Pistons 104, Bulls 98: post-game stub
Not much to say. The Bulls need their backcourt to be really good nearly all the time, and both Rose (foul trouble all night) and Gordon (getting fouled with no call trouble) had issues with officiating. Neither could guard Rodney Stuckey, with Hughes and Thabo (yuck, some defensive stopper) joining them in those ranks.
Luol Deng was terrible. Same story as much of the season in terms of his being lost in this offense, and lately it seems he's getting stripped a lot when trying to make up for it when he does get the ball. Defensively, in the second half he was owned by Tayshaun Prince for the umpteenth time in their careers.
At least Tyrus Thomas was back, got a lot of minutes, and played well. He was a bit jumper-happy but did finally start diving to the rim after setting picks, usually drawing a foul.
Noah received the starting nod over Aaron Gray tonight, and didn't do much with it. I actually think he did a nice job on Rasheed to start the second half, to the point where 'Sheed received a technical arguing against the tactics Noah was using, and then forced up bad shots against him to try and coax Noah into fouls.
And again, the modest success of small-ball in a previous game led to Vinny trying it again when it wasn't necessary. Thomas was back, no need to see Deng/Noc as PF/C, ever. It wasn't a very long stretch, but considering how bad the defense is normally, those stretches make things even worse. Nocioni had a good offensive game which earned him his minutes, but I think Vinny fails to realize that going small doesn't mean you have to punt the idea of defending the rim, it can merely mean playing 3 guards, having Noc as PF, or having Thomas/Noah as the only big. Not the 6'9" and under squad.
The re-appearance of the Larry Hughes we know and hate continues...he had a nice shooting first half, but had some patented rushed shots in the 2nd when the Bulls were closing in, and hasn' t shot well from three in the last half-dozen games. Gordon behaves the same way sometimes when the team is down, but his shots go in far more often.
And despite random spurts of getting the deficit within single digits, the Bulls never led in this game.
0 recs |
115 comments
Comments
this team is depressing and is going to be 13-20 before we know it.
by fundamentallysound on Dec 23, 2008 10:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Happy Holidays!
This team needs a field trip, or maybe Aaron Gray should host another ping-pong tournament. The lack of communication on the floor is what aggravates me. The refs were bad, but this game was a loss from the beginning when they just jacked up shots after Rose had a nifty drive to the hoop. You can’t be a good PG if your teammates won’t even cut to the hoop or try and establish a post position to swing the ball around.
Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Dec 23, 2008 10:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Too bad Aaron Gray didn't trip
and fall on one of the officials calling phantom fouls on Rose – that would have been a good use of his size.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 24, 2008 2:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No One deserves
that sort of fate….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Dec 24, 2008 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no mercy on refs
who call fouls based on reputation instead of observation.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 24, 2008 1:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And when rose gets calls
on reputation…then where will u stand….?
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Dec 24, 2008 3:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
On the same side of the line?
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 24, 2008 10:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
AI is a different case he is a known flopper
Also Rose seems like a guy who can succeed without the flopping and reputation calls as he progresses.
by Camry on Dec 24, 2008 10:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but we shouldn't question anything they're doing...
…because even though they look like shit (and, some may say, have gotten lucky), they have a better record than “you” expected and thus, you can’t be disappointed. Jerk.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Dec 24, 2008 8:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Joakim Noah, C 17 0-1 0-0 2-2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
smh
"If there’s any haters in here right now that don’t have nobody to hate on, feel free to hate on me." - A.P.N.S.
by Belize on Dec 23, 2008 10:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
At least he was starting.
Getting those valuable developmental minutes with Rose.
" I've looked at these numbers and decided the #1 problem
is that Ben Gordon is selfish..." -your friendly bulls blogger
by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 24, 2008 12:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 24, 2008 10:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with yfBB
Joakim did a pretty nice job on Sheed starting the 3rd…
When we started making a game out of it…
suprised to see he even made it to 17min really tho
by reprisal on Dec 24, 2008 3:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Should he have when he contributed virtually nothing in 17?
by CJ Bulls on Dec 24, 2008 11:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
with Gooden out?
sure.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 24, 2008 11:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bulls lose
I get chest pains . . .
The coincidence happens often
by Option27 on Dec 23, 2008 11:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The officiating was horrendous tonight
That’s all I really feel like saying.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Dec 24, 2008 12:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wait, how close was this game?
I’m looking at the box, and it’s looking like it was pretty competitive. They led in FG% and 3P%; the only thing that faltered with the Bulls (it seems) were their free throws.
by NittanyCub on Dec 24, 2008 12:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It was pretty much at 10 the whole game
We had runs when Rose came in but then he picked up a foul quick and was out. (both him and Gordon almost didn’t play 3 quarters)
by Camry on Dec 24, 2008 12:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So basically:
We lose because our two best players got called for crap fouls, is what I’m hearing.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 24, 2008 12:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
About 2 calls
Were from AI’s famous jerking of the head move and another one when he tripped on his own feet they called it on Ben.
Granted we played horrible on D but we didn’t have our best offensive weapons for a good amount. So they get to run out more and with all that it was still a winnable game.
by Camry on Dec 24, 2008 12:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, particularly Rose who was...
…pretty much taken out of the game early on due to garbage calls. Second time this has happened (D.J. Augustin). I think the refs are just running him through the ringer right now…but in years to come he’ll get the whistles. I read somewhere the other day where a guy believes that Rose will lead the league in FT attempts someday. Pretty good prediction right there.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 8:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Iverson took Rose out, his fouls, who were they on? frustration
Iverson took Rose out in a hurry, fouls were on A.I., he knew what he was doing and here is a more balanced report by the bulls website:
“Larry Hughes led a balanced attack with 19 points and five assists, but the Bulls (13-15) couldn’t overcome a big first-half deficit in a 104-98 loss in Detroit. Ben Gordon and Andres Nocioni scored 18 points apiece for Chicago, which shot 47 percent from the field.”
Off the bench, quit complaining, who did better? Who kept Iverson to a 5 pt game when averaging 18? Or was he on Stucky for 40, who also nailed Rose several times?
All Offense on Blog a bull, never Defense, maybe a line, no stats. What do you expect, your two centers combine for 4 points? All those second chance shots I guess? So was Rose even hitting? C’mon, we got beat by a better team, no bad calls, “T” on Wallace, it was called decent. Lot worse shooting percentages on this team. Matter of fact, until last week, all of them were worse than Hughes, your Bully a Bull.
by Know on Dec 24, 2008 1:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Is this English?
Or are you just drunk?
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Dec 24, 2008 1:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no idea how to interpret that post....I don't talk about calls often
Unless their blatantly obvious in either direction….or they go our way :)
But seriously there can be times when refs have too much impact on a game or get too aggressive or anticipate.
They could be the better team but their (like us) terribly inconsistent. And not too strong on defense plus we were just playing horribly flat early. In the end I think everything else is pretty much same old same old or easy to see but we got back in the game early 3rd quarter and then Rose is taken out again after a 9-0 run.
by Camry on Dec 24, 2008 3:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In another thread I said
It’s hard to hate Deng because he is such a good guy. I take that back. I can’t stand this guy and there is no words that describe how much I want this piece of sh*t off this team. This game just displayed how completely mediocre he is. I don’t even know if I would call his play mediocre, it’s worse than that.
If somebody can name ONE thing this guy excels at..Tell me because I can’t see it. His jump shot sucks now, whenever he drives to the basket he loses the ball, he can’t play defense, can’t rebound, can’t pass, and did I mention he can’t catch the ball?
PA-THE-TIC is what he is.
by illini23 on Dec 24, 2008 1:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Actually, it would be nice
if Deng would develop an Adrian Dantley type post game.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 24, 2008 2:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it would be nice
if deng would do ANYTHING in the games
by CJOliveira on Dec 24, 2008 8:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can say that again.
Similar players in that they’ll overwhelm nobody with their athleticism. Dantley capitalized by developing one hell of a back to the basket game (to the tune of 24ppg for his career) despite being only 6’5".
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 8:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow NittanyCub. You're a pretty evil person I see.
I figured I was the only person you were like that to…LOL.
Illini23, feel free to post whatever you want as long as BullsBlogger doesn’t object to the content.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 6:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
just post it here
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 24, 2008 10:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You've got that right
I’m getting tired of Deng, too. And starting to fell the same way lexdiamonds0730 . Yesterday he didn’t do anything good besides getting a few rebounds. And if his jumper is not going in, I prefer having Hughes or Thabo out there. At least they defend well and make a shot now and then…
http://comunidadebulleana.blogspot.com/ - Comunidade Bulleana (O blog dos Bulls em Portugal)
by bull83 on Dec 24, 2008 8:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
despite his struggles
deng’s FG% is still higher than larry hughes’.
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 8:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
But not much. Deng’s FG% is 44% and Hughes is 42%… You may say that this is just a phase from Hughes, but he’s playing much better than last year. And Deng is playing worst. On the last four games, Deng only made more than 10 points once. It was against the Celtics (19 points). Besides, when did Deng hit a winner???
Look, I’m not defending Hughes, not at all. I was one of those guys who hated Hughes last year. Yes, he does a lot of shit and yesterday he didn’t do much on the second half. But if it wasn’t for him, we would had lost the game at halftime… I blame yesterday lost to the refs, that gave every call to the Pistons and none to the Bulls. But Deng played poorly… again!
http://comunidadebulleana.blogspot.com/ - Comunidade Bulleana (O blog dos Bulls em Portugal)
by bull83 on Dec 24, 2008 8:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
REFS called a SUPER GARBAGE GAME!!!
Rarely do I blame officials for the outcome of games, but last nights game is one where the officials really jobbed us.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 9:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
deng
made 2 crucial shots in OT against the clips.
i actually don’t hate hughes as much as many people on this site, but to say hughes “will make a shot now and then” when he’s actually shooting worse than deng, doesn’t make sense. especially when career numbers would suggest that probably luol will improve and larry will continue to decline (his 3p, for instance, has gone down 8 points in the last 2 weeks). it just doesn’t make sense to say you’d rather have a guy out there for his shooting whose career HIGH FG (under 47) isn’t even up to the struggling guy’s career AVERAGE (under 48). deng’s career low numbers are still better than what hughes is currently shooting and what his average is.
i’m not trying to defend deng’s play – he’s sucked. but he’s going to be a member of this team a long time and they’ve got to try to work him in somehow. the fact that he hasn’t improved in 2 seasons at the age of 23 is on the coaching staff. he’s seemed to have been willing to work but everyone forgets that luol, despite being a vet, is even younger than i am! and still needs direction!
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 9:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is the point I made in the "Luol Deng Myth" thread
It’s no secret I’m disappointed in Deng’s play. But the blame for his lack of development lies squarely at the feet of Skiles and his staff. Deng works hard in the offseason and should be better (although i wish he’d spend more time in the weightroom). But in Skiles’ drive and kick offense, Deng wasn’t encouraged to diversify his game very much although I KNOW that he was willing to do what was asked of him.
Now Jaina, he did hit two shots against the Clippers, but Rose, Gordon and Nocioni also came up big in the game. So we shouldn’t credit Deng for doing what he should be doing. We just need far more of that from him than we’ve seen to this point.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 9:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i was just responding to the
“when did Deng hit a winner?” of course he wasn’t the only factor, but he made 2 real important shots. i assumed it was a dig at him because hughes made the game winner at utah and also put us in the lead against the knicks. but his 2 buckets in OT against the clips were of equal importance to those 2 shots, is all.
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 9:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you guys make two great similiar points - that shouldn't be loss in disagreement of game winning shots!
“the fact that he hasn’t improved in 2 seasons at the age of 23 is on the coaching staff. he’s seemed to have been willing to work but everyone forgets that luol, despite being a vet, is even young”
“But the blame for his lack of development lies squarely at the feet of Skiles and his staff. Deng works hard in the offseason and should be better (although i wish he’d spend more time in the weightroom)”
man up!
by exult463 on Dec 24, 2008 10:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks -
lex was agreeing with me there. i was just clarifying my statement to bull83 about deng’s shots against the clips. i wasn’t trying to say how great he did that game (cause other than those 2 shots he sucked), or that other people didn’t do their part in that game… just that it was in response to a particular question. :)
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 10:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, maybe I was unfair with him on that
But i didn’t see any improvement from him on the last two seasons, like you said. Now, he even can’t make a jumper, that was one of his best weapons.
Now, what should we do with this guy? Everyone is saying that we should give him more time. But don’t you think we’ve been patients enough? Don’t you think that Deng should be playing better by now? He’s one of our captains for god sacks… That’s why I’m really pissed. On another post, I was against lex, but now I’m begging to feel that he’s been right all along… Maybe Deng isn’t that guy that we thought we would become
http://comunidadebulleana.blogspot.com/ - Comunidade Bulleana (O blog dos Bulls em Portugal)
by bull83 on Dec 24, 2008 2:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i think he still deserves more time
but maybe i’m starting to be in the minority. i really want him to succeed but i see why people are becoming disillusioned with him. the other thing is from the sam smith article saying that luol didn’t get a shot for 27 straight possessions. doesn’t seem like the team is even putting him in a position to succeed – unless during that time he had wide open looks that he passed up. but i don’t see how a guy could get into a groove if he’s overlooked for that long.
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can Deng be coached
to have “the Dog”?
by Granny Waiters on Dec 24, 2008 10:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Big Granville!!
Deng has it inside of him. You don’t get to the NBA and not possess it. But he is too content on the court. You can be as nice a guy as you want in sports and have as gentle a nature as there ever was (Mike Singletary comes to mind….VERY nice and serene guy off the field), but in competition only the guy who is willing to cut your throat wins (again Singletary and the crazy eyes comes to mind…LOL)!! Deng is a terrific guy, but he has gotta unleash that fury. I was watching some games from the series against Miami again the other night. Deng had that look and played with passion. Gordon’s demeanor allows him to be even keeled and still be dangerous. Luol needs to channel that energy and passion that he played those 4 games against Miami with.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OK then,
can we hire Adrian Dantley to teach Deng how to post up?
I think Gordon is one of those guys without memory of his last shot or the game situation – he seems just as collected taking the last shot in a game with time expiring as in the pre-game shoot-around. This is a good thing.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 24, 2008 1:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The fact itself that we are discussing
who is better Deng or LH is very frustrating.
My only hope for Deng is that he is 23.
General manager needs the ability to foretell what is going to happen tomorrow,next week, next month, and next year. And to have the ability afterwards to explain why it didn't happen.
Sir Paxdorf.
by Azabullsfan on Dec 24, 2008 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
At least the Bulls seem to be taking notice
“Luol’s trying to find himself,” coach Vinny Del Negro said. "He has to keep hustling and find ways to impact the game. We’re trying to get him involved with certain play sets.
“When he’s aggressive and after it defensively, he’s a big plus for us. We need him to play well for us to have a chance.”
Whether Deng is the victim of an offensive scheme designed to keep the middle open for rookie Derrick Rose or struggling to find rhythm because of shots Rose and Ben Gordon are taking, he clearly has been relegated to a stationary jump shooter and a non-primary option.
Deng, who stayed active with 11 rebounds, declined to discuss that dynamic, merely saying he feels fine physically.
by Option27 on Dec 24, 2008 3:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks and I have the same problem as you posted above
Bulls lose
I get chest pains . . .
The coincidence happens often
by Option27 on Dec 23, 2008 11:04 PM CST reply reply actions actions 0 recs
I thought there were some opportunities to take the lead and possibly demoralize the Pistons. The Bulls overcame a a large deficit and got within 1. There were two Bull 3s that went in and out and Stuckey was on fire. The Pistons were able to keep the lead and we couldn’t get over the barrier to get the lead.
I like my cooking analogy where the Bulls have good ingredients but cannot come up with the right recipe. I don’t know what it is about my psyche but like you I get too upset when the Bulls are playing like crappers and often turn off the game and follow it on Yahoo. I find that less painful.
by chgobr on Dec 24, 2008 9:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If "Deng is the victim of an offensive scheme designed to keep the middle open for rookie Derrick Rose"...
…then we have a serious problem on our hands. Rose is the future and we are going to play a style tailored to his strengths. At this level, talented players find a way to co-exist as long as there are no attitudinal issues and I don’t think we have much of that, if any, on this team now. Bottom line is Deng better “find himself” quickly and adapt to the way Rose is going to play.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 9:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i think that's partly on the coaching staff
obviously the offense needs to cater to rose’s style, but deng should be able to move without the ball well for rose to find him. ideally i don’t see their styles conflicting. deng is still a young guy and his lack of improvement is on the coaches here, since it doesn’t seem like it’s lack of desire to work that brings him to this point. vinny and whoever else needs to tell him what he needs to do and not just let him float off. he needs help here. he’s struggling with his shot, but i think he’ll find his groove with that, but he does still look stagnant in the offense. and that’s on the coaches.
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 9:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
interesting ...
I noticed the same thing… but do you feel they tell “Deng just come down court and then perch yourself behind the 3pt line, right side in the corner?” And don’t move, wait for the ball to come your way and if open then take the shot or create off the dribble? Oops coach? I’m not hitting the 3 pt shot too often and when I dribble too much I get stripped often..
I agree Deng needs to “move without the ball” and slash within the line, with doesn’t happen often enough…
man up!
by exult463 on Dec 24, 2008 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
correction .. "which doesn’t"
man up!
by exult463 on Dec 24, 2008 10:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think the plan is to have Rose, and maybe a pick-setter
and then have everyone else stand out of the way.
but that seems to happen a lot.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 24, 2008 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well .. as I previously said
I will not bash VDN, a rookie coach. Still Deng’s strength is not being used, and with VDN and the two new assistants, no coaching continuity and rememberance of what Deng does well, other that PaxsDorf who rewarded him with a good contract. We might take for granted these coaches knew Deng’s game prior to accepting positions here?
The new coaches don’t listen to Pete Myers? or is Pete just collecting a pay check like Paxs? Mike Brown who replaced him? Who hires theses coaches? Why doesn’t Paxs hire specialist in player development? Would this cut into profit margin too much? I believe VDN will soon find out how to use Deng better, but still this won’t address Deng getting better than he already is!
man up!
by exult463 on Dec 24, 2008 10:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i don't know what they tell him
or if they’re just not telling him enough. if he’s screwing up, they need to tell him what he SHOULD be doing. and obviously it’s on him to do it, but if they told him enough times, he’d probably get it. i feel like he’s not getting the direction he needs – especially with quotes from vinny saying “luol’s trying to find himself.” vinny, maybe you should help him find himself! yeah he then says “we’re trying to get him involved with certain play sets” well, that’s what they should do and hopefully they come up with something. i don’t know.
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
to add to this
there was a quote somewhere from sam saying that luol didn’t get a shot for 27 straight possessions. that doesn’t seem to me like a team, coach, whatever, trying to help a guy find his groove.
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 3:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this game was frustrating to watch
Iverson did nothing except accumulate phantom fouls on our guards. Interior D was completely horrible. Stuckey got whatever he wanted. Noah was bad other than frustrating Sheed. Luol who?
Vinny’s rotations stunk yet again. Noc hit a few shots and had some nice drives, but his D was horrendous as usual.
http://theSpiderWebSystem.com/ANT2501
http://apspidermarketing.ws/scoreatwill/
by NormVanBeer on Dec 24, 2008 8:20 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
On another note..
…this Neil Funk is irritating. he is still in radio mode, describing every second of the action. We have eyes Neil! Not that there is much to see and appreciate with this team right now, except for Rose and some occaisional flashes from BG, and TT
by bullsfaninbigapple on Dec 24, 2008 9:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
describing every second of the action?
who are you listening to? i tend to hear nothing but old married couple banter from stacey and neil.
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 10:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I never thought
I’d long for Duh-or and Red. Oh my goodness, roll it. King and Funk are the worst announcers in professional sports.
by Cannoli on Dec 24, 2008 11:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly you've never watched a White Sox game...
:)
by smash! on Dec 24, 2008 11:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh Please!
The Celtics have the worst announcers – they were so bad I changed to a feed with some Russian guy during the last Bulls-celtics game.
Red Kerr was best with Jim Durham.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 24, 2008 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good review.
That game was hard to watch. With Rose on the pine, it makes me realize what we’d have if we hadn’t won the lottery and drafted him.
This might sound rash, but I was never a Deng fan and I truly believe he has to go, now. Send Noah with him and try to get something in return. (Then put all our efforts into getting Kamen or preferably going hard after Bosh.) It’s not like it’s hard to find a productive 3 in this league. And at this point, Noc or Thabo at the 3 is more productive. Seriously, we all rip Noc, but he gives us more than Deng and he knows how to play off Rose. We need a 3 that can shoot the three and extend the D to open things up more for Rose. Right now, I feel more confident in TT’s ability to stroke it from the arc. (That TT 3 was my only highlight from last night:)
by smash! on Dec 24, 2008 11:17 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
forgot to mention this
Vinny tries to mask his super-small lineups by throwing in some zone, but Nocioni is too dumb a defensive player to work in a zone either.
Basically, this defense has major problems with Nocioni in the game, because Rose has to play, and he’s pretty much letting everyone get by him, so you need big men who can rotate.
Also, Noc did one of his more annoying traits last night, unnecessarily giving the ‘hard foul’ on Maxiel when he could’ve just played defense. Maxiel was stuck under the rim, surrounded, and was starting to jump backwards to force a shot. And while Deng’s right there on him, Noc just lazily crashes his arm across Max’s body. Great show of the grit to some, but I find it to be a stupid play.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 24, 2008 11:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
it strikes me
that if bulls didn’t have a rookie coach, someone who had more stature then d-rose, then that coach would probably bench rose for his horrid Defense. That would be horrible to see him sitting on the pine in a phil jackson or larry brown team because he hasn’t figured out the d end. VDn has got it right on this one letting the guy figure it out on the fly… he just needs to put players in the front-court that can rotate as you say.
by mandoman10 on Dec 24, 2008 2:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, as much as I get mad at Vinny
for his awul “matchups” philosophy and his horrendous substitution patterns…at least he plays Derrick all the time.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Dec 24, 2008 3:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure of many that did that
Maybe if Rose wasn’t exceeding expectation or anything but when I see him it looks like a combination of not trying to foul someone and not know what to do.
by Camry on Dec 24, 2008 10:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't mind the officiating as much
as VDNs insistence of putting Rose on Iverson. Iverson might be in the top 10 of all time for drawing fouls. Why not put him on Stuckey or Hamilton. Especially after the 2 foul first quarter.
by CJ Bulls on Dec 24, 2008 11:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
had to be "matchups" from what I could tell
maybe he was trying to matchup speed for speed, who knows. I think Iverson is too quick for Gordon, so maybe that was the thought with putting Rose on him.
Iverson scored, what was it, 5 points? But he was the player of the game.
http://theSpiderWebSystem.com/ANT2501
http://apspidermarketing.ws/scoreatwill/
by NormVanBeer on Dec 24, 2008 11:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know they like to give him calls
But not usually back to back to back and to the star/leader of the other team. I dunno I don’t think guys should get calls for faking instead of working for an actual foul or just going to the hoop.
Then theres the entertainment aspect of it as well.
by Camry on Dec 24, 2008 10:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Must be nice to feel so confident
luol (chicago): Coach -Since I’m so undersized and have such bad hands, how many hours at IMG will I need to become a decent NBA player?
David Thorpe: Undersized? No. I have noticed your hands recently, hope it’s just a temporary thing. Grabbing 11 boards last night helped. For you Bulls fans, have no worries, he’ll figure it out.
Richard (Northbrook, IL): Hi David, I have to get this off my chest. I used to hate you. You always sound so confident on the radio and podcasts. And so chipper about guys that have spent time with you. I thought Tyrus stunk. I thought Courtney Lee was average. I even thought that a few years ago Kevin Martin couldn’t play in the NBA.I was wrong, wrong, and wrong. So now, when you suggest that Luol Deng will figure it out for us, I believe you. Can you help me next? I’m an accountant.
David Thorpe: Listen, when you spend lots of time with people, it takes a lot of the guesswork out of it. I’m wrong often, for lots of reasons, but betting on a sure thing like Luol Deng is easy money.
by Option27 on Dec 24, 2008 12:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
glad he noticed the bad hands part too
I though it had been happening a lot recently.
It’s easy to be confident in Deng. History’s on the side of players not falling apart when they’re 23.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 24, 2008 1:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Channing Frye????
Outstanding rookie campaign. Left his game back in 2006 though because this guy is a bum!! Not that I thought he’d ever be as good as he was in his rookie season, but he’s a young guy who cannot find the magic.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Point taken though. For the love of GOD I hope and pray that Deng finds his way as long as he's wearing...
…a Chicago Bulls uniform.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 2:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Deng possible future: Power forward
I know he now takes minutes at the PF position but it is unintended or planned. Deng’s outside game is limited and he has no significant range. Sort of like many PFs in the game. His range is more common with PFs. Deng is 6’9" and that is common with smaller PFs, like TT. He is 220 lbs and he is light for PFs but we know he is willing to work on himself to get better. How difficult would it be for him to add 15-20 lbs in the off-season. Put him in the Eddy Curry diet and tell him to add muscle with a strength trainer. He will make his money by being in the right place, right time to rebound and pick up garbage points, so he will get more chances to finish before defenders set up. He is now listed as 5 lbs more than TT and the same size. What is surprising is that Paxson talked about moving him to the 2-guard position, that only tells how badly he knows the players he drafted.
by Fastbreak on Dec 24, 2008 2:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
How insightful! I agree
Well much with the part on Paxson, but more importantly with the Deng move to the PF.
Deng would need to add muscle and toughness, but much everything else is there for him to build on. Also being closer to the rim, his stats would go up immediately by not being perched behind the 3pt line always.
Tyrus much more prefers the wing, and Noc is probably a better 3 than Deng at the SF position. (regardless of the majority BaB view)
I hope someone like VDN picks up on this, and remembers just last year, as you pointed out, the clueless idiot statements from Paxson about moving “no handles” Deng to SG for stretches during a game. This year, 2008, Paxson’s new clueless statement is moving Kirk to SG. If Paxson is still GM summer of 2009, what will his next clueless statement be? Moving Kirk Hinrich, his 10 million dollar investment to small forward so he can get some playing time.
Correction. Kirk, Noc and Deng signed the contract presented before them, they did nothing wrong and should not be subject to this consistent ridicule. Not only by me, but many on BaB. Yet someone is responsible for making basketball not so enjoyable for these three good basketball players. Guess who? And today can I say I expect something good to come from JP? ..
If most would just listen unbiasedly, (not evening considering his draft picks and non trades) to Paxson without being misled by some child idolatry of some phantom image, you’ll see that this guy has no basketball clue outside of marketing, a decent public personality and a set jump shot. A classic good guy finishing last!
man up!
by exult463 on Dec 25, 2008 5:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Huh.
Well, it’s worth a try, putting Deng to PF and Tyrus to SF. Would be interesting at the very least.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 25, 2008 10:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Deng is NOT falling apart people!
It’s the same old “left it all back in the olympic games” scenario for Deng. Instead of using the offseason to recharge his over-achieving, low-athleticism physical abilities, he spent everything he had trying to get a meaningless joke of a British team into the real tourney, just so they can be humiliated in 4 years from now.
How stupid can someone be. He wasn’t born there and doesn’t live there now, but he’s willing to sacrifice the 2008-09 NBA season, just to get them in the real games. Hilarious Lu, I thought you had a half of a brain but it’s actually less than that. When Britain plays in the next big tourny, they will get blown out by 35 every single game. How is that a step up? And it won’t be like the team deserves to be there, just Lu does. The rest of the team couldn’t make a division 2 NCAA starting lineup….And once Lu is gone they will start to lose every game by 40-50 pts.
I’m sick of watching mediocre Bulls players feeding their egos by participating in the olympics, and then stinking up the entire United Center the entire next season. We’ve seen it with Noce, Hinrich, and now Lu and Thabo. Lu looks completely gassed, and he’s slow for the nba to begin with. If Lu plans on attending any more olympic games as anything other than a spectator, we need to trade him. Only the truly physically gifted like LeBron or Kobe can pull it off. Definitely not an overachiever like we have many of(namely Luol).
I hate the olympics anyway, and haven’t had positive feelings for the “16 days of Glory”, since I was about 10 in 1990. It’s a big political farce and I’m not going to pretend it’s anything other than what it is. Pax need to start putting clauses in contracts to prevent pointless olympic participation. It’s killing these mediocre overachievers we have out there. I am surprised Luol doesn’t just come out and admit these things, because the only other logical explanation is he just “plain sucks”, and I am not ready to go there yet.
by JayDangles on Dec 24, 2008 2:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
olympics is in london next time
they get an automatic birth and im pretty sure it means allot. also wouldn’t him being the top-dog go to guy on that team be good for his development.
by mandoman10 on Dec 24, 2008 2:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
they are actually so bad
that GB does NOT automatically qualify.
by Jaina on Dec 24, 2008 3:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why don't you ask
Kidd, Anthony, James, Williams etc. if they thought their participation in the Olympics was pointless? Over react much?
by sue369 on Dec 24, 2008 4:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah right, there's no comparison
Those guys aren’t the only scorers on the team, not to mention they play in the real games. You can’t possibly compare Deng playing almost all of every game to the half games of most of those guys. And he struggles harder to get his numbers whereas they do it with less effort.
Do you really believe Deng’s cool experience playing in the almost olympic games was worth more than playing well for the Bulls who just recently started to pay him 10 million a year? If he could do both I’d say it’s great, but he can’t and it’s pathetic not great. Have you seen him play lately?
by JayDangles on Dec 24, 2008 5:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't even talking
about Deng. You said partcipating in the Olympics is pointless. I said ask those players I mentioned if they thought it was pointless. Deng’s summer experience may or may not have anything to do with how he is playing now. He may be under a ton of pressure to perform because of his new contract. Unless you have talked to Deng personally you don’t know why he is not playing well. None of us do.
by sue369 on Dec 24, 2008 6:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
tyrus thomas
looked great in this game by the way. Thorpe kept confidence in him and my hopes and dreams are returning to normally extremely high expectations.
by mandoman10 on Dec 24, 2008 2:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
Now I’m just waiting to be shot down. :D
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 24, 2008 10:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We HAVE TO GET KAMAN NOW
I’d be willing to part with gooden, hinrich, and deng. They can have any of the two out of three they want. Tyrus and Noah need to play with a true big guy WHO CAN MOVE. A front court of Tyrus and Kaman would be great at defending the paint and mostly blocking shots. Kaman deserves a fresh start, and so does Deng, hell I’m so SICK OF DREW GOODEN I’D TRADE HIM FOR THE RIGHTS TO BIMBO COLES.
by armstrong2389 on Dec 24, 2008 4:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's harsh!
Surely there’s a way to get a better big man than Kaman. He needs a fresh start in a European league.
by JayDangles on Dec 24, 2008 4:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Never thought I'd say this
but I might actually consider just trading Deng straight-up for Kaman. Might. Time to go duck now, I suppose…
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Dec 24, 2008 5:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That might be a very good deal for the Bulls (actually)
and I’m with you on the never thinking I’d feel that way. Kaman could at least be useful. Deng is a non-factor nowadays. I just wouldn’t throw in Hinrich or Gooden.
by JayDangles on Dec 24, 2008 5:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Kaman would be a great move for us. Except I wouldn't offer all those guys.
First thing i’d offer is KirK straight up (crazy how Kaman went 6th and Kirk went 7th in the 2003 draft and now I’m proposing swapping the two). I say this because it seems the Clips may attempt to move Baron Davis because he and Dunleavy aren’t co-existing very well. If that happens then Kirk would come in handy for them. Also they make roughly the same money so that swap would be feasible from that perspective.
Plus the Clippers have Camby and Randolph who can start, but I’m sure they want to get some time for DeAndre Jordan since they have a horrible record anyway. Trading Kaman accomplishes that.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 9:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Adding to that....
…let me just say that I’d much rather have Kaman than Brad Miller. Been there, done that and really don’t care to see it again. Miller is an alright player, but he is such a stop gap. At least Kaman can get you in the 14 pts 10 rbds area most nights and he’s no stiff….and he blocks a few shots!! How badly could we use that????
by lexdiamonds0730 on Dec 24, 2008 9:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He plays defense and can move at the speed of a normal person!
We need that a lot.
"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com
by Prevenge on Dec 24, 2008 10:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Clippers deal?
The Clippers have Al Thornton, why would they want Deng? They also wouldn’t want Gooden. Maybe Hinrich and Noc for bench purposes…but those two are too high paid for benchplayers.
I don’t see what we can really offer the Clippers….maybe some combination of Hughes, Hinrich, or Noah and a draft pick
by C Smoove on Dec 24, 2008 7:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Deng's stats
this year are only slightly below his career averages. I am not sure how much more he can be expected to improve. 2006-07 was clearly an outlier for him.
by MrBungle on Dec 24, 2008 7:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
um
his numbers are barely better than his rookie year. he improved in his 2nd and 3rd years (as to be expected) and even his last years numbers improved to the point that he was just about at his 2nd year numbers, which are still a decent amount better than his rookie season or this season. i hope he can bounce back.
by Jaina on Dec 25, 2008 3:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
*last years numbers improved
from the beginning of the season
by Jaina on Dec 25, 2008 3:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would be playing in the NBA today
if my high school basketball coach had just learned to use me properly, and played me all the time, even though I wasn’t very good. I would definitely be dating a model right now if my wingmen could only step it up a few notches and make that happen for me. And luol would be an all-star today if skiles had better “developed” him, taken him under his wing, been a better father figure, I guess. I suppose he’d be playing better now if vinny got tired of apparently being functionally retarded and learned how to use him “properly.” Could skiles probably have done a better job expanding lu’s game? Maybe. Who’s to say scotty didn’t try and darndest and maybe deng’s just a friggin idiot. Maybe his heart’s not all in it. Who knows. And I’m all for a coach maximizing the talent that he has, so maybe vinny could do a better job of contriving some cutesy plays to get lu some baskets. Point is this is the f-ing NBA folks. Why this growing unpopularity of personal accountability? It’s not that I don’t realize we’re all disappointed in him – I’m just sick of some people still making excuses for him. Are we still afraid of hurting deng’s feelings lest we permanently damage his psyche? Is Luol Deng a f-ing baby? Is he a small child? Last time I checked no he is a large grown man who is contractually obligated to play $70 million worth of ball. If vinny must go out of his way to adjust the gameplan so lu can score thru one of the 3 ways he knows how, then maybe it’s actually not in the best interest of the team to focus on lu getting 20 a night. IMHO, Luol Deng is and always has been overrated. His career is basically one great playoff series. Pax screwed this one up. He’s a nice player in his own right, who’ll get u 18 every few nights and spurts of good D. But in a league where pgs and bigs are the scarce goods and 3’s are so much easier to replace, lu’s just not worth his salary, plain and simple.
by TruFan on Dec 26, 2008 2:13 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
then who's to blame for the lack of formatting?
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 26, 2008 12:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
TruFan has identified what many of us Bulls fans don't want to admit.
that is Luol is a decent player who has limited upside because of his lack of one-on-one skills (he is effective off the ball but needs a system playing to his strengths to excel) and would be considered a solid asset if he wasn’t rewarded with such an overinflated contract. A similar argument could be made for Hinrich and Nocioni.
Paxson has overvalued some of his roster (and is stuck with Larry’s ridiculous contract because of the corpse’s highway robbery he pulled by going comatose after his signing) which may wind up having the Bulls lose their only legitimate scorer while getting nothing in return (Gordon). I just hope he doesn’t compound his mistakes by trading away our 2 players with the highest potential upside, Noah and Thomas. They have both struggled, being young and poorly coached, but who besides Rose, has room to grow expotentially? The Bulls can only improve by letting the younger players learn on the job.
There is no future benefit to be gained by playing Hughes 38 minutes or Gooden, once he returns, other than limping into an 7th or 8th playoff spot this year and still not knowing what kind of players they could be once they get the experience and learn a few tricks that all savvy veterans pick up along the way.
If Pax keeps the right pieces and can trade some of our overpaid albatrosses, the Bulls still could have a bright future with Rose as the centerpiece.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Dec 26, 2008 11:18 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Gooden and Nocioni are so bad at defense,
the Bulls would be better off starting Noah and TT.
If Noah gets winded, set him down 3-4 minutes of game time and then put him back in until he plays himself into shape.
When TT takes too many bad shots, take him out, explain to him what he should be doing, and put him back in.
by Granny Waiters on Dec 26, 2008 2:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 












