Byron Scott Fired
I'm going to hijack this thread for a discussion I started on my awesome twitter feed this morning:
Instead of the usual 2010 ideas, what if things stayed so bad in New Orleans on the court (and the Scott firing is a sign of desperation already) and financially that Chris Paul became in any way available?
First, how likely is that? Would Rose be the type of compensation not to have George Shinn run out of town? How much more would it take (with cap room in the summer it could be real savings for N.O.)?
One question already answered (for me, anyway) is 'would you trade Rose in a package for Paul?', a yes because that is such a clear upgrade.
A sadder question: Would Gar Paxdorf give up a cash cow on a rookie contract for a cash cow on a max contract?-ed.
9 days ago
Option27
253 comments
0 recs |
Comments
That is surprising...
They should have fired the GM who has failed to build a team around CPIII…
Why isn't your friendly Bulls Blogger friendly?
by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 12, 2009 12:35 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
seriously
NBA GM’s* have a far greater impact on wins and losses than coaches
*all GM’s, in my opinion, but I think mostly so in the NBA.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is true to a degree, but Bower got him some players this year who could help
(Ike Diogu comes to mind) and he just refuses to play those guys. I think Bowers has done a more or less crap job, but Scott hasn’t been great either.
1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box
by fundamentallysound on Nov 12, 2009 2:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But overpaying for Peja after the back issues cost him at least 2 years in Indy/sacto
Then filling the gaps with Mason, and then overpaying dramatically for then 32 yr old Posey (a good player in the right spot, but not at that price, didn’t they remember Posey took off the year after he won in Miami and was benched for not being in shape, etc byt he Heat, and promptly left to go elsewhere….add a few years to that behavior and there you go.
Okafor’s a decent player and a slight in playing upgrade over a healthy Chandler (though Tyson’s contract being off the books far more quickly is better than the slight variance in production from Okafor)….
by majoyenrac on Nov 12, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good points.
I haven’t paid attention to New Orleans so far this year (or many other teams than the Bulls, actually). Still, Diogu is what? 2 or 3 or 4 wins over the course of a season over a shitty player?
Coaches matter, and I guess you did say you agreed “to a degree” which I guess is what I implied by saying “far greater” instead of saying complete impact of GM’s compared to no impact from coaches, for instance….
Both affect the outcomes of the game, but the hand one is dealt is far more important than the way the hand is played.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 3:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I should clarify that the last statement is in relation to other NBA coaches.
Not to the general public.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ike Diogu is help….seriously….
The best help was Posey and he is past usefulness by now.
Scott isn’t perfect but the roster sucked.
by C Smoove on Nov 13, 2009 12:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
bout time
"I think it’s safe to say Noah and Rose are the future."
by Belize on Nov 12, 2009 12:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Let's hope VDN meets the same fate real soon.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 12:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I called it last night
http://www.blogabull.com/2009/11/11/1126979/open-game-thread-8-overflow-bulls#24266604
Of course, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that a team that lost a playoff game by 50+ points might have quit on its coach.
by Big D on Nov 12, 2009 12:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i want him
ive said it beofre.. from j-kidd to cp3 to D-Rose
I'm cuckoo for Kukoc!!!
by Yibs on Nov 12, 2009 1:02 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Worst part of the story?
@ricbucher is reporting that they are adding Head Coach to the title of the GM and making Tim Floyd the top assistant. Problem solved! This can’t possibly get any worse!
If we aren't careful, the leanness we now feel will be the starvation of those we serve.
by Chi 'Till I Die on Nov 12, 2009 1:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
lol
that really is fucking awful.
wasn’t floyd already coach of that team once? why on earth would they want to bring him back to the organization?
"They should. They better. I'm Vinny Del Negro!"
by Jaina on Nov 12, 2009 1:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Floyd is not that bad a coach. When he was in Chicago, he had pretty much no chance
to succeed considering he came straight from college and our roster tuned him out soon after he came to the Bulls.
His record coaching New Orleans was half-decent (if I’m remembering correctly).
I think Sam Smith once wrote pretty much the same thing about Floyd as a coach.
by KentuckyBullsFan on Nov 12, 2009 6:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not surprised either...
I watched the game last night and at one point in the 4th it was clear that his team had completely given up (laughing, smiling, joking around while getting blown out). None of them even trying to save face at all anymore. The camera cut to Byron and he just had a little grin on his face too. IMO when that happens (players give up) you gotta send a message to the team, but unfortunately it looked Byron had given up too. A real change from his demeanor in year’s past I think.
I agree that it’s the GM’s fault just as much as the coach (probably more so) when a team can’t compete because of talent disparity, but IMO it’s the coach’s job to at least motivate his team to a point where none of them find losing acceptable… No matter how much they suck on paper.
Lastly, all I gotta say is this… I don’t think that team has run a single play for Okafor all season. I realize he missed training camp, but come on. The guy is their biggest off season aquisition and he’s been relegating to put backs? Granted, he’s been a beast anyway, but that only proves just how badly they need to run some plays for him.
"When a hyper-intense guy looks for ways to fire himself up, yeah, it pretty much comes out as wild eyed psycho lunacy." - Jeff Clark from C's blog on KG
by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 12, 2009 1:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I dunno about Okafor.
He’s not very skilled and in terms of a real post up game, he’s very limited. They should run some plays involving him, but I dunno about isolating him all that often, as West and Paul are much better options.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 1:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How about a pick and roll?
And with regards to West, he’s lost a step BIG TIME. He still shows up in the stats and is more than serviceable, but honestly watch the games and tell me that guy isn’t slowing everything down. On a team with Paul it just doesn’t work to have one big guy slowing everything down, and the other guy not even a factor in the playbook. That used to work with Chandler because he really has no offensive game (beyond put backs and easy lobs) and his Defense on the other end causes a ton of fast break opportunities, but Okafor was aquired to be involved on both ends.
"When a hyper-intense guy looks for ways to fire himself up, yeah, it pretty much comes out as wild eyed psycho lunacy." - Jeff Clark from C's blog on KG
by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 12, 2009 1:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I've watched a number of NO games this year
and they have incorporated Okafor into many pick and rolls. Regarding West, he’s never been a speed player; rather, he’s a skilled finesse big man, and he’s still the same guy. He’s got great range and finishes well around the bucket. He doesn’t look any different to me.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 2:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hijacked the thread
with my not-so-inspired idea of the morning.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 12, 2009 1:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Isn't it already obvious this year...
Derrick Rose is very very good. Someday MAYBE great.
Chris Paul is already great.
From a fan’s perspective it should be a clear cut choice, but with regards to money I think we all know what Gar Paxsdorf would “hypothetically” do.
"When a hyper-intense guy looks for ways to fire himself up, yeah, it pretty much comes out as wild eyed psycho lunacy." - Jeff Clark from C's blog on KG
by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 12, 2009 1:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
You also have to worry about getting so much to give Paul that it just turns you into the Hornets. That is, not good enough for a guy like Paul.
Now, as I wrote below, I don’t expect it matters. If I’m the Hornets I’d trade for more talent and not give up on Paul until I absolutely had to. But just for argument’s sake, if the Hornets decide to cut bait, I think the Bulls would still need to develop a trade that leaves us in position to do something big this summer, because otherwise, are we good enough to make use of Paul in the first place.
by Sports2 on Nov 12, 2009 1:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Chris Paul and Chris Bosh...
Or more exciting but maybe not as good (I agree it’s debatable).
Chris Paul and Amare Stoudamire.
Yowzers.
Is it at all possible, assuming the Hornets make the Bulls take back at least one bad contract, that the Bulls could trade for Paul and have $34,000,000 in cap space this summer? I would give up anything for that chance. Really. Give me Paul and nothing else and just the chance to sign Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh or, hell, even Joe Johnson and Amare Stoudamire.
If you don’t get ANY of them, you hope that you can keep Paul happy enough that he’ll stick around because he’s definitely young enough to be great for another rebuilding effort.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rose and Salmons and as many picks to the Hornets as needed for CP3. Done and done.
1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box
by fundamentallysound on Nov 12, 2009 2:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd trade Derrick in a package for Paul in a heartbeat.
Derrick and Deng for Paul. I’d trade Derrick and anyone not named Noah for Paul, no questions asked. That said, I don’t see NO dealing him, as he’s not even in his prime yet and the team badly needs a star or it risks leaving the city.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 1:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Derrick and Deng
is um, really awful for us.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul is an MVP type player,
and I’d give up Derrick and Deng for a real franchise cornerstone like Paul.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 2:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not as long as you don't get back a contract just as bad.
I couldn’t imagine Toronto passing up Noah + Tyrus Thomas + ???
For 2010:
Chris Paul – 15.2
Chris Bosh – 17 (whatever it would be)
James Johnson – 1.7
Taj Gibson – 1.1
1st round pick – 1.5
7 minimum roster cap holds – 2.8
Total: 39.3 million
Mer… there’s got to be a way to make that work so Wade or Joe Johnson could come in.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 3:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Break down
To the Bulls:
Chris Paul
Chris Bosh
Steve Blake
Travis Outlaw
To the Hornets:
Derrick Rose
Luol Deng
To the Raptors:
Tyrus Thomas
Joakim Noah
Jerome James
Mo Peterson
To the Blazers:
Kirk Hinrich
Rosters for this season:
Bulls
Paul – Blake
Salmons – Pargo
Outlaw – James Johnson
Gibson
Bosh – Miller
Hornets:
Rose
____
Deng
West
Okafor
Raptors
Calderon
Peterson
Turkoglu
Bargnani – Thomas
Noah
Portland:
+ Hinrich
- Blake & Outlaw
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 3:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you must have some free time today
by NittanyCub on Nov 12, 2009 4:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Today?
The 2009 White Sox....like a 40 degree day.
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 12, 2009 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I like how you didn't show the Portland roster
Nate is going VDN with wacky lineups.
by Sabonis4Ever on Nov 12, 2009 7:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This works, by the way, accoding to ESPN's trade Machine
I forgot Jerome James to the Raptors. I think they’d do that, because having Bargnani, Thomas and Noah would seem to be the best situation possible post-Bosh and they could deal from a strength. And they’d only have to pay 20% of half a season of James’s salary, too.
The Bulls would have thin but okay roster this year. They’d do it if only they could find a way to still get a MAX or near-max guy for next season. If Asik is any good, having Bosh, Gibson and Asik doesn’t seem too too terrible. I could suffer James Johnson for year a until they could get a vet to come fill it an SF. Paul, Wade and Bosh on the same team, though… wow.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 3:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
After thinking it through, the big problem is there are lots of teams that could easily make kick ass offers to the Hornets
And if Paul is demanding a trade, he can probably to some extent pick his team.
Like, if you were the Cavs, you’ve got Big Z and Shaq as $30M in expirings. Offer them + Mo Williams and be willing to take back Okafor and Peja.
The Hornets will suck, but they’ve shedded a huge amount of salary.
The Celtics could offer Rondo and sell off Ray Allen
The Heat can offer O’Neal, Q Richardson (both expiring) and Beasley, and then take a ton of contracts out of the Hornets hands.
I could see the Lakers offering Bynum.
If you’re Chris Paul and you’re forcing your way out of town, wouldn’t you want to force your way to Wade, Kobe or Lebron?
by Sports2 on Nov 12, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If you could, sure.
I would think New Orleans is going to want rookie contract, possible stars more than just expirings. That’s not Deng, of course. If Rose turns out to be any good in the next year or so, Rose, Deng, Okafor and West is not a bad team. Depends on if they want to go completely cheap or just partially.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 4:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are Wade and Johnson
going to come to a club with players like Rose or Paul that dominate the ball?
I know a lot of NBA analysts poo poo Wade coming to play with Rose, but I see it working well. However, Wade and Paul sounds questionable. Paul creates everything. Can Wade play off that?
Deng is our roadblock. NBA contenders have to have a SG and SF that can either make threes or get to the line whenever they want.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul doesn't dominate the ball that much more than Rose. - 27.1% to 23.1%
And Paul shares a lot more, has a different style than Wade and his makes his teammates better. Rose doesn’t do any of those things. Plus, Paul isn’t already the “Hometown Guy” whom Wade would have to win that title back from.
And they’ve already played together, haven’t they?
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 4:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What did the Hornets expect with that team?
I was looking at them and trying to figure out what to do. Honestly, they’re the sort of team that needs a desperation trade.
It might suck for them, but man oh man. Peja. Morris Peterson, Posey, Songaila. Lots of mediocrity there.
If I were them, I’d be trying make another trade along the lines of the Chandler for Okafor deal. Get a better player on a still bad but longer deal. Shave off some luxury tax bill to help. For example:
Wouldn’t the Warriors be happy to be rid of Stephen Jackson and Corey Maggette?
Wouldn’t those guys actually be pretty impressive weapons if they’ve got Chris Paul throwing them the ball?
Yes and yes. So here’s the deal.
- Warriors trade Maggette and Jackson ($16.6M this year, and 18.5M next year). Then ($20M and $21M in the two following years)
- Hornets trade Peja and MoPete ($19M this year and $20.4M next year). Then their contracts expire.
From the Warriors perspective, you’re paying to move out two guys who don’t want to be there, and to get two shorter contracts (Peja and MoPete only have this year and next), so you create some help for yourself in the long run.
From the Hornet’s perspective, you create more long-term obligations for yourself, but there are several reasons that might cause you to overlook that. First, you simply need more talent. If you don’t get it, CP3 is going to eventually flip out and demand a trade. And he’s the franchise. Second, you’re already over the luxury tax, so your long-term expense (which you have time to do something about anyway) is offset by paying less now. By shaving $5M off team salary this year and next, you also save $5M in luxury tax payments, so you’ve given yourself a total of $10M savings now, in addition to getting much better on the court.
Plus, Paul could run out some fun games with Jackson, Maggette, West and Okafor.
by Sports2 on Nov 12, 2009 1:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
calling peja, mo pete, posey and songaila "mediocre"
is quite the compliment considering how awful they are.
http://ExtendtheGame.blogspot.com
by Calogero on Nov 12, 2009 1:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This makes sense
I agree that Paul isn’t going anywhere yet. As you say, he’s the franchise. He’s also arguably the best point guard in the league. You never trade the best player at a position in his prime if you can avoid it. I’d say the rest of the roster was put on notice with the Scott firing. NO will make a deal by the deadline and something resembling what you’ve pointed stated here is most likely. One thing to add, I think that December 15 (I think that’s the day) is the day when most new contracts are able to be traded. I would expect that NO will wait until then to see if there are any better offers and see what the new coach wants to change on the roster.
by 72-10 on Nov 13, 2009 8:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree,
I would def trade Derrick as much as everyone likes him. Paul, is a HOF pg in the same discussion as Magic, Isiah etc. This is a guy who posted a PER of 30. I doubt N.O. would be dumb enough to entertain trades for him, he means too much to the city and a franchise that is struggling to sell tix. But yes Derrick and anything else for Paul, you would hope the Bulls would say yes too.
Out coaching VDN, so easy a cave man could do it.
by ssheth12 on Nov 12, 2009 1:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I just cant do it. As good as Paul is and hes a beast
Can’t trade Rose for Paul.Did everyone seen what Denver did to him?They destroyed him he was getting pushed around and did nothing in the playoffs along with his team.All Rose needs a a cast that suits him.Getting Paul wont make a difference now considering that we will have the same players we have before.It would be the same still having Rose here if Paul is still here with the same guys we have before.Its just blowing my mind that People are giving up the the Kid already.Man everybody is just impatient.And of course i bet people will say “are you crazy,or you are an idiot”
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 1:34 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
All Chris Paul needs is a cast that suits him. He's WAAAAAY better than Derrick is or ever will be.
1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box
by fundamentallysound on Nov 12, 2009 2:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think some people are getting bit with the Portland bug.
I’d even give up Noah for Okafer if it means we get Paul.
by diedaily23 on Nov 12, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you 100%
on not giving up D-Rose. Not disputing the greatness of Chris Paul, but I’m one of the “dumb” fans who wants to stick it out with the hometown kid.
by ToroToroToro on Nov 13, 2009 12:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i wouldnt think twice about moving rose for paul
however what i foresee as the problem is that if paul were moved they would probably make us take back one of their bad contracts— probably peja, posey, or mo pete. plus, it would certainly take at the very least rose and deng to get paul, and paul is BYC so it complicates the trade that much further. Trade machine says this deal works… we get paul, posey, and devin brown, they get rose, deng, and james johnson. i dont think that package would be enough for new orleans though, and my guess is that they would be more interested in brad miller and/or jerome james in a deal with rose for paul for the massive cap relief.
http://ExtendtheGame.blogspot.com
by Calogero on Nov 12, 2009 1:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
No one is giving up on Rose,
he hasn’t had a full pre-season and his ankle is still prob bothering him, which explains him not driving as much, also I feel his confidence is a little shaken. That being said, Paul is a once in a life time PG, and you have get him if he’s available. I do agree, that he would be entering a similar situation in Chicago, if the Bulls don’t commit to getting players around and :glup: maybe going into the tax to grab that kind of talent. However, if you do trade say Rose+Deng, whose team looks better now? NO with Rose+Mo. Pete+Deng+West+Okafor or the Bulls with Paul+Hinrich+Salmons+Tyrus+Noah?
Is it a wash? The good thing would be I know many FAs would be lining up to play with Paul and he could def do more damamge in the East. Plus he already HATES Rondo, so thats always a plus.
Out coaching VDN, so easy a cave man could do it.
by ssheth12 on Nov 12, 2009 1:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
But still I just cant do it.It pains me but I just cant.Man.BUT
I wouldn’t mind having Byron Scott as the coach here.He helped make PGs great Kidd,Paul,And possibly if he ever comes here which the Bulls should consider Make Rose that guy.
But still dont want to get rid of Rose only to see him flourish somewhere else i just dont want that,even though Paul is as great as he is.All Rose needs is guys around him and a coach like Scott to challenge him.Vinny is soft.He wont help.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Anytime you can trade potentially awesome
for actually awesome, you do it. In this case, I’m not even sure Rose’s ceiling is as high as where Paul is right now. Paul’s putting up Magic Johnson numbers.
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I want the guy.
Who made Kidd,And Paul Awesome.To make Rose just as awesome.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wasnt kidd already really good on phoenix?
"What is going on up here?"
"I never know, man."
by TheMoon on Nov 12, 2009 2:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Kidd and Paul
were going to be awesome with or without Scott.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Byron Scott?
He didn’t make either one of those guys awesome. Not only that, he lost both of them and their teams by the time he got fired.
"I'm in the Hall already, on the wall already, I'm a work of art I'm a Warhol already"-Jay Z
by bigballa10 on Nov 12, 2009 3:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And yes
Some people are giving up on him from what i hear.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody's giving up on Rose,
rather many, myself included, are struggling to see any superstar qualities in him. Yeah, he’s talented, but he’s timid and is too tentative for my liking. He acts like any time he enters the paint it’s gonna open up and swallow him alive.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 2:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no i see star written all over rose
i see him as a rich mans devin harris, and thats something pretty awesome…i think he can be a mini lebron if he meets his pottential, but cp3…but chris paul is like the jordan of pgs…hes a clear upgrade…we as bulls fans are hoping that rose can meet cp3s abilitly one day, instead of hoping our guys turns into that guy, why not just get “that guy”?
Although i dont think NO ever gives up chris paul, not for rose, not for d. Will, hell nothing short of lebron, and even then i could see them hesitate a bit…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would love for the Bulls to give this guy a look
Preaches defense, has his teams shoot the 3, and few have the resume of coaching small teams to success.
In New Jersey, he guided a team with PG Kidd and big men Kenyon Martin and Todd MacCulloch to two straight finals appearances. In New Orleans, he guided a team with PG Paul and big men David West and Tyson Chandler to 105 wins the past two years.
It sounds like he’s Skiles-abrasive, but the Bulls are the kind of team that can benefit from it.
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 1:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
Noah>>Tyson chandler
Deng=David west
Salmons> mo pete
Rose
plus we have tyrus, taj, miller, and hinrich…man that coach could do some wonders with our team huh?
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 2:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We have almost no three point shooting
How do we get it without making us terrible defensively?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd start with Luol
You wanna hear a goddamned crazy stat? Luol leads the entire NBA in 16-23ft jumpers per game at 8.9. Nobody else is above 7.5. Yet he only takes 0.5 threes per game.
Only two other players in the league have nearly that much of a disparity: Monta Ellis (7.3/0.4) and Derrick Rose (6.9/0.4). Oh god!
Even sadder is that Luol has made his 16-23ft jumper 39% of the time. Rose is at 42%. They can shoot, just step back!
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that is coaching
VDN has to get these guys to understand they have to start taking 2 3’s a night. If they are open, shoot. Deng in particular needs to be setting up 2 feet back. VDN needs Rose and Deng to work on 3s now.
by Basketball Smurf on Nov 12, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
cranscape posted somewhere recently
i cant remember where the comment was located but i agreed with the idea…it was the concept that luols shot is a bit flatter and the mechanics of that shot work from a certain range, in order for deng to shoot from the 3pt line he would probably have to tweak his shot a bit, and thats not something thats always easy to do.
I have two friends who pretty much had the same problem, a foot inside the 3pt line they were pretty much money, a step back and they were building houses. It took the first one an entire summer to change his shot a bit so that he shot with a greater arch but it worked for him, while it took my other friend a week to change his shot, and he completely reworked it. The thing is neither of them was in a league (at the time) and could afford to test the shot and fail. The guy who reworked his shot can hit 3s but only when wide open now, his shot is released lower and easier to block or just straight up challenge…a guy like deng has far less options to change his shot especially during the season….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 3:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe true, I don't know
But Luol’s taken 46 threes in the past three years and made 19. Tiny, tiny sample size, but that’s 41%. If he can even hit 30% I’d rather he take a few more.
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 3:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
heh yea
especially if you are wide open and your team hasnt scored for the last few possesions…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 3:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
From recollection
the only locations Deng attempts three point shots is in the corners while camped.
Can he even move with the ball to get open to take a 3 pt shot? Those the attempts where he looks flat in his good range. He’s 2-3 steps back does the shot acquire some arc?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 4:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Outlaw was the king of the "one foot on the line, long two pointer"
He fixed it last season so it is curable.
by Sabonis4Ever on Nov 12, 2009 7:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oh God
just give me anyone over Vinny.
by diedaily23 on Nov 12, 2009 3:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would make that trade in a heartbeat
I think most logical people would. Particularly because Rose has become a little too sleepy for my tastes. I like him, but I’m really starting to have doubts about his potential. He’ll probably never be better than a second fiddle, while Chris Paul is just the shit.
"That's a spicy meatball-a!" - Vinny Del Negro
by Juiceboxjerry on Nov 12, 2009 1:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
One other thing about Rose
A lot of time only players like Noah or Noc are players being talked about with having “high motors”, but I was reading that Thorpe chat yesterday and it was brought up how all the great players like Wade, James, Paul etc. have insanely high motors as well. I think that gets lost in the shuffle. These guys are not just talented, they are cerebral and constantly working their asses off on the court, fighting on every possession. Derrick is definitely talented, but in my mind he lacks that second part big time.
"That's a spicy meatball-a!" - Vinny Del Negro
by Juiceboxjerry on Nov 12, 2009 1:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rose for CP3 a no brainer
But I can’t help but wonder how much of a revolt there would be amongst the typical Bulls fans for trading away a “hometown boy”? Sadly, I don’t think most fans realize how wide the gap currently is between Paul and Rose and wouldn’t see it as much of an upgrade at all.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 12, 2009 1:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yes, that's the problem. Too many dumb fans. Otherwise, I think it easily gets done.
I wonder how pumped Chris Paul would be about a trade.
1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box
by fundamentallysound on Nov 12, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
huh
i dont think it easily gets done cuz neither franchise would really go for it (bulls too cheap and NO should at least know they have the best pg in the league), and yea i dont think cp3 would be much pumped about the trade either, its not like hes going to a clearly better team, and arent we out of 2010 if we cp3?
If the trade was actually out there, then youd be stupid to decline it, but i dont think it will ever be out there, so i dont see the trade ever being easily done (especially since NO, cuz they have the right to, will probably milk whatever they can get from the bulls)
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 2:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I cannot beliee Scott was fired.
These coaches that aren’t named Phil Jackson, Popovich, and Sloan are never secure with their gigs. I also have to think Paul was somewhat responsible for the firing. I think had Paul stuck up for the coach maybe Scott would still be there.
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 12, 2009 1:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
eh
coaches are usually the first gone, gms are way too high up on the list, and players cant be fired only traded, and thats tough if they arent performing, coaches are the easiest, and make the most noise when they get fired….before the coach i bet there were a bunch of trainers or other staff members fired that no one heard about cuz they are so insignificant…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 2:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
also
guys like phil jackson, popovich, and sloan are part of the “advertising” for that team. Hey free agent, come to our team cuz we have phil jackson, the guy who coached THE MIKE JORDAN.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Scott will get another gig
He might be glad to be out of there with cash due to him.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 3:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The body language
Paul showed towards Byron Scott hasn’t been good since last season. My guess is he actually wanted him gone.
"I'm in the Hall already, on the wall already, I'm a work of art I'm a Warhol already"-Jay Z
by bigballa10 on Nov 12, 2009 3:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Byron has the Skiles gene.
Coaches like them eventually get run out of town.
The 2009 White Sox....like a 40 degree day.
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 12, 2009 3:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
If Paul really wanted Scott around, he’d still be around.
by drew gooden's facial growth on Nov 12, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You kids are the most dumbest people on the internet
if you think Chris Paul is even near the caliber of talent as Derrick.
I am nobody, so this is what I am
by IamClassic on Nov 12, 2009 2:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
IamRetarded
Paul is already an Allstar doing 20/10 with a shitty team. Derrick is great but he’s not there yet.
by C Smoove on Nov 12, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gramatically, this could be read to mean Chris Paul is much better than Rose.
if you think Chris Paul is even near the caliber of talent as Derrick.
"Then you need a center so if the ball gets stuck between the rim and backboard he can reach up and knock it loose instead of having to spend 15 minutes trying to hit it with a broom stick." – Sam Smith
by Granny Waiters on Nov 12, 2009 6:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's not give him that credit
Grammatically, he has no idea what he’s doing…and he calls us the ‘most dumbest’ on the interweb.
by Stacey_Is_King on Nov 13, 2009 5:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Seriously, its probably already been said, but Rose’s ceiling is CP3. So why wouldn’t you get the real deal right now and skip all the growing pains?
Out coaching VDN, so easy a cave man could do it.
by ssheth12 on Nov 12, 2009 2:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Because you might not be willing and able to put enough team around the real deal.
Let’s just hypothetically swap Rose and CP3. Say it’s a straight up trade
1- Rose or CP3, Kirk
2- Salmons, Kirk, Pargo
3- Deng, Salmons, JJ
4- Tyrus, Taj
5- Noah, Miller
It’s a nice team, but I tend to think it’s a team that still needs a big-time scoring threat. I’m not going to go on a rant here about retaining BG, but I could, I suppose. But from the bigger picture, with swapping Rose and expirings for CP3, we’re pretty locked into the team you see here. No major draft picks. No cap space. No obviously tradeable assets.
by Sports2 on Nov 12, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul is a big-time scoring threat
23ppg on 60% TS is about as good as it gets. That supporting cast is way better than what Paul has had.
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 2:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
except Tyrus, Miller, Salmons are probably all gone at the end of the year. so it's a short run.
1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box
by fundamentallysound on Nov 12, 2009 2:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They're only gone if we replace them with a FA
We aren’t losing all three for nothing.
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, the day CP3 is here
will be a good day to be Tyrus Thomas
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why?
The more Gibson plays the more the staff will forget about Thomas.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 5:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
they havent forgotten
they know how many days they have till they can ditch him
by sin on Nov 12, 2009 11:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe once Tyrus starts averaging 25-10 off of entirely dumks
they’ll play him more.
…
Nah.
I support the Tornado Release ... and Young Bucks.
by Prevenge on Nov 13, 2009 12:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not when opposing teams pracitce lay up drills on us and the Udonis Haslem's keep catching fire
beating us down the stretch of games
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 13, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How much better is it?
Deng is pretty equivalent to West
Noah is pretty equivalent to Chandler
We might prefer our guys, but what I’m saying is they’re not orders of magnitude better. In terms of capability and style of play, they’re about the same.
Salmons is somewhere between Posey and MoPete.
I don’t have faith in Tyrus or Hinrich to really be game changers. In the end, it’s a similar team to the better version of the Hornets we saw a couple years ago.
That’s good, but my guess is that the East is going to see something go down this summer where two of Wade, Bosh and Lebron end up on the same team.
That’s the sort of combination we need to be figuring out how to beat.
by Sports2 on Nov 12, 2009 2:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You think that they just want rose up front?
they would want Noah or deng as well or both.And then when Paul does get here we will have nothing.And that can set us back even more.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 2:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, I was just saying it as a hypothetical. I have no idea how it'd work from their end
If I were them, I wouldn’t trade him unless I had a gun pointed at my head.
If I did have that gun to my head, I’d start looking around at the really deep pocketed teams and force them to take back a couple of my bad contracts as well. The reality is the Hornets are having a hard time making money anyway, and if Paul goes, being locked in to Peja, Posey, Okafor, etc is pretty terrible.
Also, if Paul’s forcing his way out of town, he probably wants to go to a team with deep pockets and in immediate contention like that.
I’d be eager to talk to Boston, San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Portland and the Lakers, for example.
by Sports2 on Nov 12, 2009 2:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That Hornets team had some baddd players in '08 (their 56 win season)
Jannero Pargo, Morris Peterson, Rasual Butler, Julian Wright, Melvin Ely, Hilton Armstrong, and Ryan Bowen combined for almost 7000 minutes that year.
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 3:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rose's ceiling is not CP3.
They couldn’t be more different. Derrick isn’t a great passer or shooter and he’ll never have the vision that Paul has. IMO, he’s entirely unique to the position.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this stuck out from espn article ... 4-4 ain't bad i guess
It Don’t Come Easy
HornetsThe Hornets’ 3-6 start has not come against cupcakes. They’re tied for the most games against teams that are .500 or better with seven — and they’ve gone just 2-5 in those games.
Team Opp. Win Pct.
Bulls (4-4) .645
Wizards (2-6) .639
Hornets (3-6) .581
Thunder (4-4) .576
Wolves (1-8) .568
- W-L records entering Thursday games.
WADE 2010
by Orange Juice on Nov 12, 2009 2:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Rose ahs better size, and physical abilities. Rose hasn't fully developed as a point guard
and if you trade him away after year for a pg who’s reached his peak, you aren’t just wrong, you’re unintelligentical!
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 12, 2009 2:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Trading a guy who might someday be great for the best point guard in the game and arguably the game's second best player is not "unintelligentical"
1. Cut a hole in a box
2. Put your Kirk in that box
3. Make some team open that box
by fundamentallysound on Nov 12, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul isn't better than Kobe, Carmelo, Wade, or Lebron.
I myself don’t even think it’s clear that there’s one point guard better than the others. None of them are shut down defenders, the ones considered the best can all score, there all decent passers. I just look at what you have with Rose, then Paul. Rose is bigger, stronger, faster, jumps higher, is almost impossible to defend by another point guard and still hasn’t fully developed. Paul has, but Paul has attitude issues, Rose is teachable, Paul is already at his peak and can’t be told anything. Paul is and will be a really good point, Rose can be special. You don’t let players like him go after one really good rookie year unless it’s for the leagues best player and Chris Paul aint he!
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 12, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul with Noah sounds pretty awesome to me
I’m surprised we haven’t seen Derrick gel with our bigs around the rim yet. I thought we’d be there by now.
We still need legit 3pt threats that can play defense to make Paul really efficient and picking up victories.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 3:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
rose and noah
were a weapon last year in the playoffs, however it has alot to do with penetration, rose isnt penetrating whether it be because of injury, fatigue, or the lack of shooters on this team…he just isnt gettin into the paint…once he starts getting there more you should see noah being ready for weakside catch and dunks…
also i dont think anyone is teaching the bulls how to run a pick and roll correctly….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
paul is probably the best in the league right now.
"What is going on up here?"
"I never know, man."
by TheMoon on Nov 12, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
best player i mean, not just pg.
"What is going on up here?"
"I never know, man."
by TheMoon on Nov 12, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
with everything you just said
I support the Tornado Release ... and Young Bucks.
by Prevenge on Nov 13, 2009 12:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If NO trades Paul and the Bulls are involved
There will be at least 3 teams involved where the other team gets Paul and the Bulls get a 2 or a 4.
by hlac on Nov 12, 2009 2:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If we trade countless draft picks and other servicable players like Rose,Deng or Noah for CP3.
In the long run we would be worst than we are now.Cause then who who else would we have?Hinrich?Who really thinks with the Management would put a team around CP3 if we had absolutely nobody.At least now we have a TEAM thats can help us get to the playoffs.We need a scoring Big if than anything right now.Management would think that it would be cheaper to add more talent to the team now.rather than basically starting all over again (again) by bringing paul here.I rather have 5 very good and talented players than 1 excellent player and a bunch of plain role players.We are not that far off.We need a good to great scoring Big man Which we had never had before at all.And if im a “dumb fan” then so be it.My opinion and im sticking to it!
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 2:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Chris Paul is the best point in the league, no question.
I would love to see Rose blossom, but if he could get Paul without trading Deng and Noah, why the fuck not; we could give them a young point, some expirings an picks.
by Super-Structure on Nov 12, 2009 2:36 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Doubt that would happen
If i was new orleans.I would include deng or noah in that package
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 2:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe New Orleans will take Ben G-
shit.
I support the Tornado Release ... and Young Bucks.
by Prevenge on Nov 13, 2009 1:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Take it easy . . . . woah
First off, Paul wouldn’t get traded unless it was the last year of his contract and they had an idea he wouldn’t resign.
Secondly, by then . . . we can truly have an idea of who Derrick Rose is.
I personally like what I see right out of the gate. The non injured Rose, that is
by Option27 on Nov 12, 2009 2:40 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Yeah thats true.
They wouldn’t do that.I think Rose has improved even with the injury.As for the mental stuff hes young not even is his prime and still getting a feel of being “The Guy”.Whats with the impatience people everyone last year was talking about how great Rose can be and he will be the best PG and all of that.But now after 8 games! comming out of an injury and lost a month of playing time.Now people wants him to be traded.I mean damn slow down.We need a Big more than anything.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 2:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well the only thing I don't get is people saying his ceiling is CP3?
What happened to all those people who think he’s a combo of Deron & CP3?
by Option27 on Nov 12, 2009 2:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They probably all
Went and hid in a bunker,Rose is similar to wade but hes is selfless which is good.He can take over in the 4th when he needs to.He has done that all of last season and BG finished it off.Seriously I love CP3 but still to trade him like that.Not even knowing that the Hornets most likely want Noah or Deng or even BOTH would hurt our team>we are a playoff team we are a BIG MAN away from maybe a contender.Why split the team up for one great player who wont have ANYTHING when he gets here?And also ROSE IS SELFLESS he doesn’t think of himself he thinks of the TEAM!How many players think about the TEAM more than himself?But have Byron Scott than VDN is a big impact since hes a coach who knows what hes doing.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 3:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I’d trade VDN for Scott in a heartbeat
by Option27 on Nov 12, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep VDN should go Scott should be here he is perfect for us
And has a very nice resume
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How is Rose more selfless than Wade?
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I Never said that Wade more selfless.Im saying that there are few selfless stars in the NBA.That doesn't make himself bigger than the team.
Guys who do put himself higher are guys like Kobe and Lebron.Bot are great but I rather have Wade than both of them
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 4:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You said Rose is similar to Wade but selfless.
(using common sense and knowledge of the english language), that implies In regards to selfless ness, Wade and Rose are opposites. If Rose is selfless, than Wade is selfish. How did you not say that?
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 4:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't automatically mean Wade is the exact opposite.
There are degrees to selfness/ishness…it’s not like he said they’re the same apart from shooting 3s.
by Stacey_Is_King on Nov 12, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, but if you look at my question...
….I only asked how Rose is more selfless than Wade. My explanation was bad. I’m glad you jumped in to help, though.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 5:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think NO trades Paul
firing Byron Scott was likely to appease Scott.
Still, if you were going to move Rose in a trade, this is the player you would swap him for. CP3 is base year compensation player, so it is hard to move him without combining his contract with another large one. If the Hornet move Paul, they are going to want to get rid of Peja as well. Rose-Salmons-Miller-JJ for CP3-Peja-Devin Brown works on the trade machine. The Hornets get some exprining contracts to go with Rose/West/Okafor. The Bulls get CP3 and with than have a core of CP3-Deng-Noah. It would knock us out of 2010 contention, but we would have cap room in 2011 and a young, upcoming team that would fit nice with a Carmelo Anthony.
by Basketball Smurf on Nov 12, 2009 2:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The chris paul and rose trade is intresting
but its never happening….
However, whats more conversation worthy and completely possible, is firing vdn and getting byron scott….imagine…a real coach….its been a long time…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 3:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Bulls are right on the edge of being contenders
I say they are one player away. Many of you are sold that Tyrus and Noah can’t do it together, I think different. Those two make a great duo defensively vs any big men in the league right now, I don’t care who you put out there. The Bulls problem this year like last year is perimeter play. BG was a great scorer but he was a serious defensive liabilty. If the Bulls got a true shooting guard, big, athletic, with range, like Wade, Kobe, Manu, Redd, Mayo, Allen, the Bulls could have gotten to the championships last year and I’m sure of it. Salmons and Deng aren’t players you want as a 1st or 2nd scoring option, but we have them as go to guys and this is the Bulls problem. I believe the core for this team should be Rose TT Noah and even Deng. Develop Rose and Tyrus get Wade, or Gay and this team we’ll be the best and most entertaining team the league will have seen in a while! But it probably wont happen.
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 12, 2009 3:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Rose+Wade
>Cp3
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 3:13 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That'd be great if there was actually much of a chance of bringing in Wade
If you have a chance to get one of the top 5 players in the league, you have to take it even if it means passing up a very, very slim chance of matching Rose and Wade. A Rose-Paul swap isn’t going to happen anytime soon, but, in the hypothetical, you take the best talent and figure out the rest later.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 12, 2009 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
but thats the thing
theres a far better chance on us getting wade to join with rose, as opposed to trading rose for cp3….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 3:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If we're only talking hypothetical here, which I think everyone is,
then the CP3-Rose swap is assumed as actually being a deal on the table. The question is, with that deal hypothetically on the table, would you hypothetically do it? If hypothetical Dwyane Wade was openly talking about how great it would be to play in Chicago instead of saying how much he loves Miami, then there should be some pause. Otherwise, you would be a fool to turn down that deal. You can rebuild around Paul over time, but it’s highly unlikely you’d have a chance at acquiring that level of talent again.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 12, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if its all hypothetical
then why couldnt wade also be willing to hypothetically sign with the bulls…like you said the question pretty much then changes to this:
Its the offseason, NO approaches the bulls for a trade of D.Rose for chris paul. Also D. Wade has come out and said that he wants to play for chicago, namely with derrick rose. What do you do…
In that case i think i still pick adding wade to our roster instead of trading rose for chris paul….Chris paul is an elite and exclusive talent, but rose isnt a bust by any reach of the mind, and wade is probably one of the top 5 players in the league right now….i mean the rosters for the two scenerios pretty much look something like
Rose
wade
deng
some cheap pf
Noah
vs
Cp3
Salmons/hinrich
deng
some cheap pf
Noah
the first roster is far better, imho
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 3:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Either wade or bosh.
What other BIG MEN are avalible in 2010?
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 3:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What about Paul + Wade?
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 3:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that will never happen
We need a Big more than anything
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 4:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hahahahaha
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How is that funny its true
We get bosh then we are a contender.We give up picks and Noah or deng even both for paul when he comes in with basically nobody it will set us back even more.we are maybe 1 Chris Bosh or any other offensive Bigman that WE NEVER HAD from being a contender.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 4:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The mid-90's Bulls never had a big man.
You put the best backcourt int he history of the NBA together, and I guarantee you’re a contender.
Trading for Paul is never going to happen, so this whole thread is based on “never going to happen.” I’m glad you shared your clairvoyant abilities, though.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 5:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The 90s bulls had MJ the best EVER! He doesn't need a big man.Nuffsaid but.
Most teams now need to win with a big man.Magic need one Kareem.Zeke has an entire team who can be starters on other teams.these lakers have 2 big men.Magic has howard.the 95 Rockets have freakin hakeem.And of course at his prime Shaq.We needed a big man for years more than a backcourt.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 5:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
amen!!!!
Ive been shouting that for years….we do need a big who can score down low….thats no question. And you cant say well MJ won without a decent big man. HE WAS MJ, THE BEST LPAYER EVER, HE DIDNT NEED A BIG MAN!!
Eat. Sleep. Pray. Watch chicago play.
P.S.
You've obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a shit about what you think.
by chi_till_eye_die on Nov 12, 2009 5:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
MJ has
Made up for a Bigman by going for the easy shots he said that he does not want to stop to shoot 3s all game (like kobe) cause it will throw off his game.He takes the easy shots.Like a BIG MAN would do.Thats why he doesn’t need a big man.
Hereis the vid about him not wanting to take 3s all the time
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 6:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Magic needed Kareem?
Magic won it all in 88 when Kareem was 40 years old. Kareem averaged 5.5 rebounds per game in the playoffs.
I understand you want more floor spacing, but the general “Bulls + Big Man = Contender!” idea is baseless. Title teams over the years:
88 Lakers: No dominant post scorer
89-90 Pistons: No dominant post scorer
91-98 Bulls: No dominant post scorer
94-95 Rockets: Hakeem
98030507 Spurs: Duncan
00-02 Lakers: Shaq
04 Pistons: No dominant post scorer
06 Heat: Shaq
08 Celtics: Garnett, kinda
09 Lakers: Gasol
I’ll give you that winning with a big guy is a trend that’s coming back in again. It doesn’t mean that’s the only way to the top. And plenty of good post scorers don’t go anywhere. I keep hearing “Amare and Boozer!” If those guys were so good, how come neither’s been to the Finals? How come both their teams have shown interest in trading them?
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 6:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Did i say that they HAVE to be dominant?No i didnt
Theyhave to make an impact and Kareem still helped out that team.
The Pistons then and now have great talent at all 5 positions.The Spurs had Duncan, and Robinson.And again i sad that those Bulls had FREAKIN MJ remember the G.O.A.T?He doesnt need one.MOST teams NOT all need at least a good doesn’t HAVE to be dominant but good.And Garnett DOMINATED Gasol in the finals kinda my foot.88 Lakers had a potential Hall of fame team.Ewing would have had a ship only Guess whos in the way MJ.Malone maybe the best PFof all time.Wilt the stilt you know 100 points?Bill Russell great defensive Center with lots of help on his team and he has 11 rings or 10 cant remember.Where would the magic be without Howard they would STILL be a lottery team.Its Proven to be eaiser to build around a great Big man force open shots like what Howard does with his team.Before Kobe was with the lakers they were still a good team why?Cause of shaq.I dont see Oscar Robinson winning rings.How many does he have? Defense and good to great Big men win championships.Name me 5 Guards who won ships without 5 great guys like the Pistons had.Or without a big man (doesnt have to be dominant) just good.And YOU CAN’T USE MJ. That is all
.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 6:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh, I guess if we're considering Amare and Gasol dominant post scorers
Worthy counts in 88.
by YaoPau on Nov 12, 2009 6:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
gasol is a much better post player than worthy ever was.
"What is going on up here?"
"I never know, man."
by TheMoon on Nov 12, 2009 7:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what???
big game james, not as good as gasol??? woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow……….
Eat. Sleep. Pray. Watch chicago play.
P.S.
You've obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a shit about what you think.
by chi_till_eye_die on Nov 12, 2009 7:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
notice the word "post" in yaopau's comment.
anyways, its true the way you read it too. look at gasol’s career stats: 19/9/3/1.5 on 52% fg. worthy’s: 18/5/3/.7 on 52% fg. and gasol has only recently gotten the kind of help worthy had his whole career. gasol is not just better, hes better by quite a bit.
"What is going on up here?"
"I never know, man."
by TheMoon on Nov 12, 2009 7:23 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't know if I'd say much better
But Gasol is still underrated…..
by majoyenrac on Nov 13, 2009 8:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a media criticism
With absolutely no data or evidence to back it up.
by Stacey_Is_King on Nov 13, 2009 5:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If i see him
Take another layup on KG again i will go crazy.hes almost 7ft!! DUNK THE BALL!!!
by T.Moore on Nov 13, 2009 11:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Garnett is barely a post player. He shoots fadeaways all game
by C Smoove on Nov 13, 2009 12:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Pistons had ok frontcourt players but no dominant big man. Laimbeer, Salley and Mahorn and Edwards were all useful but none of them are go to big men.
by C Smoove on Nov 13, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
One More Inequality and im done for the day i swear
Vdn and Chris Paul=Rose and Byron Scott
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 12, 2009 3:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to see what comment you're replying to.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 3:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would happily trade Rose for Paul, but it's not because I don't think Derrick has it in him to become great.
CP3 is already a top 5 player, and besides some unnatural attachment some fans might have with Derrick there’s no real reason to not consider this trade.
But, does Shinn really have the balls to alienate a tenuous fanbase? Small-market teams don’t have the luxury of just letting go of max players without some kind of backlash. And Rose is an obvious haul in terms of talent, but it’s not like that’s the best they could get if Paul was seriously on the trading block.
The 2009 White Sox....like a 40 degree day.
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 12, 2009 3:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm just gonna be real with everyone
Paul is a good player and all, I just personally don’t like him and I’d like to shoot the fair one with him. I’m talking a good ole’ fist fight he and I. So I say Derron Williams is better than him, I like Jennings even though he may not be better, I like…….Nash better….uh….Billups better, and Calderon, I just don’t like Paul.
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 12, 2009 3:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ur crazy if you would rather have Billups, Calderon or Jennings over Paul.
I can understand if you’d rather have Williams or Nash, although I’d have to disagree, but Paul is so far superior to those other guys it’s not even funny. He is a great player, and by great I mean great, as in one of top players around today.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 3:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and he's put up a couple of the best statistical years anyone's ever had
like, up there with the Magic Johnsons, Lebron James, Oscar Robertson, Dwayne Wades and dare I say, Michael Jordon.
I don’t think he’s as good as those players, but his statistics are similar over the past two years, if not better.
"This is not Vietnam, Smokey, there are rules here." - Walter Sobchak
by Rose Colored Goggles on Nov 12, 2009 5:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul's blowup with Rondo looks bad
“You will respect me as a man.”
What the hell does that mean? Chris Paul is a good basketball player, but I don’t know if he’s got the goods to desire rings.
What would Mike do? Chris Paul should have a chat with Jerry Stackhouse to figure out respect works in the NBA.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 5:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you see the clip?
Rondo started things up after the game while Paul was chatting with Pierce. It’s all on Rondo, and Paul is right in saying that Rondo is very, very lucky to be where he is right now.
Metal sharpens metal.
And this guy right here understands and knows what leadership is all about: The coach, the hall of famer......... Dick Butka! George Ryan
by dakoose on Nov 12, 2009 6:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Rondo alot more than Paul, and the boy's got heart!
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 12, 2009 6:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rondo sucks ass.
"This is not Vietnam, Smokey, there are rules here." - Walter Sobchak
by Rose Colored Goggles on Nov 12, 2009 7:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was joking, I do hate Paul but I know he's one of the best point guards
But I guarantee this, Chris Paul will leave N.O, this cat has a bad attitude! I’m almost positive he could’ve made some type of remark to let management know he’s behind Scott. I’d love for Byron Scott to come to Chicago, he’ll coach and develop his players, but this Chris Paul…..he’s good, but not all that.
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 12, 2009 6:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We are 1 good player from being a contender
If we Trade Rose and deng or noah (if possible all 3) put draft picks in and. that will set us back since even if he gets here he will have nothing.Why trade for him if we are just one offensive Big man like Bosh or amare away from being a contender.A We are better with the guys we have now.Do people really think that the Management would rebuild AGAIN?For Paul? Or be a playoff team and look for a legit post scorer like Stat or Bosh (not boozer hes too slow) and Become that contender that we can be.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 7:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this was such a weird thing to say!
"What is going on up here?"
"I never know, man."
by TheMoon on Nov 12, 2009 4:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I can only hope
Don Nelson is next (anybody that plays fantasy bball would understand).
"I'm in the Hall already, on the wall already, I'm a work of art I'm a Warhol already"-Jay Z
by bigballa10 on Nov 12, 2009 3:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Alright, Paul is a BYC player, so he's very hard to trade
and NO has a lot of salary cap issues, so this one wouldn’t be easy to work out. Alas, I believe I’ve found a way:
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=yjjx7eo
If that link doesn’t work, basically what the trade is:
Bulls get: CP3, Julian Wright, Morris Peterson, Hilton Armstrong
Hornets get: Derrick Rose, Luol Deng, Tyrus Thomas
Now, would the Hornets do that? I think if Paul demands a trade, that’s about as good an offer as anyone could give them. We’re giving up 3 of our top 4 players right there (arguably in regards to Tyrus, but still).
Is this a good trade for the Bulls? I don’t know. It certainly hurts our cap room for next year by about $2 million. But, if we still have $14 mil available, is that enough for Stoudamire? Check out this line-up:
PG: Chris Paul
SG: Mo Peterson
SF: Julian Wright
PF: Amare Stoudamire
C: Joakim Noah
Bench: Kirk Hinrich, Taj Gibson, James Johnson, draft pick, MLE guy (Brad Miller maybe?)
Speak Blog-A-Bull, speak I say!
"This is not Vietnam, Smokey, there are rules here." - Walter Sobchak
by Rose Colored Goggles on Nov 12, 2009 3:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm just not sure that this beats what we'd have if we wait it out and get a big-time FA...
For instance, if we get Bosh:
PG: Rose
SG: Hinrich
SF: Deng
PF: Bosh
C: Noah
Bench: Taj Gibson, James Johnson, Asik, draft pick, MLE guy (preferably a SG)
"This is not Vietnam, Smokey, there are rules here." - Walter Sobchak
by Rose Colored Goggles on Nov 12, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That roster begs for 3pt shooting
I’m really disappointed in Hinrich’s shooting this season. He’s taking 3-4 bad shots per game and passing up on 2-3 shots in the paint.
I still think Bosh is the number one target. Rose, Deng, Bosh, Noah with a 3pt shooting SG is a contending team if there’s a solid 3 man bench rotation.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 4:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bosh could go to anytime...Like New York if they can sign LeBron James.
Unlike Chicago, I don’t think NY is gonna be afraid of going over the cap.
Hell, the Knicks might have to come to agreement with Bosh JUST SO LBJ is interested enough to sign with New York.
I would take a Chris Paul NOW over just the possibility of getting so and so next year.
’
by KentuckyBullsFan on Nov 12, 2009 6:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Except it's easy if you'd take lots of salary
For example:
Heat trade Jermaine O’Neal
Q Richardson
Michael Beasley
Mario Chalmers
Hornets trade
Paul
Okafor
Posey
Peja
1- Paul, Arroyo
2- Wade Cook
3- Peja, Posey
4- Haslem
5- Okafor
Yeah, it’s the Heat, but that’s the point. I don’t know if we’ve got the tools to work with.
by Sports2 on Nov 12, 2009 4:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think the Hornets could survive in the city if they just got back salary relief.
Beasley isn’t the name to the general public that Rose is.
If they don’t want to stay in New Orleans, yeah, they can go cheap on talent, but if they want to stay, they need to field a competitive team right away.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 4:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What they need is hometown boy Tyrus Thomas!
Actually, I don’t think they’re surviving in New Orleans in any case.
by Sports2 on Nov 12, 2009 4:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That might be true.
And taking that stance, you’re right. It’s more about saving money than getting talent. However, I’d think they’d still want at least one young talent that’s cheap to excite the fan base wherever they go.
People should remember that while they have the right to their opinion, they are not entitled to be taken seriously. --Bruce Bartlett
by tyger1147 on Nov 12, 2009 5:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I love Rose, but of course I would take Paul in most logical deals for Rose.
I mean, LA fans should accept a Lebron for Kobe trade. Personal issues aside (tradition, “wtf factor”, etc.) Lebron at his age is a much greater value than Kobe at his age. Lebron is already slightly better and he’s much younger, so yea, theoretically LA should love a deal that sends Kobe for Lebron, not that it would ever happen.
If we picked up Paul I’m guessing we’d have to find a way to take on Peja’s contract or something along those lines. That would be 27 million combined from Paul and Peja, so it would take something like Rose, Miller (expiring) and another 10 million dollars in salary. For expirings that could mean Jerome James and another 3.5 million or so, give or take. That’s a pretty favorable deal for us, yea it sucks to take on Peja’s contract, but it’s only two years and we get the best point guard in the league at the age of 24. Not too shabby, even if he only has 6 years left (likely more of course).
by RyPac13 on Nov 12, 2009 4:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I know that people are just speculating with this Rose for CP3 trade
But is Derrick going to be worst than CP3 at the age of 25? I know that we can’t see the future, but comparing their numbers in their rookies years, I don’t see a lot of difference (but I’m not a expert, if someone could check it out and confirm it or not I would appreciate). I think Rose can also develop a 3 point shot and learn to go to the line. I think we just need to wait a little bit longer. We are building a good team, we have assets that we can use to make the team even better and we can get a top 5 player in the summer to pair with Rose, Deng and Noah. So, I don’t get it why people would like to see the trade for CP3 if he was available now. Just wait and pray we get Wade/Bosh/Amare
Jannero Pargo = Larry Hughes 2.0
by bull83 on Nov 12, 2009 4:55 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I checked the stats and they are close
Rose had more points total,CP3 had more assists and steals.But Paul shoots more FWs than Rose that year about 3 more than Rose.But you are right they are very close in their rookie years.And Rose isnt even 25 yet.Rose will get better.if we trade Rose and Noah or Deng or both (cause im sure the hornets want one of both of those guys) for CP3 the team will be sent back a year again since he will have nobody to play with.The bulls are 1 big man from a contender why screw that up?
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 5:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We still need 3pt shooting badly
Anthony Parker would have been a nice pickup if we didn’t draft at positions we already had options.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 12, 2009 5:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The bulls
Have been a jumpshooting team for years.Its time for a change.You can always find a 3pt shooter.But rarely does anybody have a guy amare and bosh.I want amare more but the suns wont let him go.So i guess that will leave us with bosh.I want the team to attack.No more jumpshooting sick of it no jumpshooting team will ever win a chip.You have to score inside and out.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 6:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Check out the advanced stats on that link you posted and you'll see Paul was far ahead of Rose
Paul had an All Star level PER of 22.1 while Rose was simply above average at 16.0. PER doesn’t tell the whole story because it can’t account for defense. In this case, though, eliminating defensive impact would only help Rose. Rose is an incredible talent and, admittedly, it can be hard being patient while waiting for him to start hitting his potential. At the same time, the likelihood of him reaching Paul’s historic level of performance are incredibly slim.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 12, 2009 11:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
is it too early to ask if any1 would want byron scott to take over the bulls?
an di dont know if any1 else suggested this, i just logged on and wrote this, since i hear so many ppl bashing VDN
Eat. Sleep. Pray. Watch chicago play.
P.S.
You've obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a shit about what you think.
by chi_till_eye_die on Nov 12, 2009 5:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah i want byron scott
he would be perfect.I like VDN but sometimes he doesn’t seem to know what hes doing.
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 5:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
its the dude second year as HC....
im not defending him, cuz he has done some things that boggle my mind, but i guess he should be given a chance to see if he learns anything and improves his coaching. I would like to see it though, cuz byron knows how to develop young talent, look what he has done for david west and cp3
Eat. Sleep. Pray. Watch chicago play.
P.S.
You've obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a shit about what you think.
by chi_till_eye_die on Nov 12, 2009 5:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep thats true
It is only his 2nd year
by T.Moore on Nov 12, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Have the Bulls sucked for so long
that we’ve come to accept incompetence?
They’re the Chicago Fuckin Bulls. VDN should never have been hired in the first place. And once hired, he should have been replaced soon after it became obvious that he’s way out of his depth.
Let him learn the ropes on some other team. If he develops into an elite coach, we can hire him then.
by drew gooden's facial growth on Nov 12, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If he develops into an elite coach
Why would he leave where he had success? if that happens.Hes ok for now.
by T.Moore on Nov 13, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Amare would be beast for us
I would love to have him come to chicago
Eat. Sleep. Pray. Watch chicago play.
P.S.
You've obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a shit about what you think.
by chi_till_eye_die on Nov 12, 2009 5:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
GarPaxdorf:"This team needs GRIT...not a lousy expensive all-star."
by KentuckyBullsFan on Nov 12, 2009 6:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think New Orleans would trade Chris Paul only if their ownership thought a reasonable
buyout of their building lease was possible so they could move the team to another city.
Chris Paul is pretty much the ONLY reason that NBA basketball exists in New Orleans right now.
But Chris Paul is clearly unhappy and wants to leave.
So much for the “house lease that Paul built created.”
by KentuckyBullsFan on Nov 12, 2009 6:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If it involved getting Chris Paul, I think everyone on this roster is expendable EXCEPT Noah
Deng+Rose for Paul+cap filler sounds about right for what New Orleans would want for a disgruntled all-star.
Paul is a freaking MVP-caliber player in his PRIME….this isn’t like an aging Kobe Bryant.
by KentuckyBullsFan on Nov 12, 2009 6:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
all this getting paul talk
seriously needs to stop, isnt gonna happen, wont happen…so can you all please go back to talking about getting bosh or some shit…..FORGET ABOUT CP3
Eat. Sleep. Pray. Watch chicago play.
P.S.
You've obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a shit about what you think.
by chi_till_eye_die on Nov 12, 2009 7:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Chicago Sports going down the drain one game at a time.
by SoulEater7 on Nov 13, 2009 12:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
If the Bulls have to get somebody I like Amar'e
I know he’s had some injuries but the guy is tough, he can score, rebound, and he tries to play defense. Chris Bosh is just like Shaq said, “The Rupaul” of big men". He’s soft, he has a nice shooting touch, but he can be pus
by Mr Rhythm on Nov 13, 2009 7:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
umm
amare isnt a good rebounder at all, in fact he isnt good at anything that involves bodying guys up…post up…NOPE, Rebound….n….ope, Manning up on Defense….N….ada!… the only time amare gets physical is when he is dunking on guys…which ill admit he does quite a bit in flashy ways…amare is basically a solution to scoring, lots and lots of scoring…hes kinda like the ben gordon of power forwards…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 13, 2009 11:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's why we have to keep Noah
Noah will make Bosh and Amare look like first ballot hall of famers today. Those two are now stuck in score to win systems so they’re going to get bounced in the playoffs when eventually fail to stop their opponents.
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 13, 2009 11:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't Bosh
Average a Double-double?
by T.Moore on Nov 13, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure
but what’s the relevancy of that question?
12/31: Fire Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 13, 2009 4:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well we have Noah
To take care of that
by T.Moore on Nov 13, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no no
im not against getting amare…noah makes us extremely flexible, we really just need a guy who can score at a superstar level….Mr. Rythm mentioned how amare was a good rebounder, and was describing amare to be an okay defender…..neither which is true. The case of amare vs bosh isnt as clear cut as some people imagine, amare isnt heads and shoulders above bosh in anyway. Amare can score better, ill give him that, but bosh is the better defender and rebounder, bosh also possess real leadership qualities, he doesnt mind being a leader or the focal point of an organization whereas amare has publically spoken about how he isnt a captain and its not his place to lead a team. Neither are true post players, but bosh isnt more because of how skinny and relatively weak he is.
Take the toronto game for example, bosh was trying to post up noah because last year and the year before that, he was able to, noah was always weaker than bosh and had less stamina. However, noahs beastiness this year prevented bosh from succeeding. Amare and bosh are both inclined to shoot jumpers, but amare often does try to avoid bodying anyone up, maybe its a psch effect from the injuries hes had, but he is content on getting around guys or shooting over them, as opposed to banging in the post…that said, amare is really good at doing all of this, which is the big reason he is such a good scorer, and although he tries to avoid physical situations, if he finds himself in one, he doesnt shy away, he goes in strong and scores…but he does try to avoid those situations.
Bosh posts up alot more, but he is a face up finesse post scorer. He takes low post position because he cant bang anyone in, he has good footwork, so he can spin his way around guys, and has good lower body strength so he can get up and dunk the ball when close to the rim. bosh as a jump shooter is also better than amare id say, his range extends up to the 3pt line, his face up game is very similar to kg in terms of range and efficiency. On the defensive end bosh is sound however he tends to take plays off sometimes, especially on the defensive boards, but on the offensive boards he is pretty active. Amare isnt a good rebounder despite his size and athleticism, and aside from the helpside blocks that he occasionally gets, his defensive ability is non existant.
Both are good players, all-stars for sures, and because of how young they are, they can definetly become better and be true superstars and i would be happy with either one of them….that said…wade IS a true superstar, and can single handidly lead a horrible team to victory, put him on the bulls (we have a greater need for a sg right now, then a post presence) and the future is really really bright…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 13, 2009 12:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If we get anyone of those 3 we are set
But I doubt Wade is leaving now.even the owner think Wade wont leave.Amare wont leave.so its up to bosh.All those guys would be perfect for the team hes atheletic fast and good at offensive rebounding.And is a threat outside.Anyone of those guys would fit though
by T.Moore on Nov 13, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Then again
Mj is really the only one without a ligit scoring big man and thats because hes the GOAT.So yeah I think that Wade would stay in Miami even if he is a hometown guy.Would be Awesome to have Wade and Rose play together.Hometown lead team wins title.
by T.Moore on Nov 13, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
amare is a captain this year
amare’s team hasn’t been outrebounded (+2.1 reb differential, last night’s debacle included).
amare’s team is 8-2. both losses were on the second night of back-to-backs. both were against last june’s two nba finalists.
the name of the team is The DIAMONDBACKS
by marionette on Nov 13, 2009 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hmmm
the captain quote: http://valleyofthesuns.com/2009/02/07/suns-amare-bracing-for-deal/
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/stoudam01.html
from here you can look at his rebound numbers, never has he surpassed 10 for a career, which is not good for an athletic 6’10 star.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/90237-toss-up-amare-stoudemire-or-dwight-howard
a scouting report by a fan of the suns and amare, and even he lists amares weaknesses as defense and rebounding, his highest rebouning totals came when the dantoni system was in full effect, and the majority of his rebounds were DEFENSIVE, with that offensive system that strives to keep the ball in enemy territory and put up shots very quickly…you would think he would have more offensive rebounds….
Amares team hasnt been out rebounded, but that might have to do with the other players more than amare, in the last 3 games the highest ammount of rebounds he has had is 6, two times, one of the 3 games he had 5….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 13, 2009 10:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He averages
About 8-9 rebounds A game.Thats not bad.Put that with Noah and Gibson who both seems to be nice at rebounding.And his great offensive play He will fit our team.But i rather Have Bosh He is averaging a Double-double this year.Amare is better inside.But Bosh can be just as good inside.We dont need a superstar to be a contender.Just 5 good players to do their job.Im not saying dont bring wade THATS CRAZY TALK!I would love Wade but if it doesn’t happen like im beginning to think now.We need to use either Bosh cause im sure hes gone unless they go the the eastern finals (that wont happen) Or Amare (who might stay or go)depending on how they do.
One question.Besides those 3 who else are available?Other than lebron (he doesn’t want to come here)Cause he wants nothing to do with MJs legacy (also i cant stand him but thats another story).But yeah who else is available?
by T.Moore on Nov 14, 2009 1:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
8-9 rebounds a game for a 6-10 pf? thats very underwhelming
although i admit its not bad…i did say this above but ill say it again, im not against amare at all, and yea the things he isnt good at, Noah is pretty much excelling at, so he wouldnt be bad at all….well the possible free agents are this….
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=FreeAgents-09-10
I wouldnt mind bosh or amare, but i think ive joined the ranks in saying that the bulls dont need a big man, at least not specifically from free agency. Lebron or wade would pretty much be my number 1 and 2 (in that order)..
I also am not a fan of lebron, but its not big news that he is gonna be the number one player in the league for the next decade, does that mean he wins champions every year that decade…no…but i think he will be up there with prime-shaq as the most dominant force in the nba….and whether you like the guy or not…if it means celebrations at grant park….i say we get him…
Wade might be the number two guy the bulls should go after, but id say he is my number 1 guy (i hopped on the bandwagon many were on) and he is a far more likable guy than lebron…
After that Bosh or Amare would be on the bill cuz they are the best available big men, Id go bosh and then amare, mainly cuz bosh adds more than just scoring (amare is so much better than bosh at scoring) to the team, and he is a guy who can lead and set up guys. I also think bosh might make luol expendable to an extent to nab maybe another need…but thats a bridge we can cross when we get there..
After that the talent takes a drop..Joe johnson is the best consolation prize i can think of, and should be able to be had. I see him as a fusion of hinrich and salmons. In other words, if you get joe johnson you can make both those players expendable (one of them will have already been expended) or maybe go for Dirk nowitski, who was an mvp. Dirk can go inside or outside (but prefers outside) is known to be ‘soft’ but is a huge mismatch for everyone. Hes intresting but i question his fit on this team…
If for some reason the bulls cant get any of those 6 players, i think someone should get fired..gm wise…or maybe a new owner….cuz its pretty much a huge and hopefully final fail for someone whos running this ship. Not just a coach. However i would say the next best thing would be to go after two really good veterans, one sg and one pf (to fill the spots salmons and tyrus leave) Something like Boozer and hamilton or Ray Allen and Pryz, Tmac
Yao ming would be awesome if he was going to be healthy…but i dont think he fits and i dont think he will have a good healthy year again…
But aside from the big 6, for the bulls at least, everything else is a huge gamble or worse. Other teams that are already good might be able to use many of the other players as a final piece or a great complimentary piece, but the bulls need a superstar to play alongside of rose, and with everything thats happened anything short of a superstar (or two CURRENT allstars at needed positions) is a failure…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, majoyenrac, Bullshooter and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light!
by piccolomair on Nov 14, 2009 1:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would go for Bosh rather than Amare myself.Thanks for the info as well
I like T-mac but he is too injury prone cant do it.I doubt it but Getting Rudy Gay could help,If we dont get J-Johnson or wade,Could try micheal redd.But hes injury prone as well.Boozer is good as well but his D is not that good and hes slow so he wont be a good fit.Like brand for the 6ers,If all else fails why not go after david lee hes for me the VERY LAST option he averages 17 points and 9-10 rebounds pretty good IMO if the Bulls management go brain dead and not pick up any of the big named guys.D-lee could be an ok fit.
by T.Moore on Nov 14, 2009 8:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would the Bulls want Michael Redd,
when they dumped basically the same player in Ben Gordon?
"Then you need a center so if the ball gets stuck between the rim and backboard he can reach up and knock it loose instead of having to spend 15 minutes trying to hit it with a broom stick." – Sam Smith
by Granny Waiters on Nov 14, 2009 8:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I heard
That Chris Paul was upset about Scott’s firing.And they should have asked Him and west.That was just on ESPN
by T.Moore on Nov 13, 2009 11:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
what if there was a way to get Paul without giving up Rose
I know theres no way but do you think a Paul-Rose backcourt would be better or worse than a Rose-Wade backcourt (a very possible chance).
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Nov 13, 2009 5:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No idea why that comment was replied to t moores
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Nov 13, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way at all
They would want a guy to replace him.It wouldn’t make sense not to want him.
by T.Moore on Nov 13, 2009 9:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
West agreed with it
Paul was the one who is upset.
To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.
by Ben R on Nov 13, 2009 5:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The biggest development to watch?
Whether Paul becomes Garnett in his twilight years in Minny. Too much of the good soldier to publicly demand a trade and take a hit to his reputation, but definitely not giving 110% every play down the floor. Shinn is too cheap to ever bring in all the pieces Paul needs for a championship, and although the mismanagement hasn’t been at the level of the McHale soap opera in Minny yet (although the parallelism between Wittman getting fired and Glen Taylor forcing McHale to take over the garbage heap he brought together and Scott getting fired only for Bower to coach the mess he made is pretty striking), it’s getting awfully close. They’re stuck with a ton of bad contracts for bad players, still need to cut salary, and have practically no cap space in the near-foreseeable future. Paul alone makes them too good to fall into the West’s gutter alongside Sacramento, Memphis, Minny, and Golden State, but at this point, trying to get Derrick Favors looks like the only viable long-term plan they could feasibly execute.
To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.
by Ben R on Nov 13, 2009 5:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Im sorry to burst some of you guy's bubbles, but
block buster trades like the ones being mentioned above rarely happen in the NBA, not to mention with a team led by J.P.
Green and Gold / Black and White
by OznCoop on Nov 13, 2009 6:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs














