Ben Gordon
Wow, just started reading this site, amazed to find all the love for Ben Gordon. Just out of curiosity, does anybody here realize it's impossible to win a title when your 6 '3 shooting guard plays some of the worst defense in the NBA? Or when he is the definition of a "streak shooter?" Look at title teams from the last 10 years; Heat, Pistons, Spurs, Lakers, what do they all have in common? They all had steady/elite, dependable, tall 2 guards who could guard a variety of players, hit clutch jumpers, be counted on for at least 20 every night, and score from all areas on the floor. The only one of these who played questionable defense was Ginobili, but he makes up for this deficiency with his heart, and other worldly play making abilities and creativity. Gordon, on the other hand, is an atrocious defender, can't guard anybody in the league, is semi-clutch, will score 40 one night and 4 the next, has a questionable desire to win, and is very limited in what he can do offensively. For 5 million off the bench and some scoring punch, I love him. But for 10 mil in the starting lineup, GOOD RIDDANCE. I can't wait to be rid of his bonehead turnovers, selfish play, and black hole over dribbling. Ben Gordon will NEVER start on a title team, and anybody who thinks otherwise is either an idiot or doesn't know shit about basketball. I can't wait to see him get 25 a game for the 25-57 Kings next year. How many fucking games has this clown lost us singlehandedly? Against the Lakers, when he was in the lineup, whoever he was guarding would go off, whether it was Kobe, Ariza, or Farmar. Ya, he'll get you points, but very inconsistently, and nowhere near enough to compensate for his defense. Even the games he does score 40, WE LOSE, because the way he goes about getting his points is just detrimental to the team. The guy is just the definition of garbage and has gotten worse every year. Now, I'm sure some zitty ass stat geek who only watches games on ESPN gamecast will counter with Gordon's VORP or his Adjusted Clutch True Shooting Percentage Volume Ratio Per 40 Minutes or some other meaningless stat that I don't give a fuck about, but the fact is, he is garbage, watch 2 minutes of a game and it's obvious. Let's ride out the John Salmons Era and either draft Derozan/Harden/Henderson/Turner/Evans or another TRUE, tall, versatile shooting guard, add that elite big man through free agency, and trot out that Rose, Henderson, Deng, Noah, Bosh lineup with Hinrich, Tyrus, and Dejuan Blair, Jodie Meeks possibly, and maybe even Brad Miller discounted coming off the bench in a few years. That, my friends, is a team that can run, play halfourt, rebound, defend, run n gun, or thug it out, AKA a TITLE CONTENDER. I forgot to mention that all of this is contingent upon getting rid of Vinny of the Blacks and hiring a coach who has at least 4th grade diagramming capabilities.
-RG
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
71 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Get ready for the
“Oh yeah dude.. well he averages 20 points a game. Pay him anything he wants” comments
"Whenever Kirk/Ben are in together. Kirk turns into a crappy player, because he tries to freeze Gordon out of the offense." - Andrew7
glad you want to throw your lot in with this guy.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 24, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions
I didn't know that God was a starting-quality NBA 2 guard.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
He was. He used to wear number 23 for our Bulls. Ask Larry Bird.
:D
Stats with contextual observations, good. Stats with no context, bad. Anecdotal observations unsupported by data, the worst.
by fundamentallysound on Mar 25, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Strong argument!
"Now, I’m sure some zitty ass stat geek who only watches games on ESPN gamecast will counter with Gordon’s VORP or his Adjusted Clutch True Shooting Percentage Volume Ratio Per 40 Minutes or some other meaningless stat that I don’t give a fuck about, but the fact is, he is garbage, watch 2 minutes of a game and it’s obvious. "
I disagree with you.
…
Oh shit, your argument falls apart.
I mean, you have some valid points [though it should be noted that the Spurs’ starting guard was Michael Finley[I think?], and Ginobli comes off the bench]. But some points that aren’t even really worth discussing … like saying that we lose more when Gordon scores a bunch of points.
Gordon isn’t a black hole – he misses open people, but with this scheme [i.e. ’let’s all run around and score’] EVERYBODY does, and I haven’t seen him being overly ballhog-ish.
Just curious, though – would you rather have Hinrich start at the 2 than Gordon?
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Mar 24, 2009 1:34 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Hes against gordon
he MUST be a hinrich fan…..they are devious like that you know…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
Not that he's a hinrich fan or not,
just that Hinrich isn’t a good 2-guard, and we don’t have other options.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
Well lets start breaking this down.
For starters, your statement of
Now, I’m sure some zitty ass stat geek who only watches games on ESPN gamecast will counter with Gordon’s VORP or his Adjusted Clutch True Shooting Percentage Volume Ratio Per 40 Minutes or some other meaningless stat that I don’t give a fuck about, but the fact is, he is garbage, watch 2 minutes of a game and it’s obvious
You make being educated seem like a bad thing. If you want to place a lack of value on education, you are free to do so, that is obvious from your inability to develop any sort of well thought out argument, going to the faithful “He is garbage, watch 2 mintues of a game and it’s obvious.” argument.
First, you make the claim that Ben Gordon cannot be the starting shooting guard on a championship team. You claim it is because he plays some of the worst defense in the league, so I assume you are making the argument that Ben Gordon cannot be the starting shooting guard on a championship team because the team will not be able to be good enough defensively to win a championship.
Now this argument is obviously not valid. This is clearly debunked by the fact that Gordon logged heavy minutes, starting more than half the games on the best defensive team in the league in 2006-2007. Surely the best defensive team in the league has good enough defense to win a championship….that is provided the offense is good enough of course.
Now you make the claim that Gordon is only semi-clutch. This is simply not true. Ben Gordon is clutch. Since entering the league, only two players, Lebron James and Kobe Bryant have hit more game winners than Ben Gordon. Gordon hits game winners at a higher percentage than both of them. Gordon is at 13 career game winners. If Gordon were to sign a six year deal with the Bulls, he would be on pace to break Michael Jordan’s record for most game winners as a Bull by 3-4 game winners. How is he only semi-clutch again?
Now you also make the claim that Ben Gordon is a black hole. Ben Gordon has ~23.3 plays per a game. Gordon uses 76.3% of his plays to make an attempt to score. That seems quite high on the surface, but let’s now compare.
Derrick Rose uses 76.5% of his plays to make an attempt to score. And that’s your point guard. Luol Deng 74.4. John Salmons 81.
How about moving the two real black holes on the team, Derrick Rose and John Salmons! Ben Gordon is a scorer, it’s his job to score, so a high percentage of his plays should be used looking to score, given that he’s a very efficient scorer. Same with John Salmons. But obviously Gordon is no more of a black hole than Rose or Salmons….and I don’t think either of those 2 are blackholes.
You make the claim that the Bulls lost the Miami game because the way Gordon scores his points is detrimental to the team. Please tell me in what world is scoring 18 points in the fourth, including your team’s final 15 points of the quarter detrimental to the team?
You also claim that Gordon is an inconsistent scorer. This is another completely false claim.
Ben Gordon has a standard deviation in points this season of 7.58620574. Joe Johnson? 7.08423186. Tony Parker? 8.77906915. Vince Carter? 8.83439483. Dwight Howard? 7.53150338. Paul Pierce? 8.32313247. David West? 6.7277062. Al Harrington? 8.199799. Jason Terry? 6.81492255.
Four of those guys have been more consistent than Gordon, four have not. This is not a random assortment of players. These are the 4 guys above Gordon in PPG and the 4 guys below him for comparisons sake. Gordon is hardly inconsistent.
But what is Gordon? He is the greatest young three point shooter ever. At 745 career three pointers, Ben Gordon is just 6 three pointers away from breaking Nick Van Exel’s record for most three pointers made in the first five years of their career. And it’s not just because he jacks up a lot of shots…like Van Exel did. It’s because he’s accurate. Of the guys in the top 100 on this list, only two, Mark Price and Hubert Davis, have a higher three point percentage, and both of them made less than half of the number of three pointers Gordon made.
Also, as noted by opposing announcers, Gordon is top five in the NBA in fastbreak scoring this season. Aren’t we trying to build a fast pace system here? One of the best fast break scorers in the NBA who can also hit the long ball seems like a natural fit in such a system. But that’s just me.
So welcome to blog a bull.
Chicago Bulls Blog and Forums. NBA Power Rankings.
by Andrew7 on Mar 24, 2009 1:50 AM CDT reply actions 5 recs
Well lets start breaking this down.
For starters, your statement of
“Now, I’m sure some zitty ass stat geek who only watches games on ESPN gamecast will counter with Gordon’s VORP or his Adjusted Clutch True Shooting Percentage Volume Ratio Per 40 Minutes or some other meaningless stat that I don’t give a fuck about, but the fact is, he is garbage, watch 2 minutes of a game and it’s obvious”
You make being educated seem like a bad thing. If you want to place a lack of value on education, you are free to do so, that is obvious from your inability to develop any sort of well thought out argument, going to the faithful "He is garbage, watch 2 mintues of a game and it’s obvious." argument.
First, you make the claim that Ben Gordon cannot be the starting shooting guard on a championship team. You claim it is because he plays some of the worst defense in the league, so I assume you are making the argument that Ben Gordon cannot be the starting shooting guard on a championship team because the team will not be able to be good enough defensively to win a championship.
Now this argument is obviously not valid. This is clearly debunked by the fact that Gordon logged heavy minutes, starting more than half the games on the best defensive team in the league in 2006-2007. Surely the best defensive team in the league has good enough defense to win a championship….that is provided the offense is good enough of course.
Now you make the claim that Gordon is only semi-clutch. This is simply not true. Ben Gordon is clutch. Since entering the league, only two players, Lebron James and Kobe Bryant have hit more game winners than Ben Gordon. Gordon hits game winners at a higher percentage than both of them. Gordon is at 13 career game winners. If Gordon were to sign a six year deal with the Bulls, he would be on pace to break Michael Jordan’s record for most game winners as a Bull by 3-4 game winners. How is he only semi-clutch again?
Now you also make the claim that Ben Gordon is a black hole. Ben Gordon has ~23.3 plays per a game. Gordon uses 76.3% of his plays to make an attempt to score. That seems quite high on the surface, but let’s now compare.
Derrick Rose uses 76.5% of his plays to make an attempt to score. And that’s your point guard. Luol Deng 74.4. John Salmons 81.
How about moving the two real black holes on the team, Derrick Rose and John Salmons! Ben Gordon is a scorer, it’s his job to score, so a high percentage of his plays should be used looking to score, given that he’s a very efficient scorer. Same with John Salmons. But obviously Gordon is no more of a black hole than Rose or Salmons….and I don’t think either of those 2 are blackholes.
You make the claim that the Bulls lost the Miami game because the way Gordon scores his points is detrimental to the team. Please tell me in what world is scoring 18 points in the fourth, including your team’s final 15 points of the quarter detrimental to the team?
You also claim that Gordon is an inconsistent scorer. This is another completely false claim.
Ben Gordon has a standard deviation in points this season of 7.58620574. Joe Johnson? 7.08423186. Tony Parker? 8.77906915. Vince Carter? 8.83439483. Dwight Howard? 7.53150338. Paul Pierce? 8.32313247. David West? 6.7277062. Al Harrington? 8.199799. Jason Terry? 6.81492255.
Four of those guys have been more consistent than Gordon, four have not. This is not a random assortment of players. These are the 4 guys above Gordon in PPG and the 4 guys below him for comparisons sake. Gordon is hardly inconsistent.
But what is Gordon? He is the greatest young three point shooter ever. At 745 career three pointers, Ben Gordon is just 6 three pointers away from breaking Nick Van Exel’s record for most three pointers made in the first five years of their career. And it’s not just because he jacks up a lot of shots…like Van Exel did. It’s because he’s accurate. Of the guys in the top 100 on this list, only two, Mark Price and Hubert Davis, have a higher three point percentage, and both of them made less than half of the number of three pointers Gordon made.
Also, as noted by opposing announcers, Gordon is top five in the NBA in fastbreak scoring this season. Aren’t we trying to build a fast pace system here? One of the best fast break scorers in the NBA who can also hit the long ball seems like a natural fit in such a system. But that’s just me.
So welcome to blog a bull.
Chicago Bulls Blog and Forums. NBA Power Rankings.
by Andrew7 on Mar 24, 2009 1:51 AM CDT up reply actions 11 recs
Damn Andrew7.
That was quite the smackdown right there!!!
by lexdiamonds0730 on Mar 24, 2009 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions
Give em hell Andrew! LOL
Some guys aren’t going to like BG no matter what. It’s starting to get into Rex Grossman territory around here when it comes to BG. It really brings out the meathead fans that really aren’t concerned with letting logic, common sense, and facts get in their way. Then on top of that, they have nothing of intelligence and substance to offer to back up their point of view. I’ve disagreed with people here about Gordon, Deng, TYrus, and Hinrich. But mostly everyone has an opinion that we can agree to be disagreeable about. That’s what this forum is suppose to be about but the name calling along with not knowing what in the world he/she is talking about is getting old.
by Dils on Mar 24, 2009 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
RIght on
Ben Gordon often is our difference maker from a surefire loss to a win. We’ve tried going the route of Thabo, Kirk, Larry un-legend and look without Gordon’s instant offense at times of need, our team has suffered badly.
Folks rag on him for his defense, but you have to remember he’s an elite scorer in this league. Sure the 20 PPG doesn’t quite seem elite, but when you remove FT’s (which have a superstar bias) and consider shot attempts, he’s more effective on less shots than the Kobe’s, Wades, Lebron’s, Paul Pierces. Sure they score more, but they shoot more…..and tend to get the ticky tack or hack fouls that oddly Ben doesn’t get.
Derrick and Ben get fouled a lot more often than they get the calls made. We hope all the ROY press and emerging press for Derrick helps correct this in the future, but BG’s odd no calls (at least 2 a game) are astounding.
He’s a remarkably efficient scorer, can be a bit streaky, but is consistently putting up solid numbers throughout the games, hell he’s had what maybe 5 bad games all year? He beats his opponent more often than not and is completely underrated.
The Bulls with Gordon can compete against any team at times…..
The Bulls without Gordon are no better than 13th-14th in the East….it’s fair and simple.
Add that we expect Derrick to explode, and given Ben’s speed and trickery on the offensive end at getting shots (that crazy well guarded shot against Jarvis yesterday where Ben was being blanketed then made a quick adjustment like he was going to go in for a drive only to get a foot of separation and pull off a nice shot, was standard fare for BG).
Our team has floundered because of the Ben Wallace flop signing and the lack of trades until this deadline, coupled iwth godawful coaching of he who must not be named and severe rookie coaching of Del Negro (such as why was BG siting from the start of the 4th until under the 4 minute mark yesterday, wasn’t Vinny watching that we pulled away with BG on the court, and Gordon scored 14 pts for us in the 3rd quarter).
Ben Gordon isn’t a first tier all star because of his defensive deficiencies, but he is in the should be an all star player in the 2nd tier, as effective as others in that era, yet oddly folks rag on him more for him not being MJ than a player with his skills deserves.
Hell, even to me a constant BG supporter, he has turnovers and seems a bad turnover guy, but he has less turnovers per game than the guys I mentioned above (Wade, Lebron, Pierce and is at least equal with Kobe)…..Ben doens’t get the ticky tack foul calls that go his way that those guys get, whcih might save a TO for him either…..And add in that he serves as a “brunt of the offense guy” in the clutch much as those above do, and yet isn’t as ineffcient with ball handling as they are…..it’s just that Ben’s turnovers are mostly unforced caused from overdribbling, that make him seem worse.
Ben Gordon, perhaps still the most underrated player in the NBA. Not a superstar, but he’s a star folks, and will make his next team very happy…..and will make us Bulls fans upset when he leaves…..
by majoyenrac on Mar 24, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I agree with everything you just said
I have a weird feeling BG will be back. If BG realizes what he cant get on the open market and Pax realizes that you can’t easily replace his skill set, he’ll be back. The question is Deng. Pax may try to move him, if not Then let’s all hope he’s back to 2006 form and then we can platoon Salmons and Gordon at the 2.
I hope he's back
I just don’t see any way we can pull it off (the necessary trade, etc) given this economy. I mean I know we can pull anything off if we traded Rose, but Derrick is going to be our best player very very soon and will be in the LBJ, CP3, Wade stratosphere…..he’s not going anywhere.
I really don't think his defense is all that bad either...but I really can't argue it much.
Aside from a mismatch most of the guys who’ve went off on the Bulls were front court players though.
When
focused, his man to man is adequate, problem is every game you’ll see Ben not trying to rotate or focus on D and it costs us pts. But the other fact is that he much more often than not beats his counterpart on D (though sometimes he isn’t asked to guard the 2 spot)…
°__° Yeah I just always thought he seemed kinda
well like a lot of players seem to defend I think theres a lot of players that aren’t that strong in that department or sold. So to me hes practically an average defender but 6’1.
But I can see anyone saying otherwise of course.
Qualitative reasoning.
That percentage of plays attempting to score statistic is pretty absurd; what kind of normalized methodology could ever be proposed to make sense of that conceptual mess? Occam’s Razor, please.
So you are saying
BG isn’t asked to be our main scorer down the stretch for like 85% of his tenure as a Bull….? THe only time he wasn’t was during our losing streak where we tried to have Rose force the ball every game down the stretch in the middle of this year…..which I like in principle, and I like Rose having the ball, but don’t like that it was Rose, you shoot no matter what unless say a post guy gets wide open as a complete last resort….Bulls had a bad losing streak in that stretch to boot.
BG’s a killer when it counts…..and has been for years.
That’s the normalized methodology. How about BG as a rookie leading the league in 4th qtr scoring for you math geeks out there….that’s his role.
It's not qualitative.
It’s quantitative. Usage % attempts to show what percentage of a team’s play a certain player takes.
You simply multiply that by the team’s total posessions in a game to see how many plays a game a given player gets.
Then you simply do FGA + FTA*.44 / Player’s # of Plays to get the percentage of plays the player tried to score on. Turnovers are indeterminate when looking at this, you’d have to go back and watch the games to make a determination of whether the turnover ws in an attempt to score. And then the remainder, after FGA/FT + Turnovers would be plays where the player was passing the ball.
Chicago Bulls Blog and Forums. NBA Power Rankings.
Typo: Replace quantitative with qualitative.
What I mean is if BG dribbles from 16 left on the clock until 4 left on the clock, probing to score and then passing afterward, that should be considered an attempt. If he drives into the lane going straight into the basket only to meet a planted defender and then kicks it out to a covered man, then that should be considered an attempt. If BG were to facilitate a play, allowing for his teammate to get a shot attempt and then after they miss, scores; his percentage is skewed in the opposite direction.
What of the definition of possession? Should we consider simply the changes in ball possession or the restarting of the shot clock? One could easily imagine BG passing the ball to someone who shoots with a few seconds to go on the clock, only for it to be rebounded and for the set to be restarted; where after this moment he scores. Clearly in some cases the restarting of the shot clock does nothing to context, but in other cases it does. Which conception of “play” do we privilege? And even here you used two terms, play and possession, words with related but different meanings; this is a reduction.
Obviously, it would be unreasonable for a statistic to encapsulate such potentials; but that does not delegitimize the request, it reveals the limitation of statistics.
The advanced statistic is used to argue any number of points but cannot do so definitively, though it is often posited to do such. When arguing against simple stats or arguments of experience, the “math geek” (not my term) proposes these ‘more accurate’ statistics as being truly representative, despite the obvious linguistic paradox inherent.
Qualitatively—and I apologize for my earlier mistake—the statistic is muddled. Do not take this as a claim that statistics are useless; just that there is a clear exertion of power, embodied in statistics that is extremely suffocating.
Hold it Andrew...Rose has the choice to shoot or defer if he wants to and passing it to douches...
does not make him a black hole….when they fuck up his assists.
Well, I think he did
Derrick Rose uses 76.5% of his plays to make an attempt to score. And that’s your point guard. Luol Deng 74.4. John Salmons 81.
How about moving the two real black holes on the team, Derrick Rose and John Salmons!
But then he goes on to say
Ben Gordon is a scorer, it’s his job to score, so a high percentage of his plays should be used looking to score, given that he’s a very efficient scorer. Same with John Salmons. But obviously Gordon is no more of a black hole than Rose or Salmons….and I don’t think either of those 2 are black holes.
Considering his screen name...
is BG gives Bjs….I think we knew what this poster’s agenda was. Do I think BG can be the best player on a championship team…no…But that doesnt make it his fault that the team is flawed. That’s the biggest mistake people seem to make…blaming Ben for the flaws the team has overall. If you can honestly sit here and tell me that this current team would have a better record without BG…then I can honestly say I would slap the shit out of you for such an idotic point of view.
by Ayeljay54 on Mar 24, 2009 1:54 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Does the name ANDREW TONEY ring any bells with you?
Toney was the 6’3" shooting guard on the 1983 World Champion 76ers. He was A LOT like Ben Gordon except that he shot a higher percentage from inside the 3 pt. line while Gordon shoots the trey better. But they are in the same mold.
As for the common thread amongs the last 10 champions….it’s that they all had Hall of Fame talent leading them and/or they all had a dominant front lines (except for the Bulls championship teams and the Miami Heat…but Dwyane Wade put on one of the 5 greatest finals performances in NBA History). Forget about the last 10 champions…go look at the last 30 champions. In that span the only teams who were UNDENIABLY spearheaded by superstar shooting guards were the Bulls, the Miami Heat, the Pistons in the late 80’s with Isiah and Joe D., and the 79’ Sonics who were led by Gus “The Wizard” Wiliams, Dennis Johnson and “Downtown” Freddie Brown who were all about 6’3".
So get your shit together buddy before you go telling people they don’t know shit about the game.
I’ll add you to the crowd that bashes Gordon for being as average a defender as about 23 other starting 2 guards in the NBA.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Mar 24, 2009 7:59 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
"Wow, just started reading"
next step: writing!
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 24, 2009 9:36 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
is it just a coincidence that most posts that deride BG ...
are written like someone mashed a keyboard with two oversized novelty mallets?
I say no.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 24, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yes.
You should also reset your sig.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
man this post had no chance
The only monster here is the gambling monster that has enslaved your mother! I call him Gamblor, and it's time to snatch your mother from his neon claws!!
It would be really nice if we could all agree to drop the
“Can’t win a championship with ________ as your ________” argument. Without taking the time to go back and analyze it, I’d still be willing to bet money that there has been a championship team with an average to below average player for each of the positions.
The closer to correct argument would be that you can’t win a championship with ___________ as your _________, and no studs at other positions." And the correct answer may be to upgrade at that spot, but it also may be to upgrade at a weaker spot and be glad you have a guy that is well above average at at least one position. All the Bulls currently in the rotation could be a starter or key reserve for a championship team, it just depends on the combination of 5 guys starting and the coach putting them in the position to be successful.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Mar 24, 2009 12:04 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
the shame of this is
that it was probably written by a BaB regular, who lacked the… bravado to publishi it under his or her own name.
Don't Taz me bro'!
by robingoodfellow on Mar 24, 2009 2:18 PM CDT reply actions
Are you ok man?
Do you need something? A glass of water, a pill or something else? Because, the furious way that you wrote this post, indicates that you’re not ok… Or that BG did something bad to you, like didn’t gave you an autograph, or his shirt, or who knows what…
I was wondering if you have stats about how many games did we lose and won with BG scoring 40 points… If you show me those numbers, and they prove you’re correct, I will keep my mouth shut. If you don’t, well, don’t write what ever comes to your head…
Bulls are 2-2 when Gordon scores 40.
An overtime win over the Bucks and a 6 point victory over Miami in the wins.
A 3 point loss to Miami on a Dwyane Wade buzzer beater and a 1 point loss to Phoenix on a Leandro Barbosa game winner in the other loss.
Chicago Bulls Blog and Forums. NBA Power Rankings.
I wonder if this is the same guy that made this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QX4DvXFZh4c
Chicago Bulls Blog and Forums. NBA Power Rankings.
oh my god that video is so retarded
but hilarious in its ridiculousness.
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
it's hilarious
either a retarded shot at Ben or ingenious satire..
the Chicago Bulls: Where Aaron Gray Travelling Slightly Back in Time on Every Possession Happens
I guess I shouldn't of been surprised the way some responded
Cause I wouldn’t be surprised if someone took a shot at Ben.
But that video was too funny I can’t see how anyone could take it seriously.
great
it’s nice to see so many people don’t know jack shit about basketball. And what a surprise! 20 separate posts bringing meaningless geeky no pussy getting stats. I have nothing against being educated. Memorizing stats does not equate to being educated, just to being really gay. Like I said, get off the computer, get out of mom’s basement, watch, or god forbid, PLAY some basketball, and learn what the game is all about. 3 point jackers who stall the offense and don’t contribute in any single other way on the court do no win. This is true at the playgrounds, in high school, in college, and in the pros. You win with well rounded players who can do anything that is asked of them on the floor. Your Friendly Bulls Blogger, great post, you’re soooooooo witty brother! As for my contention that we lose when he scores a lot, and everybody’s contestion of that claim, here’s a fun fact, in the 11 games that gordon has cored at least 28 points, we’re 3-8! Don’t believe me, look it up stat geeks, have a ball. The only valid post opposing me was the gentleman who brought up the 83’ sixers, but that’s one team in 26 years and a different era. I mean, the proof is in the pudding. When Ben the Black Hole came off the bench, we were a gritty, defensive, big hearted team who needed his scoring punch off the bench and in the 4th. Ever since he jointed the starting lineup, our team began to decline. But thank god for his 20 a game, too bad 50 other players in the league can do that. And for the record, I think Hinrich’s a piece of shit as well. Too bad we’re stuck with his contract. As for the gentleman who claimed I had an agenda. Well, hats off to you, sir, you are truly observant. I joined this site for one reason and one reason only, I’m offended by stupidity, and defending Ben Gordon as an NBA starter is BEYOND stupid. How’s that for articulate YFBB, I’ll verbally abuse you any day of the week. Also for the record, Gordon as a 5 mil bench player is great. Unfortunately, he thinks that G in his last name is a J.
wow, you managed to hit all the talking points
without a single stroke of the return key. Now you may turn the word ‘stroke’ into a gay joke, and call it a verbal smackdown.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 24, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
o
and I’m not saying that by removing BG, we’re all of a sudden a title contender, so don’t put words in my mouth to sensationalize and deride my beautiful argument. What I’m saying, is that for 10 mil a year, we can get much better. The way I see it, if we’re not going into the luxury tax, we have room for one max player, 2 10-15 mil players, and then role players. Well, we’ve already burned up one of those 10-15 spots, by making Gordon the other, that means we’re stuck with this team, and this team ain’t doing shit. Let Gordon walk, draft a big, defensive, versatile shooting guard, there’s a plethora of them this year, sign that max big, and contend for a title.
He's clutch
against the wizards. Against the lakers, magic, pistons, it becomes time for him to shoot airballs and dribble off his foot.
Missed the Rockets game, eh?
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
"No pussy getting stats"
This is the greatest satirical post ever in the history of the internets.
Also comical that a guy is calling people out as nerds, but has the time to write like a 3 page essay on why Ben Gordon sucks. But, you, Super Awesome Baller had the time to create an account, log on, post this, then read all the replies and write some more? I hope you don’t get banned, it will just be fun to read shit that my 6 year old cousin knows is wrong.
Confusion breeds success. If they don't know each other, opponents can't have strategy. GENIUS.
last post ever
It takes 5 minutes and his fun to prove to people that they are idiots. Creating the post, loggin on, posting the replies, is all beyond worth it and fun for me. Fuck, I’d write a damn doctoral dissertation on the topic if I felt like it. Snide obnoxious remarks are traits of the friendless and bitter, Ozzie Montana, and frankly, I find them ugly. I learned a lot about the blogosphere in the last 24 hours. I particularly loved the part where people are like, “Listen asshole, why the fuck are you so fuckin pissed off about gordon, leave him the fuck alone, lighten up before i slap the shit out of you,” or, “show me the stat about our record when he scores a lot,” and then I reply with, 3-8 when he scores at least 28. So, I leave you all with the bitter feeling of being proven retarded, but don’t sweat it kids, keep your chins up, keep on chuggin, and one day you’ll say something smart. So now I ride off into the sunset, championing the arguments of the minorities, leaving you all to fume amongst yourselves, my work here being done.
Bulls are 24-18 when Gordon scores 30 or more points.
Now lets not even look at stats.
Lets just watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQqu7Nhy3Fk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Hb48p_2vg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2okxHW6cGfQ
I’m watching, but it’s been over 2 minutes, and it’s not self evident that Gordon is garbage.
Chicago Bulls Blog and Forums. NBA Power Rankings.
"friendless and bitter"
::raises hand::
Also, I’m glad the minorities are benefiting from your work, as the gays seem to be left in the cold.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 24, 2009 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions
actual last post
I’m sorry when i’m just continually insulted i can’t resists responding.
Just to clarify:
-The bulls are 3-8 when the blackhole scores at least 28 THIS YEAR, not in his career. Coming off the bench and scoring against second units he was a sparkplug, jacking up shots as a starter he has become a black hole.
Starting Shooting Guards on championship winning teams since 1996 (excluding the lockout year):
Michael Jordan (96-98)
Kobe Bryant (2000-2002)
Manu Ginobili (2003)
Rip Hamilton (2004)
Ginobili (2005)
Dwyane Wade (2006)
Michael Finley/Ginobili (2007)
Ray Allen (2008)
Ben Gordon will never in his life come close to any of those guards. I won’t even compare him to God, but as for KB, Ginobili, Hamilton, Wade, Finley, and Allen, they are all tall, versatile, can score from anywhere on the floor, are not complacent foot dribblers, and PLAY D!!!! With Gordon as your starter, who’s guarding Kobe or Ray Allen in crunch time???
Also to clarify:
Homosexual: A man/woman who is attracted to a member of the same sex.
I have absolutely nothing against homosexuals, and am a champion in their crusade from equality, and frankly, I find no need for a term that differentiates between them and other human beings, thus, homosexual isn’t in my vocabulary.
Gay/Fag: One who uses snide petty low blows on internet message boards, who has only briefly made contact with other human beings, who gets their panties in a bunch when an NBA athlete who they have never met is insulted, who in true hipocratic fashion thinks that making obnoxious sarcastic insults is different from straight up like a man calling somebody a dumbass, and who, when a male, possesses the womanly trait of taking everything personal and getting sand in their vagina when disagreed with.
Being gay and being homosexual are 2 different things.
For example,
Harvey Milk=Homosexual
Your Friendly Bulls Blogger, who sent me a warning that started out being really funny and actually almost earned him some respect but then flamed out into obnoxious sarcasm=gay
So Gordon can't, under any circumstance be part of a championship team?
Say in the offseason, the Bulls trade Tyrus Thomas, Jerome James, and Tim Thomas plus the two first rounders, and $3 million cash for Amare Stoudemire. Then trade Luol Deng for Travis Outlaw.
Then Derrick Rose makes the sophomore leap into a superstar.
And the Bulls have:
PG-Derrick Rose/Kirk Hinrich
Sg-Ben Gordon/Kirk Hinrich
SF-John Salmons/Travis Outlaw
PF-Amare Stoudemire/Joakim Noah
C- Joakim Noah/Brad Miller
As our main 8 man rotation.
That team looks like it could have championship level talent. I think they would be in contention for a championship. But having Gordon on it will prevent them from doing so you’re saying?
Chicago Bulls Blog and Forums. NBA Power Rankings.
Wow, good job both redefining words and bending stats obnoxiously
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
too bad HOMOSEXUALS (or most people with common sense)
don’t see the difference between the 3 words.
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
You have at least 5 current or future Hall of Famers on that list.
There are a LOT of guys who won’t come close to any of those guards and there is no shame whatsoever in it. Again though, like I said in an earlier post, look at the teammates of these guys you name above. With the exception of MJ, they all had dominant frontlines or a Hall of Famer somewhere on their frontline…and like I told you before, dominant front lines or Hall of Fame big men win championships. Very rarely do any of the backcourt guys spearhead the title runs (it has happened but FAR more often there is a big guy responsible).
There are so many variables to this whole thing for you to single out Gordon the way you have.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Mar 25, 2009 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions
so you're just anti-women then?
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 25, 2009 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Don't forget the immortals: Sean Elliot, Stephen Jackson, and Vernon Maxwell
Confusion breeds success. If they don't know each other, opponents can't have strategy. GENIUS.
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 25, 2009 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Heh, don't touch mad max.
He was my favourite player :-)
The Game chose him !
I wish there was an "unrec" option for this FanPost.
Mrs. O’Leary’s cow got a more fair rap than Ben Gordon.
Maybe we can?

by 













