Whats wrong with VDN?
When we first hired VDN I was excited because I didn't really know anything about him besides that he was an underrated player in 1990s NBA Live games. I also knew that I didn't like any of the available "veteran coach". Moreover, I told myself that someone has to give the Phil Jackson's and Greg Popovich's of the world a first chance and that maybe Del Negro would be the next great coach. I now can safely saw that I was completely wrong. I don't know what he is hoping to accomplish offensively or defensively. It really doesn't seem like he has a well thought out plan.
Having said all this, the worst part about VDN is his rotation. He claims that defense is important and then puts out a lineup of rose, gordon, hughes, nocioni and gray/gooden. All of our perimeter players (except Thabo and luol) always go for the steal and thus leave a lane open to the basket and I wouldnt be intimidated by any of our big men that actually play. Not only that, but Gooden, for example, never rotates quick enough. This aggressive defense could be more effective if we had a premier shot blocker (which we do...tyrus), but it will not win championships. All of our perimeter players can best be described, at least defensively, as the anti-bruce bowen. Then, Stacey King praises Larry Hughes defensive ability because he gets so many steals.
Now, I know Larry Hughes has been a pleasant suprise offensively, but his defense is HORRENDOUS. This is the same with Gooden. Even if they go off for 20 or 25 points, they usually allow an equally high amount. This makes me miss Skiles a little bit...despite his love for Adrian Griffen and Malik Allen. At least Skiles made sure that we were prepared and played as hard as any team in the league. Defensively, we always rotated well and played quality team defense despte the fact that we never had a true lockdown defender. It was actually very impressive.
On to our big men. I do believe that Tyrus and Noah are our 2 best big men. Unfortunately, they can only play limited minutes together. We may need to get rid of one. In the right system, I can see Tyrus playing a Kenyon Martin like role and Noah will eventually be a very effective role player...maybe even a starter. With TT, we have to remember that he is still VERY young and that at times he looks brilliant. He will never be a Shawn Marion like player, but he can be effective. Why cant we just give him consistent minutes so hes not looking over his shoulder every time he makes a mistake. Granted, he has many flaws (poor bball IQ and poor defensive positioning due to his propensity to try to block ALL shots being the most obvious...also, he thinks hes better than he really is), but that doesnt mean that we don't develop him. Offensively, he is raw, but judging from his high free throw %, it must be inferred that he can hit a 15 foot jumper. However, thats not his strength and VDN's system results in a pick and roll and everyone else standing around watching. This is not a system where TT or Deng will be effective. Of course, there has been more movement the last couple of games, but on important possessions we always revert back to 1 on 1 mode.
This is why I think people are being too hard on Deng. It almost seems the system was designed with our coaching staff forgetting that he was a prominent part of the offense. He is a slasher and needs to cut to the basket and run around screens for open 18 foot jumpers. He probably will never be worth the 70 million that he recieved, but its not like its such a terrible contract. If it were 55 or 60 million we would all think it was a good deal and lets face it...NBA teams almost always have to overpay for quality players.
I must say that I am in the Bosh camp. I would, however, rather sign NO ONE than Amare. Amare is a poor defender and relies on his athleticism way too much to sign to a max contract at his age (in 2010). More importantly, he's a selfish asshole that I never want to play for the Bulls. Unless he changes his attitude, I think its a safe bet to claim that he will NEVER win a championship. To be a championship quality team it is essencial that your best players do the little things that win games (ie defense, hustle, rebound, make the extra pass, etc.). Besides that, I think we need to see what we have with our young players. I think Thabo will be the best out of all of them and can eventually start alongside Rose or at the 3 if we are to ever trade deng.
BG, on the other hand, is becoming increasingly difficult to watch. He can score, but he seems to go out of the offense way too much to get his points. More importantly, he takes the ball out of Rose's hands. The more Rose has the ball the better. Unfortunately, Rose still is not very assertive nor a great leader. That will come, but the team (and VDN) should recognize his superiority to the rest of these scrubs and give him the ball. BG is an underrated defender, but that does not mean he is a good defender. Average at best, but not as bad as Funk makes him sound.
Anyway, I guess Im frustrated that Vinny seems to not understand the strengths and weaknesses of our players. Nocioni really doesnt have a single strength. I know he goes off every 4 or 5 games, but he only does so against terrible defensive teams that don't rotate out to the 3 point line. Besides that he is defintely in the bottom 20% of nba players. He really doesnt do ANYTHING well and I would say that on average we are outscored by 1 point per 90 seconds when he is on the floor. He is an atrocious defender and hes shooting 38 or 39 %. Also, why is Gooden thought of as a good offensive player? He shoots less than 45 % from the floor as a pf/c. That isnt good. We really have to get used to the idea that he is at best an average offensive player and a terrible defender. I could keep talking but this is already long enough. At least Derrick gives us all hope.

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
0 recs |
44 comments
Comments
when i say thabo will be the best out of all of them
I mean the tt, noah and thabo threesome. Im not including Rose
by rosefromconcrete on
Dec 13, 2008 1:28 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Maurice cheeks the next Chicago Bulls coach?
Maurice Cheeks was fired. I loved the way he coached the 76s last year. Should we consider him as VDN’s replacement?
by chgobr on
Dec 13, 2008 1:48 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
OH YES PLEASE!
Anybody but this nincompoop who we call our coach.
Things could be worse. We could have kept (name redacted).
by stupidgenius on
Dec 13, 2008 2:18 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cheeks has been fired twice
in short succession. I don’t think he is an upgrade over VDN.
by Basketball Smurf on
Dec 13, 2008 3:56 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mo
Mo is a average coach…he’s not the answer either.
We should have checked into Tyrone Corbin or Jeff Hornacek, either one of them would have been better prepared and have some experience as assistants under Sloan.
by C Smoove on
Dec 13, 2008 2:26 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
From all accounts
Mo Cheeks is a nice guy, a good motivator, and everyone seems to like him. However, he is a bad tactician, and just doesn’t seem capable of creating a solid gameplan for his teams.
Sound familiar? Just because he’s a household name doesn’t make him any good.
What do you see in a 14 ppg with no jumper that makes one think he will be better than a 26ppg\ 12rpg guy? Is there some kind of magic formula that tells you 14 > 26??
by Dabullsfan on Jul 1, 2008 10:19 AM CDT actions actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on
Dec 13, 2008 2:32 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
huh?
I thought this post was going to be about VDN, but it only focused on the shortcomings of the players…maybe 2 sentences about Vinny
by NormVanBeer on
Dec 13, 2008 2:37 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Our defense isn't that bat actually...
I know it’s hard to believe because it’s often painful to watch our team, but we’re above average statistically. In terms of points allowed per possession, we’re 12th in the league.
by Jamaicanpi on
Dec 13, 2008 2:48 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
VDN, needs to take a long nap, and then form a plan with a NEW ROTATION!!!
by Nextgen on
Dec 13, 2008 3:16 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe while he's asleep, Del Harris and Bernie Bickerstaff
can formulate a better game plan with a good rotation of players.
And while we’re at it, can Paxson take a nap, too, and hand his GM powers over to someone who’s willing to trade the players that Pax is in love with?
"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris
by bullhockey on
Dec 16, 2008 3:50 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
George Karl George Karl George Karl George Karl George Karl
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on
Dec 13, 2008 4:43 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
What the hell
has George Karl ever done? He’s a good coach but overrated.
Not a fan of his.
by C Smoove on
Dec 13, 2008 4:47 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Coaches (and their best players) that have won championships in the past 25 or so years
((Because I know that’s exactly what you mean))
Phil Jackson – Bryan, Shaq, Jordan, Pippen
Popovich – Duncan, Robinson, Ginobili
Tomjanovich – Hakeem, Drexler
Larry Brown – Billups, Wallace x 2, etc.
Pat Riley – Wade, Shaq, Magic,
Chuck Daly – Thomas, Dumars, Rodman, etc.
K.C. Jones – McHale, Parrish, Bird
Other than the Detroit Pistons, when has Karl even had one player as good as any of the players as what all those other guys have had—and most of them had two players on a single team that have been better than even the best player Karl has ever coached.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on
Dec 13, 2008 5:09 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Uhm
Gary Payton, Shawn Kemp and Detlef SHrempf used to be pretty good…
by BAB-Bass on
Dec 15, 2008 12:45 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And that team made it to the Finals
Something that is a feat in itself, and who knows what they could have done had they not run up against the 1996 Bulls.
What do you see in a 14 ppg with no jumper that makes one think he will be better than a 26ppg\ 12rpg guy? Is there some kind of magic formula that tells you 14 > 26??
by Dabullsfan on Jul 1, 2008 10:19 AM CDT actions actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on
Dec 15, 2008 1:33 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Exactly
It’s not like the 96’ Bulls were your run of the mill NBA-champion either…
(I actually made a pilgrimage over the pond for a weekend just to catch MJ, Pip, the Rod, Kukoc, Shaq, Penny, horace and to soak in the ambiance of the Mekka of basketball in the mid nineties. Ahh, those were the days, eh?)
by BAB-Bass on
Dec 15, 2008 3:06 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Difference between "pretty good" and "great"???
What Ozzie said. You know, they faced the greatest team in ohhh, possibly EVER. Besides, not one of them is as good as the vast majority of the guys on that list. “pretty good” as you say, yes. “Great” as I say and most of the guys on that list are? No. Those three, that season, compare favorably to the three Pistons teams. They were just really, really good but just ran up against the 72-10 Bulls
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on
Dec 15, 2008 3:04 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It was just awful rotten luck that this team didn't win a champ from 94-96
I remember they were SO damned good. THere was really only ONE team in the west that could beat them (HOuston) and they had the bad luck of meeting them. Well there was the fluke against Denver also…
ANyway, I’d keep them pretty high up there amongst the others. that’s a pretty DAMN good trio in it’s prime right there.
by BAB-Bass on
Dec 15, 2008 3:13 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Of course it is.
I’m putting them down. Just saying they aren’t Jordan, Pippen, Rodman or Hakeem, Drexler, etc.
Follow this comment thread and see what you’re missing.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on
Dec 15, 2008 3:17 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Haha, I may have jumped in the middle
I admit. :)
by BAB-Bass on
Dec 15, 2008 3:19 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No problem.
My whole point is that Karl is a good coach, not necessarily the caliber of those three players.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on
Dec 15, 2008 3:30 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Keep in mind...
This is a huge improvement over where the Bulls were twenty two games into the season last year. 10-12 keeps up without most “expert” predictions of them coming in at or under .500.
You can’t expect a rookie coach, in the truest definition, to come in and then expect everything to be fixed immediately. Look how long it took Skiles to get the team going and even in 2004 they started off 0-9. We are looking at, sadly, one of the team’s best starts in recent memory so we should go a little softer on VDN because our average team isn’t up to par with Boston or Cleveland.
Yes this team is not good by any means, but 10-12 is way better than 3-19 or anything remotely close to last season. Derrick Rose and VDN can’t be expected to turn sinking ship around, they can only hold it up for a little bit longer before it either gives out entirely again, or gets fixed and everything goes back to being how it used to be in the 90’s.
I’m not losing faith, not yet. It’s too early to start talking about firing VDN. Trades however need to be made sometime when Reinsdorf is taking a nap and isn’t micro-managing Pax.
Give it time, there’s still work to be done.
by Owlx on
Dec 13, 2008 5:50 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Vdn
Has never coached before, is not overpaid, and has a contract of 3 years. His job is mainly to hold down fort and focus on what works for the bulls and what doesnt. Everyone screaming about him putting in noah and thomas alot more, he can, but that also means we have to live with losing bad. And when we lose, then its because of the coach. Vdn has no idea what he is doing, but i honestly think hes learning. The start of the memphis game was great, i loved the offense and the way it flowed. Ben Gordon got 3 fouls, not just 2, but three in the first quarter (okay the third came barely a minute into th e second,) how the hell is that vdns fault? The players really havent complained about vdn yet, but the fans have because the bulls are losing. I feel sorry for vdn, never coached before, and is being hunted down by the fans.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on
Dec 13, 2008 6:26 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
noc sucks noc sucks noc sucks...
if vdn was really a “development” coach, he would bench noc forever and give his minutes at the 3 to thabo (remember him?) and his minutes at the 4 to tyrus.
Things could be worse. We could have kept (name redacted).
by stupidgenius on
Dec 13, 2008 11:15 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
that's an excellent point
VDN was hired to develop young players and try make them blend with Rose…
by simonswiss on
Dec 14, 2008 12:40 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sorry about the making it seem like only an anti-vdn post
I started thinking about it, but I meant to focus on how bad his rotation is. His lineups often feature players whose skill sets do not compliment each other. Instead, he puts players who have redundent skill sets and who are often poor defenders. Look what happened tonight when he played noah and tt together also (however, they also have similar skill sets). I do like this though, because they are our best defensive big men. They actually protect the rim and can defend the pick and roll. Its painful watching Gooden and Gray defend the pick and roll. In short, we need to focus on defense if we want to win. We are best when we run and if we create turnovers and more importantly force bad shots and rebound we can run and play to our strengths. If we dont, we realize that we are not a great half-court team and we lose. To me, it seems quite simple. Anyway, thats what I wanted to accomplish with this and maybe I focused on my dislike of many of our players that receive regular playing time.
by rosefromconcrete on
Dec 14, 2008 12:50 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't forget about the other guys
Remember who the coach is:
Vinny Del Harris
When you say Wisconsin, you've said it all.
by Looney_Bucky on
Dec 14, 2008 12:49 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
VDN is doing a decent job
He’s given the keys to Rose, and he seems to have a solid grasp of the “carrot and stick” approach to young players, where Skiles and Boylan only had the stick.
I don’t think he’s a good coach yet, but he’s not bad so far, and he could be quite good next year and for years down the line.
I will give him time.
by madvillian on
Dec 15, 2008 12:45 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Coach is fine; team sucks
This team is Rose and a bunch of mismatched and/or lousy parts. You should be happy with a near .500 record. Deng can’t score when it matters, BG has no handles or defense, Gray is slow, Noah can’t play more than 9 minutes without needing oxygen, Tyrus likes to jack 18 footers and get lost on defense, Noce forgot how to play basketball, etc. Let me know what part of any of this is VDN’s fault. Some of his rotations are basically experiments to see what works. As everyone knows, he is a rookie coach who inherited one of the worst teams from last season and he is trying to figure out some solutions.
People on this board like to complain about some of the lineups, but ask yourself if it really matters. If he played Blogabull posters’ “dream” lineups, how many more wins would we have? At best, maybe one or two. We would probably have many more losses as everyone here wants 40 minutes for each of Tyrus, Noah and Thabo.
I’m not saying that VDN is the second coming of Phil Jackson, but it blows my mind to see people asking VDN to be fired when he has largely made the most of this slop lineup of a team. The guy is a rookie coach. He will not be perfect. The Bulls have had one of the toughest schedules so far this season and the team is 2 under .500. What more do you want?!
by Stay Chisel on
Dec 15, 2008 2:33 PM CST
reply
actions
1 recs
2 over .500?
and not look like shit over 70% of the time?
This is getting more towards delusion by the day, but realizing this is a majority of a roster from 06/07 and ADDING an all-star-level PG has me thinking they should be better than this.
Vinny stinks. He’s not the worst, but I haven’t been convinced he’s any good either. So I’ll wait until I’m convinced to say otherwise. I think that’s fair.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Dec 15, 2008 3:10 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The only quibble I'd make w/ the argument...
…is that they didn’t upgrade “overall” all that much from 06-07 Hinrich to Rose. And Ben Wallace was actually good that year.
But still… they should be better.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on
Dec 15, 2008 3:29 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2 under or 2 over, we’re an 8th seed that gets demolished by the Celtics in the first round of the playoffs. Remember that this team is also a majority of (the “best of”?) the roster from the abysmal 07/08 team. We have now added an All-Star quality player to a horrible team. That should make the team better and it has, as shown by the Bulls’ record. This whole thing is a work in progress. Teams with a legitimate shot at contending do not hire rookie coaches.
by Stay Chisel on
Dec 15, 2008 4:20 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and in general
I wouldn’t look at the record that intensely just yet. I’m more disturbed by the quality of play, both with certain individuals and the team as a whole.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Dec 15, 2008 4:23 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
do you really think this team is a great team though?
It’s been a tough road to hoe so far. They can get to .500 tommorow. It’s not a very talented team he’s putting out there. With Hinrich out there is no depth in the backcourt and Gooden / Thomas/ Noah / Gray is perhaps the worst frontcourt in the league.
Granted some of that is on VDN but this is a pretty bad roster, made much better by Derrick Rose. I still think they could win 44 games and get a 6th seed in the East.
We’ll see, it’s way too early to judge VDN either way.
by madvillian on
Dec 15, 2008 11:12 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Identity and Coaching
I don’t believe VDN is doing a very good job, but I also think firing him would be the worst possible mistake at this time. He is a rookie coach, with a star rookie, and a crew of mostly young, confused players with an identity crisis. It is disturbing to me, that after a month and a half of basketball, I still don’t know how to define VDN’s identity. I believe this generates confusion which permeates throughout the team, leading to poor chemistry, teamwork, defense, and execution in crunch time play.
I didn’t think the Bulls would be successful immediately, and I thought if we could hover around .500 until January we would be in good shape (We are). But, I hoped he would impose an identity on to this team, and make it his own. Thusfar that has not happened. Skiles has an identity (which works well in brief stints), D’Antoni has an identity, Jackson has an identity, Sloan, Popovich, Aurebach, Riley…. successful coaches have an identiy. VDN’s (besides the hair), is questionable. Granted he should be given more time to impose it upon his team, I’m just frustrated that I don’t yet see any hints as to what that identiy would be.
Though, if he were to be fired, I still believe it would be a mistake. Who would we replace him with? How many head coaches have been fired thusfar? Philadelphia, Oklahoma, Toronto, Sacto, Minnesota, Washington… I simply don’t think there is much coaching talent in the NBA right now, therefore, unless Tom Thibodeaux (if that’s how you spell it) becomes available & is interested, let’s give Vinny a thorough opportunity to impose his beliefs upon the team. Another coaching change, would just increase the confusion in an already thoroughly confused organization.
by chowder on
Dec 15, 2008 4:23 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I was excited about VDN when the season started.
I thought Paxdorf had an idea as to what they were doing, and they said they were very impressed with what VDN had to offer, so I was excited and thought he would be pretty good. I was pushing for Tom Thibodeau, but since he wasn’t available, I was optimistic about him. Then I found out that Paxdorf is permanently high, and they don’t have a clue. Also, you’d think that in years of following the NBA, VDN would have some knowledge of the Bulls.
Things could be worse. We could have kept (name redacted).
by stupidgenius on
Dec 15, 2008 5:17 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
i dont think he should be fired
but that has little to do with his coaching ability. It sends the wrong message to fire a coach this early into his contract and would make it difficult to attract a high quality coach. I think he can get better, but what really bothers me is his redundant lineups (using players with similar skill sets) and his lack of consistency with young players. I understand that tt and noah make bonehead plays and piss us off at times, but they have to be given consistent minutes. Whether it be 20 or 35 it should be consistent. They shouldnt play 5 minutes one night and then 30 the next. This is especially true with tt as it seems that he is has a tendency to get down on himself and play tight because hes worried about getting taken out after a mistake. Moreover, hes making progress. I know his shooting % is low, but hes played well recently (not just last game). Despite the fact that we seem to think hes lazy, that doesnt seem to be the case. From all accounts he works very hard.
Also, in VDNs defense, my biggest criticism of him (besides his rotation) is the offense. For much of the season it has been a pick and roll with the rest of the team standing at the perimeter. This is great for Rose, but terrible for most of our team (especially Deng, Noah and TT). However, there has been much more movement lately, which has corresponded with improved play from Deng, TT and Noah. Unfortunately, we have the tendency to revert back to 1 vs 1 late in games and that may be responsable for Dengs lack of scoring. It almost becomes watch a guard (Rose, BG or Hughes) run the pick and roll with Gooden. This is also the cause of all of TT’s 18 foot jumpers.
Finally, I really think that giving up on Noah and/or TT would be a mistake. They are both young and could be effective with a veteran team with well-defined roles. Tyrus does have talent. He handles the ball well for someone his side and despite the fact that his shot isnt falling consistently he can hit from 15 feet. He is a good ft shooter and that should be enough evidence to suggest that a 22 year old will eventually be able to hit that shot. I personally think a lot of it is low confidence that may be tied to his minutes being yanked around. If you look at his shot it seems to usually be out-of-sync (like he is second guessing himself as he is shooting). It can be argued that he is too mentally weak, but I really do think he could be the 2nd coming of kenyon martin…not great, but good enough with a good point guard and a center that can man up and allow TT to roam the weakside. I guess I am really scared that we are gonna trade him and watch him finally reach his potencial like Tyson. Also, why doesnt he ever run the pick and roll with Derrick? Does he set really bad picks (I havent paid much attention to that part of his game)? Does he set illegal picks (like noah seems to ALWAYS do, but rarely gets called)? Or do we think that Gooden is a really good offensive player (despite his fg% being poor for a big man)?
by rosefromconcrete on
Dec 15, 2008 11:26 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
People are still speaking ill of Ben Gordon?
Man, I can’t believe this…
by JustAnotherFan on
Dec 16, 2008 8:35 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I know.
What more does he have to do? He’s proven that he’s a better defender than yo think, and that he’s at least average. He’s about a 90-50-40 guy. He does complement Rose. That makes him a competent defender and good offensive complement to Rose. Look at this play: Rose drives with a Tyrus pick, draws Tyrus’ defender, kicks it out to Tyrus, Tyrus draws BG’s defender, Tyrus passes behind him to BG, BG takes a quick open shot, swish. Where would we be without Ben? Rose is great, but admit it. Ben is a major part of our offense and we would be a lot better if Ben got Deng’s contract and Deng got the QO. Either we would know Deng is a fake, or he would play well to get the contract he wants. Ben would play as hard as he always does, and we would be a lot better off. It’s like as soon as Deng gets his contract, he’s great, and since Ben didn’t get his contract, he sucks. It’s like you trust Pax’s judgement! Jeez!
Things could be worse. We could have kept (name redacted).
by stupidgenius on
Dec 16, 2008 4:40 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Its not that BG is bad
overall I like him. Its just that he often goes out of the flow of the offense to get his points. Hes getting better, but at the same time hes not as good as he thinks he is. He is our 2nd best player (by far), but what I should have said is that his little 1 on 1 dribbling exhibitions piss me off. He can be a good compliment to Rose, but he still think he is worth too much. Saying he is getting hard to watch was a reaction to a couple of games, but overall I do like him. Now, do I like him for what he will ask for after this season? That I dont know. I dont think hes worth more than Deng’s contract, but he is definitely worth at least the same as deng (probably more). I think Deng will start to play better as the offense (hopefully) evolves to include him and play to his strengths. If our offense allows deng to play to his strengths then the contract might go from looking terrible to just a little overpaid. However, that doesnt mean that his contract should be used to measure Ben’s worth because BG will surely ask for more than Deng because he is a better player.
by rosefromconcrete on
Dec 16, 2008 6:13 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
All scorers do that
Do you think Kobe or James or anyone else hasn’t gone out of hte flow of the offense if they feel a matchup benefits them or if they feel they can do something to help a struggling offense? It happens, he’s a scorer, that’s why.
If he didn’t try to do that we’d see him with 14-16 pts a night and would lose every game by 20.
by majoyenrac on
Dec 17, 2008 1:44 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Granted
At times he picks wrong spots to do that, but he’s improved this year in that category mostly because we’re running more than the drive and kick play that was 99.99% of our set offense the past 4 yrs with Skiles.
by majoyenrac on
Dec 17, 2008 1:45 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
VDN
….definitely much better than B*%$#, tactically much weaker than Skiles but certainly better with people. I think we are all pissed b’cos we could have had D’Antoni who is certainly much better, but firing VDN now is just not an option. And look on the bright side, at least DR gets 40 minutes a game, Skiles would have made him “earn” the minutes.
by bullsfaninbigapple on
Dec 16, 2008 10:28 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs














