Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation NHL Twitter List

Gar Paxdorf does more good deeds before the deadline, but perhaps not enough

While lauding Wednesday's trade with the Kings, it did raise the issue of further glutting the guard rotation, and Thursday's deals helped alleviate that: Hughes and Thabo going out, and Jerome James (done for this season and likely his career), Anthony Roberson (practice fodder) , and Tim Thomas (filling the Noc role as a spread-the-floor PF) effectively bringing zero guards back.

[By the way, fun pull from KC Johnson in finding this Tim Thomas story that was published after his last acrimonious-and-brief tenure with the Bulls. Paxson claimed in the press conference that there are no hard feelings from either side, and even blamed a bit of it on Skiles, which I found fairly amusing]

While some of my wishes of 2 months ago did come true (seriously, I'm so happy that they actually got not only a Brad Miller type but Brad Miller himself) I did put forth some other goals for the franchise:

If some sweet deal of a disgruntled star or above-average big doesn't arise, the secondary goal should be getting some breathing room under the 2009 Luxury Tax to re-sign Ben Gordon. This could mean dealing Nocioni for expirings (again, very unlikely), Hinrich for expirings, or Hughes for some savings in 2009 (assuming expirings for him is impossible). I do not think getting any talent value for Hughes is a priority. So, for instance, a hypothetical deal with the Knicks for Malik Rose (expires 2009) and Jerome James (player option 2010) would be worth it, if only for a better chance to re-sign Gordon.

Then beyond that, dealing Hinrich and Nocioni to free up long-term salary is another item on the wish list.

While the Bulls did help their flexibility in getting more (and smaller) expiring deals for next year's trade deadline, unfortunately they did not do enough to clear 2009 cap money to re-sign Gordon under the tax this offseason (and contrary to some optimistic speculation here earlier today,  looks like Jerome James is going to be on the cap next year no matter what) or get under the cap for 2010 free agency (though that will always be a longshot).

At least they haven't done it yet. I still have hope for this offseason.

But the reports that the Bulls didn't take the opportunity to send out Hinrich for expirings because they feel they can get more value this summer is a bit puzzling. While they did clear out 2 guards, with Gordon and Salmons at the SG and Derrick Rose taking the vast majority of the minutes at the point, I don't see how Hinrich 'earns' more than 20 minutes a game from here on out. Will that help his trade value any? I suppose one benefit to him post-deadline is that he won't be playing so much off the ball, which I don't think did him favors towards proving he can be a starting-caliber point again after last season. I do like having him around as a backup guard (especially huge if someone gets hurt), but it's still a luxury.

There's something to be said for a versatile roster, but other things to be said for a Vinny Del Negro. And while it's possible that the Bulls do a deal this offseason to clear '09 salary (I think it'll be much harder, however), will it not be the available room under the tax but a sense of mistreatment that chases Gordon out of town? He said last offseason that he was genuinely confused when he lost minutes after the Hughes acquisition this time last year...the same thing could happen with Salmons, adding to VDN's recent 'hot hand' strategy with Hinrich and Gordon in 4th quarters. I like that acquiring Salmons provides some insurance for a Gordon departure, but it's no reason to use him in a manner that makes Gordon want to leave. A lot can happen between now and this offseason (and end of the 2009 season for that matter, when the '09 luxury tax is actually assessed), so I don't want the Bulls shutting doors when it comes to Gordon.

But in the meantime, this is a better roster than it used to be, and one that should use it's soft end-of-year schedule to get into the playoffs. And with Derrick Rose that's a good thing, even if it leads to a first-round destruction. Though they're only 4.5 games out of the 5th seed...

My desired playoff rotation by that point:

Rose (34)/Hinrich(14)
Gordon(32)/Salmons(12)/Hinrich(4)
Deng(32)/Salmons(16)
Thomas(30)/Noah(8)/Deng(5)/TimThomas(5)
Miller(28)/Noah(20)

(DNP: Gray, Hunter, Roberson IR: James)

Meh, something like that, anyway. I'll like many of those combinations on the floor.

And I also liked what Paxson had to say in his press conference. He outlined the basketball reasons for the Kings deal, and the roster-glut and salary-flexibility reasons for the other deals. He specifically mentioned not merely 2010 free agency, but positioning expiring contracts to be candidates to take on players at next year's trade deadline.

He even mentioned a desire to keep Ben Gordon. I guess I'll have to take that as enough for now, and try not to fret too much before this offseason. Besides, in the meantime I'm excited to watch this team play.

0 recs  |  Comment 246 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I was just about to ask

Where is the post trade deadline wrap up thread from Matt?

And here we go . . .

by Option27 on Feb 19, 2009 11:42 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Trading Kirk in the offseason?

The problem with this line of thinking is that it’s not enough just to trade Kirk (or anyone else) in the summer. Because unless you’re trading with one of the (few) teams with lots of cap space (and willing to use it), you have to take back nearly as much salary as you give out, so it doesn’t really do much to facilitate re-signing Gordon.

It can possibly be done, but it limits the market quite a bit.

Also, the problem isn’t limited to signing Ben, it’s also true of signing and trading Ben, if you’re into letting him go but getting something back for him. Because again, the Bulls won’t have the flexibility to take back a player of comparable salary to whatever Ben gets, because that player would also put them over the LT.

by Sports2 on Feb 19, 2009 11:44 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

that's my hope

a Camby-esque dump in the offseason to a team under the cap. They could offer a first to get it done if necessary. Though it makes the idea that they could get more value than expirings even sillier

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 19, 2009 11:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

though it was possible

that Minnesota was only willing to do one ‘09 expiring (plus Cardinal’s 2010 deal), so a full dumpage this summer would actually be more value.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 8:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

Then you still do Kirk for Cardinal (and a pick, one hopes) but you get Kirk for the rest of this year instead of Cardinal.

Unfortunately that’d only net us a bit under $3M in cap space. Less if we get a pick too.

by Sports2 on Feb 20, 2009 8:59 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I see it this way

We come out of the trade dead line looking like we now have a solid 2010 plan where before the dead line it looked like we had no direction. We can either wait for the contracts of the newly acquired Bulls to expire and bid on the big names in the 2010 open market. Or instead use some of those players this coming offseason, along with Kirk and our two 1st rounders to trade for say Bosh or another one of those big names before the season starts.

I have to admit I didn’t stand up and give GarPaxdorf a standing O yesterday after it was all said it done but we did get rid of the Chuck Brothers (Hughes and Nocs), finally have a true center on our team even though he’s on the decline, a true two guard even though I don’t know why some many teams wanted this guy and cmon we have Tim Thomas now … can’t wait for the Tony Yayo when he hits a 3 from the wing!!! These moves give our young bigs the time they need to continue to blossom and the time our team needs to see if Thomas and Noah are the real deal. Solomons coming to the Chi means Ben is gone but deep down I won’t miss him, his scoring yes but anyone that turns downs over 10 million is an ass to me.

Go going forward I wanna see this five things
1. The continues improvement of Rose, Thomas and Noah
2. Deng show up everyday in every way
3. Vinny improve as a coach
4. Solomons proving me wrong and actually being what we need
5. Making the playoffs or Missing the playoffs and both Denver and Phoenix doing the same

So let’s embrace the start of a new day Bulls Fans, will these dead line moves pay off or will GarPaxDorf prove the more heads are better then one theroy wrong!!!!

by Bullsfanla on Feb 20, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Real GM is debating

whether to start Gordon or Salmons – if Ben loses his starting job again, and to the new guy, It’s hard to see him wanting to resign here, no matter what lovely things Pax said in his interview.

I’m sure you’ll still find a way to blame that on Kirk, though. ;)

Incidentally, Ben is winning the “Who Starts” poll right now, but Salmons is getting quite a bit of support as well. (And I voted for Ben, for the record.)

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 19, 2009 11:48 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

agreed

the day they bench him it’s over.

Kirk’s to blame because he makes too much to be a 3rd guard.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 19, 2009 11:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and

I don’t quite get the sentiment that they should bench Gordon because it’s likely he won’t return. What at the Bulls going to learn about John Salmons that’ll be so rewarding long-term?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 12:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You got me.

Like I said, I voted for Ben. If I had my way, Salmons would replace Noc+Thabo, the guard rotation would continue as it’s been, and Tim Thomas would learn to cheer from the sidelines.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 12:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Defensive Purposes

I’m saying I agree with this thinking but there might be the reasoning; and I could see this more likely in a playoff series, where the 2 guard’s height worries VDN so he ask BG to take the sixth man role. Like I said I could see this happening but I don’t really agree with the idea.

by J Theory on Feb 20, 2009 7:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If Salmons gets the starting job, it's kind of irrelevant

Unless you see Ben suddenly willing to make the “right amount” for a 3rd guard, not to mention the Bulls paying it. It’s largely been Kirk vs. Ben up till now, but Salmons could be taking that role over for Kirk going forward.

It will be interesting to see how the minutes break down.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 12:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No, Gar Paxdorf is to blame

They made this roster. They assume the risk. They should have traded Hinrich for just about anything that would yield cap relief.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:20 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Also was gonna ask

When your headline read, “Don’t care about the games, only trades” . . .

Does this mean you’re done caring or back on the saddle?

by Option27 on Feb 19, 2009 11:49 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

back to the games!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 19, 2009 11:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I like Ben

but his defense troubles me. He’s 6-3 and gets destroyed by tall 2s that can post. If Salmons can put up 18 a game and play much better defense then Gordon it’s almost a wash if we can start getting more offensive production from Rose and Tyrus next year. Salmons can also guard the 3 – which Gordon cannot do – and so that adds another layer of value.

by patagonia on Feb 19, 2009 11:49 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

How does that figure?

>gets destroyed by tall 2s that can post

So twice a year someone will post him up once or twice a game? Name these SG’s who play the post regularly and effectively? I can only think of a few.

Why would we want Gordon to guard the 3?

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Feb 19, 2009 11:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

With the way Deng's playing

I am much more excited about how Salmons can offset that rather than anything to do with Gordon.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Feb 19, 2009 11:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

totally agree

Salmons is a good back up for Deng. I haven’t seen him play much, but from the descriptions I’ve heard, he does well everything Deng struggles at. He is an effective one on one player and 3 pt shooter. He can guard quicker guys. I wouldn’t be surprised if Salmons doesn’t finish some games instead of Deng over the last 30.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 19, 2009 11:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't let Funk and the beat writers

hear that Salmons has one on one skills. In Chicago that is frowned on as being selfish (cough Gordon /cough). Five passes before a shot only.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Feb 20, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You wouldn't want Gordon to guard the 3

But if Salmons does end up as his replacement then it’s helpful that he can.

by patagonia on Feb 19, 2009 11:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Why would you be

concerned about your SG guarding the 3 anyway? We have at least three guys who can already. Should we also worry if Gordon can guard the 4? Not every player must be a combo tweener to be a good player. Like I said, with Noc gone and Deng off and on Salmons can be more concerned with playing SF since he seems to have the skills for it.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Feb 20, 2009 12:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're overanalyzing this

I’m not saying we should let Gordon go or that Salmons is a huge upgrade over Gordon. I’m saying that if we’re unable to resign Gordon for whatever reason then Salmons does provide additional benefits that Gordon does not. That’s it – don’t try to read more into it.

by patagonia on Feb 20, 2009 12:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on the situation

Spurs and Pistons were playing last night with Bruce Bowen guarding Iverson down the stretch and Tayshaun Prince guarding Tony Parker. Iverson switched over to guard Michael Finley. Tony Parker was guarding…I think Rip Hamilton.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Salmon's offense

The fact he put up 18 a game in Sacromento is a lot different than putting up 18 a game with a PG that shoots a little and a team in a playoff hunt. If Ben Gordon was on Sacromento where nothing mattered I think he’d get 24 25 a game. So its not a wash on offense.

Defensively it looks great. I’m not Vinny ( thank god) but I’m not sure I’d want to make the decision next week of how to start games with either Ben or Salmons. Let’s say they play a team like ATL with Joe Johnson at the 2 who does Vinny start?

by Jscho316 on Feb 20, 2009 8:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

As someone whose wanted a Brad Miller

type for two years this will be interesting. I believe that Miller will make the game easier for Derrick, Deng, and Tyrus. Time to see whether or not I’m an idiot.

This is the way I’m looking at it. Since the end of the 2006/07 season the Bulls have replaced the Sefolosha with Salmons. Replaced Nocioni with Tim Thomas. Replaced Wallace with Noah. Replaced Duhon with Derrick, and added Brad Miller. That’s a fairly big talent upgrade, and a brighter future. The pieces finally fit again.

by Scotter on Feb 19, 2009 11:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah sounds pretty good I suppose

Truthfully I’m still skeptical about Salmons and Tim Thomas. Salmons seems like a guy who just figured out he can put up shots on a bad team and of course the Thomas. But I guess thats not fair to judge them on that.

by Camry on Feb 19, 2009 11:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Combined they are no worse than Sefolosha and Nocioni together.

Not even Vinny will be tricked into Timmy because of his grit. With Nocioni gone there are plenty of crappy shots for Salmons to take.

by Scotter on Feb 19, 2009 11:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Salmons is shooting 47% from the field and 42% beyond the arc

It’s not like he’s chucking up 30 shots a game to get those points.

by patagonia on Feb 20, 2009 12:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he's playing well this season

he’s never played this well before. he’s 29. No doubt he’ll invoke the Hollinger fluke rule in next year’s projections.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 12:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah thats why I say it maybe unfair

I just think about long term too much though I suppose he is only coming off the bench anyway.

by Camry on Feb 20, 2009 12:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He kind of invoked it last year.

And it proved false. While he didn’t make Hollinger’s All Decline Team, Hollinger did have this to say in his Kings preview: “Salmons, Garcia, Udrih and Martin had the best seasons of their respective careers while Miller had a Fluke Rule season; we should expect all of them to regress to the mean somewhat this year, with Salmons and Miller likely to experience harsher dips than the others.”

Except he didn’t experience a dip. His per-minute numbers look very similar to last year, except with a lower TO rate and higher usage rate (leading to a higher PER). So we can hope that he’s already escaped the “fluke” moniker and has just established his real value (as a starter; his numbers dip a lot when he doesn’t start).

by arjoseph on Feb 20, 2009 1:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

but this season is an even better candidate
a player who is older than 28, has a Player Efficiency Rating higher than 14 and increased his PER by at least three points from the previous season is 90 percent likely to perform worse the next season.

at 29 Salmons PER is 16.2, up from 13.9 last year. The previous jump was less.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 1:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Very valid.

One quibble: last year’s PER is a mix of his production as a starter and his production as a backup. If there were PER splits somewhere, I’d love to see what his PER was as a starter. I bet it’s right around 16, and not that much different than what he’s doing this year (for the whole year). If he would have started all last year (garn Ron Artest) he’d be disqualified because his increase of 3 in PER would have come when he was 28, not when he was older than 28.

That’s all I’m sayin.

by arjoseph on Feb 20, 2009 1:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

well he won't start here (at least this season)

so magic starter juice will go away.

I really think this is a career year, fueled by being able to get as many minutes and shots as he wants on a terrible team.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 1:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope

He’s finding a Turkoglu role as an older player who finally just got it.

But agree, probably just a complete outlier. Still he’s not bad.

by majoyenrac on Feb 20, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Split stats from last year vs. this year

Last year, as starter: 38 mpg, 49% FG (on 13.5 attempts), 38.5% from deep, 81% FT (4 attempts), 1.5 stl, 2.7 TO, 5.4 reb, 3.5 ast, 17.5 points per game.

This year, as starter: 37 mpg, 47% FG (14 attempts), 41% from deep, 82% FT (4.4 attempts), 1 stl, 2.3 TO, 4.2 reb, 3.7 ast, 18 points per game.

For reference, last year as sub: 24 mpg, 43% (6 attempts), 21% from 3, 84% FT (2.3 attempts), .7 stl, 3.2 reb, 1.6 ast, 7.4 points per game.

I wouldn’t be surprised if he starts, and I wouldn’t object. Odds are slim that Gordon stays, Matt. Even if we had cap room, he probably wouldn’t want to. It doesn’t make any basketball sense to ignore on-court production just so we don’t hurt a guy’s feelings, especially when that guy isn’t part of the future.

by arjoseph on Feb 20, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

well I don't think it's basketball sense either

to think that last season Salmons shot 17% better from 3 because he heard his name over the PA pre-game.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 1:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

even still

what does it say when you get those kinds of numbers on a terrible, sucky team?

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 12:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Shooting well is shooting well

Its like like he is just putting up counting stats; it should be harder to score efficiently on a crappy team, cause the opposing defense can focus.

by JeffD on Feb 20, 2009 9:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

not the same thing

1 – as much as the Bulls stink at times, they are nowhere close to the Kings in amount of suckage

2 – Ben has been posting up good numbers even when the Bulls were making the playoffs a couple of years ago

so try again…

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 9:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The Bulls won 49 games in Gordon's career, 18.8 PER (or about that).

I agree. Gordon has been good on a very good team. Not the same.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 9:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget

They’ve also replaced 20-year old Tyrus Thomas with 22-year old Tyrus Thomas. Hopefully that ends up being the biggest upgrade of all.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Feb 19, 2009 11:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I believe that's the biggie

Look at any successful team—they’re more than just a haphazard collection of talented players. Good teams play well with each other. Like you said, they fit. (Orlando is a perfect example of this. Rashard Lewis is the same player he was in Seattle. He and Turkgolu? They would never work together—they’re just tall, soft shooters. Except that’s exactly what you want when you’re playing with Dwight Howard. See also: Roger Mason).

by msquared10 on Feb 19, 2009 11:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Never thought about it in those terms

I can hear Beyonce singing that DirectTV upgrade song in my head as I type

by Option27 on Feb 20, 2009 12:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

but they're, in all likelihood, going to lose Ben Gordon... for nothing.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 12:32 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

this is a huge downgrade to me. HUGE.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 12:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not as high on Gordon as you.

And I’ve been resigned to losing Gordon for months now. They could lose him without it being a complete offensive disaster now. And for the long term good of the team, he might need to go anyway. I’ll be watching to see how he places with Brad Miller around, but I’ve been souring on his long term viability.

by Scotter on Feb 20, 2009 12:40 AM CST up reply actions   2 recs

as Sports2 pointed out

they didn’t even position themselves to do a sign/trade. Losing Gordon for nothing is a really pathetic situation for the franchise. Lottery picks who produce never have this happen.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well it's not that bad

When you think about it this way . . .

Out of all the lottery picks we have received since 98, 1 had to have probably been let go for nothing. Odds would suggest so, yes?

And I don’t count Jay Williams

by Option27 on Feb 20, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But we really

Haven’t had any as productive as BG’s been for us for as long as he’s been productive (Rose’ll change that)…

I still have some faith that something will get done….

by majoyenrac on Feb 20, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Right. It's hard to argue that anyone they've picked in the lottery...

….has been as good as Gordon has for a sustained period. If Deng returns to form, he’d be the only other one. I guess Elton Brand would count. Is there anyone else?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 4:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

some are let go for nothing

the busts.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea

If the salmon experiment works at even pretty well, i could see both gordon and hinrich going away, that would give teh bulls more flexibility for 2010 to do something. It would be kind of fitting, the ben gordon vs kirk hinrich thing would die with a stalemate…neither was good enough for the team…..its kind of funny…in a very sad way….

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Feb 20, 2009 1:12 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Quite possibly dumbest post ever

ok i hesitate to ask this but what is the whole thing with Gar Paxdorf? I follow the bulls and this site is a daily read. I feel like I’m missing out on something really obvious.

by jbrobe04 on Feb 20, 2009 12:07 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

No one knows who is making these moves

Some think Gar Foreman and Jerry Reinsdorf are making them.

Thus . . . Gar Paxdorf

by Option27 on Feb 20, 2009 12:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Haha

Ok that’s kinda what I thought. My FB status is something along the lines of who’s basement is a kidnapped Pax in and who’s making these moves? Thanks for clearing that up tho. Has been driving me crazy.

by jbrobe04 on Feb 20, 2009 12:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't be so hard on yourself.

Quite possibly dumbest post ever

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 20, 2009 1:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Somebody hasn't read this site long enough, tsk tsk.

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 20, 2009 2:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I kinda been wondering this a lot lately

I know that the Bulls maybe denying it, but they’re clearly looking at 2010 to make a major splash in free agency.

I have no doubt that they will give it their all and actually just might succeed.

The question i ask is if Tyrus Thomas continues his rapid improvement, he would be a restricted free agent that year, if I remember correctly.

Are the Bulls hoping Tyrus is in their long term plans or are they hoping he improves even more to further increase his trade value?

Cause eventually, the question will be … To match any offer Tyrus receives or not to?

by Option27 on Feb 20, 2009 12:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

But these are good questions to ask.

“Who the hell can we trick into taking Hughes” is a bad question. “Dang, TT is playing up to his potential and now we either have to pay him or lose him” is a much better problem to have. Of course we’ll probably end up in the no mans land where TT is playing well, but not as good as someone else, but we would have to move him just to have a “chance” at the other player, blah, blah, blah. The good news for BaB is, we will have so much more to argue about. TT or 2010?

by Unrealcity on Feb 20, 2009 4:24 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I believe

that the Bulls would still be in a very good position to make a sign and trade as well.

by J Theory on Feb 20, 2009 7:59 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thabo's hello to OKC
"I see it as a fresh start, coming into a young team where I really think I can fit in. I’m really excited about that," said Sefolosha, who the Thunder acquired on Thursday in exchange for a 2009 first-round draft pick.

"They have a spot for me over there. Even if it’s not in the starting five, I really hope to bring something to this team."



"I welcome the trade. I think it’s going to be a good situation for me," Sefolosha said. "I’m happy to come and play with some very good young players. It’s a lot of talent on this team, so I hope I’m going to be able to help the team and showcase my talent."

Also new coach says he’s not sure if Thabo will start or come off the bench, or play more at SG or SF, but will compete for minutes on the team.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 12:52 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

anyone know where that

swissmeister guy (okay i dont remember his nick completely) went….the guy who personally knows thabo….is he still gonna be posting here or was he basically holding the same philosophy as sue was (no offense to sue at all) meaning that when the player they were rooting for leaves the team, so does the blogger…..i was just wondering……thank you for your time….

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Feb 20, 2009 1:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And me.

But I’ll stick here, as I’ve explained on the Thabo dealt thread. Simonswiss probably too (although he’s been on this site for only a couple of months now), but I won’t speak for him (let him digest his new married status first, hehe).

The Game chose him !

by Diabolo on Feb 20, 2009 7:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I watch some

Thunder games because of Collison so now I’ll get to see Thabo too. I hope he does well there.

by sue369 on Feb 20, 2009 7:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ha.
Also new coach says he’s not sure if Thabo will start or come off the bench, or play more at SG or SF, but will compete for minutes on the team.

Just by reading that you’d think not much is changing in Thabo’s life. (We all know he’ll play more there, since he’s got little competition and they’ve got nothing to lose, but still: that could easily be the description of his time with the Bulls).

by arjoseph on Feb 20, 2009 1:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Unless you've watched the Thunder's current 2...

I somehow don’t think it will be as much of an issue to climb the depth chart in OKC.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Does anybody know when our newly acquired players mainly Miller and Salmons will play?

I’m hopefully it’ll be tomorrow, I wanna see these guys in action.

by aznsensation on Feb 20, 2009 1:34 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Brad Miller told KHTK in Sacramento that he won't be with the Bulls until Saturday

He was expecting his first game with the Bulls to be Sunday at Indiana.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:25 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

one of the papers (Trib or ST)

said that they won’t take their physicals until “tonight”. So I’m guessing that means they won’t play until Sunday.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 9:27 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

bah.

that sucks.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

KC says...

no Thomas tonight:

Times change, huh? Thomas, who will miss Friday’s home game against the Nuggets and report Saturday,

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

found it

here in the ST:

Miller, who played with the Bulls from 2000 to ’02, arrived at the Berto Center on Thursday. He and Salmons are scheduled to undergo physicals at the United Center tonight, when the Bulls host the Denver Nuggets.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 9:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If they do it before the game

they can play (or at least sit on the bench).

by J Theory on Feb 20, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah I'm assuming

they’ll all be in suits tonight at the very least.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 10:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Other team has to finish as well, right?

And I’m not completely clear on whether it matters since they reported the Ruffin to Portland as a separate deal, yet it’s also tangled with the Bulls-Sacto deal – so wouldn’t Portland have to finish Ruffin’s physical too for the whole shebang to be finalized and the guys available to us.

Unless that rule changed.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Portland would probably waive the requirement for Ruffin's physical

It’s not like they’re going to use him

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Feb 20, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

why couldn't they do it yesterday?

I suppose they would need the Kings to also rush it too then.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

VDN

wants them to wait for a day so that they can read his playbook and learn the system

PAUSE

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lol arjoseph

likely printed on a 3 × 5 index card.

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on Feb 20, 2009 2:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Man

I wanted to see them tonight. I guess I’ll have to wake up early on Sunday and catch the Indiana game.

by J Theory on Feb 20, 2009 9:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bulls are going to be really thin tonight for Denver

Starting lineup is the same, but who do we have on the bench besides Kirk, Aaron, and Lindsey?

So crossing fingers for no foul trouble for the bigs and that Lu shows up, or we’re going to see a version of small ball that’s pretty hideous. (Unless I’m forgetting some long unseen player, but that’s hardly much better.)

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 9:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Denvery worked for the lineup for last year, right?

Or was that Golden State. Or both?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 9:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think this is the one night we really miss Thabo

It’s the same we had for Wednesday’s Milwaukee game, minus Thabo – but it’s Denver instead of the Bucks.

I had to look up last year’s – I remember the kids got to play a lot for once, but not who all was available. It was Denver (Golden State was earlier, just had guys out with injuries, and Duhon had his one spectacular scoring game). We started Kirk, Thabo, Noc, Tyrus and Joakim, but also had Ben, Lu, Duhon, and Aaron off the bench, and Demetris Nichols was available but didn’t play.

So I’d say we’re in worse shape tonight depth-wise. It’ll be OK if everyone shows up and we don’t have foul issues, but there’s not much room there. Of course, it’s also just the one game.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

plus a tough one to win at full strength anyway

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:59 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Which actually mitigates against stressing over it some

If we were not so likely to win in the first place, at least this provides a reason beyond mere suckage.

I’m just envisioning an absolute blood bath with Lu not showing up, Aaron playing huge minutes due to foul issues, and a 4th quarter lineup of Derrick, Ben, Lindsey, Kirk and someone over 6’3".

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ben

has been pretty good against the Nuggets the last 4 times…hopefully he can keep it up tonight

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, Denver's playing very well lately.

Miller would be nice to have against Nene. (my big man white whale)

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 10:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm actually interested in seeing Hughes in D'Antoni's system.

As well as Sef in OKC. Durant is finally starting to get some buzz from the league and I really like Thabo, so I am interested to see how that goes. I like Noc, but I don’t want to watch a minute of the Kings. They suck and are terrible on the eyes to watch. But have fun JJ.

by Unrealcity on Feb 20, 2009 4:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A rain of clangers from Hughes would be a welcome sight

at the next Bulls-Knicks game.

I’m actually interested in seeing Hughes in D’Antoni’s system.

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 20, 2009 5:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

Am I weird if I’m almost as excited to see Noc’s first game with the Kings as I am to see the new look Bulls?

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 20, 2009 5:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

Noc and Thabo weren’t cancers. They were likable players who were in the wrong situation (coach couldn’t use them properly). They played their hearts out here and took subordinate roles without gripe. For that, I’ll be happy to see them succeed elsewhere – provided they don’t succeed against us.

--Torch

by torch on Feb 20, 2009 7:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and they both sucked

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 8:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I totally agree with your disagreement, torch.

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on Feb 20, 2009 2:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No

I’m eager to see all our former players in other systems.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know why keeping Hinrich a bit longer isn't seen as a good thing.

Once the first trade happened (and it was clear they wouldn’t need Hinrich for a major trade for someone like STAT or Bosh), there was no urgency to get rid of Kirk: he’s not a bad influence on the team, doesn’t complain about minutes, Rose seems to like having him around, he often does an adequate job when he’s out there, and it’s obvious Vinnie isn’t holding Rose’s development back by giving Kirk too many of Rose’s minutes. And why assume Kirk’s value will only go lower? It might not go higher over the next few months, but he sucked last year and was injured for a lot of this one, and yet several teams still expressed interest. We have no idea what Gordon will do this summer, and if he wants to stay for $__ and they can’t afford him, they can always explore trades then.

I think this was a good trading-time all around—looking forward to seeing what the team looks like by the playoff push.

by T Maple on Feb 20, 2009 5:45 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Because not trading Kirk now probably means not being able to resign Gordon.

Kirk could have been dealt for expirings at the deadline, freeing cap space for signing Ben this summer. It will not be possible to deal him for expirings this summer, the Bulls will have to take back nearly equal salary (unless they can do a trade with a team well under the cap, and there are very few of those).

The Game chose him !

by Diabolo on Feb 20, 2009 7:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I just don't understand

the infatuation with Gordon. The guy can shoot, no…doubt…about…that, and his 20ppg are nice. But outside of that—imo—he dribbles WAY too much, takes careless shots, isn’t a good passer, can’t/won’t defend, can’t rebound, and complains about minutes when he doesn’t get them.

I’m not the most knowledgeable fan, so I’m sure I must be missing something. Can one of the “pro-Gordon” fans out there please explain to me why Gordon is so critical to our success?

by Starred4Life on Feb 20, 2009 8:24 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

because we struggle to score efficiently and he's the only player on our team

(or was until this trade) that consistently scores efficiently.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 8:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's my opinion

that we struggle to score because we rely too heavily on jump shooters like BG to score. I realize there’s no ‘800 number’ for big men with post game, but guys who like/need to jack like BG kill this team, as it only furthers the Bulls’ reliance on jump shots.

To me, BG is a fine sixth man to have; I think the oft-used Vinnie Johnson comparison is dead on. In spurts—a la The Microwave—these flurries of shots are fine, even necessary at times, but 40 minutes-worth are just too inefficient. But Ben has made it very clear he wants no part of a sixth-man role.

Letting Ben go or trading Ben would force this team to find other means of scoring (TT?). Could it backfire? Sure, but wouldn’t we rather the Bulls try to score more efficiently than just continue to settle for jump shots that we know only results in a .500 team at best?

by Starred4Life on Feb 20, 2009 9:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm a Pro Gordon guy and I'l say this...

People that want Gordon on the bench and compare him to Vinnie Johnson, keep forgetting one thing…. GORDON IS BETTER THAN VINNIE JOHNSON!! Do you realize that Vinnie Johnson never averaged more than 15pts in a season? He average 12 pts a season for his career. I think Gordon gets typecast because of his height and I think that’s unfair. There a lot of great 2 guards tha don’t play defense in this league (Ray Allen, Joe Smith, GilbertArenas, Michael Redd) and I think people just can’t get over Gordon’s height to appreciate what he does bring. He doesn’t take a lot of shots to get hi s points. He’s capable of putting a team on his back and hitting crucial shots, and if the Bulls make the playoffs this year, that’ll be 3 out if the last 4 years that Gordon has been on a playoff team being their leading scorer. Those are the facts. If Derrick Roshad the game Ben Gordon had against Miami(34pts hitting 3 huge freethrows) , there would be people have seizures around here. Is he the perfect player? No. But I think he deserves a lot more respect for his game than what is given in this town. The Bulls have already over paid 2 guys on this team based on Height and Potential (Hinrich and Deng) while all this guy has done is stay injury free, come to camp in shape, and bring consistent production. By the way, Gordon’s having his best season as a pro.

by Dils on Feb 20, 2009 11:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't get over his

turnovers – not his height

by J Theory on Feb 20, 2009 11:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The more Rose

asserts himself the less Gordon will be in those situations. Gordon isn’t the only guy on the team that turns the ball over from time to time anyway. He is a player who has improved on his assist this year though. Something that is often missed. I can live with a few turn overs with everything else he brings.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Feb 20, 2009 12:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he doesn't turn it over that often

for his career his TOV% is 12.9, which given his 27.5% career USG% is pretty damn good. For comparison’s sake, there are only 25 players in the last 30 years that have had TOV% under 13% with USG% greater than 27%. Go take a look at their names HERE It’s a pretty damned impressive list. A few names with similar rates to Ben: Kevin Durant, Chris Webber, Alex English, Tim Duncan, etc. Ben Gordon DOES NOT turn the ball over that much.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 1:24 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

that's dumb. possessions are possessions are possessions. they all matter.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 1:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So you are saying

that if you have the ball at the end of the game for a chance to win it and you lose the ball it doesn’t make a difference? now that’s dumb, you can play the greatest game in your life but when it comes down the plays that count and you turn into a mental midget then you show how replacable you can be.

by J Theory on Feb 20, 2009 1:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How is BG

A mental midget? The Dude’s been clutch for us. I know somebody here’ll point to those stats.
He has the ball often too much as the only option in the 4th, and that’s more the problem than any “mental midget” stuff.

by majoyenrac on Feb 20, 2009 1:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

this is a stupid discussion that I'm not going to get into with you

it’s based on your own retarded anecdotal evidence that somehow Ben turns it over more in crunch time than he does in other times and that somehow the value of a possession is different just because of when it occurs during the game. In “Clutch” situations Ben Gordon turns the ball over 3.0 times per 48 minutes, which is actually LESS than he turns it over during the rest of the game (3.47 per 48 minutes). I’ve already demonstrated that that rate of turnovers is really very good when you consider how much he handles the ball. Add to this that Ben handles the ball even more in crunch time and you see that he DOES NOT TURN IT OVER THAT MUCH, yes, even in crunch time. You’re so wrong it’s ridiculous. LeBron turns it over 7.7 times per 48 minutes in clutch situations, you think the Cavs shouldn’t put the ball in his hands in those situations?

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Did I say they shouldn't put it into his hands?

I mentioned I couldn’t get over when he turnover the ball rather than his height. I can get over his height. Now it is brought up how many times he has made clutch shots and that he shouldn’t get the ball.

My thing is I can’t get over the times he has brought my hopes down when it mattered. As a fan that is important to ME.

that’s it.

now you can keep continuning calling me dumb and retarded:

by J Theory on Feb 20, 2009 1:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

well not being able to get over it is irrational, because he's

a damn fine player and he doesn’t even turn the ball over that much, as I’ve noted. But I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

okay

thanks for pointing that out.

by J Theory on Feb 20, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So you're emotionally fragile?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought it was you

fundamentally sound who pooh-poohed that shit 2-3 weeks ago. Rec’d again. Keep it coming every 2-3 weeks….to stop all this BG sucks crap that is so old.

by majoyenrac on Feb 20, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm

Gordon clutch FTA: 10.7

James clutch FTA: 24.4

There are better examples to use.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 6:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, you and your over-reliance on statistics.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 6:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

because, you know, sometimes he does things like last week.

You know, when he hit a game winning shot, and then the following game when he ::gasp:: CREATED, off-the-dribble!!! a game-tying free-throw opportunity, and then converted.

Dear god, man, don’t be so obtuse.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

SMH

(sigh)

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

same to you, buddy.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

REC to that

Wrote something below….comparing to some folks, but your stat is NICE!

I think Ben’s turnovers happen either at godawful times and are coupled by being so freaking annoying self-induced that they drive ya nuts, but overall he’s hardly a very turnover prone guy and like you mentioned with the usage rate, he does have the ball a lot.

by majoyenrac on Feb 20, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ben Gordon's

Turnovers actually aren’t that bad….it’s just that unlike others, his turnovers almost always are self-induced, and are very visible which makes it seem far worse:

Player TO/gm TO/gm career TO/36 min T0 36 Min career
Ben Gordon 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.9
D. Wade 3.4 3.8 3.2 3.6
K. Bryant 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9
Joe John (SG version) 2.5 2.5-3.1 2.3 2.3-2.8@SG
A.I. 2.7 3.6

While Ben’s not quite as good as any of the above, he has been asked to be the sole offense in the clutch for us for years…..and has performed well.

HIS TO’s though are horrible because 95% of them are all completely self-induced, but overall he’s not as prone as it would seem…..that’s all I’m trying to say.

by majoyenrac on Feb 20, 2009 1:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, i'd love to see how many of his

are unforced turnovers compared to some other people.

i know that his TO rate isn’t that bad, it’s just that he always seems to turn it over at a crucial time.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Feb 20, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Or that

His turnovers aren’t from someone stealing the ball, they are from him getting too flashy with the dribble….that’s what’s really annoying.

by majoyenrac on Feb 20, 2009 1:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's a good discussion

because there are very different kinds of turnovers. Not all of them are converted into points, but when BG turns it over and is lying on the ground it’s pretty much a guaranteed conversion 5 against 4.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The Ben Gordon turnover "discussion" revisited.

Yay!

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This list all gets to the line almost whenever they want

except for Gordon and Johnson.

It’s hard to hold turnovers against an individual shot creator that can get to the line. We can live with them if they can get to the line.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

this is also a good point.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Feb 20, 2009 2:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It does seem like

scorers on other teams are appreciated more than Gordon is here in Chicago. Everyday fans, our commentators, etc all rip on him. There are only a few superstars out there that do everything and Gordon is not one of them (yeah, he does have his problems), but what he does do is something that is valuable and appreciated everywhere besides here. Do you hear of leading scorers on other teams getting ripped this much?

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Feb 20, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No

and I can’t understand it. Hell I had an argument with some moron who said that Jamal Crawford was better than Ben Gordon……which is asinine.

I don’t get it…..folks want to blame the mess entirely on Gordon of the past few years, and keep quoting the “he didn’t get a contract” as a reason. He didn’t get a contract cuz he’s such a specialized player than he may not fit on every team, and also because he had a nice offer from the Bulls 6 yr 59M on the table…..and the Bulls threatened to match everything…..

I mean that’s not a non contract, Gordon wants more…..

by majoyenrac on Feb 20, 2009 1:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're probably right

BG is better than Vinnie was. But I’m thinking that if Joe Dumars and Isaiah Thomas hadn’t been on that ‘90s Pistons team, Vinnie probably would’ve been given more minutes and put up better numbers.

Either way you slice it, both BG and Vinnie were/are: undersized, stocky 2 guards, pure shooters, ‘scorers in bunches,’ and below average defenders. The comparisons are inevitable and in a lot of ways accurate.

To me, saying BG is “typecast” cuz of his height is inaccurate. We have to remember that smaller guards can play good defense, too: AI, CP3, Kidd, Mark Jackson, Dumars…). Defense is more about a decision than it is measurements.

And you’re probably right, too, about BG deserving more respect than he gets in this town, though. He does score consistently, and 20ppg is nothing to sneeze at.

All I’m saying is that I don’t understand why people think he is a “must re-sign.” Personally I think his points can be replaced, and through more efficient means.

by Starred4Life on Feb 20, 2009 3:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am pretty sure that Joe Smith is not a two guard.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 20, 2009 5:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Here.

110 the last two years with 25+ usage. He’s been the most efficient player on the roster the last two seasons. Noah this year doesn’t count because his usg is too low.

by Scotter on Feb 20, 2009 12:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

heck if they didn't sign Gordon

then still, why keep Hinrich?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 8:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, of course,

Derrick Rose makes Kirk irrelevant for the Bulls no matter what.

The Game chose him !

by Diabolo on Feb 20, 2009 8:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Random Hinrich thought

The rumor of Cardinal + Collins clearly wouldn’t have kept us under the luxury tax this year, so there was no chance we would make that trade.

I think it makes more sense that we were fighting over whether it was Cardinal or Collins included in the deal coming back to us since both were mentioned and we’d clearly prefer Collins to Cardinal and both was impossible for us.

That may eventually be why a deal didn’t get done (Wolves insisted on Cardinal), and Paxson said in the press conference that we had one more deal that could have helped a lot for 2010.

As a side note, despite Paxson’s words, I think there’s almost no hope Gordon comes back. It’d take a tremendous financial feat to clear room under the tax especially if the tax lowers to 68 million or so like Chad Ford’s estimate. I also think the Bulls don’t want Gordon back. I know Paxson likes Gordon, but Jerry Reinsdorf does not.

Gordon has been really pissed at the organization, and I don’t think he has any desire to come back unless he has no other decent options whatsoever (and the Bulls presently don’t like like they’d be a decent option either).

A better question might be, could we have convinced Gordon to approve a trade and move him out at the deadline? “Raymond Brothers, John Paxson here, as you can see, we’re at the luxury tax barrier already next season when we account for draft picks and minimum salary guys, we won’t be able to S&T Gordon or sign him ourselves, you know how JR is about the tax. We also just acquired John Salmons and have a pretty good glut at guard right now, we’d like to help Ben out by moving him somewhere he can play more, you think he’d waive his no trade clause now, the bird rights thing is no longer going to matter afterall?”

Maybe it wouldn’t have worked, or maybe no one was interested, but Gordon is as good as gone, and if we could have moved him for another expiring deal to a contender where he could have raised his value that might have worked out real well for everyone. Oh well, may not have been a legit option, and maybe it was tried. I can’t imagine things are going to end well with Gordon here though.

by dougthonus on Feb 20, 2009 7:30 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

hey-

is these the Doug Thonus of podcasting fame?

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 20, 2009 7:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

“this”.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 20, 2009 7:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I've been delinquent in my BaB reading

as of late. Possibly explaining why I’ve been in such a good mood? ;)

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 20, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

"I know Paxson likes Gordon, but Jerry Reinsdorf does not."

the Bulls suck.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 8:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

For a guy like Gordon

who doesn’t get into trouble, puts enormous time into his work, and is talented and was our high draft pick…it is pretty crazy how things have gone down because of someone not liking someone. That really shouldn’t come into play if you are a good boss. We are in position to getting nothing out of Gordon. Keeping or trading.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Feb 20, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think a team like the Spurs might have been interested in renting Gordon for a playoff run this year.

I also think the Rockets would have had to have taken a long look at someone like Gordon. The Nuggets might have been another option to send him to.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i refuse to believe that the Wolves offer was the only offer for Kirk

Paxson also said that their phone was ringing off the hook for Kirk. So if not the Wolves offer, and if there was another offer out there to move him for expirings, why not pull the trigger?

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 8:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess to do right by Gordon

but I don’t really care if that’s the only benefit.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure it would have been a detriment in a basketball sense

They wouldn’t haven’t gotten an expiring back as good as Ben.

by JeffD on Feb 20, 2009 9:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

re: Hinrich for Collins/Cardinal

(I sent this to Doug via email as well (he really wanted me to see this comment, heh), as a disclaimer)

What if Thabo was included in a deal to Minny (or dumped to OKC like he eventually was?)

By my calculations, that’s $568,840 additional salary this season (still under the tax), and a $5,509,630 savings next season. Likely not ‘enough’, they perhaps could beat that in the offseason. But it’s a risk.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I have to think Gordon was as good as gone....

When he turned down the contract last summer…It was only his fans that have been clinging to that sliver of a possibility that he would return.

With that said, I am surprised that the Bulls positioned themselves such that a sign and trade is unlikely…I still hold out hope the Bulls will sign and trade him for something…perhaps someone like Jerry Stackhouse, who only has $2M guaranteed next season….

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 20, 2009 5:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am not proposing a trade.

Only an example of how it could work…

In an actual deal, there could be other players involved and/or draft picks…

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 20, 2009 9:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

As for Hinrich, we have a confirmation from the Blazers beat writer that the talks about a "PG + SF from an Eastern Conference Team" that was rumored a few weeks ago was indeed with the Bulls for Hinrich + Deng

http://www.blogabull.com/2009/1/29/741968/portland-bulls-talking-den

The talks faltered due to difficulties matching salaries with Deng’s BYC. So there might be more talks over the summer to get at least Hinrich. We will see.

Brandon is one of those quiet assassins. - Chris Paul

by Norsktroll on Feb 20, 2009 8:31 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

you guys would have done Blake+ expirings for Hinrich right? (say Frye and Sergio/Shavlik)

I just don’t see why that deal didn’t happen.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 20, 2009 8:32 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i'm so glad we didn't do that

if we didn’t even get a starter in return.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Feb 20, 2009 8:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

sure

it was likely leaked from Pritchard trying to salvage his mythical status after failing to use the RLEC.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 8:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

At least he helped to push through your deal with the Kings and shipped Salmons out of the conference :)

There was strong interest in Hinrich from multiple teams, so it’s interesting to see that you could have options to move him over the summer, no?

Brandon is one of those quiet assassins. - Chris Paul

by Norsktroll on Feb 20, 2009 8:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am surprised the Blazers didn't make a decent offer for Kirk

at least, something better than Brian Cardinal or Jason Collins to splash the headlines.

by Sports2 on Feb 20, 2009 9:04 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Shipping Salmons out of the conference

was an objective?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

Dallas wanted him. Houston wanted him as a stopgap for the T-Mac situation. San Antonio wanted him. All direct competitors for playoff spots/positions.

Brandon is one of those quiet assassins. - Chris Paul

by Norsktroll on Feb 20, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the reason is mythical status might need salvaging

is because Kevin Durant might be a top five player next year.

That said, I like the Blazers standing pat. They’ve got such a great young nucleus, and the last thing you want to do is disturb that chemistry. A tweak, sure. But I really think they’ll be contending soon as it is.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 20, 2009 10:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"They’ve got such a great young nucleus, and the last thing you want to do is disturb that chemistry. "

But enough about the 2006 Bulls…

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 11:20 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

though to be fair

that Bulls team didn’t have Brandon Roy. The rest of the team is not that impressive.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 1:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

There were no difficulties matching salaries to Deng's BYC.

We had a $5M trade exception to cover the difference. The Blazers had plenty of expendable guys making that much or less.

I suspect you offered nothing at all that made the Bulls want to trade Deng is all.

by Sports2 on Feb 20, 2009 9:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

given that they weren't offering any starters supposedly

i couldn’t see the bulls giving up both kirk and deng for simply 3 rotation players, despite the fact that i’m sure the blazers think most of their team could start for anyone!

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Feb 20, 2009 9:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The only bench guy worth Deng straight up is Rudy Fernandez.

The only guy worth Kirk straight up is RLEC.

I would have done something along the lines of RLEC + Fernandez for Hinrich plus Deng. The Blazers throw in a Frye or Diogu or Blake or Sergio here or there to make it all work out.

Financial flexibility galore! A core, after this season, of Rose, Fernandez, Thomas and Noah and those are the only guys committed to past 2010. It’d be one helluva rebuild.

I have no idea how that would have actually played out, especially considering the other trades.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 9:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

good point

I’m going to run with my ‘Portland media is in the back pocket of the Pritchslapper’ theory, if only to annoy :-)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Summer will be key.

And we’ll see how Salmons performs as well…who’s gonna be available in the draft…lotsa factors. But yeah, Hinrich and Deng would fit you guys beautifully, and you have young talent that would fit us. Good to know the managers are at least talking.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 20, 2009 10:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

am i the only one

who thought that thabo was worth more than a san antonio spur draft pick?
and will he start at OKC? isnt durant playing SF now? wo is their SG?

Chicago... Where giving up career nights happens

by Yibs on Feb 20, 2009 8:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

are you the only one?

no, but one of the very few.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 8:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They have rookie Kyle Weaver and the injured Desmond Mason

So yeah, Thabo should start for them on SG since he is Weaver’s “best case” according to DraftExpress ;-)

Brandon is one of those quiet assassins. - Chris Paul

by Norsktroll on Feb 20, 2009 8:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Check out the Daily Dime

I really don’t like the ESPN NBA writers but I clicked on the website today and Thabo’s picture with Best Trade written underneith it made me click onto the daily dime. 4 of the 6 writers said OK City had the best deadline because they aquired Thabo ( defensive minded shooting guard).
Good for Thabo getting some props nationally.

Bulls recieved 1 vote and Magic recieved the other. I think the Magic getting Skip to my Lou was the most important because he can weather the storm and at least give the Magic a shot against the Cavs and Celts.

by Jscho316 on Feb 20, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Link ?

The Game chose him !

by Diabolo on Feb 20, 2009 9:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

My bad

Link didnt work. Its the Daily Dime at ESPN.

by Jscho316 on Feb 20, 2009 9:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

can't put a link in the subject line

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dime-090220

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

while trying to argue with my father that tim thomas sucks, i made the following discovering:

MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG

26.4 0.437 0.367 0.757 1.0 3.2 4.2 1.6 0.8 0.3 1.51 2.80 11.7

25.2 0.437 0.367 0.813 0.8 4.2 5.0 1.3 0.4 0.4 1.61 3.00 11.7

Those are Tim Thomas’ and Nocioni’s career numbers.

Which is which? Nocioni is on the bottom… meaning he has the edge in rebounding but everything else is scarily similar!

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Feb 20, 2009 8:51 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I think Thomas got a bad rap

definitely not an all world player, but every bit as efficient as Noc (and no I’m not bothering to look up any stats to prove that).

If he can be a 3-pt chucker and plays bad D, then we’ll have the Noc angle covered perfectly. It will be like he never left.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 8:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

like I said yesterday

Thomas’s best attribute over Nocioni is that he doesn’t play hard. So Vinny won’t use that as excuse to over-use him :)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 8:56 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

While agree with your premise

I have to argue that his best attribute over Noc is that he expires next year.

by JeffD on Feb 20, 2009 9:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i was just kind of amazed

how similar all of their stats were, even to the point that they shoot the same FG and 3P% for their careers…

tim is a thug though… last time we played them when he was still on the clips he was a complete asshole. i don’t mind him in there for a few minutes i guess, but man he irritates me.

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Feb 20, 2009 9:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

true

like I used to say about Noc, Thomas should not get anywhere beyond 15 min a game. If we see him longer than that, it’s a problem.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 9:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Nocioni's only value

was that he’s a four that shoots the three. Thomas does that: and won’t screw our rotations or our 2010 dreams. Success!

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 20, 2009 10:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And don't forget.

Thomas is taller.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 20, 2009 6:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They're the same player. I'll take Noc before I take Thomas if it's just basketball players you want.

But add in the contracts and I take Tim Thomas before Nocioni. It’s just a business decision.

It’s alarming to read anything about Tim Thomas producing in Phoenix. D’Antoni ball is a gift to NBA journeymen that just want to jack shots and play no defense. Tim Thomas got to dip, eat, and dip again.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Can anyone explain this from Sam Smith?
The Bulls also save about $500,000 this year on the deal with the Knicks.

Bulls Blog

08-09
In: 6200000 + 6049400 + 797581 = 13046981
Out: 12827676
Net: -219305

09-10
In: 6600000 + 6466600 = 13066600
Out: 13655268
Net: -588668

I wanted to think Smith was just combining 08-09 and 09-10 savings, but that’s a net savings of $807973. Sham’s numbers might be wrong and Sam’s might be right. Someone is wrong.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:14 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

how are both of those negative

when the In number is bigger in 08-09 and smaller in 09-10?

"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"

by Jaina on Feb 20, 2009 9:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Correction

08-09 net: 219305
09-10 net: -588668

Thanks.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I also like this from Smith
I’ve always thought Thomas was OK to deal with, though it will be interesting when he arrives as he told me in an interview after he left the Bulls and had a great run with the Suns: “There really is no explanation for what happened. My understanding was they wanted to stick with their young core. The first excuse I got was I was out of shape. The second excuse was I was going to have a hard time playing for [coach Scott Skiles]. Then the season starts and I don’t play. We go to New Jersey (his home) and I play [eight] minutes. Then my wife is sideswiped by a cab in New York and I go home to check out the family, which is the most important thing. The next thing I know, I get a call and am told to stay home or come back if I want. So many different things happen in life, but I know I’m still a good player. I know I can still play in this league, and when I was about to get released, all the good teams called, the Suns, Spurs, Pistons, Nets. So that told me something.I know they could have used me.”

I was too harsh with Tim Thomas.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he's probabably full of crap

or partially full.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

heh, good memory
“I’m not going to apologize for asking our players to work hard and be in shape and those types of things. It’s really as simple as that. If he thinks we would have won 20 more games with him, then I used the right word this morning on the radio.”
—Bulls GM, John Paxson, after calling former forward Tim Thomas “delusional” for saying the Bulls would have won 20 more games with him

Can’t find the actual article, just a blurb on some random site

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

nice find

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ha

i guess time does cure all. It never really made sense why they sat Thomas. But since he is a net negative on the court, I hope they do it again

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 20, 2009 11:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

time curing all

or throwing Skiles under the bus curing all :)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 11:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, Tim

we would have won 61 games that season with you on the roster.

Pax was right(I’m engraving the mausoleum). That was a delusional statement.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 11:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No Miller according to Miller

Haven’t heard about Salmons, Thomas, Roberson, and James.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 9:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

he may get the honorary Tim Thomas

‘stay home’ call.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't expect we'll have any of them.

Miller said he won’t play – I guess Salmons could? I don’t see how the New York trade guys could get here and cleared in a single day.

Plus, we have no control over how quickly the other team does physicals and all, and they don’t have quite the same player shortage issues to motivate them.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Feb 20, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

My question

If the Bulls get ~$6m in insurance money next year for James, do they sit on it? They could go over the luxury tax by $3m and essentially break even. Wait, I know the answer to this one.

by JeffD on Feb 20, 2009 9:44 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

it is a solid question though

even after getting over the tax threshhold, it’s possible that insurance money softens the blog of the actual tax tab. But why bother if you’re Reinsdorf. Cite the economy, throw up your hands, and cash some checks.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 9:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

last year

the rest of the teams each received around $3 mil for the luxury tax payoff.

1 – Do you know if it will be close to that this year?

2 – Can they use that to help re-sign Ben?

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 10:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You could go...

here and add them all up.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

too lazy right now

thanks for the link though. Maybe I will later on.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 10:20 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I just did it.

12 teams over the tax (a couple just missed by hundred grand or so—ouch!)
18 teams under (bulls are 20th in payroll—way to go Jerry!)

$101 million in tax payments

~$5.6 million to every team under.

This assumes that Hoopshype.com salaries are correct. Glancing at a few, it looks updated. This also assumes that all salaries count against the tax—this is not a given and maybe even unlikely. This further assumes I entered all the numbers correctly in my spread sheet—also not a given, but I think I did.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 10:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Can I link to google.docs?

I have no idea.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 10:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It works!

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 10:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Very well done

That’s unfortunate for the Bucks…I would’ve never guessed they’d be over. I hope Richard Jefferson jerseys pick up in sales for their sake!

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 20, 2009 11:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ha!

nice work. Thanks. I’ll assume that you are close to the number, give or a take a mill or so.

So now the more important question, can that money be used to re-sign Ben?

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's not the right question

The right question is “Is ’dorf willing to use that money and the James insurance money to pay the tax the next few years, as a result of signing BG this offseason?”

I would guess no, but stranger things have happened.

--Torch

by torch on Feb 20, 2009 11:23 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

well it's a matter

of getting under the tax by year’s end anyway. So to be completely honest (Gar Paxdorf AND Ben know this), they can sign him for close to what he wants over the summer. As long as they’ve shed the appropriate amount by the end of the season it’s good, right?

That’s why this whole thing is lame to begin with.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 11:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd have to think a lot of those teams that are razor-thin close

likely got under somehow. ‘else that’d be a huge blunder on there end.

Though if you take out 3 teams (Bucks, Raps, Pistons) and add them to the paid out list it’s only losing ~850k of the Bulls tax payout.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 11:25 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's what I didn't care enough to look up.

“So-and-so’s salary for part of the 2008-2009 season doesn’t count against the tax for ________ reasons.”

I figure it’s still be between $4.5 – $5.5 million so the same idea.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 20, 2009 12:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Matt, you said it yourself yesterday

“Kirk Hinrich is made of fucking teflon.” While I like your potential minutes breakdown, I’m scared that Noah won’t see any minutes at the 4, meaning more time for Deng or Tim Thomas at the 4, and opening up chances for tiny-ball or more minutes for Kirk at the 2 and Salmons at the 3. And I just find it very hard to believe that this franchise will routinely only play Hinrich 18 minutes; I’d like to see it, but it’ll stun me.

by Calogero on Feb 20, 2009 10:37 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

We'll go to tiny ball regardless of the roster

if we’re -10 or more entering the 4th quarter. Vinny uses it to get back into games and it only works if shots fall.

Tim Thomas and John Salmons arriving doesn’t help us defensively at all. I hope these guys can hit shots outside of all offense systems like D’Antoni and Sacramento.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 10:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

super scientific breakdown of Deng vs. Gordon

situation: Bulls make trade with Kings, what do you think?

Gordon: Brad Miller will help us by creating space and better shot opportunities

Deng: ::cries::

(we know which response Reinsdorf prefers)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 20, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

lol

Deng’s really gonna be weepy when Salmons takes over the starting 3 spot

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 12:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Why would Salmons take the starting 3 spot? Deng's not short for a SF nor "instant offense"

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Feb 20, 2009 12:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

sarcasm?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 20, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

All around

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Feb 20, 2009 1:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 20, 2009 2:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Bulls and Young Talent
Blogabull_s_small
Sign up for BlogABull game previews
Small
What will the Bulls rotation look like?

Recent FanPosts

Sports
I'm Happy to Have a Break From Tyrus. He's gone anyways.
Small
Game Preview # 6: Bulls vs Charlotte Bobcats
Small
Why isn't there more talk of LeBron...
Small
Contract/Cap Question for BAB
Jayhawk_small
Game Preview # 5: Bulls at Cleveland Cavaliers
Small
We've Got To Rescue D. Wade
Blogabull_s_small
Chad Ford Rounds up extensions and team options for recent draftees
Pippenmug1_small
Game Preview #4: Chicago Bulls vs Milwaukee Bucks
Drose2_small
Start of trade talk....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger