Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Ben Gordon: Pax and Gar are shuffling meaningless titles in Jerry's world

Ben Gordon was on AM1000 this morning (mp3 - the Gordon interview is the very first part of the podcast) and had some interesting quotes concerning his future with the team as well as how his contract negotiations have been handled in the past.

DaBullz.com has an accurate recap:

  • He is not hearing any whispers of where he will end up.  He’s not sure if the Bulls are interested.
  • Ultimately everything goes through Jerry Reinsdorf, regardless of who is in the front office.  Those guys just represent Jerry’s wishes.
  • Doesn’t have a relationship with Jerry Reinsdorf.  Sometimes talks to him about contract things.
  • Last summer was drawn out and came to a stalemate.  On Ben’s end, he tried to work out some other options involving other teams, but that did not go over.  At the end, he went to the Bulls and said he would take the offer, and they told him it was no longer on the table.  That was last summer’s negotiations in a nutshell.  They had an offer, then when he decided to take it, they told him it was no longer there.
  • People do business different ways.  In this business you can’t be surprised with what happens.  Just took this as a learning experience, and did what he had to do this season, and now he’s going to let the chips fall where they may.

Kudos to Marc Silverman for some quality questions concerning the front-office shakeup, and bringing up the now-acknowledged pulling of the 6/$55m offer (i.e. basically everything left under the luxury tax...for some reason I had 6/$48m stuck in my head) after the 'deadline' last summer.

Not to get into that story again (of course it's moronic the Bulls would pull that offer), what's interesting in this interview was how matter-of-factly Gordon said 'no' when asked if he's heard anything from the Bulls, and how he viewed John Paxson and Gar Foreman's changing roles as non-factors after dealing (or attempting to, anyway) with the Bulls front office the past two offseasons. John Jackson picks out this exact quote:

"Ultimately, I think everything goes through Jerry," Gordon said. "I think those guys represent what Jerry wants. He's the owner. Obviously he can determine how quickly -- or how not -- the process is."

Not that it's surprising to hear that an owner has ultimate say (remember Mark Cuban a couple years ago remarking that GMs are mostly powerless) in matters like handing out tens of millions of his (investors) dollars. But Gordon's description of the Bulls world is one where it's not a case where Reinsdorf is approving what his basketball people suggest to him, but that Reinsdorf's actually driving the 'process'. And that's worrisome.

Because we've had countless debates here over the merits of re-signing Gordon. And there are solid, real reasons to lean either way on that decision. Heck, it's likely they can still sign Gordon and retroactively look smart by not having to pay him as much as they offered last offseason.  But I sure hope that's the type of conversation going on between within the melded mind of Gar Paxdorf. Not two yes-men making moves based on who are Jerry's kids.

(actually, Gordon later in the interview was fully behind dealing the young frontcourt and draft picks for Bosh or Stoudemire. Maybe he should be GM?)

0 recs  |  Comment 209 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

bonus BaB points

to anyone who tells me what exactly John Paxson does for a living.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 6:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

gripes about the media

"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." --Newton

by fundamentallysound on Jun 10, 2009 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

heh, close

that was actually part of my rationale for the question. He got ‘promoted’ because he hates the media and now he doesn’t have to deal with them. So Gar handles the small stuff, Reinsdorf handles the big stuff, what does Pax do?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

probably

Gar makes the recommendation from all input involved (80% of the work)

Paxson agrees to decisions and provides input

and Jerry makes the final decision.

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on Jun 11, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're all wrong

the correct answer is “watch Final Four”. I would’ve also accepted “military Dad”.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

dammit

i wanted a free burger

I was watching the 1995 Playoffs VS the Magic's and remembered how much I hated Horace Grant. Horace Grant - i hope you burn in bball hell

by Belize on Jun 11, 2009 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

what about

watches Major Dad?

by M 80 on Jun 11, 2009 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

exactly the same thing Luol Deng does..

collects a pay check and doesn’t give a damn…

some might also see differently, but Hinrich does the same thing, he’s just does it displaying more appreciation. But at the end of the day, none of them believe they can win a championship.

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 10, 2009 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

he grew/maintains and nurtures Vinny's hair

technically speaking he’s a jack-off all trades

by Belize on Jun 10, 2009 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

At the neglect of his own it would seem.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 12:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

:::dies:::

by Belize on Jun 11, 2009 12:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't disagree with Ben about the frontcourt

But I wish he would have put it in nicer terms.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Jun 10, 2009 7:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not worried about his (or Joakim's) little feelings getting hurt in and of itself

I prefer when teammates stick up for each other, particularly in the media. It’s not Ben’s (or any other player’s) place to be criticizing teammates publicly. There are many ways he could have answered the question put to him without going the “major upgrade” route – it doesn’t matter how accurate the statement is, it’s still divisive.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Jun 10, 2009 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, I take it as another piece of evidence that he's not planning on being back

other evidence:

- he called out JR for being cheap in a not so subtle way (see my comment below) and tied that to the Bulls inability to make progress and establish a winning tradition (need management to “maybe spend a little bit of money to get some players in here and give us a chance”); combine that with his own proclamation that he wanted to be paid his market value (which he thinks is pretty high) and his own desire to win and that’s pretty damning evidence that he doesn’t think the Bulls is the organization to meet his goals with

- he basically called out his former and current GMs as yes men

- he completely undercut the Bulls media position that they want to retain him by stating unequivocally that they had not contacted him at all since the end of the season

add it all up and I have little doubt that BG’s wearing a different jersey next year.

"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." --Newton

by fundamentallysound on Jun 10, 2009 7:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That I'd totally agree with - it was decidedly not a Bulls-speak interview

And if that turns out to be the case I suppose it doesn’t matter if he flat out insulted everyone by name.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Jun 10, 2009 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ben is a gem!

and in one single interview he subtilty called out the weak front court, weak management, and the foolish owner, and still expressed his desire to continue to play to help make this organization a winner.

Kirk and Deng (“the paxson core”) are so weak they never call out what’s wrong with the organization in regards to winning it all. Because they know what the problems are.. and it includes them “not believing”.

Think back and think present concerning the players in the NBA who endlessly expressed to mgmt the desire to win by getting better players! Kirk and Deng are still trying to find consistent offensive and hit 3pt shots consistently and have no time to think about winner or having better players who are already armed locked and loaded. Who would banished them permanantly to the bench.

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 10, 2009 9:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What a big mouth for a undersized, one-dimensional player

For this guy to be calling out and criticizing fellow players is beyond me. And for any bloggers to refrain from nailing him for what he is, an overated big mouth, is scandalous. Who made this guy the second coming of Michael Jordan? He’s gone!!! Thank you Pax and Jerry!

by SlamDunk on Jun 11, 2009 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There was nothing subtle about it.

I don’t like when players criticize their teammates in the media. Throwing out the old “no offense” thing just shows me he knew he what he was doing and didn’t really care.

And how do you know who’s expressing what to management? Maybe other guys on the team are having face-to-face communications with the org. Heck, maybe those guys you just called out have actually done things like work out with the younger players trying to help them improve – and I’ll take that any day over someone criticizing teammates in the media.

And I like Ben – I just didn’t like how he chose to say what he said in this interview regarding teammates.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Jun 12, 2009 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree it was (refreshingly) blunt

but he did make sure to put in the ‘no disrespect to them’ in there :)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on Jun 11, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just posted this above, but what the hell

I hate the whole “no disrespect” thing – people say that when they know they’re being offensive (or at least borderline offensive) as if it suddenly changes the whole nature of the comment. Seriously, “no disrespect, but you suck” is still “you suck.” It’s like throwing out “no disrespect” at the beginning of a comment gives the speaker a license to be totally rude and offensive, and whoever’s at the other end of the comment is suppose to feel fine about it.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Jun 12, 2009 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is speaking objectively

not emotionally. And gosh, someone needs to. It isn’t like this is Stephon Mayberry talking or something. This is a guy who has been invested in this team his entire career, working hard during his own time, a top player, and otherwise in the thick of it. I’d take his objectivity over empty words of guys just throwing out the same lines we hear all the time. Objectively/no offense, I agree with Gordon. Emotionally I like our players for the most part. Logically things need to shake up. Logically that will involve some of our young guys because other teams want an attractive package. If that is taboo to talk about who cares. I’d be fine if I heard any of our guys, minus a few, say that. If Captains Hinrich and Deng actually said anything beyond the party line I’d be thrilled.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 12, 2009 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I originally noted that I don't disagree with him.

Obviously most people with half a brain would agree that acquiring Bosh or Stoudemire would be a major upgrade to the frontcourt. I still don’t like it when teammates speak negatively of other teammates in a public forum, ever. I don’t care how candid he wants to be about the contract negotiations, the organization, his own play, but I see nothing positive in a player putting down his current teammates.

Besides, who’s he telling this? We all know it. Undoubtedly the front office knows it. It’s not like these words of wisdom have suddenly enlightened the front office: “What? Bosh is better than Tyrus? Heck, get Toronto back on the phone and tell ‘em we’ll do the trade after all! Man, if only Ben had states this through the media sooner….”

I realize he was asked a question, that Ben did not bring it up out of thin air. He had a lot of options in how to answer it – he could have talked about them being All-Stars, he could have talked about their offensive talents, he could have softened it up by talking about how Tyrus and Joakim are still young and have been working hard on their games. I, personally, would have much preferred any of those to what he said.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Jun 12, 2009 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dunno.

If I were Noah or Thomas I’d be flattered to think someone would want me in a trade for Bosh. That sorta implies they are good pieces that people value. It isn’t like what happened to Thabo for example or how the Lakers got Gasol. If a trade goes down they’d be going to another team as main pieces, not as scraps.

And in Ben’s defense…this is like the third off season that everyone has been talking about him as either trade fodder to help the team or simply someone to write off the books to help the team. He is likely desensitized to throwing around scenarios like that at this point. Why is it taboo to speculate other moves that could help the team win? How many times have we heard “If we sign Gordon we won’t be able to get Bosh etc”. How about “If we are not willing to trade Noah and/or Tyrus we won’t be able to get Bosh?”

I just think he has had such a long time to separate himself emotionally from this song and dance that it likely didn’t occur to him that it might be considered rude to talk about moving players in and out being a player himself. He is only allowed to talk about working hard and liking his teammates and some abstract idea about winning (forget the fact it will be hard to do that without moving players and getting Bosh…).

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 13, 2009 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They all get it from the media, with the exception of Derrick (so far...)

I’d feel the same if anyone else on the team were talking about Ben that way. That’s all I’m saying – I just don’t like teammates commenting negatively on each other.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Jun 13, 2009 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I particularly like BG's subtle dig at Reinsdorf's cheapness at around

7:00-7:05 “’I’d really be relying on the organization to step up and maybe spend some extra money to get some players in here and give us a chance.”

Ba-zing!

"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." --Newton

by fundamentallysound on Jun 10, 2009 7:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I really wish BG

and players in general realized that the more money they make means less money for the team to use to get better players. Like, for a numbers-pulled-from-nowhere hypothetical, with LeBron. If he gets the absolute max contract from the Cavs in 2010, and leaves them with less than 50% of their cap for the rest of the team, he has no right criticizing the organization for not surrounding him with better players.

If Ben would realize this, the Bulls could throw more money at bringing in better FA’s, which increases the chances for team success. Then, with the Bulls getting more exposure because they’re going deep into the playoffs, Ben would probably get more endorsement deals, which would make up for the lower salary.

by kozzer on Jun 11, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You mean you wish Deng would realize that.

BG isn’t costing us anything at the moment.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wish Deng "realized" it

and that BG “realizes” it. Deng’s contract is in place, so there’s nothing that can be done about that anyway. BG, if he really does like his Bulls teammates and thinks they can contend in the future, should know that the more money paid to him is less money paid to the rest of the squad.

by kozzer on Jun 11, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

BG gets punished because he is the last in line to be paid? THAT makes sense.

BG should do it for free. It is the only way his passion for basketball and his love of the Bulls can truly be shown. Other players can show it even with the large sum of money in their pockets, but BG must take one for the team.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Punishment?

We’re talking tens of millions of dollars here. I’m not accusing BG of doing anything except what a vast majority of pro athletes do all the time. I’m not faulting him in particular for it. Just talking about him here because it’s his contract situation that’s the topic of this thread.

by kozzer on Jun 11, 2009 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes, and schoolteachers should get millions instead

i know.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kozzer would you really take one for the gupper!

Let’s suppose your boss came to you and your 5 other co-workers, and said I can give raises this year up to 25%, but also mgmt said I must cut one individual.

And all of a sudden.. “Kozzer” raises his hand to take the fall.

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 11, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh?

What’s this got to do with me? I get paid a living wage, and if I were in the top .01% of earners and my boss said that if I accepted a slightly smaller raise so that the company could be more competitive, then I’d do it.

In a manner of speaking, I’ve already done that.

Why am I getting piled on for stating the opinion that players should value team success more than whether they get $35 million or $50 million?

by kozzer on Jun 11, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

cause it's lame?

You’re assuming that Reinsdorf would reciprocate by helping out the team, and not just pocketing the savings from Ben’s generosity.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, that is an assumption

but when have the Bulls been significantly under the cap? I honestly don’t know. Plus, the cap is going to be coming down next year and probably the one after that. Then, with the new CBA, who knows how things will be?

by kozzer on Jun 11, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so you're asking BG to trust the same guy

who a year earlier pulled an offer from him

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

actually, this is reason not to take less money

there’s no cap advantage to the team. The Bulls are only restricted by the luxury tax, and that’s Reinsdorf’s call. So he can be the nice one.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

huh?

No cap advantage? Is that because they’re going to be over the cap regardless so any reduction in Gordon’s new contract would have zero effect on cap space?

by kozzer on Jun 11, 2009 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

pretty much.

though they can be under the cap in 2010 with some deals, and then a couple million off of BG’s cap figure would help sign a max FA.

Though that’s so much risk it’s beyond the realm of being a ‘team player’ to give up money, it’s foolish. My point remains that in the current situation it makes far more sense for Reinsdorf to be the one to sacrifice for the team than Gordon, if one insists on such behavior (which I don’t).

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

as you can see .. I leave the more technical details to my brotha from another mother..

Including yfbb.. there are at least least three other guys on this blog who should have been Paxson’s replacement years ago..

We just need a dude with some cash to buy the team from Jerry..

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 11, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

exult

I’m scared every time we agree. I feel like I’ve lost my way or something :)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Always at least one in the family everyone calls crazy..

But we’re still “fam”

We don’t have to agree on which road to take, but on the final destination..“we do”.

So yfbb don’t take it personal if many readers view you sometimes as “crazy”. Remember we all have your back!

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 11, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

just wait until Gordon's holding up a Pistons jersey.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Billips now consider one of the better PG in the NBA

was considered a questionable combo/pg before his arrival to the Pistons..

are we envisioning something better for Gordon..

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 11, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's flattering that you would think of me

but I don’t want to move to Chicago and live through another Chicago winter. But thanks for the thought!

by hlac on Jun 11, 2009 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're missing a important point

Ben realizes he needs better players than the already overpaid Luol Deng and such!

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 11, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think he has any real special sentimentality towards the Bulls.

Every player should get the most they can get. To suggest otherwise is foolish. I mean, would you take less money to work for a company that doesn’t really want to be the best company in its field and the owner is cheap?

It’s up to the company to properly evaluate prospects to get cheap production, properly evaluate and analyze free agents and get the most bang for buck.

If the Bulls want to vastly overpay Nocioni and Wallace (and maybe Deng), Gordon shouldn’t take less money for that. He can leave. Big-market teams have a natural advantage in sports because they typically make more money and thus can typically afford to spend money to make up for their mistakes.

If Gordon doesn’t think the ownership is going to spend money and go into the tax area to be a contender, and his choices are: A) stay with the Bulls and take less someone else can get more down the road (and others got “more” before him) or B) go to a different team that will either pay him more or that he thinks is more willing to pay the luxury tax to be good…. is this a hard decision?

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's a good point

if Gordon wanted to take less for the sake of the team, it’d make more sense to do it for the benefit of some other team.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah.

If I were Gordon at this point … I would rather go to Oklahoma, even.

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 11, 2009 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not at the moment but he contradicts himself

winning a championship is his number one priority but but money is a factor so I can see kozzers point. But also see BGs where he just wants to be paid fair market value.

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on Jun 11, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, nobody has offered anything close to what the Bulls did.

So my question is, does BG know what the definition of “Fair Market Value” is? It means what people are willing to pay him, not what he thinks he is “worth” or entitled to because he is the team’s leading scorer. And I agree that he is contradicting himself. You usually go for money/playing time/be “the man” or you take less/play a role on a team that is a contender. That is why so many players stay with their crappy franchise for years and make bank and then at the end of their career go “Oh crap, I actually care more about winning now, so I guess I’ll take less money to play on a great team.” BG isn’t there yet. He wants above fair market value, because everyone else on the team currently has gotten above fair market recently, so understandably, he does as well. But the Bulls aren’t going to win a championship by paying a lot more for him than anyone else is willing to pay. And over paying for players more often turns out like the NY Knicks than it does the LA Lakers. The Lakers have a top 3 MVP canidate every year and the greatest coach of all time and an owner in Buss that is in love with his team and is willing to pay to see it succeed. Our best player is a rookie who still needs so time to develop into a true star and we have “The Hair” as coach and JR as an owner, who cares more about the White Sox than the Bulls and I mean way more. And yet he tries to micro manage. Darn it, I just made myself really depressed. I’m starting to lose my optimism for the Bulls actually going somewhere besides playoff bottom feeder.

by Unrealcity on Jun 15, 2009 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really wish Kirk and Deng would walk into Reinsdorf's office and say please cut my salary by 50% and 75% respectively

Because we’re overpay relative to value obtained and I think we should follow "kozzer"’s guidelines to help us sign better players?

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 11, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So you really think

that players should try to squeeze every last dime out of their teams? With no regard to the rest of the team?

by kozzer on Jun 11, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, because every NBA player does it

I don’t understand how you can be upset with a group of people who have such a short career window trying to maximize every financial opportunity they get.

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 11, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who's upset?

I’m simply making the point that I wish more players would recognize that they can help the team win by not taking up so much of the cap room, and with team success comes more income from endorsements.

Remember the Beef Wennington?

by kozzer on Jun 11, 2009 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, they should all realize that

But it will never happen in pro sports. Despite the team concept, when it comes to money everyone is out to get his.

You see older guys taking less money to stay with a team, but it’s extremely rare for young players entering their primes to take pay cuts.

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 11, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The free market

For some reason, everybody is out for themselves.

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 11, 2009 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not just "pro sports." It's like, this thing called capitalism, or something.

I think the foundation of our society is built on getting the paid the most (legally, I’d hope). Or something like that.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But the teams don't use that "extra" money for the "betterment" of the team.

EVERYBODY is out to make the most they can, which includes the organization. They want the same amount of effort from the players for less money, not so they can go sign other “good” players. JR does not care about NBA championships, he cares about Baseball championships. So BG should try to get as much as he can, because he is just entertainment for Chicagoans who are paying more than any other city to see “their players”.

by Unrealcity on Jun 15, 2009 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

FYI

players are not allowed to restructure existing deals to give back money, even if they really really felt bad about it.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

indeed.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe one day you can enlight us to this glorious history of this union

because it’s a mystery to me (any maybe others) and why it has stranglehold power unlike the NFL union?

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 11, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a better union.

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 11, 2009 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

From a player's security perspective..

but when I see teams stuck with players like Larry Hughes, Ben Wallace, etc and then I see NFL Bears with deadbeat “Cedric Benson” whom they can just cut with greater portions of contracts specified as non-guaranteed.

It seems because of the NFL structure it motivates players to bring it every year unlike NBA where we have our named above , plus players like Deng, Agent Zero, etc. etc.

Sure I understand these players might have 7 to 12+ years to accumulate wealth, but these non competitive, lack of motivation for proper conditioning guys eating salary cap. It hurts? It seems..?

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 12, 2009 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, the NBA has more bargaining power,

for whatever reason.
One of those things may be that the football crowd isn’t as civilized as basketball [just tossing out ideas, I really don’t know]? Basketball’s smaller team size and ability to be dominated by a single player for a period [thus stars] probably also helps it.
But yeah … this is less of ‘The NBA’s player union is awesome!’ and more of ‘The NFL’s player union SUCKS!‘.
The NFL’s structure is much nicer to teams and the sport wears on people’s bodies a lot more. I don’t know why they’re paid less money because of that … it’s probably just that their union sucks at negotiating. [Or, conversely, the NBA’s owners group is worse at negotiating than the NFL’s … or # of games/profit margins. Probably a little bit of everything.]

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 12, 2009 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent point you're making .. still it doesn't make a lot of sense why such as vast difference??

Thanks!

As you mentioned it seems it would be the opposite. NFL with more security?

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 13, 2009 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

this is the biggest contract he'll ever get

his entire life. I don’t expect him to compensate in the slightest. Reinsdorf can pay some lux tax, he’s even wealthier and too old to spend it all.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

*by compensate I meant compromise

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"No."

"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." --Newton

by fundamentallysound on Jun 10, 2009 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

he was probably pissed that even got out

since it looks like it was more the Greek team saying they were interested in Gordon, not the other way around.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

God willing

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on Jun 11, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't be surprised

if the fact that Gordon went out and tried to work out S&T with other teams is why that offer was pulled. That doesn’t show loyalty, and that’s no son of mine!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh I was thinking the same thing.

In a mafia kinda way. Like never bite the hand that feeds you.

by SoulEater7 on Jun 10, 2009 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was my thought too.

And I don’t really blame them for it. (I had more written here, but there’s no use rehashing those arguments.)

Right now, the Bulls are definitely seeing what another team will offer, and other teams are seeing if the Bulls will make a move. If you were Paxdorf, what offer would you put on the table? We killed the Bulls for bidding against themselves with Noc. I don’t want them to be bidding against themselves with Gordon, either.

by arjoseph on Jun 11, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

they bid against themselves with Noc when he was a RFA if I recall correctly, when they had the right to match -- no such right

exists for them with Gordon. He could get a call on July 1 and take the deal without even talking to the Bulls; that’s a big difference.

"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." --Newton

by fundamentallysound on Jun 11, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a good point.

But right now, before the official start of the free agency period, Ben can’t slip away in the night. He could agree in principle, but if the Bulls threw more money at him than the other team, it would effectively be a chance to “match.”

Once July comes, though, you’re totally right.

by arjoseph on Jun 11, 2009 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the problem is the guy signing the checks exhibits pretty much none of those qualities (the off the court stuff obviously

no one is expecting JR to hit clutch jumpers)

"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." --Newton

by fundamentallysound on Jun 10, 2009 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh, I bet he thinks he could beat MJ at H-O-R-S-E

But I’ll give it to JR, he’s quite capable of hitting clutch jumpers in his respective area of expertise. He just plays on a different court.

by Sports2 on Jun 10, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a ridiculous idea that BG would beat MJ (at the same age) in H-O-R-S-E,

unless the game involved being double or tripled teamed while shooting.

"Whoever was responsible for pulling that offer [to Ben Gordon] off the table...bring him before me and I'll punch him right in the face " - Frederick Pfeiffer

by Granny Waiters on Jun 11, 2009 12:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Indefinite pronouns strike again!

"Whoever was responsible for pulling that offer [to Ben Gordon] off the table...bring him before me and I'll punch him right in the face " - Frederick Pfeiffer

by Granny Waiters on Jun 11, 2009 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I concur.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 10, 2009 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't.

Sure, leaders work harder than anybody else and step up when no one else wants to and gets things done. I’ve seen that from BG and I’ve appreciated it. But there is something missing in BG. I believe it is why we have all argued about him so much. The plain truth is that no one on his own team thinks he is a leader. Every year the players vote for someone else to be team captain. And more then that, he keeps throwing his name out there and NO ONE is biting. He is the guy at work that thinks he’s “the bomb” and is always saying he is the best salesman/worker/whatever, but everyone who works with him knows better. People consistently roll their eyes every time he says “I’ll be team leader” when a project is brought up in staff meeting, because they know he lacks true leadership abilities. He just doesn’t seem to see what everyone else does. That’s Ben Gordon. He thinks he is worth way more than everyone thinks he is worth, but can’t seem to grasp the obvious. He thinks he is the best player, because he scores the most. He thinks he should be team captain and seems to just not get it that he isn’t getting any votes. I think we would be better off without him even though he is an amazingly elite scorer in my mind. I think he could be the missing piece to a championship team if he understood who he was as a player and if he didn’t think he was a top tier guy. If he were in Mo Williams spot on the Cavs, that would be fun to watch.

by Unrealcity on Jun 16, 2009 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ben Gordon may not be a leader

but Deng, Hinrich and Gooden as captains? Please!

The only Bulls who I see providing leadership next season for sure are Noah and Miller. Hopefully Rose will grow into being a leader.

"Whoever was responsible for pulling that offer [to Ben Gordon] off the table...bring him before me and I'll punch him right in the face " - Frederick Pfeiffer

by Granny Waiters on Jun 16, 2009 5:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We will be better off without him

…we have argued this ad-nauseum on this forum, so no point visiting that, but I am confident that the team will perform better without him. I agree that he is a workhorse but I am now starting to question hiw character and that maybe the selfishness extends beyond the play (in his world view it seems like everyone (GM, owner, younger players etc) sucks but him??

by bullsfaninbigapple on Jun 11, 2009 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for nailing this myth!

Ben Gordon is an undersized, overated two-guard!

by SlamDunk on Jun 11, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks for nailing this stereotype!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tyrus Thomas isn't as good as Chris Bosh?

WHAT?!?
Oh my god, BG is going CRAZY.

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 11, 2009 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sports 2, while I agree with some of your bullet points:

“He’s been willing to play within the team concept. "
I disagree. Did you watch the 07-08 season? He, along with Deng, were selfishly playing for a contract.

Also, BG’s lack of defensive intensity is astounding. It does not take talent to play defense, it takes desire. Hense, the reason why I do not think BG is a great leader, and neither did his teammates (team captain?).

I won’t miss BG at all next year!

by StephenAA on Jun 11, 2009 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rose must not have the desire either I guess. He is worse than BG.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"it does not take talent to play defense, it takes desire. "

some height would help, no?

Our team captains stink on ice. One is too shy for the media, the other is Luol Deng.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no talent to play defense is a stupid, stupid point.

you should be sent to Scotter’s under-10 defensive fundamentals camp.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's good to hear this stuff from Ben...

…though I have to believe he’s always thought these things. However, it’s now a little easier to verbalize this stuff since JR got his jabs in a few weeks ago.

We are now officially in the “I can’t stand you, you can’t stand me but let’s work out a deal” mode. I think Ben is willing to put hurt feelings behind him, but is JR?

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Jun 10, 2009 7:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think JR watched the Celtic/Bulls series.

He has to know BG is good for business. I mean I could be wrong and maybe he figures Rose is enough to keep fans content but Im pretty sure most of the team wants to stick together so I would think he’d do the right thing and put egos aside. I think BG is great for the Bulls and maybe he wins you 5 to 10 games a season. I hope JR does what is right.

I find it odd that two New Yorkers can’t see eye to eye. But maybe they sweep it all under the rug. Fingers crossed.

by SoulEater7 on Jun 10, 2009 8:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"maybe he figures Rose is enough to keep fans content"

sad, but also possible.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the bulls will probably sell out the UC regardless

even when they stink they draw sellouts. This is why JR doesn’t dip into the luxury tax to get quality players. If only we were more fickle…

by benster on Jun 11, 2009 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They didn't sell out every home game this year

Competition with the Blackhawks for bandwagon fans, and just all-around idiocy for almost a decade is wearing thin. The Bulls front office does not want to see if their fan base will become like the Warriors, the city is only willing to root for so many pathetic losers.

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 12, 2009 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We've still made ,what, $500 million in the last decade?

Things could be worse. We could have kept Boylan.

by stupidgenius on Jun 14, 2009 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You haven't made shit ;)

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 15, 2009 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ben's re-signing should be conditional on locking Fred Pfeiffer and JR in a room together.

(re: signature line).

"Whoever was responsible for pulling that offer [to Ben Gordon] off the table...bring him before me and I'll punch him right in the face " - Frederick Pfeiffer

by Granny Waiters on Jun 10, 2009 7:56 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"look smart by not having to pay him as much"

they’re so smart they out smarted themselves, paying an injury-ridden, questionable fit Luol Deng a bag load of millions in the summer of 2008?

This probably will be another Bulls Bozo dealing summer, anything done right; which would include signing the better/best players to contracts via FA signing, extentions or trades would be unDorfibly unBulliably out of character.

I just see an organization that is wimpfully outmatched in Basketball smartness (GM,VP,Owner, etc), yet fortunate to be in a large major market.

When the Zen master (Phil Jacskon) left (not primarily MJ) a boat load of brains left this organization. Jackson with MJ made idiots like Dorf and Krause shine even as they continued to try to destroy a winning environment. Now, no one is wise enough to fill in the voided gap and manage Jerry Reinsdorf.

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 10, 2009 9:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

maybe I should've said "look less stupid"

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now you're just tempting him

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 10, 2009 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That works out well on measuring the Bulls summer negotiations

1) excellent
2) smart
3) look smart
..now the ceiling and measurements for Jerry Reinsdorf’s Bulls follow
4) look less stupid
5) stupid
6) really stupid

man up!

by exult463 on Jun 11, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel better...

knowing you were wrong all year with your snarky comments toward me.


the now-acknowledged pulling of the 6/$55m offer (i.e. basically everything left under the luxury tax…for some reason I had 6/$48m stuck in my head) after the ‘deadline’ last summer

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 10, 2009 11:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I believe you were always saying $10m a year

you still smell.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

KC had it at 6/$54m

http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/fullcourtpress/2009/05/more-on-ben-gordons-future-with-bulls.html

I think I only recently magically shrunk it to $48m in my brain. I take great interest in correcting myself in this, not as much to make me look better but as to not make you gain status and seem less smelly. That would ruin my worldview.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and FURTHERMORE

you could’ve corrected me. I do it to you all the time!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I corrected you several times.

…you have been in denial…

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 11, 2009 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You would be wrong.

And you are smelling your upper lip.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 11, 2009 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn’t have a relationship with Jerry Reinsdorf.

That’s just plain sad

by Belize on Jun 10, 2009 11:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I know

considering how chummy (to creepy levels, but still) Uncle Jerry can be!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not I

though they have a decent facility, right?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here it is!

Link

My bad, thought u posted it. Yah…decent, but for a team that ran the 90’s, u’d think they have atleast wideer lockers than my cubicle @ my last job.

by Belize on Jun 11, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't they write him a note and stuck it in his locker

when they claimed he was late for a team bus or something and in trouble. A note. Yeah, no relationship there and that is from the player level management he supposedly sees all the time and should know him. He’s been on the team since he was drafted. It isn’t like they don’t know who Ben is.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

im surprised

that Jerry doesnt atleast have a mean-boss relationship with his players. Does he walk around the lockerroom or atleast practice? Actually, has he ever sat in the upper deck? I think after ever bad trade, he should be forced to watch a game on the 2nd deck…behind the basket too, no basline seats.

Damn..its getting late

by Belize on Jun 11, 2009 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't he trot down there

and pull Gordon aside during a practice at the beginning of last season? Maybe that was the big “Thabo is starting over you” speech. That went well.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 12:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hi, guy I've never talked to before.

I’d like to tell you that you’re the worst shooting guard in NBA history. You think you’re going to start for the BULLS?!? Come on now! We’re a famous tea witha stried legacy!
“Who’s going to be shooting guard then?”
“Some other guy, Scrambled … Stackapancakes … something. He’s tall. He could blo YOUR butt out of the water.”
[walks off]

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 11, 2009 2:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why is that sad?

73 year old white guy and 26 year old foreign black guy…why would they have a relationship beyond signing and cashing of paychecks?

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 11, 2009 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

or D2.0 and the sane population of the world.

it’s like oil and water, man!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Slaps head

How’s about 73 year old New Yorker and 26 year old New Yorker?

Of course, one grew up in Brooklyn and probably hates those suburbanite yuppies who grew up in Mt. Vernon with a passion, but I doubt it’s who you thought it was.

by Sports2 on Jun 11, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

HA!

I don’t think most New Yorkers would BG a New Yorker.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 11, 2009 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

would consider BG a New Yorker

And he was born in Great Britian…and may play for their national team.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 11, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

really? link?

this is the first I’ve heard of this.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

From the Telegraph UK

Head coach Chris Finch has compiled a squad list for the camp in August, as Britain prepare for Game On At The O2 in London and then the EuroBasket finals in Poland.

It includes Chicago Bulls pair Luol Deng and Ben Gordon and Scotland’s Robert Archibald as well as Pops Mensah-Bonsu, Andy Betts and Joel Freeland.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Jun 11, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I quit.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who's the guy in the picture?

I’ve never seen a ‘Luol Deng’ on the Bulls.

Things could be worse. We could have kept Boylan.

by stupidgenius on Jun 14, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah......it's not like Gordon was raised in Mt. Vernon or anything

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 11, 2009 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, he didn't move to the US shortly after his birth. Not at ll.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Has Reinsdorf ever signed a #1 or 2 option FA in his Life?

Gordon needs to leave this sorry cheap organization. They pay Deng & Heirich on potential that never materialized. They stiff Gordon by offering him less than two players he consistently outperformed. He should sign a 1 year contracts with Cleveland or Miami. Then get his 5 year deal next year. Screw Paxson & Reinsdorf. No prime time FA or Coach will ever work 4 these cheap idiots. No wonder Jordan, Jackson and others couldn’t wait to distance themselves. Rose needs to demand to leave next.

by sadafan on Jun 10, 2009 11:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

uh, I'm sorry?

are you forgetting a legend named Ben Wallace?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 10, 2009 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, I'm sorry.

I meant a PRODUCTIVE #1 or #2 option.

by sadafan on Jun 10, 2009 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rose could end up where Bosh is now

as far as being in a dead end and needing to make choices. Although at least Rose is in a big market and his home town. If Rose is interested in winning he needs the right guys around him. They will need to do something out of their comfort range to make that happen. So far they did the “bold” move of locking the 3rd and 4th guy (or even the 4th and 5th guy if trends continue). That will get you another 5 years hovering at or below .500. I guess a businessman can be happy with that. Some players don’t care either. We’ll have to see.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something happen!!!!

GarPaxDorf: I do not want to wait two more weeks. Agree to a trade, even if “in principle” to appease my restlessness.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 8:00 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Just wondering

Can the Bulls even talk to Gordon at this point?

Free agent season doesn’t start till next month, and, technically, Ben’s not really our player anymore.

I agree that this interview makes the situation sound bad, but maybe the silence shouldn’t be unexpected at this stage.

I don’t know. I guess I’m just trying to hold on to the thought that Ben might be back next year.

by dogra on Jun 11, 2009 8:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

he still is their player

until 7/1.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

(though I'm not sure about the 'early' contract negotiation rules)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think they can talk

until July 1 officially. Doesn’t mean unofficial talks happen, but they aren’t supposed to. The league has never cracked down on those July 1 signings, but if they’re going to have that rule they should enforce it or it makes no sense.

by KT on Jun 11, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And it's not like they couldn't have had an exit interview that says:

“We like you and if things go how we both hope, this is how we see your role next year.”

Or something.

But then Paxson probably doesn’t talk to Del Negro, who probably doesn’t talk to his players, so…

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And it isn't like Jerry didn't sing to the media.

Oh wait, he did. THAT couldn’t have helped things.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm going to assume the Bulls

really don’t know what they are going to do. Count all the suggestions that are posted and times them by two and then you have what the Bulls have.

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on Jun 11, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would that surprise any of us more than an eyebrow raise if that were really the case?

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not even an eyebrow raise ... more of a nod

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 11, 2009 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ben's gone

At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if he was willing to take somewhat less money to go somewhere else. He feels disrespected, and with good reason. Making a guy an offer and then yanking it when he accepts it is just bush-league behavior, and moves like that demonstrate why this team has sucked the last decade. If Ben ends up taking less money to sign with a bad team like Oklahoma City, that’s a pretty sad commentary on this franchise.

Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0

because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger

by Big D on Jun 11, 2009 10:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If Gordon takes that it'll be because he things it gives him a chance for a championship

I really think that’s somethig he values highly – where if there are similar deals he’ll take the one with a contender.
I don’t think he thinks the Bulls can win with their management.

Worried.

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 11, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

SMH again...

“That was last summer’s negotiations in a nutshell. They had an offer, then when he decided to take it, they told him it was no longer there. "

Gee, the part about giving Gordon a 48 hour warning after the offer had been on the table for 2 months didn’t make your “acccurate” recap, Matt.
Unbelievable how unfair you are to Pax in particular.

“of course it’s moronic the Bulls would pull that offer”

Um, no it’s not.
But then I keep forgetting Matt how great of a GM you think you are.

by StephenAA on Jun 11, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Pay attention to the last thing the box says.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IZ9CL4phPk

(darn reply button strikes again!)

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm a crappy GM

I host people on this blog who can’t read, as in: it was ‘accurate’ to what BG said in the interview.

so you’re right: I need to tighten up payroll and get rid of all these dead weight commenters!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ouch...

“not to get into that story again”
oh, please do…
So it’s OK to print BG’s mis-leading version of the story (however “accurate” the interview was) while calling the other side “moronic”. Yep, that’s fair.

I’ve been called a lot of things, but ’dead weight" hurts…

by StephenAA on Jun 11, 2009 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

huh?

I linked to the old thread about it, and there have been MANY others discussing the pulled offer.

  I didn’t want to get into it on that post, but if you want to jump in the conversation like a child wandering in midway through a movie, have at it. It was a moronic move by the Bulls, whether they put on more warnings or not.

And I have no idea what you’re getting at when saying I should be ‘fair’ about printing BG’s
‘misleading’ story…honestly I’ve read that several times and have no idea what you’re trying to say.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if bg had taken that offer

they couldve stayed under the tax AND kept hinrich right?? Then it is a moronic move!!! If nothing else it would put you in a better position to trade players, and if jerry really disliked gordon that much trading him to anther team with that contract would have most teams throwing offers on the trading block…

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Jun 11, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it was an offer

that had the Bulls at the tax limit for that season. But for that season they could’ve kept everyone, yes.

I’m trying to find the most recent conversation about the merits of pulling the offer after the arbitrary deadline. I’m not saying we can’t discuss it, I just didn’t like StephenAA’s assertion like he somehow ‘got’ me for being UNFAIR for not addressing in this post a subject that has been poured over for months.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The biggest plus side i can think about pulling the offer is this

I think if the bull had signed gordon to a contract they would still be a piece away, that piece being a capable offensive big man. I think most, if not all teams wouldnt really do any trades or deals with teh bulls especially this year since they are basically out of the running for any 2010 moves, and if the bulls did pull off any trades it wouldnt help thier capspace much (20% per outgoing players contract?). So if the bulls had signed ben gordon, they might have been as competetive (or a bit more so) than last season, but still not a team that would win a championship, and they probably wouldve stayed that way for awhile (cuz if you think about it, luol and gordons contracts are here for another 6 years, while when hinrichs finally expires, rose will get his most likely max contract, plus any aditional rookies) i think the bulls would been at that place you love to call mediocre. Good enough to stay out of the draft lottery and yet not good enough to actually compete for anything.

However in hindsight if the organization hadnt pulled the offer, the way bg and kirk played a team like toronto surely wouldnt mind making a trade of bosh for gordon cuz they need a perimeter threat…or a portland trade or minny trade. Having salmons was not a guaranteed plan at the time the offer was pulled. No one envisioned the bulls would compete so well with boston or rose would be this good.

uhhh this is getting too long….my basic point is that there was logic behind the pulling of the offer…whether it was a good move at the time is hard to determine, but in hindsight i think it truly looks horrid, much like the deng contract or the hinrich contract (not the noch contract cuz at the time it was being done you pretty much called it out as being bad) those mistakes might have also made the ben gordon resigning difficult not just financially but i can see the organization second guessing bens value just because they failed to acknowledge past guys value….

I know people are gonna take that last part and criticize it to no end, but i think that business organizations, although they try to behave machine like, are made up of humans, and humans are prone to emotions and mistakes made due to those emotions…..although when you commit too many mistakes at some point you really should consider stepping down…..

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Jun 11, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let him go!

A year or two from now no one would remember this short, selfish player (Ben Gordon) ever existed!

by SlamDunk on Jun 11, 2009 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are right.

In two years no one will care about the Bulls as much as they already don’t care about the Clippers if this is the direction the team is going. BG will be fine where ever he ends up.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 11, 2009 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except for the team he plays on,

which will magically be doing better.

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 11, 2009 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Vinny isn't a magician! Didn't he already tell us that when he got the job?

I am right! So no magic to help us… we’re screwed!

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Jun 12, 2009 1:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Vinny stopped believing!

I think he killed the Sopranos.

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 12, 2009 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Matt...

Your almost constant desire to be sooo critical of Pax and Vinny in the last year just reaks injustice (in the blogasphere sense). You seem to be the second coming of Jay Mariotti – God help us. Your tone is almost constantly negative towards anything the Bulls organization does.

Your criticism of Vinny this year was especially unfair considering he was a first year coach with a rookie point guard, a second year center and a third year PF. Of course he made mistakes. Almost every coach in the playoffs ended games without a timeout – sheesh. Vinny did a great job, all things considering, and I believe he has the intellegence and work ethic to only get better. He has very good communication and relational skills and the feedback from the players throughout the season and at the end was mostly that they respected Vinny, knowing his background as a hustle player for many years.

Also, your desire for Vinny to play TT regardless of what he does on the court is just wrong. I have played, coached and directed a basketball league for many years. Tyrus is STILL young enough to teach him that if he doesn’t listen to the coach and doesn’t give his all (sprinting down the court, FCOL), he won’t play. Do you really think that letting him play regardless of what he does is in the long-term best interest to the team and even to Tyrus? Really? These aren’t just mistakes he’s making. It’s life-skills learning that needs to be awakened in him. Pax took a risk in drafting TT knowing that these things needed adjustment in his life. Maybe, just maybe, Pax and Vinny care about TT the person just as much as TT the player.

You have a nice site, Matt, and you write well. However, you indirectly call names (moronic) and yet you call ME the child!?

“not to get into that story again”
Then don’t, and leave the “moronic” line out of it.

I should have said BG’s version is “one-sided”, not “mis-leading”.

BG is the one who acted unprofessional in this situation regarding the last 2 offers made by the Bulls. Could JR have reinstated the contract offer. Sure. But if your going to build character (a seamingly dreaded word with you) in your organization, your word is your word.

If BG is on this team in the future, I hope it is in a 6th man role.

by StephenAA on Jun 11, 2009 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, I think you're negative

except….you’re unfairly criticizing the players. I like them and am super super positive about them. Annoyingly so. You basically describe Tyrus Thomas as an immature simpleton, and praise the ‘character’ of Reinsdorf hardballing and winning a negotiation (at the possible expense of his team). We value different things, not necessarily have different mindsets.

Additionally, I’m positive…that Vinny is a crappy coach until proven otherwise. I don’t think it’s impossible to become a better one, I just don’t see the reason for him to go through the learning process on the Bulls dime.

If you’re a mole from inside Bulls land, I wouldn’t be surprised:

These aren’t just mistakes he’s making. It’s life-skills learning that needs to be awakened in him. Pax took a risk in drafting TT knowing that these things needed adjustment in his life. Maybe, just maybe, Pax and Vinny care about TT the person just as much as TT the player.

Ok, maybe not a Bulls mole, but Stephon Marbury?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

though maybe there is something to the theory

that the Bulls hired Vinny to teach him life skills, because they care about him as a person.

God damnit I’m so angry, and Ben Gordon hasn’t even been shown the door yet.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I need to get caught up in life.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"You're a bum."

"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." --Newton

by fundamentallysound on Jun 11, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

marbury 3:16

I was watching the 1995 Playoffs VS the Magic's and remembered how much I hated Horace Grant. Horace Grant - i hope you burn in bball hell

by Belize on Jun 11, 2009 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mole? LOL

“you’re unfairly criticizing the players”
Your kidding right? You think my tone towards TT and BG is the same as yours towards Pax and Vinny? OK.

“I just don’t see the reason for him to go through the learning process on the Bulls dime.”
Then who’s dime then? If you believe Vinny has all the makings of a good coach, then you pick him up now! Were the Bulls really championship material this last season with a different coach? Really? Maybe they can grow together as a team and be realistically ready for a championship run in 2 years.

Trust me, I am not a mole.
I don’t even live in Illinois anymore.
And the Marbury comment hurt more than the dead-weight, or is it the same?

by StephenAA on Jun 11, 2009 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't say I believe Vinny has all the makings of a good coach

I said it’s not impossible he has the makings of a good coach. But this year hasn’t convinced me to where it’s worth finding out, in case you aren’t familiar with the phrase ‘damning with faint praise’.

I beginning to sense a correlation between you citing Vinny’s “very good communication and relational skills” yet apparently rarely understanding what I write.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who doesn't understand?

“If you believe Vinny has…”

The “you” was meant as a generality, not you in particular.
I thought you (Matt) would catch on when I used the second “you” in the same sentence, as in “then you pick him up now” (unless you – Matt – think you – Matt – have anything to do with actually picking the coach of the Bulls).

“I host people on this blog who can’t read”
Would you like me to comment on our host? :)

Have a wonderful Friday!

by StephenAA on Jun 12, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Vinny does not have the makings of a good coach.

When you argue that Vinny was a first-year coach, and was therefore expected to make mistakes, you’ve redefined the word ‘superficial’. Yes, and if I my 14yo daughter had coached the Bulls, you could have said exactly the same thing about her.
 
The important questions are, did he make more or less mistakes than could be reasonably expected? And were they more or less serious than could be expected? And did he show a promising learning curve? Etc., etc. etc.

And the answers to those questions are – I believe clearly – all damning. He made terrible decisions throughout the season, and unquestionable stunted Rose’s development. He gave every indication of being out of his depth throughout.

I’m not going to go into detail here, but among many other glaring weaknesses, the Bulls offensive success rate out of time-outs was dismal from start to finish. That’s a very simple way of judging coaches strategic abilities, and VDN received a failing grade.

Did you happen to notice the recent play orchestrated by Van Gundy at the end of the game in LA – the one that was inches away from winning the game? That was a brilliantly conceived play, and precisely the sort of clever strategic approach that VDN was incapable of producing.

by badnewsintennisshoes on Jun 12, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well...

“When you argue that Vinny was a first-year coach, and was therefore expected to make mistakes, you’ve redefined the word ‘superficial’.”
Huh?

“The important questions are, did he make more or less mistakes than could be reasonably expected?”
That was my point. I’ve re-read my post and I thought I made that clear.

But, in the spirit of true sportsmanship, I’ll try to say it again:
I felt Matt was overly critical throughout the season of Vinnie by not putting 2 main things into context: he was a rookie coach and he had a very young team. Is a rookie coach going to make more mistakes than a veteran? Of course. But I do not feel Vinnie made more mistakes than could “reasonably be expected” from a rookie coach. Keep in mind this very young team and rookie coach had a .500 season.

“I’m not going to go into detail here…”
Then it is just your opinion. And I disagree.

“the Bulls offensive success rate out of time-outs was dismal from start to finish. That’s a very simple way of judging coaches strategic abilities,…”
Wow, I didn’t know it was that simple.
It has nothing to do with the (young) players executing, uh.

“Did you happen to notice the recent play orchestrated by Van Gundy at the end of the game in LA – the one that was inches away from winning the game? That was a brilliantly conceived play…

Two points on why you’re wrong:
1. That play is not new. Are you kidding. A lob play near the basket with high picks given? I’ve seen many plays drawn up like that through my tenure of watching the NBA. The issue with every last second play on whether it will work or not is what the defense is anticipating and what they overplay
2. There was a last second play in the Bulls / Boston series where Kirk got wide open UNDERNEATH the basket (and then missed it, ugh). That was a much better drawn up play that what Lee put up for the Magic.

“and precisely the sort of clever strategic approach that VDN was incapable of producing.”
And precisely (see point 2) why you are catigorically wrong, again.

“damning” “Unquestionable” “every indication”
You have very strong opinions.
Are you always right, or do I even have a chance?

by StephenAA on Jun 12, 2009 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes...

it was a young team, but it’s really not so difficult to distinguish between coaching and execution. It is clear to me (and plenty of others with whom I have spoken) that VDN did a very poor job throughout the season.

Of course you are free to disagree, and I wouldn’t expect either one of us to elaborate in great detail on this type of forum. But, to use just one obvious example, do you think that it was a sign of a promising or rapidly maturing coach that VDN almost invariably encouraged BG to play one-on-one (or two) in order to take final shots? That, to me, was clearly damning. Even Lebron James was exposed in that role, and Kobe has underscored the wisdom of using the obvious shooter as a passer under such conditions.

It doesn’t matter that the play used by Orlando had been used before or not – it was very creative under the circumstances, something that cannot be said for the almost invariably unsuccessful plays drawn up by VDN after time outs. Were some of those plays ruined by poor execution? I’m sure that a few were. But as I watched those plays unfold throughout the year, I saw many more instances of poor coaching.

I do have strong opinions, and I have been watching basketball for many years, and cannot recall a worse firs season coach in the NBA.

If you’d like to produce some examples of signs that VDN improved significantly later in the year, I’d like to see them

by badnewsintennisshoes on Jun 12, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no... :)

“It is clear to me (and plenty of others with whom I have spoken) that VDN did a very poor job throughout the season.”
I think I got your point in your first post!

“Of course you are free to disagree,…”
Whew, I wasn’t sure about that.

“…do you think that it was a sign of a promising or rapidly maturing coach that VDN almost invariably encouraged BG to play one-on-one (or two) in order to take final shots?”
Ugh. I hate that play! Like I clearly said, Vinny made mistakes. But I am not convinced that Vinny always drew up the play for BG to take the final shot without giving him an option to pass if he is doubled. And we all know how much BG likes giving up the ball. Therefore, was it all Vinny’s fault? And like Matt has said soooo many times, the other players seem to be afraid to take a last second shot. So what else is Vinny to do?

“Even Lebron James was exposed in that role,…”
I doubt LBJ has ever been “exposed” in a one-on-one role. Are you kidding?

“It doesn’t matter that the play used by Orlando had been used before or not…”
You said SVG “conceived” it. Now you’re back-tracking.

“Were some of those plays ruined by poor execution? I’m sure that a few were. "
A few? ok

Let’s just agree to disagree. :)

Have a nice weekend…

by StephenAA on Jun 12, 2009 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe so...

we can “agree to disagree”, but…

“I doubt LBJ has ever been "exposed" in a one-on-one role. Are you kidding?”

No, I’m not kidding. Do you think that Cleveland got as far into the playoffs as they were capable of? In other words, do you not believe that they might have made it to the finals if they had relied less on James to carry such a disproportionate load late in the games?

That’s precisely what has been so impressive about Kobe in each of the last two series – his willingness to use the attention he draws to get the ball to other players. That’s partly a reflection of maturity on his part, and partly due to GOOD COACHING. Cleveland’s coach, while better than VDN, made plenty of mistakes in the playoffs, and over-relying on LeBron late in games was one of the glaring ones.

by badnewsintennisshoes on Jun 13, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because if there's anything that expresses sharing the ball,

it’s going 11 for 31 from the field in game 4 for 32 points.
The Kobe Bryant Experience in action!

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 13, 2009 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Half of his point is true, though

A better coach would figure out some kind of gameplan in the 4th quarter other than 1 on 5. Even when the Lakers throw away the Triangle they still run the high screen and roll with Gasol or post up Kobe to free up their shooters.

The Cavs don’t do anything. They just give James the ball at the top of the key and expect him to figure it all out on his own. I really don’t understand why they played so poorly during crunch time when their offense was actually very efficient in the regular season.

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 14, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah ...

That was the Cavs’ entire offense last year.
That’s not really James’ fault … that’s Mike Brown’s fault. It’s stupid.

Three things you must know:
-"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."
-Pau Gasol: The defense of a seven foot ladder paired with the post presence of Manute Bol.
-Joakim Noah is better than you.

by Prevenge on Jun 15, 2009 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and unfair to Pax???

only if you reason that he doesn’t technically do enough to be criticized for the fortunes of his team.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't you have to trade them to another SB Nation Blog?

I need to tighten up payroll and get rid of all these dead weight commenters!

"Whoever was responsible for pulling that offer [to Ben Gordon] off the table...bring him before me and I'll punch him right in the face " - Frederick Pfeiffer

by Granny Waiters on Jun 11, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yay, another Ben Gordon thread

These always turn out brilliantly.

Just make a fucking decision Paxdorf, your own players are openly insulting you on sports radio, yet ironically it’s the one guy who has been the most consistent, hard-working, and forthright in his 5 season tenure.

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 11, 2009 11:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

you forgot gar

garpaxdorf…..3 heads are -better than- equal to none

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Jun 11, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you were right to be wary

the people jumping in saying that BG shouldn’t be resigned…that’s not even the point. The point is whether you’re comfortable with Jerry Reinsdorf determining who gets resigned or not.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 11, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought we avioded them for awhile.

Gordon trolls showing more restraint than I usually do. Nope, just slow to the punch.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on Jun 11, 2009 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
What the Bulls are missing
Jayhawk_small
Game Preview # 12 - Bulls @ Nuggets
Blackstar_small
Plan B: if the Bulls fail to sign a FA superstar at the 2 or the 4 spots...
Small
How About A Whole New Plan?
Small
Game Preview #10: Chicago Bulls vs. Los Angeles Lakers
Small
Rose Problem: Trying too hard to please Vinny and "teammates"
Small
Your thought on a GS-Chi Ellis A-R for Kirk TT trade dreams
Jjohnson
What's going on in Derrick Rose's head?
Drose2_small
what i'd do as GM right now...
Small
The concern about Rose...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger