Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Chad Ford's Mock Draft 7.1 (Updated 1:42 PM)


Now it gets crazy.  [Update: crazier.]

Star-divide

Ford plans on updating the Mock Draft throughout the day as he tries to nail down teams' intentions, and I'll do the same here ([Updates are bolded and bracketed.]).  Since almost every team is looking at about four guys for each pick, it's all up in the air.  I'd say it's even more up in the air given the uncertainty; the incentive for giving out disinformation to try to game the system seems more likely to work this year than ever.

A survey of the significant changes since Ford's last Mock:

1.  Ford now has Curry and Evans going in the Top 5, which leaves Harden to fall all the way to the Knicks at 8.  It doesn't really influence the Bulls unless they move up in the draft, but I thought it interesting.  Apparently, if Minnesota can't move up to #2, they're hoping to get two of Thabeet, Rubio, and Evans with their two picks (i.e., they're hoping one of the first two fall).  In this Mock, Ford has Thabeet and Rubio off the board, so the picks are Evans and Flynn.

[1a.  Ford now has the Bucks taking Jennings at 10.  Not super important, but he was one of the prospects nobody could place.  The only potential importance to the Bulls is that this might influence the Pacers' pick at 13.  Ford gives it a 70% chance.]

2.  Ford has now flipped Henderson and Williams, the former going at 11 to the Nets and the latter going to the Bobcats at 12.  The Nets have been one of the teams considering Hansbrough strongly, and one of the teams mentioned as a target for the Bulls' efforts to move up.  It might be disinformation, but it looks like they'll take one of the swingmen now and let Hansbrough fall.  As for the Bobcats, Ford mentions that Larry Brown fell in love with Wiliams, but that His Airness has taken a fancy to James Johnson.  Since the Bulls have apparently been looking hard at Johnson, this could be very significant.

3.  Ford has had Indiana taking Blair in the last couple of Mocks, but now he says they'll take Ty Lawson (60% confidence).  [In version 7.1, Ford has them taking Jrue Holliday instead, at 60% confidence.  Previously Ford had Holliday going to the Bucks, but now he has them taking Jennings.  The implication is that Holliday is certainly higher than Blair or Hansbrough on Indiana's board.  Lawson now goes to the Hawks at 19, which makes tons of sense after their trade.]    Ford and Jack are FAs and Tinsley has completely moved in to the dog house, so Indiana could certainly use a PG.  Ford's placement of Blair here was mostly as a "best available" pick, and now he seems to think they'll draft to need.  Again, very significant.

4.  In the last iteration of the Mock Draft, Ford had the Bulls picking James Johnson at 16 and Toney Douglas at 26.  James Johnson seemed like the default pick, however, as Ford had Blair, Hansbrough, Williams, and Henderson off the board already.  Now, he still has Johnson as the pick (with a 55% certainty), even though both Hansbrough and Blair are available.  Here's what he has to say:

Confidence level: 55 percent

Analysis: The Bulls have been working the phones this week trying to move up in the draft.

They've talked to the Nets, Bobcats and Pacers about swapping the 16th and 26th picks to move up a few spots.

Who are they after? I've heard everything from Johnson to Blair to Hansbrough to Williams to Mullens here. Last night a new name, Omri Casspi, surfaced as a possibility. To be honest, I can't get a terrific handle on which way they are leaning.

Blair is the most physical. Casspi isn't far behind. Hansbrough is the most NBA-ready. Mullens has the most upside. Johnson is somewhere in between. I'm not sure exactly how Johnson fits in Chicago with Luol Deng on one side and Tyrus Thomas on the other, but there's no question about his upside.

Omri Casspi?  Everything I've read about the dude seems great, but at #16?  When Blair is available?  When Hansbrough is available?  If the Bulls pass on either one of those guys (but especially Blair) to pick Casspi or Johnson . . . I don't even know how to hyperbolize my disappointment.  It's all uncertain now and nobody really knows who's going to pan out and how, but that would just seem like a huge blunder.  I continue to hope that Gar Paxdorf is an evil genius and Johnson has been a complete smokescreen.  In which case, bump that certainty up, Chad, to keep selling it.  [None of this changed in 7.1.]

5.  BJ Mullens to the Wolves at 18.  We'll see.  I have a feeling this pick will get traded.

6.  Sam Young to the Hornets at 21 (70% confidence). 

7.  Blair to Portland at 22.  Ford acknowledges that the Blazers moved up two spots to increase the likelihood of drafting Casspi (since everyone in the 20s is looking at him, apparently), but since Blair is available in this Mock, they can't pass him up.  Basically, the last few Mocks demonstrate that Chad has no idea where Blair is going to go.  Everyone is interested, and nobody is committing.  Whether that means tons of teams are playing coy and hoping he falls, or whether that means everybody is leery and he really will fall, remains to be seen.  If he's there at 16 and the Bulls don't take him . . . again, I can't even hyperbolize.  The mere thought of it has me flummoxed.

8.  Casspi to the Kings at 23.

9.  Nick Calathes!  Calathes is the projection at 26 now, not Toney Douglas, and at 70% confidence this looks like a solid rumor.  I actually like the pick a lot.  It helps the cap situation to stash him, and he seems like a talent who would be going higher if he were immediately available.  It sets up a future European Invasion when both he and Asik come over.  Imagine the marketing possibilities.  (For smash:  Toney is now going to the Lakers at 29.)

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

1 recs  |  Comment 75 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I completely agree.

Johnson over Blair would be pretty much indefensible. Let’s pretend that won’t happen.

by potato0328 on Jun 25, 2009 10:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

arjoseph, speaking of Casspi, Hollinger did a Euro Draft Rater (similar to his regular draft rater)

but it’s Insider. Any chance you can let us in on what his system thought of Casspi? I know it didn’t think much of Rubio.

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 10:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes, thanks YaoPau. Looks like Casspi projects out pretty well as a late first rounder. Get him, Gar.

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

unless of course Calathes is there in which case, take Calathes because he'll be better than Casspi.

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting comparison.

Casspi rates out as a 12.0something and Calathes rates out at a 13.66. While that shows that Calathes might be better, it’s also within the margin of error, which is amplified since Calathes is a PG. I’d say they’re similar prospects in overall quality, but are very different types of players. Casspi seems like a Paxson special (gritty, tough, energy guy, slasher, not a great shooter). Personally, I’d rather have Calathes, but I’d be fine with either at 26.

by arjoseph on Jun 25, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd like Calathes because he projects out slightly better,

he’s a big guard to replace Kirk after the inevitable Hinrich trade (and he doesn’t come over until next year, so he’s luxury tax friendly for this year), and we already have two SFs. If we’re dealing Deng or Salmons in an Amare or Bosh deal, though, then Casspi makes some sense.

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Calathes will be better

And we won’t have to have him on the roster this season. If he’s there at 26 we should take Nick Calathes.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Jun 25, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Casspi seems to be...

a fine player. Youtube only shows the best plays and not the flaws, but I liked what I saw

by bull83 on Jun 25, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think there was a video up on Bulls.com from when he worked out for the Bulls...

he was a really likable personality for what it’s worth. Don’t know much about him as a player though.

What do I need to show fire for? I'm not a dragon. - Lou Pinella

by smash! on Jun 25, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

His numbers project Childress at a 9.7 PER in the NBA

“Josh Childress (Hawks) probably was the worst per-dollar value in Europe last season, because like Brandon Jennings, he struggled to adjust to the different game.”

I give him credit for trying to tackle a really tough translation, but some of these numbers are just bad. Ilaysova projects at 16 boards per 40? I think he averaged like 8 here.

by YaoPau on Jun 25, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, it's an imperfect system like any projection system. It was pretty bang on in terms of total

production (as measured by PER) for Danilo Ganillari last year though. So I’ve got a little bit of faith in it. Plus, it’s one of the reasons I’m so high on Asik . . . so it better work :-P.

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"His Airness has taken a fancy to James Johnson"

For the love of god Gar, don’t draft James Johnson.

by YaoPau on Jun 25, 2009 10:31 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Actually...MJ wanted to take B Lopez in last year's draft, but L Brown talked him into Augustine.

Given the depth of point guards in this year’s draft, if they had drafted Lopez last year, they would be in position to do damage in the East going into next year.

"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen." - Michael Jordan

by PeteRoc on Jun 25, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hah!

That’s the kiss of death that he’ll be a bust.
I know getting sick over a 16th pick seems retarded, but Johnson over Blair would make me sick.

by M 80 on Jun 25, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently there's more drama than I made out.

After the Cats had a workout with both Williams and Henderson, Williams came away with the impression that he had a guarantee from them (Larry really really liked him). It was only then that Mike finished the back nine and became involved.

by arjoseph on Jun 25, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Awesome summary, thank you for that.

What do I need to show fire for? I'm not a dragon. - Lou Pinella

by smash! on Jun 25, 2009 10:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Can people stop linking ESPN Insider stories?

I go to this blog so I don’t have to pay for their “expert” analysis. Thanks for the summary but most people just link it and then I get pissed when I see nothing but ads and Walt Disney asking for my $25 for his crappy stories and even crappier magazine.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Jun 25, 2009 10:45 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I link because I assume there are other Insiders who come to the blog.

I summarize and quote a bit because I know not everyone has it. I’d quote the whole thing, but I try to commit as little copyright infringement as I can. I can’t begrudge them for charging for content; it’s like having an SI subscription back in the day, but without the swimsuit issue.

And the Insider writers tend to be good, so I think it’s worth it.

(Besides, you can see in the status bar at the bottom of the page where a link is heading. If it says insider.espn.etcetera…, you can pretty easily avoid it.)

by arjoseph on Jun 25, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look around online

you can get ESPN the mag subscriptions for $3 for a whole year and ESPN throws in a year of Insider access for free.

After that you pay the standard pricing.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Jun 25, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Still not worth it

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Jun 25, 2009 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Was just watching ESPN this morning...

and Doug Gottlieb did a mock that had the Bulls taking Johnson at 16, passing on Hansborough. He also had Jennings falling to the early 20’s.

What do I need to show fire for? I'm not a dragon. - Lou Pinella

by smash! on Jun 25, 2009 11:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

ESPN is stupid

Brandon Jennings is a top 10 pick, if teams are so afraid of a little ego, they should watch NBA TV and reminisce a little about how Shaq was seriously contemplating sitting out for a year if he wasn’t drafted by a team he wanted to play for.

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 25, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

While I completely agree with you, Gottlieb went through the picks one by one and had pretty decent rationale for each...

Can you imagine if he was on the board at 16 though? What would the Bulls do?

What do I need to show fire for? I'm not a dragon. - Lou Pinella

by smash! on Jun 25, 2009 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a good chance he will be.

And it’s almost definite the Bulls won’t pick him.

by arjoseph on Jun 25, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you for the work, AR.

This is pretty exciting.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Jun 25, 2009 11:24 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

nicely done.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Jun 25, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love your logic about the front line

the problem is, you need a coach who knows what he’s doing in order to exploit those match-up advantages. Giving VDN Noah, Miller, Blair, Tyrus and Tim Thomas is about two players too many for Vinny to fit his head around.

My new proposed nickname for Vinny Del Negro: The Scarecrow

Why you ask? What part of the song did the Scarecrow sing in Wizard of Oz?

by Rose Colored Goggles on Jun 25, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We have a coach

Brad Miller coaches the front line

Things could be worse. We could have kept Boylan.

by stupidgenius on Jun 25, 2009 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

another bad-knee draft day scare

Brandon Roy

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 25, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Has there been an NBA success combining ...

bad knees and weight issues? And it’s not just a bad knee “issue”. If reports are correct, he has no ACLs, in either knee! That is a pretty huge unknown for durability.

Throw in short as well, and too much hype. The craze of short guys who rebound do well seems a bit overblown. By my informal count in my head (looking up nothing) they’re usually short, rebounding backups, except Boozer… who’s always hurt, so not sure that’s an example of a success.

Bottom line: Blair might be good, but tons of questions. I wouldn’t draft him at 16. Yes for our later pick… Group think be damned.

by Bill Cartwright's Elbow on Jun 25, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Short PF's

Boozer, Brand, Millsap, Hayes, Powe, Big Baby, Bass… lots of shorter power forwards have proven to be effective in the league, especially ones with high volume rebound rates which (along with shooting) has proven to the one college stat which more times than not translates to the next level.

The weight issue is by far a bigger concern than the knee issue IMO, Mike Sweetney and Eddy Curry being prime examples. However, both of them notoriously had/have terrible work ethics which you absolutely cannot say about Blair. David Thorpe recently wrote that Dejuan Blair was far and away the hardest worker he had an IMG this summer and looked like a man among boys (these “boys” being other hopeful draftees and current NBA players).

And for what its worth, Hines Ward doesn’t have any ACLs either and he has been one of the most dominant receivers in the NFL for the better part of the last decade, at a position which requires more cutting and lateral movement than almost anything.

That being said… why not go for Blair? You aren’t realistically getting anything more than a fringe starter or rotation player at 16 anyways so its not like you are passing on anyone super special like you would at say 5 or 6.

by DickieSimpkinsFanClub on Jun 25, 2009 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boozer, Brand, Powe and Big Bay don't count.

They are are all 6’8" or taller. (Brand and Boozer at 6’9" so that’s just foolish) Do you want a PF bigger than 6’8"-6’9"? Sure, but it’s hardly short. And that none of the other three are stars, and the shortest among them (hayes) is so one-dimensional, almost makes the point.

If you don’t think the 1"-2" difference between Blair and Millsap/Hayes/Bass is that big of a deal, then you shouldn’t think 1"-2" between Boozer/Brand and “normal” PF’s is that big of a deal. If you want to cling to the statement that Brand and Boozer are “short” for a PF, then you should recognize that Blair is that much SHORTER than them. If their being 2" shorter than “normal” makes them short, then what does Blair being 2" shorter than them make him? Not a good analogy is what.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 25, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

For what it's worth, Sam Smith was on CSN and said that he believes the Bulls have cooled on Blair...

and not bc of the knee situation, but because of that fact that they believe that an undersized PF can only be successful if he has a face-up game, and the Bulls don’t think much of his mid-range shot/abilities.

What do I need to show fire for? I'm not a dragon. - Lou Pinella

by smash! on Jun 25, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice Post

Here’s what Andy Katz had to say:

16. Chicago Bulls — B.J. Mullens, Ohio State
The Bulls need another big and Mullens has the potential to be a productive talent in a few years.

26. Chicago Bulls — Toney Douglas, Florida State
It would be a great call for the Bulls to get Douglas, a potentially strong backup for Ben Gordon or Kirk Hinrich.

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on Jun 25, 2009 12:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

but

Kirk won’t be here… And it’s likely Ben won’t be here either…

by kingj41 on Jun 25, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It doesn't look exciting, no.

But whether it’s awful or not depends on who else was available. If both Blair and Hansbrough are gone at 16, I’d be fine with Mullens. I might even be fine with him over Hansbrough. As for Douglas, if Calathes, Casspi, Young, and Budinger are gone — whatever.

by arjoseph on Jun 25, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

a friend for 'free money' Tyrus!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 25, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

wonder how much

a cheeseburger is worth to him…

by kingj41 on Jun 25, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Priceless!

Both the quote and username. You sir, get a rec

Things could be worse. We could have kept Boylan.

by stupidgenius on Jun 25, 2009 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but how many gangs is he affiliated with?

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 25, 2009 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Poopsworld is saying that the framework of a deal is in place

for NJ’s 11th pick and our 16th and 26th. This is contingent on Williams being available when the Net’s are picking.. Lots of rumors. To say that this draft and the trades surrounding it are a bit crazy is putting it mildly.

by idel212 on Jun 25, 2009 1:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

he reminds me a lot of D. Wade

wouldn’t mind this as long as we get back into the end of the 1st or early second for a nice big.

I vote for Thomas to play, play more and play regularly.-Sam Smith

by tyrus4prez on Jun 25, 2009 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see DWade at all. Except that they both put up crazy rebounding and assist totals and had

questionable jumpers (though Wade was a much, much better FT shooter which indicates his form was better than Williams).

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That article was calling him Artest-lite

Crappy TS%, but can shoot the 3, good passer, questionable ball handler, good defender… I like that comparison

by YaoPau on Jun 25, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, it's a good one. DX has his ceiling as a poor man's Andre Iggy. Which makes sense, too.

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's weird he's being mentioned this high though

11th overall for a SG who cannot score is unheard of. A few months back, I think you were the first to say you liked him on one of the draft threads… but at #26… And I think that’s what he was supposed to be, a sneaky late pick who’ll find a spot in this league.

I could see Terrence Williams scoring 5ppg in a starting role. I’m basing my “he can shoot the three” on his going 57/148 this year after not shooting well the first three years. If he shot 47/148, we’d be talking about him at #26 right now. His just 6’9" wingspan scares me too, since his defense is so important to his value.

I still like him over Henderson. Trading both picks to get him is awfully iffy though…

by YaoPau on Jun 25, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, I don't see it. He's not THIS good. . . but it's a crap draft.

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mentioned that to Sports2 earlier this week.

He was at 36.8% before the tournament. Five more makes over 33 games and we’re calling him a “great” outside shooter. Five more misses and we say he hasn’t improved at all.

That’s just too much “noise” and too many other factors against his good shooting (3 years of 2pt%, FT%).

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 25, 2009 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

guys often

become better shooters as they mature into veterans. god, it must be the 100th time i’ve made this same comment….

they rarely, however, become better defenders and rebounders, acquire better handles, better court vision when they’ve never shown the aptitude in college. twilliams has, while the rest of this draft hasn’t. that he’s shown shooting potential as team leader on an excellent team is good enough for me right now.

while i personally wouldn’t trade the 26 and 16 to ensure getting my guy, since i think a good guy will potentially be there at 16 (and 26), i’m not the gm who’s personally witnessed the workouts.

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Jun 25, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Williams's handles are WEAK.

1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box

by fundamentallysound on Jun 25, 2009 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, that actually made me lol...

What do I need to show fire for? I'm not a dragon. - Lou Pinella

by smash! on Jun 25, 2009 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Guys often show improvement in shooting in college.

Show me a player (actually, a bunch of players so that it’s “often”) that didn’t improve his/their shot in four years college but did improve it once they got to the pros. I agree that shooting is the easiest skill to improve. But it’s not like everyone in the NBA can shoot, and Williams has already shown a consistent ability NOT to improve his shot. That’s got to be the 101st time I’ve made that comment….

And as FS said, he’s not a good dribbler.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 25, 2009 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I frakkin love it.

If we have Williams and Blair?!? That’s what many of us were hoping for way back when Williams was projected late 1st round and Blair was projected much higher.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Jun 25, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh geez...

I thought this was a part of the “Hinrich for 10” thread.

::blushes::

Hell no to this, I want Blair.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Jun 25, 2009 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A few things:
To be honest, I can’t get a terrific handle on which way they are leaning.

Paxson is feeling great right now. He’s finally got that blasted media fooled!!!

It helps the cap situation to stash [Calathes]

1st-round rookies have cap holds so it wouldn’t help that this year (but the Bulls are over anyway). Would help the luxury tax, though. It would help the cap situation a little bit next year, though. I assume you just got the words mixed, but I point it out because it can be quite interesting in how convoluted it all is:

If a first round pick signs instead with a non-NBA team, his scale amount is excluded from the team salary on the date he signs his non-NBA contract or the first day of the regular season, whichever is later. The scale amount goes back onto the team salary on the following July 1 or when his non-NBA contract ends, whichever is earlier. In other words, these cap holds are removed for players playing outside the NBA, but only during the regular season.

So his salary counts against the Bulls until the start of the season. Then it comes off (big whoop this year). It then goes back on next July 1st. However, it will still be at THIS YEAR’s 1st-year salary rookie scale which would save the Bulls about $130,000 in cap space. Asik’s, on the other hand, do not count against the cap until he signs. I like Calathes, but I’d love for the Bulls to trade back and get two top-10 picks in the 2nd-round. 26th for the Blazers 3rd & 8th in round 2? I’d do that quick, quick. Get Douglas and Green. Or Collison and Green. Send them overseas. hahaha, just kidding.

I’m not sure exactly how Johnson fits in Chicago with Luol Deng on one side and Tyrus Thomas on the other, but there’s no question about his upside.

I wish people who covered the draft for a living would actually know something about it. As in, a team that’s good drafting out of the lottery almost certainly isn’t looking for a starter. Like, you can’t see how multi-positional Johnson works with Deng and Thomas but you totally understand how the single-positional Blair works with Thomas. WTF?

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 25, 2009 2:08 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Like, you can’t see how multi-positional Johnson works with Deng and Thomas but you totally understand how the single-positional Blair works with Thomas. WTF?

What do I need to show fire for? I'm not a dragon. - Lou Pinella

by smash! on Jun 25, 2009 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What can we expect from Joe Johnson?
Tyrus_thomas_dunking_small
Headlines for the Bulls over the next six months:
Small
The True State of this Franchise
96350467
The last days of Tyrus?
Small
Could Bosh stay in Toronto?

Recent FanPosts

Blogabull_s_small
Spurs intrigued by Tyrus Thomas?
Rose2_small
A Chicago / Sacramento trade poposal.
Small
Call me crazy, but how about we actually build around Rose?
Drose2_small
Trade Deadline Deals GAME
Small
2010 Free Agency
Small
Thomas suspended for tonight's game vs. Miami

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger