Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

BlogABull roster evaluation: take one

[If this is your first visit to the site since the upgrade, visit this post first.  Though suggestions for the tech team are encouraged, don't be whiny about the change -ed.]

As it's the start of the offseason (for the Bulls, anyway), I felt the need to post my starting-point-quick-and-dirty opinion on how I view each guy on the roster. This can probably be gleaned from what's been written here in various threads, but here it is in one space. Don't expect anything that in-depth or convincing, just my initial thoughts before the summer gives us the types of details where more informed decisions can be made:

Hinrich: He's the one I most worry that this season wasn't a fluke, and he's just not that good. If he played like last season (his best season), he's a slightly above league average PG. So while one way to look at it is that the team should only look for someone better...I can also see the case of that if you just put any replacement out there you won't exactly be losing much, especially if that replacement also had a friendlier contract.

Gordon: Work out the contract extension. If he's asking too much, instead of increasing the money offer him an early opt-out after 3 years (or just a 3-year contract). A sign/trade will be tough, and the qualifying offer doesn't help anyone.

Hughes: Try to move. Don't even bother with him otherwise. He's not going to change as a player, and if you play him a lot of minutes your team will be worse off for it. I'd consider acquiring someone with an equally bad contract without the pretense of entitlement minutes. (A real coach would help in this case too)

Sefolosha: I'd see if he has any value and have him the primary 'sweetner' in a deal, although probably doesn't have much value outside of the BaB community's crush wall, and Mike McGraw's screensaver. He has some skills from the backcourt that the team lacks, but they can be found fairly cheaply in the free-agent market and thus Thabo shouldn't be seen as untouchable. Out of the team's younger players, he's the one I'm least attached to.

Duhon: So long.

Brown: Ditto.

Curry: Don't care. Although I'll surely scoff if he's released due to 'character' issues.

Deng: I think his bad season was mainly due to injuries. However, that earns him the label of 'injury-prone'. But not enough of a worry to not re-sign him, you'll be paying for his age-23 to age-28/29 seasons. Even if he never makes a 'next step', I don't see how that winds up being some awful mistake.

Nocioni: Try and move for a shorter-term deal. The contract was a mistake for a tax-averse team, his minutes could be given to more promising players, and it'll help eliminate small-ball. At the very least, don't deem Deng expendable because you have Nocioni to take his place, ugh.

Nichols: Don't care.

Simmons: Expiring contract...so just don't short-sightedly buy him out.

Gooden: A Thomas-Noah-Gooden 3-man frontcourt rotation can do some damage, as Gooden's attributes (strength, finishing ability, post play) are those that the younger two could use as a complement. However, Gooden's fat expiring deal is also the team's best trade piece, especially in a Gordon or Deng sign/trade. So if he has to be used (instead of Noc) in a mega-deal, so be it.

Thomas: if he's going to be traded, it better be for somebody good. Like a Gasol-level good.

Noah: ditto. I'm not objected to trading either guy, but it'd have to be for a top-tier player, not in some kind of 'shuffling the deck' lateral move.

Gray: I take it back, I'm less attached to Gray than Thabo, although so unattached that I put Gray more in the Curry-Nichols-Brown category than the Thomas-Noah-Sefolosha one. He's signed through next year and he's as fine of an inactive list 3rd center type player as any, I guess.

And as an overall plan, I say first priority is to look for a real upgrade at any position, using anyone. That's the hardest to accomplish, however. (actually, first priority is winning the lottery, but that's not something they can really work on)

If it can't be done and the desire is there to just getting a 'new vibe', Hinrich would be my vote as the 'core' guy to move. And for the long-term, look to move bad contracts Hughes and Nocioni, with the pick, Sefolosha, or the roster filler as throw-ins but not Thomas or Noah.

Although overall,  I wouldn't recommend doing something just to do something. I think the 'vibe' change that Pax was blabbering about can be done with a real coaching staff. And especially after thinking through potential scenarios, it looks like any real shakeup (the kind that would, ya know, actually help) will be tough to do after a season that destroyed nearly everyone's trade value.

1 recs  |  Comment 208 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I guess, but

the only thing i dont really agree on would be how much you value TT.. he hasnt brought much this year and just dissolved his stats and ability from last year. I thought they released curry (?), and hughes is not going anywhere (at least not sensibly). i think a gordon/deng deal would be really< valuable and unless you can get someone to actually replace what both of those are worth, id consider keeping at least one of them. hinrich, we can get better [perhaps 0 Arenas 0 ] and i believe hes overpaid.

--CHI TOWN CRITIC

by ChiTownCritic on Apr 20, 2008 10:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Curry hasn't been released

he had thumb surgery and was shut down for the year shortly after the PeeOn incident. He has limited salary protection for next year, I believe it’s around $250k to waive him by the end of training camp, after which he’d get his full minimum salary ($750k…sham’s site is down so I can’t get the exact number)

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry...

sham?

Finally: The End.

by ChiTownCritic on May 5, 2008 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that is a fair assessment.

With our low trade value in general we have to move what in better situations we wouldn’t move in order to get a few key pieces shipped out. I reeeeally wish they’d find a way to get rid of Hugues. First in line out the door I hope. He eats up minutes and is terribly inefficient for the amount of ball time he seems to require. Inheriting him into a new coach and system doesn’t see fair to them. Unless this new coach actually has balls enough to bench him. To avoid all of that I’d rather just get rid of him. Get someone who is being payed big bucks but also not demanding 35 minutes a game. Even a back up center. As long as he is really going to be played as a back up.

by cranscape on Apr 20, 2008 11:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This situation is horrible!

At least when teams are terrible there is no real debate over who they should get rid of/where they should try to improve. Here, everybody is average and relatively close to their ceiling (with exception of TT, Noah and maybe Thabo), so it makes it difficult to decide which average guy to get rid of outside of the bad contracts. Man, I hate that we’re overpay for role players.

"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."

by jpchi on Apr 20, 2008 11:16 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

With a new coaching staff

I don’t think Hughes gets any entitlement minutes.

And I think the biggest need is for somebody who create their own shot or get to the FT line at the 2 or the 3. Not being able to get to the line killed this team.

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 20, 2008 11:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

even if he doesn't get the minutes

there’s still the issue of him whining about it. He was already dropping some hints of unhappiness a week into his tenure.

Not that it really matters if he does whine…as long as he doesn’t have the same ‘influence’ as Wallace.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, that was my fear as well--

here’s a guy who from day one said and did all the wrong things. If you think about it, not even Wallace did that.

First he talks about how he expects to start, then he talks about how he plays for enjoyment and not winning. Playing like crap, he’s benched, and immediately makes his displeasure known.

I mean, what choices does the organization have? If he ends up continuing his crappy play and whining, it’s possible that the team with the already-fragile (if not destroyed) image among players now may be in a position to give Hughes the Tim Thomas treatment.

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 20, 2008 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and I agree they need someone who can get to the line

although I think Gordon can create his own shot…it’s just usually a jump shot.

But say they replace Deng with FTA machine Corey Magette? I’m not really happy about that switch in terms of value. (not to mention it’s just hard to move Deng for value at all). If it’s swapping Gordon for Gilbert Arenas…well sure. I think again it’s a problem when defining ‘different’ and ‘better’. A 2 or 3 who can create shots and get to the line better than Gordon or Deng isn’t that easy to find.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 11:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hughes will be a problem even if he doesn't get enititlement minutes, but guys

making 13 million seem to find the court no matter who is coaching. At least Hughes is injury prone.

Getting to the line wasn’t a major reason for the team stinking up the joint. It’d be nice, but there’s a reason it’s the fourth factor. A Corey Maggette wouldn’t have fundamentally made a difference. It’s well behind guys who give a crap on defense, guys who can make a layup, and guys whose favorite shot isn’t a midrange jumper.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on Apr 20, 2008 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well I'd say that avoiding the 'midrange jumper'

goes in-hand with getting to the line more.

But yes finding bigs that finish is a higher priority. I think the ‘giving a crap on defense’ will come back naturally.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's plenty of guys who get to the line,

who would rather be taking off balance 19 footers. Larry Hughes being the poster child, but I can think of others.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on Apr 20, 2008 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Going forward

It’s the biggest need. I agree that giving a crap was the biggest need last year. Although we should be glad because now Pax has an excuse to move one or two of Deng/BG/Hinrch. They could all have locked themselves up with long term deals and been mediocre for a lot longer…

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 20, 2008 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe an excuse but not an opportunity

and when it’s put that way, isn’t Hinrich the clear choice to move? His ‘mediocre’ is worse than the others.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

depends on what you expect and value most

if it its scoring, then no. I don’t think he’ll shoot that low a percentage again on a team playing the right way. But if it’s his ability to defend bigger guards, then probably since it looked like he was tired of doing it. And his ast% actually went up and should go up a lot more next year with improved play from TT/JoNo/Gooden.

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 20, 2008 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm starting to lean the other way re: defense

if he can’t defend big guards, then that’s a knock on his value. It makes it easier to accept his faults on offense if he’s taking the defensive pressure off of Gordon.

I don’t recall him doing well against the small fast guards anyway.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok but if you dump him

ostensibly to replace him with BG and another guy to take the bigger guard, doesn’t the defense get worse and the TO’s increase? Unless the other big guard is Magic Johnson of course…

But if you are saying keep BG in his role as 6th man and get a new starting backcourt, then yeah, maybe. Maybe Thabo and Calderon, I could go for that.

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 21, 2008 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't it depend on whether

Hinrich’s defense is deteriorating or this year was just an aberration?

I mean, I agree that good defense is about giving a crap, and that overall the team simply didn’t. But for Hinrich on an individual level, it wasn’t for lack of effort (most nights, at least)—I thought it was more a matter of him fouling more, or doing the same things as he did last year, but getting called for it more.

So the question is whether all these years of defending bigger guards is catching up to him or whether he just needs a fresh start next season to return to being one of the better defensive guards.

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem with the PG position is a lack of depth

There aren’t many players that are worse than Hinrich that I’d actually want at PG. Which is strange because they’re a ton more PG sized guys wandering around the earth than any other position. There should be more quality depth at PG than any other position.

formerly sbulls

by Scotter on Apr 21, 2008 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a really interesting take. I wonder if

most of the talented PG’s out there who are 6’3 and under are weeded out before reaching the pro level by being told they’re too short.

On the other hand, if you are 6’3 and under, just think about how much quicker you have to be to make up the same amount of ground as someone 6 or 12 inches taller. It’s not like all of these 6’3 guys all over the place have that kind of quickness…

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, just looking over the

PG PER numbers, it jumps out just how bad Hinrich’s production was this season, and how the guys around that same level I’d deem a lot worse.

The one that clearly jumps out (in production and availability) is T.J. Ford, but he does have that dreaded ‘snappy neck’ condition.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

All Hail Small-Ball!!!

Saw Phoenix use it yesterday. Don’t know how good it was as the GameFlow was down. Althoug, my guess is…

Nash-Barbosa-Bell > Duhon-Hinrich-Gordon

For all those height people, notice how the Phoenix 3-guard isn’t much bigger, than the Bulls’.

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Apr 20, 2008 11:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Depends. Or... sort of.

Nash & Barbosa listed at 6-3, Bell at 6-5. So yes, bigger at two positions (Hinrich’s listed at 6-3, yeah?) by listed heights. That’s why I said not “much”.

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Apr 20, 2008 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, pretty close!

Except for, you know, skill.

"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."

by jpchi on Apr 20, 2008 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Small ball is ok,

as long as you have the personnel for it. If this was Hardaway-Richmond-Mullins with Don Nelson as coach (or Nash-Barbosa-Bell/D’Antoni) small ball keeps you interesting and competitive. It hasn’t won any championships, though (but we’re talking about just being relevant / relatively competitive at this point).

Anyway, with the Bulls, especially after Skiles lost control, the Bulls stopped being the scrappy team that could, and small ball became just another crappy lineup thrown out there.

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 20, 2008 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about the two championships the Pistons won

running Thomas/Dumars/Johnson on the floor on a regular basis?

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Apr 21, 2008 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They still had

James Edwards for traditional back-to-the-basket scoring down low. They also had a handful of decent bigs in addition to Edwards: Salley, Rodman, Mahorn and (though known for his perimeter play) Laimbeer.

You could argue that with Dantley being their post scorer they may have played a small ball lineup a little more…

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

James Edwards?????

Yes, he was the driving force behind the Pistons championships.

by Cannoli on Apr 21, 2008 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, he's no lock for the Hall,

and no one’s saying he is.

But the point was simply that you can’t really call the Pistons a small-ball team when they’re shuffling that number of bigs in and out of their lineup. I don’t think any of them was an All-Star at the time, but they did play key roles in typical “big man” ways—if you drove the lane, then you’d pay; if you turned your head on defense their bigs would be finishing alley-oops over you; key rebounds/blocks (Rodman/Salley) and boxouts (Rodman/Mahorn).

Maybe it’s Boylan’s now-infamous 4-guards plus Noc lineup, but it seemed that when the Bulls played small-ball this season it was a sure sign that opposing bigs were going to have their way on both ends of the floor.

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree completely

I used to get nauseous every time we went with four guards.

by Cannoli on Apr 21, 2008 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big ups to the Sixers for beating the Pistons.

Yes, I’m already missing Ali G, and it’s only been like two years.

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Apr 20, 2008 11:41 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

not to get militant (yet)

but fanshots could be the new home for such OT comments, if you so desired.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh dear god.

So no more threads going off topic? I don’t know if I’ll be able to handle that.

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Apr 20, 2008 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

am I the only one

who begs for comments just so they can see it auto-update?

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure I like it

because as I am typing, I see somebody jump in and say pretty close to what I was going to say. Should I still post it then or find something else to do?

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 20, 2008 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a problem for the ages.

I like the pop-up comments

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Apr 20, 2008 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh.. you must know my answer on THAT

also, you could recommend the comment you agree with. It’s like a thumbs-up (which is always cool)

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 20, 2008 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Did that work?

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Apr 20, 2008 11:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The X and C thing is pretty cool

I’ll give you that, although only incrementally better than F3 [new. What I’d like to see in the next version is more of an invitation to chat. The first comment could be a topic and then there’d be settings to let others join or watch and maybe the transcript would get published like a thread. Then you wouldn’t have to wait around for people to reply.

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 21, 2008 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am loving this new format...

This is as close to a real-time chat as you can get, while still maintaining a lot of the advantages of blog comment posting, namely, time to actually formulate your thought…

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good thinking.

People can flame each other in real time then. And instead of posting in paragraphs or at least semi-complete sentences it will read like an instant message transcript and make no sense afterwards (or during, from my experience). Chatting might be fun, but in my experience it gets pretty shallow and wouldn’t replace well thought out replies. Then again, maybe people don’t always want that and would welcome the real time of chat. (shrug)

by cranscape on Apr 21, 2008 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

OT: are you a big BG fan?

(Battlestar Galactica)

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 21, 2008 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

(pushes up her nerd glasses)

by cranscape on Apr 21, 2008 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't want to see Hinrich moved.

Only because it’s a selfish reason. He’s from my hometown and drafted by my favorite team…

With your powers combined, I am captain planet.

by CARXRiedmann on Apr 20, 2008 11:54 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

But the refs hate him.

Have you ever noticed this… ? It’s like everyone else can play aggressive defense except for him.

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 20, 2008 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was getting

pretty old this season. I was even rolling my eyes at a lot of calls against Hinrich. It seemed to throw his defensive game off more than other years, especially the few few months. You could see the same move go uncalled all game and then when Hinrich did it the whistle would blow. Hinrich didn’t do a lot to help his case, but it isn’t like a lot of other players do either. I can hardly watch a Spurs game for all of the complaining about calls they do. Anyway, it was as if the refs handbook this season, instead of saying something like “focus on getting rid of the rash of moving screens we noticed last year” or whatnot to say “Hinrich isn’t allowed to breath on anyone. If he does he gets a foul.” Hinrich really should have learned to adapt, but with how long he has been in the league it seems like a strange position to be in.

by cranscape on Apr 21, 2008 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't want

to see him moved either. Keep him Pax!!

by sue369 on Apr 21, 2008 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree about moving Kirk, but who will take him,

and what will they give us for him? I think we are stuck with Kirk until he proves he isn’t grossly overpaid, but in the meantime let’s look for another point guard.

I don’t think we should sign Ben Gordon unless he reduces his demand quite a bit. Pure scorers are usually overpaid.

by Tim S. on Apr 21, 2008 12:04 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How good is this team?

I’m afraid that my emotional attachment to some of these players makes it very difficult for me to evaluate how good this roster can be anymore.

Here’s how I’m trying to look at this problem: Assuming 1) the team doesn’t add any new players, 2) natural improvement/return to historical trajectory and 3) Pax gets a good coach who will fairly dole out minutes, how far could this team go next season? (proposed rotation with ages in parentheses)

PG: Hinrich (27) / Hughes (29)
SG: Gordon (25) / Sefo (24)
SF: Deng (23) / Nocioni (28) / Sefo
PF: Thomas (22) / Noah (23)
C: Gooden (27) / Noah / Gray (23)
Throw in one more semi-useful piece assuming the Bulls trade away their pick this year (as was suggested in the last few Bulls Beat)
H/T: Dwyer who mentioned a variant of this roster

If this is a team top four in the EC, the organization is in a fantastic position (and this roster is already much better than the one I expected to win the east this season). If, based on this season, everyone thinks this roster is bottom 4, there need to be significant changes.

These are the two reasons why I remain optimistic about this current group of players:
1) They are still REALLY young
2) This season was a clusterfuck (which was exacerbated by the fact that they are all so young) and I’m confident that a new coach will do wonders

So before evaluating individuals on this roster, I think we should look at it in aggregate first. I think the rotation above is good for 50 wins next season and would use 2008/9 to get the team back on track. Then, Pax could use 2009/10 to tweak, positioning the team for Championship contention over the next 2-4 seasons with Hughes as a useful trade chip to add that last piece.

by paxson43 on Apr 21, 2008 12:10 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I am mostly hoping

that whoever we are left with will realize how much losing sucks, how much not getting to the playoff sucks, and how much having individual reputations tarnished more than sucks. And that they need to keep that in mind in October and not figure it out next April when it is too late to do anything about it. More than just a couple people need to care next year. What has made the Bulls watchable for me prior to this year is that they put out effort and seemed to care during most games, win or lose. I’d much rather they’d win of course, but even losing while trying is watchable. This season was hardly watchable.

by cranscape on Apr 21, 2008 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

Since Pax only drafted “winner” maybe this was the first time most of these players have really really lost. So their initial reaction (this season) sucked, but maybe the memory of 2007/8 will fuel them this offseason and into the future. Perhaps just excessive optimism on my part…

by paxson43 on Apr 21, 2008 12:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pax43,

overall I agree, but the one thing that you didn’t address is the organization’s chemistry with their players. After this season, I think it’s more than reasonable to have some serious questions about whether John Paxson needs to change his approach with the players.

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only Paxson's

approach, but John Paxson’s office and position needs to be eliminated and replaced

by exult463 on Apr 21, 2008 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but President / VP of Basketball Operations is overdone.

So I nominate either “Czar of Player Dealings and Development”. I’d consider “The Decider” or “Passer of Judgment”, but this is not feel-good enough. Maybe something like, “Designated Best Friend to All Bulls Players” or, for short, “Your Special Friend”. More accurately, “Your Special Friend Except During Contract Negotiations, in Which Case We Will F* You Up.”

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

give it a rest man

Or like someone suggested, just put "I’m the guy who wants pax fired now" in your signature if every comment is going to say it anyway. I can do it for you if you want.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last week I had to verify Paxson's title

with the Bulls because I wanted to make sure he wasn’t part of any decision making with the club in any capacity beyond the players and coaches.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or

AKA, titles and responsibilities that may be under performing at a rate worse than that of the team on the court.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No way...

Does that roster win 50 games.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Apr 21, 2008 12:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

3 teams in the Eastern conference...

Won 50 or more games this year. The Bulls aren’t even in the same discussion of the talent level they posess.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Apr 21, 2008 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

don't bother

Sefolosha’s birth certificate is probably fake. I’m guessing he’s older than Noc.

by hscs on Apr 21, 2008 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right

Thabo comes from that little country renown for poor record-keeping….

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hole it...

was he actually born in Switz or S.A?

Maybe I have to take that back.

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the wiki says

“He was born in Vevey, Switzerland to a Swiss mother and a South African father.”

by cranscape on Apr 21, 2008 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boylan said that his daughter

was born ten days after Thabo in the same hosptial in Switzerland.

by sue369 on Apr 21, 2008 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

same hospital I was born too, only about 11 years earlier :-(

The Game chose him !

by Diabolo on Apr 21, 2008 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess I asked for it

with the dumb joke. Point was he’s old for soon-to-be 3rd year player. Yes, I’ll keep making that point.

by hscs on Apr 21, 2008 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your point is well taken

Tahabo is no longer, if he ever was, a prodigy

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sefolosha is a small forward

and Luol Deng should be floated as trade bait to the Clippers. If you could deal Nocioni for Maggette then I’d do that, but I doubt the Clippers want that. So I suggest

Bulls get
Maggette
Clippers 2008 #1

Clippers get
Deng
Bulls 2008 #1

I still worry the most about Hughes. He’s just streaky enough to want to play him, but he’s just not that into basketball for winning. He’s working out there for a paycheck. If he wants minutes he have to earn them.

If you stop considering Thabo as a guard the roster opens up. We were playing Thabo more at the SF late in the season since Gooden was unavailable so Noc was being played at the PF.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 8:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

uhhh

Deng can’t be traded before the draft. And has base-year contract issues once he does sign. I read that somewhere.

Also I think you consider Noc/Thabo/Deng way too similar. I agree that if Noc gets dealt you make Thabo the backup 3.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like Thabo at the 3 too

much better than at the 2. That’s one of the reasons I think you move Deng if you move anybody.

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 21, 2008 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ew

If I’m sketchy over deeming Deng replaceable because of Noc, I’m downright gagging thinking of the same status for Thabo.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

completely agree

Thabo is a much better athlete, is much more aggressive going to the basket, and also a much better ball-handler than Deng.

Another thing I like about Thabo is that he seems to be able to realistically assess his shortcoming—and he’s willing to put in the effort to overcome them. He’s said he needs to improve his strength and his outside shot, and he’s going to spend the whole off season dong just that.

If Thabo comes back this fall noticeably stronger with a better looking mid-range jumper, I’d have no problem putting him ahead of Deng. It doesn’t matter that Deng is younger—because of his well below average athleticism, his ceiling is extremely low for a small forward. I would think we’ve already seen the best of Deng. Maybe he can add some veteran cleverness to his game, but he already plays like a player on the downside.

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even if we've seen the best of Deng, it's still better than the best of Thabo.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Apr 21, 2008 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m will to see

how they both come back after this summer. Thabo has barely scratched the surface of his physical talent, while Deng is already banging his head against the ceiling.

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, and one day if he reaches that incredible ceiling

he may be 65% the player Luol Deng is already.

You’re nuts. I heard this Gerald Green kid has some hops as well…

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The point is to try and get athletic

at a position that cries out for athleticism. It’s basically the difference between Iggy and Luol. They each have certain talents, but Iggy’s talents demand defensive double teams, where Luol only requires a chaser to run through all the screens Deng needs to get an open look.

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Deng was hurt this year

and Iguodala is simply far better than Thabo, whether they matched up in your Gerald Green workout tapes or not.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have no idea how you can make that statement

given that Thabo has played in so few games. I struggle to figure out what criteria you use to judge players and your perception of their aptitude. It’s completely unpredictable.

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 21, 2008 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well by your criteria

if he hasn’t played in that many games, then it’s surely because he didn’t earn the time. :)

It’s not the greatest sample size for Thabo, but what he’s done in his career so far isn’t good enough, and he doesn’t really earn the ‘potential’ tag.

Yes, that includes some ‘unpredictable’ guesswork on my part, sheesh. I just don’t see what seperates Thabo that much from other ‘athletic’ swingmen with lacking skills.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, but you have to pay royalties

on unpredictable guesswork. I have that patent on file with snley.

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

there's not even much of a difference

Between Thabo and Rodney Carney. I wonder if Philly fans are thinking they can let greedy Iguodala go because Carney’s in the wings.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a big difference between

Deng and Iggy. I wouldn’t be pushing for an upgrade to someone like Iggy if Deng had played at that level this year.

2008 or bust.

by bullshooter on Apr 21, 2008 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well that's a different argument

because having Thabo as a replacement is the opposite of ‘pushing for an upgrade’.

And I’m guessing you think that Deng didn’t just have a bad season (that turned out to be not really that bad)

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You really think that?

Come on now…he is their centerpiece.

by Illini15 on Apr 21, 2008 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hard...

to imagine that deng is close to his ceiling, although his ceiling is probably a lot lower than we thought it would be last year. deng still hasn’t added the 3 point shot to his regular shot selection, nor does it appear that he’s put on any noticeable weight or muscle, which would aid the 6’9” forward in the paint. he can be aggressive at times, but then disappear for long stretches. i would like to think that if he could put on about 20-25 lbs of muscle and work on his post play and 3 point shots, and stay aggressive, we would see his ceiling.

by leeac on Apr 21, 2008 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is difficult to accomplish

knowing you have 5 years, and 50 million guaranteed.

Lets hand Deng the craps dice until he rolls himself into a superstar.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Earlier this season

I heard JVanG talking about what to do with a tweener—too small for one position, but not quick enough for another. He said that you have to play him at the position he best matches up with quicknesswise. (Matt, I’m pretty sure I’ve seen you say the same thing.)

To me, this says Deng should be a power forward. So I agree, this does mean he needs to put on 20-25 pounds of muscle and work on his post play—but forget the 3 point shot. His standing reach of 9’ 0.5" is 2 inches greater than Noah’s. There’s no mystery to me about why the Bulls wanted him to post up last year. His body (granted, with a few more pounds) lends itself to that game

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do generally agree with that

but I’m not sure how Deng all of a sudden got too slow to guard the 3. For the umpteenth time he was hurt.

Also if the choice is play more inside or outside (i.e. 3-pointers), if he’s truly ‘soft’ he’ll opt for the latter. Not that I agree with that perception, but I could see it happening. Technically he could be both, but this year he did neither.

Also, is anyone that sure that Thabo is big enough to guard the 3? I only like him there as a way to keep him from handling the ball and shooting, and it gives another reason to boot Noc.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The quickness thing

was on his draft card. It’s been with him his whole career.

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The team is better off with him from 18 ft in

It’d be nice to have a guy who is willing to attack the basket, and had the physical strength to do so. He’s already got a great midrange game, if he added some muscle and worked on being a better finisher, the team would be in far better shape defensively. The drawback though is he is going to lose his pre-injury quickness that makes him a very good defender. Everyone says Thabo is there to guard the 3’s, but there is no way Deng is strong enough to play PF.

by Ozzie Montana on Apr 21, 2008 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it is a definite problem

if that achillies strain is something that lingers. I don’t see why an offseason wouldn’t ‘cure’ it though.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Deng as a PF

The other day I downloaded 82Games detailed player shooting stats and started filtering guys that had similar games to Deng in terms of their percentages inside and outside, and also their percentages of assisted buckets.

One guy that came out pretty similar was David West
Deng
2 point Jumpers: 58% of total, 40% shooting, 74% assisted
Inside Shots: 39% of total, 60.6% shooting, 60% assisted

West
2 point Jumpers: 62% of total, 43.7% shooting, 61% assisted
Inside Shots: 35% of total, 57.6% shooting, 49% assisted

Chris Bosh
2 point Jumpers: 55% of total, 40.6% shooting, 65% assisted
Inside Shots: 42% of total, 61.4% shooting, 56% assisted

Marvin Williams and LaMarcus Aldridge were also pretty similar as far as what they did.

I thought West was especially interesting because West and Deng weren’t that much different in size coming into the league:
West 6’8.25” (barefoot) and 226lbs. 7’4.25” wingspan, 9’0.5” standing reach. 31.5” vertical.
Deng 6’7” (barefoot) and 220lbs. 7’0.5” wingspan, 9’ standing reach. 31.5” vertical.

by Sports2 on Apr 21, 2008 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Deng should emulate West

People like to write him off because he has CP3, but he is quite adept at creating for himself, and can take it to the basket quite well when he’s not jump-shot happy. The 3 ball is there, but it’s rarely utilized, which is what Deng should be doing to. Focus more on attacking the basket. Hinrich, Gordon, and Noce will always be there to stretch the floor, he doesn’t have to linger on the perimeter as well. Having at least one aggressive player out there makes the shooters’ lives so much easier.

by Ozzie Montana on Apr 21, 2008 9:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can still draft based on what the other club wants

You agree to the trade in principle, draft the player at your position the other club wants, then finalize the deal when you can officially announce them.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

in all your years of observation

when have you seen that happen with a restricted free agent? Not to mention you still didn’t fix the base-year issues.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't the Bulls draft Marcus Fizer

for another team so that they could get J. O’Neal? Forget for a moment that the ‘00 draft was the worst in recent history. Given the fact that the Bulls were left with Fizer, isn’t it dangerous to draft for someone else on the hope that a deal will get done?

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As I recall that draft

the Clipper swooped in and grabbed Darius Miles, whom the Bulls really wanted. Krause took a huge risk in drafting Fizer, who duplicated the only strong position on the team at the time (Elton Brand), hoping he could swing him with another piece to L.A. and get Miles back.

The Clippers said no, and the Bulls were completely behind the 8-ball.

I agree with you that you can’t afford to take those kinds of risks when you only get to try once a year. It’s not like chess, or stock trading, where you can blow it off and come back later that afternoon with a new strategy.

You have to take someone that you believe can help your team, not a hoped-for bargaining chip.

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember it the way bullhockey did

Didn’t Krause famously not want Darius Miles due to his cornrows? Or was that just a way to Krause-bash at the time?

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could be wrong, but I don't think so

Remember, Krause picked up Eddie Robinson, corn rows and all, the following off-season.

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't that the year that Krause

was spurned Tim Thomas, right after the offseason where he was spurned by T-Mac and Grant Hill? With the Bulls amassing a surplus bigger than the Clinton years, they had to give that cash to someone, anyone.

Eddie Robinson was just the anyone the Bulls ended up finding. Corn rows and all.

I’m not sure if he said no because of corn rows, but by that time Krause was way too desperate.

By the way, this was also the time period that people were calling D-Miles “Baby Garnett”. Good for a laugh. :)

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Different years I think

Wasn’t the year that Krause and Co. tried to wine and dine McGrady and Hill the year they ended up giving that cash to Ron Mercer?

by Ozzie Montana on Apr 21, 2008 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL Ron Mercer, I forgot...

Clearly, this franchise is cursed…

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, it is dangerous

It’s not something that is high on my list, but I’m really just trying to push Sefolosha over to the SF position so that Deng looks like better trade bait.

It’s that or fight yet again the issue of Andres Nocioni and his now non-BYC contract.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sefolosha is no replacement for Deng

at all.

He’s much worse, he’s actually older, and one of two* skills that Thabo did have (rebounding) is mitigated by moving to SF, as Deng’s far better at THAT also.

*Thabo’s other skill being those good looks, of course

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ammendum

Deng’s not a ‘far’ better rebounder than Thabo, they’re equal.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only thing that will keep Deng with Chicago this summer

is his fucked up decision to decline a contract extension last Fall. It’s almost impossible to move him without getting junk in return.

The one thing that is certain is that Luol Deng just isn’t as good as we all thought. Factor in a season of injuries this year to those of his rookie and sophomore campaigns and we start to get a bigger picture of how whatever value we can get out of him must come from the court where he shows up some nights and not at all on others.

I’d rather risk a year on Sefolosha in year 3 of his rookie deal than another season on Deng.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can you clarify this?
I’d rather risk a year on Sefolosha in year 3 of his rookie deal than another season on Deng.

Sounds to me like you want to relegate Deng to the bench and give Thabo some “entitlement” minutes. To what end? So because Deng’s been in the NBA 2 years longer, the Bulls should cut their losses and go with a player who hasn’t approached what Deng did his first 2 years despite having been older than Deng was.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Apr 21, 2008 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where you are in your contract NOW MATTERS

Deng did himself no favors in turning down a contract extension and pushing this Summer of Funk back on the organization. All he did was fuck himself and the organization. Let’s try really really hard to pretend this all didn’t happen.

Obviously, if you sign Deng he starts. But that wouldn’t change my mind on trying to get Thabo as many minutes at the SF position.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll never get the personal animosity

people have towards Deng and Gordon turning down contract extensions.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love or hate em

We do both when they sign contracts and when they don’t.

Deng regrets his decision. Feel free to pretend he doesn’t know what he’s done to the team.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh my god. Seriously?

He knows he hurt the team? Is that why there are “rumors” he wants to leave Chicago?

Do you have a link to him saying he regretted the decision?

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Apr 21, 2008 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Read the papers

Deng does regret it. He did say he wants to stay with Chicago this season and on Friday after the player meetings with Paxson.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reinsdorf was the one

who said he had one of the two players say to him that the player regretted not signing. The press asked BG and he said it wasn’t him. I don’t remember Deng ever saying he regretted not signing. The only thing we heard about Deng came second hand.

by sue369 on Apr 21, 2008 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"I'm gonna go get the papers

get the papers.”

—Jimmy Two Times

Eclipses are cool.

by preverbal on Apr 21, 2008 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Deng's only on record

saying he regrets that he didn’t negotiate. Reinsdorf is still accurate in saying that Deng regrets his decision. That decision is the failure to negotiate.

All in all, these are things that I never thought would come from the guy I thought was one of the most professional guys in the league and certainly the best of the MEN on our club.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What the hell?

Where did Deng say this? The only accounts I’ve read have Paxson giving both Deng and Gordon take-it-or-leave-it deals with no ability to negotiate. Did Deng say he regrets not being able to negotiate? This actually makes sense because Paxson knew these guys were his best trade commodities and neither could be traded this season (or would have been difficult) if they signed deals. So Paxson gets them cheaper than their value or not at all.

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Apr 21, 2008 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The grown man didn't say

that he regretted ‘his decision’, and that decision was turning down the contract offer. His regret was that they didn’t come to an agreement after he made his decision. Basically he’s dissapointed the Bulls didn’t come back with more money. No grown man would want more money.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

GROWN MEN

With testes and everything. Not everyone can be one, unless they have the right chromosomes, or a good surgeon.

by hscs on Apr 21, 2008 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"and only after such a distinction

could that grown man get a grown man’s rebound.” – Dore

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Get over it already

Would you rather that Deng and Gordon had signed big long-term contracts – and then had the disappointing seasons they had? They actually did the Bulls a favor by foolishly turning down extensions. If they had accepted them, the Bulls would probably be bumping up against the luxury tax right now. That’s a bad spot to be in for any team; it’s a terrible spot for a lottery team to be in.

by Big D on Apr 21, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's where we are

that’s where we will be whether I made any of these arguments or kept them to myself.

You still have two players with known ceilings, documented deficiencies exploited all season long, and neither one of them is under contract or in a position to be traded.

No matter what we do with Deng and BG the club will still be in a bad position.

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm surprised you don't think your

arguments DO have impact on the actual team.

But anyway, I challenge the idea that we know their ceilings. Consider it challenged.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, at least I now have a reference point

where I can stop taking ‘the observer’ seriously anymore.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you indeed want to deal for Maggette

(assuming he doesn’t opt-out of his contract)

They need guards. Bulls have guards.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you don't want to bother with the rules of RFAs or draft picks

Think the Clippers would be game for Nocioni/Thabo for Maggette? How about Hinrich/Nocioni for Maggette/Mobley (signed through 2009-10)?

Imagine the Gordon/Mobley combo-riffic backcourt. Maggette as the new 6th man. Then, uh, find some average point guard with MLE-type scratch.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You would give the MLE to

Duhon ??? :-)

The Game chose him !

by Diabolo on Apr 21, 2008 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

heh

Duhon would be a bit more useful, wouldn’t he…

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

RE: uhhh

The Bulls and Clips could still agree, in principal, to a deal and execute it at the proper time a week down the road or whenever it becomes ok to do so. Right?

To me, Deng has the classic Duke flaw of not being able to create his own shot in the NBA. I know I’m generalizing here, but Coach K’s system down there doesn’t seem to teach skills that are crucial to succeeding at the NBA level. Maggette is an exception and escaped Durham after only one year so he wasn’t completely polluted.

by Jobu on Apr 21, 2008 8:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What school does consistently produce players who succeed in the NBA?

I hate Duke as much as anyone outside of Chapel Hill, but Coach K had All Star players like Grant Hill, Elton Brand, and Carlos Boozer as well. Christian Laettner and Shane Battier have been good role players. Producing the likes of Laettner, Hill, Brand, Maggette, Battier, Boozer, and Deng amongst others is nothing to scoff at. The only school I can think of that has come close to matching that kind of talent over the course of the last 20 years is North Carolina. Most of their NBA value, though, came through in the mid 90’s with Stackhouse/Wallace followed by Carter/Jamison.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Apr 21, 2008 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Worthy, Jordan

off the top of my head.

Eclipses are cool.

by preverbal on Apr 21, 2008 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Was referring only to the last 20 years, so back to 1988.

UNC did have a nice run on NBA talent in the 80’s though. Add in Perkins, Smith, and Dougherty just off the top of my own head.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Apr 21, 2008 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Schools

UCLA? Arizona? UConn? Off the top of my head it seems like these systems also produce players who succeed at a decent rate.

I’m just saying for each Brand or Boozer, there’s a longer list of Trajan Langdons, William Averys, Sheldon Williams, Chris Duhons, JJ Redicks, and, until this year, Mike Dunleavy Jr.

by Jobu on Apr 21, 2008 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every good program is going to have a similar list of stars, role players, and scrubs

You stated that Duke doesn’t produce good NBA players. I was just refuting that, because you can’t single out Duke for failing where no one else really exceeds what they do.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Apr 22, 2008 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it'd be slightly more possible if it was someone under contract

Deng is a restricted free agent. So you have to convince the Clippers to pay him, and Deng to accept playing for the Clippers.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still like that Hughes for Rasho and stuff trade

but it’s tough to come up with more teams desperate for 60 games of inefficient production at shooting guard.

by hscs on Apr 21, 2008 8:51 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd settle for Noc for Rasho and stuff

although my ‘Free Rasho’ sign looked out of place when Aaron Gray was eating his lunch on the last game of the year.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Hinrich’s biggest problem is that he needs to put on some weight. He stopped taking the ball to the lane years ago because he wasn’t getting calls when he got fouled. If you look at guys like Deron and CP3, they’ve got more muscle on them and don’t get knocked around as much.

Of course, it would be nice if our starting 2 went to the lane as well, but Gordon is a big fan of his jump shot, and Hughes is playing to keep himself happy. :D

by darksmokepuncher on Apr 21, 2008 11:40 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Paul and Williams

are much better dribblers than Hinrich which grants them superior ball handling skills to navigate the paint. Kirk has a crossover dribble that is very good, but he only uses it on the wing to set up a jump shot.

I don’t know why Hinrich doesn’t take it to the cup more often. Might it be a lack of confidence?

by NBA Observer on Apr 21, 2008 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kirk in general attempts fewer shots per game

for the Bulls (10.3) than CP3 (16.1) and Williams(13.6) for their teams – yes, I agree it would be nice if he tried to score off the drive more often, but part of that is just his role on the team and a question of him looking for his shot more often in general. Particularly at the end of the season he seemed to be hardly shooting anymore (down to 6.2 per game, and from 16.1/48 to 12.3/48 in April) – could be lack of confidence from the disastrous season, or just the issues with PT among the guards and giving up on the season? Or just a different focus with the change in the team – assists per 48 were up in March and April?

My Bulls may suck, but my Jayhawks are National Champs!

by wjb1492 on Apr 21, 2008 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The coaching staff needs to tell Hinrich to shoot first, pass second.

Kirk is not a pure PG. Everybody knows that. I’ve seen him get free in the lane for an open layup countless of times only to see him pass it out for a 18 footer instead. Part of the reason is the pressure of the media and coaches trying to get him to be like CP3 and Deron. It’s obvious he does not have the court vision to be that kind of PG. The second half of the season he was very passive shooting, because he was trying to be the player everyone else wants him to be. I think Hinrich is better off (and more effective) just trying to get his buckets. There are tons of shoot first, shoot second, pass third PGs in the league. The difference is that Kirk is naturallly a very unselfish player. The new coaching staff should just tell him to get his. He’s not the kind of player who is going to shoot up ridiculous shots while triple teamed. If the shot is not there, he will pass. Hinrich should have a Tony Parker mentality. I am not comparing their skill levels, but when Parker gets into the lane, he is looking to score. If nothing is there, Parker will pass the ball out instead of forcing up bad shots. Parker is a shoot first pass PG who plays within the system and does not negatively effect the team. This is in comparison to someone like Mo Williams who will shoot first, shoot second, shoot third, and only pass as a last ditch effort.

by shoryuken on Apr 21, 2008 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The coaching staff may tell him

But is he mentally sound enough to do so? There are more critics of Hinrich than any other Bulls player except when Ben Wallace was on the team. But, I agree that he should try to emulate Parker’s style of play. Obviously, it’s a little easier when Manu and Duncan are on the roster, but he doesn’t have the vision nor the handles of Paul or Williams to ever be a “true” PG.

by Ozzie Montana on Apr 21, 2008 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually,

I was hoping that he would pass more; but that when he would look to score, he would do so by taking it to the cup more…

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A new season and new coaching staff can rebuild his confidence.

Look at Thabo under Skiles vs. under Boylan. There’s just too much pressure on Hinrich to be a player that he is not, and I’m not sure why the critics pick on Hinrich. While he is certainly making big bucks, it’s not like he is making superstar $15 mil+ money. I think he shoulders too much criticism. It’s not like he is playing with Manu or Duncan. He’s got BG and Deng, who are nice but not great players. Hinrich is not going to be a superstar, but that doesn’t mean he can’t be a good player. The new coach needs to give Hinrich the green light to try to score more in the lane and just relieve him of being the franchise savior. He’ll need to work on getting more arc on his shots in the lane, but his work ethic has never been questioned.

Yeah I’m not a fan of his pull up jumpers either. I want him to take it to the lane like Parker and only shoot set shots from the outside. Hinrich’s just not that good of a shooter off the dribble.

by shoryuken on Apr 21, 2008 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your entry is eerily similar to

this Answer to a fan question by Sam Smith:

http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/basketball/bulls/askthewriter/cs-080304sam-smith-chicago-bulls-kirk-hinrich,1,6763139.story

And particularly, the following passage:

What I don’t quite understand is what is expected of him. He works hard all the time. He doesn’t take off for injuries. He plays defense and out of position without complaint. He is not nearly the most physically talented player or an All Star. But the Olympic coaches picked him to tryout and play for the team. They didn’t ask anyone else who plays for the Bulls.

Look, I don’t think people should heap undeserved praise or disdain. But this is the guy who completely folded to start this season. Others had excuses like contract negotiations (BG/Deng), being older than dirt (Wallace) or being inured/a rookie (Noah) to start the season. But Kirk all of a sudden was just really bad, with all of his numbers going down except for fouls, which probably went up. The botched one-on-zero fast break is only one example of his spectacularly bad play. There were plenty of times that he just didn’t show up to play or else in the middle of a Bulls’ run he’d dribble over the half-court line and just take steps out of the blue for a crucial turnover.

So while you and Sam Smith and maybe a few other die-hard Kirk fans wonder out loud how people could be so down on Kirk, I find myself wondering how he could have forgotten how to play the game that is his livelihood this season.

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoops

the Sam Smith quote ends after that first paragraph…

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope Kirk

gets a chance to redeem himself as a Bull. He may have a great season with a new coaching staff.

by sue369 on Apr 21, 2008 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I can honestly say, Sue,

that I really, really miss watching how the Bulls used to play when they had a winning record against the West out of any Eastern team and Kirk was the engine of that team.

Part of what irks me is that he kind of teased us by being on the cusp of being a really good player. I’m not saying he pulled an Ike Austin on us. But I do feel like he yanked our chains… unless he bounces back and plays really well. Which I hope he does…

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh?

Why would he yank our chains? The guy just bought a $14 mil. house? Wouldn’t he want to play well in order to keep living in his new house? If anything he may have put too much pressure on himself to have a great season.

I remember when Kirk was in high school and from what I read about him from college he hated losing. Hated it! I don’t think that has changed. If he was the only player to have a bad year I would be worried but he wasn’t.

by sue369 on Apr 21, 2008 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

he was the only player to have an awful year

well, him and Wallace. Gordon, Deng, Noc, Thomas, Thabo were merely ‘bad’ compared to expectations.

Anyway, I don’t think bullhockey was implying that Hinrich intentionally tanked the season.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah Kirk had a turd of a season

and that fastbreak foul up was the worst Bulls play of the season. However, I don’t think that he folded or didn’t show up to play (except for the last month when nobody was trying). Part of the blame is on Hinrich and a part of it is on the coaches. The main point of my rant was that Hinrich can have a good next year with coaches who understand his limitations. A lot of his crappiness was due to being forced into a playmaking PG role that doesn’t suit him and having him defend shooting guards. The coaching staff should have realized that that idea wasn’t working and instead should have told him to just go out and score. Remember there was a brief golden period before Hughes came over when he was paired with Thabo, and he did well. The coaches play to Deng and Gordon’s strengths, so why not play to Hinrich’s? They didn’t expect Gordon to defend 2 guards, because they know he can’t. Deng isn’t expected to pass or dribble the ball up the court, because they know he can’t. Deng and BG had decreased numbers across the board and ridiculous turnovers too. I mean how many times do we have to see Gordon turn the ball over when a trap comes. People want to blame their poorplay contract situations, but Iguodola and Josh Smith excelled this year. Hinrich is just as liable as anyone else for the poor season. but shouldn’t be singled out for it. The new coaches just need to play to his strengths and he should bounce back next year.

by shoryuken on Apr 21, 2008 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

um yeah, why is this a new idea

I agree with you
we need to look at who our best players are, and let them be that, and trade/draft/coach around that.
as I may have mentioned before, I can’t stand gordon or Du, but think wee need to keep them, and I love noc, but think we need to trade him.
I also hope that our incoming coach understands the value of ‘players’ not necessarily by position, and while that doesn’t mean I want to see Noc the 4 or Kirk the 2, I definitely wouldn’t mind using Lu 4, and Ty 3. and honestly, I wouldn’t mind the occasional Noc 4 if Ty was lined up the 3. a major problem of ours has been unbalanced, not just small lineups. Mickael Pietrus, cuz there’s no way we’re getting our hands on Ellis, Iguodala, or Josh Smith. and for everybody who wishes we could draft Beasley, why don’t we stick Lu on the block and tell him to pretend he’s Beasley? referencing the JVG quote above, and 20 lbs of muscle.
@ this point I don’t see us being able to replace Gordon’s scoring easily, and I think we need to hold onto him, at a fortunately-now-decreased price, until his value rises again and teams start asking about him. We hit him with a reasonable offer, which he’ll decline, and then match if he gets offered something else. I think based on his size and skillset, the only teams that could really use him well are the Lakers, Cavs, or one with a dominant big, and none of them have real money. but in a couple years, if we’re competitive, more teams than that may look for him.

by Sko on Apr 21, 2008 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I only consider moving Hinrich in the terms of

“if Paxson is intent on moving one of Hinrich/Gordon/Deng, which one would you move?” Since Hinrich is simultanously the oldest and worst of that group, I think it’s a pretty easy decision.

He’s also likely the easiest to move since he’s under contract.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention the

unassuming, Midwestern persona, by which I mean, no off-the-court incidents causing embarrassment for the franchise in the media… whatever franchise that might be, eventually.

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 21, 2008 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

off topic

Does anyone else have to log on again and again?

I hit the reply button and get a “polite” message saying I have to log in if I want to post.

Is that a bug or is there some other way to log on?

by alec on Apr 21, 2008 11:50 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

East power rankings for next year

1. Celtics. elite team with 3 ‘famers.
2. Pistons. old, disgruntled, arrogant…. powerhouse.
3. Magic. Superman is back
4. Cavs. start of LeBron’s fairwell tour
5. Wizards. Like their swagger
6. Raptors. Once the cancerous Ford is gone they’ll gell.
7. Sixers. Miller has emerged, nice future
8. Hawks. 8th seed sacrifical lamb
9. Nets. Devin Harris is overrated
10. Knicks. Miss playoffs by a few games
11. Heat. Wade is declining, roster a disaster
12. Bucks. Redd got paid, Yi dissapointing
13. Bobcats. Maybe a trade? Some decent pieces there
14. Pacers. A mess.
15. Bulls. Disaster, laughingstock of the NBA, the ant-model franchise of how to run a team since 1998. Everything that can go wrong has. The entire organization, from the janitors, to the 15th man on the roster, to Paxson, is one giant hilarious JOKE.

by Eon_blue on Apr 21, 2008 12:41 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They do like small ball...

Kirk kind of looks like an ant when trying to guard a 6’7” or 6’8” guy posting up

My Bulls may suck, but my Jayhawks are National Champs!

by wjb1492 on Apr 21, 2008 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

that we have been a joke this year but below the Knicks? Are you kidding me? How are the Knicks not the prime example of how not to run a franchise?

"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."

by jpchi on Apr 21, 2008 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Makes sense in a world where Wade is declining and Ray Allen and Paul Pierce are HOF'ers

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Apr 21, 2008 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's on the ESPN board

And is a Kobe/Lakers fan, so his perception of the NBA is slightly askew. You’ve got 10 year olds saying the Kobe/Gasol tandem will be better than the Shaq/Kobe combo.

by Ozzie Montana on Apr 21, 2008 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No way!

Are you kidding me? The Bulls will totally produce a next “Michael Jordan” soon enough, and will reemerge as the top team once again.

by JL on Apr 21, 2008 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hinrich

wouldn’t Hinrich be the toughest guy to move and get a better player for.
1. Hopefully this was just one bad year and hes still pretty good
2. Trade value has gone down from this season
3. Contract.

by jrapps1323 on Apr 21, 2008 6:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i'd go with hughes

at least there are teams that want deng

Finally: The End.

by ChiTownCritic on Apr 21, 2008 7:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's true

Oh, for the non-newbs around here, my sn is now my Bleed-Cubbie-Blue name, since I can’t have a different name for each blog. So, really, I’m daaaaaaaBulls, now cubbiebear.

On hughes, I think he can do some things well, and can be expertly utilized, but should never earn a starting spot. Since I think we’re stuck with Hughes, Gordon or Kirk have to go. Too much money to dole out to two positions.

"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente

by cubbybear on Apr 21, 2008 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

what if we bit the bullet on Hughes?

and just let his contract expire? or waited for it to have more value in two years? it’s not like we don’t have time.. I mean, Tyrus is at least 2 years away from whatever his fans, including me, expect, and it’s not like we’re in the verge of a chip here

by Sko on Apr 21, 2008 8:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

as long as they don't take on extra years

a deal works just as well, and you wouldn’t have to worry about Hughes poisoning the waters, or ::gulp:: actually getting playing time.

(unless those extra years were for someone actually productive)

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The organization would be conflicted

The alternative to letting Hughes’ contract expire would be to play him to boost his value so some GM will bite on him. Pax would have to become convinced that Larry really has no value and wouldn’t increase his value by playing before he’d agree to let his contract expire.

My guess is that if Larry can’t be moved that Pax will try Larry as a starter next season hoping that he plays so well that a) some other GM wants him before the trade deadline or b) he earns the right to be the team’s starting 2. If this doesn’t occur after the trade deadline, Larry should be deactivated. Pax’s comments the other day seem to suggest that this may be the way he’s leaning.

by paxson43 on Apr 21, 2008 10:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe not deactivated

but definitely not starting either. He’s just a contract at this point, and any team acquiring him likely knows it. Luckily in the NBA bad contracts are moved all the time.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see...

how anyone would take Hughes after he performed identically to his Cleveland tenure after the trade.

by McCabe on Apr 21, 2008 8:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He's been fooling teams his entire career

There’s bound to be some team dumb enough to take him on for added depth. I could see him going to Boston because they’ve realized how bad Ray Allen’s ankles really are, and basically he would just be asked to defend.

Obviously this is a dream scenario where we get their 1st round pick, he destroys the team by shooting 40 3’s a game, they lose 70 games, and we get another lottery pick.

by Ozzie Montana on Apr 21, 2008 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see it happening...

he got to the D.C. through potential, to Cleveland through two good seasons, and to Chicago through a contract swap. Only one of those teams got fooled.

by McCabe on Apr 21, 2008 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's that implausible?

Seriously, that trade scenario is better than some of the laughers people put up. And Hughes is obviously damaged goods at this point in his career, but I still feel like he would be of use to a contender looking for some depth. He’s not a savvy or experienced vet, but Eric Snow has gotten by all these years by just being a good defender, I think Hughes can do so as well.

Rusty Longley v 2.0

by Ozzie Montana on Apr 21, 2008 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

except he's not a good defender

he’ll grab a couple steals for you, but he gambles to do so and is ambivalent otherwise.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Apr 21, 2008 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention

Eric Snow was getting paid 700k and 4.5mil reespectively when he got traded and will undoubtedly be an assistant coach somewhere in the near future.

by McCabe on Apr 22, 2008 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No love for Gray?!

You need to recognize that Aaron Gray is a rapidly improving 7 foot Rookie who’s athleticism & game has developed tremendously from a year ago. He made great progress last summer & I expect similar improvements to his footwork & athleticism again this summer. Great 2nd Round pick & I’m excited to see him develop as a Bull!

by JGoldbe23 on Apr 21, 2008 9:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He's really got to cut the weight down

If he ever wants to be taken seriously by anyone other than Red, Gray should be able to play 25 minutes a game without looking like he ran the Chicago Marathon with a Gortex jacket on.

by Ozzie Montana on Apr 21, 2008 9:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do you improve atheticism?

Cause I gotta get me some of that.

"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."

by jpchi on Apr 21, 2008 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously,

if I could jump two feet I could dunk, and it’s really depressing that I can’t.
Anyone? Drugs maybe? Mmm drugs.
Or take Derrick Rose’s idea and eat gummy wurms; it may not work, but they are delicious.

by Prevenge on Apr 22, 2008 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whatever Spud Webb ate

Or maybe he had calf-replacement surgery with a cricket.

"I tell you, Steve Blass, you pitch me inside, they never, never find that ball."
-Roberto Clemente

by cubbybear on Apr 22, 2008 3:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What do you weigh and how much do you work out?

It’s not rocket science.
1. Lose extra weight.
2. Develop the muscles you have

by Sports2 on Apr 22, 2008 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They got Specialists for that!

I remember reading how Gray was working w/ a trainer last summer who was working on his dexterity, nimbleness & athleticism through some alternative exercises. A few years ago I would certainly agree you can’t teach athleticism, but nowadays w/ so many innovative trainers & exercises , a fat stiff like Aaron Gray can actually become more flexible & athletic. Think about all those big oafs you’ve played w/ or against over the years, now give him a summer working with a legit, NBA level physical trainer w/ some creative exercises & I think you would see a difference.

by JGoldbe23 on Apr 22, 2008 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

that you might be able to increase some hand/eye coordination with some drills/exercises, and you can increase flexibility easily. But, I don’t think that physical abilities are ever really increased. I have strength training/speed training sessions every other day, and the only thing that has really changed is that I’m now able to perform at my athletic peak for a longer period of time. For that reason, I don’t really see him increasing his athleticism noticeably. He’ll just be able to perform at his highest level (whatever that is) for longer.

"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."

by jpchi on Apr 22, 2008 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he can improve from where he is at now.

He can likely reach a set level of athletic ability, likely somewhere higher than the flub dictates for him now, but his glass ceiling is going to be a lot lower than most others. He isn’t going to work his way into Tyrus Thomas natural talent in a million year. He might be able to max out his own potential though, and stay on the NBA bench somewhere instead of holding down a lazy boy back home. That much is up to him.

by cranscape on Apr 24, 2008 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You said
Gray is a rapidly improving 7 foot Rookie

and I really can’t agree with you.

If you had said, “rapidly expanding 7 foot wookie”, well, now, that’s another story…

"Duhon, don't make that garbage-time jumper... Save it for the next game!"

by bullhockey on Apr 22, 2008 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now I can honestly say that I agree...

...with just about everything in this posting. I really can’t find one issue where I don’t see eye to eye with you here.

by lexdiamonds0730 on Apr 24, 2008 8:15 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree and disagree

Kirk- trade his weak ass
Gordan- I agree
Deng- keep him he is only 23
Nocioni- trade him he plays the same position as deng and is extremely old
Tyrus- call the blazers and see if we can get Aldridge back 6”11 and 17 and 7 are great
Gooden- I like gooden, but if we can send him nocioni, and sum cash for Okafor then get Okafor hurt ass, at least he is a dble dble
Hughes- he got D, but he is garanteed to be hurt at least 30 plus games, trade his ass

I would love to send hughes 12million and gooden to houston for T-Bac I mean T-mac, just so we can have an all-star. Even tho he didnt make it this year, im sure if t-mac is in the east he will be starting on SUNDAY.

If he aint an all-star then why are we talking about em

by rasaan86 on May 1, 2008 8:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Bulls and Young Talent
Blogabull_s_small
Sign up for BlogABull game previews

Recent FanPosts

Small
Interesting Trade Idea: S-Jax & Anthony Randolph
Small
Kudos Bulls. You've surprised early.
Bolo_picture_small
What about Iverson?
Sports
I'm Happy to Have a Break From Tyrus. He's gone anyways.
Small
Game Preview # 6: Bulls vs Charlotte Bobcats
Small
Why isn't there more talk of LeBron...
Small
Contract/Cap Question for BAB
Jayhawk_small
Game Preview # 5: Bulls at Cleveland Cavaliers
Small
We've Got To Rescue D. Wade

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger