Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

In defense of Paxson

Luol Deng’s agent, Jason Levien, announced this week that his client will either have a long term deal in place with the bulls by august 3rd when Luol leaves for London, or he’ll

sign the one year qualifying offer with the bulls this year and sign elsewhere the following year.  He’s even introduced a potential suitor : the Portland trailblazers, who will have cap room, a talented young core, and a spot in the starting lineup.  Portland is actually fairly happy at small forward with the athletic, three-point shooting, Seattle native who they drafted out of high-school sixth overall in 2005, Martel Webster.  But that’s beside the point.  The point is that Levien is doing what Luol pays him to do. 

 

People talk about how sports are a business.  The business concepts at play here are leverage and risk.  Paxson has played his cards patiently and is in position where all the leverage is on his side.  He knew how many teams had cap space, he knew how many free agents were available, and he knew he could match any offer Luol received.  Now only Memphis has cap space to offer more than the midlevel.  And Memphis has made it clear they won’t be making a splash this off-season.  This brings us back to the agent, Levien.  His options for Luol are accept the bulls long term offer, sign a contract with a non nba team, retire from basketball, work out a sign and trade, or take the one year qualifying offer and become an unrestricted free agent.  I don’t think he’s a smooth enough talker to get luol to take that josh Childress route, and sign and trade deals are complicated deals where the gm ultimately has the final say.  Add that to the fact that Luol likes the team and wants to play in Chicago and Levien is left with only one card he can play.  Threaten to take the qualifying offer.  Make it a little more pressing with an imaginary deadline; through out a couple teams who would pay top dollar next year and you have a carefully built bluff to try to steal some of paxon’s patiently built leverage.

 

Here’s the downside.  Luol would make 4.5m next year.  If during that year, or in the off-season while he’s representing England in the Olympics, he suffers a serious injury that 4.5 million could be all the money he makes playing basketball for the rest of his life.  Sure it’s not likely, but it is risk, and he is the one holding the risk.  This is  why he wants a deal before he leaves to for England.  Most players don’t seek long term contracts because they want to get their money and relax, darius miles and Eddy Curry excluded of course. They are aware that while playing this game at full speed against big tall strong fast super-athletes they could get hurt.  The players don’t want to hold that risk.  They pass it on to the organization with long term contracts, which then pass it on to insurance companies.

 

But let’s say Luol takes the injury risk on himself and signs a one year deal to become an unrestricted free agent.  Next season the free agent class includes Shawn Marion, Mike Bibby, Wally Szczerbiak, Jason Kidd, Allen Iverson, Rasheed Wallace, Lamar Odom, Andre Miller, Grant Hill, Ron Artest, as unrestricted; Marvin Williams, Linas Kleiza, Jason Maxiell, Danny Granger, Hakim Warrick, Rashad Mccants, Martell Webster, Francisco Garcia, Jamario Moon, and Paul Milsap as restricted; and  Kobe Bryant, Richard Hamilton, Al Harrington, Jamal Crawford, Quentin Richardson, Hedo Turkoglu, Jermaine Oneal, Carlos Boozer who have the option of becoming unrestricted free agents.  Not to mention the other guys currently in the same restricted negotiation boat as Luol  like Omeka Okafor, Josh Smith, Andre Iguodola, Monta Ellis, Sasha Vujacic, Andris Biedrins , Nenad Kristic, JR Smith, and Delonte West.  Also not to mention the fact that teams might be a little tight with big long term deals considering the following year the free agent class could consist of Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, Chris Bosh, Amare Stoudemire, Ray Allen, Manu Ginobili, Joe Johnson, Tracy McGrady, Yao Ming, Steve Nash, Dirk Novitzki, Brandon Roy, Kenyon Martin, Stephen Jackson, TJ Ford, Richard Jefferson, Peja Stojakovic, Tyson Chandler, Andrea Bargnami, Lemarcus Aldridge and Michael Redd. 

 

If Luol thought this off-season was like a bad dream, next year could be a nightmare.  With a less than stellar year statistically, playing with a new coach and rookie point guard, a strong year by anyone of Portland’s small forward group of Webster, Travis Outlaw, and rookie Nicolas Batum, Luol could be looking at taking a midlevel deal or re-signing with the bulls.  Although at that point, they might rather be a player in the monster free agent market, where they’ll have some cap space to play with if they don’t take on multi year commitments with Deng and or Gordon this off-season.  Again, I’m not saying that he will have a down year or that the depth of free agents will quickly dry up the cap space money, but it could, which makes it a risk.  And again it is risk Luol will be holding all by himself with his one year deal.

 

But lets say it does all go they way Levien lays it out.  Luol makes his 4.5m this year, has a great year statistically playing with Derrick Rose who draws the defense’s attention to allow a cutter like Luol to move without the ball and get himself easy baskets.  Let’s say Portland or Miami decide that Luol will be even better taking passes from Brandon Roy or Dwayne wade and he’s a better fit than the other free agents available. Let’s say they offer him 60 to 72 million for the maximum five years.  And let’s say Luol accepts it and leaves Chicago with nothing for the 7th pick in the draft,

which it swindled from the phoenix suns in 2004.  In this scenario, Luol makes an average of 12 to 14 million a year for 5 years.  The bull’s most recent published offer was 57m for 5 years.  Rumor has it they have shortened it to three or four years in the 9 to 11 million dollar range.  So that means, best case scenario, year 1, Luol forges 4.5 to 6.5m for the chance of making 1 to 5 million more a year for two or three years, after which he would have been an unrestricted free agent anyway at the ripe age of 27 when he’ll likely scoff at 14m a year.  And all he has to do to earn this impressive return on a 4.5 to 6.5m dollar investment, is take on injury risk, and hope that he puts up numbers good enough to outshine the rest of the free agent class? 

 

That sounds like a pretty awful deal for Luol.  But Levien is backed into a corner and he wouldn’t be doing his job as Luol’s agent if he didn’t at least try to put some fear into Paxson and steal some leverage by allowing this threat to leak out to the press to get bull’s fans riled up, as ridiculous as the threat may be after looking at it a little closer. 

 

Sure he takes on some injury risk by taking a three or four year deal instead of a five year deal, but the recent trend has been that players are willing to take that risk for the right to maintain flexibility, which is why the 2009 and 2010 free agent classes have so many stars that are unrestricted.

 

Players who take a qualifying offer are guys who are only going to get all or part of a midlevel offer, which their team would probably match anyway if they are unrestricted.  Mickael Peitrus is an example from last year with golden state.  He took the injury risk, had a decent season and was compensated with a satisfying partial midlevel offer from the Orlando magic.  Of course the difference between the qualifying offer and the first year of what a longer contract would have paid was maybe a million.  And giving that up, he got what he wanted: freedom to sign a midlevel deal with whoever he wanted.  Luol knows he’s not a midlevel player and knows he’s in a completely different situation.  His agent knows this too, but he has to try.

 

In the end, the bulls will make a deal that makes sense for the organization this year and years into the future.  If I had to guess I’d say it will be a four year deal at around $48 million front loaded as much as the cba allows (as he did with Kirk and Big Ben in the past) to give him the flexibility to make moves a couple years from now as Derrick Rose becomes a mega-star. 

 

Paxson, in his first ever front office job, has done an amazing job of transforming a team that featured Marcus Fizer, Eddie Robinson, Jalen Rose, and Eddy Curry into a perennial playoff contender.  But for some reason, fans seem like they would rather blame him because his first career top rated free agent acquisition\didn’t work out the way people hoped, or blast him for not making short sited trades, or doubt him for not giving the players as much money as they ask for.  Personally, I would love to enter contract negotiations opposing those types of fans who have the give-him-what-he-wants and don’t-be-so-cheep attitudes.  Maybe--and this will go against everything that our expert columnists like Marriotti and Sam Smith stand for--we need to give him some credit for building from a team of rejects and making the team relevant and realize that the man knows what he’s doing.  Paxson is being patient to give him self the chance to make a move when Hughes $13.7m comes off the books in what might be the best free agent year in the history of basketball.  The more he spends now on Luol and Ben now the less he has to spend to add a player to a team that includes derrick rose going into his third season along with a mix of smart veterans and developing young guys still playing on their rookie deals.  Any trades he makes will keep that idea in mind.  And unlike the last time he had cap room, in 2010, there will be quality players at all positions.  I know patient and frugal isn’t as much fun, but it works in the nba and will continue to work. 

 

But, if you still don’t agree with his patient strategy and like to see a team overpay for big names and lock itself into long term contracts  and take massive risk and mortgage the future and live in the luxury tax, maybe your just a closet New York Knicks fan.  An Isiah-Thomas-led New York Knicks fan. I hear he’s not that busy, maybe drop him a line and have him toss out some trade ideas. Just a thought.

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

Comment 46 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Considering the Bulls situation,

age and talent wise, and also factoring in the age, character and talent of those unrestricted and restricted free agents next year (below), I’d take Deng over any of them. Maybe Portland would too.

Here is the list (from your post) again : Shawn Marion, Mike Bibby, Wally Szczerbiak, Jason Kidd, Allen Iverson, Rasheed Wallace, Lamar Odom, Andre Miller, Grant Hill, Ron Artest, as unrestricted; Marvin Williams, Linas Kleiza, Jason Maxiell, Danny Granger, Hakim Warrick, Rashad Mccants, Martell Webster, Francisco Garcia, Jamario Moon, and Paul Milsap as restricted

The Game chose him !

by Diabolo on Jul 24, 2008 3:19 AM CDT reply actions  

that's what I thought as well

I read all those names and Deng was better than nearly all of them.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

The only one that fits Portland better is

Danny Granger. He can hit the 3, is athletic, can defend the enemy’s best player, etc. I like him a lot.

I also like Deng a lot and think he will have his breakout year (his BREAKOUT breakout, I mean) this season. He’s an attractive target for the Blazers, though when I watch him this season I will pay attention to his defense and I hope he can develop a 3 point shot at least a little—with our guards and big men, that’s important, but I’ll take defense over the 3 point shot.

Obviously, guys like Marion, Kidd, Artest are “better” than Deng, but are either too old or too crazy to fit any sort of window Portland is planning on. Deng, clearly, does.

As does Granger.

The Blazers tried for Granger last trade deadline and couldn’t get Indy to agree to a deal. He has been pointed out as a target that Pritchard craves. I could see the Blazers offering BIG money to Granger with the cap space and either force Indy to match the big money or force a sign n’ trade.

If not Granger, I could see Deng being a target as well.

If Webster or Outlaw continue to improve, like the writer suggests, then the Blazers might not need any SF, but I think it’s more likely Deng and Granger will still be a lot better than what the Blazers already got at SF.

All of the Deng issues are moot if he doesn’t just take the qualifying offer. I think that’s worst case scenario for all involved, as it isn’t like Deng has been an iron man his career thus far…

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 24, 2008 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would include Kleiza in that list as well.

Kleiza and Granger are the only two younger guys who I might like better than Deng, if I were Portland or anyone.

by arjoseph on Jul 24, 2008 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

You think the blazers would rather have kleiza than deng?

Gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you on that one.

by swede2287 on Jul 25, 2008 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Really though

While yeah it would stink if Luol got hurt and his career ended this summer or next season…. $4.5M plus all he’s earned to date are more than enough for him, his kids and family to live more than comfortably for the rest of their lives….

But I understand your point, it would stink for him to end at $4.5M when he could have earned $50-60M more guaranteed, I just wish folks wouldn’t lose sight of that.

I mean Aaron Gray will earn something like $800K this year…..that’s a VERY good salary, yet folks try to act like it’s nothing (and many of these folks are probably earning significantly less than that)....

Sorry, I just get sensitive to those kind of comments: “he suffers a serious injury that 4.5 million could be all the money he makes playing basketball for the rest of his life. Sure it’s not likely, but it is risk”

by majoyenrac on Jul 24, 2008 8:12 AM CDT reply actions  

Agents are Pimps

Summer/2007 Conversation:

AGENT – Luol, I understand you like the Bulls 5year/$57M offer and think its enough money to feed Sudan for the next millenium. But don’t you see the Bulls are disrespecting you.
LUOL – They are?
AGENT – I can name a dozens max contracts out there for lesser players than you.
LUOL – But they were signed based on potential when supply of good players was at a premium. The environment has changed and owners have to spend more judiciously to avoid the luxury tax.
AGENT – Luol you are going to be a superstar! You are only 23 and have improved every year. Do the math yo will be averaging at least 30PPG and 15 REB and 10 ASSISTS by the time you reach 27. You are a max contract canidate if I have ever seen one.
LUOL – Do you really think so? I am not really a very athletic forward.
AGENT – LUOL TRUST ME!

Summer/2008 Conversation:

LUOL – I just talked to VDN and I think he has some great ideas how to turn our team around. He sure is a breath of fresh air and he actually listened to me. And I checked out that Rose kid – AWESOME! This team has a hell of a future and I want you to get me signed up right away – I need to focus on basketball.
AGENT – WHOA kid – the Bulls are still offering basically the same deal as last year.
LUOL – Well I did have an off year.
AGENT – The Bulls are disrespecting you. Skiles and Boylan misused you last year and everyone knows it. You deserve MAX money!
LUOL – So what our the other teams saying?
AGENT – Luol, the other teams LOVE YOU!
LUOL – What kind of contracts are they offering?
AGENT – Well uh, Cap space is tight right now but they all have max contracts available in 2009 and 2010.
LUOL – But what do we do in 2008? I might get hurt and I want to play with Rose.
AGENT – You are going to the olympics when …..

The following has been a dramitization. Had the this been an actual emergency, the Bulls would have done something by now.

by Stacey "Burger" King on Jul 24, 2008 9:49 AM CDT reply actions   2 recs

"An Isiah-Thomas-led New York Knicks fan."

::rolls eyes::

Isiah was so bad he never even had the opportunity to pay someone of Luol’s caliber. The Bulls flaking out on re-signing their own young, good talent is not the same thing as the Jerome James memorial MLE-bust of the year.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 9:49 AM CDT reply actions  

This fan post sounds like it is written by the Bulls brass

It’s nearly impossible at this point to continue defending John Paxson as the EVP of Basketball Operations. I’m not even certain he’s ever negotiated any contracts.

Looks like that role is played by Gar Forman and The Chairman.

by NBA Observer on Jul 24, 2008 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Mediocrity now for success later

Maybe it makes more sense to let both guys go, and have cap space available in 2010 when Hughes is off the books as well. The question really becomes are the bulls a championship level team by resigning Deng and Gordon, or are they better served into waiting it out until they can land a true superstar. Deng and Gordon are good players, but they are not superstars, so however much I would hate to lose them for nothing next year, I know that we can get better players in 2010. Look at this list:

Joe Johnson
Ray Allen
Ben Wallace
LeBron James (player option, likely)
Dirk Nowitzki (player option, unlikely)
Josh Howard (player option, likely)
Marcus Camby
Rip Hamilton
Stephen Jackson
Tracy McGrady
Shaquille O’Neal
Dwyane Wade (player option for 10/11, unlikely)
Michael Redd (player option for 10/11, likely)
Tyson Chandler (player option for 10/11 – 50/50)
Eddy Curry (player option for 10/11 – 50/50)
Amare Stoudemire (player option for 10/11, unlikely)
Brad Miller
Manu Ginobili
Chris Bosh (player option for 10/11, unlikely)

Then you have the expiring rookie contracts of Rudy Gay, Brandon Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Adam Morrison the Bulls should at least be able to get a comparable player then. Deng and Gordon may be worth more, but let someone else pay them more, rather than hurt ourselves for the future.

"I really miss DannyRange"

by DropUOff on Jul 24, 2008 11:28 AM CDT reply actions  

yes, the future of bringing Brad Miller home.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

and....

If you’re admitting that 2010 is a longshot. Why not take the chance further by signing Deng and Gordon, and hoping that in 2 seasons you can eventually pawn off Nocioni and Hinrich for 2010 expirings? Then you have a good team that a ‘superduperstuperstar’ would want to go to, or if needed some assets (with cap/tax room) to trade for one.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Good Point Matt

I just heard that Kevin Martin, who is also represented by Deng’s agent, got Kevin a 5yr, $55 deal last year. If the reports are true, and the bulls have offered Deng 5yr at $57, then we have done all we should do in negotiations as well. Here we have a player that is probably a little bit better than Deng at this point in their respective careers, who makes less than what the Bulls have offered Deng at $57.

"I really miss DannyRange"

by DropUOff on Jul 24, 2008 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

there's a rumor

that the Bulls have yet to even come back to 5/$57.

So at least the chairman’s getting his jollies over some old-fashioned negotiatin’

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

also

maybe Kevin Martin is a saintly selfless individual who overrode his agent.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

It could be

that Lu and BG just plain want out. Maybe all this “I love it here” stuff is just for thier reps. No smart person wants to look like a discontent. Lets face it, the Chicago media has never REALLY warmed to them. Thier name ALWAYS came up in random trade senarios. There is also alot of pressure to perform in Chicago. BG probably gets the worst of this though. No matter how well he performs, the media will always want to replace him with a bigger guard that can defend better.

by Bigred15 on Jul 24, 2008 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know

I think that Deng wants to stay, and Ben would like to stay also, unless he could get a sign and trade with the Knicks.

"I really miss DannyRange"

by DropUOff on Jul 24, 2008 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

People talk about how sports are a business. The business concepts at play here are leverage and risk. Paxson has played his cards patiently and is in position where all the leverage is on his side.

First, Paxson hasn’t played any cards. Gar Foreman and Jerry Reinsdorf are doing the negotiation.

This brings us back to the agent, Levien. His options for Luol are accept the bulls long term offer, sign a contract with a non nba team, retire from basketball, work out a sign and trade, or take the one year qualifying offer and become an unrestricted free agent. I don’t think he’s a smooth enough talker to get luol to take that josh Childress route, and sign and trade deals are complicated deals where the gm ultimately has the final say.

Have you met Lou’s agent? Give us the run-down. Surely there’s something more we need to know about his lack of loquaciousness. He must be pretty tonuge-tied if he can’t suggest a guy who grew up in Europe might consider going and playing in Europe for more money than he’s getting here.

Add that to the fact that Luol likes the team and wants to play in Chicago and Levien is left with only one card he can play.

Prove it.

Threaten to take the qualifying offer. Make it a little more pressing with an imaginary deadline; through out a couple teams who would pay top dollar next year and you have a carefully built bluff to try to steal some of paxon’s patiently built leverage.

Did John Paxson author the CBA’s restricted free agency provisions? Because aside from that bit of leverage, which simply comes from extending the QO, I don’t see any for the Bulls. So quit with the fawning nonsense.

Here’s the downside. Luol would make 4.5m next year. If during that year, or in the off-season while he’s representing England in the Olympics, he suffers a serious injury that 4.5 million could be all the money he makes playing basketball for the rest of his life.
.... ...
But let’s say Luol takes the injury risk on himself and signs a one year deal to become an unrestricted free agent. Next season the free agent class includes Shawn Marion, Mike Bibby, Wally Szczerbiak, Jason Kidd, Allen Iverson, Rasheed Wallace, Lamar Odom, Andre Miller, Grant Hill, Ron Artest, as unrestricted; Marvin Williams, Linas Kleiza, Jason Maxiell, Danny Granger, Hakim Warrick, Rashad Mccants, Martell Webster, Francisco Garcia, Jamario Moon, and Paul Milsap as restricted; and Kobe Bryant, Richard Hamilton, Al Harrington, Jamal Crawford, Quentin Richardson, Hedo Turkoglu, Jermaine Oneal, Carlos Boozer who have the option of becoming unrestricted free agents. Not to mention the other guys currently in the same restricted negotiation boat as Luol like Omeka Okafor, Josh Smith, Andre Iguodola, Monta Ellis, Sasha Vujacic, Andris Biedrins , Nenad Kristic, JR Smith, and Delonte West.

Did you type all those names?!?

Also not to mention the fact that teams might be a little tight with big long term deals considering the following year the free agent class could consist of Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, Chris Bosh, Amare Stoudemire, Ray Allen, Manu Ginobili, Joe Johnson, Tracy McGrady, Yao Ming, Steve Nash, Dirk Novitzki, Brandon Roy, Kenyon Martin, Stephen Jackson, TJ Ford, Richard Jefferson, Peja Stojakovic, Tyson Chandler, Andrea Bargnami, Lemarcus Aldridge and Michael Redd.

Don’t forget Aaron Gray!

If Luol thought this off-season was like a bad dream, next year could be a nightmare. With a less than stellar year statistically, playing with a new coach and rookie point guard, a strong year by anyone of Portland’s small forward group of Webster, Travis Outlaw, and rookie Nicolas Batum, Luol could be looking at taking a midlevel deal or re-signing with the bulls. Although at that point, they might rather be a player in the monster free agent market, where they’ll have some cap space to play with if they don’t take on multi year commitments with Deng and or Gordon this off-season. Again, I’m not saying that he will have a down year or that the depth of free agents will quickly dry up the cap space money, but it could, which makes it a risk. And again it is risk Luol will be holding all by himself with his one year deal.

Another insteresting business concept is expected value. What’s the actual risk this some of this stuff happens and screws him?

Well, there’s the risk he gets hurt. This risk has to be quite small. Hell, Elton Brand suffered an injury that, to my knowledge, no NBA player has successfully recovered from to play at a high level. So the odds are quite small. I think I’m being generous to the idea when I give it a 5% chance that he’s hurt in a way that destroys his career.

Likewise I think the chance of him playing himself out of a bigger deal is quite low. Most of that Yellow Pages you just typed in sucks. So put the chance of him taking the MLE (maybe $40M) next year at about 10%. Sure, it’s possible, but unlikely.

That leaves about an 85% chance Deng collects his $4.4M next season and then goes on to sign something like a 5yr $70M contract (that will start his salary at $12M… the Blazers or Heat could easily do that next year, for example).

So add up the expected values:
5% chance of $4.4M
+10% chance of $44.4M
+85% chance of $70M

Deng’s expected return is something on the order of $68M if he accepts the QO. Which would seem to be, ya know, about $10-20M than the Bulls have apparently offered him.


But lets say it does all go they way Levien lays it out. Luol makes his 4.5m this year, has a great year statistically playing with Derrick Rose who draws the defense’s attention to allow a cutter like Luol to move without the ball and get himself easy baskets. Let’s say Portland or Miami decide that Luol will be even better taking passes from Brandon Roy or Dwayne wade and he’s a better fit than the other free agents available. Let’s say they offer him 60 to 72 million for the maximum five years. And let’s say Luol accepts it and leaves Chicago with nothing for the 7th pick in the draft,

Actually, he could potentially get $13-$14M to start, which would result in a $75-$80M contract.

which it swindled from the phoenix suns in 2004. In this scenario, Luol makes an average of 12 to 14 million a year for 5 years. The bull’s most recent published offer was 57m for 5 years. Rumor has it they have shortened it to three or four years in the 9 to 11 million dollar range. So that means, best case scenario, year 1, Luol forges 4.5 to 6.5m for the chance of making 1 to 5 million more a year for two or three years, after which he would have been an unrestricted free agent anyway at the ripe age of 27 when he’ll likely scoff at 14m a year. And all he has to do to earn this impressive return on a 4.5 to 6.5m dollar investment, is take on injury risk, and hope that he puts up numbers good enough to outshine the rest of the free agent class?

Did you forget how you built up the risk of injury and poor performance when you started talking up a short-term deal?

Because if it’s 5% and 10% over one year, it’s bound to be higher over the course of two, three or four.

Which is why, of course, players would rather sign 5 year deals, in general, than 2-3 year deals.

The question then falls back to the probabilities. Again.

Is he better taking, say, a 100% chance of $30M from the Bulls for three years, or by taking:
7% chance of 4.4M
15% chance of, say $16.4M ($4.4M plus two years of MLE)
77% chance of $35.4M ($4.4M plus two years starting at $15M – you said he’d likely scoff at $14M).

That brings us to $30.38M, so if he’s purely rational, Deng still stands to gain by signing the QO vs. taking a short term deal with the Bulls, although that scenario does close the gap a lot.

Sure he takes on some injury risk by taking a three or four year deal instead of a five year deal, but the recent trend has been that players are willing to take that risk for the right to maintain flexibility, which is why the 2009 and 2010 free agent classes have so many stars that are unrestricted.

So he should just do the trendy thing, eh? :)

Paxson, in his first ever front office job, has done an amazing job of transforming a team that featured Marcus Fizer, Eddie Robinson, Jalen Rose, and Eddy Curry into a perennial playoff contender.

OMG!

But for some reason, fans seem like they would rather blame him because his first career top rated free agent acquisition\didn’t work out the way people hoped, or blast him for not making short sited trades, or doubt him for not giving the players as much money as they ask for.

Double OMG!

Personally, I would love to enter contract negotiations opposing those types of fans who have the give-him-what-he-wants and don’t-be-so-cheep attitudes. Maybe-and this will go against everything that our expert columnists like Marriotti and Sam Smith stand for-we need to give him some credit for building from a team of rejects and making the team relevant and realize that the man knows what he’s doing. Paxson is being patient to give him self the chance to make a move when Hughes $13.7m comes off the books in what might be the best free agent year in the history of basketball. The more he spends now on Luol and Ben now the less he has to spend to add a player to a team that includes derrick rose going into his third season along with a mix of smart veterans and developing young guys still playing on their rookie deals. Any trades he makes will keep that idea in mind. And unlike the last time he had cap room, in 2010, there will be quality players at all positions. I know patient and frugal isn’t as much fun, but it works in the nba and will continue to work.

But, if you still don’t agree with his patient strategy and like to see a team overpay for big names and lock itself into long term contracts and take massive risk and mortgage the future and live in the luxury tax, maybe your just a closet New York Knicks fan. An Isiah-Thomas-led New York Knicks fan. I hear he’s not that busy, maybe drop him a line and have him toss out some trade ideas. Just a thought.

The “don’t be that type of fan” appeal! Classic as limburger cheese on your head.

by Sports2 on Jul 24, 2008 1:31 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

Agreed

I think what bothers me most is the organization’s inconsistency… when resigning Noc, the priority seemed to be “make him happy” over “don’t overpay.” Now that we’re actually negotiating with good players, we decide that we’re going to play hard ball? Doesn’t make any sense to me.

by potato0328 on Jul 28, 2008 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

The org decided making players happy was overrated.

I mean, look what happened two years ago, when everyone was happy and we got to the second round of the playoffs? And then last year, everybody was unhappy and we had a 15 game swing.
Definitely overrated. Gordon will take the MLE if we offer it enough times! Muhahahahahaha!!

by Prevenge on Aug 1, 2008 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is a great post.

Not that I agree with it all, but this is why Blog-a-Bull is awesome. Initial post = very well thought-out. Comment like this = very well thought-out response.

Deng really doesn’t have as much risk as bullsbusiness makes out. Even if he has some type of minor injury and another off-year, someone will probably offer him a contract in the $9M ballpark based on (a) the fact that his “off” production is still pretty valuable for a team, and (b) his upside as a young guy. He hasn’t been injured enough to be an injury-risk player (like Grant Hill or Jermaine O’Neal), and Sports2 correctly points out that the risk of a career-ending injury is pretty small (and runs both ways as a risk both the player and the team are taking). The threat of Deng taking the QO is very real, although I too think the Bulls get something done in the next few weeks.

(If it comes to it, and Deng goes to the Olympics without a deal, I don’t think he automatically takes the QO. It becomes much more likely, but there will be more negotiation after the Olympics if Deng isn’t signed by then.)

As for Paxson, he has not been a bad GM. The debate is whether he’s a good one. Jury is still out for me. He does smart things like front-loading contracts. Unloading Wallace for the package from the Cavs was a good move, too (rather have Hughes’ contract and some other pieces, like Gooden, than the Corpse’s contract and locker-room demeanor); I thought it would be impossible to move Ben Wallace, but Pax did it while finding some upside. Then again, he wasted PJ Brown’s expiring contract and was wrong in evaluating how much Wallace would help us.

As for the Nocioni and Hinrich contracts, I like how Paxson gets all the blame for those and none of the credit for the good stuff (which is credited instead to Gar and the Chairman). It’s got to be all or nothing, the good with the bad, or neither.

by arjoseph on Jul 24, 2008 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

On the last point...

...not necessarily. I have no way to prove this and am making hypothetical speculation that I’m not sure even I believe in, but: it could be that Reinsdorf had a hand in signing Ben Wallace (everyone does get blamed for that one), and then decided to let Paxson take-over, more-or-less in negotiations—extending Hinrich, re-signing Nocioni. Reinsdorf sees how much these deals potentially hurt the Bulls down the road and decided that he was taking over from there.

by tyger1147 on Jul 24, 2008 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be surprised if Reinsdorf pushed to re-sign Noc

Nobody chanted ‘Ben Gordon’ in the playoffs.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gee Sports2

Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed?

“First, Paxson hasn’t played any cards. Gar Foreman and Jerry Reinsdorf are doing the negotiation.”
Pure Semantics.

“prove it.”
Is this a court of law? I will pay more attention in the future to your posts hoping that you can prove all of your opinions.

Sports2, I think your one of the best posters on this board (regardless of what Matt thinks :)). A nice rebuttal would have sufficed rather than sarcasm.

On a side note: I also believe Paxson is a very good GM. Patience is a virtue, and good business.
My hope is that Deng signs for 5 /50 and Gordon signs for 3/30 with the thrid year being a team option.

p.s. And yes, this is my first post, although I’ve been a long-time looker.

by StephenAA on Jul 24, 2008 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

OK, ok

But sarcasm is fun sometimes. :)

And seriously, it’s not pure semantics who’s doing the negotiating. I mean, if Pax isn’t even the guy calling the shots, defending his negotiating stance is a tad askew, isn’t it? That’s my biggest problem with the Bulls. For a team that talks about “accountability”, the musical chairs at the negotiating table (and in other major decisions) makes it impossible for me, as a fan, to figure out who’s accountable for what’s going on there.

Which is where the “prove it” stuff comes in. I’ve got no problem with opinions, but when we state something that’s obviously opinion as fact, then I think it’s fair to point it out.

by Sports2 on Jul 27, 2008 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I tip my hat.

That’s a great post of epic proportions.

by swede2287 on Jul 25, 2008 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

It looks to me like " bullsbussiness" is close to Bulls frontoffice

Is this a new way of “leaking” arguments to fans these days?

"YES,WE CAN!"-B.OBAMA.

by Azabullsfan on Jul 24, 2008 3:07 PM CDT reply actions  

heh

if so, not very subtle username.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

wow and i was worried no one would read this

Some interesting responses. Sadly I don’t work for the bulls. yet. but if your reading, John, let’s talk. Don’t get me wrong, i like luol quite a bit. He gets most his points cutting to the basket without the ball when the defense is tracking a teamates threat to drive or on that pattened spot up shot a step inside the three point line. He isn’t particulary good as a three point shooter, a defender, a ball handler, or a guy who can make his own shot. Those are some pretty big drawbacks. And maybe he’ll get better at all those things this year. But they are the same things he’s needed to get better at since he was a rookie. I’ hope for his sake and for the team’s that this is his breakout year. Just like i did last year and the year before. But maybe it will be one of those other free-agents breakout year. Maybe it will be one of portland’s other small forwards breakout.

Luol is currently one of the best long term prospects of the unrestricted guys next year. No question. And Luol would be a good fit in portland. But Kobe, Hedo, Harrington, or Boozer might not look too bad if they opt out. Or kleza or grainger. It’s a gamble. And is Luol willing to lay down around 6.5m this year to take that gamble? He took a gamble by turning down the extension last year. but he didn’t have to lay down money that year to do it. that didn’t work out like he’d hoped. he fired that agent and signed with levien this year.

On the subject of Luol’s agent, i don’t know him. There i said it. But i do know his motivation is to get his player the most lucrative contract he can to get himself the biggest payday he can. And with that in mind i don’t think he is so complex that you have to know him to understand what he’s doing. As for taking the money in Europe, I think Luol is in a drastically different situation. They were both nba players and restricted free agents dealing with a contract negotiation. But, Josh wasn’t going to get much more than a mle. Josh was in a situation where the hawks had a few players at his position. Josh wasn’t a starter on his team. Josh is a player that could be the star of a team in europe. Luol can be a great nba player, when paired with a star. Now, i wouldn’t be surprised if luol’s agent through that story out there (like landry’s agent did today). Nor would I be surprised if he pushed for a sign and trade. But that is because those are the only cards he can play. Usually the guy going to the media to negotiate is the one without leverage in the negotiating room.

As for fans scoffing at 4.5 million dollar salaries, i agree. I was going to say,,”4.5m, a great salary unless your a versitile 6-9 23 year old athlethic nba star.” but i thought it was a bit hokey.sounding. I do not make 4.5m a year.

Anywho, i am well aware that my opinion of Pax is not one that is shared by all (or any) but I tend to look for positives. Everyone has strengths and weeknesses. But I personally would rather look at a situation that I don’t understand and try to figure out the reasoning behind it, rather than assume that since i don’t understand or agree that it must be the work of a incompitent fool who isn’t qualified to do the job that only 31 other people in the world have managed to get. Except of course, Isiah.

One question that maybe one of you can answer. How many free agents have taken the one year qualifying offer and got a handsome payday the next year in the range that luol is looking for? Like i mentioned, i know petrus did for 4-5m a year. But anyone get the 10-15m a year?

Anywho, thanks for the read.

by bullsbusiness on Jul 24, 2008 10:27 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I'm not as much afraid of the QO

as Luol (and his reps) aggressively pursuing a sign/trade, knowing that the Bulls have had 2 chances to sign him yet won’t.

Teams aren’t interested enough in him yet, but that’s because they still assume the Bulls want these guys back.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 24, 2008 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mastermind vs midget brain

Paxon might be better than Crumps, but someone stole his thunder. One is a mastermind while the other is midget brain.
Who ate Paxon’s lunch??

by Fastbreak on Jul 25, 2008 9:47 AM CDT reply actions  

Guys

i dont get it. why all this hinrich and noc hate. both deng and gordon had bad years last year (just like hinrich and to some extent noc) and all we want to do is sign deng(who is not worth more than 5yrs 57) and gordon who i hope is gone soon. both these guys are not worth anything more than last years contract and they should just be allowed to leave if they want more. it is very easy to get a small forward replacement in the nba and we should not panick over that loss. i love deng and he is part of the core of kids i grew to love so much but he is not anything better than a third option and hence should only be payed accordingly. deng is injury prone gordon is just lucky he ended up on a rebuilding bulls team at the right time so that his only talent of shooting stood out more. but honestly he is not an iverson who can hold a franchise. i bet alot of good players end up getting cut because they just did not fit into the team that drafted them.

did pax overpay noc yes i agree a bit he did but i think noc will have a much better year and if deng leaves he will have an even better year. gordon i just dont like him on this team anymore. we end up depending on him alot and we live and die with his shots. i would rather sign a proven veteran.

Bulls NBA CHAMPS BY 2010

by glycen on Jul 25, 2008 11:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Check this out

“i bet alot of good players end up getting cut because they just did not fit into the team that drafted them.”

Did a fanpost about this. From 1999 till now. You’ll see that this is the first year teams are not maxing guys out. click this

by Blacknight23 on Jul 27, 2008 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Excellent diary and post by bullsbusiness

Today’s Chicago Tribune has bulls business’s summary look prophetic.

The Bulls and Luol Deng’s representative continue to negotiate and occasionally make progress toward a long-term extension,
Deng also has said he wants to remain with the Bulls, and negotiations remain cordial and professional. Proposals have been exchanged, with one source saying three-, four- and six-year deals still are being discussed.

This sounds to me like Levien/Deng blinked and a deal likely will be done. Paxson/Reinsdorf may come across the winner on this one.

by chgobr on Jul 26, 2008 6:31 AM CDT reply actions  

WHY DO WE NEED A WINNER?!?!?!

I know that’s not directed at you, and I’m no business man, but I definitely believe in Win-Win strategies and not that every negotiation has to have a winner and a loser. Ugh.

by tyger1147 on Jul 26, 2008 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with you!

Unfortunately, you correctly perceive that there is a contentious tone in the diary implying someone must win and someone must lose. You are correct – this can be a win – win and hopefully will be for the Bulls and Deng/Gordon.

by chgobr on Jul 27, 2008 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Win-Win

Will be Deng getting a long-term deal that’s livable for the Bulls. Bulls get a good player at a price they’re not going to want to dump for PJ Brown in a year, and Deng gets set for life.

I think the Deng blink was in turning away the overtures from the Greek team. If he really wanted to force the issue with the Bulls he should have gotten a firm offer on the table from them.

by Sports2 on Jul 27, 2008 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

But what about motivation

When you have a team that most players feel unappreciated it, it affects play and might mean a very mediocre performance for Deng and Gordon.

by Fastbreak on Jul 26, 2008 12:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.

FanPosts

Links

"Best NBA Blogroll"
-- Dan Shanoff

The Essentials:
Bulls.com
NBA.com
HoopsHype
BallHype
ESPN.com NBA

Workin' the Beat:
KC Johnson - Tribune (blog)
John Jackson - Sun-Times (blog)
Mike McGraw - Daily Herald (blog)
Nick Friedell -  ESPNChicago.com
Sam Smith - Bulls.com
Aggrey Sam - CSNChicago.com


More Bulls Blogs/Forums:
Thank You Isiah
Chicago Bulls Podcasters
Bulls Confidential
By the Horns
Bullish Thoughts
Chicago Bulls KY
Pippen Ain't Easy
RealGM Bulls Forum
SportsTwo Bulls Forum

Blogging the Association:
(League Wide)
True Hoop
HoopsAnalyst
Give Me the Rock
The Basketball Jones
NBA Fanhouse
Hoops Addict
SBNation.com - NBA
ProBasketballTalk
ShamSports
Ball Don't Lie
The Painted Area


(Team-Centric)
Queen City Hoops

Bobcats Baseline
Knickerblogger.net    
Sixers' Shots
Forum Blue and Gold
SuperSonicSoul
Hornets247.com 
SonicsCentral.com 
ClipperBlog.com  
The Nugg Doctor
Loy's Place
Reds Army
Need4Sheed
THE WIZZNUTZZ
RaptorsForum.com
TWolvesBlog.com
Spurs Dynasty
David's Memphis Grizzlies Blog
The Bratwurst
Sixers Journal
Sixers 4 Guidos 
3 Shades of Blue  
CavsNews.com
RaptorTalk
Deceptively Quick
TheLakersNation.com
Utah Jazzer Blog
KnicksDefense.com
T. Jose Caldeford
Hoopinion
RaptorBlog.com
Suns @NBAWeblog.com
The Cowhide Globe
Stepien Rules
Project Spurs
Raptors Republic
Dino Nation Blog
Lake Show Life
Valley of the Suns
The KnicksBlog.com
Big Lakers Fan
Roundball Mining Company
Cavs: The Blog
48 Minutes of Hell
Daily Thunder
Piston Powered
The Two Man Game
PistonsNationBlog.com
Cowbell Kingdom.com
Hot Hot Hoops
NetsAreScorching
Celtics Hub
Orlando Magic Daily
Philadunkia
Truth About It
Always Miller Time
Slippery When Nets
Eight Points Nine Seconds
Howlin' T-Wolf
Red 94

MSM NBA blogs:

Ira Winderman (Heat)
Jason Quick (Blazers)
IndyStar.com (Pacers)
Michael Cunningham (Hawks) 
Full-Court Press (Pistons)
Jonathan Feigen (Rockets)
Rick Bonnell (Bobcats)
Jazz Notes
Chris Herrington (Grizzlies)
Orlando Sentinel
Michael Lee (Wizards)
Alan Hahn (Knicks)   
Doug Smith (Raptors)
Marc Berman (Knicks)
Al Iannazzone (Nets)

For the Statheads:
Basketball-Reference.com
APBR Discussion
Knickerblogger's Stat Page
82Games.com
Doug's Stats
Popcorn Machine
HoopData


Other Resources:

HoopsHype Salaries
SportsTwo Salaries
ESPN.com Trade Machine
RealGM: NBA Draftpicks Owed
ShamSports.com Salaries
DraftExpress

 


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger