Game Preview # 25 - Bulls vs. Atlanta Hawks
[Thanks to wjb1492 for today's game preview (sign up!). -ed.]
Atlanta Hawks (19-6, 7-4 road) at Chicago Bulls (9-15, 7-5 home), 7:00 p.m. Central time, WGN America.
Check out the Hawks point-of-view over at Peachtree Hoops. I can't even begrudge them their enthusiasm - if ever there was a group of fans that put in their dues, it's Hawks' fans.
The Bulls last faced the Hawks just 10 days ago - traveling to Atlanta to play the second night of a back-to-back and turning in a total stinker of a game to lose by 35. Just to refresh your memory as to how miserable that game was, the Bulls gave up 50% shooting while hitting only 36.4% of their own shots and lost in very nearly every box score stat. The Hawks are once again favorites to win, so what hope is there for us Bulls' fans?
The Hawks are the team on the second night of a back-to-back this time, beating Utah at home last night then having to travel to Chicago. Unfortunately for the Bulls, the Hawks have been ridiculously good in this situation, with a 5-1 record on the second night that includes wins over Denver and Dallas. Still, it has to be something of a positive that they just played and traveled while the Bulls had a day's rest after a home win. (For the record, the Bulls are 6-5 when playing on one day's rest.)
Also, the Hawks are on a 6-game winning streak. Now this sounds like a negative for the Bulls, but think about it - streaks have to end at some point, right? And sometimes they end because a team on a roll totally overlooks an opponent they assume isn't a threat, right? And after beating the Bulls by 35 just 10 games ago, by far the Hawks' biggest margin in this 6-game win streak, what team is Atlanta more likely to overlook than us? (Not that I've studied this scientifically or anything, but it makes me feel better to believe it!)
And finally, all 13 Bulls practiced yesterday (Tyrus in non-contact drills only) for I believe the first time all regular season. Now unfortunately this doesn't mean that all 13 players are healthy, or even available for the game yet. But maybe all practicing together will give the ones who play an emotional boost - I mean, we heard all about what great chemistry this group had leading into the season, and as short as the viable bench is the missing elements had to have hurt at least a little. So, maybe having all those elements back in contact, even if it's only in practice, will improve the on-court effectiveness of the team! Right?
OK, so in reality it's a huge stretch to find positives about the game tonight. Atlanta had fairly decent expectations coming into the season, and if anything they've exceeded those with the second-best record in the East right now and the second best scoring margin in the entire NBA. They have the top-rated offense, and a top-10 defense to go with it. They're athletic, they're healthier than the Bulls, and they're flat out playing much, much better as a team. And the Bulls continue to be in the bottom half of the NBA by virtually all measures. Meanwhile, in spite of a glimpse of hope here and there, John Salmons and Kirk Hinrich continue to struggle with their shooting far into the month of December - we're way past the "shooting slump" category here. Lately, Brad Miller has joined them, shooting under 40% over the past 5 games and missing all 5 3-pointers attempted.
The team has collectively looked better over the past couple of games - the harshest critics will point out that the effort still resulted in a 1-1 record with the win being a not-so-impressive victory over the Knicks, but for most of us the difference has been noticeable in that the Bulls were at least watchable. I didn't have the overwhelming urge to turn the TV off during these past two games, and that alone suggests a huge improvement in . . . something. The "greater effort/energy" mantra will likely be sorely tested tonight, but no matter what my head is telling me as I write this, I still feel that glimmer of hope stirring. Maybe this is the game that the effort and focus is there from beginning to end? Maybe this is the game that the shooting is respectable in every quarter? Maybe this is the game that takes us all back to the beginning of the season, when we were fresh off victories over the Spurs and Cavs and the season didn't feel like another long march to the lottery? A lot of things will need to break right for the Bulls to walk away with a victory, but I hear that's why they play the game.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
hawks are great
example of the good that can happen going with youth. though credit should be tempered. their ownership situation forced them to sit on personnel movement to a degree. (the part owner in boston sued ’em for signing joe johnson!) and they had notable draft mishaps (cp3/deron), although they lucked into horford a bit, with just a 30% chance.
for years, this team was weak offensively and mediocre defensively; considered a mismatched roster of too many wing players. now they’re one of the elite (perhaps?). that should be a lesson to all proposers-of-bad-trades, proposers-of-bad-free-agent-signings. maybe there’s value in roster stability.
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
There is value in roster stability
not to mention coaching stability, but that’s when you have talented players not crappy ones.
Fan of the Chicago Cash Cows formerly known as the Bulls
luol deng, ben gordon, tyrus thomas, thabo sefolosha, joakim noah, derrick rose, jr smith, and shannon brown
are you saying they are crappy, and joe johnson, josh smith, marvin williams, al horford, mike bibby, zaza pachulia, jeff teague, and (ex-bull!) jamal crawford are vastly more talented?
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
ATL has much more talent than us. They don’t get rid of their high draft picks and their picks actually tend to well….i dont know…develop over time.
Look at Josh Smith….he would have been off the Bulls team…branded as a malcontent…ATL keeps him and the coach actually develops and tells him how to improve his game. And whatta ya know, the player changes for the better
Well, that was one of Marionette's points
Due to the somewhat unique ownership situation there, they ended up holding onto guys that in often would have been moved from a team – not just the Bulls, but other teams around the league as well. And up until last season, most people I know generally thought the Hawks were a horrible mess with a coach that should be fired.
They look brilliant in retrospect, but it’s not like people around the league were saying to watch out for Atlanta or that the Hawks were building a team “the right way.”
Just waiting on some offense....
look at memphis
sac, okc… i think more teams are going to build this way, and the mle additions for vet balance will go the way of the 18 ft jumper. patience will be required, however.
(while noting that bibby and crawford are proving vet pluses for atl…)
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
No I wasn't saying that at all
My point was that they stuck with those players and in of all those you named on the Bulls, we only stuck with Noah, Rose, Deng and even Tyrus is on the way out. They replaced those talented guys with crappy ones i.e. Pargo, Hunter, Taj (although he’s a rookie who’s trying so I’m not bashing him).
Fan of the Chicago Cash Cows formerly known as the Bulls
Salmons, Miller and Hinrich are killing the Bulls
Each guy has a PER at least 4 pts lower than what they had last year. When these guys play bad, its like the Bulls are playing 3 on 5. As much as we rip into Deng and Rose, I think the real reason we’ve been so bad is because half of our rotation is playing like D league guys.
Miller (18.6 to 12.3)
Hinrich (13.9 to 7.4)
Salmons (16.0 to 11.8)
by Basketball Smurf on Dec 19, 2009 3:15 PM CST reply actions
For real.
We have 4 competent-good players and a ton of complete scrubs.
by Super-Structure on Dec 19, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions
bulls 87
atlanta 96
vdn goes back on fire watch….
*side note: Wjb should be in charge of Game Previews, she does the most i think anyway, and i like her previews, she always has intresting stats that i dont think many people would think about (like how well the hawks do on back to back games) and the tone of the previews seem positive even if its predicting a bulls loss. But most importantly, she actually does the ones assigned to her, and this year weve had the most games without game previews that i can remember (i think)
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
um, no...
yes, i do like her previews, but don’t take away MY gig. i enjoy doing them as well, at least when i can, i so far i have fulfilled the one i signed up for. but i do agree that its a bit disappointing when i come on here on gamedays and there is no preview.
we went out for pizza after the game. -dave wannstedt
by BULLieving in Miami on Dec 19, 2009 5:59 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
It would kind of be more disappointing to me reading about how badly the Bulls/organization suck(s) before each game though.
I enjoy doing them, in spite of the season
I wish I could sign up to do a few more, but I think we get a nice mix of people this way. It would be really hard to come up with something even remotely interesting to write doing it more often. But I would like it if every game got covered as well – it has been a little dead lately. It seems like a lot of the people who sign up are students, though, so I imagine others had my issue with being to busy during finals.
Thanks for the nice words, though. It’s nice to know the game previews are appreciated.
Just waiting on some offense....
ATL 103 Bulls 79
The 2009 White Sox....like a 40 degree day.
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 19, 2009 6:24 PM CST up reply actions

by 













