Forget about both Miller and Kaman
Kings' center Brad Miller admitted to the Sacramento Bee recently that he has a difficult time dealing with losing.
"I hate losing, hate it," said Miller. "I'm a real competitive person, and I get real grouchy and hard to be around.
==================================
Brian Windhorst of the Cleveland Plain Dealer has reported that the Clippers are expected to hold onto their stable of big men this season.
Windhorst claims that word around the NBA is that Los Angeles won't trade Zach Randolph, Marcus Camby or Chris Kaman.
==================================
So that pretty much counts both of them out.
This season is getting worse and worse. Paxson better have a nice lil trick up his sleeve.
about 3 years ago
NormVanBeer
24 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Don't see how Miller is better off in Sac then.
Plus this team theoretically could win some games…especially if we made our roster resemble an actual NBA teams by say getting a center. Most everyone hates to lose, except Larry Hughes who just wants to play.
agreed.
NVB, you’re being too cynical even for me. Or maybe I’m just over-protective of any Brad Miller hope.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 29, 2008 12:44 AM CST up reply actions
lol
maybe so…the recent losing streak has made me feel ultra cynical of this entire org the past few days. Maybe a win tonight against the Nets will cure everything…ahh who am I kidding…we’ll lose tonight and I’ll hate Noc even more.
http://theSpiderWebSystem.com/ANT2501
Any word that claims Zach Randolph is untouchable
should not be taken seriously.
"He's not scared to take that shot," Rose said. "That's Larry. No matter what, I don't need to remind him to shoot. He's willing to shoot any time."
The Flippers are over the salary cap,
so for 2 months after acquiring Randolph, he can not be part of a multi-player trade which makes him very difficult to move.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 28, 2008 11:15 PM CST up reply actions
Well...
I’m not going to track down the link right now, but if I recall correctly one of the ESPN writers (or maybe it was Sam Smith) was saying that the Kings owners really like Brad Miller, and would like to send him to a place that he would enjoy… an even though he hates losing (doesn’t every professional athlete?… except Hughes of course) they mentioned that he would likely welcome a trade to Chicago, mostly because of the proximity to his Indiana home. Plus, he’s familiar with the organization.
My name isn't Ron... I run a DJ and Karaoke business named Kidron Music... my name is Jesse...
his familiarity with the organization
may not be a plus for the bulls… haha.
but yeah, i remember reading that as well. they had said he wanted to retire a pacer but he probably wouldn’t mind coming to the bulls. plus he was on the bulls when they were really bad. this is hopefully an improvement…
If Brad Miller is out, good. I don't think he's the answer.
Kamen is still intriguing, but we really need to focus on trimming other positions while we get ready to make a bigger/badder move trying to bring in a superstar at C.
How many superstar centers are there?
And how many of them would ever be available to the Bulls? The only one I can think of is Amare (if you count him as a center), who will be a free agent in 2010.
Why resort to name calling?
-Dionysus2.0
because I wish to insult you personally
-your friendly BullsBlogger
Mihm for Sefolosha
The Bulls have an overabundance of wings and need a big man; the Lakers have an overabundance of bigs and need another guard to replace the injured Jordan Farmar.
Risks:
1. Sefolosha may yet blossom into a starter-quality player.
2. Mihm has shown himself to be injury prone, and may go down with another injury.
Rewards:
1. While Mihm may not wow anyone he’s a decent player when he’s healthy.
2. Mihm’s expiring contract frees up more cash for Ben Gordon.
My questions for this forum are:
1. Are there any additional risks/rewards to this scenario?
2. Do the rewards outweigh the risk or do the risks outweigh the rewards?
"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."
You know, he's a guy we ought to go get
I don’t see any real risks to getting him, and he’s statistically been quite decent on the rare occasions he’s been healthy.
De gustibus non est disputandum
He can't be worse than Gray
Plus he can be signed for cheap.
Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 29, 2008 10:00 PM CST up reply actions
sold.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 29, 2008 3:23 PM CST up reply actions
Sure... but what problem does Sefolosha solve for the Lakers?
I mean, I guess they don’t need Mihm at all, and maybe Sefolosha might help somehow, somewhere. Dream, dream, dream….
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
a defensive minded guard/sf
He isnt that great to fill their PG spot, but he can fill in in the triangle probably. Then in the playoffs etc, he’d be great to have on their bench getting some minutes slowing down Paul Pierce, JJ etc.
Would you rather trade for Hinrich+??? for Odom?
Odom’s playing very well, but their SF defense doesn’t seem a problem at all. Not one Thabo could solve, anyway.
Their PG D, OTOH, could use help, along with a competent walker of the ball up the court. Although trading away Odom makes the SF position worse…….
I don’t know. Obviously, they probably couldn’t care less about Mihm
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Sure but I don't really see the Lakers moving Odom
or wanting to commit all that salary to Kirk.
I think they’re much more open to tinkering then big changes.
Well, if the old Ron Harper could play next to Jordan,
Thabo could play next to Kobe.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 30, 2008 1:20 AM CST up reply actions
Phil likes guards who can shoot
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 30, 2008 9:29 AM CST up reply actions
Odom's importance
It’s not that I don’t think highly of Hinirch, but Odom is too important for the Lakers to trade for a couple of reasons.
1. Versatility: He can play all 5 positions in a pinch, and is a solid 4.
2. Speed and Length: The Lakers’ new defensive scheme is tailor-made for long and quick players like Odom.
3. Insurance Policy: He can fill in adequately for either Gasol or Bynum should they succumb to injury.
4. Expiring Contract: The Lakers would like to re-sign Ariza next season without incurring too much of a luxury tax penalty. Since Odom has said he’d like to finish his career in LA, even if it meant taking a paycut, the Lakers may be able to keep two very good players instead of just 1.
5. Chemistry: Odom has sacrificed a lot for this team. He’s a pretty humble, good-natured guy. I think he’s a good role model for younger players, boneheaded mistakes aside.
"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
In Association With
Ball Don't Lie - NBA - Yahoo! Sport
- Days of NBA Lives: Wherein Rick Fox isn’t here for the right reasons
- A shameless businessman wants to trademark “Linsanity”
- Video: NBA players give their Valentine’s advice
- Chicago’s owner sees an unfortunate comparison between Derrick Rose and Michael Jordan
- Another day of a combination of Jeremy Lin’s last name and mental instability
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
