Beasley Beat, Rose Beat
BullsBeat 's Doug Thonus devotes a podcast to scouting each prospect. He does some work for Draft Express, so he had access to their video software (FYI, these were recorded before the measurements were released). I try not to pretend I'm a scout, but luckily for us, Doug is (or at least is pretending), and he seems pretty good at it.
The very very abridged recap: Beasley's quite beastly, Rose may take some time to bloom. (or was that just the lame version?)
0 recs |
189 comments
Comments
Listened to both...
alot of info on both players…at the end of the day can you make your teammates better…i say Rose does that…so get your D Rose Jerseys Chi town!!!!
CHICAGO MANE!!!!
by YEP on Jun 4, 2008 10:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I feel much better about Beasley....
....after listening to that. He can really finish, he must have a good work ethic to be so developed in the absence of any real consistent coaching, he’ll be able to rebound in the NBA, and he’ll likely become a better teammate when he has some that are better on the court than the people reading this blog (no offense, of course).
That being written, I still favor Rose. But Beasley sounds like he’ll be an offensive force early on in the NBA.
by BullsFanInSeattle on Jun 4, 2008 12:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Very little doubt that B-Easy will be beastley
you need 2-3 stars on a team to legitimately challege for a title. I wouldn’t be shocked to see the Bulls try to get both these foundation pieces. I favor Rose as well but I do expect Beastly to put up 20 and 10 sooner than later.
by messwiththebull on Jun 4, 2008 12:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
His analysis of Beasley's finishing skills struck me as entirely
irrational and inconsistent.
On the one hand, Thonus states that Tyrus is a “terrible” finisher in the NBA. In support of that proposition, he argue that Tyrus relied to heavily on dunking in college, were he had an athletic advantage. In the NBA, he doesn’t have the same athletic advantage, so he doesn’t get as many dunk attempts, and thus he struggles with finishing in other ways.
Then the analyst goes on to address Beasley. He states that Beasley, unlike Tyrus, DOESN’T DUNK a lot in college, but rather finishes with layups or other shots. The analysts ASSUMES that Beasley (mysteriously) chooses to finish with those layups/shots rather than dunks, although the analyst contends Beasley COULD dunk if he so decided. Therefore, according to the analyst, Beasley repetoire of finishing skills will translate well to the NBA.
Huh?
It is very odd that Thonus concludes, based on nothing more than supposition, that Beasley is intentionally eschewing dunks in favor of layuyps. The more rational, direct conclusion is that Beasley can’t dunk the ball as often as some other players in college because he isn’t that athletic. If he had the athletic advantage, he would presumably use it. A dunk is the highest percentage shot in basketball. If you could dunk the ball every possession, you would. The concern is that Beasley DOESN’T possess that athletic advantage over other college players, so he is forced to resort to more difficult shots. One might conclude that, in the NBA, against far superior competition, Beasley won’t be able to make the layups and hook shots that he subsisted on in college. In other words, he would be nuetralized.
Thonus has to be consistent. If the superior athleticism of the NBA inhibited Tyrus from dunking (his preferred method of finishing), wouldn’t it also hinder Beasley from fnishing lay-ups and hooks (his preferref method of finishing)?
My point isn’t to compare Beasley and Tyrus. Beasley was a far better college scorer. My point is that Beasley’s failure to dunk a lot in college and his need to resort to more difficult shots against average college defenders is a cause for concern, not an occassion to laud Beasley and proclaim that he’ll be a great NBA finisher.
LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 4, 2008 1:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
For me, it just solidifies Beasley as a Carlos Boozer with a 3 point shot
Right down to the layups in favor of open dunks.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 4, 2008 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boozer doesn't play defense either.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh,
Wouldn’t Boozer with a 3 point shot be the best 4 man in the league?
by rb22 on Jun 4, 2008 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
With a 3 and D, yes.
Blogabull... So Fresh and so Clean Clean!
by Goostafer on Jun 4, 2008 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What goostafer said
Also, someone who doesn’t disappear in the playoffs would be nice.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 4, 2008 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Carlos Boozer with a 3 point shot....
that sounds really good. just so we’re on the same page.
by swede2287 on Jun 4, 2008 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My impression of what he said
is that Tyrus tends to lose control of the ball around the basket. Sure, he’s athletic and can jump quick and high to swat away shots…but how often have you seen Tyrus swoop in toward the basket and then just fumble the ball away?
Beasley can get the ball to the basket in any number of ways without the ball just flying out of his hands.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know. How many times?
This is what I absolutely hate about these amateur scouting reports: lack of quantitative analysis Fine. Thonus knows more about basketball and has a better eye than me. Great. But don’t just tell me he doesn’t do this or that “often enough” or does this “enough to justify __” or whatever. For instance, don’t say Beasley has a great jump shot (say its as good as you could want) and uses it more than most bigs, but then say he doesn’t eschew his post game for the jump shot.
I’ve seen and heard enough jabbermouths to not trust anything anyone says off of a “memory”. Scotter’s analysis is the kind that I like. Tell me something, sure, but give me evidence to back it up.
by tyger1147 on Jun 4, 2008 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're right that Thonus has not been the biggest Tyrus backer,
and there’s some not at all subtle Tyrus bashing in the podcast.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see any mention at all of Tyrus in tyger's post
I’m just curious where you got that from
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Jun 4, 2008 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His title "How many times?" refers to my closing comment,
“the ball just flying out of his hands” which was a reference to Thomas.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which was to bash you, not reference Thomas.
I thought your ego would have assumed it’s always about you.
by tyger1147 on Jun 4, 2008 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, Tyger.
I knew what you were up to. I just ignored it.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was actually more to bash Thonus.
So if you “knew what [I] was up to…” the ego did prevail. Ohhh, I’m a sneaky bastard.
(sorry matt, i do try to cause trouble from time-to-time)
by tyger1147 on Jun 4, 2008 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As our dear departed bullshooter found out,
it doesn’t pay to respond to your personal attacks with retaliations. You may have noticed that it’s been months since I responded in kind to one of your attacks.
I enjoy friendly conversation with you; we’ve been able to muster a few civil exchanges…and, if possible, I’d like to have more of them.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
IS bullshooter gone
???
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, I'm the reason
now let us never speak of it again.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What are you talking about
What evidence do you actually want? If i told you about my friend playing basketball how would i explain him to you? Rose can get low numbers in athletic tests (im being hypothetical) but because you have seen him be an athletic freak on the court, you would tell everyone he is, and it is true, but not because some numbers say some, because you saw it.
Agreed take everything with a grain of salt, but im not sure what evidence you looking for, in the end you wont know how good someone is until they come into the nba, i think its just that pro rose concept coming out. I havent heard the rose podcast, but i will and i wonder what proofs will be there that show rose being a guy who makes his team better.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't listen to the Rose one either.
Go back and look through some of Scotter’s posts and you’ll know exactly what i’m talking about.
For instance, don’t just say something like “Beasley has as good of a jumpshot as anyone coming out.” That really doesn’t mean anything because it’s almost certainly untrue. Combine the scouting w/ the stats: “His shot looks very good w/ a consistent high release and follow-throug, etc. and he makes XX% of his jumpshots (not just FG%) which ranks XX amongst __ whatever group you want.”
Thonus was just incredibly cliche heavy. It was boring.
by tyger1147 on Jun 4, 2008 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea but
The stats dont really translate into the nba. Saying that so and so could hit xpercentage in college doesnt mean squat for many reasons (the level of defense, the range of the shot, etc). I think all you can say he is as good a shooter as anyone coming out, meaning that he could go head to head with anyone in the draft in a shooting contest. thats how i got it, although i can see why you would think its cliche heavy.
I used the “if a friend tells you about another friend playing basketball” anology, and i suppose you would be the kind of person who would simply say “bring and ill see it for myself” rather then take my word for it. It makes sense to have that kind of oppinion, but i think using stats in the sense of how someone would translate wouldnt make alot of sense cuz the situations would be different.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look. A LOT of people think Ryan Theriot is a great baseball player.
And they think Alfonso Soriano is bad. That’s enough to never trust anyone’s unsubstantiated opinion.
by tyger1147 on Jun 4, 2008 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i know
i understood where you were coming from, but what do you want me to do, i dont think theres any hard evidence that could explain how a player will act at the next level in a few years from now. This a guy that has seen many many basketball players, spoken to many many proffesional people about the players, and is coming up with a conclusion which he think is fairly accurate, he wont be 100% no one can be, so you listen to him and see what he says. If you are john paxson, you see what others say, you see what you see, and you try to figure out where the truth is. Stats are nice but they can never translate well. We wont know what beasly can really do until he is in the nba. SO im sorry, but i dont know what it is you expect to come from him other then wording everything in a more politically correct manner which might not really be possible (for example, how do you rank a guy in shooting, unless you put every player in the same shooting drills in many different situations and then rank them, after tehy do the drills a few times so you get a reasonable justification, you know to make sure nothings really a fluke, and i dont think anyone has the time or patience to do such things).
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I’m not particularly interested in college statistics. Except the ones that Hollinger determined translate better, of course :-p
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, but saying he takes 1/3 of his shots as jumpshots would be nice
or only 20% or whatever
and give me a comparison to carmelo anthony. Don’t just tell me, “He takes jumpshots but not that many.” What’s that mean?
by tyger1147 on Jun 4, 2008 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and also
you’re asking Doug to not only watch all this video, but create his own 82games.com database to tabulate the situational shot charts.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree it would be asking alot. Although I thought
Synergy provided statistical breakdowns with their video, but that might just be for the NBA.
Since it applies here and was a decent amount of data entry. YaoPau looked at the their numbers against guys that will get drafted in this thread. I thought it was a decent idea and replicated it with my own spreadsheet. I don’t view as proving anything, but I thought it was interesting. If you want a look at just about every stat fro Rose and Beasley for the season and against 11 tougher opponents click here.
formerly sbulls
by Scotter on Jun 4, 2008 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This looks like a meaty project
Does it make sense to post it as a fanpost, and point out some of the key pieces of info we should get from it?
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
YaoPau's idea not mine.
I just have the tools to expand on it so I’d rather let his fanpost. But, I will breakdown the statistic a little bit and point out some of the statistics that matter in that thread when I get some time.
formerly sbulls
by Scotter on Jun 4, 2008 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And no, it doesn't "prove" anything.
We’re talking about prospects here. Nothing is ever proven. But at least give me some numbers with your analysis. That’s all I’m asking. Whether it’s “pure” numbers of competition, or whether it’s just the type of player he is. Don’t just say things like, “he’s an excellent finisher” because the only reason I believe that is because I’ve seen it, too. And if that’s what he’s relying on, then he’s not providing me anything new.
by tyger1147 on Jun 4, 2008 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think what he was saying was
Tyrus Thomas’ finishing ability is with his dunks, so if someone prevents him from dunking (making him jump from an odd footing, or keep a body on him to prevent him from getting his ups) he wont be able to finish. While Beasley, who relies more on differnt ways of getting his shot off (in terms of layups) can finish in awkward positions, with bodies on him, from a good footing or not, from the left or right side of the rim, from either hand. He can score, i dont know how that really is illogical, it makes sense.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your impression.
I understand Thonus is saying that Beasley can maintain control of the ball through body contact. However, what good is that if he isn’t athletic enough to get his shot off over the taller, high rising interior players of the NBA?
This is one of my major problems with Beasley, based on the film I have seen. (I’m not a pro scout, just my opinion.) The way he finishes isn’t impressive, in my view. It doesn’t look very effortless. Many times, he resorts to relatively difficult fade away lay-ups and hooks over small college defenders. Won’t most of those just get swatted in his eye in the NBA? Or at the very least, won’t he have to alter the shot even further, increasing the level of difficulty and reducing the chances of conversion?
When I see Beasley resorting to difficult lay-ups in college, I immediately think of it as a manifestation of his limited size and athleticism. That’s just me.
LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 4, 2008 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Bulls can make these guys play 3 on 3
in the private work-outs.
What I wonder is who can the Bulls get to come in and provide a competitive look for Beasley to work against? The Bulls next pick is way out in the 2nd round…and I’m pretty sure Tyrus and Gooden won’t be coming in to work Beasley out.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
Thomas has to be one of them, probably noch (another tweener), and if we are lucky deng (best player on the team skillset wise?). Giive beasley hinrich, and thabo and see what he does with that group….thatd be nice actually.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not how it works
Beasley and Rose will have individual workouts. The current team members don’t go up against these guys. Alot of teams have group workouts with a a bunch of draft prospects, but Beasley and Rose are going 1 & 2 in some order, and their agents know that. They won’t have them compete against somebody projected to go lower. What good would that do?
As for the Beasley on offense against NBA players thing, it’s pretty simple. Beasley can score in a variety of ways and do whatever he needs to do to get the ball in the hoop depending on the type of defender that is guarding him.
by rb22 on Jun 4, 2008 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not only won't they
I believe it’s not allowed per the CBA
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Itd be cool if it was
But i guess it only is done in video games…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm curious. Why do you assume that
Beasley will be able to finish his lay-ups and hooks in traffic against taller, more athletic NBA players?
Won’t those shots get altered or blocked?
I’m not saying you are wrong, I am just wondering what your rationale is.
LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 4, 2008 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just my opinion I guess
I think he’s very skilled and has knack for putting the ball in the basket.
You wouldn’t think that Steve Nash would ever be able to finish in the lane in the NBA with his lack of size and athleticism, but he uses his skill, instincts, and craftiness to find ways to do so, whether it’s scoops, hooks, using his body to shield the defender, fading away, or using his weak hand.
Beasley will score all kinds of ways too, although probably in Miami. He’ll pick & pop for jumpers when his guy hedges too hard. He’ll catch facing up and shoot jumpers or drive by bigger slower guys. He’ll catch in the post and use his skill, instincts, and craftiness to score inside. He’ll use fakes, up and unders, baby hooks using his body to shield, or whatever he needs to do.
He’s not as athletic as a guy like Tyrus but he’s on a totally different level in terms of basketball skill. Not to mention the fact that every game he’s ever played in the defenses number one concern is stopping him. He’s never left alone for a second and doesn’t have as many opportunities to dunk. He’s learned other ways to get the ball in the hoop though. That’s not a bad thing.
by rb22 on Jun 4, 2008 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jordan had the ability
Kobe does too, dwade has the ability too. THey do it on bigger stronger guys all the time, just because they have the knack of having a soft touch and keeping control of thier bodies which thonus seems to say beasley has. Getting bumped but still being able to control yourself in mid air and alter the shot, having someone hack your right arm but switch to your left and throw it off the glass from either side…isnt that what the report says beasley can do. The same things cant be applied for dunks however, a bigger guy pushes you in mid dunk, you cant finish, all you can do is let the ball go and hope it goes in, but a good finisher (as thonus explains) is someone who can get thier shot off no matter what the situation.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BG
Does not have this skill for reference point (see numerous times knocked down to ground with arms flailing)
by bullschwaa on Jun 4, 2008 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But aren't Jordan and Kobe extremely athletic as well?
In order to be successful interior scorer, doesn’t a player need both the ability to withstand contact and the athleticism to rise above challenging defenders?
Beasley has the former, but does he also possess the latter? Because if he doesn’t, all of the ball control in the world won’t matter. I guess that is my concern.
LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 4, 2008 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thonus mentions that he has had this same debate
with Givony. I understood Thonus’ position to be that balance and body control are every bit as much athletic traits as quickness, speed and jumping ability.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately, regardless of what appellation you apply to
them, a guy with tremendous body control and balance still won’t score in the paint in the NBA if he is six inches off of the ground. (That’s hyperbole, but you see the pont, I’m sure.)
It’s a cliche to say that the NBA game is played above the rim, but it’s accurate.
LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!
by 1958ChiTown on Jun 4, 2008 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
indeed
but luckily beasley wasnt considered in the lower percentiles of athleticism, maybe rose is more athletic for his size, but beasley is athletic enough to get done what he is expected to get done. I think thounus said it, beasley can add more weight, but he is one of the rare draft picks that really dont need to in order to make an impact. Of course if he does, then he might become more beastly.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
when was the last time
that you saw zach randolph do anything above the rim? I’m not saying I’m in love with zbo at all (i can’t stand his black-whole nature), but you definately can’t knock his ability to score while playing WAY below the rim.
by carlirvington on Jun 5, 2008 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
beasly is athletic
but jordan and kobe would take it to shaq, ewing, mutumbo, three or four guys at once…..its not just about being athletic, jordan could definetly jump high which helped, but once your in the air it takes alot of skill to move the ball from one hand to the toher, and go from one side to the other, and still maintain the fact that it changes nothing…you can score.
Tyrus is athletic too, very athletic, but that changes nothing, if he is forced to jump too early or too late, or pushed in mid air, he wont finish (as easily), and the guys who can finish (jordan, wade, kobe, etc) it wont matter where they are pushed, you have to litterly tie them up to really prevent them from scoring.
I think thats what Doug was saying about beasley, the guy just needs to get close enough to the rim and somehow, someway he will find a way to get the ball in the rim, whether it be with his left hand or right, whether it be under the rim, or 10 feet from it, whether it be from the left side or the right side. Thats a skill that really requres alot of practice…
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
85Chi
I see where you would think that him ‘resorting to difficult lay-ups’ is an issue. But understand this. He has the ability to change his style of play.
This is not a direct comparison, but think about the way Boozer plays the high post. He can bang his 17 footer all day, or he sets up a drive to the basket to finish with either hand. Sometimes scorers use angles to assure a shot is not blocked.
So he minimizes the ability to get blocked. Even if it looks akward or difficult, he’s in control of his body via a fade, fall-away, etc.
by kingj41 on Jun 4, 2008 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have similar questions. I kept thinking a lot of the shots
he puts up would have been altered or swatted by a weak side shot blocker in the NBA. He’ll adjust, but he’ll do what most undersized PFs do. Take more jumpshots. Even 70% of Elton Brand’s FGA are jumpers. There’s also a decent amount of rebounds that he gets with body control and tipping it to himself that aren’t going to happen in the NBA. If I was sold on Beasley being a superstar. It would be because I was sold on Beasley playing the 3 where he had a size advantage and sold on Beasley becoming an above-average passer.
formerly sbulls
by Scotter on Jun 4, 2008 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's how I took it as well
I don’t know about Beasley choosing not to dunk, but I took it to mean that when Tyrus can’t dunk he struggles to finish. Beasley’s shown an ability to finish without dunking.
Tyrus has a pretty abysmal inside shooting percentage. I don’t think it’s that controversial to say he’s not a good enough (non-dunking) finisher
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and to the point of Beasley
yes, it’s worrisome that he doesn’t dunk more often, I would not take it as a positive that he’s already compensated by making tougher layups, because those are made even tougher in the NBA.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Biggest concern
The fact that he really will be a poor defender (unless he really learns the way to play defense, which i really doubt). So i think he will end up being a one dimensional player, although i did like the last parts especially about “if everyone stayed (on the bulls) who would benefit the most” and the answer was gordon and kirk, gordon would have alot more open looks (beasley would draw attention, probably more then deng if he pans out) and hinrich and beasley might be able to run a bunch of pick and rolls/pops/fades (like joe smith, pj brown, and what i wanted thomas to do with kirk).
I think the attitude will be a big thing to look up about him, is he gonna think he is the best player on the team, or will he want to win? Defensively he will suck, but it seems offensively he will be good, i think it just comes down to will he be willing to be a team player and do what he needs to to help the team not himself.
I think in the end if his offense is greater then carmelos (in terms of effectiveness) and he fits into the bulls team system, i think his defensive liablilities can be overlooked (to an extent)
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everytime
i read something negative about Beasley the image that flashes in my mind is Antoine Walker.
AHHH! Help.
by NBA Observer on Jun 4, 2008 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
While walker likes to do his little bouncy dance thing, Beasley likes to show his pecs or pull and rvd and point to his name on the back of the jersey.
(no im not confirming your comparison)
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm, ideas
Backside shirt popping: why pop the jersey on the front with the silly team name when you can backside pop your own name.
by NBA Observer on Jun 4, 2008 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's definitley the new trend coming out next season
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 4, 2008 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Antoine Walker could never dream
of being as athletic as Beasley.
by swede2287 on Jun 4, 2008 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t get the Mark Aguirre comparison out of my head,
but lately I’ve also been thinking along the lines of Adrian Dantley…anybody remember him?
He was a 3 who played like a 4, a little on the short side so he used an array of ball fakes to get his shot off, somehow snaking up around the basket to get lay-up after lay-up, a really great first step, excellent outside shot the defender had to honor. Hmm…Adrian Dantley.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Thonus was spot on there
He’s right. Tyrus Thomas does struggle AFTER the contact. When he’s got the clear path to the rim get out of his way. You’re going to be in a poster. But if the defenders come over and bruise Thomas they have a real good chance of forcing an awkward shot.
This isn’t to say that Thomas will not improve. Thanks to Boylan, we essentially lost an entire regular season of development with Thomas. We must get a staff together that will actually work with Tyrus. For the same reason the Lakers don’t want to trade Bynum I think the Bulls should have with Tyrus. The kid is special, but you have to be patient with him and work with him. That’s the system. Ready, steady, GO!
Beasley is just a pro AFTER the contact. He takes the bumps and still gathers for a shot. That’s really difficult to teach. It’s got to come from the soul. It starts with “I’m good, but after the contact I’m great.” It’s confidence mainly. Beasley just has piles of the stuff right now. Perhaps too much.
by NBA Observer on Jun 4, 2008 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus can't even dribble around one guy on a fast break.
Its like he’s only been playing ball for a couple years sometimes.
by iBurkey on Jun 4, 2008 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's just saying that Beasley
has more of a polished offensive low post game. He had a refined post game in college aka finishing skills – he could dunk a lot (and he did) but he also scored a whole lot on tough layins, hooks. That is not a easy way to score the ball for a young player – ask Dwight Howard.
I think that’s an okay point by him – just suggesting that Beasley’s offensive game is polished…like a player like Boozer’s is now. Plus he also has the athleticism of a Tyrus.
by swede2287 on Jun 4, 2008 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the question is then...
Who is going to work harder at improving their game?
Like i said yesterday, i doubt beasley is going to play the 4 much in the NBA, he seems much better suited to be a 3, I guess we will see how it turns out next year. He can finish around the rim in college, but will that translate to the NBA? There may be more upside for beasley, but there is also a chance he will become a glenn robinson type. with rose, there may not be as much individual upside, but there is less downside, and just in terms of having a floor leader and someone is dead-set on winning, i think that is much more valuable, especially with this bulls team.
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE
by CONOR6 on Jun 4, 2008 2:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
this is extremely speculative
but I get the feeling that whatever their talent level is now, Rose is the type who’ll work to maximize it, whereas Beasley’s the type that’s red flagged for someone who won’t.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
right
rose’s work ethic is unquestioned…so worries about his inconsistent jumper or his inability to go left will be taken care through non-stop practice and drills
Beasley i believe has to have a good work ethic to be as good as he is, but is it good enough for the NBA? again, we will see, but i just have more faith in rose’s motor and desire
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE
by CONOR6 on Jun 4, 2008 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Thonus' implication
was just the opposite, namely, that Beasley couldn’t possibly have developed his incredible all-around individual game without an extremely high level of personal dedication. The fact that Beasley’s “team” game is underdeveloped, Thonus put down to Beasly’s never having been in a stable team environment…or at KSU, basically just having crappy team mates.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah but once you get them dolla dolla billssssss
or something. Has Carmelo improved at all?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that depends on the individual
Money is a tricky thing for certain guys
Some guys, hinrich is a perfect example, feel the pressure of the big contract and try too hard to make things happen and end up playing worse.
Some guys, b. wallace is an even better example, stop working as hard because they are too busy counting their millions.
you are right, though, i haven’t really thought about that, carmelo is better than he was when he was a rookie, but he isn’t that much better. and his terrible defense does not help his cause, or his teams.
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE
by CONOR6 on Jun 4, 2008 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So who wants to play psychologist
or maybe mind reader. It is a big question, and if you go on character maybe rose seems more likely, but beasley isnt really the “im stronger, bigger, and more athletic then you so im better” type, he actually is more skill then physical, while rose (despite height) has all the physical gifts that have had to have played a strong reason on him being one of the better guards. If rose isnt naturally ambi, then one would think he worked a hell of alot to be able to shoot and score from anywhere with either hand. That skill set seems more practiced then natural. This isnt a knock on rose of course, because being able to see the court and figure out who to pass to when, and out play your opposition isnt natural either, but if you are faster and stronger then everyone….
well take a look a defense, rose isnt a great defender either however his physical tools allow him to makeup what he lacks in fundementals, whereas beasley doesnt have the physcial tool to keep up alot of 3s and may not be strong enough to keep up with 4s. Offensively, rose will explode past his guy, not cuz he is skilled better, but because he is just faster. He will attack the rim not because he has a bunch of tricks cuz he is unusually strong and explosive, while beasley will blow past his man because he has the threat of a shot and a drive, and attack the rim because he can finish in different ways and use finnesse if he is outpowered.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beasley is a 4
He is big, strong, and athletic enough to guard NBA 4’s… or as I said before the “less offensive big” or “more perimter oriented big.”
His advantage on offense comes when playing him at the 4 against guys who are slower than he is. He can face them up and shoot over them, or just drive by them. He’ll be great for pick & roll or pick & pop too, cause you can’t leave him for a second, and he can finish at the rim or with the jumper.
If you play him at the 3, I think he’d have more issues on defense trying to guard quick 3’s than he would playing the 4 and guarding a big.
by rb22 on Jun 4, 2008 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no big deal, but
i disagree, when i think of beasley i think of rudy gay
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE
by CONOR6 on Jun 4, 2008 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
Rudy Gay is a skinny rail and never even played inside at UConn. He’s always been a wing. I think Gay is good too but definitely a 3 not a 4. He’s not big & strong enough to guard 4’s, and he isn’t much of a rebounder. He’s a 3. Beasley is a 4 in just about every way.
by rb22 on Jun 4, 2008 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus, Gay is a huge leaper.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 4, 2008 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no worries dude
i just disagree with you.
I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE
by CONOR6 on Jun 4, 2008 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why?
They really don’t have a lot of similarity in their games.
And, based on the measurements released yesterday, it seems like Beasley measures out as a typical 4.
by potato0328 on Jun 4, 2008 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that comparison makes no sense at all.
please explain
Blogabull... So Fresh and so Clean Clean!
by Goostafer on Jun 4, 2008 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gilbert Opted out
Give him a big sign on…grab beasley for cheap…trade the scrubs and keep noah, deng and hughes (yea..hughes, gil loves sum hughes. no homo) and I say…
BULLS IN 09 BABY!
by Belize on Jun 4, 2008 2:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mega deal for the guy with two knee surgeries?
He may be grown beyond his “tear me down” inspiration.
by NBA Observer on Jun 4, 2008 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gilbert > hinrich
then again, I just really dug 0’s style since he made that turn around / iknowitsgoingin shot….hey, amare did it
by Belize on Jun 4, 2008 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never Mind
Just read Beasley’s 6’7’’ height…someone name me a beast in the NBA with that height..I cant think of one off top
by Belize on Jun 4, 2008 2:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
6-foot-7 without shoes
NBA players are allowed to wear shoes.
by Tyrant10 on Jun 4, 2008 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
i just looked at barkey’s height..and it around the 6’6’ range…rodaman’s the same
by Belize on Jun 4, 2008 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Was the Chuckster a PF?
I always viewed him as a PF. But the more I read about the more the commentators and other players seem to think he was really a SF. For a pudge, he was way too fast for any 4 to guard him.
by NBA Observer on Jun 4, 2008 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup yup
chuck was one of the nastiest…but my point is – that its rare that a PF enters the league and is suceesful if he’s not at least 6’ 10’’ (esp. in this day and age with the Dwights and the Amare’s)..IMO, rare cases include the Barkley’s, Rodman’s etc…the thing is: Is beasley that special? The more I ponder, the more I see rose’s face [||]
by Belize on Jun 4, 2008 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not true
And it depends on what heights you use. You can’t compare Beasley’s barefoot height with other player’s listed height. Beasley will probably be listed 6-9 in the NBA. He was listed 6-10 at Kansas St.
Also, Howard is a center. Duncan is really a center too. Even Stoudemire played center until Shaq got there. Rasheed usually plays center. Look at the best NBA 4’s, and almost all are listed 6-9 or 6-10, which is the same is Beasley. Garnett & Dirk are the only ones listed taller.
Let’s just stop it with the Beasley isn’t big enough thing. I thought the measurements and tests proved he is plenty big/strong/long to be an NBA 4.
by rb22 on Jun 4, 2008 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmmm...
just saw this:
http://www.nba.com/fantasy/draft_kit/powerforwards1_15.html
if boozer is 6’9’’ (which i didnt know)..then that fits beasley’s style…I dont mind that either
by Belize on Jun 4, 2008 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
with his wingspan and standing reach
measurements, he is the same size of the typical NBA power forward.
He’s not undersized.
by swede2287 on Jun 4, 2008 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Will this work in all your opinions?
Lets say we take Beasley, and we play a line up of Hinrich, Deng, Beasley, Tyrus, and Noah with Thabo, Larry, Noc, and Drew as backups… Thats a big lineup on the floor at all times… We would have to sign and trade BG, (maybe we can get rid of Larry as a bonus with him) but I think that if Deng, Tyrus, or Beasley can guard shooting guards on other teams, we are going to be great in terms of flexibility with our players. If Seattle can make KD a shooting guard, we should be able to do that with Deng.. I just cant see any negative in playing this kind of basketball… We will be bigger, stronger, faster, and more versatile than any team we play…
by NamingRightsOnSale on Jun 4, 2008 4:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well
Deng, Tyrus, and Beasley can’t guard shooting guards. Durant shouldn’t be a shooting guard either.
by rb22 on Jun 4, 2008 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Deng
But beasley doesnt have the defensive mindset to really guard a two guard (but i think he can keep them from penetration due to his sheer strength) and thomas is gonna foul every 4 seconds)
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deng is not a good option for SG
The Bulls tried it out several times last year, he’s just not that quick to keep up with some of the SG’s in the league. That lineup has basically no outside shooting (I’m withholding Beasley’s 3 point shot until I see him actually shoot the NBA 3 well), as Deng never takes the shot to keep his FG% high. I doubt Tyrus could guard 2’s, the better ones could easily draw fouls on him.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 4, 2008 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You think Deng doesn't shoot 3s
so he can keep his FG% high?
by JeffD on Jun 4, 2008 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, and it's true
He averaged 2 3’s a game attempted his rookie season in only 27 minutes, then next year he dropped to 1 3 attempted, next year only 0.1 attempted. His FG% shot up 6% as a result from 2006 to 2007. The coaching staff told him to stop shooting 3’s because he would raise his percentage, and it made him hone his midrange game.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 4, 2008 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still...
We’ve seen him regularly make shots from just inside the arc. While he doesn’t shoot the 3 that much, he has extended his range sure.
Don't call me doughboy!
by Khalid El-Amin on Jun 4, 2008 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
* for sure.
Don't call me doughboy!
by Khalid El-Amin on Jun 4, 2008 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying he doesn't have range
But, he just doesn’t look for the shot. If he’s not going to develop a post game, then he might as well start shooting some 3s so he doesn’t become so predictable. Everyone knows if you stop him from 18 ft, he isn’t going to slash to the hoop consistently.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 4, 2008 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
I also think he will develop a 3 next year, especially if we get a drive and kick PG (Rose) or a strong PF (Beasley) who commands attention around the basket.
Don't call me doughboy!
by Khalid El-Amin on Jun 4, 2008 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think if he could make them
at a decent rate he would take them.
by JeffD on Jun 4, 2008 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is exactly what Deng did to his game
He listened to the Bulls staff which encouraged him to pass on the 3 point attempts and take two steps in to shoot the 18 footer. Deng agreed with the idea. He worked over the summers on his game from 18’ and in as he was adding bulk to his upper and lower body.
His FG% did increase and part of the reason why was because he avoided the perimeter shot to dribble up into a wide open mid range game.
by NBA Observer on Jun 5, 2008 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would take your big Beasley away from the paint...
and that is never, ever good – aka Sheed would be do his team more if he stayed in the paint.
by swede2287 on Jun 4, 2008 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the prevailing wisdom is that you should draft the best player available and not by position; but the level of debate (expert and fan) comparing Rose and Beasley just leads me to believe that it is not possible to separate these two based on skill level . To me the decision is as much a choice between Hinrich and Thomas as Rose and Beasley; draft Rose and Hinrich goes, draft Beasley and Thomas goes. I wish I could have seen Thomas play more but from what I have seen I choose Hinrich and therefore Beasley.
by sibulls23 on Jun 4, 2008 4:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not necessarily
Paxson won’t trade Kirk just for the sake of it, he’d rather just leave him at the SG spot. Beasley could play the 3 or 4, and the Bulls could keep Tyrus with his cheap rookie contract, and maybe let Deng walk if he’s asking for too much.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 4, 2008 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
paxsons too nice
I think, and he gave kirk his contract (if kirks contract wasnt so big, maybe it wouldnt have been such a big deal to get rid of him) so i see pax keeping kirk around for at least one more year UNLESS some huge trade is in the midst (like the miami giving away the number two pick) but it would have to be real huge for paxson to just simply turn his back on kirk. I think pax gives kirk one more year and if kirk plays at hte same level as he did last year, then pax can tell kirk that he isnt performing the way pax thought he would when he gave him the contract. One horrible year (where really the whole team sucked) is not a good excuse to get rid of hinrich
Now i know what your thinking, YES IT IS!!! and maybe if pax was riley it would be a different story, but honestly i dont see paxson doing this at this point in time, barring a huge trade.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Jun 4, 2008 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you to a point...
...and I came to the exact opposite conclusion: Take Rose. Drafting Beasley is a further investment in Hinrich and Gordon. Drafting Rose is a further investment in Tyrus and Noah. I think we’ve invested enough in Kirk and Ben, and we’ve seen exactly how good they are and how far they can go. It’s time to invest in the two bigs that we’ve drafted the past two seasons.
On the other hand – remember that this Bulls team was so good at the point that Chris Duhon managed to average almost 30 minutes a game, 75 games per season, the last four seasons. There’s more than enough playing time to go around if they draft Rose – it’s actually Larry Hughes and his contract that complicates matters,not Hinrich nor Gordon. But with Beasley they do have to make difficult decisions right away – with Tyrus, Deng, Nocioni, and Thabo.
by BullsFanInSeattle on Jun 4, 2008 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that first paragraph is well put
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Finishing
The skill to finish is certainly underrated in the NBA. I think that Thonus’ points about Beasley’s extremely high finishing skills are spot on. I was watching tape of him and was concerned because he looked to be shooting ‘easy’ shots but in fact I think he is skilled enough to make getting a good shot look easy. I can support taking Rose, but he better be a damn good point guard…
by Jud Buechler on Jun 4, 2008 5:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
100% with Jud Buechler. My only problem with drafting Rose is that our backcourt gets even smaller (assuming we keep Gordon at the 2). We would have some real trouble guarding some of the bigger backcourts in the NBA.
People have suggested moving Hinrich to the two, and as much as I think this season was a fluke for him, I also don’t see him being that effective at the 2 just because he has stopped driving to the basket…...along with everybody else on this team.
by darksmokepuncher on Jun 4, 2008 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to ask the experts....
....why is the prevailing wisdom that we must trade Kirk (or Ben Gordon) or do some other moves right away if we draft Derrick Rose? Is it because everyone thinks that Kirk makes to much to be a backup, and so would Gordon if we re-sign him?
Because I see Chris Duhon’s minutes – almost 30 minutes a game, 75 games a year, the past 4 years – as being the start for Rose. He could take Duhon’s minutes, nobody would bat an eyelash, and the Bulls would immediately improve for that move alone.
I think Larry Hughes and his contract appears to be a much bigger stick-in-the-mud than Hinrich or Gordon. And when it comes to backcourt minutes I think Thabo deserves more, and he’s the guy nobody talks about nowadays when discussing the Bulls drafting Rose. A backcourt combo of Rose-Hinrich-Thabo or Rose-Gordon-Thabo is pretty dang good, I think, assuming Thabo develops with consistent playing time.
by BullsFanInSeattle on Jun 4, 2008 6:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why we talk so much about trading Kirk...
There are several reasons that people are talking about trading Kirk…
1) He seems to be getting the most interest, and has the best percieved value… Despite coming off of his worst year, national media has reported solid interest from about about ten teams. Many teams are looking for a Point Guard this year, and Kirk is the best point guard available this summer that doesn’t play in Canada. If we take Rose, then Kirk is considered expendable, so many people would like to trade him while his value is high. There is also the theory that his value is bound to go down, because even if he plays better next year, he probably won’t get as many minutes. (although, in response to that, it’s fair to point out that his contract goes down next year, so he will still be considered an attractive point guard option.)
2) Ben Gordon is a restricted free agent… Many people think that we should move Gordon instead of Hinrich. The trouble with that theory is that Ben would have to agree to any trade. We would need to sign him, then trade him. Which obviously makes trading more complicated. Also, there is a poplular opinion that Ben thinks he is worth more money than the rest of the world thinks he is worth.
3) Larry Hughes is a highly paid suckster… Of course Larry Hughes is the biggest stick in the mud. He makes a shitload money, doesn’t do what he’s best at (slashing) and he doesn’t care about winning. That’s exactly why we can’t trade him. Nobody wants him. And if we can trade him, it’s just going to be for somebody else’s terrible, over-paid garbage. And nobody gets excited talking about those trades.
Now, I don’t mind the idea of keeping Kirk around, because I think he is a good player. But I think that the team definitely needs to explore his value right now and see if it can land a player that might give us a better chance to win.
by kidronmusic on Jun 6, 2008 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My concern with Beasely isn't athleticism or size
Look at how Beasley tested out for the love of 1958Chitown!
I don’t take the testing as gospel, but there are certain things to keep in mind. First, good results mean more than bad results. It’s easy for me to see how, for example, Rose might have simply flubbed the lane agility drill. On the other hand, I think it’s unlikely a guy will test unusually well if he’s actually not that athletic.
Second, it’s one thing to score well in one area, but he scored well in most every area.
Aside from being 6’7, he measured out at a very elite level. Strength, reach, wingspan, jumping ability, lane agility and speed all measured out very favorably to the truly elite bigger guys that have come out in the last few years. Melo, Dwight Howard, Amare, Al Horford, Amare.
In short, when I really looked at where he measured, it was in very select company.
by Sports2 on Jun 4, 2008 6:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Where can you find full memphis or K state games on the web?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 4, 2008 8:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Scotter is a good man
http://www.ncaasports.com/mmod/player
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 4, 2008 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
On Espn..
“We are continuing to hear that if the Bulls draft Derrick Rose with the No. 1 pick (which is looking more and more likely) they’ll try to move the No. 2 pick for either a draft prospect like O.J. Mayo or a veteran point guard like T.J. Ford or Kirk Hinrich. “
So…if the Heat want Hinrich..is there a way to swap him for the #2 pick? That would be a ill…grab beasley and rose!
here’s d link btw
http://tinyurl.com/5gkhxa
by Belize on Jun 4, 2008 9:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich is a much better fit than Ford
Ford is injury prone, can’t shoot, and can’t defend like Kirk. He replicates rather Rose’s strengths if anything. I still think they’d prefer to just draft Mayo, though, unless we added a whole lot….
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Jun 4, 2008 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"injury prone"
is a stretch. He had a couple of bad freak injuries…other than that he’s held up pretty well. Also, he shot better than Kirk did this past season (except from 3pt range)
by NormVanBeer on Jun 4, 2008 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has a congenital spinal cord issue, iirc,
so maybe he doesn’t get injured more often than many others, but his injuries related to that are pretty darn serious. I don’t think you can call them freak injuries when he has a specific built-in condition that renders him prone to neck injuries.
Here's to the most exciting offseason in a VERY long time!
by wjb1492 on Jun 4, 2008 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
bad choice of wording on my part
I know/knew about his condition….and you make a good point. However, that’s the point I was trying to make. It’s not like he gets injured way more than any other player. The couple of bad ones that he’s had, were REAL bad collisions/fouls. It wasn’t like he got slightly shoved and then just crumbled on the sideline.
by NormVanBeer on Jun 5, 2008 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not that I checked this out
but from the games I’ve watched from TJ Ford I think his FG% increases because he finishes better than Kirk at the rim. Kirk is a better jump shooter, but TJ is better at finishing at the rim. If Kirk had more of the knack to finish at the rim he’d float between 45 and 48% from the field.
I think TJ is pretty good, but if there’s a chance to move Hinrich to the Heat for the #2 I would do that deal in a heartbeat.
by NBA Observer on Jun 5, 2008 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd have to guess that nearly all guards are better at the rim
than Hinrich.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 5, 2008 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
slight misconception
I recall going through 82games, and Kirk was a little bit better than other Bulls guards at finishing over the years. It’s not clear how many of those attempts were open layups though.
by hscs on Jun 5, 2008 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, I guess I'm skewed by what Scotter pointed out below
maybe he does finish inside, but it’s so rare that he tries to…
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 5, 2008 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ford doesn't shoot a better % inside than Kirk.
In fact his inside FG% is isn’t particuarly great. However, a significantly larger % of Ford’s shots are inside shots. Ford is in the low 30s and and Kirk’s is the high teens. Ford puts up numbers, but I wouldn’t be that interested.
formerly sbulls
by Scotter on Jun 5, 2008 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
Ford’s game is predicated on getting to the rim. I think the best compliment to Wade would somebody who can knock down jumpshots (allowing Wade to penetrate) and play tough D, sometimes guarding the larger, premiere two guards. Small he may be, but Kirk can do that. I’d just be a lot more impressed by a Hinrich/Wade backcourt than a Ford/Wade backcourt. Heck, it’s probably going to be a lot better than the Rose/Hughes lineup I’m afraid we’re going to see.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Jun 5, 2008 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next to Wade
Hinrich’s height or lack thereof is entirely moot. Hinrich can guard all the shooting guards in the NBA not named Kobe Bryant. Wade doesn’t want to guard the other SG.
Any player you can add to the Heat that will guard the primary scoring guard threat will inevitably benefit Wade’s lackluster man defense. Once you take Wade off the primary scorer you can allow him to defend his assignment but gamble in the passing lanes in a method identical to what Jordan was doing for Chicago by assigning Pippen to guard the primary scoring threat. Hinrich is no Pippen and Wade is no Jordan, but the model matches.
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich couldn't handle Jamaal Tinsley
I think you’re overstating his prowess.
Though alongside Wade he’d likely get more leeway with the officials.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 6, 2008 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and evidently
all the guards not named Cuttino Mobley
by NormVanBeer on Jun 6, 2008 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
already being discussed
http://www.blogabull.com/2008/6/4/545713/best-of-both-worlds-rose-a
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 4, 2008 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the other thing is Wade and the boys are older than the Bulls
So Kirk going there fits in a way better than a draft pick. Their window approaches and goes- they need to get good enough to keep first Marion, and then a few years from now, Wade. Seems like Kirk fits that better than Mayo.
by iBurkey on Jun 4, 2008 9:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
trade
I’m just convinced there is going to be a trade to go along with this draft pick. Drafting Rose and keeping Hinrich on the bench combined with Noce and Hughes contracts…got to be most expensive bench in NBA history. Hinrich has good trade value and having 3 guards under 6.5 to me is silly. If they go with Beasley I don’t think Bulls have ever shown any real commitment to him and won’t hesitate to move him.
by sibulls23 on Jun 4, 2008 10:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I want to believe in Pax
but I don’t think he’ll pull off the move. The Heat have the #2 and cap space. Riley might be able to swing another megadeal. He always seems to. But the Bulls have Kirk and Noc with large contracts and both of these players are perfect for a Pat Riley team. He’s not coaching anymore, but Spoelstra will carry a similar mission next season. Kirk would give them the PG they want. A player that defends and will defer to Wade on offense and then make the cut, run around screens, etc. Noc is that valuable bench player the Heat don’t have. Losing Posey to the Celtics in free agency on the cheap didn’t help matters.
If the Heat are sour on #2 pick we should give them vets and take back the #2. Add in a 3rd team if you want to try and get the Heat a pick later in the lottery. Maybe the Clippers at #7?
by NBA Observer on Jun 5, 2008 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anybody find it strange that when Rose was asked about Beasley,
Rose said, “He’s much better than me.” (during the interviews)
...
I listened to both .mp3s. Beasley sounds better than I thought considering the 80% pro-Rose sentiments. (I have no idea considering I watched very little college ball last year.)
by KentuckyBullsFan on Jun 5, 2008 1:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What's Rose going to say?
He’s got to look like a nice guy. Beasley said the same thing, pointing out how Rose went further in the tourney than he did.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 5, 2008 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not many good answers to that question
The only answer I would have liked to hear is “I’m not thinking about other players in the draft. I’m going to be in the NBA. I’m thinking about ALL the players in the league.”
In short, defer and redirect the question to something you want to talk about.
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm. I’m not sure that Rose’s answer isn’t the perfect response
you’d want from a point guard.
I don’t know how many of you were watching Jimmy Kimmel’s pre-game show last night when he was interviewing Magic Johnson. After a little talk about all the great players of Magic’s era, Kimmel said something like, "And Magic, a lot of people regard you as the greatest player of all time."
Magic immediately replied, "Oh, no. My game was all about team. I never thought of myself as the best player on the floor."
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 6, 2008 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beasley - Melo Connection / Rose Ramblings
How come there has not been much comparison drawn between these two players? I am surprised about that given their similar physical characteristics, offensive prowess, defensive liabilities and ‘attitude’ problems. Is it because Beasley is more of a down low scorer?
Is Rose capable of guarding the Dwyane Wade size guards in the NBA or is he too undersized? I think that his penetrating ability will open up a lot of looks for Deng if we take him, while taking Beasley would open up more looks for Kirk and BG. The sad part of all this is that even a lineup of Kirk, Rose, Deng, Thomas and Noah isn’t competing for any brass anytime soon.
Is there some way we can swindle Miami by unloading Kirk, Tyrus and other pieces for that pick? It seems to me that Pax would be ‘morally’ opposed to a swindling of Kupchak proportions….
by Jud Buechler on Jun 5, 2008 2:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not much comparison where/
BaB’s been on the Melo/Beasley comparison for so long it’s slid off the “recent” list.
As the the Miami swindle, I think there are at least two active threads dealing with that one right now.
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 5, 2008 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have major concerns about Beasley in the post
He’s been racking up stats against undersized opponents. If they are taller than him his quickness is employed. However, his height and his quickness will both be attacked by NBA defenses. Taller power forwards will front Beasley all day. Whatever team drafts him will have to utilize excellent floor spacing.
I’ll write up a full post about Beasley. Right now I see Beasley falling to the Sonics at #4 unless another club attempts to trade up to get him. I have Rose to the Bulls. Mayo to the Heat. Lopez to the Wolves.
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who are you?
You try to make it sound like you’re a scout for an NBA franchise. I appreciate your enthusiasm, and I can tell you read alot about the NBA, but your analysis doesn’t seem like it’s from somebody who really understands basketball.
You really think somebody who watches and scouts basketball for a living is going to draft Brook Lopez over Michael Beasley? I know that not all NBA GM’s are great at their job but c’mon.
by rb22 on Jun 6, 2008 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least he's getting more realistic
It’s not like he’s pushing the Wallace for Amare trade idea anymore
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Jun 6, 2008 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 6, 2008 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This has been addressed before
I don’t know why NBAO writes with that tone, and he claims he doesn’t know either.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 6, 2008 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I clicked on his profile hoping to understand him better
Unfortunately, I am now more perplexed by him than ever. The internet is an oh so interesting place.
by Illini15 on Jun 6, 2008 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A friend turned me onto Malcolm Gladwell
She gave me “Blink”. I loved it. I’m reading everything I can get my hands on from Gladwell.
I have deja vu all the time. It will happen a half dozen times per day. It happens when I’m playing basketball a lot. Sometimes I will dribble the ball up the court and see player movements before they happen. When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do.
Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time its troublesome.
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't even know how to respond to this, so I'll all say is...
“Blink” sounds like a pretty sweet book.
by Illini15 on Jun 6, 2008 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still waiting for your blog and video scouting service
if you think I’ve made that needling remark before, it’s likely the deja vu
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 6, 2008 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Read my profile
I wrote a synopsis of my method of thinking. Many other readers made similar comments.
My real job pays me to predict what will happen.
If I had traveled to Las Vegas as a young man I probably would not have left. My office would be the sportsbook at some casino. That didn’t happen and I don’t bet on sports anyway. In the way my story is written, I’m still attempting to predict what will happen.
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
alec
don’t even think about it…
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jun 6, 2008 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
...how did you know?
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 6, 2008 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tell me, alec...
Was your question going to be, “What exactly is your job?”
I want to see if I can read minds as well as NBAO does.
by Illini15 on Jun 6, 2008 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually, my first thought was
to keep my mouth shut or risk getting burried under the pile of riducule that was sure to follow. I’d say Matt’s “blink faculty” read me right into the situation I was trying to avoid.
But you’re right…my next thought was something along the lines of “the guy works in the research department of a brokerage firm and he’s deluded himself into thinking people are paying him to read the future”—because if he were right as often as his job description implies, we’d all have noticed by now…and the truth is, no one has.
Of course, that didn’t stop me from immediately placing a hold on Blink at the library. ;)
Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky
by alec on Jun 6, 2008 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not going to lie
This part kind of weirded me out:
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time its troublesome.
Uhhh, drugs are bad, mmmkay?
by Illini15 on Jun 6, 2008 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I kind of want to sig that
Only if I get NBAO’s blessing, though.
by Illini15 on Jun 6, 2008 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Self ridicule is what I do
Humor begins with the ability to make fun of yourself.
Sig away friend.
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome. You da man.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Jun 7, 2008 12:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The inference
The blockquote doesn’t format separate paragraphs with this software, so I don’t think you were trying to join those two paragraphs as one.
That last line is meant to convey that I’m trying to develop my projective thinking into something useful more than it presently has served me.
I’m not a psychic. I’m not an astrologer. And even sharing this stuff on a blog isn’t what I tend to do. I like you guys. I like BAB. I like the Bulls. I enjoy the interaction. Sometimes you share a little more when it’s necessary.
If people get a good laugh out of all this I’m fine with that. I’m probably condemning everything I could offer anyway. I’d laugh if I read this stuff too.
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A question
Is there anything specifically about my posts that makes you think I do not understand basketball?
NBA Drafts are filled with special players that for some reason or another didn’t make them the #1 or #2 or #3 picks. Paul Pierce was a sure thing. He was selected #10 in 1998. Robert Traylor was drafted #6 in the same draft. Whoops.
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your knowledge seems to be occassionally hit and miss, but
more than anything, it’s your tone. It’s like your disconnected from a normal reality, or at least the blogabull one. I can’t put my finger on it. Maybe that’s your theory on life carrying over into your posting habits, who knows.
And really, I don’t mean any offense. I’m just trying to help you figure out what people are trying to say when they comment on your posting style.
by Illini15 on Jun 6, 2008 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
It doesn’t mean I don’t think your well read and knowledgable about the NBA. It’s kinda like comparing David Thorpe and Chad Ford when talking or writing about the NBA or the draft or whatever. Thorpe comes off as a guy who understands basketball from more of a scouting type perspective. He understands player evaluation, player development, offensive & defensive strategy, how to put pieces together to form a team, etc.
Ford comes off as a guy who is knowledgable from talking to other people, but when he tries to give more of his opinions on player or team evaluations, I think it comes off pretty generic and weak. He’s not a basketball guy, he’s a journalist who covers basketball. He’s like most of the basketball or sportswriters that cover the NBA. I don’t really value any of their basketball opinions. I think they talk to alot of people, read alot, and probably watch quite a bit, but I don’t think they really understand basketball that well.
I think this is the case for almost everybody on here, but I think most people seem to know their place, while your tone makes it seem as though you think you’re an NBA GM or something. I don’t really mind it most of the time, and I respect your enthusiasm, but once in awhile your tone gets to me little bit.
by rb22 on Jun 6, 2008 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of...
the “Who are you?” question, I’m going to channel my best inner Alec here (sorry, Matt.)
Who are you, rb22? I swear, whenever I read your posts, every single one of them are my exact thoughts to a fucking T. It’s so weird, it almost freaks me out.
by Illini15 on Jun 6, 2008 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly not
No one on this site thinks like Paxson, even the dumb ones.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 6, 2008 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the insult, ass.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Jun 7, 2008 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think I'm all that different
from the other users here. But I must be wrong.
I think this is the case for almost everybody on here, but I think most people seem to know their place, while your tone makes it seem as though you think you’re an NBA GM or something.
You’re not the first person to say this. I’m just not seeing my posts as the GM of make believe and the other users as understanding their place.
Do you ever review your posts from prior days, weeks, months?
by NBA Observer on Jun 6, 2008 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe you're right
That the others don’t know their place either. Most everybody else sounds the same though, just typical fans passionate about their team. You’ve got a different elitist vibe about you… I probably do too though. I do pride myself on understanding basketball better than most people. I won’t lie about that. I’m definitely a bit of a basketball snob. I’ll admit it though.
by rb22 on Jun 6, 2008 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do think your username
probably adds to your “elitist” aura
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Jun 7, 2008 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
33 new comments
About how NBA O comes off on the blog? And here I thought I was going to get to read more unabashed Beasley/Rose bashing.
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 6, 2008 10:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You have to admit, it's been pretty entertaining
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Jun 7, 2008 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I enjoyed it with a glass of milk
Rusty Longley v 2.0
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 7, 2008 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
I want the last 3 minutes of my life back! :)
Parental Advisory - Explicit Content
by Jivas on Jun 8, 2008 10:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












