January-Basketball on Paper Style
[ UPDATE: Scotter's also done the same work for Nov+Dec -ed.
From the FanPosts. I'll even add a couple numbers via David Thorpe (naturally, given the subjects): PER since December 1st (up until the Suns game) for Deng was 18.03, for Thomas 17.57. With Deng's PER over 21 in January -ed.]
There's been a lot of discussion about what's happened in January. I calculated some of the advanced statistics for the month of January since advanced splits aren't available online. Here's January:
| January | USG% | TO% | eFG% | TS% | ORtg | DRtg | Poss | OR% | DR% | FTr | AS% | MIN |
| TEAM | 20.0 | 15.5 | 48.5 | 52.9 | 106.7 | 107.6 | 1492.6 | 29.4 | 74.3 | 22.0 | 61.3 | |
| OPP | 20.0 | 15.0 | 48.6 | 54.2 | 107.6 | 106.7 | 1490.6 | 25.7 | 70.6 | 28.0 | 54.4 | |
| Rose | 24.1 | 14.5 | 44.8 | 47.5 | 100.7 | 112.8 | 261.7 | 4.3 | 6.6 | 11.6 | 32.3 | 570 |
| Gordon | 23.4 | 17.4 | 49.6 | 54.9 | 103.3 | 111.5 | 252.2 | 1.8 | 8.7 | 25.1 | 17.5 | 565 |
| Thomas | 17.7 | 12.4 | 45.9 | 54.0 | 112.2 | 102.8 | 153.2 | 7.9 | 16.1 | 38.3 | 6.9 | 455 |
| Deng | 19.9 | 9.9 | 51.0 | 56.8 | 117.1 | 105.2 | 152.1 | 6.4 | 21.3 | 28.6 | 10.5 | 402 |
| Nocioni | 19.3 | 14.1 | 46.1 | 51.8 | 100.7 | 107.6 | 141.7 | 1.7 | 19.7 | 23.9 | 6.9 | 386 |
| Noah | 15.6 | 14.7 | 56.6 | 54.0 | 115.2 | 104.8 | 108.7 | 17.5 | 20.4 | 10.8 | 6.3 | 366 |
| Hinrich | 19.3 | 20.7 | 49.4 | 52.7 | 102.9 | 109.1 | 111.3 | 3.0 | 8.8 | 18.0 | 28.9 | 302 |
| Sefolosha | 15.6 | 21.0 | 52.1 | 55.1 | 103.3 | 105.9 | 80.8 | 5.4 | 21.3 | 12.9 | 13.5 | 272 |
| Gooden | 22.3 | 9.4 | 47.6 | 54.6 | 115.9 | 108.5 | 84.9 | 10.1 | 21.7 | 29.3 | 9.5 | 200 |
| Gray | 16.0 | 23.4 | 55.9 | 58.5 | 105.8 | 106.6 | 47.1 | 8.0 | 21.1 | 26.5 | 12.0 | 154 |
| Hughes | 22.5 | 21.1 | 42.9 | 47.5 | 87.1 | 107.5 | 61.6 | 1.6 | 14.2 | 19.6 | 12.1 | 144 |
| Hunter | 18.8 | 29.3 | 45.0 | 46.0 | 83.4 | 107.7 | 27.3 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 10.0 | 25.0 | 76 |
| Simmons | 21.0 | 0.0 | 60.0 | 57.4 | 124.1 | 109.2 | 9.6 | 14.0 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 24 |
Statistically this was a .500 team that went 7 and 9. The one encouraging sign was that the team performed much better on the defensive boards than earlier in the season. Deng, Sefolosha, and even Nocioni were all back to their career norms after very poor starts by all three on the defensive boards.
It was a terrible offensive month for all the perimeter players. Gordon, Hinrich, Sefolosha, and Nocioni all had offensive ratings below 104. Derrick had an especially bad month with a TS% below 48% and a free throw rate that was basically last on the team. The other guards had serious turnover issues in January. When Nocioni is taking a shot every time he touches it, a turnover rate of 14% is a serious problem. And so is getting out rebounded on the offensive boards by Ben Gordon.
If there's a bright spot this month it's the play of Thomas, Deng, and Noah. Thomas had a solid month. He was able to make 46% of his FGA. That's how low the threshold is for him to be an effective offensive player because he gets to the FT line so much. Deng was pretty close to what he was in 06/07. Noah's usage rate was up so he was much more involved offensively, while still playing efficient offense.
It's only one month so the usual caveats apply, but there's at least a glimmer of hope. If those three could maintain their January level of play this team could be what many of us hoped it could be with some improved play by the guards. And of course if Gooden, Nocioni, and Hughes would just magically disappear from the roster, I could really enjoy this team. If they were terrible, which I don't believe that they would be, at least they would be terrible with a purpose.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
159 comments
|
12 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yay! New Scotter post. This usually means intelligent conversation about basketball.
This makes me happy.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 3:09 PM CST reply actions
indeed
numbers for the sake of numbers rather than trying to win some argument…yet sadly argument arrise from such numbers… :(
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
they aren't numbers for the sake of number. they are numbers to look at and see if they jive with
the opinions we’ve all been forming on the site the last month. They comport with my sense of this team over the last month. Derrick has been much less efficient offensively which is not good considering he’s a sieve on defense. Deng, Thabo, et. al. have hit the boards much better this month. Tyrus’s jumper has been falling with more regularity and he gets to the line at a great rate and shoots a very good clip for a big man. Oh and Nocioni stinks, glad the numbers back that up, because it’s obvious to anyone with eyes and a functioning basketball brain.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 3:33 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think that's quite what Pic meant
More that Scotter calculates statistics in the interest of what the stats are, rather than hunting down stats that support whatever argument he wants to make.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
so you are supposed to look at the evidence THEN (?!?!) form a conclusion, what kind of debating is this!
I see the point, I guess I just read picco's comment the wrong way
but there’s nothing wrong with using stats to back up an observation that you made independent of those stats. Context is important. Scotter always makes it a point to say that.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 3:50 PM CST up reply actions
Thats why i agreed with you
Most people post stats with an argument. So and so sucks heres why. We should trade these players heres why. Arguments that have no end and many perspectives and often will create conflicts which at some point becomes depressing to read. Here we have scotter, who puts up stats for a different reason. To inform, to discuss the team and how they have performed so far, what is lacking and what is on the right track. To provide as what you said, and how i define, intellegent conversation.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
What's the alternative?
Saying “So-and-so sucks and I have no evidence as to why.” Yeah, using statistics to back up an argument is a bad idea.
Usually it’s a stat-sided argument against a non-stat-sided argument. Yeah, those digress. One’s relying on empirical evidence, the other on guts, feelings, memories, etc. They’re not debating in the same area; it’s not a surprise they get bad.
On the other hand, when arguments become “stats vs. stats”, there are still disagreements, but it goes to the level of logical, rational and reasoned on discussing which stats are a “better” indication and why. Those don’t tend to get nearly heated.
Most arguments here of course, go:
A: “This person is great.”
B: “No he isn’t. These stats help explain why.”
A: “Well, I like him, so instead of just sticking with that, I’m going to say, ’You’re wrong.’”
B: “Here’s more stats that show why that player isn’t great.”
A: “Well, this has digressed. I’m depressed. He’s a great player! This is not debatable!!!”
I can see how Person A could get fed up.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Its never that simple
Person b would get fed up too….then more people are added to the mix, and before we know it we arent talking about the bulls but competing over two players. Theres two thoughts that i often consider, to each his own, and we have no real truth anyway, just a hope to find truth. We have no say or power either, just a hope that what we predict, believe and desire becomes justified and/or real.
Also, if you ever play the game of basketball, let me know how many times your team considers that statistical advantages over just the overall playing style of a player. Meaning, just because a guy can put up great numbers, doesnt mean that he is better for the team. The game came first, stats were created to prove points people like john hollinger had about the game.
And even further, somtimes you just like the way a certain player plays, even though its not at a high level. Sometimes you just want to be able to discuss your favorite basketball team, without having to listen to stastical evidence about how your favorite player isnt that good. Maybe you would rather discuss how the team is doing….and thats what i made my post about. A rare neutral post that recognises the bulls as a team rather than players vs players, who should leave and who should stay.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Feb 2, 2009 5:43 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Wait, are suggesting that Scotter doesn't link to stats or quote stats...
…to help reinforce his points of view?
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
huh
when did i suggest that?
this?
“Here we have scotter, who puts up stats for a different reason. To inform, to discuss the team and how they have performed so far, what is lacking and what is on the right track. To provide as what you said, and how i define, intellegent conversation.”
I was refering to this post, i thought the “here we have” kind of took care of that….guess not.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
I'd say the "scotter...for a different reason" part suggested that.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Further, you seem to be suggesting...
…that others who use statistics don’t happen to look at statistics, in addition to watching games, and form an opinion on a player or team. Then, said persons, might get in a discussion with someone, and in addition to try to explain what they’ve seen, they might throw in a few stats to back up the point.
This is a bad thing?
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Well, in fairness
you can’t really defend Kirk Hinrich’s awesome play of late with statistics only!
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
you can't really defend it period. He's only seemed good because
the alternative is Larry Hughes.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 5:30 PM CST up reply actions
That was sarcasm, my friend.
But yes, you’re right. He has pretty much sucked, and this is probably why Picco made that comment about statistics earlier….just a hunch, I guess. But I think I’m right.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
yeah, I understood the sarcasm. I just wanted to take a shot
at Hinrich and that opened the opportunity, so I took it.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 5:42 PM CST up reply actions
Fine by me!
Kirk needs to go. That contract is a complete waste for this roster.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
awww
this thought found its way even here….maybe i am the real bringer of kirk hate….if all kirk fans leave the site, will the site bash kirk? But thats sort of like “if a tree falls in the woods, and no ones around to hear it, will it make a sound” kind of thought.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
Kirk is not properly suited to this team. His only value
this year has been that he’s not Larry Hughes. Not exactly a ringing endorsement. We’d be better of with the cap space.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 5:51 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not trying to bash Kirk
But do you really think that at the amount he’s being paid by the organization, he’s really bringing full value to the table? Price tag is too high to be a guy that’s our 3rd most-talented guard. Couple this with the impending 2010 free agent bonanza, and it’s just flat-out silly to keep a guy like him on the roster.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
Yea i know about the price tag thing
Ive been in agreement for trading kirk for the betterment of the team, its best for both parties since kirk really cant play the pg and d. rose is well…..point god comes to mind. I actually like the prospect of kirk with the blazers cuz i think it puts the blazers in a near contention spot, and puts kirk in a situation where he can be his most productive.
The only thing, and perhaps the biggest thing, which has caught me on the “wrong” side of arguments is how the cap relief for kirk would be used. If kirk is traded for a real player (meaning someone who is worth making a starter) especially at the front court position, im all in. If kirk is traded for just cap relief then i want it to be to sign a good free agent, not ben gordon.
My biggest irk with the trading or kirk (heh that rhymes) is that most believe that we should then pay to have gordon signed, and i cant seem to understand the logic. I agree with the rest of the media outlets in the league that gordon is a 6th man, and though he does produce the best out of all of our guards offensively, and though his offensive numbers may match up with some of the superstars in the league, he doesnt have all of thier abilities.
To take it further, i dont believe that gordon can work well with rose, its not so much of a chemistry issue, but more of a complimentary issue. I would love to go for a joe johnson in 2010 rather then pay gordon whatever he wants and then in 2010 listen to people complain more about gordon and his limitations.
I think people make alot of good arguments pro gordon, but i often wonder if they realize that those pro gordon arguments are used against the likes of hinrich thabo and hughes, and once those players are gone, those arguments wont be as effective.
So im not against the notion or logic of hinrich being gone, its just the moves after he is gone that i question. And if the hive mentality is any indication, i cringe at the thought of the future.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
Yeah, I'd be willing to dump him for expirings in a heartbeat
I wouldn’t even ask for any talent back in return. If I could get talent back, obviously, you take it, but in no way would it be a deal breaker for me. He’s a bench player on a starter’s contract. That doesn’t work.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 5:50 PM CST up reply actions
um....wtf?
i dont know where you got that idea from, it sounds like probalby what fundementallysound thought i was saying also…..so if thats the case sorry to all, i wrote something that can imply what i dont mean…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
Speaking for myself, I love stats and rarely see them as bad
And obviously everyone has their favorite players or teams and will tend to interpret any stats in light of those preferences. Objectivity is a very difficult thing for humans.
What I meant about Scotter’s posts (and I’m not suggesting he is the only one around here who does this, so feel free to take this as a comment on posts in the general style and nature of the one Scotter has posted here) is that he calculated and posted the same stats for all the players on the team and put them all out there for people to reference when responding to his following interpretation of them. You’ve got a decent sample size (with the exception of the bench sitters who don’t play enough minutes, but the fact that they’re bench dwellers kind of speaks for itself), a wide variety of stats for discussion.
This would be in comparison with a “oh my gosh, (insert player) is the (best or worst) ever because he had a (insert +/-) on (insert specific game), or the any of the posts that follow a player’s great/horrible single game with "he’s awesome/sucks” based on stats for that one night.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
Yeah...
Can we outlaw the +/- stat on this site now? And while we are at it, every other stat that makes Nocioni look like a halfway decent player.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions
I concur.
Doing research w/ hopefully no bias, and then drawing conclusions from what one got (or allowing others to draw their own conclusions) is always excellent. It was the implication (or explicit statement) that using statistics to back up a point is bad thing because it leads to digressed arguments made me literally shake my head.
Correlation does not equal causation! :-)
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Was what i wrote that vague?
You got it perfectly right, yet fundamentallysound got it perfectly wrong…..ahh maybe i should just stop posting or something….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
I think it was just the phrasing "numbers for the sake of numbers"
which through me off. Saying something is there just for the sake of itself is generally taken to have a negative connotation.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 4:00 PM CST up reply actions
yea i should stay away from vague comments
also i wrote a reply above trying to be more specific (anyone wonder why i wrote so much, its probably to avoid my constant vague phrases, or explain them….i think)
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
it was more a lazy reading on my part than anything, no worries.
glad we’re in agreement.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 4:21 PM CST up reply actions
Personally...
I like when you go off and write your usual ten paragraph diatribe. I can’t say I always read them, but I feel a kinship in your enthusiasm.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:05 AM CST up reply actions
Don't Flag Me for Returning to the Point
Oddly the stat that most sticks out at me is the win/loss ratio. For some reason, my recollection of January involved a lot more losses, and was surprised to find out we were one game under .500. That said, we still should have been better since this was a relatively easy month.
it's because we had a five game losing streak, that makes the whole month seem more depressing
especially given how close and winnable some of those losses were.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 4:22 PM CST up reply actions
Add that to the strength of schedule
Not to mention the perception of other teams as a team the Bulls should beat. At least it ended on a good note, though, right?
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
Noce has a great "grit and hustle" rating though.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
can we place a moratorium on these jokes for a while?
I mean I like shittin’ on Noc as much as anybody, but the “grit and hustle” comment about Noc has gotten so tired it’s almost as annoying as when people say it and take it seriously. I’d prefer if we all just ignored Noc’s existence.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 4:32 PM CST up reply actions
He's the elephant on the roster...
Seriously, as much as we try, we can’t ignore him and his contract that goes into the next millenium.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions
Tyrus Thomas... Honestly...
I’ve been looking for a place to post this, and hopefully Matt see’s my comment, but… gasp… I finally think Tyrus is a keeper. I was wrong about him. Matt was right. He finally got the minutes, and I’m learning to live with any boneheaded mistakes, but TT brings a dimension to our team that we will almost certainly would not be able to replace… Unless we can get Bosh… Then I say trade the bum!
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions
Ya know... who knows what's going to happen?
No one of us do. That’s what makes following the team (or sports in general, or human behavior even more generally) so much fun. But he has a lot of potential. He’s a great athlete with very good defensive skills and very underrated offensive skills. And, as Matt has always said, it’s very important for this organization that he succeeds. if he can somehow get to the level Deng was in 06-07 (better would be great, of course) and Deng gets back there, and Rose comes even mildly close to his potential, that’s a core of 3 guys under-25 that would be unrivaled by any team. Throw in a helping of an above-average player in Noah………
Anyway, my point here being, maybe he’s great, maybe he’s not. But let’s at least let it be proven one way or the other. Or something.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Thinking about Deng...
I always liked him, and maybe I’m just opening up a can of worms for others to knock him now, but… He probably regressed a bit at the beginning of this year (certainly stat wise), but I think he has finally figured out a decent role on THIS team. That takes time when you are a wing player on a team with a rookie point guard. Maybe some will say that the Bulls overpaid for him, but personally I think it’s a special kind of player that has the ability to adapt their game for the betterment of the team. Deng still has a ways to go, but we’re starting to see what this team could look like when he contributes (especially in the 4th).
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:39 AM CST up reply actions
I agree.
Deng’s a good third option and being paid like it on a “championship-caliber” team. Now, maybe a team should try to lock up it’s 1st and 2nd options first, and that’s understandable, but he’s so young still. He likely won’t be on the decline at any point during his contract.
Now the Bulls have a future 1st option in Derrick Rose. I think Ben Gordon is an okay 2nd option for offense, but a great 3rd option or 3rd-best player. If the Bulls can somehow get a player at the PF or C position that is better than Gordon, and they could keep Rose, Gordon and Deng, wow.
I still think Deng and Gordon are the team’s two best players, right now. And that’s not a great team. Hopefully though, Rose makes that leap over them in the next couple of years.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
i don't think it's ever good to have your PG as your 1st option
now to your eariler point… it’s much more fun watching competent management and a team win championships that our present situation. I don’t know it you were old enough to enjoy the 6 championship years this team had. The feeling and the pride far exceeds anything we have witness theses Paxson/post Phil Jackson Krause years.
I can only imagine the feeling now in Pitt.
man up!
Chris Paul.
Magic Johnson?
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
Paul hasn't won a championship yet
and its questionable if he will, but if he does with the present team, then David West or another star player will need to be the 1st option.
Magic Johnson was never the 1st option, probably only once when Kareem got injured, and therefore he was really the PG during that period but also the center.
Philly tried it with the “answer” and the question still begs itself!
I believe really talented PG serve as excellent 2nd options because it always keep the opponents guessing and not easily defended during playoff championship caliber games.
man up!
I think we are splitting hairs here...
I think of first option as where the offense originates. Just because CP3 tosses 5 dunks up to West that doesn’t really qualify West as the first option in my mind. Remove CP3 from that equation and everything falls apart.
And with regards to Magic… He absolutely did it all.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (born Ferdinand Lewis Alcindor, Jr.; April 16, 1947)
No argument just discussion and history lessons for you guys who didn’t see the other great one play
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kareem_Abdul-Jabbar
man up!
Yeah, we all know about Kareem...
His career was nothing short of legendary. He was great, hall of famer, and a magical/tender lover in the bedroom too.
But ask yourself this, If you were drafting an “all time” team who would you take ahead of him? Probably not many players, but I’d take Magic in a heartbeat.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 2:41 PM CST up reply actions
Well, the one counterpoint is supply and demand
Assuming that this “draft” is going to involve around 24 other fantasy gm’s, let’s assume they’re all reasonbaly astute fans. Typically, in any era, the falloff between the top 2 7’ers and the rest is much greater than at any other height/position. So if I had to choose a fantasy team from any era, given the first pick, it would typically be the best center, even though I think the era of the low-post ended with Chamberlain. Assuming an even distribution of picks at the other positions, my second pick would allow me to select the 3rd-6th best at another position, which would allow me to select another fabulous player. So over the eras, that would give me Miken in the 50’s, Russell or Wilt, Kareem, Patrick or Hakeem, Shaq, Duncan, and Howard. For an all-time team, the same pressure would exist. Now, Russell, Wilt, Kareem or Shaq; that IS a question.
Jordan, I think, is the only possible exception to that rule. But since most of these GM’s would know that they had to draft a center based on the supply and demand rule, I’d guess that if I passed on drafting my center first, by the time my second pick came around, I wouldn’t be getting any of the top 7 or 8 centers, maybe not even top 10.
Fun idea; wonder if Matt would allow for a fantasy draft here among 24 or so “GMs”, or teams of GMs, and if anyone has the computing power to run a theoretical season. Must have been done somewhere. Anyone ever see that kind of project?
by California Al on Feb 4, 2009 7:25 AM CST up reply actions
You are absolutely right...
The other counterpoint would be to only draft within positions. IE: If you already have Wilt Chamberlain at center, how ridiculous/amazing would it be to have Bill Russell starting as a power forward next to him? Obvioulsy Bill Russell was not a PF, but he would have most likely dominated the position. Plus, standing next to Wilt would have made for an impenetrable defense no doubt.
I like the way you think California Al. My friends and I play this game a lot (mostly while drinking). The conversation will usually devolve to something like “would 5 Michael Jordan’s beat 5 Wilt Chamberlains in a full court game?”… God I love sports… My wife on the other hand couldn’t care less.
Get that 24 GM idea going and I’m on that in a hot second.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 4, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions
My thoughts exactly
When you have a point guard capable of scoring around 20 ppg, isn’t he by definition the first option? He has the choice (option) of shooting or passing, which typically is the first option in the offense. And in defending said offense, if the first thing to defend is the threat of the pg just scoring quickly and easily (ala Thomas, Johson, Nash, Parker, Stockton, etc), as opposed to an offense that’s first threat comes from a wing or the post (any of Phil’s nine rings, Boston and Houston), isn’t in fair to call the pg the first option, as in sequentially?
by California Al on Feb 4, 2009 6:42 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah, but he makes inappropriate sexual advances...
Never good for a 1st option.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 2:31 PM CST up reply actions
you young guys just type names of great players without really knowing history
The Pistons seem to follow a similiar model today as they did during Isiah two championship years. Basically a balance team without really a 1st option. Please note, this wasn’t one of the greatest NBA championship teams in comparision to other great teams, they just held the torch until the Jordan Bulls reached maturity.
During Isiah time, they got scoring from many different players on any given night (Vinnie “microware” Johnson, Bill Laimbeer, Mark Aguirre, Joe “Finals MVP” Dumar, James Edwards and even Dennis Rodman scored over 40 pts in one game..(side note.. Ben Wallace couldn’t carry a torch anywhere near Rodman)
man up!
Well that wasn’t at all condescending.
FYI, there are very few universal truths when discussing anything with a qualifier of “greatest” before it, but you seem to think otherwise.
I’m not trying to start a fight with you, but Isiah Thomas was a very solid player (easily the best Piston) on a very solid championship team. And before you say anything about my age, I was definitely old enough to remember the “bad boys” era.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 2:53 PM CST up reply actions
think about this ..
the best player on a team (many times the PG) doesn’t necessarily mean the 1st offensive option?
Sure… Isiah Thomas, Chris Paul and Magic Johnson fit this mold, and hopefully Derrick Rose down the line…
man up!
Wait ...
So Chris Paul isn’t the first option for the Hornets? I’d definitely disagree with that. He has the highest USG%, and he has the ball pretty much at all times in their offense.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
Khalid.. I don't despise youth ...
And if you’re about my age, you actually envy and celebrate it,
Still it never hurts to throw a few jabs every now and then, if you can take it without being offended?.
man up!
I'm guessing you're offensive to older people too
it’s more of insulting someone’s intelligence at this point.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 3, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions
Matt
I know you would jump in,, and take a shot… on any open opportunity… That’s cool!
But, if I insulting anyone’s intelligence, I offer by apology ….
Yet, I know based on reading BaB and the comments of those involved, they are all tough as nails, can handle themselves and not offended by me. ;)
man up!
I am older
and tough as nails, and cna handle myself AND offended by you. Why, again, isn’t a high scoring PG the first option in an offense? Oh, yeah, because Paxson blows.
by California Al on Feb 4, 2009 7:32 AM CST up reply actions
when I'm driving and I see old people beginning to cross the street ..
I speed up fast…, but for you California Al, elder statesmen I have nothing but admiration… (aside from your unyielding Paxson support? .. Are you really related to Jerry Reinsdorf? like a younger brother or something… because I know you’re not a fan of Dorf, yet you and him both have Paxson admiration in common!)
I just wish I knew Matt and saw him crossing the street.. I’d mistake him for a real old guy.
man up!
did you just threaten to run Matt over in your car?
Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger
by fundamentallysound on Feb 4, 2009 3:31 PM CST up reply actions
come on fundamental ??
read between the lines…
I’ve didn’t say I ever hit a old person, Maybe I just press my foot to the pedal more?
man up!
you sir are a tool.
Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger
by fundamentallysound on Feb 4, 2009 3:56 PM CST up reply actions
TO MURDER MATT?
You, sir, sicken me.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
exult is a mascot here.
if more people took him seriously it’d be a bigger problem.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 4, 2009 5:01 PM CST up reply actions
No, I'm not a fan of Jerry
I think he’s a great guy to go in on a deal with, but I think in a lot of ways he prevents the Bulls from being their best, and I hate that.
I’ve qualified my Pax support by saying that I just don’t know if he’s good many times. But when the chairman reserves his veto power, controls contract negotiations and puts a non-negotiable cap on publicly, how can you say where the meddling stops? Ergo, hard for me to make a determination of whether he’s good, bad or ugly, but I like him. OK?
by California Al on Feb 4, 2009 10:17 PM CST up reply actions
look it up— Isiah led his team in scoring during those championship years. Isnt that what a first option is? Isiah was also the first option for crunch time. Watch the 88 finals and see how the Pistons all defer to Isiah even though he was running on one leg. look at them during their time outs and see how, even with his injury, they implored him and only him to take over. Thats your first option.
by TheMoon on Feb 3, 2009 3:03 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
TheMoon I can appreciate your research ..
Still I know Dumars was the Final MVP during on of those championships. (maybe Isiah was the other..?)
man up!
1) Not just research, I have actually watched those games.
2) Tony Parker was the 2007 finals MVP because for one series he torched the other team. This did not change the essence of who the Spurs are, or cause them to change who their 1st option is.
by TheMoon on Feb 3, 2009 3:17 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
You missed the point...
Dunncan wasn’t the MVP… Thus trotting out the stat the Dumars was negates your failed attempt to put TheMoon in his place.
Get it?
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 3:19 PM CST up reply actions
Didn't miss the point
ignored and changed it.
by California Al on Feb 4, 2009 7:34 AM CST up reply actions
not sure where to throw this in...
not even suire if you guys were debating this…
but if there was an all-time draft today…30 teams and everyone that ever played is 20 years old right now and you dont get the first or 2nd pick and are not smart enough to pick Magic or kareem you prolly aint winning a championship.
I imagine Wilt would go 3rd. Russell 4th. MJ 5th if every GM over the last 20 years were being polled this would be the most often found result if we take market and butts in the seats out of the equation and draft purely for winning a championship.
and with today’s rules magic would be essentially unstopable.
MJ on the other hand could be defeded with a stud like Kareem in his prime and ..say…Mutumbo next to him and Pippen on the wing Reggie Miller on the other and Kidd at PG.
MJs prime years conincided with an era of weak C’s and only a few good PF’s.
Just dream, robinson, ewing really.
I love the Bulls tried and true…i highly doubt the 96 team could beat the best showtime laker team…and kareem was pushing 40.
Russell before M.J. was when you lost me.
M.J.‘s prime coincided with a lot of HOF Cs and PFs that didn’t get rings in partly thanks to Jordan’s prime. Barkley, Malone, Kemp, and Shaq in addition to Olajuwon and Ewing all got their team to the NBA finals during that period. There weren’t nearly that many HOF Cs and PFs in their primes during the 80s. There was basically the Lakers, the Celtics, and Moses and Erving. I think you need to reevaluate your opinions.
Thank you
How many HOF centers per era are you expecting? Hakeem and Patrick fell a little short of the Wilt-Russell part 2 that was hoped for, but they were great. Add various parts of Mutombo, Shaq, Robinson, Ewe, Parrish, Laimbeer; wait a minute, did anyone but the Bulls NOT have a very good center?
by California Al on Feb 5, 2009 3:19 AM CST up reply actions
BTW
Thanks for the usual excellent post
by California Al on Feb 5, 2009 3:19 AM CST up reply actions
Just curious...
Do you think the Bulls would have beaten either of the Olajuwon teams that won during MJ’s first “retirement”? ie: if Michael had never left, and kept those teams rolling along from season beginning to end, could they have beaten Houston?
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 5, 2009 9:57 AM CST up reply actions
Sure. I believe the 93-94 team could have
been the best of all-time. That team won 55 games without Jordan. Jordan, Pippen, and Grant in the heart of their prime. Jordan would have been 30. Grant and Pippen would have been 28. Now you add Toni Kukoc to backup all three, allowing those guys to rest more during the season. At point guard there is the hyper efficient duo of Armstrong and Kerr. And the usual collection of big men-Cartwright, Williams, Wennington, Perdue, Blount, and King/Longley. Like I said that 93-94 team won 55 games with Pete Myers playing over 2000 minutes, and they took the eventual Eastern conference champion Knicks to 7 games without Jordan. Get Grant to resign, and the same team basically comes back the next year. When I started writing this I assumed the extra playoffs games would have eventually taken their toll, but I don’t see how the Knicks,Pacers, Magic, or Hawks would have been beaten the talent and team the Bulls would have had. And most of the East was already atrocious so there would have been a ton of easy regular season blow outs.
Now Olajuwon and the Rockets. I think the Bulls beat the Rockets without question. The Bulls were uniquely suited to beating teams with great centers. Olajuwon benefited from getting to go against teams that featured a great centers-Robinson, Ewing, and Shaq. All these teams relied on their center to be both the defensive anchor and the team’s leading scorer. That allowed Olajuwon to almost completely take other team’s defensive anchor out of help defense and forced the other team’s leading scorer to expend a ton of energy both defending Olajuwon and trying to score against arguably the best defensive center in history. The team that gave the Rockets the most trouble during those two seasons was the center-less Phoenix suns who took the Rockets to 7 games in the semis both seasons.
The Bulls could always throw 4-6 always fresh bodies at any great center. It didn’t matter how many fouls a Bulls center got as long as they made Olajuwon or another center work for their points. Would any of Otis Thorpe, Robert Horry, Mario Ellie, Vernon Maxwell, Kenny Smith, Sam Cassell, and Clyde Drexler give the Bulls a serious problem. I don’t what would have happened further down the line in this scenario, but I’m pretty sure that the Bulls get those two championships, and maybe they do get all eight.
You make a good point about Phoenix taking them to 7...
I never really thought about it that way. I always assume that MJ’s Bulls were unbeatable, but I’m also from Chicago… Kind of deflates my position when arguing with people in other cities (I live in the south and travel to NYC and LA on a semi-regular basis). I’ll be stealing your points from now on :)
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 5, 2009 4:05 PM CST up reply actions
Just to add an interesting note.
Jordan was worth an average of 17.5 win shares in the first 3-peat. Add that to the 55 won in 93-94…
He was worth 20.3 in 95-96 and 18.3 in 96-97. I don’t know how basketball projections are usually done, or if they can even project “wins” similar to baseball, but I thought that was really interesting.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
"Anyone else win 72?"
First problem, it’s impossible to extrapolate how players from the 60’s would play if they grew up in today’s world. Better competition, training, etc would have pushed them to higher development as well. Wilt was such a phenomenal athlete, I picture him being as dominant now as then, but with lower stats due to the offensive goaltending rule.
MJ proved able to overcome any center thrown at him, and I doubt that Kareem’s and Wilt’s prowess would have changed that much, so if he’s on the board, I have to take him. If I got Mike, I can probably get along just fine with a Thurmond, Hayes, Unseld or Gilmore.
by California Al on Feb 5, 2009 3:13 AM CST up reply actions
Wilt would have played against much bigger and stronger
players (relatively speaking) in the 1980/90s and his production would have been similar to Shaq’s. Similarly, put Shaq on a 1960’s team, and he would have an easy time physically dominating any center but Wilt.
Maybe we can?
by Granny Waiters on Feb 5, 2009 6:28 PM CST up reply actions
If you adjust Wilt's numbers
for the greater minutes he played and the much higher pace back then, Wilt’s numbers already start to look like Shaq. I think Wilt could have been just as dominant as Shaq. That’s still an a top ten all-time player.
Can't forget one thing
The same extrinsic factors that made big men better athletes 20 years later would have also made Wilt better. How much? Pure conjecture. But when people compare a 60’s Wilt with an 80’s Patrick always to assume the players somehow evolved in 20 years. Better training, better competition, better nutrition, etc all would have extended Wilt.
I think your right about Shaq type productivity, which some have argued is the best ever. I’m guessing we wouldn’t have seen a lot of finger-rolls which so many like to make fun of.
by California Al on Feb 6, 2009 12:12 AM CST up reply actions
Sweetness reigns supreme
the know-it-all-ness on pure hypothetical gets me every time.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
That's probably true...
I imagine that we’ll offer Rose (1st option) max money in five years, and hopefully we’ll get something decent for Gordon (preferred 2nd option) in a sign and trade if we can’t hold onto him… Which I hope we can.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 2:20 PM CST up reply actions
One thing that jumps out at me from the numbers is that Rose was one of the worst
on the entire team at getting to the line. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that his TS% was also one of the worst on the team. Given that he’s a horrid defender so far, him not scoring efficiently anymore is a genuine cause for concern. He needs to keep driving, he’s been settling for his mid-range J more and more and looks really timid about going to the rim anymore, and even when he does drive he contorts his body to avoid contact. He’s got to learn to live for that contact and use it to his advantage to get to the line. This is what efficient scorers do. It’s how DWade has made his living, it’s what has catapulted Devin Harris into his current stardome, and it’s part of what made MJ so great.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 4:54 PM CST reply actions
He really needs to work on getting to the line
A lot of times when he drives he makes such an impressive effort to get a layup off while avoiding contact that it isnt really a higher % shot then his jumper(when its on). He needs to find a balance between getting (clean) shots up and getting to the line…and some help from the refs.
Nice to see his assist % growing.
#s on T2, Noah and Thabo really support what weve been seeing from them.
not really, Wade has been injured so much simply because he has been unlucky.
lots of guys play with that style and don’t end up injured as much as Wade. It’s been a couple of freak things. The shoulder injury he had was him playing defense and had nothing to do with his attacking the rim. That was the major injury that really hurt him, but don’t worry about the facts, just keep chucking out cliched arguments that ignore the truth.
by fundamentallysound on Feb 2, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions
Agree to that
The shoulder injury that basically cost Wade two years (because he was and he said favoring the other side to save his shoulder and then his knee started to get issues) happened by the FT line area on the wing where he tried to run through a screen and ran into Battier…..it was a freak accident.
Well, he had to have all those injuries, you know
What sort of commercials would they make about Wade without them? ;)
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
Well I think one benefit that Rose has over Wade is that he has a decent jumpshot. I think Wade goes to the bucket
more out of necessity because he never had a great or even good jumpshot.
The Great Vin Scully Once said
of a careless commentator who threw stats around without thought, “Why, he uses statistics like a drunk uses a lamppost; that is, for support instead of illumination.” What I appreciate about Scotter’s work is that it is always illuminating. Thanks.
And I agree about the Noce bashing; we all know his limitations. Say what you want, I’ll take him over Larry Hughes any day, and Hughes has much more talent. Hopefully, they’ll both be traded for more useful pieces.
Then again,
I would take a deflated basketball for Larry Hughes.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
Be careful. We only want REAL "hot piles of garbage".
We don’t want Marbury or Steve Francis who are figurative “hot piles of garbage”. They would be just as bad as Hughes. Actually, Starbury would be worse, because he can’t stop talking to the media and showing up at games and saying completely asinine things. I don’t normally like to take shots at athlete’s intelligence, unless it is referring to Basketball IQ, but there is something seriously wrong with Steph. I’m just saying, sometimes we are so quick to get rid of Ben Wallace that we end up with Larry Hughes. Let’s make sure we only get an overpaid “big” who is willing to ride the pine and doesn’t think they are an all-star.
Give Larry credit so far,
He has been much better about not causing complete chaos since getting benched than I ever expected. What few comments have been released by the media really toe the teamspeak line, and there have even been a few glimpses of him smiling at and cheering on teammates from the bench.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
Yea kudos to you Larry!
You’re making $12,827,676, and you don’t have to do anything but pretend to be whoever the upcoming opposing guard is that the Bulls are playing in the practices and sit on the bench…
"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."
by Ugh It Live! on Feb 3, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions
if he's not traded by the deadline, he may be a lot more unhappy.
however, he does seem to be smiling often on the bench…
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
You would too for that kind of money.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions
Awwww cmon...
That’s just Larry being Larry. Ain’t he cute though?
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:32 AM CST up reply actions
I would be thrilled to sit anywhere for that money
because I suck at basketball – but I do think I’d have an issue if my current job decided to let me sit around as window dressing, even though I was still getting paid. Larry not playing is what I prefer for the team, but I still have some empathy for him that it’s a rough situation and understand he wants to be playing.
But honestly, when he started racking up the DNP-CDs, didn’t you expect a bit of a blow-up by this point? I totally agree with Jaina that it may not go so smoothly if he’s not traded by the deadline, but honestly I didn’t think it would go this smoothly before the trade deadline.
And for that matter, people would be all over him if he made a comment about not caring if he played as long as he gets paid.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
i don't like it either.
i wasn’t particularly happy when they sent tim thomas away, though at least larry sits on the bench heh. i just think if you’re not going to play someone, cut them and let them go somewhere they can do their job. not to say i wanted them to play thomas, since that guy is a thug, but i would have preferred them to release him then. as it is, tinsley may be filing a grievance against indiana for sending him away for the entire season while they claim that they are trying to trade him, with nothing on the horizon.
i had heard he probably would be quiet until the trade deadline.. i can only imagine what will happen if he’s still rotting on our bench after that.
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
It's easier
Said then done. If I were JR I wouldn’t cut to pay him a guaranteed $30M….If Kirk gets hurt again, Larry will play again (assumign he’s not traded)….
well, that's true
and in this case (unlike tim thomas) he’s actually traveling with the team and such. cause in that case it looked like there was 0% chance he would ever suit up for the bulls. and i’m not saying don’t work to trade him because obviously that’s more beneficial, and i fully advocate keeping him on to try to trade him up until the trade deadline… the thing that annoyed me with tim thomas is they waited literally until the last possible day to cut him that was allowed.
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
The thing that
Annoyed me with Tim Thomas was that he absolutely positively sucked and we could have used his spot then.
The thing that’s bad wtih Larry is that he’s not as awful as BaBers want to say, but he’s completely unnecessary on this team because he’s both not in our future, and not as good as our other guards (and we have the benefit of decent guards)…
What if they paid you 13 million to be window dressing...
AND in one year or so you would undoubtedly be working for another company anyway. 13 million is pretty sweet walkin’ around money, and he definitely won’t get injured while joking around on the bench.
Even Larry has to realize that it’s a business and he might be more valuable as an expiring contract NEXT year. If he doesn’t, then his agent should tell him so quickly.
It’s not like his career will be over, and he can definitely fill a need on MANY rosters in the future.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions
The problem is that concerning his potential future earnings.
He likely thinks he can sign, at the bare minimum, a 3 or 4 year MLE after this deal runs out. He probably thinks more, but still. If he sits for the next year and a half, he knows that won’t happen. Tim Thomas had to get signed by the Suns and have a great post-season to get his stupid contract from the Clippers.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
That's a big part of the issue
And there’s also the fact that he believes he can help the team win more now if he plays. Reasonable minds may disagree that this is the case, but I have no doubt Larry thinks that.
Khalid, the fact that it’s millions isn’t especially relevant to Larry’s state of mind. That was discussed ad nauseum wrt Ben’s contract negotatiations. These guys live in a world of millions of dollars, so it’s no different to them than the salaries we earn are to us. Maybe I’m just a total oddball, but I’m more comfortable feeling like I’ve earned my salary. Would I take a million dollars in the lottery? Absolutely! Would I be comfortable being paid a million dollars to sit around? Nope, I’d be looking to do something to feel like I deserved to earn that money.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
With regards to the money...
I realize these guys live in an inflated world, but Hughes contract is the most inflated among them. He makes more than EVERY player on the team (A LOT MORE), and will next year too.
I understand the point that money shouldn’t factor into his ability to just sit and not complain, but when you make more than everyone AND you still complain (beyond the little ripples he has), well that’s just a recipe for him to never get paid again.
I hope Hughes isn’t THAT stupid.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 2:13 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed... Who cares if Larry thinks he's an all star...
Everyone knows he isn’t. And yes, Stephon Marbury is a spoiled player in a dysfunctional franchise that needed desperately to shed it’s image. The sad thing is that he is a good player, probably the best on that team, and that’s why the media continues to stick microphones in his face. That, and he also happens to play in the largest media market in the NBA. He’s on a whole different stratosphere of circumstances than Hughes, and thank God he’s not on the Bulls.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:23 AM CST up reply actions
I think the minutes are what make me happy...
well besides Nocioni. I think Thabo should be getting Nocioni’s.
The last couple of games...
He has been.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:40 AM CST up reply actions
Thats good then maybe VDN is getting it.
For the month though Nocioni has played 114 more minutes than Thabo. Nocioni is killing the Bulls. Like I said a few weeks ago Nocioni is the Larry Hughes of Argentina.
by ImmanuelKant on Feb 3, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions
I think what's happened...
Is that Noah has finally emerged (in VDN’s mind) as a better option at center than Noc (which was asinine to begin with), which for some reason means Thabo fits better with the rest of the rotation. Honestly I can’t figure out how VDN decides who plays and who doesn’t, but we’ve definitely seen more Thabo than Noc in the last 3 games. Is it a coincidence that the last time we lost (Minnesota) was the last time Noc had more minutes than Thabo? Who can say for sure?
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
Thabo's not going to play the 4
where Nocioni is getting most of his minutes. Can Deng play the 4?
Plus with Gooden on the shelf a general rotation adjustment is going to include a lot more of Noc at the 4. The killer is when Noc is at the 4 and Gray is at the 5 and we have no rebounding at all.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Feb 3, 2009 10:59 AM CST up reply actions
deng can play the 4
in a small ball lineup, but i wouldn’t put a lot of minutes there. i’m hoping gooden takes noc’s minutes for the most part… though both are black holes and annoying to watch.
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
But at least Gooden can rebound...
And give us SOME presence on offense in the paint. Noc is basically a slow oversized guard with no post game at all. We don’t need that… Ever.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions
Noc or Gooden
it doesn’t matter. Both hurt the team. But that’s because the sets we are running are terrible. It’s all high screen with our guards and Gooden/Noc setting them. Noc can make open threes, but he’s not really a trheat to roll off a screen to the rim. Neither is Gooden. So since any defense canjust force both player to roll out 18’ and beyond it takes away whatever rebounding they might deliver.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Feb 3, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions
I'm more concerned about defense
both are awful defenders, but Gooden can rebound. He wins the backup 4 spot over Noc.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 3, 2009 11:11 AM CST up reply actions
it's a seriously simple rotation...
…if one doesn’t concern themselves with contracts or veteran-ness.
Rose-Gordon-Hinrich in the backcourt
Thomas-Noah-Gooden in the front court.
Deng-Sefolosha on the wings
Noc if you HAVE to have 3pt attempts (disreguarding them going in)
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Feb 3, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Oh, and Gray if you need size in the way you need Noc for 3's.
Neither should play much, but they bring something none of the players do. they can split 10 mpg between them, if needed.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Feb 3, 2009 11:16 AM CST up reply actions 4 recs
You're right
I rec. I rec.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Feb 3, 2009 11:29 AM CST up reply actions
and 12 fouls...
If we play hack a Shaq.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
Their shot selection also kills me. It never seems in flow of the offense...
But yeah I think Gooden’s shot is more consistent even though nobody seems to be down to rebound when he’s shooting. Nocioni’s 3’s are nice but they come after 6 missed shot’s a few charges and some really bad defense.
by ImmanuelKant on Feb 3, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions
pick your poison I pick Gooden
and very little of him.
by ImmanuelKant on Feb 3, 2009 11:34 AM CST up reply actions
Great post
I was endlessly searching around for these splits.
Thanks.
One note, Gordon and Nocioni are almost never in the paint in the flow of the offense. Don’t expect them to get any offensive rebounds. Are we expecting them to get offensive rebounds?
They’re the perimeter shooting threats whenever they’re in the game. I have no expectation they’ll rebound the basketball on the offensive end.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
Really?
VDN has put Noc out there at the 5 MANY TIMES. It speaks volumes as to how dumb of an idea that is, ESPECIALLY when you consider that he can’t get an offensive rebound.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions
I think Noc can rebound on both ends.
There’s just so few chances a player camping beyond the arc or setting high screens and rolling to the arc is going to be in a position to rebound.
Playing Noc at the 5 is insane. Playing Hinrich at the 3 is stupid. These are acts of desperation and Vinny has generally used them when times were desperate.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Feb 3, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions
To his credit...
I haven’t seen him use it at all in the 3 game win streak (unless it was brief and I missed it). Hopefully he’s done with this kind of logic. However, as somebody pointed out in the game thread, “Vinny hates winning”. This streak must have him boiling inside.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Feb 3, 2009 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
Noc can't rebound at both ends
or he can, and he’s chosen not to in his career.
He rebounds decently for a 3. But he’s more effective offensively as a 4 who can draw out a defender to the 3-point line.
He’s screwed eithier way. Thus why he’s a tweener, bench player, role player, whatever. And when he can’t hit shots he shouldn’t be on the court at all.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 3, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions
he's a bulls in a china cabinet...
so to speak.
by ImmanuelKant on Feb 3, 2009 11:20 AM CST up reply actions
Sigh. I hate it when I have to agree with someone bashing Noce.
But, agree I will.
I agree it's stupid
but Noc at the 5 has worked.
Matt,
what website did you find the numbers for PER splits? I’ve been looking all around the place to find those type of numbers.
Thorpe had Hollinger calculate them.
(or so he told me)
I don’t think they’re available anywhere in splits.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 3, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions
You should tell Thorpe to post here.
Or maybe Thorpe is actually Scotter?!?!
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
update
Scotter was kind enough to provide data for Nov+Dec
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 3, 2009 3:20 PM CST reply actions
Not that Really understand many of these stats...
But I REC this post because it looks like you put a lot of work into it :)
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
If you want to understand them better.
I’d be happy to explain them.
As I was posting these, I thought about how much has changed in the last 3 to 4 years. There’s no way I could post these stats a couple of years ago without having to explain nearly every stat. Hell, I didn’t really know any of this stuff four years ago.
Do you have a link to a guide?
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls, Riggans Your Thingans
here's a decent one
http://basketballnotebook.blogspot.com/2005/12/basketball-notebook-stats-primer.html
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 3, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions

by 













