Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Ben Gordon: I've Played My Last Game as a Bull

[From the FanShots. Just more posturing: this time saying there are teams willing to do a sign/trade (that's news) and that there's no way he's taking the qualifying offer. Which doesn't really make sense to say, in my opinion. -ed.]

Hmm.... So is that a yes to Mike James and Rasual Butler?

Link 10 months ago Paul_tiny atthehive Comment 140 comments 7 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This report was one ESPN.com's front page....

doesn’t look good.

His message seems the same as before….but this report is getting a lot more attention.

And he is not going to sign the QO, according to this report.

by swede2287 on Aug 15, 2008 10:03 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't blame him

because the QO is close to suicide but it’s time to move on.

by messwiththebull on Aug 15, 2008 11:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You can stick Rasual Butler where the sun don’t shine.

I wouldn’t be totally shocked if something got done with the Hornets though, given that there was some mutual interest last year.

As a Bulls fan, I don’t want to trade him. If he does go, I’m hoping for Julian Wright back, and perhaps getting you guys to take Nocioni as well (for a shorter contract).

by Sports2 on Aug 15, 2008 10:16 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here's what I thought up before with the Hornets
Gordon ($8.M BYC) and Nocioni ($8M) for

Mike James $6M
Julian Wright $1.56M
Rasul Butler $3.63M
Melvin Ely $1.07M

will, I think, work according to the trade rules.

What does this trade do for us?
Julian Wright is, I guess, a nice prospect and gives us another player still on his rookie contract in 2010.
We get out from under Noc’s contract.
James is instant offense… a poor man’s Gordon.

Shit, I can’t even convince myself this is a good idea.

My first through ninth preferences are to keep Gordon. My tenth preference is something like this.

by Sports2 on Aug 15, 2008 10:22 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah

I think there’s now way Hornets’ FO gives up Wright for Gordon in any sort of deal. Even if it involved dumping James/Butler contracts. Gordon would like real nice as the 6th man, but Pargo going to Europe opens up a whole new can of worms for New Orleans (though I personally love it).

What’s your first preference on potential Gordon trades by the way?

by atthehive on Aug 15, 2008 10:56 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, you convinced me that it's a good idea

Butler/Thabo platoon is serviceable at the 2. Mike James I could do without, but he did score 20ppg in ‘06, and he’d make Kirk expendable, which is nice. I’ve always liked Ely, he’s a hometown guy who seems like a faster, skinnier clone of Aaron Gray, complete with some post moves. And Julian Wright could be better than Gordon in a year or two… I think he’s fantastic.

And in response to atthehive, I think the Hornets pull the trigger on this deal. They just signed Posey, so they don’t need Wright. Besides, with Nocioni’s 3 point stroke and ability to play the 4, he might be a better option for the Hornets than Wright anyway – their backup PF is Ryan Bowen at the moment. Gordon is obviously a huge upgrade offensively over Mo Peterson, and they’ll need to upgrade more than with just Posey if they want to leapfrog the Spurs and Lakers next year.

by YaoPau on Aug 16, 2008 12:28 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree Noc and Gordon would be good for them

I’m much less certain that Wright does anything for us. Butler and Ely shouldn’t play anything but spot minutes. I thought Butler was much more of a 3 than a 2. James doesn’t do anything for me.

So that leaves us with Wright. A guy who did nothing to distinguish himself as a rookie and plays the same position as the guy we just signed to a $70M contract.

Getting rid of Noc’s contract is the only clearcut good thing, and even that’s mitigated by the fact that, without Gordon, it’s not even strictly going to be necessary to move Noc to get under the cap in 2010.

I mean, if the alternative is Ben leaving for nothing, then I suppose I take that. But jeez, I’d put us at pretty well under 30 wins next year.

by Sports2 on Aug 16, 2008 12:46 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Did you watch the playoffs?

Julian Wright would be an excellent backup SF to pair minutes with Derrick Rose.

I didn’t like Wright last year in the draft because I didn’t think he could shoot or pass. Fortunately he did both of those things late in the season and in the playoffs.

I don’t think he has long term prospects to shoot the 3pt shot very well though. That will be a problem trying to play SF.

by NBA Observer on Aug 16, 2008 10:19 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Shooting has never been his strength

But he’s a great passer and a hard worker/good teammate guy. I’d love to have Julian. (I’m sure that surprises no one. Rock chalk, Jayhawk!)

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Aug 16, 2008 10:50 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

After this deal

the Hornets SF rotation looks like this.

Peja/Posey/Nocioni

There would be a lot of money tied to that one position and all three players have at least 4 years remaining.

We might have to deal Gooden and keep Noc(god this would suck) to get a deal done with New Orleans just to make up for the mistakes the club has made with Gordon.

by NBA Observer on Aug 16, 2008 9:03 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Say what you want about Gordon...

But this is not good news with our scoring problems. He still is/was the best scorer on this team. Ugh…

"Sharapova's Thigh": Sports, Entertainment, Booze, The Ladies... And Their Thighs.
http://sharapovasthigh.blogspot.com

by CubsClapp on Aug 15, 2008 10:19 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is simply a strong play for leverage

This is the only leverage that BG has, and he’s smartly playing it. I wouldn’t read too much into it…we’ve seen this mating dance before. Let’s not fall for the okey-doke now….

Parental Advisory - Explicit Content

by Jivas on Aug 15, 2008 10:23 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And if he gets re-signed

He’ll say he wanted to play here all along and loves the fans of Chicago. Meh.

"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"

by Ozzie Montana on Aug 15, 2008 10:36 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

As far as a sign-and-trade partner...

how about the Knicks? He seems like a D’Antoni-type guy. The Knicks may even find taking on Larry Hughes contract acceptable, since his contract expires in 2 yrs. Zach Randolph, anyone?

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Aug 15, 2008 10:37 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why would the Knicks want him?

And they’d have to give up a guard in return, no? They have a few of their own.

by messwiththebull on Aug 15, 2008 11:39 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Which means

if this is to work, has to be at least a 3-way trade

by hlac on Aug 15, 2008 11:41 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ben Gordon is gambling right now...

…that another team will offer him more or he will go to Europe…

And, like gambling, I am willing to bet the Bulls will call his bluff…or at least they should.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 15, 2008 11:37 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Well, if his agent is talking to other teams

Ben probably has a good idea of what they’re offering.

Likewise, there have been several reports that other teams were inquiring about him. So I don’t see that he’s gambling too much.

by Sports2 on Aug 15, 2008 11:40 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right...his agent is talking to other teams...

Like any gambler, to show the other players that he has hand…he can talk all day, it doesn’t mean anyone has a viable offer on the OR could offer the assets that the Bulls would be willing to accept.

I mean, its not like BG has any leverage in this situation…he could threaten to not sign the QO, but the Bulls would still hold his rights and thus the right to agree to any trade offer that would come across the table…if he goes to Europe, the Bulls still hold his rights, and thus the same rights…he is trying to talk his way into something resembling leverage…weak.

by Dionysus2.0 on Aug 15, 2008 11:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

In short...

… you expect the Bulls to bully him into a cheap contract? What do you expect to happen?

by Sports2 on Aug 16, 2008 12:39 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And come on!

CHEAP?

59/6 is over his value to me. He’s as sixth man for guards sake!

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 2:32 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So you expect the Bulls to bully him into an overpriced contract?

Does that make much sense to you when you really stop and think about it? :)

by Sports2 on Aug 16, 2008 6:30 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Interesting mix of words :)

Overprized to me. Underprized to BG. So, yes. Bullied. :)

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 7:33 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why are the Bulls compelled to do anything now? If we don’t get a trade we like, BG can sign the QO or stay home. This is kind of a joke. Gordon has little leverage here, unless Europe is a real option (and I don’t think it is).

That said, WTF are the Bulls doing? How are we better off without Gordon? I understand that the backcourt is crowded, but if we dump BG for trash just to get something, fans need to riot in the streets. Going into the tax zone is not an issue until the end of the season. Yes, Gordon is asking for too much, but paying a little more (which I believe is enough to keep him) will not kill the team. Pax will have some time to unload some payroll to get under the tax threshold.

If I’m wrong and BG will only be satisfied if he is the highest paid player on the team, then I need to re-think my interest in professional sports.

by Stay Chisel on Aug 16, 2008 12:02 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

I have a big problem with

Ben Gordon’s decision to release that statement at the Bowling Bash.

by YaoPau on Aug 16, 2008 12:16 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

heh...

I just spent some time creating a fanpost for this topic and then realize we were all beat to it by a Hornets fan… So since my fanpost will probably soon disappear, I’m going to copy and paste here.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Despite arguing not to resign Ben Gordon to a big money deal with YFBB for most of the last two days, I don’t feel good about the latest news.

Ben is now saying that he is done playing for the Chicago Bulls… that he prefers a sign and trade to a different team, which he considers likely… and that he does consider playing overseas to be a feasible alternative.

He seems quite certain that he won’t play for the qualifying offer.Which would seem to insinuate that he has a sign and trade close to being worked out, since I don’t see him sitting out for a year, and the team overseas that was said to be courting him just spent good money on Jannero Pargo.

Chicago Tribune Article

Espn Article

Daily Herald

I am curious to see what kind of sign & trades Ben, his agent, and or Paxon can work out. But I’m not particularly thrilled about a sign and trade either. As I have said in several posts on this blog, I think Ben is a good player, and a very good fit for our offense. I think he is worth almost every penny of 10mil per year. But I don’t think that the league 39th best scorer is worth the 13 mil a year that he is reportedly asking for. But if we sign and trade him, and another team gives him that insane deal, then we are still taking back that salary, just with other players attached to it. And presumably, players that don’t fit our offense as well.

So here’s hoping it is for expiring deals. Then I’m not thrilled to lose the outside shooting, but I’ll be happy to start gaining some cap flexibility in the next few years.

Also, this probably ensures that Kirk will stay around for the year, which I guess I’m fine with, but I would assume that we would take back a front court player in any sign and trade, so hopefully, that ensures that Nocioni will be sent out for a shorter term deal.

Also (Part Two), Is this a good time for me and Alec to bring up JJ Redick?

by kidronmusic on Aug 16, 2008 4:44 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hopefully the Bulls are smart enough to call his bluff and do nothing.

The likelyhood of another team being willing to pay Gordon 12-13 mil/year is slim to none in my mind.

Too bad for Ben that IT is out of NY… ;)

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 6:03 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

According to the poll

in the Trib’s article more fans than not agree with you.

Good luck Shawn Johnson, Lolo Jones and Doug Schwab. Bring home the gold!!!

by sue369 on Aug 16, 2008 10:47 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, but what choice does he realistically have?

He can go to europe. – We have heard of no one who is interested and surely not for the money he is asking.
He can take the 59/6.
He can hold out and not sign anything – Worked out very well for Anderson Varejao…
Or he can take the QO – which is taking a BIG gamble as he could get injured and either way not be guaranteed a bigger offer as an UFA next year.

He has no leverage to force a SAT from the Bulls. If they just keep a little cool. This is where I’m against ex players as GM’s. They have very little negotiation training. Scouting and such? Sure, they can do that, but GM’ing? Not so much.

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 11:22 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm not a BG

fan so I don’t care what he does one way or the other. I know I’m in the minority in here.

Good luck Shawn Johnson, Lolo Jones and Doug Schwab. Bring home the gold!!!

by sue369 on Aug 16, 2008 11:45 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm with you

The Bad out weighs the good.

by J Theory on Aug 16, 2008 11:54 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Likewise

I’m hoping and praying he doesn’t relent and take the 59/6.

by hlac on Aug 16, 2008 12:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

exactly....

Where has this sort of logic been over the past few weeks? Ben Gordon has no bargaining position, there is no reason for the front office to raise its offer. Its not happening. Why would they? If they paid him extra money like everyone around here (seemingly) wants I would be very pissed off. This is a business, there is a market value set for BG. The market is dictating what BG gets and it is dictating he is an undersized jump-shooter with weak defense that is a liability when you need him most, which is late in games. The bulls have made him a very reasonable offer and for BG’s sake I hope he finds another team which values him so his agent and Pax can work out a sign and trade, because the bulls are going about this intelligently and wont overpay him.

by ridindirty on Aug 16, 2008 11:55 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Bulls org

has been around along time. I can bet you any thing that Paxson is not alone in negotiations. They do surround him with a staff that handles these type of things.

by J Theory on Aug 16, 2008 11:56 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It didn't even sound like he was involved

in the Deng negotiations.

His quote afterwards was something like…each person in the Bulls organization does what he’s best at, and negotiations are not his (my) strength.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on Aug 16, 2008 12:53 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nor should he be alone.

A GM builds the team, sure, but why would the man signing the checks and paying the players ever leave himself out of the negotiation process? Would you do that if you were the one paying? The level of involvment may be in question but that’s really up to the owner. Of course Reinsdorf and whomever else he deems appropriate will be involved in the negotiations.

by messwiththebull on Aug 16, 2008 4:35 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Winners overpay

so a team like NO may give that contract to BG. If NO does end up with BG, I’m assuming Ben gets a deal comparable to what they gave Peja. When you think you’re that close to winning it all, you pay a premium because of the time value of that window of opportunity. But if you’re not on the edge of contention, overpaying only screws you over because now you have less flexibilty to build that winner and make that similar generous offer when the time comes when you yourself identify that FA that could put you over the top. This is why NO overpaid, which they clearly did, for Posey. This is why they didn’t want to pay Pargo because they probably were watching the BG situation. They have a tradable young asset in Julian Wright. They have the pieces it seems to make a deal under the cap. They have a favorable relationship with John Paxson, having pilfered Tyson from him already.

It makes sense for NO to pay BG close to what he’s asking for but it doesn’t make as much sense for the Bulls to. Let’s get this S&T worked out, say bye to Ben, and move on with our lives.

by messwiththebull on Aug 16, 2008 8:13 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And though the Bulls may not get players that fit as well

I’m assuming they’ll get Butler and James who come off the books fairly soon. Hopefully the Bulls could then move Noce because I like Julian Wright and would like to see him get the minutes at the backup 3. The SG minutes can then go to Thabo, Kirk, and Larry, with Kirk also getting some minutes at the 1. Mike James and Butler become trade assets themselves as their deals are up after the 09-10 season. The Bulls could get three very tradable assets in return for someone they see as a 6th man, don’t want to overpay, and likely would not be as tradable an asset should he get the deal he’s seeking. I think there is plenty of value in it for the Bulls should they deal with NO. More than enough to justify a S&T and Ben will do fine in NO.

by messwiththebull on Aug 16, 2008 8:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They don't have to take back the salary another team gives BG

It says here in that Daily Herald article

Now, whether this is just wishful thinking on Gordon’s part or a likely occurrence is anyone’s guess. In order to work out a sign-and-trade, the restricted free agent would have to find a team willing to meet his salary requests, then work out an equitable trade with the Bulls.

The other team would likely have to agree to take back more salaries than they send to the Bulls, because the Bulls do not want to exceed the NBA’s luxury-tax threshold. With the players already under contract, the Bulls have about $8.6 million left to spend on salaries next season before having to pay a dollar-for-dollar penalty on any excess above the $71.5-million tax threshold.

by Option27 on Aug 16, 2008 9:49 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

all this fus

about luxury tax maks me sick. Really, for one year they wont pay the luxury tax?even if it means getting a much better deal back.

by Sambossanova on Aug 16, 2008 10:20 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think their point

Is that they’ll go over the luxury tax if they believe it takes the Bulls to that next level.

Apparently, they just don’t think Ben Gordon is an “Over the luxury tax” kinda player

by Option27 on Aug 16, 2008 10:26 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Luxury Tax?

Do you really think it’s about luxury tax? That is just an excuse for negotiations. What there really saying is “Ben we don’t think your worth as much as you think your worth.” If it was a superstar player the player would be signed already and if the Bulls really didn’t want to pay the LT then they would move a player soon after.

by J Theory on Aug 16, 2008 10:44 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You know, there's a lot of distance between $12-$13M and what he'd likely sign for

I mean, every player tends to put their asking price higher than what ownership wants to pay them.

And at this point, if you were Gordon, if you had to settle for less, wouldn’t you prefer it be somewhere else?

by Sports2 on Aug 16, 2008 6:34 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Well, I'm going to assume this was meant as a reply to me... ;)

Not necessarily. He’s been living in the same town and played with basically the same team for 4 years. WIth the num #1 draft pick and a new coach, I’d take the 59/6 and be very happy to be on what could be a successful team for many years to come… But that is my outlook. And I’m obviously not in this position. BG is, and he apparently has other priorities….

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 7:38 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ahh, the alpha male

So Ben is the best undersized 6th man with limited defensive skills shooting guard on a 33 win non-playoff team in the league, pay the man his money. He is the king of the dip sh*ts.

It is embarrassing that our self-annointed Alpha Male (pay me the most because I am the best) is not even a top 50 player in the league.

by bullschwaa on Aug 16, 2008 3:25 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

tough guy talk

are you kidding me? The point that BG thinks he is the best player and deserves the most money is embarrassing. Most NBA teams don’t have their best player come off the bench. Manu is the closest and he still has TD covering the alpha male role.

The Bulls problem IMHO is that we dont have a real go to guy on the roster and when those players are made available our GM won’t pull the trigger to get one.

by bullschwaa on Aug 16, 2008 4:49 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Highest paid

Isn’t that the rumor that he wants to be the highest paid because he scores the most points?

by bullschwaa on Aug 16, 2008 5:40 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yep

Good luck Shawn Johnson, Lolo Jones and Doug Schwab. Bring home the gold!!!

by sue369 on Aug 16, 2008 9:19 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

he could sign the QO

in an arranged sign and trade. It wouldn’t get the Bulls back as much as they could, but Ben’s interest right now is to get to a team where he will get minutes to get his points to earn his way into the mega deal he deserves.

He won’t get the PT he needs in Chicago. And the club is sending the clear as day message that they don’t think Ben Gordon is all that great.

by NBA Observer on Aug 16, 2008 9:08 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ben Gordon's problem is that no one is willing to pay him what the Bulls are offering.

He doesn’t want the QO. He has no offer from Europe or he would have used that as leverage. Ben Gordon has nothing. He is playing poker with nothing in his hand and every one knows he has nothing. It is not a good position to be in.

by chgobr on Aug 16, 2008 11:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He has leverage

he could sign the QO and be imply that he’d be cancer to the team. That forces the team to pursue options other than the QO.

by messwiththebull on Aug 16, 2008 4:40 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If he's a cancer

NO ONE will want him or pay him what Gordon thinks he is worth. Being a team cancer hurts his image even more and isn’t easily overcome.

If he signs the QO, I’m sure he’ll be trying extra hard to show everyone how great he is. Anything else would be suicide.

And that might be the best option if he refuses to sign what is being offered: he takes the QO, plays really well and shows he’s a good soldier (even though he has done that since he became a Bull, these negotiations leave a bad taste in people’s mouths and they forget his ok-with-6th-man-ness unless you’re paying close attention). It becomes THE contract year to really show the league he is great.

And the Bulls don’t need to sign n’ trade him; the market sucks for this deal right now. Everyone is going to EXTREMELY lowball the Bulls. Butler and James from the Hornets? Jesus Christ.

At LEAST take the QO, he can’t be a cancer or play poorly (on purpose) or he’ll never even sniff 59/6. He’ll be taking the MLE somewhere and trying to resurrect his career.

The Bulls have leverage since they choose to deal him or not. Only thing Gordon can do is take the QO, take their 59/6, or bolt to Europe. Only the QO gives him a chance to make what he thinks he should make, and it isn’t a lot less (reportedly) than what he’ll make his first year of the 59/6 deal.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 16, 2008 4:47 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

And by "leverage"...

…I don’t mean a LOT of leverage, but the ball is MORE in the Bulls court than Gordon’s. He can’t force a trade and his chance for big money ever in his career is on the line.

After all this he probably won’t be a happy soldier if he signs a longterm deal, but I’d be pretty confident in thinking you’ll get the best Ben Gordon you can get if he signs the QO. You can trade him later then, if these wounds don’t get healed.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 16, 2008 4:50 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

"He’ll be taking the MLE somewhere and trying to resurrect his career."

If that happens all of us will have to go somewhere else for our (for many, DAILY) Bulls-fix since Matt surely will go bonkers and shut down the site in protest if that ever would come about. ;)

You think the last B in BaB stands for “Bull”? Think again… ;)

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 5:03 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

B for bonkers?

Oh, come on, I’m sure you can be more creative than that.
‘bat-shit insane’? ‘blowhard’? ‘B … dumbhead?’ … Yeah, I ran out of words. Drat. If only blog was dlog, and bull was dull. Oh, there’d be letter-related puns.

by Prevenge on Aug 17, 2008 12:59 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm not saying it's good leverage

and it would be an implied threat that would be made before even signing the QO, meaning the Bulls will themselves push for a S&T. He won’t have the opportunity to be a cancer on the team because he’ll be on another team for the 08-09 season. Maybe that’s partially what all these recent charity event quotes are implying, I don’t know.

by messwiththebull on Aug 16, 2008 6:29 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Trying Extra Hard" = Not a team player

and given that the Bulls will want to play as a team and not help BG pad his point totals let alone let him handle the ball at the expense of Derrick Rose, I don’t see him getting much playing time. I’m all for the Bulls not ruining the team because BG has delusions of grandeur.

"To a man with a hammer, every solution looks like a nail." SLC

by WayOldGuy on Aug 17, 2008 11:07 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

When does the Bulls training camp start? September?

I wonder if the BG situation will be resolved within the next week… or at least before labor day

by Mattchoo on Aug 16, 2008 12:41 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can only laugh.

When will Gordon realize he has no leverage in this situation?

He is a restricted free agent with no competing offers from other franchises, domestic or foreign.

He sounds more and more like a petulant child with each passing day.

 

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Aug 16, 2008 12:55 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But it is a business

And you don’t want an agent getting too upset even thought they hate agents and you don’t want to leave a bad taste in the other players still left on the teams mouths.

But other than that he really has no leverage. He should’ve chased Europe way before Childress did.

by J Theory on Aug 16, 2008 1:00 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If he goes to europe now he'll get a ten percent discount to Childress' contract.

Funny how they’re haggling over a couple million bucks…and Childress has already lost $2.5 million in euro devalution over the last 30 days alone.

Well, funny to me. Maybe not to Josh.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on Aug 16, 2008 1:15 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BG probably ought to watch what he says about his role on the team, as well

I generally don’t favor negotiating through the media anyway, but I understand BG doesn’t have a whole lot of other options. However, at least in my opinion, he hasn’t been coming across as much of a team player lately. I like BG, although I’m not as big a fan as many here, and I always gave him credit for being beyond professional with the constant jerking around in the lineup. But if I’m the other guys on the team and I’m seeing all these quotes about being so valuable as the leading scorer, and BG having his minutes cut without merit when that happened to all the guards with the trade, and seeing what he’s purportedly turned down…

Up till lately, BG has been pretty savvy in his use of the media, but I’d have to agree with ChiTown that he’s sounding pretty bratty of late.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Aug 16, 2008 1:27 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Didn't BG

change agents last year? Doesn’t sound to me like this agent has his best interests at heart. I agree with you on his behavior of late.

Good luck Shawn Johnson, Lolo Jones and Doug Schwab. Bring home the gold!!!

by sue369 on Aug 16, 2008 1:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You'd think that Ben of all players

would understand that fans all over the country are reading his comments…and making unfavorable associations with his name.

Was it you, wjb, that siad once a player gets pegged to being a certian way, it’s almost impossible to change the public’s perception?

Ben should be much more circumspect in his cpublic remarks.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on Aug 16, 2008 1:57 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He might not have a choice.

Never mind these are direct negotiations with Reinsdorf. If he signs a QO and they know he’s gone next year, there go his minutes if they drop out of the play-off hunt.

From his perspective might be safer to go to Europe where somebody will definitely play him and come back unrestricted when more teams have cap space.

by ziffle on Aug 16, 2008 3:07 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

no kidding.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 16, 2008 8:19 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Remember that the Bulls still can retain his RFA so he might not even

be an UFA if he goes to Europe for one year. (Which, let’s face it, he will not)

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 4:11 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just as Childress...

If Ben goes to Europe,he still comes back if less than 3 years as a Restricted player if the Bulls don’t renounce his rights prior to then…so,if Ben goes overseas,he comes back with essentially the same problem….Bulls own his rights!

by dakidfromchitown on Aug 19, 2008 7:21 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

no way out?

Remember Lance Briggs comments last year. Its all about the $

by Jesse07 on Aug 16, 2008 3:31 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

both players couldn't get better offers

I used Briggs as an example because he was in a similiar situation with Urlacher’s money affecting his signing like Dengs effected BG. If Briggs would have been able to get paid elsewhere he would have left, but after a long drawn out ugly negotiation, he stayed with the team.

I keep telling myself that I am done with these threads because nothing more is going to happen this offseason, but I get sucked in.

by Jesse07 on Aug 16, 2008 4:12 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks - I feel the same way

Gordon is going to sign a day before the season starts. He has no other viable option.

by chgobr on Aug 16, 2008 4:14 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sign what, though?

That is the interesting question…

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 5:00 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My guess - 6 years 59 mil

The Bulls might sweeten the bonuses. The deal will essentally be what they are offering now.

by chgobr on Aug 16, 2008 5:47 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah.

I’m not a big BG-fan (and this not being helped by the contract negotiations and demands) so think I’d prefer he sign the QO… But I expect him, like you say, to sign the 59/6.

by BAB-Bass on Aug 16, 2008 5:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Any other good free agents available to spend our $10 million per year on?

Let Gordon go and get a front line player. Then when Gooden and Hughes’ salaries come off we can get an all star.

by hhirb on Aug 16, 2008 3:40 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can't wait till the Bulls let Gordon go and offer Shane Battier a 70 million dollar contract in a few years

BG isn’t Chicago Tough, obviously he must be let go.

"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"

by Ozzie Montana on Aug 16, 2008 9:29 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BG is BG, he can't be replaced by nobody

he is a good player in his own right, he will be missed.

when are we going to add a 7th championship?

by broseleay301 on Aug 16, 2008 10:18 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm hoping

he goes somewhere else and torches us later on. Best to get revenge on the court. I don’t like what’s happened to Gordon, even before this latest turn. Just my opinion though. For a team that has overpaid a number of players it is a shame that they suddenly straighten out their act when Gordon’s pay day comes around. And when Gordon is gone I hope they get rid of Hinrich and Noc and use the money to get someone to replace the offensive production somehow. It is going to get ugly otherwise. It wasn’t going to be pretty even with Gordon, but if they don’t make a bunch of moves with him gone we are going to make the predictions true.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Aug 16, 2008 10:35 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He probably will

go for 40, but lose when he allows Larry Hughes to drop 45 on him.

by CJ Bulls on Aug 17, 2008 10:44 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Larry Hughes?

Dropping 45? Maybe if he takes 150 shots a game. In which case the Bulls will certainly lose. Larry Hughes can beat himself easily enough.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Aug 17, 2008 11:53 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

kirk hinrich to guard bg

thats gonna be bigger than india vs pakistan in cricket

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....

by piccolomair on Aug 17, 2008 12:11 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

To be fair to Larry who does kind of suck

He had 36 and 40 in a game last year, off 17 and 19 shots respectively. Cavs won both games. I’m not holding my breath for either to happen again this year.

by CJ Bulls on Aug 17, 2008 3:31 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the most hilarious game

was when he nearly dropped a triple-double on the cavs

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Aug 17, 2008 3:33 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think the Bulls have been very logical.

Every year they overpaid the team was moving in the right direction. Ben Wallace, Hinrich, Noc all came after positive seasons. The team was headed in the right direction. Noc’s extension came as the Bulls were favored by some to win the Eastern Conference. It made sense to keep the momentum going. Now they collapsed and they aren’t moving forward, so why continue to overpay in order to maintain an average team. I am sure if the Bulls made the conference finals this year Gordon and Deng would have gotten their money right away. That didn’t happen though.

Noc and Wallace contracts are sunk costs. You can only learn from them. You can’t use them as a way to support also overpaying gordon.

by CJ Bulls on Aug 17, 2008 10:49 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I see

Gordon as a better player than the ones they overpaid in the past. That is why I am pissed. Overpay lesser players and then let the better one go while retaining the mistakes. The Bulls are losers in every instance. Not something to be happy about I don’t think. And if they don’t make any trades I don’t see how things are going to look good for us. Yay, we saved money. Pat ourselves on the back and then get ready for a sucky season.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Aug 17, 2008 11:51 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

You're right

In his own right he is good and I will miss him.

Dee Fonde, Walt Moryn, Bill Serena, and Harry Chiti were good in their own right and I do miss them so.

by hlac on Aug 17, 2008 4:12 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

gordan should negotiate a 2yr deal

something like 19 million for two years with a 30 min per game guarantee. that way the bulls cud release him for 2010 yet he cud still play and gain value

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....

by piccolomair on Aug 17, 2008 12:04 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not sure I understand...

Has a player ever negotiated his contract in a way that guarantees minutes?

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Aug 17, 2008 12:45 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah I don't think that will happen

The best case scenario is that Gordon takes a 2-3 year deal that allows the Bulls to wash their hands of him in a couple of seasons along with Hughes and Nocioni, around the time that Derrick Rose will be starting to assert himself as a dominant franchise PG (obviously assuming he turns out to be that awesome). Aggressively pursue Big Name FA “X”, attempt to build title team around Deng, Rose, and Player X, and optimistically Noah and Tyrus.

However, you have to wonder has relations soured a good deal after 2 years of tension between BG and management? Whether you like him or not, he was still the best scorer on a team that made the playoffs 3 years in a row, brought a certain level of excitement back to Bulls games, and is now (in his mind and in his supporters) being treated like an afterthought, or at least isn’t getting the treatment he thought his past play entitled him to.

"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"

by Ozzie Montana on Aug 17, 2008 1:32 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good post.

It would have been slightly intriguing to see how these negotiations would have gone if Rose wasn’t in the picture.

Thank God he is, though, but still. You think they would have made a bigger offer? I would guess yes.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Aug 17, 2008 1:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Qualifying Offer Question

If BG doesn’t sign a QO, do the Bulls retain his rights? Assuming no European contract is in the offing and BG stays in the US and no sign and trade is created, what are the Bulls rights and what are BG’s rights?

"To a man with a hammer, every solution looks like a nail." SLC

by WayOldGuy on Aug 17, 2008 12:14 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

see Anderson Varejao

The Bulls do keep his rights the same as they would be over this summer. Like I said at the top of the post, I’m not sure I get the strategy of saying he wouldn’t take the Qualifying offer. At least in Varejao’s case it wasn’t much of a number, but for Ben it’s over $6m, and is therefore a genuine threat he could use.

Maybe it’s just that Gordon knows a S/T is farther along than reports have suggested. So he threatens to hold out if Paxson doesn’t agree to a S/T I guess?

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 2:08 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is pretty much exactly what happened with Crawford

1. The Bulls essentially offered him an MLE sized deal. It’s debateable whether they actually wanted him at this price… I think they were pretty sure he wouldn’t accept.
2. Jamal went out and got a better offer from the Knicks, but the offer required a sign and trade since the Knicks were over the cap.
3. Crawford started saying he didn’t want to come back publicly (why would he, when the Knicks were offering him more) and Pax and Isaiah Thomas a fairly acrimonious negotiation in which I remember Thomas laughably jawboning the press on Paxson being unreasonable for not wanting to take back Moochie Norris.

As it happened, what the Bulls got was unloading JYD’s long-term contract for a bunch of expiring contracts, ultimately allowing us to sign Ben Wallace a couple years down the road.

Anyway, the reasoning for Gordon seems pretty clear cut. Since we know three or four teams have inquired about sign and trades, they surely have talked some numbers. And it’s surely more than the Bulls are offering.

So for Gordon to get the best deal being offered, he has to present a threat of being unhappy, just like Crawford did, and just like Lamar Odom and Elton Brand and Corey Maggette did a few years ago when they were RFAs held by the Clippers and other teams made them offers. In the case of Brand, he said up and down that he’d be unhappy playing for the Clippers and wanted to go to the Heat, but the Clippers matched the offer and it was soon forgotten.

The problem here is whatever offers Gordon has gotten come from teams that are over the cap, so there has to be a sign and trade to force the Bulls’ hand.

All of which sort of throws the argument of “who’s got leverage” into the ocean. Leverage doesn’t matter much if you end up burning your bridges with guys by using it.

by Sports2 on Aug 17, 2008 2:46 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I love your assumptions

He “talked” 3-4 other teams so they surely talked number and surely it was for more money? Talk about a leap in logic.

by CJ Bulls on Aug 17, 2008 3:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BG for LB; Gooden for Diaw

Gordon ($8M BYC) and Gooden ($7.1M expiring) for
Barbosa ($6.1M) and Diaw ($9M).

Gordon fits the new PHX hierarchy/style much better than Barbosa. Diaw has worn out his welcome as a non-shooter who needs the ball to be effective on offense, whereas Gooden plays the standard athletic shooter/rebounder-type who succeeds next to Shaq. Kerr/Porter get to fully reshape the team in their image, and Sarver gets Drew’s expiring deal off his books next summer.

This is less financially attractive for the Bulls, but it injects them with excellent complimentary talent — a sparkplug scorer who has no problem coming off the bench, and a skilled post-scorer/defender who (like Noah) is an excellent distributor and should serve to increase the scoring opportunities for the new core (Rose/Deng/Tyrus). If they’re looking for talent that fits the team concept in return, this is the best bet if the Marion deal doesn’t get done.

by abb on Aug 17, 2008 1:36 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Make it Noc instead of Gooden

then maybe.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 2:09 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rose/Barbosa would be the fastest breaking backcourt in the league when paired

and would equated to some fun stretches of basketball, that’s for sure. Something we could certainly use with BG out of the picture. At the least, it will keep people awake.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Aug 17, 2008 2:12 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wouldn't touch Diaw

He totally fucks the Bulls’ salary structure and has no role here. Even if we traded Noc.
On the other hand, I’d be happy to trade Ben and get back Barbosa. Basically the same player but at a better price.

Looking at sign and trade possibilities though, it’d be pretty tough to make something work. Since Diaw is unacceptable for financial reasons there are only so many guys the Suns could offer back to make a the deal CBA compliant.

by Sports2 on Aug 17, 2008 2:59 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

9m/yr through 2012

that’s bad.

But I wouldn’t say he’d have no role. Paxson is clearly looking for any big man that can shoot and run the pick/pop game. Dealing Noc for Diaw also means Gooden can be moved, preferably for a lumbering oaf to play Center.

Though ideally, Brad Miller fits both the ‘oaf’ and ‘shooting’ qualities that would mesh best with Thomas&Noah.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 3:20 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you really want an oaf?

on a Rose team? I begged the other Paxon to let big Z walk from the Cavs and replace him with then FA Tyson Chandler — say what you will about said Baby Bull’s failures in Chicago, but certain players (Chris Paul, LeBron, J-Kidd) excel at making athletic bigs play better and their teams thrive because of it. I think Derrick will be that kind of player and it would be a shame to waste his transition game on someone like Brad Miller, Big Z, etc.

And re:Diaw, I wouldn’t take him either — reportedly, he got really lazy after signing his big deal. He just has the right type of talent (along with Barbosa) you’re looking to get back from a BG trade.

by abb on Aug 17, 2008 3:29 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

they can't run all the time

someone has to help Noah guard the league’s big centers, and Rose will be running a pick/roll once in a while.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 3:31 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

good point; would SAC pay BG starter's $?

Didn’t they just re-up Beno Udrih, get rid of Artest and make this “Kevin Martin’s team”? I’m not saying they wouldn’t want to move Miller, but pending top $ for a 6th man is what the Bulls had problems with last summer, no? And isn’t BG’s camp against him playing such a role?

by abb on Aug 17, 2008 3:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

if the Bulls just did

this, it’d clear up a lot of problems, and some money under the tax. Heck, I’d give them a pick too.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 3:43 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So a three way with Phoenix, Sac and Us

Phoenix gets BG, Sac gets ???, and we get Miller.

by hlac on Aug 17, 2008 4:23 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

sorry hlac

that means we keep BG :-p

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 4:32 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't like that

Gooden’s got plenty of range on his shot and can run the floor, but he’s still bigger and stronger than Diaw by a mile. I guess it’s just me, but Diaw is pretty waifish looking to play the four/five. It seemed like a gimmick in Phoenix and it was exposed as such pretty quickly.

Honestly, if we’re looking for undersized fours, I’d rather have Noc than Diaw. Noc is cheaper and probably cause the most favorable matchups he can when playing there. He’s aggressive (Diaw is not) and he can shoot. Against a lot of fours he’s got a quickness advantage, but he’s still strong enough to play down there. Diaw… not so much. I know you don’t like Noc much, Matt, but he looks like a cheaper and better option than Diaw.

by Sports2 on Aug 17, 2008 3:33 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wouldn't play Diaw at the 5

just as a 4/3. despite the waifishness, he’s a far better defender than Noc. He is also a smarter player, many times over. Rose could run plays with him that he couldn’t with Noc. I don’t think Noc has set a proper screen in his life.

Like I said I’d try and use Gooden to get a more true center…but overall you’re likely correct that this all causes more problems than it fixes.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 3:42 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

agreed

Very true about Gooden — except he’s not much of a defender, just a rebounder. Diaw, for his guard-build, is a really solid low-post defender. The reason to take him back would be salary in a BG trade to PHX. I definitely prefer Noc to him in most cases, except as a facilitator — Diaw can really pass and would enhance the looks for Tyrus, Deng, and even Rose. Getting Barbosa in the deal would make it more fair, dollars-wise.

by abb on Aug 17, 2008 3:42 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

besides

I guess I included Drew because we may have to package more players in order to get value back, and he’s the only one who makes sense for the Suns.

What are our movable assets besides BG?
1. Gooden – expiring, servicable
2. Noc – skilled veteran, tweener, long deal
3. Thabo – potential, rookie scale
4. Hinrich – starting caliber PG, defender, long deal

Unless you want to include one of the pups…but I’d argue they’ve decided to keep Tyrus for now by selecting Rose over Beasley. Hughes is unmovable.

Our goals are a) getting talent in return and b) long-term strategy, BG for expiring deals+young talent/picks makes the most sense, right?

by abb on Aug 17, 2008 3:51 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't like those goals in the first place

I wish the logic would swing the other way, use our own picks (we couldn’t keep them with the tax anyway!) with these assets to get someone good.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 3:54 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Marion deal?

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Aug 17, 2008 1:38 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My bad on the no reply...dammit.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Aug 17, 2008 1:38 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

if logic has anything to do with it

(which, of course, it often doesn’t in the NBA):
1. Unless the Bulls intend to simply cut costs and lose Gordon’s value as a former #3 pick and elite NBA shooter/crunch-time scorer, they must trade hiim out-right or sing-and-trade him between now and the trading deadline.

2. In order to get equal value in an outright trade, they’d have to land another rookie scale player who has elite talent that fits their new core AND has underperformed with his team — Andrea Bargnani, Robert Swift, Channing Frye, and Adam Morrison are the only possibilities I see, and most would agree none of those provide equal value. The one possible base-year guy might be David Lee, opening up New York’s 4-spot for younger/cheaper/D’Antoni-er Wilson Chandler and letting BG play out his rook deal in a high-tempo offense. But is David Lee enough for the Bulls?

3. Sign-and-trade seems most likely — Ben wants $, Bulls want talent/a team player/to build for the future in return. That means they want a) to cut costs and dead weight b) to unclog positional logjams and make players happier c) to turn multiple demiocre talents into one great talent that fits. Only a few teams would help them with Scenario a — win now clubs like Cleveland and Dallas come to mind. BG and Noc for expiring Wally and Eric Snow cuts costs, but the Cavs already put their scoring guard money down on Mo Williams. Mark Cuban will spend to contend, and a short 2 like Ben could start next to J-Kidd, but what do we get in return, a wheezing Josh Howard?

Paxson’s best bet is moving disgruntled-yet-talented Gordon for an equally talented superstart who wants a better situation. Artest and McGrady are off the table. Ditto for RJ and Redd. Here are the best talent return trades possible:

1. Marion for BG + Gooden — MIA wants to cut costs and build around Wade-Beasley, and Marion wants a fat extension. Unless he backs off from that position, they have to trade him by the deadline to get anything in return, and have to sign-and-trade him this summer if they want a young player entering his second deal. The Bulls get 48 minutes of non-stop alley-oops from Rose to the four-spot, and don’t have to rely on Tyrus to start right away. Marion would definitely enhance Rose’s rookie assist numbers, generate more fast -breaks with blocks and steals, and even replace BG’s 3-pt shooting. Noc’s contract even looks better since they could certainly use his savy in their upcoming playoff runs…

2. Diaw + Barbosa for BG + Gooden — as above.

3. Channing Frye + Martell Websiter + Darius Miles for BG + Noc = a tricky one, but Portland may be inclined to move young talents like Frye/Webster if Miles is healthy enough to force them to honor the $9M they owe him this season and next. Blazers get another veteran backcourt combo talent to start alongside Roy (who can handle PG duties) and tutor rookies Bayless/Fernandez, plus they can afford Noc’s contract for a veteran shooting-combo forward with some toughness. Bulls get two young, versatile offensive front-court players, get out from under the lengthy Noc deal, and a big expiring contract for 2009-2010 to boot (D-Wade homecoming, anybody?)

4. Okur for BG — easiest to accomplish, allows either Noah or Tyrus to come off the bench, and gives CHI a 7-foot shooter. Jazz get another sniper along with Korver, move Brewer to 3, AK to 4, and Boozer to 5, making the team faster and more effective. I would definitely do this if I’m Utah, though I’d prefer a running big for a Rose-based team. Still, Okur is the best skilled C available (Brad Miller = baaaad idea…)

5. Chris Wilcox + Robert Swift for BG = cut costs with Wilcox’s expiring deal, gain low-cost young shot-blocking (injury prone?) C in Swift. OKC gets a veteran sniper to pair with Westbrook in a deadly backcourt, moving Durant to his natural 3-spot and Green to his natural 4-spot.

Sorry to go on so long, but I just realized how optimistic I am for all the good options they have. Hope Pax reads this…

by abb on Aug 17, 2008 3:23 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

I like the idea of getting a big for a guard and let Noah and Tyrus develop.

Maybe managment thinks we’re not going anywhere this year anyway and why get locked in to another guard and miss a chance to get a big now or an all star when Hughes and Gooden come off the books.

by hhirb on Aug 17, 2008 6:29 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

NEW YORK DEAL AGAIN?

I like the idea of trading BG for David Lee and the Knicks’ 2009 first round draft pick and the option to switch first round draft picks in 2010.
Do you think the Knicks will bite?

I do like the idea of Marion as a Bull even if only for this year and we don’t have to move anyone that I would consider a core player.

I just don’t see Portland doing that deal — or any other but you never know.

Same for Utah.

This is another case where I don’t see the other team doing the deal. Although in this case I think more has to do with management at OKC.

"To a man with a hammer, every solution looks like a nail." SLC

by WayOldGuy on Aug 17, 2008 6:58 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

two first rounders and Lee?

no. Besides, how much do you want to pay David Lee? I can see the ‘contract extension distraction’ articles already ….

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Aug 17, 2008 7:12 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Okay okay I was joking about the two draft choices

Besides I know that Mr. Thomas is no longer making the deals.

"To a man with a hammer, every solution looks like a nail." SLC

by WayOldGuy on Aug 18, 2008 6:54 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What's the deal for Bargnani?

Is any possible, given where he and BG are in their careers/contracts currently? He’s a guy I’d keep an eye on as more interesting than Okur, with quickness to play like Dirk someday maybe.

1) Miami. I thought this deal was with Noc instead of Gooden? I’d hope w/ Marion there’d be a nice playoff run, but what do you do for next year, for his next contract. If you don’t like losing BG for nothin’…..

2) Sports2 HATES Diaw! So this one’s right out. ;=)

3) I could see advantages for Portland doing that, but I think they’re feeling pretty cocking, and will want to see how it plays out for them with Oden and all the youth. Figure they’ll probably wish they’d done something like this at year’s end. If you’re the Bulls, what do you do with Fry and Webster? Turn them around in trade?

4) On the contrary, I don’t see Sloan trading his 7ft sniper for the, uh, BG-size one. (Should I add a smiley here too?)

5) Have to agree w/ WayOldGuy, OKC wouldn’t be smart enough to do this. But I have to ask, what’s with the question mark after “injury prone”, re: Robert Swift? (Man, let’s hope that poor guy has some good luck in his future, but what are the odds?)

I like Lee too (who wouldn’t?), but how many limited, “hustle”-types can one team have/afford? Even if Noc were gone, significant minutes to Lee similarly takes away from my personal vision of the team. Maybe his role would be 20mpg backup PF, and that would be enough?

I really think we’re overreacting to this BG talk, that it’s simple posturing (negotiating?), and Ben will be right back here, coming off the bench again next year. And if there is a S&T, it won’t be for anything that exciting. Julian Wright at best. (Who could actually be exciting, I suppose.)

The public wants what the public gets....

by marionette on Aug 18, 2008 7:18 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Poor BG....

For a guy who alreadt averaged more than 20pts. a game for a season.his market value seems pretty low…Or,maybe we just don’t know what other teams think his value is…sad to say,but the talent of J. Smoove even brought the sleeping giants to their feet in them offerring Josh 59mm,won’t ben call the Grizz,set up a secret meeting,do a lil collusion and get them to offer Ben 5/55 and then BG saves face by acting like he wants to play for the Griz,but he didn’t break down and the the Bulls decided to match,making everybody look like the good guy…In a sign and trade,nobody wins…Let’s say BG signs a 12mm a yr. contract,the players you get back are 6mm players…such as….Udrih(ick),Duhon(are you kidding),Battier,Matt Harpring,Antonio Daniels,Bobby Jackson,Abdur-Rahim,Pryzbilla,Tony Battie,Jerome James,Jared Jeffries,mike James,Stromile Swift,Brian Cardinal,Jason Collins,Gadzuric,Jaric,Radmonovic,Tim Thomas,Jeff Foster,Tinsley,Adonal Foyle,Nazr Mohammed,Speedy Claxton………None of these guys do anything for me if I am giving up BG! None of these guys will get you 18 a game or even come close to what Paxdorf would be looking for if you lose your N0.3 pick a couple years back and your leading scorer….

by dakidfromchitown on Aug 19, 2008 8:30 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2f597263b71b32c9d2a85c1427a038ce_bigger_small
Thank You Ben Gordon
Jayhawk_small
A Brief History of Ben Gordon: the Quotes Version
Horace_20grant_small
To the Bulls' Front Office
Rose2_small
Optimistic view of BG leaving (I Hope)
Derrick_rose_1__small
An F.U. to the owner

Recent FanPosts

Bulls-2a_small
List of 2010 free agents (start choosing)
Aaron_scantlen-small-square_small
Trade idea: Kirk for Rudy
Small
Iverson to the Bulls in Gordon S/T?!?!
Small
Hinrich Vs. Gordon
-1_small
Could this be Dumar's post-signing-Gordon plan?
Small
Pistons vs. Bulls
Small
Looking back at the 26th pick now...

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports