Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Lakers-Rockets and Hinrich

I am starting to wonder if maybe the Lakers might be interested in accquiring hinrich, especially if they dont win a championship this year.  Derek Fisher has been awful and can only get worse. I don't think they view jordan farmar as their future PG and if they do, yikes.

 

I am sure Kobe would be happy to have kirk playing along his side, take a little bit of the defensive pressure off of kobe.  And keeping the franchise player happy is always the most important thing in basetball right?  They are the lakers and they have lots of money so that shouldn't be an issue in terms of his salary.  Kobe and Phil only have so many years left to work things out...

 

I don't mean to be all speculative, but since I personally want Gordon over Hinrich, I thought about it as I was watching the rockets-lakers.  Someone indulge me with a creative way to get Hinrich to the Lakers that makes sense.  And by sense, I mean not having to take on Lamar Odom for the same amount of money for 5 years. After all, the draft this year sucks, so we might as well procrastinate by coming up with trade proposals.

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

1 recs  |  Comment 47 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

No! I wanna see the Lakers go away. Not get better.

Why would you help out the teams on top of the hill? Honestly I don’t like anything the Lakers have. I hope they lose game seven.

by SoulEater7 on May 15, 2009 1:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If it helps the Bulls, who cares?

The Bulls aren’t competing w/ the Lakers for a championship for 3-4 years, at minimum, unless they get super duper lucky and get Bosh and Wade in the following two summers. The Lakers, Hinrich included, won’t still be championship material.

The Bulls made the Cavs better by trading them Wallace and Smith and helping facilitate (in the same trade) the trade for Delonte West. But they needed to do it to get rid of Wallace and make this team better.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on May 15, 2009 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see what you would want from the Lakers.

If it’s just to dump his contract then I’d rather the Bulls not becoming the Memphis Grizzlies for the Lakers. Not to say that Hinrich is on Gasol’s level but still, make a deal with the bottom feeders and get a draft pick or at least something of value in the deal.

by SoulEater7 on May 15, 2009 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hinrich would not be able to stop aaron brooks. He can not D the super quick PGs. Hes better against the slightly stronger, slightly bigger guys. B davis, D wade, J kidd, Jose Calderon, and the such.

by sillyrussian on May 15, 2009 1:36 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

ditto

the lakers need like a barea…

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on May 15, 2009 2:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've been wondering why

The Lakers didn’t make a big pitch for Kirk last year after the Rose pick, or at least at the deadline…..dangling expiring Odom and taking Hinrich and maybe another first round pick. Odom’s good, but really for them he’s a nice to have (though I guess with Bynum hurt again he’s been more than a nice to have for them—not for most teams but for them—but Kirk with Kobe would be a formidable guard duo…..

Oh well, I don’t know what they have to offer, our guards are far better than anything they have, and their bigs are far better than anything we have….so ultimately I think that’s why a Hinrich trade didn’t happen….

4/30/2009 GAME 6: Joakim Noah is God.

by majoyenrac on May 15, 2009 7:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought Hinrich for Odom was fairly okay at the beginning of the season.

But Odom is sooooooooo important to them. He’s their third best player and consistently so.

People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett

by tyger1147 on May 15, 2009 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It wouldn't be a one for one....

And yes he is their 3rd best player (seeing as Bynum’s hurt again) but Odom’s expiring, and I don’t know if they’ll bring him back….

If Bynum was healthy which was to be assumed, a Kirk-Kobe-Pau-Bynum-Ariza lineup would be absolutely sensational….Kirk would be a great 4th option and Ariza and Kirk with Kobe and Bynum and even Pau would be a great defensive unit to boot…..

4/30/2009 GAME 6: Joakim Noah is God.

by majoyenrac on May 15, 2009 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kukoc

was our fourth best player; that extra weapon, so for right now Bynum would be Kukoc and Odom would be Rodman.

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on May 15, 2009 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd argue Kukoc was really the 3rd best player and more important than Rodman.

Rodman was key in a couple of playoff series, but the argument that Kukoc was more important isn’t hard to make.

by Scotter on May 15, 2009 6:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

offensively i'd say toni was 3rd behind scottie.

defensively odom on toni kinda suck. they are almost the same player. toni was a better 3 pt shooter. toni had one really nice post move, that little spin wrist shot under the basket.

by SoulEater7 on May 16, 2009 2:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is my suggestion...

This doesn’t really help keep Gordon because our payroll wouldn’t really go down far enough. The Bulls would still need to go into the Luxury Tax. But it this trade would 1. Free up more Cap Room for 2010 2. Give us more assest to make a trade again by the trading deadline if any of the big name players become available 3. It gives us a backup veteran Point Guard and another backup SF.

Hinrich to the Lakers

A. Morrison and D. Fisher to the Bulls

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=p9vsa9

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on May 15, 2009 8:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I certainly would

Rather just keep Hinrich than trade him for crap. Fisher ain’t bad, but is already old and not getting younger, and I think Kirk’s a better leader and a far better player these days.

We already have 18-19M (after picks, maybe $15-16M) for 2010 pre trade’s….

Save Hinrich, and if need be trade him with the expiring Brad Miller for a really good player….don’t just trade away a nice cap lowering contract for a team leader and a good player who’s also your best defender, for crap just to help the Lakers be a dynasty….

4/30/2009 GAME 6: Joakim Noah is God.

by majoyenrac on May 15, 2009 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

totally agree...

fisher and morrison? we could definitely do better.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on May 15, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since the poster is asking about the Lakers

who do you think we can get that’s better from the Lakers?

Odom will be a free agent.

Bynum? no way he get’s moved

Gasol? Don’t see it.

All of their other players have horrible contracts. The best you can do from the Lakers is grab expiring contracts and go from there.

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on May 15, 2009 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

my point is if that's your best bet from the lakers, it's not useful.

i could have seen something involving odom at the beginning of the season, obviously not now though.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on May 15, 2009 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rules

can sign and trades ivolve multiple players/picks. I wouldn’t mind Ariza as our 6th man in the long run if salmons leaves next year and we sign gordon. I am pretty sure he would be able to defend quick threes and tall twos very effectively. Seems good on the fastbreak.

by Sambossanova on May 15, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We need to get a third team involved.

Who would want to shed salary this Summer? Let’s see…Every team with designs on landing a big name 2010 free agent…so, Hinrich to the Lakers, Lakers expirings to third team, third team’s player to the Bulls…

Who could this third team be…New Orleans? Utah? Orlando?

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on May 15, 2009 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

actually

i corrrect my statement below that morrison has worst contract. I didnt realize 2010-2011 was a qualifying offer meaning he is an expiring contract.

But its probably true as you said that maybe packaging miller and salmons or something along those lines with hinrich might be better option. I just hope that whomever is running the team for the next year is n’t trigger shy and we end up with hinrich as our 6th man or starting SG, miller expiring and give a contract extension to salmons. In my opinion that would be a catastrophic year of personnel moves. I don’t like salmons in the long run either when you have Deng and on one is going to take deng’s contract these days.

by Sambossanova on May 15, 2009 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who cares what happens with the Lakers

Next year teams will look at Fisher, Morrison, and Miller as a more attractive trade than Hinrich and Miller because of Hinrichs contract. That is adding 10 mil to your budget a year when your trying to slash payroll because that is what most teams are going to be looking to do.

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on May 15, 2009 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Dallas doesn't resign JKidd they're going to be desperate for a PG

If we’re unable to sign Ben, why not offer up Kirk for Josh Howard? Howard makes $10,890,000 w/ a team option for 2010/11 worth $11,835,000 so we could easily not pick that up or pick it up and trade him.

That would get rid of the Hinrich contract and free up more money for 2010. Also, Howard can fill in at the 2 or the 3 if he’s needed and is still a solid player when he’s got his head in the game.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on May 15, 2009 9:49 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

At this point

I think the bulls are trying to build a team around rose, not pick up random good players and kirk is probably not enough to get howard for the mavs. I dont know if they ahve a 2010 strategy as well but I am starting to think that every single team in the league is clearing up space for 2010 which means there must be players who will be available at the next tier (not superstars).
Odom doesn’t interest me much cause I have such mixed feelings about him/ Looking at the lakers roster and salaries, they dont have much to offer. An Morrison, is crap and his contract is much worse than hinrichs. Maybe the lakers have some picks for 2010. If the bulls want to ahve cap space, it might be a good idea to start drafting random foreign players or college players with no superstar potential and hope that one of them will turn out to be a contributor off the bench while making 800k/year. Thats why I liked the Asik pick.

by Sambossanova on May 15, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This move would allow them more financial room in 2010

by getting hearly $17M of Hinrich-owed money off our books. I think that Howard could be a productive player for the Bulls (he’ll fit right in w/ VND’s “me-first” offense) and could be our starting 2 if we lose Gordon or a 6th man if we wanna play Salmons at the 2 with Luol at the 3.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on May 15, 2009 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

With Howard joining Brad Miller and Joakim, the Bulls would then be the all-pot-smoking team.

Maybe they should re-sign Corey Blount when he gets out of prison. And they could sign Rasheed and Damon Stoudamire as well.

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on May 15, 2009 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha you may be right

but really I only care about what they do on the court…Howard still did average like 18 and 6 this year for Dallas, where most of the touches go to Dirk. I’ll even give John Hollinger my $1 for mentioning Howards PER of 17. Compare that to Hinrich’s 13.9, Salmons’ 16, and Deng’s somewhat-misleading 14.7 and I think he’s an upgrade.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on May 15, 2009 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I joke about his off-court issues, but the truth is,

he’s a hell of a player. He’s everything Deng should be, in terms of on-court skills. (Off-court, one could argue Deng’s everything Howard should be.)

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on May 15, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's not everything Deng should be. He's just the opposite of Deng offensively.

Howard is great in isolation situations, completely average if he actually has to cut and move in an offense. He’s one of few players that Kidd has made worse.

by Scotter on May 15, 2009 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about Darius Miles?

Memphis is going to drop him for his pot bust. We could pick him up too. Now we just need a smoked out PG and we have the whole team, because we already know that we have the mascot as well.

by Unrealcity on May 17, 2009 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pot smoking PG... thus, my Damon Stoudamire suggestion :)

He may have gotten arrested for smoking pot, but on the other hand that guy tore it up as a rookie. And on a bad team… !

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on May 18, 2009 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I suggest we find a way to get Josh Powell

(draftexpress.com profile here). We need a specialist to match up with the beefier (or fattier) frontline players in the league, as the Celtics seemed to win just about every inside battle that didn’t end in a shot being blocked by Tyrus or Noah (along with some plays that did have a block by Tyrus or Noah).

I would suggest finding a way to get rid of Aaron Gray as well, since theoretically, he’s there to provide a big body, but gave us few quality minutes this past season.

I’ve rec’d your fanpost because it’s a very good thought, and one that I haven’t really thought about since the illusory “Kobe to the Scott Skiles Bulls” topic that jerked our collective chain.

As I’ve said many times before, Kirk is a really good player who had one horrible year, and a guy I’d love to keep on the Bulls if he only was a better fit. And I agree that Kobe would welcome him with open arms to help take some of the defensive load.

It’s true that he wouldn’t be able to stay in front of Brooks, but I believe that he wouldn’t mind faceplanting Brooks a few times, which is what the Lakers need right now. Very similar to how the Bulls needed someone—anyone—to mix it up with Rondo, and Kirk obliged. I also remember pretty vividly that Kirk served a hard foul on Earl Boykins back when Early Boykins was a rising name in the league (when he was on the Nuggets).

With kirk around to take on the other team’s best offensive backcourt player, Kobe would make teams pay on the other end.

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on May 15, 2009 11:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think Josh Powell would be a nice signing. A good fourth big man behind Noah, Thomas and Miller.

by NBR on May 16, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is a hard one

Being a Bulls fan living just minutes away from the Staples center and catching heat daily for my Bull love and Laker hate, this is a tough call. I don’t want the Lakers to get any better and I think Kirk would help them get over the hump. On the flip side we’re going to have to move either Kirk or Ben and I think we need Ben a little more then we do Kirk right now. But what do we get in return? I don’t want to take on trash for a 2010 off season free agent run and be stuck with nothing if everyone stays with their orginal teams. So if we move Kirk then maybe we can move him with Tyrus for Bynum and Fisher? I’m at work and can’t put the time in make sure the numbers work but it would work for both teams.

For The Lakers
Kirk gives them a steady presence on defense, he’s tough and doesn’t amke many mistakes. He knows his role on offense and won’t be mad when Kobe is yelling at him because he didn’t catch a bad pass coming from Byrant. lol

Tyrus gives them an athlete they need at the four spot, he could even start along side Gasol. He would give them much needed weak side defensive help and I could see him thriving in LA. He would only need to block shots, hit a few jumpers and bring the hammer when he’s given a nice pass from Gasol or Odom. This trade would also allow the Lakers to keep Odom, trust me they want to but not at a high price.

Let’s not forget LA needs to clear cap this year for Ariza, if they don’t they could lose a very key part of their future success. I think teams with some $$$ might throw it at Trevor. He plays D, shots the 3 pretty well and can finish. They just might let Bynum walk if they can get a few guys that help them win now and keep Kobe happy.

For us it’s a no brainer, we get a young big that would only need to get us a double double a game for right now. Bynum and Noah would be a pretty scary tandem for years to come. Fisher can help Rose as in that player coach type role of the bench. Fisher played pretty good defense when he was younger and has always been a good leader.

Again the salary probably stops this from happening but I would do this deal if it was possible.

by Bullsfanla on May 15, 2009 11:20 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I really dont see it working

I dont see the lakers pursuing Hinrich, and i dont see what the lakers could give to the bulls that is apealing. Aside from players, i dont think the lakers are in any position to give us financial stability. I think they want to sign odom back (because he is like thier 3rd best player and is the ‘guy" when kobe is on the bench) and i think in 2010 they want to keep kobe (who i am sure will opt out fo mo’ money. Then you look at the players, and Jordan Farmar seems like a hinrich light, not as good defensively, but younger, quicker, alot more potential, and possibly will have a better offensive game (in terms of setting up offense, getting ot the rack and finishing)

The mavericks one makes a little more sense, plus they wont be contending for anything with or without hinrich, but if they keep jason kidd, id take an aging kidd over a kirk hinrich (okay by i’d i mean, most people…but actually not me)

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on May 15, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

All I can say

Is I hope the Lakers lose game 7 against the Rockets (although I don’t see it happening). If that happened then I wonder if they don’t start looking aggressively to acquire missing pieces as a second round loss would be a huge hit to the Lakers and their basketball world. Maybe they get desperate and we can pry Gasol from them? Bynum?

Dallas, as rumor has it, is disappointed after their second round loss and may be willing to move and acquire some personnel. They could be good trade bait.

"Remember, I'm Italian".

by BCs71 on May 15, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd love Bynum

But I really do worry about the injuries given that he’s still so young and now has 2 bad knees to try to flesh out his full game on. It’s a risk….might be worth the take, but with him heading into BYC and for the money he’s making, it’s a big risk (plus I don’t think Laker Nation trades him just yet).

Would have been great to have Pau in Luol’s place though….damn…

4/30/2009 GAME 6: Joakim Noah is God.

by majoyenrac on May 15, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting.

We could send them Kirk and Tyrus for Pau…the salaries work, the Bulls get their PF while the Lakers potentially get two starters…

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on May 15, 2009 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

nOT HAPPENING

Pau’s not going anywhere, Kobe loves him, he’s a top 5 pf, and did you watch him yesterday, he sealed his spot with la…

4/30/2009 GAME 6: Joakim Noah is God.

by majoyenrac on May 18, 2009 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If they lose

You can bet Kobe goes back into cry baby mode and the front office will be forced to make some moves.

Odom and Ariza will have to be resigned if not they are going to take a step back in terms of talent and depth. They are going to have to trade someone to make that happen unless Lamar takes a major pay cut. They might be forced to move Bynum, Phil isn’t high on the guy and Kobe can’t stand him unless he is playing very well. In order to keep Kobe happen they just might have to ship him out remember they Moved Shaq!!!

by Bullsfanla on May 15, 2009 1:49 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They moved Shaq

But of course everyone would have taken Shaq at that time….and they got a TON for him.

I know Bynum’s young, but he’s really young and already has had 2 bad knee injuries on 2 different knees….and is only 21…..while guys’ll say, yeah but he’s only 21, that sometimes works, but for a big guy who’s come in with that rap and the latest injury, knowing not only does he have these injuries but is struggling to come back from this latest one late season…a 4 year $58M deal will be a lot to trade for in BYC terms…..for a guy with those kinds of issues and the economy and 2010 being the way it is with all the potential quick-fix options, I don’t think it’s a sure deal they COULD trade Bynum….and I think for them it mgiht also be riskier to trade Bynum than to move forward with him……given their market, his age, the signs he’s already shown when healthy and given the Laker Nation potential love of Bynum…

4/30/2009 GAME 6: Joakim Noah is God.

by majoyenrac on May 15, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Laker Nation potential love of Bynum

Is turning and turing quickly out here in LA. The local media is blasting him for his late night partying, making in rain in the club and not speaking with the press. Even Kareem is saying that he isn’t the same kid from last year work ethic maybe he needs a Tyson Chandler change?

by Bullsfanla on May 15, 2009 2:58 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Sad to see it, but it looks like Phil's best coaching days are past him

The last great coaching job was the 05-06 season, where a cast of worthless peons and Kobe Bryant held a 3-1 series lead against the Suns. I guess last season was a good job as well because they were playing very well even before Gasol became a Laker.

Now, they barely run the Triangle Offense and are much more of just a run-n-gun team, and their bench players lack the discipline his teams are usually famous for. Bynum did just return from injury, but he is looking completely useless out there, to the point where DJ Mbenga would probably look better. He continues to give Fisher heavy run even though he’s straight trash.

And, I know the Rockets are a very good defensive team, but Pau Gasol went from being guarded by Yao Ming to a 6’6 Chuck Hayes. No matter how excellent of a defender he is, Gasol should be getting the ball non-stop on the block.

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on May 15, 2009 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is,

and then he’s passing it back out because he’s worthless. :P

"Ben Gordon is a bundle of muscle and clutch. That's all he's made of. Drink BG7 energy drink, you'll grow a pair of balls on your balls."

by Prevenge on May 16, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know that some of us Blazer fans would like to see

Capt. Kirk in a Blazer uni.

My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.

by OCBlazerFan1 on May 15, 2009 3:56 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If you offer Blake and Outlaw...

I’m willing to accept it. Like I said in another post, the Bulls could use Salmons or Outlaw or maybe Deng – I doubt it – in a good package (TT, Miller and picks) to get Bosh. That’s the only player that I really want to see next to Rose in 2009/10

by bull83 on May 15, 2009 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have no issue with that

with Webster coming back, a forward has to leave to clear the logjam.

draft rodrigue beaubois

by Cablinasian on May 16, 2009 2:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think LA would love to acquire Hinrich, but I don’t see what they have to offer.

The team can get better offers elsewhere.

by NBR on May 16, 2009 3:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Blackstar_small
Plan B: if the Bulls fail to sign a FA superstar at the 2 or the 4 spots...
Small
How About A Whole New Plan?
Small
Game Preview #10: Chicago Bulls vs. Los Angeles Lakers
Small
Rose Problem: Trying too hard to please Vinny and "teammates"
Small
Your thought on a GS-Chi Ellis A-R for Kirk TT trade dreams
Noah-thumb-500x401-6596_small
What's going on in Derrick Rose's head?
Drose2_small
what i'd do as GM right now...
Small
The concern about Rose...
Old_logo_gif_small
Game Preview #10: Bulls at Sacramento Kings
Small
The move that no one talks about

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger