Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

How can the Bull's acquire a star?

Watching Lebron and Kobe lift their teams to victory on Sunday is about as frustrating as the whole 2008 Chicago Bulls season.  I know it is cliché, but the Bulls need a star to lift them to the next level and deliver in the clutch.  Without a star, this Bull's team will continue to be a perennial first round speed bump of contender on their way to the finals.  

Star-divide

How can the Bulls acquire a star?  They can develop a current player, but the Bull's organization hasn't had too much luck developing young promising players.  They could trade for a star, but that usually doesn't happen, and all the Bull's trade value is very low right now.  The only other way is to get lucky in the lottery, but with a "playoff contending" team the ping-pong balls and odds are very low.  

A high draft pick in the right year is gold for a GM.  To bad the NBA isn't like other professional sports, where star players can be traded for draft picks or for a combination of draft picks & players.  Another thing to make you frown is this year's special player and future number one pick is a player who would be the missing piece of the puzzle on the Bulls- Michael Beasley.  Beasley would fit in perfectly between Deng & Noah, and he can score to take pressure off the guards.  

As it looks now, the Miami Heat will probably have the most ping-pong balls and best chance to land Beasley.  Like I stated above, teams usually do not trade down for draft picks because the talent level drops off quickly after the top tier players are drafted.  Miami already has their star in Wade, and they have positioned themselves nicely to rebuild around him quicker then I could have ever imagined.

So how do you get Beasley from Miami?  The Bulls will probably have a pick around 6-12 depending on the rest of the season and the lottery.  It would be nice to trade up, but that is pretty far fetched, so lets be creative.  What if the Bulls traded a #6 overall & Tyrus Thomas for the rights to draft #1 overall but that probably isn't enough?   Tyrus Thomas's value is low which isn't helped by his minutes from Boylan's inconsistent playing time, so the Bull's would need to sweeten the pot.  What if they added another young player or an attractive expiring deal like Gooden?  They could also take back a bad contract like Marc Blount to give the Heat a lot of flexibility with the big Free Agent Opt Out Summer.    

So here is my proposed deal:

The Bulls send:  

2008 first round pick,
Tyrus Thomas,
Drew Gooden,
(and whatever else they want)

to Miami for:

2008 #1 pick
Marc Blount's horrible contract

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

0 recs  |  Comment 88 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

what?
Beasley a super star?  I say no.  Is Beasley worth the '08 pick, Thomas, Gooden, and "whatever they want"?

Again, I think not.

by Lt.Dan on Mar 3, 2008 11:47 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Beasley
Beasley has more star potential than Chris Bosh did coming out of college.  He is more polished and an effective scorer than Bosh, and he can score from the inside and out.  Plus, because he actually has basketball skills instead of just athletic ability he would be a better fit than Tyrus.  Do you even watch college basketball?

by Jesse07 on Mar 3, 2008 12:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're gambling alot
on Beasley. That is a ton to give up.

by RogersPark Kris on Mar 3, 2008 12:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Point Taken
but the Bull's need to do something.  The current roster does not cut it.

It might seem like a lot to give up now, but nobody will argue that the Lakers made the right move trading Vlade for Kobe.

by Jesse07 on Mar 3, 2008 12:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would trade...
... half of this stinking team for Beasley. If only dreams could come true...

by Vangelis on Mar 3, 2008 6:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I do...
And I think it's a big risk.  I wouldn't sell the farm to get him.

by Lt.Dan on Mar 3, 2008 1:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd make that trade in a second
You can't put a price on a superstar player.  Whether or not Beasley is one remains to be seen, but the Bulls won't win a championship as long as our go-to guys are Hinrich, Gordon, and Deng.

If we'll never win a championship with the current team, why aren't we scrapping it asap?  This constant above-averageness that so many teams employ never made any sense to me.

by YaoPau on Mar 3, 2008 2:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

eh?
you can always add players too without 'scrapping'. I don't know if Roy Hibbert is the next David Robinson, either, but I don't exactly want to find out.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 3, 2008 3:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

also, it should make sense
since being constantly above average keeps the money coming in. Only one team wins a title each year, and 7 different ones in the past 25 years.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 3, 2008 3:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Personally
I would rather strive for greatness than settle for being above average.

by Jesse07 on Mar 3, 2008 3:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you can strive for greatness
while still only being above average. Is Dallas great?

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 3, 2008 3:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Dallas
Dallas understood that they didn't have a squad that would win it all, so they went out and grabbed one of the top 4 point gaurds in the league.  Its a little early after a major trade to determine if they are great yet.

by Jesse07 on Mar 3, 2008 3:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

well my response was to the idea above
that if you aren't winning a title you have to 'scrap ASAP'. Dallas didn't do that.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 3, 2008 3:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Above average in the East...
... means brutal. Above average in the West means a couple of tweaks and you're a contender. It would be crazy for Dallas to scrap. It is imperative for the Bulls to "scrap ASAP". Deng, Kirk and BG are not the answer...

by Vangelis on Mar 3, 2008 6:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's my thinking...
First, the Bulls aren't the Mavs.  The Mavs have a legit superstar (who won the MVP last year), have been to the Finals, and have been the #1 seed in the West heading into the playoffs.

The Bulls don't have a superstar; no player on their roster has even been an all-star.  The farthest they've advanced is the 2nd round, and their highest playoff seed was #4.  I don't see the comparison.

In regards to the Pistons, just because one team in NBA history has won a title without a Hall-of-Fame-level player doesn't mean that's a smart blueprint to follow for your own team.  They're an outlier in the truest sense of the word.

I understand the monestary aspect; that's meaningless to me.

But an even bigger issue is that the East is starting to get really good.  Garnett, Howard, and LeBron give the East three legit contending superstars, and Bosh, Butler, and Wade are in the team photo.  Forget about a title, we aren't going to get out of the East trotting out a bunch of dime-a-dozens... especially when we're struggling this year just to make the playoffs.

The top NBA teams have built through the draft (Spurs-Duncan, Heat-Wade, Mavs-Dirk, Lakers-Kobe, Phoenix-Amare+Marion, Hornets-Paul, even the Celtics drafted Pierce, traded the #5 for Allen, and traded Jefferson for Garnett), and I think the Bulls have to take that route to bring home a title.  (Trades involving Nash, Shaq, and Garnett in their primes don't come around often.)

For a while, fans (me included) have complimented Paxson for drafting quality college players at quality programs, but I'm starting to think it's the wrong method.  If you have a top pick, go for broke (I still like the Tyrus pick over Aldridge), else you'll end up with a bunch of okay guys that get you nowhere.  Whew, that was long.

by YaoPau on Mar 3, 2008 9:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

history hasn't caught up with the Pistons yet
No one is eligible for the Hall of Fame, and it's really not that important. Isiah Thomas wasn't even very good. He was pretty good. When Monsignor Billups retires I'll be leading the Hall of Fame charge.
Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Mar 4, 2008 8:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ok, I'll bite
Not even very good?  Dude, Paxson was pretty good.  Thomas was closer to best ever than to pretty good.  Correct me (that's gonna be a surprise) if you disagree, but on the list of desirable pg skillsets, wouldn't you list penetrate with equal ability to dish or score near the top?  Pick and roll effectiveness has to be up there as well, and nasty defense helps.  I think I agree w you on Billups, but I can't think of 2 pg's that I'm positive are better than Thomas was.

by California Al on Mar 4, 2008 9:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

a career 18.1 PER
is pretty good. The assist totals are shiny, but come with an average career ORtg, few exceptional seasons, and he wasn't even the best player on those teams.
Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Mar 4, 2008 9:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty good case
Hard to point at a best on that team.  I still credit them with putting 48 minutes of D into the NBA, and had to displace the two (maybe) best teams in history to that point.  The greatness of the Bulls' dynasty starts with passing Detroit.  Who do you think was their best?

by California Al on Mar 4, 2008 10:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He has a strong case for being the best
but the point is that there was a half-dozen guys on those teams that were really (HSCS would just say 'pretty') good.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 4, 2008 11:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

minimum half dozen
I'm remembering the 2nd squad including Vinnie, Worm, Salley and Edwards.  Most teams had trouble running with their bench.  

by California Al on Mar 5, 2008 6:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Laimbeer
His PER doesn't stand out, but it's not going to for such a low usage player. His high ORtg is proof of excellent, although not prolific, offensive production, and his range likely helped Thomas' drives more than Thomas helped Laimbeer get open looks. Laimbeer rarely turned the ball over as well.

When the Pistons were at their peak, Laimbeer was the team leader in win shares (31st career NBA), and his interior defense was probably more important to the team's success than anything happening on the perimeter. And he was a great rebounder (31st career NBA TRB%).

Fire Boylan!

by hscs on Mar 5, 2008 8:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And the whole...
..."ya never know what's going to happen" thing. How above-averageness did Detroit possess before Rasheed fell in their lap.

Recent 6 game losing streak. losers of 8 of the last 9. Hello Rasheed Wallace and 8 game win streak. Winners of 12 of 13. NBA Championship. etc.

You build an above-average team and you get to that "one piece puts us over the top" spot. The Bulls were there just recently, but West and McHale were too stubborn for their own good. Now they have to get back to that spot and hope the next GM is willing to deal.

Or something like that.

Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Mar 3, 2008 3:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Or we could do nothing
keep losing because we can't win these games with Boylan and let the ping pong balls fall where they may.  We're bad.

It's possible Riley may try and replicate the 2007 Summer of Celtic Pride down in Miami.  He's got a lot of the chips.

The Kids Must Stay In The Picture!!!

by NBA Observer on Mar 3, 2008 11:57 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Stars?
Good post I have been thinking about this a lot.  Any  star puts the Bulls in the playoofs this year or next in the east.  Still frustrated over not getting Kobe after he said he wanted to be a Bull.  Deng, Hinrich, Gordon and TT for Kobe seems like a steal at this point.  1. Are there any stars out there this offseason?  to that I'd say the Bulls best hopes are in the West where a team with star power gets bounced from the playoffs early looks to change things up.   Then 2.  what position are we going for?  If we get an Allstar SF then we can trade Deng and keep more of the core.  SF has been our weakest position and Deng has been most responsible for this poor season.  I don't think we have any player at any position that is untradeabull.   but I'd like to keep Hughes, Gordon, TT and Noah.  I like Gooden and think he deserves to be starting and I'd like to see him wrapped up long term, but his contract makes him trade bait.  GILBERT ARENAS  would be my favorite solution as I think he is one of the top 5 playes in the league he is dynamic can score and get assists.  lets reunite the old Wiz guards with BG off the bench.   Maybe Tmac, Baron Davirs or AI become available. Carlos Boozer, Maggette Igoudala, Mike Dunleavy, Richard Jefferson, Josh Howard (just spitting out names)  Maybe if the Lakers lose Kobe is now tradeable because he is no longer their only star and if they cash in his chips for several good players...
I think Deng, Hinrich, Gooden (maybe Noc) and a 2nd rounder can get a star in return.  I think we need a star PG or SF.

I would definitely try to trade up in the draft as a GM, but that is a fan pipedream that just never comes true.  I like Jerryd Bayless from Arizona

by Zac23 on Mar 3, 2008 12:50 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Zac
I agree, I like the gamble that is Gilbert.....

Of course, I'd most like the other knee casualty gamble--Elton Brand first

For Gilbert and crappy change, let's trade Hinrich, Deng and T2....

Have the offense be:
Hughes/Arenas/Gordon PG
Arenas/Hughes/Gordon/Sefalosha SG
Nocioni/Sefalosha at SF
Gooden/Noah/Draft pick at PF
Noah/Draft Pick/Gray at C

For Brand and crap change let's trade Gordon, Deng, Tyrus and Duhon

Hinrich/Hughes/Sefalosha at PG
Hughes/Sefalosha/Hinrich at SG
Nocioni/Sefalosha/Draft pick at SF
Brand/Gooden at PF
Noah/Brand/Gooden/Gray at C.

I think the Wizards would love the defense that is Hinrich and the possibilities that is Deng, even with Caron.  Move Caron to the SG spot or play more with the west coast offense with more shooters and another defender or three (Hinrich, Deng, T2 all can play D at times).  T2's athleticism and D might help them hedge the loss that is the offense-only of Jamison (presuming he's less needed with 2 other decent scorers in Hinrich and Deng).

For LA, well they need some flash (Gordon & Tyrus) and they need some presumed value (Deng).  A solid PG might not hurt either (Duhon)....and Kaman continues to be their big man of the future, plus the nice solid draft pick they get in the draft.

The Bulls grab Elton and try to put together a winner.....

by majoyenrac on Mar 3, 2008 4:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you guys could go ahead and do this
because you are talking about NBA2k8, right.  That would be an awesome videogame lineup.  Just go ahead into GM mode and make the trade and let us know how it goes.  If you don't have an xbox, Christmas is right around the corner.

If you guys are actually serious, do you really think there are enough shots in three games, let alone one to keep BG, Hughes and Arenas happy?  And that team might average 5 assists per game.  Don't you think it would be easier to trade BG and Hughes to Washington and then you guys could fill up the wiz blogs with these fascinating ideas?

Baby Bulls II?

by bullshooter on Mar 3, 2008 6:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate all the can't get enough
shots to get them all happy bs.

If that's the case, we trade Gordon.....at midseason.  Problem solved (Hughes would be a more ideal trade, but he's got likely still a higher contract by a bunch) and Gordon's likely signing the  1 yr extension anyway.

Also, with my Arenas, Hughes, Noc, Gooden, Noah, Gordon lineup it's all the guards who will be scoring....I think there's enough scoring going on here.

Not as far fetched as you might think...

by majoyenrac on Mar 3, 2008 9:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

if BG signs the one-year deal
he has a no-trade clause.
Baby Bulls II?

by bullshooter on Mar 4, 2008 9:22 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But
if he's still on the bench on his way out, why would he exercise his no trade clause?

by majoyenrac on Mar 4, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Is it a matter of exercise
or is it a league rule?

by alec on Mar 4, 2008 10:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

this happened with Devean George
Gordon can waive his no-trade, but if he's traded he loses his Bird rights, meaning his new team couldn't  go over the cap to retain him (or sign/trade him). And given the state of payrolls in the NBA, he'd be basically only restricting himself to a mid-level contract.

http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#80

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 4, 2008 11:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks makes sense
I guess well it works in NBA lIVE (or I imagine it would).  I have the Wii (not PS3 OR XBOX) so I unfortunately can only play what has to be the crappiest basketball game since the old Jordan vs Bird on Nintendo NES (yes I remember that being bad as a kid).

I was shocked how awful the new game was (unfortunately I bought it and tried to learn to like it, it was a labor of hate though and now it sits without me playing it).

I guess that game being as crappy as it was should have been a sign that our Bulls would be as crappy as they were, since the last fwe years the NBA Live series has at least been entertaining......the Wii's controls were off base and they didn't even have guys like NOAH in the game (And some guys like Francis, etc were awesome even though they suck and others like rookie Alando Tucker, were ranked at superstar levels).....it was an awful game..
Oh well, sorry to get all video game nerded out on this site.

by majoyenrac on Mar 4, 2008 12:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bird Rights
Like with Devean George in the Mavs-Nets deal, Gordon would have to be willing to give up his Bird Rights if he were dealt to another team while under a one year contract.  With Bird Rights, Gordon currently can be offered more money by the Bulls than any other team in the NBA.  As well, the Bulls don't have to be under the cap to sign him.  With no Bird Rights, Gordon could only sign with a team under the cap for a value that does not take them over the cap.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.

by snley on Mar 4, 2008 11:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Noc
can't win with him starting at the 3.  

by Zac23 on Mar 3, 2008 6:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree
Especially if we have another consistent (Arenas or Brand) scorer around him.

Nocioni's a solid player, he gets too much of the BaB ire, when really he's one of the few who brings it most nights.  Of course every bad game or stretch he has gets magnified because his BYC makes his contract rough, but he's a starter on most teams, and his contract will be more favorable as the years progress.

by majoyenrac on Mar 3, 2008 9:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

brings what?
he's not a high-minute player on a good team. He's uber-Bonner.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 3, 2008 10:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well
Someday we might see about that.  He was a high minute player on decent Bulls teams of the past....

I think a lot of good teams would love a quality player like Nocioni on them.

He's hardly our problem.

by majoyenrac on Mar 4, 2008 7:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Zac, most of your posts
I disagree with a lot :), but I actual do agree that the Bulls need to target Gilbert Arenas.  However, why in the world do you think we should have a guard combination of Arenas/Hughes/Gordon?!  Those are all score first guards!  Based on the history you seem to have much disdain for Kirk Hinrich, so maybe that is why you are thinking of that type of guard lineup...  I think that a guard lineup of Hinrich/Arenas and then Hughes first off the bench would be vastly better.  Hinrich doesn't need to score first to be effective on the floor.

Nonetheless, (this goes out to everyone) aren't there certain rules about trading for ETO guys the summer that they can execute the ETO?  I think the ESPN trademachine isn't allowing Agent Zero to be traded; does he have to waive the ETO to be traded?  My next question is do the Bulls have enough room to just sign Gilbert Arenas as a FA if he opts out?  If the Bulls let BG7 walk, and then sign Deng to an extension at about $9.5M starting next season, will they be able to sign Gilbert Arenas within the league rules?

My lineup would be like this: Hinrich, Arenas, Deng, Gooden, and Noah.  The first 3 players off the bench are Hughes, Nocioni, and Tyrus Thomas.

by Mattchoo on Mar 4, 2008 12:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They can't.
There is no true, young "superstar" who is available. None.

The Bulls need to keep developing Tyrus and Noah. Ultimately, a lineup featuring Noah, Tyrus, Deng, Gordon, and Hinrich is the only avenue the Bulls have to being a potential title contender. That lineup may never win a championship or even compete for one, but it is the only viable option for the Bulls. Any other course is folly.

Trading any of those five in a desperate, futile attempt to land an elusive "superstar" will condemn the franchise to another five years of floundering.

After long reflection, I am of the opinion that if Paxson breaks up the core of the team now, he will be doing so at exactly the wrong time. He's retained them thus far, he should wait to see what kind of players they will ultimately become. Don't trade them when their value is at its nadir. Hire a GOOD coach who can communicate with and develop young players (that should be the priority this offseason), then allow that coach to work with the squad for two seasons.

LSU 38 OHIO STATE 24 - LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION AND I AM THE KING OF BOURBON STREET!!

by 1958ChiTown on Mar 3, 2008 1:07 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'm with you
those guys just aren't available.

And even if Kobe was available (which has never been confirmed just how close the Lakers actually were to trading him), I don't even think he's at the 'trade everyone for that guy' level due to his age, injuries, and malcontent-ness. Not that Kobe isn't at the same level, but you'd have to build a team around him faster than these other guys.

Here's my short list, in no order
LeBron
Howard
Wade
Paul

And maybe Oden and Durant?

But people asking for the same type of package for Tracy McGrady are nuts.

Sadly the Bulls best chance is with Thomas. If Beasley (and I have no faith in the quality of competition in college basketball) is truly that special, Riley wouldn't pass on him.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 3, 2008 1:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you may be referring
to Sports2.  In any event, you can almost add me to that list--I'd just want to make sure the guy actually wants to play in the NBA.

by alec on Mar 3, 2008 1:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

apologies
sports2 would've been my second guess.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 3, 2008 1:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Eh, Durant
That dude is a no defense-playing, shot-chucking machine.

He's like Noc on crack.

by RogersPark Kris on Mar 3, 2008 1:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, no way Durant

should be on that list.  He's like a skinny Noc with slightly better handles.

I'd place Deron Williams before Durant on that above list, along with Yao (if he's healthy), Amare, and maybe Dirk.  Even Carmelo still looks very promising and hasn't yet turned 25.

At any rate - the Bulls aren't going to get any of those guys.  They need figure out which of their "core" can be disposed of, and then get guys who can be an upgrade at those same positions.  If Deng is not cutting it, maybe they can figure out a way to pry Caron Butler away from Washington.  

by Bayern Munich on Mar 3, 2008 1:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Beasley really is a stud at the college level
Being a KU fan and current OSU student, I've gotten to see plenty of him in Big XII play.  If the Bulls somehow won the lottery and got him, I'd be thrilled.  But, there are still so many potential issues moving from college to the NBA.  My personal threshold for trading away known young quantities for potential is just lower than some people's I guess.

(And K State isn't a "winning program"!)  ;)

Maybe I'll take up hockey.

by wjb1492 on Mar 3, 2008 1:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It is not easy but agree with 1958ChiTown and Matt
we must not make a move when we are in a position of weakness and very frustrated.  Deng, Hinrich and Gordon are having career worst years.  Let's see what happens when a new coaching staff is installed.  

We lucked out being able to make the Corpse trade.  Maybe someone else will be desperate and we can make a move.  Without some other desperate team trade let's see what happens under a new coahing regime.  TT is 21 years old.  I disagree with Hubie Brown's declaration last week and repeated yesterday that TT is not improved.  His jump shot is much improved as is his defense.  

We don't need to give away potentially really good players to obtain an expensive big name at the end of his career.  First let's get a top flight coaching staff in here to see if that is a big part of our solution.

by chgobr on Mar 3, 2008 1:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree...
"...ultimately, a lineup featuring Noah, Tyrus, Deng, Gordon, and Hinrich is the only avenue the Bulls have to being a potential title contender..."

This group of players will never make us a contender. What's missing is leadership, someone who will take the team on their shoulders in close game situations, someone who can deal with the added responsibility.

We need to restructure this team via a major trade this summer (or summer '09) coz this ain't gonna work.

by Vangelis on Mar 4, 2008 9:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I say
keep the pick and take Mayo.  

by Kemp on Mar 3, 2008 2:23 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

and Mayo
will keep it because he is actually good.  

He shoots 45% from the field and 41% from the three point line, plus 80% from the free throw line.  He averages a steal and a half and gets rebounds and assists.  

He has an undue stigma around him because the media wanted someone to vilify in contrast to Rose and Love; despite this, he has been proven to be a smart guy by taking control of his recruiting process and by getting a 30 on his ACT, so personally he seems like a reasonable investment.

by Kemp on Mar 3, 2008 2:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I have no issue with his general level of
intelligence, but I'm not sure I'd raise the recruiting process as evidence of it.  And you'll notice I didn't raise any of those "stigma" issues as an objection.  He still wouldn't be my first choice.

But, to each his own.

Maybe I'll take up hockey.

by wjb1492 on Mar 3, 2008 3:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Need good luck or stupid GM's
...to get a star.  I agree with the guys who identify no young 'superstars' on the market.  Unfortunately, landing a star is mostly about luck.  If you have the 2nd pick in the 2003 draft, you end up with Carmelo Anthony or Chris Bosh.  If you have it in 2006, you have Tyrus Thomas.  Great potential, but far from immediate star impact.

Some of the stars mentioned above (McGrady, Arenas) have huge holes in their resume when it comes to team success.  Additionally, their individual games are far from complete.  

The Bulls will have to either get very lucky in upcoming drafts or that GM's of star players (maybe Kerr in Phoenix with the Shaq deal blowing up in his face) look to move their stars to regain flexibility.

Absent good fortune, the Bulls may have to (gulp) maintain cap flexibility for 2010 summer to target Wade or Lebron.  It's hard to imagine a scenario where they actually end up on the market, but I guess we can all dream.

by Gene Banks on Mar 3, 2008 2:36 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I would take...
... McGrady or Arenas. Better than anything this roster will ever achieve. We are full of cry-babies and lack a leader...

by Vangelis on Mar 3, 2008 7:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If the season ended today
The Bulls would most likely land with the 9th pick again.

Last year, that got us Noah.

I wouldn't be mad at another impact player like Joakim. Although I would rather him impact the game offensively.

by Option27 on Mar 3, 2008 4:52 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Last year was an unusually deep draft...
If Noah had come out a year earlier, he would have been a #2 pick

by bullsfaninbigapple on Mar 5, 2008 8:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You never know though
The Suns got Amare with the 8th pick, I believe Dirk went #8 as well.....

Hell the Jazz got Boozer in the 2nd round, and Gilbert and Manu were 2nd rounders too.

9th ain't a bad spot to be in....of course I'd rather be 30th and winning it all, but the way we're going I'd rather be in the lottery with a high draft pick and building the future with a new coach.

by majoyenrac on Mar 5, 2008 12:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It makes it intriguing to a new coach.
That's for sure. Paxson's selling point:"You have a front-line of guys that will be 23, 21 and 23 on Opening Day next year that were all selected in the Top 9 of the draft. You have another draft pick in the Top 10 this year. Care to try it out?"
Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Mar 6, 2008 11:03 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We also have
A lot of guys who are very talented who for some reason collectively are playing like shit.

Hinrich--much better in the past 4 yrs than he is currently.

Gordon--ok maybe he's about the same as he is, but I'm sure on a numbers perspective if the guys around him were playing better, Ben's numbers would be better.  I don't think he's playing awful, he just is a hot and cold kind of player.

Luol Deng--sure injuries have slowed him a bit this year, but he still is a solid player and is like Captain Kirk having what seems to be a career bad year.  I wonder if new offense and a fresh start with all new coaching staff could help Deng and Kirk.

Larry Hughes--this guy is proving that he can at least be the old Washington Larry, which is a borderline star in this league.  Sure he makes a bit of money (a bit too high) but he's not that overpaid, and he fits our team well (given that we still lack a true superstar or inside performer, I'm fine with Larry driving the lane).

Tyrus Thomas---if we could crack the code with this guy, tha alone could make us an Eastern elite team (we have too much depth to be as bad as we are).

Thabo Sefalosha--this guy's got mad skills too and is improving on offense.

Joakim Noah--Come on, he's a great energy player with a lot of untapped skills. He also seems to have a very high BBALL IQ, something very exciting for a rookie at this level.  He also seems to publicly have leadership qualities, another huge plus.

Andres Nocioni. I know Matt and a few others hate him, but he's a guy who can do a little bit of everything. He's no star, sure but he can add a level/stir up the pot and give our team a different look depending on if he's Andres the 3pt shooter or Andres the slasher.  He has to avoid being Andres the chucker, but I think a lot of that has to do with him being Andres the competitor and seeing Captain "Ho-hum", and Luol--why didn't I sign, and our resident hot and cold chucker Ben Gordon this year....Andres is the biggest competitor on the team (although who knows what Joakim could become).

Drew Gooden, a very servicable role playing big man.  A little better than just a role player, but not a star either.  He's another good to have on your team guy, and was a nice pickup for the Bulls, even though it cost us Joe Smith (who is having his best year ever, or maybe since he was in his first and second year in the league).

And even Aaron Gray could be servicable.

There's too much talent on this team.  Sure we're missing the bonafied superstar, but we have more depth than most teams in this league, and if it weren't for 5 of our big guys being huge disappointments (Hinrich all year, Gordon's slow start, Deng's slow start, injuries, and slow recovery, and the marginal improvement of Tyrus over his solid rookie year, and of course the corpse) maybe we wouldn't be where we are today.

I have to think fresh blood/fresh coaching staff, not Skiles' old cronies who these guys turned off back on Dec 1 anyway could get our main guys back to at least their former selves.

If we got everyone back to their former 3-4 yrs selves, we just need to crack the Tyrus code to be very good next year.....add another rookie hopefully a top 6-10 pick at worst, and tehre you go.  I'd give a go with this team, I can see why Larry Brown would like what he sees....I just don't understand why this team sucks.

by majoyenrac on Mar 6, 2008 12:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's almost like
Our guys learned pretty early on how to play and compete like veterans, and then now realized this year that they are still young and have learned how to play like the youngest team in the league.....it's very strange.

by majoyenrac on Mar 6, 2008 12:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you're way off on Hughes
He shoots way too much to be given heavy minutes. He should take over Pargo's old role, for those all-to-often times when nobody wants to shoot.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 6, 2008 12:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah
But he's been decent at hitting his shots for us (43% shooting almost 35% from 3 pt land not fabulous but not bad at all), and unlike Pargo can defend and handle the ball well.

I did like Pargo though....

I know Hughes has his trigger happy flaws, but I still think if we get him back to his old Washington ways he's far better than just a Pargo guy to come in and shoot away at will to give us a spark.....

But to each their own I guess.

by majoyenrac on Mar 6, 2008 12:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They should limit Hughes to 20 mpg
 and mask it as "developing the youngsters". He'll probably look great and some team will want him.
Let us prepare for glory! --Michael Redd

by tyger1147 on Mar 6, 2008 3:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

don't think that'll work with the guards
since we only are developing thabo and he's been out.

by Jaina on Mar 6, 2008 3:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I say they just ride it out
and wait until after next year when players like Bosh, Anthony, Wade and even LeBron might be available after potential opt-outs. Arenas is a great player but how many serious injuries has he had now?

by Ugh It Live! on Mar 3, 2008 5:28 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Well...
Anthony isn't available, he signed a 5 year deal and Bosh isn't going anywhere. I also have a feeling LeBron and Wade will have teams by then, especially Wade.

by Kemp on Mar 3, 2008 9:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

TT isn't good
I'm sorry for all you TT "obsessers" out there, but Tyrus isn't a good basketball player. I hope that he develops, I push for him every time he touches the court. He simply, besides for unbelievable athletic talent, doesn't have the skills or the talent to be a star. Trade him if you can, if the stock is there.

by BarryLird on Mar 4, 2008 7:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Despite getting yanked in and out of the rotation
all year, he has a 15.20 PER (about league average) at age 21.  He has shown numerous flashes of his great athleticism, good energy on the court, and a development of actual basketball skills like a midrange shot, man D, and passing.  I know it's fun to be the devil's advocate, but bring something to the conversation other than unbased opinions.  

by snley on Mar 4, 2008 8:22 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you stated it correctly
"about league average" ... average!

by exult463 on Mar 4, 2008 10:39 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

At age 21! League average at age 21!
In case you didn't catch that, league average at 21!  Being league average at that age is pretty impressive.  And that number has been on the upslope lately as he's finally been given a chance to play after a gaffe during a game.  Plus, PER mostly accounts for offensive contributions, which means there's contributions on the defensive side from Thomas that go unaccounted for.  I'm not familiar enough yet with other metrics to point to those, but, again, league average at age 21 in his second season for a guy drafted as an athletic project is impressive enough to not write off his career like some people want to do.    

by snley on Mar 4, 2008 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And
League avg despite being yanked in and out of the lineup....

Plus he's a natural defender, which always has lower PER stats than an offensive player....

Ben Wallace's highest PER when he was fabulous and one of the top 2-3 Centers in the league probably maxed out around 15-16 (I don't know the exact, but I know even Hollinger has stated that that is a flaw in his calculations)....

It's hard to get consistently solid contributions when you play 25-30 minutes one game and 3-9 minutes the next, that would even cause a negative impact on guys like Kobe....It also can cause guys like Jerome James to at one point (a week or two ago) have a PER of 46.8...

by majoyenrac on Mar 4, 2008 12:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I tried to look stuff up
But all I got was the wikipedia stuff.....and a bunch of (why does wallace stink crap).

I remember when Hollinger first came to ESPN he acknowledged that his PER doesn't accurately take the impact of defense (or doesn't always emphasize it best).

by majoyenrac on Mar 4, 2008 12:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Basketball-reference.com is everyone's friend.
PER incorporates blocks and steals (and fouls I believe). Which everyone acknowledges isn't enough.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Mar 4, 2008 12:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's my best friend now
I have to apologize to folks I've held as my best friend for a while, but basketball-reference.com is my newest BFF.

Why?  Cuz I can see it whenever I want to.....

by majoyenrac on Mar 4, 2008 2:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Murray
"I've decided to invest our money into real estate... in outer space!"

by YaoPau on Mar 4, 2008 10:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

NBA Lottery fun is back
ESPN finally puts up the new lottery game

I've tried this thing 20 times already. 19 times has the Bulls selecting Blake Griffin from Oklahoma at pick 9.

The one time I got something different than pick 9 was pick 2. At the second pick, it had the Bulls taking Derrick Rose.

I'm sure most of everyone's games will have similar results.  

Also worth adding. I remember playing this game nearly 1,000 times last year and 90% of the time it had the Bulls selecting Spencer Hawes at the 9th pick.  

Well, he was available for the Bulls to take at pick number 9 and they passed. So like many other mock drafts, this don't mean nothing but some good ol' fun.

by Option27 on Mar 4, 2008 1:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Mock drafts
Mock drafts are fun, but I am in football draft mode now though.  One player that I have seen at #3 from draftexpress and all the way down to #11 from NBADRAFT.NET is OJ MAYO that is a big range for a player in a NBA draft.  It will be interesting where he goes.

by Jesse07 on Mar 4, 2008 2:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Bulls and Young Talent
Blogabull_s_small
Sign up for BlogABull game previews

Recent FanPosts

Small
Kudos Bulls. You've surprised early.
Bolo_picture_small
What about Iverson?
Sports
I'm Happy to Have a Break From Tyrus. He's gone anyways.
Small
Game Preview # 6: Bulls vs Charlotte Bobcats
Small
Why isn't there more talk of LeBron...
Small
Contract/Cap Question for BAB
Jayhawk_small
Game Preview # 5: Bulls at Cleveland Cavaliers
Small
We've Got To Rescue D. Wade
Blogabull_s_small
Chad Ford Rounds up extensions and team options for recent draftees

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger