The Aftermath of "Game" 3
Okay I've calmed down a bit.
I realize the series is still far from over.
The Bulls still have a shot to pull this off.
In a way I'm kinda glad what happened tonight happened.
The Bulls have been through a crazy past week.
They really think they were a great team who could go all the way.
Which they can, but only if they give 180%.
Anything less will result in a lost.
I think with them having the C's on the ropes and then all the injuries they thought they could just go home and give a meh performance and win. Well guys, no you can't.
And the Bulls seem to have a really poor shooting night as a team every seven games or so. As you would expect with a jump shooting team. This was one of those nights. It appeared as if none of them could throw a rock into the ocean. Better this happens in Game 3 as opposed to Game 6 or 7.
In Game 4 we need:
Some intensity from Derrick. He's been pretty passive since Game 1. It's almost like "okay I proved my point, now let's let my teammates score." He needs to realize he is by far our best player. And he needs to take over.
Tyrus and Noah need to be active. With Boston having so few big men left, not to mention they're all fat pieces of crap/really old/really white (I'm looking at you Scalabrine), we need to make them run and get them in foul trouble. If we force them to play Paul at the 4, we're in good shape.
Kirk Hinrich and Brad Miller have to do something. Our bench should be miles better then the Boston bench. Hinrich and Miller should be > Mikki Moore, Tony Allen, Eddie House, Stephon Marbury. Before Derrick came around Hinrich was a huge factor on the team. So what the hell is going on?
I'm still amazed at the amounts of time I saw Marbury get by Hinrich, who is supposedly a great defender. Stephon freakin Marbury. We need something out them. They can't just come in and play "quality" minutes aka don't do anything, but don't screw up minutes. We need to see them take full advantage of the Boston scrubs when they're out there.
Last but not least. John Salmons needs to learn how to play in the flow of our offense again.
He's starting to do what Gooden and Noch did before we shipped them out. Every couple possessions or so, it becomes a John Salmons possession. He takes the ball and we essentially run an isolation for him and let him play with the ball and "create" his own shot. This does not work. I understand he's trying to tire out Pierce by making him play some defense, but he should know he doesn't need to ball to make Pierce work. Run around through picks and screens instead. By having these Salmons possessions in ruins the Bulls offense flow. They need to stop.
I hope this serves as a massive wake-up call to a young team who needs to realize they need to bring the effort every night, if they want a chance to win this series.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
1 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Rec'd on all points
People complain about Ben but Salmons is a certified ball stopper. A vortex. He needs to stop babysitting the rock and let it move around the court. My turn basketball at its finest right there.
Tyrus and Noah have be 100% engaged and active rebounding. Tyrus totally lost focus in Game 3. We need at least 14-18 pts/8 boards out him.
Derrick needs to attack the Boston bigs when they come out on the perimeter. Attack, attack, attack while still maintaining control
Hinrich needs to tighten up, Starbury who hasn’t played in a year burnt him like yesterday’s toast on numerous occassions. Unacceptable.
Brad has been playing like garbage, he has no energy and is slower than usual. Limit his minutes to 20 at most.
We will win Game 4, but we lost the series when we lost Game 2.
by C Smoove on Apr 24, 2009 12:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Bulls won a lot of games with Salmons one on one
He does that a lot, and he is good at it. I think his groin slowed him but the Bulls are relying on him to work over Pierce. The Bulls offense most of the time is just one on one, with ball stoppers doing their thing. Salmons looked ok right away and made a concerted effort to wear on Pierce, but then Pierce turned the tables and worked Salmons straight out of the game. Pierce is just a better shooter/ big game performer than Salmons with an injured groin.
Since the Bulls don’t have much offensive strategy, I don’t know that dumping this on Salmons is really the right thing totally. I think the Bulls since his groin injury found other ways to score, and maybe game 3 they wanted John to be that same old player he was and they got too far away from the success they had on offense post-groin pull of Salmons.
Someone else or some other scheme needs to be used to take Pierce out of his game. That is my complaint here . Salmons in his current state can’t be that guy.
"Remember, I'm Italian".
by BCs71 on Apr 24, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying he can never go one on one, cuz your right he is good at it.
It seems like the whole first quarter was the Pierce vs Salmons show.
And although I hate to make the comparison cuz he’s way better, but Salmons has fallen in love with his shot like Hughes did. Both of them are capable of attacking the basket, but for whatever reason they rather hit contested jumpers or fadaways. If you are gonna take shots, take high percentage ones. Go to the hoop and draw the foul. I know his groin might hamper his aggressiveness, but if he’s not able to go then he should play. Put Tyrus at SF, or Kirk.
If the groin is effecting Salmons that much it might be better to bench him. Personally I think they should have given him Game 1 off at least, maybe Game 2, that way with the way the playoffs are scheduled he would have had a long rest and maybe it would have gotten better.
by Edicus2288i on Apr 24, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Bulls are fine
Every team goes flat once in a while. Maybe it had to do with their being the trendy Eastern Conference Finals pick for every expert the past few days, who knows. But on paper we’re about as good as the Celtics, and with home court advantage we’re better. Tyrus has to win the battle over Glen Davis, though – Tyrus has been awful so far.
by YaoPau on Apr 24, 2009 3:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I just don't get it
How are the Bulls’ bigs allowing the Celtics’ bigs look so good? Tyrus/Noah/and a non-overplayed Brad Miller are better than the badly depleted lineup the Celts have right now.
"Remember, I'm Italian".
by BCs71 on Apr 24, 2009 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Noah and Miller are doing fine
I think Tyrus is a mediocre on-ball defender and it’s shown this series. Perkins and Mikki Moore haven’t done much.
by YaoPau on Apr 25, 2009 2:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
People were seriously picking that?
Who and where? I haven’t been watching tv.
by Camry on Apr 25, 2009 1:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was frequently discussed after Game 1
I’m not sure what percentage of talking heads actually changed their pick.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Apr 25, 2009 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the money
It looked to me like Boston was running one of their bigs at the ball no matter who had it, and we responded by throwing the ball away like jr high players. If they’re overplaying the outside game, we have to burn them inside. Noah was all over the glass; it seemed like he had 20 boards by halftime. TT had that one gigantic dunk, and then wasn’t a factor.
by California Al on Apr 26, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs













