Development arrested
Vinny Del Negro said all the right things in his opening press conference about developing the young players on the Bulls, namely Thomas, Noah, and Sefolosha. He probably said Aaron Gray too, so at least he followed up on that effort:
Without a doubt, Gray has been the most consistent of the Bulls' young, big men this season. He grabbed 9 rebounds in 21 minutes against the Wizards but did not score.
(real consistent, sheesh)
Well, as I've whined before in this space, that experiment lasted about a half-dozen games, and ever since Vinny's been relying on the old and the gimmicky.
And it's not completely unforgivable: both Thomas and Noah have had the worst season of their careers thus far. It's incorrect (and annoying) to say that they've always been bad and this is just yet another coach speaking the truth. They've been productive before, they haven't been so this season. (Thabo actually has been the opposite, so it's not like this is a 'consistent' decision process)
But, so what? Vinny benches Noah completely, Thomas gets five minutes after having a decent stretch of games, and the result was indeed a win on Saturday night. But it was more like managing not to blow a lead to one of the worst teams in the league (and certainly one of the worst defensive units...that's why the 'ball movement' was so good, Stacy King) that was coming off a game the night before and were on the road. Yay?
Noc redeemed himself a bit in that same game, but that was after a stretch of abomination that would've gotten most players benched, especially if they happened to be younger than 29. And the less said about Gray the better. Though not really a fault of his own, It's a symptom if he's in there so much he matters.
But this isn't meant to read like yet another dig on Vinny. He is apparently so tired of Noah's lack of preparation that he dropped his usual milquetoast explanations to point it out.
And if it's truly this bad, it's not Vinny, but yet another organizational failure.
At least in the summer when he hired Vinny, it seemed like Paxson had a plan to commit to these players. But like seemingly always, there's no plan. The coach has obliterated any idea of a reliable frontcourt sub pattern to instead give in to 'matchups'. Thomas, Noah, and Sefolosha are not only not being developed, they're regressing.
The trade season will be very interesting. Drew Gooden's putting up solid numbers on an expiring deal. Larry Hughes was likely told in that famous meeting he'll be moved if he keeps quiet and performs as a sixth man. And since he's hitting 47% of his threes (after a career at 30%. That's um, a fluke) maybe it'll work. Perhaps Paxson feels that Noc couldn't be stapled to the bench either for him to retain any trade value, even knowing that it'd mean between Noc and Hughes there's very little time for Thabo to play at all.
But, again: that'd imply a plan on Paxson's part, a bit of a micromanaging one at that. And reportedly Paxson is notoriously hands-off when it comes to coaching.
So maybe it is what it is. Vinny likes Noc's heart, Hughes' versatility. Think's Gooden has to play 40 minutes for the team to be successful, and that Aaron Gray really is good at knowing the defensive schemes, even though he can't quite move his feet enough to execute them...and thinks he can't win with their younger counterparts. Maybe Noah's a lost cause, but Thomas and Sefolosha are just victims of 'matchups'. We'll be seeing more gimmicks, more small-ball. It's the only way to compete.
So then instead of the likeliest tradees, instead Thomas, Noah and Sefolosha will be the ones dealt. Even if they succeed elsewhere, we'll be told that it just wasn't going to happen here. Paxson will have said now these are the 'character' guys we want, forget those others that were drafted based on their 'character' in the first place.
At that introductory press conference, Vinny and Pax didn't know they'd have Derrick Rose. But with a goal of building around him, why wasn't there more of a comittment to seeing if the young talent fit or not? And if they're not only ill-fitting but busting themselves off the team, why is the same guy who picked them now in charge of their replacements? Paxson should've drafted better, he should've had more of a hand in getting them better, and he should be fired before he has the chance to 'build' around Derrick Rose. But the man has a lifetime contract after participating in some tearful trust falls with Reinsdorf, so maybe he doesn't see the urgency with his recent draftees that I do. If you can't tell, I'm getting pretty sick of seeing this happen in yet another season.
1 recs |
273 comments
|
Comments
I get u
but dont agree wit u. You play horid = hit the bench…either the weight bench or next to the water boy. Im backing The Hair on this one
"If there’s any haters in here right now that don’t have nobody to hate on, feel free to hate on me." - A.P.N.S.
by Belize on Dec 7, 2008 11:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
your philosophy doesn't hold up
Noc was horrid, still gets minutes. Thabo had a great game a couple weeks ago, rarely sees the floor. Thomas has had several good games in a row, gets 5 minutes.
The only thing I give him a break on is Noah. If he’s out of shape and also not in the right spots, he shouldn’t play as much. Maybe not completely benched, but still.
Shoulda just hired Larry Brown, he’d have this same gimmicky shit but he’d have them playing defense at least.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 7, 2008 11:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Were more short handed on the 4 and 5
Coach is just tryin to light a fire…dunno if it will work, but its a tactic
"If there’s any haters in here right now that don’t have nobody to hate on, feel free to hate on me." - A.P.N.S.
by Belize on Dec 7, 2008 11:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I ask you this
1) Would Larry Brown (Or anyone else beside D’Antoni) be playing Rose this many minutes?
2) What GM out there available would be perfectly suited for Pax’s job. You have to give him time to at least see if he can build around a star for once.
by Option27 on Dec 7, 2008 11:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
no I don't
though to your first point I didn’t say Vinny’s doing an overall bad job. Letting Rose do what he wants is a definite plus.
Larry would definitely play Rose a lot, albeit at shooting guard :)
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 7, 2008 11:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The thing with Pax is that he;s tried hard to get a star all these years
Through trades (I believe it) and taking risks like Tyrus. Also thought Gordon and Deng could turn out all stars as well. He didn’t quite luck out.
I think a lot of his drafts involved him kinda hoping they would turn out to be a stars in some regard.
Now he finally has one, I think it would be fair to see if he can truly build around Derrick.
Like we’ve mentioned before, this year is considered to be an audition to see who fits well and who doesn’t. Wait till after the moves he’s made to judge his entire GM career
by Option27 on Dec 7, 2008 11:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he likely deserves a second chance
but I don’t have to feel confident about it. You cannot whiff on drafts like this.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 7, 2008 11:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Like I mentioned before
He hasn’t been able to really fill in the necessary spots on the team to adapt to Rose’s style. He finally can, so we should see what he does with the team after he’s done dealing these next two years.
I know the signing doesn’t seem too popular any more but to be able to have stolen Ben Wallace away from the Pistons that year (Also a money issue . . . I know) was kinda huge.
It showed he could sign a big fish. Wallace was truly thought as the missing piece too cause the Bulls were convinced they had some future stars on the team.
He has some bargaining chips now and some money to play with in the next couple of years.
Let him build around his newly found star
by Option27 on Dec 7, 2008 11:30 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Also worth noting
GM’s who were on the hot seat who turned things around real quick . . .
Ainge and Kupchak
by Option27 on Dec 7, 2008 11:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and coincidently
both former players of the teams they were GM’ing
by CJOliveira on Dec 8, 2008 7:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ainge turned it around...
But McHale should have won assistant GM of the year for that one.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 10:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
true
though in retrospect Ainge was indeed making solid picks in the late stages. Gomes, Perkins, Powe, Davis, West…it allowed him to at least give a semblance of a trade package, with some cheap talent left over.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 10:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh...
I still think the friendship between Ainge and McHale had more to do with the talent involved. Al Jefferson puts up nice stats, but still plays mostly in garbage time as other teams destroy the Wolves…
I think our offer of Tyson-Deng-Gordon and I can’t remember maybe the pick that became Thabo Sefalosha—I think Matt you gave us details on that rumoured trade) was far better than what the Wolves got….
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 10:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Matt's saying that Ainge still made solid draft picks
Rajon Rondo and Leon Powe look to be steals, and Al Jefferson netted him Garnett.
And Ainge did what Paxson hasn’t done yet….hit the panic button. He traded the #5 pick and Wally World for Ray Allen. Would Pax ever trade a high lottery pick and an expiring contract for an older star that might get them over the hump?
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 10:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
forgot (somehow) about Rondo
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 12:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So where do these rank on your Ainge is great list
1)Signed Mark Blount to a 6yr/41mm dollar contract
2)Drafted Gerald Green
3)Traded the rights to the #7 draft pick in exchange for Sebastian Telfair. That pick later ended up becoming Brandon Roy.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 12:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
to be a lame interneter
Ainge > Paxson
Green was picked 18th overall.
The other two were indeed bad. Paxson’s done more bad, and little great.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He also doesn't have another GM
willingly giving away players.
He caught the perfect storm of McHale throwing up the towel and Sam Presti trying to prove he was smarter than everyone in the room by dumping Ray’s contract for nothing (Jeff Green if you want to count that as something). You can credit him, and should, but those normally don’t occur.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 12:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
then Paxson gets no credit for bilking Isiah Thomas twice.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 12:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Think about it this way
Trading chips . . .
Joah and Thomas or Curry?
I think Joakim and Tyrus have a bit more value than Eddy does so credit him at least for that
by Option27 on Dec 8, 2008 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Telfair trade was brilliant
Ainge traded the #7 pick and Theo Ratliff for Telfair and Raef LaFrentz.
The prime motivation for this deal was trading Ratliff (under contract for two years) for LaFrentz (under contract for 3 years). Coupled with the fact Ratliff was hurt and insurance paid off some of his contract, this had two effects.
1. It saved the Celtics several million dollars
2. It gave them the big expiring contract they needed the next summer to get Garnett.
Without getting that done, there would have been no Garnett. Which gets to a pretty important difference between Ainge and Pax. Like Pax, Ainge made some questionable moves for financial relief. Unlike Pax, Ainge capitalized on doing it.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on Dec 8, 2008 1:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LaFrentz's contract is being paid off by insurance right now
Are you insane? The deal was brilliant. You mean to tell me Ainge traded for Sebastian Telfair and passed on Brandon Roy so he could save a few million dollars an then foresaw next year Telfair could be traded in a Garnett deal. I think you and Joakim have been hanging out together a bit too much.
Wouldn’t Brandon Roy and LaFrentz have been more attractive pieces than Ratliff and Telfair?
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 1:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No, LaFrentz had 2 years and $22M left
Ratliff was an expiring contract. Part of what the TWolves wanted was a big expiring contract.
Obviously Ainge couldn’t forsee trading for Garnett specifically. But he could forsee that the downside of the deal was saving about $15M dollars.
The upside was having the expiring contract to turn around and use to get a major upgrade (which he actually used, unlike Paxson).
$15M is a hell of a deal for a #7 pick. By comparison, the Bulls bought the pick that netted Deng for only $3M. As is so often in the case in the NBA, the finances were quite a bit more important than who was picked.
But I do note that you’re very quick to backtrack on your “second guessing draft picks is pointless” stance when it suits you.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on Dec 8, 2008 1:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To put it a completely different way
Ainge had $15M+ reasons to pass on Roy to take Telfair.
Paxson was just a fucking idiot for passing on Roy to take Thomas.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on Dec 8, 2008 1:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah he should have traded the #2 pick
to get rid of a contract. That’s how you prefer to run your team.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 2:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Heh, might as well if the alternative is Tyrus and Khyrapa
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on Dec 8, 2008 2:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's hope you're never made GM of the Bulls.
Saving on one year of a contract is worth the #7 pick?
So your contention is Roy and Lafrentz is not as good as Telfair and Ratliff? I’m pretty sure the Wolves would have welcomed LaFrentz’s one extra insured year to substitute Brandon Roy for Sebastian Telfair. Especially when they weren’t under the cap last year anyways.
I didn’t backtrack, I tried to play by your rules to show how every GM makes mistakes. I’m sorry if you can’t be happy either way.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
GM's do it all the time
As I mentioned, the Bulls got Luol Deng that way, because Phoenix simply didn’t want to pay the #7 pick’s salary. Because they wanted to use that money and that cap space on Steve Nash.
Regarding what Minnesota wanted, the point you’re trying to make is a non-sequitor, but obviously they didn’t think too terribly highly of Brandon Roy since they had him and traded him away.
Regarding your backtracking, I don’t see how you were “playing by my rules” when your initial response was to someone else. That doesn’t make much sense. But the point is simply that there was a really big and important component of that trade that you left out. When you add the complete set of facts to the mix, it paints a very different picture.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on Dec 8, 2008 2:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
GMs do it all the time?
I can recall the Deng incident. The trade, whether you believe it or not, was to acquire Telfair. Saving a year’s contract was a bonus. Other than that, when is this all the time occuring that top 10 picks are being bought? I remember Ray Allen being traded for the #5 pick. I remember #9 pick for Jason Richardson. I remeber the #3 pick for Shareef Abdur-Rahim.
Sure they didn’t like Roy as much at the draft. But after Roy won rookie of the yearI bet they would have preferred him to Telfair in the deal. Don’t forget, the deal was made after Roy had already played one season.’
The point I’ve been making, as noted above, is that you can pick apart any GM after the fact for draft mistakes. They all technically do it at time. The $ saved was not a big component
Here is the ESPN report of the trade. It notes the key was the Celtics felt Telfair was a better fit at PG than Randy Foye, Marcus Williams, or Rajon Rondo. Doesn’t mention the money coming back.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2006/news/story?id=2503245
And here’s a recap from the Boston Herald. Again little mention of saving money on the deal. Although the Celtics did send cash to Portland in the deal.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 3:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
imho
your a hater. plain and simple. paxsons been pretty solid overall. take a step back and look at the big picture.
by ridindirty on Dec 11, 2008 11:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yikes
Both GMs were starting with first team caliber All-NBA players in Kobe and Pierce. I think we have that now in Rose. I doubt we could see the same luck as Ainge with KG and Allen and Kupchak with Gasol.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 11:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wallace left for the most money
How Tyrus/Noah/Sefolosha peform is independent of Rose. This isn’t a case of them not fitting, they’re not even playing. Maybe your argument can apply Deng, but I’m talking about 3 guys busting on him, not just being bad fits.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 12:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
?
The #2 pick I will give you (as in, i liked aldridge that year and were hoping they would take prior to the draft… but its not like everyone in the league wasnt high on tyrus, but paxson should be picking solid player with the #2 pick ), but you get no guarantees out of a #9 or a #13 pick. I dont care what rhetoric you want to lay on me, this isnt the 80’s. The draft is a crap shoot.
by ridindirty on Dec 11, 2008 11:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so changing GMs has little consequence
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 12, 2008 11:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
up to a point, correct....
while a different gm may have made different decisions, he would have made bad decisions along with the good, as has paxson. I would argue that the 9th & 13th picks do not have a high probability of being all star plays, more like your average starter at his position. I do not think that you can judge either noah or sefolosha at this point in their careers.
by ridindirty on Dec 12, 2008 11:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the notion that he "stole" Wallace fails on its face
Joe Dumars is a superior GM to Paxson and likely knew that Wallace was washed up or more a product of his teammates than people realized. He low-balled (according to Wallace’s market value at the time) Big Ben and watched him walk out the door with no qualms about it. He’s similarly dealt Chauncey away for cap space in a move that has killed the Pistons in the short term, but will likely benefit them long term because Chauncey is set to drop off very soon. Basically, Joe D isn’t afraid to let his guys go when their value is high, which has been a big failing of Pax’s.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 12:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course he knew Wallace was done because Flip couldn't play him in crunch time.
Remember the Cleveland series when Wallace was sulking on the bench in the 4th quarter? If Paxson was a good GM he would have done his homework on Wallace. Don’t tell me it was all JR’s idea. Paxson is the GM.
I would have to say though Paxson would have drafted Carmelo and maybe thats the one thing he can say he has the edge over Dumars. Dumars is a better over all GM but Paxson maybe better at drafting talent.
I feel like the Bulls have been rebuilding for like 10 years......... oh wait they have!
by ImmanuelKant on Dec 8, 2008 1:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oh cmon
Joe D always finds quality players ant lower 1st round stages.
Pax always had lottery picks
by CJOliveira on Dec 8, 2008 7:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dumars can't draft talent?
Jason Maxiell, Rodney Stuckey, and Tayshaun Prince are great picks considering where they were picked. Amir Johnson looks like a decent player after being given the starting spot.
Dumars is also in control of his team’s roster. He doesn’t answer to some owner who has personal preferences for certain types of people.
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 10:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Darko...
In a year when there were so many other locks behind him. Thank God the Pistons didn’t get any of them on rookie contracts, they might actually be the dynasty they claim they are.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 10:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I often think Joe D is a bit overrated…..
He lucked out in taking advantage of Atlanta for Rasheed Wallace…
Those other guys (sans Stuckey) are doing well because of the huge talent around him and the pressure…I mean Maxiell’s a decent player, but he could be exposed as the undersized PF he is if he was playing next to Aaron Gray…
And Stuckey’s had talent of Rip/Prince/Billups and now A.I. to ease into….
Dumars let Okur walk for nothing, nabbed Darko in the draft of the century, and while he’s had GREAT TEAMS they have only won it all once and made it to the finals twice.
That’s better than we’ve done, true, but he’s lucked out with some moves he made 5-6 years ago that greatly helped him stay tenured. Derrick Rose might be the guy for the Bulls to do the same soon.
And it looks like the recent A.I. trade was a blunder….I know they’ll have cap room and blah blah blah, but I just don’t see a small market Cavs superstar going to a colder and small market Pistons team when he’s got likely Miami, New York, etc to play with….
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
All those players sans Tayshaun
Are ok, but they’re borderline starters at best (Stuckey obviously has potential for more).
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 12:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If you can draft borderline starters picking after the lottery
Isn’t that a good thing? Paxson has had a lottery pick in 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2008, obviously he has a higher chance of getting better players.
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes but,
Who would you rather have…
Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, Rose, Noah, TT
or
Darko, Amir Johnson, Maxiell, Stuckey, Tayshaun
The Bulls list is superior. I think Dumars gets the credit of lowered expectations on his picks.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 1:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
I’d take Lebron, Andre Miller, Trajan Langdon, Chris Mihm, Sagana Diop, and Luke Jackson over either of them. You think we should hire Jim Paxson?
Oh wait… we already have.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on Dec 8, 2008 1:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And Dujuan Wagner?
(whatever that dude’s name was)
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 2:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see the relevance here?
I was making a point that Dumars picks while solid, didn’t light the world on fire. Why does he get so much drafting credit?
And you bring up the Cavs for no good reason? I guess it’s to point out Rose, but Rose wasn’t an easy choice. And taking Rose off that list, I’d still take the Bulls players of the Pistons players drafted.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 2:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he gets great credit for drafting in the first place
I’ll say this for Dumars: he wants Rodney Stuckey to play, and trades Chauncey Billups. Paxson can’t even deal Kirk Hinrich to free up room for Rose.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 2:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah and that move has worked out great
Although Pax earned rep is one slow movement, sometimes no movement is the right decision. In the short term at least, this move has really hurt Detroit.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 3:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dumars and draft credit
It’s the late 1st rounders and the the 2nd round picks that bring him the most credit. His lottery picks make him look like GM Michael Jordan.
He drafts Rodney White #7. Then he drafts Mehmet Okur #38. He also drafted Brian Cardinal, but luckily didn’t pay him what Jerry West paid him.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 3:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He should have started w/ Hinrich this summer.
That’s the first strike against your plan.
A) This team should have been rebuilding around Rose as soon as they drafted them.
B) After 5 years, they should have known Hinrich is not a permanent SG.
C) They don’t feel confident enough w/ Gordon to have paid him “like a starter”.
D) Hinrich gets paid too much to be a backup PG/SG, especially when they’ll have to spend to get a “real” SG.
E) Hinrich’s contract is good for a starting PG, and it’s pretty obvious they could have gotten something good for him, if not equal Paxson value.
That presented the first opportunity at rebuilding around Rose and Paxson already failed. It created a clusterfuck situation at guard that you should not put on a rookie head coach.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Dec 8, 2008 8:43 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed...
But to say that you can’t put the guard situation on a rookie coach you should also be willing to concede that you can’t put the frontcourt situation on him either. VDN is screwed daily with this roster. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. I don’t think VDN realized/cared how rabid the fans were about seeing TT play more, in his world 20-25 minutes a game is probably plenty of minutes.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 10:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A small segment of fans...
Dont confuse us here blogabull with the entire bulls fan population. We are a small sample of the bulls fanbase. I’d like to think we are a more savvy segment of the fanbase though…..
by Ayeljay54 on Dec 8, 2008 10:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
dont confuse us posters here on blogabull.*
by Ayeljay54 on Dec 8, 2008 10:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I actually think 20-25 minutes is enough too.
But that’s a Pandoras box that will no doubt lead to me typing here all day and missing my afternoon class.
Last week of school, I should at least TRY and look prepared.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 10:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was always a disciplined basketball player....
just not talented enough…so I have a hard time understanding why a basketball player cannot realize his own strengths and weaknesses and try to stick to those. Tyrus has to realize that when he’s around the basket….good things happen to him. I think he’s stuck on proving that he’s developing perimeter skills…when noone really cares. We need rebounding, putbacks, and inside finishing.
by Ayeljay54 on Dec 8, 2008 10:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Preach it...
With a hard driving PG like Rose, a 2nd chance big man man can literally feast on opportunties around the rim. TT does to a certain degree, but not like Chandler did last year with Paul. Of course having a decent big man in David West next to him, and being 7 foot 1 (or 2) probably helps as well. TT can be a beast on this team, but I guess we’ll have to wait and see if it ever happens.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 10:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's because you weren't talented that you had good work ethics.
The amount of people in the world that are elite in anything (athleticism, musically, artistically, beauty, acting, etc.) AND work hard is such a small group of people that they are routinely given multiple millions of dollars. People generally get by with what they can. If you are gifted, you use it. If you are not, you have to work harder to keep up, so you gain a strong work ethic. There are only a few Jordan, Kobe, Rose types out there in every generation. 1 in 100 million.
by Unrealcity on Dec 8, 2008 1:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
rose is bad ass...but....
seriously……?…………. your putting him in the same sentence as jordan and kobe……wow….man crush……i sense man crush!!!!
by masputo on Dec 9, 2008 3:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
I think anybody who’s watched Derrick knows he’s already the real deal, and thus he’d be playing plenty of minutes as a top 1-3 PG in the East…
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 8:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I also
Don’t think Derrick would be playing this many minutes though early if we still had Kirk off the bench, but Derrick would definately be playing at minimum low 30’s….instead of the 38.
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 8:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rose is playing
too much because Kirk is out and we have no real backup at point.
by Cannoli on Dec 8, 2008 10:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
SEE
I don’t necessarily think he’s playing too much. He’s there and learning on the fly and now that we have Hunter his per game minutes have been reduced (he was in the 40’s—playing maybe 43 MPG for several games post Kirk, now he’s in the 38’s since Hunter game—essentially 8 games ago (he played 9, but the first was just a 30 second stint to get his feet wet).
Rose is playing about 35 MPG since we had Hunter, which given his upside, and his already stellar play is worthwhile….
I mean he could get injured, but he could just as easily get injured in 30 MPG too. He also might improve his conditioning and learning the NBA ropes as eventually he should be a upper 30 MPG player who might also have to be ready to do a Lebron at times and play the full 48 if the game is important enough and he’s playing well…..that’s not this season, but he needs to prepare for that in the future.
I think he’s playing solid enough minutes. I think if we had Kirk, he’d be playing 30 MPG which wouldn’t be enough long term….though less a problem this year.
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 10:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Somebody has fucked up here
Either VDN has fucked up by not playing the very players he was hired to develop, or Pax fucked up by taking stupid and lazy players with consecutive lottery picks. It’s one or the other. I can understand how a coach can be so frustrated with Noah that he’d want to bench him, but the only alternative is Aaron Gray.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
by Big D on Dec 7, 2008 11:15 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
how about option three
where the young players aren’t living up to their obligation to the team to understand their roles, gameplan, floor spacing, preparedness, etc….? and how about someone like noah actually lifting a weight so that 7’ frame can be more of a lowpost rock instead of a lowpost sapling? you can blame paxson all you want for trades ‘not made’, or for not ‘buildling a team around rose’, but he’s assembled a team that should be better than it is right now. at some point, you have to look at the players and their progress, or lack of progress, and wonder where the breakdown is. and if it’s not the coaching staff, then it’s the players themselves.
by leeac on Dec 8, 2008 12:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Who drafted the players?
If Noah is so lazy that he can’t even list a weight in the offseason, that’s on Paxson. He should have done his homework on the guy before he drafted him.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
by Big D on Dec 8, 2008 7:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
From here, it's like Boylan 2.0
I don’t follow the Bulls as much as I do some other NBA teams, but it seems to me the only real change from last year to this year is the name of the head coach. Tyrus Thomas and Joakim Noah can’t get any burn, Larry Hughes is playing small forward, Drew Gooden is playing center… it’s silly.
by Ben Q Rock on Dec 7, 2008 11:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
we don't say that name around here
I don’t think it’s as bad as then. Back then the Bulls were out of the playoffs race, and Paxson knew he’d have a new coach in the offseason. At least Vinny can say this is under the pretense of trying to win games.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 7, 2008 11:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
It seems far better, our team is playing hard….something that didn’t happen at all post Skiles—except for the first post Ben Wallace game where our team gave max effort on O and no effort on D—and the same with a late season Bucks game (and barely happened with Skiles).
Del Negro seems to be motivating the club to play more as a unit, we just have major major holes in the frontcourt that are more exposed than ever after it seems Noah’s conditioning took a nosedive this offseason.
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 8:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the difference is
Tyrus and Joakim would be playing if they played well.
Last year they were playing well, just not playing.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 12:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Totally do not agree with the small lineup paraded against Wiz.
Im a die hard Noce fan and I missed the game but reading up Noce playing at center made me gnash my teeth.
Talk about putting guys in a position to fail. Andray Blatche promptly took advantage of that match up and God knows what Okur, Shaq, Oden, Sheed Wallace and other actual NBA centers would have done to Noce had they been in there.
It may have worked this time but will VDN fool himself into believing it will work the next time?
by PatBull on Dec 7, 2008 11:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
as we've seen before, yes.
after the loss in Orlando Vinny said he liked it, and then we saw more of it.
They’re playing the Knicks next, which is definitely a team that could fit as a ‘matchup’ needing to go small.
What I never get is why Thomas and Thabo aren’t consider great options if one insists on that route. Usually go small means ‘go noc’.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 7, 2008 11:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They can't play Gray against the Knicks, can they?
My God, D’Antoni will run him off the court. Then again, Noah might pass out running up and down the court against that team.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
by Big D on Dec 7, 2008 11:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
At least go with TT or Sefo.
Im pretty sure a DRose, Gordon, Deng, TT and Gooden lineup can take the Knicks, without exposing Gray, Noah or Noce to Al Harrington.
by PatBull on Dec 8, 2008 12:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know about that,
Noah may have thisgame circled on his calendar. He very well may come to play. On the other hand, VDN might have that game circled also, but to explicitly keep his min low to punish. But its reasonable to think that Noah will have his regularly active and prepared 12/12 against his alum buddy D. Lee…
You miss 100% of the shots you never take...
-something i heard, probably basketball related
by The Mattador on Dec 8, 2008 5:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
D'antoni
also might have circled this one
by CJOliveira on Dec 8, 2008 7:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Noah just can't play right now.
He deserves the benching with his effort this season…he looks nothing like the player that closed out last season as the starting center…Noah has actually regressed.
If Del Negro is going small, I would at least like to see Tyrus at center instead of Deng…we would at least have a shotblocker on the court…
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 8, 2008 10:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly I'm concerned...
What if we get blown out and Duhon has better numbers than Rose?
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 10:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Duhon can put up better numbers in every head to head matchup
If the Bulls win I could care less. The real shame would be the 6’9 tandem of Al Harrington and David Lee killing our frontcourt.
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 11:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
David Lee is everything I wish TT could be...
I fully expect him to destroy our frontcourt.
Harrington is fine too. A big man who can extend his man to the three point line… We dream of such players in Chicago.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 11:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden shoot a 3 last week
We can matchup!
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 11:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, wow...
That 3 really was the most ill advised shot of the season yet… I hope he puts it in the repetoire for good.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
God, I hope you're joking.
If you’re not, that’s sad.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Dec 8, 2008 11:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No Tyger...
I really think we made a mistake letting Duhon go. He’s miles better than Rose is right now, and might be the guy we need to make a legit run at a title THIS YEAR. You think we can offer a trade straight up to get him back?
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 11:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No way
There is no way D’Antoni or Walsh take Rose instead of Duhon.
It’s a shame we let Malik Allen and Duhon go because maybe we could have traded both of them for the unhappy Amare Stoudemire.
I mean Duhon can play a quicker or slower temp game and is a better defender than Nash (that might work better with Shaq :) )…
And as Stacey King keeps saying every time Bulls v Bucks, Malik can hit that 20 foot jump shot….I just think it’s funny Malik gets no time last year on the Nets, and now he’s starting again for Skiles…..makes you wonder why we’ve thought so highly of our actually somewhat talented roster before we got a mega talent like Derrick Rose…
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 11:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's not be crazy now...
We really don’t want Stoudemire anyway, that would mean less minutes for Gooden and Gray.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 11:56 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
* Or TT and Noah...
Which would make Matt’s head explode.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 11:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought you might be worried about it being some message.
Or some insult to the Bulls’ collective ego. Or something ridiculous.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Dec 8, 2008 12:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you as much of a jerk in real life too?
Troll.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 12:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You know what...
Fuck you Tyger. You always come here and try to drum up hypothetical arguments where there are none, then make retarded and rude ass quips when I try to make joke with you. Do you want an argument? Is that what you would like? It’s almost always personal with you for some reason. How lonely can you be? Try trolling for some porn, you are obviously needing some control or release.
I don’t care if I get banned for making profane or obscene comments, but you sir are an asshole.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
To Matt...
My apologies for lowering the level of discourse here. If there was a way to delete the last remark I would. You can ban me if you need to. No hard feelings.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 12:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I honestly thought that was the possibility.
I wasn’t trying to be an ass. I was asking a question I would have asked to anyone. I didn’t even look at the user posting it at first. Chicago fans tend to get caught up in ego-centric messages, and I was just going to point out that a rare coincidence of unlikely but possible events could occur: Rose has a bad game, Duhon has a good one, Knicks beat the Bulls.
However, a chicago fan actually being concerned about those things is not impossible. I assumed the user who posted it (you) was joking, but I was curious if they really were. You made a sarcastic/ass, personal comment, so I sort of replied in kind.
Sheesh. Don’t take it so personal.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Dec 8, 2008 12:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the bulls don't play small
they play tiny. I don’t really having anything to add. I agree with any negative comment about VDN.
by robinhood on Dec 7, 2008 11:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
There's probably a lot going on that affects decision-making
But I think VDN’s first (and second, and third, fourth, fifth….) priority is staying employed. Vinny has zero prior coaching experience; this job dropped into his lap like manna from heaven. He knows that if he fucks up this opportunity, he won’t be sniffing another head coaching job for years to come.
If Vinny wins, he stays employed. Period. If he takes the Bulls to the playoffs, he’s getting his extension. But his contract doesn’t give him much time to make it happen, so Vinny’s not going to let something like player development get in the way. That’s the only way I can explain his line-ups, substitution patterns, etc. The guy seems to have no vision, no long-term strategy … he seems literally to coach game to game. In my mind, he’s giving up the long-term health of this team for his short term gain.
by drew gooden's facial growth on Dec 8, 2008 12:22 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's a failure on Paxson's part
Look, the truth of the matter probably is that if the young guys are just irredeemably bad and VDN plays them hughe minutes come hell or high water, then the Bulls win 25 games, he looks like a dope, and gets fired.
For every time we complain about not seeing the kids, imagine a whole season of 2-17 efforts and/or Noah huffing and puffing up the court getting beat by everyone. If those guys really do suck, it’ll be brutal, and despite our protestations, we’ll be just as willing to throw VDN out with the rest of them.
Truth of the matter is that good coaches in crummy situations get fired all the time. Hell, Eddie Jordan is probably the best coach in Wizards history, and he got fired because his franchise player and starting center got hurt. No win situation.
Now, couple that basic reality of being an NBA coach with a GM who hasn’t given you clear guidance. Now, if your GM sat down with you and said “Look, Vinnie, I really need to know what direction to go, so you gotta play these kids to find out what’s there. If you do that and they stink, I promise I won’t hold it against you”, then you might do things differently. On the other hand, you might still think he’s a lying sack of shit who’ll fire you if things get bad no matter what. The stink of failure is contagious.
But still, if your GM has given you clear direction, you’d have to think twice about crossing it. Hence, I doubt such direction has been given. So if you want to blame someone, go see Pax.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on Dec 8, 2008 1:05 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
No, I get it
VDN’s damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. I’m not trying to dump all the blame on Vinny, just trying to get a handle on his thought process.
And I agree that he’s probably getting mixed signals from Pax. Who knows — Pax might have directed him to develop the youngsters and showcase some of the vets for trade purposes, basically setting Vinny up for failure. The situation sucks, and I’m obviously no coach or GM, but everything being done so far seems so short-sighted.
by drew gooden's facial growth on Dec 8, 2008 2:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It sends the wrong message when you play guys who aren't producing
If Noah or whoever is forgetting the plays and not doing what is worked on at practice, they deserve to not play. Many people, including me, aren’t happy that Larry Hughes was playing. But now that he is and has reigned in his game, he has been effective. I’m glad he’s not stubbornly not playing the guy. It tends to send the wrong message. If Tyrus and Noah could learn from Hughes…..(my god I never thought I’d be saying that).
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 12:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that a coach can't just grab his ankles for his players
but, unless we’ve written off Thabo, TT, and Noah completely, we need to know what we have in them. They’re projects. By definition, they’re going to be inconsistent. If a player isn’t doing shit off the court, then I agree that they need to earn their PT. But it seems to me that Thabo and TT put in the work (I’ll give VDN a pass on Noah for now), so let them play through their mistakes and build up some confidence. It’s not like we’re contending for a championship (and even the playoffs aren’t guaranteed this year).
We’ve seen how the Skiles approach can backfire (see Chandler), so I’m a bit worried that VDN is trotting out the same rationale to limit the PT of the same young players that Skiles failed to develop.
by drew gooden's facial growth on Dec 8, 2008 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hope that's not the case
I’m under the assumption that once these young players (TT/Noah) start following the principles of VDN’s offense/defense, their playing time will increase. Even when he praises Gray, it’s for saying Gray is in the right spots, not that Gray is talented. So it sounds like an indictment on the other bigs.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 3:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
All this stuff about player development needs to go away.
The one player that we really need to develop is Derrick Rose and I would say that is going along just swimmingly. Thabo is 24 and in his third year, he doesn’t need to be developed. At this stage, if given playing time he’s probanly very close to his ceiling as a player. As for Noah, he’s almost 24 as well and was not drafted based on upside. When he came out he was considered one of the more NBA ready players around, his problems on the court do not stem from not being properly “developed”.
So that leaves us with Tyrus, and the only player on this team (minus Rose) that you could make a legitimate case for NEEDING playing time to grow. I guess I understand both sides on this one, but I am of the belief, that if tou have a talented team that is playing reasonably well and has a bright future (thanks to Rose), why woud VDN sit back and take mistakes and sloppy play by one guy and retard the growth of the rest of the team? After almost two and a half years, I think it’s time that Tyrus adapt to what we’re doing and not the other way around. I’m not saying he can’t eventually be a good player for OUR team, but the time has come for him to earn his job,
by Juiceboxjerry on Dec 8, 2008 12:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
the thing is Thabo HAS developed in spite of everything that's happened to him.
His per-minute numbers and advanced statistics have all improved significantly every year. It’s not his fault VDN won’t play him. I sincerely hope they are just trying to raise Noc and Hughes’s trade value by playing them so many minutes. Thabo is good! Please, believe me on this.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 1:06 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree Thabo can be a good player.
All I was saying is that I don’t see him “developing” into Joe Johnson just because we threw him out there 35 minutes a game. If he had star potential we probably would’ve seen it by now.
by Juiceboxjerry on Dec 8, 2008 1:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
right, but he has actually developed
and he’s certainly got more room for improvement than players like Noc and Larry (who had played excellently lately) who are what they are and will never more than that and will only decline from here on out (Noc especially).
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 1:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But as you were kind of getting at
He’s still the worst guard on this roster not named Lindsay Hunter (who I don’t mind either). So there just aren’t enough minutes to go around right now. If he stays patient, one of them or even him will be somewhere else soon.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 12:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure Thabo has really developed. He started the first few games of the season and looked just as mediocre-to-bad as last year. Since then, he has not really had the kind of minutes necessary to showcase his supposedly improved game. Still, I think I’ve seen all I need to with Thabo, particularly given that this is year three. He is a competent backup (and that’s not an insult).
Has anyone seen anything to suggest that he should be starting ahead of Rose or Gordon? I haven’t, and if VDN agrees I have no problem with him riding the bench. With Rose seemingly playing 48 a night, there are not many minutes to go around at the 2. BG starts and Hughes is playing well (can’t believe I just typed that), so minutes are tight. As for playing some 3, you have Deng and Noce ahead of him.
I think some people on this board believe that the Bulls are hampering the development of a potential All-Star. This guy is average at best.
by Stay Chisel on Dec 8, 2008 8:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he warranted being the backup 3
especially given VDN’s love of small and running lineups.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 9:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He shouldn't be starting,
but he shouldn’t be stuck to the bench with Crazy Glue. He’s produced in the minutes he’s gotten, his 3 is better [more arc and it was coming along in the last couple games he played!], he can guard pretty well and generally does good things.
Really I think that what’s blocking his minutes is the emergence of Larry Hughes as a player who suddenly learned to not take random 22-foot fadeaway jumpshots with 3 people on him, since Hughes plays the 3 so often.
But he should be getting some minutes at the very least: more than 0 a game. 5~10.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 8, 2008 10:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
also, it's tough to fault Tyrus for not "adapting to what we're doing"
when he’s in a completely new system this year versus his first two in the league. He’s never been known for his basketball IQ and just when he was learning the Skiles system, he’s forced to re-adapt to VDN’s new style. It’s not an easy thing to do (see: Deng’s suckage to start the year, but Deng was allowed to play through it and adjust and he has. Tyrus has instead gotten the hook very quickly, even when he’s playing well.)
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 1:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus went 2-17 in the second game.
and was shooting below 30%, Yet remained the starter for five more games. With Rose and Gordon, Tyrus is the only Bull to play every game…he is getting an opportunity, but he is not capitalizing.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 8, 2008 10:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
but, but...starting doesn't matter! It's the minutes!
http://www.basketball-reference.com/fc/pgl.cgi?player=thomaty01&year=2009
some games his opportunity is for one stint, then he never comes back. That’ s not a real opportunity.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 10:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Look at his game logs
His minutes have steadily decreased every game since the opener. And starting doesn’t mean squat if you get yanked at the first bump in the road.
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 11:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They have not steadily descreased.
But they have been wildly inconsistent…
Tyrus is still averaging over a 20 minutes a night despite four games of playing less than ten…overall, he is getting minutes, he is just not doing a lot with those minutes. I looked at the game log, two games of double digit rebounds, only four games with 8 or more rebounds…while shooting 34% from the field.
At some point, the responsibility is on the player to produce (though I don’t know why Noc continues to get minutes).
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 8, 2008 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Tyrus used up all his #2 pick entitlement minutes a long time ago. Real problem with this team, and it’ not that TT, Sefolosha, or Noah aren’t playing enough, is that they don’t have any quality front court players that are worth the minutes. You will lose no matter who starts.
"Derrick Rose is like a $500,000 Maybach parked in the driveway of a $200,000 house in the middle of nowhere" - Bill Simmons
by RogersPark Kris on Dec 8, 2008 1:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right.....so if Gooden is shooting 1 for 100
Why doesn’t Tyrus get more minutes? Why does this “you suck you don’t get minutes” argument only apply to 3 players on this team? If all our big men suck, then there shouldn’t be a big deal in handing out minutes to Tyrus.
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 1:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden hasn't played well the last 3 games, that is true
But you have to look at his play from the beginning of season on. Even with this recent stretch, it’s a no brainer that Gooden should be getting the majority of the minutes over Tyrus or Noah.
"Derrick Rose is like a $500,000 Maybach parked in the driveway of a $200,000 house in the middle of nowhere" - Bill Simmons
by RogersPark Kris on Dec 8, 2008 1:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden is not shooting 1 for 100.
So its a flimsy premise…
While Gooden has been struggling recently, and is just an average starting PF, he has played better than any of out other bigs this season…and unless you like the lineup with either Deng or Noc at center, someone actually has to play….all of our big men have been struggling this season…just look at the per by position on 82games.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 8, 2008 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Gooden has earned the right to stay on the floor with his play. three pointers aside….
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 2:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No he hasn't. He's been horrid, especially at C.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden playing defense
at the 5
by Granny Waiters on Dec 8, 2008 10:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Gooden is harming the team with retarded play,
he’s worse than TT and shouldn’t be playing. He’s bee producing good so far, but his last couple games have been just horrid.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 8, 2008 10:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I mean, he should be starting and etc.,
but if he, say, goes 0 for 4 on 20 foot hurried jumpshots in the first quarter and plays some turnstyle D, I’d say you have to sit him.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 8, 2008 10:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The point about Gooden
is that his D is average at best. It looks much better if he tallies rebounds.
The bigger problem is when his offense is complete crap. And unfortunately, his career inconsistency makes him an unreliable player. He’ll post 20 and 17 one night and then 2 and 9 the next. He’ll put together 2 solid outings and then 2 abysmal outings.
If this standard applies to Noah and Thomas, the guys I think we should be playing the 35 minutes a night, we’ll get similar results, but we’ll potentially develop them into much better, more consistent players. If we only would play them.
I don’t fault Vinny for these minutes right now. While I do not have any evidence, I do think we’re playing Hughes, Noc, Gray, and Gooden more minutes to fluff our trade buffet table. I think we’re open for business on the trading front, but we’re playing some guys that likely are to be moved.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 9, 2008 9:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden is not the long term solution,
since he is properly a 6th man who should be set down on the 30 or so games a year where he is clueless. Same for Nocioni. Gray lacks the talent to be more than a 10-12 minute per game backup, and Ruffin is the classic 12th man.
Since the Bulls are not winning a championship this year, start TT and Noah and let them sink or swim. They are either important future big men for the Bulls, and if not the sooner found out the better.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 8, 2008 10:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the issue though
Why let the whole team sink just to see if Tyrus/Noah can play. This team is 9-11 coming off a pretty difficult opening schedule. They should have the chance to earn a playoff trip before you throw players on the court who aren’t the best.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 9, 2008 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I've long agreed that Thabo shouldn't warrant development
but as was pointed out below, he was actually playing well. If that’s the case, he shouldn’t have been buried.
And your talk about tolerating sloppy play and whatever….it’s a great story, and as long as you’re not talking about Noc or Drew Gooden or Larry Hughes, it’s mostly true!
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 9:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well said.
I thought that going into this season the philosophy was “wins be damned, we’re going to develop our players.” Instead, we seen a very B*$&%#esque attempt to do whatever works to win games. VDN is already grasping at straws as if his job was at stake. It’s alarming. I imagine/hope/pray Pax told him going into the season that his job was safe given basic competence and the development of Rose, but Vinny’s actions and rotations seem to suggest the mandate is otherwise.
Asked what kind of player he expects to be in the next five years, he said: "Not a star, but like, a superstar. Something around, like, Chris Paul, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, something like that."
by BigBenign on Dec 8, 2008 12:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm starting to wonder if Noah
might have a learning disability. I mean, if there’s a canidate for ADHD out there…sweet God this might actually be true. Just look at his style of play. Bouncy, manic, difficulty concentrating, boundless “energey.” Memory deficits. Watch him on the bench – can’t sit still. Paroxysmal effort but lacks the ability to “stay on task” – for instance with something like conditioning, or working on a skill set. If we could just find out whether he’d been like this when he was seven, we might actually be able to diagnose him.
Holy shit, call the pharmacy!
JOAKIM NOAH NEEDS MEDICATION!
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Dec 8, 2008 6:05 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
he gets the kind of meds a pharmacy cannot provide
(except in California)
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 9:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is it video games?
or house music? Because both of them are 128 beats and then something else.
I’ll wager that Noah enjoys both outlets.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 10:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately,
the medication most indicated for ADD or ADHD is 20-40 mg of methamphetamine (called Adderall or Ritalin), which is a banned substance in the NBA. Also, given Noah’s predilection for mind-altering substances, he would not be the best candidate for this type of medication due to the very real possibility of abuse. But, seriously, I think you made a good onservation, even if you were only (half) joking.
by Cannoli on Dec 8, 2008 10:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't know the specifics about the NBA, but at least in MLB
With a valid prescription for a documented problem (like ADHD) you’rer allowed ritalin and other variations of speed. I think most banned substance enforcements generally tread lightly around psychological diseases.
by silentpete on Dec 8, 2008 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You are completely overstating the possibilty of abuse
Adderall is a mixture of amphetamines, not methamphetamines. Big difference (well small difference, chemically).
Just cause he smokes a (non-addictive) substance he’s gonna start snorting his ADHD medication?
Also I’m sick of people hating on Noah for the pot thing- I guarantee you that a LARGE proportion of NBA players smoke pot (I think the NBA is the only major sport that doesn’t test for it, which I applaud) , he just got caught. Noah’s out of shape cause he’s lazy, not cause he smokes pot.
by ajc53 on Dec 8, 2008 3:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd argue he's out of shape because he's always had an air of entitlement to him
his parents are both rich and famous. This was part of the reason he could play the extra year at Florida and not sweat it, he was going to be wealthy regardless so he didn’t need to jump at the money the first chance he got like so many other players are forced to do. He loves basketball and he loves competition, you can see that. I’m just not convinced he loves putting in the work in the off-season required to be great.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree 100%
I think Noah hasn’t needed to work. That’s why you hope by not playing him he matures and sees how hard everyone is working around him to get minutes.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 4:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I take the alternative approach
when he plays, he’s still the best C we have and I think he just run him ragged. It’d be one thing if Noah was routinely getting beat on the floor because he was tired, but I just haven’t seen any evidence of that. He’s still rebounding very well and playing the best post defense of anyone on the team.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
we just run him ragged*
in the sense that you play him until he literally can’t play anymore (i.e. when he starts sucking wind so bad that it actually affects his play to the point that he’s no longer our best option at the 5)
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think there's more to the story that we don't see
that VDN is using to settle this. Like forgetting plays and being out of position. I agree, Noah is the best post defender in most matchups. Although against the really big, physical centers I prefer Gray.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 4:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
how many of those "really, big physical centers" still exist?
I can think of Shaq and maybe Dwight Howard (who Gray can’t do anything with anyway) off the top of my head. Erik Dampier? Does he count? ( I say no.) Anyone else?
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
sadly, Gray does better against Howard than Noah.
Howard
Oden/Przybilla
Shaq
Damp
Bynum in the next few years.
Ilgauskas
Yao
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 5:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well Dampier did kill us in that game a few weeks ago
Brendan Haywood also feasts on the Bulls. I dunno what to say, I just know I’d rather see Noah at the center spot than Gray. Maybe if we all keep trashing Gray like we did Hughes, he will become a respectable backup. I just wish the team didn’t act like Gray was a legit option in the post on both sides of the ball. He’s a stopgap, and should be used as one.
What do you see in a 14 ppg with no jumper that makes one think he will be better than a 26ppg\ 12rpg guy? Is there some kind of magic formula that tells you 14 > 26??
by Dabullsfan on Jul 1, 2008 10:19 AM CDT actions actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 5:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
that this yeah is going to be an outlier, a sophomore slump, and that Noah HATES losing, especially when he can change it: and that he will show up next year on task. :D
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 8, 2008 10:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Develop players?? WTF??
There is no “developing players”. In this society we live in — it started with professional sports — there is no development anymore. Especially here in America. Since we get our information so quick and we’re basically programmed to have ADD, the saying, “What have you done for me lately,” has never been so poignant. People need wins NOW because if you don’t win, it isn’t just drunk Norm Van Lier talking about it for 5 minutes after the game. It’s Van Lier, it’s two talk radio shows, it’s ESPN, it’s Blog-a-Bull, it’s Rosenbloom, it’s K.C., it’s Sam Smith, it’s 16,000 media outlets. That whisper you used to hear is now a roar and you do things NOW because you have no other choice. So to think that any coach in any situation is going to work on “long term” is a joke. “Long term” these days IS six games. If you want stability, go watch the WNBA.
by wilsoneads on Dec 8, 2008 7:05 AM CST reply actions 2 recs
again, this is all good if they're benched for veteran talent
who knew watching Aaron Gray fit this go-getter lifestyle I’m in.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 9:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
Enjoyed reading this. +rec
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 10:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
WARNING - Positive thoughts in this comment
I’m going to give the optimist’s view of this situation.
We all know that Rose is the lynch pin of our team going forward for many years. We are going to build around him. The key is determining which players can play well with him and which cannot.
What do we know for sure? That Hughes, Gooden, and likely Noc are not in the longterm plans for a Derrick Rose led team. What do we notice about that list? They are all getting a lot of PT so far this season. Dare I say they are being showcased?
I would like to think that Pax/VDN are doing what they can to drive up the trade value of those three players as much as possible before February to see what we can get for people who are obviously not in our long term plans. Then after those trades, we see how who’s remaining (Thabo, Thomas, Noah, whomever we pickup) perform with steady minutes alongside Rose.
It is a dream, I just hope it’s not a pipe dream…
--Torch
by torch on Dec 8, 2008 7:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You have to earn that positivity.
What you just posted is a very plausible idea. The problem is that there’s no way that I could give Pax enough credit to think he’s actually doing something like that. I get the feeling that he’s extremely clueless when it comes to evaluating his players. You don’t end up in these type of strange roster situations if you know how to do that kind of stuff.
by Juiceboxjerry on Dec 8, 2008 7:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"give Pax enough credit to think he’s actually doing something like that"
is why I included the “pipe dream” part.
I think Pax gets a little too much ire and people forget the goods moves he’s made:
Drafting Hinrich
Drafting Gordon
Buying Deng
Drafting Duhon (like him or not, he’s at least met the expectations of, if not overachieved for a 38th pick)
Signing undrafted rookie Nocioni
Raping the New York Knicks for a seemingly unending stream of draft picks
Hiring Skiles when he did.
I’ll give you that he’s also made mistakes. Signing Ben Wallace was a big one, but I think he did well in rectifying that last year. I think that Gooden and Hughes (along with their respective baggage) is better than Wallace, Smith, and Griffin. He probably got too little for Chandler (but that is in hindsight). I still think it’s too early to fairly judge Thomas and Noah.
Fair or not, I think Paxson will be judged on his next 18 months. He has been given that time by Steve Schanwald (who has a job for life) and the gift of Rose. How does he handle this trade season (Hughes, Gooden, Noc, Hinrich?)? How does he shape the team this offseason (Gordon)? And likely the biggest judgment – can he land one of the 2010 prizes?
I think Pax has done enough to not label him a bad GM. I think we have to wait until the summer of 2010 before that label can be permanently affixed. In each situation, in a vacuum, I think Paxson has made some very good moves. What seems to be lacking over the past 6 years is a complete, over-arching strategy. He has the next 18 months to make people believe there was one all along.
--Torch
by torch on Dec 8, 2008 8:21 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah
He’s not quite a bad GM, but hasn’t doen enough to warrant himself as a good GM. Just a middle of the pack GM. He was moving on the up and last season’s horribleness brougth him smack dab down to reality.
We’ll see if he can do anything to build around Derrick (he either makes a major trade for a C we need without giving up everybody sans Derrick this offseason, or prepares himself well for the 2010 season….if we’re capped out of the 2010 free agency and have no C to speak of, Paxson needs to get the axe.
The Wallace for Gooden and Hughes trade and the gift of winning the #1 overall pick in a stacked drafts, are the 2 things that saved Paxson’s job…. the Hughes and Gooden trade saved him last season and the Rose pick has given him a minimum of 2 more years to clean up the murk he’s made.
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 8:49 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I think that's fair
Pax is meh.
My biggest issue is that he has this philosophy of talent evaluation that says ‘character’ first….and lately he can’t even get that right. So it’s worrisome to think he values it in relation to talent, and he’s missing out on talent for a trait he’s having trouble projecting.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 9:25 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
What he says
publicly and what he’s done in actuality aren’t really true.
He’s trying to help market this team as everybody’s blue collar hard workers….and that worked well in the Skiles system when we were winning, but works less so now….
If he really believed he was going after character guys….why then would he have drafted Tyrus Thomas….a very athletic, huge upside guy who came from a final 4 team, but more of a surprise final 4 team, who never had the character of a Rose or the maturity to be a pro athlete, he just had the raw talents….
Why would he also have gone crazy over Ben Wallace….a guy not from a winning program in college who won in the NBA but was often in fighting with his coaches…
No I think that character thing is just a rationalization and way to market the club.
Gordon was at the time of the draft the next best player, and really he hasn’t overly disappointed. Sure Al Jefferson would be great, but so be it. Deng too was a nice pick at #7, Al Jefferson too would be preferred, but Deng and Gordon aren’t a bad job.
Kirk Hinrich was well worth his #7 pick. I think if Pax had more talent eval time in the preceding year instead of radio time, he would have done whatever he could to get D. Wade (Wade was a monster in college), but we weren’t really thinking of a need for a PG back then, it was always SF/bigs and then Jay got hurt.
THe Tyrus trade was a f-up….that was an f-up but in a few years Tyrus still could be a great player, but considering the makeup of our team and the need for a leader, Brandon Roy sure would have been great….even LMA….still Roy had injury concerns, LMA had the whole “taking nights off in college already before he’s paid” concerns, and Tyrus was and still is this huge wildcard of potential. The card is bent now, but still there….
Noah though, Noah looked like a lock. He played very well last year down the stretch and should be a starting C…but nobody could predict the conditioning issues…I mean he’s not Sweetney, so that’s a suprise. He came from a professional athlete upbringing, so you’d just think he’d have that motivation (it would have been drilled into him)….he also was a big leader from a two time FLA championship team…..of which it seems right now only Horford (who we couldn’t get) might be the only 100% solid pro, though Noah still can achieve something…..
Spencer Hawes might be that offensive guy we’ve needed, but at the time we thought with Tyrus upside and Wallace’s aging window we’d have a few years….didn’t happen.
Still I’d say at the time of drafting Pax was mostly taking the upside guys or guys that fit our needs and then characterizing them as character guys later…..to get fans to buy in.
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 11:04 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
tennis guy here
Yannick Noah, his father, used to smoke cigarettes on changeovers early in his career. that sould tell you how serious his family was about “conditioning”.
by wilsoneads on Dec 8, 2008 5:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tennis
is a game where you need your conditioning. If you can smoke cigarettes during changeovers AND be successful, that’s some hardcore working out you’re doing …
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 8, 2008 10:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking this too...
Especially against the Wizards, with whom we have been rumored to have had trade talks.
Players like Hughes, Nocioni and Hinrich are players that the BaB readers usually place into their trade proposals…then we have players like Gooden, Gordon and Gray who have contracts that are expiring, thus being a sweetner for a potential trade (except for Gordon) or are not really in the Bulls long term plans…
What I am saying, I think Del Negro is trying to get burn for two guys he believes could have a future with Rose in Deng and Gordon, while giving minutes to a bunch of other players who could be traded between now and February…
but part of me, shudders, actually thinks Del Negro is really just trying to win every single game without a plan for the future….hence Rose playing 40 minutes a night.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 8, 2008 10:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yEAH
I was watching that game and I kept thinking, where are Noah and most especially Tyrus?
I actually aplaud VDN a bit for benching Noah. Joakim needs to regain that fire that we Bulls fans liked so much in him last year. Perhaps having him sit a bit will get him motivated to be that leader on the court he showed he could be last year….
Let’s just not make that consistent. I also see that with Haywood down, Washington doesn’t have that much more of a consistent C than we do, so VDN might have made a good call going with the small ball lineup….
But the really disappointing thing for me was the lack of Tyrus Thomas playing time. Tyrus did as youmention have a nice string of 5-6 straight solid outings. I didn’t even remember him being out there on Saturday….of course I saw that monster block in I think the 3rd quarter and was like, oh wow there you go Tyrus that was awesome….only to flip back to rewatch it on the DVR and see that of all people it was Ben Gordon…..
But yeah, I kind of understand the sitting of Noah….don’t like the idea behind it, but when we’re over a month into the season and Noah only looks ready to play 1 out of ever 4 games and still seems to have issues with transition D….it might not be a bad tactic to say you don’t get a golden plate to play if you play poorly even if it means more Aaron Gray….
But the Thomas benching AFTER a string of good T2 games is beyond disappointing….
Good news though for us is that Larry Hughes had another very good game….it’s like his 5th or 6th straight game of playing team basketball….something I’d hoped we would see from him when we acquired him (thinking he’d see that without a Lebron on our team he can do a lot of little things to help us and not force his game), but something he definitely did not play until very recently…..we may yet find some takers for Hughes next season. He’s a slightly lower paid version of this year’s hot expiring contract in Sczerbiak, and he’s a better player than Wally to boot….I like the effort.
Good to see Nocioni bounce back a bit with a good game. Hopefully the haircut helps…. I still like you say don’t understand why Nocioni gets all the minutes after truly atrocious veteran bball play and then see Tyrus who’s been doing a lot of little things out there gets relegated to almost an entire game benching, but whatever…..
It’s also great to see Gordon and Rose playing so well together, and Luol had a good 3rd straight game. If we can somehow keep these 3 together, use Hinrich, Gooden, Sefalosha and a pick to nab a decent 5….we could be building something once Tyrus gets his act together….
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 8:23 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Um... No one??? That is an awesome title, of course.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Dec 8, 2008 8:47 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I just blue myself :)
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 11:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It *is* okay to blame the players you know.
The young bigs’ career is a good test case for this “blame the players last, and blame them least” axiom. The first two years it was coaching’s fault for not giving them more minutes. This year it’s coaching’s fault for not getting consistent minutes. Then at the possibility that they just might not be that good, we stomp our foot and say, “Well then, stupid Paxson…how could you have drafted them in the first place?!?” Not saying coaching/management haven’t made some mistakes, but the urge to blame them first and foremost over the players is almost comical. We’re like overprotective parents.
by T Maple on Dec 8, 2008 9:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'll blame Noah first
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 9:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes,
because around the league few people were questioning Paxson’s choice. Some thought Hawes would be a big white stiff that would’ve typified Paxson’s choice of ho-hum players. Noah, in contrast, had a great attitude, cared about his teammates, and had “a non-stop motor.” Most experts concluded it was a good pick that would fit right in with this team. Noah’s sophomore slump (so far) is one of the biggest disappointments this year.
by T Maple on Dec 8, 2008 9:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Noah
Comes prepared, he’s still the pick over Hawes….but Joakim’s not taking it seriously and that’s the shame.
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 11:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It is very simple why the coach or Pax gets the blame
If a player is good and not playing, that is the coaches mistake.
If the player is bad and not playing, that is Pax’s mistake. If they are lazy/stupid/bad at basketball he should have figured it out.
It is the same reason people don’t blame Noc or Gray for sucking… it is not their fault they suck, it is really hard to be good at basketball, it is the coach’s and/or Pax’s fault for playing them/having them on the roster.
by JeffD on Dec 8, 2008 10:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know why this made me laugh, but it did...
I have an image of Gray coming home to his future wife, sulking, wondering why his coach keeps trying to play him “Hey, I suck, when will he figure it out too”.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 11:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
After reading the comments this morning...
some major points I perhaps didn’t make clear:
This isn’t meant to be the usual development-vs.-winning manifesto because currently:
1. guys aren’t being rewarded for good play anyway
2. the ones playing aren’t veterans with status that have to be beat to lose their jobs
3. the team still kindof sucks no matter who they’re playing
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 9:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This stretch of games to finish 2008 are winnable
So far the one loss below the pace I had expected. I figured we’d split with the Sixers, win at Milwaukee, and take care of the Wizards at the UC. We stole on at Philly because they couldn’t make anything. We blew the game to the Sixers at the UC. We stunk it up defensively against the Bucks. Then we let the worst team in the East back into a game on the road after a back to back.
Needless to say, the 4 games are forcing me to reconsider my win-loss predictions for the rest of 2008.
Each day I’m still asking the same question. What is our objective right now?
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 10:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And the Spurs game was winnable
We blew that one too. Is Bob Babich a ghost assistant with the Bulls?
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 10:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As they say in football,
a “prevent defense” is called that since it prevents the team using it from winning.
We are seeing way too much “prevent” play from the Bulls when they have a 4th quarter lead.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 9, 2008 6:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So if Pax
is Gob, (“For my next illusion…a low-post tweener who we like as a ‘swingman’ as well”) does that make VDN Buster? Obviously Reinsdorf is George Bluth…I’m laughing at the thought of him sitting through a Bulls practice yelling “no touching!”
"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."
by Ugh It Live! on Dec 8, 2008 9:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Noah's more like Buster
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 10:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Either way...Lets hope none of them venture to Catalina next time they're in Cali...

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."
by Ugh It Live! on Dec 8, 2008 10:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So fill out the rest of the cast
Vinny = Michael
Rose = George Michael
Kirk = J Walter Weatherman(And that’s why you don’t draft Final Four players)
I’d pay money to see a group chicken dance.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 10:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Drew Gooden
has to be Ice – the bounty hunter/caterer.
I was gonna with Joakim as Lucille Bluth – I bet when he goes shopping the booze far outweighs the groceries.
Too bad _______ (don’t dare speak his name in these parts) is gone…he would’ve made a great Barry Zuckercorn.
Aaron Gray as Tobias? I could see Aaron digging the cutoffs…
"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."
by Ugh It Live! on Dec 8, 2008 10:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gray's got to be Steve Holt
Could Noah be Maybee? He makes it look like he’s an NBA player, but he really isn’t. “Draft Me!”
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 10:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Rose is George Michael
Who is Maeby? Lindsey Hunter?
And who’s the diabolical mother running everything in secret? Reinsdorf
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 11:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lucille Bluth is Gar Heard
The Chairman can be no other than George Oscar Bluth.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 11:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"I just made a huge mistake"
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 11:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have a problem with Rose as George Michael
Rose is a winner, so he’s the only one without an Arrested Development analogue.
by drew gooden's facial growth on Dec 8, 2008 3:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Stan Sitwell
"It never is, because I'm the Shogun. And before you get to the Shogun, you gotta go through a lot of ninjas."
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 8, 2008 3:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought George Michael
first because he’s young, but second because he’s really got the right idea in his mind yet he still needs that fatherly(Vinny) approval all the time.
I guess this means that Pax is Gob.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 3:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My impression of the Wizards game
I got the impression that the whole 2nd half of the game was actually a teaching lesson. I gave up on complaining about the rotation towards the end of the 3rd quarter. After that I figured the goal was to show the Bulls roster on the bench why bad teams like the Wizards are bad and why ball movement makes bad teams look really bad.
Obviously the Wizards were catching up and making it a game by exploiting the small lineup, but Vinny called two timeouts and ushered out the same 5 man unit. When the ball movement led to shots that went it the small ball was sustainable. When the shots didn’t fall the Wizards typically capitalized.
The fact that little changes at all were made in the 4th sent me the message that it really was a teaching lesson and Vinny didn’t care if they had to lose the game.
The good news is I can add the Wizards to the list of teams we should play every night if we can schedule it to help elevate the value of Larry Hughes. 83% from downtown!
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 9:59 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
If D’Antoni was coaching
Let’s say that D’Antoni accepted the job when Jerry talked to him down in Pheonix, how would these three be devoloping?
I would guess Ty and Noah would be getting no minutes just like Vinny is doing right now. D’Antoni plays a small rotation 7-8 guys a night. To play in his system you have to run the offense and do the things he wants to do. I don’t think Tyrus or Noah would catch on and after training camp or the first month they would be burried on the bench like Eddy Curry. Could you image D’Antoni’s reaction to Noah’s stamina problems….
My D’Antoni lineup would look like Rose Gordan Deng Noc Gooden with Larry and Thabo coming off the bench.
by Jscho316 on Dec 8, 2008 10:06 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
honestly, that could be true
but D’Antoni’s a coach I’d trust. With Vinny we’re getting the same ‘coachy’ nonsense without the experience or credentials.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 10:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Wizards game is probably as close to the D'Antoni system
employed by another coach as we are going to see. We had 15 personal fouls in the game. Thomas plays 5 minutes. Beyond that it’s a 7 man rotation for the other 234:56 minutes. Both teams shot above 50% from the field. Neither team exceeded 40 rebounds. The score was 117-110.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 10:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and
there were 60 assists in the game and LARRY HUGHES HAD 5! He almost doubled his season total in one night.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
D'Antoni's impact on the bulls is an interesting question
I’m not a D’Antoni loyalist but it seems he has quickly put his mark in a positive way on the Knicks. Of course, compared to Isiah any one would look good and improve the team. I saw Gordon interviewed on the NBA channel after the Washington game. He was asked a fluff question about comparing Skiles to VDN. Clearly they expected the VDN system to be great compared to Skiles. Gordon surprisingly said the difference is that Skiles had more experience (smarts) compared to VDN. That was a clue to me how inexperienced VDN must seem to the players. We have a young team that a strong-willed coach could mold. VDN doesn’t have the experience to imprint his system onto a team. He may develop it as the season progresses. He doesn’t seem to have it now. D’Antoni may have been able to improve our team in a way we can now only hope to see.
Most of us realize Paxson is trying to make a trade for a big without giving away too much. It is not easy. I have been a big fan of Tyrus but even with the good things he does his stupidity seems to overwhelm the good. This was evendent in the Philly game where he helped them get back to tie the game and then was a big factor in their poor play in overtime to lose the game. I have been a big critic of Hughes cringing at his poor shot selection. I must say his recent play has impressed me. It is not just that his offense has improved. His defense seems better. He is staying in front of his man and is impacting the game defensively.
We could be better and we could be worse. The next few weeks may give a clue to whether we will be able to call this a successful or another failed season.
by chgobr on Dec 8, 2008 10:29 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
BG's NBA TV Comments
I saw Ben’s comments on NBA TV, too. It seemed like he was really slamming VDN with his answer, but I’m not sure that’s what he intended. He made it sound like Skiles knew what he was doing and Vinny is making it up as he goes along. I’m surprised this has not received some more attention.
by Stay Chisel on Dec 8, 2008 11:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Vinny has never coached before
So this is all new to him. I can’t imagine Gordon having all the right words to explain the difference between the two coaches right after a game. Perhaps if he had more time to respond as in a taped interview or interview for print he could elaborate beyond the 7 second soundbite.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 11:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would agree with your interpretation
if BG didn’t actively tune out Skiles last season. He is also getting more consistent minutes under VDN than Skiles. I think BG was just being truthful – Skiles has a system and he stuck to it no matter what. VDN is far more willing to experiment and is throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. I don’t think its a dig on VDN, I just think it is the truth.
by Basketball Smurf on Dec 8, 2008 1:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The point is moot...
D’Antoni turned the job down, probably because he knew we don’t have the players that can fit in his system.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 11:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Also...
If Rose played with the guys that Nash had in Phoenix (IE: the Steve Nash role), he would have been the MVP every year too.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no, pretty sure it was money.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 12:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I might believe that
if he didn’t go to the Knicks.
by JeffD on Dec 8, 2008 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Look...
I think Thomas deserves more time since he was starting to play with his eyes open recently. But screw Noah. There’s no excuse for an “energy” player to come into camp out of shape. Plus, he seems to have trouble learning the plays, which is especially concerning considering no plays are even run for him. If he’s so out of shape…that he cant contribute his typical energy, hustle and rebounding….then why should he play? It’s apparent he spent the entire summer walking the streets of Gainesville drinking and smoking the earth….but not working on his game. Now he’s getting called out for it. Mind you, the bulls are on their 19th game of the season….and he’s STILL not in shape.
by Ayeljay54 on Dec 8, 2008 10:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Vinny is terrible
I understand Noah not getting time due to conditioning…that is unacceptable, this is your job and being out of shape is totally unprofessional. Fine. i get that. But giving Tyrus’s minutes at the 4 to Nocioni is not cool….especially after 3 effective games and one double double. Tyrus was actually starting to cut down on mistakes, he deserved at least 25 minutes. He is actually a player who might be here in a couple years. So why are guys who are not in our long term plans getting all the burn(hughes, noc, gooden). It’s because Vinny wants to win as many games now as he can to save his job. Gooden can shoot 1-11 two games in a row, Noc have multiple shitty games but that’s ok…why do they get a longer leash than Tyrus.
We know what Gooden and Noc are….journeymen…
The team needs to be honest and realize we are REBUILDING. This team won’t be a serious championship contender until 2012 at the earliest and that’s assuming we snag one of the better FAs in 2010
At best now we are a 7th or 8th seed. I don’t care about making the playoffs, that’s not good enough. We now have a star to build around so let’s slow our roll and worry about how to build a permanent winner not just a low playoff team. A lot of teams build to just make the playoffs and waste a lot of money to field a team that will never make a deep run(for example the Wizards wasting serious $$$ on Arenas and Jamison)…that team is going nowhere…except gettting bounced from the playoffs by the Cavs.
I’m rambling but when your top 3 picks play a combined 5 minutes, then your organization has serious problems.
So please give Tyrus his 25-30 minutes even if he’s struggling. Try to work Noah back into shape slowly and as far as Thabo….i still like his intangibles and defense but he’s not gonna work out here. I don’t think he’ll ever be very good but he could be a Bruce Bowen/Posey glue-guy if he ever can hit the 3 consistently.
by C Smoove on Dec 8, 2008 10:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Funny thing about seeding for the playoffs
If the playoffs started Wed, tomorrow night’s game vs. New York would be the play-in game for the 8th seed
--Torch
by torch on Dec 8, 2008 11:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden can shoot 1-11 and get minutes
Because he was GREAT the 4-5 games previously, and then had 2 straight awful games. When Drew plays well, we’re a much better/different team.
I think it’s silly to blame VDN for doing things to try to save his job. What’s he supposed to do, go all Illavorni on this team and play the youngs and really be on the hot seat.
As for Noc getting time, I get it to an extent, but after Noc played what was his 7th or 8th straight god awful game on the game before the Wizards game, it was puzzling.
Tyrus should get more than 5 MPG. Perhaps Tyrus wasn’t listening to the coach, and that was a reason for the benching…..
While it’s disappointing Noah got a DNP-CD, I don’t blame the coach.
by majoyenrac on Dec 8, 2008 12:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The whole roster is a quagmire.
Hopefully Pax will make a decent trade soon.
Nocioni has an Olympic gold medal, a bronze medal and a EuroLeague MVP, and now… His legs are broken! Coming to an arena near you.
by Khalid El-Amin on Dec 8, 2008 12:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No
We’re fighting to make the playoffs this year….we’re not a rebuilding team. We’re not the Grizzlies, the Thunder, the Bobcats or whatever. We’re just not.
The main thing right now is to develop Rose and get him to have the playoff experience. Who cares about TT and Noah….those guys look like complete clowns out there.
by Half-Life on Dec 8, 2008 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
True
I look at us more like a ‘rebuild’ along the lines of the 03-04 Heat with rookie Dwayne Wade, Lamar Odom, and Caron Butler and a coach that will be replaced down the road.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 3:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so does that make Gordon and Deng the Butler and Odom to Rose's Wade?
(not from a positional standpoint, but from an impact standpoint.)
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 3:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Something like that
They have different contracts so I don’t know if the same Summer deals can be made, but I could see us moving one or both for better pieces to complement Rose.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 8, 2008 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well, since Pax failed to re-up Gordon, I would bet that he's going to walk for nothing
this summer, so those deals become much less likely. Thanks again, Pax!
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 3:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what's the point of making the playoffs as an 8th seed? there's really no worse position to be in
in the entire NBA. This team is not a contender and won’t be one until changes are made. The Bulls might as well develop their young bigs to raise their value for a trade or to just make them better players, period. There is no value-raising to be done for guys like Noc, Gooden, etc. Teams know what those guys are and they aren’t going to change. This whole “we’re fighting for the playoffs” thinking is garbage. This team is barely a playoff caliber team, if at all and I’m not willing to sacrifice the future for a chance to get swept out of the first round of the playoffs. That kind of thinking is what got us into this mess (Skiles failing to get the Bulls young players to the next level and just looking to make playoffs every year).
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 3:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can permanently damage players
when you subject them to constant losing and general “badness” IMO. I think Durant’s shot selection might be corrupted for a long time because they told him to just go out there and force up junk. Playing with winners helps development. Promoting losing or playing the wrong players sends a bad message.
Why play Noah when he’s killing the team while Drew Gooden sits on the bench and could do a better job and everyone knows it. How does Rose pick up on defense when he sees the guys around him getting minutes aren’t following defensive principles either. These are really young kids out there for the most part.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 3:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden isn't doing a better job! Gooden stinks. He's a mediocre 4-man and a terrible 5
He launches ill-advised jump shots and plays matador D. I’d rather see Noah hunched over about to throw up on the court than have Gooden out there launching horrible shots and D-ing no one up. Noah rebounds better than Gooden and plays better D. Those are the things we should be looking for from our 5 man. If you’re going to play Gooden anywhere, it has to be at the 4. He’s not a 5. He’s not a 5. He’s not a 5.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In fact, Gooden is the worst player on the Bulls by adjusted-plus minus
of players that have received over 100 minutes. He’s at a whopping -10.6 right now, whereas Noah is at a bad, but not AS bad -6.92. Remember too that Noah was one of the best adjusted plus-minus players on the team last year. Let him play. He’ll figure things out. Players don’t learn by sitting on the bench, they learn by playing. I don’t know how many times we have to see this happen before we realize it to be true.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, but it's still early on.
Plus, Noah is taken out whenever he plays bad and remains in whenever he plays well. Gooden is left out there whether he’s playing good or bad. I would expect that to mess with the numbers a bit.
I didn’t mean to turn this into a Gooden vs. Noah argument. It was meant to say the coach sends a message by playing the guys who are accomplishing what VDN and the players want them too. I would guess that Rose would prefer to play with Gooden right now vs. Noah. Playing Noah only because he’s a draft pick and thus hurting Rose’s game send the wrong message.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 4:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think having a guy that pulls in more rebounds of your missed shots
and actually has your back if you get beaten off the dribble is something that damages your development. I’m sure it pisses Rose off when guys like Luke Ridnour get by him and then Gooden escorts them to the hoop. Noah would at least challenge the shot.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
when he's not sucking for air ...
or in foul trouble due to rotating late because he’s running on smokers lungs.
by Ayeljay54 on Dec 8, 2008 4:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
most of those "late rotations"
that you’re talking about are Noah trying to cover for other people (I’m looking at you, Drew Gooden, Aaron Gray, and Nocioni) being out of position. If you watch, Noah is trying to contest every shot when he’s down there and there is usually at least one guy running free because the other guys aren’t D-ing up. Noah challenges the most shots, so he draws a lot of fouls.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just because you challenge a shot....
doesn’t neccesarily mean you werent out of position you’re damn self. Honestly, I don think Noah is out of position often…..but he’s been struggling to get back to his man in transition….and has either been burned easy baskets, or has had to foul his man. Plus, for the second consecutive year….he’s slow to learn the freaking plays.
by Ayeljay54 on Dec 8, 2008 4:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, it's worrisome that he's kind of dumb
when it comes to learning the plays and I do wish he was in better shape and taking things more seriously. However, my point remains that even in spite of all of that, he’s still the best C we have. The only way he’s going to learn the plays is by running them… he needs to be on the court to do that. The only way he’s going to get into shape at this stage of the season is by playing minutes and playing his way into shape. And because he’s already the best C we have just imagine how much better he’ll be when he’s not out-of-shape and knows the plays. There’s really no reason not to play him. Gooden and Gray are not NBA centers. Gray’s barely an NBA player.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and another thing
I have always thought the whole take a player out because he’s in foul trouble thing was stupid. You’re worried about the player being taken away from you, so to counteract that, you voluntarily take him off the court? What the hell!!! It makes no sense. Let players play and if they foul out so be it. Especially if you’re only going to play the guy 16-20 minutes a game anyway, you might as well not take him by citing “foul trouble.”
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't recall any Noah weakside blocks this year
although I’m sure they’ve occurred. Noah has been great on his man, so-so at best off of his man. TT is the king of the weakside. I suppose he should be playing more then.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 4:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
TT does erase a lot of missed defensive rotations with his
shot-blocking / shot-altering. The only problem is that his offense has been so terrible, that it’s more than negating the positives he brings to the defensive end, but I think with more PT, he would get a better grasp of the offense and his O would improve. I don’t know how else to say it… players learn on the court, not from the bench.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But some players aren't destined to be good
playing somebody that doesn’t get it doesn’t mean he automatically gets it. It just wastes minutes. I’m not at that point with TT yet. Although I think it would benefit the team if one of Noah/TT was moved.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 5:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
The only problem is that his offense has been so terrible, that it’s more than negating the positives he brings to the defensive end
With Rose, we’re built to be a transition team. When you put Noah and Thomas out there we’re even better in transition. Tyrus can create fast breaks with his weak side defense. He can also finish the breaks.
Thomas and Noah need to be out there with Rose to make the transition game effective. The more transition, the less opps for Tyrus jump shots. Gooden, Gray, and Noc do not give us nearly any opportunities to get into transition with their defense.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 9, 2008 9:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
But right now at least Thomas and especially Noah’s transition D is so atrocious that it negates anything our offense transition can do.
by majoyenrac on Dec 9, 2008 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you can disagree all you want, but the facts are Tyrus's
O has been terrible this year thus far and we’ve played at the league’s 5th fastest pace. He’s been better of late and I want him to play, because as I mentioned above, that’s where players learn – on the court. But, his offense has been a huge negative for the team thus far this year and that’s not really arguable.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 9, 2008 8:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
also re: Noah's rebounding and D
he has the best DRtg on the team at 100 and the best Total Reb% on the team (19.5% for Noah vs. 16.3% for Gooden).
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I also don't believe you can permanently damage players by having them lose
look at the Celtics. Rondo was on that HORRIBLE team from 2 years ago and then last year he came into his own and this year he’s even better. Players get better by playing and especially by playing with better teammates. The Bulls have very few options for acquiring better players for Rose to play with, so they better give the ones they have a chance to play so that they get better or so that they can make themselves look better so we can trade them for someone better. Those are the options. Nocioni’s value is crap, Hughes’s value comes to us only in that he expires at the right time, and Hinrich’s value is just above crap. The young guys in the front court have to get better for the Bulls to be successful long term, one way or another. They either have to get better so another team will give up something good for them or get better so that the Bulls get better. Those are our options. That’s it.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 4:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rondo is more the exception then the rule.
And as wonderfully as he developed, he is just a super role player, not really a star. LeBron’s teams never tanked after they acquired him. Neither did Dwight Howard’s or Chris Paul’s or Kobe’s teams. Superstars are usually brought up in an environment of winning, or at least gradual winning.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 5:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
we don't need Noah or Tyrus to be a star to be better than what we've got starting
right now. Derrick Rose is the star, Ben Gordon and Luol Deng are the lower-tier supporting cast, and Tyrus and Joakim can be just fine if they are “super role players” which is really just a throw-away cliche that doesn’t mean anything. Rondo is playing the second best ball of any PG in the East (behind Devin Harris). He’s the best defensive PG in the league and his offense has really come along this year.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 5:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My contention is playing guys who don't deserve minutes will hurt Rose
I don’t care how it affects Noah and TT, at least in comparison. I hope they develop those skills too, but right now Noah and TT aren’t showing it in VDNs mind. I don’t have a problem with it. He’s clearly played them at various times. This is just the low point for them. If after the season, TT and Noah are only playing 10 minutes per game yet producing good numbers then I’ll have a problem with it.
The super role player is not a cliche. If you put Rondo on this team instead of Rose, the Bulls would be worse as would Rondo’s play. He is successful because his weaknesses (mainly scoring) are masked by the Celtics strengths (3 players who at times can require a double team).
The guy is only averaging 10 and 8 with 2 steals. He’s not exactly tearing up the box scores. He’s also the 4th/5th option on offense no matter who is in the game.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 6:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
um, also... those guys teams and their "environment of winning"
was caused by those players being superstars… not the other way around. It wasn’t the team fostering a good environment for them, they brought the winning to the team. Derrick Rose is doing the same thing. This is a garbage team right now that has no business being 9-11, it is only because of Derrick and BG’s exceptional play that this team is where it is.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 5:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But those teams didn't tank for development minutes.
Bynum, for example, wasn’t producing and therefore wasn’t playing many minutes. When he did produce, he got minutes. It’s one thing to complain about Thabo who is legitimately buried, but TT and Noah have and will get ample opportunities to produce, they just haven’t taken advantage of it so far. Just look at their 13 and 10 respective PERs.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 6:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
but tyrus has been playing better as of late
and got rewarded with a 5 minute stint and no chance to return. he was pretty ineffectual, but gray had no points and 1 assist in his FOUR DIFFERENT STINTS which is exactly what tyrus had. he had 9 rebounds, but had 22 minutes to tyrus’s 5. unnecessary.
by Jaina on Dec 8, 2008 7:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't the Bulls win the game?
At least VDN put out a lineup that got the team the victory. Gray wasn’t bad in the game. Do I want to see TT playing 5 minutes in the game long term, certainly not. But I don’t think that’s what he’ll be playing long term.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 8:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
that's not the point i was making at all.
you said when they produce they should get minutes, and gray was not that productive (especially when you consider his first stint only, since that was basically equivalent to tyrus’s playing time) and got 4 times as many minutes. who knows what the outcome would have been if tyrus had played.. that wasn’t the point at all.
by Jaina on Dec 8, 2008 10:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He played defense that VDN liked
as quoted in the paper. He also grabbed 9 boards in 22 minutes. Those are very good numbers. He wasn’t hurting the team. I think that’s more than you can say for TT and Noah at times this season.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 9, 2008 12:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That is a good point.
Look at the careers of Elton Brand and Tracy McGrady for example…they were accustomed to losing throughout the early part of their careers and have never been on a successful team.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 8, 2008 8:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
because their teammates have never been good enough.
they’ve just lost to better teams. it has nothing to do with anything else. ugh.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 8, 2008 9:31 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Rondo isn't a role player
Rondo certainly feeds off Garnett’s intensity, but he’s a star player. He’s a play maker with his passing and his defense. He literally was the key player that turned around games in the NBA Finals last year.
His athletic skill has caught up to his superior knowledge of spacing and movement and I think the biggest part of that is Garnett. Everybody works hard around Garnett or you cry about it like Glen Davis.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Dec 9, 2008 9:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would disagree
If the Cs never made the Garnett/Ray Allen deals, we’d be hearing nothing about Rondo right now/
by CJ Bulls on Dec 9, 2008 12:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
If the C’s had Gooden/Noah/Gray/Thomas as their bigs, folks would throw Rondo in every trade scenario in Boston…
He’s quick, he’s a good defender, he’s a good passer, but he’s not a scorer. Just a quicker Kirk Hinrich without the ability to consitently defend the 2’s, and while he’s not a bad general, he’s also helped by the Garnett leadership.
He’s not a bad player though and is far better than we thought, bottom of the top 10 to top 15 in the league.
by majoyenrac on Dec 9, 2008 2:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he's a much better defender than Hinrich.
he’s probably the best defensive PG in the league.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 9, 2008 8:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this isn't the argument at all
I’m not convinced that playing Aaron Gray is going to ensure a playoff bid, whereas playing Thomas and Noah dooms them.
Making the playoffs is still a goal. If the Bulls had veteran dependable talent then maybe this would be a more philosophical debate.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 8, 2008 3:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok but maybe it isn't what
Gray is doing, but rather what Noah and TT aren’t doing?
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 4:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Being fat?
Maybe Noah is on to something…
by JeffD on Dec 8, 2008 4:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That comment was pointless
Gray is consistently lauded for being in the “right” position on defense by VDN, something that has been written about several times as Noah’s weakness (not remember plays/positioning etc.)
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 5:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So what if he is in the right position
if you can get around him like he isn’t there and he literally can’t jump to block a shot.
And as has already been mentioned, why does this only apply to Thomas and Noah? Noc is as bad, if not worse, than those two, yet he slides.
by JeffD on Dec 8, 2008 6:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
because that isn't true
I don’t see many people going around him. He has struggled when forced to go outside on pick and rolls, but other than that he’s been decent on defense.
I have no explanation for Noc. I would guess it’s because Noc is a veteran, but other than that I’m not sure. He has struggled. I guess it’s similar to Deng who continued to play even when he struggled.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 8, 2008 6:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They go around him or he fouls them.
He sure as hell doesn’t move in time to get in front of them. I have no idea what you are seeing that is decent about Gray’s defense. I guess maybe standing in one place being tall. He is good at that. Although sometimes he messes it up by trying to move and ends up getting a block called.
Noc and Deng aren’t similar at all in this respect, Noc has been terrible on defense for a long time. Now he’s just terrible on offense to go along with it. And that, again, is the point. Who cares if Gray is in the right spot on defense if he sucks? Who cares if Noc is a scrappy veteran if he sucks? Like Matt said, if Thomas, and to a lesser extent Noah, weren’t playing because there were decent players playing ahead of them, fine. But they aren’t playing so Gray and Nocioni can? Gray has peaked at “bad” and Noc is already playing worse than both TT and Noah and is rapidly de

by 