Hawks near a trade for Jamal Crawford
GS would get Acie Law and Speedy Claxton in return. I guess the Hawks need more 20-foot contested jumpers with 18 seconds left on the shot clock.
over 2 years ago
Big D
31 comments
1 recs |
Comments
don't teams usually try to get better through trades?
by darksmokepuncher on Jun 24, 2009 3:04 PM CDT reply actions
they only had to give up acie law and speedy claxton
it’s a dumb trade, but i don’t think they’re getting worse for it.
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
maybe I'm getting ahead of myself....
Does this mean that Bibby wont be around?
If they are replacing him with Crawford, they are getting worse.
by darksmokepuncher on Jun 24, 2009 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions
i guess i just figure... it's the hawks
they will probably suck forever…
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
that's a really good point.
I hadn’t thought of that
by darksmokepuncher on Jun 24, 2009 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions
But is anyone else besides Nelson gonna play him at point
Hes a guy who should come off the bench to me and has been for a while.
i don't know
i think Crawford is a net negative on a team. Especially on a team without great leadership.
by Basketball Smurf on Jun 24, 2009 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Crawford's like Ben Gordon
if BG couldn’t shoot as well as he does, could drive a little, and hogged the ball about 5 times more than he does now.
-I was wrong about Pau Gasol. I have been shamed. :(
NO!!!!
We should do my Josh Smith trade this second…..
This is a dumb trade for the Hawks….not surprising, but I know they were shopping Smith a bit too.
I think it was Deng and something for Smith and Claxton..
NO!!!
Why again like every year is it trade rumours and trades of some rather big time players while the what should be biggest trade partner team in this league with all these should be good to very good #2/#3 options not doing ANYTHING yet.
Come on Bulls make a trade. I know we lucked out with the big Salmons deal (because he fit in so well) but come on, we still have more we need to do….
And a Hinrich for Outlaw/Blake trade is just so typical of this org (most boring trade ever for our end, and a really good trade for their end)…
THE BULLS ARE GOING TO WIN IN 2010....maybe by stating this the positive vibes can make it happen.
They have to trade Josh Smith now
If they don’t, Smith and Crawford are going to strangle one another fighting for shots.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
Yeah
But I was thinking in my scenario that Claxton’s expiring was nice. I think now it was Deng + James + #16 (they benefit from the dollars) for Smith plus Claxton…
Claxton costs more, but he can fill in the Hinrich role. We ship out Kirk in another transaction….
Oh well.
I think the Hawks might want to trade Joe Johnson as I doubt Crawford will move yet again this year and think Johnson will be very upset with Crawford stealing his touches…
I just don’t get this trade.
If they had a premier PG sure, but Bibby ain’t that these days and they still have to worry about signing him as is.
THE BULLS ARE GOING TO WIN IN 2010....maybe by stating this the positive vibes can make it happen.
Claxton
Of course can’t really fit the HInrich role from last year, but should be able to fit at least limited minutes as a 5-10 MPG backup 1 year loner…..
We don’t need Hinrich much each year progresses.
Smith’s the target of my post, not anything else.
THE BULLS ARE GOING TO WIN IN 2010....maybe by stating this the positive vibes can make it happen.
huh?
Again, this isn’t the Bulls. There can be more than one good player on a team.
(not that Crawford is)
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 24, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions
You can't have two players who launch terrible shots whenever the urge strikes them
Especially when neither of them are particularly good shooters.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
You can always trade the asset later if it doesn't work out though
Josh Smith will always have some takers….no need to rush it. THough if they want to rush it, I hope Gar’s a watching.
THE BULLS ARE GOING TO WIN IN 2010....maybe by stating this the positive vibes can make it happen.
Josh Smith is not an improvement over what we have now.
Frankly, I would prefer to keep Tyrus at the 4 rather than paying that salary for Smith, moving Luol, playing Salmons at three, forcing Hinrich to be the starting 2…what I really don’t like is forcing Thomas to the bench in what should be his breakout (err..contract) year.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 24, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Josh Smith is a far
Brighter prospect and athlete than Luol Deng for less $$.
He also has a higher value even with the questionable perhaps non coachable tag. It’s not like Mike Woodson has a Popovich kind of rap, or that the Hawks are concerned a well oiled machine in mgmt……Josh Smith is a freakish athlete more put together than Tyrus.
That move allows us to part with one uber athlete if we need to and still keep the other to work with Rose….
I don’t know if we’d have to buy and hold Smith, but in terms of further trades having him certainly doesn’t have the 2 yrs of injury and higher priced Deng risk. Plus unlike Luol, Josh Smith is actually a freakish athlete, not an avg athlete who somehow was build to have more athleticism than he’s ever had…..Deng’s good because he’s a smart player…..
THE BULLS ARE GOING TO WIN IN 2010....maybe by stating this the positive vibes can make it happen.
I guess we are looking for different things in basketball players...
Especially ones that are no longer on rookie deals. I no longer consider Smith nor Deng to be a prospect, they are NBA players…and to that, Luol Deng is a better NBA player than Smith. While I appreciate Smith’s freakish athleticism, I do not appreciate his idiotic basketball IQ, poor shot selection, $6 Million trade kicker or his poor team defense…
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 24, 2009 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah
I don’t understand there direction with this move
Management by committee
They’re making the playoffs though. Woodson has to wonder if they’re intentionally creating headaches for him.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Jun 24, 2009 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Woodson's lucky
the front office upheaval keeps him employed.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 24, 2009 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Joe Johnson at PG?
Whatever, Jamal Crawford taking contested jumpers is still better than Josh Smith taking contested jumpers.
That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT
Didn't Crawford always insist he was a PG, even after the Bulls used successive lottery picks on PGs to play next to him
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
I really think if Jamal starts
they won’t make the playoffs. Theres something about that guy a mix of the team imploding of course but still we talk about intangibles for winning definitively the opposite here.
Especially considering
He is the active player with the most games played without a playoff appearance.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 24, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions
What, Larry Hughes wasn't available?
"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris














