Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Coyotes Ink Aucoin to One Year Deal


spread the word

Reaction to Comrade Gordon

All things considered, it's probably just yet another negotiating ploy by Gordon to get the Bulls to do something. Something besides Paxson throwing his hands up in the air and saying (figuratively of course...from what I've seen they're saying nothing) "what can I do? it's the tax!". Mike McGraw couldn't get a confirmation, and according to Henry Abbott's peeps the report is false.

Kelly Dwyer showed his confusion (through confusing prose) over both Gordon's value and this stalemate with the Bulls. Unlike some, he understands that Gordon's definitely valuable, his faults are overplayed, he's consistently played the good soldier while "being taken in and out of the starting lineup for arbitrary reasons by coaches who were grasping and struggling with superstition" (love that line, KD), and that the Bulls will be abhorrent on offense without him.

But that the Bulls shouldn't budge.

Even if it means Gordon going to Russia?

He could take that Russian offer, watch as the Bulls trade away Andres Nocioni or dump Kirk Hinrich after Hinrich spends one more year as Chicago's point guard with a teenaged Derrick Rose on the sidelines, and come back to a Bulls team willing to come just as close to the luxury tax as they were this summer (that is to say, just under it) while paying Gordon what he thinks he deserves. Would Chicago fans put up with that? The smart ones would. The pull-up-your-bootstraps ones? Yeah, they wouldn't go for it.

I feel offended that Kelly would group me in the loathed meatball population, because I absolutely wouldn't go for this. (and benching Derrick Rose -who will be 20 by opening night, by the way- for a season? gross)

The NBullsA blog also thinks this isn't a bad idea, but notes the obvious: "Only one problem.  No way in hell Ben would come back to the Bulls after they let/forced him to go play in Europe."

That's certainly my biggest problem with it, and why, perhaps what could be presented as a logical case, letting Gordon go to Europe is even worse than him taking the Qualifying Offer. After participaing in whatever back-slapping the team could give themselves for not giving in to Ben's demands, they'd become a joke of a franchise, and on their way to a crummy season.

The QO would certainly also be a bad option. But at least there's a chance he'd have a great year and re-sign. The chemistry problems? Gordon's certainly proven he won't rock the boat even when seeing a diminished role. But why even assume a diminished role? The guard 'glut' only exists in names. Larry Hughes doesn't deserve a minute of playing time. Thabo's development time is not high priority given his chances of actually developing. Hinrich has Derrick Rose's job, and between him and Nocioni there should be moves made to clear the long-term salary off the books regardless.

The Qualifying Offer is still a bad, bad result to these negotiations, but out of resignation I'm starting to talk myself into it. No player has had a good year (or even  re-signed) after taking the QO. But none of those players were as good as Gordon, or on a team that needed him as much.

Overall, the fact that it's at this point, and the last two Bulls observers I quoted above agree, just plain sucks.

But while I do wish Gordon would lessen his demands, I'm starting to empathize with his tactics: thrashing to get any attention while wondering why the Bulls aren't doing anything. I've said in the past that any type of money-saving and/or roster consolidating deal would likely do wonders. Others agree. Send Hughes away for corpses with contracts. Pay a team to take Cedric Simmons off the books. Make the necessary Nocioni deal now. Free up some cash, free up some playing time.

Anything could work for this organization except letting Gordon go overseas, and then telling us fans (even the dopey ones) that they sure would've have liked some notification...a chance to match the offer...if only they had the time.

0 recs | Comment 49 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'm having horrible visions of Larry Hughes launching jumper after jumper next season

If that’s the alternative, maybe it’s worth it to overpay Gordon.

by Big D on Sep 3, 2008 11:45 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We'll play Thabo.

30 minutes a game.
Hughes can play the role of Ben Wallace [with back injuries]. Maybe Rose can step on his toes and dislocate them a couple times.

by Prevenge on Sep 4, 2008 4:51 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wishful thinking

Players making as much as Hughes is making don’t sit on the bench in the NBA, whether they deserve to play or not. Hughes will get at least 25 minutes a game next year, I guarantee it (especially if Gordon is gone).

by Big D on Sep 4, 2008 5:19 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

why do you think they are keeping kirk

All kirk needs to do is run one scrimmage against larry hughes, thats it just one scrimmage guarding larry hughes…and then…whamo!!!….no one discretely discconnects body parts quite like the great white ninja kirk hinrich. Why do you think he is always slumping, those wrists of his are so strong, so heavy, that they are constantly pulling his arms down.
Thats why reinsdorf likes him so much

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....

by piccolomair on Sep 4, 2008 10:14 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Did you see my

post in the J. R. Smith post below about Kirk’s workouts at the Berto this summer?

by sue369 on Sep 4, 2008 12:30 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think Larry Hughes needs Kirk's help

to become injury-prone. He’s good enough at it himself.

by Prevenge on Sep 7, 2008 10:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hope Isiah gets hired by another team

No one else is going to give up an expiring contract to get Larry Hughes.

by Big D on Sep 4, 2008 5:53 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not that many guys around with an expiring contract big enough, let alone big men

No team will take Larry Hughes alone. Off the top of my head, Larry Hughes and Kirk Hinrich for Allen Iverson might be remotely interesting for the other team, since Denver won’t go anywhere with their current lineup and needs to start repositioning for the future. Chicago instantly saves about $2 million to put on top of the offer for Gordon, and gets an expiring deal for a SG/PG. I doubt AI would be very happy though, and the Bulls would need an additional PG since he can’t start and back up Rose all the time.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 4, 2008 6:24 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It must suck for Jerry and Pax...

.. to finally be in a position where they are, in the words the Bulls have often used, are being held accountable for their mistakes.

I’m guessing the irony is lost on them, however.

by Sports2 on Sep 4, 2008 8:44 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But why even assume a diminished role? The guard ‘glut’ only exists in names. Larry Hughes doesn’t deserve a minute of playing time. Thabo’s development time is not high priority given his chances of actually developing

A lottery pick who showed he could play when actually given minutes last season is not a high priority? What do you mean given his chances of actually developing? What more evidence of development do you need to see…he averaged nearly 12 pts and 6 rebs when starting…he scored 20 points in 22 minutes against Philly last season…Thabo, at 6’7", provides the Bulls with their only positive size mismatch at a position…What more does a guy have to do to justify development? Jump high?

by Dionysus2.0 on Sep 4, 2008 8:55 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Play better!

Thabo’s always looked more like a 3 to me. He’s pretty much identical in game and size to a guy like Iggy or Josh Howard, except, ya know, he’s not that good. But those guys are 3s who can play the 2. Thabo is more a 3 that can play the 2.

12 and 6 when starting is… so what? I was under the impression starting was irrelevant up until the time it came to pay Gordon. What about minutes?

This guy started 81 games for the Bulls once, and his numbers look very similar to Thabo’s last year.

by Sports2 on Sep 4, 2008 9:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh, for Pete's sake

There’s a difference between a 30-year-old journeyman-at-best and a 23-year-old who hasn’t had that many minutes.

2 points of order on that apples to oranges comparison:

1: 20 minutes/game vs. 24 minutes/game – (your coach) Pete got “very similar” number with 20% more minutes per game
2: Thabo’s averages include the games under Skiles where he was reduced to a quivering pile of jello. His second half performance was better.

Thabo needed half a season away from Skiles to get back to his performace level at the end of the previous season. It was a lost year development-wise and you need to give him some minutes in a less toxic environment to see if he continues coming around. He could be a good one.

That said, I wouldn’t mind seeing him get a look at the 3, but that’s getting crowded, too. (Espcially if Thomas gets some minutes there.)

by ziffle on Sep 4, 2008 9:46 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A slashing two, what larry hughes refuses to be

That is how i see thabo, i think he can be a scottie without the shot. I think thabo was drafted as sort of a brandon roy esque player, as in a poor mans brandon roy. I dont think thabo can quite be floor general like roy is, but he is still a decent passer. His physique gives him the ability to really attack the rim (speed, strength, hops) and his length and speed make him a great defender at the 2 guard (hes done great defensive jobs on kobe). Thabo i thought would make a nice 3, but i think he would make an even better 2 guard, if he had a chance to attack the basket more. D. Rose should help in that, as can a better post offense (not neccesserily a player, but plays and players that can open up driving lanes). I think thabo can work on his shot over the years and perhaps have a decent one, nothing special, but enough that he can get mroe chances to attack the rim.

Pottential wise i dont think thabo is going to grow alot, i dont think hes gonna be a special star in the league, but i think he can be a real good role player who can keep the bulls team away from jumpshots and defend both the perimeter and the wings real well.

I dont think he should ever start, but i do think he should get something like a consistant 16 minutes a game (or more depending on what the defense requires) I also think he is a better fit with gordon, rose, or hinrich than any of those three would be with each other. He compliments our guards defficiencies really well (gordons lack of size and defense, hinrichs lack of size and driving ability, roses lack of size and for now defense).

That said i would like to see larry hughes player more of the 3, just the position alone should force him to stay away from crazy shots, or at least shoot more in range.

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....

by piccolomair on Sep 4, 2008 10:28 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, I was mostly looking ath the per 36 minute stats

which, except for Thabo’s 3-like solid rebounding, are frighteningly similar. I actually went into that analysis thinking Thabo would blow away Pete in most every category and I was being stupid to do it.

Then, looking at the advanced stats and Per36 minutes stats, I got kind of disappointed.

Now did Thabo do better the second half of the year? Sure did, but it’s not dramatically different. He shot a fair amount better, but things didn’t change a whole lot aside from that.

I like Thabo, and I’m perfectly happy to have him on the team. The issue isn’t whether he’s awful forever, the issue is what is this guy like after two years in the league, and what would it mean for us if he starts. And the numbers say it’d be more or less like starting Pete Myers. He’ll become better than that, but I don’t want to commit 30 minutes plus so he can develop into a slightly better journeyman. he can do that on his own.

I’d rather have Gordon, or truth be told, Hinrich or probably even Hughes if I actually want to win a particular game.

by Sports2 on Sep 4, 2008 12:46 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Remember the importance of D & toughness!

These are the less-talked about reasons why those great Bulls teams were able to hang six banners. When shots weren’t falling, the D & toughness were still present.

Say what you want about Thabo’s still developing offensive game, which I don’t think is as bad as some are making it seem, the guy plays great defense & has an under-rated toughness about him. How else does a rookie come in & D up Kobe?

If Noce & Hinrich go, maybe not this season but soon, we’re gonna need someone to make up for all of the pesky toughness those guys have brought to the team during our recent success. If TT develops into the shot blocking dominator we know he can be & Noah continues to develop, it will be the Bulls’ defense that leads us to playing in late June.

Give Thabo the tick & he will show he can help us win for many years to come.

by JGoldbe23 on Sep 4, 2008 12:50 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Plus

I think he could spell Rose quite adequately at PG

by hlac on Sep 4, 2008 12:54 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i'd love to see

an improvement in thabo’s handle before giving him substantial minutes at the 1.

even though there’s not much data for him playing the point, this shows his production by position (and the fact that there’s data for him at the 4 is just scary). i’d like to see him get his TOs down. though if he could keep his opponent to a 6.9 PER while on the floor i’ll take it. :)

by Jaina on Sep 4, 2008 1:05 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If Gordon is still not signed anywhere by the start of training camp I assume he

will not be allowed into camp which is only 4 weeks away. He should make a decision in 4 weeks.

by chgobr on Sep 4, 2008 11:53 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

uh, I'd guess that assumption is correct.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Sep 4, 2008 12:09 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This may be a dumb question

but… why were the nugs able to part ways w/ camby for only a 2nd round pick? i thought in order to make a trade in the NBA you had to essentially match salaries, or come really close. so why were the nugs able to pull this off? can the bulls try the same move with noc or hughes?
and, if the only reason the bulls arent offering BG more money is simply because they don’t want to go into the “dreaded” luxury tax, well, that’s lame.

I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE

by CONOR6 on Sep 4, 2008 12:50 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you can only do that

if one team has the salary to absorb the other one without going over the cap. since the clips had plenty of cap room to take camby’s salary, they didn’t have to give much back in return.

bulls can’t do that unless it’s with someone with cap space.

by Jaina on Sep 4, 2008 12:53 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thanks

I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE

by CONOR6 on Sep 4, 2008 1:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

All you say is nice

but Gordon isn’t worth more than what the bulls are offering. The most I would pay Gordon is 6 year 62 million. That is only a half-million a year more than what they are willing to pay now. If Gordon wants 12 million a year, he isn’t going to get it from the Bulls. Why should the Bulls spend $70 million on a guy who might not be able to play the 2 with Rose?

Gordon doesn’t want to play in Russia. And if he does so, he will be hurting himself as much as he would be hurting the Bulls. What was the last Euro league player to come to the NBA and get a $60 million contract? Its not going to happen. And if he takes the Russian offer and spurns the Bulls GMs around the NBA are just going to label him greedy and dumb. He is not signing in Russia, playing for 2 years and coming back to the NBA and getting a $10 million a year contract. I don’t know who is new agents are, but hopefully someone in his family needs to talk him off the ledge. He is going to hurt his career more than he hurts the Bulls.

by DangerMouse on Sep 4, 2008 1:15 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Question

Well, according to you, Gordon is worth more than what the Bulls are offering, since you say you’re willing to pay him more than what they’ve reportedly offered him.

So why on earth does Gordon need to be “talked down”? If even you, who’s in the midst of criticizing him, would offer more than what he’d get if he suddenly just gave up and took the Bulls’ current offer, it sounds like pretty clear evidence that he needs to continue to not sign.

by Sports2 on Sep 4, 2008 1:34 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

well i don't really think he's worth more than the offer

but i’d concede that 6/62 contract (and maybe a little more) if it would help him agree to the contract (and be happy with it). there’s a slight difference, what i think he’s worth and what i’d be willing to pay, because sometimes a little overpayment is needed as long as it’s not crippling.

i’m not sure if this is the sentiment dangermouse is expressing also, it sounds like it is.

by Jaina on Sep 4, 2008 1:47 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No, I said I would pay Gordon 62 million

I didn’t say he was worth that. If upping the offer by $3 mil appeased him enough to get into camp, than I would be all for it. But by all accounts he is asking for somewhere near $12 million a year. That the ledge he needs to be talked down from. All this posturing about the QO and going to Russia are ridiculous, because those options hurt Gordon more in the long run than simply accepting the current Bulls offer. And the reason the Bulls haven’t stepped up to the plate is because they aren’t sure how he fits. He is in a tough situation. Sometimes you swallow your pride and accept the measly $59 million on the table.

From a business standpoint, I think Gordon should take the Bulls offer. It doesn’t appear that there is a better offer out there. Something tells me that from a pure quality of life standpoint, Gordon is going to enjoy Chicago a bit more than Moscow.

By continuing not to sign what does he accomplish? The Bulls by all accounts aren’t moving the offer. So what “clear evidence” do you see that he should continue to hold out? Who, other than people on message boards, are offering Gordon more money to play basketball?

by DangerMouse on Sep 4, 2008 2:03 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What you would pay = what he is worth

I don’t think there’s any way around that. It might be a grudging admission of what he’s worth, but if he’s not really worth it, you simply don’t pay it. I mean otherwise, right, you’d be hurting yourself by giving up more than you’re getting back.

I also don’t see how Gordon’s posturing hurts him in the long run. How?

If Ben wants, he seems to be able to wait another month, make everyone sweat, then sign the $59M deal if that’s the best he can do. Nobody’s going to give a shit in 6 years when it’s time to negotiate his next deal. And if it gets him a few more million, then it was clearly worthwhile.

Sure, it seems the Bulls aren’t offering more now, but if he could grudgingly pull a few more million out of you, maybe he could pull a few more million out of them. And if he can’t, no harm done, he signs the $59M.

What sounds bad about quality of life in Moscow? It’s got like 10M people and if he’s pampered from head to toe and spends most of his time playing hoops, I doubt it’s a big deal to him.

by Sports2 on Sep 4, 2008 8:17 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That is assuming the Bulls keep that offer on the table.

Which, after the bad taste that must left in their collective mouths, I doubt they do.

by Dionysus2.0 on Sep 4, 2008 8:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes!

How dare he have the temerity to seek other offers and say he won’t sign the QO, when doing so would create a crummy situation for all involved.

And I can certainly understand why the Bulls, ready to make a commitment to a guy to the tune of $59M dollars, would suddenly flip out and decide he’s not worth having. When there’s really no pressing need to get anything done whatsoever for weeks.

by Sports2 on Sep 4, 2008 11:06 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I didn't say there was no offer...

I just don’t think it will be six years nor $59 million…

by Dionysus2.0 on Sep 5, 2008 7:58 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

STRAP ON YOUR BOOTS GENTLEMEN

it’s time for VEEEEEEEEEEEEEKKKKKKTOOOOORRRRR!!!!!!

by AFireInside661 on Sep 4, 2008 2:21 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Veektor also left the Bulls to go to Russia

I’m not sure what exactly that says about the Bulls organaization. Combined with all the coaches who turned the Bulls down this off-season, probably nothing good.

by Big D on Sep 4, 2008 5:28 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That says that some players would rather play closer to home?????

Your looking to much into this. It’s the business side of the business. Look at Cleveland with Varejo and this year with D. West.

by J Theory on Sep 4, 2008 6:39 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Then he goes to Russia.

Which we know by now he isn’t. But if he did so what. Rather save the money than overpay him.

by J Theory on Sep 5, 2008 8:10 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

but Veektor blows, so why does it matter?

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Sep 5, 2008 12:03 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

After participaing in whatever back-slapping the team could give themselves for not giving in to Ben’s demands, they’d become a joke of a franchise, and on their way to a crummy season


I disagree with that assessment. Losing Gordon, while it shouldn’t be construed as apositive development, will not relegate the Bulls to rebuilding status nor condemn them to a poor season. Even if we lose Gordon, we’ll have rid ourselves of Skile and Wallace while adding a healthy Deng and thje number one overall draft pick.

This lineup is not laughable, by any stretch of the imagination:

Rose
Hinrich
Deng
Thomas
Noah

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Sep 4, 2008 2:52 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sorry for the wayward block quote.

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Sep 4, 2008 2:53 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

it's the worst offense in the league

and I don’t mean laughable in terms of the relative product….though they’d have no shot at the playoffs and could give themselves a ‘rebuilding’ tag (yay?). It’s laughable to spend a #3 overall pick on a guy you let go for nothing when it’s time to pay him. A complete failure.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Sep 4, 2008 2:56 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I honestly think that they could make the playoffs as the seventh or eighth

seed without Gordon. I have great faith that Rose (and Del Negro, to a lessser extent) is going to have a significant impact on the efficiency and character of the Bulls’ offense. Then again, perhaps I am naive or fanatically optimistic.

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Sep 4, 2008 3:11 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would be shocked if Gordon doesn't sign the $59 mil Bulls offer.

I want Gordon but I do not want to pay him more than close to the $59 mil. I think we do lose something if Gordon does a dumb move like sign with Moscow, but in the long run SG is the easiest position to fill. Without Gordon we still have a decent team with a possible future superstar in Rose.

by chgobr on Sep 4, 2008 3:17 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would be equally shocked if he does sign it.

After all of this talk and whispers we have heard about him wanting to be the highest paid player on the team. Its clear that he values himself more than this…and if he truly believes that he is worth it, he will want the opportunity to earn that contract in true open market. Unfortunately, that could mean the QO is in his near future, though with that comes tremendous risk…

by Dionysus2.0 on Sep 4, 2008 4:32 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I suppose

he could want to be the highest played on a team like the Bulls but would take less to play elsewhere. You have to wonder why a guy would want to play for the Bulls after all the trouble the last few years — especially if you know you would be a sixth man behind lesser players (by some estimations). The money might make it worthwhile for Gordon, but if the money isn’t there then there are not a lot of perks be stuck as a sixth man behind Hinrich and possibly Hughes and a stacked back court. Being a sixth man in a team of stars isn’t bad. Being a sixth man on the Bulls… with negotiations going as they have could it be possible Gordon is simply done playing for the Bulls? He could be a starter on another team like the Heat for example. He won’t be getting top dollar there, but at least he’d likely start. He might see his future somewhere else, even if it isn’t for the max money.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Sep 4, 2008 6:20 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There are 59 million reasons that trump BG being a starter on another team.

These guys care only about the $. Once they get the highest amount then they say how much they want to be with the team paying them and what a great situation it is to play for the city. Oh then there is the line about winning a championship. First is the money. So far with about 4 weeks to go before training camp the Bulls are showing him the money. If this doesn’t change Ben will love the Bulls, won’t mind being the 6th man and yes, BG will want to win a Championship for Chicago.

by chgobr on Sep 4, 2008 6:49 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Generally you make more money as a starter

If you don’t think the Bulls aren’t using that against him in contract negotiations, you’re crazy. Besides, once players sign contracts, they immediately start looking ahead to their next contract. If he gets typecast as a sixth man in Chicago the next few years, he can forget about ever getting the huge contract he obviously wants.

by Big D on Sep 4, 2008 8:18 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2f597263b71b32c9d2a85c1427a038ce_bigger_small
Thank You Ben Gordon
Jayhawk_small
A Brief History of Ben Gordon: the Quotes Version
Horace_20grant_small
To the Bulls' Front Office
Rose2_small
Optimistic view of BG leaving (I Hope)
Derrick_rose_1__small
An F.U. to the owner

Recent FanPosts

Aaron_scantlen-small-square_small
Trade idea: Kirk for Rudy
Small
Iverson to the Bulls in Gordon S/T?!?!
Small
Hinrich Vs. Gordon
-1_small
Could this be Dumar's post-signing-Gordon plan?
Small
Pistons vs. Bulls
Small
Looking back at the 26th pick now...
Small
Back Up Plan...

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports