Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Uga VII, Requiescat in Pace: A Tribute to a Damn Good 'Dawg

Bulls complete road trip 4-3, there's still been no trade

The Bulls are certainly playing better, back at that level where they lose close games to pretty good teams, like Saturday night against Dallas.

Vinny's still doing odd things down the stretch of games, like playing Andres Nocioni and benching Ben Gordon. Bulls need points down the stretch, and their best scorer isn't out there. It's big-picture bad as well, since it's basically pushing Gordon out the door, and it's not like it's been a winning strategy anyway. I truly don't why Vinny sees Hinrich as a late-game crutch (he's not some kind of shut-down defender), and judging by Vinny's comments I can only assume that when Drew Gooden gets back he'll be deployed the same way.

But that's somewhat minor Vinnyness, something that could be helped with a freaking trade. The kind we've been waiting for all season.

It could (and perhaps should) be as easy as shuffling some bench pieces. Get a 3rd big man not named Drew Gooden, get Hinrich (back to being sick of him already, though mostly the fault of Vinny's loving gaze) and Noc's contracts off the books. The usual.

Or the not-so-usual: trading for Amare Stoudemire.

It's been rampant discussion here the past few days, and I think the Bulls are in a good position to deal. It's a problem trying to figure out what the Suns value most (contending this season? expiring contracts? expiring 2010 contracts? young players? cheap players? shedding their own long-term contracts?), but the Bulls can offer a lot of combinations that could make it worth the Suns while no matter their intentions.

And while he's not a perfect player, I think Amare is the caliber of player that's worth pairing with Derrick Rose at the expense of everyone not named Derrick Rose. Not that all the non-Rose Bulls should all be packaged together, but I wouldn't hold off on anyone as a starting point. Again, it's more what the Suns could want. For instance I'd discuss Deng, but the Suns might not want a long-term contract even though Deng is the best young (non-Rose) player the Bulls have.

What makes the most sense is having the 'young forward' be Tyrus Thomas. As much as I value not only Thomas' potential but his current production, he seems the best piece from both teams' standpoints. For a team that needs defense and already has Shaq clogging up the middle, Tyrus could do real damage. He's already a plus defender and has all-nba type talent on that end, but for Amare I'd be fine watching that blossom for some other team. (and reportedly the Suns are 'most intrigued' by Thomas)

It also means that Joakim Noah stays as the defensive big who can play alongside Stoudemire. (Basically, no combination of Deng/Thomas/Noah should be offered, merely one of them) Thomas and Stoudemire are similar offensively (in approach I mean, clearly Stoudemire is far more developed and successful), with Noah making more sense as Amare's frontcourt partner in that he wouldn't get in his way on offense, and he'd be the anchor of the defense.  That status is unrealistic for Noah this season, but hopefully he treats his next offseason more seriously than his first, and gains the strength necessary to be a full-time center.

Then it's a real negotiation as to what the Suns value. This year's first-rounder should be in play, as the Suns don't have one for this draft. I love the idea of including Hinrich, as the Suns really need a backup point and it helps the Bulls to get Hinrich's salary off the books. If by some miracle the Suns need the 'toughness' of Nocioni, that'd be an even better scenario. The Bulls would likely have to take back Leandro Barbosa and/or the dissapointing Goran Dragic. By further sweetening the pot, could the Bulls somehow get the Suns to take Hughes instead of Gooden? Suns aren't getting under the cap until 2010 no matter what they do, so it's possible (though any deal would likely have to result in the Suns getting under the luxury tax next season).

Stoudamire’s good enough (despite motivational and defensive issues) to be the type of guy where you get him first and fill out the rest later. Him+Rose is a very good start, if they keep Deng that's a great piece as well. What Amare could do here is finally give the Bulls a high-percentage frontcourt scorer, someone who can force double teams and give the offense a chance when the initial options don't pan out.  He may feel he has to be 'the man', but luckily our current (or more accurately, future) 'man' is a humble selfless point guard, so Amare can have all the glory he wants even while Rose becomes the team's real best player. Depending on the deal, the Bulls could be getting so close to the tax in '09 that retaining Ben Gordon is an impossibility, but with Amare I'd be less incensed at that result as I would otherwise.

And if Amare fails to work out, he has an opt-out in 2010 and the Bulls can re-load again with Rose entering his prime.

Either way, this team still needs a trade awfully bad. I'd settle for just getting rid of a couple of Vinny's toys but seeing star frontcourt players available could make this a very exciting trade deadline. Now, if the Bulls whiff on Amare I wouldn't bemoan the lack of, ahem, 'fortitude' from Paxson. I'll just be upset if nothing happens at all.

1 recs  |  Comment 195 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

If I'm the Suns

I demand the Bulls do the following deal:

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=17113224302830303032304134231727&teams=2121212121444&te=&cash=

For Amare, the Suns should want 9M in cap space in ’09: Gooden & Simmons, both expiring contracts
plus
the Bulls best young talent: Tyrus, Noah, And Thabo
plus
the Bulls to take a bad contract back: Dragic, NBDL-bound @ 1.7M / year.

I’ll throw in Amundson just so the Bulls can field a team.

That leaves the Bulls starting:
Amare
Noce
Deng
BG
Rose
with a bench of: Hinrich, Gray, and Amundson, among others.

The Suns remain a playoff contender, starting:
Shaq
Tyrus
Hill
J.Rich
Nash
with a bench of: Barbosa, Noah, Lopez, Thabo, (and Gooden?).

I believe it would then become more difficult to sign BG in the offseason. My understanding was that the Bulls need Gooden’s contract to come off the books in order to offer BG more than the MLE.

Anybody know if that’s true?

by fizertime on Feb 9, 2009 12:35 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

they can offer BG whatever he wants

but they’re self-strung by the luxury tax.

I’d never do that deal you proposed.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 12:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd love it if the Bulls could get Amare without giving up Noah. I just doubt they can.

But know this: the Heat have already offered Beasley & Marion. The Bulls will have to beat this offer to get Amare:

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=3423172732383418510&teams=1414142121&te=&cash=

I think that Noah/Tyrus/Thabo/Gooden is a better offer than Beasley/Marion. I don’t think Tyrus/Thabo/Gooden is better. Wouldn’t you trade Tyrus & Thabo for Beasley? Even if you’re a team that needs defense more than offense like the Suns, it would be tough to pass on Beasley unless the Bulls make a significantly superior offer — i.e., include Noah.

The dark horse is the Pistons.

If I’m Detroit, I think hard about offering Stuckey: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=32358831727&teams=21218&te=&cash=

Then, the Pistons would probably use AI’s expiring contract sign Andre Miller to be their point in ‘09-’10.

I’d rank the Suns potential Amare offers:

(1) Tyrus / Noah / Thabo / Gooden
(2) Stuckey / ’Sheed
(3) Beasley / Marion
(4) Tyrus / Thabo / Gooden

by fizertime on Feb 9, 2009 1:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They have Lopez

Don’t doubt they need to give up Noah

by Option27 on Feb 9, 2009 1:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The Suns will want to contend next year, too. And Shaq will want to sit out even more.

You think the Suns will win many games with a frontcourt of Lopez, Tyrus, and whoever they find at the vet minimum, when Shaq needs his rest?

Suns will want Noah & Tyrus. And to get Amare, the Bulls should give up both, even if it stings.

by fizertime on Feb 9, 2009 1:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It sounds like the Suns don't want to contend

Young players and draft picks means a complete blow-up of the team.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 1:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They can still make the playoffs w/Tyrus & Noah instead of Amare.

In fact, they may be a better team with Shaq as the clear alpha dog.

There’s no reason for them not to try to make a run at the playoffs this year and next, with Nash & Shaq signed through ‘10 and Richardson through ’11. Trading Amare gets them under the luxury tax and ensures that he doesn’t leave for nothing in ’10.

by fizertime on Feb 9, 2009 2:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well it sounds like they want to trade Shaq too

I heard everyone is available besides Nash, which I think we can agree means Steve Kerr doesn’t know what he’s doing. I’m with you that they should try to contend though – they don’t have much in young talent to develop.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 3:01 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

My guess is "everyone's available but Nash" is Kerr posturing to shake up the team

…But that the Amare rumors are legit because Amare really will leave in ’10, the Suns play better with only Shaq or Amare on the floor, the Suns can get a lot in return for Amare, and the Suns really do want to get under the luxury next year.

by fizertime on Feb 9, 2009 3:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm surprised the Suns aren't going for it this year

They’re only 2.5 games out of the 4th seed – what do they have to lose? With their experience and offensive weapons, I’d take them over the Mavs, Blazers, maybe the Hornets and Nuggets. They can always trade Amare and Shaq in the offseason.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 4:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

$$ and timing

In order to avoid the luxury tax through a trade in the offseason, they’d be forced to trade with a team so far under the cap that they could absorb Amare or Shaq’s salary. That would limit them to dealing with the “Thunder”, Grizzlies, Heat, Pistons and … maybe a couple other teams?

Plus the Suns may rightly feel like they’ll be a better team this year by subtracting either Amare or Shaq’s ego and adding role players (i.e., Tyrus, Noah, Thabo) who hustle and play defense. I could see the Blazers making a run at Shaq for Lafrentz, Przybilla, Sergio, & Frye. Shaq mentors Oden, while Przybilla and Sergio serve useful roles on the Suns who would then save a lot of money next year.

by fizertime on Feb 9, 2009 4:25 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

TT/Gooden/Simmons and our 1st rounder IS better than Beasley/Marion.

Phoenix doesn’t want Marion back. It’s the same deal as Stat. Great players who worked well with the team and in both instances, they were still winning more than they were losing, but they decided that they were “malcontents” and wanted them gone. Even for an over the hill Shaq. Even for a prospect, pick and an expiring contract. Sarver is even more of a penny pincher than JR is. He has been forcing the Suns GMs to sell off their picks for years. Now that attendance is going down (in a small market, i.e. less revenue overall from ancillary pieces such as marketing and TV and the like), the owner is done paying Luxury Tax. If they aren’t contenders, WHICH THEY ARE NOT, then he wants to break it up. If Amar’e would stay in 2010, they wouldn’t be trading him, but they know he is unhappy and are pretty sure he is going to sign with someone else. Sure, the Suns could get to the second round maybe, but they aren’t getting by the Spurs this year and certainly not by the Lakers, period. So there is no chance of them winning it all, i.e. being “contenders.” Besides, as it stands, they are currently projecting to finish outside of the playoffs in 9th place. They have been healthy and are barely still in the chance while the Jazz have been seriously injured and are about to get AK47 and Boozer back. The Suns want to cut salary and not have locker room tension. Amar’e gone and they are not taking back Marion. Period.

by Unrealcity on Feb 9, 2009 10:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

People in AZ

are salty cuz of Stat’s comments…add to the fact that all the season holders haven’t seen a losing streak for a minute. there all in array.

"Kiss my Converse!" - Sho'nuff

by Belize on Feb 9, 2009 5:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

wow

its really late =/

"Kiss my Converse!" - Sho'nuff

by Belize on Feb 9, 2009 5:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Fuhgetaboutit!

TT will offer much of what Amare does on offense, while being a much better defender and rebounder. Matt is right, Amare is only worth ONE of TT/Noah/Deng plus other Bulls “parts” and draft picks.

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 9, 2009 9:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's a rumor

The Heat have not confirmed that they have offered Beasley. We can say 100% that they have offered Marion but other than that they could be offering Chalmers for all we know.

After thinking about it I wouldn’t be surprised if Amare isn’t moved until the summer.

I would like for someone to put together a trade that included Deng just to see how it would look. I would do it but I do not know how Dengs contracts works if he is traded this season.

by J Theory on Feb 10, 2009 7:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How bout sum

simple? Plus a draft pick…I like Tuck…dunno y really, but solid when I see him, compared to Tragic

"Kiss my Converse!" - Sho'nuff

by Belize on Feb 9, 2009 5:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

sounds good to me but....

Phoenix wants to cut salary, so the would never do that… How ’bout this:

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=171135632246143238&teams=21212144&te=&cash=

It know it’s crazy, but maybe Phoenix would want to make two deals… the Beasley Marion deal AND a deal like this… they could clear out a ton of cap space like their owner wants… we get rid of big shot Larry and get a low post presence AND we get 2010 money.

I think it would at least be worth considering… and I think it would get us in the playoffs.

by 72-10 on Feb 9, 2009 10:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

By the way

I realize that getting Amare is the #1 option… we would keep Noah in that scenario though… For those of you saying we should trade Noah too… do you REALLY want Aaron Gray and/or Nocioni to start??? We would be trading one problem for another. We have to keep Noah if we trade Thomas.

by 72-10 on Feb 9, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but the way I feel today, Id give em both up. Good proposal tho, I don’t thik Shaq would be a horrible move…a lil’ bit on the “impatient” side, but it would be interesting

"Kiss my Converse!" - Sho'nuff

by Belize on Feb 9, 2009 3:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I know it's crazy to even say so

Knowing the unwillingness of the Bulls to pull the trigger on any deal, but I honestly feel deeply in my heart the it’s one of those “any day now” type of trades.

If they are trading Amare before the deadline, it’s to the Bulls.

If it isn’t, fuck life.

by Option27 on Feb 9, 2009 12:37 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Ha ha

I feel the same way. Ha ha. Supposedly, Steve Kerr met with Amare about not assuring a trade before all star weekend. I’m waiting…

by chi on Feb 9, 2009 8:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

imagine if kerr pulled a mchale/jerry west and accepted this

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=17113562456216634231727&teams=212121444&te=&cash=

larry has that system down to a science. Especially with the way the economy is….big wigs like larry coming in dressed in their mink coats and 24k gold cigarrete holders with pockets lined with coke make for a large draw during shift changes.
by BobbySouthSide on Dec 9, 2008 4:24 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs

by Jbasic89 on Feb 9, 2009 1:02 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Well it was obviously not a realistic trade...

larry has that system down to a science. Especially with the way the economy is….big wigs like larry coming in dressed in their mink coats and 24k gold cigarrete holders with pockets lined with coke make for a large draw during shift changes.
by BobbySouthSide on Dec 9, 2008 4:24 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs

by Jbasic89 on Feb 9, 2009 2:58 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

YES YES YES

I would trade anyone and everyone to get Amare on this team. If Noc has to start the rest of the season, fine. Thomas and Noah may be good players in the future but can anyone honestly say they will ever be all NBA first-team players? No.

The Bulls will really be able to run with Amare. Hopefully they can pick up some better defensive players next year.

Are the Bulls with Amare the next Golden State Warriors (davis era)?

www.stallingtheman.blogspot.com

by Raf on Feb 9, 2009 1:07 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I sure hope we’re shooting a little than the Golden State Warriors…

by msquared10 on Feb 9, 2009 1:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, of course.

I’m just trying to compare their offenses.

www.stallingtheman.blogspot.com

by Raf on Feb 9, 2009 9:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I started writing two separate posts

explaining why we shouldn’t get Amare – because he’s had microfracture surgery, because he’s four years older than Tyrus, because he’ll demand twice Tyrus’ salary, because he plays in Coors Field, because Rose won’t be fully developed until Amare’s contract is up.

I deleted both – we really need the guy. As much as I like Tyrus and Noah, we’re never going to win a championship with those two starting at the 4 and 5. And really, what PF is better offensively for our team. Amare’s a 25.0 PER, .588 TS% career playoff player. I mean christ. If it takes both Tyrus and Noah, I do it.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 1:54 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Deng, Rose, and Amare are 3 legitimate championship pieces. BG is a 4th. Then we just need a defensive big man and a bench.

If, by the grace of God, the Bulls get Amare, Reinsdorf should man up and pay the luxury tax to keep BG and sign a legit PF at the MLE in the offseason. We would not be looking at paying the luxury tax to keep BG if not for Reinsdorf’s horrendous decision to sign the franchise’s future over to Ben freakin’ Wallace.

by fizertime on Feb 9, 2009 2:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Reinsdorf

can man down and let Gordon walk, what Gordon can do on the court is replaceable.

by LOTP on Feb 9, 2009 3:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

by whom?

who can do what Gordon can do AND is available? You act like he scores 10 ppg. Gimme a break.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 9, 2009 3:44 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Gordon lacks histrionics, and therefore is an inferior player.

Also Gordon is a midget who is barely 4 feet tall.

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 9, 2009 9:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Tell me what you really think about Amare's -7.4 net PER compared to last season

No more D’Antoni ball. How much longer can a breaking down Steve Nash carry him?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 8:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

really?

the suns changed their offense to feature Shaq instead of Amare. Do you not know that? That has been Amare’s biggest gripe. Amare is a great player independent of Nash.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 9, 2009 11:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They're willing to trade him instead of trying to make him happy.

And might even trade him for less than he’s worth to do it. I don’t think they like Stoudemire and are more concerned with running a certain type of offense than maximizing the abilities of each of their players.

Or maybe just more concerned with maximizing Shaq instead of Stoudemire.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 9, 2009 12:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The Suns have been running their offense through Shaq all season

That is not in dispute. This article is from earlier in the season, and Stoudemire has obviously grown even more disappointed.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/8861324/Slow-offense-suits-Shaq,-but-maybe-not-Suns

"But Porter’s commitment to an inside-oriented, half-court offense somehow has managed to trim by three the per-game shot attempts for star power forward Amare Stoudemire. With his touches limited due to a slower pace and an interest in running more of the offense through Shaq, Amare’s 13 shots are yielding three fewer points per game (22.2 from 25.2). Included in this conservative approach to working through Stoudemire are three games that offered Amare 10 or fewer field-goal attempts.

In Wednesday’s triumph at Minnesota, the Shaq-fest rewarded Porter with 18 points, 10 rebounds and three blocks from O’Neal. The philosophical flip-flop was felt late in the third quarter when five consecutive possessions went through Shaq, produced zero Phoenix points and allowed the Timberwolves to cut their deficit from 15 to 10 points in less than three minutes.

During most of this stagger, O’Neal was defended by 7-foot veteran center Jason Collins while the 6-10 Stoudemire was checked by 6-7 small forward Ryan Gomes.

Although Stoudemire has registered mild public mutterings after a couple of these pedestrian games, future feedback depends on how the Suns fare when the schedule becomes more challenging." Well, they didn’t fare too well.

Here is an interview with Nash where he talks about his drop in production and the problems with the offense.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dime-090207-08

“The challenge for us is that we still haven’t found that balance on offense between going in to Shaq and finding that spacing and movement that everyone else needs.”

The Suns have become a different team under Porter. The Suns should feature Amare but they don’t. I don’t know what Kerr and Porter are thinking but it is up to the Bulls to take advantage.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 9, 2009 12:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

hahahahahahahaha

looks like it

You disagree. What’s your observation?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 9, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that's a concern

I typed up an excel comparing his year before Nash to his ‘08 season to this season, and the main difference between D’Antoni+Nash and not was Amare’s scoring in transition. In the first 10 seconds, his numbers with D’Antoni/Nash were off the charts – you’d expect high scoring, but the efficiency was high too.

So that’s the main cause of his TS% drop from .656 to a still impressive .610. I think the rest of the PER dropoff can be attributed to his no longer playing center. His typical stats without Shaq – 10.5 rebounds, 2 blocks per 36 minutes – were better than his stats with Shaq – about 9 rebounds, 1.3 blocks.

Amare’s 20.2 PER and .616 TS% are still ridiculous. I’d expect at least that for a couple years on the Bulls.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 11:53 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Thank you

rec

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

on offense Amare could set up where ever he wants with the Bulls. With the Suns, Amare has to make room for Shaq who is extremely limited on where he can operate. As Hollinger stats provided below show, Amare played well with Shaq. He struggled when the Suns made Shaq the feature player, instead of a complimentary player.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 9, 2009 12:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Between Shaq and Amare

Amare is the one on the trading block?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 12:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

they are both on the trading block

everyone is available except Nash. Do you read?

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 9, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Apologies

I had overlooked that Shaq was included in the Suns trading block.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 12:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you just being dumb today?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 9, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This franchise clearly wants to distance itself from what you have referred to as a highly overrated team

They want a defensive minded team (still not sure how trading Marion for Shaq was supposed to help that) that’s built to win in the playoffs. It’s a shame because as long as I’ve followed the NBA you could always count on the Suns to provide good entertainment. They’ll keep Nash around next year just to appease the fans and then they become the Bulls Southwest (a gritty bunch of overachievers w/ an owner who refuses to spend past the Luxury Tax limit).

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Feb 9, 2009 12:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Make the case that Noah wouldn't be an impediment.

I mean, if you simply move Noah out of the way, because Amare is a much better option, then sure. You can bring Noah out further from the basket, use him to set screens, use him to feed (the ball) Amare, etc.

You can move Noah in ways you can’t and wouldn’t want to move Shaq, who can’t move.

But what defense is going to fall for that? Defenses are going to leave him as close to undefended as they can and deny and double Amare.

He’ll be an impediment because he’s no kind of threat and everyone knows it.

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 2:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

shaq's presence alone isn't the impediment

You answered your own question. WIth Noah instead of Shaq, the offense would run through Amare. Amare would be on the strong side of the court as a featured member of the play. Noah would be on the weak side in offensive rebounding position. Right now in the Suns offense, Shaq is on the strong side and Amare is on the weak side waiting for the ball to be swung to him. The Suns changed their offense to feature Shaq.

As Hollinger notes, after the trade last year, Amare was spectacular -

"That the trade for Shaquille O’Neal worked out less awfully than expected is largely the result of how dominant Stoudemire was in its aftermath. After the All-Star break he averaged 28.5 points per game and shot 58.8 percent, with the added bonus of over 10 free throws a game that he converted at an 83 percent clip. Offensively, he was quite possible the most dominant player in the league.

One other relevant number is 35.6. That was how many minutes he played per game, and if that seems a little on the low side consider that before the trade he only played 33.0. The reason was fouls — Stoudemire averaged 4.60 personals per 40 minutes, putting him in the top third of power forwards. And when he got in foul trouble, he abandoned any pretense of attempting to play defense, giving the Suns further incentive to sit him at the first hint of danger.

After the trade his minutes increased from 33.0 to 35.6, while the fouls per game decreased from 3.8 to 3.6. It’s not hard to connect those dots — with Shaq playing the middle, Amare wasn’t picking up as many fouls as the last line of defense, and could instead focus on dunking on people’s heads.

Amazingly for such a high-volume scorer, Stoudemire led all power forwards in TS% and was third in the league overall. He had one of the highest free-throw rates in basketball and hit a career-best 80.5 percent from the stripe. In fact another scary thing about Stoudemire’s game is what a good midrange shooter he’s becoming. Last season he nailed 48.8 percent of his long 2-pointers, complementing a staggering 67.2 percent in the immediate basket area."

Coming into this season however, Porter changed offense from one that ran through Shaq from one that featured Amare. It accounts for his drop in production.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 9, 2009 2:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A couple things

Talking about how well Amare did after the Shaq trade but in the D’Antoni offense doesn’t do anything to convince me that Noah + Amare is a good idea, because Noah is not Shaq and doesn’t bring those skills to the table. :|

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 2:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you asked why woudn't noah be an impediment

with the assumption that shaq was an impediment. I answered back that Shaq wasn’t an impediment; Amare played well both before and after Shaq.

Nothing suggests that Noah will be an impediment, but you. He is not an impediment now to the current Bulls offense. He doesn’t occupy the same space on the floor and is far more mobile than Shaq. I really don’t get your point.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 9, 2009 4:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Err, I see that.

What space on the floor is Amare best at?

What is the only space on the floor where Noah has much use?

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 7:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would wager

that any system with Noah at C and Amare at PF would still have Amare setting the high screens.

Noah would play off the ball to receive passes from the notoriously average passing Amare anytime he rolls off the screen into the paint.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 2:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Those are good points.

I’ll go with what smurf said above and (although, no basketball sense to back it up, just seems logical) state allowing Stoudemire to have the ball in his hands and create for himself will increase his production more than the periodic double-team.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 9, 2009 2:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not following

Why couldn’t Amare and Noah work together? With Noah’s offensive rebounding ability, I wouldn’t think opponents would benefit from doubling Amare. And Amare gets to be the featured guy again.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 3:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hollinger Analysis...

Hollinger Player Profile | Stats Key
SEASON FG% FT% P/40 R/40 A/40 TS% Ast TO Usg Reb PER
2002-03 .472 .661 17.2 11.2 1.2 53.0 6.0 14.4 19.4 15.9 15.83
2003-04 .475 .713 22.4 9.8 1.5 53.6 5.9 13.5 24.2 14.0 19.85
2004-05 .559 .733 28.8 9.9 1.8 61.7 6.5 9.4 25.2 13.2 26.71
2005-06 .333 .889 20.8 12.8 1.6 42.0 5.9 2.9 24.7 17.8 17.83
2006-07 .575 .781 24.9 11.7 1.2 63.7 5.2 14.2 22.5 17.0 23.15
2007-08 .590 .805 29.7 10.7 1.8 65.6 6.5 9.6 24.7 15.2 27.29
2008-09 .533 .830 22.6 8.9 2.2 61.1 9.3 13.0 21.7 13.1 20.40
2008-09 (projected) .613 .807 29.8 11.2 1.9 69.5 7.1 10.0 25.1 15.89 27.68

2007-08 season: That the trade for Shaquille O’Neal worked out less awfully than expected is largely the result of how dominant Stoudemire was in its aftermath. After the All-Star break he averaged 28.5 points per game and shot 58.8 percent, with the added bonus of over 10 free throws a game that he converted at an 83 percent clip. Offensively, he was quite possible the most dominant player in the league.

One other relevant number is 35.6. That was how many minutes he played per game, and if that seems a little on the low side consider that before the trade he only played 33.0. The reason was fouls — Stoudemire averaged 4.60 personals per 40 minutes, putting him in the top third of power forwards. And when he got in foul trouble, he abandoned any pretense of attempting to play defense, giving the Suns further incentive to sit him at the first hint of danger.

After the trade his minutes increased from 33.0 to 35.6, while the fouls per game decreased from 3.8 to 3.6. It’s not hard to connect those dots — with Shaq playing the middle, Amare wasn’t picking up as many fouls as the last line of defense, and could instead focus on dunking on people’s heads.

Amazingly for such a high-volume scorer, Stoudemire led all power forwards in TS% and was third in the league overall. He had one of the highest free-throw rates in basketball and hit a career-best 80.5 percent from the stripe. In fact another scary thing about Stoudemire’s game is what a good midrange shooter he’s becoming. Last season he nailed 48.8 percent of his long 2-pointers, complementing a staggering 67.2 percent in the immediate basket area.

Scouting report: The one big negative in Stoudemire’s game is his defense. He’s a poor help defender and tends to pick up cheap fouls. His effort level was particularly awful early in the year but picked up quite a bit as the year went on. As mentioned above, fouls tend to be a big differentiator with him — if he gets a quick two, he’ll don a toreador outfit for the remainder of the half.

On offense, he’s an impossible cover because he’s a deadly 15-foot shooter with freakish quickness for his size. Thus, he can go by almost any defending big man with one dribble to the right and either dunk, get to the line, or both. He’s also outstanding at flying down the lane on screen-and-rolls, forming a particularly deadly combo with the passing wizardry of Steve Nash, and is among the best in basketball at running the floor.

If Stoudemire has an offensive weakness, it’s that he’s largely a finisher. He doesn’t have much of a post game and has posted very low assist rates his whole career. Also, he tends to run people over on those rolls to the basket — he was fourth in the NBA with 44 offensive fouls. Nonetheless, the big picture is that he’s the most efficient scorer in basketball right now.

2008-09 outlook: Stoudemire projects to finish third in the NBA in PER, and I’m wondering if that doesn’t undersell him. He looks fully recovered from his microfracture surgery, and with a full year as a full-time power forward he could be in position to have a monstrous year.

That’s especially true if he can cut his fouls. Think about this — last year he averaged 25.2 points in just 33.9 minutes. If he can stay out of foul trouble long enough to average 39.0 minutes or so, he could easily eclipse 30 points per game and win the scoring title. That he’ll do it while shooting in the high 50s and making his free throws makes him even more deadly.

Most similar at age: Alonzo Mourning

My name isn't Ron... I run a DJ and Karaoke business named Kidron Music... my name is Jesse...

by kidronmusic on Feb 9, 2009 2:22 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Where's the update?

Projected PER ~28.
To date PER ~20.

What gives?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 8:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Feb 9, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He quit to force a trade?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 9, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

that's what I'm banking on

heck, he wouldn’t be available if he was putting up a 28 PER.

Plus we can’t be certain Terry Porter can coach. (not that the Bulls have one either)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 11:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What will Vinny Do....

I see him benching Amare for Noch! ( ;

You know… to go small!

by 72-10 on Feb 9, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Or

Get Noc his regular 34-40minutes of hacking and gunning

by LOTP on Feb 9, 2009 3:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Did you see the Detroit game last night?

Stat was dogging it big time. He’s definitely uninspired out there. You just get the feeling that, with a player like that, motivated by a percieved slight, itching to be “the guy” and with the talent to do so…wherever he goes, I just see Amare being a beast out there. Especially if he comes to the Bulls or Golden State. Best running big man in the game with running teams…yowza.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 9, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Did not Amare want Shaq?

What are his demands? Does he just want someone to play center not named Sean Marks, Brian Skinner, or Pat Burke?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 12:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think Shaq's the issue for Amare, it's Porter's usage of the two of them

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Feb 9, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he hates not being the featured guy and I get the sense that he really doesn't like

Terry Porter or his system. Shaq is fat and slow, STAT is lean and can run. He surely wants to run to maximize his own skills and he’s got to be really pissed that he’s not the featured guy. Think about it, they dealt Marion who wanted to be the featured guy and STAT probably figured Shaq would be the aging artifact that he had become in Miami. Instead, the Suns decided to completely alter their style of play. Boris Diaw and Raja Bell both expressed their disappointment at the change in style of play after they were dealt. Under Mike D, the players had fun. They aren’t having fun anymore, and I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think that rightly or wrongly that the players (STAT included) blame Shaq for slowing things down and ruining their run and gun fun.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 9, 2009 3:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Anderson Varejao, Chris Andersen, Brandon Bass...

…those are the 3 obvious MLE FA targets the Bulls could pair alongside Amare in the frontcourt next year. Right now Varejao is a slight step up from Noah (and a perfect complement to Amare). Bass has a much better offensive game than Noah, and would look fine starting next to Amare, though you’d prefer a more defensively-minded big. Andersen would be okay in a pinch on a 1-2 year deal, as long as Noah doesn’t leave his stash behind.

Also, a team in desperate need of a PG and a crazy Argentinan might be willing to swap a decent big for Hinrich &/or Noce.

The point being, Noah’s a nice player, and would look good next to Amare, but he shouldn’t be a deal-breaker.
 
If the Bulls can’t get Amare for Noah, Tyrus, Thabo, Gooden, and a #1, then so be it. But they’ve got to make the offer.

by fizertime on Feb 9, 2009 3:01 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'd add Rasho and

Jeff Foster to that list too

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 4:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Foster signed an extension early this season

Loves me the Rasho, however.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 8:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually...

those are some good MLE bigs. One of the questions is Asik. Can he come over early with a buyout? Is he any good? Does he still have a knee?

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 9, 2009 7:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent pickup. I've wondered about Asik.

If the Bulls really feel he is a player that impacts who they can give up. I’m with Option27 that this time it feels like something is going to happen. Kerr and Paxson appear to like each other and I assume trust each other. I would love to keep Tyrus and do have the same concerns about Amare voiced above but we need a star to lift this team beside Rose. Steve, oh Steve please oh please take Hughes in this deal.

by chgobr on Feb 9, 2009 8:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think people realize how good we can be....

With Rose, Amare, and Deng as the big three (young, long, fast, and athletic). Having Amare would make everyone elses offensive game just that good. He would command double teams, picture him throwing it backout to Ben or Deng for a jumper, or to Rose for a driving layup. Or Deng slashing to the cup with a pass from Amare or Rose or the other way around. My point is good passing and good finishing would be what a team like that would be capable of. And let’s not forget Deng has better playoff averages then regular season. About Amare and his defense and rebounding, I think he’s capable of doing both (maybe a change of scenary).

by chi on Feb 9, 2009 8:31 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

You're doing way too much

picturing of Amare passing. He does a lot of things, passing isn’t one of them.

by Scotter on Feb 9, 2009 11:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Scotter, I just posted a question on your Forwards fanpost

Let me ask it here in a different way.

I would rather have Pryz and Fernandez. Do you agree and whom would you trade?

by hlac on Feb 9, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know.

I don’t think Portland deals anybody. I’d love to have Przybilla, I wanted him instead of Ben Wallace, but I think Portland recognizes his value. I’m going to stay out of the trade talk. If something happens, it happens. The weeks before the trade deadline are mostly hot air anyway.

by Scotter on Feb 9, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Portland won't trade Przybilla

Unless they get a center in return. (they wont trade him anyway, but Oden can’t stay on the court this season so they would need a center in return)

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 10, 2009 5:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying it as that...

I’m saying the floor will be spreaded and I think his immediate offense will help everybody elses offense. Deng already slashes, maybe when Amare steps out like he wants to take a 17 foot jumper, he can think again and dish it to Luol inside the cup. I know he does a lot of things, what we’ve need for so long was someone to throw the ball down to in the post,it’s not that hard for him to throw it back out to a teammate for a jumper,etc…

by chi on Feb 9, 2009 12:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just because it's not hard doesn't mean he's gong to do it.

If there’s a basketball reason that they’re running the offense through Shaq and not Amare, it’s because Shaq is a willing passer. He holds his position, let’s people move and finds them. That’s not Amare, he’s not going to be the guy who gets other guys shots. That’s one of the reasons Bosh is a better player than Stoudemire.

by Scotter on Feb 9, 2009 12:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong

He will get guys open shots because he commands a double team.

by chi on Feb 9, 2009 1:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i think its more likely

he opens up offensive opportunities for other players because you can’t leave Amare. He is too good a finisher/shooter to leave and clog the lane. Teams would have to pick their poison, help on Rose/Deng/Gordon and give up an easy basket to Amare or let your perimeter defenders match up one on one with Rose/Deng/Gordon.

He’s not a traditional back to basket player so I don’t know how many assist he would rack up. But his presence on the floor requires the attention of more than 1 defender so he should open things up in that way.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 9, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly, my point..

How the hell is that a ridiculous statement…

by chi on Feb 9, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

depends on what the suns want

Im a big Tyrus and not an Amare fan but bulls need Amare more. If Suns want Kirk to backup both guard spots, and seems like they’re not too happy with Barbosa and Dragic. Maybe this would work:

Tyrus+Thabo+Kirk for Dragic and Amare or If they want to trade Barbosa, bulls add Gooden. Plus draft picks here and there, it might work.

Barbosa and Dragic doesn’t fit Porter’s system and both has 3yrs remaining. Barbosa can be a cheaper version of Gordon while Dragic can backup rose.

Tyrus+Gooden is a better combo to Shaq. Tyrus is more of a weakside player and slasher and can provide shot blocking and athleticsm while gooden shoots mid range shots.

Maybe Bulls can give “future considerations” where we take Jrich for Hughes expirer if things doesn’t workout for the suns and decide to rebuild full time.

They can also have Noce for free if they want too lol

by trig on Feb 9, 2009 8:57 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Boy, I guess I'm in the minority of here...

I’m just not willing to involve Tyrus in any deal to get Amare. We’re talking about a guy whose had micro surgery, a malcontent, and a guy who refuses to play defense. Outside of the point production, hot does he help? The Bulls this year aren’t hurting on offense. They actually don’t have a problem scporing points. Their problem is defensively in the post and I just don’t know how much better this team would be getting rid of possibly the best shot blocker in basketball who’s 22 and hasn’t even scratched the surface of his potential. I’m more willing to give up Deng than Tyrus. But maybe that’s just me.

by Dils on Feb 9, 2009 9:37 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Neither

Deng and Tyrus are good now. They are going to get close to great as Rose matures in the NBA.

It makes little sense to send either of them for Amare at this time. I think the Suns will get better offers from teams that are in much worse condition than us that are desperate for scoring(lol, Warriors).

I’d reach for Amare if we could get rid of Ben Gordon in the process and take back Jason Richardson.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 9:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm a Gordon guy personally but I agree with you

in terms of what the Suns may do and what type of offers they will get.

by Dils on Feb 9, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Need Scotter

But Gordon’s PER to open the season was hovering around 20. It dipped to a healthy 18.5. Now it’s down to 16.6 or about what he was last year when the club declined to extend him the offer he thought he deserved.

Must be everyone else on the team.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 10:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Gordon certainly got himself in a shooting slump for the week or so after Hinrich returned

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

BOLD STATEMENT

“They are going to get close to GREAT”

by Jesse07 on Feb 9, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Being in a minority, Dils, doesn't necessarily mean you're wrong.

Giving Tyrus and Noah, just as they are maturing into potentially solid NBA players with tremendous upside potential makes no sense to me, especially with all the baggage Amare seems to be carrying. If we can get him for draft picks, Gooden, Hughes, Noce, Heinrich, Gordon, etc., than it would be a great trade. Otherwise, this is going to backfire on the Bulls. What good is a short term stimulus going to accomplish if the long term consequences will be all on the downside?

The Bulls don’t need Amare as much as they need to dump Gooden, Hughes, Noce, possibly Kirk if they don’t lose Gordon…(addition by subtraction) while adding a productive center who can provide some interior defense and can score a few points in the paint.

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on Feb 9, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The more I think about it,

the less enthusiastic I am about Amare. Unlike Rose who gets the benefit of the doubt due to age (and being a perimeter player) Amare will likely never be a defensive stopper. Remember, 9 of the 19 last NBA championship have been won by teams without a great offensive player at the 4 or 5.

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 9, 2009 10:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good to see somebody else that's not for getting Amare

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 9, 2009 11:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think if PHX decides

they’re in ‘we gotta win now’ mode they’re going to be talking more seriously with Detroit over us, but otherwise we’re in good shape.

Going off what Matt said and considering that the Suns would like to get a backup PG for when Nash’s back flairs up, I worked this deal out.

Works out well for both teams, we get to keep Joakim, they get Hinrich in hopes he can turn into Nash 2.0. Plus Kirk’s deal is frontloaded so he won’t kill their cap space. I’ve always liked Barbosa and if we wanted to really run teams out of the gym we could put Rose, Barbosa, Deng, Stoudamire, Noah out there. Hopefully Noah wouldn’t get gassed too quickly but I like that lineup a lot.

My concerns about Stoudamire have been well-documented by others here. Will the microfracture surgery shorten his career like most people think? Does Jerry really want to pay him $120M over 6 years like he’s going to want when we have to give Rose max money and re-sign Noah/Thabo? Can Amare tone his ‘Rodmanesque’ down?

I’m skeptical and would almost be happier knowing a deal with Detroit went down while we focused on a Brad Miller deal, with a bigger trade in the works down the line. Oh, and there’s all the Ben Gordon stuff too, but Ben’s already gotta be thinking he’s gone, anyone live by him? Is there a ‘For Sale’ sign up in front of his crib?

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 9, 2009 9:37 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Good Points

I’ve read that Phoenix does not want to deal Barbosa, but I don’t think he would be off the table… Would Pax deal Kirk??? I don’t know.

by 72-10 on Feb 9, 2009 11:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Barbosa

was rumored all summer, despite being a salary “bargain”. He wasn’t considered to be a Kerr (or Porter?) type. Then he missed training camp ’cause his mother was ill. All trade chatter stopped when she died early into the season. (And they traded Raja and Boris.)

He’s not letting it destroy his season, however. He’s been playing flat out amazing, even if the minutes he gets aren’t that numerous.

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 9, 2009 9:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The fun thing about trading Thomas and Gooden and draft pick and _______....

…for Stoudemire right now, would probably make the Bulls good enough to get into the 6th spot in the playoffs… where they could be a frightening matchup for the Orlando Magic.

Rose – Anthony Johnson
Gordon – Courtney Lee
Deng – Turkoglu
Stoudemire – Lewis
Noah – Howard

Backups: Hinrich vs. Tyron Lue and Courtney Lee, Magic have no backup at SF and the backup frontline is horrible. Which matches up well with a Nocioni, Aaron Gray backup frontcourt.

Howard would have to guard Stoudemire since Lewis wouldn’t be able to, unless they just let Stoudemire go off. And I think Noah could do at least an almost-average job against Howard.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 9, 2009 10:12 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Forgot one key matchup, The Hair vs. Ron Jeremy

The Gerbil makes it a sweep for the Magic

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Feb 9, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

trade option from

bleacher report
Enter the Chicago Bulls.

The Chicago Bulls have a disgruntled Ben Gordon, who is extremely talented and young. Here’s where it gets interesting.

The known fact is Derrick Rose is untouchable. Since Ben Gordon probably would thrive off of Nash, the Bulls should package him, Tyrus Thomas, and Joakim Noah in a deal for Amare Stoudemire and Matt Barnes.

This gives Phoenix another athlete to pair with Jason Richardson in Thomas, a Shooter in Gordon, and a big body in Noah. Which could revive the run-and-gun in Phoenix to an extent.

Ultimately Kirk Hinrich should be moved to free up space in the cap for this mega shake up to happen. Luol Deng, Amare Stoudemire, and Derrick Rose and Nocioni would make a great team.

Hinrich himself should be shopped to the Toronto Raptors for Jason Kapono and First-Round Pick to give the Bulls the shooter they need to relieve pressure off of Rose as he develops more.

…this trade review brings up some more points about other team options.

by gman2849 on Feb 9, 2009 10:24 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Gordon and Richardson

How effective is Richardson at the SF position?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 10:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

dunno, he'd probably do alright

he’s really big and slow for a SG. And he’s grown to love the 3-pointer more and more, so maybe the 3 is his more natural position.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought Richardson was a SF coming out of college

But he seemed to get all his NBA minutes at the 2 in Golden State.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"a disgruntled Ben Gordon, who is extremely talented and young. "

he’s not extremely either.

But anyway, he has (effectively) a no-trade clause. How does that not even get mentioned?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 11:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

it's bleacher report

even discussing gordon in any trade options is just dumb; there is no way him or anyone else in his position would even consider waiving his bird rights

by Calogero on Feb 9, 2009 11:20 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A very interesting year.

I am amazed at the number and quality of players that are rumored to be up for grabs. So many allstar and allstar caliber players are seemingly available. This situation is due to two factors:
1) the 2010 free agent market.
2) there are only 4 real contenders for this years Championship (LA, CLEV, BOS, SA). Some teams are trying to become more “contendable” and other teams are trying to unload as much as they can.

Amare has great potential on the Bulls roster. He is the inside dominance that has been missing for many years. I don’t want to see Hinrich, Rose or Noah go though.

by chicago-homesick-blues on Feb 9, 2009 12:04 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Stoudemire, Rose and Deng is "Change we can believe in". You don't win wiith...

…with a big 3 of Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, with Deng allegedly being our best player in the mix.

I could not believe how many Bulls fans thought the mix of the second three could do anything more than overachieve and win a playoff series here and there. They play hard and that’s admirable. But neither of those guys is elite at anything (except maybe Gordon and his shooting).

Now with Stoudemire, Rose and Deng as the focal point (with Deng clearly being 3rd in the pecking order), THAT’S more like it. I can accept Gordon walking if this is the three we would move forward with. We’d simply need to replace Gordon with a Raja Bell type. I’d be completely comfortable building around these three 20 somethings and my hopes as a Bulls fan can expand past the first round of the playoffs.

In that mix of 3, you’ve got 2 elite talents and possibly the best third option in the league in Deng. As Rose develops, this 3 headed monster becomes more and more dangerous and with some hard work, dedication and leadership this trio leads the Bulls back to prominence.

But we’ll have to see how things work out. No guarantee yet that Phoenix will move him. One thing I know tough. Tyrus Thomas will emerge and lead the league in blocked shots next season while averaging a double double if he ends up in Phoenix. People will stop viewing him as sub-par in comparison with LaMarcus Aldridge.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 9, 2009 12:29 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

it is kindof strange

that Deng would become the least of that 3, where he used to be the best.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 12:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But that's a good thing.

That’s been the whole point all along! Whoohoo!

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 9, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Thomas will never lead the league in Blocked shots

I’ll gladly take that bet any day, and even give you 100-1 odds. As long as Dwight Howard is in the NBA, no way Thomas leads the league in blocks. he isn’t even second in the league in blocks. Camby, Birdman Ronny Turiaf, Bynum, All better shot blockers than Thomas right now. People view thomas as sub-par to Aldridge, mainly because Aldridge would’ve given the Bulls what they needed. Low Post scoring. Everyone knew it would take awhile for Thomas to develop.

by paxdorf on Feb 9, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Howard Per 36 minutes: 2.9 blocks

Thomas Per 36 minutes: 2.6 blocks

I’ll take those 100-1 odds :)

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I was basically just saying that...

…Thomas will make his presence felt defensively. I get the feeling that Terry Porter will let Thomas roam. Hell, Porter is DYING for a guy who wants to play defense. Thomas would show an inkling of wanting to do that and Porter will let him have carte blanche on D…LOL.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 9, 2009 6:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

WXYZ interviews Amare
Don Shane: What does it have to do with?

Amare Stoudemire: I think financial problems with the organization. Right now they’re trying to figure it out. My job is to bring my A-game every night so I’m focused on the game with Detroit.

Transcript

Amare goes on to praise playing in Detroit.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 12:35 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Does anyone really care about Amir Johnson though?

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Feb 9, 2009 7:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I have a few concerns about Amare.

(1) Declining production this season;

(2) A history of catastrophic injury;

(3) A reputation for being an indolent malcontent.

If Amare was a truly indispensible, elite superstar, the Suns wouldn’t be willing to trade him, in my opinion.

In any event, VDN has neither the coaching pedigree nor the credibility to effectively manage and motivate a veteran “star” like Amare. I could easily envision a scenario where a disgruntled Amare becomes the de facto emperor of the Bulls, a la Ben Wallace in the waning twilight of the Skiles era.

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Feb 9, 2009 1:00 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

Are you considering the Suns "financial considerations"?

JA Adande said his sources were telling him the Suns are primarily considering dealing Amare for financial reasons.

Amare told WXYZ that he thinks the Suns are shopping him for financial considerations.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 9, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't that the position that Amare and the Suns have to take in

order to maintain any negotiating leverage?

They certaintly can’t publicly disclose that they are willing to trade Amare because they no longer feel he is a dominant player. That would severely diminish his trade value.

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Feb 9, 2009 1:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you suggesting

that Steve Kerr has any idea what he’s doing? He’s screwed up worse than Pax and Isiah.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 3:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I read over at the Suns

blog today that the fans think Kerr is a Spurs spy designed specifically to run the Suns intentionally into the ground. Funny stuff.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 9, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The only

conclusion that could be logically drawn…

::tears::

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 9, 2009 6:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

NOT

of joy.

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 9, 2009 6:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Or

laughter.

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 9, 2009 6:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Would people be this anti-Amare

if these rumors were, like, a month ago?

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Feb 9, 2009 1:17 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Nothing about Stoudemire has changed.

The fact remains that he LONGS to be mentioned alongside Duncan and Garnett. But those guys both scored as well as he does when they were younger (and both are still capable of averaging 20 ppg), both Garnett and Duncan are FAR better rebounders and defenders than Stoudemire, both are immeasurably better teammates to this point, and neither of those guys would ever shut it down the way it seems Stoudemire has shut it down.

Let me ask you this. Do you think that having Duncan or Garnett on the current Suns team instead of Stoudemire would make any difference? I believe that either player would completely change the culture surrounding the team, you’d have two guys who are fantastic rebounders/defenders and in Garnett you’d have a guy who would have ZERO PROBLEM with the ball going in to Shaq and if Duncan were there then they probably never would have acquired Shaq because Duncan would be the true low post presence they’d need to win in the post season.

Now Stoudemire is VERY CAPABLE of doing everything that Duncan and Garnett do…and then some. But his attitude is so far from that of Garnett and Duncan that I wonder if he’ll ever reach those heights.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 9, 2009 3:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not the HOF stratosphere of KG or Duncan

But if someone like Al Jefferson was available, wouldn’t you trade for him? What about Carlos Boozer? All are more than capable scoring big men with flaws. I think Amare and Rose is a great start to building a contender. Making the trade in the first place means Paxson acknowledges the team needs change, and I’d see it as a sign of becoming more aggressive in the free agent markets the next few summers. Maybe they trade for Amare and they never become anything more than slightly above average, but it’s a chance definitely worth taking. There’s a realistic shot of pairing Rose with not a superstar, but still enough of an All-Star talent who can dominate the game that they could vault to that 4-5 spot in the East.

Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 9, 2009 3:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait a minute Ozzie.

If you look above, you see me make a case for picking up Amare. Despite his warts, I make a trade for him right away (or Al Jefferson). I was simply responding to Illini15’s suggestion that people wouldn’t bad mouth Stoudemire a month ago. Look at my past Stoudemire posts. I’ve been saying the same thing about him for a while. He seems more concerned about being “the man” than winning. I think if he gave it his all then Phoenix wouldn’t be having the problems they are having now (and that’s why I threw Garnett and Duncan into it – also the fact that Stoudemire casually mentions being talked about in their class at times).

But make no mistake about it. A bad Stoudemire (20 pts 8 rebs) is better than a good anybody we have now. And the prospects of a Stoudemire, Rose, Deng core gets me much more excited than a Deng, Gordon, Hinrich core.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 9, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Garnett never scored like Amare

not even close. And as for “Amare’s shutting it down”… he’s posting a 20+ PER and .600+ TS%! Do you know how many times Duncan and Garnett have done that in their careers? 0.

I understand that Amare isn’t a Jordan-esque superstar, but I’m baffled by the hate on his board for him. He’s a premier talent, he’s just 26, and he’d easily be the best player we’ve had on our team in the last decade. You guys all sound like Paxson.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But, you can run an offense through

Garnett and Duncan in a way you can’t with Stoudemire. Garnett is one of the best passing 7 footers ever. Duncan isn’t as gifted, but he makes all the right passes and hold his position in the low post. They benefit their teammates more offensively. I love stats, but you have to factor that in. There’s a difference between hate and being realistic about the risk factors.

by Scotter on Feb 9, 2009 4:31 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

And where has their passing ability done for them?

Garnett won nothing before aligning with the pure-scorer Pierce. Duncan’s teammates, Ginobili and Parker, have made their living off scoring in isolation.

If I pass the ball to my big man, I want him to score. I’ll take a guy scoring at a .600 TS% clip over another guy scoring at a .540 TS% clip who can also kick it out for jumpshots that will drop at less than a .540 TS% clip.

by YaoPau on Feb 9, 2009 4:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"Garnett won nothing"

I hate this line of ‘thought’.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 4:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

the quotes are apt because this spew requires no thought whatsoever

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 9, 2009 5:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You might hate it, but it's true

Among Garnett’s 7 consecutive 1st round exits was a 45 win team, a 47 win team, two 50 win teams, a 51 win team, and then he lost in the conference finals with a #1 seed 58 win team. His teams had enough talent (and home court advantages) to win in the playoffs, and he kept losing.

I think it stems from his not being a very good scorer. He’s a good jumpshooter, but he has virtually no ability to create for himself inside, and simply being a good passer isn’t nearly enough to make up for his scoring deficiencies.

Unless you want to attribute all those playoff losses to bad luck.

by YaoPau on Feb 10, 2009 12:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

YaoPau....do you realize that...

1997 T-Wolves lost to a Houston Rocket team with Hakeem Olajowon, Clyde Drexler and Charles Barkley on it.

1998 T-Wolves lost to a 61 win Seattle Supersonic team with Gary Payton, a pre-alcoholic Vin Baker and veteran snipers like Detlef Schremf, Dale Ellis and Hersey Hawkins.

1999 T-Wolves lost to the eventual champion Spurs.

In 2000, the 50 win T-Wolves lost to the 59 win Trailblazers who had Rasheed Wallace, Steve Smith and Scottie Pippen.

2001, the 47 win T-Wolves lost to the 58 win San Antonio Spurs.

2002, the 50 win T-Wolves lost to the 57 win Dallas Mavericks….who were led by Dirk Nowitzki, Steve Nash and Michael Finley.

2003, the 51 win T-Wolves lost to the 50 win 3 time NBA champion Los Angeles Lakers led by Kobe and Shaq (obviously) in the first of two losses to that Lakers team (in 2004 the 58 win T-Wolves lost to the 56 win Lakers who went on to lose to Detroit in the Finals that year).

Basically, the T-Wolves were outmanned and outgunned in the VAST majority of these series’. They only had homecourt advantage twice if i’m not mistaken in the 8 year playoff run they had….and both times they hosted the Shaq/Kobe’s Los Angeles Lakers!! Fun.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 10, 2009 11:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I concede! I concede!

You bring up good points. I looked at the 50+ wins and assumed home court advantage. I was wrong.

Maybe you’re right – with the teams he had, maybe 25ppg on a .530 TS% is as impressive as Amare’s 20ppg on a .600 TS% on the Suns. Maybe he was a superstar all those years, but his supporting cast was that bad that nobody could take those teams past the 1st round.

My counter to that is LeBron took an equally bad Cavs team to the NBA Finals. Granted, it was in a much weaker East, but Garnett had six chances to win a playoff series with a crappy supporting cast and he never won one until Cassell/Sprewell and 58 wins came along. If Garnett was really a superstar instead of just a damn good all-around player, I think he wins one of those series.

by YaoPau on Feb 10, 2009 2:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We see what happened when Garnett finally got to play with...

….talent on the level of the competition he faced. Like you said, he got to the Western Conference Finals when Cassell and Sprewell got there…and when he got to Boston and got a chance to play with a fellow future hall of famer or two, he won the Championship. Hell, NOBODY is a bigger MJ fan than I am, but it wasn’t until Scottie and Horace developed that the Bulls won. Do I think MJ would have won at some point?? I’m such a huge Jordan fan that of course I believe he’d have won with or without those guys. But the fact remains that even MJ needed decent parts.

As for LeBron, there is a difference between KG and LeBron. Now KG is an all-time great. No doubt. But when he finally leaves that game, no one will EVER have a discussion about whether he was the greatest player of all time. Now LeBron on the other hand is a different story. When he retires, if he keeps improving and eventually starts winning titles then there will DEFINITELY be talk about whether he is the greatest of all time.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 10, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Garnett got as far with the Minnesota Timberwolves and FAR less talent....

…as Stoudemire has gotten with the Phoenix Suns and their FAR superior talent. Name Garnett’s 3 best teammates in Minnesota.

I’d argue they are:

Sam Cassell
Latrell Sprewell
????

Can’t think of a third. Billups played with him, but wasn’t the Billups we see now. I’d probably lean toward Terrell Brandon as the third best teammate of Garnett’s.

We don’t even have to start with Stoudemire’s teammates. They were unquestionably better….yet in the grand scheme of things, the Suns made it no further than the T-Wolves did when KG FINALLY got teammates worth a damn.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 9, 2009 6:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

YAO PAU!! Are you really insisting that Garnett and Duncan haven't scored at least....

…on the same level as Stoudemire? Please take a look at the stats. Both these guys have consistently been 20 pt scorers as has Stoudemire. With the exception of his two seasons averaging about 26 ppg, his highest scoring season has been 20.9 ppg….and that’s this season.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/stoudam01.html

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/garneke01.html

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/duncati01.html

Take a look for yourself and see how similar all their PPG’s are…and how different their RPG’s are.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 9, 2009 6:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

YAO PAU!! Are you kidding me???

Garnett never scored like Amar’e???

Stoudemire’s 2 highest scoring seasons to this point are 26.0 ppg and 25. ppg2

Garnett’s 2 highest scoring seasons are 24.2 ppg (with 13.9 rpg and 5 apg to go with that) and 23 ppg (with 13.4 rpg and 6 apg to go with that).

Despite Stoudemire averaging a whopping 2 to 3 ppg more, I give Garnett the edge, hands down!!!

Like I said to Ozzie. If you look at an earlier post of mine on this board you will see that I’m all for obtaining Stoudemire. If NOTHING else, it stops a lot of Bulls fans from thinking Luol Deng is the best thing since sliced bread because we’ll have a REAL, ALL-STAR LEVEL frontcourt player. No hate here big fella. Just the real deal. Stoudemire is explosive, and a physical marvel (I argue that only Dwight Howard and LeBron James are more physically gifted than Stoudemire) but seeing as though Duncan and Garnett score about the same but bring FAR MORE to the table in other aspects of the game, he simply isn’t as valuable as either of those two guys at this point. I don’t see how you can dispute that.

The sad thing is that if Stoudemire left it all on the court like Duncan and Garnett, then he would be, in your words, a “Jordan-esque” superstar. I mean he’s already incredible. But he’s gotta get more out of his natural physical ability.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 9, 2009 6:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's about efficiency

Garnett took a lot more attempts than Amare.

by YaoPau on Feb 10, 2009 12:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Who would you want shooting. Garnett or Troy Hudson or Wally World????

I thought you would choose Garnett. Yet, as evidenced by his Assist Per Game numbers, he involved his lesser teammates to a great extent.

Stoudemire has had a wider array of top tier teammates to share shots with. Nash, Marion, Joe Johnson…now Jason Richardson, Shaq and Grant Hill (who all at 35 are better than Garnett’s best teammates as a T-Wolf.)

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 10, 2009 8:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Amare's not coming to the Bulls

Paxson will call Steve so that he can tell Bulls’ fans that he tried. But Amare is not a “character guy” that Paxdorf looks for. Plus Detroit can offer a better deal.

Sheed, Rip, and Tayshaun for JRich, Amare, and Barbosa. That keeps the suns really competitive. Actually shaves off 1 million for this year. Sheed comes off the books next year. And Detroit still gets to be about 7 million under the salary cap next year (Iverson’s Expiring, who I think they should deal to Dallas for J-Kidd) and has a core of Stuckey, Amare, and JRich, to along with role players like Maxiell and Amir Johnson.

Also, Hinrich is not going to be traded. Give up hope. Paxson doesn’t want to lose Hinrich and Gordon. And there is no way Gordon resigns with the Bulls. He wants to be paid top dollar. 10 million a year was a fair offer. He wants more. And the suns aren’t going to pay him either. Because he just isn’t that good. Undersized, no defense, streaky jump shooter. A poor man’s Gilbert Arenas. (when he was healthy) And the suns are looking for Defense, that’s not Gordon.

Tyrus is coming along better than I expected. But now is the time to trade him. He is only 6’8. Can’t really shoot. Doesn’t really have a post up game. I think we are seeing the best he can produce. 14-7 and about 2 blocks. Pretty good. But no Amare.

Unfortunately the only deal the Bulls will make is a minor one. Getting rid of Larry Hughes.

by paxdorf on Feb 9, 2009 1:25 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Do you have a crystal ball?

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Feb 9, 2009 2:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Getting rid of Larry Hughes would not be a minor trade.

Even though he’s not playing, he’s making a ridiculous amount of money. If the Bulls can pull a Camby deal, I’d shit myself.

by NittanyCub on Feb 9, 2009 2:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Tyrus vs. Noah next to Amare

I think I’d like to challenge the conventional wisdom that Tyrus should be the one to go for Amare if we make a play for him. The more I think about it, the more I think I’d like to see how Amare/Tyrus works out. Amare and the Suns as a team played their best ball with Amare basically as the five next to Marion or Diaw.

Tyrus has some similarities to those guys. Noah have very few, and in truth, he’s a weaker center, at least over the next couple of years, than Amare, even if it’s Noah’s ultimate position. I question just how ideal it’s going to be to pair up Noah and Amare offensively, and I don’t see much of an advantage defensively.

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 2:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

yes

if we think our roster is redundant now, imagine when you have essentially two of the same player.

MJ said not to give the ball to Bill Cartwright late in games. do you blame him??

by BULLieving in Miami on Feb 9, 2009 2:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I wish Thomas was still the GM of New York. He did such an excellent job -for everyone not in New York-

by NittanyCub on Feb 9, 2009 2:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not similar != work well together. Similar != won't work well together

Curry and Chandler were similar and generally sucked on the court together.

Beyond that, Amare and Tyrus are not that similar.

Amare’s got at least an inch and definitely 25-30lbs of muscle that Tyrus doesn’t have. These attributes help make Amare a stronger finisher and allow him, when motivated, to have more than a wing and a prayer when defending guys like Tim Duncan or Dwight Howard.

Tyrus is a nifty passer when he desires to be, and is quite a bit quicker. He also appears to enjoy playing further out from the basket. He envisions himself out there, whereas Amare doesn’t.

Those are very important differences, no matter how many blanket statements or superficially similar player pairings get posted.

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"He envisions himself out there, whereas Amare doesn’t."

Amare doesn’t?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 9, 2009 3:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Far as I know he's never declared himself a small forward!

He’s certainly a face up guy, but he looks quite a bit more comfortable close to the basket.

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

curry and chandler aren't that similar

one was a 7 ft tall skinny guy who had to dunk with two hands but could rebound and block shots, the other was a 7 ft tall fatass who scored easily but couldn’t rebound to save his life.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Feb 9, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I never said that not being the same type of player will always work well together, did I?

I’m saying that it’s more probable that they will be a better tandem as opposed to holding the same style of play for two players. It’s not that hard of a concept, man.

by NittanyCub on Feb 9, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

disagree

i think Noah is good on the weak side. Amare would draw attention and double teams, and one thing Noah does do well is go to the rim on the week side, or following a play, which is why he’s gotten more scoring opportunities lately. Noah isn’t our ideal center physically, but i do believe he has a good basketball IQ to know where to be on the court.

MJ said not to give the ball to Bill Cartwright late in games. do you blame him??

by BULLieving in Miami on Feb 9, 2009 2:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Tyrus is also good on the weakside. Who would you rather have going to the rim, Noah or Tyrus?

I’d think it has to be Tyrus.

Who would you rather have if you want to scare the other team from cheating off the weak side? Noah or Tyrus? I’d think you would prefer Tyrus.

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

tyrus sometimes disappoints

i like him to be more agressive, but sometimes i see him waiting to get the ball first before attacking the rim. i’m just saying i think Noah has a better knack to find his spot on the floor than Tyrus.

MJ said not to give the ball to Bill Cartwright late in games. do you blame him??

by BULLieving in Miami on Feb 9, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually think Noah could be more like what Ben Wallace used to be in Detroit

He does doe things well without the ball. An offensive force alongside him would definitely allow him to roam around the rim like he would do in Florida alongside Horford and wreak havoc.

Granted Ben Wallace had Rasheed in detroit. Rasheed gave him a little bit extra room cause of his 3 point threat but I see Amare doing similar things to Noah’s game

by Option27 on Feb 9, 2009 6:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Amare, hot zones, and the effect of Shaq

I thought it was interesting to look at where Amare shot from over the last couple years with the NBA Hot Spots tool.


Position 2008 2007 2006 Noah 08 Thomas 08
Under Hoop 57% 61% 68% 95% 50%
1st band 15% 19% 17% 5% 19%
2nd band 27% 17% 15% 30%
Outside 1% 2% 0% 2%

The effect of Shaq and the new Terry Porter offense has pretty clearly resulted in him taking more jumpers from further out.

As I pointed out above, that can obviously change with the Bulls because you wouldnt use Noah like you’d use Shaq. But at the same time, Noah is a guy who’s more or less completely out of his element offensively if he’s away from the basket. So much so that he’ll be left unguarded unless he can demonstrate he’s a threat (I don’t see him doing this).

Tyrus, on the other hand, is a guy who, while we complain about him taking too many jumpers, is a guy who we at least don’t completely cringe at him taking jumpers. And he’s certainly comfortable doing it.

I think the template I’d want to use for working with Amare is the pre-Shaq Suns:


Position Amare Marion Diaw
Under Hoop 68% 51% 51%
1st band 17% 19% 13%
2nd band 15% 7% 29%
Outside 0% 23% 7%
Total Shots 1,055 1,068 566

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 2:32 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Nice post, and not just because you agree with me.

I like the detailed evaluation of Amare.

I guess I should clarify that I’m not saying I out and out hate the Noah + Amare combo. I’m simply arguing that I’d prefer Tyrus + Amare when I think out the details.

Amare / Tyrus / Deng / Gordon / Rose has pretty much everything I’d want except experience and great defense from the guards. But offensively, top notch.

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 7:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Fantastic post.

I have nothing to add but a recommendation. Do you live in PHX or something? You seem to know a shitload about the Suns.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Feb 9, 2009 7:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ohhhh yeaaaa

phx or something. i’m actually concerned with coming across as too negative when it comes to amare and the trade. I also think sarver/kerr are idiots if they trade him to rebuild, or to save money. i think even shaq could be dumped for some $ improvement, if necessary.

overall, i’d summarize by saying i’m leery of turning over all of the new, young core for him. and maybe he’d fit better in miami for beasley and marion. that maybe it’s not worth the worry/cost of outbidding them, if that’s what the suns are set on.

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 9, 2009 8:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

For me, it's what you're looking for.

Offensively, I say Thomas and Amare for sure… unless Thomas has acontinued insistence on being a play-maker, as Marion did, and as I think Thomas should insist.

Defensively, I think Noah and Stoudemire are better complements. For reasons my boss looking over my shoulder won’t let me elaborate on right now.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 9, 2009 2:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Heh, I agree that I feel a bit better defensively about Noah + Amare

I just think the difference isn’t that big defensively. If I look at Noah, I think he’s a couple more years from really being what we want as far as strength at center. Amare would be better off at playing that role now and we could have Noah chasing around PFs like Bosh and Dirk.

I wonder what happens down the road however. I foresee Noah adding strength but slowing down a bit, and looking more like Chandler.

I also forsee Amare losing a bit off his fastball and gaining more weight as he gets older. Not to the Shawn Kemp or Derrick Coleman extremes, one hopes, but in that same basic mold.

So over the long haul, imagine them both being fives defensively. At least best suited to be fives defensively.

Tyrus I see staying a defensive 4. So while I agree in the immediate sense that Noah’s the better fit, when I think about where I see them going, I still might prefer Tyrus

by Sports2 on Feb 9, 2009 3:24 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of the Bulls not making any trades yet,

can we get a countdown application on the site somewhere? I saw on ‘Bright Side of the Sun’ that they have a ‘Shaq retirement countown’ that literally counts the days, minutes and seconds until his contract is up. It’s pretty funny, and another bell and whistle that could be added to the blog.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 9, 2009 4:06 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Somewhere on the web

I saw on Omer Asik to the Bulls countdown. It’s crazy if you read some of the blogs about him. Dude has a bit of a cult following.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 9, 2009 5:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i have a serious fear that vinny will convince pax that stoudemire is not the “team” guy chicago needs. Maybe i over value his influence on his higher ups, but i fear it none the less. also i would trade the right combo of players not named rose to get stat

by mj4ever on Feb 9, 2009 6:47 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

average this past month and week

Tyrus
15gms .474(FG) .750(FT) 0.1(3pts) 11.5(pts) 6.5(rebs) 1.1(ast) 0.9(stl) 2.2(blks) 1.4(TO)
3gms .500(FG) .737(FT) 0.7(3pts) 17.3(pts) 11.7(rebs) 2.0(ast) 1.0(stl) 2.3(blks) 2.3(TO)

Amare
16gms .498(FG) .820(FT) 0.0(3pts) 19.3(pts) 7.6(rebs) 1.8(ast) 0.6(stl) 1.1(blks) 2.9(TO)
4gms .471(FG) .871(FT) 0.0(3pts) 18.8(pts) 9.5(rebs) 1.0(ast) 1.0(stls) 0.3(blks) 3.0(TO)

by trig on Feb 9, 2009 8:08 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Let's have the last three games repeat for Tyrus for the rest of the season.

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 9, 2009 10:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A decade without a superstar, go for STAT.

Tyrus would have an Al Jefferson effect in phoenix, but who cares? Stoudemire, Deng, Rose would provide a real CORE, to build around.

Blog a Bull: Where your Friendly Bulls Blogger happens.

by broseleay301 on Feb 9, 2009 8:40 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Has anyone else considered ...

the fact that Amare is a world-class jagoff that will basically destroy any semblance of team chemistry that exists? I tell Amare thanks, but no thanks, we’ve already gone thru this b.s. with Douchebag A: Ben Wallace, and Douchebag B: Eddie Robinson?

Build with the guys you’ve got.

by MikePeplowski on Feb 9, 2009 8:42 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. I hope Pax passes on Amare. 5-7 extra wins next year ain't worth it.

The reasons have been so well stated before that I won’t repeat them.

by T Maple on Feb 9, 2009 8:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Amar'e may be a bit of a primadonna, but...

…he’s in a completely different class as a player than either Ben Wallace or Eddie Robinson. He’s no choir boy, but he’s no Pac-Man Jones either.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Feb 9, 2009 10:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Deng

Matt, I’m w/you, both because Gordon needs to stay on the floor unless we need to shut somebody down, in which case I want Thabo there, and b/c I’m willing to trade Deng to get Amare. Forgive me if I’m redundant, but Amare has Luol’s range and a more agressive offensive demeanor. We have guys who can space the floor, Deng’s not one of them, and our joint will be mad crowded if Rose, Amare, Deng, and whoever is playing 5 are all shooting form midrange or closer. Amare can dominate inside, and he’ll still pull more rebounds than Deng. If we have him, he’ll stay motivated b/c we’ll be feeding him. I don’t want to trade Tyrus OR Joakim. I’ve always thought some of us were wrong projecting Tyrus as, first, a Ben Wallace type, and on this thread, oddly a Stoudemire type, when he seems more to me like a Marion-type, light/mobile/good defensive instincts/shot-in-progress.
We talk about getting contracts off the books, but really, Nocioni and Hinrich’s contracts get easier to swallow or move as time goes on, and if we hang onto Tyrus and Noah, we could use Noc at the 3 exclusively. I’d start Rose Gordon Noc Amare Noah,
w/Thabo, and Tyrus as situational 6th men, and Kirk as my backup point.

by Sko on Feb 10, 2009 12:05 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

marionette and Bulls2

clearly I hadn’t yet read your contributions. I’m with you.

by Sko on Feb 10, 2009 12:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yep

I’ve always seen him as marion type player and not a post player. A guy that can have an impact on the game on both ends of the court and can score w/o calling plays specifically for him.

by trig on Feb 10, 2009 2:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

UPDATE
A source shot down one report that the Bulls and Miami Heat were the front-runners to land Stoudemire, saying the two teams that have offered the most for the All-Star forward have yet to be publicly identified.

by J Theory on Feb 10, 2009 8:09 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Blackstar_small
Plan B: if the Bulls fail to sign a FA superstar at the 2 or the 4 spots...
Small
How About A Whole New Plan?
Small
Game Preview #10: Chicago Bulls vs. Los Angeles Lakers
Small
Rose Problem: Trying too hard to please Vinny and "teammates"
Small
Your thought on a GS-Chi Ellis A-R for Kirk TT trade dreams
Noah-thumb-500x401-6596_small
What's going on in Derrick Rose's head?
Drose2_small
what i'd do as GM right now...
Small
The concern about Rose...
Old_logo_gif_small
Game Preview #10: Bulls at Sacramento Kings
Small
The move that no one talks about

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger