Rondo vs Rose
Different styles... who will be better?
about 2 years ago
JustAnotherFan
12 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I'd say Rondo. Better vision, better defense, scores more efficiently (even without a jumper).
1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box
by fundamentallysound on Nov 17, 2009 1:25 PM CST reply actions
I wanna see Rondo without 3 guys that the defense has to account for at all times. All the efficiency would drop off.
Not just three guys, but three hall of famers.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
Rose
Rondo has holes you can’t patch and highlights you can take away with fundamental defense.
Rose can take his game to any level he wants. We need a real coaching staff to get him there offensively. The current staff is drilling him on defense and to take all their open shots on offense.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
The first guy says Rondo scores more efficiently
and then tells us Rose has the higher eFG%. Is there a better way of measuring scoring efficiency?
He also says Rondo has the edge physically
and then in the middle of the paragraph acknowledges that rose is the better athlete:
“Because of this, the difference in sheer athleticism between the two isn’t as far apart as one would be inclined to think.”
Rondo has played better so far
Rose is having a rough start…. and Rondo was the one who beat the Bulls in last year’s playoff.
But I still think Rose has the potential to be better… let’s see














