Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

[Let's try this again: Bumping up another fanpost as the designated main Amare discussion thread for the day.

As another juicy link, Chris Herrington has a 'hunch' that 4 teams are in the running (Bulls, Cavs, Blazers, Griz) and the Bulls will win out.

And who is Dwayne Wade crapping? You have to be patient, and only the Celtics and Lakers can make one move towards a championship? What about the Heat acquiring Shaq? -ed.]

Half the NBA is going West for All-Star weekend. The Suns are looking East when it comes to trading Amare Stoudemire.

Talks between the Suns and Portland Trail Blazers about Stoudemire have unraveled, CBSSports.com has learned. Phoenix is now focused on Eastern Conference teams -- and not just Chicago.

The Bulls remain a serious contender due to Drew Gooden's expiring contract and Larry Hughes' expiring deal next season, plus the largest expiring trade exception in the league ($5.2 million). But Miami is the latest team to emerge as a serious landing spot for Stoudemire, a person with direct knowledge of the talks said Wednesday night.

The Heat's involvement is sure to set off speculation about the possibility of Phoenix taking back Shawn Marion, who was traded to Miami for Shaquille O'Neal last February -- ground zero in the demolition of the Suns' 58-win-a-year success story over the past four seasons. But it is not believed that Suns managing partner Robert Sarver wants to go there. And Sarver's heavy hand in the process has become one of the key obstacles to Phoenix securing the best deal, according to two league executives -- one of whom described the situation as "dissension." Teams are getting mixed signals from Phoenix as far as what the Suns are looking to take back for Stoudemire, another executive said -- one version from Sarver and another from president Steve Kerr.

That isn't uncommon in NBA trade talks, especially on a deal as massive as this one. But it's just another impediment in Kerr's way as he tries to leverage an already difficult position. Some team executives have concerns about Stoudemire as a max player, given that anyone who acquires him would have to be prepared to re-sign him if he declines his player option after the 2009-10 season. Stoudemire's defensive deficiencies have been well documented, and he's a difficult player to commit to long-term given that he underwent microfracture knee surgery in 2005.

The deal Portland was discussing with Phoenix involved LaMarcus Aldridge, Jerryd Bayless, and Raef LaFrentz's $12.7 million expiring contract. "That deal is dead," the person familiar with the talks said. One reason could be that Portland is really looking to acquire an elite point guard, according to an NBA team executive. That begs the question of whether Portland G.M. Kevin Pritchard was asking for Steve Nash. But according to another rival executive, the Suns have made it clear that Nash, Grant Hill, and Leandro Barbosa are "untouchable."

about 3 years ago 34807_10150110422314252_720619251_7444382_2783851_n_tiny Option27 395 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Sad as it is for me too

I think you should really start grasping the idea of it happening.

And be happy, like me!

by Option27 on Feb 12, 2009 12:30 AM CST up reply actions  

yeah but if TT was playing like this for the last year and a half, we wouldn't even consider trading him.

Now, Im scared that we’re trading him away exactly when he finally got on the right track.

But if it happens, it happens. Im actually hoping for a TT, Noce, Thabo and exchange of draft picks scenario. (But Noce’s contract is gonna be a problem I guess)

by PatBull on Feb 12, 2009 12:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Once we get amare

we should try to clear up capspace in order to get ready to sign him in 2010 if he so chooses to opt out. Id also try to find a way to somehow clear enough capspace to grab one of the sgs in 2010, i mean…..rose, hamilton, deng, stoudamire, noah……that sounds pretty good.

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Feb 12, 2009 2:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Hamilton will not be available.

He signed an extension when the Pistons traded for Iverson.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 9:19 AM CST up reply actions  

oh i mustve missed that

thanx for the heads-up….

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Feb 12, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Hamilton

Too is very overrated. He’s a taller BG who’s less streaky, but also less able to completely blow up in stretches. I think those two are neck and neck, and would rather keep the younger BG over the overrated Rip…

Rip has been helped so much by the crew around him, especially int he Billups days, but he’s in his all star days had Billups, jack of all trades Prince, and of course Sheed to take a lot of the pressure off that Ben Gordon gets as a Bull.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Offensively id say both are similar

id say hamilton though is a much better defender, and i was more suggesting that there are other sgs available in 2010, who may not be as offensively gifted as gordon, but can still be solid starting sgs (as opposed to having hinrich or thabo play starting sg) and if we have amare that would be enough of to be competetive, not to mention that defensively some of the 2010 guards (or most) would be upgrades over ben gordon. I used hamilton cuz that was one name i could remember that i wouldnt consider to be a BIG free agent in 2010, there are others who i could have easily used…

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Feb 12, 2009 12:54 PM CST up reply actions  

um, c'mon

yeah, they’re both good players, and certainly one could do worse than any one of them, but i still say hamilton is, overall, a bit better than gordon. better defending, great off the ball movement. sure, if you give him the ball and then stand put he’ll not be able to create and produce as much as bg (in a bad offense) but on the flipside gordon is probably not going to become that off the ball off some screens spot up shooting guard people thought could be a good match with rose.

it just looks like rose and gordon alternate possessions sometimes, that may be the coaching, but still hamilton maybe a better fit with him. but the real point is, c’mon, these bulls are not a really good team, anybody can see that, yet now nobody wants to change our players with bonafide big names like Stat or Hamilton.

by grillo on Feb 12, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Why would they have a problem taking back Marion?

If they don’t want him around, they can just cut him. What the hell, they were talking about taking Raef LaFrentz, and it’s not like he would contribute anything. The only reason they’d want Marion anyways is because of his expiring contract.

Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0

because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger

by Big D on Feb 12, 2009 12:34 AM CST reply actions  

bad terms and relationship issues

i mean…i know its hard to believe, but basketball players and the organizaiton workers….they are all people….no matter how much they understand that the nba is a business….sometimes emotions are created that impact relationships negatively….maybe the suns wanted to avoid an encounter with marion

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!

by piccolomair on Feb 12, 2009 2:16 AM CST up reply actions  

It takes two to tango

From what I hear, Kerr is not that fond of Beasley

by LOTP on Feb 12, 2009 2:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Add me to the list.

In 4 years TT will likely be one of the best all around 4’s in the league when Rose is in his prime, while Stoudemire will be a max contract player on a serious decline due to injury problems (e.g. Jermaine O’Neal).

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 12, 2009 1:31 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree, add me to the list.

Just couldn’t formulate my thoughts when I was rebutting. :P

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 12, 2009 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm right with you man.

I love TT but this is Stoudemire and we’ve been saying since 2005 that we nee a low post option. Well, here one is.

by Playboy_Bull on Feb 12, 2009 6:17 AM CST up reply actions  

We have one now

WE WON"T BE A CONTENDER WITH AMARE. I know you didn’ t say we would be playboy but I can’t emphasize that enough. Why not wait it out this year w/ TT and Noah playing well and see where that gets us.

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 7:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Amare is not a low post player.

That is not his game…

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 9:20 AM CST up reply actions  

but he can score inside and on high-percentage shots.

A low-post game isn’t absolutely necessary; it’s the ability to score inside on high-percentage shots.

Not that you were saying anything about that. I do agree, he is not a low-post player. This probably should have been a response to, “we need a low post option”.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

It was a response to

we need a low post option.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 9:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I meant my comment should have responded to that one.

My fault. All around.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions  

I think Amare would be fine as a post player in the East and with the Bulls

We’d feature him in the post since, well, what other options do we presently have down there?

I do think we’ll pay far too much to get this from Amare as the net gains will be marginal when factoring salary costs with the sacrificial lamb being defense.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Also

Amare is pretty damn good against the East. His FTA per minute go from 1 every 5.5 minutes to 1 every 4.5 minutes. His FG% drops, but his FTM% increases.

The deal is still good so long as Thomas and Noah are not among the departed. If that happens we’ve made a terrible mistake.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:29 AM CST up reply actions  

it's gotta be one or the other. it can't be both. one of them has to be left to pair with Amare.

otherwise, get ready for lots and lots of Aaron Gray and Nocioni at center. Yuck.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

If it's both...

I’m sure we will get Robin Lopez back….

He’s far from a solution at center, but for the Aaron Gray haters, at least it’s another option. He’s like a poor mans Noah.

Trade for Amare. Keep Deng and Rose. Figure out the rest later.

by kidronmusic on Feb 12, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Why would the Suns want Noah

if they are giving up the cheaper and bigger Lopez.

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Because Noah is good

And Lopez isn’t.

Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 12, 2009 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks Ozzie.

Trade for Amare. Keep Deng and Rose. Figure out the rest later.

by kidronmusic on Feb 12, 2009 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Noah is good at one thing and gets playing time

Lopez has shown he can play some offense and defense but doesn’t get playing time. Thabo doesn’t get minutes but people swear that he’s a good player.

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 1:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Lopez has scored in double figures twice

Where has he shown he can provide offense?

by JeffD on Feb 12, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I forgot that he had never played basketball before being drafted

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Uh, ok

So what did he show in college the Noah didn’t?

Here is a portion of his scouting report:

Unlike his brother who has a smooth offensive game, Robin is offensively challenged Lacks great moves in the post and struggles with his shooting touch Scores mostly on garbage baskets and cheapies around the hoop Must improve from the free throw line where he shot just 55% Feel for the game is questionable especially on the offensive end Not a great passer with vision of the floor When he receives the ball, he still appears to get nervous and turn it into a hot potato Experience and time should allow him to become a better offensive player, although its unlikely he will ever be the scorer that his brother is

by JeffD on Feb 12, 2009 3:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Reading that sounds very much like Noah

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Again, uh, ok

You said “Noah can do one thing… Lopez has shown he can play some offense and defense.”

So, again, where has Lopez shown he can play offense?

by JeffD on Feb 12, 2009 3:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Even if Lopez can't score

he is one-dimensional just like Noah why demand a nearly identical player that is smaller and more expensive.

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Noah can at least pass well though

And doesn’t ever seem to be too nervous, just not strong enough yet.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions  

And doesn't put in extra work

and causes problems. I’m now realizing how bad people are at forgetting all the flaws of players when they have a good stretch.

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 4:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not forgetting the

start of this year….but the dude’s coming on and is young. He has a chance to learn.

I’m fine with trading Joakim. I think we expected a bit much from him too soon to start the year and I think he’s learned what happens if he slacks……

Course next year’s different story if he does that again, but I would never say he’s untouchable.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 4:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Except he now has a live-in personal trainer.

I’m now realizing how bad people are at taking on new information and getting pre-deceived notions out of their heads.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Any source for the live-in trainer

if so I will retract that statement but I’ve never seen anything about it.

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 4:11 PM CST up reply actions  

No reason to throw away that view

even if Noah does have a live in personal trainer.

In fact, is it even better to have a live in personal trainer? Does he really need outside help to keep his body in peak condition to perform at his job that also lives in his home?

He’s showing less fatigue lately. I’m sure he’s working harder, but torch is probably closer.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

If he does need outside help...

…isn’t good he has a live-in personal trainer? They already have the guy. No use in hoping he’s something he’s not.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 5:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Doug Thonus said it in a podcast.

scroll down here, and he mentions that he said it. his podcasts are here. I don’t know which one it is.

Just found it: Bulls Beat #93 is where he mentions it.

I’m not going to vouch and say he’s the geratest guy eva or anything, but he has interviewed Paxson for a reputable draft site. If you don’t want to take his word, that’s up to you, but I believe him.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 5:30 PM CST up reply actions  

What is the one thing at which he is good?

Because it seems to me that Joakim Noah receives playing time mostly because he is pretty good in multiple categories of consideration (offensive rebounding, passing, starting breaks, blocking shots, generating steals), and not because he is skilled in a single category (such as raw scoring).

by jpx7 on Feb 12, 2009 5:09 PM CST up reply actions  

According to a classification system from David Sparks

that I like. Noah was classified as a scorer’s opposite. He contributes in all other areas of the game. In general, these are among the most valuable types of players.

by Scotter on Feb 12, 2009 5:20 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I love looking at that map every time.

It’s just amazing.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 5:47 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree.

I’ve been looking back through Sparks’s stuff again today trying to think through the Amare situation again, which is why I mentioned him. His player type stuff was fairly unique and interesting for thinking about trades.

He’s another one that does something interesting for a couple of months, and then gets hired by an NBA team. It’s great for him, but very frustrating.

by Scotter on Feb 12, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Something funny...

…I looked through a link to APBR message board of one of the ideas he was working through. Someone mentioned that he would be good for an NBA office, and he said something modest to the effect of, “No team is going to come asking for me.”

The good stats-guys (or, those who use metrics) are getting snatched up in basketball left and right. I could only imagine how long it would take to work your way through as a scout (or an observer-type). There’s a lot of interesting and valuable work going on right now.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 7:38 PM CST up reply actions  

He is good at deflections

Good at altering shots

Good at defense (improving, the last play tonight notwithstandng), a decent passer, very good on the fast break.

He’s not GREAT at anything, but he’s good at most things.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 8:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll add one thing on the subject of post presence-

the few time I’ve seen him back-to-basket, he’s been pretty good. The Suns simply don’t run a lot through the post, and now, when they do, they do it through Shaq.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Dude it's not homerism. You draft a 19 year old kid second in the draft because of upside right?

And now you’re starting to get a return on your investment. So why in the world do you now trade that guy for someone with a knee injury who doesn’t play defense that’s going to strap you financially? TT fans aren’t showing homerism. I’m actually shocked so many fans are actually thinking this thing through to the point of not wanting Amare. Maybe some fans want a big name so bad that they aren’t willing to think of the consequences. And by the way, if TT gets better and play like this consistently, he will be a better player than Amare in the long run.

by Dils on Feb 12, 2009 8:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Better than Amare?

This is homerism at it’s finest. Amare is a proven top 10 talent in the league and to hang your hopes on TT getting better and playing consistently and extrapolating that he will surpass Amare is crazy talk.

And while Amare has had microfracture surgery there is no guarantee that TT will not get hurt in the future (see Al Jefferson and a quirky landing).

You may lose on the talent of the part of the equation in the future if TT does develop into his potential but you lose out on a known commodity and inside scoring in the short term.

by bullschwaa on Feb 12, 2009 8:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Stoudemire would be indeed short-term

if a trade does not include an extension to his contract. It would be foolish to trade anything by excess parts (e.g. Gooden, Noc, Hughes, Hinrich) for 1-1/3 seasons of “renting” Stoudemire, since the Bulls are not contending for a championship next year either way.

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 14, 2009 2:15 AM CST up reply actions  

A return on your investment doesn't always mean

only that the player is starting to play better. A “return on your investment” could mean trading your young improving asset for a tremendous established player. If you have that much emotional attachment to this guy, I’m happy you’re not the gm.

"One thing I do know is teams like a lot of our pieces. That's not to say they want to give us a lot of players in return, but I know they like a lot of our pieces." - John Paxson (1/21/09)

by Juiceboxjerry on Feb 12, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

we're fans. it's okay to have an emotional attachment to the guys you like. that's why even though

I crap on the Hinrich lovers quite a bit, I understand where they are coming from. They watched him come up from a rookie and develop into a pretty good player and then had to watch him regress to merely average. With Tyrus, I watched him in the tournament and fell in love with his shot-blocking, aerial dunks, and his emotional leadership of that LSU team. I wanted the Bulls to draft him on draft day and was thrilled when we got him. He’s probably my favorite Bull, even ahead of Derrick Rose, despite the fact that I know Derrick is the better and more important player. I’ll be sad to see Tyrus go if he does, but it doesn’t mean I won’t be hoping that Amare lays waste to the East as we make a run at the playoffs. Plus, it’s not like Tyrus dies if he goes to Phoenix, we’ll still be able to watch him if we want, and he’ll probably be on nationally televised games more because the Suns always get a lot of games. I don’t know how much an Amare trade will help, but if it goes down, I will still follow Tyrus’s career, but root for Amare to dunk on his head whenever we play against the Suns.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

I have no issue with a fan being emotionally attached to a player

on the team they root for. I really like a lot of the players on this team. But, it becomes a problem when you become SO emotionally attached that it clouds your judgment as to the true value of those players. For example: not trading Tyrus Thomas for Amare frickin Stoudamire.

"One thing I do know is teams like a lot of our pieces. That's not to say they want to give us a lot of players in return, but I know they like a lot of our pieces." - John Paxson (1/21/09)

by Juiceboxjerry on Feb 12, 2009 2:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you think your initial question

was far too simplified to assess the actual discussion of the prospect of trading Tyrus?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 4:20 PM CST up reply actions  

+1 on the list: STAY CHISEL

just remember all caps when you spell the man’s name

by Stay Chisel on Feb 12, 2009 8:33 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm pro-Amare.

We can’t lose perspective. Just a few weeks ago, Bull83 suggested an exteremely similar trade, and was laughed down. It seemed incredibly improbable – and rightly so.

For all Tyrus gifts, he’ll never have the brute strength Amare brings down low. That was there when he was in high school And when motivated, he’s as explosive, strong and nasty as any power forward in the game.

I think that’s the Amare we’ll see.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 9:00 AM CST up reply actions  

I think Bull83 had a deal without the Bulls giving up Thomas or Noah

but he was right in that Phoenix would start shopping. Apologies, man!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Nah,

that was all in good fun. The truth is, with all the trades we post on this site, one of us is pretty much bound to be right. If the Bulls acquire Bosh, Stat, Maggette, Kaman, Miller #1, Miller #2, Fernandez, Outlaw, Sene, Mikki Moore, Spencer Hawes, or Jason Richardson, there will be at least one BaBer who will be able to stand up and say “That’s right, baby, I knew.”

Then you start your own rumor-mongering website, see, and claim to have insider sources…

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 9:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Gooden Thabo and __________

it was a laughable trade. the idea he’d be available, buddy, not so much. :-)

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 9:30 AM CST up reply actions  

And Deng!

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 12, 2009 10:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I, m going to say something that I posted on another post...

Why is it that people critsize Gordon for not playing defense and being a one trick pony but these same people want wnat to trade TT and get Amare, a guy that is going to do the same thing in the post as Gordon does on the wing(Just score)? Kind of hypocritcal if you ask me.

by Dils on Feb 12, 2009 9:23 AM CST up reply actions  

The "same people"?

Who are they? A basketball team is about meshing players abilities, both strengths and weaknesses. I can deal with Ben’s occasional defensive lapses becaues of his scoring. Ditto with Amare. It’s players who don’t play D and aren’t particularly good on O that kill you. Like Mr. Nocioni.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 9:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Noah's a good post defender.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 9:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Then we've got a problem.

But I don’t think Noah ends up being a deal-breaker; Pax probably see Robin Lopez as a player in that capacity.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Noah is good against bad players

Recently the cream of the crop Al Jeff and Yao tore Noah up. I don’t blame him when he was matched against Dirk because Dirk was just hot in the 2nd half. Let’s judge the Bulls against good players not the Clips, Suns, Sac…. a mediocre Pistons.

The thing that worries me the most about the East is that no one on the Bulls is close to guarding Dwight Howard. I know it isn’t easy but other teams use good doubles and multiple centers throughout the game to slow him down.

by Jscho316 on Feb 12, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions  

He looked pretty good against Rasheed, no?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions  

eh

not particularly in the 2nd half no. Didn’t sheed score something like 9 pts in a row? My memory is failing me, but maybe that wasn’t all on Noah.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Tyrus was guarding him in the 3rd most of the time

Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 12, 2009 11:59 AM CST up reply actions  

thanks

I do remember Noah on him a couple of times. Point is, neither could defend him. They knew he was going to the fade-away each time, yet neither could do anything about it.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 12:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think anyone can do much about

a well executed fade.

If we aren't careful, the leanness we now feel will be the starvation of those we serve.

by Chi 'Till I Die on Feb 12, 2009 12:34 PM CST up reply actions  

that's true, once the shot is up

but there are things they can do BEFORE he even gets the ball. Fight for position, push him a little further away from his spot, etc.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Make him show you his dribble

That’s how you defend Sheed. If he’s got his back to you, protecting his dribble and posting you up, you’re just about out of options to defend him.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 12:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Sheed

is an all star and has superstar talent, can spread the floor and can get off a shot at will (an unblockable shot).

I mean hell Tyrus Thomas was on Nowitzki the other night, guarding the f out of him and Dirk got going and was absolutely phenomenal in the 2nd half of our disappointing loss…..and I’m not about to blame that on Tyrus.

Stars can do that, and Al is a Star, and Dirk is a superstar.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions  

for streches

Sheed finished with 20 on 7-11 and 10rebs. He got extremely hot in the 3rd and cooled off in the fourth. Noah got his hustle rebounds no doubt but nothing to really tell me he is a good defense center.

by Jscho316 on Feb 12, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

'Sheed scored some fadeaways in the 3rd

but Noah did a good enough job, and then in the 4th Sheed did nothing.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions  

I remeber Sheed dropping some lonnnnng j's on him

Which he does on everyone. Personally, I don’t want Noah defending out beyond the arch.

by California Al on Feb 12, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Sheed's Third

Tyrus was doing most of the defending on Sheed in the 3rd quarter when he was doing horking up his “ball don’t lie” jumpers.

by lilzaky on Feb 12, 2009 10:21 AM CST up reply actions  

It's usually impossible to "shut down"

a good offensive player. You can, however, make them take difficult shots, and Noah does that very well. I think his defense has been excellent. With more strength, Joakim could be one of the best post defenders in basketball.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Yao

Didn’t really tear him up, they both were in foul trouble. Yao destroyed Gray-Noc….as Noah had his best Tyson Chandler as a Bull in the playoffs imitation that game.

Jefferson did beat Noah on the one on one, but Jefferson was just on, hitting everytihng that day and the Wolves were feeding and feeding and feeding (high amount of touches). Noah’s D wasn’t bad at all, there are just some games where you can’t do much else, and without Noah Jefferson would have had closer to 50+ as the Wolves were really feeding him to score.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Jefferson tap-danced his way to a bunch of points.

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 12, 2009 10:16 PM CST up reply actions  

The idea, to my way of thinking,

is that Noah continues to develop into a defensive-minded center, and that Asik ends up backing up Noah, providing the same thing.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 9:32 AM CST up reply actions  

Damn Tyger beat me to it.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 9:32 AM CST up reply actions  

I guess I was just trying to figure out how there's an argument by "some" people that

Gordon is a lesser player and in some way expendable because he doesn’t play defense at the 2-guard spot (which a lot of good 2 guards don’t) but when discussing trading for Amare how it’s acceptable to disreguard his lack of defense at a post position which is critical and at the same time trade away a kid who actually does play defense and is getting better offensively.

by Dils on Feb 12, 2009 9:38 AM CST up reply actions  

because people are simple-minded.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 9:39 AM CST up reply actions  

Because

It’s easier to replace a shooting guard who doesn’t play defense than finding a low post presence that has lack of defense. Especially when you consider that Amare was being discussed in the MVP talks last year.

by J Theory on Feb 12, 2009 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't know how you can say that when we got the defensive stalworth of

Drew Gooded on our roster. Pretty easy to find offensive minded big men to me.

by Dils on Feb 12, 2009 10:39 AM CST up reply actions  

are you really comparing Drew Gooden to Amare Stoudemire

Over the last couple years the Bulls have had Chandler, Noah, Tyrus, Wallace, PJ Brown, and Harrington. All defensive minded players. All pretty easy to acquire.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Of course not but J Theory said it's easier to replace a 2-guard

that doesn’t play defense than a post presence that doesn’t and I think big guys in the NBA that want to score more than defend are falling off trees. Such as Gooden and Beasley, and Randolph, the list goes on. If it was easier to find a post player who could defend then why the heck is Chandler getting big bucks, and Camby, and why did we pay Wallace all that money? defense in the post is crucial to a title and Amare isn’t going to give us that.

by Dils on Feb 12, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

amare makes 15 million a year

so I don’t if money is something in your favor.

Camby was traded for a second round pick, Wallace for Larry Hughes and Chandler is on the market right now. Again, it is much easier to acquire the rebounding, solid defense guys than it is the superstar inside scorers. That is just a fact. Gooden, Beasley and Randolph are not anywhere close to Stoudemire. Stoudemire is a first team all-NBA performer. None of those guys has ever made an all star team.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 12:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Easy to acquire?

We traded Elton Brand for Chandler, who we in turn traded for PJ Brown. We traded Eddy Curry for the right to pick LaMarcus Aldridge, who we in turn traded for Tyrus Thomas AND the right to swap picks and choose Noah. We offered Ben Wallace $60M to play here, so that was easy…And Harrington came over in the Jamal Crawford deal…in every case, except for perhaps Crawford, the Bulls had to give up something of value to acquire those players.

Teams just don’t give those types of players away.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 1:56 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

we have acquired 7 of one type of player

and zero of the other type of player, despite our best efforts. So yes, the 7 guys we managed to get and who are being freely offered around the NBA (I guess you didn’t see the part where Chandler was being shopped and where Marcus Camby was traded for a second round pick) are easier to acquire than the zero dominant inside scorers we have obtained.
Math. look into it.

PJ Brown went to the Celtics for nothing. Chandler is being shopped for expiring contracts right now. Ben Wallace was a free agent who we overpaid when THERE WERE NO OTHER SUITORS. Yes you have to give up something of value to acquire those players. (Although the Cavs were able to acquire Wallace for Gooden and Hughes). But we have been trying to acquire a dominant low post scorer for a long time and NO ONE WILL EVEN LET US SNIFF ONE UNTIL NOW.

Think about other teams. The Cavs were prepared to let Anderson Varejao walk. Udonis Haslem was a 2nd round pick. Kendrick Perkins is on a rookie contract. The Suns traded Kurt Thomas to San Antonio for a pile of beans. These guys are far more common than you are asserting

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 3:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Who is the dominant low post scorer to which you refer?

I guess you missed my point…those players do get traded, found in the second round and signed as free agents…but teams do not give away the good ones for nothing, except in the case of Denver who was up against the tax…but Memphis did that with Gasol last season…While I agree they are a common type of player, teams usually recognize the value of that type of play, thus other teams must give up something in order to them…

Cleveland was never prepared to let Varajeo walk, that is why they matched his offer from Charlotte…and the Suns did not trade Thomas to the Spurs, the traded him to the Sonics for TWO first round picks.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 4:16 PM CST up reply actions  

wait

so you have to give up something, to get something. and you agree with my basic point that acquiring Amare is more rare than acquiring a Ben Wallace or Anderson Varejao? Than what are you arguing about? That is my point. It is easier to replace a defensive rebounding type player than it is to acquire someone like Amare Stoudemire. If you agree, what is your point?

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

and you keep confusing low post scorer

with back to the basket player. Amar’e scores in the low block. He just rarely plays with back to the basket.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 5:17 PM CST up reply actions  

You said dominant low post scorer...

Which implies the player is in fact posting up.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 5:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Thomas was traded for one first round pick

that comes up in 2009. Probably somewhere in the realm of 26 and 28. Late first round picks have been sold for 3 million dollars in past drafts. Not that steep of a price.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 5:24 PM CST up reply actions  

He was traded for...

Two first round picks. 2008 (Serge Ibaka) and 2010.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 5:40 PM CST up reply actions  

i was talking about his most recent trade

the reason for the mix-up. 2008-02-20 trade. Although the fact that he has played for six teams kind of disproves that he is some rare commodity which teams never part with.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 5:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Some notes

The Cavs were prepared to let Anderson Varejao walk FOR THE contract demands of 11 mil per.

Kendrick Perkins is not on a rookie contract.

Kurt Thomas was not traded from the Suns to the Spurs. He was traded to the Sonics. The Sonics traded him to the Spurs.

Marcus Camby was traded for tax relief.

Care to reconsider using accurate information?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 4:25 PM CST up reply actions  

i'm sorry

perkins makes 4.5 million a year. My mistake. Huge deal there. I don’t know how Boston can ever afford him.

Vareajao is signed for 1 more year at 5.7 million. So where you got that 11 million per contract from I don’t know. He is barely making more than the mid-level exception.

What was inaccurate about what I said concerning Camby? He was traded for a second round pick.

Thomas was traded for Brent Barry (who the Sonics promptly released), Elson (also released) and a 2009 first round pick that figures to be 26 to 28th. So yeah, huge price.

Now, you care to stop being such a condescending idiot?

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 5:05 PM CST up reply actions  

The Sonics were looking for:

-cap relief
-picks
The situation there’s pretty unique. Hell … the Allen deal.

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 12, 2009 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

More to the point...

… which guys would you suggest are available now for a pile of beans.

by Sports2 on Feb 12, 2009 4:28 PM CST up reply actions  

i'm not going to run through who the Bulls may or may not have

a chance to get. The point was that these type of players were easier to acquire than the big time inside scorers. They are, the Bulls history is proof. The Bulls have had 7 of them very recently. Not one person has refuted that argument.

Coming available in the offseason will be R. Wallace, Varejao, Lee and Milsap. Chandler is available right now at the deadline. If it was harder to replace a post defender rather than scorer, wouldn’t the Hornets being shopping West instead of Chandler? Despite the presence of a lot of big time 2010 inside scorers, only 1 is available – Amar’e. Bosh isn’t. Neither is Dirk or Yao. Teams don’t let those guys get away. On the other hand, guys like Wallace, Perkins, and Noah are seen as more replaceable and thus are more readily available. I don’t understand why this is so shocking to posters at BaB, but there it is.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 5:14 PM CST up reply actions  

how about antonio davis?

i’m going off memory. And that is six or seven guys in 5 years. This argument is dumb

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Davis had a monster contract when we acquired him

As if he’s a contract off the street is a terrible argument you shouldn’t be making.

These stoppers are not easy acquisitions.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 4:26 PM CST up reply actions  

we've had 7 stoppers and 0

guys who could be considered premier inside scorers. These “stoppers” are certainly easier to acquire than big time inside scorers. Which was my point.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions  

We had two inside scorers.

In Elton Brand, then Eddy Curry.

We traded both of them…and netted these types of guys that you are discussing.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions  

especially when we let them go.

Brand was the best player on the worst team in the league. Curry was Eddy Curry. Neither of them was near what Amar’e is now.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 5:46 PM CST up reply actions  

And Eddy was

never polished and Elton was damn young and we had him for what 1 year years ago….

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 9:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I hear what you're saying.

But I don’t think Stat is nearly the defensive nonentity Drew is. And his scoring is much, much, much better.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Drew Gooden

And Amar’e Stoudemire compared in the same sentence, used to rebut and argument about replacing each other?

That’s a laugh. Drew’s not an all in the same league as a top 1-5 PF that is Amar’e Stoudemire

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Drew:

-isn’t actually good on offense
-is worse than Stoudamire on D
:P

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 12, 2009 10:20 PM CST up reply actions  

When is Asik

expected to join us? Is it in 2 more years if it happens or possibly next year?

Does anyone have a youtube thing on him? Or any essential scouting report/analysis? I’m intrigued….and actually a mini analysis instead of a video would be rad if anyone knows where to find it (hard to watch those things while at work).

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not one

who criticizes BG, I like BG a lot….but while we might get on BG for defense and are still excited for Amar’e because Amar’e can get into the lane and score as a big, and is athletic enough to when he wants to play D (he’s not 6 inches smaller than the man he guards—though BG’s listed as 6 3, come on now, he’s got to be 6 foot tops).

I’d like em both, and have always thought BG was very important to us in the pre Rose days because he was the only offense we had (And his offense oft put us on top)….now move that kind of production in a role that’s 10 feet closer to the basket, and a guy that can perform with the best of them in the league, and yes folks are going to prefer Stat.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Gordon is SHORT.

Stoudemire is TALL.

Case closed.

Maybe we can?

by Granny Waiters on Feb 14, 2009 2:22 AM CST up reply actions  

We've lost perspective.

I hope Pax hasn’t.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 9:28 AM CST up reply actions  

addendum

he is an All-NBA first team caliber player that hasn’t won shit despite the metrics disciples carrying him around like a golden calf.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:32 AM CST up reply actions  

hasn't won shit

neither has CP3, Lebron, Howard, or Bosh. I guess you don’t want those guys either.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 10:34 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

it really makes one sound like an idiot

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

and worse...

other people are repeating his mantra….

On another thread, I posted about 30 great players names, none of them won a championship in they’re career…

Let alone before they turned 27 like Amar’e will next year.

Trade for Amare. Keep Deng and Rose. Figure out the rest later.

by kidronmusic on Feb 12, 2009 1:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I really don't want to wait around

for the excuses to continue to mount as to why the Bulls cannot win.

The last thing I want to see is an NBA where metrics are the conversation. The game won’t even matter at that point. Fans will just rationalize their way back into the box of assumptions.

Go lunch with a Keynsian and an Austrian economist and walk away saying the best part was the boring jello dessert.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 1:24 PM CST up reply actions  

you have a metric too, you know

you can’t win a championship when players who’ve won championships = 0

or is it merely best players?

For instance: The Bulls can’t win because nobody has won. Well of course they haven’t, they’ve been on the Bulls.

I think you don’t want to wait too long because it requires a lot of time to get ones head out of their own arse.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 1:29 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

That's why the Celtics were fools to aquire KG.

What a loser.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

and don't forget kobe

he has won, all right, but he somehow needs to win again now to prove he’s really something.

by grillo on Feb 12, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

"hasn't won shit"

way to show your hand, NBAO.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

um...

Was that when he finally revealed?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 10:45 AM CST up reply actions  

hmm, I guess not.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

I must've missed the memo on Sunday

because this HAS to be “Talk Out Of Your Ass” week right?

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Apologies to STAY CHISEL

But I think I go to the top of the list for my comparison of the post-trade team with Minnesota, except worse.

First of all, where did you get this Tyrus for Amare strawman to rant against? The only deal talked about seriously is TT-Noah-#1. TT for Amare? Sure, of course!

by California Al on Feb 12, 2009 10:02 AM CST up reply actions  

Well played

+1

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:32 AM CST up reply actions  

there have been versions of the deal

(see McGraw) that have not included Noah. Reports are that the Bulls don’t want to send Noah. At this point no one actually knows who is or is not being included. The one constant has been TT. I think we can get Amare without giving up Noah

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 10:39 AM CST up reply actions  

If the rumors are true

they shot down Bayless, Aldridge and RLEC. You think they want TT and our dregs?

by California Al on Feb 12, 2009 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm not convinced Portland actually offered that.

And there are reports refuting that rumor. but I don’t think its shocking that the Suns would prefer TT over Aldridge. I prefer TT over Aldridge.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

I know

long term I’d definately take TT over LMA, and I would draft that way in a heartbeat. Tyrus Thomas still has gobs of untapped upside and has shown signs of playing everything from 2 guard to Center (As his shooting form is perfect, he just has to work more on calming down when he shoots).

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:38 PM CST up reply actions  

so this is where the argument ends

if phoenix trades for Tyrus and not for LMA you can finally say he’s better, c’mon, he netted you Amare!

by grillo on Feb 12, 2009 2:31 PM CST up reply actions  

more like Eddy Curry did! (thanks isiah)

but yeah your right about the LMA / Tyrus comparison

by gman2849 on Feb 12, 2009 2:37 PM CST up reply actions  

No

I don’t give a rats ass on what Phx trades if they don’t take Tyrus in a comparison between Tyrus and LMA. I think Tyrus will be the better player (or has the upside to easily be the better player). If we were to trade Tyrus for Amar’e it still wouldn’t mean jack shit in that comparison.

If LMA is traded to the Suns in lieu of Tyrus for an Amar’e package it could mean that a) Paxson didn’t want to part with Tyrus b) The Suns nabbed Raef’s expiring and wanted the more ready player to play next to the aging Shaq and Nash or c) Steve Kerr is the modern version of Isiah Thomas…..I could see it being a bit of all 3.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 3:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Plenty of room on the list; just being named is an honor

I have 2 problems with the proposed trade. One, I think that TT’s ceiling may be in the vicinity of Amare (if it’s somewhat less but he comes with a lower price tag, I am OK with keeping him). Two, these proposed deals that involve Tyrus, Thabo, Noah and/or picks concerns me because our bench gets a lot more shallow. Yes, I know: get the All-Star and fill in the details later. But with Amare, the clock is ticking because he can opt out in 2010. That’s a small window of time in which to do something with this team. If he opts out, we may be back to square one and I don’t want to be left with a team depleted in the trade and then again with his departure.

by Stay Chisel on Feb 12, 2009 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Call me Homer!

I want on the list!

"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." -- Michael Jordan

by bennythebull on Feb 12, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Nobody is saying that TT is as good as Amare

But I have serious misgivings about trading TT right now. Worst case scenario is that he’s this good next year, and presumably still a player with good trade value. Bulls are going nowhere this year with or without Amare.

I just hope Pax clears out the dead wood.

by madvillian on Feb 12, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

Worst case scenario...

is that we keep him and he either regresses or gets injured. Tyrus playing like this consistently is far from a given.

by BNeL21 on Feb 12, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Amar'e

Though will always remain trade worthy, he’s what a 2-3 time already first and second team ALL NBA player and a multiple all star starter (fan vote) who’s 26 years old….

He draws fans, he’s an athletic freak, he’s a scorer (Whcih the fans love) and he’s played against the best on some of the biggest stages and succeeded (That 50+ game stretch against the SPurs a few years back in the playoffs)…

If Amar’e doesn’t work here, there would be gobs of teams itching for him next year’s deadline for their title run. Players of his caliber though typically don’t get dealt.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Amare vs. TT

Amare is slightly older and more polished, comes with a much larger salary, a restructured knee, and a prime that is over before D-Rose’s prime starts. He doesn’t try hard for rebounds, doesn’t defend the pick and roll well and has shown in the past he’s capable of little to no motivation. It’s not nearly as cut and dry as you try to make it Juicebox.

by KmartLUC on Feb 12, 2009 11:28 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Amen to that!

I cannot believe the number of fickle people on this site that do not want to trade TT for Stoudemire. You are the same people that wanted to trade TT for other teams’ garbage. Now you have a chance to get an MVP candidate and you think Thomas is better than Stoudemire? Get a clue…

Thomas has shown flashes of great games over the past three years but no consistency. Stoudemire is a proven commodity that is in his prime. People on this site talk like Stoudemire is on the downside of his career. He is 26 for Christ sakes and has years of greatness ahead of him. He has also recovered from his surgery so stop using that as an excuse also. I also love the comments like “Thomas and Rose will be in their prime together in the next few years”. You can wait another 3 years…I have waited 11 for the Bulls to have a “real” team that can compete for a champioship and I do not want to wait any longer.

Trade Thomas and any other misfit that Phoenix wants from the Bulls roster and get Stoudemire in a Bulls uniform today …

by Bulldonger on Feb 12, 2009 11:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm for the Amare trade

but, you’re using the term ‘MVP candidate’ too liberally. Hell, even Dwight Howard isn’t an ’MVP candidate just yet. Lebron and Kobe own the league in that regard. And there are still several more names to filter through before you find Amare.

by kingj41 on Feb 12, 2009 12:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Amare was an MVP level player last year and the year before. He's slacking big time this year.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 12:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Well with consideration to the way MVP

is (mis)interpreted, he cannot win unless his team competes for a title. Highly skilled, no doubt, but an MVP candidate he is not.

by kingj41 on Feb 12, 2009 12:08 PM CST up reply actions  

MVP caliber player

Fine…MVP Caliber type player. The bottom line is he is a star player that a team can build around. Let’s not argue semantics, here.

by Bulldonger on Feb 12, 2009 12:13 PM CST up reply actions  

It's not a semantical argument.

I wouldn’t make him the piece to build around. He’s not going to carry you to the promise land, but fortunately the Bulls have the right piece in place in the form of D. Rose to make Amare fit perfectly and increase those odds.
But, I am in agreement with your assessment that Tyrus will not blossom like some people think he will. And if the Bulls make a deal, Noah should be staying in Red.

by kingj41 on Feb 12, 2009 12:24 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

OTOH, one must consider Stoudemire's ego.

“MUST” because that’s undoubtedly why he’s leaving Phoenix.

Can he be second-fiddle to someone 6 years younger than him? I don’t think so. He gone.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

He wouldn't be 2nd fiddle

Ego won’t be a problem because they will be benefiting one another. Shaq is the problem in PHX, not Nash. The Bulls don’t have Shaq.

by kingj41 on Feb 12, 2009 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Amen to that

Shaq seems to always be the problem (Orlando with Penny, folks blamed Penny then), Lakers wtih Kobe, folks blamed Kobe for a while and now aren’t…..Miami with I don’t know Riley, and folks started to blame Shaq a bit…..Phx and it’s suddenly Amar’e’s crap because we’re force feeding immovable Shaq since Kerr needs to keep his job. Since Amar’e’s not happy we’re going to start the boo bird whispers for a few months to get fans to turn on him quickly so that we can trade him since the problem (Shaq) ain’t going anywhere.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:44 PM CST up reply actions  

i thought he was leaving Phoenix due to finances

i don’t think his ego is the problem. We never heard about his ego when Nash was winning those MVPs. He seems to get along with Shaq. He just wants to be the focus of the offense. And he should be. Stoudemire was fine in Phoenix until this year and Terry Porter. He wants to be the main inside threat for a team. Well, he should be and will be with Chicago.

I don’t think it will be as hard to resign him as opponents of the deal are implying.

by Basketball Smurf on Feb 12, 2009 12:29 PM CST up reply actions  

i meant Stoudemire wanting to leave.

my fault,

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 1:32 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think he has to be second fiddle in terms of perception.

he’ll be the #1 scoring option and get gaudy numbers. That’s likely enough.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Can he handle being the celebrity of the team

While the fame and publicity-averse Rose quietly runs the team?

Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 12, 2009 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

right, that's what I'd hope the dynamic would be

KC would pull a hammy running to Stoudemire while Derrick can quitely cry in the locker room. (this is after the game 7 loss in the ECF to the Cavs when LeBron scored 52 points)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 1:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I guess it depends on how good Rose becomes.

I still want him to be the leader. I don’t like Stoudemire’s leader-ing attributes. I don’t think I do, anyway. If Rose becomes the undisputed leader, and the better player (which, as a “healthy Baron Davis” is still my hope), Stoudemire won’t be getting the most public attention.

I don’t know. I don’t Rose to become the one sitting in the corner to placate Stoudemire’s ego. Not good ideas.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

In fairness to Amar'e he's never really been allowed to lead.

He’s always been one of the youngest guys on his team and has sort of deferred to guys like Nash. I think he’d like to be a leader, the hierarchy in PHX just didn’t really allow for it.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 3:38 PM CST up reply actions  

exactly

Rose is the one who ultimately has to carry the franchise.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Agree With Bulldonger

Plus, Rose is our future MVP. (I was MVP of beer pong last night )

by Jesse07 on Feb 12, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions  

go

post on the OKC site. You know you’re a Thunder(cat) fan.
And UNC DOMINATED like I said they would.

by kingj41 on Feb 12, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I was MVP of beer pong last night

Sources?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 12:53 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I think

many of us are ok trading Tyrus for Amar’e, but not Tyrus, plus our cap relief (Gooden), plus 2 first round draft picks, plus blah blah blah. Or some Tyrus and Deng and Noah combo for Stat and Barbosa

Tyrus and Hughes for Stoudemire would be awesome.

I just don’t want to give up too much, and feel if we do they could have a player in a year or 2 approaching STAT quality (different kind of player in the D focus) and have cap room and have our draft picks…..

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I love Tyrus

but, Pax has a chance to cash him in for Amare, do that please!!!!

by LOTP on Feb 12, 2009 2:50 PM CST up reply actions  

I still think a package of Gooden/Nocioni/Thabo/Gray

+ first rounder

would be all I offer take it or leave it.
I’m beginning to get the sense that the Suns are losing options as to where they ship them.
I say lowball them and they’re eventually cave.

by Edicus2288i on Feb 12, 2009 1:24 AM CST reply actions  

They are trying to save money...

They shouldn’t want Nocioni.

Trade for Amare. Keep Deng and Rose. Figure out the rest later.

by kidronmusic on Feb 12, 2009 3:15 AM CST up reply actions  

EXACTLY! The Lakers Got Gasol For Nothing

Why pay more if you don’t have to?

Otherwise, you’re really rolling the dice because there is absolutely no consensus on Stoudemire if it costs TT.

by hhirb on Feb 12, 2009 8:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Thats because Memphis wanted nothing

except a salary dump. That is all. The lakers had the best offer to accommodate that. That dosen’t happen every day.

If we aren't careful, the leanness we now feel will be the starvation of those we serve.

by Chi 'Till I Die on Feb 12, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

There wouldn't be a trade

Nobody would take that offer. Maybe you could do that for Ben Wallace….

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Blazers want an Elite PG for LaFrentz's $12.7 million expiring contract

I’d send Kirk Hinrich++ in a heart beat to free up salary.
If Amare is obtained also, Bulls would hopefully then be better prepared to sign him or resign Tyrus. This seems to be a no brainer… don’t know why Paxson makes things so difficult for himself?

man up!

by exult463 on Feb 12, 2009 1:35 AM CST reply actions  

they said an elite PG, not a league average starting PG...which is what Hinrich is.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 1:37 AM CST up reply actions  

We know that about Kirk, but perception league wise might be different?

I believe Portland would jump at a three-way trade, but we’d have to include Kirk,Gooden,Simmons,Thabo and Gray. LaFrentz contract goes to the Suns, and Portland get’s our perceived good for box office sales PG. We wouldn’t need to give up Tyrus or Noah (as Edicus2288i mentioned), but at most maybe Noah?

man up!

by exult463 on Feb 12, 2009 1:45 AM CST up reply actions  

I think Portland's talent scouts have proven that they do a decent job of evaluating players

if you and I can see that Hinrich is league average, you can bet the people who do this for a living know he’s average.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 2:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Steve Blake is not that much different in terms of overall impact from Hinrich.

No, really. Hinrich might be a better fit because his defense would allow Roy to be even more of an offensive force, by not having to expend as much energy on defense, but the point remains, Blake is effective and more than half the price and years left on his deal that Hinrich has. Also, Jerryd Bayless is pretty good playing at the PG spot, just not as good as POR fans think he is.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions  

The fact that Roy, LMA, Rudy, and others

are so good masks Blake’s weaknesses. If Kirk was as open as Blake normally is, his stats would be terrific. When I think of a backcourt with Kirk, Roy, and Rudy…that’s a championship guard corps. Versatile, tough, skilled.

With Kirk, Portland could compete for a championship this year.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 11:26 AM CST up reply actions  

okay...

that last line might be stretching it.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 11:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Kirk misses open shots a lot. I don't think he'd be any better hitting those open looks

than Blake. I actually think Kirk shoots better when there’s at least one person closing out on him. He seems to think about it too much when he’s wide open.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Kirk

Would be good for Portland, this is a guy who averages 6-7 assist for his career w/ average players, his assist total would be even better in Portland, the be honest Kirk is not a bad player, he is just not a good fit on the Bulls

by LOTP on Feb 12, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree

Hinrich’s never played with any real consistent post players and put up pretty decent numbers 2 years ago. I think his mix of D and combo abilities make him slightly above avg…..but unfortunately us having kept him to be a benchie isn’t helping his stock.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

"What this

bookcomment presupposes is… maybe he didn’t?"

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 12, 2009 9:26 AM CST up reply actions  

‘Vamonos, amigos,’ he whispered,

and threw the busted leather flintcraw over the loose weave of the saddlecock.

…sorry love tenenbaums

"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."

by jpchi on Feb 12, 2009 1:34 PM CST up reply actions  

But

From what I hear Portland loves Deng and Hinrich

by LOTP on Feb 12, 2009 2:53 PM CST up reply actions  

So do

Paxson and Reinsdorf….

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 3:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Nash

I wonder if that “elite” point guard isn’t a reference to Nash, I know it seems unlikely (since they’ve said they’ll keep Nash, fans love him, etc. etc.), but how else do they acquire an elite point guard ?— do they get Deron, Paul, Rose, Parker, even Devin Harris? Who has an elite point guards up for trade? If the Suns rebuild, why keep Nash? Just saying….

by RichKarp on Feb 12, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Really

Elite point guards available: Zero.

The Blazers are delusional if they think they’re moving RLEC for an elite point guard. Is the oxygen up there really just one giant bong hit? I thought it was just a legend.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Who knows what the options are at this point?

If this is true, and Sarver is leading negotiations, then we could be looking at a Joe Johnson for Boris Diaw situation.

by lampnasty on Feb 12, 2009 1:46 AM CST reply actions  

exactly... why we need to construct a 3-team trade(with expirings) involving the Blazers, Sarver wants LaFrentz contract now

he wants to save money the day after the deal is completed…
We should be able to keep Tyrus, but we’ll need to give up our highly esteem by Paxson backup PG (Kirk), who is highly coveted by Pritchard & his Blazers

man up!

by exult463 on Feb 12, 2009 1:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Portland was the only other possible deal

out there that I was worried about. The path is clear… Amare could easily be in a Bulls uniform in less than a week.

by Bulldozer on Feb 12, 2009 4:22 AM CST reply actions  

This may become a salary dump and we could get Amare for Gooden and the 5.3 trade exception

We could throw in the 1st round pick. Even though this is a steal what would this do to our team? We probably couldn’t sign Gordon. We also would have a crowded front court with TT, Amare and Noah which I could definitely handle.

We could luck out as this deal may become a salary dump. The problem is it isn’t as good as the LaFrentz deal which they seemed to have nixed. Trying to trade Amare has revealed the level of Phoenix management dysfunction.

by chgobr on Feb 12, 2009 8:07 AM CST reply actions  

exceptions can only be used by themselves

the exception would have to be used in the form of taking back another player, cheaper than the exception, from Phoenix to make the monies work.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 8:39 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

That would be great

Maybe we take back Grant HIll (even though I hate Hill, he’s decent and lower than the exception).

Trade Deng-Tyrus-draft pick for Amare then a separate trade of the exception for Hill (I know they said he’s not going anywhere, but bear with my fantasy).

Bulls:
Rose-Kirk
Gordon-Thabo
Hill-Noc
Stat-Noc
Noah-Stat-Drew

We’d be able to keep BG when _rew expires and have a solid trio of Rose-BG-Amar’e.

Work out a trade using at least Kirk to fill in some holes….

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I like Kirk

I wish he wasn’t so unnecessary here….but he is with the better Rose.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Hill

I believe Hill is on the list of “untouchables” (hoops hype)

by Jesse07 on Feb 12, 2009 12:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah I said that above.

I still hate him after he took that huge what was it $100M deal from Orlando, played in 50% of the games to ruin that franchise for the 6-7 yrs he was there for, then as he finally started to get healthy and they lucked into the Dwight Howard and Jameer Nelson picks, he turned down their 2-3 yr $4M/yr deal to go to Phx for $2M a year for 2-3 years.

That was bullshit. He should have pulled a Kerry Wood of the last few years before this upcoming one and played for $1M even though he could have had more on the open market, because he felt he owed it to the team.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah.

Agreed. I mean, hell.

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 12, 2009 10:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Its reports

that G-Hill is untochable, I don’t know why he would be, this guy is an injury away from coaching

by LOTP on Feb 12, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Did anyone read my comment

I said that up there when I said I know they said he ain’t going anywhere but bear with my fantasy

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 3:01 PM CST up reply actions  

If portland really wants a point guard...

Why don’t they facilitate part of a 3 way deal that would include Kirk… He would go to Portland, LaFrentz would go to Phoenix and we would Get Stoudemire…. There would have to be others involved… like Phoenix would need Gooden, and maybe we would have to give up some prospects like TT or Seflosha or both.

by 72-10 on Feb 12, 2009 8:28 AM CST reply actions  

Depends on the Blazers playing ball

If Portland were willing to had another $5M to their Luxury tax bill, how would you feel about [URL=“http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1711198124563032275045420153025304110181727&teams=222222212121214444&te=&cash=”this[/URL]?

Blazers trade: Raef, Sergio, Outlaw, Diogu
Blazers get: Hinrich, Gooden, Nocioni

Bulls trade: Hinrich, Gooden, Nocioni, Thomas
Bulls get: Amare, JRich, Sergio, Amundson

Suns trade: Amare, JRich, Amundson
Suns get: Thomas, Outlaw, Diogu, LaFrentz

Financially this trade gets the Suns under the tax, resulting in the big savings I’ve talked about in other players, while not putting the Bulls over the tax.

The Blazers are already over the tax, so the escrow and tax disbursements are lost to them anyway. They do have to pay extra cash in the form of more tax and more salary however. I’ve heard Paul Allen is good for that, but everyone has their limits. I dunno.

And it satisfies the Blazers desire for a PG. I don’t know if you’re going to do better than Kirk.

The Bulls are left with
1- Rose 36, Serio 12
2- JRich 16, Gordon 32
3- Deng 18, JRich 18, Thabo 12
4- Amare 18, Deng 18, Simmons/Amundson 12
5- Noah 30, Amare 18

That’s a pretty interesting lineup. I might also go Rose/Gordon/JRich/Deng/Amare to start, but I’d have to see how it all works out. As I’ve said elsewhere, I’m not as optimistic as many about pairing up Noah and Amare

by Sports2 on Feb 12, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

That's not a bad trade for what the Bulls are actually giving up

In fact, probably about as good as they could get. I think that lineup could definitely challenge Orlando sans Nelson, and, if everything were working perfectly (unlikely), give a run to the Celtics and Cavs. At least 5 or 6 games.

OTOH, you’d be losing Gordon after this year. I didn’t see you giving up a draft pick, so maybe you hope to acquire someone with similar abilities with that (if not someone with similar quantity of abilities).

I’d think a Rose-Gordon-Richardson-Stoudemire-Noah lineup is among the best in the league on offense.

This is probably the best possible deal for “shortening the window” I’ve seen yet. Maybe not a true contender this year, but if Rose takes a big leap next year and you can get Anthony Parker or someone like that to fill in for Gordon…..

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 9:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, someone probably gets our pick.

With Gordon I see a couple of possibilities. Other things being equal, I think we’d have $5-6M before we hit the LT threshold if that trade went through. That’s not enough to keep Ben. Our options as I see them would be:

1. Since we’re getting/are stuck with JRich, we might do well to try and flip Gordon immediately. A player like Childress, Collison or Haslem would be pretty darn useful to us in the world I outlined and might be gettable for BG.

2. The other thing is that since we’re unlikely to be under the cap in 2010, or at least face a murkier situation, it makes it a bit less harmful to move Hughes immediately and take on post 2010 salary. A team like the Clippers (Kaman), Nets (Carter), Knicks (Jeffries + a useful young player), or Pacers (Tinsley + a useful player or Murphy) might be had. That could do some combination of filling out our roster and potentially opening up enough cap room to sign Gordon.

But at the end of the day, I do think I’d probably lean toward trading BG in that situation. I think he might be able to bring something useful and it’s hard to see keeping him and JRich.

Perhaps Larry Hughes for Troy Murphy and Gordon (with Thabo as sweetener if necessary?) for Childress could be arranged?

by Sports2 on Feb 12, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

I can speak for everybody here

Nobody wants any piece or Jared Jeffries, let him continue to be an unproductive player for the Knicks

by LOTP on Feb 12, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I've been thinking the same thing recently

I love that idea. I think Portland would do Hinrich for the Lafrentz contract in a heartbeat. And if Phoenix just wants to save money, then we could offer them the best deal in that regard.

"One thing I do know is teams like a lot of our pieces. That's not to say they want to give us a lot of players in return, but I know they like a lot of our pieces." - John Paxson (1/21/09)

by Juiceboxjerry on Feb 12, 2009 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

What does Sarver think of Reinsdorf?

I know The Chairman is a good businessman, but he can also play the role of a good cartel comrade and absorb some financial hits to get a better roster because he can afford it. If we’re a big market with a larger role in the redistribution of league revenue, I really don’t see how the other owners aren’t constantly bitching about the Chairman’s unwillingness to break the tax.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

above and beyond!

Now that is the kind of deal I was talking about! Good for all parties involved…. I think the only hitch is Kerr may not want to trade JRich, but other than that I think a deal like this actually has some real world possibilities.

by 72-10 on Feb 12, 2009 10:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Shut up

You need his toughness. He went hunting last week! Him and Oden can wrestle bears and shit.

Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 12, 2009 9:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Noc's last days as a Bull?

According to KC:

The Bulls could be without Andres Nocioni Thursday night against Miami. He’s questionable after suffering a lower leg contusion in the Pistons game and skipping practice Wednesday.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 8:41 AM CST reply actions  

I would have such mixed feelings about losing Nocioni.

From a basketball perspective, I’d be very happy. From a human perspective, I’d lose out on a lot of laughs. The guy just cracks me up. On the court, off the court.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 8:56 AM CST up reply actions  

I know what you're sayin

everyone knocks Noc because of the hacks and defensive lapses, but he does go out there and work for everything he gets. If TT had 1/2 of his drive, we wouldn’t be debating this trade at all right now. Noc is still going to stay in the league for a while, he’s just not a good fit with this team/system anymore.

It’ll be fun to see the occasional highlight of him starting a fight by fouling someone way too hard or something, and going to see him play against the Bulls is also something I’m looking forward to.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 12, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Just to be clear, I don't really know if he got traded.

But with Noce’s history of trying to play with anything short of a broken bone or a torn ligament, his skipping a a game for a contusion seems like a signal for something else.

by PatBull on Feb 12, 2009 9:37 AM CST up reply actions  

ha!

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

heh, nice.

I won’t feel as strongly as when Duhon finally left

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

I have a feeling you might be right (at least I hope you are)

It doesn’t always happen, but I remember several instances in the past where a player would mysteriously come down with some type of ailment right before the trade.

I don’t know….Toronto seems to be the consensus

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 9:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah I know what you mean.

If it is Toronto, I hope it’s for Jamario Moon or someone like him. Don’t like Kapono too much.

by PatBull on Feb 12, 2009 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

raptors fans hate moon

i can see why; he doesn’t really do anything. think a 28 year old thabo with worse ball handling skills

by Calogero on Feb 12, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Noc did get hurt in the Detroit game

It looked like he tweaked his left ankle trying to defend Prince. He was limping back on offense, but then the toughjuice settled in and he just kept on playing.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:46 AM CST up reply actions  

right

I noticed that as well. He played the rest of the game so I assumed there was nothing wrong.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

If Noc cannot play

he cannot play. maybe the club wants to keep him out of the Heat game for fear of what he might do to Erik Spoelstra.

:)

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

what is the logic of a trade that involves Gooden Hughes and Amare?

I don’t understand that! How can Phoenix really pull the trigger on a trade involving Gooden Hughes and Amare? Even if other pieces are included, the Suns aren’t getting much production in return. It just seems dicey

also: Sure, the suns are interested in TT. And if TT gets involved in the trade (TT,Gooden, Hughes for Amare), is this so bad? TT is an inconsistent backup forward. The only reason he is playing well now is Gooden’s injury. If Amare ever joined the Bulls, TT would not be happy with 10-15 minutes a game. Or could they play together?

by chicago-homesick-blues on Feb 12, 2009 8:43 AM CST reply actions  

Many of the media reports about the Amare rumors

are focusing on the Suns position primarily coming down to financial considerations. They’re trying to lighten their long term salary commitments.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah

I was excited when I heard Larry’s name in a Amar’e swap….taht would be awesome, as Larry’s cap killing ways come off the same time as Shaq’s albatross. Phx would be down for 1 yr then back up.

And who knows with Shaq Goo_en might not be such a bad foil as he’ll be outside of the paint, and Shaq on the inside…..they still have Nash and likely J Rich…..

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Gordon has to approve any trade (which he won't)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:16 AM CST up reply actions  

What about one to Portland?

Or another contending team? I bet Ben would like to prove his worth to a playoff team during the actual playoffs…that could earn him what he thinks he’s owed.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 12, 2009 9:31 AM CST up reply actions  

meh, if the Bulls are getting better, that makes them a playoff team.

they’re on the cusp now. if they get significantly better (like with Amare), then they might be a higher seed, more press coverage, possible 2nd round playoff team.

and he’s still losing his bird rights anyway, so even if “he earns what he thinks he’s owed”, only a select few teams will be able to give it to him.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

I always felt he would think like that

Throughout NBA history players have made money on hot playoff series.GM’s around the league either can’t spend because of the recession ( Suns Hornets) or are saving up til 2010 ( Det NY) Gordon should take a chance of being a star in the playoffs for a team that will be in the playoffs more than 5 games.

by Jscho316 on Feb 12, 2009 10:08 AM CST up reply actions  

i thought we had banned any mention of trading gordon

he has a veto over any trade, and there’s no way he’s waiving his bird rights

by Calogero on Feb 12, 2009 9:17 AM CST up reply actions  

I still

think its ridiculous to assume Gordon would veto any trade. Clearly given the right situation it might be smarter to boost his value this year than have to deal with the Bulls in negotiations again.

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:24 AM CST up reply actions  

I guess I could see him sick of Vinny's late-game bullshit

but not THAT sick of it.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:27 AM CST up reply actions  

well

if I felt like looking back into old ESPN articles I know Marc Stein has speculated the same thing as I have, that since there’s such a little chance that he’ll resign with the Bulls and since he was so frusturated with the Bulls handling of a sign and trade last summer, that he might want to just part ways and see what he can get on his own.

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions  

tell you the truth

i could see the thunder offering him a substantial deal this summer; they have such bad 2 guards they’ve been starting kyle weaver there. however, if ben waives his bird rights he kills any leverage he has over the very few teams who are going to have cap space this summer. if he waives his bird rights, the thunder know they’ll only have a couple teams to compete against, whereas with his bird rights the whole league is in play via sign and trade

by Calogero on Feb 12, 2009 9:33 AM CST up reply actions  

well

it all depends on the situation. what if its a great deal for the Bulls and they tell Gordon straight up, look if you veto the trade we’re not gonna sign and trade you and we’re gonna tell every GM in the league that we’re not gonna sign and trade you. Would do the same thing to Gordon’s leverage. Would it be smart for the Bulls? No, but if Gordon calls their bluff they don’t lose anything.

I just think theres a chance it could get done, its happened before after all.

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

i dont understand what you mean by

“its happened before.” when has a player of gordon’s caliber ever waived his bird rights in a trade?? i recall the god awful devean george nearly killing the kidd trade last year over his bird rights, and there wasn’t a chance in hell he was going to get to use his.

by Calogero on Feb 12, 2009 9:39 AM CST up reply actions  

a player of Gordon's caliber has never played on the QO

a player of Gordon’s caliber has never been allowed to let walk by their team either, but it looks like it’s certainly possible.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

dont u get a veto

any time a trade would require you waiving your bird rights? for instance, devean george got a veto last year and he wasn’t on the QO

by Calogero on Feb 12, 2009 9:48 AM CST up reply actions  

oh man, how did that work?

I think you’re right. And Devean George had way fewer reasons to believe his bird rights meant anything

Gordon’s not a unique case in that sense, just the QO, meaning he’s never had his ‘big’ deal.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions  

regardless

I don’t know whats in Gordon’s head, nor the Bulls for that matter, they’re both fairly enigmatic entities.

However, the fact that this situation is unique, if thats your stance, to me makes the scenario more hazy and unsure, not concrete that he’ll definitely veto as you guys seem to think. No reason not to believe it might happen, even if you doubt it.

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah

Its funny that Devean George almost stopped that trade that didn’t quite work out and folks aren’t saying thank you’s for him sticking to his bird right guns.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

it was especially funny he re-signed

since the theory when he nixed the trade was that Devean George just pissed off the team that would use his bird rights in the first place. But for some reason they resigned him. And I’m not surprised they didn’t hold a grudge, just surprised because Devean George sucks.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

well

depends on what you mean by Gordon’s caliber. Vladimir Radmonovic allowed a trade when he was on the Qualifying Offer. The question is, what does Gordon really think he’s gonna get? Those Bird Rights are only gonna help him to get the max or a 6th year. Does anyone think he’s really gonna get them? He had reportedly no takers this summer and the economys only gotten worse.

Sure, he’s had a good year but if you be realistic about it, what are the actual chances he gets resigned by the Bulls to a big deal or sign and traded for a big deal? I’d say the best odds are he ends up signing a deal to a team with space for 4 or 5 years for something over but not too much over the midlevel.

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

and sorry

for using well as my title every time, I can never think of anything to write up there

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

correct me if im wrong

(and i often am with regards to the cap), but if he signs for 4 or 5 years above the midlevel, only a team under the cap can sign him, meaning he would still need his bird rights if he wants to go anywhere but to the 3 or so teams with cap space.

and i seriously hope you aren’t saying gordon and radmonovic are players of the same caliber

by Calogero on Feb 12, 2009 9:46 AM CST up reply actions  

no

but neither of them are max players. what are the bulls gonna get back for gordon in a sign and trade? this year they were clearly offered nothing worth taking. I just don’t think teams are gonna throw worthwhile assets at the bulls to get him and I don’t think the Bulls will want to take on salary, even expiring contracts potentially, just to get him to another team for the few extra million he wants.

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:49 AM CST up reply actions  

but why eliminate the possibility?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:54 AM CST up reply actions  

there are a few reasons I can think of

maybe negotiating with the Bulls last summer left such a bad taste in his mouth he doesn’t want to do it anymore.

maybe he realized after no sign and trades of any kind seemed to come up last summer that it’s a dead end.

maybe he really thinks he’s being used poorly on the Bulls (who could blame him) and that playing on a different team would boost his value and he considers that more important than waiting on a team as notoriously Hamlet-esque in their decision making to do a sign and trade.

Maybe I’m wrong and he’ll veto but I just dont like the idea thats it should be laughed out of the blog the idea that he might ever consider letting it happen.

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:59 AM CST up reply actions  

also

there might be more teams under the cap by next summer.

by JSlakov on Feb 12, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions  

yes, he's better than Radmonovic

The bird rights allow the Bulls to go over the MLE, either to stay or for a sign/trade. That’s enough reason to stay.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 9:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Uh oh.

You used the word realistic while discussing Ben Gordon’s contract…Remember, he has turned down at least $50M guaranteed twice…

To me that is a clear indication that he thinks he is worth more than that amount…

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

I think Ben is in for a rude awakening this summer and I actually think

he’s worth what he wants. I just don’t think anyone will be willing to pay him because the economy sucks right now and he’s not a player that’s going to put you over the top. The only teams with cap space to sign him to more than MLE dollars are pretty much small market teams, with maybe one or two exceptions (Miami maybe?).

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

agreed

I think if he and his agent are serious about returning to Chicago (which they said they were)…if he gets a chance to even SNIFF anything between $9-10 mill, he has to take it.

Not saying that he should jump at the first lowball offer from JR, but if negotiations even resemble what they have the past couple of years a fraction of an inch, he’s gone.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

This is his Summer.

He finally gets to hit the open to unrestricted to test his value around the league. I hope the Bulls don’t offer to overpay him before he gets a chance to have his value assessed by other teams…

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 2:10 PM CST up reply actions  

*open market unrestricted*

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 2:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I think you'll get your wish

in the past, Paxson has usually let the “market” determine what he does…well, except for in the case of Noc, but we won’t even go there.

I don’t see the Bulls making the first offer for Ben.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:20 PM CST up reply actions  

The Grizzlies and I believe Toronto

were willing to offer him a contract similar to what we gave him.

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 2:36 PM CST up reply actions  

no they weren't

The Grizzlies made it seem like they wanted Noc, and maybe they did. But they never presented an offer like the one he signed for. In fact, I don’t think they ever presented an offer at all. Paxson jumped the gun and overpaid, point blank.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:46 PM CST up reply actions  

You never know though

I don’t know how far they can get in talks, but perhaps preliminary dollars were discussed….

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions  

they don't have a right to match

I’ve long said (heh) that what could very likely to happen is Ben taking a reasonable offer somewhere else (for more shots and minutes), and Paxson and Reinsdorf whining to the media that he didn’t give them a chance to match. So that way they both ‘lose’: Ben on some guaranteed money, the Bulls on a real asset.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 3:21 PM CST up reply actions  

ah, you're right

that didn’t dawn on me. Well we’re pretty much up the creek then.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know why Gordon would leave money on the table.

To spite the Bulls…

But you did say reasonable offer…reasonable by Ben Gordon’s standards appears to be more than $50M guaranteed…The Bulls may not consider an offer greater than that reasonable…

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 4:21 PM CST up reply actions  

The Bulls offer would never be on the table

Last thing Gordon saw was the Bulls pulling an offer after their deadline. So right now there’s nothing for him from the Bulls.

Gordon gets a good offer, and bolts. Bulls have nothing to do with it.

Technically he’d only have to be offered $43m to match the total $50m figure you flipping obsess over, as he made $6m+ this year.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 4:58 PM CST up reply actions  

The Bulls made an offer last Summer to Gordon

Without waiting for the market to determine his value.

" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem

is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger

by Dionysus2.0 on Feb 12, 2009 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Gordon and Nash

Though could be fantastic, but they’d have to lose Richardson first (And I didn’t click on your link so maybe you said that)….

With Richardson, there’s no deal.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Please

The Bulls can survive w/o Gordon

by LOTP on Feb 12, 2009 3:09 PM CST up reply actions  

we heard you

the first 89 times…

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

We would still have a team without Rose, too.

I think the ‘Bulls’ will survive no matter what.
The question is, will we be better?, and the answer is: no, we’ll be worse.

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Feb 12, 2009 10:36 PM CST up reply actions  

This is music

to my ears! Drew gooden and Larry Hughes for stat! How sweet would it be to turn those two terds into STAT! This would automatically make Paxson GM of the year.

by Bulls4Ever on Feb 12, 2009 9:26 AM CST reply actions  

im guessing there'd be many other parts involved

this hughes thing throws in an odd wrinkle though; i’m not really sure what sarvers thinking is there. hughes and amare are both up in 2010 (if amare opts out), shaq’s up in 2010, i don’t really understand why he thinks getting hughes will provide such a savings; they don’t have many long contracts other than nash and barbosa, who are “untouchable”

by Calogero on Feb 12, 2009 9:30 AM CST up reply actions  

He's

looking to save money. Sure stat and hughes both end in 2010 but who would the fans want you to resign bigtime for big cash? STAT. They wont want you to resign LH cause he’s LH so no pressure there so that money is gone. Drew Gooden is gone after this year. BAM theres money there. As much as they may want TT i bet two things are happening. A. Pax dont wanna trade him right now cause of his recent play 2. TT is also comming up for an extension so the Suns would have to pay him, what if Nash made him some sick monster putting up MEGA stat numbers for the next two years? Guess who the fans are gonna want to be resigned for whatever cost? Thats right TT. Trust me its all possible. I mean we love him and he sucks imagine if he was putting up the numbers like AMARE did but with two good knees and alot less attitude. PHX might be forced to pay him 20mil . Money has alot to do with AMARE getting traded if not everything.

by Bulls4Ever on Feb 12, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

fair point about TT up for extension

however, if sarver is willing to trade amare for hughes and gooden under the premise of “well they’ll kill me for not resigning amare but they’ll be fine with me letting hughes go,” then that doesn’t really make sense, since he’s letting amare go for nothing already. however, with phoenix, things don’t always have to make sense; got a great coach? fire him! on pace for 60 wins? dump marion for shaq!

by Calogero on Feb 12, 2009 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Phoenix can't be that stupid

As much as I’d LOVE to see Hughes traded in this fashion, there is absolutely no reasonable basis for this whatsoever. Hughes is one of the most untradeable players in the entire league this year because of the combination of his lack of skills and bad contract (next year would be a different story when he goes into expiring contract status). The only way that he gets moved this year is if the Bulls take on a similarly bad contract with a bad player (Amare is certainly paid a lot, but it’s not a bad contract in relation to his value as a player).

I can’t see any rational reason for Phoenix to do a deal with us for STAT that doesn’t involve TT. The perception (whether you agree with it or not) is already that trading STAT for TT (plus whatever other assortment of players the Bulls would throw in) would be getting rid of STAT for 60 cents on the dollar (which is bad enough for Phoenix management in terms of heat from its fan base). Any trade scenario that doesn’t include TT would be perceived as virtually giving away STAT for absolutely nothing (which in that case, Phoenix is better off just keeping him for the next year-and-a-half and letting him walk).

To get someone of relatively high value by NBA standards, we’re going to have to give up a player (or multiple players) that also have some value. Expecting that we can rid of our garbage players in exchange for a 26-year old All-Star big man that has averaged 20/9 over 6 seasons is unreasonable.

It’s my personal opinion, but what we can reasonably expect in terms of production from STAT today (and for the next 5 years) > potential (or even the ceiling) of TT.

by Frank the Tank on Feb 12, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Amare's player option

is heavy leverage for him. The owners and players union have to renew the CBA or amend it soon. 2010 is lining up to be a big summer where all the financial rules could change in terms of contract length, guaranteed money, etc.

Sarver needs flexibility. Amare’s player option takes that away from Sarver.

Say the economy starts to tank. Amare looks around the league after 09-10 and sees little guaranteed money in a new contract. He could just stay with the Suns and collect 16+ million for that year. Then try again for a new contract after 10-11.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

I wonder what's going to happen to all these guys if the economy is still in the tank in 2010 (a very real possibility).

Will these guys just not get the max deals they want / deserve?

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 10:55 AM CST up reply actions  

What does a business do in a downturn?

They lay off workers because they typically cannot lower their compensation the way they can lower the prices of goods and services.

NBA owners would do the same thing, but they’ve bought into an organized cartel with strict regulation of their decision making. So they do the next best thing. Lighten the load on future commitments.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:59 AM CST up reply actions  

This is a no-brainer

TT will never be as good as Amare. Amare has been an allstar for at least 6 years and TT hasn’t even been playing good ball for 6 months.

There is zero comparison. I can remember Amare putting up 37pg on Tim Duncan in the playoffs. The reason the Suns never made it to the finals was because Nash doesn’t play D. Evern with that, they came close 2 years ago if not for a suspension in the Spurs series.

Bottomline – Amare will come to Chicago and dominate the east. This may not make us a Championship team this year, but it puts us as the third best team in the east behind Boston and the Cavs. Give Rose another year, and we are contenders in 2010.

by MarkAllen on Feb 12, 2009 9:51 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

No chance Amare makes us better than Howard’s Magic. We’re at best a 4 seed and a 2nd round exit.

by KmartLUC on Feb 12, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

If you

look at it just from a money standpoint for say the next few years (while they economy is sucking) it makes alot of sense. Im not so sure though that TT will require all that much money when he gets his next deal, if he keeps this pace up from these last 10 games or whatever then yeah he would get alot but def not max. Maybe never max for him..

by Bulls4Ever on Feb 12, 2009 9:51 AM CST reply actions  

Some fun stuff from new york...

The Sporting News

The New York Knicks won’t be part of the sweepstakes for Amare Stoudemire, who the Suns are shopping to other NBA teams, Newsday reports.

Sources tell the newspaper that Donnie Walsh was among those who called Suns exec Steve Kerr about Stoudemire, but nothing came of the conversation. “The sense was they (the Suns) wouldn’t do anything with New York,” a source told the newspaper.

The Suns also shunned the Knicks when they were interested in two of Mike D’Antoni’s favorites, Boris Diaw and Raja Bell. Both players eventually were traded to the Charlotte Bobcats.

Stoudemire thrived in D’Antoni’s fast-paced offense in Phoenix but has struggled since the team added Shaquille O’Neal. D’Antoni and the Knicks could use a center like Stoudemire, but it appears the Suns want no part in helping their former coach acquire his former players. “”http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=516956" >

by gman2849 on Feb 12, 2009 10:20 AM CST reply actions  

Anyone got anything on Cleveland feeling out a deal besides a Grizz blogger?

The concept of Amare on the Cavs alters my views on the prospects of which players we send out to acquire Amare.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 10:56 AM CST reply actions  

if the Cavs get Amare...it might not be worth it to follow the NBA for a while

Stoudemire and LeBron would just kill the rest of the league. It would not be pretty.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

How does Cleveland pay both those guys in 2010?

Isn’t everyone trying to get down so they can make a run at LBJ?

by hhirb on Feb 12, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions  

You can pay your own guys as much as you want

for the most part.

Lebron, Amare, Mo Williams is one scary behemoth in our division. This would be terrible for us.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

they would be able to pay them more than any other team could because they'd have their Bird Rights

and the money the team would make from merchandising and playoff ticket sales over the term of their contracts would make up for it. Everyone can try to make a run at LBJ but ultimately CLE can offer the most money and years and if they bring in Amare, he has absolutely no reason to leave. He and Amare would own the league for the next 7 to 8 years.

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

and if they don't...

…they’re title favorites this year and next.

Even if they have to blow up everything in 2010, I can’t imagine that they’ll have too many chances to be a title favorite for two straight years anytime soon.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 11:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah,

That would be one of the most depressing things ever.

shudders at thought

If we aren't careful, the leanness we now feel will be the starvation of those we serve.

by Chi 'Till I Die on Feb 12, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Cleveland can't offer what we can...

JJ Hickson hasn’t done crap, whereas Thabo already has shown he can play and T2 is starting to show he could be excellent. We can offer the same cap relief they can. We can offer a better draft pick. Additionally, Kerr and Pax are friends. Additionally, if Amare won a championship with Lebron, Kerr would eat considerable crow.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

since when can we offer them better cap relief... they have Wally Z's gigantic expiring contract

which is about 4 million more in expiring money than we can offer

Vinny discovers frontcourt by accident. Someone re-smash Gooden’s groin!
- your friendly BullsBlogger

by fundamentallysound on Feb 12, 2009 11:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Snow?!?

oh lord. I didn’t know that dude was still in the NBA. My god.

Well, hopefully it’s about more than expirings.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Feb 12, 2009 11:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Cavs have Wally and Eric Snow

as about 21 million in expiring salary.

I’d be worried about Sarver’s demand for relief versus Sarver’s demand for a young talent.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm pretty certain they cannot trade Snow

they’re already picking up insurance checks based on his medical retirement. (or something)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 11:25 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Good call

If we aren't careful, the leanness we now feel will be the starvation of those we serve.

by Chi 'Till I Die on Feb 12, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Found it

Jan 4, 2009 Cleveland Plain Dealer

Snow cannot be traded in order for the Cavs to pay his salary via insurance and receive the discounts against the luxury tax.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 12:44 PM CST up reply actions  

In theory they could trade him, just like the Blazers can trade an injured Raef

Then only the other team gets the insurance payment for all games after the trade. But since he has a new job at which he also sucks but hey it’s a new job, the NBA might not look favorably on such a deal and stop it. Also they are trying to medically retire him a la Darius Miles. Then he really can’t get traded anymore by the Cavs if that request goes through. Their big chips are Wally, Varejao, Pavlovic, and next year the expiring deals of Z and Big Ben.

The cake is a lie. Trade the cake!

by Norsktroll on Feb 12, 2009 1:30 PM CST up reply actions  

check out...

…this deal.

Szczerbiak, Hickson, a draft pick, trade exception for Ced Simmons and $3 million cash for Stoudemire and Dragic.

Sarver pockets around $4 million more dollars this year than he otherwise could have, and only has $1.3 comitted to next year.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 11:54 AM CST up reply actions  

hahaha...

this says the Bulls actually get worse and the Suns get better.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions  

lol, you thinking you're relevant

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

indeed. I keep waiting for NBAO's scouting blog.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Man

NBO you’re not getting all the ire here.

I don’t agree with your recent stance on the 0 championship arguments for good players, but come on BaB, NBO’s one of the better posters here typically…

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 2:17 PM CST up reply actions  

not as good as he thinks

I enjoy when he actually has thoughts. Not when he casually spouts cliches, framed like something truly profound.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 3:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Agree there.

But I’ve never seen such I’m the greatest poster ever vibe from him though….perhaps I wasn’t reading it closely enough….

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 4:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I reloaded on snark

last night questioning Jesse07’s beer pong title.

I’m still not opposed to trading Thomas for Amare, but still pushing buttons to prepare them for the crap we may turn Amare into.

What’s with our staff? What’s with our organization? What has it done to player development that magically disappears when we acquire an already developed player? But we can teach him defense. Just believe?

I’m not one to rub a reader’s face in their own comments, but our metricians have an army of straw men I can summon.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 4:37 PM CST up reply actions  

HAHAHAHAA

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Feb 12, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Hollinger....

added to The List?

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 12, 2009 5:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Why? I'm not dismissing it. I just find it hilarious/surprising/interesting/crazy-sounding.

All of which make me i-chuckle. Or something. You don’t think it’s one of those?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Feb 12, 2009 6:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Ya

I laughed too!

I think an accountability list of who wouldn’t trade TT for Amare is dumb/funny as well.

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 12, 2009 7:29 PM CST up reply actions  

nash and hill... untouchable?

what does that even mean?

Chicago... Where giving up career nights happens

by Yibs on Feb 12, 2009 11:00 AM CST reply actions  

Still.

it hurts…

Just saw the young Suns: Amare dunk from Nash header on NBA TV Dunk Contest ’05 repeat.

Yet it’s the players that are portrayed as cancers by the media?

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 12, 2009 5:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Matt is that your question

in the Hollinger chat on espn?

Matt (Chicago): Chad Ford said the Miami deal won’t happen because in order for the salaries to match up Phoenix would have to add another player like Barbosa and they are absolutely unwilling to do that. Thoughts?

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 12, 2009 11:21 AM CST reply actions  

not me.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 11:25 AM CST up reply actions  

What the hell...

There are actually people on here that would refuse to trade tyrus for amare? A month ago all the same people would have done this deal in a second, some of the most fickle fans I have ever seen.

by brose on Feb 12, 2009 11:35 AM CST reply actions  

I pretty much

Was against trading/releasing TT when people were shitting on him from distance.

With playing time, he will develop. It’s been the mantra for fans of young players, and what do you know, we had an injury thrust the two young guys into big minutes and they’re delivering. Now it’s trade for Amar’e? Not really interested, because there’s only one ball and Gordon fills it up too, additionally our defense has been better with Noah and TT help side, our rebounding has been good (not great)…I’m just not really willing to take that risk that STAT comes here and isn’t motivated to play any better than he has in Phoenix, or worse, can’t play any better and is just declining.

"..what you mean? I'm a legend like Kareem!"

by CommittedToExcellence on Feb 12, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Tyrus Thomas

Is a good asset, not a good player, yet… Are you really ready to pass on another premier post player(Gasol, KG). For 10 years the Bulls have been acquiring talent, and have not been winning, isn’t about time we try to cash in with these prospects and find a bigger and better piece? People have been on here for a long time now, complaining about how our biggest weakness is low post scoring, well here it is for the taking, a 26 year old PF that can give you 25-30 a night, a former first team all nba player.

by brose on Feb 12, 2009 11:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Irony

Paxson doesn’t make move for Amare

KG won his last year.
Gasol wins a championship this year.
Amare gets his next year with his new team

3 possible bigs that the Bulls couldn’t trade for all win championships. Man that would sting.

by Jesse07 on Feb 12, 2009 12:24 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Yea..

But Amare coming to the bulls does not give us a championship caliber team.

by NDBears34 on Feb 12, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Amare

is a very good player, but I’m just worried Pax sticks with Hinrich and Nocioni, and then we won’t have enough money to sign BG next year, and then Amare opts out

by NDBears34 on Feb 12, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions  

relax

yes, in it’s current form, this team (with Amare) will not win a title. But to think that they won’t or can’t add more pieces is crazy. The point is, he puts them CLOSER to being a contender, which is what we’re trying to accomplish in the first place.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree tehre too

We have no idea what Rose will become, and Amar’e’s great. Might not take too much to fill int he blanks.

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 2:17 PM CST up reply actions  

true

but no way they win the title in its present form. Not a chance.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course that's true

After we deplete the talent pool a bit, but some quick fixes of fill in the blanks can make us closer…..with 2 studs like Amar’e and Rose….and if we nab Amar’e while keeping Deng who knows….

Plus we’ll have a good 2.5 months to have BG have his final contract with the Bulls audition (and BG might want to stay seeing as he works well with Rose and now might have an inside guy to make BG the all star he has the skills to be (not superstar)…

by majoyenrac on Feb 12, 2009 3:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree!

I think people thought I was being serious up above (I hope not)…my sarcasm is off today :(

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 3:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Now now

you can’t chastise Pax for failing to make trades in the past and then simultaneously assume that this one would open the floodgates

--Torch

by torch on Feb 12, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

i'm not

but to think that if they trade for Amare and then thinking that they’ll stick with that is not correct. To say that getting Amare doesn’t make them a championship caliber team…uhhh yes that’s true…but people need to stop acting like that’s the only deal that will get done. Whether it’s a second deal or some offseason moves, point is, more moves WILL be made.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Good Point

This makes me wonder if Pax is looking to do something like Boston did when, they acquired Ray Allen and it didn’t seem to be a logical option to try to make them into contenders… until they got KG. Only this could be in reverse.

If we assume the bulls get Amare for Tyrus, Gooden And Pick as our biggest cost, What Other options do we see in this economic downturn that the bulls can cash in on for say,
Hinrich, Hughes, Thabo even Noc?

I think washington still likes hughes right?
Portland likes Hinrich (hell even Deng) for the right pieces to surround Rose and Amare.

I mean even if we have Gordon for only the rest of this season, he is still a valuable contributor to this team now. (though as a fourth scoring option he could put is into serious contention)

What I’m asking is, who could we get to compliment Rose and Amare to seriously contend for a title this year?

I Keep thinking how the big 5 (LA, BO, CL, OR, and now SA) all have top Forwards who need to be defended.

I love Noah and would like to keep him, but he’s not ready to stop these guys yet.

by gman2849 on Feb 12, 2009 1:27 PM CST up reply actions  

off-the-cuff evaluation

If the Bulls did Tyrus/Thabo/Pick/Gooden for Amare…

They’re the 4th best team in the East. Right now. (though this is coming from someone who thinks they had the talent this year to be 6th or so) They likely couldn’t get up to the 4th seed, but I wouldn’t say Atlanta or Miami is better than them.

So that’s the team’s starting point for next season. 4th! Heck they could pass up Orlando if Hedo leaves, ’Shard declines at age 30, etc. Things happen.

the East smells outside of the top 3, so that’s not that great of a position. But it at least puts the Bulls into conversation for challenging for the East crown. One more move, a giant Wade-esque step from Rose, etc.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

4th in the east

6’d overall? Do we surpass the Yaos’ Melos’, Odens’ as well?

how about getting B Miller?

by gman2849 on Feb 12, 2009 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

6th in the east without Amare, not 6th in the NBA.

If we aren't careful, the leanness we now feel will be the starvation of those we serve.

by Chi 'Till I Die on Feb 12, 2009 2:11 PM CST up reply actions  

You continually overrate

this team like you underrate the defense (the defensive aspects of the game). Not a lot, but I think it’s better to group the Bulls together with MIA and ATL, in a second tier in the East. Do you see it (as I do) that if Noah, Tyrus, Gooden and Thabo are the deal, then they’d be fortunate to be included in the second tier?

I’m not looking for a fight, I’m just trying to understand how many more wins folks think an Amare addition gives. And it seems crucial to consider the deal in it’s specific totality. The East is not strong, so it’s more important that they keep their better defensive players, their young legs for the transition game, and bet on improved consistency. (IMO)

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 12, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Then

there’s this notion that Johnny Pax is gonna suddenly become a trade machine with the remaining pieces. Pieces we’ve been waiting for him to deal all season, or longer.

"As a basketball player gordon is a useless as tits on a a whore" - BigWay (Dec 2, 2008). BigWank, I'll miss you more than all the others. This song is for you, my brother!

by marionette on Feb 12, 2009 6:35 PM CST up reply actions  

If we lose Gordon and Hughes

don’t we then have $25 million to find replacements?

by hhirb on Feb 12, 2009 1:29 PM CST reply actions  

I found some players who are being talked about

Trade Rumors

- Full Court Press – Are the Raptors, Pistons, and Suns working on a three-way trade?
- CBS Sports – And if so, could Amare Stoudemire be the one who winds up in Detroit?
- WXYZ.com – It sure sounds like he wouldn’t mind playing for the Pistons.
- Chicago Tribune – The Bulls could offer an attractive package for his services.
- Inside the Warriors – But then, the Warriors would love to have Amare too.
- Bright Side of the Sun – As would the Heat, the Hawks, the Blazers…
- Sactown Royalty – Meanwhile, the Spurs may have interest in Kings C Brad Miller.
- Washington Post – The Wizards are talking, but not talking Antawn or Caron.
- MLive – ‘Sheed: "If I get traded, I get traded. Can’t cry over spilled milk."
- New York Post – David Lee prefers to stay with the Knicks.
- NY Daily News – The Bucks could look to move Richard "Peanut" Jefferson.
- Charlotte Observer – The Bobcats may move either DJ Augustin or Raymond Felton.
- The Love of Sports – The case for Starbury as the Orlando Magic’s fill-in point guard.
- OCRegister.com – Finally, why the Lakers were thrilled to dump Slalom Vlade.

by gman2849 on Feb 12, 2009 1:36 PM CST reply actions  

more

here

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Bill Simmon's take

36. Amare Stoudemire
Bruce in Phoenix recently begged me, “Can you hold off on the Trade Value column until some GM is dumb enough to offer us too much for Amare? I don’t want them to know that he sucks now!” Hey, Bruce? I think they know. Why do you think you’re getting so many pu-pu platter offers? It would help if Amare grabbed a rebound or switched correctly on a high screen more than twice per quarter. I still say the Amare Era is salvageable — stick the kid on a team with a good point guard (Chicago?), tell him to just worry about putting the biscuit in the basket (New York? G-State?), or trade for him and say, “We love you, you’re our franchise guy” (Sacramento? Memphis? Indiana?) and I think he’d start slapping up 29-9s again. With a smile on his face.

by gman2849 on Feb 12, 2009 2:00 PM CST reply actions  

I agree with that speculation in terms of Amare's attitude

he’d be fine being the top option, even if Rose is the franchise player.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you actually read all the comments?

Matt comments on these stories and gives his thoughts. Really he does!

If we aren't careful, the leanness we now feel will be the starvation of those we serve.

by Chi 'Till I Die on Feb 12, 2009 2:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Paxson to meet with Kerr during the All-Star break

this is good news. Get JR out of the picture.

General manager John Paxson will be in Phoenix for All-Star activities this weekend and likely will meet with Kerr.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:24 PM CST reply actions  

But...

JR lives in Phoenix…

He’ll probably be there too.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 12, 2009 2:34 PM CST up reply actions  

No trades will go through w/o JR's approval.

Are you seriously thinking otherwise?

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 12, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

getting his approval is one thing

having him actively take part in the negotiations and in the deal is another. He already screwed up the D’Antoni thing…get him out of the room!!

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Right. I'm not saying there needs to be a scenario in which

Sarver/Kerr are in a room with Pax/Jr…that would be horrible. But at some point Pax has to call up Jerry and be like “I got the go ahead to make (insert deal), we good to go?”

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Feb 12, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions  

right, I agree

I’m fine with that…like you said, he pretty much has to do that. I just don’t want JR anywhere close to this meeting though. All we need him for is a signature.

http://awsomepeoplesearch.com/

by NormVanBeer on Feb 12, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

their own game of G-E-I-C-O

championship role-player edition!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions  

The Blazes get everything
Change in Team Outlook: +10.2 ppg, +6.9 rpg, and +1.8 apg.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 2:55 PM CST up reply actions  

I found it interesting for NJ

they add Hughes and add .5 APG…how Hughes doesn’t pass

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Feb 12, 2009 3:21 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

heh, good catch

The RealGM data analysis is just basic arithmetic anyway. But it’s still fun.

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

This would be a pure salary dump for PHX

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=croey6

Throw in our number 1 to PHX

I think it works well for all four teams involved.
Granted PHX will probably look like the loser, but then again I don’t think they’re gonna come out the winner with any trade they do.

If PHX was to trade Shaq before this trade they could also take on Jermaine O’Neal’s expiring contract too. So 3 big expiring contracts and then Hughe’s big one next year.
Plus our number 1 pick.

It would give them a lot of cap room for the future

by Edicus2288i on Feb 12, 2009 2:58 PM CST reply actions  

Why do people

Think Portland want Noc?

--Torch

by torch on Feb 12, 2009 4:14 PM CST reply actions  

¿Que toughness?

If I knew the Spanish I’d use it.

I’d like KC to disclose some nuggets about the representatives for the clubs he says are high on Nocioni. Can I get a division? A conference? Anything?

12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Feb 12, 2009 4:41 PM CST up reply actions  

good luck.

I agree it would be nice. I think they’re just buying a cliche at this point.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Feb 12, 2009 4:59 PM CST up reply actions  

i've been messing with the new trade machine on ESPN..

and every trade involving amar’e does not increase our projected wins for this season… according to hollinger….. anybody else tried it out yet?

by masputo on Feb 12, 2009 10:03 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.

Links

"Best NBA Blogroll"
-- Dan Shanoff

The Essentials:
Bulls.com
NBA.com
HoopsHype
BallHype
ESPN.com NBA

Workin' the Beat:
KC Johnson - Tribune (blog)
John Jackson - Sun-Times (blog)
Mike McGraw - Daily Herald (blog)
Nick Friedell -  ESPNChicago.com
Sam Smith - Bulls.com
Aggrey Sam - CSNChicago.com


More Bulls Blogs/Forums:
Thank You Isiah
Chicago Bulls Podcasters
Bulls Confidential
By the Horns
Bullish Thoughts
Chicago Bulls KY
Pippen Ain't Easy
RealGM Bulls Forum
SportsTwo Bulls Forum

Blogging the Association:
(League Wide)
True Hoop
HoopsAnalyst
Give Me the Rock
The Basketball Jones
NBA Fanhouse
Hoops Addict
SBNation.com - NBA
ProBasketballTalk
ShamSports
Ball Don't Lie
The Painted Area


(Team-Centric)
Queen City Hoops

Bobcats Baseline
Knickerblogger.net    
Sixers' Shots
Forum Blue and Gold
SuperSonicSoul
Hornets247.com 
SonicsCentral.com 
ClipperBlog.com  
The Nugg Doctor
Loy's Place
Reds Army
Need4Sheed
THE WIZZNUTZZ
RaptorsForum.com
TWolvesBlog.com
Spurs Dynasty
David's Memphis Grizzlies Blog
The Bratwurst
Sixers Journal
Sixers 4 Guidos 
3 Shades of Blue  
CavsNews.com
RaptorTalk
Deceptively Quick
TheLakersNation.com
Utah Jazzer Blog
KnicksDefense.com
T. Jose Caldeford
Hoopinion
RaptorBlog.com
Suns @NBAWeblog.com
The Cowhide Globe
Stepien Rules
Project Spurs
Raptors Republic
Dino Nation Blog
Lake Show Life
Valley of the Suns
The KnicksBlog.com
Big Lakers Fan
Roundball Mining Company
Cavs: The Blog
48 Minutes of Hell
Daily Thunder
Piston Powered
The Two Man Game
PistonsNationBlog.com
Cowbell Kingdom.com
Hot Hot Hoops
NetsAreScorching
Celtics Hub
Orlando Magic Daily
Philadunkia
Truth About It
Always Miller Time
Slippery When Nets
Eight Points Nine Seconds
Howlin' T-Wolf
Red 94

MSM NBA blogs:

Ira Winderman (Heat)
Jason Quick (Blazers)
IndyStar.com (Pacers)
Michael Cunningham (Hawks) 
Full-Court Press (Pistons)
Jonathan Feigen (Rockets)
Rick Bonnell (Bobcats)
Jazz Notes
Chris Herrington (Grizzlies)
Orlando Sentinel
Michael Lee (Wizards)
Alan Hahn (Knicks)   
Doug Smith (Raptors)
Marc Berman (Knicks)
Al Iannazzone (Nets)

For the Statheads:
Basketball-Reference.com
APBR Discussion
Knickerblogger's Stat Page
82Games.com
Doug's Stats
Popcorn Machine
HoopData


Other Resources:

HoopsHype Salaries
SportsTwo Salaries
ESPN.com Trade Machine
RealGM: NBA Draftpicks Owed
ShamSports.com Salaries
DraftExpress

 


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger