Sam Smith craps all over the Boozer rumors
[From the FanShots. I'll make this our Boozer thread of the day, and close yesterdays. As a quick take, I like that it's at least a more aggressive 2010 plan. Check the link for Sam's dig at the Blazers, nice! -ed.]
(But Taj Gibson rocks!)
7 months ago
Juiceboxjerry
530 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Again, I gotta believe Sam.
First, I think he’s pretty entrenched in the organization now and knows more inside info than he did when he worked for the Trib. I think sometimes he speaks on behalf of the organization, and this is one of those times.
And second, though I’d love a bold move, I just don’t see Bulls management doing this. Not for Boozer at least.
For my true fans, I feel bad for them. The longtime fans of the Chicago Bulls – I just felt like they’re being cheated. Not with me, but just things that happened in the past. I feel like the fans deserve a lot better. - BG7
by smash! on Jul 10, 2009 8:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
woj and bucher both crapped all over this as well
results seem mixed on this; im guessing its been discussed, but then the bulls heard that the dreaded media found out and began calling their guys (smith, kc, woj) to go into full denial mode. we wouldnt want to upset our lord and savior kirk hinrich now would we?
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 8:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
honestly
how many times have trades been denied thoroughly only to happen shortly after? I don’t think this proves much either way.
by JSlakov on Jul 10, 2009 8:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
But I think if it held any truth SSmith would be talking about how great it would be for the Bulls...
instead of making fun of the Blazer’s GM.
For my true fans, I feel bad for them. The longtime fans of the Chicago Bulls – I just felt like they’re being cheated. Not with me, but just things that happened in the past. I feel like the fans deserve a lot better. - BG7
by smash! on Jul 10, 2009 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
ok but
I mean Sam has good access but if they lie to him, he’s going to print it and it happens all the time. They’ll later change their story and Sam will pretend like the lie never happened because then his access will seem less valuable.
by JSlakov on Jul 10, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know how much they tell him.
I’m sure he has sources inside the Bulls telling him things but I don’t think he’s one of the forst to know. I’m sure he gets most of it handed down to him.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
screw Sam
didn’t he just write an article about how great a position the Bulls were in to get a FA guard cheaply this offseason, then a couple days later there they are signing Pargo? Sam also had them taking Lawson and Calathes in the 1st rd. Once they took two PFs, he was singing a different tune.
by M 80 on Jul 10, 2009 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I know for a fact he has been in the know on several almost trades and he hasn't reported anything on it- not one peep- because they asked him not to.
He’s now in the inner circle so much that he actually listens to their requests to sit on inside info. Now this can surely be an exception, and I hope it is, but I tend to believe him on this one. Mainly because I don’t see how the Pargo signing makes sense if we’re losing Kirk…
by smash! on Jul 10, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your last point
and I’m wondering… how do you “know for a fact”? Do you know people inside the org?
by 72-10 on Jul 10, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
which one?
Mainly because I don’t see how the Pargo signing makes sense if we’re losing Kirk…
or
Mainly because I don’t see how the Pargo signing makes sense if we’re not losing Kirk…
man up!
by exult463 on Jul 10, 2009 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how 'bout
I don’t see how the Pargo signing makes sense
?
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
by marionette on Jul 10, 2009 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it makes sense
its a “hey I’m doing something so leave me alone” type move
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 10, 2009 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow spin control is in full effect.
Sam mentions the trade and then mentions how well Taj and Johnson are playing in practices. Then he also mentions how hard Deng has been working out at the Berto.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 8:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously though, I do wonder if Taj isn't a jumping jack and he just flubbed his jumps at the combine
(he measured out as a sucky jumper, but everyone says he plays above the rim)
Maybe he’s got a secret 40 inch vertical he was holding back from everyone. I’ve got to cling to some kind of fantasy to justify his selection, anyway.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he needs to be an awesome jumper to play above the rim...
bc his incredible wingspan makes up for his lack of hops.
For my true fans, I feel bad for them. The longtime fans of the Chicago Bulls – I just felt like they’re being cheated. Not with me, but just things that happened in the past. I feel like the fans deserve a lot better. - BG7
by smash! on Jul 10, 2009 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone in the NBA has an incredible wingspan
Well, not everyone, but you get the point. I always hear people talking about what great athletes and hard workers, and how big players are, but everyone else in the NBA is too. His relative gifts have to be truly unique to make it. Certainly Taj has a good wingspan even for the NBA, but that won’t be enough for him to be good if he otherwise sucks compared to the guys he goes up against.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You really extrapolate a ton from a simple comment, which explained how he "played above the rim"
I didn’t say he would be good, I didn’t really comment on him at all, except his wingspan. He’s 6-feet-10 with a 7-4 wingspan- that’s big, even for the NBA.
by smash! on Jul 10, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
SENE!
AJINCA!
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some guys just aren't combine type performers.
Settings like that just don’t work for some people. Even Blake Griffin’s combine numbers weren’t eye popping, but anyone who has seen this guy get out in transition or explode to the basket knows he has NO PROBLEM getting up higher than most others.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Jul 10, 2009 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
sports
correct me if i have you wrong, but you’d have taken lawson at 16 and blair at 26 right?
i don’t think anyone else here would’ve gone for lawson, but it would’ve worked brilliantly…
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
by marionette on Jul 10, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't remember what I went on record as saying :)
(feel free to look it up, I’m not trying to be coy). I’m pretty comfortable with the JJ selection, and I after looking at things in detail, I became much less enthusiastic about letting Rose have a go as an SG.
But to get at your general point, I still would have welcomed Lawson with open arms.
The thing is though, I don’t think Bayless is a very similar player to Lawson. At worst, I looked at Lawson as a very highly skilled player, who’s got a lot of things going for him that Bayless doesn’t.
1. He’s an awesome shooter
2. He’s a very good distributor
3. He really takes great care of the ball.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
lawson would’ve been the forever backup, that’s how i couldn’t take him 16.
i’m not liking jj pick at all. we shall see…
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
by marionette on Jul 10, 2009 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
B.E.I.R.T.???? C'mon, we can do better than that. ;-)
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Jul 10, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bulls Spin.
BS.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Jul 10, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Man if we do this trade
the people that hate the pargo signing now are gonna have a fit when he becomes the third guard and starts playing crazy mintes.
by Gogiman15 on Jul 10, 2009 9:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I won't.
Lottery or bust. I will root for loosing. However you can’t tank or Stern will punish you with a six or seventh pick.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wouldnt blake become our third guard?
he’s no hinrich but better than pargo
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
either they get a guard in the deal
or it frees up room under the luxury tax to sign another one.
or Demarcus Nelson!
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
i hear hes got a lot of potential
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who gives a shit who the third guard is?
It’s not like they’re going to win the championship whether they do the trade or not. You do the trade because it sets you up nicely for 2010. As opposed to muddling around every year trying to go .500, whoch is apparently the Bulls’ current plan.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
by Big D on Jul 10, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
if we can get rid of hinrich and then deng too….. man i can only hope
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
their plan
is to flirt with the lower playoff seeds and take one or two games in the first round
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 10, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sam's getting more turdish as the years go on
Great, Taj Gibson remembered the media’s name, whereas Tyrus called you all ‘smarmy fuckface 1, 2, 3, etc’
Maybe Gibson is more mature because he’s a 31 year old rookie?
Lets all pretend that the Bulls are interested in this deal and do have a real plan to reshape this team. If so, stuff like ‘who replaces Kurt’s minutes’ doesn’t matter. Don’t people get this? They let one of their best players walk, this current team does not matter. They’re not trying to build a tltle team any time soon.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 9:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i thought the same thing about who replaces kirk's minutes
gee, maybe they should’ve thought of that before letting BG just walk out the door. replacing kirk’s minutes shouldnt be a deterrant to any trade that gets his contract off the books for next summer.
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they did
when they planned on playing Salmons at the SG spot and knowing Rose will be taking up most of the minutes and PG. Kirk is a backup, his minutes are easy to replace.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i also liked how sam said
“maybe he’s no karl malone” about taj gibson. gee, ya think doctor?
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, he's always been this turdish
I actually think the account of Taj was just a recycled account of what a nice young man Thabo was. I remember that article from back in his Trib days.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remembering that article
it talked about Thabo being nice and Tyrus being a douche.
Notice that in this article, Taj gets praised as teacher’s pet, and JJ (who laughed at Sam in the opening press conf) gets the ‘Vinnie says he’s in poor shape’ treatment.
Perhaps JJ is in poor shape… I actually said as much based on his combine numbers. But Sam is definitely a turd.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
holy crap
you’re right!! i remember that article now…..wow. its like the exact same thing
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This article sounds
like Johnson and Taj were playing against no one and just passing the ball to one another.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sam "Stay Tuned" Smith
You can watch JJ and Taj July 14th in the Vegas Summer League. 7PM CST tipoff. They’re charging $15 to view the streams, but NBATV might carry the games.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was wondering
how should i throw 15 dollars away without literally throwing in the garbage, thanks for the heads up
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 10, 2009 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
always with the negative outlook
we got rose + cap space next summer. we’re gonna be building a title team.
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not that much cap space
if kirk is still around and fish opts in
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah i guess but
you gotta think kirk will be traded. i mean he’s too expensive to keep as a back up pg and he can start on most of the teams in the league
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
as with everything with this franchise
when i see it i’ll believe it
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also, will believe Kirk will be traded only after seeing the press release
They love Kirk. Kirk gives them a secure feeling. I don’t think he’s going to get traded.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they are
going to remind everyone about “versatility” and that kirk can play and the 1 and 2, and thats why they HAVE to keep him
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 10, 2009 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
sure, but if so
it’s not until next summer. And even then they’ll have a roster of Rose + max guy….then it’s a few years to get the other pieces. The point being this current team is pointless to follow (if the trade happens).
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok i agree on that
but you cant be saying we’re not building a championship contender. i mean if that were true, why are we all still paying attention to the bulls? if you really believed that, why are you still here leading this blog??
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol i guess you're right...
do you get paid for this though?
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they're not building one
until they actually sign the FA
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we shouldn't be in this position in the first place
right now we should have been contenders…. so yeah it’s more stating the facts than being negative.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich + Roy + Deng + Noah + a real fucking coach sure seems like a good way to start.
Hell, you trade Gordon two years ago for Pau Gasol and HOLY FUCKING SHIT.
Yep. That is all.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Jul 10, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not everyone cares for BG as you do.
They offered the little man 2 contracts and he hemmed and hawed about. NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU LAMENT HE WILL NEVER BE WORTH THAT CONTRACT! So damn tired of Bulls fans and their revisionist history.
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 9:49 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
You really are shortsighted!
I don’t think BG was the greatest or even think he was a good fit…however, whenn you have a player that can score 20 ppg, you don’t let him walk for nothing…they needed to offer him a big contract and then if they really didn’t want him, see if they could unload him…a decent role player and a draft pick might not fully make up for BG, but it’s better than NOTHING!
by DRose01 on Jul 10, 2009 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah how is trading that Hinrich contract working out?
I liked BG but he wasnt worth what he wanted $$$ wise. I wish he was still a member but he followed his nose to the stench of Joe D’s Pistons with their new coach who might as well be Del Negro Pt. 2.
No, Im not shortsighted just realistic. This organization can do a lot better than a bad decision making SG who had only one talent. Gordon can be replaced.
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 10:07 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Umm... seriously? There have been plenty of teams interested in Hinrich.
He’s not traded because he’s a teacher’s pet, not because no one wants him.
ANDRES NOCIONI WAS TRADED!!!! Yeah, Gordon getting overpaid by a million isn’t going to keep him from getting traded. You should start a new talking point.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Jul 10, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
its not like we gave up a dwayne wade or a lebron for nothing…ben is a good player, but he was not and would not have been a bulls savior. he was our best player because he was put in the position to be our best player. dang sucks (injuries, softness, too high of expectations, etc.), rose wasnt there for all of bens 4 yrs, and hes a scorer…of course hes gonna be our best player (and by that i mean score the most points everything else was mediocre at best). I dont understand why people are crying over ben gordon like hes an all star player who brought us championships…hes not an all star, hes not a player of superstar caliber, or a player u build around…in all reality hes a 6th man that should be comming off the bench! plus as goofy as this organizations mngmnt is u cant say they did not offer him a good deal…twice!
by Gogiman15 on Jul 10, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
Yeah we got a list for you too.
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 10:03 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
So, no trade for an all-star PF because they would have to give up their 3rd guard?!?!
I think this is another example of the “if it’s not perfect, we won’t do it” school of GM’ing that the Bulls seem to follow. The deal would probably make this year’s team better, but even if it didn’t they still would have shed salary for 2010 and Boozer gives them more flexibility in 2010 because he offers sign-
and-trade potential.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree here and they can get a guard back from
Portland to fill out the roster.
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 10:09 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
so the bulls give up 2 of the best 6 players they have
and get a one year rental on a injury-prone player (actually injury prone, not Deng style) and spare parts. did you read the article, sam smith’s logic actually makes sense, whether he is a turdish homer or not
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they're.blowing.up.the.team.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The team won 41 games.
And should be improved with the moves they have made this offseason…the
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Jul 10, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Losing Gordon for nothing
We lost at least 9 games due to Vinny not having any coaching experience at all. We should have challenged the 50 win mark.
Minus Gordon and…well, it’s just scoring and double teams and free throws and work ethic.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Weird...I was going to say...
The trade as proposed would be the equivalent of blowing the team up…not sure if that move improves the team next season.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Jul 10, 2009 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Adding Boozer
Do you really think the addition of Boozer and the subtraction of Hinrich and Tyrus is at best a wash?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Puts a lot stock (all of it) in Boozers health
not that 2009 matters if this trade goes through.
by JockstrapNoah on Jul 10, 2009 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do actually...
The team gets much weaker in the backcourt, while only getting what I see as a marginal improvement (over Tyrus’ projected ‘09-’10) in the frontcourt…the team becomes a weaker defensive team both on the perimeter and the interior…
I think its at best a wash…but, I am not completely against it because of the flexibility it offers at both the deadline (another huge expiring contract) and in the offseason (as a potential sign and trade chip).
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Jul 10, 2009 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
blow it up! blow it up! blow it up!
rose plus nothing plus new gm equals me watching this team.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is going to be my first chant at the United Center
along with some “fire vinnay! fire vinnay” during the pre-season.. just like last year. lol. oh god that was fun.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They are trying to build a title team soon
Which is why they did not overpay for a player that does not fit into those plans.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Jul 10, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok it's been a month..
the Danny Mac show sucks! Shocking. No bulls talk.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 9:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
you want Mac talking Bulls?
at least Matt Spiegel sort of can, I guess.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's trying to but Mac keeps talking wine/food.
dude talk SPORTS!
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
better wine/food
than hockey
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true.
I just wish he could pause and take a breath when he speaks. It’s a hard listen when he has pms.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh...
They need to just do the trade, free up the cap space, and hope Nelson and PAago play better than expected…best case: we end up with a core of Rose, Deng, Boozer, Noah + any free agent we can find room for…worst case (or maybe this is the best case): Boozer is injured all season, nobody steps up enough since all we really have are Rose, Deng, Noah, we get a high lottery pick and draft a solid young player…now we have Rose, Deng, Noah, draft pick, and the best player all that cap space can buy! I feel like it’s a win-win situation…
by DRose01 on Jul 10, 2009 9:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Boozer's health
has more to do with the travel in and out of Salt Lake City. He missed just 8 games in two years with the Cavs. He could be breaking down with age, but the travel schedule in the West in and out of SLC isn’t fun.
Look at how many other Utah players miss games when they’re drafted or acquired by the Jazz. They have a key player on the shelf for almost every game.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you should submit that to a medical journal.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's the lowered level of blood circulation due prolonged sitting on long plane flights
Drastically reduces the ability of the body to repair injuries.
Should probably also look into the effect of the sodium-rich environment. That can’t be good either.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Very interesting stuff
I like your theory NBA Observer. It does seem like Okur, Kirilinko, Boozer and Harpring have missed signifcant time in Utah. Even D-Will missed some time last year. Although we never saw this in the Stockton-Malone days…
by Rose Colored Goggles on Jul 10, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm really just making excuses for Mr. Integrity Carlos Boozer
He missed no games at Duke either.
Born in Germany, raised in Alaska, so there’s a Father Military Officer somewhere in there. Or a sausage maker.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think i read an article
that when in high school he had to travel by plane to all his games
"...but the devil lives inside this kid, I swear it. It rises out of him in a mist, this baby-faced defiant wrathful version of Pat Kane, escapes his bodily confines to perform satanic miracles all over the offensive zone. The only thing more fearsome than that assist was the keep-in preceding it. The only thing more unholy than his face is his black magic." GMH
by Illini0509 on Jul 10, 2009 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"sodium rich environment"
hahahahahaha…nice!
by iamsasquatch on Jul 10, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you'd think the lack of alcohol in Utah would allow players to be in better shape, counteracting that effect.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
by Big D on Jul 10, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I may be a minority of one, but I'll breathe a sigh of relief if the rumors have no basis.
If they lose both Kurt and Tyrus just to get an incredibly expensive one year rental player whose offensive skills offset his lack of D except when he is recovering from his latest injury (isn’’t one dinged Deng enough?), the Bulls will have to change their name to the MATADORS in spite of adding such stellar super stoppers like tiny Jannero and the mighty Taj. Talk about putting a fear factor in opposing offenses I’m sure LeBron and Pierce are trembling at the threat to their title quests!
Hinrich is a solid defender and Thomas could be one of the best if they weren’t coached by one trick circus clowns. How would the Bulls coaching castoffs and never were wannabe’s rate relative to the winning teams leaders….(i.e. Celtics, Lakers, Rockets, Jazz)? On a scale of 1 to 10, I say the Bulls are lucky to rate single digits (zero doesn’t count).
Yes, I still believe in Tyrus who makes my heart twitter but whose Twitter skills leave a whole lot to be desired. At this point I would rate him as the VinnyDel Illiterate of the Twitter community and although his basketbal IQ is probably in Vinny territory, when he figures it out (with playing time, experience and encouragement,) somebody’s going to lament their shortsightedness. Call me a starstruck fool, but as the late Barry Goldwater once said….“In your heart, you know I’m right.”
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Jul 10, 2009 10:54 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Does anyone know?
If we get Boozer, do we get his Bird rights?
Can we offer him 6 years next summer (IOW, can we offer him more than anyone else)?
I don’t necessarily want Boozer long-term. But if we know we can sign him for more than anyone else next summer, he has an incentive to wait for our offer and work with us. Therefore, he then becomes an excellent S&T candidate (much better than TT at least) for say… Bosh.
If we can sign one max-FA first next summer straight out (Wade, LBJ) with the money we have under the cap, we then can S&T Boozer afterward for another max-FA (Bosh). Obviously, my whole goal here is to get 2 max-FA’s next year. Yes, it is a dream, but you owe it to your fans to go for it!! And that is the only possible way I see it happening.
If we don’t get Boozer’s Bird rights, I would just rather go into the season with TT, because Boozer then has no incentive to wait for work with us next summer.
by StephenAA on Jul 10, 2009 11:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
yes.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boozer would be an excellent 2010 asset for this reason
For just this reason. Worst case is that he falls apart this season and all that is accomplished is shedding Kirk’s salary.
Best case is what you outline above — he has a good season and is sign-and-tradable. I think having Boozer would significantly increase the chances of the Bulls acquiring a talented player in 2010.
But, reading Sam’s column, it’s just not going to happen.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I still don't see why everyone is so optimistic that Boozer is sign-and-tradeable
Utah wants to dump him b/c they’d rather keep his backup. He chose not to opt out this summer b/c the market for his services must not have been to warm. Think about it….the Pistons were always rumored to be the first in line for him, yet they went after BG and CV.
The writing is on the wall. Everyone has already seen him when he’s healthy, so lets say he plays injury free this coming year. Barring a significant uptick in productivity, no one (including us) is going to want to pay him what he wants, so why would a team accept him in a sign-n-trade?
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
his back-up is a very good player.
Boozer will be traded! Utah is just waiting for the best offer.
But I think the Bottom line for the Bulls is simply this: Boozer is more valuable in a S&T than Tyrus is. I am not saying I like giving up Kirk in this trade, but if all your giving up is TT, JJ and a possible future pick, you do it!
by StephenAA on Jul 10, 2009 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're still assuming you can get something for Boozer next summer...
Did you not participate in any of the threads concerning BG’s departure?
Players are assets when you own their rights for longer than the coming season. When the other teams know they can sign a player without giving up one of their desirable pieces, then they simply wait for that player to enter free agency.
Boozer is not in the Lebron, DWade, Bosh, Stat category, so no one needs to accept a sign-n-trade. They can simply sign him outright b/c the market for his services isn’t as high.
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gee...
The Bulls had no interest in a S&T with Detroit. Detroit had nothing to give back to the Bulls and Detroit was practically the ONLY player out there that could offer BG that amount. Next year will be different, with many teams in play for a possible S&T (e.g. Toronto).
If Bosh does not want to stay with the Raptors next summer, if you were the Raptors, would you rather have Boozer coming back in a S&T or TT?
by StephenAA on Jul 10, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I were Toronto, I'd want more than Boozer in your scenario.
If I just wanted Boozer, I wouldn’t need a sign-n-trade to get him. Better yet, I would want to pay him the max because I wouldn’t have to do it.
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
*would [not] want to pay
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
This is the main reason I would want Boozer on this team this coming year – because of the likely possibility he can bring greater (than TT) assets to us next summer in return (S&T – Bosh?). Because we own his Bird rights, he then has an incentive to work with us!!
by StephenAA on Jul 10, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No.....Not Exactly
First….who is going to want to pay Boozer the max?
Second….if you can name a team that will be willing to give him a max contract, what pieces will they have to offer in the sign-n-trade?
Boozer will be free to go anywhere next summer, so the only way he will be signed and traded is if a team is actually willing to give him the max contract. Why would anyone do such a thing when they know they don’t have to?
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
Who is saying anything about a max contract for Boozer. The “Boozer S&T for Bosh” example would include others on the Bulls (although I am not even sure Bosh is even worth a max contract, but that’s beside the point).
Boozer is not going to get a max contract. The point is is that we can offer him one more year than anyone else can (regardless of the dollar amount that is offered to him). That is huge to a player and an incentive for him to work with us.
PLUS, he is more valuable in a S&T than TT is.
by StephenAA on Jul 10, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boozer's not worth a max contract, that's not the point.
The whole point of this trade would be to clear up even more cap space for the summer of 2010. This trade means the Bulls are really going all in for that summer. It may backfire on them, but the Bulls really don’t have much else going for them.
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed....I'm disputing the notion (or likelyhood) of using Boozer in a sign-n-trade.
I agree they’d be going for broke next summer to obtain someone other than Boozer. The notion that you can easily pluck Boozer into a sign and trade implies that another team would be willing to give him the max (including number of years).
My argument with StephenAA is that there’s no reason for another team to give him that b/c he’s not in the top tier of desirable free agents.
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's not worth the max, but if he turns out another healthy season he increases his value
And, despite all the claims that teams would be cheap, we’ve seen that franchises with cap space have no problem going for it.
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he's not worth the max....why would another team agree to a sign-n-trade?
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
“why would another team agree to a S&T”
1. Because they want Boozer badly.
2. Because there are 20 other teams wanting him also.
3. Because Boozer will opt for the most money.
4. Because the Bulls can offer him the most money (in terms of years alone)
Therefore, a S&T is in Boozer’s best interest, and possibly the Bulls.
I don’t know how to explain it any better than that.
by StephenAA on Jul 10, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why teams woud not agree to a S&T
1. If they want Boozer bad enough, they can get him for less than the max
2. All 20 other teams don’t have pieces worth giving up for Boozer unless its to dump their own bad salaries.
3. Yes…Boozer will opt for the most money and take less than the max as was implied this summer when he was forced to come back to Utah.
4. The Bulls can offer him the most money, but that’s only relevant if another team wants to offer Boozer the max. To do so when you don’t have to offer him the max is stupidity and wishful thinking.
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some things to keep in mind
is that if you sign a player out right you can not use the MLE for that off season. That is the reason Toronto worked out a sign and trade because now they can go and resign some of their role players.
So it works out better if you do a sign and trade. Just because it’s a sign and trade it doesn’t have to be for the max. Who knows how he comes back from his injury.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's true....and well said.
I was attacking the premise that Boozer could be used as a traditional, big name asset that could be traded for even better or comparable assets in return.
I still can’t envision a scenario where we end up with desirable pieces in a sign-n-trade involving Boozer.
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just to directly reply.
For instance: Stoudemire wants to leave the Suns, and it’s not about money (for instance). Suns are willing to pay Boozer his $12 or $13 million asking price.
Bulls Sign & Trade Boozer + James Johnson + Taj Gibson (+ 1st round pick??)
for
Suns Sign & Trade Stoudemire at MAX!!(16/17)
Why doesn’t that work for you?
StephenAA never said anything about Boozer getting a max contract. I think you just inferred that on your own.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Jul 10, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
On paper, that would be a great deal for US (I concede)
In fact, you can construct a similar arrangement where we end up with Bosh (which I think was the objective of StephenAA).
Johnson + Gibson might be crap. Of course, they might just turn out to be pretty good (if not great), but neither one of us knows that, so the meat of your proposed deal comes down to Boozer and a pick for Stat. The pick would likely amount to a slot outside the lottery assuming Stat + DRose stay healthy.
Scenario 1
The point still remains….Boozer (and his agent) will seek a max contract. If Phoenix is willing to give it to him, then the deal works for both teams, and we’ll hopefully live happily ever after. Personally, I don’t see why Phoenix would give him such a deal considering they still wouldn’t be title contenders without landing someone else. Carlos would be 29 going in the first year of the new deal.
Scenario 2
On the other hand, If Phoenix is unwilling to give him said “max” contract, Boozer doesn’t have to participate in a sign-n-trade, and he’d be free to go anywhere. At that point, he’d only be going to Phoenix because (1) he actually wants to go there, and (2) Phoenix is at least willing to pay him comparable to the best he could get on his own.
Again, your proposed deal is great for us, and if it happens I’ll be happy. I don’t see a lot of upside for Phoenix.
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do they have to pay the max again?
Boozer at $13 million plus Taj Gibson and James Johnson for say… Amare Stoudemire at $16 million doesn’t work for you?
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Jul 10, 2009 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
You’re still not getting it… or I’m not getting it. hmmmmm…
What Ozzie is proposing is that we do this deal to just get rid of TT and Kirk’s contract so that we open up more cap space next summer. That is a valid reason. All I am saying is that there is another resason to do a trade with Utah for Boozer – for the POSSIBILITY of a S&T with Boozer that gives greater value than TT does. That’s all. And yes, I think Boozer IS S&T-able.
by StephenAA on Jul 10, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes....the ability to dump contracts is very likely in a Boozer trade...that's it.
We’d either sign him next summer or lose him just like we lost BG. A sign-n-trade presumes we’d be in the same position as Toronto with Bosh. However, Bosh and Boozer will not command the same attention nor willingess for a team to commit to a max contract.
Bosh – Yes, Boozer – No.
When you throw out the possibility of a sign-n-trade, you’re implying that some team out there will be willing to give Boozer the max. I know anything can happen, but Zeke is out of the league and Dunleavy just drafted his starting PF. How many teams are left that would be dumb enough to commit a max contract to a injury-prone PF?
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan
by PeteRoc on Jul 10, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
sign and trade with miami?
he mentioned he wanted to play there, would a wade-less heat team still be as appealing?
"...but the devil lives inside this kid, I swear it. It rises out of him in a mist, this baby-faced defiant wrathful version of Pat Kane, escapes his bodily confines to perform satanic miracles all over the offensive zone. The only thing more fearsome than that assist was the keep-in preceding it. The only thing more unholy than his face is his black magic." GMH
by Illini0509 on Jul 10, 2009 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
riley
always get a good deal there.
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
by marionette on Jul 10, 2009 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chris Broussard
on ESPN two minutes ago:
Pritchard has told people around the league that this deal is not going to happen. It may get resurrected down the line in another form, but it’s not going to happen right now.
Utah is still trying to move Boozer. The Pistons still might move Hamilton for Boozer. That’s the most likely destination as a possibility right now.
http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/
by NormVanBeer on Jul 10, 2009 11:04 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
the Pistons still have around $4m in cap room
so that’s some savings for Utah if they send Boozer + someone else, though not a lot of savings. Though Rip can help the Jazz on the court more than taking a chance on Tyrus.
It’s a no-brainer for the Pistons, they get some roster balance and can re-enter the 2010 derby.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep
and to boot, they would have a pretty decent team this season if everyone stays healthy.
http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/
by NormVanBeer on Jul 10, 2009 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
poor Charlie V
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Jul 10, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Depression...
may get resurrected down the line in another form,
Funny didn’t we hear the same thing about the Kobe trade? Paxson: ’’It’s not happening right now’’..
This has been one awesome offseason. Let downs after let downs. Shades of 2007.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and that year turned out fine.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sam does make a point
that Portland is the only one confirming this but no one knows what they are giving up.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 11:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
oops
Although it was not immediately clear how many players Portland would be required to surrender in such a deal, sources say that names mentioned include Travis Outlaw, Steve Blake and Martell Webster.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How often do you hear "Bulls sources" or "Jazz sources"
in any of these rumors?
Sam Smith might be right. It’s just Pritch practicing the black arts.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So is the deal dead or??????
I keep hearing it brought up on the score and other websites while ’’sources’’ have shut it down….??
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 12:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Utah and Portland still can make some noise
Something’s gotta give with Boozer or Milsapp and there is now another fanshot quoting ESPN saying Tim Thomas was pulled out of the Marion deal because he’s allegedly now included in another deal.
Talks may fizzle. They might sizzle. I’m expecting a LONG offseason of possibilities.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really need a trade!
Why is it when it’s a Bulls rumor it’s always exhausting to no end? When was the last trade they made in the Summer? Wallace was trade dead line as was Salmons and Miller. I could also throw in Jalen Rose. The only summer trade I can think of with the Bulls was Elton Brand.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyson Chandler?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup!
missed that one! Maybe because it was so underwhelming?
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather talk about all this nonsense
than the Cubs or Sox. Baseball, great to attend, boring to watch.
Bears Camp is in a sub 30 day countdown. I need Bulls news dammit!
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I need some GOOD Bulls news.
I mean there has to be some,they don’t expect us to watch the resurgence of Kirk Hinrich and Luol Deng do they? Winters are bad enough in this city. I’m still shocked Kirk Hinrich is on this roster. Deng I would expect with his contract and all but Kirk Hinrich. Thats some shit right there.
This is the problem when you have two wimpy GM’s. Not one…….. but two.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're shocked that Kurt is still on the roster?
How so? It’s widely known that he’s been the Golden Child for 6 years now. Why would you be shocked?
http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/
by NormVanBeer on Jul 10, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok not shocked...
extremely angry? Disappointed? Frustrated?All that..
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's more like it!
http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/
by NormVanBeer on Jul 10, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate it
all they talk about on the radio is damn baseball. “The cubs at hotdogs and kicked a cooler” who cares. Let’s talk about basketball and football.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate Cubs talk!
almost as bad as Michael Jackson talk.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's all
being generated by pritchard, people! he’s working hard to get something for (next to) nothing, give him that i guess.
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
by marionette on Jul 10, 2009 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and
you are all dancing to his tune….
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
by marionette on Jul 10, 2009 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus Thomas is really Stromile Swift with a retarded mask on..Think about it
Same height, same school, same athletic ability, same sucky ass work ethic, same no real position having retarded statement making fucker. News flash retard. Sloan doesnt like lazy ass jump shooters who have 1 for 17 games. Fuck u stromile.
by drakedog on Jul 10, 2009 12:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
nobody's ever said that before
so now that I’ve ‘thought about it’…
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juicy tidbits from the Sun Times article
‘‘There are always conversations going on, and we’ll continue to talk to teams to see if we can make ourselves better,’’ general manager Gar Forman said.
‘‘It’s that time of year,’’ coach Vinny Del Negro said. ‘‘Teams are looking at a lot of different things, but they’re just rumors right now.
‘‘We’re gonna stay focused on the summer league and the young guys we’re trying to develop.’’
But according to sources, the Bulls prefer Chris Bosh, who is only 25, taller and a three-time All-Star. The problem is it’s doubtful the Toronto Raptors would consider trading Bosh right now.
‘‘I like the direction our team is going,’’ Del Negro said. ‘‘We have to get some guys healthy and playing at the level we need them to, but the guys have had productive summers so far.
‘‘We have flexibility moving forward, and, hopefully, we make sound decisions going forward to improve our team in other ways.’’
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 12:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
heh
‘‘There are always conversations going on, and we’ll continue to talk to teams to see if we can make ourselves better,’’ general manager Gar Forman said.
If that’s not Pax-speak, then I don’t know what is!
by NormVanBeer on Jul 10, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's actually 'GM Speak'
Just about every GM in every sport says crap like this when rumors are flying.
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bosh is taller!!!!
Yay for pterodactyl necks!!!
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Jul 10, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, if it's not going to be Bosh, there's really no point in improving the team or long-term outlook
There’s really only 2 options:
1) Bosh
2) Sucksville
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bosh is God
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
VDN
But I love the direction our team is going.
This is VDN response to Gordon’s departure. He’s basically saying his scoring didn’t make up for his many deficiencies.
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." -Sir Winston Churchill
by propheteer on Jul 10, 2009 1:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hah
But I love the direction our team is going.
Tyrus should make another “crapper” tweet. It would be appropriate.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Jul 10, 2009 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe he means literally
as in Vegas.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a few days before the Bulls-Sac deal in February Smith had some words about a potential Boozer deal (for Hinrich, wtf? Why would Utah want Hinrich as a backup pg for 9 mil a year?):
At All-Star break I heard talk that the Jazz might be inclined to trade Carlos Boozer to the Bulls for Kirk Hinrich, a favorite of Jazz management. Boozer has an opt out after this season, so he could be a very short term rental. Of course, given his lack of play this season he could play one more season on his deal. The bigger issue is he’s missed with injury more than half the games the Jazz has played since he’s been there. And as for one of those wink, wink promises to resign, well, the Cavs thought they had one from Boozer before he signed with the Jazz. And Boozer supposedly made it when Jim Paxson, who is now on the Bulls staff, was running the Cavs.
I’d hope the Bulls wouldn’t consider that, though, like Stoudemire, he’d run a nice pick and roll with Rose. Still, I’d rather wait and see if Stoudemire is available this summer, or maybe even Lamar Odom. Other possibilities this summer are Hedo Turkoglu and Mehmet Okur.
The Clippers remain a possibility with big men under big contracts in Marcus Camby and Chris Kaman with a team with a small record. Portland, also with a management that long has cherished Hinrich and in need of a better point guard, has several appealing players they could deal, as do the Warriors.
Just a few more shopping days.
Apparently Smith is higher on the likes of Kaman, Camby and Okur rather than Boozer. Amare would be nice of course, but more expensive (sounds like he won’t go anywhere without an extension in place first for big money) and definitely does not allow us the flexibility that Boozer does.
And stop worrying about Pargo being the 3rd guard, Portland has to give us something back in this proposed deal, likely Blake and Outlaw or one of those players and another fill in. Looks like Pargo will remain our 4th guard in this deal.
Sign and trade could work for Boozer, it would narrow the field down to people that want to give Boozer 6 years and there’s a high probability he plays well on our team with Rose at point and of course him being in a contract year. Even the worst characters often perform well in those contract years.
Sign and trade for Bosh could work too, though it’s a very narrow and low probability thing at this point. But imagine Bosh wants out, Toronto can’t do anything other than try to sign and trade to bring something back. Not a bad deal if they get Boozer for Bosh after Bosh opts out. Sure, it’s a downgrade, but it’s so much better than Bosh walking. Of course the deal could be adjusted either way to satisfy either team’s requirements, picks/small expiring/small salaries, etc. but that would be the headline.
by RyPac13 on Jul 10, 2009 2:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just use the quote tags next time.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Jul 10, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I apologize, I missed the italics error.
Smith’s words should end at “Just a few more shopping days” rather than “was running the Cavs.”
by RyPac13 on Jul 10, 2009 2:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the way it's headed
One source close to the process on Friday identified two main obstacles to the aforementioned three-way deal. Concerned about the quality of its backcourt rotation if it has to surrender Hinrich with Thomas after losing Ben Gordon in free agency, Chicago would insist that the Blazers surrender young guard Jerryd Bayless, which Portland is reluctant to do.
If it can’t get Bayless, Chicago might still be willing to substitute Tim Thomas for Tyrus Thomas in the deal, but sources say Utah would likely balk if Tyrus Thomas is not included.
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's no way the Bulls are that lucky
Trading only Tim Thomas to Utah, Kirk and a future 1st rounder to Portland and getting Boozer while still keeping Tyrus?
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They have to deal Tyrus..but Bayless who i have liked since AZ...
which Portland is reluctant to do.
Thats what is holding this up? They won’t give up the kid?Interesting and good on the Bulls for trying for Bayless.
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Portland is foolish to hold Bayless
to kill this deal.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foolish yes
But Pritchard’s ego is at stake here
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont get why portland wouldn't want to let go of bayless...
I mean they are getting their starting pg from us so why not give their third stringer to us in return. wierd. maybe we get steve black instead.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how about rudy
hes a sg, we need a sg….(restarts rudy chant…) “Rudy, Rudy, Rudy Rudy…..”
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Jul 10, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pritchslap sees Bayless as the pg of their future
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so."
by Teri on Jul 10, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
which is why he keeps wanting to trade for a damn pg to take up minutes needed to develop him
i think he lives in the world of vinny where the thinking is that sitting players on the bench will help them develop
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha!
I don’t get it either, but I heard their coach doesn’t trust the young guys
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so."
by Teri on Jul 10, 2009 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither does Phil Jackson
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what would they do with
boozer, tyrus, johnson, gibson all at PF?
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
deal tryus later? Or make him play the 3?
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
johnson will play the 3
who cares about Gibson. Only the Bulls have a problem with having too many good players…
by Basketball Smurf on Jul 10, 2009 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Who cares about Taj Gibson? James Johnson can play the 3 and 4
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Bayless was so good
the Blazers woudn’t want Hinrich so badly. They better be willing to give him up in a trade.
by runningman on Jul 10, 2009 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah I don't get that either?
Why wouldn’t they include him if they are getting a better player in return?
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless is still more of a project
Blazers might feel that with Hinrich there, they can be patient with Bayless until he reaches his potential.
The Bulls could definitely afford to be patient with Rose there.
If the Bulls could somehow pry Bayless and Boozer away, Gar would pass his first initial test with flying colors.
I love Bayless and he could also be a great asset if indeed a major trade does occur later on.
Kudos Gar.
Pritchslappy won’t do it though because it’s so hard for him to trade his lottery kids. It would freak with his ego
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
because pritchslappy
is even more reluctant to trade his guys than pax, if that’s possible
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the ultimate showdown
of overvaluing mediocre core pieces.
by M 80 on Jul 10, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya... why would blazers not be willing to do it if they get a starting pg in this deal.
wierd.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not to mention their starter now instantly becomes a solid back up
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well i thinkt hey want bayless for future trades.
just my thought now that i think about it.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They should be concerned about this trade first.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Jul 10, 2009 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya well i mean its assets right?
if they can get the trade done without trading bayless im sure they will try. he is a valued prospect around the league.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well i think the issue is that they want bayless for other trades.
not to play.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich is better now
Bayless has the higher ceiling. Hinrich is a better fit with Roy, but maybe they are worried about Roy’s long term health. Plus the Blazers always want something for nothing.
by paxdorf on Jul 10, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the replies guys
The Bulls definitely need to force Pritchard to make a choice. Either give up his project or give up on Hinrich.
There’s no way they should only have to give up their trash.
by runningman on Jul 10, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is actually
good news to hear. Hell, ya gotta give up something to get something in any deal. The fact they want to upgrade for trash is the starting point in trade talks.
It’s encouraging that Bulls are approaching this with getting a guard in return…
by kingj41 on Jul 10, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stupid Bulls
Why would we make Bayless a dealbreaker? He can’t defend, he can’t play alongside Rose, he’s a shoot first pass second player, he’s not a great 3pt shooter… basically he’s Rose but tiny and worse. Only our team would pass on getting Boozer because we didn’t get a backup PG who’d play 15mpg as part of the deal…
by YaoPau on Jul 10, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deal breaker?
It’s almost as if they’re negotiating….
And honestly, you’ve condemned Bayless’ game, and based on what? He barely played last year and was a star in college. Is it that you hate his game now because there’s a slight possibility that he could become a Bull, like you’re getting some preemptive hatin’ going on?
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The writing's on the wall
Tiny point guards are below average defensively unless they’re Kyle Lowry and have the athleticism to block shots. Bayless doesn’t, he’s undersized, he has no wingspan. The ceiling for a guy like that is Monta Ellis, who 1) isn’t that good and 2) is still a huge projection for a guy who won’t get playing time for us, on a team whose coaches don’t develop players well.
Does Bayless have value? Can we use him as a trade chip? Of course, but the recent history of Bulls negotiations says management lets little shit get in the way of the bigger picture. We have a chance to land Carlos Boozer! An all-star PF! Whose game fits well with Rose and Noah! And now the “We almost had Gasol, except”, and “We almost had D’Antoni, except” and “Gordon would’ve signed, except” is creeping back in again. I understand we’re negotiating, but right now I just want the Bulls to pull the trigger for once.
by YaoPau on Jul 10, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand your point
but again, they’re just talking. None of the reports say the Bulls asking for Bayless is a “deal breaker” or that the Bulls will refuse the deal if Portland offers Blake instead. Your assessment of Bayless may very well turn out to be true, but he was drafted in the lottery last year, one of the better drafts of recent years, and never got a chance to play last year. I guess I prefer Bayless over Blake, but I don’t mind Blake as a backup PG to Rose.
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He did get some minutes and was generally awful
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's only 20
So you guys are saying you’d rather have Blake? I can get with that, I think Blake fits the Bulls’ immediate needs better, but Bayless has a good chance to be much better than Blake.
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he sucks he doesn't fill any need at all. And wastes cap space
I’m fine taking a flier on him, but yeah, I think there’s a pretty solid chance he’s busteriffic.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he doesn't suck
And yeah, there’s potential for ‘bust’, but there’s also potential for ‘star’.
It’s Blake v Bayless. Consistent medicrity v risk. I’m not advocating one way or the other because I see benefits on both sides.
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Consistent mediocrity + expiring contract
And yes, he does suck at the moment. The potential is that he won’t suck in the future.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Generally awful?
Do you stay up and watch west coast games? Do you understand their slow offense?
Yes, he got some minutes during the middle of the season, but overall he wasn’t given consistent minutes. His game doesn’t fit Portland’s offense, so he does have a learning curve, plus, he’s a natural 2 being asked to run point.
Don’t run over to his stat page and make an assessment.
Generally awful? Wow. You took it to the extreme w/ that statement.
by kingj41 on Jul 10, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I remember correctly
when he actually did get consistent minutes (around late Jan / early Feb) he played pretty well. But it was only for that one stretch.
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was ‘learning’ the NBA game and learning a new position. He’s a quick, athletic guy that can create his own shot better than he can create for others. But he was asked to create for others in their offense.
He struggled somewhat w/ that, but I would think his role on this Bulls team will be to do more what he’s comfortable with.
He would really be a Ben Gordon replacement for cheap. Not that he’s going to shoot the same percentage as Ben, because he needs to improve his 3-pt shot dramatically to be there, but he’s got a very good mid range game and has the ability to attack the basket. I don’t know where this guy gets generally awful from though. That’s absurd.
by kingj41 on Jul 10, 2009 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
By any objective measure, yes he was generally awful
He had like an 8 PER. He shot the ball at Duhonesque levels and turned it over and fouled at a high rate.
It’s one thing to say he’s got potential. He certainly does. But his performance as a rookie was poor.
Saying he didn’t get any minutes is a bit of a cop out too. He’s not a high schooler. He played at freaking Arizona. And didn’t light the world on fire there either, by the way.
There are plenty of guys who have come into the league and hit the ground running at similar or younger ages.
Nor do I really see him as an ideal Gordon replacement. Just because he looks physically similar to Gordon (with much shorter wingspan) doesn’t mean he plays much at all like him. I think the Monta Ellis comparison is a lot more valid, but Ellis put up better numbers in similarly limited minutes almost across the board. Another guy who seems similar in terms of style of play would be Earl Boykins, who’s probably a guy who started off really crummy looking and got a lot better.
But at the end of the day, is that really the sort of guy we need to add?
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ellis and boykins
are better comps than gordon for sure. i wasn’t a fan of bayless in the draft, especially that high. but he showed a lot of potential, despite being “generally awful” last year. showed nba level aggressiveness, maybe his feisty-ness would work with derrick.
biggest complaint: more midget-ness (á la ben) in the future for this bulls back court. he does “play bigger” than ben though, i think (as does derrick).
still prefer bayless to blake, who doesn’t fit the future here at all, and thus is essentially worthless, imo.
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
by marionette on Jul 10, 2009 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess that's a more positive spin on how I look at him too
I think on the whole he’s just unlikely to be complementary to Derrick, so how would Bayless fit in the future?
I think If he works out, he’s a change of pace 6th man. I don’t see him ever being the guy I’d want starting next to Rose unless he just radically upgraded his game.
I think if he doesn’t work out, which is much more likely, he doesn’t bring us much value, except that management can say “look, we got this high potential lottery pick in the trade!”.
I slightly prefer him to Blake, but it’s like saying I prefer 1.3 to 1.1.
I’d be much, much happier with Rudy. Or perhaps someone else on an expiring deal.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, is there any way to look at his stat page and call him anything else?
And yeah, I saw him play a few times. He looks largely like a playground player to me. He’s got a lot of skills, but I don’t know that they wonderfully translate to the NBA in general or playing with Derrick Rose in particular.
Specifically (and this is from watching him)
1. He’s not a good defender and he’s got little T-Rex arms. His defensive potential is largely against ones, not twos.
2. He’s not a good straight up shooter who will space the floor, which is something we will absolutely need from our two guard.
3. He’s pretty out of control looking. I realize Portland likes to walk it up, but how does running two 6’1" guys who can’t shoot work for us?
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We will need his little T-Rex arms
when we get Bosh. It will be a new theme.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Jul 10, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't have anything against stats
But don’t breakdown a player on that alone.
He was a rookie, playing out of position, for a coach who’d rather have veterans out there. I think his learning experience there would actually be more than he’d learn here, sadly. But there would be less for him to learn, as he’d be asked to do more of what he did in college.
And he won’t be a starter. He’ll be a back-up. And while he’s not a straight up shooter, is Blake?
Portland has to give up salary for this deal to work. Bulls take back too much w/ Blake or Outlaw. Bayless is cheaper, younger, and a possible asset to use in future trades.
If he was generally awful, Portland would have no problem including him in the trade. He’s an upgrade over the rest of the guards on the Bulls roster not named Rose (if Hinrich is leaving), so, I don’t understand what upsets you about acquiring him.
by kingj41 on Jul 10, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not breaking him down on his stats alone
But the stats reflected his play that I witnessed, which was not good.
Nor does his style of play fit well for us.
And yeah, Portland might still not want to give up on him even if he was generally awful. The fact that he’s played poorly so far doesn’t mean that he can’t turn it around. He’s still got potential. And the Blazers may simply not want to either admit their mistake. Or they’re just bluffing up his value.
Or the trade could have nothing at all to do with him and there’s just rampant misinformed speculation.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cause they were most likely getting Blake in return
They’re right for asking for Bayless instead. Portland won’t play him anyways
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
isnt bayless only like 20 years old or something though?
he could, you know, get better.
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They guy is 20!
I’d love to see the Bulls hold out for someone with his ceiling
by DRose01 on Jul 10, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
plus hes much more of a combo guard than a point
i dont see why he cant play off the ball. granted him and rose together would probably be a sieve defensively, but again these guys are just turning 21, so the idea is that they might improve
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm so for Bayless
That I would be willing to even include someone else in the deal.
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe toss in tim thomas on top of tyrus and kirk?
say throw tim to utah and utah throws cj miles to portland???
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm talking more like one of out rooks
Give them Gibson too
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless isn't a strong shooter
which minimizes his off the ball impact. Defense won’t have to respect his shot, but he would be deadly in a catch and shoot-fake to a dribble drive scenario. I don’t know if the defense ever comes out to guard him though thus protecting against the dribble. He needs more PT.
Blazers say they love him, but I think this is more like the Bulls said they loved Thabo. It just made the trades appear like they were losing more.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless
isn’t the best defender, but he’s pretty strong for his size even though he might not look it. He’s a really good shooter and actually would probably compare well with Gordon. He actually ‘can’ shoot, but obviously on a talented team hasn’t had the PT yet. And he can get to the line, as long as the refs actually call fouls…
by kingj41 on Jul 10, 2009 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't Bayless rated as an above-average defender
coming out of college? I seem to remember that… Could be thinking of someone else, though, as I was in DRose heaven after last year’s lottery.
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, but that was vs. college competition
he’s not as long as other guards, given that he’s a more natural 2 guard. So some taller 2s can elevate and shoot over him.
by kingj41 on Jul 10, 2009 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, he is small for a 2
so I see where you’re coming from. At least that gives him some defensive potential (showing he’s done it on a high level at a big college program) going forward.
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What Bayless does have is the speed, the footwork, and the strength to be a good defender
He needs better teaching. It can improve. It’s not like he’s a guy that would have every opposing SG driving right past him. He could at least do what Gordon did for us defensively.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"He needs better teaching. "
well, that’s out.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
what a classic example of your posting
say something shitty about the team you’re a fan of, while making sure it contributes nothing to the conversation. everyone on this site knows:
1) you love BG
2) Hate VDN
3) dislike (?) Kirk
Do you really need to add these comments to every discussion?
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am very relaxed. Drinking a beer in the summer sun
just bored of the constant whining. when you have so much knowledge to share and the capability to convey ideas creatively, why limit yourself to whiny quips that are so tired and repetitive?
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
good to see the whining police are back
to whine about the whining again
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
: )
who knows maybe it’ll catch on that most people come here to get info and have discussions, compare ideas, etc
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
most people don't even read the comments
(I hope.)
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
apparently you dont
all ive seen you do the past 3 days is complain about all the whining. contribute something please.
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
But somone...
will whine about someone whining about whining.
How about accepting criticism?
by McCabe on Jul 10, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh
but it was serious. The club teaches as well as Dean Wurmer.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, all jest has some truth
or something like that.
all the Bulls can seem to consistently ‘develop’ when it comes to young lottery picks is resentment.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
ZING
SIG this comment.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's how I took it
I was a serious comment but hella funny.
Thank God Derrick don’t need to be taught anything
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"contributes nothing"
well, I laughed.
What exactly are you contributing?
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't have much to contribute
I know a lot less than most and come here to get info. that’s why it’s frustrating when people who have things to contribute limit themselves to the same tired complaints. we get it VDN was probably a bad hire, kirk makes too much, deng is hurt and BG left for nothing. is there really anyone here who disagrees or hasn’t heard this ad nauseum?
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so does that make you the BaB ombudsman?
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's an awfully big word there
just a fan of insight, info, logic, etc. i can’t count how many times i’ve read BG left for nothing, kirk makes too much, VDN is a sucky coach. you could delete all these comments and no one would miss it.
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe a letter to the editor would help?
well, SAY something else then, besides saying you’d like to read something else. If that’s the case, then read something else.
http://mvn.com/bullriding/
http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-bulls-confidential/
http://pippenainteasy.com/
http://bullsbythehorns.com/
http://dabullz.com/
http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewforum.php?f=10
I’m sure someone out there thinks Vinny isn’t a shitty coach.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why won't mommy and daddy stop fighting all the time :(
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thank you
i will check em out
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you have a low threshhold
BigforkBullsFan
joined Jun 22, 2009
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what is a low threshold.
i joined recently but have been reading a long time
by BigforkBullsFan on Jul 10, 2009 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lucky me.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i am so...
entertained right now. lolzz..
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
comedy as value and is a contribution
that was funny.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just because they are negiotating
it happens. People say things sometimes just to see if they can get away with it. Maybe Portland says yes, fi give throw out a couple draft picks
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jul 10, 2009 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the other hand, why should the Blazers make Bayless a dealbreaker?
I mean, under the best case scenario, he’d the their 4th guard if this trade goes down. Maybe 5th.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think its cause they value bayless as a future trade asset
not because of his place in the rotation. ya he would be redundant for him. but he is valued as a prospect around the league.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
theyre just scared cause they last guy they traded to us with potential worked out sooooo well
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol. poor TT.
i know right? seems like a proven player for them is better than potential that may never pan out. i really thinkt he blazers window is smaller than most fans think.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i..e they need to win next two years.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they can be the bulls of the west.
rebuild 1stroundplayoff appearance rebuild rebuild 1stroundplayoff appearance…
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except for the Bulls its
Rebuild – 1st round exit – 1st round exit – 2nd round exit – rebuild – 1st round exit – ?
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
sh*t happens in the nba
the blazers using the narrative of “we are getting better” and “potential” just hit year two. so since i been watching the nba i know that after this year there fans will be calling for change. its obvious.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
also on BE their main writer basically is over the whole potential thing.
and i completely agree with him. when you are losing in playoffs people start to point fingers and things just dont work out. also i dont think we can expect their WHOLE roster to turn out to be all stars.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Bulls defeated the defending champs one year though
I seee…. Lakers going down in the first round next year! Followed by nasty trade rumors, wicked contract negotiations and loss of confidence for every single Blazer.
by JockstrapNoah on Jul 10, 2009 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pritchard POGS
You can trade them for other POGS.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats absurb
substituting tim thomas for tyrus thomas, ewwww.
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 10, 2009 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we should hold out for bayless
even though boozer is the “big name” in the deal and we’d get a lot of cap savings next summer, we are giving up a hell of a lot of talent for what could be a 1 year rental. even though hinrich’s overpaid he’s still a nice player who would be a great fit on portland, and tyrus is still young and talented.
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We need to hold out for Bayless...
If we let Boozer walk after next year we have Rose, Bayless, Deng, Noah and our two new rookies and our 1st rounder next year….that looks pretty attractive to me if I am Chris Bosh…Lot’s of young, improving support but I still get to be the guy along with Rose…if this trade went through, I’d wet myself with glee
by DRose01 on Jul 10, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
of course, woj is also saying
that these latest developments are another red herring
LINK
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 2:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's pretty clear now that their are negotiations in place
The story keeps developing. If there wasn’t a story there, it would have died a bit ago. Even the Bulls haven’t downplayed it.
That’s how you know for sure that there are some pretty serious talks
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think what i said this morning is probably what happened
word is getting out to stein and ford that these talks are taking place, and the bulls are then calling sam smith and woj to tell them that they arent so that if the deal falls through, they can at least attempt to save face with kirk and tyrus
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, at first I believed Sam, KC and the rest of the downplayers
But now, it’s impossible to deny.
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Looks like Sam was kept in the dark on this one? Could be pretty embarrassing for him if this goes through.
by onlythebulls on Jul 10, 2009 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's begging that this deal doesn't happen
To give us the “I told ya so” line
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sam Smith wouldn't fall for that
He is a veteran reporter, I’d like to believe he would know when he the bulls are feeding him junk.
Not like Sam to be played like that.
by onlythebulls on Jul 10, 2009 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he really had any sources anyways
Most of everything he wrote seemed opinionated
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He had sources, they suspiciously died away circa 1998
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and that turned out rather ugly
for the broncos, but hey at least da bears have cutler……
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 10, 2009 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Patty Mills just broke his foot
Would this make them more reluctant to give up Bayless or more anxious to get Kurt?
by NormVanBeer on Jul 10, 2009 2:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd say more anxious to get Kurt
because Kurt is the “win now” PG they need, whereas Bayless is a “2 years away” guy. Mills’ foot will be healed by then.
by kozzer on Jul 10, 2009 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i mean that should really have no effect on the deal
“my god, our 3rd string point guard got hurt in the offseason! no way were giving up bayless now! who would ever run our summer league team?!?!?”
by Calogero on Jul 10, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds more like what the Bulls would say.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Jul 10, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
depends on the expectations they had for Mills
doesn’t sound like they’re married to any of their guards except for Roy.
by NormVanBeer on Jul 10, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blazer fans don't want to give up Bayless
of course, they don’t want to give up anything.
http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/7/10/944939/chicago-wants-bayless-if-they-are
by Basketball Smurf on Jul 10, 2009 2:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
it sounds liek they have the same issue with bayless as we did with tyrus
they think hes a bundle of potential waiting for the moment when he becomes all star
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't get me wrong... I'd like to have Bayless based on his potential
But I think he’s much more likely to be a flaming bust.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If portland doesnt want to give up bayless
How about handing us Rudy
RUDY…RUDY…RUDY….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Jul 10, 2009 3:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Rudy is actually good at basketball
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
rudy in his interviews seems to think he can create offense and not jut hit tray bombs.
he was all pissed with the hedo stuff cause he thinks he can be that type of player. kinda skinny though no?
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He just wants to start
or get the 30 mpg he should.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya? its certainly possible he deserves it.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eventually rudy will get traded
playing behind roy means he only gets so many minutes. plus, he has value around the league. He is young, has a great contract, and oh yeah, he can play a little basketball too
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So keep Bayless
insert Rudy.
What’s the problem?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
RUDY…RUDY…RUDY….
c’mon, the bulls organization don’t have the savvy to land rudy……
don't let the bed bugs bite
by Rex Grossman on Jul 10, 2009 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope Bayless isn’t our sticking point preventing this deal from being done.
I’d imagine we’d get Outlaw with Bayless in any deal that sends Hinrich to Portland, but I could be wrong.
The league is filled with young, inexperienced point guards and we already have the best 1-2 year PG in the league who conservatively projects to be a top 10 PG for years to come. I’m not sure what Bayless provides us other than a possible future trade asset. Hell, it’s not even a fact that he would be a good backup for Rose.
I think I’d almost rather have Blake backup Rose this year and we can use the 4 million or so next year to pick what we want from a much larger pool than “Blake or Bayless.”
by RyPac13 on Jul 10, 2009 3:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They are
or they’re not getting Hinrich.
by runningman on Jul 10, 2009 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The way I look at it.
Bulls want Boozer for Tyrus Thomas. Jazz would like to give Boozer to the Bulls. The Jazz and Bulls can’t complete the transaction unless a 3rd party is involved. The Blazers act as the Ticketmaster and Hinrich is the surcharge.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 3:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
blzrfan, I believe that is not correct.
The bulls could easily do either deal alone, sending Tyrus + Tim Thomas/Jerome James expiring deals to Utah for Boozer. Salaries would be close, if not within the allowable limits for the trade and the Jazz would get over 6 million in expiring contracts + Tyrus.
We could do Hinrich straight up for Outlaw and either Bayless or Blake. I believe that also matches up pretty closely.
If the only 4 players involved were Bayless, Tyrus, Hinrich and Boozer, the Blazers would be taking back 6 million in salary and the Bulls would be taking back another 2 or so I believe, which won’t likely happen. Maybe that is the trade though, who knows.
by RyPac13 on Jul 10, 2009 3:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jazz don't want expiring deals.
They want immediate cap relief to sign Milsap. They already have a giant expiring deal with Boozer.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
B&B like the Bulls.
If we aren't careful, the leanness we now feel will be the starvation of those we serve.
by Chi 'Till I Die on Jul 10, 2009 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn’t Jerome James deal be at least partially covered by insurance? Meaning the salaries match up to make the trade work + the Jazz don’t pay his full 6 million… that would give them a few million more to help sign Milsap and save money this year, as well as next.
by RyPac13 on Jul 10, 2009 4:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jazz are more concerned about luxury tax
The partial insurance doesn’t remove the cap salary.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
WHAT is that portland is giving up if they dont give up bayless?????????
someone answer…..
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 4:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Cap space and rumored to be Blake or Outlaw
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
cap space? ahhh.... thank u i was going insane.
i guess its nice that what blz are giving up (cap space) coincides with the exact same thing that they want (hinrich)
lolz.
by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So then the Blazers would probably take the brunt of Utah’s savings this year?
I guess that makes more sense.
I don’t see the Bulls taking back more money than they are giving away though, at least nothing worth mentioning.
@mandoman10 They are either giving up Blake and/or Outlaw or they are taking back 5+ million dollars in this deal and allowing Utah to have Millsap (not sure if it was just Portland’s fans that wanted Milsap or not).
by RyPac13 on Jul 10, 2009 4:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I highly doubt this is going down
Hinrich isn’t the player that the Blazers want to use all their capspace on. He isn’t a huge upgrade over Blake. More likely to happen is a POR-UTAH-DET three team trade.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 4:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What exactly do the Blazers need to improve?
What is your weakest link?
It’s LMA to me, but what do you guys think?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
u think LMA is the blazers weakest link?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!!?!?!?!
if that was the case, blazers would go 82-0.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, what is the weakest link?
or is it just tear down whatever anyone thinks and pretend like you’re not really searching for any additions?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
personally i think its PG but
blazers went after a SF (hedo) and said PG wasnt their top priority.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
K, fail
Now what?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too easy
Pritch has to pay.
Tyrus for LMA and Rudy.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
U bulls fans still bitter
that u traded LaMarcus Aldridge for Tyrus Thomas?
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, we like manly men
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chris Brossard of ESPN
just reported that the Blazers offered Milsap a contract.
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Blazers have bigger needs than backup 4
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
but Pritch is being an ass as always
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
he is trying to screw with a division rival
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hes going to end up screwing himself in the ass
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Paying a lot of money for Milsap...
and not being able to extend Aldridge.
by McCabe on Jul 10, 2009 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Paul Allen will be able to do whatever he wants to.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Both Roy
and Aldridge will want max contracts, Pryzbilla will likely want a raise, all while paying Oden 9 million, Milsap 8-10…I don’t know. That said, the league should create some limitation if that becomes the modus operandi for the richer teams; this doesn’t need to be the MLB.
by McCabe on Jul 10, 2009 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As in...
raising the luxury tax if you spend x more.
by McCabe on Jul 10, 2009 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They're going to pay more tax the more they spend
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Milsap will be very tradeable on the contract the Blazers can offer him.
by Sports2 on Jul 10, 2009 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just saw the offer on ESPN
4 years, between 32-36 million dollars.
That’s a damn good deal for Milsap, the Jazz would be crazy to not match, and trade Boozer to whomever.
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh wait, there's good ol Pritchslap
The offer includes a hefty signing bonus that will make it difficult for Utah to match. The Jazz will be presented with the offer Saturday and have seven days to match because Millsap is a restricted free agent.
I admire the sheer balls of this guy to fuck around with another team because they can’t afford the luxury tax and he can. Seriously, what a douche (who I want running the Bulls).
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
blazers will
extend LA no matter what.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but
Millsap>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hinrich
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You have LMA and Blake is your PG com' on
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Utah is going to resign Milsap match the offer
and then trade Boozer.
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not without Blazers
they need to trade with a team with cap space. no other team has cap space and wants to use it besides the blazers.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
KP put the
jazz in a really bad spot. either do a 3 way trade with us that benefits us or lose millsap to us
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
U can get burned by
not taking best player available. (bowie over jordan, bowie was need)
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Milsap is a RFA
Utah will match the offer
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where is the Jordan of this scenario?
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jordan is Millsap (i know sounds ridiculous)
and hinrich is bowie. bowie was a need. hinrich is a need. but millsap is better than hinrich and jordan is better than jordan
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Analogies suck
The similarity of Millsap/Kirk to Bowie/Michael is best described as non-existent. I just as easily argue it shows you should take the guard that can control the ball.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Umm yeah it is
Why need a 4 so bad? Aren’t you guys on LA’s fan club?
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blazers are looking to
force jazz to make a three team trade with them that gets the blazers a good player because the blazers know how much the jazz love millsap
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don't have to force Utah do anything major
It’s Chicago you guys have to worry about.
Just give up Bayless and avoid this nonsense
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, just get this bayless thing out of your mind
nobody likes bayless more than KP. hinrich isnt worth it
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
3rd stringer for a starter?
Some would beg to differ
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BREAKING NEWS
Milsap has been offered a 4 year contract by the Blazers
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 5:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok
It seems like Portland is being Stingy with this trade, if they dont want to give up Bayless for Hinrich .. well thats just stupid they have so many guards, and no one wants steve blake
so if Utah Resigns Milsap (hopefully) they NEED to get rid of Boozer, and if Detroit doesnt make a move, i say we take boozer off theyre hands and give em tim thomas and some picks.. shit ill give up Deng in a heartbeat….i mean they can get something out of it
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 5:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich is barely better than Blake!
the bulls are the ones that are getting stingy! they get a 20-10 guy with an expiring contract for their backup point guard and a scrub! seriously!
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why aren't the Blazers winning with Blake then?
You dramatically overvalue Blake. You need Roy happy. You need Hinrich like Wade needs him in Miami. Hinrich gets both Wade and Roy to where they need to be on Offense and takes the ball pressure and tough guard matchups on defense.
Blake just passes and avoids the 8 second violation.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't be decieved by PER...
Hinrich is definitely better than Blake.
by McCabe on Jul 10, 2009 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Hinrich was barely better than Blake then the Blazers would be a better team
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
correction, better defensive team
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blazer tied for second in the west as the youngest team in the nba
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blake sucks
if not then extend him or trade him for a PG
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
With a bad defense, largely attributed to the ineptitude of their starting backcourt
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 10, 2009 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the only reason they wanna keep Bayless
“To stay young”
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not going to even comment on that
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yea and your main weakness
is your PG
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
But that’s no reason to overpay for hinrich
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you'll pay 8-9 mil per
for position redundancy?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im not a huge fan
of millsap, LA, Joel, and Oden on the team. That’s four legit starters. but hinrich is just okay.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Call us when you return to Earth
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No they dont get a 20-10 guy
Tyrus isnt a Scrub , Tim thomas is a scrub and an expiring contract, we already know that if they wanted Tim , the deal woulda been done.. But Steve Black Sucks ass the only reason hinrich had bad numbers last season was because he was a frickin backup, if he had solid minutes with ROY and Aldridge, he would be ALOT better.. and its not like portland is giving up boozer for hinrich portland wants to give up blake for hinrich .. why the HELL would we do that, were giving up Tyrus who has potential for Bayless who has potential
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boozer is a 20-10 guy
and tyrus is a scrub (90% of the time). and blake does NOT suck. he was the starting point guard on a 54 win team.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he was the starting pg because they didnt have anything better to play
are we going to say fisher is the best pg in the league because he was the starting point guard for the world champs? i think not
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No but
you are disrespecting Blake to say he sucks
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's the hole you admit
And when presented with a chance to fill it you claim you’re overpaying.
Do you have any broken down cars? I know a ton of mechanics that will fix them all for free.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he does suck
theres a reason hes the one youll hear being offered.
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You compared Paul Millsap to Jordan on a Bulls board
So, let’s just leave “respect” out of this….
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Add to the fact that he's a nazi
He’s a sucky nazi
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But the thing is
Hinrich is just a SLIGHT upgrade over Blake. im for hinrich if it means we can get someone else but if we use the only capspace we will have forever on a small upgrade its not worth it. look, there’s no bigger blazer fan that is more pro-hinrich, but u guys aren’t thinking clearly
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he's just a SLIGHT upgrade it makes no sense to take that contract
So why even consider the trade? If you really believe that Kirk is only slightly better than Blake, clear thinking would be to say no deal.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont know what else you think youre going to get with 8 mil
unless youre about to compare another 8 mil player out there to mj
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude ive been on blazersedge
ive seen blazer fans’ “bayless < Hinrich” posts..
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kirk in a good system and coach probably will be an all-star
Hinrich given the proper expectations, and encouragement for his confidence might be one of the top 3 pg in the West.
Bulls development ability, coaching and back office organization is crap. This is the intangible aspect that few think about.
man up!
by exult463 on Jul 10, 2009 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DUDE
HE SUCKS Jordan Farmar has more promise than Blake, Hes just lucky he has ROY and a good team, He is the weakest link
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
against the clippers. way to go
and through 3 other quarters he managed to get 3 assists. yay
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably because
he sat out. it was a blowout
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
hinrich had 4 blocks in a game once
now thats a good defender
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
seriously
citing a quarter of play?
"...but the devil lives inside this kid, I swear it. It rises out of him in a mist, this baby-faced defiant wrathful version of Pat Kane, escapes his bodily confines to perform satanic miracles all over the offensive zone. The only thing more fearsome than that assist was the keep-in preceding it. The only thing more unholy than his face is his black magic." GMH
by Illini0509 on Jul 10, 2009 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
in ref to axel not faiz
"...but the devil lives inside this kid, I swear it. It rises out of him in a mist, this baby-faced defiant wrathful version of Pat Kane, escapes his bodily confines to perform satanic miracles all over the offensive zone. The only thing more fearsome than that assist was the keep-in preceding it. The only thing more unholy than his face is his black magic." GMH
by Illini0509 on Jul 10, 2009 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He is a backup PG and Hinrich is a starter
We can make a trade for Boozer without Portland and still have cap space to sign Wade in the summer of 2010. The Jazz may have to settle for Ty Thomas and Jerome James. That scenario would require the Jazz to buyout James contract to get the savings.
If I was Paxson I would then not trade Hinrich to the Blazers to double screw the Blazers when they don’t get Hinrich or Milsap for being bitchess.
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bulls aren't getting Boozer without the Blazers
because Jazz need cap relief. bulls have no cap room. blazers do. blazers NEED to be part of the trade.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
psh like we need boozer anyways
we got taj gibson if all else fails!
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's what they want not what they need
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only other option is to let Blazers have Milsap
I’m sure they would be able to buy out either James or Thomas 6 mil with no problem. As a fan I van see why you don’t want that to happen.
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But the blazers know that
the jazz wont let them have millsap. they will match. but they will have to trade boozer.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So why delay the inevitable?
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep. Both will happen
But i dont think chicago will be involved
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No you are incorrect sir or mam...
the Bulls would be giving up our starting PF who better day are ahead of him (probalby) and our backup pg/sg who would be a starter on your team.
What are the Blazers giving up? Money which they obviously have plenty of from your statements earlier. What else?
You can give up your starting pg or your backup and you choose your starter…why? Do you want to wina championship in the next couple years or in 3-5 yrs?
by ronmexibull on Jul 10, 2009 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why is the cap space so coveted?
all i keep hearing is that allen doesn’t give a damn about it and will sign anyone to any contract
"...but the devil lives inside this kid, I swear it. It rises out of him in a mist, this baby-faced defiant wrathful version of Pat Kane, escapes his bodily confines to perform satanic miracles all over the offensive zone. The only thing more fearsome than that assist was the keep-in preceding it. The only thing more unholy than his face is his black magic." GMH
by Illini0509 on Jul 10, 2009 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure if this is posted already
From the twitter this morning
YahooSportsNBA : While the Jazz continue to shop Boozer, a high-ranking Bulls source remains unmoved in saying Chicago isn’t in discussions about a deal.
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so."
by Teri on Jul 10, 2009 5:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha
man this is such i waste of two days.. followin this crap with the stupid blazer fans acting like they dont want hinrich..
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
bulls fans are going to ask for roy and la for him
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you bullshit with us we bullshit with you
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Last time i checked
it was KP that punked the bulls. how is tyrus thomas working out for you?
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and lma is doing what? allstar games? playoff domination?
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is an argument
u cant win. so just stop
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aldridge is a better offensive player ill give em that
but if he is your future PF why are you pushing so hard for Milsap?
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No we punked you for Jordan
How many titles does Portland have? um 1.
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why does Pritchard think he can get something for nothing?
He’s a good GM but he is Paxsonian with the way he is hoarding his players and then waiting them out to pay them. He should sign Roy to the max, sign LMA to a decent contract and make this trade. His team would be a force but now, lol, they’re playing chicken and we all know Paxson never blinks first.
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 5:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
so ur proud of
ripping off the bulls for aldridge.. ok, that just shows how interested you are in a fair deal
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
HAHAhAH
HAHAHAH
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
man im
its a joke, im basically sayin yea aldridge is better than tyrus no doubt, but Hinrich is WAY better than Blake
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Other way around
Hinrich is better than Blake but aldridge is WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY better than tyrus
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you overvalue your players too much seriously what has lma done?
you act like hes the next tim duncan or something
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That really is not the case...
Aldridge is a better scorer; Tyrus is a better rebounder and shot blocker. Aldridge is better, but he is definitely not as good as you suggest.
by McCabe on Jul 10, 2009 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus Thomas comes up with
a spectacular block once in a while. overall, aldridge is better than thomas at defense. and he’s a better rebounder too
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LMA is soft and not a better defender than Thomas
by ronmexibull on Jul 10, 2009 6:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thomas' Sportscenter blocks
doesnt mean he is a great defender. LMA is much better defender. much more solid. LMA isnt soft. Channing Frye is soft
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I think LMA is a better rebounder and defender
Ball don’t lie, LMA and Tyrus are not close to being comparable right now.
Tyrus gave up rebounding last season and his defense is very inconsistent. He’s better on help than one on one. What I saw of LMA he looked better last season.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brandon Roy speaks about contract negotiations
“I sit back and think about all the hard work I’ve put into my dream, excited about the opportunity to provide for my family,” said Roy. “I go in knowing that I’ve come into the league and I’ve done everything I can do to get a max contract.”
Tremors in Pritchardton.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jul 10, 2009 5:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They're doomed sadly
They had such promise with all that young talent
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
isnt roy on the select squad this summer?
maybe he will bond with rose and he will decide to come to chicago in time
by sin on Jul 10, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Roy left
there would be riots in the streets of portland. i i’d say there is about a 3% chance it happens.
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man Roy would be sick
But hes not that much better than Pargo
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I mean Pargo
Hit so many clutch threes
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
pargo put up like 25 in a quarter
"...but the devil lives inside this kid, I swear it. It rises out of him in a mist, this baby-faced defiant wrathful version of Pat Kane, escapes his bodily confines to perform satanic miracles all over the offensive zone. The only thing more fearsome than that assist was the keep-in preceding it. The only thing more unholy than his face is his black magic." GMH
by Illini0509 on Jul 10, 2009 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if roy went to chicago
rose/roy backcourt. wow
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup
that would be something to admire….
but w.e. Rose/Wade.. that is gonna be SICK
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i really think wade is staying
u could make a run at bosh though
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
KC Johnson is about to be on Chicago Tribune Live
To talk about ALL THIS
I’m excited to hear the crap he’s feeding us
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 6:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh lord
“Management’s view from within is that they will get their improvement from within”
KC is a total puppet
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OMG just put a dick in his mouth and bend him ova already!
He is the bitch!
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
dyam
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also worth noting from the interview
He claims that all these rumors are based on 1 single report and all his sources claim it’s false.
He also thinks the Bulls will not be lucky enough to land any major free agents in 2010
But yeah, he think the Bulls just stand pat on everything
I wanna puke now
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 6:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
fuck him
i hope Gar sees it and feels stupid
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, he was honest about the 2010 stuff
You know, I think that will actually lose the Bulls a bunch fans — they’ll feel it at the gate.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow
harsh but appropriate…I hate KC
by NormVanBeer on Jul 10, 2009 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I laughed and then felt bad about it.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Screw Portland
Memphis needs a starting PG and has cap space.
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 6:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
haha
Memphis mite get AI
"Game 7 of the 2011 Finals.. 10 seconds left in the game, the score is tied up 92-92.. Kobe with the ball he drives in.. IS BLOCKED by bosh, Rose picks it up Runs it down Throws up a pass to Wade.. WADE SCORES! GAME OVER ! BULLS WIN BULLS WIN!"
by Faizamaze on Jul 10, 2009 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Thunder could use Hinrich also
Homecoming
by illwill on Jul 10, 2009 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They got Westbrook
thats why they draft harden instead of a point guard
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich would really be a perfect 3rd guard to go with Westbrook and Harden.
Westbrook is long way away from being a natural point guard. Three different styles that all can play together. Start which ever two you want, and bring one off the bench as a 6th man. If OKC could also acquire a defensive center in salary dump like the move they trade with Tyson Chandler then getting Hinrich would make a lot of sense because they would now be in playoff contention for the next few years with Hinrich expiring right when they have to pay Westbrook.
by Scotter on Jul 10, 2009 7:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Portland just offered Millsap a 4 year deal?
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 6:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jazz will match and this will force them to deliver Boozer to the Bulls
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it will just force them to deliver Boozer to the Heat or the Pistons
or any number of teams that will be better than the Bulls next year as well as the foreseeable future.
"That's a spicy meatball-a!" - Vinny Del Negro
by Juiceboxjerry on Jul 10, 2009 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pistons? Naw
Jazz doesnt want Hamilton’s contract.
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
3 team trade
jazz arent doing any 2 team trades
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 7:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still the Jazz doesn't want Hamilton's contract
and we kno he wouldnt be going to the Trailblazers.
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blazers don't want to trade Rudy
by Playboy_Bull on Jul 10, 2009 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But if they get Prince...
they just might
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like all this
will be settled in the next week. Utah has got to be on the phone shopping Boozer
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There will be a three team trade
between Utah, Portland, and some team that a) wants boozer and b) has a player that the blazers want
by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wish it was Deng.
What do I think of Luol Deng? The only time he's ever played a full 82 games was a contract year. Thats called bullshitter my friends!
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 6:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
One thing that's kind of strange about KC reporting that the Bulls weren't involved at all
is, why would this Bayless rumor pop up then? It would be one thing for the whole Boozer thing not to be true, but now there’s whole other side rumors that are false as well?
"That's a spicy meatball-a!" - Vinny Del Negro
by Juiceboxjerry on Jul 10, 2009 6:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
spin control
What do I think of Luol Deng? The only time he's ever played a full 82 games was a contract year. Thats called bullshitter my friends!
by SoulEater7 on Jul 10, 2009 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the whole point
He’s clearly been left out
by Option27 on Jul 10, 2009 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at who is reporting the Bayless rumor. The same people that pushed
the original rumor. It nothing else it saves face for ESPN.
by Scotter on Jul 10, 2009 7:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I started the Bayless rumor
Yesterday.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Jul 10, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly,
if the bulls fuck this up another big man gets traded and not to the Bulls, i’m going to go insane. there should be riots outside of the united center.
by The90sBullsRevival on Jul 10, 2009 7:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dude .. order your white straight jacket now..
man up!
by exult463 on Jul 10, 2009 7:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
the major issue here is we need to sell Tyrus high. His value may get a bit higher during the first half of the season but right now Tyrus has good value. i like ty and would love to see him stay with the bulls, but the 3 amigos that run the show will never give him a new contract. so why not sell him off.
Boozer is a nice piece, but if we think we can pry Bosh or STAT away at the deadline i am all for holding onto Tyrus and our expirings to make a run at a later date.
if we go through RFA with Tyrus it will not turn out well, in my opinion
by jf111847 on Jul 10, 2009 7:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah
the drafting of Johnson and Gibson seem to indicate the bulls arent interested in tyrus as a long term solution
by The90sBullsRevival on Jul 10, 2009 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think at this point, Tyrus will not breakout like I/everyone has hoped for...
I realize he’s still pretty young, but it’s becoming unlikely and it always was a possibility ( he was a high-risk high-reward pick). Couple that with the fact that the Bulls don’t want to pay him beyond this season and moving him seems fine to me.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 10, 2009 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
new thread is up
http://www.blogabull.com/2009/7/10/945350/blazers-offer-milsap-4-year-deal-a
Damn, I wish the Bulls were as enthusiastic about their team as we are!
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 10, 2009 8:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs














