Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Dead - Former NFL QB Shot and Killed


Martell Webster trade proposal.

If the Bulls are somehow unable to resign Gordon I think that Pax should attempt to pry Webster from the hands of the Blazers. Webster is a good shooter and has great size, he is not the scorer that Gordon is, but he solves the small backcourt issues we have been having since the Duhon/Skiles era. We finally got rid of Duh (Thank you Isaiah D'antoni).

With Webster we would have 2 good young SG's with him and Thabo. I think we should use Derrick and Kirk in a T.J Ford and Calderon tandem at least untill the trade deadline, then possibly trade him (Kirk) and Gooden's expiring deal for a post player (Don't know who?). Webster is a base year player making about 3.5 mil a year. Maybe we can sign and trade Gordon to Portland fro Webster and LaFrentz. We could probally throw in Noce to make the deal works.

I am assuming that Gordon signs for 10 mil.  Noce makes about 8.5 mil. which would be a total of about 18.5 mil. LaFrentz makes 12.4 mill and Webster makes 2.9 mil  for a total of 15.3 mil. We could throw in someone like Simmons (1.6 mil) if we do not want to use our trade exception to cover the cost that we fall short on.

In this trade we get a young long shooter togive Rose a target to pass too once he gets into the lane. It solves our small backcourt problem. We get a veteran big to back Noad, with another expiring contract. We get rid of Noce's bad contract. The Blazers have aleays coveted the way the Bulls have built their teams. I know they have Bayless, but he is not as proven as BG7. They get a gritty gut who can shoot the three in Noce who could start at the SF spot on their team.

I would rather keep Gordon, but this is a worst case scenario since every internet report has us resigning Deng and trading Gordon. Shooting is still very important in the NBA. Your thoughts?

 

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

0 recs | Comment 44 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

the DEFINITION

would be nice but he ai’nt no BG7, we are going to need the scoring of ben nxt year

by broseleay301 on Jul 15, 2008 9:33 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thats true.

I don’t want Ben to go, but managment seems to be more in love with Kirk. 20 pt scrorers do not grow on trees and like I mentioned this is a worse case scenario. I would like to trade Hughes and Simmons for LaFrentz and Webster, but that probally will not happen.

Rose / Obama 08

by illwill on Jul 15, 2008 9:41 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

if you want to talk about efficient 20 point a night scorers then yes, they do not grow on trees.

but there are tons of guys in the nba who can score 20 a game. it’s just a matter of giving them the shot attempts. last season there were probably 30 guys who averaged 20 a game, another 20 guys within 2 points of 20 and probably another 25 who averaged 20 a game at some point in their career. the league is full of chuckers and wannabe chuckers.

fuck you, that's my name!! you know why, mister? 'cause you drove a hyundai to get here tonight, I drove a eighty thousand dollar bmw. that's my name!!

by MarketMaker on Jul 16, 2008 11:39 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I like the idea of a SG platoon

two big SGs, one who can defend (Thabo), one who can shoot (not Thabo). I have a feeling this is how Paxson will solve the SG issue with Ben seemingly on his way out.

I don’t know much about Webster besides his being a high pick. Is he a decent defender? I know he played mostly SF on the Blazers… is he quick enough to defend shooting guards? Can he put the ball on the floor and get to the rim, or is he just a set shooter?

by YaoPau on Jul 15, 2008 9:47 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't know about D

I have read that he is just an average athlete. He shot 38.8% from thee last year. He is 6-7 about 220 lbs and is only 21 years old. I have not read anything about him being a poor or outstanding defender, but I will keep looking.

Rose / Obama 08

by illwill on Jul 15, 2008 9:57 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ISO: Mortimer!

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Jul 15, 2008 9:59 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Like the idea

Might not be the scorer Gordon is, but might be a good fit….

I wish Paxson does something regarding the lack of size of the players…

by Agusnico on Jul 15, 2008 10:00 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

D Rose

If Pooh can become a dominant backcourt player like we expect. We do not need another domminant backcourt player,just a good one to compliment Rose. Kobe plays with Fisher, Jordan played with Pax/B.J/ Harper. Magic played with Scott and Allen played alongside Rondo. What i’ve noticed is that as long as you have an all-star you are fine with putting him with someone who can compliment them. As much as it would be exicting to watch Rose and Wade in the backcourt together it is not necessary to have to all-stars in the backcourt to win a ring.

Rose / Obama 08

by illwill on Jul 15, 2008 10:22 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's necessary to have good players.

If they have someone as good as Wade at another position, sure. But… what were you saying again?

by tyger1147 on Jul 15, 2008 10:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Looking at the numbers,

it would not appear that Martell is a very good defender at all. In fact, it appears very likely that he stinks on ice as a defender. On B-R his DRtg has gotten better every year, but he’s still giving up 110 points per 100 possessions, which is not good. Particularly troublesome, though, if we’re going to bring him in to replace BG is his PER differential at the SG spot. He only posts 12.0 PER and gives up a whopping 21.7 PER according to 82 games. Granted, this is on just 4% of the Blazers total minutes, but still it’s not a good sign.

by fundamentallysound on Jul 15, 2008 10:16 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In Blazers scheme of things

why Gordon? with rookie sensation combo guard …
Jerryd Bayless who scored 28 pts in first summer league game.

Blazers want to follow the Bulls blueprint and let a veteran like Ben Gordon eat up minutes from a talented rookie who basically does the same thing as Ben?

by exult463 on Jul 15, 2008 10:25 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I know.

That is one deal killer, but BG is proven and Bayless is not.

Rose / Obama 08

by illwill on Jul 15, 2008 10:31 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

R.I.P Webster

Lets move on to the next proposal.

Rose / Obama 08

by illwill on Jul 16, 2008 12:29 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think I will post this on Blazers Edge

It seems like a reasonable trade to me for both sides. Expect mixed responses though.

by Sabonis4Ever on Jul 16, 2008 1:47 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Webster had a solid season

I’m a Webster fan, more than I am an Outlaw fan, and he improved a lot this past season and showed some glimpses of the player he could become.

First off, Webster should have gone to college. He wasn’t ready for the NBA and during his 2nd season he played pretty poorly, and was rumored to be mopey, depressed, lost his confidence, all that fun stuff. The Blazers hired a sports psychologist to be available for all of the players, and Webster started going during the offseason and got his head on straight.

He came back during pre-season, won the starting SF spot away from Outlaw, and had a decent season highlighted by a 24 point quarter against Utah and much improved defense.

Here’s my basic scouting report on the kid:

He’s already a good shooter, which he was drafted for, and he has as pretty a shot as you’ll ever see. He hasn’t been as consistent with his shot as he is supposed to be, but when he is confident and when he gets shots he always produces.

And that’s a big point: when Martell gets 10-15+ shots, he produces. He gets in a groove in those situations. He played with the starters however, who feature LMA and Roy, so he was a 3rd option at BEST with those guys, so he mainly got the scraps and kick outs and waited for the pass. When Roy was hurt or Martell became the main option at times, he always produced.

That might be what he needs if he doesn’t remain a Blazer, to become a star. Like any shooter, he needs shots, but as long as he isn’t as good as Roy/LMA/Oden, he won’t get many shots.

Unlike most athletic young dudes, Martell plays within the team offense and doesn’t take bad shots very often. It’s not that he isn’t aggressive or doesn’t want to shoot (you can tell he wants to shoot), he just does what the coaches tell him and he defers to the better players.

And Martell is actually really athletic. He gets up really high, had plenty of nice dunks, is in the best shape on the Blazers team, and had the fastest times in the pre-season conditioning drills. He’s much more athletic than people think.

He’s a bad ballhandler, which is a big reason he has played mostly at SF. Lucky for him, he has really good size, and when drafted at age 18 he was 6’7” (I think he is at least 6’8” now, but I don’t have access to any current measurements). He has a great NBA body, and has terrific size for a 2-guard but just doesn’t have the ballhandling ability.

I personally prefer him at SF, and it doesn’t help Webster’s case as a SG that we got Brandon Roy.

Webster has shown the ability to get to the rim and finish, and when he is used as a first option he does this decently enough; mixing it with his nice outside jumper. He is supposedly working hard on his dribbling ability, so he can use his size and quickness off the dribble more. If he does improve there, it will open his offensive game up. Penetrating and getting to the rim isn’t a strength, but the ability is there.

For a SG/SF, Webster has had some really good rebounding games. He gets up really high and likes to rebound.

When drafted, Webster’s defense was ABYSMAL. Last season, his third, he was much, much, much improved. I dunno what the numbers say, but you can see the difference in how he defends other SFs and SGs. He uses his body more, knows where and when to rotate, and wasn’t directly targetted as a weak defender like in his first two seasons. He isn’t all-world just yet defensively, but he improved GREATLY.

He did a good job on Lebron, and does well against big players like him. He’ll struggle against a quick dude like Kobe, but so would anyone. Martell is prone to rookie mistakes, but he is decent at sticking to his man and knowing where to be, at a young age.

In contrast, Travis Outlaw is entering his 6th season and still has no idea where to rotate on defense and is very slow laterally. Webster’s defense was a big reason he started over Outlaw.

Not to overstate his defense though, as he isn’t making the all-defensive team anytime soon. But, the improvement is clear, he tries on defense, and is solid for a very young dude.

Is he a SG? Maybe in a year or three, if he can work on his dribbling. He isn’t a bad passer, but is too unsure of when to penetrate or how. He doesn’t push the issue enough and just TAKE shots, and plays within the offense too much. This is good of course, but also frustrating because he needs shots to be Martell Webster. A lil’ more aggressiveness, selfishness, would help him out.

He averaged 10.7 points a game as a 3rd/4th option, compared to Travis Outlaw’s 13 ppg as the 1st option off the bench (when Outlaw came in, he came in gunnin’). He has a lot of potential left to grow.

He works very, very hard and WANTS to be a star. I dunno if he’ll be able to do that in Portland, and his end-of-rookie-deal cap hold endangers our cap space next summer doesn’t help things, but I think he could be our SF of the now-n-future if he remains a Blazer.

I think he’s still too raw to do well in Chicago perhaps, and he’s still probably best used as a SF. I’m pretty sure he’ll end up a good player, and a really good scorer. Learning under Nate McMillan has been tough for his first few seasons, but it’s forcing him to develop a more all-round game and that will help him get where he wants to be.

He’s not as exciting as Travis Outlaw, but if Martell was used in the 1st-option 6th man way, he’d put up better numbers. Unfortunately, from afar I’d say Martell is still too fragile confidence wise to “lose” his starting job.

He needs time, but he’ll be good, at least as a scorer. How many smart, really athletic, hard working, big, natural shooters don’t find success?

Shoulda’ gone to college, though. He just wasn’t ready for the NBA.

I don’t think the Blazers will use the RLEC on anything but a piece they really need. Gordon is a great scorer, but not what we’re looking for I think. It’ an interesting idea though, and Martell is probably more forgotten amongst national fans.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 16, 2008 2:40 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

I should mention that what you say about his defense being improved

actually does show up in all the numbers I quickly glanced over. His DRtg went up every year and between this year and last year the PER diferential for him and the guy he was guarding got much much better. So there does seem to be some hope for Martell and it’s obvious that he is improving, which is a sign he actually is trying on D and that’s half the battle.

by fundamentallysound on Jul 16, 2008 8:21 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That was one hell of a post

One more thing: Can Webster consistently create his own shot?

by YaoPau on Jul 16, 2008 9:04 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

When compared to Gordon,

No, Webster isn’t a guy who can get his own shot.

He improved on that, and drove and raised up for his own shot or took it all the way, but even though he did it more often it is still a weakness in his game. Hopefully his dribbling has improved to a point where he can put it on the floor, because I think that’s his biggest hindrance to creating his own shot.

When he’s got it going he seems able to get his own shot, but working within the team offense and not trying to force things like he normally does, he seems unsure of when to try for his own shot or not, and usually just passes the ball off quickly. So, while you know he needs shots to do his thang, he doesn’t hurt you by messing up the offense and just taking any ol’ shot he wants.

It’s a wierd mix of not looking for his own shot, whilst knowing he really wants to shoot it, trying to play within himself and not force things, when forcing it a lil’ might be beneficial in the long run, etc. One game he’ll rain down 20+ points with only 9 shots, the next he’ll shoot 4 times in 30 minutes.

But no, he isn’t a guy who can get his own shot consistently, though I know he’s supposed to be working on that. Until I see otherwise, he is a jumpshooter who will sometimes take it all the way in and dunk it.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 16, 2008 10:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If I re-read it

Maybe I woulda.

It was a point that required slightly re-wording it 5 or 7 times. Very important point.

Very important.

If I had re-read it, after I wrote it, I likely would have edited down what I was saying. Fortunately, the main thesis of my post was crucial to the discussion, and warranted repeating 5 or 7 times.

The point was important, is all, in regards to answering a question.

Could I have re-read it? Yes, but I didn’t re-read it, but IF I did, I may have noticed that as well. Still, all things considered, when things are being said by the typing of fingers, and that thing said is important, it should be said 5 or 7 times.

When you’re dealing with matters of importance, re-reading wastes time and so does saying it once.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 16, 2008 7:08 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   2 recs

You're the shit, that is all

I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)

by Ozzie Montana on Jul 16, 2008 9:11 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was on the verge of petitioning BaB for a self-imposed moratorium

on Portland trade suggestions…then along comes this thoroughly delightful comment. Nice.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on Jul 16, 2008 10:40 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here's the deal:

In the blazers games I saw, the team set up plays for Webster in the beginning of the 3rd quarter on a regular basis. This is how he exploded against Utah in January (his highlight game). I haven’t seen him in isolation sets very much (then again I only saw about 10-15 games last year), but he is money when he’s set up successfully, and like Mort’ said, he produces when shooting high volume.

by premthegrem on Jul 16, 2008 10:28 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Seems like he shares things in common with Thabo

Here are the stats from last season: they are comparble per 36, Webster scores more but Thabo’s rebounding, assist and steal numbers are better. Their shooting details on 82games (Thabo, Webster) shows that Webster is a better jump shooter, but that Thabo takes it to the hoop more.

If I were Pax in the hypothetical situation proposed in this thread, I’d pass on Webster and make sure Thabo is shooting 1,000 jumpers a day iinstead of rapping.

by paxson43 on Jul 16, 2008 10:26 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sports Psychologist?

Anyone know if the Bulls have one available to the players like the Blazers? Seems like a great investment.

by bullschwaa on Jul 16, 2008 7:48 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes

his name is Pete Myers

by YaoPau on Jul 16, 2008 10:35 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I see two problems with this trade for the Blazers:

1. BG is at best a 2, which we have covered already with Roy/Fernandez, while Webster is a 3, and trading him away would leave Outlaw as the only serviceable sf. Although Roy/Fernandez could possibly log some minutes at the 3 if needed, Webster is a better fit because of his size.

2. Raef’s contract is a valuable asset which I think can be used to get a higher tier player than BG. Think about it, we’re giving up a great contract and a young player in Webster for an obviously better player, BG, and a bad contract in Noc. I don’t feel that BG is so valuable that we need to give up a trading chip (Raef), take on a bad one, AND give up Webster in order to get him. Consider that Kwame was traded for Pau Gasol at the deadline. Although highway robbery like that doesn’t happen very often, it seems to establish the value of Raef’s contract as somewhat higher than what you’re rating it here.

by premthegrem on Jul 16, 2008 10:34 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bulls/Blazer trade

I think something needs to happen between the two teams. We both have a lot of young talented pieces. I wounder what it would take to re-aquire LMA. The Blazers need a PG and we have Kirk?

Rose / Obama 08

by illwill on Jul 16, 2008 12:18 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LOL

Considering some of the Blazers fans thought the #1 pick for Aldridge was a good trade, it’s safe to assume Kirk for LMA isn’t going to happen.

I was a multiple time all star throughout my little league career. Won 5 championships- 4 in a row- thats more in a row than MJ… (kenwo4life@aol.com)

by Ozzie Montana on Jul 16, 2008 12:23 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gotta try right?

We would never tarde D Rose.

Rose / Obama 08

by illwill on Jul 16, 2008 12:35 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

lol

tarde

I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad

by thecoolest on Jul 16, 2008 12:44 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LOL!

My bad

Rose / Obama 08

by illwill on Jul 16, 2008 1:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A bulls-blazers trade probably won't happen

The only players the blazers want are Rose and Deng. Neither of those guys are coming to Portland for anything less than the Big 3 (Roy/Aldridge/Oden). Maybe Deng is a possibility if the Bulls do a sign and trade to the Blazers for Travis and idk, Raef? That is unlikely to happen because Deng prolly isn’t gonna make more than 11 mil, so the blazers would have to take something back (and we don’t want bad contracts, because that would tip the trade in the bulls favor and screw up our financial planning) . Face it, the blazers have a greater quantity of attractive pieces for the bulls than the bulls probably do for the blazers, and I think KP will want to wait and see what happens with this squad and will only make splashes around the trading deadline in Feb. Maybe something big could happen then.

by premthegrem on Jul 16, 2008 6:09 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm in agreement that Rose and Deng would be the two primary players of interest to KP&Co.

..................................... and agree that the Big 3 are untradeable in KP’s eyes, thus no deal is likely in the offing.

If Bayless follows his MVP Summer League performance with top level (superstar-in-the-making) play and if Rose comes out of the gate a little bit slowly, there might be some possible grounds for a deal, with the Blazers throwing in someone good to make up the difference in perceived value… This is long odds, however… The Blazers are stacked at the 2 between Roy and Rudy Fernandez and Bayless and there is a perceived need for a true 1.

But who trades a #1 overall pick?

t

"He shoots....................... he scores!!!"

by timbo on Jul 22, 2008 1:47 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think that KP (and Paul Allen) are loathe to trade Marty...

................................ KP is giving every indication of liking the cards in his hand and not wanting to do any discarding. A deal involving, let us say, Rose for Bayless and Frye might have some legs, but that’s not happening… The same reason Chicago doesn’t want to trade Rose is the reason the Blazers don’t want to mess with their roster too much at this point. First we play, then we see, then we adjust…

Marty was drafted straight out of HS, so he is physically just coming into his own. The Blazers feel compelled to SEE if the wildly high draft-pick they invested years ago pays off in the end. The Blazers had young Jermaine O’Neal straight out of HS and traded him too soon and that is a MASSIVE obstacle to any possible trade of Webster. A deal involving him would have to be one-sided in the Blazers’ favor, I think.

Anyway, those are my thoughts…

t

"He shoots....................... he scores!!!"

by timbo on Jul 22, 2008 1:36 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2f597263b71b32c9d2a85c1427a038ce_bigger_small
Thank You Ben Gordon
Jayhawk_small
A Brief History of Ben Gordon: the Quotes Version
Horace_20grant_small
To the Bulls' Front Office
Rose2_small
Optimistic view of BG leaving (I Hope)
Derrick_rose_1__small
An F.U. to the owner

Recent FanPosts

Small
If I was Jerry Paxman... My 2 Year Plan
Small
I'm Glad He's Gone
Chicagostadium_small
Are the Bulls lottery bound?
Toe_small
Forget Who Left for the D, Just Start Playing Some
Small
Jerel McNeal
Bulls-2a_small
List of 2010 free agents (start choosing)
Aaron_scantlen-small-square_small
Trade idea: Kirk for Rudy
Small
Iverson to the Bulls in Gordon S/T?!?!
Small
Hinrich Vs. Gordon

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports