Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Larry Hughes' silly contract incentive

OK, I think it's a little bit unlikely we win 49 games, but we've exceeded expectations in this early part of the season.  We've had a pretty brutal schedule and are 8-9.  If we can go 41-24 over the remaining games, we'll end up 49-33.

And what happens if we win 49 games?

Larry Hughes gets $2M I think.  And the Bulls pay the Luxury Tax.

Star-divide


Hughes arguably had his best playoff performance since scoring 33 points in Game 5 of the Wizards' first-round series against the Chicago Bulls in 2005. It was the type of show the Cavaliers -- and perhaps that angry fan -- expected from Hughes when he bolted Washington that summer to sign a five-year, $60 million contract with the team. (The contract could be worth up to $70 million with easily attainable incentives; Hughes got a $2 million bonus this season because Cleveland won at least 49 games.)



So he's got $10M in total incentives, with $2M being earned in a given year.  So I'd guess it's the same sort of incentive for each year, and that if the Bulls win 49 or more games, they'll have to pay him another $2M.

So what, you say?  Jerry Reinsdorf is probably interested in this because if the Bulls have to pay out that additional $2M, they'll be over the luxury tax threshold.  So they'll have to pay $2M to Hughes, about $2M to the league in luxury tax fees, and they won't get a share of the tax revenues collected against other teams (which has historically been another couple million).  At the moment, it looks like teams will pay, in total, about $90-100M in tax, which amounts to $4M to $4.5M per team. The league has the option to not distribute all of this money back to the teams, but it's a big chunk of money.

So in total, winning more than 49 games and having Hughes on the roster could result in an additional $8M expense for the Bulls.  That's a lot of freaking money.  More than half the teams in the league, for example, claim as operating income.  And while the Bulls made about $58M after their basic expenses last year, $8M isn't exactly a drop in the bucket.

So what does this mean for those of us who mostly care about the on-court product?  I dunno, but I find it interesting as an example of how poorly structured incentives (I wonder what Deng's are) can create perverse outcomes.

Suppose, for example, it looks like the Bulls are going to be close to 49 wins or more as the trade deadline approaches.  Do the Bulls just suck it up?  Do they make a trade they know will make them worse in the short run?  How hard do they work to trade Hughes?  If they don't make a trade, do they start "resting" their starters and try to lose their last few games?

And how much harder is he to trade?  Generally when you trade a guy, the team is taking him on because they want to get better.  But if they trade for Hughes and get too much better, they're out a couple million more bucks

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

8 recs  |  Comment 84 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Shows why it's been harder

than everyone believes for Paxson to move Hughes. He might have to just wait until the contract expires.

by J Theory on Dec 2, 2008 1:44 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Realistically

I don’t think this is a problem.

We won’t win 49 games.

by BAB-Bass on Dec 2, 2008 1:47 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not this year, but I expect them to be around 45 wins next year.

No matter what they do, that should be the minimum expectation.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 2, 2008 5:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

nice find.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 2, 2008 2:02 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I wonder how the contract is structured/worded.

Obviously there is no way to know…but that be an escalating incentive, you know the team wins at least 49 games year one, 52 year two, 55 year three and so on…Or it could have been a one time incentive…its interesting how these contracts are structured…I wish they were made public.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 2, 2008 2:12 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

It would certainly be helpful to see the contract itself.

Perhaps it’s written to be Cav-specific, such that his trade to the Bulls nullified it. Etc.

by arjoseph on Dec 2, 2008 3:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Are we sure that money applies to the cap?

I thought incentives were determined before the season whether they were attainable for cap purposes.

by CJ Bulls on Dec 2, 2008 2:14 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

ah, that's right. (?)

I believe they’re determined as ‘likely’ or not?

But that may be only for when calculating cap figure for the upcoming season. The Luxury Tax is calculated after the season, so there’s no need to speculate on incentives.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 2, 2008 2:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

For cap purposes, only likely to be earned incentives count. Since the Bulls didn’t win 49 games, I’d guess Hughes’ incentive is considered unlikely.

However, all incentives actually paid count when determining the luxury tax:

When determining the amount of tax a team owes, the league uses its team salary (see question number 14) on the date of their last regular season game (i.e., if a player is traded away before the end of the season, then none of his salary is taxed), with the following adjustments:

    * Any “unlikely bonuses” (see question number 61) that were actually earned are added to the team salary.
    * Any “likely bonuses” (see question number 61) that were not earned are subtracted from the team salary.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Dec 2, 2008 2:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's an article

on Hughes. Tom doesn’t think much of him either. I’d like to know what “the plan” is that Pax and Vinny told him.

by sue369 on Dec 2, 2008 3:39 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Good find, thanks.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Dec 2, 2008 3:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Is there a pub that Ziller doesn't write for?

This guy is everywhere.

Nice read.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Dec 2, 2008 4:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the Bulls

Making $58M last year in a godawful year, will attest if they won 49 games and made the playoffs, this would be a nice boost to their revenue line, making Hughes $4M cost not too much a concern for them. Plus having Rose in the playoff hunt in a more favorable matchup with 49 wins should suggest, really will be a boost to not only ticket sales, but Rose Jersey sales and Bulls sales in general.

So i think this is roughly a mute point. A good thought, but for the Bulls corp brass, I think they’d love any chance at best to not only make the playoffs but progress to the 2nd round…..imagine the hype they’d get with a huge expiring contract (Hughes next year) a young stud who improved the team by 16 wins back to where it was 2 years ago) and hopefully by then a nice core with Rose and Deng and hopefully Gordon to build off of.

Also, I don’t think with our backcourt issues and Deng’s play, 49 wins is a possibility, but it is early and our young bigs have talent, they just don’t know how to use it yet…

by majoyenrac on Dec 2, 2008 4:07 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

The Chairman signed the Corpse

He has to accept the flies that came with it.

I will pile on if they try to hold the line at 48 wins though. It will be an impossible storyline to defend.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Dec 2, 2008 4:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"moot" point, ya mean

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 2, 2008 5:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you mean "moo point"

cause it’s like a cow’s opinion, doesn’t mean anything.

by The90sBullsRevival on Dec 2, 2008 6:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What?

If any business loses $4M, then its not a moot point and is a concern for them.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Dec 2, 2008 11:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They won't lose $4M

They’ll get a better matchup likely in the playoffs and have a better chance to make more $$ in merchandising. Imagine if the addition of Rose gets them back to EC darlings in 1 year…..

It’s not a pure $4M loss…..that’s what I was saying.

That’s what would make it a mute point. But either way it’s very unlikely to happen.

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 7:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's the Chairman's fault

He made the deals. He’ll live up to them. We probably won’t hear a peep out of him complaining about any of this.

Sure, he’d rather receive the luxury tax revenue than pay the luxury taxes, but has he ever complained about a deal after he signed up for it?

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Dec 3, 2008 9:24 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If we get to 49 wins the following unlikely things probably have occurred:

1. TT and Noah become good.
2. Hinrich either returns to ’06 form or is traded for a good player
3. Nocioni is traded
4. Aaron Gray sees less than 10 mpg.
5. The DOW hits 10,000 again.

by MuleTrain on Dec 2, 2008 4:13 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Hey leave that Wall St.

jargon at work daytrader – basketball only please!

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Dec 2, 2008 4:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hughes has been playing well.

We cannot discount Hughes’ offensive contribution to the team this season. With Deng yet to show up this season, Hughes’ input has been all the more helpful and necessary.

Hughes has had more of a positive impact this season than Hinrich or Deng. And in light of that, give Hughes some credit.

by chicago-homesick-blues on Dec 2, 2008 5:22 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I can't believe you posted this

Even worse, I can’t believe it’s true.
Hughes has been okay for several games, all in a row.
Lu has been lost.
Kirk hasn’t been that bad, just gone.

"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." -- Michael Jordan

by bennythebull on Dec 2, 2008 5:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not to nit pick...

But he’s shooting 42% overall. That’s not good. He’s shooting 39.5% on 3’s, which isn’t bad. He’s not creating shots for teammates, and is averaging just over 1 assist a game. His PER is the highest it’s been in 3 years. He has a slightly negative +/-, which is better than I would have expected. He’s played too much time at the 3, but part of that was out of necessity with Deng hurt.

Our expectations are so low for him that this level of play is considered not bad. Obviously, his value considering salary is terrible. But he’s not the worst 4th guard out there. (that’s probably the nicest thing you’ll see me say about him; i’ve been all over him since the day we traded for him)

by Moses Taylor on Dec 2, 2008 5:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm tired

of Luol laying stink bombs int he first quarter. I know it seems VDN wants to get the ball to Luol early to get him going and get him out of his funk, but Luol’s been terrible in the first quarter and really mostly first half much of this year. He’s played better in the 2nd half, but not so much better than he warrants the lead he gave up in the first 2 quarters with poor shot selections, not playing his game and not defending.

Much as it pains me to say this, maybe Larry H should take his spot…..I mean he’s been playing in the offense of late and is playing decent defense too. Deng needs to get his confidence back. Maybe Luol gets the Ben Gordon treatment.

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 7:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He seems to be getting the Kirk treatment

This isn’t meant to pick on Kirk, just pointing out the similarities. Kirk’s big money contract started, he was playing international ball (which I don’t think is much of an excuse by the way), and he came in looking not very good last year. Just like Deng this year.

But still, I think we need to give Deng at least a few more weeks to see where he’s at. It’s not like Hughes is such an upgrade that we’re really missing anything by doing that.

And if anything, what bugged me about last night was that Deng didn’t get back in the game at the end, or in the OT.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Dec 3, 2008 8:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What is the deal in Chicago

We give Tyson a contract that he looked like he would definately live up to in 04-05 and he comes in crappy.

We give Kirk that contract and he flounders slightly the next year after the World competition but then when he’s paid his salary really implodes…

We give Deng a contract and suddenly Mr. Consistently good, not bad at anything but not particularly great at anything, just solid all around, can’t do anything consistently….

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 11:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

with a lineup including Rose, Gordon, and Gooden

they do not need Hughes too. and if you’re complaining about shot selection, how is Larry Hughes an answer?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 3, 2008 9:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd rather

Have Hughes play in our system wiht a more cough consistent cough game than have Deng play and throw up even more wild shots that are forced out of the system only to dig ourselves in a hole.

Look Luol’s a better player than Hughes, but right now Deng’s been awful. Give him Gordon treatment off the bench for a few weeks till he finds his legs and his game and then in Jan if it looks like Deng’s back to his former self switch it up again.

Deng is a big reason for our 1st quarter holes…..

Larry in the past 3-4 games is playing within the offense, only taking 1-2 bad shots a game (and he’s making at least 1 of them to boot) and is actually defending a bit like he used to do….

He’s also talking all teammy the past week or so.

Deng needs to get in the doghouse a bit, and needs to re-find his game.

You always complain we should play our best players….well right now the last stretch of games Hughes is warranting a spot as our best current player over the surprisingly off Deng.

Deng’s played poorly in all but 2 games or so he’s played…..

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 11:23 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

we'll just to have to agree you're wrong

I mean, disagree.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 3, 2008 1:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't get it

Why continue to throw Deng out there and give him the slap on the ass when he’s not playing great and putting us in big holes to start the games?

I know he’s been a much better player than Larry un-legend, but benching him for a few games to get some fire back in Luol (he’ll still play 30 MPG, to work out of this godawful funk) is not such a problem….

Luol’s a Bull long term, Larry really isn’t…..but Luol needs to get out of this funk and him jacking up poor shots in the first quarter while getting constantly beat defensively because he’s trying to do too much for his game offensively doesn’t help.

Deng’s adjusting fine after the first quarter and a half….maybe he needs to stop being so coddled by the org so we can again see underdog Deng of 2 seasons ago shine…

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 1:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

because when has Deng ever had fire in his ass?

or whatever

he’s obviously struggling in the new offense, benching him won’t help that

playing him more in it will

I don’t understand how that’s a difficult concept.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 3, 2008 2:17 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't understand

Why Deng looks like shit and everyone says play him more….but Gordon has a bad stretch and everyone’s happy to bench him….

Or that Larry Hughes starts to play decently again and everyone hates him either.

I know eventually Deng will be fine, I’m not saying dramatically cut his minutes 30 MPG ain’t a dramatic cut, but maybe getting him to perform and ease into his role rather than jacking up everything and forcing his game in the 1st qtr isn’t the solution to a guy on a so far 20% of the season long funk….

Now that’s not hte difficult concept.

Maybe Deng needs to get some fire and be motivated to play to his abilities….

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 3:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Look

what coming off the bench has done to Andrei Kirilenko? Of course AK47’s a better player than Deng, but see that as a point….

Deng needs confidence back much like T2 needs his confidence back….

At most I suggest this for a month, unless Deng either comes on or the team with him off the bench gets on a real roll….

Either way it’ll give us more of a chance to make the playoffs this year, which would be a big boost for Rose going forward. We don’t need/shouldn’t want the lottery as we have too many young guys as is and aside from Rose and maybe Gordon and maybe Deng our draft picks haven’t been all that solid either.

I’m not anti-Deng, I don’t and haven’t loved his contract, but he isn’t an awful player. He’s quite good as a lower top 10 definately top 15 SF….but right now he’s Kirk Hinriching himself out there and we had enough of that last season.

His confidence looks shot early in the games.

If he turns it around consistently sure, put him back in. I am trying to say the coaching staff should talk to him and say they want to ease him back in after injury and ease him more into the offense because he’s struggling. Obviously the Bulls brass aren’t going to bench him for $71M 4 months after signing him….but we should do whatever we can to get him back into his game and into doing the things he does right.

He’s not had 1 single game this year where he didn’t have at least a qtr stretch of good basketball, but he has had stretches early this year and late this year where he’s played very poorly…..and it seems to be a confidence thing.

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 3:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

benching didn't get Thomas more confidence

better coaching and putting him into place to succeed did

god, benching your best players is virtually NEVER a solution to any problem outside of injury

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 3, 2008 3:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Benching

the last few years did immediate things to Ben Gordon….

I don’t know if playing another 12 games or so of crap for Deng is going to get the message to him to play his game.

Deng needs to be aggressive in moving WITHOUT THE BALL.

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 3:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

benching never worked for ben gordon

there is no direct correlation. Last year, sure, he was better off the bench. The year before that, the same. The year before that, better as a starter.

What evidence do you have to suggest otherwise?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 3, 2008 5:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and even when he was better off the bench

his numbers were really pretty close iirc.

by Jaina on Dec 3, 2008 5:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well

This might now be a mute point after Luol finally put a game together last night….

But I don’t know, it seems when Ben used to have his early Nov slumps that he’d move to the bench and in 1-3 games would get his form back……

Now I think then he should have been moved back to a starter spot, but that didn’t happen and we had to live with Duhon…..

The evidence was the play, rewatch early on the past 4 years…

As for Nocioni, it’s a real shame he’s becoming the new Chris Duhon for our club….I’ve been a big Noc fan, but even I’m saying bench him…..hopefully he’s just hurt, because if he isn’t then what the hell’s going on?

by majoyenrac on Dec 4, 2008 7:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It seems like that, but it's not true.

I’m not going to go re-watch all the games from the last four years and neither are you. I’ll look at the boxscores. You’ll pretend you remember exact history over the past four years. I think everyone knows which is more reliable.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 4, 2008 8:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Also

Deng’s been injured and might be rushing back…..I mean I’ve been slightly down on Luol before because he can be so much more than he shows…..he has the talents, not the fire….

But he’s never really looked BAD before, and he looks BAD.

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 4:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

as to your first two sentences...

it’s not the same people

again, when has deng ever had “fire”? he’s been just fine w/o it. besides, “fire” usually means being more aggressive and you just said he shouldn’t be.

you’re making zero sense.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 3, 2008 3:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Deng

sure had fire in that Miami series everyone shouted about all last season…

Deng sure has stretches when he takes it to the rim and tries to utilize his strengths…

Deng the last few games is aggressively shooting awful, mostly contested jump shots from 20 ft away, rather than the 10-15 foot smart jump shooter he was in the past.

Finally I’ve never heard of any basketball or sports web site that didn’t compare 2 players together…..they don’t play in a cocoon…that was an asinine comment.

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 4:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i have no idea what that last comment means

the same people who are saying deng shouldnt be benched were also saying Gordon shouldn’t be benched.

your confusion lies in your inability to remember things correctly.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 3, 2008 5:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You are a moron

That’s the end of this topic.

by majoyenrac on Dec 4, 2008 7:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 4, 2008 8:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think

either should be benched as a long term solution ever….but if one is struggling learning a new system (Deng this year) or learning to play with new teammates (Gordn the last few years) and totally not playing their game, why not let them ease into a role.

Seems to be working of late with Tyrus Thomas.

But of course, again Deng had a great game, maybe he can build off of that one and this argument/discussion is completely overwith.

I would never say 100% Bench Deng and never play him. I am eating crow on the Noc vs Deng talks though, because I wasn’t expecting Noc (who got Rose’s game right away) to slip as badly as he has in this funk of his…..and thoguht for 2/3rds the price he wasn’t a bad option….but Noc has been awful.

I still like the idea of Tyrus at the 3 in spots….though Tyrus has to get a bit more consistent with his jump shot (his form has looked good this year though, but the shots aren’t falling)…

by majoyenrac on Dec 4, 2008 10:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you're simultaneously reading way too much into a few games of play

and then way too much into the power of ‘fire’ acquisition by benching. I don’t think that’s a coincidence.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 3, 2008 3:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's the Deng

We’ve wanted to see….now he needs to continue that.

I’d take that too, but that’s been a ridiculous far cry from the Deng we saw before the Bucks game….

Deng was great yesterday, as was Tyrus Thomas again…..why Nocioni (in the worst slump of his entire career even when he played with the plaintair facitis int he playoffs he wasn’t quite this awful) is getting the time over Thomas in the clutch right now is ridiculous.

I hope Noc gets back to form, he’s been awful.

by majoyenrac on Dec 4, 2008 7:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good thing he wasn't benched, eh?

Eh? Eh?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 4, 2008 8:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't saying bench him

If you reread my posts, I was saying have Luol come off the bench play 30 MPG and get his confidence back.

I’m not about to say Luol’s back….he’s had 1 other nice game this year, also against he Bucks, and played like crap afterwards….but yesterday was a good start.

And for the Gordon talk, you are just being ridiculous. BG has started the seasons off slow in the past, trying (like Deng has been doing) to do too much, and oddly the tactic of calming him down and getting him into a rythym worked (god I can never spell rythym and I know that’s wrong)….

Anyway, Deng for 10 games in a row when he played was forcing his game, rather than having the game come to him, and was trying desperately in the start of games to force awful shots etc to get going….then he’d sit for a bit and come back int he 2nd or 3rd and have a nice stretch of bball.

All I was saying was if he keeps up the awful play of every game but last night, it might benefit him if VDN sat down, talked to him, and said they wanted him to find his role and not go hog wild forcing awful shots and not playing the D he’s capable of…..

Luol’s a Bull for a long time, he’s not going to get a permanent spot on the bench….and was still getting 30 minutes in my estimations. I just wanted him to get his confidence back and learn the system, rather than force a game he doesn’t have into a system he hasn’t learned..

Never did I say bench him completely….

But who knows hopefully he can string more than 1 or 2 games together….he used to. and he really looked great yeserday.

by majoyenrac on Dec 4, 2008 9:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Dec 4, 2008 11:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

don't +1

even to be an ass

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 5, 2008 9:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's alright

He was right, I was +1.

by majoyenrac on Dec 5, 2008 12:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

His minutes at the 3

have been the best basketball he has played since he left Washington.

"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." -- Michael Jordan

by bennythebull on Dec 3, 2008 2:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

As have been

his games since Paxson/VDN talked to him….3-4 games ago.

by majoyenrac on Dec 3, 2008 3:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

it's a very low standard.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 3, 2008 3:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and a really really small sample size.

And is also usually countered by the significant drop in defense

by Moses Taylor on Dec 3, 2008 5:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's Not Just Hughes

Hughes came off the bench last night with 13…I think right now everyone is blaming someone…Nocioni…Why is Joakim so inconsistent…did the weight loss even help Gray…Why are the Bulls struggling with turnovers….I don’t think it’s just Hughes…but in terms of contracts, all the fuss that was going on with Ben Gordon…everyone getting upset with him and the frustration he had with the organization as a whole…i would say he is the only player…besides our Eastern Conference Rookie Derrick Rose…ballla……Gordon is the only other player who is living up to the expectations as best he can…He is leading the team in scoring averaging 20.4 points.

by bighands on Dec 4, 2008 12:00 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

NEVER BELIEVE WHAT YOU READ

First, I believe the owner, GM, coaches and players care more about “on the court performance” that someone on blog some bullshit, I apologize moderator, but some post are just too far off the mark.
______________________
"Hughes arguably had his best playoff performance since scoring 33 points in Game 5 of the Wizards’ first-round series against the Chicago Bulls in 2005. It was the type of show the Cavaliers — and perhaps that angry fan — expected from Hughes when he bolted Washington that summer to sign a five-year, $60 million contract with the team. (The contract could be worth up to $70 million with easily attainable incentives; Hughes got a $2 million bonus this season because Cleveland won at least 49 games.)
_________________________________________________________________

It was the type of show (no it was played on the court not a show) with the Cavaliers?
 He was not playing even for them at the time in 2005, why in the H would they care then (the fan, please, go get your pepsi and third hot dog). He played in 36 games that year with 15.5 points and 4.5 rebounds and 3.6 assist (pretty much the same performance you get now?)

Now, maybe look before our Bulls get involved, remember, you have someone you have Wallace that you fail to mention? Contract dollars? Performance? The Trade? His 3 pt per game average this year (a superstar?).

All critical before you worry about a small incentive by someone, it is not that player, that gives the incentive. Hughes wanted to stay at Washington, they wanted him, still want him, but THE KING said, “get me Hughes”, hence the large contract. So don’t hate the player, don’t even hate Cleveland, for they usually to what the KING wants. He fills their seats. Last year before we got Hughes, he said, “GET ME JASON KIDD”, management did not listen this time or bow to the king. Now he is getting ready for the big Apple or Europe at 50 million a year.

Lets look at 2006-2007 (this is last year, a tad more recent than the 2005 mentioned), this was be the second of the five year contract, right. You still with me? Not a contract year? Correct? Played in 70 games, 68 starts and averaged a career high, remember, this is the ninth year in his career, average NBA career length?
Take a guess? 4.7 years So even you (and I) should know what your getting, RIGHT? 14.9 points per game, 3.8 assist and only one of seventeen player in the league last year (remember, this is 2007, not 2005) to finish with 1000 points, 250 rebounds, 250 assist and 85 steals. In the NBA, yes, the whole league (300 players). You don’t take that away from someone, he did it, case closed. In addition, he rated number 26 in steals per game. You think Thabo, Gordon are going to ever give you that? Heinrich? Anyone on the Bulls going to do that? Rose? Think he will make it 11 years in the NBA? How many players make it 10 years? Answer please? Not even 10 percent of every player on a team in 2008. 50% have less than three years expereince, you think someone with some knowledge, or played the game would respect someone who could do it for 5-7-9-11 years. I could never do it above my college level. Its truly like winning the lotto to have that skill. You don’t understand numbers, surely not defense and here is where the money came, Hughes is a great defender beyond even his good defensive numbers. A game, if studied and he play mid 30 minutes, he will take 6-8 points off the other teams score. I can’t show you or teach you how to know that, but less then the NBA level it’s known and rewarded, hence, why he make nearly a couple hundred grand a night. Now smoke those numbers in your pipe, because believe me, someone else did thirty times before it was offered. Then say, who can play the point at that height, play #2 and play small forward? Now you see value.
Now, what did he average is whole career and college career in FG and 3pts?
Once you start learning this about players, you start learning the game.

 The same as he always has (Hughes) about 41% from the field, about 31% from the 3 pt mark. He finished the 2007 season (three more years on his contract remember) with going near the last ten games scoring over 16 ppg. Lead or tied the team in steals 21 times and went a month hitting 21-48 from the 3 pt line. In the year ending 2007, scored in double figures 55 times and topped the 20 pt mark 15 times.

Not to keep this brief, and it is honest as can be, and not lopsided like I am a Hughes junkie, he gives what he us what he always given any other team. Same average, same numbers, when played the minutes. At 30 next year, I want to know who on the bulls is better? Yes, Rose had the numbers, but for less than 2 months in the NBA, this is 10 years and 2 months in the NBA. Got one player? Nope, we got Sanford and Son heap of trouble with the wort junk in the paint. Now, he is leading our whole team yet does not start. HMMM, I would play for what somebody does on the court would not you? Look at the minutes, learn, most of all, with a player like Hughes that 95% of fans can not understand, it is the defense, not the missed 35 footer clanger (many times at Cleveland, where that started cause Lebron would finally pass then with 4 seconds left on the shot clock some games, Hughes would pop 30-40, many he would not.
I am no a friend of Hughes, agent, promoter, relative, etc, I don’t even know Larry Hughes, nor would he know me if I was in the first row of the United Center.
I am not saying he is a superstar, not saying he is the Bulls future, which when I read that statement I fall the ground laughing for besides Rose, if he makes the 4.7 year average, which I think he will no with injuries, what player is the Bulls future? If they have been in the league two years, three years, don’t give that b.s. that more minutes will turn him into a real player and Larry is stealing them. Thats the worst logic I ever heard for winning a game and this team needs to win first.
Hughes has put up numbers now for ELEVEN years. Only 1 out of 10 in the NBA can even say they played that long in the NBA, can you believe i?. No only that, the numbers are the same, yep, Larry Hughes has the same damn numbers except now, which he has always been streaky player he is leading the Bulls in three point shooting.

 NO, never been his strong point. FG, nope, around 41-43. 3 pt 31% but that is the game today. Read, learn, it has changed dramatically in 5 years. Free throws, probably around 80%, so if you let him get off the perimeter drive, his score will come up to the 14-15 range.
Now defense, don’t think you have a Bull beating the oldest guy (besides Hunter) on the team, that is sad, but there is your answer young man (believe me, I am older than you) even though he was supposed to be out after taking his shoulder completely out of joint and expected back in January. Finally, you can say he is always injured, wrong again, look at players on year 11 in the NBA, yes, there are only 30 this year, see if they are crossing (this is on offense mind you) the 10,0000 points this year as a guard in the league. I not saying he is Jordan, don’t feed that back, not saying he is Pippen (though he was the first player since Scottie Pippen way back in 1994-5 to have the highest steals mark per game average in 2005 (maybe that is why you go back and pick out 2005, cause he matched our Scottie, thats it, isn’t?).
But like I wrote in my thesis here, don’t get all broke up over a few open jumpers, if you want to win with what you have now, play him hard and he will come with games hitting mid thirties 3-4 times, popping a double double, etc. Its not pretty, its consistent over now 11 years and that my friend is why he is only 1 of 10 guys that can make it TEN years in the league. Why the whole team will be gone out of the NBA on an average of less than 5 years. He is defense, loves it, if a turnover, watch how he will play, foul smart, defend smart, take that 6-8 points away. The fans don’t see it, can’t read it, announcers talk about their mother in law rather than defense. He is a rare player.
One that has commanded the money he makes and will probably continue to make for another 5 years to age 35, he has lost very little speed or ball handling skills. Read all the post here and most sites, its about starting, who coms off the bench, who scores, assist, etc.. Sure its important, but when hoops are your life, the other side become just a important, this is why Hughes is a player for 11 years. Like it, dislike it, they are all facts, no cheap shots to anyone, maybe Lebron, though a superstar, needs to learn how to pass. In addition, is in it purely for $$$$ first. Larry is Larry, he earns what he desearves and will do it for fifteen years in the NBA.

by Know on Dec 12, 2008 2:31 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

thanks, relative of Larry Hughes

I mean, I didn’t read it, but I saw there was a lot of it. So it must’ve said…a lot.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Dec 12, 2008 3:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Try some fancy book learning, lot a stat and not hate

Since we stormed Normandy, as a fan, believe I can write, if you can’t read, so be it, not answer the questions, obvious, bad b-ball player, let’s see you make 180,000 a night, JEALOUS, the board is full of it, positive post about anyone, one. He is the worst, but leads the team, with playing in the 20 minute range, a trip. Ozzie, why can’t Rose beat his 3pt mark, Hughes was never a 3 pointer. Now, I am true, Rose looks to be the better player, all that was said was fact and you can’t argue with that except with school yard, red neck talk, thats it. As for as not reading, GOOD, the complex mechanism of play within the game is so poorly understood, that your comprehension would prove worthless to engage in anything meaningful. If he is slightly better then mediocre, explain the stats and leading our bulls? Everyone of them? Fact remains, Gooden and Hughes for Wallace was a great trade, the point of the postings. I will continue to write about who I wish, mother no, played against him in college, yes, same conference. Larry is what he is, and you will never be, either on or off the court, but he would not post that, I will. Give the team two more weeks to Gel, lets see what we have, for who you have, is not going to play any better together after this amount of time.
Then end of 2010 is a long time, about 8 weeks short of two years. Can’t rebuild for 25 years now can we? Get a big man with 10 years experience, then we may have a chance at the playoffs.
Bust of somebody, few others that play far, far worse. If you can’ see that, it’s a plain shame.

by Know on Dec 15, 2008 2:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

HUH??

I have no clue what you just typed

by NormVanBeer on Dec 15, 2008 8:25 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What?!

I agree with NormVanBeer, that made no sense.

Things could be worse. We could have kept (name redacted).

by stupidgenius on Dec 15, 2008 5:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Larry is what he is

and I can’t wait until he is gone.

by sue369 on Dec 12, 2008 4:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would make trading Hinrich and Nocioni higher priorities.

Hughes actually seems to have elevated his game to slightly better than mediocre.

And of course, Hughes is a big expiring 2010 contract.

by Granny Waiters on Dec 12, 2008 11:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't like him

so I hope he’s gone the sooner the better.

by sue369 on Dec 13, 2008 3:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

go away

as Larry’s mother you are not allowed to post here

by NormVanBeer on Dec 13, 2008 10:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow!

“14.9 points per game, 3.8 assist and only one of seventeen player in the league last year (remember, this is 2007, not 2005) to finish with 1000 points, 250 rebounds, 250 assist and 85 steals. In the NBA, yes, the whole league (300 players).”
Larry Hughes is mediocre among NBA starters at a bunch of cherry-picked stats, and abysmal at the others!
HE IS INCREDIBLE!
I am now convinced.

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Dec 16, 2008 4:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ha
I am no a friend of Hughes, agent, promoter, relative, etc, I don’t even know Larry Hughes, nor would he know me if I was in the first row of the United Center.

Then stop writing about him. No one cares about Hughes this much. I’m sure he’s a good guy, but he just is a bad basketball player.

What do you see in a 14 ppg with no jumper that makes one think he will be better than a 26ppg\ 12rpg guy? Is there some kind of magic formula that tells you 14 > 26??
by Dabullsfan on Jul 1, 2008 10:19 AM CDT actions actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Dec 14, 2008 12:26 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Norm, Ozzie not a wizard and a boy named Sue, will leave out the numerical reference

If I was his mother, anyone named NORM (have a beer), I bet would she would whip you. Stop replying to my post, then maybe I will stop writing. Otherwise, get used to it. Does he lead the team in three point percentage? 2-3rd in FG. Can’t anyone say anything positive about any bull and they are attached? All you all do is bitch a bull.
He is not a bad basketball player, if so, who on our Bulls is good? Two players please, for all but 2-3 are 5 years younger, but can’t keep up? Then give me some stats that back it? You can’t? Next Case!
Poor history knowledge here among the fans, maybe an average age of 14.
Don’t recall the coastline of Northern France along the English Channel, turning part in World War II boys, lost two relatives for this country and you have no knowlege of it’s history. SAD. No nazi’s = free speech, yes, Bulls fans did storm Normandy, W0W, any male 84 and up? $180,000, well $182,000 is what Larry earns per night for each of his 82 games, sorry I have to break this down for you. Chew on that stat, I know you will. So if he is leading in numerous average “fan” categories on our team and will be earning close to $200,000 a night next year, maybe we shoudl play him, for the percentage is we win when we do. If he is not, I can see where your attitude probably enjoys a loss more, you like to complain, so do not play him. Fact remains, he is, your only player that can play three positions and does one thing no other Bull can do, play defense. Read up on the average length of an NBA career, I can not teach, but Hughes doubled it and still leads the team, not to hard to figure out is it now?
4.7 years, he is on year 11. 9.4 versus 11, you should have fractions this year, try them out. So get used to another two nice years of 14.5 points a game, 41-42 average, 80 free throw average, low thirties 3 pt average and pulls 6-8 points off the other teams scoreboard when you learn to watch a game. This is, what make him what he is, and earns what he earns. If not, name two other player with 11 years and a salary like that and numbers to match? You can’t, so put a pencil to paper and figure it out, your post have no meaning, not a fact, not a stat, just " Dah, I don’t like him, be glad when he is gone", wish we had Wallace back: Maybe, we would be in the finals like Larry was 18 months ago playing out of position as a point guard. Average Basketball IQ of a bulls fan, may be scary. Guess you were in diapers when Dennis, Scottie and Michael played.
Nah, no one liked Dennis, but his numbers blew people away. A defensive player, played well, very well.
In 1983 an award of defensive player of the year, was first awarded for the first time the history of the NBA, to honor the play of defense, i took that long to admire what it meant to the game, when a player from Arkansas, also played 10 years (maybe you will start to understand the logic and admiration of a fan that sees putting 11 years in the league by a player as an accomplishment that only one in ten NBA players will ever make). Scored 11,000 points, (Hughes will also) maybe you may see the similarity, maybe not, I doubt it, averaged 15 points a game also. FG% 40 also over career, Sidey Moncrief. To bad you don’t understand what we have or what his game is, maybe another 10 years and you will learn the nuances of winning.

by Know on Dec 16, 2008 3:50 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

The problem is, you see, that your posts don't make any sense.

Seriously, they’re entertaining, but that’s because they read like the person who wrote them blew his mind out with crack or something. Why are you talking about D-Day? ‘Any male 84 and up?’ What the hell does that have to do with basketball?
“So get used to another two nice years of 14.5 points a game, 41-42 average, 80 free throw average, low thirties 3 pt average”
Those are NOT GOOD NUMBERS.
That said, Hughes is:
-playing decent this year [sigh]
-better to have along with Gooden than Wallace
Also, why are you talking about Dennis Rodman? Comparing Hughes to Rodman is sacrilegious. The next time Hughes leads the NBA in rebounding [or anything besides taking the odd fadeaway jumper with 20 seconds left on the shot clock that hits the side of the rim] for seven years in a row, you can make that comparison.
Also: players that are cheaper and better than Hughes:
-Josh Smith
-Gerald Wallace
-Mo Williams
-Jason Terry
-J.R. Smith
-Richard Hamilton
I only needed to go up to Detroit to get that list of names. The effort was probably wasted, but it was kind of fun anyways. :P

"You remember the first time you picked up a basketball video game and you had no idea how to run plays, so you just gave the ball to your shooter and you ran around the court aimlessly until a defender was far enough away and then you jacked up a shot? THAT IS LARRY HUGHES!"
-Anonymous fan letter, heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com

by Prevenge on Dec 16, 2008 4:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A PRIVILEGE to address the cheery picked response by by Prevenge

D-Day, was a reference to “free speech” and “verbalizing hate”, and an answer to the above question when someone did not understand what D-Day meant, I explained, it a blog, not a thesis, get over it. What does it have to do with basketball, absolutely nothing. What does it have to do with “hate” like your sign off for “your” so called team? Everything. Someone thought the bulls fans stormed Normandy (when actually some did), Sad how quick we forget that, but will worry about someone’s 3pt average until we die because we are just so envious of their income. You would have to scroll and read up to get a understanding. Any United States male over the age of 84 would be involved, that should clear that for you, true, not place for the board, but when poorly remembered and understood, a mention was necessary.

Next: Agreed they are not great numbers in the game of basketball, but they are the way the game is going, more about style, than team numbers (Rick Berry guaranteed Shaq 80% free throw in a one day training course years ago, would not take it, rather stay at 50% FT for he would look bad?, see SI for article.). How many games did that cost over a career? The numbers have been heading down for nearly 10 years. If you don’t agree, one your wrong, two show me the numbers that prove otherwise. What is the percentage drop in FG? What is the drop in the number of 3pts? What is the drop in percentage of FT? It sure was easy for you so skip over any and all reference to any mention of defense, why Sir Prev?

The question was not Detroit players at all Prevenge, yes, though on crack, meth and a self injected morphine drip with pure grain alcohol to quench my parched lips at the time written. Here, cut and pasted: ""Does he lead the team in three point percentage? Second or Third in FG% The BULLS, not the Pistons?
Near the top in free throws? Near 80 in whole 11 years?

He is not a bad basketball player, you should have the stones to admit that and if so bad, as I wrote, if so, who on our Bulls is good? Who is better? You can’t answer that except put down a rookie who is going to pass his season average in games in the next couple weeks for the last 5 years of his life. Not eleven years in the league. Making some good coin at age 29 to me, must be doing something right. Then someone will post he had a career year (not true), career year was second year of this contract, so don’t waste your time, I will save you it.

How about 11 years in the league, you forgot to rip on that or even acknowledge under 5 years is the average of an NBA player. 50% of the players in 2008 are under three years in the league? Only 30 players of 300 have the years of Hughes today? Can’t give the man one thing can you, remember, all was said and I love to do it, cause your like a pack of wolfs taking the short bus to school?

You selectively read,, Hughes leading the NBA in anything? Easy, steals in the whole NBA couple of years ago, so lead the NBA in a stat, correct? Wrong again, can you admit it or go after a vowel I missed in a posting instead? Don’t even know your own team players, but attack someone who thinks he is our best defender.

Or do you take that away cause you “hate” for a reason (back to nazi’s). Does the other players you mention in Detroit all have 10 years behind them in the league? NOPE Again, easy. easy easy.

Enough, if you sign off is a hate statement for a bulls player, maybe start going to Detroit games. Chauncy is back home in Denver were he played high school and College ball for the twilight of his career.

Again, no reference to any defense, or any other bull player playing better?
I am not saying he is great, but when you put the whole package as easily explained and mirrored with another player with the same percents (you say they are not great numbers, but they got this guy in the HALL OF FAME?, your wrong again). Maybe you did not read the analogy to Sir Sid? Lower numbers but as Jordan stated, one of the toughest to play against.

This year is too early, he is still working his way back from a shoulder completely removed from its socket. Ask the boys at Rush Pres about that x-ray. Has always needed two 30 plus minutes a game to have his shot down. Did it in Washington under the advisor of Michael Jordan as teammate, then did it Cleveland until moved to the point guard for the betterment of the team, numbers suffered, went to finals, It will be Lebrons only time in Cleveland, past or future. Great player? Whats his 3pt average, lower than Hughes? YEP, 29% Then look at the number missed? But, the face of teh NBA for points and offense sell tickets and T.V. and games. The board here even proves it also. One can say they need minutes for one player during a game, then not another, he accepted off the bench but asked for minutes to keep his shot. Hughes will finish most every game, coaching staff is excellent, Bickerstaff, Harris, know what they are doing, rookie coach will be just fine also, moderator needs to give some a break. We have a better than average player with Hughes, thats it, play him or show me numbers of another player on our Bulls team (not your fantasy pool) that has better numbers? SIMPLE Then, before ripping my post and attacking me just address the years in league comment versus the average years in league, what good defensive skills he has (well noted, your pretty far off if that is missing)? Just be honest, thats all. Is that too much? If so, maybe your problems are are more than just worrying about a post on a blog about an eleven year above average player in the NBA?

by Know on Dec 16, 2008 5:00 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Your players don't have years or numbers of Hughes

First, its not fantasy, so get off the salary, unless you offered to the player, second the player on detroit you mention are not on the their 11th year as stated, nor may have not averaged over 14 pts per game over 10 plus years. Third, if the percentage fg is better it is less than statistically significant when factored with the the defensive play. Would not run after a 43 fg % with none cracking 45 (which you hope a center would) Nothing better than a point or two and your taking guys with 3-4 years in the league. So you will have to further than Detroit, yes there is better players at less money, but we don’t make that call, and it never means their available. The fact was, is there a better Bull player putting better numbers up this year, even after a previous 10 years. You all rip a miss free throw, but with a steal a few sunk when driving the lane, no comment. Just weak, sure there are bad shots, but salary is you issue and you can’t blame the player for that. More power to him and see how many Bulls on your team right now will put up those numbers over 11 years? Even our star rookie had a weak game against the clippers, when he lands that fat contract is it time to rip him? Is he wore out cause the high school season is over now, 25-30 games? The one college year? Average is going down quick, getting stuffed like he is at build a bear. Made a star out of 8 good weeks, lets get a year. Maybe 40 plus games? For a coaching staff who is the best we have had in years, don’t understand the 40 minute games every night for a rookie on a team hoping to get to the first round? He is spent already, your going to need guards now, worse yet, we need a center the most of all. Just remember, not great, but better than average, if not, show me stats for a current player on 10 or 11 years. He is just not the player that deserves hate from cats like you just cause Cleveland gave him a contract (which helps us). He never held out or wanted to leave Washington. Study some numbers and you will see. 40-45 is all you get now pal or maybe you will take Lebron 29% 3 pt average, time left on the clock and then the number of shots and bitch about paying 50 million in New York. Again, one more time, a bulls player with better overall numbers, surely not sitting on the bench, but also i there to defend and get the win at the end, cause isn’t finishing when it counts and you put your real players in?

by Know on Dec 19, 2008 1:25 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Bulls and Young Talent
Blogabull_s_small
Sign up for BlogABull game previews

Recent FanPosts

Small
Interesting Trade Idea: S-Jax & Anthony Randolph
Small
Kudos Bulls. You've surprised early.
Bolo_picture_small
What about Iverson?
Sports
I'm Happy to Have a Break From Tyrus. He's gone anyways.
Small
Game Preview # 6: Bulls vs Charlotte Bobcats
Small
Why isn't there more talk of LeBron...
Small
Contract/Cap Question for BAB
Jayhawk_small
Game Preview # 5: Bulls at Cleveland Cavaliers
Small
We've Got To Rescue D. Wade

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger