Source: If no contract in 2 weeks Deng signs tender
[From the FanPosts (you all are fast). This is just a negotiation tactic. I'm sure in a couple weeks we'll hear about Deng's offer to play overseas too. Though if it helps things move along, then I'm all for these 'leaks'. -ed.]
Unless the Chicago Bulls can reach an agreement for a contract extension with restricted free agent Luol Deng before he departs to join the Great Britain national team in two weeks, he will end talks and tell management that he plans to leave the organization as a free agent next summer, a source close to Deng told Yahoo! Sports.
Guess we need to stop dragging our feet on this one. I would hate to end up losing deng after next yaer for nothing. Sign and trades need to be taken more seriously now.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
1 recs |
231 comments
Comments
Interesting thanks for the link
I am hopeful this is the typical posturing during negotiations. I believe Hinrich didn’t sign until September or October and there was some similar bantor before he signed.
by chgobr on Jul 21, 2008 6:39 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich signed when he was extension-eligible...
...two years before he could be an UFA.
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 7:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bulls better take this seriously
Deng doesn’t strike me as the type of guy who would bullshit about something like this. If he decides he wants out, he probably means it. Either way, the Bulls better not take the chance, because they can’t afford to lose a player with Deng’s value and get nothing in return.
by Big D on Jul 21, 2008 6:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i agree
and i’m going to be pissed if he walks.
that said, i’m kind of glad he’s taking a no bullshit route. after all, the organization decided they would NOT negotiate last year, so i appreciate that he’s showing he’s got the control. everyone’s been talking about the leverage the bulls have… well. doesn’t seem like they got too much of it now.
by Jaina on Jul 21, 2008 7:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
although come to think of it
if they just walk… who is going to give them a big contract next year? what team even can? since everyone wants to be in the ‘10 sweepstakes… no one’s going to want to be adding a big contract next season.
by Jaina on Jul 21, 2008 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Atlanta and their love for wing players, for one.
Golden State, depending on what they do w/ Biedrins and Ellis (nice young trio). Miami could if they got someone to take Blount and Haslem (not a bad replacement for Marion). Oklahoma City if they want to play three 6’9” guys at the 2 through 4. Of course, the Trailblazers might have something. Obviously, a lot can happen before then and those are numbers as of about now.
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it doesn't matter who is going to pay them...
their walking for nothing…we get f*cked
by Jbonelli on Jul 21, 2008 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Portland
will have two big contracts coming off the books next year. Steve Francis and Raef LaFrentz. Deng would look good surrounded by Roy, Oden, LMA and Bayless. If the Bulls let him sign the tender and walk that would be a crushing blow to this teams future. And could end Paxson’s run as Bulls GM.
by ronmexibull on Jul 21, 2008 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deng doesn't seem like a bullshit artist,
but I wouldn’t count out his agent. If Deng has just told his agent, “You take care of this, I don’t know what I’m doing with this contract stuff,” (or if said agent has convinced him of that), then the agent might be using tactics that Deng would never himself use, but has implicitly authorized. I can picture Levien reassuring Luol that “this is how the game’s played.”
by arjoseph on Jul 21, 2008 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome...
to Paxson World!!!
Where everything happens in slooooooooooooow motion and everybody is accountable…
by Agusnico on Jul 21, 2008 6:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
except
from reading it, it seems to be more a reinsdorf world.
why cant he just focus on the sox and leave the bulls alone?
"It is playoff time. Whoever responds and changes quicker is going to win four games and then go to the next round." - Toni K
by Yibs on Jul 21, 2008 7:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My bad...
You´re right it is Reinsdorf World…
Still, even if Reinsdorf focused on the Sox I wouldn’t mind Paxson leaving with him…
and Nocioni…
and Gordon…
and Hughes…
and…
by Agusnico on Jul 21, 2008 7:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't mind leaving to work at the Sox...
but Nocioni and I will have a hard time learning how to play baseball…
We’re argentinians, we like soccer!!!
by Agusnico on Jul 21, 2008 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does that mean it's our fault too?
"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente
by cubbybear on Jul 21, 2008 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This tactic might be pointed at other teams as much as at the Bulls.
As in, “Hey teams, make some offers here to force the Bulls’ hand, or we’re off the market regardless.”
by arjoseph on Jul 21, 2008 8:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not worried
unless the Chairman opens his mouth with more “one player told me they regret their decision” nonsense.
by NBA Observer on Jul 21, 2008 9:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Josh Childress got an offer from Europe.
3 years, $20 million from the Greek Team. The Euro is strong and JChill will not have to pay taxes…he is said to be considering it. Luol could go that route.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AkNr4Q8Bzvp6PwbhyW8bPGy8vLYF?slug=aw-childressgreece072108&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
by Dionysus2.0 on Jul 21, 2008 9:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
crazy stuff
i can’t believe the NBA is now losing talent to the Euro League. I blame W. Bush.
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
by Orlando Woolridge on Jul 21, 2008 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your crazy
How can you think it’s W. Bush fault when you can clealy see that this has Karl Rove’s hands all over it?
by boerwinkle on Jul 21, 2008 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The vast right wing conspiracy's long threads invade the NBA!
"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente
by cubbybear on Jul 21, 2008 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If this is true...
... then we might not see Omer Asik in two years after all…
Please Pax, don't trade Hughes! Just make sure that he stays injured until... 2010!!!
by bull83 on Jul 21, 2008 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not exactly true on the taxes
If you retain your US citizenship, only the first $80k or so earned overseas is tax free.
Even if you renounce your citizenship, the IRS still keeps tabs for ~10 years in case you decide to come back.
While there are advantages to be had by those paying Euros, not paying Uncle Sam is not one of them.
--Torch
by torch on Jul 21, 2008 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he meant..
that he wouldn’t be paying taxes in Greece since the team picks up the tab on that.
by BNeL21 on Jul 21, 2008 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It'd be bad
very bad, but the hawks (and thus the bulls if Deng did this) still own his restricted rights when he (they) come back to the nba
by carlirvington on Jul 21, 2008 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if they'll start going after big stars next
All it takes is one crazy Russian billionaire willing to offer Lebron $30 million a year (which is more than the NBA’s maximum salary). It would be pretty funny if half the teams in the NBA saved cap space for Lebron, and he told them all to go to hell and signed in Europe. Obviously endorsements would be the big question mark, but for players who don’t have a ton of endorsements, like Childress, the Euroleague may actually be the better option right now.
by Big D on Jul 21, 2008 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go to Europe
and live in obscurity during his prime? These guys want their money but most of them want the big bucks you get from endorsements here in the states. Not to mention fame in their home country where success here is still viewed as the pinnacle.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Jul 21, 2008 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are plenty of endorsement deals in Europe
I agree that a guy like Lebron seems far-fetched, but hell, Deng is basically from the UK anyway. It doesn’t seem far-fetched in a lot of cases to me.
by Sports2 on Jul 21, 2008 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was
writing with our home grown big stars like Lebron, Wade, etc in mind. Not people who originated in other countries like Deng who already does have a life and family overseas. I just doubt our home grown stars would want to play elsewhere. It is hard enough to get them to take international play seriously even in the Olympic games. Why would they want to go off somewhere and play in a league not even televised here? I would not be surprised if great basketball players from other countries pass on coming to the States to play sometime in the future if the fame and money is good enough in their own country and they keep beating us in the international scene. On the other hand, I think it would take quite a bit for the reverse to happen.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Jul 21, 2008 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Europe
The declining american dollar is a source of great trouble. Having the fed print more money to bail out these banks, etc only further devalue our currency.
on to basketball:
Even though we have a glut of players I don’t think we are in any position to throw assets away. We can not allow Deng or Gordon to walk away for nothing.
"It was shock. You almost feel you have three or four innings to play, but you go home." -- Alex "Mr. March" Rodriguez after losing to Mexico in the WBC
by haze on Jul 21, 2008 10:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd agree
but would other teams be willing to sign-and-trade for the dollars those two guys are asking for? It doesn’t seem like anyone wants to pay these two guys their asking price. These two guys may be disappointed in the offers they get next year as well.
by messwiththebull on Jul 21, 2008 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If other clubs want to pay Deng and Gordon bongo bucks
then why aren’t we trying to accommodate them? Can’t we just sign Deng for 6 years, 80 mil and then trade him to the Lakers to get something back rather than nothing?
by NBA Observer on Jul 22, 2008 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather give Deng 'bongo'
and that way we keep Luol Deng! He’s good at basketball!
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 22, 2008 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen
How Bongo is Bongo… what should we do? 5 and 70?
by JockstrapNoah on Jul 22, 2008 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
if he straight up says he’s signing the tender so he can leave the organization next year, and not to play better so that the Bulls give him a better offer, then he shouldn’t veto any trades based on losing his Bird Rights, since his plan is to leave anyway and he can’t expect the Bulls to capitulate to a sign and trade after that. Of course things are never so cut and dry but something to think about.
by JSlakov on Jul 21, 2008 11:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why couldn't he expect the Bulls to capitulate?
If the Bulls are idiotic enough to hold a grudge at the expense of getting better, Deng would be smart to get out ASAP. He could go somewhere else for one year and be one of the second-tier guys in the summer of 2010. Whenever teams save up cap space to spend it, and then don’t land that big star, there is always someone willing to overpay for that second-tier guy. If he can threaten that, why wouldn’t the Bulls do a sign-and-trade if it helps them, too?
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you just suggest
that Deng should sign a one-year deal after this one-year QO is up just so he can test the 2010 waters for a shot at a sloppy seconds signing?
by messwiththebull on Jul 21, 2008 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't say should. Said could. But take what you want from it.
The bigger point is that the Bulls would be idiots not to do a sign-and-trade w/ Deng if it would help them, just because they hold a grudge. As I detailed above for Jaina, there might be a few teams that could and are willing to pay him next year.
You must be itching for a fight.
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but
this is all a matter of posturing anyway. If Deng says “I’m signing for the one year tender and then leaving” then the Bulls can say “Fine. We’re going to try to trade you this season though.” And if he says “I don’t want to lose my Bird rights,” then the Bulls can say “You’re gonna lose them anyway because you said you’re leaving and we’re not going to sign and trade you.” Whether or not they would stick to that, I would think it might be enough to get Deng to agree to a trade, especially since he probably wouldn’t be enjoying his time in Chicago and would at least give him a chance to prove himself to another team that he’s worth the kind of money he wants.
That said, I can’t remember a starter ever agreeing to a one year tender before. (I guess Olowokandi might count as a starter) so I don’t think this will actually come to play.
by JSlakov on Jul 21, 2008 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chill out
I wanted to be sure I understood what you posted. That’s a lot of risk for Deng to assume, in my opinion.
McGraw sees Portland as a viable threat next year to sign Deng.
http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=222216
by messwiththebull on Jul 21, 2008 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think them and Miami have to be favorites.
Deng won’t be as good as Marion, but he’ll be younger and not near as expensive. They’d have to figure out a creative way to trade Blount and Haslem (expiring in 2010) for 2009 expirings, but “anything is possible”.
Anyway, I think the main thing keeping Deng away from other teams this year isn’t the lack of money, but more that signing him to any reasonable (or even a slightly over-priced) contract would get matched by the Bulls. With that not being the problem next year, I don’t see him having a few very interested suitors.
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I apologize for over-reacting. I'm tired today.
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No problem
I’m just trying to avoid being banned.
by messwiththebull on Jul 21, 2008 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting - the Bulls may be able to block Portland somewhat
Chris (Portland, OR): Do you see the Blazers making a run at Deng, either in a trade or signing him next offseason?John Hollinger: (2:55 PM ET ) Next offseason is much more plausible than a sign-and-trade this year. But the Bulls might try the Darius Miles Sabotage trick if it gets to that point. (If any team signs him for 10 games the Blazers have to put his money back on the cap).
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is there any way to put
in a clause where if Mark Cuban buys the Cubs, he also has to take over the Bulls…exile Reinsdorf to Basketball Purgatory
by Jbonelli on Jul 21, 2008 11:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I vote let him sign
And let him go. Deng wants too much money and isn’t the superstar his cred expects.
I’d hate to lose him for nothing, but I’d also hate to overpay him and be stuck with a guy making $13-14M a year who’s max worth is closer to $8-10M a year…..
We have too much young talent to worry about with the still unproven but much more athletic Tyrus, Sef, Noah and Rose coming up…..
Deng’s a nice to have, but he has yet to prove he really is our best player (he’s our best stat stuffer, but I wouldn’t yet say he’s our best player).
If he wants to play hardball, let’s call his bluff. Have him sign the 1 year tender and become a free agent with Gordon next year. I don’t think it’s happening with guys like Joe Johnson, Richard Hamilton, Stephen Jackson, TMAC, Camby, Rudy Gay, Manu Ginobili, Carlos Boozer, Jermaine O’Neal, and Mehmet Okur amongst others also being up for free agency next year….
I think we should call his bluff let him sweat about it and work out the extension in Sept/Oct….
Worst comes of it, he becomes a free agent and we use that money to resign some of our guys and get a few solid veteran players…...
We can also use this time to try the Tyrus at SF experiment (which I like, Matt hates, and we’ve blabbed on and on here about and I’m not about to blab any more…
by majoyenrac on Jul 21, 2008 12:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Who do you think our
best player is then, if Deng’s just our best stat stuffer?
"Sharks are as tough as those football fans who take their shirts off during games in Chicago in January, only more intelligent." --Dave Barry
by rea5661 on Jul 21, 2008 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ben Gordon
Is our current best player. He is the guy who makes our breaks us in the clutch. He’s viewed unfairly as a 1 trick pony, and perhaps he just is a 1 trick pony, but he’s the only pony who performs when the game is on the line, and thus suffers when he fails.
Deng wallows in the shadows, and prior to last year showed he could play defense…..I was very unhappy with Deng’s lack of defensive effort last year, and think it was a ploy to stuff his stats further, which unfortunately still went down (althought he whole team was a mess).
I think we have enough with Noc, Tyrus, and Thabo to make up for a Deng loss, and either way I don’t htink it’s wise to overpay Deng at $14M a year when we could use that money in the future for a better player for the same money or possibly even less dough.
by majoyenrac on Jul 21, 2008 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is an example of what bad contracts lead to
and why I am so averse to this organization giving any more out.
by messwiththebull on Jul 21, 2008 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To me there is a difference
between paying a little more for a starter like Deng to stay around than overpaying an aging sixth man like Noc. To me the biggest mistake would be to let a thing in the past such as like Noc’s signing affect how Deng’s negotiations go. Noc and Deng’s situations are completely different and should not influence each other. Noc’s signing is a financial mistake for us, but to not sign Deng because of it…that would be the unforgivable mistake in my mind.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Jul 21, 2008 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But we're stuck
with Noc, and his “aging” 27 yr old ways.
I don’t think the gap between those two is nearly as large as is perceived on this site. Noc plays with vigor when teh going gets tough, andt hat helps offset some of his lesser stats. Noc is a better 3pt/outside shooter…..
Noc knows how to get to the rim (he forgot so last year).....and Noc often is made to look like the loser when an offensive guy does a switch and someone else on the d end doesn’t switch making Noc look like the loser….
by majoyenrac on Jul 21, 2008 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Noc "forgetting" how to get to the rim gets a pass, but Deng "not trying" on defense doesn't?
Not to mention that Deng had a lingering injury all year that many say is tough to play through (and David Thorpe seemed to think hindered him greatly). Also, Noc looks like a loser on some of those switches maybe because his teammates expect him to be athletic enough not to have to switch (which is a mistaken expectation), or not to go under picks, etc.
Brian Scalabrine also “plays with vigor.” When he plays.
by arjoseph on Jul 21, 2008 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
We’re stuck with Noc anyway, he’s not going to be paid in the $14M range that Deng wants and really is Deng worth more than $6M over Noc, I certainly don’t think so….
Deng’s just not athletic enough to deserve max money….I think we call his bluff….
Deng has no hope of being a top 5 SF…..he doesn’t deserve that kind of dough.
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
Your comparison of Brian Scalabrine to Nocioni is ridiculously stupid…..just so you know. I don’t know if anyone would compare Nocioni and BS…..
I don’t get that point at all.
I don’t hate Deng, I would like him at a $10M or maybe $11M a year salary….slightly overpaid maybe but not too vastly overpaid….he’s a solid player with many good all around skills….
But that doesn’t mean he’s going to ever be in the Lebron, Melo, Pierce, Marion, Artest (even though I hate him), Josh Smith, Iggy, Butler, Richard Jefferson, Prince, Lewis (who is more athletic and explosive) and even young guys like Durant, etc.
Deng might approach all around skills of RJ, but that’s nowhere near a $14M a year guy.
If he wants to play hard ball, I don’t see any reasons long term why letting him go would be catastrophic (it might hurt the year after this one, but who knows how much that will if Rose is all he should be and if Tyrus can be a monster PF/SF that his athleticism shows he might be at some point).
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's as good as that second tier.
And RJ himself is a $14m guy.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 22, 2008 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That doesn't mean
RJ is worth that money….
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And still
I’d take RJ now over Deng….but Deng could be at his level by next year.
I don’t want to overpay Deng because the Nets foolishly overpaid for Richard Jefferson….
Neither guy is worth that kind of money. They are at best 3rd bananas in my book.
Deng’s a solid guy, great PR guy, good player, but I just don’t want to further stranglehold our team by paying him $13-14M when he’s just not worthy of that kind of dough. I’d rather get a similar or even better player for $10M and add another solid veteran for $4M….
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Any suggestions on who those other players are?
If there are close alternatives to Deng at better price points, I’m much more inclined to agree with you that we shouldn’t pay him. Please elaborate.
by arjoseph on Jul 22, 2008 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd jump at the shot of getting
Josh Childress for half of what Deng’s asking for. Childress 07-08 PER = 17.24. Deng 07-08 PER = 17.07.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And with all the free agents coming up in the next 2 yrs
There’s only so much money to go around, so we definately could get a veteran for less than $14-15M that Deng wants….
It sucks that Charlotte has Wallace and Richardson, because I’d love to make a splash by dealing Deng for Okafor. Okafor would control the paint a bit….we’d still need offense, but that’s a nice trade for now too. And who knows if BG and Okafor could shine in the next level together…..
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you really just
say you wanted to give up a 23-yr old player whos career is on the rise for a 25-yr old player whos PPG has been declining for the last 2 years and are still down from his rookie year?
Reading your trade “ideas” makes my head hurt…
"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."
by Ugh It Live! on Jul 22, 2008 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is Deng's career on the rise?
He also has declined and 2 yr age difference is nothing.
Okafor’s a solid inside presence, and a defensive anchor. We have enough athleticism with Thabo, Hughes, Nocioni, Thomas to offset a loss of Deng at the SF….
Especially if we get a PF/C in Okafor who’s more a wash and could play well with Noah/Gooden/Gordon (as in the past). Big players are a premium, and Okafor could be what we hoped Big Ben would be for many more years to come….
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Flagged as inappropriate.
(not really)
Anyone who further cites Deng’s and Gordon’s numbers from last season aloneas some sort of proof of anything is ignorant at best and intentionally dishonest at worst.
It’s a piece of the puzzle of information, but to act like it’s the beginning and end of a comparison is a joke.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The signficance of last year's numbers
is that it brings up the possibility of mean reversion. Did these guys just play out of their minds and have a breakout year and then come back down to earth?
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or did they play for shitty coaches on a team
where everyone played poorly.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Young players tend to improve with more years in the league
I doubt 3 years of continued improved play from Gordon and Deng is hardly a mirage.
If we’re all about getting complementary players with no upside, then Josh Childress is definitley your man.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Childress, unlike Deng and BG,
has seen his PER increase each and every year. And he’s only 25. And he’s done this as a non-starter. And his PER is currently at (Deng) or above (BG) theirs. How does he have no upside again?
Deng lost 1.72 off his breakout PER. Gordon lost 1.79 off his breakout PER. Whether or not this is the case, you have to wonder about mean reversion. The basketball gods took some profits, maybe.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a feeling that if Childress were to start every game like Deng
His PER would drop. Not catastrophically, but you would see the difference. Bench players can hide their flaws by playing less minutes (Josh played 7 minutes less this year than the last one).
And it’s apparent that Childress can’t be had for a fraction of the cost. If it takes 13 million to sign Deng, I’m betting it’s going to take 10 million to sign Childress. IMO, The extra 12 million dollars over 4 years isn’t that big of a deal considering Deng is just a lot better, and has proven he can start at the 3. Childress was usurped by Marvin Williams, I don’t think he’s worth anything but Nocioni money.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can go ahead an rely on your feeling
and I’ll rely on the numbers and my personal observations. Your feelings may end up being right, but when it comes to making financial decisions I lean more on quantifiable data.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hscs recently posted
on this topic. In case you didn’t read it (apparently you didn’t, because the numbers demonstrate the opposite of your “feeling”) here it is again:
http://ballhype.com/story/love_and_mathematics_pt_2_the_paul_millsap_quandary/
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 22, 2008 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Childress posted a career high PER
In a season where he played 7 less minutes than previously. I’m well aware of the arguments that are made on per minute production, but does that apply to Childress?
He was a starter, got starter minutes, and was then demoted to 6th man status in place of Marvin Williams.
I don’t want to get into a whole PER, production debate here (in another thread, I would love to considering you and others know way more about than I do), but isn’t his PER last season a bit of a mirage since it came with decreased minutes?
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
first...I don't know a lot about it...
I believed as you do before i read the article from hscs.
It turns out to be one of those cases where “common sense” just isn’t supported by the facts…which is not to say that individual cases can’t (in fact, they often do—hence the word “average”)run against the averages
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 23, 2008 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have that same feeling
But he did play almost 30MPG…..so we shall see.
Still I feel he’s more a complimentary piece even than Deng, but who knows that could be the fan in me talking.
I know I’ve said trade scenarios for Deng, but it’s not like I hate him….he’s a ncie to have. I don’t want to pay a nice to have a need to keep $$.
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because you were so gracious . . .
My point with Scalabrine was not that he and Noc are cookie-cutter copies. My point was that vigor doesn’t mean anything if it isn’t backed up with talent. You threw “vigor” out there as a positive for Noc that you implied Deng doesn’t have. I was questioning the value of “vigor” in the abstract.
Is my stupidity less ridiculous now? Let me know if you need more explanation.
by arjoseph on Jul 22, 2008 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Calm down
I wasn’t calling you stupid, I was saying that comment was ridiculous and stupid.
And no I don’t follow. We’ve seen over the past 4 years how Deng will time and time again have a monster qtr 1 or 3 and disappear in the 4th.
Nocioni’s aggressiveness never ceases no matter the circumstance. True Deng’s better than Noc, I’m not saying that….but is he $7-8M better? I don’t think so….
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deng's asking for $16 million now?
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deng's not asking for $16M
But in a few short year’s when Deng’s making $14M, Noc will be making $6M….
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I blame Larry Hughes
Deng: This guy’s NOT making more than me! He’s a chucker, Pax!!!!
Pax thought bubble: “Thank god I didn’t keep Wallace around”
"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente
by cubbybear on Jul 21, 2008 2:03 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
if you guys remember...
pip and MJ had to go throught this same BS contract crap. jordan threatened to retire if he didn’t get his due, and pippen started spreading trade rumors about himself cuz he wasn’t getting his fill
by Rose1 on Jul 21, 2008 2:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I see your point
and hate to point out the obvious but despite the obvious positional differences, Luol is NO MJ and BG is NO Pip…
If Deng and Gordon had even NBA Finals experience right now, – not even a title – they’d have legitimate gripes to the Bulls for rich, long-term deals.
"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."
by Ugh It Live! on Jul 21, 2008 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right on Noce
I would be fine letting 1 or both go really…...we might just end up better off.
Last thing I want to do is overpay for a nice 3rd option in Deng and pay him 1st or 2nd option money…..or pay for a 1 trick pony in Gordon when his ball handling skills and size is a bit much to expect to pay a guy $10-12M for.
I’d be happier paying Gordon $10M/yr though for 4 yrs than paying Deng $12-14M/yr for 4 years as at least Gordon has proven himself a clutch performer when the going gets tough….
Deng’s got more all around gifts, but Gordon’s a special player in his own right…
Last thing I’d want is to pay $24M a year for BOTH of them and watch as other teams pay less for 2 all around better players.
by majoyenrac on Jul 21, 2008 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So the Bulls can let Deng and Gordon go for nothing, and end up better?
Yeah, I’m sure free agents will be lining up to sign with a Bulls team that goes 20-62 in 2008-09. Didn’t Krause already try that approach?
by Big D on Jul 21, 2008 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Krause
Let go of MICHAEL JORDAN and Scottie Pippen….
Deng and Gordon are 1/10th of Scottie Pippen and 1/1,000,000 of Michael Jordan….
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You didn't address my point
Are free agents going to be willing to sign with a terrible Bulls team? The Bulls sucked last year, so just imagine how bad they’d be without their two best players.
by Big D on Jul 22, 2008 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not
I’m sure a lot of folks will want to play in Chicago, which even with a crappy year last year lead the league in attendance….
Without BG and Deng we still have talent with potential superstar D. Rose, Noah, T2, Thabo, Hinrich, Nocioni….
We also have the house that Michael built to play in….
Losing those 2 guys (I doubt we’d lose both anyway) isn’t going to hurt us like losing 2 top 50 all time (likely top 20 all timers) in Scottie and MJ….this team has enough depth around it.
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tracy McGrady and Tim Duncan and...
...say otherwise. Chicago isn’t that much of a draw. Who’s the last big-name FA to come just for the city?
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was then
When the team was a complete mess…..we’ll see what happens this year, but this team is in much better shape than the early 2000’s club.
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right now it is, but if Deng and Gordon go???
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We still have a guy
Who’s picked almost across the board as a can’t miss in Rose, another nice piece in HInrich, the athleticism of Noah, T2 and Thabo….
Not to mention the underrated Gooden and several other pieces.
Gordon and Deng aren’t and will never be superstars…..you are comparing apples to oranges throwing Pippen and MJ into this scenario.
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I threw this in where? You're just confusing yourself now.
Besides, who says Rose is going to be a superstar in two years? Neither Williams nor Paul broke out until their third year and both were in college longer than Rose.
Rose will be far from a finished product in two years. Which means you’re hinging all your hopes on Thomas and Noah and Thabo. As much as I like those guys, I’m not ready to do that.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Paul
was a stud in year 1, hurt in year 2, but when he played still amongst the top 5-6 PG’s.
Deron Williams took 1 year, but was solid by year 2…...
I’d be happy to put hopes on Thomas and Noah…that’s what you do with lottery picks….
Not sure how I’m confusing myself….
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is now?
When Deng and Gordon walk, this team is a complete shithole yet again. In fact, it will be 1999-2004 all over again, only this time we have higher odds of our lottery pick actually panning out to be something special.
Thabo has yet to show anything to be taken seriously as anything but a nice energy player. Letting our 2 most talented (minus Rose) players walk puts more pressure on Kirk to produce, and puts even more onus on Thomas to develop into something special.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well let's put that pressure on Thomas already
The Thomas experiment ends in 2 years, let’s hope this year we can find out for sure what he has, otherwise we run the risk of DRASTICALLY overpaying him too.
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except you don't overpay players who don't produce
If Tyrus is a bust, he’s not coming back, and Paxson washes his hands of him.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah so many people are flocking to the Bulls because of the Bulls mystique.....
This isn’t Florida. The Bulls have just as much appeal as any other franchise in a big city, no one cares about Jordan anymore (gasp!!!!), particularly as some sort of incentive to play for a team that doesn’t care enough about its talent to re-sign them, and would rather be stuck in a perpetual state of shittiness to mediocrity.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
Kobe sure seemed interested…..last year, and I don’t think that was all media crap, I think Paxson didn’t pull the trigger.
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Kobe was playing games because he's a giant assclown
And was merely trying to shake things up. And besides, we all know if Kobe was going to come here he wanted Deng here. Specifically Deng.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah we'll never know really....
I think that deal could have been done. It would have gutted our team regardless of what the deal was and made last year even worse (well maybe just as bad, but without the mirage of being good that we had until early Jan—where we thought we’d turn it all around).
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was because he thought the Bulls would be better than the Lakers
Good luck attracting free agents to a terrible team when half the teams in the league will have cap space in 2010. Lebron is going to New York, and who knows what physical condition Wade will be in in two years, so it’s foolish to tank the entire franchise in hopes of getting one of those two guys.
by Big D on Jul 22, 2008 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
Why are we so gung ho on overpaying for 2 guys who will keep our team in the mid 40 win’s…?
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because they can win 45 games....we've seen them do that
Then you add the superstar potential of Rose, the improved games of Tyrus, Noah, and Thabo….well you got yourself a stew going there.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Aren't you 1000 times more optimistic than I am?
You’re saying let Deng and Gordon walk, assuming Rose will be a huge star, and that Tyrus, Noce, and Thabo will easily fill the void.
I think my position is pretty even-keeled. Take a team that is talented, underachieved last season, add a new coaching staff that promotes player development and offensive continuity, add a potential franchise PG to the mix….doesn’t that sound good to you?
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am not saying those 3 will easily fill the void
But if Rose becomes a star, we’ll have $20-25M to spend to pick up an additional piece or two…and/or we could see what T2 or Noah have to offer in yrs 2 and yrs 3….
Gordon and Deng have had their time and we’ve yet to see drastic/ridiculous improvement they were good as rookies and have improved marginally each year but aren’t likely to be great and there are other younger players coming in who will keep them in that lower realm of the second tier…..
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am assuming you replied to me
but I never once said Tyrus, Noce, and Thabo will easily fill the void. I’m not even thinking about those guys. The point is to get a superstar to run with Wade, or at least giving the team a chance to make a legit run at that superstar. Being cap strapped or trying to do sign-and-trades using two overpaid borderline all-stars as your bargaining chip for said superstar is not a legit run, in my opinion.
I think 38 wins for this team next year is pretty optimistic actually. That could conceivably challenge for the 8 seed. For a team with a 19-year old rookie PG as it’s best player and a first time rookie head coach, that’d be one hell of an accomplishment.
Naturally I’d welcome a surprise to the upside, but I’m not putting a futures bet on the Bulls to do +38 wins.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's a ton of comments saying pretty much the same thing
Somone else might have said “use those players to fill the void”. But, essentially that’s what you get when they walk for the 2 seasons until we can hope that Bosh or Wade signs with Chicago.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
the Bulls will be in the mid to upper 40’s wins range and easily compete for at least a 5 slot out East….
But I don’t think we’ll get marginally better unless T2, Noah improve drastically.
Hopefully in 2 years Rose will be the face of the franchise that Chicago expects he can be…
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the thing is, we let go deng and gordon....
this entire franchise collapses. lets face it: right now, they are our two best players. now, we dont kno if a guy like rose or thabo or even TT becomes the star of this team in the future, but the fact is, to help in developing our young guns, we need the “veterans”, and we need them to be good( at least until we have a shot at d-wade in 2010)
by Rose1 on Jul 21, 2008 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's a bit hyperbole, but I'm actually in agreement
if they let them go, this team is a disaster. Back to 20 wins, lottery picks, and ‘future’.
And whether you think that’s a good long-term strategy or not, I don’t think the franchise wants to go back to those days in the least.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 21, 2008 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The alternative is that we overpay for these two guys
because it looks like that is what will have to be done to placate these two, we end up no better than a perennial 4 seed and 2nd round exit, but are too cap strapped to more than marginally improve, find out that these players are closer to their plateaus than most of BaB wants to acknowledge (how many players continue an upward surge after their PER declines after their breakout year, I don’t know, but would be interested to see a study), and they become difficult to deal due to their overpaid contracts. I see this as more disasterous than the doomsday scenario Rose1 envisions. The worst thing to be is mediocre and cap strapped or old.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How many plateau at ages 22 and 24?
They were a second-round exit w/ a 21 and 23 year old as their best players. They added Thomas who still has the chance to be as good as those guys and they added a superstar-prospect, No. 1 overall pick that would, in hope, be light years better than Kirk Hinrich was in that series.
The hope isn’t that Deng and Gordon become superstars—$11 & $14 million isn’t really “superstar” money. The hope is that they get marginally better (and they still should) and that Thomas proves to better than PJ Brown, Noah better than Wallace and Rose better than Hinrich.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd have to run a study, can't answer off the top of my head
but I have seen players have a breakout year, get that contract, and then end up being overpaid. You can’t overweight last year’s performance – I agree with you – but you can’t underweight it either. It has signficance, as does Deng having another injury plagued season. They are all inputs into the pricing model.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I mean, just look at what happened to Hinrich.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'll have to explain that to me.
I’m still not seeing Hinrich as overpaid if he’s a starting PG.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He wouldn't get that same contract today
even if he were the same age at that time, coming off the season he just had.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
After last season, I'll take second round exits
You really want to go back to the days of 20-win seasons? It’s easy to say that in theory, but once you’re in the lottery it’s tough to get out unless you get lucky. And considering the Bulls landed Rose, I wouldn’t count on them getting nearly that lucky anytime soon. Besides, Paxson better realize that if the Bulls become terrible, he may not be around to make the lottery picks.
by Big D on Jul 22, 2008 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to progress towards a championship
I won’t take second round exits. I mean, there’s nothing I can do about it, but rest assured I’ll be on here bitching about them.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you'll take 20-win seasons?
I don’t think people realize what the consequences of losing Deng and Gordon for nothing in return would be. You can’t just look at it in a vacuum and say they’re not worth the money. The Bulls just drafted a guy who they think will be their franchise player, and hired a coach with no experience. You really want them to start their careers on one of the worst teams in the league? And you think free agents will want to sign here?
by Big D on Jul 22, 2008 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember, I'm the nutcase
that thinks the Bulls in their current form (i.e. with BG and Deng) are a 35-38 win team anyway. I think free agents will want to sign here if the Bulls can offer them a boatload of money and a chance to play with Derrick Rose, assuming he is the Elite PG on the level of Chris Paul and Deron Williams we all seem to expect him to be.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And if he doesn't?
If he gets close but isn’t that good?
And I sort of figured this is where your assumptions failed: the Bulls can offer a “boatload of money” but so can a number of other teams. Money is irrelevant here because ANY TEAM w/ more than the max cap space and ANY TEAM w/ enough assets for a sign-and-trade can offer the same “boatload of money.”
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The CBA back then didn't favor the players
as it does now.
The players know how the NBA market is handcuffed on purpose. They know that emerging in your first three years is the key to max dollars. It’s too difficult to move max dollars so teams just pay them to not be a nuisance and maybe get 20ppg.
by NBA Observer on Jul 22, 2008 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's pretty sad
that jordan had to threaten to retire in order to be paid fairly.
by Jaina on Jul 21, 2008 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice negotiation tactic
If Paxson and Reinsdorf are actually serious about building a title contender, they can sign him to a fair deal. If they’re content with drafting in the top 10 every year, stockpiling assets that will go nowhere, then let him walk. There’s nothing stopping them from turning this franchise into the Clippers with more profitability, except for common sense.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 21, 2008 3:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This may be just a negotiating tactic, like Matt says
The Bulls better make sure it doesn’t become more than that, though. Feelings can get bruised pretty easily during negotiations, but they can’t afford to lose Deng for nothing in return. Especially now that the Bulls have Rose – if they put together a mediocre/lousy team over the next three years, will Rose even want to resign with the Bulls? I know this is his hometown, but I wouldn’t assume he’ll be happy on a mediocre team.
by Big D on Jul 21, 2008 5:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's an excellent point and on a related note....
...I believe that’s why I (and I think Matt and maybe others) aren’t so eager to take this hard-line stance in these negotiations such as saying: ”$10 million is reasonable and not a penny more!!!” If they let Deng and Gordon go for lesser value (which they would, why else would they other team be doing it?), you’re pinning ALL the hopes on Thomas and Rose. What if Thomas doesn’t quite develop into that All-Star? What if Rose takes a little bit longer and isn’t so great after only two years? Why do these hard-liners assume that Wade, Bosh or James (or anyone else) would want to come to Chicago considering that there will be plenty of other teams w/ cap space?
As matt always says: Teams do not get better by letting their two best players, both under the age of 25, leave.
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
+1
too lazy to use the action button :)
by Rose1 on Jul 21, 2008 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
flagged
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 21, 2008 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Teams also don't get better by overpaying good but not great players
Looking around the league, I think something in the neighborhood of 5yrs/$51M (or 6/$64M) is a perfectly reasonable amount for those two guys.
Start them off about about $8.5M, skirt the tax, and try to unload Hinrich and Nocioni.
Maybe that’s a hard line stance, but look around the league. Can Deng make a really objective case to being worth more than Caron Butler ($8.9M) or Mike Dunleavy ($9M) or Tayshaun Prince ($9.5M) or Josh Howard ($10.4M)?
I don’t see it. I think the Bulls can win with those players at that price, but every penny more than that they get will, with this ownership, be a penny pinched somewhere else, and that will eventually screw us.
by Sports2 on Jul 21, 2008 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I disagree on the penny-pinching part.
A) If Krause has some ability to get Wade, Bosh, James, etc. in 2010 and this team is primed for a breakout, money will not be a factor. He’s said as much and I believe him. It makes no sense to go into luxury tax territory for an over-achieving 3rd-seed, but it does for a championship-caliber team.
B) bumping a 5-year deal up from 5/51 to 5/56 is hardly breaking the bank. That money can be made up in a LOT of ways—for one, you cut or trade away your 2nd round picks. Voila.
C) we’re not talking about paying a bench guy DOUBLE his probable salary and adding on two years (they did that last year. We’re talking about increasing the team’s best players pay by 10% or 20%.
D) I’ve yet to someone lay out a successful, hypothetical plan of action over the next couple of years that lets Deng and Gordon go. The most common thing typed: sign-and-trade them for something of value and then sign a superstar in 2010.
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is that they have to take back matching salaries
So not would they have to get back something of value in a sign-and-trade (which is hard enough), but they’d also have to get back players with value whose contracts expire by 2010 (if they’re going to have a shot at signing a star in 2010). That’s going to be nearly impossible, since seemingly half the teams in the league are also trying to clear cap space for 2010. Why would they give up a good player with an expiring contract in the next year or two, and take on Luol Deng with a big long-term contract? If there’s going to be a sign-and-trade, the Bulls are either going to get back either a player with value or an expiring contract at best (and they could possibly get neither, since they won’t have much leverage). It’s unrealistic to expect they’ll get both, so I sure wouldn’t count on any sign-and-trade helping the Bulls more than Luol Deng and Ben Gordon can.
by Big D on Jul 21, 2008 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately
A) I don’t completely understand what you’re getting at here, but I think you mean a team has to be a “true contender” before you’re willing to spend, but that’s a very nebulous concept. You can always duck out of that. For example, look back in 2006. We got one mostly effective year out of Wallace. At the time we got him, I was positively screaming that now was the time to grab Al Harrington or Gooden. As it stood, we were not quite contenders, but given a relatively week field, adding a guy who could score 20 points a game like Harrington (even if he’s not a superstar) might have gotten us a ticket to the finals. So spending on that team might have gotten us past the Pistons.
As a general note, I tend to think the “I’ll spend for a contender” meme doesn’t hold up that well. Sure, James Posey is marginally overpaid, but the Celts are obviously title contenders this coming year, and they wouldn’t add a bit to what they offered to bring him back. And if I were a betting man, I’d bet on the Celtics org to be more willing to spend than the Bulls.
So, if you’re the Bulls, the only way to get in that position in the first place is by being extremely careful with your money before you get to that point.
B) Exactly the same sort of things were said about Noc and Hinrich’s deals. And of course, if they were smaller, then going to 5/56 or 5/60 wouldn’t be breaking the bank. But there’s no separation in reality… the money all comes from the same pocket.
Further, you can’t cut or trade your 2nd round picks. You have to keep a minimum of 14 players in the league now, and in reality if you want to save money, you keep your second rounders, who’ll make around $440k instead of veteran guys who make $700k. Which, of course, is another corner cutting method that slightly decreases your odds of winning a title.
C) Sure, but you have to look down the road and consider how tenable those salaries are going to be. As I said, I don’t have a problem paying Deng or Gordon. I want them back, but it makes no sense to me to be paying, for example, Deng, more than guys like K-Mart , Caron Butler, Prince, Howard, Jamison, Dunleavy, etc. At best, he’s solidly in the middle of the pack with those guys. I think when push comes to shove, it’d be very hard for him to turn down a deal of the length of his liking that pays him commensurate with that.
D) It’s much like asking for a successful hypothetical FannieMae bailout plan. At best, you get the least offensive option. The only successful option was to not get yourself in that predicament in the first place (meaning, for the Bulls, not massively F’ing up over the last couple of years).
I really don’t want to let Deng and Gordon go. But I’m not going to fold up the tent and give them whatever they ask for either.
by Sports2 on Jul 22, 2008 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So going 20-62 the next two years and just hoping to god...
...that Thomas and Rose emerge as superstars and that they can also get one of those top super-duper stars is your preferred method? I’ll take the more sure thing.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that Deng is in the middle of the pack with those named players.
Even if you argue that he’s in the camp of Howard and Butler (younger guys with upside), he’s not worth more than them in contract money. The problem is that this isn’t comparison shopping; those other guys aren’t available as replacements for Deng. If we let him go, who are we getting instead, and when?
by arjoseph on Jul 22, 2008 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying let him go
I’m just saying don’t cave to his demands. This is a negotiation. Or at least it’s supposed to be… it doesn’t appear the Bulls have made an actual offer.
So if I’m the Bulls, I make about same offer I did last year, or basically the equivalent for a different length of time if that’ll really make them happy.
And I tell Ben and Lou to go back and read the surprisingly simple message that Gilbert Arenas sent them last year. And I point them in the direction of guys who’ve played out their QOs and taken less.
And I simply point out that a guarantee of $52M (or 30, or 60, or whatever) is a hell of a lot more than a guarantee of $4.4M or $6M.
In short, I make them a fair offer. I don’t slap them in the face and pull money off the table, but I don’t give things away either and give them whatever they want, quaking in fear that they’ll walk. Yes, it’d be bad for the Bulls if they walk, but it wouldn’t be good for the players either.
by Sports2 on Jul 22, 2008 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Pay Em
12 and 14 for 5 years each.
by JockstrapNoah on Jul 22, 2008 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont get it.
We turned down potential trades to get either KG or Gasol and we turned them down because each team wanted Deng. Now we dont want to pay the man who paxson pretty much labeled him as untouchable. Wtf is paxson doing.
by eross226 on Jul 21, 2008 6:50 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
lol interesting way to look at it
though deng actually WAS offered for kg.
but still, good point. last year was a “take it or leave it” offer because they claimed that they weren’t worried about negotiating this year instead. and now look where we are.
by Jaina on Jul 21, 2008 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's a good point
are they the core of the team, or aren’t they?
I get the hangup on ‘overpaying’. But overpaying Deng and Gordon is not the same as overpaying Nocioni.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 21, 2008 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how about a sign and trade with paxson, pete myers, and VDN for danny ainge, doc rivers, and tom thibs?
by Rose1 on Jul 26, 2008 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say Hell No
Danny Ainge maybe….but I still say Doc Rivers sucks, championship and all…..I call it lucky break thanks to Ainge and KG (but mostly thanks to McHale).
by majoyenrac on Jul 28, 2008 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have we even signed Rose yest?
I dont see why it takes forever to get stff done for the Bulls. The Bulls have t do something drastic in a few weeks for our IMMIDIATE FUTURE. also, that Josh childress thing has me a bit scraed for the “mid-major” player who could be big stars over seas
by knickknack7450 on Jul 21, 2008 9:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i havent seen the yahoo article, but
kc says the bulls and deng are discussing 3 year deals now rather than a long(er) term commitment. wow, turns out i was right… thats not gonna happen often
by kite on Jul 21, 2008 10:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If we're going for a short-term deal
why a 3 year deal that fucks up the chance of having cap space in 2010? Why not a 2 year deal?
by Sports2 on Jul 21, 2008 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
i sorta agree. i like the idea of a 2 year deal, but i dont think its going to happen. i think deng wants a little more security than a 2 year deal provides. but i guess a 3 year deal could be a good piece to trade in a sign-and-trade for one of the top free agents in 2010. it would’ve been great if they had agreed to a 3 year deal last year when they were negotiating. judging from the tone of kc’s article, it sounds like they will get a deal done, which is better than nothing, i guess.
by kite on Jul 21, 2008 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
sign-and-trades, sign-and-trades, sign-and-trades
everyone acts like it’s so easy to do that w/ Gordon and Deng right now, but that it’s not even a consideration for the 2010 superstars. I don’t get it.
by tyger1147 on Jul 21, 2008 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A 3-year deal is great and that's what I'm rooting for.
You don’t have to overpay these guys for too long and you have an expiring deal to use as trade bait (three-way trade bait?) going into the summer 2010.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why can't we give them both(Deng + Gordon) what they want
and get rid of Kirk and Noc whatever way’s best for the franchise? Wouldn’t that free up like $20 mil+? this is stupid. Pax gives Noc and Kirk EXTREME contracts but won’t shell it out for Deng and Ben who are WAAAAAAYYY more important to us. WTF are u doing Pax?
by AFireInside661 on Jul 22, 2008 12:00 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's an old fashioned stand off, again, that's why.
Reinsdorff drew his line in the sand, according to JC comment a week ago, at Not Going to Match last years rejected Offer, and of course Denger and Gordo agents have to prove their worth by getting at LEAST the max offer from last year. As we know, the Dorfer doesn’t back down in these kind of situations. Which is why a three year deal is all that is presently being discussed. So, all that Pax stuff about getting these contracts out of the way to allow needed follow up moves, was wishful thinking….and now, it’s down to just how much face the Dorfer will demand, before he agrees. Which puts the lie to our hopes that there was a “plan” working towards what’s best for team, as opposed to just more Dorfer “deal making”, which means, Dorfer feeling like he “won”. I feel abused again, but should have known better after coaching hire bizarro just a short time ago. It ain’t what Pax wants that counts.
by Cholla on Jul 22, 2008 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not matching last year's offer
on the other hand, seems like a pretty clear slap in the face. If I were Deng and Gordon I’d take the QO before I did that myself.
by Sports2 on Jul 22, 2008 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You do realize that these two guys
are coming off worse seasons. Why would the Bulls, from a standpoint of logic, return with the same or higher offers for two guys who regressed both in terms of individual and team success, both are now a year older, and one is coming off yet another season with an injury?I’m not saying you don’t, but logically, you wouldn’t be inclined to.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because the Bulls realize that EVERYONE had worse seasons.
And the Bulls also realize, logically of course, that they had one coach so inept at getting his players to play hard they fired him on Christmas Eve. They also realize they replaced him w/ one of the worst coaches possible.
It’s logical, really.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are overweighting Skiles performance last year but not Deng's or BG's.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, I'm not. I'm taking it all into consideration, and you're taking none of it.
If I was over-weighing Skiles, I’d say these guys would deserved $15 million/yr. I’m not saying that.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Skiles was so inept, yet Deng and BG weren't?
Skiles is a fine coach. The blame falls on the players moreso than him, in my humble opinion.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
which is where you're wrong.
An entire team does not under perform w/o influence from the coach. How did Hinrich, Gordon and Deng (and even Thomas) have somewhat breakout seasons one year and then all tank the next.
And yes, Gordon and Deng were worse, but neither declined to “inept” or terrible standards. Not only are you over-inflating the value of one troubled season, but you’re overstating how bad that one season actually was!
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You assign blame to the coach
I assign more of it to the players, the same players who think they are $13-$14m/year players. We differ in this regard and consequently likely won’t agree on anything related to this subject.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because you can't
just get rid of Nocioni, Kirk or even Hughes contracts, without taking back equal salary. The only way around this is to find a team with a big enough trade exception (or whatever it’s called, the Bulls have one for about 4 million I think, the Nuggets got one for about 10 mil when dealing Camby to the Clippers).
The Game chose him !
by Diabolo on Jul 22, 2008 2:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
there's also the 75/125% rule
so it’s not exactly equal contracts.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 22, 2008 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deng, Gordon, Childress, Smith are not getting offers from other teams.
They are the ones who are in a vice here. This is a terrible year for restricted free agents. They have no other option except to negotiate with their team. There is no money being thrown at them they can use for leverage. Deng and Gordon are dealing with a market that is not valuing them very high.
by chgobr on Jul 22, 2008 6:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow...
I kinda tought that a deal with Deng was going to be easy. He’s the best player on the team and at only 23. What’s up with Pax? Pay Deng. I understand having doubts with Gordon, but if they sign them for 5 years they’re basically giving their prime years to the Bulls. Pax always valued a player’s attitude and both Deng and Gordon have been great players. They rarely complain, work hard, and stay out of trouble. If I’m going to risk overpaying for a player/players, these are the guys I’m taking a risk with.
by Wake on Jul 22, 2008 8:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why overpay them when no one else thinks they are worth an offer?
by chgobr on Jul 22, 2008 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seems that teams think Deng and BG are worth big money
They just don’t have the cap space to make the offer themselves. Plus Chicago can match anything they do offer.
Okafor, Gordon, Deng, Igoudala, and Smith are all in the same boat. It’s either going to be less money per and more years or more money per and less years.
Why we didn’t just extend 3 year offers with max money last Summer is beyond me?
by NBA Observer on Jul 22, 2008 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Max money?
That’s where I end up firmly on the side of don’t overpay – imo, very few players are worth the max, even combined with a shorter deal.
But we’re never going to reach any kind of consensus around here, because as a group we don’t agree on what Lu and BG are worth to start with, much less whether it’s OK to slightly overpay them. To me, anything approaching max dollars is significantly overpaying, and I’d pay Lu more than I’d pay BG. If all the reports that the sides are “far apart” are accurate (and no reason to doubt anything that general given the other info out there), then the team clearly doesn’t think they’re worth the max, either.
If nothing else, taking Rose will at least piss off Pat Riley.
by wjb1492 on Jul 22, 2008 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is how I'm leaning as well
it sounds simple, but I guess that makes me simple, or at least worn down by the constant talk of ‘overpaying’, and ‘value’. These are the core guys on the team, you can’t throw them away. Sign/trades will get the Bulls nothing as good….merely not nothing.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 22, 2008 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it valid to look at this mess and say…neither Gordon nor Deng are superstars, but Iggy is...
so rather than trying to figure out a way to split up your money and partially satisfy both Deng and Gordon, why not just make one big offer for Iggy and let G&D fend for themselves?
Would the Bulls would be better off with one real star (Iggy) rather than two decent non-stars?
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 22, 2008 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Iggy is not a real star
and I would argue that the Bulls’ core has been redefined for two reasons:
1) Derrick Rose
2) The utter failure of the previous core of showing any leadership and resilience last year. That core not only flinched but folded.
A core consists of players you build around. Deng and BG are players you build with, not around.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Iggy = superstar...maybe/maybe not
But I do think he’s significantly better than either Gordon or Deng. I’d rather have Iggy and Redick than Gordon and Deng.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 22, 2008 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure but I wouldn't overpay Iggy either.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'd rather have a team of guys who don't get overpaid...
...and never really win and then hope somehow someone comes along as a FA that they can afford max money to.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather sign the right players
that will lead you to a championship even if it means passing on the ones who won’t at the expense of taking one step backwards (for two forward).
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can't just choose who to sign. They have to choose the team, too.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But first you need the dollars to even have a chance
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or the assets in a sign-and-trade.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clarification: the Bulls will have the "dollars".
They aren’t a broke team.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If D Rose becomes a superstar deserving of a max deal you need to be
able to afford other stars. To afford other stars after you overpay Deng and Gordon is a challenge. You may be forced to trade Deng or Gordon to free up salary room and stay close to the cap, which is difficult because their salary is too high. Examples are the Corpse and Larry Hughes.
by chgobr on Jul 22, 2008 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your argument seems logical to me.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except it's not. Name one max-extension player...
...whose team couldn’t afford him.
The Jazz and the Hornets are both over the cap and both are affording their stars. If Rose turns into Paul or Williams, there will be absolutely NOTHING that
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The logic was that
1) “To afford other stars” – this implies that you’ve already re-upped Rose or have earmarked those max dollars for him
3) “after you overpay Deng and Gordon is a challenge”
So the argument is not that giving Rose a max-extension will be difficult to do under these circumstances, but that “affording other stars” after having done so and having overpaid BG and Deng “is a challenge”.
at least that’s how I read it. I’ve been accused of misinterpreting posts in the past so maybe I’m reading his argument wrong. I’m sure one of you guys will let me know.
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right. I misread that.
But that’s because Rose won’t be maxed out for four years. So now you’re on the 2012 plan? Besides, by the time Rose is maxed out (after his fourth year), Deng and Gordon will have one year left of a five-year deal.
So again, the logic is still wrong.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not that big of a bind
Utah and New Orleans both gave max (or close as possible) deals to their franchise PGs, and they have some pretty big contracts on both teams (Boozer, Tyson, West, AK47, Memo). You can go over the cap to sign your own UFA.
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just out of curiosity
If you go over the cap to sign a UFA, that’s cleared of luxury tax for the current season….but the next year assuming you are still over the cap, then you fall into luxury tax issues right?
I was also wondering, is that the same with the MLE? You can give a guy the full MLE for 2-3 years or whatever or give 2 guys it, etc. but if in year 2 you are over the cap, that exception is only good for the one year right?
I’m assuming I’m right on both of these, but these things rarely get mentioned in the articles discussing the cap, so I’d like to ask the experts. Thx.
by majoyenrac on Jul 22, 2008 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ugh.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 22, 2008 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You may "ugh" this, but my guess is we actually come out of this
a lot worse—probably something like Deng and…nobody.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 23, 2008 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I double Ugh
Reddick is a bust. Gordon is light years ahead of him, quicker, more athletic, can create his own shot…..
Iggy for Deng, that might be a wash, but perhaps a wash I’d like to see, given that Iggy’s more athletic…..right now I’d give Iggy the slight edge and who knows that might continue.
by majoyenrac on Jul 23, 2008 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt very much we come out of this mess
with better than Iguodala + Reddick.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 23, 2008 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would that be good for us though
That’s not a fair mix.
We might come out of this mess with nothing too in the short term, but be better off long term. I’d certainly like that more than basically losing Gordon for Reddick.
by majoyenrac on Jul 23, 2008 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Iggy tips the balance
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 23, 2008 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Iggy and Deng are
essentially a wash. Iggy’s more athletic, Deng’s got more all around fundamentals. I’d take Iggy with the 7th pick if I could turn back time, and then pick Deng with that 8th pick nowadays instead of the reverse, but they are so freaking close it’s really hard to say. I just think the athleticism of Iggy fits our current team ever so slightly more, and I think he wants more to be the franchise guy (where Deng wants franchise dough but doesn’t seem to want to be the leader).....and that’s why I pick Iggy.
But there is no way Iggy tips the balance for losing both Gordon and Deng….that’s ridiculous, but oh well perhaps that’s the point.
by majoyenrac on Jul 23, 2008 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
Either are franchise guys, but guys who want to be franchise guys might turn into franchise guys (Caron Butler maybe) more than guys who want to be second fiddle’s but get their payday (Jermaine O’Neal).
Both of those two are/were better than these 2 at prospective peaks…but oh well it’s a comparative point.
by majoyenrac on Jul 23, 2008 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll admit to having a little bit of Iggy on the brain these days.
I have my Philadelphia relatives in town for the week (including my brother-in-law, who’s a coach at ANC—they’ve been in and out of the top 5 nationally the past few years (#1 last year for a stretch)…campus is crawling with major college coaches/recruiters).
They love Iggy. There’s no way in the world they’d consider Iguadala for Deng even up. Just to see how deep their support runs I’ll ask them if (money no object) they’d go for Deng + Gordon for Iggy….
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 23, 2008 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We're all waiting.
And then we’ll be ready next week when you get some other ridiculous idea, take it to the extreme and then repeat it 73 times.
by tyger1147 on Jul 23, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I should add...
...that idea will have little to no evidential support.
by tyger1147 on Jul 23, 2008 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well that's backtracking
you said you’d RATHER have Iggy/Reddick than Gordon/Deng.
Yes, we know you said it without really believing it just to satisfy your ‘curiosity’ and bait pointless discussion, but still…
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 23, 2008 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I WOULD rather...and I think it'd be easier.
Unless something like the Hinrich for cap space deal gets done with Denver, I don’t see any way both Deng and Gordon get signed.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jul 23, 2008 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not the MAX max, but the offer on the table when negotiations ended last year....
That’s the line in the sand…and it’s Reinsdorf that drew it. AS mentioned, KC covered that a week or two ago, said Dorfer wasn’t going to reward players with worse numbers. And that offer from last year, that Deng/Gordon didn’t accept, is from the players point of view, the very LEAST they will accept now.
I understand the logic of both sides, except in this case, a mexican standoff isn’t going to benefit anyone, least of all progress of team. Compromise on last year’s best offers, Reinsdorf, and move on. But no, it’s an ego thing now, a matter of face, and the Dorfer doesn’t back down in these situations. Does he? Tell me I’m wrong there please…
And yes, to whoever is dismayed that this is happening with the supposedly easier to sign of the two, ... we aren’t even talking about Gordo yet publicly…if they won’t sign Deng, they ain’t signing Gordo. one last time this ain’t what Pax wants, so it’s not his fault.
by Cholla on Jul 22, 2008 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sign and trade
Deng is a very good player and will be better. But he wants all star payment without an all-star game. Trade him!
by JustAnotherFan on Jul 22, 2008 8:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Heat
If the Bulls can’t come to terms with Deng, they should try to offer the Heat Hinrich and Deng (at the QO, I’m sure he’d accept a trade to Miami) and any sweeteners (maybe Gray or a pick?) if necessary for Blount, Banks and Beasley.
by smashbrickley on Jul 22, 2008 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we should also throw in some magic unicorns and rainbows and i'm sure the heat would do that deal
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
by Orlando Woolridge on Jul 22, 2008 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cap
Do the unicorns take a roster spot?
by bullschwaa on Jul 22, 2008 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah they count on the roster
but we could always send them down to Iowa to make room for green leprechauns and fairies with wings.
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
by Orlando Woolridge on Jul 22, 2008 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beasley would demand that the Bulls retain the unicorns and rainbows
so that trade wouldn’t work out anyway.
Seriously, people, you’d give up Beasley for two non-all stars who want borderline max money and play second fiddle at best?
by messwiththebull on Jul 22, 2008 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not a bad idea! Riley has not been in love with Beasley and Hinrich and Deng .
may be very appealing to Riley. This takes away the guard log-jam and gives us an inside presence. Very interesting.
by chgobr on Jul 22, 2008 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's an awful trade
Beasley may be great, sure and might offset it….but I don’t want Blount on the Bulls especially for Deng and Hinrich.
I’d like to see Deng, Hinrich to the Heat for Beasley, Haslem and a 2nd round dollar clearing draft pick swap (similar to what the Nuggets did with Camby).
Take the risks on Beasley, add a nice veteran presence in Haslem….who knows.
Not my favorite trade but clears up some of the logjam at the 1-3 spots and we get an inside potential force in Beasley….to pair with Rose.
Not happening anyway, but nice to think about.
by majoyenrac on Jul 23, 2008 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Paxson was going to be this freaking tight with the cash
Why didn’t he just draft the safer pick? Why in God’s name did he draft someone who is going to take some time to develop, yet refuse to pay the money to build a legit contender around him
I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 22, 2008 12:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ping...Ouch...
That’s the sound a nail makes after it gets hit on the head…
by kingj41 on Jul 22, 2008 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And if they're (the organization) gonna be this tight with cash
What makes you all think they’re extending an offer to a big FA come 2010.
If all of those guys opt-out it’ll be because they want to win, not just go to a team with the most cash.
And if you’re reeling in a player who’s in it for the money, then that’ll be taking on a bad contract because we’ve all seen how ‘lazy’ some guys get after their big payday.
by kingj41 on Jul 22, 2008 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As in the other thread...
...if they had only been this tight w/ the cash for Hinrich and Nocioni, they wouldn’t be in this situation.
by tyger1147 on Jul 22, 2008 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I recall
I recall that Paxson justified signing NOC longterm by saying he wanted to scare teams away from poaching the bulls rfa’s. Maybe we’re seeing the results of that right now?
by JockstrapNoah on Jul 22, 2008 4:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Here is what Reinsdorf is telling Deng and Gordon - educated guess
“You get a bonafide offer and we will match it ” Folks it is July 22 and so far nothing. This includes Europe and sign and trade deals. If Deng/Gordon are so good why doesn’t one of the other 29 teams step up to the plate. Maybe the Noc deal has pushed away interest. Maybe some of it they just plain aren’t worth the 12-14 mil they are asking for.
by chgobr on Jul 22, 2008 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because nobody has cap room to make them an offer
The only team that has any cap room at this point are the Grizzlies, and they’re not going to spend it because they’re losing money. Besides, they’re restricted free agents – maybe somebody would have gone after them if they didn’t have to worry about the Bulls matching. I guarantee you that if Deng signs the qualifying offer and becomes an unrestricted free agent next year, somebody will give him what he wants.
by Big D on Jul 22, 2008 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is retarded.
Rose will become a superstar, Tyrus and Noah are question marks and Thabo will be a solid 2 guard. We need Deng because he is a good wingman. He is going to give you 18 and 8 everynight at the SF spot. We all know there are many players who do less than Deng and Gordon, but get paid a whole lot more.
Rose / Obama 08
by illwill on Jul 22, 2008 6:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
correction
This is retarded.This is retarded:
by hscs on Jul 22, 2008 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Interesting
Other teams are have found a strategy to defeat the Bulls.
1. Bulls player is RFA
2. You’ve got overpaid crap on your roster or short-term contracts.
3. Call up the RFA’s agent and tell him you’ll overpay for his client if he can just arrange a sign and trade.
4. If it works, you replace your overpaid crap with somewhat less overpaid quality young RFA.
5. If it doesn’t work, you’ve still poisoned the well for the Bulls.
by Sports2 on Jul 23, 2008 7:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
well, the Bulls are still the big winners
(in profits :-P)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 23, 2008 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












