/stinks is another man’s ball movement. That man is John Paxson.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 1:49 PM CST up reply actions
ball movement to find a worse shot is contrary to the point. too bad Pax doesn't get that.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 1:49 PM CST up reply actions
He turns down
those looks because he knows he can’t knock them down. This guy misses so many damn open jump shots.
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 12:34 PM CST up reply actions
He also took the fewest threes of his career last year.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Being out for 30 games kind of implies that.
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 2, 2010 2:13 PM CST up reply actions
ha.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 2:32 PM CST up reply actions
i think people are forgetting that, though
They’re referencing last year as one of his two good years. Pointing out that he missed a large chunk should illuminate that he might have had a classic 18-game Kirk Hinrich slump that made his entire season look like his five (now six) others.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
hinrich
has been in the league for 7 years…he had a good rookie year, he had a good second year (playoff against the wizards) he had a good third year (playoff against miami first time) he topped off in his fourth year (playoff against detroit)….he then had a crappy season, an injury season, and now this season……so i guess my question is:
he might have had a classic 18-game Kirk Hinrich slump that made his entire season look like his five (now six) others.
does that imply that hinrich had at least 5 (6 if you include this one) similar seasons, and that they were bad?
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
never mind
i read some of your other posts and i see where you were going with this…..
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
yes, it does
he had okay second and third years
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
thats fine
but his second year was better than his first year, and his third year was better than his second year…in terms of when a player comes in the league, thats what should be expected…hinrich continued to grow every year slightly up until 07 when he completely dropped off the map…he had an okay second and third year compared to i guess what would be the universally accepted norm of a good year for a guard in the nba (what exactly would that be btw?) but his rookie year was considered a real good year for hinrich despite being drafted 7th overall (so he wasnt a bust and played really well) and the fact that he improved every year after that, to me i read that as having good years…
If you compare hinrichs best year to his first couple years, then you would say he had a good second and third year, but a great 4th year….and his fourth year is good enough that i think if he continued to have that production then he would be well worth his contract, but his 4th year isnt out of the water better than his third or second, hes always improved slightly each year, so his second and third years wouldnt be considered Bad years, they would be considered good years since they are just below what would be his best year…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
He has a good 3pt%
but his overall fg% is horrible, in the era Jordan played in the 3pt shot was not a huge point of emphasis
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
Honestly if one more Kirk Hinirch apologist comes out with anymore retared stats..
proving that he’s a good player I will have to burn down his 4 million dollar French Villa style Mansion in some wealthy Illinois town i’ve never heard of. I do have google and a container of gasoline from my snow blower.
WATCH THE FUCKING GAMES!
HE
IS
AWFUL!!!!
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
Then..
Cry yourself to sleep.
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
You are the same guy who promised to drive into the Lake if Kirk was not traded at the deadline....
How can I take anything you say seriously?
Thomas, Miller, Salmons, James, Pargo, Gray, MLE, and (there is no LLE thanks to the Pargo signing) will not be here with a Max Free Agent...don't get too attached.
Because I don't take myself serious.
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
by SoulEater7 on Mar 1, 2010 11:21 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Soul eater i actually got a little exited
When u mentioned that u would drive into a lake if Captain fuckwit didnt get traded. I knew i had at least something to look foward to …but now …just dissapointment LOL
I just think it's amazing
how some people can watch a game and murder some players for a lack of effort and let others get a pass. Kirk Hinrich is the senior member of this team and the captain and he has not given the effort these last two games. I’m not even talking about missing shots either. That happens. Deng missed a lot of shots last game against Indiana, but he still made things happen by rebounding and getting to the line. Kirk’s lack of effort has been glaring the past two games. So much for intangibles and leadership.
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
by bigballa10 on Mar 1, 2010 10:43 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
You want to point out any examples of his glaring lack of effort?
Or are you just going to make vague, general statements that can’t be disproved, allowing you to consider yourself right no matter what.
He's been pretty clearly moping the last two games. He made some of the laziest passes I've ever seen tonight.
He just seems out of it.
It’s candy. I don’t eat poop-flavored candy. I’m not going to watch poop-level basketball.
--tyger1147
We hear the talk about his fit, intangibles, ‘glue guy’, ‘thrust’, and any other ways you can put lipstick on a sub-40% shooting pig, but it’s become increasingly clear that it can’t be just propaganda when the moves they make (or don’t) say that they believe their own hype.
-- yfBB
God, I hate Hinrich and his poop-level play.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 1, 2010 11:39 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Again, I don't see what you're seeing
I have seen some bad passes out of Kirk, but the ones I saw were the result of a guy trying to force something for a team down by a ton, not by a guy who didn’t give a shit.
He also mishandled/dropped the ball at least 3-4 times tonight. Completely sloppy, lazy play from a captain.
Thrusting toward the playoffs, one game at a time.
If you watched the last two games at all
and you want to compare them to any other game he’s played this year, you will see that he showed no energy at all. I’m not saying I’m right no matter what, I personally did not see the same effort out of him that he normally shows. That’s what I saw. If you didn’t, you didn’t. I’m especially disgusted by it because we were already without Noah, then Deng goes down for yesterday’s game and Rose went down in each game. What’s stopping him from driving to the hoop and getting to the line or stepping in to help on the boards when we were getting destroyed on the glass last night? Again, Rose, Deng and Noah are out. Instead, I see him playing hot potato on the perimeter with Flip Murray and Pargo. For the record, I’m not a Hinrich hater either. He wasn’t always this tentative on the court.
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
I don't see that at all
that’s the problem with relying on intangibles either way. If he makes shots he’s more glue-y.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 10:46 AM CST up reply actions
What kind of
“glue” is Kirk? Elhmer’s, Gorilla, or Crazy glue
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
he's that nasty paste
that you used to use in elementary school that got all over your fingers and you did everything you could think of to wash it off and get it off of your fingers but somehow it stuck around
Rubber cement?
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 3, 2010 3:07 PM CST up reply actions
I thought people ate that paste.
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 3, 2010 5:33 PM CST up reply actions
Kurt probably did eat the paste.
We miss you, Tyrus Thomas and Ben Gordon!
by Granny Waiters on Mar 3, 2010 5:56 PM CST up reply actions
Ok.. it was funny awhile ago..
now people are looking like REC Queens.
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
Keep Hinrich for 2011
Kirk looked absolutely terrible tonight shooting the ball, and I’m starting to realize that as much as I want him to be good – it just may never happen. With that said, I’d like to keep him for next year as a backup point guard to Rose. If we can add a Wade/JJ via free agency to be a legimate SG, then this team will be a contender.
by South Jersey Wedding Photographer on Mar 1, 2010 10:52 PM CST reply actions
oh...jesus
and I’m starting to realize that as much as I want him to be good – it just may never happen.
You clearly don’t get it do you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOcBWheLcm4
When the bow breaks the cradle will fall and it has fallen!
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
I posted this in the overflow but it should have been here since my comments were about Kirk.
First I do believe Kirk is an excellent defensive guard even with his somewhat limited athleticism. I’m sure those who play against him find his glue like positioning about as comfortable as a gnat at a picnic. Just ask D Wade. But as BBall Smurf’s post so clearly spells out, his offense is somewhat woeful.
I want to semi defend Captain Klank who everyone is dumping on. Apparently some are upset with his less than sterling performances in his last 2 games where he made just 2 of 15 shots (.133) including 0 for 8 from the arc, not exactly the stuff legends are based on. In the 2 games prior to his current funk he hit 13 of 19 (.684).
If you want to point any fingers, aim them up in the Riensdork suite, because even with his season average falling to .396. it still ranks him, unbelievably as our 2nd best shooter at the guard position.
Jannero Pargo .341. No wonder his minutes are increasing. Vinny apparently is a fan of instant suckage.
Devin Brown .378 but only .162 since joining the Bulls…does anyone slightly miss the White Panther yet, besides myself? This is even worse than
Lindsey Hunter .167 Why was he inactive tonight? They could have used his firepower off the depleted bench.
Flip Murray .390. Actually he made a couple of nice drives if you ignore his Ben Gordonesque move dribbling the ball off his leg on a breakaway.
And lastly Acie Law who has shot an amazing 1.000 since joining the Bulls, although he has taken only one shot so maybe it’s too early to jump on his bandwagon. However his season average is 50% (16-32) and his lifetime .398 trails Kirk’s .414. That’s all the pieces in our bag of 2’s and 3’s after Derrick and no one could seriously argue that Hinrich isn’t the best defender of this sorry bunch. How good could Law be, getting only 31 shots all year with the Bobcats, a team that is very weak at guard?
In conclusion, Vinny who is so seldom right, is right this time on starting Kurt because management has left him with a big bag of excrement to choose from. By the way, whatever happened to John Salmons, Ben Gordon, Shannon Brown, Thabo Sefalosha, J R Smith, and what’s that other dude’s name? Oh now I remember, he had an attitude problem and the Bulls hate players with bad attitudes, you know the dude who lit the Bulls up tonight off the bench, the likely 6th man of the year, yes that’s him, Jamal Crawford.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Mar 2, 2010 12:30 AM CST up reply actions
I agree with most of your post
But Jamal Crawford is a much more effective player now than when the Bulls let him go. When he was on the Bulls, he was a chucker who just wasn’t an efficient scorer. Now, his %s are much higher because he’s learned his role.
What's the deal with "scent of a woman" on this blog?
I feel like this is the fifth time i’ve seen a link related to ti
"Make good basketball plays!"
-VDN
31 games as starting SG
12.1ppg- 4.2reb- 5ast.- 1.4to- 1.2st 41.5%fg 37.5%3pt
Not big offensive numbers for a shooting guard, but not the complete and utter crap that you portray. I am disappointed that in these last 2 games where his shot wasn’t falling at all, he didn’t attack the basket. Even though he doesn’t finish well inside, he could get to the line(as he did once early in the Indiana game). Sometimes getting to the line is a good way to get your shot on track. Kirk is being too timid on offense, and it’s starting to bother me somewhat. When your number 2 scorer is out, somebody has to step up, and Kirk didn’t do it at all.
by kingles on Mar 2, 2010 12:38 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
magic starter juice?
his bad months count, too.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 10:47 AM CST up reply actions
You’re right
It is very disturbing to me that I have put myself into the position of trying to prove that Kirk is not TERRIBLE, but that he’s actually really almost mediocre. I know Kirk can play better than this, but that might be the most damning fact of all.
I praise you for your honesty in your first few sentences.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Except the thing is he doesn't have to be more than mediocre
Assuming we add the all-star PF we’re looking for, Kirk doesn’t have to be anything more than an average offensive player for the Bulls to be a successful, championship-caliber team.
Why not get someone who is, though?
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
If we had the opportunity to upgrade over Kirk, fine
But assuming we use our cap space on an all-star PF, I don’t see that happening. Yeah, if we’d traded Kirk at the deadline for expirings, we might have the cap space to get someone like Anthony Morrow or Ray Allen, but are those guys huge enough improvements over Kirk that it justifies tossing this season down the drain? I don’t know. Think how bad this team would be without Kirk (remember, that equates to Jannero Pargo playing 25 mpg). If we don’t make the playoffs, our chance at landing a big FA goes down dramatically.
I don't think Pargo would do well if he was PLAYING in the WNBA.
I would put Pargo starting and playing 25 MPG as a worse catastrophe than the WNBA.
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
I would take Bosh and Kurt
over Joe Johnson and Taj as starters.
We miss you, Tyrus Thomas and Ben Gordon!
by Granny Waiters on Mar 2, 2010 9:30 PM CST up reply actions
My issue here is that Kirk is holding something back offensively.
I rewatched the entire Atlanta game, because I wanted to see if my initial feelings were warranted. They were. On 4 different occasions, Kirk beat his man with the dribble and got into the lane. All 4 times he passed it back out to somebody who was defended. No shot attempts, no free throws, and no assists. On one occasion, he had a wide open 10 footer, and passed it up to throw it back out to the 3pt. line and reset the offense. Not only that, but I have little doubt he could have gotten to the basket several times had he tried to.
Now Kirk isn’t a very good finisher at the hoop, this is true. But when his jumpshots aren’t falling, he needs to be willing to drive to contact. Attack the basket, get to the line, or draw the defense so the ball can be kicked out to an OPEN shooter. Kirk, has the handles and plenty enough quickness to do this. Hell, Brad gets to the tin all the time, and he’s slower than molasses in January.
He is just not doing all he could do to help offensively, and that is bad. I believe that Kirk should be at least AVERAGE offensively, and being that he’s well above average defensively, that would be pretty good. Instead he is bouncing between bad and almost mediocre offensively. He’s just being way to passive on offense to be effective. It’s one thing to be mediocre or worse, and it’s another thing to SETTLE for playing like that.
by kingles on Mar 3, 2010 1:09 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Kirk
Always holds back on Offense, he’s been doing that really since his sophomore season….and I think now it’s become a full fledged habit that hurts him offensively. He used to be much more aggressive…then I think became more passive when Ben and Luol proved to be better on the O side….
Ok Stacey I'm am so sick of hearing the "Hard Hat and Lunch Pail" nickname for Taj. Enough already, wasn't funny the first time, but you now say it 15-20 times per broadcast. It's enough to make me want to hate Taj, when I don't hate Taj.
I believe he never mastered "rejection" as a kid
He grew up in the period and location where competition was discouraged early in pre-teen development. Don’t keep scores etc B.S. Well that new ideology was never adopted in inner cities.
Kirk in H.S. and College was a very talented player and excelled many at the level, he came into the NBA believing in his talent and some of the hype initially. But then he witness NBA level quickness and leaping ability unlike he saw in college. This was earth shattering and he seems to have retreated to doing the things he does well without exposing his mental weaknesses.
Kirk probably would never ask the H.S. girls to dance fearing she would say “no”
Same thing with block shots at the rim, Kirk doesn’t have Brad Miller’s bulk to shield a defender from blocking his shot and he quit on attempting to develop “steve nash” type at the rim crafttyness?
When he was somewhat booted off the U.S team with really talented players, he came home with his tail in-between his legs and hasn’t seem to recover since that summer?
I believe much of Kirk’s lack is mental, and he retreated into a comfort-zone that limited his upward craftyness as a guard. And I really believe he has the talent to be better, but mentally he is holding himself back.
"I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it."
"Go ahead, make my day"
"We boil at different degrees"
"A good man always knows his limitations"
"You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"
I missed you exult.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 3, 2010 11:30 AM CST up reply actions
If healthy, imo this is the best Bulls team in 5 years
Including Kirk’s positive contributions, although I miss Ben Gordon. Deng actually is showing some toughness and learning to play off of Rose.
I was never a Tyrus fan, so I just don’t miss him… ever! Pargo? why? He should change his name to Pac-n-go!
Slow Salmmolasses is gone!
The final record might not prove anything, and injuries are paramount, but might as well enjoy because the team might look different next year.
I never dislike Vinny and I’m actually happy he is achieving some success. I’m confident he’ll be a continuing coach in this league and/or college. VDN has learned and continues too.
Bulls Mgmt & Paxson continue to be clowns, with the Vinny coach search craziness and now VDN has firmer footing and the players like him!
"I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it."
"Go ahead, make my day"
"We boil at different degrees"
"A good man always knows his limitations"
"You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"
Yes, but in the past he’s been willing to step forward in situations like this
Now he’s defering to PARGO, and Flip Murray.
I wasn't saying
That was a good thing….
Ok Stacey I'm am so sick of hearing the "Hard Hat and Lunch Pail" nickname for Taj. Enough already, wasn't funny the first time, but you now say it 15-20 times per broadcast. It's enough to make me want to hate Taj, when I don't hate Taj.
I know
THIS is the time for Kirk to step up and justify the faith that the Bulls have shown in him. If the Bulls are going to make the playoffs, much less get a decent seed, Kirk has to play as well as he is capable of. He can’t hold back now, and I certainly hope he’s self aware enough to realize this.
I am really looking forward to tonights’ game.
Funny
That Hinrich played well enough only to see Deng go into a hole and shut himself out of the game to my frustration—worst Deng game of the year by far…..
Ok Stacey I'm am so sick of hearing the "Hard Hat and Lunch Pail" nickname for Taj. Enough already, wasn't funny the first time, but you now say it 15-20 times per broadcast. It's enough to make me want to hate Taj, when I don't hate Taj.
This is exactly what I was referencing above
He hasn’t stepped up these last two games with others out. Instead he’s still passing around and not trying to at least help on the boards or get to the line, something, anything to kick start the team. It bothers me a lot because he used to really step up when we needed him to score and this was even with Ben Gordon here.
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
I gotta say, with time to think about it, I am getting pissed at Kirk.
It has always been my perception that Kirk has been ‘playing his role’ the last 2 years. That the old Kirk was still there, and would show up when he was needed. For example, he averaged 9.9ppg last season. In the one game last season where Rose didn’t play, Kirk had 24pts. and 8 ast., and this was a late season game against a Detroit team who we were competing against for a playoff spot. He also played well in the playoffs, he was aggresive and even got to the line 25 times. THAT is the kind of play I expected when the Bulls were short handed and trying to secure a playoff berth.
I have always been a fan of what Kirk can do on a basketball court. The problem is that it doesn’t matter what he CAN do, if he doesn’t DO it when it matters. He is hiding behind Rose AND Deng where in the past he didn’t hide behind BG. His passivity seems to have become pathalogical. Maybe it won’t ever get any better as long as he’s with the Bulls, his play is really starting to be depressing to me. Rose can’t do EVERYTHING.
by kingles on Mar 2, 2010 1:19 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
This is exactly where I'm coming from
I don’t even hate Kirk like some do, nor am I complaining about this whole season (even though he was terrible in the beginning). I’m specifically dissappointed that the last 2 games he did not step up at all with key guys hurt. If his shot is off, that’s fine, it happens. But he didn’t go to the boards like he has been doing recently, he wasn’t being agressive at all (which is not just shooting). At least penetrate and try to get guys open looks or try to get to the line to get going. It just looked to me like wasn’t competing because his shot was off.
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
He shoots a higher propensity of his FGA as 3pters though
Which he shoots reasonably well for his career.
He still has a low %, but apples to apples for most comparisons, you probably could raise Kirk a pt.
Ok Stacey I'm am so sick of hearing the "Hard Hat and Lunch Pail" nickname for Taj. Enough already, wasn't funny the first time, but you now say it 15-20 times per broadcast. It's enough to make me want to hate Taj, when I don't hate Taj.
That fact that there is so much debate on here about Hinrich being bad
makes me think this blog might be half filled with retards.
Beasley spent the first two quarters like he was wandering through a forest.-Neil Funk
Now why would you say that?
There have been some very cogent arguements by those who say Kirk is bad. Come on, don’t do ’em like that Souleater…
by kingles on Mar 2, 2010 2:02 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
great debate...
IMO, hinrich sucks terribly because hes a mental midget… he really is… hes scared to shoot the ball.
by PTBALLER1523 on Mar 2, 2010 5:03 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Kirk had a bad game
But come on now….
Here’s a comparison of his numbers:
Off the bench 21 games
35.8% FG, 33.9% 3-T 1.5 FTA, 68.8% FT%, 2.9 rebs, 4 assists. Asst/TRV 1.95 Team record 9-12
Since being a starter
41.6% FG, 1.6 fta, 80% ft, 4 rebounds, 4.6 Assist, 1.34 TRV, 3.44 Asst/trv11.3 Pts, team record 21-11.
Kirk played terribly when he was in a primarily 2 guard role. He’s improved much more as a dual PG….and the team is doing much much better since he moved into the starting lineup (granted some of which being against easier competition).
But let’s stop all the grandiose ness of it all. He had a bad game a very bad game as did the team….but he’s been playing much better of late.
36.6% 3pt
Ok Stacey I'm am so sick of hearing the "Hard Hat and Lunch Pail" nickname for Taj. Enough already, wasn't funny the first time, but you now say it 15-20 times per broadcast. It's enough to make me want to hate Taj, when I don't hate Taj.
by majoyenrac on Mar 2, 2010 8:41 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Yeah there's a lot unfair with this thread
I think we’re all in agreement that Kirk has been bad offensively as a whole this year. That’s different from being bad offensively.
Kirk started out awful, but so did half our team. In his last 35 games he’s averaged 12pts – 4rebs – 5ast per 36 with a .521 TS%, a 38.5 3PT% with just 1.4 turnovers. A lot of Kirk’s drop in PER is due to his early season slump. Some has to do with the drop in usage (not his fault). And Kirk certainly isn’t helped by Vinny’s offense or the lack of an inside scorer.
Look beyond the 18 game slump, and Kirk’s been a 38% 3pt shooter, .520 TS% player, and a decent passer for a SG who doesn’t turn the ball over much. That’s not to say he’s good, but combined with his defense he’s startable, and the best SG we’ve got right now.
I’d like to see someone argue why Kirk is bad rather than why he’s been bad, which doesn’t need proving. He’s just 29, he’s coming off a very solid age-28 season, and apart from his early slump he’s been right back at that pace this season.
by YaoPau on Mar 2, 2010 9:43 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
No YauPau...
Let’s not look beyond the 18 game slump. Those 18 games didn’t take place in the preseason you know. I’m surprised that someone who can make such a great observation of why the Bulls shouldn’t take a chance on a 29 year old Joe Johnson, can then inversely make an argument that Kirk Hinrich will suffice at the same posistion.
He’s terrible OK. He just is. At some point stats just get in the way of what’s obvious. He’s a decent defender that get’s beat by faster and better players. He’s at best an inconsistent 3pt shooter, and he’s not enough of a playmaker or assist man to validate the minutes he’s playing next to Rose. He is one of the worst starting 2 guards in the league. It’s who he has become. He was always a combo guard who was never great at one thing and he’s actually getting worse at those things. I’m sick of the rationalizations for his existence here. Fact remains: Kirk Hinrich has gotten worse ever since his big contract.
by Dils on Mar 2, 2010 10:54 AM CST up reply actions 3 recs
The weird thing is
Taj gets killed occasionally on defense too, Noah as well. Yet the argument here is Taj and Noah are very good despite that and Kirk’s just a bit above average because he’s lit up once in a while. I’m fine with putting some trust into people’s scouting eyes, but if you’re going to stand by an argument, be consistent.
And you’re right, the 18 games count. But so do Kirk’s 51 from last season when he had a 55 TS% and a PER just under 14. Slumps happen. If Kirk wasn’t bouncing back from his slump, I’d say maybe something’s wrong. But he’s been just fine in the past two months+.
no, yaopau
you made the argument that Hinrich was very good on D, and I and fundamentallysound refuted it by pointing out that he was just one good defender among many. Kirk isn’t one of the top rebounders in the league like Noah. And last I checked, not too many people were happy with Taj starting. Most everyone wants a PF to replace Taj next season.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 11:35 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
that age-28 season
was limited by injury and he finished very strong. Can we throw out those final 18 games like the first 18 this year?
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 11:02 AM CST up reply actions
Yep
He isn’t a 55 TS% guy (2009 season) or a 49 TS% guy (2010 season). He’s 52% for his career, 52% over the past four years, 52% in his last 35 games this year.
Wait, what?
he’s actually had a 49.5 TS% entire season an a 50.5 TS% season.
Two seasons 0.55 – 0.56
Four seasons 0.49 – 0.51
1 season at 0.528
Where do you think he really is? 0.52 TS%? I don’t buy it.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
The thing that i get confused about
Is how do u get your chooting percentage down…i Mean how do u lose shooting shill with age…Does getting older make u worse shooter?
You're right. It is. But he's never shot that exactly in a single season.
It’s also gone down TO .52 TS%. That’s an indisputable fact.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
So what the hell's your point?
Nobody ever shoots at exactly their average. If they did, sports would be boring because we would know who’s going to win before the game starts.
the reason he is bad is because he can't penetrate and finish in the lane
even against the opposing teams weakest defenders. He doesn’t create offense for others at a high rate when he plays the 2 guard. He doesn’t shoot the 3 frequently enough to be effective. He is an inconsistent player, as evidenced by your cherry-picking games to look at. And he isn’t getting any better.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 11:29 AM CST up reply actions
You're the one cherry-picking games and you don't realize it
Your argument:
Of the 74 guards playing more than 25 MPG this season, Hinrich ranks 63rd in fg%. 65th in TS%, and 65th in PER. Which is why, I guess, that despite the Bulls being devoid of offensive options, Hinrich ranks 60th in USG%. …
Hinrich is a terrible offensive player. The END…..
HUGE leap of logic there. Just because a player has bad stats over 1700 minutes doesn’t mean he’s bad. Look at his team’s offensive scheme. Look at the parts around him. Account for the possibility of a slump.
I’ve seen a couple mentions of Gordon on here. The same Gordon who’s making 30.5% of his 3s this year. Does that mean he sucks at 3’s? Nope. Is he a crappy player because he has a 14 PER this year with bad defense? Nope. Slumps, offensive system, teammates, etc.
by YaoPau on Mar 2, 2010 11:37 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
How is citing stats from an entire season cherry picking stats?
I don’t know how that is a huge leap in logic. And I say again, the role he has right now for the Bulls, is the role he will have from now on. He will never raise his assist percentage here because he will never be the point guard again. He is never going to get 18 seconds to dribble around and look for his shot again. Those days are done.
One of my main points is that Hinrich is hugely inconsistent. And he doesn’t have 10 or 15 game slumps. He has full season slumps. His TS% is low this season, but its not that out of line with what he did in 07-08 or the first 2 years of his career. (And its not like he is going to be getting to the line a ton without having the ball in his hands for 15 seconds of every shot clock, so it is not some absolute he raises it). He has only shot over 42% from the field twice in his career. He has shot below 38% from 3 so far in 09-10, in 07-08, 05-06, and 04-05. You are acting as if he is going to revert back to some consistent standard he has upheld throughout his career. He is not. He is more likely to shoot under 42% next year than he is to shoot over based on his career stats.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 11:50 AM CST up reply actions
Definition of cherry-picking
Cherry picking is the act of pointing at individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.
I’m not ignoring data. I acknowledged he had both an 18-game slump this season and a hot streak last season, and I’m looking for the underlying average. You’re taking 1700 minutes of a 16000 minute career and concluding “Hinrich is a terrible offensive player. The END…..”
I never said Hinrich was consistent. I didn’t even say he was good. But you can’t label a guy for his 49 TS% this year without acknowledging his 55 TS% last year. You can’t use
He has shot below 38% from 3 so far in 09-10, in 07-08, 05-06, and 04-05.
in an argument without acknowledging that he shot 41% in ’09 and ’07.
by YaoPau on Mar 2, 2010 11:59 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
great rebuttal
in 2 out of 6 years Hinrich has shot a decent percentage from 3. You call the Basketball hall of fame, I’ll start collecting donations for the statue.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
and that is the main difference with Gordon and why the comparison doesn't make sense
Hinrich’s play, while bad even for him, is not that far from what he has done throughout his career.
Gordon is having the worst shooting season of his six year career. He has never shot the ball this poorly or been this inefficient. Hinrich has come close to shooting this poorly at least 4 different time in his career. And he isn’t injured, like Gordon. Gordon’s season is much better compared to what Deng went through last year, not with what Hinrich is going through now.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 11:56 AM CST up reply actions
Hmm...
and that is the main difference with Gordon and why the comparison doesn’t make sense. Hinrich’s play, while bad even for him, is not that far from what he has done throughout his career.
Let’s see if that’s true:
Gordon career: 16.1 PER, .552 TS%.
Gordon 2010: 14.1 PER, .535 TS%
Difference: 2.0 PER, .017 TS%
Hinrich career: 14.4 PER, .520 TS%
Hinrich 2010: 11.0 PER, .489 TS%
Difference: 3.4 PER, .031 TS%
The numbers show the opposite of your argument. It’s Gordon whose crappy 2010 numbers are closer to his career averages.
But maybe that’s unfair, since Gordon was an inefficient scorer his first two years. Here’s the matchup of their 06-09 stats compared to their 2010 numbers:
Gordon 06-09: 17.2 PER, .568 TS%
Gordon 2010: 14.1 PER, .535 TS%
Difference: 3.1 PER, .033 TS%
Hinrich 06-09: 15.0 PER, .538 TS%
Hinrich 2010: 11.1 PER, .489 TS%
Difference: 3.9 PER, .049 TS%
Even just looking at last season to this season, both players have taken a 2.9 PER dip, but Hinrich’s TS% is down .062 compared to Gordon’s .038. Slumps!
whatever dude
just ignore that Gordon’s crappy numbers are in line with Hinrich’s career numbers…. nothing to see there.
And you totally misconstrued what I said. I said that Gordon numbers were out of line with what he gives you regularly because of injury. Hinrich’s numbers aren’t out of line with what he has done the previous seasons. You have to go back to 06 to find a year where Hinrich has a PER over 14.
I’m not going to get bogged down in a Gordon discussion. its a distraction. He plays for Detroit, Hinrich is sucking it up here.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
and you obviously know when you average those numbers for Hinrich
it distorts the picture. Yes, Hinrich had a 15.0 per from 06-09. But more accurately, Hinrich had a 17.0 per in 06, a 13.1 PER in 07, a 13.9 per in 08 and a 11.1 PER now. Its been 3 seasons since Hinrich has a PER that is equal to the league average.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 12:30 PM CST up reply actions
Okay, year by year
Subtracting this season’s dip from previous seasons:
Gordon 2007: -4.1 PER, -.037 TS%
Hinrich 2007: -6.0 PER, -.070 TS%
Gordon 2008: -2.3 PER, -.023 TS%
Hinrich 2008: -2.1 PER, -.012 TS%
Gordon 2009: -2.9 PER, -.038 TS%
Hinrich 2009: -2.9 PER, -.062 TS%
How you look at that and say “Hinrich’s 2010 numbers are closer to his past seasons than Gordon”, I don’t know.
Who cares?
He’s been bad for the last 2 seasons and he is extra bad this year. After having a career worse season in 07-08 that we all thought he would never “top” he has managed to go even higher on the shit scale this year. Gordon has been going back and forth between good and average during that span, Hinrich from bad to really bad. You win. I really don’t understand what this proves.
Why is kirk playing so bad this season? Please, let me know what excuses you have for him this season. In 07-08 it was Skiles. Now its because he has Rose.
Please enlighten me why the Bulls should keep this player who has had the 3 worst years of his career in succession and why I shouldn’t rip him? A player who has been played decidedly worse since he signed his contract. Please tell me how he is going to improve playing the 2 next to Rose? When is he going to turn it around? Why should the Bulls count on him being an offensive contributor in the future, when over the past 3 seasons he has proven to be below average on that end. That is the point of the post. Not some Gordon-Hinrich comparison whose main purpose is to once again take the focus off how much Hinrich has sucked.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
No big deal
Just the evidence you gave showed Kirk has been terrible on offense this season. You turned it into “Kirk is terrible on offense, he’s not that good on defense, and he’s overpaid.”
YaoPau
Recc’d on the Gordon bit….that’s a good correlation.
Kirk’s been much better since given a more consistent role, and he’s played much better since being paired up against the better (starter) players….
Role’s matter in this league and Kirk’s a solid role player, but he needs a defined role. If he didn’t need a defined role he’d be a superstar…which he ain’t by a country mile.
But Kirk’s much better than we give credit for him being. His glue is evidenced by the fact that our team has improved much better with him in a defined role….and he has improved….
He makes a few too many millions, there’s plenty of them in the NBA. He could be a ncie starting PG on many teams in this league….
Ok Stacey I'm am so sick of hearing the "Hard Hat and Lunch Pail" nickname for Taj. Enough already, wasn't funny the first time, but you now say it 15-20 times per broadcast. It's enough to make me want to hate Taj, when I don't hate Taj.
Did you really say to look beyond 18 games?
That’s 30% of the season so far for a team that will finish around .500
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
His age 28 season which was solid....
…was also his fewest minutes played. His numbers last year were very similar to his best year, but those are two outliers among the other four. It’s arguable that last year’s “solid” effort would have regressed to the mean if given more time.
If we’re going to lop off a large chunk of bad this season as a “slump” why don’t we lop off a large chunk of his career as a “hot streak”. Take out his two best years (one of which was cut in half), and he has a 50.6 TS%
I think there’s a lot less deviation in his five worst seasons than in his two best. You’d know that better, though. I bet if you plotted his seasons, two would be huge outliers. Then, if you regressed all of them to the mean, his bad seasons would be way closer than his good seasons.
I think it’s more that his two good seasons have made him look better than his 18 game slumps here and there.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Ok I'm not following
You and Smurf are criticizing the lopping off, but that’s not my argument, and it’s not wrong to look at one section of data. I’m saying (1) Yes he’s been awful overall this year, but (2) most of that is attributed to an early season slump. Since then he’s played at his career norms, and (3) it doesn’t make sense that his overall 2010 numbers are indicative of his ability, especially after playing solidly last year.
So it’s saying that there are good trends and bad ones, and it’s incorrect to let 18 games cloud reality. Kirk isn’t the 55 TS% player he was last year, but he isn’t the 41.6 TS% player he was through 18 games this year either.
To say 2 seasons worth of data in 6.5 years are outliers, ugh, I don’t know about that or how to figure if that’s even possible. Just lopping off the two best (especially when they’re a year apart) won’t tell you very much, and I’m not even sure if you’re being serious when suggesting that.
But even if you did that, what would Kirk’s career numbers be? Around 13.5 PER and a 50.6 TS%? With those numbers, throw in his good defense and he’s a starting caliber player.
by YaoPau on Mar 2, 2010 4:01 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
50.6 TS% and 13.5 PER are good now? Last I checked those were pretty crummy.
I’d rather have Thabo (or someone like him) at the correct price for a player like that (4 mil a year) than the overrated Kirk Hinrich.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 4:05 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
They're fine if you're a guard that plays defense
Thabo’s cool by me.
Basically what I'm saying is that Thabo brings the same total impact
as Kirk, he’s younger, and he’s cheaper. He’s another guy the Bulls would have done better to keep over Kirk at 9 million a year.
But they have an irrational love for his “thrust” and “glue.” There’s a disgusting joke in their somewhere, but I’ll pass on connecting the dots.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 5:31 PM CST up reply actions
Who would you rather have on the team right now, Thabo or Taj Gibson?
And regarding Thabo vs. Kirk, Thabo is a far worse player than Hinrich. He’s a far worse shooter, passer, and even manages to turn the ball over more despite having a significantly lower USG%. He might be a better value than Kirk, but he is not a better player. The Bulls already have one of the worst offenses in the league, substitute Thabo for Kirk and we’d be completely anemic.
Well, if we moved Kirk for expirings
and kept Thabo on the cheap, then we probably would have been able to afford Tyrus who is better than Taj. So that would have been a better allocation of resources.
So I’d prefer Thabo in that scenario. We also could have just drafted Taj instead of James Johnson in that scenario.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 6:28 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
You're lopping off a third of the season.
I’m lopping off a third of his career.
For me, the problem with your argument is that you’re saying his 52 TS% over 35 games is comparable to a TS% over 7 years. That doesn’t work. That would imply that if he had a really bad 5-game stretch coming up, that your entire argument would be kaput. What if he has 3 more shit games, drops his TS% to .51. Were you wrong all along? Then has 10 good games that brings back close to 0.52? Are you right again? Then he ends the season with 10 really bad games and he drops back below 50%? Am I right and you’re wrong?
Or, giving you the benefit of the doubt, what if he has 10 really good games and 10 mediocre games the rest of the season and raises his TS% to 0.54? Again, your argument that he’s playing to his career averages is wrong. That doesn’t work for me.
It might be starting “caliber” in the technical sense that other players with those numbers start, but it’s not “good” starting caliber.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
I don't think I've made the definite claims you think I've made
My position was “there’s not enough info from this season to say Hinrich sucks offensively, because there’s a good chance he just had a slump”. And I pointed to his 52%‘s to show that he’s been better than 49% before and he’s been better in the last 35 games.
I guess I don’t understand the confusion here, and I wonder if it’s because Hinrich’s been so inconsistent over his career. If this were Gordon, and I said “He slumped early on, but because he’s been better over his career and played at those career marks the past two months, I think it’s unfair to say his 2010 numbers = his ability”, I’m not sure there’d be this disagreement.
Normally you’re pretty good with logic, so maybe I made an oversight here, but I don’t think so.
yep, magic starter juice.
Like Thabo was supposedly going to get last year. Like Gordon had magic bench juice his whole career, except it was actually magic starter juice… or smoething
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
Even more telling
Is that we’re 1-6 without Kirk at all….
Ok Stacey I'm am so sick of hearing the "Hard Hat and Lunch Pail" nickname for Taj. Enough already, wasn't funny the first time, but you now say it 15-20 times per broadcast. It's enough to make me want to hate Taj, when I don't hate Taj.
oh come on don't you see their point here
without kurt, we totally would’ve rocked atlanta last night!!! never mind the blowout…. every game we lose, it’s his fault….. every game we win, his play makes no difference. our awesome record when he doesn’t play shows us that easily.
but seriously, some people here have more mood swings than a bipolar pregnant woman with ADHD. we win games – everything is super peachy and we might get to the second round of the playoffs. we lose games – and suddenly we have the worst SG in the league and we would be so much better off without him…
he’s not very good, and he is overpaid. but he isn’t killing the bulls.
Practice beats talent when talent doesn't practice.
by iamsasquatch on Mar 2, 2010 9:15 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
yep, that is the point
because we have no one better, we must suffer through the crap that is hinrich. I have been anti-Hinrich for awhile. I originally posted all these stats at the trade deadline, when he was playing well, when people were clamoring to keep him. The fact is that in the last 3 years he hasn’t been anything more than an average NBA player. He is overpaid, and this year, he is killing the Bulls on offense. Just like he did in 07-08.
I’d be fine with him as a 3rd guard or if his fans would shut up about how well he is playing sometime. We are talking about a 2 guard who hasn’t scored over 20 pts a game yet this season. That isn’t what the Bulls envisioned when they signed him.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 11:33 AM CST up reply actions
hmmm
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3710/gamelog;_ylt=AqlUWBda2igYuo6uOYZkRGTPPKB4
interesting……seems like he was doing quite well since the all star break too, save for his last two games, and one other game (at washington). how come you didn’t say anything then???
Practice beats talent when talent doesn't practice.
by iamsasquatch on Mar 2, 2010 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
you are right
the only reason i am saying anything about Hinrich is because he has played poorly in the last 2 games. You got me. It is just a happy coincidence that he has sucked all season long so I had plenty of evidence to work with. Damn I’m lucky. :)
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 11:58 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
he hasnt sucked all season long
he sucked in the beginning, when he was playing off the bench. he then got moved to the starting line up and improved his stats tremendously, and along with that the team’s wins increased lots too…… and now the last two games have been bad and this is just a convenient time for you to take advantage of the mood swings exhibited on this blog by our recent losses….
Practice beats talent when talent doesn't practice.
by iamsasquatch on Mar 2, 2010 12:06 PM CST up reply actions
the numbers are the numbers
but i anticipated someone would try to shoot the messenger
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 12:26 PM CST up reply actions
what?
that doesnt make sense. you’re not the messenger for anyone….. and i havent attacked you, just your argument
Practice beats talent when talent doesn't practice.
i wouldn't say you attacked me
but the point of your post seem to be that I’m only saying these things because Hinrich is slumping. The focus of your argument appears pointed to me and to anything I said about Hinrich.
You wrote:
and now the last two games have been bad and this is just a convenient time for you to take advantage of the mood swings exhibited on this blog by our recent losses….
seems like he was doing quite well since the all star break too, save for his last two games, and one other game (at washington). how come you didn’t say anything then???
So on two occasions you addressed the timing of my post. I’ll just point out that most of what is written here is copy and pasted from replies to other persons. If you read the game thread, people asked me to make this post after Hinrich shit the bed, but I had written most of this stuff weeks ago. I just had to update the numbers. That is why I talk about Salmons as if he is still on the team in the post. I was too lazy to edit that part.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 1:28 PM CST up reply actions
all i was trying to say there
was that he’s in a two-game slump….wait a little and he’ll pick it up. and i agree with you on the fact that he is not a great player. he isnt even a very good player. but he is a good player, who is overpaid, yes. but without him, the bulls suck a lot more than with him. he is by no means “killing the bulls” as you have said.
Practice beats talent when talent doesn't practice.
Umm... Kirk had nothing to do with our wins/losses earlier in the season.
Our early losses can be attributed to Derrick Rose’s ankle injury early on. Kirk Hinrich moving into the starting line up did not get us wins, Derrick Rose being healthy, and being the beast he is, got us wins. Hinrich doing good or bad does NOT correlate with our wins/losses.
by Onyx1191 on Mar 2, 2010 11:15 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Bridge, meet water.
Obviously there will be some debate regarding the intanglible value KH adds to the team, which seems to have been long settled among both management and the players (who by all accounts value him). But, just assuming that you’re right and KH is an overpaid offensive underperformer, the bigger question is not what money was paid in the past, but what to do right now? My thought is the Rose has arrived, something that wasn’t certain at the beginning of the season, and KH now becomes moveable this summer. But there’s still the money problem – who will the bulls be able to replace KH with and get some other team to pay his salary – and are we really just better off keeping him and his salary over the next two years?
Derrick Rose on one health knee
11-24
Kirk on two good ones
1-9
Kirk’s defense is not what it used to be. He’s acquired Ben Gordon’s tendencies to turn away from his man while he slips behind him to establish rebounding position.
12/31/08: Fire Vinny Del Negro.(upd: 1/7/10)
Kirk should be a bench player more than a starter.
by jamaica876 on Mar 2, 2010 10:25 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
jamaica, if Kirk loses his starting postion, who would take his place among this group of career bench players?
Isn’t he still better than the current crop? To me his primary value is taking some pressure off Rose, who still has a long way to go on defense, by usually guarding the opposition’s best offensive threat. This allows Derrick to conserve more energy, allowing him to become a much more dangerous scoring machine since Kurt has moved into the starting lineup.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Mar 2, 2010 10:43 AM CST up reply actions
Contract
If he was making 5 million a season in stead of 9+ is anyone even having this argument?
by oakdale on Mar 2, 2010 11:23 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Yes. Do you see anyone laying off Pargo because he only makes 2 million?
A bad player is a bad player.
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 2, 2010 2:05 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
My point
Kirk’s haters hate him because he doesn’t live up to his contract. Kirk’s supporters don’t fault him for the contract that the org gave him.
That contract prevents us from signing better players. That contract prevented us from keeping
Ben Gordon. So you have to analyze his production with his contract in mind, because it’s a horribly allocated resource.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 1:54 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think anybody will try to argue that Kirk isn't overpaid
However, this is the NBA. 99% of players who sign 5-year deals are overpaid by the end of the contract.
Kirk's salary is about double what it should be. Most guys aren't THAT overpaid.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 4:06 PM CST up reply actions
jerome james
adam morrison
ben wallace
larry hughes
andres nocioni
eddy curry
and now elton brand
thats without any research and off the top of my head….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
So John Paxson handed out three of the worst contracts in the NBA. Hooray?
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 4:38 PM CST up reply actions
yep
that was exactly my point ?
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
I was talking about relative to the whole of the league,
there are very few people more overpaid than Kirk. It just so happens that Paxson had a penchant for handing out big deals to limited players.
That doesn’t change the fact that MOST players in the league are not paid about double their actual value.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 4:42 PM CST up reply actions
There are probably 60 well-paid players more overpaid than Kirk this season
Some big terrible contracts this season: McGrady, Redd, Curry, Simmons, Miles, Blount, Chandler, Hughes, Jaric, Kenny Thomas, Shaq, Jerome James, Harpring, Darko, Etan Thomas, Brian Cardinal, Jermaine O’Neal, Adam Morrison, Antonio Daniels, Speedy Claxton etc etc etc
Some less drastic, but still terrible: Nick Collison, James Posey, Jason Maxiell, Rafer Alston, Jared Jeffries, Noc, Marcus Banks, Jamall Tinsley, etc etc etc
Obviously Kirk’s deal isn’t a bargain, but he’s done a fairly decent job earning his contract. I have a feeling you’re looking only at the salaries of guys who pan out, and leaving out the hundreds of millions of dollars wasted toward guys who blow out / get hurt.
Maybe so, but this whole discussion of Kirk's deal vs. the rest of the league is a sidetrack
off of the essential point. The Bulls willfully hamstring themselves by refusing to spend and they have grand plans for a max contract FA to pair with Rose. Having a player as overpaid as Hinrich on the team really, really damages their ability to make substantial positive change to this currently middling team.
The other thing about a bunch of those terrible deals is that many of them expire this year. Unfortunately for the Bulls, Kurt’s runs FOREVER (okay, not forever, it just feels that way) and it puts a big crimp in their ability to build a championship level team.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 5:29 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
You do realize that at the same time you're criticizing the Bulls' "refusal to spend" and their tendency to overpay.
You can’t attack from both angles.
yes, I can, because that's the paradox that the Bulls represent.
They will spend just up to the tax line and no more, but they spend that money extremely unwisely and overpay the wrong players which is doubly crippling given their refusal to pay their way out of the mistakes they make.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 6:29 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Most teams in the league are unwilling to pay the tax for a non-contending team
Hell, even the lakers, who are a contender in a major market are trying to cut back on their tax bill.
Are you kidding me!!!!!,
Amir Johnson doesn’t make this list
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 12:57 PM CST up reply actions
I'm glad you lump Hinrich in with those guys.
You’re now seeing how bad he is.
In the past 10 years, just four team owners have not paid a luxury tax and are not on pace to pay one this year: Donald Sterling, Jerry Reinsdorf, Chris Cohen (Golden State), Bob Johnson (Charlotte).
Two owners’ teams averaged an operating income of over +$10 million per year while their teams have lost over 60% of their games: Donald Sterling and Jerry Reinsdorf.
::glare::
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
Interestingly, BG ranks between 40th and 50th in TS eFG and FG so yes while Kirk sucks
BG is not much better and is clearly not worth the 5/55 contract he signed.
Is pointing out someone who is perceived to be an huge upgrade over Kirk but in reality is not somehow
taboo around here? I am simply using the same metrics that you used.
huh?
you’re fighting random ghosts. This is a response to Gar ‘glue’ Forman, IMO. Though I think it’s a bit overboard myself.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 12:36 PM CST up reply actions
I just find it odd that people would compare Hinrich to a player
who has been injured for much of the season, yet still has put up better offensive numbers than Kirk, as if that is some sort of argument in favor or Hinrich. Hinrich has been awful… but so has Gordon! okay. I’m sure Detroit fans are pissed.
by Basketball Smurf on Mar 2, 2010 12:36 PM CST up reply actions
I agree Kirk sucks but keeping BG over Kirk wouldn't have made much of a difference in the grand scheme of things,
which is what many people in here seem to believe.
The difference being
BG could still be traded for more than expirings. BG’s value in scoring is greater than Kirk’s value in intangibles.
And even still, with Salmons gone, the Bulls would have had BG on the roster for less than what Kirk’s paid, so they’d be able to go all out for a max FA the same as they are now, and they’d likely solely focus on a post player as opposed to the feeling now that they need to fill 2 positions, one being SG.
So yes, it would’ve made a difference in the grand scheme of things because the ORG has said that the plan is 2010. They would have a better foundation for building their team.
This discussion has been had so many times here
it’s ridiculous. If the Bulls had not taken back the offer BG accepted after their self imposed deadline, he would have signed for 6/54 which is $9 per year as a opposed to the $11 million per year he will average with Detroit.
Joakim on whether he ever tried tennis: "I played a little bit. If anybody on the Bulls wanted to play me, I would kick their ass."
the Bulls when they strike out in free agency?
Welcome home!
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 2, 2010 1:50 PM CST up reply actions
Pretty sure I'll take him before I take JJ at 5/92
by Sports2 on Mar 2, 2010 3:32 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I think we can agree on that but it doesn;t change the fact
that if the Bulls had signed BG they would have had three bad contracts instead of two.
No, if they had signed BG they would have dumped Kirk
and BG at 5 years / 50 million was good value. They could have had him at that price, if they had moved the golden boy for expirings.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 4:39 PM CST up reply actions
BG at 5 years 50 million is a good value?
Really? Good thing you will never be a GM I suppose.
by MrBungle on Mar 2, 2010 4:42 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
He's had a bad year this year due to injuries, but when he's healthy
he’s basically Ray Allen lite. I think that’s valuable enough to warrant 5 years / 50 million.
Kirk Hinrich sucks. The end.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 2, 2010 4:44 PM CST up reply actions
If Kirk Hinrich is 5/55 with his best years apparently behind him.
How is Gordon any more worthless?
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 2, 2010 4:55 PM CST up reply actions
lol, I see certain comments were nuked.
Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 3, 2010 12:19 AM CST up reply actions
I would just like to say as a Huge Kirk fan
Kirk Hinrich played his worst, absolute worst basketball game of perhaps his entire career yesterday….
-It wasnt so much his shot wasnt falling, but with lu, noah, rose all out, hinrich is the best player on the team, and yet he looked lack luster to say the least…before some douche chimes in and says “well he always looks like that” let me say it now…NO…NO HE DOESNT!!! The fact that it startled me yesterday isnt me getting new eyes, it was seriously the first time ive seen that
-Hinrichs defense, whether he gets blown by or not, is always there, hes always doing a good job of watching his man and the ball and applying pressure when possible…YESTERDAY WAS NOT THE CASE….it was worse than whatever defense ben gordon is percieved to play. He took plays off, again…of all the games ive ever watched of him, ive never seen him do something like that…sure he gets beat or humiliated on defense, but no…that was him not trying
-His assists were coward assists, they werent “im gonna try to make a play” they were “god i dont want this ball, here u take it rose” ive seen him do this on certain occaisions, but its not a regular habit, last night it was an all game habit..
and the most damning point
-Jannero DYSON pargo looked better than kirk hinrich….it was…disgusting
The indiana game was bad in terms of offense for hinrich, but coupled with yesteerdays game, the most recent memory anyone (even a great hinrich fan) can have is nothing but negativity towards hinrich, so i expected a post like this, and damn it, if hinrich has a sub par next game…i might call it quits on being a hinrich fan…what would be a subpar game you ask? less than 10 points, shooting less than 40%, more turnovers than assists, <6 assists…..
One last thing, before we go comparing this season to the the horrific 2007 season…lets wait for the season to end,
One more sidenote: John Paxson was in the building last night, i wonder if he walked up to hinrich and said “yea were trading you in the offseason” cuz my god…what the hell was wrong with him last night!!!
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Mar 2, 2010 1:49 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
LOL!
Jannero DYSON pargo
We miss you, Tyrus Thomas and Ben Gordon!
by Granny Waiters on Mar 2, 2010 10:10 PM CST up reply actions
No sugar coating there…
You saw exactly what I did. His play against Atlanta was a basketball atrocity . People can argue about how he played previously, but not about that. ‘Angry Kirk’ should be all over the court Thursday night, I would consider it a huge disappointment if he’s not.
by kingles on Mar 3, 2010 1:41 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
yea it was a travesty
i think any hinrich fan watching mustve just like sank, cuz there was nothing you could walk away with….hes had poor shooting nights tons of times, its nothing new, but he always brought something to the table, yesterday i saw hinrich do something i dont think ive ever seen him do….take a defensive possession off, he was flat footed, he wasnt as aware as everything going on, when he wasnt being posted up, he looked like he was sleeping, rose would get beat and hinrich just stood and watched. On offense he didnt bother attacking the rim, especially at a state when rose and deng were both out….man i just cant explain how horrid it was to watch that game, im a hinrich fan because of his game, because of how he emphasizes doing the little things in his game, and that play that i am such a fan of, for the first time watching this guy, it wasnt there…and it was dreadful…
Angry Kirk, not being traded kirk, well rested kirk….i dont care what label you wanna give him, it just better not be the kirk hinrich who takes plays off…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Mar 3, 2010 2:45 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
MANAGERS FAVORITE PLAYER
Listen, i know the bulls management loves him, i don’t know why, maybe because he doens’t complain or cause problems on the court or off, but it’s time to get rid of him, even if it’s for a bum player. The bulls are just wasting money and time with this guy, he has already reach his potential, you can’t say that about rose. Management needs to get rid of him, so rose can be more of a leader to this team, having kirk there with the tittle captain doesn’t help, neither does his sorry offense. To me, his just like tyrus thomas, he can only play defense and has no offensive game. I don’t know what happen to kirk because a couple of years ago the guy was a good shooter and a better scorer, but now he doesn’t even drive to the basket, he just shoots jumpers all day and stays on the top of three point line. Bottomline the bulls will never be a contender until management stops playing favorites and get rid all the bums on the team, like, kirk, miller and pargo.
by Jermal on Mar 3, 2010 9:04 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
GOOD TEAMS DON'T KEEP BAD PLAYERS
I just wanted to say look at the cavs and lakers, they don’t keep bad players on their team, if they have a player that is not helping, they usually get rid of him. Cleveland and the lakers have too much talent on their roster. Just look at how deep their bench is and how good it is compare to the bulls, that’s why their good and the bulls aren’t good.
interesting
cavs: Darnel Jackson, Booby Gibson, Daniel Green, Anthony Parker, and thats just the players that arent expiring
lakers: Fisher, Sasha, Morrison…..plus a bunch of expiring junk….
the lakers and cavs arent great because of what they do or dont have on the bench, but because of the overwhelming talent that starts on their teams…
the cavs dont have a deep bench at all, they have a good starting five, with perhaps the most overpowering force in the nba on their team and thats what makes them good. The lakers have the best constructed starting 5 followed by a brilliant coach, their biggest weakness is that pg spot, but with guys like kobe, pau, and artest on the floor utilizing the triangle…that weakness can usually be hidden.
The bulls need to have a deep bench because they lack the same firepower that the elites have, but i digress hinrich at the pg spot is a luxury due to d.rose and he is terribly inconsistent on the offensive end to just play sg, either hes gotta get more aggressive in terms of scoring, or hes gotta go….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
I would sure
love to have Jemario Moon.
by QUINTEN DALEY on Mar 3, 2010 4:05 PM CST up reply actions
LET HIM GO
First, i want to say, you don’t give cleveland and the lakers bench that much credit. I will admit that the laker bench isn’t playing like it did last year but it still better than any other bench in the league except probably cleveland. You must have forgotten who cleveland has on it’s bench that is really good, like j.j.hickson,anderson varejao, leon powe, and on march 22 zydrunas ilgauskas. The lakers have shannon brown and jordan farmar who you forgot to mention. Hinrich isn’t a luxury, his a player that is overpaid and doesn’t score enough points, yes he can play defense on the shooting guards and d-rose can’t but the buls have other gurards that can do that, like brown for example. The bulls can easily find someone to play defense on a shooting gurard, probably in the d-league, but they need someone that can score, that’s why i say get rid of the bum and pargo and miller too next season.
Rockets bench?
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
the Ellis/Iverson comparisons are faulty because you aren’t taking usage into account. Those guys have usages of ~30, so they’re bound to get assists by virtue of having the ball all the time. a USG%/AST% might be more telling.
Hinrich has been bad, sure. But as someone who has watched Steve Blake for years, he’s a lot more versatile on offense than Blake or Fisher and would be really good alongside a star 2 like Roy/Kobe/Wade.
#52

by 














