Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Blogger Q&A - And The Valley Shook

Just remind yourself every minute or so: the Bulls won the lottery.

It's only been a couple hours. I think the high has come down (a bit), and I'm starting to try and actually think about what the Bulls really should (and will) do.

It's early, but so far it isn't a situation where I knee-jerkedly say "take Rose" (which I did), and then as time goes on I start to think more and more about Beasley. It's pretty much still all in favor of selecting Derrick Rose.

He just seems the exact type of player, a real upgrade, that can be immediately plugged in without any messing with the rest of the roster. If anything he'll improve it, as while Rose won't make anyone better, he'll can get them open.

Plus there's something to be said about how much easier it's been made for guards to dominate the league. As 'Scotter' said in the comments, you'd abide by the old advice to 'go big' if Beasley was projected to be a Duncan or Hakeem. But he's a slightly undersized power forward, who can rebound but isn't going to be a defensive game-changer. To me, if you're passing on Rose for a big man, it better be for one that can dominate both ends.

And looking position-wise with this roster, with a player as good as Rose (can be), there's no guard logjam to influence the decision. Heck, was there anyway? There's one above-average guard on the roster, and that's Gordon. Why pass on Rose to just keep that status quo? You can make a similar case for Beasley as an upgrade over the Tyrus/Noah/Gooden frontcourt rotation, but I was actually more comfortable with those three than the backcourt (and there's always the chance of getting a frontcourt upgrade through other means).

So far, Chad Ford, my man T-Zilly, and Stacey King (yes, a lottery win will get me to watch ComcastSportsNet) say to draft Beasley. I saw Jay Bilas on SportsCenter advocate Rose. I'm sure there will be plenty of 'expert' opinions each way. I'm so deep in the Rose camp that I'm convinced that anyone who thinks the Bulls should take Beasley is biased as a result of being scared of a Derrick Rose led Bulls team.

But besides what I think, and what the experts think, it's likely the Bulls believe Rose is the guy. Based on all the PaxSpeak we've heard over the years, they value leadership, work ethic, and even more oblique attributes like 'resonating with our fans'. And yes, I make fun of Pax when he talks like that, and will continue to do so. But, all those intangibles point to Derrick Rose. Especially the 'resonate' part if you judge the poll here (70/30 in favor of Rose), and the fact that Rose is from Chicago

This is the type of decision that will bring out some, er, 'strong' feelings. For either guy (and even moreso for the fringe that want to deal the pick). But we should all remember that this will be remembered as a great night however it works out. A time to praise the great Steve "Stan" Schanwald, and for comments like (my favorite of the night, courtesy of RogersPark Kris) "I guess we won't be re-signing Duhon".

A 1.7% chance, and Pax finally got his lucky break. All the great ones need it sometime.

2 recs  |  Comment 214 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

How good will Rose be as a rookie?

A lot of point guards struggle in their first year, and Rose is only 19. I’m leaning towards taking him anyways, but Beasley can probably contribute more right away.

by Big D on May 20, 2008 11:17 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I should've said something about that logic as well

I don’t think taking the best player ‘now’ is a sound strategy at all, when picking this high. I agree that I wouldn’t be that high on his rookie season production either. Better than Mike Conley’s though.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 20, 2008 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I agree

It’s something to consider, but they’ve got to be thinking about the next decade with this pick, not just next season. I mean, they might not have another chance to draft a superstar like this for a generation (at least I hope they don’t, since if they do then something probably went wrong). The Bulls aren’t winning the championship next year anyways.

by Big D on May 20, 2008 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It depends on what Beasley is.

Is he a ‘6 8” perimeter player or is he a 6’ 10” post player?

Rose will probably fall in between the mediocre rookie season D Will had and the very promising rookie season Paul had. A lot depends on the makeup of the team, obviously, but I’d take my chances with Rose, especially on a team that may not have much early success. I fear Beasley under a similar scenario.

by messwiththebull on May 21, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As much as I'd like to take credit for it

RogersPark Kris made the Duhon comment.

This debate will continue until you hear that ESPN report by Marc Stein that reads “Report : The Bulls to select Rose with number 1 overall pick”

I’m just still stoked that the Bulls are finally the talk of the NBA again and all of a sudden, we’re the young darlings of the NBA. Sorry Portland.

I was also kinda scared that the Bulls were going to fall off the national TV map after this miserable season but this pretty much assures us that the Bulls will once again be fun to watch. No more last second TV scratches, I hope.

by Option27 on May 20, 2008 11:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not that I really care, but Miami wants Rose, too.

They really don’t need a PF. I think they might trade down, maybe just one spot or so, since they need help, just not Beasley’s, unless they think he can play a different position, or Marion’s going to leave.

"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente

by cubbybear on May 21, 2008 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duhon 2.0

becomes hinrich. this is a MUCH improved backup defensive SCORING point guard.

by gman2849 on May 20, 2008 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah not like

the utah game that took over on espn last season

Tyrus Thomas
-"Million dollar talent, ten cent head."

by bulls*hit on May 20, 2008 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

When are trades allowed again?

I have a feeling we won’t know anything about the Bulls consideration until Pax sees what he can get for Hinrich, Tyrus or Gooden

by Option27 on May 20, 2008 11:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought there was a date

that all NBA teams are allowed to start dealing again after the Feb deadline

by Option27 on May 20, 2008 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to 2k8

when the offseason starts, trades are once again a go. But thats in video game world, im sure the real world has some more restrictions.

im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on May 21, 2008 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

why trade them?

when they appear to become soooo much better with a great player taking the lead in rose. you just end up taking a step back. Deng was injured last year and gordon was double teamed because hinrich wasn’t pulling his weight. And Hinrich becomes a much better upgrade as a backup point/2 then anything we had before (duhon???)

by gman2849 on May 21, 2008 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe not, but

it’s evened out considering that Rose will be locked into a rookie contract for 4 years.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 21, 2008 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's still a lot

As the number 1 pick Rose would make 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6. Kirk’s contract declines at an adverse rate. All in all the Bulls would have about 15 million committed to the PG position.

I don’t think that’s tenable in the NBA.

by NBA Observer on May 21, 2008 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

$15 mil spread over 2 players at the same position is actually pretty reasonable

Especially when you consider that one of those players can reasonably play 2 positions. Having you begun smoking something in the last week or so?

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on May 21, 2008 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How is 15 mil at one position reasonable?

You have 5 positions to fill, about 62 mil in cap space, and 68 mil to the luxury tax.

It’s unreasonable to expect every position to share the same amount of salary, but the salary cap numbers would produce a per position contractual limit of 12.4 million. Approaching the luxtax it’s 13.6 mil per position.

Of course, 15 million is reasonable if you’re an owner willing to bust the luxury tax.

by NBA Observer on May 21, 2008 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

God, you're thick.

The Bulls aren’t paying shit at the PF/C positions right now. And if they get rid of or don’t sign one either Hughes, Gordon, Deng or Nocioni, they aren’t paying it at another position either.

He didn’t say paying $15 mil at every position is a great idea.

by tyger1147 on May 21, 2008 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um, you know how much will be locked in at SF

Chapu+Deng=possibly 18-20 million, add in more with Thabo.

Rusty Longley v 2.0

by Ozzie Montana on May 21, 2008 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I favor trading Nocioni if Deng agrees to an extension

My cheesy exception to the 15 mil per position notion is that Deng and Noc both see time at the 4 because any coach will always use a small lineup if they think it’s necessary.

by NBA Observer on May 21, 2008 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is this what you're looking for?

http://www.mynbadraft.com/nba-rookie-salary-scale-2008/101

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sure

unsurprisingly, NBAO was just pulling random numbers as if he knew them in his head.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 21, 2008 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, well,

not sure exactly what “declining at an adverse rate” would be, either.

Reclining?

Inclining?

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heres one

I dont know if this would work but Kirk Larry to Portland for the contract that is Steve Francis this years pick and Channing Frye.

by TRiCioNeRo on May 20, 2008 11:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Playing right next to Saer Sene

Man, what a frontcourt!

"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente

by cubbybear on May 21, 2008 12:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we

slide Frye over to the 3, we can throw Marc Gasol into the mix. Think of the length!

by Petor on May 21, 2008 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

also

Francis’ contract was bought out

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 20, 2008 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still think it's legitimately too close to call.

We are talking about the kid that loves Sponge Bob Square Pants compared to the kid that got a gummy bear tummy ache at the final 4.

And Riley has already suggested he might propose some sort of trade for swapping 1 and 2, which, depending on what he offers, might be worth considering.

My Bulls may suck, but my Jayhawks are National Champs!

by wjb1492 on May 20, 2008 11:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hehehe
“(The Bulls) have a starting point guard in Kirk Hinrich, and (Ben) Gordon plays that position a lot,” Riley said. “Probably down the road, I’ll be talking to (Chicago General Manager) John Paxson.”

Sure Pat, we’ll take Dwyane Wade for the number 1 pick.

by Big D on May 20, 2008 11:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

do you think there's any chance he'd trade Wade?

I’d like to, but I kind of doubt it.

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on May 20, 2008 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No way

The only way he’d do it is if he know that Wade is damaged goods because of all his injuries.

by Big D on May 20, 2008 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then we shouldn't trade for him

No matter how many times he gets up from falls.

"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente

by cubbybear on May 21, 2008 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it just goes to show

how much of a weasel pat is.

and how much he wants rose…

he will never offer anything better for rose. but he’ll try

by gman2849 on May 20, 2008 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

riles has always been a Kirk fluffer

send him there for Dequan Cook if riles loves him so much.

get that contract off the books at any cost.

by Orlando Woolridge on May 20, 2008 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Riley has been scouting

the top choices half of the year. If you’ll recall, he just left the bench and let the heat flounder in order to find the best talent to draft.

He knows the difference between Rose and Beasly is big.

by gman2849 on May 21, 2008 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent point

Last night, he looked the most bummed I’ve maybe ever seen him.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That quote tells me that Riley

thinks the Bulls are taking Rose, which he also gave that indication last night when he said he’d consider dealing the #2 pick. It’s been reported that Riley loves Rose and isn’t sold on B-Easy, and if this is true, Riley’s comments would only support that thought.

by messwiththebull on May 21, 2008 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't get it

Aren’t there trades going on all night during the draft?

The draft is June 26th

by Option27 on May 20, 2008 11:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes there are

but remember they are always pending trades that aren’t made official until later. So the player has to go put on some hat for a team he is never going to play for. Why? Who knows.

by BoxingHideout on May 21, 2008 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stacey King did hedge his pick of Beasley

by saying that if the Bulls get an uptempo offense coach rather than a grind it out halfcourt coach, he’d pick Rose.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 20, 2008 11:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

even a grind it out coach

will want a penetrating point who defends

by gman2849 on May 20, 2008 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow.

Wade seems a lil pissed right now at not winning the lottery. No one “deserves” to win the lottery… (except for boston last year, i mean, cmon, no.5?) at least the heat got someone to replace Shaq or Haslem and can do it big. dont cry.. not again..

Tyrus Thomas
-"Million dollar talent, ten cent head."

by bulls*hit on May 20, 2008 11:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think that article was before the lottery...

He was all smiles and fist pumps when they landed #2.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on May 21, 2008 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's still a weird comment

Apparently having talent that sits with injuries, and losing spectacularly even when that talent does play, makes you more deserving than not having talent? Hell, maybe it does, if the reason you don’t have talent is your crappy GM traded it for 5 magic beans and an expiring contract.

But maybe it was one of those things where someone specifically asked him if Miami “deserved” the #1 pick and he was just parroting that word back…

My Bulls may suck, but my Jayhawks are National Champs!

by wjb1492 on May 21, 2008 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your post pretty much sums up my thoughts Matt.

I won’t have a firm opinion on Rose versus Beasley until at least the official measurements come out and I can take a 2nd look at them. But, I’m leaning Rose too.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on May 20, 2008 11:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

10 years of drafting

and if we didn’t muff it, we got a high pick when there was no great (sometimes even good) talent available.

throw in a freak accident that left us without a potentially very good point guard and this is the first time that we really make up for those lean years.

and what makes it that much sweeter is that the last few years (deng gordon tyrus noah) we gathered some very decent players to surround this pick

by gman2849 on May 20, 2008 11:58 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You're right

suddenly our “supporting cast” looks like a damn fine supporting cast.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 12:09 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

With a starter coming in instead of a backup, this team looks pretty deep.

Playing off of Henry Ford,

IMO, Paxson can take whoever he wants, as long as its Derrick Rose.

"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente

by cubbybear on May 21, 2008 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL cubby!

Love your sig as well.

Joakim Noah for player/coach!

by marionette on May 21, 2008 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow

laughed out loud watching that.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry, but I gotta post

Just got here and I’ve got to say how ecstatic I am about this crazy good fortune. I think people will refer to this the same way they refer to the Knicks’ Ewing draft – as a secret NBA conspiracy to get a top flight player to a leading franchise. I’m too overwhelmed to make a thoughtful prediction, but if Miami is determined to get Beasley, I say we pull the ole “we take beasley at 1, you take rose at 2, we swap and owe less money.” A simple move but one that saves us money. Now, to whom do we trade Kirk Hinrich? Rose penetrating and passing to a cutting Deng or Thomas makes me want to fast-forward the summer! Go Bulls! I’m so happy right now!!!

by OldSkoolSloan on May 21, 2008 12:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Trading down just to save a little money would be a terrible idea

Whoever the Bulls pick is going to be the team’s franchise player (at least he better be). Why pull something like that and get off on the wrong foot with him just to save a few hundred thousand dollars? If they trade with Miami, it better be to get additional players, not just to save money.

by Big D on May 21, 2008 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Missing my point

I’m saying, if Rose is our guy and Miami really wants Beasley, we take their guy and force them to give us some cash or send a crap player. This is exactly what we did with Aldridge and Thomas a few years ago: we got the guy we wanted AND Sogalia from Portland AND we paid Thomas less money cause he was a lower pick. I’m not talking about trading away our pick, I’m talking about leverage.

But it sounds like Miami wants Rose too, so forget about it.

by OldSkoolSloan on May 21, 2008 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was Veektor from Portland

My Bulls may suck, but my Jayhawks are National Champs!

by wjb1492 on May 21, 2008 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

AND

that trade for Aldridge didn’t work out so hot.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on May 21, 2008 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

So imagine how “hot” that pick would look if we were paying Thomas as if he were drafted number two instead of number four. Thomas went/goes $3.5, 3.7, 4.7,6.2 and Aldridge went/goes $4.3, 4.6, 5.8, 7.6.

Do you people get it yet? Again, Miami probably wants Rose too, but understand the concept.

by OldSkoolSloan on May 21, 2008 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The concept is pretty straight forward

But I would rather pay more and get the better player so that the team can get out it’s funk. Saving a mil or two is nothing in the NBA.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on May 21, 2008 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK, once more

I agree. We pay more for the guy we want. If we want Rose and Miami wants Rose, than we pick Rose number one and pay the dough. Settled.
BUT – if we want Rose, and Miami wants Beasley, we could take Beasley, force Miami to trade Rose for Beasley and get the guy we want cheaper. See?
In 2006 we wanted Tyrus, Portland wanted Aldridge. We got the guy we wanted $2M less per year. And $2M more in cap room can make a big difference in the NBA. Trades in the NBA are in the details.

by OldSkoolSloan on May 21, 2008 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude

Miami wants Rose. Its not a secret. Riley wants Rose. Wade wants Rose. There is no tricking Miami to give us extra so that we give them Beasley. If we want Miami to give us something, it is so that they end up with Rose. Capiche?

John Paxson has been like family to me. I can no more disown him than I can disown my white grandmother, who also was unable to pull off any deals for superstar free agents or hire a top-notch coach.

by preverbal on May 21, 2008 9:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Taking Beasley first

would be like taking Brand, a real good choice and a player you’d cry for when they stupidly trade him.

But you have to take the player that has the potential to be transcendent. And that’s Rose.

Why help the Heat? They are already gonna improve greatly with healthy Wade, Marion, and Beasley. Let them have Rose, and they pass you by like you’re standing still.

Joakim Noah for player/coach!

by marionette on May 21, 2008 12:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Forgot to add my other point

that passing on Rose feels like something you could regret 3 years from now like MIL and ATL do.

Sometimes it’s best not to think too much.

Joakim Noah for player/coach!

by marionette on May 21, 2008 1:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree - lean to Rose...

...Matt did a great job summing up approximately where I stand on the issue at this very moment in time. (I may change my mind in a couple of hours).

What scares me off from Beasley is the complete lack of defensive intensity. I see this trait as being part of a player’s DNA – either you care about playing defense or you don’t, and he “don’t”. The other issue is that Beasley will certainly come in and be a dominating offensive player, and therefore develop a sense of entitlement that will make it less likely that he ever provides proper effort on defense. I think Amare Stoudamire is a good comparable, and while Stoudamire is a great player, I’d rather have…

...a two-way point guard with dominating ability on both ends. The risk with Rose is if his perimeter shot never improves, but at his age and with the improvement he showed during the year, I’m not overly worried about this. And while it was only one year of college, I love that he played for Calipari and on a team that played excellent team defense. I have a strong degree of confidence that he will fulfill his substantial potential on the defensive end of the court.

This is a scary choice; Beasley is a sure thing, while Rose carries some development risk. But players who are selfish on offense and who possess no defensive intensity give me the heebie-jeebies, so I choose Rose. I think. :)

Two more points that have been lumbering in my mind the last couple of hours:

(1) Drafing Rose pushes our window back a year or two; it will be worth it, but our personnel decisions have to keep this in mind, as Rose will need two years to reach a development stage where he can lead a team deep into the playoffs.

(2) There is work to be done…we have to turn some of our backcourt excess into something of value…a team of Rose/Hinrich or Gordon/Sefolosha in the backcourt, Deng/Nocioni at SF, and Thomas/Gooden/Noah does not strike me as a championship-level squad, unless Thomas develops in the most optimistic fashion possible (if that happens, then it’s ON!).

But holy crap…what a night!

by Jivas on May 21, 2008 12:45 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

if by pushing our window back

you mean playing better then hinrich plays and making our other guys better, then yeah, I see what you mean

by gman2849 on May 21, 2008 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The history of rookie point guard performance is not generally strong...

...I’m not complaining, simply pointing out that our resources should be focused on maximizing the team’s ability to win 2-6 years from now rather than right away.

Trust me, NOBODY is more excited to see us upgrade from Hinrich to Rose as I am!

by Jivas on May 21, 2008 12:52 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

but hinrich 13 plus per this year was not very inspiring. and given that we would have everything to gain by playing rose and hinrich next year, well I just don’t see this team playing better then hinrich and duhon…

by gman2849 on May 21, 2008 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hinrich was just ridiculously, unexplainably awful this past year

He’ll probably bounce back, but I thought he was somewhat overrated even at his prior level of performance, and I personally don’t see any point in hoping/assuming/thinking that he’ll bounce back. Draft Rose, and bounce Hinrich.

by Jivas on May 21, 2008 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stop me if this brings back memories

In the deep dark heart of the Bulls’ post-Jordan misery they traded practically their whole team for Jalen Rose. The Bulls proceeded to beat three absolutely shitty teams for their first three game winning streak post-Jordan. My friends and I reminisced about this as we got smashed celebrating the tonight’s preposterous luck. We remembered how we started talking title. GOD were we fucking stupid. Tonight felt like floating in space. I love the fucking NBA, and fucking sports.

And you know it for a fact that everybody's eating out of your hands

by chibullsareback on May 21, 2008 12:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

sorry if this is a dumb question

i’m just as excited to get the top pick like everyone else but i don’t understand how we were guaranteed a top 3 pick once we didn’t receive the 9th pick. can anyone explain this? thanks.

by mjfanatic42 on May 21, 2008 1:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The only actual ping pong balls chosen...

Are 1 through 3. Once 9 came around (which is where we were supposed to pick based on record) we knew we had to be in the top 3.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on May 21, 2008 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't Lean Either Way

Both Beasley and Rose are immediate upgrades.

Miami should be interesting to watch with D-Wade/Whoever Chicago doesn’t pick.

Insert clever and witty remark slash pun here!

by ES46NE10 on May 21, 2008 2:04 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

From a Blazer fan

Congratulations on Lady Lottery luck. Have fun arguing over who to take and who to trade afterwards!

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 21, 2008 3:04 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget what I said about two weeks ago.

Getting D’Antoni and winning the lottery makes Paxson the GM of the year somewhere down the line and pretty much a genius all over again.

Well, he got the lucky part right. If he has any smarts at all, he’ll make the rest work.

And I’m pretty sure we’re putting way too much of our hopes with this team into one young man.

by tyger1147 on May 21, 2008 4:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

AM I DREAMING?

me like all of you had to go through this whole season watching the young full of potential bulls struggle. i hated paxson. i hated every opposing broadcast network. i hated the nba. it felt like the nba was conspiring against us. NOW it’s like all that was just a dream. This is beautiful. I know maybe with a rookie starter it will push our champion ship contending a few years back but so what. I’m lookin forward to see:
1.D. ROSE PG
2.B. GORDON SG
3.L. DENG SF
4.T. THOMAS – D. GOODEN PF
5.J. NOAH – A. GRAY C
this lineup- watching all these young guys grow will make all these past shitty years worth it. i even think this is gunna fire up loul and b. gordon in to stayin with the team. if we do it right fuck a title shot, i want a DYNASTY.
D. ROSE = hometown HERO ala mighty mouse “HERE I COME TO SAVE THE DAY”

by AFireInside661 on May 21, 2008 4:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey,

I thought there was only one NBA Draft thread !

I guess that’s all changed now :-)

The Game chose him !

by Diabolo on May 21, 2008 5:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

the other was getting way too big.

but this is really a Rose/Beasley post lottery thread anyway,.

Rose all the way baby. Beasley was owned by the Badgers bigs in the NCAA tournament, and that made me think he’s not that good.

by KT on May 21, 2008 6:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha

that thread is toast. Think of all the time wasted discussing Kevin Love and smile

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 21, 2008 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL Diabolo!

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on May 21, 2008 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i was leaning towards beasly

but after reading all these posts, in gonna go with rose. he certianly was exciting to see in the final four. but i still say him and kirk make a better backcourt than gordon. i see that rose would have the same problem as kirk by gaurding the bigger guys wen playin with gordon. i think thats too much to put on an up and coming rookie. i would have loved seeing miami drop in the draft, at least new york didnt get too high a pick. i bet dantoni wishes he had waited to pick a team now. and can we send someone people know to the draft, is it possibly to send benny the bull? man im exicted.

Ralph Wiggum, a smarter man than Jim Boylan

by Yibs on May 21, 2008 7:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: defending bigger guards

I think that’s Sefolosha’s role, to reduce Gordon’s minutes when we’re facing a team with no favorable defensive matchup for Gordon (i.e. Detroit).

A Rose/Gordon/Sefolosha backcourt makes me happy, although I worry that Gordon has delusions of grandeur which will lead to his not being a Bull much longer.

by Jivas on May 21, 2008 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Adverbs

Matt, “knee-jerkedly” is right up there with “lickety-splitly” ( a la Tom Waits in “Old 55”) as one of the great grammatical constructs of our time. As for the Bulls choice, I’m leaning low-postedly.

by Cannoli on May 21, 2008 7:46 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I know this has nothing to do with basketball

but does anyone else really want the Bulls lead to be from the city? A lot of us on this site were ballplayers in high school, and I’m assuming most of us are from the city, too. Rose’s game – slashing, pull ups, physicality – is just so damn representative of the brand of basketball played here. I guess I’m saying I could really get behind that.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on May 21, 2008 8:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I saw the "Magic" championship on ESPN2 once

on a very, very late night. I truly felt bad for the announcer. There’s only so much enthusiasm with which you can say “He played the warlock!”

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on May 21, 2008 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That

explains oh so much.

by kingj41 on May 21, 2008 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

From a cultural standpoint...

...I would be very happy to root for that kind of style from my team; it’s why I was so strongly attracted to the Memphis team (NCAA) last year, even though I pretty much never watch college basketball (Tournament excepted) and actually won a Tournament pool when Kansas beat them in the finals.

It would certainly be a seismic cultural shift for the Bulls, huh?

by Jivas on May 21, 2008 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely

there’s something really effecting about it. Usually in the NBA, as many people have said, you’re just rooting for the uniforms. This would be something a lot more engaging – like you said, a culture shift.

Time to start saving for league pass….

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on May 21, 2008 8:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In two or three years (or sooner), Rose and Thomas could give the Bulls...

...the most athletic player at their respective positions in all the NBA. I don’t know about a “culture” shift, but that’s a huge change from two years ago.

by tyger1147 on May 21, 2008 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Worries about a hometown boy?

Anyone worried about how playing in his hometown might affect Rose? I don’t know too much about his background. Is this something he can handle with a good family support structure (akin to LBJ in Cleveland) or does he end up with a thousand hangers-on? Any insight?

by OldSkoolSloan on May 21, 2008 8:20 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

well, at least we know

that Eddy Curry didn’t fail because of the city pressure. He was just not very good.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 21, 2008 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

RE: Hometown Boy

I saw a piece on ESPN (OTL?) or something recently where it explained how Rose’s family completely protected him from the outside world and all the negative influences. It was partially driven by the story of some Chicago hoops phenom that was murdered before he could attend college.

by Jobu on May 21, 2008 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

His family is very supportive of him

http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2007/nov/04/brothers-keeper/

If anything, that makes the rookie transition better, as he won’t be as homesick, and the fans will be ridiculously lenient with him (at least I hope so). Also, I can’t think of a better thing than to play pro hoops in the city that you grew up in, on a team that you idolized as a boy.

Rusty Longley v 2.0

by Ozzie Montana on May 21, 2008 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

saw a story that said

he and MJ’s son, Marcus, and dating twin hometown Chicago girls.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Could be who

they draft has a lot to do with who they hire as the new coach.

by sue369 on May 21, 2008 8:20 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think so at all

getting the pick right is far more important. Maybe the hire will indicate who they plan on drafting, but not determine it.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 21, 2008 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess

time will tell.

by sue369 on May 21, 2008 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Does Rose bring Ty Corbin?

Corbin’s had a front row seat watching Jerry Sloan create an offense around Deron Williams. Does that experience transfer to Rose and the Bulls?

Or do we talk to Calipari about the job? Calipari’s already been instrumental in molding the dribble drive motion offense to perfectly suit Rose.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 8:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Boston has also adopted elements of the DDM offense,

which Thibodeau has now seen up close for the past season. Even though he’s known as a defensive coach, would he install Rose’s familiar offense if he got the Bulls job?

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 8:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Problem with Rose

Part of me really wants to go with Rose because I think he’s more of a sure fire superstar and he’s just amazing to watch, but I can’t advocate drafting him over Beasley without knowing for sure we can get someone resembling a post up option for Hinrich and/or Gordon.

As good as Rose might be, this is likely our one chance of getting a superstar and I think we have to go for the one who fills the need that all Bull fans know to well unless we can parlay our extra guards for a young big scoring option. It’s been said a million times so I don’t think I need to defend the statement that a post scorer would make the Bulls so much better and having watched many Beasley games this year, I don’t think there’s any doubt he’ll be double teamed almost immediately, the guy can score in too many ways and is too talented. So for right now, unless a deal comes on the table I love, I am hoping for Beasley.

by JSlakov on May 21, 2008 8:50 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't Rose create post options?

I think the current thinking in the BAB universe is that with a better distributor, TT and Noah oop their way to adequate post production. Furthermore, Gooden has some skills down there and was telling the media that he’s going to step up his preparation this summer. Finally, there’s always Aaron Gray who can dump in a few points against third string bigs.

I hear the point you’re raising and fully advocate using the pieces that may be available on the team (Hinrich, Gordon, Gooden, Hughes, Thomas, Nocioni) for a super duper star (or whatever). That said, I’m optimistic that the “we need a post player” mantra keeps on getting repeated only because we’re so used to saying it, not because it’s totally true. I just want to see how this team plays with a new coach and a capable PG in training.

by paxson43 on May 21, 2008 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Drafting Rose does require more work to restructure the roster than drafting Beasley would...

But I don’t think that’s a valid reason to draft one player over the other. When you pick this high, you can’t worry about roster balance – take the guy with the best chance of being the immortal who can lead his team to a championship, and make moves with the rest of the roster to obtain the proper balance.

”...I can’t advocate drafting him over Beasley without knowing for sure we can get someone resembling a post up option….” I mostly agree, except for the “without knowing for sure” aspect…I certainly hope that other moves could be made immediately to balance the roster, but not being certain about them wouldn’t stop me from drafting the best player.

by Jivas on May 21, 2008 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A little something to think about

Rose is listed as 6’4 right now. Wouldn’t you think that Rose still has time to even grow another inch or two?

by Option27 on May 21, 2008 11:25 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

meh? He's a well-built PG.

He’s plenty big. If he were 2” and 10 lbs heavier but with the same athleticism, sure that’d be better, but if he is 6’3”, I can’t see his size being any sort of a problem.

by tyger1147 on May 21, 2008 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He and Beasley are the same age

So if you’re arguing one might grow it only makes sense the other might as well

My Bulls may suck, but my Jayhawks are National Champs!

by wjb1492 on May 21, 2008 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also

To anyone who hates Paxson for passing on Brandon Roy for Tyrus Thomas, this is his chance to not make that mistake again.

To me, I still don’t see that drafting Tyrus was a mistake but to everyone that does . . .

by Option27 on May 21, 2008 11:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Tyrus

will have a monster year

F HINRICH

by 234L on May 21, 2008 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well at least it's not saying passing on Aldridge was a mistake

the knock on Roy was injury history. And, so far, he’s been injured a lot, plus he has some weird heel thing that is chronic until he gets surgery.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 21, 2008 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No surgery

Heel is supposedly old news, he had no problems with it last season. He wore some orthopedicy thingy on his shoes and it reshaped and allegedly solved the heel problem.

Otherwise, his only injury last year was a groin pull because Caron Butler dragged him down to try to draw a foul. Plus, he came back after only a week when he was ‘sposed to miss the rest of the season.

The Blazers did not want to mess with surgery on feet (who knows what could go wrong, and if your feet die so does your NBA career) and right now it seems like the correct decision.

Thomas could be a great finisher with a PG like Rose setting him up. Getting the #1 pick now really solves a lot of past draft mistakes by Paxson.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 21, 2008 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So could playing time for Thomas.

You really don’t want to get into an argument about Thomas-over-Aldridge being a mistake. Really, ya don’t.

by tyger1147 on May 21, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

really?

Why? It was a mistake…...

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on May 21, 2008 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cute, but not because it's right or wrong...

...but because it’s pointless and pretty damn annoying. There’s a lot of other things to get annoyed about.

by tyger1147 on May 21, 2008 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotcha

I thought maybe you had some info I didn’t know about Tyrus or something…....

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on May 21, 2008 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know most Bulls' fans hate LMA

But I actually like Tyrus and think he should have played a LOT more. He’s got talent and should be set free to create chaos with his athleticism and length.

Of course, I think LMA is great. Over the last few months of the season, he was scoring down low with a variety of post moves and a soft touch. He’ll fit Oden perfectly. I’d rather both teams be happy with who they got, and not argue that one guy sucks just because he isn’t on your team.

Tyrus will do great with Rose, in my mind. A good PG to set him up for dunks, ala Nash and Amare, does not take a giant stretch of the imagination.

IF, however, one was feeling like Paxson did not draft the correct dudes, getting the #1 pick makes that allll go away.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 21, 2008 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thorpe

http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=20697

Jamie (Utica, NY): David, for once I actually agree with Jay Mariotti and believe its a no brainer that the Bulls take Derrick Rose. He could be the next Chris Paul, he’s a leader and is a huge upgrade over Kirk Hinrich. Not to mention he’s from Chi-town. Who would you take? And can the Bulls deal Hinrich if they take Rose?

David Thorpe: (12:35 PM ET ) As I told some people earlier, statistically speaking, power forward was the Bulls best position last year. PG was their worst. You do the math.

by Option27 on May 21, 2008 11:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

thorpe also thinks

Denver would do Deng & Hughes for Melo…

Jason (Brooklyn): Sign and trade Deng + Hughes + whatever for Carmelo + whatever?

David Thorpe: (12:52 PM ET ) Denver would do it.

I vote for Thomas to play, play more and play regularly.-Sam Smith

by tyrus4prez on May 21, 2008 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How much does Melo need the ball in his hands?

I think Bilas said last night that the PG should have the ball about 65% of the time.

Was sharing the ball an issue for Denver last season?

As much as I like Melo, and as much as I’ve busted on Deng this past year, our current supporting cast seems to work really well for Rose.

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Melo needs to get the ball. If he doesn’t get the ball he’ll never pass it off a rebound to get his shot. When they fall he’s awesome. When he’s putting up bricks he’s not giving you enough on defense to lessen the offensive bleeding.

I’d rather keep Deng. In addition, trading Deng in a BYC is really difficult. Also, as a BYC player we wouldn’t be able to trade him until late December. I want our whole roster in camp for a united preseason of prep.

by NBA Observer on May 21, 2008 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would like to consider that deal

First of all, let’s be serious here and realize that Deng can’t hold Melo’s jock strap. Stop being homers, there is no comparsion between the two players at similar ages right now. Deng is trying to get to where Melo is right now and he’s far from it. Melo is trying to get to the next level.

Melo is not a perfect player but he certainly looked better when he was playing with Andre Miller. I didn’t hear these complaints about his game and his shot selection when he was playing with a PG. Put him with Rose and I think you have your elite PG and your star who will carry the team in the 4th quarters. Deng doesn’t even want to assume the burden of being a #1 option, nevertheless carry the team. He’s a nice player but he’s soft and doesn’t have anything closely resembling a killer instinct. We’d be stealing Melo if all it takes is Deng + contracts and we all know it.

by messwiththebull on May 21, 2008 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Carmelo has had shot selection

problems his entire basketball career. Melo is a high usage moderate efficiency player. That type of player can help carry a good team, but it also limits a team from achieving greatness because the offense can never be much more efficient than the guy using 30+% of the possessions. Plus he gives nothing on the other end of the court. Deng isn’t as good as Melo in the abstract, but he won’t hold a team back from being great.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on May 21, 2008 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Deng won't hold a team back?

His passive play, his sense of entitlement, his adoption of this untouchable mindset, his prior year regression, his recurring injury issues, his inability to match-up with athletic 3s (Tayshaun comes to mind), none of these holds a team back?

Carmelo may have shot selection issues, but when its’ the PG that determines where and when you get the ball, these issues can be mitigated. I’m more concerernd with Melo off the court to be honest with you.

You can’t teach heart, you can’t teach the wilingness to carry a team, and Deng has neither but wants to be paid like he has both. He’s a nice player and I like him but I like him better as a #2 or #3 option because he doesn’t have the makeup or currently even the game to be a #1.

by messwiththebull on May 21, 2008 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've never said Deng was a #1 option.

I said a team will have a harder time reaching greatness with on the roster than with Deng on the roster. You have to understand the relationship between how possessions are used and efficiency. Anthony’s not efficient enough offensively to carry a team beyond a certain point. If Anthony brought more in the nonscoring aspects of the game then it would be a different story. Who are the high scoring forwards that were a central piece of great teams?

Outside of a bad series against Prince and this screwed up season, Deng has been very solid on defense. Deng doesn’t use as many possessions, and he’s a player who’s efficiency increases with reduced possessions. And he brings more in the non-scoring aspects of the game. He doesn’t help an average/good team as much as Carmelo, but he doesn’t place limitations on a team either.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on May 21, 2008 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right. Carmelo wants to be paid and wants to play...

...like a have-it-all superstar. He’s a good scorer and that’s about it. Deng just wants to be paid more than Hinrich because… well, he’s better than him.

by tyger1147 on May 21, 2008 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea

wouldnt carmello be just a forward larry hughes??

Ralph Wiggum, a smarter man than Jim Boylan

by Yibs on May 21, 2008 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

People forget Carmelo

averaged 29 – 6 – 4 on 48% shooting. Why take Beasley’s 26 ppg in college when you can get an established, young, NBA star?

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on May 21, 2008 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because Beasley rebounds well enough

to have a shot at playing PF, and he’ll be locked in on rookie contract.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on May 21, 2008 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i just hope scottie pippen breathes a sigh of relief

after the number 1.8 is forgotten by most bulls fans and replaced with 1.7

by lampnasty on May 21, 2008 11:46 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm already stuck on Rose

It’s over to the Hinrich trade thread with all my ideas.

by NBA Observer on May 21, 2008 11:50 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm just happy

this happened in something closer to a Lebron/Oden year than a Bargnani/Bogut year. This kind of leap will likely never happen again for the Bulls, so I would have been pissed if it did when those were the options.

by JeffD on May 21, 2008 12:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yup

it usually happens in the Bargnani/Bogut years

by your friendly BullsBlogger on May 21, 2008 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Does it make sense to make a run at both Rose and Beasley?

Would Riley take one of our guards and one forward or more for Marion (whose contract status is uncertain) and the #2 pick? Riley then has rebuilt his team over-night and give us both Rose and Beasley to build a championship team around. I would work with Riley to see who he wants. The Bulls players have faired well against the Heat the last two years.

P.S. – I cannot get the smile off my face.

by chgobr on May 21, 2008 12:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah right

good luck with that. Kepe the draft pick and get a star.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on May 21, 2008 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

652- lock

opinions on prying Villanueva from the Bucks? I think he’s be great next to Tyrus and Noah. If Milwaukee does trade Redd, Maybe we could get V and Jones for Hughes.

by Sko on May 21, 2008 12:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

and lest it seem o/t

what I mean is, some of us, and others, are asking ‘why would we take Rose when we need low post scoring?’ and what is true, is that those options seem to be rare, but not as rare as Rose looks to be. So read the above as “with Rose, how can we address the post?” mind you, my favorite choice would be locking Deng in a weight room and sliding high-protein meals under the door.

by Sko on May 21, 2008 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rose v. Beasley

I’d be more excited about Beasley if I hadn’t been so excited about Tyrus. In college he looks too much the same, and he’s physically smallish for a 4.
Rose is the rare player who can physically dominate at his position. I see few current NBA point guards who will be able to keep him from going where wants. One big reason LeBron is so good is not that he’s taller or more athletic than his man but he’s heavier and stronger (plus he’s got mad skills). Easy choice.

by El Toro de Goro on May 21, 2008 12:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Devils advocate

Beasley was more Durant/Carmelo than Tyrus in college… Beasley can really shoot and score, while Tyrus is all athlete, little skill (at least in college).

Lebron is indeed so hard to stop because he is bigger and more athletic. If he would ever post up, being heavier and stronger would help, but his athleticism and size is unmatched. Rose ain’t at THAT level (who is?), but for PGs he seems to have very good size and athleticism.

I think you guys should draft Rose, but Beasley could be one of the best PFs drafted in the last decade.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 21, 2008 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Me neither

Didn’t say they couldn’t play together… they’d form a really athletic inside/outside small PF/big SF combo that would be pretty unique.

Beasley can shoot, score inside and outside, Thomas can dunk and use his athleticism to wreak havoc. I don’t think drafting Beasley means you dump Tyrus, especially when compared to getting Rose probably DOES mean Hinrich is on the move.

Really, there is no downside to drafting either guy. They are great.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 21, 2008 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Take Rose and let God sort the rest out

Both Rose and Beasley should put up fine numbers over their career assuming they stay healthy. I don’t think anyone disputes that. But while I view Rose as a winner, I don’t feel that way about Beasley right now. Sure, some of it has to do with his past, his antics, but usually you see that “it” with a player, and as immensley talented as Beasley is, I just don’t see “it” in him. Rose has “it”. Rose looks like a winner, a leader, an influence.

Then I look at their games. Firstly, Beasley has to measure up to a legit 6’ 10” as he’s listed. If he comes in at the 6’ 8” – 6’ 9” range, I think that makes Rose a lock. I know it’s only one or two inches, but Beasley, for all his post prowess, plays on the perimeter an awful more than I’d like my 4 to play. He takes more jumpers and more threes than I’d like to see, even though he makes them. He seems like a 4 who wants to play like a 3, and we’ve seen those guys before. If he’s undersized, this makes his preference of play an issue because then the Bulls go from drafting him as a offensive post presence to just taking a prolific scorer. You don’t pass up on an elite PG for that. You do for an Oden, Dwight, a legit big man who plays like a big man.

by messwiththebull on May 21, 2008 12:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"There's one above average guard on the roster and that's Gordon..."

If “Gordon’ is the answer, the question is: there is one below average guard on the roster.

As to Rose/Beasley I think it boils down to who the new coach is and the system he installs. If Shaw and the triangle, then Beasley. If a pick and roll/DDM coach, then Rose.

by hlac on May 21, 2008 12:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The coach doesn't matter when it comes to who you take #1

we’ve already catered the tailoring of our roster to one coach and it cost us Tyson for peanuts in return. The organization should have learned from that but I have my doubts now if fans didn’t even learn from that. You don’t decide who to draft because Brian Shaw is your coach.

by messwiththebull on May 21, 2008 1:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Amen

Seriously, fuck the coach. If the coach is any good, then they should be able to adapt to whatever the personnel is. If they can’t, then Pax shouldn’t hire them anyways.

by Big D on May 21, 2008 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to Paxson, having a #1 pick will play a big part in which coach he hires.

Pax said he is looking for a coach that he can work and connect with, someone who won’t take his input on players and tactics as personal criticism if they disagree occasionally. He added that the option the first pick offers; to get a high scoring big or a superior lead guard makes his coaching search easier since this flexibility enables him to better evaluate the philosophies potential new hires bring. He will be interviewing Ty Corbin, Jeff Hornacek, Chuck Person and Shawn Casey this week (none which blow me away).

When asked if he was concerned with the glut of players at the 4 and at guard, Pax said when you have a chance to get a special player you pick him and then sort out the roster later, rather than worry about how the current mix will be affected. He said he was much more concerned how the same group that won 49 games last year played so poorly, even after he thought his additions (Noah, etc.) should have made them better. This implies that he felt some players did not give full effort for various reasons and they may be heading out the door.

Finally, could the Bulls afford Calipari, who may see this as a great opportunity now that he will likely be coaching a possible future hall of famer that he helped develop? Can the Bulls really gamble with another unproven assistant to be a first rate NBA coach at this juncture? Now that Boylan is no longer available, the pool of top-notch head coaches has run drier.

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on May 21, 2008 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This Pax interview was on MIke and Mike's TV show this afteroon

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on May 21, 2008 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey all -

Just wanted to let you know Paxson’s press conferance will be on Bulls.com at 3 PM ET. Enjoy.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on May 21, 2008 1:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Pax said last

night he would get them in for workouts but didn’t say when. Maybe he will say something about it in his press conference today.

by sue369 on May 21, 2008 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like

Paxson only refers to Michael Beaslys as a scoring threat.

by TRiCioNeRo on May 21, 2008 2:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Noticed that too.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on May 21, 2008 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is tough

I mean MBZLE is exactly what weve been looking for but getting Rose means we could take a few steps back maybe trade for some youth (tell Gordon to fuck off). If Rose becomes a superstar all we would need i s a l o w p o s t s c o r e r…... shit… not again

by TRiCioNeRo on May 21, 2008 2:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Do you hear

police sirens in the background?

by TRiCioNeRo on May 21, 2008 2:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

.....

Im going to pissed off if they do pick Beasley and trade Tyrus…Not his fault that our mediocre coaches mishandled playing time for our young players…

If we do get rose…We will have more trading Chips…WTF are you going to trade tyrus for? how much value does he still have left f after this disastrous season….Theres plenty of teams looking for a PG….Get rose and trade kirk while u still can…after 5 yrs of him…we all should know it wont work out..

by SK23 on May 21, 2008 2:17 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

but I would trade TT and hughes for an expiring contract… Tyrus does have value heres one thing that will give him value… If he goes he will be better look at Eddy and Tyson they immeadiately got better not much but better.

Id rather have JR Smith than Ben Gordon

by TRiCioNeRo on May 21, 2008 2:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Why?

Why trade him away tho? Keep him and draft Rose….that Duo should be crazy and fun to watch for many years…Tyrus is only 21…I refuse to give up on a player that young with untapped potential..

Its just another monumental mistake waiting to happen again…We dont need that no more…

by SK23 on May 21, 2008 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Suck it Pat Riley

i say we draft Rose, basically forcing the Heat to take Beasley (even tho they should take bayless). then we trade for Shawn Marion who we now get at a discount (Kirk, Gooden and Noc) because of they just picked Beasley.

Subject line might be harsh but i’m in miami and have had to endure being told that pax will screw it up and draft beasley and the heat will still get rose…

F HINRICH

by 234L on May 21, 2008 2:28 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Horrible

Where will Marion play? PF?...thats a horrible idea IMO…Id rather keep Beasley than trade him away for a quick fix that might not even get us nowhere…no thanks

by SK23 on May 21, 2008 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

huh?

F HINRICH

by 234L on May 21, 2008 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he meant

Draft Rose, Miami takes Beasley and then Marion would be available, and then the Bulls do some package to take Marion away. I daresay that would work smashingly, old bean.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 21, 2008 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good news

Pax said they’re online gonna focus on Beasley and Rose

Enough with the Love comments now

by Option27 on May 21, 2008 2:28 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

my new rose comparison

Chicagoan and Bulls nemesis Isaiah Thomas

F HINRICH

by 234L on May 21, 2008 2:47 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I hope not

I’d be disappointed if Rose isn’t better than the hugely overrated Isiah.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on May 21, 2008 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

whatever

hate him all u want but he was def one of the greatest

F HINRICH

by 234L on May 21, 2008 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only because you say so

Look at him compared to Kevin Johnson for some perspective. There’s little difference in the Per Game, Per 36, and Advanced stats. Thomas just had better luck with injuries. I doubt you rate KJ amongst the greatest.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on May 21, 2008 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do for several seasons

Anyone who can play PG and average 20/10 with 50% FG is pretty damn good in my book. But, you do have to take longevity into consideration. Bernard King may have been one of the greatest scorers of all-time, but the dude was injured/coked up too much to really have a lasting legacy.

Rusty Longley v 2.0

by Ozzie Montana on May 21, 2008 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Career lenght and durability are certainly factors

I was more just trying to show 234L that Thomas isn’t that far away from someone whom he personally, nor many others for that matter, may not have really considered as a great player. Thomas was certainly more valuable over the course of his career. Just not by as much as 234L probably thought. And Thomas is an overrated “legend.”

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on May 21, 2008 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ratings are like that anyways

People will always prop up players to be greater/worse than what they really are for reasons that often don’t relate to the actual sport. Regardless, who cares about Isiah’s merits, we may be getting a future great PG ourselves :)

Rusty Longley v 2.0

by Ozzie Montana on May 21, 2008 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember watching Isaiah play

I will take an overrated legend any day. He is a legend after all. If Rose is another member of the 50 greatest then I will be happy even if he is overrated. Wait a second are u seriously trying to say isaiah wasnt one of the greatest? if yes smoke more crack…

Isaiah was much better than Kevin Johnson, but Johnson was good and I appreciate the obscure reference to a very underrated and forgotten player. KJ taught the Gorilla just about everything it knows. but i think Rose would eat him alive…

F HINRICH

by 234L on May 21, 2008 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is he the 2nd best PG ever as many consider him?

Hell no. He was a classic case of a player looking better than he is. His public perception benefits from his improved playoff play when more people paid attention to him and picking up two championships near the end of his career. Good, but no where near the 2nd best PG all-time.

This old APBR thread that discusses Isiah pretty well.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on May 21, 2008 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stats are Stats

Championships are Championships.

Isiah is one of the biggest douches of all time, but he was an amazing PG who led a team with no dominant post player to TWO championships.

Lots of PGs have similar numbers, but not a similar impact. Hardaway, Kevin Johnson, hell, Marbury has had some great years statistically, but not team-wise.

If KJ led a team to the title, you’d have a right to compare them. He was a great player, but just not as good as Thomas—no matter how much I hate the grinning chump.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 21, 2008 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beasley the safer pick?

of course he is. the kid is a stud. would fit nicely in the current bulls game plan. That’s exactly way Paxson should look the other way and choose Rose. I’m not one for fairy tales and as far as destiny goes…that’s what girlfriends believe in. I feel it in my bones, that this lucky turn, is an opportunity to break from the normal procedure of playing it safe and become the wild! Become that beast of a team the rest of the league will take notice! Rose can become that great finisher the bulls desperately lack. No more dribble dribble dribble dribble…dribble dribble dribble Eeeeeerrr! game over.

by akuma77 on May 21, 2008 5:53 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Trade Scenario from SI's "Truth and Rumors"

Hinrich in Bulls-Heat trade?
Posted: Wednesday May 21, 2008 06:47AM ET

Even before Chicago won the NBA draft lottery Tuesday (and the chance to draft Memphis point guard and Chicago native Derrick Rose if it chooses), an Eastern Conference executive said the Bulls appeared willing to consider dealing point guard Kirk Hinrich. Hinrich now becomes a possible Heat trade option if the Bulls take Rose first and leave Kansas State power forward Michael Beasley for the Heat at No. 2.

by jrapps1323 on May 21, 2008 5:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

A test for the Kirk haters:

How do you feel about the Heat with Hinrich/Wade/Marion/Beasley?

Joakim Noah for player/coach!

by marionette on May 21, 2008 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who would we be getting back for Hinrich?

Dum spiro spero! (While there is life, there’s hope!)--Leon Trotsky

by alec on May 21, 2008 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok

Rose would destroy Kirk and that i would enjoy. and what do we get for kirk? a heat girl would be enough… if matt sees this you are gonna be in BIG trouble…i think there is another thread for those weird kirk h8rs.

F HINRICH

by 234L on May 21, 2008 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone thought about this?

Given how most Bulls fans are pushing for Rose (for all of the aforementioned reasons), if Paxson ended up taking Beasley aren’t we running the risk of pushing Beasley away. Imagine Beasley, known for shaky character and work ethic, arriving in Chicago to a disappointed fan base. Doesn’t that prospect scare anybody else? It’d go one of two ways; either it would really piss him off and he’d play with a chip on his shoulder to prove us all wrong (a la Arenas for being passed over), or he’d become disillusioned and not give a crap and we’d watch him fail as Rose become a star somewhere else.

Also, if we took Rose and his career didn’t pan out to what we hope (All star, top 3 PG) and Beasley became a star elsewhere, that would be much easier to swallow than taking Beasley and having Rose become a star elsewhere. Also, doesn’t Rose have a much lower risk factor? I feel like we could all see Rose as at least a 15 and 7 guy, with the intangibles, and Beasley could be out of the league in 5 years with off court issues.

‘‘I kind of got used to wearing No. 23, but I know it’s not going to happen in Chicago,’’ he said. ‘‘But that’s a small price to pay for playing in my hometown.

by bullsfanhongkong on May 21, 2008 10:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure

Well, I’ve heard from an “inside source” that Pax has discussed a trade of the pick. Bulls #1, Hughes, Noc, for O’Neal, Daniels, and Indiana’s #1, plus whatever is needed to make the numbers work. The Bulls brass thinks we are too young. Its only step one in a two step plan. Its a short term move for a long term gain. Its giving up something for another something. And I’m totally kidding. If the Bulls don’t draft Rose, I will be stunned, stunned, disappointed, disillusioned, and totally stunned. Ha HA—Rose baby!!! Two days ago I was wondering if Kevin Love could possibly work out. Celebrate my brothers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

John Paxson has been like family to me. I can no more disown him than I can disown my white grandmother, who also was unable to pull off any deals for superstar free agents or hire a top-notch coach.

by preverbal on May 21, 2008 10:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Pax drafts winners.

Rose won in the tourny- Beasly didn’t. Rose made his teammates better, Beasly is like melo, he doesn’t. He’s an undersized PF or a big SF, and will be a great rebounder too. But seriously, Tyrus is developing, and is seriously athletic as well, he’s not a prolific scorer by any means, but what the Bulls need is a recommitment to winning, and a good PG. Another me first scorer really doesn’t help us at all- we remember Michael and Scottie- we’ve tasted the real thing- we don’t want a Mavs/Suns/Nuggets thing where they win lots of games that don’t matter, and can’t win it all because the players don’t care that much, and finally starting talking about D in game 2 of the 2nd round.

Seriously, if I were Thabo, I would practice my 3 ball, and my dives to the hole. Cuz with the 2 of them out there playing D, we’ve got an awesome D backcourt.

by iBurkey on May 21, 2008 11:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Blackstar_small
Plan B: if the Bulls fail to sign a FA superstar at the 2 or the 4 spots...
Small
How About A Whole New Plan?
Small
Game Preview #10: Chicago Bulls vs. Los Angeles Lakers
Small
Rose Problem: Trying too hard to please Vinny and "teammates"
Small
Your thought on a GS-Chi Ellis A-R for Kirk TT trade dreams
Noah-thumb-500x401-6596_small
What's going on in Derrick Rose's head?
Drose2_small
what i'd do as GM right now...
Small
The concern about Rose...
Old_logo_gif_small
Game Preview #10: Bulls at Sacramento Kings
Small
The move that no one talks about

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger